{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1091","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-02"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1091"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nI. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER I ROLL CALL C :=z i:i: w ~ c::, I- \u0026gt; c::::, LLCz\u0026gt; C'-1 =::s ~ -  LL1::z: -~ w \" ~ c::, C\\1 ::~ 0 == ~ co LL.I LU a: ~ w ~ ~ a: (fl LU c:a  ?---1 ~ C) ~ C ~ ~CJ) ~ ~ ~ Q.) ~ ~  \"\".'1 ~ II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS WELCOME 9() S ~ Q.) ~ .... ~ ~ ~ Q.) -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 111. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. PARTNERS IN EDUCATION C. PUBLIC ED FOUNDATION REPORT  \\ ' ' . \\ \\ \\ \\ I . ' \\ '. \\  . \\ \\ \\' ' . \\ \\ . \\. \\ .. . ., .\u0026lt;.\\\\ \\ .. \\ .. . . D. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS E. LRCTA/F.JOSHUA ~ ~ ~ Q: ~ I le I. 11. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Welcome to Guests REGULAR MEETING February 12, 2004 5:30 p.m. 111. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Partners in Education - New Partnerships Bale Elementary School - Twin City Bank - Baseline Elementary School - Southwest Produce - Williams Magnet School - AARP-C. Public Education Foundation of Little Rock - John A. Riggs, IV D. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) E. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association F. Joshua lntervenors IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Demonstration Regular Board Meeting February 26, 2004 Page2 V. VI. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes: Regular Meeting - 01-22-04 Special Meeting - 02-12-04 B. Extension of PN Agreement C. Personnel Changes SCHOOL SERVICES: A. Naming of Facilities: Mann Magnet Middle School Auditorium B. Resolution to 4G: Attendance Rubric C. School Improvement Report: An Overview VII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Land Sale - Forest Heights Middle School B. Lease: Miles Memorial Church C. Resolution Authorizing Refinance/Consolidation of Outstanding Debt D. Construction Budget Revision - Mitchell and Rightsell E. Donations of Property F. Financial Report VIII. CLOSING REMARKS: IX. X. Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions EMPLOYEE HEARINGS ADJOURNMENT I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER I ROLL CALL U. PROCEDURAL MATTERS WELCOME Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. PARTNERS IN EDUCATION C. PUBLIC ED FOUNDATION REPORT 0. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS E. LRCTA/F.JOSHUA To: From: Through: Subject: Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 February 26, 2004 Board of Education Debbie Milam, Director, ViPS/Partners in Education)~ Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Partners in Education Program: New partnerships The Little Rock School District Partners in Education program is designed to develop strong relationships between the community and our schools. The partnership process encourages businesses, community agencies and private organizations to join with individual schools to enhance and support educational programs. Each partnership utilizes the resources of both the school and the business for their mutual benefit. The following schools and businesses have completed the requirements necessary to establish a partnership and are actively working together to accomplish their objectives. We recommend that the Board approve the following partnerships: Bale Elementary School and Twin City Bank-University Branch Baseline Elementary School and Southwest Produce Williams Traditional Magnet School and AARP Partnership Proposal Twin City Bank- University Branch and Bale Elementary School Twin City Bank- University Branch commits to the following partnership activities:  Sponsor Red Ribbon Week  Count change collected through fundraisers  Arrange for Penny, Nick and Buck to make appearances at school functions  Recruit employees to read to students and listen to students read  Job shadowing  Provide speakers for topics such as economics, saving money, etc.  Provide refreshments for staff functions Bale Elementary commits to the following partnership activities:  Provide artwork for display in bank lobby  Provide choir to perform on holidays and special occasions-grand opening  Acknowledged Twin City Bank - University Branch as a Partner in Education  Invite the bank to school events  Work with the bank on community service projects BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Partnership Agreement between Baseline Elementary and Soutwest Produce Southwest Produce is willing to: Make food/ice donations for special events Make food donations to help needy families, if needed Sponsor one or more students for Job Shadowing Kay Moore will mentor a female student and will visit with said student at least once a month at Baseline Be willing for students to make a fieldtrip to the store in the line of academic study or career education Participate in our annual community service project by donating or getting food items at cost Display student work in the business Baseline Elementary is willing to: Provide a calendar of events and invite employees to appropriate school functions Provide appropriate tokens of appreciation for partnership Help with a special project, such as a clean-up day or other 3623 Baseline Road  Phone (501) 447-3700  Fax (501) 447-3701 Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 !\" \u0026gt; C: C ~ ::0 en fll c3 ~ WILLIAMS TRADITIONAL MAGNET SCHOOL A CHOICE FOR EXCELLENCE AARP Arkansas and Williams Traditional Magnet School Partnership Establishment The AARP Foundation leads positive social change to help people 50 and over age with independence, dignity and purpose. The Arkansas State Office and Information Center are both located in Little Rock. All AARP chapters are non-government, non-partisan, non-profit community service organizations that are open to all local AARP members. The AARP offers many programs, services, and many other subjects of interest to their members and their families. There are numerous employees who have a wide range of interests, talents, experiences, and ideas, and possibly will be willing to share these for the benefit of students at Williams Magnet School. Williams Traditional Magnet School is a tri-district magnet school operating in Pulaski County as a part of the LR.SD. There is a staff of approximately 40 and a student enrollment of approximately 460. Despite all of the help afforded by the three school districts whose children attend, the school is always in need of additional resources in connection with the education provided to students. The staff at Williams Magnet School completed a school needs assessment to determine needed services and resources for the 2003-04 school year. The Partnership Council will use this information to match resources and needs throughout the school year. Activities will be coordinated through the AARP team leader and the Williams Magnet School team leader. The Partnership Council will attend an initial conference, and will then meet as the need arises to assess the effectiveness of the Partnership. Communication will be open and constant. *Proposed plan of activities for the 2003-04 school year: AARP Grandparent's Day Activities Student incentives/awards for Grandparent's Day Grandparent seminars/classes Provide educational resources Assembly guests 7301 E:vergreen Street  Phone (501) 447-7100 Williams Magnet School Student/Teacher participation in AARP programs Promote ongoing recognition and appreciation Send monthly newsletters Art work Participate in contests Choir performance Fax (501) 447-7101  Little Rock , Arl\u0026lt;ansas 72207 '.54.n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" DATE: TO: FROM: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: February 26, 2004 Board of Directors ~nald M. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Bill Goodman~ February 2004 Construction Report - Bond Projects The remodeling of Central High School is being performed in construction phases. Portable classrooms have permitted construction to be done during normal working hours in the areas of the building that are vacated by staff and students. This method and the cooperation of Central' s staff have allowed the contractor to accelerate the construction schedule. The completion date has been changed to the summer of 2005 as opposed to the original completion date of December 2005. All of the portable classrooms at Mann Magnet Middle School were sold at a public auction earlier this month. All of the portable classrooms will be removed by the end of this month. This will allow the contractor to build the new parking lot north of the replacement school. All construction will be completed by May 1st . The above is all good news. The bad news is that the construction of the new media center at Dunbar Magnet Middle School has had several unexpected delays. Instead of being ready for occupancy this summer, it will be completed in December 2004. If you have any questions, please call me at 447-1146. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.1rsd.k12.ar.us 501-324-2000  fax: 501-324-2032 rn  c:: C ~ 6l ~ ~ .'..\". mn ::c C ~ z ~ ! \u0026lt;z5 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD FEBRUARY 26, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Baseline Renovation $953,520 Jul-O4 Brady Addition/renovation $973,621 Aug_:Qi Central Renovation  Interior $10,200,266 Aug-O5 Dunbar Renovation/addition $6,161 ,950 Dec-O4 J. A. Fair 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music room addition $3,155,640 May-O4 Mabelvale MS Renovation $6,851,621 Mar-O4 Mann Partial Replacement $11 ,500,000 May-O4 McClellan Classroom Addition $2,155,622 Jul-O4 Parkview Addition $2,121 ,226 Jun-O4 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Renovation $1 ,193,259 . Aug-O4 Pulaski Hgts. MS Renovation $3,755,041 Aug-O4 Southwest Addition $2,000,000 Aug-O4 Tech Ctr I Metro Renovation 'Addition/Renovation Phase II $3,679,000 Jun-O4 Wakefield Rebuild $5,300,000 Jul-O4 Williams Renovation $2,106,492 Mar-O4 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - WINTER/ SPRING 2004 Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I tst. Completion Date Mitchell Renovation $750,000 I Aug-O5 Rightsell I Renovation $660,000 Aug-O6 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I Est. completion Date Booke-r --- Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown --Roof-- --- ----- -Boo-ker -- $48,525 I Unknown ADA Rest rooms -- Booker TBD Unknown Carver Media Center Expansion Unknown Unknown Chicot -- Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown Chicot Sound Attenuation \u0026amp; Fire Alarm $50,783 Un-known Cloverdale Elementary Addition Unknown Unknown Dodd Fire Alarm Upgrade TBD Unknown Fair Park 1Additior, Unknown I Unknown Forest Heights _ !Remodel $1,400,000 Unknown Garland Remodel Unknown 1 Unknown Geyer Springs Roof Repair $161 ,752 . Unknown Gibbs - Addition Unknown Unknown - --- Henderson Lockers $80,876 Unknown -- -Mab-levale- -- Fire Alarm Upgrade TBD Unknown McD-ermot-t --Fire Alarm Upgrade TB~ Unknown Meadowcliff --- Addition Unknown  Unknown -- --- Pulask_!_!igts. MS_ - - ~ rgy monitoring system installation Unknown Unknown Washington Fire Alarm Upgrade -- T~ Unknown --- Western Hills Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC $640,000 Unknown -- Western Hills _ __ire Alarm Upgrade TBD Unknown - - Western Hills ADA Rest rooms TBD Unknown Woodruff Parking addition $193,777 Unknown CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD FEBRUARY 26, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Administration Administration Administration Administration Annex Alternative Learning Ctr. Alternative Learning Ctr. Badg._ett ______ _ Badgett Bale Project Description Asbestos abatement Fresh airs stem Fire alarm Energy monitoring system installation Energy monitoring system installation Energy efficient lighting Partial asbestos abatement Fire alarm Classroom addition/renovation E nergy monitoring system Partial roof replacement HVAC Bale Bale Bale Booker --------'- ------- Booker Energy efficient lighting . Energy monitoring system installation Booker A sbestos abatement Booker Brady Brady Carver -------- -- -- Fire alarm  Energy efficient lighting --------Asbestos abatement - -- ------ Carver ----- Central Parking Central/Quigley Central/Quigley Central/Quigley Central Central Central Central Central Cloverdale Elem. Cloverdale MS Cloverdale MS Dodd Dodd Dodd Facilities Service Facility Services Fair Park- -- - Fair Park Fair Park J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair Forest Park Forest Park Forest Park __ _ fulbright Fulbright Fulbright --===-Fulbright Fulbrigh.!_ __ _ Franklin Gibbs GibbS - - - - - - Energy monitoring system installation Parking lot S tudent parking Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair A thletic Field lmprovemen-t - Irrigation System P urchase land for school Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations -Ceiling and wall repair -Fire Alarm System De- s-ig-n-/1-ns- tallation -,-FroniTanding tile repair - Energy efficient lighting  Energy efficient lighting _ Major renovation \u0026amp; addition Energy efficient lighting - Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile ~ Replace roof top HVAC J nterior renovation Fire alarm . HVAC renovation/fire alarm ~Energy efficient lighting Asbestos abatement-ceiling _Energy efficient lighting Press box Security cameras Athletic Field Improvement I rrigation System Roof repair_s __ _ Replace window units w\"lcentral HVAC Diagonal parking __ _ 1Energy efficient lighting Energyefficient lighting 7EnergyITlonitorfi,g._s_y~st\"- e-m_i_n-stallation - Re lace roof top HVAC units Parking lot ______ _ Roof repairs R enovation Energy efficient lig,h_tin~g,__ _ Energ monitoring s stem installation --~$=3-8:..0::.!,.4.:.c9::..5:c,-___M ar-03 $55,000 Aug-03 $32,350 ~g-03 May-02 ~ t-01 Dec-01 $15,160 $82,000 $237,237 $18,250 $2,244,524 - Jul-01 $269,587 ---.-. --$664,587- -=----$170,295 $23,710 -- $10,900 $34,501 ----$80,5~ + $345,072 - - $14,4~ .._ - $111~742 $174,000 $265,000 $38,000 $1~ 500 Unknown $2,000,000 .,_ $24,000 $80,876- $22,470 - $132,678 $189,743 $1 ,393,822 $90,665~ $156,299- $215:570 $84,672 $12,00~ $315,956 $90,162~ $59,310 $277,594 $10,784 - $12,500 $38,000- $14,000 $391 ,871 $485,258 ~ 11 ,7~ --- ~ 788- $134.463 $11,950 $107,835 $140,000 - $200,000 $2,511 ,7~ - $76,447- $11 ,770 Aug-02 Dec-02 Mar-02 Dec-01 Aug-01 Apr-01 Oct-01 Feb-02 Mar-02 Sep-02 Aug-02 May-01 Aug-03 Aug-03 Aug-03 Aug-03 Aug-03 Dec-02 Dec-02 Oct-01 Aug-01 Aug-01 Jul-01 Jul-01 Nov-02 Aug-01 Jul-01 Aug-02 Mar-01 Aug-03 Apr-02 Aug-01 Aug-01 Apr-01 Nov-00 Jun-01 Jul-03 Jul-03 Aug-03 Nov-03 Aug-03 ~y-01 Jun-01 Aug-0_!_ Aug-02 Sep-02 Oct-02 Mar-03 Apr-01 Jul-01 2 f\u0026gt; ril ,0 ~ z m rn ::z:: ~ Cl m \"' :n .... ~ ::z:: C m ~ ~ ! 15 z CONSTRUCTIONREPORTTOTHEBOARD FEBRUARY 26, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I I I Est. Completion Proiect Description Cost Date Hall Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $8,637,709 Sep-03 Hall Asbestos abatement I $168,2221 Aug-01 Hall I Energy efficient lighting I $42,931 Jul-01 Hall I Energy efficient lighting I $296,707 Apr-01 Hall Infrastructure improvements I $93,657 Aug-01 Hall Intercom I Feb-01 Hall Security cameras $10,600 Jun-01 i--H:-..,..e._n--d-,,e....rs_o_n ______ ,,E,,...n_e,..r..g,.,_y,'-ef_fi1ci_en_t_l~ig_ht~ing'---------'--'---$-'--1-9'-3'..,,6_7_9_ ____J_ u_l-01---1 Henderson Roof replacement gy,~m_ ______, ___$_ 107~,8_35 ____M_ ay~-_0.1,.. Henderson Asbestos abatement Phase I $500,000 1 Aug-01 Henderson Asbestos abatement Phase 2 $250,000 Aug-02 IRC IEnergy efficient lighting $109,136 Jul-02 Jefferson Asbestos abatement $43,639 Oct-01 Jefferson Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm $1 ,630,000 Nov-02 Laidlaw Parking lot $269,588 1 Jul-01 Mabelvale Elem. Energy monitoring system installation $12,150 Aug-01 Mabelvale Elem. 'Replace HVAC units $300,000 Aug-02 Mabelvale Elem. Asbestos Abatement $107,000 ' Aug-02 Mabelvale Elem. Energy efficient lighting --'$-_1.0:..6_,,.5.:..9.:..8\n_\n,_ ___D_ e_c-,..0..-21 Mabelvale MS-------,R- e-n-o'\"v''a-t_e_b_le_a_c_h\"e\"\"r_s_,,___ ________- _ -__$ 1_3_4~,7 _9_3_ ___A_ u~g~-01_, ~ann Asphalt walks 'The total $1_ 8 million If---___D, ,...ec_-c0c1----1 Mann Walkway canopies is what has been Dec-01 Mann Boiler repla_c_e_m_e_n_t _______ __, used so far on the l~ ___ O_c_t-01_. Mann Fencing projects listed 1f---___ Se_,p_-01---1 ,-Ma-nn- --- Partial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. Aug-01 McClellan Athletic Field Improvement $38,000  Jul-03 1 M_c_C_le_lla_n=-~----____ l_rr~ig~a_tio_n_ System $14,750 Jul-03 McClellan Security cameras $36,300 1 Jun-01 _M_c_Cle_lla_n _______ E_n_ergy efficient lighting $303,614 May-01 McClellan Stadium stands repair $~23_5_,,,0....0,...0._ ___- A=cu-=g--:0:-=1-1 McClellan Intercom $46,000 Feb-02 I_M_c_D_e_rm_ ott _____. ...,,E__n_ergy efficient lighting 1 $79,411 1 Feb-01 McD_erm6tt Replace roof top HVAC units , $476,000 Aug-02 Meadowcliff Fire alarm ! $16,175 1 Jul-01 Meadowcliff ______A_ s_b_e-st_o_s_a-bat_em_e-n-t -------1~---$--2'-5-3-'-\",4--1.2.:.._,__ __A_ u_g_-0--21 Mead_ow_c_liff - ----,-E-n-ge_r_g_y_effi-1c-ie_nt l-ig-h-ti-ng------~,----$-88-',-29_7_ I ----D-e=c--0-21 Metropolit~ I Replace cooling tower i $37,203 ' Dec-00 Metropolitan Replace shop vent system I $20,000 May-01 1 _M_e_tr_o_politan_ ______E_ n_e_r,g=y monitoring system installation ____$_1 7_,,_145_ ____A_ u=g-_0_1, Mitchell Energy efficient lighting $103,642 I Apr-01 ~itchell __-_ 'Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 Jul-01 Mitchell Oakhurst Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek- Otter Creek ~~~t~:n~~:::~ent $~!\n:~-~-~----A-Ju~_I:~- ~-\u0026lt; Energy monitoring system installation $10,695 May-01 __ _ Energy ~ ff~ient lighting ---=-~_ ____$8_ 1_,,82_8__ Apr-01 - -----A-sb-es=tos- a-ba-te-m-en-t ------------,--$1,0~,000- -----A~ug-0~2 Parking lot $138,029 1 Aug-02 --- - -----~6 c-las-sr-oom- -add-itio-n -----------~$88-8,-778- 1- ---O-ct\u0026lt;-02 Otter Creek , Parking Improvements 1 $142,541 1 Aug-03 Parkview HVAC controls $210,000 I Jun-02 Parkview Roof replacement $273,877 1 Sep-01 Parkview Parkview Exterior lights , $10,784 1 Nov-00 HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls $301 ,938 Aug-0'1 Parkview Locker replacement $120,000 , Aug-01 Parkview 1 Energy efficient liohting $315,000 Jun-01 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD FEBRUARY 26, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facilitv Name I Proiect Descriotion I Cost I Est. Completion Date Procurement Energy monitoring system installation $5,290 I Jun-02 Procurement Fire alarm I $25,000 Aug-03 Pulaski Hgts. Elem I Move playground $17,000 Dec-02 Rightsell I Energy efficient lighting $84,898 I Apr-01 Rockefeller Energy efficient lighting $137,004 Mar-01 Rockefeller Replace roof too HVAC $539,175 I Aug-01 Rockefeller I Parking addition $111,742 I Aug-02 Romine I Asbestos abatement $10,000 . Apr-02 Romine 'Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $3,534,675 Mar-03 SecurityfTransportation Bus cameras $22,500 I Jun-01 Southwest Asbestos abatement $28,138 Aug-00 Southwest INew roof $690,000 Oct-03 Southwest Energy efficient lighting $168,719 I Jan-02 Southwest Drainage I street widening I $250,000 I Aug-03 Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installation $4,830 Aug-02 Student Assignment Fire alarm $9,000 Aug-03 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation $275,000 Dec-01 Technology Upgrade Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data Nov-02 Terry Energy efficient lighting $73,850 Feb-01 Terry I Driveway \u0026amp; Parking $83,484 Aug-02 Terry 1 Media Center addition I $704,932 I Sep-02 Wakefield I Security cameras I $8,000 Jun-01 Wakefield Energy efficient lighting $74,776 I Feb-01 Wakefield Demolition/Asbestos Abatement I $200,000 Nov-02 Washington 1 Security cameras I $7,900 I Jun-01 Washington I Energy efficient lighting I I $165,281 Apr-01 Watson Energy monitoring system installation I $8,530 Jul-01 Watson Asbestos abatement I $182,241 Aug-01 Watson Energy efficient lighting $106,868 I Aug-01 Watson ,Asbestos abatement I $10,000 Aug-02 Watson I Major renovation \u0026amp; addition I $800,000 - Aug-02 Western Hills IAsbestos abatement I $191 ,946 I Aug-02 Western Hills I Intercom I $1,100 I Dec-01 Western Hills 1 Energy efficient lighting $106,000 I Jul-01 Williams Parking expansions $183,717 Dec-03 Williams Energy efficient lighting $122,719 . Jun-01 Wilson Renovation/expansion $1 ,263,876 Feb-04 Wilson Parking Expansion I $110,000 Aug-03 Woodruff Renovation I $246,419 I Aug-02 4 !I' -a z I ii: m .z.. . r\u0026gt; ril ~ z z m h ::c ~ Cl m en .=..\". m ('\") ::c C m ~ z !!l ! lz5 Date: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS February 26, 2004 To: Board of Directors From~andy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - February This is the fifty-second communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with one high school, two middle schools and one elementary school to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology Training a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of Nuts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. !II \",zt. i c\n') ::,c, m m ii: m :!:i r, ~ ~ z m h ::c ~ c\n') m CII Audit Report - February 2004 Page 2 of 2 b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. c) Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. d) Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. e) Working with Information Services on streamlining of data processes regarding SIS reporting. f) Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. g) Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. h) Reviewing leave accountability system. a) Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. b) Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. c) Participating in planning for Day of Caring (April 17, 2004). Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. '54n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" Date: February 26, 2004 To: Board of Education F rorn: ( Beverly Williams, Director ofH uman Resources Through: Morris L. Holmes, Ed.D. Interim Superintendent Re: Agreement regarding extension of the PN contract for all employee groups Attached is an agreement, which was reached on January 27, 2004, between the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association and the District with regard to an extension of the present written negotiated Agreements. On going negotiations will continue. I am requesting the Board approval. 810 W/. Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-447-1001 !\"\u0026gt; -a m ~ z m h ::c ~ C') m en\n,,, :s ~~ !\n::c ~8 o.., ren ..,m \u0026gt;\no n-:nS ~ m en .!.l.l Cl \u0026gt; ,,. :z ~ :z ,C,.: LITTLE ROCK CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION January 27, 2004 AGREEMENT BETWEEN LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT AND LITTLE ROCK CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION I. The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District and the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association agree to extend their written negotiated agreements for the following employee groups: Teachers\nBus Drivers, Aides, and Monitors\nCustodians: Security Officers\nand Paraprofessionals. II. This extension is effective from January 30, 2004 until March 7, 2004 for all Agreements. All provisions and benefits of the contracts will remain in full force and automatically continue. On going negotiations will continue. ~?fit Grainger Ledbetter Chief Negotiator, LRCTA Date: ~/_- --\"-P_,_2----=--!)::.....i'----- 1500 West 4th Street Li ttle Roel~, AR 72201  5011372-3519 1-\\=.A/l'f=.1-. Affiliate DATE: TO: FROM: THROUGH: Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS February 26, 2004 Board of Education Beverly Williams, Director, Human Resources Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools Personnel Changes It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.C.A. 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed-in a school district in this state for three (3) years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 18, 2003 are considered intern teachers. !D Personnel Changes Page 2 February 26, 2004 NAME Igwe, Carrie Reason: Leaving City Forenro, Dan Reason: Retired Purifoy, Jimmy Reason: Deceased Thompson, Peggy Reason: Retired Wamble, Faustine Reason: Retired Andrews, Ashley Beggs, Melinda POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS Resignations/Terminations Certified Employees Spec. Ed 9-2-86 2-17 MABELV ALE EL. 2-4-04 SPE925 Computer Tech 8-19-03 5-20 DUNBAR 5-31-04 TCHlO General Music 11-13-78 6-21 WATSON 12-18-03 TCH925 English 8-27-74 6-21 FAIR 2-13-04 TCH925 Elem IV 8-16-93 5-18 WILLIAMS 1-2-04 TCH925 . New Certified Employees Elem III 2-16-04 1-01 BALE TCH925 English 1-20-04 4-19 CENTRAL TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 43667.00 50788.00 53213.00 53213.00 48267.00 26546.00 annual 9678.23 prorated 25554.23 annual 11845.45 prorated Personnel Changes Page 3 February 26, 2004 NAME Brown, Carleton Cain, Mary Carter, Arre! Charles, Glenroy Dyer, Julie Farrar, Neoma Harder, Melanie POSITION SCHOOL English CENTRAL ElemV GEYER SPRINGS Spec. Ed. ALC Algebra I FAIR Elem IV STEPHENS Elem ill CHICOT Physical Science FAIR START DATE END DATE 1-20-04 1-20-04 2-9-04 1-20-04 1-22-04 2-16-04 1-20-04 SALARY CLASS 4-01 TCH925 1-04 TCH925 1-06 SPE925 6-13 TCH925 1-05 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 2-03 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 30553.00 annual 14162.59 prorated 28588.00 annual 13251.73 prorated 30630.00 annual 11964.84 prorated 44566.00 annual 20658.20 prorated 29609.00 annual 13416.58 prorated 26546.00 annual 9678.23 prorated 14447.00 annual 6696.79 prorated\ni m C\nii-!!? ~~ cr(l !~ m u, !II ,... ~ u, m \u0026gt; C) ~ m I:: .mz.. .\n,,:s ~ ~ l!.::r:: ~8 0,... .., u, ..,m ~ ~ -n 3~ m u, .!Z.! Cl ~\nz ,C.: z c-: IT Personnel Changes Page 4 February 26, 2004 NAME Harrison, Kenneth Kuhn, Scarlett Larry,Betty Lockhart, Kelly McDaniel, Yvonne Muhammad, Khaleelah POSITION SCHOOL Geometry HALL Elem III STEPHENS Typing MABELV ALE MID. Algebra PUL. HGTS. MID. Elem III CLOVERDALE EL. Elem IV STEPHENS START DATE END DATE 1-22-04 1-26-04 2-5-04 2-16-04 1-14-04 1-14-04 SALARY CLASS 4-18 TCH925 1-05 TCH925 4-01 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-02 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 46889.00 annual 21246.53 prorated 29609.00 annual 14033.43 prorated 19095.62 annual 7658.14 prorated 26546.00 annual 9678.23 prorated 26546.00 annual 12719.96 prorated 27056.00 annual 13809.83 prorated Personnel Changes Page 5 February 26, 2004 NAME eumeier, Cynthia Olivares, Lizete Smith, Michelle Treat, Heather Watkins, Cindy Williams, Frank Wise, Marshalette POSITION SCHOOL Elem Il MCDERMOTT Spanish CENTRAL Elem Il MCDERMOT Elem I CHICOT Spanish DUNBAR Music START DATE END DATE 1-5-04 1-6-04 1-5-04 2-2-04 1-14-04 1-20-04 MABELV ALE EL. English 1-12-04 HENDERSON SALARY CLASS 1-07 TCH925 1-03 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-16 TCH925 6-08 TCH925 4-04 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 31651.00 annual 16320.05 prorated 27567.00 annual 14070.66 prorated 26546.00 annual 13687.78 prorated 26546.00 annual 11060.83 prorated 40839.00 annual 19568.69 prorated 39461.00 annual 19524.97 prorated 32595.00 annual 15957.57 prorated ~ a, C:\n\u0026gt; S!? ~~ cgi !~ m (I) !I' ~ (I) m \u0026gt; C, i!ll m :I: .mz. . ~:s ~~ !. :z: ~8 or- -.,u, ..,m \u0026gt;\na !:? ~ m m (I) !.l.l Cl ?\n: z C,. z C': rr Personnel Changes Page 6 February 26, 2004 NAME Hobbs, Anthony NONE POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE Certified Promotion Day Coor. ROMINE 1-5-04 Certified Transfer SALARY CLASS ADC105 61-17 Resignationsfferminations Non-Certified Employees Alexander, Deborah Care 8-26-97 CARE Reason: None Given CARE 1-21-04 3-17 Anderson, Leamon Child Nut. 11-13-03 FSH4 Reason: Accepted Another CHILD NUT. 1-30-04 1-01 Position Austin, Sharon Instr. Aide 8-21-00 1NA925 Reason: None Given FAJRPARK 1-5-04 1-03 Barnes, Connie Child Nut. 9-29-03 FSH550 Reason: Personal FULBRIGHT 1-21-04 3-01 ANNUAL SALARY 50712.00 annual 28166.95 prorated 9.15 per hr 7121.00 11635.00 8130.00 Personnel Changes Page 7 February 26, 2004 NAME Bates, Betty Reason: Retired Boykin, Lalicia Reason: None Given Britton, Erica POSITION SCHOOL Secretary FAIR Custodian HALL Instr. Aide Reason: Returning to School GIBBS Burton, Jennifer Care Reason: None Given CARE Canady, Aquanetta Care Reason: None Given CARE Clegg, Shirleta Care Reason: None Given CARE Davis, Eleanor Care Reason: None Given CARE Doyne, Pamela Care Reason: None Given CARE Fairchild, Hattie Child Nutrition Reason: None Given WILLIAMS Fisher, Lisa Secretary Reason: Personal SOUTHWEST Goodman, Phyllis Care Reason: None Given , CARE START DATE END DATE 6-15-87 2-27-04 7-29-99 1-30-04 9-9-03 2-3-04 1-18-00 1-21-04 9-9-02 1-21-04 1-22-02 1-21-04 8-18-03 1-21-04 2-4-02 1-21-04 8-26-91 12-1-03 9-29-03 2-5-04 10-25-03 1-20-04 SALARY CLASS 44-20 CLK12 1-01 CUS925 1-03 INA925 1-05 CARE 3-07 CARE 4-01 CARE 1-03 CARE 3-03 CARE 5-13 FSH6 39-12 CLKlO 1-07 CARE ANNUAL SALARY 33396.00 10329.00 11635.00 6.68 7.68 6.25 6.43 7.12 9274.00 22656.00 6.97 ~ a, C: il\"Sz!? ~e 0~ !~ m en !ZI ,... ~ en m \u0026gt; C\u0026gt; Rl m I:: mz - il\"s ~~ l!!!\n::c zo C\u0026gt;O 0 ,- .., en ..,m \u0026gt;\no C') :S\n=~ :3 en m en .!Z.I Cl ~\n: z C )\u0026gt; z rrr. Personnel Changes Page 8 February 26, 2004 NAME Handy, Rosilyn Reason: None Given Harris, Fayette Reason: None Given Harvell, Lola Reason: None Given Hussian, Lateesha Reason: None Given Johnson, J arnes Reason: Terminated Johnson, Nikol POSITION SCHOOL Care CARE Child Nutrition CENTRAL Care CARE Custodian DUNBAR Instr. Aide ALC Instr. Aide START DATE END DATE 9-10-01 1-21-04 10-2-03 2-26-04 9-29-03 1-20-04 8-21-79 1-5-04 8-14-03 2-12-04 1-13-00 Reason: Returning To School MITCHELL 1-16-04 Jones, Ruthie Child Nutrition 8-4-97 Reason: Health OTTERCREEK 12-18-03 Kennedy, Jarvis Custodian 8-8-03 Reason: None Given CENTRAL 2-2-04 Knight, Cynthia Child Nutrition 1-16-03 Reason: Accepted Another CLOVERDALE MID.1-8-04 Position Lee, Roy Custodian 4-22-91 Reason: Retired TERRY 12-5-03 Martin, Fred Custodian 8-13-01 Reason: Health MEADOW CLIFF 1-30-04 SALARY CLASS 1-05 CARE 3-01 FSH550 3-08 CARE 1-03 CUS925 1-10 INA925 1-07 INA185 1-06 FSH5 1-01 CUS928 3-02 FSH550 1-11 CUS928 1-11 CUS925 ANNUAL SALARY 6.68 8130.00 7.82 11201.00 14067.00 13115.00 7532.00 10329.00 8158.00 14461.00 14461.00 Personnel Changes Page 9 February 26, 2004 NAME Turner, Lois Reason: Accepted Another Position Washington, Sydney Reason: None Given Williams, Angela Reason: Personal Williams, Charlotte Reason: Health Young, Cylde POSITION SCHOOL Child Nutrition CENTRAL Child Nutrition START DATE END DATE 8-12-03 1-30-04 4-1-03 CHILD NUTRITION 12-9-03 Instr. Aide 11-4-03 ROMINE 12-31-03 Child Nutrition 9-22-03 HALL 12-15-03 Custodian 3-18-02 Reason: Returning to School MCDERMOTT  12-3-03 SALARY CLASS 3-12 FSH550 2-01 FSMEAL 1-10 INA925 3-01 FSH550 1-02 CUS12 New Non-Certified Employees Beard, Roberta Instr. Aide 1-20-04 1-10 FAIR PARK INA925 Blackmon, Ronald Security Officer 2-2-04 36-14 ALC SOFR9 Ervin, Christin Instr. Aide 2-3-04 1-01 GIBBS INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 8470.00 11593.00 14067.00 8130.00 13955.00 14067.00 annual 6615.29 prorated 15390.00 annual 6426.59 prorated 7086.59 annual 2949.55 prorated ~ a, C: ii\" 2z? ~i:! c~ ~ :0 m~ emn !I' ,.. ! en m \u0026gt; C, Fil m :mI: .z..\n,,:s ~~ !\n::c ~8 o.., re-n ..,m \u0026gt; :0 n:S r=~ ::! en emn !ll  Gl ~\n: z ,C. zr. rr Personnel Changes Page 10 February 26, 2004 NAME Finch, Felicia Fortenberry, Carolyn Ghant, atlyn Graham, Linda Gray, Cleola Hawkins, Derrick Higgins, Melissa POSITION SCHOOL Trainee CHILD NUT. Bus Driver TRANS. Care CA.RE Child Nutrition BALE Bus Driver TRANS. Instr. Aide KING Instr. Aides FRANKLIN START DATE END DATE 1-5-04 2-2-04 2-13-04 1-7-04 2-2-04 1-26-04 2-9-04 SALARY CLASS 2-01 FSMEAL 3-01 BUSDRV 3-05 CARE 3-01 FSH550 2-02 BUSDRV 1-10 INA925 1-10 INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 11593.00 annual 6108.14 prorated 9540.00 annual 4073.26 prorated 7.40 8130.00 annual 4220.49 prorated 8956.00 annual 3823.91 prorated 14067.00 annual 6311.14 prorated 14067.00 annual 5550.76 prorated Personnel Changes Page 11 February 26, 2004 NAME Hooks, Marichal Johnson, Linda Johnson, Stephanie Jones, Mary Lyons,Peggy Mondy, Lisa Myers, Dale POSITION SCHOOL Bus Driver TRANS. Custodian FULBRIGHT Child Nutrition OTTERCREEK Child Nutrition CLOVERDALE EL. Instr. Aide FAIR.PARK Security Officer CENTRAL Custodian WILLIAMS START DATE END DATE 2-2-04 1-19-04 1-28-04 12-1-03 1-20-04 2-6-04 1-21-04 SALARY CLASS 3-04 BUSDRV 1-01 CUS925 3-07 FSH550 3-01 FSH550 1-10 1NA925 36-10 SOFR9 1-01 CUS12 ANNUAL SALARY 11296.00 annual 4823.01 prorated 5164.50 annual 2441.91 prorated 8312.00 annual 3679.08 prorated 8130.00 annual 5020.16 prorated 14067.00 annual 6615.29 prorated 13657.00 annual 5402.77 prorated 13399.00 annual 6271.87 prorated ~ a, C:  en z ~~ C kl ~~ m~ m en !I' ,- e~n m i ~ m I:: .mz..\ni-s ~~ l!,\n::c ~8 0 ,- -.,en ..,m -~n~ 3 g: m en !Zl  Cl ~\n: z C: \"zr. M' Personnel Changes Page 12 February 26, 2004 NAME Relford, Yolanda Simpson, Sylvia Terry, Shirley Tidwell, Darrell Tribulak, Ashley Trussell, Kimo Turner, James POSITION SCHOOL Instr. Aide WASHINGTON Custodian START DATE END DATE 2-2-04 1-26-04 MABELV ALE MID. Bus Driver 2-2-04 TRANS. Child Nutrition 2-2-04 CHILDNUTR. Care 2-9-04 CARE Instr. Aide 1-27-04 CHICOT Security Officer 1-8-04 WOODRUFF SALARY CLASS 1-10 INA925 1-01 CUS925 3-02 BUSDRV 1-01 FSH4 2-02 CARE 1-10 INA925 36-11  SOFR9 ANNUAL SALARY 14067.00 annual 5930.95 prorated 5164.50 annual 2329.64 prorated 10118.00 annual 4320.04 prorated 7121.00 annual 2986.23 prorated 6.80 14067.00 annual 6235.10 prorated 14065.00 annual 7032.50 prorated Personnel Changes Page 13 February 26, 2004 NAME Urias, Oscar Weaver, Nellieann Williams, Wanda Williams, Yalanda NONE NONE POSITION SCHOOL Custodian START DATE END DATE 2-2-04 CLOVERDALE MID. Instr. Aide 1-14-04 STEPHE S Bus Driver 2-2-04 TRANS. Instr. Aide 1-12-04 CHICOT Non-Certified Promotion Non-Certified Transfer SALARY CLASS 1-01 CUS12 1-10 INA925 3-02 BUSDRV 1-10 INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 13399.00 annual 6815.74 prorated 14067.00 annual 7451.71 prorated 10188.00 annual 4320.04 prorated 14067.00 annual 6995.48 prorated\ni a, C: ?-Sz!? ~\ncgi ~~ m~ m UI !D ,... !j'\n! UI m \u0026gt; C) ~ m :I: .mz.. . ?\"s ~~ !\n:c ~8 0,... -,, UI ..,m ~~ rn m UI ,,. 2 ~ c,,-.: Personnel Changes Page 14 February 26, 2004 NAME Moore, Erica Moore, Cristen POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE Sabbatical Leave SALARY CLASS ANNUAL SALARY Date of Hire 8-17-00 Length of Sabbatical 1 year (2004-2005) Date of Hire 8-12-99 Length of Sabbatical 1 year (2004-2005) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Date: February 26, 2004 To: Board of Education From: Morris L. Holmes, Ed. 0. Interim Superintendent Re: Naming of Facilities: Mann Magnet Middle School The faculty, staff, parents and students of Mann Magnet Middle School have submitted a request to name the school auditorium in honor of Mr. James L. Matthis. The request and supporting documents are submitted in accordance with Policy FF: Naming of Facilities. The administration recommends approval. bjg r\u0026gt; ill ~a -t- -1: ~~ ::a~ ~~ !i\nm C:\n,,se z ~~ C kl !~ m en IT z C ~ C': IT NAMING AND RENAMING F ACLITIES I propose that the Horace Mann Magnet Middle School Auditorium (Designation of building and/or other location) 1000 East Roosevelt Rd., Little Rock, AR 72206 (Address) Be named for James L. Matthis I. Biographical Data: Attached II. The Nominee's significant contribution is: Attached III. I believe the facility should be named for this person because: Attached (Signature) (Date) This form should be submitted by person nominating names for new facilities to the LRSD Board of Education for consideration according to Board policy FF. I. II. Biographical Data: Mr. James L. Matthis was born on January 23, 1939 in Jefferson, Texas. He received his early education in the Macedonia Schools in Jefferson, Texas. He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Wiley College Marshall, Texas, and his Masters Degree from the University of Central Arkansas Conway, Arkansas. Additional course work was complete at UCA. Prior to beginning an exceptional professional career, he was a member of the Army Reserve and was stationed at Fort Smith, Arkansas. The Nominee's significant contribution is: Mr. Matthis began his professional career as a high school music teacher in Augusta, Arkansas. He shared his gifts in the education profession for forty years. He devoted the last thirty-six years of service in the Little Rock Public Schools beginning as a vocational coordinator at Horace Mann High School, Administrator-Opportunity Gateway School, ESAU Coordinator-Federal Programs and Assistant Principal-Mann Magnet Middle School. III. I believe the facility should be named for this person because: We the staff at Mann Magnet believe that the Mann Auditorium should be named James Matthis Auditorium for various reasons. Mr. Matthis taught music. The auditorium was part of the original Horace Mann r\u0026gt; ill\ngg\nor- -\u0026lt;- -o-\n=g ~o\n~ ~ ID C:\n\u0026gt;S!? z ii cf(l !~ m \"' IT z ~ r. IT High School during his tenure as a teacher. He was responsible for the smooth operation of the auditorium. He watched thousands of students walk across the stage. Mr. Matthis' most cherished responsibilities focused on helping students to become good scholars and citizens, supporting administrators, teachers, and support staff in accomplishing their assigned responsibilities and assisting parents in helping their students in school. For these reasons, we believe Mann's Auditorium should be named in honor of Mr. Matthis. TO: Board of Education SCHOOL SERVICES DIVISION 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 447-1130 FROM: Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent - School Services Dr. Lloyd Sain, Coordinator of Leadership Development THROUGH: Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent DATE: February 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Resolution to 4G: Attendance Rubric The District and the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association {LRCTA) have completed their task as requested by the Board in proposing an alternative to the on-going discussion with Domain 4, item 4G (attendance and punctuality). On February 1th, we submitted for your review our recommendation and now solicit your direction on this matter. !='\nK:c, :::.o nz ::c U\u0026gt; m~\n'\"c' ~c: \"i!! ins C) z ~~ PJ8 ~m LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Date: February 26, 2004 To: From: Through: Board of Education Sadie Mitchell,~ciate Superintendent-School Services Lloyd Sain, Coordinator - Leadership Development Morris L. Holmes, Ed. D. Interim Superintendent Re: A School Improvement Report: An Overview of the Schools and Their School Improvement Progress, Grants, and Initiatives The above named report is being provided under separate cover. We will be available to review the findings and respond to any questions you might have. Please feel free to contact us if we can provide any additional information. bjg !\" 8 ~ lz5 en !=' ll:n ::.o nz ::c en m-1 rr--\"C': ,\".\", C..'). i5 0 :CZ -I a, enc: ~8 r-m MEMORANDUM I FACILITY SERVICES DIRECTORATE DATE: TO: SUBJ: February 9, 2004 Dr. Morris, L. Homes, Interim Superintendent r. Do Stewart, Chief Financial Officer ~ton, Director of Facility Services nformation: Land Sale - Forest Heights Middle School The Little Rock School District has received a viable offer from a company known as Mangan Properties, LLC, of Little Rock, for the purchase of the property immediately west of Forest Heights Middle School for the sum of $200,000. This $200,000 figure includes the Little Rock School District's realtor's fee of 9%. The property was professionally appraised in December of 2003 at $188,000. It is the intention of Mangan Properties to construct a dental office at this location that will present a single-story office building with associated parking. The building will tie-in well with the neighborhood and the adjoining buildings, and I believe that it will make an excellent neighbor to our school property and not interfere with the operations of the school. The details of the sale of the property are such that there will be a vision screen from the school looking toward this property. The Offer and Acceptance that you signed has been forwarded to Rector Phillips Morse for notification to Mangan Properties. DE:cg !\" 8 ~ iz5 en !=' !I:(\") =I 0 nz % en m--1 r-\n:c r- C: go(\")\n:c__, i\n~ ~~ mo r- C) r- m FOREST HEIGHTS PROPERTY March 24, 1983  J RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Little Rock School District of Pulaski County, Arkansas, herein called \"District,\" is the owner of the following described lands located in the City of Little Rock, Arkansas: and\nA tract of land located in the NW SW Section 31, T-2-N, R-12-W, Pulaski County, Arkansas, more particularly described as: Beginning at a point on the South right-of-way line of Evergreen Drive, (formerly \"K\" Street), 30 ft. South of the centerline and 70 ft. East of the West line of said Section 31\nthence S 8g(ll6'10\"E along said South right-of-way line 275.0 ft. to a point\nthence South along a line, parallel with said West line of said Section 31, 450.06 ft. to a point\nthence NS916'10\"W and parallel with the South rightof- way line of Evergreen Drive, 295.0 ft. to a point on the East right-of-way line of North University Avenue, said point being 50 ft. East of the West line of said Section 31\nthence North along said East right-of-way line and 50 ft. East of and parallel with the West line of said Section 31, 230 ft. to a point\nthence East and continuing along said East rightof- way line, 5.0 ft. to a point\nthence North and continuing along said East right-of-way line, 55.0 ft. East and parallel with the West line of said Section 31, 205.0 ft. to a point\nthence Northeasterly along the arc of a 14.81 ft. (Deed 15.0 ft.) radius curve to the right, having a chord bearing and distance of N4521 '55\"E, 21.08 ft. to the point of beginning containing 131,609 sq. ft. or 3.0213 Acres more or less. WHEREAS, said lands are hereby found to be surpl~s to the needs of the District, and are accordingly no longer needed for school purposes and should be abandoned and sold\nand WHEREAS, in order to convey merchantable title to said lands free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, it is necessary to secure releases of said lands from the liens of several mortgages or deeds of ti-ust securing bonds issued by the District, and it will be necessary in order to secure such releases that the District place the proceeds of the sale in the Building Fund of the District to be used exclusively for either repairs or new construction of buildings and other facilities for school purposes . of the District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District of Pulaski County, Arkansas: l. That the administration take the necessary measures to offer for sale the above described surplus lands which are no longer needed for school purposes. 2. That no offer be accepted except by resolution of this Board convened in a legal meeting. 3. That the proceeds, if any, from the sale of said lands be placed in the Building Fund of the District and will be used exclusively for either repairs or new construction of buildings and other facilities for school purposes. 4. That a certified copy of this Resolution be delivered to the several trustees of the mortgages and deeds of trust presently encumbering the above described property, this Board requesting that upon receipt of such certified Resolution said corporate trustees forthwith release, in recordable form, the above described lands from each of the separate mortgages and deeds of trust aforesaid, as same are applicable to each corporate trustee. ADOPTED: March 24, 1983 STATE OF ARKANSAS) ) ss COUNTY OF PULASKI) Subscribed and sworn to before me My Commission Expires 7/1/83 this 24th day of March, 1983. . c\n?:t,,na, )t' ~,,,., ,~ J Notary Pu ic - 8 z ~ lz5 Cl) :.n., z ~ 0 ,\n,Cl) ~n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" TO: Board of Education THROUGH: Dr. Morris L. Holmes I Superintendent of Schools FROM: SUBJECT: ease: Miles Memorial Church Title/Subject: Short Summary: Objectives: Expected Outcomes: Population/Location: Budget Amount/Source of Budget: Manager: Duration: Long Range/Continuation: Other Agencies Involved: Expectations of the District: Needed Staff: Comments: Recommendations: Attachment: Copy of proposed lease Request for leasing action. The Miles Memorial Christian Methodist Episcopal Church has requested to lease the parkin~ lot at the Procurement Office, 1800 East 61 St. Not applicable Not applicable Office/Procurement Office, 1800 East 6th St. Not applicable Doug Eaton, Director of Facility Services One year beginning March 2004 and ending February 2005 Not applicable Miles Memorial CME Church Not applicable Not applicable The Miles Memorial CME Church, recently constructed across from Procurement, has requested the use of our parking lot during non-working hours to support their functions until their parking lot can be constructed. Their parking lot is expected to be completed within one year. It is recommended that this leasing action be approved. The Little Rock School District has entered into similar leases to support nonprofit organizations in our community. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.k12.ar.us 501-324-2000  fax: 501-324-2032 8 ! lz5 Cl) !=' :l:n =l 0 nz :Z:CII mr --\n\u0026lt;o r c: gon\no .... i5\n~~ fgo rr mC\u0026gt; LEASE AGREEMENT Lease made this ____ day of __________ _ , by and between Little Rock School District, as Lessor, and Miles Memorial CME Church of Little Rock, Arkansas, as Lessee. WINESSETH Lessor hereby leases to Lessee the entire premises described as follows : SEE EXHIBIT A A TT ACHED HERETO, m the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, for the term of one year beginning on ______________ , at yearly rental of twelve dollars ($12.00) payable in equal monthly installments, or a lump sum, at the office of the Lessor. This lease may be extended from year to year on the same terms and conditions by express agreement of the Lessor and the Lessee. CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, AND OTHER PROVISIONS I. In the event that the said premises shall be or become unsafe for the continuation of the Lessee's use thereof, or if Lessee be prevented by any present or future law or ordinance and/or by the authorities having jurisdiction in the premises from continuing use of said premises, this lease shall terminate at the option of the Lessee on sixty (60) days' notice, in writing, to the Lessor by registered mail addressed to the Lessor at the place of address listed herein or such other address as the Lessor may hereafter in writing specify\nand the Lessor agrees, thereupon, to return to the Lessee any rent paid in advance for the unexpired term. II. Lessor represents and warrants to be the owner of the premises described above and to have the authority to make this lease. III. Lessor reserves the right to terminate this lease by giving thirty (30) days' notice in writing by registered mail to Lessee. IV. The Lessee shall take good care of the leased premises and be responsible for any repairs necessitated by any act or negligence of the Lessee or the agents, employees, or visitors of the Lessee. V. The Lessee shall not do, or permit to be done, anything in or about the leased premises that interferes with the rights of other tenants of the Lessor or that conflicts with State or Municipal law or regulations of the Fire Department or Board of Health that creates a nuisance or that is dangerous to persons or property. VI. The Lessee shall not do, or permit to be done, anything in or about the leased premises that increases the fire hazard or that causes the premises to become uninsurable or results in increased rates for fire or extended insurance coverage. VII. The Lessee shall be allowed to make alterations or improvements to the leased premises with the prior written consent of Lessor. Such alternations shall be at the expense of the Lessee, subject to the other provisions of this lease, and shall become a part of the premises. The Lessor shall have the right to retain the premises as improved at the termination of said lease. VIII. Upon termination of this lease, the Lessee shall surrender possession of the leased premises to the Lessor in a condition as good as it was when the Lessee took possession, ordinary wear and tear, damage by fire, casualty, and the elements excepted. IX. This lease shall not be assigned or any part of the leased premises sublet to any agency, organization, entity or individual without prior written approval of the Lessor. Lessor retains the right to review the specific sublet documents, including terms, conditions, and financial agreements, before granting approval to sublet any or all of the premises covered under this lease. X. The Lessee shall hold the Lessor harmless from liability against all damages or injury to persons or property arising during the term of this lease and caused by any act or negligence of the Lessee or the agents, employees, or visitors of the Lessee. XI. No sign, picture, advertisement, or notice shall be affixed to any part of the leased premises except as approved by the Lessor\nand the Lessor may remove the same, if objectionable, with written notice to the Lessee and the removal to be at the Lessee's expense. Upon termination of this lease, the Lessee shall remove any such sign, picture, advertisement, or notice affixed to the leased premises and restore the place it occupied to the condition existing at the time of commencement of this lease. XII. This lease shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. It shall be governed by the laws of the State of Arkansas and is severable for interpretation purposes. 2 !\" 8 z s z U\u0026gt; XIII. The Lessor reserves the right to have first preference for the use of the leased premises. The Lessor and Lessee will work together to avoid conflicts in the use of the leased premises. The leased premises will be used by the Lessee for Sunday services only. Permission for uses of the leased premises by the Lessee at times other than as specified in this paragraph will be requested from the Lessor prior to their use. XIV. By entering into this agreement, the Lessor does not obligate itself, in any way, to meet any financial or contractual obligations by the Lessee in securing necessary permits for enhancement or modifications to the Lessee's property nor is the Lessor obligated to modify the leased premises to meet any conditions as expressed in any permits secured by the Lessee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this lease on the day and year first above mentioned. LESSOR: LESSEE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 West Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 By: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Miles Memorial CME Church By: Title: 3 Exhibit \"A\" The leased premises are described as the west parking lot bordering Bender Street at the Little Rock School District's Procurement and Materials Management Supply Center at1800 East 6th Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. 4 8 z ~ iz5 en !=' l:o =I 0 oz :mc ..e.n, ,-,a ,... C: jloO :ID .... c:c' izo .... a, emnco: ,... C) r-m Memorandum Date: February 26, 2004 To: Little Rock School District Board of Directors From: ~arral Paradis, Director of Procurement \u0026amp; Materials Management Through: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools ~ald M. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer Subject Request for Resolution authorizing the refinance/consolidation of the District's outstanding lease-purchase and post-dated warrant debt. Summary: The District has the following outstanding lease-purchase and post-dated warrant debt agreements in place: Company City First Bank Community Bank Community Bank Crews \u0026amp; Assoc. Stephens Inc. Yearly Due Date 10/15 1/05 1/15 1/15 1/15 Payment $70,177.36 $55,499.47 $47,054.75 $66,852.10 $65,568.10 Amount Outstanding $140,354.72 $166,498.41 $141,164.25 $267,408.40 $327,840.50 Interest Rate 5% 6.14% 6.45% 5.23% 4.5% The Procurement department issued an RFP (request for proposals) to consolidate and refinance the debt above to take advantage of current lower interest rates. Bank of America offered the best overall rate - 2.97%. Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark has reviewed the master lease that consolidates the above agreements and prepared the attached resolution for your approval. Objective: To streamline paperwork and take advantage of savings from current lower interest rates by consolidating/refinancing debt. Expected Outcomes: Savings to the District of Approximately $52,000. New consolidated payment will be made on January 15 of each year. NO time extension was made to the term of original debt other than to coordinate this date. g ~ z \"' Board of Directors February 26, 2004 Page 2 Population/Location: IA Budget Amount/Source of Budget: Transportation Department - All of these funds were used to purchase school buses. The annual payments are being made from the LRSD Transportation Department budget. Manager: Darral Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management Duration: Last payment will be January 15, 2009. Long Range: NIA Other Agencies Involved: LRSD Transportation Department Expectations of District: NIA Needed Staff: NIA Comments: None Recommendation We request the Board of Education approve the resolution for the refinance/consolidation of the district's outstanding lease-purchase and post-dated warrant debt as detailed above. 2 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Little Rock School District (the \"District\") desires to consolidate/refinance various leases/existing debt related to the District's lease/purchase of various items of equipment utilized by the District in its day-to-day operations\nand WHEREAS, the District desires to accomplish the consolidation/refinance by entering into a Master Lease/Purchase Agreement with Banc of America Leasing \u0026amp; Capital, LLC. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Little Rock School District Board of Directors that Don Stewart, as Chief Financial Officer of the District, is authorized, on behalf of the District, to enter into, execute, and deliver that certain Master Equipment Lease/Purchase Agreement (the \"Agreement\") with Banc of America Leasing \u0026amp; Capital, LLC, related to the District's lease and/or acquisition of certain equipment utilized by the District in its day-to-day operations (the general form of which Agreement is attached to the Resolution). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands as the Little Rock School District Board of Directors on this ___ day of February, 2004. !\" 8 ! cz5 en Date: To: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT February 26, 2004 Little Rock School District Board of Directors Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Subject: Construction Budget Revision- Mitchell and Rightsell Based on Facility Services and Dr. Stewarts' analysis regarding the scope of work needed at Mitchell and Rightsell, the recommendation is that the Board approve sufficient funds, making up the budget shortfalls in the amonts of $1.54 million for Mitchell and $1 .78 million for Rightsell. The Board received a report at the last board agenda meeting that sufficient funds are available in the Bond Funds. /dge cc: Dr. Don Stewart Chief Financial Officer 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501) 447-1002 !\" 8 ! iz5 en Attachment: Related Information: - For the 2004-05 school year the projected enrollments from Student Assignment are: Mitchell: 228 Rightsell: 243 - For the beginning of the 2004-05 school year, the plan is to locate the Mitchell student body at the Badgett Elementary School site. - Mr. Eaton has speculated that Mitchell could be available for occupancy by the end of the Winter Holiday season, 2004. '.54.n Individual Approach to a World if Knowledge\" DATE: February 26, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent ~M. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer PREPARED B~uglas C. Eaton, Director, Facility Services SUBJECT: Construction Budget Revision - Mitchell and Rightsell Attached are Executive Summaries and Scopes of Work for the Mitchell and Rightsell Renovation Projects. The purpose of these documents is to assist the Board in determining if the District will proceed with these projects. As noted in the Executive Summaries, the budget shortfall for the Mitchell project is $1.54 million and for Rightsell the shortfall is $1.78 million. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.k12.ar.us 501-324-2000  fax: 501-324-2032 '\" i cz5 (II Mitchell Elementary School Executive Summary I. Purpose: The purpose of this summary is to provide information regarding a decision as to whether sufficient funding will be made available to repair Mitchell Elementary School. II. Problem: The problem before us is to decide whether Mitchell Elementary School should receive sufficient funding in order to enhance its overall appearance and structural integrity to the point where it can continue as an elementary school. ill. Facts bearing on the problem:  Age and Condition: Mitchell Elementary School is essentially a wood-frame building with a brick structural veneer and a plaster interior. It has wooden floors that have been overlaid with another layer of tile, and in many areas with carpeting. The building does not meet the current codes\nyet, in many areas, it is not deficient. It was designed for an operating capacity of 258 students plus academic and support staff. It sits on a lot of less than three acres in size and has a small parking lot and play area. It was expanded in the 1980s with the addition of three extra classrooms. Projects were completed in the 1970s and 80s that added air conditioning, upgraded code-deficient areas, such as plumbing and electric, and most recently has had energy-efficient lighting installed. The Building is structurally sound, yet it is beginning to show deterioration in a number of areas. In 1995 surveys were done for all buildings in the Little Rock School District. Needed renovations and repairs included substantial replacements of every building system, which when completed would still render the building inadequate for an elementary school of the 1990s. Beginning in 1998 the Little Rock School District began an initiative to re-summarize the needs of its facilities. The needs, at that time, totaled $950,000 and centered around environmental needs, structural needs, technology and electrical upgrades, ADA compliance, restroom renovations, and changes to the administrative and academic space. Specifically\nroof and structural repairs, waterproofing the facility, mold remediation,\" interior and exterior renovations of classrooms and administrative space, landscaping, bringing the building within ADA compliance, adding a classroom, and adding a heating-ventilation fresh-air return system, and making electrical upgrades to support all the aforementioned, plus technology that is required in our facilities.  Financial Considerations: The Little Rock School District has allocated $950,000 for any and all work to be accomplished at Mitchell Elementary School. As may be seen by the attached enclosure, this is not a sufficient level of funding due to all the work that is necessary to bring this facility inline so that a reasonable life can be expected for this capital investment. The funding shortfall is estimated at $1.54 million dollars.  Attendance Considerations: At this point in time it is anticipated that Mitchell could be impacted by the districts new attendance zone plan. Students presently attending Mitchell will be given the opportunity of choice which will allow them to attend schools in their attendance zone. A decrease in student population at this school would warrant an examinatjon of the per pupil cost for facility rehabilitation. IV. Courses of Action:  Re-examining the role of Mitchell Elementary school as an educational facility in LRSD: The possible decrease of student population coupled with the cost of repairs warrants a look at whether investing in Mitchell Elementary school is cost effective.  Reduce the scope of work to minimum essential: Decreasing the scope of work to accomplish minimum essential necessary to maintain the facility. This is predicated on a reduced occupancy.  Redefine the scope of work for non school facility: Should the facility cease to remain as a school, a reduced scope of work could be accomplished to maintain the facility and convert it to another LRSD purpose.  Do not accomplish the repairs: This course of action is only an option if LRSD decides not to retain the facility. And then, some expense will be incurred to preserve the facility for either retention or disposal. !\" 8 ! \u0026lt;z'5 en Scope of Work Mitchell Elementary School Mitchell Elementary School: a. Roof and Gutter replacement An examination needs to be made of the surface of all roofs of Mitchell Elementary School and the substructure of the roof along with the gutters and downspouts to determine extent of repairs necessary to ensure a safe and dry facility. Including within this should be an examination of the re-insulation of the attic space. b. Heating-Ventilation Unit Replacement It has been determined that the units in the building, installed in the late 1970s, have far outlived their usefulness. We desire that the scope of work include replacement of the air-handling units. We wish to retain much of the original system outside the building as well as the heating system and boiler inside the building. It is simply the air-handling units that we would like exchanged. c. A Fresh-Air System We would like an investigation and a scope of work to be done to provide a fresh-air system to all occupied space in the facility that will meet current ASHRE standards. It is our desire that this freshair system run independently of any heating or air-conditioning system. d. An Electrical Upgrade to Support Technology and any added Airconditioning or Fresh-air Systems The electrical upgrade to support technology will require us to delineate outlets in each classroom, but an estimated number of five to six per classroom will be needed. e. Interior Water Damage Those portions of the building that have been damaged due to infiltration of water from the exterior surface or from leaky pipes need to be repaired in the most efficient manner. g. Excessive Wear Due to Age Those areas of the building that have shown excessive wear or damage due to age and have caused plumbing leaks will be repaired as economically as possible. h. Administrative Renovation: It is our desire to modify the main lobby area to expand the administrative complex to provide for a new office for the principal and secretary. 1. ADA: We would like to try to adapt Mitchell Elementary School with a lift-system that allows students to get between the first and second floor. J. Waterproofing: We would like, upon the completion of all work at Mitchell Elementary School, for a waterproof coating to be applied to the exterior brick surface. k. Landscaping: We would like the rip-rap favade around the two sides of the school where it is presently located filled in with concrete to provide a permanent surface from the sidewalk up to the ground level of the school, eliminating all grass and growth in this area. 1. We would like the asphalt behind Mitchell Elementary School removed at the upper level and replaced with sod. m. Classroom addition: We would like a one-classroom addition ranging in size from 750 to 800 square feet. This would be a standard classroom with no water or restroom facilities. It would have cabinetry on one wall, at least a 12-foot-long chalkboard with 4-foot bulletin-board extensions on each end. There would be a coat rack, carpeted flooring, and wiring connected to the building's existing intercom and data systems. 2 !\" Rightsell Elementary School Executive Summary I. Purpose: The purpose of this summary is to provide information regarding a decision as to whether sufficient funding will be made available to repair Rightsell Elementary School. II. Problem: The problem before us is to decide whether Rightsell Elementary School should receive sufficient funding in order to enhance its overall appearance and structural integrity to the point where it can continue as an elementary school. ill. Facts bearing on the problem:  Age and Condition: Rightsell Elementary School is essentially a wood-frame building with a brick structural veneer and a plaster interior. It has wooden floors that have been overlaid with another layer of tile, and in many areas with carpeting. The building does not meet the current codes\nyet, in many areas, it is not deficient. It was designed for an operating capacity of 258 students plus academic and support staff. It sits on a lot of less than three acres in size and has a small parking lot and play area. It was expanded in the 1990s with the addition of one extra classroom. Projects were completed in the 1970s and 80s that added air conditioning, upgraded code-deficient areas, such as plumbing and electric, and most recently has had energy-efficient lighting installed. The Building is structurally sound, yet it is beginning to show deterioration in a number of areas. In 1995 surveys were done for all buildings in the Little Rock School District. Needed renovations and repairs included substantial replacements of every building system, which when completed would still render the building inadequate for an elementary school of the 1990s. Beginning in 1998 the Little Rock School District began an initiative to re-summarize the needs of its facilities. The needs, at that time, totaled $800,000 and centered around environmental needs, structural needs, technology and electrical upgrades, ADA compliance, restroom renovations, and changes to the administrative and academic space. Specifically\nroof and structural repairs, waterproofing the facility, mold remediation, landscaping, bringing the building within ADA compliance, adding a classroom, and adding a heating-ventilation fresh-air return system, and making electrical upgrades to support all the aforementio'ned, plus technology that is required in our facilities.  Financial Considerations: The Little Rock School District has allocated $800,000 for any and all work to be accomplished at Rightsell Elementary School. As may be seen by the attached enclosure, this is-not a sufficient level of funding due to all the work that is necessary to bring this facility inline so that a reasonable life can be expected for this capital investment. The funding shortfall is estimated at $1.78 million dollars.  Attendance Considerations: As of this writing is anticipated that Rightsell could be impacted by the districts new attendance zone plan. Students presently attending Rightsell will be given the opportunity of choice, which will allow them to attend schools in their attendance zone. A decrease in student population at this school would warrant an examination of the per pupil cost for facility rehabilitation IV. Courses of Action:  Re-examining the role of Rightsell Elementary school as an educational facility in LRSD: The possible decrease of student population coupled with the cost of repairs warrants a look at whether investing in Rightsell Elementary school is cost effective.  Reduce the scope of work to minimum essential: Decreasing the scope of work to accomplish minimum essential necessary to maintain the facility. This is predicated on a reduced occupancy.  Redefine the scope of work for non school facility: Should the facility cease to remain as a school, a reduced scope of work could be accomplished to maintain the facility and convert it to another LRSD purpose.  Do not accomplish the repairs: This course of action is only an option if LRSD decides not to retain the facility. And then, some expense will be incurred to preserve the facility for either retention or disposal. 8 ~ a z UI School: Scope of Work Rightsell Elementary School Rightsell Elementary School: a. The Fresh-Air Unit The fresh-air unit will be as specified on Mitchell, above. b. Electrical Upgrade The electrical upgrade will be as specified on Mitchell, above. c. Remediation ofHV AC Closets In this particular case, it was determined that the heatingventilation closets are going to have to be completely gutted and all fungi remediated to ensure a safe atmosphere. This, of course, will include the replacement of these units, in kind. d. HV AC Unit Replacement HV AC unit replacement will be as specified on Mitchell, above. It is our intent to save as much of the main system that provides heat to the building as possible and concentrate on the replacement of the air-handling units installed in the building in the late 1970s. e. Resealing of the Basement Walls I would like consideration given to excavating the entire building down to the footers to expose all basement walls and have these walls resealed to prevent water-infiltration. f. Interior Drainage Determine the extent of the interior drainage to determine whether the interior storm-water drainage-system can be abandoned and included within the design of \"g\" stated below. g. Determine the scope and cost for a gutter and downspout system to divert water from internal drains to an exterior drain system. 3 Included within this should be the necessary gutters and downspouts and the ceiling of the roof. Consideration should also be given to an analysis and replacement of the flat-roof portion of the school. h. Interior Repairs Those portions of the building that have been damaged because of water penetration shall be repaired in the most economical manner. 1. ADA: We would like a lift-system installed to enable students with disabilities to transverse the first and second floors. J. Classroom Addition: We would like one 750 to 800 square-foot classroom, with no water or restroom facilities, added to the facility. It would have built-in shelving or cabinetry on one side, black or dry-erase boards on one end, carpeted flooring, energy-efficient lighting, coat rack and shelves on one wall, and would be connected to the District's data and intercom system. k. Asbestos removal: To be removed commensurate with renovation work needed. Board report.doc 4 !\" 8 z ~ lz5 C/) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 501 SHERMAN STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72202 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Junious Babbs SUBJECT: Mitchell and Rightsell Five (5) Year Projections DATE: February 12, 2004 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Junious C. Babbs, Associate Superintendent Phone: (501) 447-2955 E-Mail: junious.babbs@lrsd.org In response to the request for Mitchell and Rightsell Elementary School five (5) year projections, the following information is being provided: Mitchell and Rightsell Elementary Five Year Plan This document is a projection of student numbers for two (2) Little Rock School District elementary schools over the period 2003-04 through 2008-09. Projections are based on a set of assumptions and conditions as they exist in February 2004. Assumptions and Conditions Projections completed for the schools were compiled by \"rolling up\" students currently- attending an elementary school and identifying future students using the average number of kindergarten students who have registered in each attendance zone for the school over the past four ( 4) years. In a case where the demographic in a school zone has changed due to unusual growth or other factors, an adjustment to the average figure would be used for the projection. The numbers for the \"roll up\" students assume an equal mobility rate across the district. As some students in the schools leave a school due to address changes, others will enter at a fairly equal rate. School projections include P4 classes in existence as of February 2004. Growth Assumptions about growth do not include a forecast of substantial numbers of students who do not currently attend LRSD returning to district schools. While that is a desirable condition, there is no data on which to base a projection regarding that occurrence. There are some schools where the projection based on the four-year average of kindergarten enrollment appears to be inconsistent with the recent history of enrollment growth in the school. In this case the projection was adjusted downward due to conditions in the particular school zone. Examples of schools where reductions occurred include both Mitchell and Rightsell, where students from outside the school attendance zone are now allowed to return to their attendance zone school. An additional variable not yet available (i.e. NCLB school choice opportunity) to enter or exit will be determined during a designated period of the school year. It will be important to note that P4 numbers may increase pending recent legislative action. School Enrollment Numbers Over the Past Five (5) Years School 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 Average Mitchell 247 278 298 284 255 272 Ri!!htsell 269 264 268 298 292 278 !\" 8 ~ z Cl) :n ~ z \u0026gt;z ,0. ,Cl) PROJECTION WORKSHEET SCHOOL: Rightsell Elementary School Capacity: 296 GRADE 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 K 40 33 33 33 33 33 1 47 40 33 33 33 33 2 43 47 40 33 33 33 3 33 43 47 40 33 33 4 46 33 43 47 40 33 5 47 46 33 43 47 40 P4 36 36 36 36 36 36 TOTAL 292 278 265 265 255 241 Attending -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 Choice Schools Return to -25 -20 -12 -8 -6 Attendance Zone TOTAL 292 243 235 243 237 225 PROJECTION WORKSHEET SCHOOL: Mitchell Elementary School Capacity: 283 GRADE 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 K 40 36 36 36 36 36 1 41 40 36 36 36 36 2 34 41 40 36 36 36 3 39 34 41 40 36 36 4 44 39 34 41 40 36 5 39 44 39 34 41 40 P4 18 18 18 18 18 18 TOTAL 255 252 244 241 243 238 Attending -11 -10 -8 -7 -6 Choice Schools Return to -13 -13 -13 -13 -13 Attendance Zone TOTAL 255 228 221 220 223 219 2008 and Beyond Revisited stipulation magnet agreements (2008) among the State of Arkansas and the three (3) participating school districts (Little Rock School District, North Little Rock School District, and Pulaski County Special School District) will have significant impact. Pending results may display variation in student enrollment numbers in each LRSD school. cc: Dr. Morris Holmes LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: February 26, 2004 TO: Board of Education FROM: ~al Pru-adis, Director of Procurement and Materials Mgmt. THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property Attached are requests to donate property to the Little Rock School District as follows: Schoo 1/DeQartment Item Donor Bale Elementary School One (1) Sylvania VCR/ Mr. Brian Minchew, DVD player, valued at parent of Bale student $100.00, and 9 Magna Doodle Deluxe Boards, valued at $15.00 each, to the special education self-contained classroom Central High School $300.00 cash to the Mr. Rush Harding, III Lady Panther basketball team Central High School $500.00 cash to the Mr. Ronald Crawford Lady Panther basketball team J.A. Fair Magnet Four ( 4) sections Mr. Woody Rigdon of High School of 6' concrete pipe, Hanson Pipe \u0026amp; Products, Inc. valued at $200.00, for use in outdoor classroom J.A. Fair Magnet Delivery services, Mr. Gary Gaul of High School . valued at $150.00, DUIT Construction Company of four (4) sections of concrete pipe for use in outdoor classroom ~ :i  :! 2 Gi ~ ?' \u0026gt; ~ c\n1: Irr :! Board of Education February 26, 2004 Page 2 School/Department J.A. Fair Magnet High School Martin Luther King, Jr. Interdistrict Magnet Elementary School Martin Luther King, Jr. lnterdistrict Magnet Elementary School Metropolitan Career and Technical Center Pulaski Heights Middle School Woodruff Elementary School 200 tons of rock fines, valued at $500.00, to be used on outdoor trails and greenhouse floor Mr. Haskell Dickinson of Granite Mountain Quarries A Hewlett-Packard copier, M.L. King PT A valued at $130.00, to the Health Services Department . at King $1,500.00 cash to be used Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. Duane Jackson for student incentives and and Ms. Genevieve Jackson classroom \u0026amp; instructional materials for Pre-Kand kindergarten curriculum. Funds are to be distributed as follows:  to Ms. Julia Lloyd's class and  to Ms. Shacuna Jones' class. Paints, primers, sealers, reducers, thinners, fillers, tools, tapes, sand paper, polish pad, etc., valued at $21,675.30, to the Paint \u0026amp; Body Program $10,000.00 cash to the instructional program at Pulaski Heights to be allocated as follows: $4,000.00 for the library (1/2 for upper level AR books)\n$1,000.00 each for 7th grade English books, gth grade English books, gth grade science classes, Foreign Language Dept., \u0026amp; the Special Ed Dept. $500.00 each for Math Counts and the Quiz Bowl. Mr. Perry Gravitt, President Hackman Paint \u0026amp; Supply Co., Inc. Winthrop \u0026amp; Lisenne Rockefeller School supplies and uniforms valued at $350.00 Dassault Falcon Jet Corp. Board of Education February 26, 2004 Page 3 School/Department LRSD Athletic Dept. Mahlon Martin Professional Library 124 metal gym lockers, valued at $11,560.00, installed at Forest Heights Middle School \u0026amp; 14 large mirrors, valued at $3,500.00, to be placed in the weight room at Quigley Stadium Educational books valued at $3,500.00 Donor Mr. David Ensminger Arkansas Democrat-Gazette It is recommended that these donation requests be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board. BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL To: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement and Materials Manage From/I\u0026lt; Barbara Anderson, Principal of Bale Elementary School Date: January 15, 2004 Subject: Donation Mr. Brian Minchew, a parent of a student at Bale, wishes to donate a Sylvani1 VCR/DVD player valued at $100.00 to the special education self-contained classroom at Bale. Along with this, 9 Magna Doodle Deluxe Boards, one for each child, will be donated. They are valued at $15.00 each. It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the pol\\ of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. LittCe 'Rock Centra( J-fif3li Sclioo( 1500 Soutfi Park Street Litt{e 'Rock, .'Arkansas 72202 Pfione 501-447-1400 ]\"ax 501-447-1401 DATE: 1/9/2004 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL crf!_,~ SUBJECT: DONATION Rush Harding, III, of 4 Valley Creek View, Little Rock, AR 72223, very graciously donated $300 to our Lady Panther basketball team. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. RECEIVED Jfo.N r. c ittCe 'Rock Centra{ J-fffJli Sclioo{ 1500 Soutli Park Street Litt[e 'Rock, .Jlrkansas 72202 Phone 501-447-1400 ]'ax 501-447-1401 DATE: 1/9/2004 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL ~ SUBJECT: DONATION Ronald Crawford graciously donated $500 to our Lady Panther basketball team. Mr. Crawford's address 1s as follows: P. 0. Box 13688 Maumelle, AR 72113. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. TO: FROM: DATE: RE: J. A. FAIR MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS 13420 David 0. Dodd Road Little Rock, AR 72210 Phone: 501-447-1700 Fax: 501-447-1701 Environmental Science * Information Science \u0026amp; Systems Engineering * Medical Science Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Ci~\\ C~dra Norman, Principal January 6, 2004 Donation to J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Mr. Woody Rigdon, Hanson Pipe and Products, Incorporated, 1300 Bond Street, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202, has generously donated four sections of six foot concrete pipe with a value of $200.00 for use in the J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School outdoor classroom. It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Thank you for your consideration. RECEIVED A School of the Little Rock School District TO: FROM: DATE: RE: J. A. FAIR MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS 13420 David 0. Dodd Road Little Rock, AR 72210 Phone: 501-447-1700 Fax: 501-447-1701 Environmental Science  Information Science \u0026amp; Systems Engineering  Medical Science Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement (l\n\\L Cassandra Norman, Principal January 6, 2004 Donation to J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Mr. Gary Gaul, DUIT Construction Company, 16915 High 1-30, Benton, AR, 72015, has generously provided delivery of four sections of concrete pipe for use in the J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School outdoor classroom. Delivery services for this pipe have value of $150.00. It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Thank you for your consideration. A School of the Little Rock School District TO: FROM: DATE: J. A. FAIR MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS 13420 David 0. Dodd Road Little Rock, AR 72210 Phone: 501-447-1700 Fax: 501-447-1701 Environmental Science * Information Science \u0026amp; Systems Engineering * Medical Science Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement t~sandra Norman, Principal January 6, 2004 RE: Donation to J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Mr. Haskell Dickinson, Granite Mountain Quarries, has generously donated 200 tons of rock fines with a value of$500.00 to be used on the outdoor trails and the greenhouse floor of J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School. It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Thank you for your consideration. A School of the Little Rock School District MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. INTERDISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOL To: Darral Paradise, Director of Procurement bi'~, From: Tyrone Harris, Principal Date: January 5, 2004 Re: Donation The M.L.King PTA, 905 M. L. King Jr. Drive, Little Rock, AR 72202 has generously donated a Hewlett Packard copier for the Health Services Department at King valued at $130.00 It is recommended that this donation request be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. I I 1 t .. ' . i 905 Martin Luther King , Jr. Drive  Phone (501) 447-5100  Fax (501) 447-5101  Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. INTERDISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOL To: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: TJi Harris, Principal Date: January 5, 2004 Re: Monetary Donation Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. Duane and Genevieve Jackson of 16801 Davis Cup Lane in Little Rock, AR 72209 have made a generous donation of $1500.00 to split between Julia Lloyd and Shacuna Jones. It is Mrs. Jackson's wish that the donation be used to purchase student incentives, classroom and instructional materials to support the pre-kindergarten and kindergarten curriculum. It is recommended that this donation request be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. Thank You 905 Martin Luther King , Jr. Drive  Phone (501) 447-5100  Fax (501) 447-5101  Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Michael Peterso~rincipal Donation January 7, 2004 Please accept this generous donation given to Metropolitan Career and Technical Center. Mr. Perry Gravitt, President of Hackman Paint and Supply Co., Inc. of Little Rock, AR, has given Metropolitan's Paint and Body Program $21 ,675.30 worth of paints, primers, sealers, reducers, thinners, fillers, tools, tapes, sand paper, polish pad, etc. These materials will be used for training our students. We recommend that this generous donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. cc: Dr. Marion Lacey, Associate Superintendent Metropolitan Career-Technical Center 7701 Scott Hamilton Drive  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209  (501) 447-1200  Fax (501) 447-1201 PULASKI HEIGHTS MIDDLE SCHOOL \"r/)tt,.wi119 r/)anllte, r/)Pide\" Date: January 6, 2004 To: From: Darr~aradis, Director of Procurement 1,W Dr. aniel Whitehorn, PHMS Principal Subject: Donation Winthrop and Lisenne Rockefeller of 3518 Hill Rd. Little Rock, AR 72205, have very graciously donated $10,000.00 to the instructional program of Pulaski Heights Middle School. They have requested that the money be allocated in the following manner: $1,000.00 for 8th grade English books, $1,000.00 for 7th grade English books, $1,000.00 for the Foreign Language Department, $4,000.00 for our library (one-half of this amount is to be spent on upper level AR books), $1,000.00 for the Special Education Department, $1,000.00 for 8th grade science classes, $500.00 for Math Counts, and $500.00 for Quiz Bowl. It is recommended that this very generous donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. ~  ~~ :' ::y~ i ~\n401 North Pine Street  Phone (501) 447-3200  Fax (501) 447-3201  L.ittle Rock , Arkansas 72205 To: Mr. Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Janice M. Wilson, Principal Date: January 15, 2004 Re: Donations Dassault Falcon Jet Corp, P.O. Box 967, Little Rock, AR 72203, has generously donated school supplies and uniforms valued at $350.00 to Woodruff Elementary School. We sincerely appreciate this donation on behalf of the children of Woodruff. School counselor, Shirley Davi~, distributed the school supplies and uniforms to children who needed assistance. We recommend that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. RECEIVED LRSD ATHLETICS Fax:501-324-2119 Jan 4 2003 13:58 P.02 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Iii . ATHLETIC DIRECTOR-SECONDARY SCHOOLS II\\ January 5, 2004 To: . Darral Paradis, Director LRSD Procurement Department From: n I.JJ Johnny Johnson, CAA r ~7 Athletic Director LRSD Subject: Lockers and Mirrors Donation David Ensminger recently donated 124 metal gym lockers valued at $11,560 to the Little Rock School District which were installed at Forest Heights Middle School. Mr. Ensminger also donated 14 large mirrors valued at $3, 500 which will be placed in the weight room at Quigley Stadium. It is reconunended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the LRSD. 3615 West 25th Street*Little Rock, AR 72204*(501)447-2060 To: From: Subject: '.\n4n Individual Approach to a World efKnowledge\" Darral Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management tf]lkJQrion E. Woods, Coordinator of Professional Development Donation of Books for the Mahlon Martin Professional Library Arkansas Democrat-Gazette donated educational books to the Mahlon Martin Professional Library. The value of the donation is $3,500.00. The contact information is as follows: Cynthia Howell Arkansas Democrat-Gazette 121 E. Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 It is recommended that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.kl2.ar.us Little Rock School District Financial Services 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: (501) 447-1086 Fax: (501) 447-1158 DATE: February 26, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors THROUGH: Donald M. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent PREPARED BY,Mark D. Milhollen, Manager, Financial Services  Subject  Summary  Objectives  Expected Outcomes Population/Location  Budget Amount/Source  Manager  Duration Financial Reports District funds are reported for the period ending January 31, 2004. To report the District's financial status monthly to the Board of Directors. The Board members will be informed of the District's current financial conditi9n. NIA NIA Mark Milhollen, Manager of Financial Services NIA  Long Range/Continuation Financial reports will be submitted monthly to the Board.  Other Agencies Involved None  Expectations of District NIA  Needed Staff NIA  Comments None  Recommendation Approval of the January 2004 financial reports. We recommend that the Board approve the financial reports as submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, ~PENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2002/03 01/31 /03 COLLECTED 2003/04 01/31 /04 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 58,550,000 57,147,781 97.61% 57,547,800 55,681 ,497 96.76% DELINQUENT TAXES 8,000,000 7,923,699 99.05% 10,100,000 9,516,878 94.23% 40% PULLBACK 29,400,000 29,600,000 EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 187,000 205,072 109.66% 210,000 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 385,000 174,515 45.33% 180,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 135,000 337,232 249.80% 150,000 206,062 137.37% MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 340,000 223,326 65.68% 380,000 231,195 60.84% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 275,000 90,653 32.96% 200,000 77,339 38.67% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 160,000 156,386 97.74% 240,000 166,872 69.53% TOTAL 97,432,000 66,258,663 68.01% 98,607,800 65,879,843 66.81% REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 24,000 17,215 71 .73% 21 ,000 11 ,594 55.21% TOTAL 24,000 17,215 71.73% 21,000 11,594 55.21% REVENUE- STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 54,867,630 30,219,479 55.08% 53,226,139 29,447,876 55.33% REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 7,590,000 3,891 ,937 51 .28% 8,300,000 3,373,820 40.65% VOCATIONAL 1,340,000 644,552 48.10% 1,400,000 621 ,053 44.36% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,700,000 346,684 20.39% 1,675,000 271 ,285 16.20% EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 205,407 75.14% 273,358 202,301 74.01% TRANSPORTATION 3,685,226 1,226,542 33.28% 3,875,562 1,243,841 32.09% INCENTIVE FUNDS - M TO M 3,265,000 1,396,152 42.76% 3,900,000 1,473,688 37.79% ADULT EDUCATION 1,006,014 335,976 33.40% 920,337 368,337 40.02% POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 658,607 658,607 100.00% 560,545 267,486 47.72% EARLY LITERACY LEARNING 120,000 TAP PROGRAM 285,271 285,271 100.00% 285,245 142,623 50.00% AT RISK FUNDING 650,000 57,386 8.83% 360,000 193,739 53.82% TOTAL 75,441,106 39,267,993 52.05% 74,776,187 37,606,049 50.29% REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 620,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,126,233 13,857 1.23% 1,350,000 141,308 10.47% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,664,438 554,813 33.33% 1,632,430 544,143 33.33% TOTAL 3,410,671 568,670 16.67% 3,752,430 685,451 18.27% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 176,307,777 106, 112,540 60.19% 177,157,418 104,182,938 58.81% REVENUE - OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 25, 152,981 7,262,743 28.87% 24,075,790 10,010,008 41 .58% DEDICATED M\u0026amp; 0 3,980,000 2,082,476 52.32% 4,000,000 2,398,316 59.96% MAGNET SCHOOLS 25,065,942 9,210,250 36.74% 24,689,351 9,322,338 37.76% TOTAL 54,198,923 18,555,469 34.24% 52,765,141 21,730,662 41.18% TOTAL REVENUE 230,506,700 124,668,008 54.08% 229,922,559 125,913,600 54.76% - LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2003 AND 2004 - APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 2002/03 01 /31 /03 EXPENDED 2003/04 01 /31/04 EXPENDED EXPENSES -SALARIES 100,865,586 51 ,391 ,118 50.95% 100,684,982 46,716,574 46.40% BENEFITS 24,838,361 12,739,832 51 .29% 26,483,772 12,288,907 46.40% PURCHASED SERVICES 19,795,774 9,845,498 49.74% 19,719,297 9,320,130 47.26% MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,347,098 4,087,172 48.97% 8,185,459 5,169,777 63.16% CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,616,991 781 ,770 48.35% 1,575,580 630,412 40.01% OTHER OBJECTS 8,508,680 2,903,848 34.13% 8,384,567 2,968,136 35.40% DEBT SERVICE 12,217,048 12,213,572 99.97% 12,098,342 12,191 ,763 100.77% TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 176,189,538 93,962,810 53.33% 177,131,999 89,285,698 50.41% EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 26,148,726 7,478,349 28.60% 26,056,193 8,419,292 32.31% DEDICATED M\u0026amp; 0 3,980,000 1,723,548 43.31% 4,000,000 2,306,955 57.67% MAGNET SCHOOLS 25,065,942 11,415,683 45.54% 24,689,351 10,577,444 42.84% TOTAL 55,194,668 20,617,580 37.35% 54,745,544 21,303,691 38.91% TOTAL EXPENSES 231,384,206 114,580,390 49.52% 231,877,543 110,589,388 47.69% INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (877,506) 10,087,617 (1 ,954,984) 15,324,211 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M\u0026amp; 0 1,645,440 1,645,440 3,558,580 3,558,580 OPERATING 8,557,652 8,557,652 9,026,855 9,026,855 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M\u0026amp; 0 649,695 (416,671) 1,578,177 3,985,551 OPERATING 8,675,891 20,707,381 9,052,274 23,924,095 TOTAL 9,325,586 20,290,710 10,630,451 27,909,647 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2004 PROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01-03 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 01-31-04 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE FAIR 33,282.90 33,282.90 MCCLELLAN 77,219.02 77,219.02 CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 110,501.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110,501.92 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 32,802.37 87,000.00 62,375.74 57,426.63 NEW WORK PROJECTS 18,614,545.40 246,791.00 10,141,400.20 7,434,812.30 1,285, 123.90 SECURITY PROJECTS 42,273.97 2,650.68 39,623.29 LIGHTING PROJECTS 29,869.56 7,679.00 22,190.56 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 2,768,579.81 2,108,630.36 2,265,578.88 514,549.29 2,097,082.00 RENOVATION PROJECTS 31,306,506.59 166,300.00 11,338,379.23 9,779,114.60 10,355,312.76 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 2,335,019.24 945,917.47 3,353.37 1,385,748.40 SUBTOTAL 55,129,596.94 0.00 2,608,721.36 24,763,981.20 17,731,829.56 15,242,507.54 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALE 444,618.31 1,000.00 445,618.31 DUNBAR PROJECT 5,266.71 5,266.71 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 22,074,599.23 (2,608,721.36) 19,465,877.87 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 INTEREST 7,288,776.89 893,210.83 8,181,987.72 SUBTOTAL 31,107,082.11 894,210.83 (2,608,721.36) 0.00 0.00 29,392,571.58 GRAND TOTAL II ~!lZ lllD llZ llll!l ~lD II\n! ~ ~!l Z\n! ~Ill ~g lZnl !l~ll li !l!lZ!lli m D!l LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY - THRU THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2004 -- - - PROJECT ENDING f------- ALLOCATIONS EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE ENCUMBERED ALLOCATION PROJECT CATEGORIES THRU 01-31-04 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 THRU 01-31-04 THRU 01-31-04 SUBTOTAL 01-31-04 - -- - - ADMINISTRATION 673,846.55 889,772.32 (485,325.77) 149,597.63 62,375.74 0.00 616,419.92 57,426.63 NEW WORK PROJECTS 35,565,851.80 443,467.00 4,589,606.29 11,671,442.11 10,141,400.20 7,434,812.30 34,280,727.90 1,285,123.90 SECURITY PROJECTS 265,814.17 113,930.47 109,609.73 2,650.68 0.00 226,190.88 39,623.29 - LIGHTING PROJECTS 4,883,405.13 2,641,482.13 1,832,392.06 379,661 .38 7,679.00 0.00 4,861,214.57 22,190.56 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 13,342,240.87 ~ 791,385.63 4,218,294.40 3,455,350.67 2,265,578.88 514,549.29 11,245, 158.87 2,097,082.00 RENOVATION PROJECTS 51,655,707.04 --397,615.34 4,119,045.21 15,666,239.90 11,338,379.23- 9,779,114.60 41,300,394.28 10,355,312.76 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 11,735,611.7-8 - 575,016.53 4,325,201.40 4,500,374.61 945,917.47 3,353.37 10,349,863.38 1,385,748.40 - - - - -~-- - UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS 20,759,698.84 20,759,698.84 -- - - - - ~ TOTAL 138,882,176.18 5,852,669.42 18,708,823.32 35,822,666.30 24,763,981 .20 17,731,829.56 102,879,969.80 36,002,206.38 -- - - - - ~ - - - - - - f- - - c- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - I l,l~Ul,\u0026amp;nnl\"nW y I ~t\\Ul1.n,r.:au \"VI LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT - SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND --- --- - FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31 , 2004 I Fund Purchase Maturity Institution Interest Rate Type Principal Date Date Operating 01 -30-04 TFN Bank of America 0.850% Repo 2,735,000.00 Operating 01 -15-04 03-15-04 Twin City Bank 1.350% CD 5,004,986.08 Operating 12-19-03 02-02-04 Twin City Bank 1.350% - CD 9,500,000.00 Operating 12-19-03 02-13-04 Twin City Bank 1.350% CD 5,000,000.00 Operating 12-19-03 03-01-04 Twin City Bank 1.400% CD 9,600,000.00 Total - 31 ,839,986.08 - - Food Service 01 -27-04 TFN Bank of America 0.720% Repo 810,000.00 810,000.00 - Activity Fund 01-16-04 TFN Bank of America 0.780% Repo 1,200,000.00 Total 1,200,000.00 - - Bond Account 09-08-03 03-08-04 Regions 1.094% CD 400,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 01 -16-04 07-14-04 Metropolitan 1.930% - - CD 1,000,934.31 Capital Projects Fund 01-16-04 07-16-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.400% CD 5,231 ,393.21 Capital Projects Fund 10-15-03 02-13-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.250% CD 5,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 01-30-04 01-31005 Bancorp South 1.850% CD 2,100,244.72 - Capital Projects Fund 11-18-03 04-15-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.300% CD 6,000,000.00 - Capital Projects Fund 05-15-03 08-16-04 USBANK 1.420% CD 11,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 01-16-04 06-10-04 Bank of America 0.910% _ Treasury Bills 5,365,126.36 Capital Projects Fund 05-15-03 05-14-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.360% CD 9,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 12-01-03 05-03-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.250% CD 3,060,648.33 Capital Projects Fund 09-15-03 03-15-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.430% CD 10,221 ,001 .82 Capital Projects Fund 01-26-04 TFN Bank of America 0.810% Repo 5,740,000.00 Total 64,119,348.75 Deseg Plan Scholarship 12-05-03 06-15-04 Bank of America 1.020% - Treasury Bills 668,325.28 Total - 668,325.28 Rockefeller Scholarship 01-15-04 . 06-10-04 Bank of America --- 0.910% - T reasury Bills 252,059.89 Total 252,059.89 - Risk Management Loss Fund 01 -30-04 TFN Bank of America 0.250% Repo 400,000.00 400,000.00\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1201","title":"Little Rock School District, school board meeting minutes and correspondence","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["2004-01-22/2004-12-16"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational planning","School board members","School boards","School management and organization","Meetings"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, school board meeting minutes and correspondence"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1201"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 22, 2004 RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held its regularly scheduled meeting at 5:30 p.m. on Thursday, January 22, 2004, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Tony Rose presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Tony Rose Larry Berkley Micheal Daugherty Bryan Day Baker Kurrus Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL Mr. Rose called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Six members of the Board were present at roll call\nMs. Strickland arrived at 5:35 p.m. In addition, student representative Marcus Kennedy from McClellan High School, and teacher representative Julia Banks, from Wakefield Elementary School, were also present. II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOMING COMMENTS Mr. Rose welcomed the audience and asked Dr. Holmes to proceed with the presentation of recognitions and citations. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 22, 2004 Page2 Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Superintendent's Citations Dr. Holmes introduced Yang Dai, a student at Central High School. Yang achieved a perfect score of 1600 on her SAT this year, and a perfect 36 on the ACT assessment as a sophomore. Yang was congratulated for this achievement. The College Board reports that only 900 students in the country achieve a perfect score on the SAT, and only about 1 in 8,300 students make a perfect score on the ACT. Anna Musun-Miller, a Central High School senior, was recognized for her selection as a regional winner in the annual Cum Laude Paper Competition sponsored by the Cum Laude Society. The competition recognizes students for original thought and superior scholarship. She received $500 from the Cum Laude Society in recognition of her achievement. Students from the Parkview Magnet High School Student Congress team recently participated in the Arkansas Student Congress, a mock legislative session held annually at the Arkansas State Capitol. This team won the overall award and each participant also received individual awards. The participating students were: Adam Baldwin, Graham Campbell, Abby Epperson, Luke Frauenthal, Malaiha Iqbal, Sam Kauffman, John Marcus Phillips, Emily Soderberg, and Andy Stroman. Their teacher and sponsor is Pat Treadway. The Superintendent presented a certificate of recognition to Barbara Blaine, counselor at Western Hills Elementary School. Ms. Blaine recently received the Distinguished Professional Service Award from the Arkansas Counseling Association. As a member of this association, she recently completed a three-year appointment to the association's national public policy and legislation committee. Dr. Holmes introduced Carol Fleming, a speech pathologist at Pulaski Heights Middle School. She is serving as president-elect of the Arkansas Speech-Language-Hearing Association, and was awarded a superintendent's citation in recognition of her service to the community and to her professional organization. David Hughey from Geyer Springs First Baptist Church attended the meeting, representing members of the church who participated in Share Fest. This church group worked at Otter Creek Elementary School and Mabelvale Magnet Middle School, painting, planting and making other improvements to the school campuses. Other Share Fest volunteers were recognized at the December Board meeting. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 22, 2004 Page 3 Estelle Matthis was invited to attend the Board meeting to receive a plaque honoring her husband, James Matthis, who recently passed away. Mr. Matthis had retired as a vice principal at Mann Magnet Middle School in June 2002. The plaque read: 'The Board of Education of the Little Rock School District expresses its condolences to the Matthis family and its deepest appreciation to James Matthis for his many years of commitment to his students, his school, and the Little Rock School District.\" Judy Martin, like Ms. Matthis, recently lost her husband, Frank Martin, who was the Executive Director of the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association. Although Mr. Martin was not an employee of the LRSD, he worked for the benefit of our teachers and Ms. Martin was given a plaque honoring his memory. The plaque read: 'The Board of Education of the Little Rock School District expresses its condolences to the family of Frank Martin and acknowledges the important role Frank had in representing the membership of the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association.\" Board Member Bryan Day was presented a certificate of completion from the Arkansas School Boards Association recognizing his completion of six hours of inservice study. Arkansas law mandates that Board Members complete a certain number of hours of training each year in the duties and responsibilities of a Board member under the school laws of Arkansas. Marcus Kennedy, McClellan High School student, and Julia Banks, Wakefield Elementary School teacher, were awarded citations of appreciation for their service as ex officio representatives to the Board for the month of January. Lastly, Dr. Holmes introduced John Carter, LRSD security officer. Mr. Carter has been assigned to provide safety recommendations and security to the 810 West Markham Street administration building staff. B. Remarks from Citizens Vanessa Pace-Hampton, student council sponsor at Parkview Magnet High School, introduced the Parkview Student Council vice-president, Derrick Raney. Derrick announced that Parkview would be the host school for the Arkansas Association of Student Councils in April 2004. The school is working with City Year of Little Rock to attract young leaders of student councils across the state to attend the conference. They asked the Board and the Superintendent to assist them in their efforts to provide a quality experience for the students, and he indicated that additional information and invitations would be sent to administrators, board members and the Superintendent as additional plans are developed. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 22, 2004 Page4 James Floyd, from the Wright Avenue Neighborhood Association, yielded his time to Shirley Johnson, representing the Mitchell Elementary School PT A. Ms. Johnson said that Mitchell parents are opposed to the dispersing of Mitchell students to Stephens and Washington Elementary Schools. The PTA is interested in working through whatever steps are necessary to get their students back to a neighborhood school, and they want their children to be able to walk to school instead of having to be bused. The current situation has caused some families a great deal of distress by having siblings separated between two schools, and it has caused the community distress by the appearance that the LRSD is trying to destroy the community by closing the school. She asked the Board to repair the school, and get the children back to the Mitchell campus as soon as possible. Dr. George Blevins addressed the Board and asked for an explanation of why the issue of closing Mitchell School is back on the table. He suggested that the cause of projections of reduced enrollment at Mitchell is directly related to the way that students are being assigned to Mitchell School. He stated that the building is in the condition that it is because of a lack of routine maintenance and upkeep. The matter of public trust is at issue here, and the Board was reminded that the Mitchell Community supported the millage issue because of promises that were made to make improvements to Mitchell School. Otis Kirkland stated that he has two children who attend Mitchell Academy. He asked that the Board take whatever steps necessary to keep the school open and in good working order. The school is a part of the community, and it is important to the community for the children to be able to attend their neighborhood school. Annie Abrams introduced herself as a parent advocate for three generations of students in the Little Rock School District. She retired from the LRSD, and has \"worn many hats\" in her efforts to advocate for various human rights causes. She stated that the issues surrounding the current discussion on Mitchell Academy boil down to simple issues of accountability, accessibility of educational opportunities, and achievement by the District to provide what is \"right\" for every child. Mitchell School is an anchor in the community and in the City of Little Rock. She noted recent investments by the city providing new street lights, tree-plantings, grants for after school programs at Mitchell and other efforts to keep the Wright Avenue area and Mitchell School community thriving as a contributing sector of the city. She urged the Board to keep the school open and operational as a part of the identity of the community in which it is located. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 22, 2004 Page5 D. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association Grainger Ledbetter, Executive Director of the L. R. Classroom Teachers Association, was present at the meeting. He greeted the Board, but made no additional comments or presentation. IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Remarks from Board Members Dr. Mitchell congratulated Jeffrey Trimble, Jr., a Mann Magnet student who represented the City of Little Rock and the State of Arkansas in the Jr. National Young Leaders' conference at the Martin Luther King Salute to Greatness. She stated that he did an exceptional job of presenting himself and representing our District in this event. In addition, Dr. Mitchell complimented Jo Evelyn Elston and high school counselors who recently sponsored a graduate follow-up luncheon. The luncheon was provided for students who graduated from the LRSD last year, including students who are now attending schools from all over the country, from trade schools and two-year colleges, four year colleges in-state, and other colleges and universities across the country. These students provide perspective for counselors on how well they were prepared in the LRSD to succeed in post-secondary educational opportunities. The discussion benefits the students, but most importantly provides insight for counselors and administrators to serve future students. Mr. Kurrus thanked Dr. Blevins, Ms. Abrams and other speakers who advocated for Mitchell Academy at tonight's meeting. He stated that Mitchell Academy was a marvelous school. He then read a quote from a recent Arkansas Democrat Gazette article, attributed to Mr. Dagtas who recently was granted a charter to operate the LISA Academy. Mr. Kurrus noted that the quote and the article were insulting and insensitive to the issues of public education and the exceptionally good education that is available in the LRSD. Schools like Mitchell Academy would be ultimately affected by the granting of charters to operate schools like the LISA Academy. LISA would not be providing transportation or services for special needs students, but would draw from available state funds that would come to public school students. Mr. Rose thanked Mr. Kurrus for his comments and stated that \"Baker is my hero.\" We have great schools, great students, great families, and caring employees who provide the best possible public education for every child who comes through our doors.\" In addition, he commented on the recent State of the Union address, and noted that \"the current administration is not a friend of education.\" REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 22, 2004 Page6 B. Student Assignment Report Mr. Babbs reviewed current student assignment processes and noted that 72 students had been processed for NCLB transfers. He announced open enrollment from January 26 through February 6\nparents are encouraged to pre-register their children at their attendance zone school or at the student registration office. When registering, parents must provide a birth certificate, social security card and proof of residence. In addition, he announced the annual Magnet School Fair which is to be held on Saturday, January 24 at Park Plaza mall. C. Budget Update Dr. Stewart provided a brief report on his recent monitoring of legislative sessions. He noted the possibility that $500,000 - $700,000 would be allocated for poverty programs, but no actual figures had been provided. He felt that it was good news that no reductions had been announced, and that the legislature remains very focused as they grapple with the funding formula and other aspects of accountability issues. As of the date of this meeting, 50 acts had been signed, 10 or 15 bills had passed through the House and Senate, but had not been signed into law by the governor. Reorganization of the state's school districts is still very much part of the discussions. D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects Mr. Goodman reviewed the summary report provided in the Board's agenda. Dr. Mitchell asked him to review construction plans at Fair Park Elementary School, noting that it needs a new roof. E. Internal Auditors Report Mr. Becker was present and noted that his report was printed in the agenda. No additional information was provided. F. Technology Update Ms. Neal was present and reviewed the summary report provided in the Board's agenda. She noted that 134 teachers would begin on-line staff development this week. AETN and the Arkansas Department of Education are providing video clips correlated to curriculum standards which will be available on-line. Mr. Berkley asked that Ms. Neal provide a report or a demonstration on how our teachers are integrating technology in their daily classroom instruction. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 22, 2004 Page 7 G. Update: Division of Exceptional Children Barbara Barnes provided a written summary and a brief report, as requested by the Board. V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS A. Minutes Minutes from a special meeting of the Board of Directors held on December 11, 2003, and from the regular meeting held on December 18, 2003 were presented for review and approval. There were no corrections noted and the minutes were approved. B. Personnel Changes Routine personnel changes were printed in the Board's agenda. Dr. Holmes recommended approval. Mr. Berkley made the motion to approve personnel items as presented. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. VI. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION A. Second Reading - Policy Revisions: IKF - General Education Graduation Requirements Policy IKF General Education Graduation Requirements was presented for the Board's review and second reading adoption. Arkansas Act 1748 of 2001 was revised by Act 1729 of 2003, changing the grade range from K-9 to K-8 for the requirement of 20 minutes of physical activity three times each week. The policy revision puts the LRSD in compliance with State law. First reading approval was granted at the December Board meeting. Mr. Berkley moved approval\nDr. Mitchell seconded and the motion carried unanimously. VII. SCHOOL SERVICES A. Magnet Schools Assistance Program Update Debbie Price, Director of the Magnet Schools Assistance Program, provided a written summary of MSAP activities and achievements. Dr. Holmes provided a brief background report and discussed a few of the program highlights. No Board action was requested or required upon receipt of the report. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 22, 2004 Page8 B. 2004 Magnet Schools Assistance Program Grant Proposal Linda Austin, Director of Planning and Development, presented the 2004 Magnet Schools Assistance Program Grant proposal for the Board's review and approval. The proposal was printed in the agenda and a resolution in support of the submission was provided for the Board adoption. Mr. Berkley moved to approve the proposal as presented. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. VIII. BUSINESS SERVICES A. Donations of Property The Board was asked to approve the acceptance of recent donations to schools and Departments within the District. The donations are listed in the following chart. Marcus Kennedy, student ex-officio, read the items listed in the Board's agenda. Dr. Daugherty made a motion to accept the donated items\nMs. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. SCHOOUDEPARTMENT ITEM DONOR Central High School $500.00 cash to be applied toward the Central High School Class of 1993 completion of the reflectino oool Cloverdale Magnet Middle $240.00 gift card Wal-mart Super Center School Food coupons in the amount of $200.00 Buraer Kina Wilson Elementary School $400.00 cash to be used to purchase Elite, Inc. suoolies for students Woodruff Elementary $100.00 cash match for volunteer hours Wal-mart #126 School from Tamela Warren , Woodruff parent to ourchase aood conduct incentives Little Rock School District 7,01 0 copies of the book \"The Search Aromatique, Inc. for the Smell of Christmas to be distributed to students in 23 elementary schools. Donation valued at $104,800.00 B. Financial Reports The monthly financial summary reports were provided to the Board as part of the printed agenda. Mr. Milhollen was present to review the reports and respond to questions. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, improving the academic achievement of all students and maintaining an equitable, nondiscriminatory learning environment will forever be the core of the Little Rock School District's mission\nand WHEREAS, despite past efforts, there remain schools within the District where minority group enrollment exceeds 75%, thus constituting minority group isolation\nand WHEREAS, school choice is viewed as a healthy method of providing opportunity for students to take advantage of unique curriculum offerings, special emphasis and program activities\nand WHEREAS, magnet schools expand educational choices, provide meaningful courses of study to which students can relate and set high expectations for all students for further education and the world of work\nand WHEREAS, magnet schools enhance parental and community involvement and encourage the use of community resources, thus improving the effectiveness of education in our District\nand NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Little Rock School District Board of Education endorses and approves the Voluntary Plan for submission with the LRSD 2004 MSAP proposal to the U.S. Department of Education. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands on behalf of the Little Rock School District Board of Education on this 22nd day of January, 2004. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, improving the academic achievement of all students and maintaining an equitable, nondiscriminatory learning environment will forever be the core of the Little Rock School District's mission\nand WHEREAS, despite past efforts, there remain schools within the District where minority group enrollment exceeds 75%, thus constituting minority group isolation\nand WHEREAS, school choice is viewed as a healthy method of providing opportunity for students to take advantage of unique curriculum offerings, special emphasis and program activities\nand WHEREAS, magnet schools expand educational choices, provide meaningful courses of study to which students can relate and set high expectations for all students for further education and the world of work\nand WHEREAS, magnet schools enhance parental and community involvement and encourage the use of community resources, thus improving the effectiveness of education in our District\nand NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Little Rock School District Board of Education endorses and approves the Voluntary Plan for submission with the LRSD 2004 MSAP proposal to the U.S. Department of Education. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands on behalf of the Little Rock School District Board of Education on this 22nd day of January, 2004. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 22, 2004 Page 9 IX. CLOSING REMARKS Dr. Holmes reminded families that open houses are being held this week and that the specific information is included on the school calendar. Report cards go home next week. X. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mr. Berkley moved to adjourn at 7:30 p.m. Ms. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. APPROVED: J..  Q\u0026amp;\n. 0 c.f R. Micheal Dauerty,Secreta LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING February 12, 2004 RECE VED MAR 2 9 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special session at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 12, 2004, immediately following the regularly scheduled agenda meeting, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Tony Rose presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Tony Rose Larry Berkley Mike Daugherty Bryan Day Baker Kurrus Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER President Tony Rose called the special meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. All members of the Board were present at roll call. II. PURPOSE OF THE MEETING The printed agenda for the special meeting contained the following action items: A. Personnel Action B. Employee Hearing SPECIAL BOARD MEETING February 12, 2004 Page2 Ill. ACTION AGENDA: A. Personnel Action The administration asked the Board to approve a personnel promotion in the Department of Early Childhood Education. Alma Dawson was promoted from an eleven month contract to a twelve month contract to begin on Monday, February 16, 2004. Mr. Berkley moved to approve the recommendation, Mr. Day seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. B. Employee Hearing Employee James E. Johnson requested a hearing before the Board in regards to the administration's recommendation for termination of his employment as an instructional aide in the LRSD. Mr. Johnson had retained an attorney in this matter\nneither he nor his attorney appeared for the hearing. The LRSD was represented by Attorney Khyaam Eddings. The recommendation for termination was based on Mr. Johnson's falsifying his application for employment, indicating that he had never been convicted of a crime. A routine background check by the Human Resources Director, Beverly Williams, indicated that in fact Mr. Johnson had been charged with more than one criminal offense: a Class B felony in June of 1996 and a class C felony in July of 1996. There was a brief discussion of the possibility that Mr. Johnson's criminal records might have been expunged, and whether any of the offenses might have been as a juvenile. Dr. Daugherty exited the hearing at 7:10 p.m. On advice of counsel, the Board was asked to only consider the fact that the application was falsified, and since neither the employee nor his attorney were present to respond to the Board's questions, those issues should not be a part of this hearing. Mr. Day made a motion to accept the administration's recommendation for termination based on falsification of the employment application. Ms. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING February 12, 2004 Page 3 IV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Berkley, seconded by Mr. Kurrus. APPROVED: J  ~(p -0~ R. Micheal Dauerty, Secretary LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT February 18, 2004 Ann Marshall, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Marshall: RECEIVED FEB 2 O 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING I am enclosing minutes of the LRSD Board of Directors meetings held on October 23, November 6, November 20, December 11, and December 18, 2003. Please let me know if you have any questions, or if I can provide additional information. Enclosures Sincerely, b- Beverly J. Griffin Executive Assistant to the Superintendent 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501) 447-1002 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES REGULAR BOARD MEETING February 26, 2004 RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held its regularly scheduled meeting at 5:30 p.m. on Thursday, February 26, 2004, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Tony Rose presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Tony Rose Larry Berkley Micheal Daugherty Baker Kurrus Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: Bryan Day ALSO PRESENT: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL Mr. Rose called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. Five members of the Board were present at roll call\nMr. Kurrus arrived at 5:40 p.m., and Mr. Day was absent. In addition, student representative Derrick Rainey from Parkview Magnet High School, and teacher representative Carolyn Clements, from Washington Elementary School, were also present. II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOMING COMMENTS Mr. Rose welcomed the audience and asked Dr. Holmes to proceed with the presentation of recognitions and citations. REGULAR BOARD MEETING February 26, 2004 Page2 Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Superintendent's Citations The Superintendent presented certificates of appreciation to the ex officio representatives to the Board for the month of February\nCarolyn Clements, teacher from Washington Magnet Elementary School, and Derrick Rainey, student from Parkview Magnet High School. B. Partners In Education Debbie Milam introduced Kaye Rainey, who announced the upcoming Parent Institute and invited Board members to participate in the day-long parent involvement activities. The Institute will be held at Parkview Magnet High School on Saturday, March 6, 2004, starting at 9:00 a.m. Ms. Milam presented a new business and school partnership for the Board's adoption: Twin City Bank - no representative in attendance\ncertificate was previously presented, in partnership with Bale Elementary School - represented by Cathoria Johnson Mr. Berkley moved to approve the formation of the partnership\nMs. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. C. Public Education Foundation of Little Rock John A. Riggs, President of the Public Education Foundation of Little Rock, addressed the Board in his annual report of the operations of the Foundation. As part of the report, the goals of the Foundation were listed as: 1. To implement \"Value Added\" Reporting\n2. To improve and enhance teacher quality\nand 3. To provide innovative idea grants to LRSD teachers. During the 2003 school year, $100,000 was provided to LRSD teachers who applied for grants to enhance quality classroom instruction and to implement strategies to increase student performance. These funds were presented in a \"sweepstakes\" with teachers being caught totally by surprise on the day when the prize money was distributed. A copy of the financial balance sheet was presented for the Board's review, indicating total assets in the amount of $263.591.33. REGULAR BOARD MEETING February 26, 2004 Page 3 D. Remarks from Citizens Mim Hundley addressed the Board regarding the elimination of some Pre-AP classes, and concerns regarding students who need the Pre AP opportunity to become ready for future AP classes. She noted specifically students who aren't mature enough to succeed in an AP class, but who benefit from the more rigorous Pre-AP classes, over the courses labeled \"regular.\" Ms. Hundley noted that Pre-AP world history, U.S. History, and English IV were of particular concern to her and she asked the Board to reconsider their decision to allow the curriculum revisions that eliminated these courses. Otis Kirkland discussed recent decisions about renovations and repairs that are needed at Mitchell Academy. He expressed disappointment in the lack of maintenance that has been provided at Mitchell over the years, and wondered why it took so long for the District's administration to realize that there were health and safety hazards present in the building. He also expressed his opinion that the student assignment plans are designed to have a negative effect on the enrollment at Mitchell and that Mitchell would ultimately be closed because of the efforts to reduce the enrollment. He asked the Board to keep Mitchell open and to show compassion and concern for the welfare of the students and families in the Mitchell neighborhood. James Floyd echoed some of the same comments made by Mr. Kirkland and noted that Mitchell is an institutional anchor in the community. He asked the Board to consider the impact that will be made on the community once the Clinton Library and the Heifer Project headquarters are completed. He noted the importance of the Wright Avenue corridor, and stated that many young families are now taking advantage of the opportunity to buy and renovate some of the older homes in the Wright Avenue and Mitchell School communities. Terrance Bolden advised the board that he lived on Battery Street, about four blocks from Mitchell Academy. He feels that the Board has backed away from promises made during the millage election and stated that there were trust issues that should be considered. He feels that schools in his area have been neglected over the years, and that funds for routine maintenance are riot fairly and equitably distributed across the schools in the LRSD. He stated that \"promises have been made, and promises must be kept.\" Dr. George Blevins is the Vice-President of the Wright Avenue Neighborhood Association. He stated that Dr. Les Carnine, former superintendent of schools, had encouraged members of the Wright Avenue area to continue to work to keep Mitchell open. He stated that he felt then that \"forces were at work\" to force the closure of Mitchell. REGULAR BOARD MEETING February 26, 2004 Page4 Dr. Blevins, like the previous speakers, stated that the matter of \"public trust\" is the issue of most concern, and he asked the Board to fulfill the promises made to the community. He asked the Board to make the commitment\nto allocate the funds to repair the school, and to provide for proper upkeep and maintenance into the future. E. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association Grainger Ledbetter, Executive Director of the L. R. Classroom Teachers Association, was present at the meeting. He greeted the Board, and offered assistance to the administration in the \"spirit of working together.\" In light of the uncertainties surrounding funding through NCLB legislation and other possible revenue sources, he asked the Board to consider holding open forums across the District for teachers to provide input on new approaches to meeting the needs of the students. He asked that the administration gain the insight of those who spend their days in the classroom when deciding which new programs and remedial strategies are selected. He stated that the teachers want to be able to balance the use of their skills with the requirements of the new programs so that they can individualize the instructional approach in their classrooms. In addition, Mr. Ledbetter stated that career teachers were interested in developing partnerships with new or inexperienced teachers to implement professional development through experience and demonstration of effective classroom management skills. He reported an \"amazing number'' of complaints received during his first four months on the job regarding the lack of assistance from building administration when disciplinary actions are required. He stated that teachers are reporting kids \"out of control\" and that more emphasis seems to be placed on the due process rights of the students instead of support for the teachers who are being challenged to provide an educational environment that is conducive to learning. IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Remarks from Board Members Dr. Mitchell thanked Mr. Ledbetter for his comments and stated that she was very pleased that the CT A was interested in developing a partnership to aid in the training of new teachers. She stated interest in having the Superintendent and administration begin immediately to work with the CTA leadership to develop the necessary programs. REGULAR BOARD MEETING February 26, 2004 Page 5 Dr. Mitchell also noted the \"embarrassingly low\" number of parents who participate in the District's parent involvement workshops. She encouraged parents to become more involved in the programs that are developed and designed to assist them in their child's educational experiences. Ms. Strickland also thanked Mr. Ledbetter for his comments. She reported that she had attended the open house at Metropolitan Career and Technical Center and was pleased with the manicure she received from one of the cosmetology students. She thanked Mr. Peterson for inviting her to observe at Metro. Mr. Kurrus thanked Mr. Ledbetter for his comments and stated the importance of realizing that \"we are all in this together.\" Mr. Rose mentioned a radio broadcast that aired earlier in the week regarding the percentage of children in Arkansas who suffer from hunger. The free and reduced lunch programs through the federal government impact the lives of Arkansas' public school children. He asked the audience to think about hunger issues, and to support the Arkansas Food Bank, the Rice Depot, and other programs which provide food for those who do not have as much as they need every day. Dr. Daugherty discussed his concerns regarding the stress of day to day living that affect the well being of teachers and other District employees. He encouraged the administration to look at ways to implement stress reduction strategies for employees and to investigate ways to encourage employees to take advantage of programs that are offered. B. Student Assignment Report Mr. Babbs reported that the Student Registration Office was on target for the mailing of approximately 25,000 letters notifying students and parents of their school assignments and choice options. They will be mailed on March 5. He noted that school choice applications are being accepted and processed and that letters notifying them of their status will be sent as soon as the availability of seats is known. He noted that he is on standby, waiting for the Board to determine the make-up of the committee that will work to develop student assignment plans for the 2005-06 school year and beyond. REGULAR BOARD MEETING February 26, 2004 Page 6 C. Budget Update Dr. Stewart reminded the Board of his discussion at the February agenda meeting, whereby he noted an error in the calculation of state funding in the amount of $7.7 million. As he surmised at the time of the agenda meeting, that money should have been calculated into the projections for the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special School Districts, and the error has now been corrected. He reported that preliminary estimates, based on last year's enrollment levels would provide approximately $25 million, but reminded the Board that the bottom line changes each time one of the factors used to calculate state aid is revised or adjusted. He noted that the recent legislature had provided formulas that were intended to provide more resources to the schools and districts with lower socio-economic factors which should result in the LRSD receiving additional funding for schools with 90% or greater free/reduced lunch status. D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects Mr. Goodman reported that he had been visiting schools where construction and renovation projects were recently completed to assess some of the buildings where there are problems. He said that he was working with the contractors building-by-building to get the problems corrected. He reported that Dr. Holmes had visited the Mann building, and that he was pleased with the overall project, but noted that there were still a few areas where corrections and adjustments needed to be made. E. Internal Auditors Report Mr. Becker was present and noted that his report was printed in the agenda. No additional information was provided. F. Technology Update Ms. Neal was asked by the Board to present a brief technology demonstration. She invited Barbara Kennedy and Teresa Knapp from Dodd Elementary School to bring some of their students and show the Board how technology has been incorporated and integrated into the daily classroom curriculum. Students Autumn Brown and Tara Gordon displayed some of the projects completed by the students and presented their perspective of learning through computers. REGULAR BOARD MEETING February 26, 2004 Page 7 The Board took a brief recess at 7:05 p.m. and returned at 7:15 p.m. V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS A. Minutes Minutes from the regular meeting of the Board of Directors held on January 22, 2004, and from a special meeting held on February 12, 2004, were presented for review and approval. There were no corrections noted and the minutes were approved. B. Extension of PN Agreement On January 27, 2004, the Classroom Teachers Association and the LRSD reached an agreement to extend the current contracts for all classifications of employees through March 7, 2004, so that the negotiations process can continue. Mr. Ledbetter signed for the union, and Beverly Williams, Human Resources Director, signed for the District. The Board was asked to endorse the agreement. Dr. Mitchell moved to approve the agreement\nMr. Berkley seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. C. Personnel Changes Routine personnel changes were printed in the Board's agenda. Dr. Holmes recommended approval. Mr. Berkley made the motion to approve personnel items as presented and Ms. Strickland seconded the motion. Dr. Mitchell had a question regarding one of the individuals listed as a certified new-hire and offered an amended motion to approve all of the items listed in the recommendation with the exception of certified appointments. Dr. Daugherty seconded the amended motion and it carried unanimously. The original motion as amended, was approved unanimously. The certified employee recommendations will be reviewed and presented for approval at the next meeting. VI. SCHOOL SERVICES A. Naming of Facilities: Mann Magnet Middle School The faculty, staff, parents and students of Mann Magnet middle School submitted a request to name the school auditorium in honor of Mr. James L. Matthis. Mr. Matthis was a thirty-six year employee of the LRSD, beginning his career as a vocational coordinator at Mann High School. At the time of his retirement, he was an assistant principal at Mann Magnet Middle School. REGULAR BOARD MEETING February 26, 2004 Page 8 The recommendation to name the auditorium in Mr. Matthis' honor was prepared according to Board policy FF: Naming of Facilities and was presented to the Board by Mr. Jim Fullerton, Mann principal. Mrs. Estelle Matthis was present and expressed her appreciation to the Board for acting in such a timely and considerate manner. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to approve the recommendation as presented by the faculty, staff and students of Mann Magnet Middle School. Ms. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. B. Resolution to 4G: Attendance Rubric Sadie Mitchell and Lloyd Sain presented a proposal to resolve the issue of Domain 4, Item 4G: Attendance and Punctuality of the new Professional Teachers' Appraisal System. The administration and the Classroom Teachers' Association have reviewed the recommendations and provided the Board with a compromise developed through on-going discussions. After a brief discussion, it was noted that no action, or a \"no\" vote on the compromise agreement would be an endorsement of the rubric as the Board previously approved it in the summer of 2003. Ms. Strickland moved to approve the recommended revisions to the PTAS attendance and punctuality rubric, and Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion. Mr. Rose requested a roll call vote: Dr. Daugherty, Dr. Mitchell and Ms. Strickland voted to approve the motion\nMr. Rose, Mr. Berkley, and Mr. Kurrus voted no. The vote was a tie, and the motion failed. C. School Improvement Report: An Overview of the Schools and School Improvement Progress, Grants, and Initiatives Ms. Mitchell and Mr. Sain provided a written summary report at the request of the Board. Ms. Mitchell reviewed the report briefly, and offered to respond to any questions the Board might have regarding the report or the status of schools on school improvement. VII. BUSINESS SERVICES A. Information: Land Sale - Forest Heights Middle School Mangan Properties made an offer to purchase land immediately west of Forest Heights Middle School for the sum of $200,000. This property had been declared as surplus in March of 1983, and was appraised in the amount of $188,000 in December of 2003. Mr. Berkley made a motion to approve the sale of surplus property\nDr. Daugherty seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING February 26, 2004 Page9 B. Lease Agreement: Miles Memorial Church The Miles Memorial CME Church requested use of the parking lot at the Procurement Office at 1800 East Sixth Street. Their use of the lot would be during LRSD non-work hours, and would allow sufficient parking for the church on Sunday and after hours while their parking lot is under construction. The lease is for one-year, at one dollar per month, March 2004 through February 2005. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to approve the lease agreement, Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. C. Resolution: Refinance / Consolidation of Outstanding Debt Mr. Paradis presented a request for the Board to authorize the refinance and consolidation of the District's outstanding lease-purchase and post-dated warrant debt. Approval of the resolution would result in a saving of approximately $52,000. Mr. Berkley moved to approve the resolution\nDr. Mitchell seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. D. Construction Budget Revision / Mitchell and Rightsell Elementary Schools Dr. Holmes recommended the Board's approval of a request to increase the budgeted amounts for construction and renovation at Mitchell and Rightsell Elementary Schools. Based on estimates of the needed repairs, an additional $1.54 million is needed for Mitchell, and $1.78 million is needed for Rightsell. Mr. Kurrus moved to approve the Superintendent's request, and Mr. Berkley seconded the motion. It carried unanimously. E. Donations of Property The Board was asked to approve the acceptance of recent donations to schools and Departments within the District. The donations are listed in the following chart. Derrick Rainey, student ex-officio representative, read the items listed in the Board's agenda. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to accept the donated items\nMs. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING February 26, 2004 Page 10 SCHOOUDEPARTMENT ITEM DONOR Bale Elementary School VCR / DVD player and nine Magna Brian Minchew, parent of Bale Student Doodle Deluxe Boards to the special education self-contained dassroom Central high School $300.00 Cash to the women's Rush Harding, Ill basketball team $500.00 Cash to the women's Ronald Crawford basketball team J. A. Fair Magnet High Four sections of 6' concrete pipe, Woody Rigdon of Hanson Pipe \u0026amp; School valued at $200.00 for outdoor Products, Inc. dassroom Delivery Services, valued at $150.00 for Gary Gaul I DUIT Construction delivery of pipe for use in outdoor Company dassroom 200 tons of rock fines, valued at Haskell Dickinson / Granite Mountain $500.00 for outdoor dassroom Quarries M. L. King Magnet Hewlett-Packard copier, valued at $130 M. L. King PTA Elementary School for Health Services Dept. $1,500 cash for student incentives and Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. Duane Jackson and Ms. classroom materials for Pre-K and Genevieve Jackson Kinderaarten curriculum Metropolitan Career and Paints, primers, sealers, and other Perry Gravitt / Hackman Paint \u0026amp; Supply Tech Center materials to the Paint \u0026amp; Body Shop Company valued at $21,675.30 Pulaski Heights Middle $10,000 cash: $4,000 for the library, Winthrop \u0026amp; Lisenne Rockefeller School $1,000 for middle level English and science books, foreign language materials and special education department. $500.00 each for Math Counts and Quiz Bowl Woodruff Elementary School supplies and uniforms valued at Dassault Falcon Jet Corp. School $350.00 LRSD Athletic Department 124 metal gym lockers valued at David Ensminger $11,560.00, installed at Forest Heights Middle School, and 14 large mirrors, valued at $3,500 to be placed in the weight room at Quigley Stadium Mahlon Marlin Professional Educational books valued at $3,500.00 Arkansas Democrat-Gazette Librarv F. Financial Reports The monthly financial summary reports were provided to the Board as part of the printed agenda. Mr. Milhollen was present to review the reports and respond to questions. REGULAR BOARD MEETING February 26, 2004 Page 11 VIII. CLOSING REMARKS Dr. Holmes announced the annual Clementine Mathis Rouse scholarship banquet, and notified the Board that a table would be provided for Board members who would like to attend. Additional information will be provided as it becomes available. The Board took a brief recess prior to convening for an employee hearing. They returned at 9:25 p.m. IX. HEARING Michael Peterson requested a Board hearing as a result of a salary grievance. He requested that the hearing be open to the public, and was represented by Attorney Robert Scull. Attorney Khyaam Eddings represented the District. Mr. Peterson had previously requested a review of the duties and responsibilities of his position\nit was his belief that he should be paid comparable to a high school principal in his role as vocational administrator at Metropolitan Career \u0026amp; Technical Center. Mrs. Williams, Director of Human Resources, had reviewed Mr. Peterson's background, his salary history, and his position at Metropolitan and had denied the request for a salary adjustment. At the Superintendent's request, Sandy Becker audited Mr. Peterson's salary history and Mr. Becker was present at the hearing to review those findings with the Board. Ms. Williams reviewed personnel file documents, and Carol Green responded to questions regarding the duties and responsibilities of Mr. Peterson at Metropolitan Career and Technical Center. The Board recessed at 10:45 and returned at 11 :00 p.m. Ms. Strickland made a motion to uphold the administration's recommendation to deny Mr. Peterson's request for a salary adjustment. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion, and it carried 5-0-1, with Dr. Mitchell abstaining from the vote. X. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, Mr. Berkley moved to adjourn at 11 :00 p.m. Ms. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. APPROVED: Jc)~ 04 TonyR.Rose, President ~/\u0026gt;e~ JJ ~ R. Micheal DaJKerty, Secreiary RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Little Rock School District (the \"District\") desires to consolidate/refinance various leases/existing debt related to the District's lease/purchase of various items of equipment utilized by the District in its day-to-day operations\nand WHEREAS, the District desires to accomplish this consolidation/refinance by entering into a Master Lease/Purchase Agreement with Banc of America Leasing \u0026amp; Capital, LLC. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Little Rock School District Board of Directors that Don Stewart, as Chief Financial Officer of the District is authorized, on behalf of the District, to enter into, execute, and deliver that certain Master Equipment Lease/Purchase Agreement with Banc of America Leasing \u0026amp; Capital, LLC, related to the District's lease and/or acquisition of certain equipment utilized by the District in its day-to-day operations (the general form of which Agreement is attached to this Resolution). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands as the Little Rock School District Board of Directors on this 26th day of February, 2004. Director Katherine Mitchell Michael Daugherty H. Baker Kurrus Larry Berkley Tony Rose Sue H. Strickland Brian Day ___ ABSENT __ _ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING March 11, 2004 RECEIVE MAR 2 9 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special session at 5:30 p.m. on Thursday, March 11, 2004, immediately following the regularly scheduled agenda meeting, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Tony Rose presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Tony Rose Larry Berkley Mike Daugherty Bryan Day Baker Kurrus Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER President Tony Rose called the special meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. All members of the Board were present at roll call. II. PURPOSE OF THE MEETING There was no printed agenda for the special meeting. The meeting was called solely for the purpose of conducting an executive session for a personnel discussion. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING March 11, 2004 Page2 Ill. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Board moved into a closed executive session at 5:35 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Berkley. Mr. Day seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. The Board returned from executive session at 6: 10 p.m. and reported no action was taken in closed session. Mr. Berkley made a motion to authorize the Board's president to negotiate a contract with Ray \u0026amp; Associates for the purpose of conducting a superintendent search. Mr. Kurrus seconded the motion, and it carried 6-0-1, with Dr. Mitchell abstaining. IV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 6:12 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Kurrus, seconded by Mr. Berkley. APPROVED: 3 J,\u0026amp;\n Ot..f LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 25, 2004 The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held its regularly scheduled meeting at 5:30 p.m. on Thursday, March 25, 2004, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Tony Rose presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Tony Rose Larry Berkley Micheal Daugherty Bryan Day Baker Kurrus Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL RECE VED MAY 11 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Mr. Rose called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. Five members of the Board were present at roll call\nMr. Kurrus arrived at 5:45, and Mr. Berkley arrived at 5:55 p.m. In addition, ex officio representatives Tyler Fuller, student at Central High School, and Shannon Smith, teacher from Watson Elementary School, were also present. II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOMING COMMENTS Mr. Rose welcomed the audience and asked Dr. Holmes to proceed with the presentation of recognitions and citations. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 25, 2004 Page2 Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Superintendent's Citations Dr. Holmes introduced Nancy Rousseau, Central High School principal, for an announcement and presentation of citations to members of the Arkansas Repertory Theater and the Arkansas Arts Council. Ms. Rousseau and Kimberly Dade, Central's communications teacher, were accompanied by several students dressed in Renaissance period costume. The students delivered invitations to the Board and to members of the audience to the CHS Renaissance Fair, to be held on Saturday, April 3 at Quigley Stadium. The fair was made possible by a grant from the Arkansas Arts Council and the Repertory Theater. Joy Pennington, Executive Director of the Arts Council, and Leslie Golding and Susan Nichols, representing the Repertory Theater, were presented with certificates of appreciation for their generous contributions to the Central High School drama and arts department. Members of the McClellan Magnet High School Teachers of Tomorrow organization recently attended the Phi Delta Kappa National Future Educators of America conference in Dallas. At this convention the McClellan chapter of TOT won first place in the Scrapbook category. The team members present were LaDonna Mahomes, Stephanie Caster, and Gabriella Hicks. Their sponsor Gladys Godley and TOT Coordinator Wanda Baskins were also present and all received Superintendent's citations in recognition of their achievement. Samuel Meredith, Central High School band director, and the assistant band director Alan Sharlow were presented with certificates in recognition of their recent Division 1 ratings at the Arkansas Region 6 band contests. The CHS symphonic and concert bands received the highest awards possible at this year's competition. It was noted that it had been since 1988 that CHS had received a division 1 rating, and the students and directors were congratulated for their accomplishment. Derrick Raney, senior at Parkview Magnet High School, received a citation in recognition of his selection as the recipient of the 2004 Clementine Mathis Rouse student achievement scholarship in the amount of $1 ,000. The teacher winner of the Rouse Scholarship fund in the amount of $500.00 was Shirley Krannichfeld, first grade teacher at Wilson Elementary School. Ms. Krannichfeld could not be present at the meeting, but will receive a citation from the Superintendent and a plaque from the Rouse family scholarship. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 25, 2004 Page 3 B. Partners In Education Debbie Milam presented new business and school partnerships for the Board's adoption: Baseline Elementary School, represented by Eleanor Cox, in partnership with Southwest Produce Metropolitan Career \u0026amp; Technical Center, represented by Mike Peterson, in partnership with Pulaski Technical College, represented by Larry Lewallen Williams Magnet School, represented by Anne Pattillo, in partnership with AARP, represented by Maria Diaz Dr. Mitchell moved to approve the formation of the partnerships\nDr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. Student Performance The agenda was reordered by consensus to allow the student performance to take place at this point in the agenda. Students from Baseline Elementary School performed for the Board. They were accompanied by Principal Eleanor Cox, and their teacher, Debbie Headley. The students are participating in World Drumming, and will perform a concert with 17 other schools across the District on May 2, at the Arkansas Repertory Theater. C. Remarks from Citizens Bridgette Marshall, parent of a student at McClellan High School, discussed the process she had been through in her efforts to have one of her son's grades changed. She stated that he had been injured in a football game and was not offered provisions to help him make up class work that would have raised his grades. The student is currently enrolled at the Accelerated Learning Center Evening School to make up some of the credits that he missed. It was her assertion that the students were not being treated fairly at McClellan. Dr. George Blevins addressed the Board regarding the superintendents' search and the selection process. He announced a town hall meeting on April 20, sponsored by Concerned Citizens United. The purpose of the meeting is to gain community input into the process of identifying and hiring the next superintendent. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 25, 2004 Page4 D. First Tee Golf \u0026amp; Life Skills Program Tony Hourston, from the First Tee Golf and Life Skills Program, addressed the Board regarding the program and their efforts to reach more children in the community. First Tee teaches responsibility, judgment and sportsmanship. Approximately 3,500 children participate currently, and the registration fee is $25.00 per year. He offered his telephone number for PE Coordinators to contact him in efforts to involve more LRSD students. E. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association Katherine Knight addressed the Board and offered collaboration and cooperation in various areas to improve students' performance in the classroom. Ms. Knight noted that she and the Superintendent, along with other LRSD administrators and state level reading directors, had met with Barbara Kapanis, a consultant for the Reading First Initiative. In addition, Ms. Knight announced that Hazel Louks, a NCLB specialist, was offering a professional development opportunity for teachers who were interested. She stated some concern regarding the supplemental services providers under NCLB, and whether there were any measures of accountability, taking into consideration past performance and success records. Ms. Knight concluded her remarks by thanking the Board and the negotiating teams for the successful negotiations of the contracts. She stated that teachers were excited about the raises, as well as the perfect attendance incentives offered. The union had met to ratify the contract on Monday, and the ratification of the contract was included on the LRSD board agenda of this meeting. IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Remarks from Board Members Mr. Kurrus announced that the baseball diamond at Central High School had been completed, and that he had attended the opening day ceremony. In addition, he thanked Mr. Hourston for the presentation on First Tee. He stated that these programs, as well as other athletic programs offered by the LRSD were good for kids. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 25, 2004 Page 5 Dr. Mitchell announced the Clementine Mathis Rouse scholarship fund, which provides a $1,000 per year renewable scholarship to a LRSD student each year. The scholarship banquet has been scheduled and the audience was invited to purchase tickets to support this worthwhile event. It was noted that over $30,000 had been awarded to LRSD students through this program. In addition, Dr. Mitchell congratulated Marian Woods for her efforts to provide more professional development for our employees. She encouraged parents to get their students ready for the spring testing administrations. In closing, she thanked Dr. Holmes for coming into the LRSD when we needed someone to step up, and she encouraged him to consider applying. Mr. Rose announced that he had visited Watson Elementary School to read on Dr. Seuss' birthday. He was impressed with the cleanliness of the building, and he thanked the custodial staff for their efforts to keep the building and grounds in good condition. Mr. Rose commented on the recent legislative reports and information from the special session. He encouraged the staff and the audience to continue talking to their senators and representatives to encourage them to finish the job they started in the special session. Much more needs to be done to fund the educational programs in Little Rock and across the state. It was agreed by consensus to reorder the agenda to allow the proposal for renaming Mabe/vale Magnet Middle School to take place at this point in the meeting. It will be reported under the section and heading previously designated in the Board's agenda. After a brief recess, the board returned at 7:00 p.m. A motion to suspend the rules to consider business added to the agenda since the date of the agenda session was offered by Mr. Berkley, seconded by Dr. Daugherty, and carried unanimously. The action on all contract related items was taken at this point in the agenda, but will be reported under the section and heading designated in the Board's agenda. B. Student Assignment Report Mr. Babbs reported that student assignment procedures were continuing according to their timetable in preparation for the 2004-05 school year. Assignment letters for the four-year-old classes are to be mailed on April 9, and if additional seats become available, the staff will fill the spaces with students who are currently on a waiting list. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 25, 2004 Page 6 V. C. Budget Update Dr. Stewart was present, but had nothing to report. D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects Mr. Goodman reported on the status of repairs and renovations at Mitchell Academy. The opening of bids will take place on April 7, and the general construction will begin in July or August. The remainder of his report was printed in the Board's agenda. E. Internal Auditors Report Mr. Becker was present and noted that his report was printed in the agenda. No additional information was provided. F. Technology Update Ms. Neal provided a brief summary report as part of the Board's agenda. In addition, she invited Board members to observe technology training that will be taking place in June and July at the UALR technology center. Board members were invited to contact Ms. Neal for additional information. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS A. Minutes Minutes from the regular meeting of the Board of Directors held on February 26, and from a special meeting held on March 11, 2004, were presented for review and approval. There were no corrections noted and the minutes were approved. B. Personnel Changes Routine personnel changes were printed in the Board's agenda. Dr. Holmes recommended approval. Mr. Berkley made the motion to approve the changes as presented. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 25, 2004 Page? C. Ratification of PN Agreement A suspension of the rules was required for the Board to consider ratification of the PN agreement, presented by Beverly Williams, Director of Human Resources. Mr. Berkley moved to suspend the rules, Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. All components of the agreement were finalized on March 12, 2004, and a copy of the tentative agreement was printed in the Board's agenda. The agreement provided 2.875% salary increase for the 2003-04 school year, and a 10% increase for the 2004-05 school year. Mr. Berkley moved to approve the negotiated agreement between the L.R. Classroom Teachers Association and the LRSD Board of Directors. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion, and it carried 6-0-1, with Mr. Rose abstaining from the vote. Mr. Rose indicated that his abstention should not reflect any disapproval of the PN agreement, but that it was offered to eliminate any possible appearance of conflict of interest. Mr. Rose's wife, as a teacher in the LRSD, will receive the compensation and benefits approved by the Board's vote. He asked that the vote be recorded as unanimous, in spite of his abstention. D. Salary Adjustments, 2003-04 School Year The rules were suspended in order to consider action on the salary adjustments and contract agreements for all employee groups not included on the teacher's salary schedule. The motion to suspend the rules was offered by Mr. Kurrus, seconded by Dr. Daugherty, and recorded as unanimous. The recommendation provided the same salary adjustments as that negotiated for teachers. Ms. Strickland moved to approve the recommendation, Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Slip Sheet: Mr. Kurrus offered a motion to suspend the rules to consider an item presented just prior to the Board meeting, and not included in the printed agenda. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. The action would approve an extension of the written agreements for bus drivers, aides, monitors and security officers, from March 25, 2004 until April 26, 2004, at which time it is expected that these groups will conclude their negotiations. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 25, 2004 Page8 Ms. Strickland moved to approve the extension as presented by the CTA and the LRSD negotiating team. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. E. Student Calendar, 2004-05 The proposed student calendar was presented for the Board's review and approval. It was printed in the Board's agenda, but had been added after the agenda session, and therefore required a suspension of the rules. Ms. Strickland moved to suspend the rules, Mr. Berkley seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Mr. Berkley made a motion to approve the calendar as presented. Ms. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. VI. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES A. Carol M. White Physical Education Program Proposal The U. S. Department of Education, Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools, recently published guidelines for the 2004 grant applications under the Carol M. White Physical Education Program. Margo Bushmaier, Mary Paal, and Annette Scogin are developing the application, which requests funding in the amount of $627,000 over a three-year period. The grant would provide a coordinator of elementary physical education, equipment to enable student participation in physical education activities, staff development, and implementation of \"Nifty Nutrition\" educational materials for elementary school students. All students within the LRSD would benefit from receipt of the grant funding. The Board was asked to approve the submission of the grant application. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to approve the submission, Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. VII. SCHOOL SERVICES A. Naming of Facilities: Media Center / Mabelvale Magnet Middle School The faculty, staff, parents and students of Mabelvale Magnet Middle School submitted a request to name the library at MMMS in honor of Mr. Carl Martin. Mr. Martin is a life long resident of Mabelvale, and has served as the school's historian and friend for many years. Mr. Martin and his family were present. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 25, 2004 Page 9 A brief history of Mr. Martin's ninety-three year involvement in the Mabelvale community was printed in the Board's agenda. Ann Blaylock, principal, and Stella Cameron, media specialist, as well as other members of the Mabelvale faculty were present, including Kathy Farley, Martha Flowers, Pam Wallace, and Judge Evans. Ms. Strickland made a motion to approve the naming of the media center at Mabelvale Middle School in honor of Mr. Carl Martin. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. A dedication ceremony will be planned and Board members will be notified once specific information is known. VIII. BUSINESS SERVICES A. Donations of Property The Board was asked to approve the acceptance of recent donations to schools and Departments within the District. The donations are listed in the following chart. Ms. Strickland read the items listed in the Board's agenda, and made a motion to accept the donated items\nDr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. SCHOOUDEPARTMENT ITEM DONOR Booker Arts Magnet GE Refrigerator, valued at $200.00 for Jeffrey Carson Elementarv School the teachers' lounae J. A. Fair Magnet High 156 backboards, valued at $1 ,000 for David Rainey of Smurfit-Stone School use by students in science fair projects Container Corp Forest Park Elementary New iron fencing at east, north and west Forest Park PTA School playground perimeters, valued at $19,850 Stonework surrounding play equipment areas, valued at $17,867 Multipondo play equipment and installation, v3lued at $2,798.35 Gibbs Magnet Elementary $2,500 to be applied toward the Susan M. Wixon School installation of a sorinkler svstem Jefferson Elementary Six DVD players, 1 DVDNCR combo Jefferson PT A School player, valued at $775.00 Parkview Arts / Science Four iMac computers with separate Patrick R. Carrington Magnet School components, color printers, and miscellaneous computer supplies to the Journalism Department, valued at $3,035. Rightsell Academy 15 Dell P2//300 computers w/separate Acxiom Corporation components, valued at approximately $1 ,000. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 25, 2004 Page 10 IX. B. Annual Audit/ Financial Report Mark Milhollen introduced Mr. Don Smith, from Thomas \u0026amp; Thomas, CPA, Inc. A copy of the annual audit report had been presented to the Board under separate cover. Mr. Smith made a brief summary report and responded to questions. Under Arkansas law, the Board is required to approve the annual audit prior to submission to the state department of finance. Mr. Berkley made a motion to approve the audit\nDr. Daugherty seconded the motion, and it was unanimously approved. Mr. Milhollen reviewed the regular monthly audit reports. There were no questions, and the Board accepted the report. C. Financial Reports The monthly financial summary reports were provided to the Board as part of the printed agenda. Mr. Milhollen was present to review the reports and respond to questions. CLOSING REMARKS The Superintendent reviewed upcoming events printed in the District's calendar, including a reminder of the March literacy exams, and dates for distribution of report cards in early April. X. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, Mr. Berkley moved to adjourn at 7:55 p.m. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. APPROVED: LJ-~l-04 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDEKIT March 26, 2004 Ann Marshall, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Marshall: RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2004 OFFICE OF DESElIBEGATICN MOMITORING I am enclosing minutes of the LRSD Board of Directors meetings held on January 22, February 12, February 26, and March 11, 2004. Please let me know if you have any questions, or if I can provide additional information. Enclosures Sincerely, Beverly J. Griffin Executive Assistant to the Superintendent 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501) 447-1002 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING April 8, 2004 The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special session at 6:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 8, 2004, immediately following the regularly scheduled agenda meeting, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Tony Rose presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Tony Rose Larry Berkley Mike Daugherty Bryan Day Baker Kurrus Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes Susan Whitson, Court Reporter I. CALL TO ORDER RE E ED MAY 11 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING President Tony Rose called the special meeting to order at 6:08 p.m. All members of the Board were present at roll call. II. PURPOSE OF THE MEETING The meeting was called for the purpose of conducting an employee hearing. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING April 8, 2004 Page2 Ill. EMPLOYEE HEARING: Employee Kenneth Moore, who was represented by Attorney Jack Kearney, requested the hearing after being notified that he was being recommended for termination. Mr. Moore requested that the hearing be open to the public. Attorney Chris Heller represented the District. Court Reporter Susan Whitson, was present, and a full copy of the hearing transcript will be made a part of these minutes when that document becomes available. A letter to Mr. Moore recommending termination of employment was mailed on November 6, 2003. He had been placed on administrative leave, effective August 22, 2003. The letter detailed twelve specific acts of conduct considered to be insubordinate and in open conflict with the principal of Hall High School, and other unprofessional actions which were detrimental to the overall environment at Hall High School. Mr. Moore had been on paid administrative leave since August 22, 2003. Mr. Heller called witnesses for the District, including Detective Kevin Simpson of the L.R. Police Department, Tandy Hunjan, special education teacher at Hall High School, Pat Taylor Shelton, guidance secretary at Hall High School, Marshall Slayden, curriculum coordinator at Hall High, Beverly Williams, Director of Human Resources, and Vernon Smith, Jr., Principal at Hall High School. Mr. Kearney called Mr. Moore as a witness, and two parents and a former Hall High School student stood in the audience in support of Mr. Moore. They were not asked to take the stand as witnesses. The Board reviewed the documents presented by Attorney Heller, and reviewed specific instances of disparaging and derogatory remarks made by Mr. Moore directed at the Principal Smith. In addition, Mr. Moore had reported a threat of violence to the LR Police Department, and his written statement was included as part of the documentation. Mr. Moore indicated in his report that he took the threat to be of a serious and reportable nature\nas a result, the individual was charged with terroristic threatening. When Mr. Moore was called as a witness in the case in the Municipal Court of Pulaski County, he changed his story and indicated that she might have been just \"blowing off steam,\" and that he didn't think she would really have acted on her threats. The Board withdrew to deliberate at 11 :25 p.m. They returned to the board room at 11 :40 p.m. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING April 8, 2004 Page 3 Mr. Berkley made a motion stipulating that the District had proven evidence presented as listed below: 1. That Mr. Moore had disparaged and insulted the Principal and other LRSD administrators in a conversation at Hall High School with special education teacher Tandy Hunjan on August 21, 2003\nThat he had made insulting, derogatory and racially disparaging comments about the Principal to other staff members at Hall High School\nThat he refused to leave the Principal's office on August 12, 2003 after being directed to do so by the Principal\nThat he attempted to learn the Principal's social security number from a clerical staff member at Hall High School\nand That he initially refused to provide a statement about events witnessed when an individual disrupted the freshman orientation at Hall High School. 2. That Mr. Moore had engaged in other unprofessional actions which were detrimental to Hall High School as follows: He told LRSD administrators and LR Police officers that he had received a credible threat from a former Hall High School teacher. His statement resulted in the termination recommendation and prosecution of the teacher. Mr. Moore provided testimony at the trial\nhowever, he stated in court that he did not consider the threat to be credible. His testimony was inconsistent with statements previously given to and relied upon by the LRSD, the LR Police Department and the Pulaski County Prosecutors Office. Mr. Moore presented false and misleading information to the Director of Human Resources stating that he had been cleared of allegations that he engaged in abusive behavior towards a student, when in fact the charges had not been cleared. Mr. Moore improperly gained access to the confidential files of the Arkansas Department of Human Services and obtained information regarding an LRSD student. The motion was seconded by Mr. Day, and carried unanimously. Mr. Berkley made a motion to uphold the recommendation to terminate Mr. Kenneth Moore based on the above finding of facts. Mr. Kurrus seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING April 8, 2004 Page4 IV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 11 :42 p.m. on a motion by Dr. Mitchell, seconded by Ms. Strickland. APPROVED: L.J -~~ - 0 c..{ y, Secretary LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 22, 2004 The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held its regularly scheduled meeting at 5:30 p.m. on Thursday, April 22, 2004, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Tony Rose presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Tony Rose Larry Berkley Micheal Daugherty Bryan Day Baker Kurrus Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL Mr. Rose called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. Six members of the Board were present at roll call\nMs. Strickland arrived at 5:50 p.m. In addition, ex officio representatives Lenora Nunnley, student at J.A. Fair High School, and Darnell Bell, teacher at Western Hills Elementary School, were also present. II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOMING COMMENTS Mr. Rose welcomed the audience and asked Dr. Holmes to proceed with the presentation of recognitions and citations. REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 22, 2004 Page2 Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Superintendent's Citations Dr. Holmes presented a citation to Caroline Allen, junior at Central High School. Caroline is the goalkeeper for the Lady Tigers soccer team, and was recently named the Gatorade Arkansas High School Girls Soccer Player of the Year. A superintendent's citation was presented to Jeffery Trimble, Jr. in recognition of his recently receiving the Youth Achievement Award from the Arkansas Martin Luther King Jr. Commission. Jeffery attends Mann Magnet Middle School. Ryan Spencer Higgins was recognized for receiving the 2004 John W. Harris Leadership Award from the National Beta Club. Only 50 Junior Beta Club members nationwide were selected to receive this award. Ryan is an eighth grader at Dunbar Magnet Middle School. The Parkview Magnet School Women's Basketball Team received citations for winning the state 5-A championship. Coaches Lahoma Howard and Kiffany Davis were presented with citations. It was noted that this was the first time the Parkview Women's team had won a state championship. Coach Howard was recognized for being selected as the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette Coach of the Year, and junior player Crystal Boyd was named Miss Basketball of the Year for 2004. Coaches William Hardiman and John Kelley were recognized , along with representative members of the Parkview men's indoor track team. This team won the state 5-A championship in indoor track - - a first for a team from the Little Rock School District. The state spelling bee champion, Anne Ye, was recognized for winning this competition for the second year in a row. Anne is an 8th grader from Dunbar Magnet Middle School. She will represent Arkansas at the National Spelling Bee in Washington D.C. in June. Members of the Mathcounts State championship team, coached by Trela Cook, received certificates of recognition from the Superintendent. Team members were Sho Mamiya and Miles McCullough, from Pulaski Heights Middle School, and Anne Ye and Peter Liu from Dunbar Magnet Middle School. These students will travel to Washington, DC for the national Mathcounts competition in May. REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 22, 2004 Page 3 Certificates were presented to Susan Garner, Central High School yearbook advisor and journalism teacher, and members of the 2003 Central yearbook staff. Jessica Rutledge, this year's editor, was present to accept the citations. Taylor Publishing Company selected the 2003 Central Yearbook as the overall winner nationwide in the Theme and Design category. Representatives of Rotary Club 99, Karen Fetzer and Ron Boyeskie, were present to receive certificates of appreciation for a Rotary project in which every third grade student received a dictionary, and storybooks were placed in elementary school libraries. The project is coordinated through the ViPS office staff and Debbie Milam, who serves as the Rotary Club 99 Literacy Chair. Quiz Bowl championship teams were introduced and awarded certificates of recognition by Diane Rynders, LRSD Gifted \u0026amp; Talented Coordinator. Elementary Division I champions, from Jefferson Elementary School, were Andrew Manley, Joel Temple, Jane Bashaw, Avery Zorn, Sid Perry, April Terry, Madison Smith, Brendon Holmes, and Trey Finney. Their coach, Karin McAtee, and their principal, Roberta Mannon, were also present. The Elementary Division II champions were from Geyer Springs Elementary School. T earn members included Lakacia Lloyd, Chesery Lowe, Kristin Bell, Jenny Howell, Sarah Kline, Shane Burris, Damion Donovan, and Christopher Rodgers. Their coach Barbara Hodges, and their principal Donna Hall, were also present. The Middle School Division team was from Mann Magnet Middle School. Team members included Silas Altheimer, Cyrus Bahrassa, Dillon Hupp, Melissa Wilcox, and Jillian Peterson. Their coaches Bonnie Bumpers and Jason Finney were also recognized . The Mann team went on to win first place in the SA Junior High Division at the statewide competition. The state championship team included Silas Altheimer, Cyrus Bahrassa, Aaron Campbell, Dillon Hupp, Will Pierce and Dalton Wise. Lawrence Watts from Central High School was named Most Valuable Player from all of the 5-A high school teams in the state at the Governor's Quiz Bowl. His Coach, Lenora Murray, was present as well. Certificates of appreciation were awarded to Bill Gatewood and Georganne Cisco from the Old State House Museum for donation of the facility and volunteer services for the Quiz Bowl finals. Scott Morgan and Beth Collins were awarded certificates for hosting the preliminary competitions at Western Hills Elementary School. REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 22, 2004 Page4 Students from Metropolitan Career \u0026amp; Technical Center recently participated in the Arkansas Skills USA competition in Hot Springs. Mike Peterson introduced the students and their instructors, and each of them was given a certificate of recognition for their achievement. The instructors and students are listed: Instructor/ Course Student Award Darrell Berry / Micah Davidson Gold - Photooraohv Advertising Design Erin Richey Bronze - Photography State Pin Desion Award Carl Grummer I Jeff Merkt Bronze - Technical Drafting Architectural Computer-Aided Drafting \u0026amp; Design Jordan Brown State \u0026amp; National Skills USA Courtesy Coros Linda Soderling / Cosmetology Katrina Brown Silver - Hair stvlino Shammeka Starks Silver - Nails Chealse McClendon Silver - Nails Jakita Bass Bronze - Nails LaTonva Rauls Bronze - Model Chef Woody Powell / DeAndrea Gooden Gold - Commercial Bakina Culinary Arts A'Nvseian Lane Silver - Commercial Bakina Steve Averil/ Doug Petz Gold - Diesel Truck Diesel Technology Jonathan Motl Silver - Diesel Truck Scottie Elmore Bronze - Diesel Truck Robert Belk Gold - Diesel Farm Justin Wilson Silver - Diesel Farm Jason Bredlow Bronze - Diesel Farm James Birtcher / Joshua Stramiello Gold - Extemporaneous Speaking Law Enforcement Carla Stallings/ Brian Kelly Gold - Job Interview Medical Professions Mitchell Perry / Robin Dixon Bronze - Graphic Communications Printing Technology Jerald White/ Paul Wilson Bronze - Secondarv Weldina Welding Toby Lutman, Kris Doan, Bronze - Quiz Bowl Jesse Delling, Aaron Kubli, Wilson Paul In addition, Carl Grummer I Architectural Computer-Aided Drafting \u0026amp; Design Instructor at Metropolitan received the Skills USA Honorary Lifetime Membership Award for Outstanding Service to Arkansas Skills USA. The final Superintendent's citations were given to the ex officio representatives to the Board for the Month of April: Darnell Bell, teacher at Western Hills Elementary School, and Lenora Nunnley, student at J. A. Fair Magnet High School. B. Remarks from Citizens Vanessa Hampton, the Student Council Sponsor at Parkview Magnet High, introduced Derrick Rainey, Reginald Cleaver and Carlton Wamble. These students participated in the recent statewide Student Council conference held at Parkview. REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 22, 2004 Page 5 Thirty schools from around the state participated in the conference, and the student council representatives were present to thank the Board and the Superintendent for their contributions to the success of the conference. City Year sponsored a community service activity, the Superintendent addressed the group at the opening event, and Board Member Bryan Day was recognized for his contributions to the conference through the City of Little Rock Parks and Recreation Department. Anne Williams, fourth grade teacher at Carver Magnet Elementary School, addressed the Board regarding the attendance component of the PTAS evaluation instrument. She stated that although she has accumulated 62 days of sick leave, she was given a poor evaluation, below basic, for missing a few days of school during a recent illness. She and other teachers want the Board to reconsider this component of the evaluation process and to work with the union to come up with a method of evaluation that does not penalize a teacher for being ill or for having to use sick time when another family member is ill. C. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association Grainger Ledbetter thanked the negotiations team for the cooperative process in coming to agreement for all the various employee groups. He stated that they were almost complete and that teachers were especially encouraged by the $3,000 stipend that would be available to teachers who complete the National Board Certification process. IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Remarks from Board Members - Mr. Rose made comments regarding the LISA Academy and the recent announcement that the school would be located in the far western part of the city. He stated that the State Board of Education should reconsider their approval of this charter school because taking it out of the inner city will drastically change the dynamics of the school and the resulting enrollment will have a negative impact on the LRSD enrollment. He stated that he personally had received three recruiting letters from LISA, and that he is appalled that state funds will be taken from the public schools to fund this private academy. REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 22, 2004 Page6 Mr. Kurrus continued on the topic of LISA Academy, stating that an estimated $600,000 will be taken from the LRSD to fund this private school for the approximately 107 students who have enrolled thus far from our District's boundaries. He thanked the two State Board of Education members who voted against LISA, and he stated the ADE might want to reconsider their approval after seeing how they have changed the basic plans from application to implementation. B. Student Assignment Report Mr. Babbs did not have a formal report, but did provide the list of names recommended to serve on the Student Assignment Committee. He will contact all of these individuals and coordinate a meeting to begin the process of reviewing the current attendance zones and school assignment policies and procedures. Dr. Daugherty has been asked to co-chair as the Board's representative on the committee. C. Budget Update Dr. Stewart was present, but had nothing to report. D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects Mr. Eaton reviewed the written report provided by Mr. Goodman and printed in the Board's agenda. E. Internal Auditors Report Mr. Becker was present and noted that his report was printed in the agenda. He reported that the recent United Way Day of Caring had resulted in community service projects at eight of our schools. F. Technology Update Ms. Neal highlighted topics printed in the report provided for the agenda. The Technology Center is scheduled to open in June, and Board members were invited to tour at their convenience. Two professional development days are scheduled next week, and staff will be involved in computer training on those days, teachers as well as administrators and other staff. REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 22, 2004 Page 7 G. OCR Compliance Review Karen Broadnax, ESL SupeNisor, provided a written report for the Board's review and approval. The findings of the OCR review and investigation were printed in the agenda, and evidence was included indicating that the District had satisfactorily fulfilled the terms of the Commitment to Resolve. Mr. Day made a motion to accept the report as presented. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS A. Minutes Minutes from the regular meeting of the Board of Directors held on March 25, and from a special meeting held on April 8, 2004, were presented for review and approval. There were no corrections noted and the minutes were approved as submitted. B. Personnel Changes Routine personnel changes were printed in the Board's agenda. Dr. Holmes recommended approval. Mr. Kurrus made the motion to approve the changes\nMr. Berkley seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. VI. SCHOOL SERVICES A. Summer Educational Programs Dennis Glasgow reviewed a proposal for providing summer enrichment programs on a pilot basis to students who need reinforcement of basic skills, and for students who need credit recovery for failing courses in secondary school. The District is challenged to find a variety of educational opportunities for student enrichment. Mr. Glasgow reviewed the RFP and explained the recent state legislation that requires the District to offer free credit recovery courses for those students who are in the free and reduced lunch socio-economic status. Since budgetary requirements were still unknown, Mr. Day made a motion to table. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 22, 2004 Page8 VII. BUSINESS SERVICES A. Regulation: GBEA-R - Conflict of Interest An explanation of the requirements for compliance with Arkansas statute 6-24- 101, Act 1599 of 2001, was provided in the Board's agenda. Mr. Paradis presented the regulations to implement our compliance. No vote was required. B. Request for Dedication of Right of Way: Parkview Magnet High School Mr. Eaton provided a request to dedicate to the City of Little Rock a right-of-way easement on 26th Street near Parkview High School to fulfill the requirement of a conditional use permit. This easement is on the east side of the campus and will not detract in any way from the operations of the school. Street and drainage improvements will be made in this area, and will benefit access and traffic around the school property. Mr. Day moved to approve the right of way easement\nMr. Berkley seconded the motion. It carried unanimously. C. Donations of Property The Board was asked to approve the acceptance of recent donations to schools and Departments within the District. The donations are listed in the following chart. Student ex officio, Lenora Nunnley, read the items listed in the Board's agenda. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to accept the donated items\nMs. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. SCHOOUDEPARTMENT ITEM DONOR Central High School $848.00 for bus expenses for 9t \" grade Leslie Golden and Susan Nichols students to attend a production of Arkansas Repertory Theatre Romeo \u0026amp; Juliet at the Repertory Theatre The novel, \"Bleachers,\" by author John Kevin Crass of the Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Grisham to each member of the Tiger Clark Law Firm Football Team. Total value of the donation, $1 ,603.49 Cloverdale Magnet Middle Burger coupons, valued at McDonalds, RCN Enterprises, Inc. School approximately $500.00 to be used as student incentives A framed oil painting of the school, Mr. Carey Hilburn valued at approximately $350.00, to be hung in the front office REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 22, 2004 Page 9 DONATIONS OF PROPERTY (continued) SCHOOUDEPARTMENT ITEM DONOR Mabelvale Magnet Middle Seven computer tables and a portable Fidelity Information Services, Inc. School AV computer station for the technology through Becky Bowling center of the new library. Total value approximately $1,400. LRSD Assorted office furniture and a Canon Mark Ross, Ross \u0026amp; Ross, PA typewriter, valued at approximately $100. Two Mark 100 AF Metal/Weapon Little Rock National Airport Detection Systems with an extra control module, valued at approximately $7,500. D. Financial Report The monthly financial summary reports were provided to the Board as part of the printed agenda. Dr. Stewart was present to review the reports and respond to questions. VIII. CLOSING REMARKS The Superintendent briefly reviewed upcoming events as printed in the District's calendar. IX. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. APPROVED: 5-JO . 0 t.f R. Micheal Dau LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING May 13, 2004 The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special session at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, May 13, 2004, immediately preceding the regularly scheduled agenda meeting, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Tony Rose presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Tony Rose Mike Daugherty Bryan Day Baker Kurrus Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: Larry Berkley ALSO PRESENT: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER President Tony Rose called the special meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. Six members of the Board were present at roll call\nMr. Berkley was absent. In addition, ex officio representatives were also present: Susan Bonominio, teacher at Williams Magnet School, and Keenan Williams, student at Hall High School. II. PURPOSE OF THE MEETING The meeting was called for the purpose of reviewing Summer Educational Program recommendations and to authorize the budget required to conduct those programs. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING May 13, 2004 Page2 SUMMER EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS: Dennis Glasgow reviewed the recommendations and provided the Board with a brief background of the process used to develop the summer enrichment and credit recovery summer school programs. This item had been presented previously in the April Board meeting, however action was tabled at that time pending additional budget information. Mr. Day made a motion to approve the recommended budget for the proposed summer programs. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. IV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 5:40 p.m. APPROVED: 'J-\n)O. O'f LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT May 10, 2004 Ann Marshall, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Marshall: RECEIVED MAY 11 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING I am enclosing minutes of the LRSD Board of Directors meetings held on March 25 and April 8, 2004. Please let me know if you have any questions, or if I can provide additional information. Enclosures Sincerely, ~ Beverly J. Griffin Executive Assistant to the Superintendent 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501) 447-1002 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING May 19, 2004 RECEIVED JUL 1 3 200\nDESE OFFICE OF GREGATIDN f,,ONfTORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special session at 5:30 p.m. on Wednesday, May 19, 2004, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Tony Rose presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Tony Rose Larry Berkley Bryan Day Baker Kurrus Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: Mike Daugherty ALSO PRESENT: Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER President Tony Rose called the special meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. Six members of the Board were present at roll call\nDr. Daugherty was absent. II. PURPOSE OF THE MEETING The meeting was called for the purpose of considering the consultant's recommendations for the position of superintendent of schools EXECUTIVE SESSION Mr. Berkley made a motion to convene an executive session for the purpose of discussing personnel matters. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion, and it carried 6-0. The Board returned from executive session at 8:45 p.m. and reported that no action was taken. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING May 19, 2004 Page2 IV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. APPROVED:~ .l l(  Oc./ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 20, 2004 RECEIVED JUL 1 ,'.\u0026gt; 2004 DESEGREG1:rtif OF f,,ONITORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held its monthly meeting at 5:30 p.m. on Thursday, May 20, 2004, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. The meeting date was rescheduled from May 27 to accommodate the annual high school graduation ceremonies. President Tony Rose presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Tony Rose Larry Berkley Micheal Daugherty Bryan Day Baker Kurrus Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL Mr. Rose called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. Six members of the Board were present at roll call\nDr. Daugherty arrived at 6:55 p.m. In addition, ex officio representatives Susan Bonominio, teacher at Williams Magnet Elementary School, and Keenan Williams, student at Hall High School, were also present. 11. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOMING COMMENTS Mr. Rose welcomed the audience and asked Dr. Holmes to proceed with the presentation of recognitions and citations. REGULAR BOARD MEETING May20,2004 Page2 Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Superintendent's Citations Dr. Holmes announced that Yang Dai had been selected as a Presidential Scholar, one of 141 selected this year nationwide. She will be recognized with the other selected students June 19 - 22 in Washington. DC. Yang could not be present, but the citation presentation included recognition of many achievements\nYang earned perfect scores on the ACE and the SAT, and has chosen to graduate early to attend Princeton in the fall of 2004. Students at Cloverdale Magnet Middle School were recognized for successful participation in the Economics Fair at Henderson State University. Their teacher, Amy Walker, was present and introduced the winning students, Theo Pippins, Aisha McDonald, and Mahogany McClure. Amanda Verma, a junior at Central High School, was recognized for her participation in the National Junior Science and Humanities Symposium in Baltimore, MD. Amanda won first place in the medicine and health category, for research done at UAMS under the direction of Dr. Thomas Kelly. Amanda received a $16,000 scholarship and a trip to London in June to participate in the International Youth Science Forum. Kristian Henderson was selected to receive a $25,000 scholarship in the annual Discover Card Tribute Award Scholarship Program. The scholarship is provided in coordination with the American Association of School Administrators, and Kristian, a junior at Central High School, was selected as one of nine national winners. She will attend the awards ceremony in Riverwoods, Illinois this summer. Kris Zumwalt, a seventh grade student at Cloverdale Magnet Middle School, won first place in the Sybil Nash Abrams Memorial Student Poetry Contest. The award included a cash award and an invitation to attend the Poets' Roundtable of Arkansas Spring Workshop in Springdale this summer. Members of the Geyer Springs Neighborhood Association attended the meeting in recognition of the newly formed BFI Children of Promise Scholarship Foundation. Donna Hall, principal of Geyer Springs Elementary School, Willie Hinton, Ward 2 Alderman, and Dale Stevener, General Manager of BFI were present. Joan Adcock, member-at-large of the City of Little Rock Board of Directors, read the poem Children of Promise, written by Joa Stafford-Humphrey. REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 20, 2004 Page 3 The Children of Promise fund will provide scholarships for Geyer Springs students who maintain good grades and citizenship throughout their middle and high school years. Their achievements will be tracked, and the scholarship funds will be made available when they enter post-secondary educational programs. Terese Klaus, a sixth grade social studies and science teacher at Henderson Magnet Middle School, was recently named the Wal-Mart Teacher of the Year by the Bowman Road Sam's Club store. Ms. Klaus is a first year teacher, and was nominated by her principal, Marvin Burton. Jo Evelyn Elston, Director of Pupil Services, introduced members of her staff and student representatives of participating Peer Helpers groups. As a community service project, students raised $5,520, which was donated to The Arkansas Rice Depot. Students from Carver Magnet Elementary School raised over $1 ,000.00 and students from Booker Magnet Elementary School raised over $900.00. School Counselors Tracy Thompson, Vivian Johnson and Tammy Ringler were present as well. The District's Director of Human Resources, Beverly Williams, was recognized for her recent election to a three-year term on the Alumni Association Board of Hendrix College in Conway. Bryan Day, Zone 3 representative to the Board, was recognized for becoming certified as an Honor Board Member by the Arkansas School Boards Association. The certification indicates completion of 15 hours of mandatory and voluntary school board member training. Several employees were recognized on their recent retirement from the LRSD: Edith Blythe, Ollie Bradford, Mary Jane Cheatham, Larry Cobbs, Barbara Folsom, Sarah Williams, and Joyce Wyatt. Each of them received a plaque in appreciation for their many years of service to the District. The final Superintendent's citations were given to the ex officio representatives to the Board for the Month of May: Suzanne Bonaminio, teacher at Williams Magnet Elementary School, and Keenan Williams, student at Hall High School. B. Partners in Education Prior to recognition of the partnerships, Debbie Milam announced the District's total number of volunteer service hours, which was celebrated recently at the annual VIPS Night for the Stars. A total of 464,000 volunteer hours accumulated during the 2003-04 school year, valued at over half-million dollars. REGULAR BOARD MEETING May20,2004 Page4 IV. Ms. Milam presented one new business and school partnership for the Board's adoption: Baseline Elementary School, represented by Charlotte Cornice, in partnership with McDonald's on Geyer Springs \u0026amp; Baseline Dr. Mitchell moved to approve the formation of the partnership\nMs. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. C. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association Katherine Wright Knight announced a recent gift to the District's Mah/on Martin Staff Development Library at the Instructional Resource Center\n$2,200 worth of digital camera equipment will be available for teachers to use on loan. Ms. Knight thanked Dr. Holmes for his service to the District over the past few months. She thanked the Board for having the foresight to bring him in as the interim superintendent, and she expressed hope that he would be considered as the next permanent superintendent. She stated that this had been a very good year with no major public crises, due in part to respect and admiration for Dr. Holmes' leadership. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Remarks from Board Members Dr. Mitchell reported that she had attended the SECME Awards Program, coordinated by Jo Evelyn Elston and the Pupil Services staff. She commended the students on their work and remarked that their \"amazing projects\" were evidence of what can be achieved when students start early taking math, science and technology courses. Dr. Mitchell also attended the Bob Sarver Memorial Banquet to recognize students who help each other and learn to \"give back\" to their peers. Mr. Kurrus expressed pride and appreciation for a successful school year. He thanked parents, students, teachers, and all who were involved in making the educational experience a positive one for his children and all students in the LRSD. REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 20, 2004 Page 5 Mr. Kurrus commented briefly on the commemoration of the May 17, 1954 ruling by Justice Earl Warren, known as the Brown vs. Board of Education ruling. He had attended a community meeting where Attorney Chris Mercer spoke on the topic of \"separate but unequal\" and he stressed the importance of positive attitudes and \"getting to know our neighbors.\" Mr. Day congratulated all the high school students who would be graduating the following week from LRSD high schools. He thanked his fellow Board members for the good experiences he has had over the past eight months. Mr. Rose thanked the LRSD and all who have been involved in providing an excellent education to his daughter. Ms. Strickland commented on the report provided in the Board's agenda regarding the newly formed Student Assignment committee. She thanked the committee members for agreeing to serve, and asked that future meetings not be scheduled on Wednesday nights. B. Student Assignment Report Mr. Babbs was not present, but had provided a written report for the Board's agenda. The report included a brief summary regarding the first meeting of the Student Assignment Committee, notice and recognition of the 50th anniversary of the Brown vs. Board of Education ruling, and an update on the process of the District's attempt to expand Pre-K programs. C. Budget Update Dr. Stewart briefed the Board on the process being utilized to prioritize the budget. Department managers had submitted their wish lists and the process of prioritizing would begin with a detailed review with the Superintendent and Cabinet members. On the revenue projections, no revisions of the original estimated state aid had yet been provided, but notice of tax assessments indicate an increase in the average growth projections. The reappraisals are becoming effective gradually and will impact revenue incrementally as those taxes are collected. Dr. Holmes made brief remarks regarding the budget process, and stated that he would be coordinating the meetings for discussion of projected revenue and establishing a reasonable fund balance. He wanted the public to be aware that the revenue dollars are limited, and that reduction in expenditures should be expected in order to maintain a reasonable balance and provide the salaries promised to employees. REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 20, 2004 Page 6 D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects Mr. Eaton reviewed the report provided by Mr. Goodman and printed in the Board's agenda. Construction projects across the District are underway and many will be completed over the summer. Mr. Eaton also detailed several moves that will be accomplished over the summer, with students at Wakefield returning to their new building, and students from Mitchell moving to the Badgett School building while renovations are underway at their school. E. Internal Auditors Report Mr. Becker reviewed the report printed in the Board's agenda. No additional information was requested. F. Technology Update Ms. Neal reported briefly on the highlights of the report provided in the agenda. She noted that staff development technology sessions held on May 3 were well attended and that teachers were gaining technology experience and expertise at a fast pace. Ms. Neal also noted that Henderson Health-Science Magnet Middle School is installing and implementing an EAST lab. Approximately half of the E-rate applications have been approved and appeals are in process for the half that were questioned or denied. V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS A. Minutes Minutes from the regular meeting of the Board of Directors held on April 22, and from a special meeting held on May 13, 2004, were presented for review and approval. There were no corrections noted and the minutes were approved as submitted. B. Personnel Changes Routine personnel changes were printed in the Board's agenda. The administration requested and recommended approval. Mr. Berkley made a motion to approve the changes\nDr. Mitchell seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 20, 2004 Page? C. Rehire of Current Staff Members In addition to the routine personnel matters, the administration recommended approval to rehire all current LRSD employees with the exception of those who hold positions funded with grant funds which end prior to June 30, 2005. Mr. Kurrus made the motion to approve the administration's recommendation\nMr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. D. Contract Negotiations Contracts negotiated with the LR Classroom Teachers Association were presented for the Board's review and approval. The changes apply to the 2004-05 school year and affect previously negotiated agreements with transportation employees, including bus drivers, aides, and monitors, and with the District's security officers. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to ratify the agreements reached by the negotiating teams for transportation and security employees. Mr. Day seconded, and the motion carried unanimously. VI. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION A. Federal Grant: Smaller Learning Communities Linda Austin reported that she had submitted a grant application to the U.S. Department of Education for a Smaller Learning Communities grant for Central and Fair High Schools. The grant would provide $749,928 to restructure the schools into smaller learning communities based on students' career and academic interests. The proposal, when implemented, would improve overall academic achievement in reading and mathematics and would enhance teachers' professional development opportunities and incorporate research-based strategies into the instructional day. It is expected that notification will be made by the end of September. Mr. Berkley moved to authorize the administration to maintain the submission. Ms. Strickland seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. B. Federal Grant: Community Technology Center Ms. Austin reported on a second Federal grant proposal for a Community Technology Center grant, in partnership with EAST, Inc. to expand the Central High School 9th grade technology center. The amount of the application was $500,000 with an equal in-kind match requirement. The proposal would expand access to technology and training for residents of the REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 20, 2004 Page 8 Central High community, provide after school, Saturday and summer programs for students and the community, and enhance teachers' technology-based strategies through increased professional development opportunities. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to authorize the submission\nMr. Berkley seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. C. State Grant: 21 st Century Community Learning Center With the Board's authorization, a proposal to fund a five-year 21 st Century Community Learning Center grant will be submitted to the Arkansas Department of Education. The funds would provide a community learning center at Mabelvale Magnet Middle School which would provide after school, before school, Saturday and summer learning programs. The proposal requests a total of $540,000 over a five-year period. Mr. Berkley moved approval of the submission. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. D. State Grant: Enhancing Education Through Technology Grant Lucy Neal presented a request for the Board to maintain a submission to the Arkansas Department of Education for an EEET (Enhancing Education Through Technology) Grant. The application was due on May 13, 2004. The grant was submitted in partnership with the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special School Districts, and would provide a total of $300,000 to provide training for teachers in using the mobile Alphasmart technology labs at Cloverdale Middle School, Henderson Middle School, Mabelvale Magnet Middle School, and Southwest Middle School. The LRSD's share of the grant would be $100,000 and no matching funds are required. Ms. Strickland moved to approve the administration's request to maintain the grant submission. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. E. State Grant: Arkansas Better Chance for School Success The Early Childhood Department staff submitted a request for the Board's review and approval of an application to the Arkansas Department of Human Services, Division of Child Care and Early Childhood Education for funding of programs for three and four year old children who reside in the LRSD. The ABCSS (Arkansas Better Chance for School Success) program provides early access to educational experiences to pre-school children who are \"educationally deprived\" as defined by Act 49 of 2004. REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 20, 2004 Page 9 The proposal would provide up to $5.5 million from the Arkansas Department of Human Services, Division of Early Childhood Education. Dr. Stewart responded to questions regarding the District's current funding of early childhood programs and how this money would be used to expand and enhance what the LRSD is already funding . Dr. Mitchell made a motion to approve the request for application. Ms. Strickland seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. F. Adoption of Health Textbooks The Health textbook adoption committee provided their recommendations for the replacement of textbooks for the District's health education courses. Health has traditionally been offered as an elective in grades 9 through 12, and as part of the physical education curriculum in 6th grade. Health will be added to the science curriculum at the 5th grade level in the 2004-05 school year. Age appropriate recommendations for textbook adoption were presented for the Board's review and approval. Larry Berkley and Sue Strickland served as the Board's representatives on the adoption committees. Dr. Mitchell moved to approve the selections of the committee\nMs. Strickland seconded the motion. It carried unanimously. G. Adoption of Family \u0026amp; Consumer Science Textbooks/ Industrial Technology Education Textbooks Textbook recommendations for Family Consumer Science and Industrial Technology for grades 7 through 9 were presented for the Board's review and approval. Carol Green, the Career and Technical Education Director, headed the review committee, and all Family and Consumer Science middle and high school teachers were given the opportunity to provide input and recommendations for the adoption. Mr. Berkley made a motion to approve the list of textbooks presented for review. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES A. Recommendations for Compliance with Act 1220 of 2003 Margo Bushmiaer, Coordinator of Health Services, presented a recommendation to bring the LRSD into compliance with Act 1220 of 2003. This legislation mandates a school nutrition and physical activity advisory committee that will include members of the Board, administrative staff, food service personnel, teachers, parents, students, health professionals and REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 20, 2004 Page 10 community members. A roster of the members of the Physical Activity Advisory Committee was presented for the Board's approval. Mr. Berkley made a motion to approve the recommended committee. Mr. Day seconded the motion, and it carried 7-0. B. CARE Program Tuition Increase Jo Evelyn Elston, Director of Pupil Services, presented a recommendation to increase the amount charged for the District's before and after school CARE Program by $15.00 per month\nfrom the current $110 per month to $125.00 per month. CARE is a self-supporting program, and the proposed increase would bring the revenue in line with expenses that will incur when CARE employees are given the raises approved by the Board for all LRSD personnel. Dr. Mitchell moved to approve the recommended increase. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. C. Student Handbook Revisions, 2004-05 Dr. Watson provided recommendations for the revision of the 2004-05 student handbook. At the request of the student representative to the Board, a review of Rule 26 will be conducted, which designates the sanctions for possession of a cell phone or pager. The Board had discussed this request at the agenda meeting, and Dr. Watson agreed to review the suggestion with discipline/ handbook committee members and building principals. Ms. Strickland moved to approve the handbook revisions as printed in the Board's agenda. Mr. Kurrus seconded the motion and it carried 7-0. Dr. Watson will return at the June agenda meeting with the results of the review for the Board's information and a possible revision or amendment. VIII. BUSINESS SERVICES A. Donations of Property The Board was asked to approve the acceptance of recent donations to schools and Departments within the District. The donations are listed in the following chart. Student ex officio, Keenan Williams, read the items listed in the Board's agenda. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to accept the donated items\nMr. Day seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 20, 2004 Page 11 SCHOOUDEPARTMENT ITEM DONOR Central High School $500.00 cash to the CHS Jazz Band Regions Financial Corp. $100.00 cash to the CHS Lacrosse Joe \u0026amp; Sage Arnold Club $750.00 cash to the CHS Jazz Concert Donnie Pointer / Coca-Cola Benefit Geyer Springs Elementary $100.00 cash to the Early Childhood Jeffrey M. Graham, Attorney Department Pulaski Heights Elementary $1 ,200 cash for trophies and books for Entergy Engineering Dept. most improved readers Pulaski Heights Middle $2,000.00 cash to the PHMS Winthrop and Lisenne Rockefeller School Mathcounts team for travel expenses to National Competition in Washington, DC LRSD Three printers, one fax machine and Jean Sonk assorted computer cables and wires, valued at $200.00 B. Financial Report The monthly financial summary reports were provided to the Board as part of the printed agenda. Mr. Milhollen was present to review the reports and respond to questions. IX. CLOSING REMARKS The Superintendent asked Dr. Lacey to review the upcoming high school graduation dates and middle school commencement ceremony schedule. X. STUDENT DISCIPLINARY HEARINGS Dr. Watson presented summary information for two students being recommended for expulsion from the District. The first student, Anthony Speakman, was a 10th grade student at Hall High school. It was reported that Anthony was in possession of a loaded gun on the school campus. Anthony stated that he found the gun on the school grounds\nwitnesses stated that Anthony had shown the gun to students during the lunch period on the previous day. One of the witnesses took a police officer to Anthony's home, and the weapon was located there. REGULAR BOARD MEETING May20,2004 Page 12 The administration recommended a one-year expulsion as required by Arkansas Law. If the courts do not assign Anthony to a detention facility, it is recommended that he be placed at the Juvenile Justice Center Step One program. Mr. Berkley moved to approve the recommendation for one-year expulsion and placement at the JJC for Anthony Speakman. Mr. Kurrus seconded the motion and it carried 4-2, with Dr. Daugherty and Ms. Strickland voting against the motion. Board members asked Dr. Watson to note in the record that if the student was not placed in a detention facility on the weapons charge, he had a right to a Board appeal hearing Terrell Price was a 9th grade student assigned to the Alternative Leaming Center. Terrell and three other students were on the football field at McClellan High School after school on February 18, 2004. Witnesses stated that Terrell pulled a gun and fired into the air, then ran into the community behind the school. A young man who was standing near Geyer Springs Road was hit by a bullet at the same time the shots were fired on the football field. Terrell did not have an administrative disciplinary hearing because he was detained by the Juvenile Courts and has been assigned to the Juvenile Justice Center awaiting his court appearance on separate and unrelated charges. The administration recommended a one-year expulsion as required by Arkansas law. If the courts release Terrell from the JJC before the calendar year expires, the LRSD will reassign him to that program. Mr. Kurrus moved to approve the administration's recommendation. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. XI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. APPROVED: ~ -~4-0i Robert M. Daerty, Secretary LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING June 8, 2004 RECEIVED JUL 1 -3 2004 DES OFFICE OF EGREGAT/ON fr10NITORJNG The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special session at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 8, 2004, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Tony Rose presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Tony Rose Larry Berkley Mike Daugherty Bryan Day Baker Kurrus Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER President Tony Rose called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Six members of the Board were present at roll call\nDr. Daugherty arrived at 5:07 p.m. II. PURPOSE OF THE MEETING The meeting was called in response to a petition from Concerned Citizens United. Mr. Rose addressed the audience and stated that 45 minutes would be allotted for the group to make their presentation. Each Board member would then be allowed an opportunity to made comments. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING June 8, 2004 Page2 Ill. PRESENTATION/ SPEAKERS Mark Perry, Executive Director of New Futures for Youth, introduced himself as a committed supporter of the LRSD. He expressed appreciation for Dr. Morris Holmes and the work that Dr. Holmes had done over the past year as interim superintendent. Mr. Perry asked the Board to carefully consider the qualities and qualifications of the person selected to be the next superintendent. He asked whether that person would stay in Little Rock for a number of years, and whether that person would come here with a commitment to the community that Dr. Holmes has exhibited. He stressed the importance of seeking the input of the community when selecting the next Superintendent of Schools. Otis Tyler asked the Board to review the \"gaps\" that exist in the community beyond test score and achievement gaps. He noted the \"gaps\" exist in housing, city services in specified neighborhoods, infrastructure, income levels, and the differences in the educational background of parents or grandparents who are raising children. He stated that Concerned Citizens United was interested in promoting \"direct democracy\" and had a desire to engage the District's Board and administration in robust conversation that would lead to reasoned and informed judgments. Annie Abrams stated that Concerned Citizens United was organized with the intent of serving as an impetus to include all citizens, parents and other community members in ensuring academic achievement for all children, especially those from lower income neighborhoods. She stated that CCU was challenged to confront the LRSD Board in order to gain a participatory role in the selection of the next Superintendent of the LRSD. She stated that Morris Holmes would provide stability that had not been present during the past few years in the LRSD, and she expressed a firm belief that he would remain committed to the children of this city. She expressed confidence that the LRSD would continue to produce \"thinkers\" and committed citizens for the 21st century. Kathy Wells introduced herself as a community activist anti a member of the CCU. She recommended Morris Holmes for the position of Superintendent of Schools and stated that the Board had made a grave mistake by not offering an interview to Dr. Holmes. She stated that the Board could rectify that mistake by allowing an interview immediately. Ms. Wells listed Dr. Holmes' past work history and experience as a teacher, principal, and Superintendent of a large school district. She stated that Dr. Holmes had a reputation for being a hard worker who inspired leadership. Ms. Wells reminded the Board that they had adopted a Strategic Plan that was developed through participation with members of the community and she asked them to follow through on the plan that they adopted. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING June 8, 2004 Page 3 IV. Dr. George Blevins presented a PowerPoint slide show that compared statistics and demographic information through a variety of charts and graphs. The information provided was a result of his research of the websites of the school districts where the candidates for the LRSD Superintendency are currently employed. Terrance Bolden reviewed the purpose of the incorporation of the group Concerned Citizens United. He stated that community members were disenfranchised, and that the LRSD Board had an opportunity to make things right by taking action that is fair and right. He stated support for Morris Holmes, and said that the Board and the community owed Dr. Holmes a degree of dignity and respect for his 35 - 40 year career as an educator, and for the year that he gave as Interim Superintendent. Mr. Bolden asked the Board to consider offering Dr. Holmes an opportunity to interview for the position of Superintendent, and he asked the Board to seriously consider why they did not consider him a candidate in the first place.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1405","title":"Report: ''Rezoning of Schools in the Sherwood Area of the Pulaski County Special School District,'' Office of Desegregation and Monitoring","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["2004-01-14"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Education--Evaluation","Educational planning","School districts","School buildings","School facilities"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Rezoning of Schools in the Sherwood Area of the Pulaski County Special School District,'' Office of Desegregation and Monitoring"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1405"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["3 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_18","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2004-01","2004-02"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/18"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District, plaintiff vs. Pulaski County Special School District, defendant.\nTOM COURTWAY Interim Director State Board of Education JoNell Caldwell, Chair Lillie Rock Shelby Hillman, Vice Chair Carlisle Sherry Burrow Jonesboro Luke Gordy Van Buren Calvin King Marianna .,Lawson '92ville MaryJane Rebick Little Rock Diane Tatum Pine Bluff Jeanna Westmoreland Arkadelphia Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Little Rock, AR 72201-1071 501-682-4475 January 30, 2004 Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510. Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Marshall One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 http:/ /arkedu.state.ar.us RECEIVED - ., 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 Dear Gentlemen and Ms. Marshall: Per an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of January 2004 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for January 2004. Respectfully Submitted, 'Sc'6tt Smith, #92251 Attorney, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - I, Scott Smith, certify that on January 30, 2004, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Marshall One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Based on the information available at December 31, 2003, the ADE calculated the Equalization Funding for FY 03/04, subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Based on the information available at December 31, 2003, the ADE calculated for FY 03/04, subject to periodic adjustments. C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 On December 31, 2003, distributions of State Equalization Funding for FY 03/04 were as follows: LRSD - $24,193,699 NLRSD -$12,761,400 PCSSD -$23,167,185 The allotments of State Equalization FundinQ calculated for FY 03/04 at December 31, 2003, subject to periodic adjustments, were as follows: LRSD - $53,226, 139 NLRSD - $28,075,080 PCSSD - $50,967,808 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at December 31, 2003 for FY 03/04, subject to periodic adjustments. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at December 31, 2003 for FY 03/04, subject to periodic adjustments. It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at December 31, 2003 for FY 03/04, subject to periodic adjustments. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Distributions for FY 03/04 at December 31, 2003, totaled $5,649,703. Allotment calculated for FY 03/04 was $12,343,806 subject to periodic adjustments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Calculated for FY 02/03, subject to periodic adjustments. I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Distributions for FY 03/04 at December 31, 2003 were: LRSD - $1,473,688 NLRSD - $1,036,112 PCSSD - $3,723,884 The allotments calculated for FY 03/04 at December 31, 2003, subject to periodic adjustments, were: LRSD - $3,684,217 NLRSD - $2,590,278 PCSSD - $9,309,708 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 In September 2002, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 02/03 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 In January 2003, General Finance was notified to pay the second one-third payment for FY 02/03 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function instead of Reginald Wilson as indicated in the Implementation Plan. L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 In September 2003, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 02/03 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2003, the following had been paid for FY 02/03: LRSD - $3,835,562.00 NLRSD - $742,399.62 PCSSD - $2,252,050.92 In September 2003, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2003, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $1,243,841.33 NLRSD - $263,000.00 PCSSD - $727,406.63 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 In July 1999, each district submitted an estimated budget for the 99/00 school year. In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD - 14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD - 12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) The ADE accepted a bid on 16 buses for the Magnet and M/M transportation program. The buses will be delivered after July 1, 1999 and before August 1, 1999. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LASO - 8\nNLASD - 2\nPCSSD - 6. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LASO - 8\nNLASD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LASO - 8\nNLASD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001. The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two type C 47 passenger buses and fourteen type C 65 passenger buses. Prices on these units are $43,426.00 each on the 47 passenger buses, and $44,289.00 each on the 65 passenger buses. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LASO - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLASD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42,155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. Specifications for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M school buses have been forwarded to State Purchasing for bidding. Bids will be opened on May 12, 2003. The buses will have a required delivery date after July 1, 2003 and before August 8, 2003. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. 0. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1 , 1995. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1 , 1994. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Final payment was distributed July 1994. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01 /02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. 10 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 11 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 12 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 13 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supeNisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 15 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 26, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 16 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2004 (Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is finalized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearence Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 18 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2004 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 19 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1 . Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. C. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1 . Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 20 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17- 1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81 st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 21 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 22 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCS SD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 23 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11, in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 24 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, A letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 17 48 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, A letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. 25 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. C. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2004 Ongoing Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of AD E's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 26 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 27 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the AD E's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 28 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of AD E's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the AD E's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 29 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LASO, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lntervenors filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 30 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued} D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued} 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua intervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lntervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lntervenors were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1 , 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 31 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21, 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 32 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued} 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 33 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of AD E's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11 , 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11 , 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. ' On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 34 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 35 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. 36 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 37 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 38 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 39 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to SouthwestJr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 40 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. D. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. 41 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2004 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31, 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. 42 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 43 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts. In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further assistance to schools, i.e., Title I Summer Planning Session, ADE session on Smart Start, and the School Improvement Workshops. All schools and districts in Pulaski County were invited to attend the \"Smart Start\" Summit November 9, 10, and 11 to learn more about strategies to increase student performance. \"Smart Start\" is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. Representatives from all three districts attended. On January 21, 1998, the ADE provided staff development for the staff at Oak Grove Elementary School designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement. Using achievement data from Oak Grove, educators reviewed trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. On February 24, 1999, the ADE provided staff development for the administrative staff at Clinton Elementary School regarding analysis of achievement data. On February 15, 1999, staff development was rescheduled for Lawson Elementary School. The staff development program was designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement using achievement data from Lawson, educators reviewed the components of the Arkansas Smart Initiative, trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. Student Achievement Workshops were rescheduled for Southwest Jr. High in the Little Rock School District, and the Oak Grove Elementary School in the Pulaski County School District. 44 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued} On April 30, 1999, a Student Achievement Workshop was conducted for Oak Grove Elementary School in PCSSD. The Student Achievement Workshop for Southwest Jr. High in LRSD has been rescheduled. On June 8, 1999, a workshop was presented to representatives from each of the Arkansas Education Service Cooperatives and representatives from each of the three districts in Pulaski County. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On June 18, 1999, a workshop was presented to administrators of the NLRSD. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On August 16, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACTAAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for teaching assistant in the LRSD. On August 20, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for the Accelerated Learning Center in the LRSD. On September 13, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACTAAP program were presented to the staff at Booker T. Washington Magnet Elementary School. On September 27, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to the Middle and High School staffs of the NLRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On October 26, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to LRSD personnel through a staff development training class. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On December 7, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was scheduled for Southwest Middle School in the LRSD. The workshop was also set to cover the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. However, Southwest Middle School administrators had a need to reschedule, therefore the workshop will be rescheduled. 45 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) On January 10, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for both Dr. Martin Luther King Magnet Elementary School \u0026amp; Little Rock Central High School. The workshops also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On March 1, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for all principals and district level administrators in the PCSSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On April 12, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for the LRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. Targeted staffs from the middle and junior high schools in the three districts in Pulaski County attended the Smart Step Summit on May 1 and May 2. Training was provided regarding the overview of the \"Smart Step\" initiative, \"Standard and Accountability in Action,\" and \"Creating Learning Environments Through Leadership Teams.\" The ADE provided training on the development of alternative assessment September 12-13, 2000. Information was provided regarding the assessment of Special Education and LEP students. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate in professional development regarding Integrating Curriculum and Assessment K-12. The professional development activity was directed by the national consultant, Dr. Heidi Hays Jacobs, on September 14 and 15, 2000. The ADE provided professional development workshops from October 2 through October 13, 2000 regarding, \"The Write Stuff: Curriculum Frameworks, Content Standards and Item Development.\" Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems by video conference for Special Education and LEP Teachers on November 17, 2000. Also, Alternative Assessment Portfolio System Training was provided for testing coordinators through teleconference broadcast on November 27, 2000. 46 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) On December 12, 2000, the ADE provided training for Test Coordinators on end of course assessments in Geometry and Algebra I Pilot examination. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation conducted the professional development at the Arkansas Teacher Retirement Building. The ADE presented a one-day training session with Dr. Cecil Reynolds on the Behavior Assessment for Children (BASC). This took place on December 7, 2000 at the NLRSD Administrative Annex. Dr. Reynolds is a practicing clinical psychologist. He is also a professor at Texas A \u0026amp; M University and a nationally known author. In the training, Dr. Reynolds addressed the following: 1) how to use and interpret information obtained on the direct observation form, 2) how to use this information for programming, 3) when to use the BASC, 4) when to refer for more or additional testing or evaluation, 5) who should complete the forms and when, (i.e., parents, teachers, students), 6) how to correctly interpret scores. This training was intended to especially benefit School Psychology Specialists, psychologists, psychological examiners, educational examiners and counselors. During January 22-26, 2001 the ADE presented the ACTAAP Intermediate (Grade 6) Benchmark Professional Development Workshop on Item Writing. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were invited to attend. On January 12, 2001 the ADE presented test administrators training for mid-year End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. On January 13, 2001 the ADE presented SmartScience Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This was shared with eight Master Teachers. The SmartScience Lessons were developed by the Arkansas Science Teachers Association in conjunction with the Wilbur Mills Educational Cooperative under an Eisenhower grant provided by the ADE. The purpose of SmartScience is to provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. The following training has been provided for educators in the three districts in Pulaski County by the Division of Special Education at the ADE since January 2000: On January 6, 2000, training was conducted for the Shannon Hills Pre-school Program, entitled ''Things you can do at home to support your child's learning.\" This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. The school's director and seven parents attended. 47 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) On March 8, 2000, training was conducted for the Southwest Middle School in Little Rock, on ADD. Six people attended the training. There was follow-up training on Learning and Reading Styles on March 26. This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. On September 7, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Chicot Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Karen Sabo, Kindergarten Teacher\nMelissa Gleason, Paraprofessional\nCurtis Mayfield, P.E. Teacher\nLisa Poteet, Speech Language Pathologist\nJane Harkey, Principal\nKathy Penn-Norman, Special Education Coordinator\nAlice Phillips, Occupational Therapist. On September 15, 2000, the Governor's Developmental Disability Coalition Conference presented Assistive Technology Devices \u0026amp; SeNices. This was held at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On September 19, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Jefferson Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Melissa Chaney, Special Education Teacher\nBarbara Barnes, Special Education Coordinator\na Principal, a Counselor, a Librarian, and a Paraprofessional. On October 6, 2000, Integrating Assistive Technology Into Curriculum was presented at a conference in the Hot Springs Convention Center. Presenters were: Bryan Ayers and Aleecia Starkey. Speech Language Pathologists from LRSD and NLRSD attended. On October 24, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On October 25 and 26, 2000, Alternate Assessment for Students with Severe Disabilities for the LRSD at J. A. Fair High School was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. The participants were: Susan Chapman, Special Education Coordinator\nMary Steele, Special Education Teacher\nDenise Nesbit, Speech Language Pathologist\nand three Paraprofessionals. On November 14, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On November 17, 2000, training was conducted on Autism for the LRSD at the Instructional Resource Center. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. 48 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) On December 5, 2000, Access to the Curriculum Via the use of Assistive Technology Computer Lab was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter of this teleconference. The participants were: Tim Fisk, Speech Language Pathologist from Arch Ford Education Service Cooperative at Plumerville and Patsy Lewis, Special Education Teacher from Mabelvale Middle School in the LRSD. On January 9, 2001, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. Kathy Brown, a vision consultant from the LRSD, was a participant. On January 23, 2001, Autism and Classroom Modifications for the LRSD at Brady Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Beverly Cook, Special Education Teacher\nAmy Littrell, Speech Language Pathologist\nJan Feurig, Occupational Therapist\nCarolyn James, Paraprofessional\nCindy Kackly, Paraprofessional\nand Rita Deloney, Paraprofessional. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcast on February 5, 2001. Presenters were: Charlotte Marvel, ADE\nDr. Gayle Potter, ADE\nMarcia Harding, ADE\nLynn Springfield, ASERC\nMary Steele, J. A. Fair High School, LRSD\nBryan Ayres, Easter Seals Outreach. This was provided for Special Education teachers and supervisors in the morning, and Limited English Proficient teachers and supervisors in the afternoon. The Special Education session was attended by 29 teachers/administrators and provided answers to specific questions about the alternate assessment portfolio system and the scoring rubric and points on the rubric to be used to score the portfolios. The LEP session was attended by 16 teachers/administrators and disseminated the common tasks to be included in the portfolios: one each in mathematics, writing and reading. On February 12-23, 2001, the ADE and Data Recognition Corporation personnel trained Test Coordinators in the administration of the spring Criterion-Referenced Test. This was provided in 20 sessions at 1 O regional sites. Testing protocol, released items, and other testing materials were presented and discussed. The sessions provided training for Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Pilot Tests. The LRSD had 2 in attendance for the End of Course session and 2 for the Benchmark session. The NLRSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. The PCSSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. 49 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2004 (Continued) On March 15, 2001, there was a meeting at the ADE to plan professional development for staff who work with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students. A $30,000 grant has been created to provide LEP training at Chicot Elementary for a year, starting in April 2001. A $40,000 grant was created to provide a Summer English as Second Language (ESL) Academy for the LRSD from June 18 through 29, 2001. Andre Guerrero from the ADE Accountability section met with Karen Broadnax, ESL Coordinator at LRSD, Pat Price, Early Childhood Curriculum Supervisor at LRSD, and Jane Harkey, Principal of Chicot Elementary. On March 1-2 and 8-29, 2001, ADE staff performed the following activities: processed registration for April 2 and 3 Alternate Portfolio Assessment video conference quarterly meeting\nanswered questions about Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) and LEP Alternate Portfolio Assessment by phone from schools and Education Service Cooperatives\nand signed up students for alternate portfolio assessment from school districts. On March 6, 2001, ADE staff attended a Smart Step Technology Leadership Conference at the State House Convention Center. On March 7, 2001 , ADE staff attended a National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Regional Math Framework Meeting about the Consensus Project 2004. On March 8, 2001, there was a one-on-one conference with Carole Villarreal from Pulaski County at the ADE about the LEP students with portfolios. She was given pertinent data, including all the materials that have been given out at the video conferences. The conference lasted for at least an hour. On March 14, 2001, a Test Administrator's Training Session was presented specifically to LRSD Test Coordinators and Principals. About 60 LRSD personnel attended. The following meetings have been conducted with educators in the three districts in Pulaski County since July 2000. On July 10-13, 2000 the ADE provided Smart Step training. The sessions covered Standards-based classroom practices. 50 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 19-21, 2000 the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were 200 teachers from across the state in attendance. On August 14-31, 2000 the ADE presented Science Smart Start Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This will provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. On September 5, 2000 the ADE held an Eisenhower Informational meeting with Teacher Center Coordinators. The purpose of the Eisenhower Professional Development Program is to prepare teachers, school staff, and administrators to help all students meet challenging standards in the core academic subjects. A summary of the program was presented at the meeting. On November 2-3, 2000 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching. This presented curriculum and activity workshops. More than 1200 attended the conference. On November 6, 2000 there was a review of Science Benchmarks and sample model curriculum. A committee of 6 reviewed and revised a drafted document. The committee was made up of ADE and K-8 teachers. On November 7-10, 2000 the ADE held a meeting of the Benchmark and End of Course Mathematics Content Area Committee. Classroom teachers reviewed items for grades 4, 6, 8 and EOC mathematics assessment. There were 60 participants. On December 4-8, 2000 the ADE conducted grades 4 and 8 Benchmark Scoring for Writing Assessment. This professional development was attended by approximately 750 teachers. On December 8, 2000 the ADE conducted Rubric development for Special Education Portfolio scoring. This was a meeting with special education supervisors to revise rubric and plan for scoring in June. On December 8, 2000 the ADE presented the Transition Mathematics Pilot Training Workshop. This provided follow-up training and activities for fourth-year mathematics professional development. On December 12, 2000 the ADE presented test administrators training for midyear End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. 51 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued} 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued} The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcasts on April 2-3, 2001. Administration of the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy took place on April 23-27, 2001. Administration of the End of Course Algebra and Geometry Exams took place on May 2-3, 2001. Over 1,100 Arkansas educators attended the Smart Step Growing Smarter Conference on July 10 and 11, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The Smart Step effort seeks to provide intense professional development for teachers and administrators at the middle school level, as well as additional materials and assistance to the state's middle school teachers. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the first keynote address on \"The Character-Centered Teacher\". Debra Pickering, an education consultant from Denver, Colorado, presented the second keynote address on \"Characteristics of Middle Level Education\". Throughout the Smart Step conference, educators attended breakout sessions that were grade-specific and curriculum area-specific. Pat Davenport, an education consultant from Houston, Texas, delivered two addresses. She spoke on \"A Blueprint for Raising Student Achievement\". Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. Over 1,200 Arkansas teachers and administrators attended the Smart Start Conference on July 12, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Start is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the keynote address. The day featured a series of 15 breakout sessions on best classroom practices. Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. On July 18-20, 2001, the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were approximately 300 teachers from across the state in attendance. 52 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) The ADE and Harcourt Educational Measurement conducted Stanford 9 test administrator training from August 1-9, 2001. The training was held at Little Rock, Jonesboro, Fort Smith, Forrest City, Springdale, Mountain Home, Prescott, and Monticello. Another session was held at the ADE on August 30, for those who were unable to attend August 1-9. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by video conference at the Education Service Cooperatives and at the ADE from 9:00 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on September 5, 2001. The ADE released the performance of all schools on the Primary and Middle Level Benchmark Exams on September 5, 2001 . The ADE conducted Transition Core Teacher In-Service training for Central in the LRSD on September 6, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for Hall in the LRSD on September 7, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for McClellan in the LRSD on September 13, 2001. The ADE conducted Basic Co-teaching training for the LRSD on October 9, 2001. The ADE conducted training on autism spectrum disorder for the PCSSD on October 15, 2001. Professional Development workshops (1 day in length) in scoring End of Course assessments in algebra, geometry and reading were provided for all districts in the state. Each school was invited to send three representatives (one for each of the sessions). LRSD, NLRSD, and PCSSD participated. Information and training materials pertaining to the Alternate Portfolio Assessment were provided to all districts in the state and were supplied as requested to LRSD, PCSSD and David 0. Dodd Elementary. On November 1-2, 2001 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching at the Excelsior Hotel \u0026amp; Statehouse Convention Center. This presented sessions, workshops and short courses to promote exceptional teaching and learning. Educators could become involved in integrated math, science, English \u0026amp; language arts and social studies learning. The ADE received from the schools selected to participate in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a list of students who will take the test. 53 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) On December 3-7, 2001 the ADE conducted grade 6 Benchmark scoring training for reading and math. Each school district was invited to send a math and a reading specialist. The training was held at the Holiday Inn Airport in Little Rock. On December 4 and 6, 2001 the ADE conducted Mid-Year Test Administrator Training for Algebra and Geometry. This was held at the Arkansas Activities Association's conference room in North Little Rock. On January 24, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by ADE compressed video with Fred Jones presenting. On January 31, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by NSCI satellite with Fred Jones presenting. On February 7, 2002, the ADE Smart Step co-sponsored the AR Association of Middle Level Principal's/ADE curriculum, assessment and instruction workshop with Bena Kallick presenting. On February 11-21, 2002, the ADE provided training for Test Administrators on the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Exams. The sessions took place at Forrest City, Jonesboro, Mountain Home, Springdale, Fort Smith, Monticello, Prescott, Arkadelphia and Little Rock. A make-up training broadcast was given at 15 Educational Cooperative Video sites on February 22. During February 2002, the LRSD had two attendees for the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The NLRSD and PCSSD each had one attendee at the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 2, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. The ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 9, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. 54 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) The Twenty-First Annual Curriculum and Instruction Conference, co-sponsored by the Arkansas Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and the Arkansas Department of Education, will be held June 24-26, 2002, at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs, Arkansas. \"Ignite Your Enthusiasm for Learning\" is the theme for this year's conference, which will feature educational consultant, Dr. Debbie Silver, as well as other very knowledgeable presenters. Additionally, there will be small group sessions on Curriculum Alignment, North Central Accreditation, Section 504, Building Level Assessment, Administrator Standards, Data Disaggregation, and National Board. The Educational Accountability Unit of the ADE hosted a workshop entitled \"Strategies for Increasing Achievement on the ACTAAP Benchmark Examination\" on June 13-14, 2002 at the Agora Center in Conway. The workshop was presented for schools in which 100% of students scored below the proficient level on one or more parts of the most recent Benchmark Examination. The agenda included presentations on \"The Plan-Do-Check-Act Instructional Cycle\" by the nationally known speaker Pat Davenport. ADE personnel provided an explanation of the MPH point program. Presentations were made by Math and Literacy Specialists. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, gave a presentation about ACTAAP. Break out sessions were held, in which school districts with high scores on the MPH point program offered strategies and insights into increasing student achievement. The NLRSD, LRSD, and PCSSD were invited to attend. The NLRSD attended the workshop. The Smart Start Summer Conference took place on July 8-9, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. The Smart Start Initiative focuses on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event included remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. After comments by the Director, Bena Kallick presented the keynote address \"Beyond Mapping: Essential Questions, Assessment, Higher Order Thinking\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On the second day, Vivian Moore gave the keynote address \"Overcoming Obstacles: Avenues for Student Success\". Krista Underwood gave the presentation \"Put Reading First in Arkansas\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. 55 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued) The Smart Step Summer Conference took place on July 10-11, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The event included remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. After comments by the Director, Vivian Moore presented the keynote address \"Overcoming Obstacles: Avenues for Student Success\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On the second day, Bena Kallick presented \"Beyond Mapping: Essential Questions, Assessment, Higher Order Thinking\". Ken Stamatis presented \"Smart Steps to Creating a School Culture That Supports Adolescent Comprehension\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On August 8, 2002, Steven Weber held a workshop at Booker T. Washington Elementary on \"Best Practices in Social Studies\". It was presented to the 4th grade teachers in the Little Rock School District. The workshop focused around the five themes of geography and the social studies (fourth grade) framework/standards. Several Internet web sites were shared with the teachers, and the teachers were shown methods for incorporating writing into fourth grade social studies. One of the topics was using primary source photos and technology to stimulate the students to write about diverse regions. A theme of the workshop included identifying web sites which apply to fourth grade social studies teachers and interactive web sites for fourth grade students. This was a Back-to-School ln-seNice workshop. The teachers were actively involved in the workshop. On August 13 Steven Weber conducted a workshop at Parkview High School in the LRSD. Topics of the workshop included: 1. Incorporating Writing in the Social Studies Classroom 2. Document Based (open-ended) Questioning Techniques 3. How to practice writing on a weekly basis without assigning a lengthy research report 4. Developing Higher Level Thinking Skills in order to produce active citizens, rather than passive, uninformed citizens 5. Using the Social Studies Framework 6. Identifying state and national Web Sites which contain Primary Sources for use in the classroom The 8:30 - 11 :30 session was for the 6 - 8 grade social studies teachers. The 12:30 - 3:00 session was for the 9 - 12 grade social studies teachers. Several handouts were used, also PowerPoint, primary source photos and documents, and Internet web sites (i.e., Library of Congress, Butler Center for Arkansas Studies, National Archives, etc.). This was a Back-to-School ln-seNice workshop. The teachers were actively involved in the workshop. Marie McNeal is the Social Studies Specialist for the Little Rock School District. She invited Steven Weber to present at the workshop, and was in attendance. 56 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2004 (Continued} On September 30 through October 11, 2002, the ADE provided Professional Development for Test Administrators on the End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Exams. The training was held at the Holiday Inn Airport. All three districts in Pulaski County sent representatives to the training. On October 3, 2002, Charlotte Marvel provided in-service training for LEP teachers in the Little Rock School District. On December 6, 2002, the Community and Parent Empowerment Summit was held for parents of children attending the LRSD. It took place at the Saint Mark Baptist Church in Little Rock. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented information on No Child Left Behind, Supplemental Services, after school tutoring, how parents can help, and the Refrigerator Curriculum. Mr. Reginald Wilson, Senior Coordinator for Accountability, presented information on ACTAAP, including how to find information on the AS-IS Website and what is included in the school report cards. Donna Elam spoke on the topic \"From the School House to the Jail House\". On December 10 - 12, 2002, the Math Workshop \"Investigations in Number, Data and Space\" was held at the Clinton Elementary Magnet School in Sherwood. Training for Kindergarten and First Grade Teachers was held on December 10, and included Making Shapes and Building Blocks, Quilts, Squares and Block Towns. Training for Second and Third Grade Teachers was held on December 11, and included Shapes, Halves, Symmetry and Turtle Paths. Training for Fourth and Fifth Grade Teachers was held on December 12. Fourth grade covered Seeing Solids and Silhouettes. Fifth Grade was about Containers and Cubes. The sessions provided quality time for teachers to discuss the curriculum, reflect on implications, provide mutual support, and continue planning. The ADE provided professional development for all school districts on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems on January 7-9, 2003 at the Holiday Inn Airport. The LRSD had two in attendance, NLRSD had one in attendance, and the PCSSD had two in attendance. The ADE conducted the Smart Start Statewide Professional Staff Development Video Conference at the ADE/AETN Studio and at participating Education Service Cooperatives from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on February 12, 2003. The ADE conducted the Smart Step Statewide Professional Staff Development Video Conference at the ADE/AETN Studio and at participating Education Service Cooperatives from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on February 13, 2003. 57 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for techn\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_241","title":"Arkansas Task Force to Joint Committee on Educational Facilities, part one","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2004/2005"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","Educational planning","School buildings"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Task Force to Joint Committee on Educational Facilities, part one"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/241"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n2004-05 TaskF orceto J oinCt ommitteoen E ducationFaalc ilities 4100 Richards Road North Little Rock, AR 72117 Phone: 501-371-1543 Fax: 501-683-0517 www.arkansaslacililies.com Arkansas School Administrators: During the summer of 2004, a team of architects and engineers assessed every school in Arkansas. This assessment was a extensive effort involving nearly 1,200 schools, 6,000 buildings and more than 84 million square feet of space. The intent of the assessment was to identify the condition of school facilities in Arkansas and to determine their adequacy. The following report includes the assessment data and summarizes deficiencies for each facility. This study required the efforts of more than 300 people and includes over a million points of data entry. Each school was pre-assessed to identify buildings and review the scope of the assessment. Next the assessment team visited each and every building, completing pre-printed forms related to building condition. Those forms were then entered into a database that held all the condition data. This data was used to prepare each school report. The purpose of distributing this report is to gather district input on the assessment data and improve upon accuracy. Revisions will be incorporated into the database and revised reports will be developed. While these reports have been through several rounds of quality assurance and review, it is possible that some of the infonnation could include misinterpretation on the part of the assessment team. It is important that each school district report via e-mail to the Task Force project coordinator any major discrepancies within the report. Thank you for taking the time to assist in this effort. It is the intention of the Task Force to evolve the assessment into a permanent database for school facilities in the state. School facilities are continually changing. For example, a deficiency identified in July may have been repaired in September\nthe use of buildings may change\nas buildings age, new problems develop\nand new schools are always being built. We need your input to continue to improve the database and assist the legislature in identifying funding mechanisms that will assist the districts in upgrading their facilities. Contained within the report are two types of data. Factual data includes items such as age, size, and school enrollment. Subjective data is based on the professional opinion of the planners, architects, and engineers involved in the assessment. Much of the subjective infonnation contained in these reports is based on a set of assumptions necessary to ensure a consistent approach. These assumptions can be found in the draft Arkansas School Facilities Manual and are based on state and national indexes. Key assumptions used in developing the reports include: I. The condition of the building is based on a point in time, approximately July 2004. Changes or improvements since that time have not been included. 2. The use of the building is based on the 2003-2004 school year. 3. All buildings will be brought up to proposed building system standards. 4. Current state guidelines for student/teacher ratios were maintained. 5. Cost estimates are in 2004 dollars and were based on an average cost-per-square-foot to construct a particular school type. Cost estimates were also adjusted for the location of the facifil\u0026gt;: within the state. Repair estimates use the nationally recognized RS Means Facilities Cost Data to estimate repair costs at the time of assessment. 6. The enrollment and use of buildings to calculate educational suitability cost were based the 2003- 2004 school year. 7. The space requirements for school facilities were based on the space guidelines in the draft Arkansas School Facility manual. 8. The number of current school buildings and school districts would remain the same. Consideration for any future consolidation was not included. 9. Alternative uses of facilities for the purpose of generating income, reducing operating expenses, or reducing capital expenditures were not estimated or incorporated. 10. Additional space for growing districts was accounted for, but no credit was taken for declining districts. TaskF orcteo J oinCt ommitteoen E ducationFaalc ilities 4100 Richards Road North Little Rock, AR 72117 Phone: 501-371-1543 Fax: 501-683-0517 www . .1rk.1ns.Jsf:1cilities~com 11. Additional square footage for schools that do not meet proposed educational suitability standards was added, but no credit was taken for schools that exceeded space standards. 12. Temporary/portable buildings were not included in total available square footage. 13. School buildings used for educational purposes where evaluated on a comprehensive level, while administrative and athletic buildings that are not used for academic purposes were evaluated on a summary level. The deficiencies listed on the attached sheets were based on: 1. Assessors' identification of items needing repair or replacement. 2. Assessors' identification of systems exceeding their life expectancies. It should be noted that even if a system has exceeded its life expectancy it still may be in working condition\nhowever, life cycle models would suggest these systems require repair or replacement in the near future. Since this report envelops several years of potential implementation efforts, these costs have been included. The cost ofrepairing or replacing systems was based on RS Means Facilities Cost Data. RS Means is a nationally recognized company that collects construction costs across the country and categorizes them by division and major class for all types of school construction. The company averages these costs to a national standard and provides regional adjustment factors to apply the cost locally. With repair or replacement of any system, there is a wide variety of solutions that will impact the cost. However, for budgeting purposes, the assessment team identified the most logical correction and a cost estimate was developed for budgeting purposes. A facility assessment should not be confused with a building repair or renovation program. The focus of the assessment was to determine adequacy of school facilities and an order of magnitude estimate to correct inadequacy. This information can be helpful in determining a repair or renovation program but additional master planning at the building and school level is necessary. For example, if a building needs a new roof, lighting, and an addition, there are several options concerning which type of roof is best for that location, as well as how that roof will be replaced in conjunction with lighting retrofits and phasing of new construction. When it comes to interior lighting, once lighting is replaced, it is not uncommon to replace the ceiling and may also be cost effective to update the electrical service in a building even if the assessment did not call for replacement at this time. If a building needs an addition, analysis will be required to determine the most appropriate design solution. There may be a need for additional classrooms, but the existing building may have an undersized library. Therefore, it may make the most sense to convert the existing library to classrooms and build a new library/media center. All of these decisions impact cost. An assessment is not a building program or master plan. An assessment provides the basic information regarding existing deficiencies and lifecycle data which can be used to compare the relative condition from one school to another. An assessment is needed in developing a master plan but in itself does not denote such. In conclusion, this report is an assessment to identify school facility inadequacy and an order of magnitude estimate of the cost to correct these inadequacies. It will be used by the state legislature to determine funding formulas and mechanisms for addressing these education inadequacy issues. Thank you again for your review of these reports. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the project coordinators listed on the following page, or simply log on to www.arkansasfacilitics.com to submit comments electronically. 2 Region TaskF orceto JointC ommitteoen EducationaFla cilities 4100 Richards Road North Little Rock, AR 72117 Phone: 501-371-1543 Fax: 501-683-0517 www.arkansasfacilities.com 1 \u0026amp; 4 [N. West, Ozarks, N. Central, N. East, Crolwy's Ridge, Great Rivers] Brett Kingrey 501-371-1572 2 \u0026amp; 3 [Western, Arch Ford, DeQueen/Mena, S. West, S. Central] Aliza Jones 501-371-1571 5 [Pulaski, Wilbur D. Mills] Drew Coppock 501-371-1522 6 [Dawson, Arkansas River, South East] Stan Leek 501-371-7727 Task Force to Joint Committee on Educational Facilities Scott Copas, Chairman 3 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Floor# Room# System Site Site 111, Site Site Site Site Site Site Site Site El I HVAC Deficiency Sidewalk requires replacement Fence/Gate (Chain Link) requires replacement I'ra,1ii\n~: ~ ~ulirm r01:1Ia ADA - Accessible routes from parking or sidewalks to building are not fully compliant ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant AP - ~le ~e\u0026amp; b~n bU !1 I !fi - ell m:itfi I , lilCIIT111n ADA - Handicap parking spaces are not fully compliant ADA - Access to playgrounds or athletic fields is not full com liant Playfield Equip (2nd to 5th) requires replacement Playfield Equip (Pre-K to 1st) requires re lacement School has insufficient football/soccer fields. School has insufficient baseball fields. Computer room lacks independent AC. Electrical Exterior Light - Light Pole - Parking \u0026amp; Road is missin and is needed Specialties School lacks an appropriate surveillance system. Specialties School lacks a dedicated computer equipment S ec\n1111,11 Specialties School's PBX is undersized. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 02775-002 02820-003 0 QZ 59541 59543 (,13:,\"\"\n!13 337830 340889\n- I 337832 340890 02880-009 59528 02880-012 59530 EA-007 107457 EA-008 108361 JS?fll~ EA-025 110713 16520-001 59544 EA-033 113254 EA-024 110088 11 ii Ii tl EA-030 112098 Qty UOM Priority 1,000 SF 100 LF LS LS LS LS 3 Ea. 10 Ea. Ea. Ea. LEa. 6 Ea. Ea. 150 SF Ea. 2 2 $ $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ l 4 $ 2 $ $ 4 $ 4 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 4,853 2,167 ii 5,850 2,106 ::di I 702 3,510 114,817 237,650 34,649 32,188 II\\ 13,636 10,063 20,411 24,660 ~fiil 17,550 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated l:stimsl:ll Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated fbi Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Es lrn3l!!d Estimated 6003 - Horner Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 1 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School SubTotal by Building 22 $ Building: Administrative Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Roofing Elastomeric Membrane Roofing requires 07530-003 59434 3,100 SF 2 $ 'E:~ I l~W-9ft!~~f\u0026amp;.~~4~~1iftJlf~lfffl Exterior Interior I 1 ,1 Interior Interior il'IL'!!:rie,, Interior Interior ln1eno1 Interior Interior lnlerior HVAC HVAC Plumbing Plumbing PIIJ ng Plumbing A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 322085 1 LS 2 $ Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is $ needed  V ei:il\nnl Acoustical Suspension requires replacement Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement otl\u0026lt;I tc et requrl'B! -Pi.,aew nl Panic Device requires replacement ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant Aoi:i- RClcrr11:lfrnqJ1utie~l 0 9 ~ llil lr,I 1cgm ii ngf ! ~ gorn ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully compliant Custom Cabinet requires replacement C1u11 li?!flo,pH !filulre1! re,ila1:S'1ile\u0026lt;1t Classroom ventilation inadequate End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System requires replacement End of Life: Sanitary Sewer requires replacement E,,d\n:if f._.,fatF su~ela encl c'lUl,rac:r aqulre rellilaml!nl='nt ADA- Lavatoryis notf ullyc ompliant 08710-001 59438 ~lS 09130-003 59436 09510-003 59437 - 4J1l 59440 321690 -JB9i 321694 06410-003 59441 DI! -0:)3 .IM 15830-001 59431 15700-902 310401 15100-907 299488 15100-908 299494 ll DD .D!I 8~ 335268 2 Ea. ,oo ~ 84 SF 100 SF 2 Ea. 8 4 3,090 3,090 3,090 LS IS LS LF LI\" Room SF SF SF Ea LS 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 4 $ 4 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 549,024 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 28,127 Estimated u~ E:.s. d 1,446 Estimated 10,986 Estimated I 1 Lil ralj\nd 201 Estimated 342 Estimated .a Es~tna!Ecl 1,776 Estimated 116 Estimated ~ Eslimel!tl 347 Estimated 4,249 Estimated \"'f.! E!i1 40,655 Estimated 27,829 Estimated 3,333 Estimated 7,231 Estimated 11':Q!i E3Il,mued 116 Estimated 6003 - Horner Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 2 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Administrative Floor# Room# System Electrical El :...ri\"\"C:.il Electrical Electrical Deficiency GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed tlFI I:'! i 1111111,1 r\"I L Ic  ~d End of life: Electrical Service requires replacement End of Life: Lighting Fixtures require replacement T11i\nh I~ Cl~  ~  C!l1 W1 - \" 11 r!lfl uire, r!!!lliaei!n11B11t Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed = \u0026amp;f\n!t~ HmrtlqlrPbe rr1115islan, r~ Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed r :Sat e Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Fire Alarm requires replacement Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant im\u0026gt;!!f ~ req = re,-lar. Specialties End of Life: Public Address and Intercom - Communications require replacement Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Roofing ~i'i I r!IJ Roofing Roofing A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement iing requI= rt!!]lscement. Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement Deficiency Code AssesslD 16140-001 59423 1 1 ~ 001 5~2\". 16400-901 299489 16500-900 299491 i 67ll'9D 299MQ 13910-001 59425 13910-004 59426 :ti! lu-lJ \" J 13910-022 59429 13910-025 59430 l:ffl!lll!.Sll1 :~~c:.o 13850-900 299493 321696 lOISS- 11130-901 299496 SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 07510-003 59555 01:i {1-0IB -g,~1\n07510-003 59376 07510-003 59412 Qty UOM Priority 2 Ea. 3,090 SF 2,080 SF  9 .'\nr- 4 Ea. 3 Ea. 4 Ea. 8 Ea. 1,~ll 3,090 SF 1 LS 3,090 SF 36 $ 2 $ 2 $ $ $ $ $ $ 2 $ 3 $ $ Qty UOM Priority 2,058 SF 2 $ -ill I ' 4,760 SF 2 $ 4.760 SF 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 271 n1 13,104 8,097 1,114 783 I I. 1,109 2,630 .,Jl!ll!- 4,357 57 OCIE 3,469 205,802 Estimated EstimsieG Estimated Estimated \u0026amp;.,-f,- Estimated Estimated E!lrima d Estimated Estimated im\ni Estimated Estimated Estimated Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 16,331 37,772 37,772 Estimated E 11111~ Estimated Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 3 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Exterior Aluminum Window (Awning) requires replacement 08520-003 59554 1,025 SF 2 $ 58,083 Estimated Exterior ADA-Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 335254 1 LS 2 $ 6,781 Estimated ~e!!ID Exterior Exterior {l!ri'vr Exterior Exterior Ill! Exterior Exterior Eueri' Structural Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 SI .. [J I r \"' I ttili,gJ r~u[rei, [(!f)laCOl't-l I ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant Steel Door (Single Hung) requires replacement ADA End of Life: Exterior Doors require replacement ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant I ,,r,:i eslarn. re1JlrM r!!lllallS\u0026gt;m!n Soffit requires replacement  ll'iC! ~ I' COn:lploiil'I ADA - Stairs are not fully compliant Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is needed A I \" r I ,, I!!] mis.\u0026amp; f11,la (l,!lj  Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is needed Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is 1,eede ,u ll [)r:u:1Q cie - l1e111i\ni!Hi~!p . nel!ded Ceramic Tile requires replacement ntJ I AcousticaSl uspensionre quiresr eplacement tlll I lJ-OOli! 593'11 321681 08110-006 59375\nt~:l,9 08100-900 299487 332045 .\n,941\u0026gt;1 07460-001 59482 07 460-002 59483 ,\n2 _!l 335260 08710-001 59563 OS ,Q-001 51.1!1 08710-001 08710-001 59381 59417 09310-002 59556 09648-003 59557 09130-003 59559 6 6 1 w~ 600 275 8 -\n_ 130 475 8,515 Eii LS 2 $ Ea. 2 $ l!..S -. Door 2 $ LS 2 $ SF 2 $ SF 2 $ _.\nLS 2 $ Ea. $ ~\" Ea. $ Ea. $ E SF 2 $ SF 2 $ SF 2 $ ,0 EE,jm3j 1,932 Estimated 11,014 Estimated Esbm..i= 20,656 Estimated 1,920 Estimated IIS!'i E,\nimeL 11 2,980 Estimated 2,485 Estimated :'.'I i,-~d 5$1 2,340 Estimated 43,945 Estimated I0,,.m.l l:.!iilrnBlsd 5,493 Estimated 5,493 Estimated o. E'!c al'!?d 1,738 Estimated 5,225 Estimated 20,345 Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Bern. School 3090 Page 4 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Interior Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement Deficiency Code AssesslD 09510-003 59560 fir!~~1~j~~:'~ft~~r!e~A~~ ff,,JftJe!i~Jl'\u0026amp;'t~tktgftt~i~1~::~ab-i~iip~,tt~\n',~ Interior Panic Device requires replacement 08710-015 59565 Interior In, -~r Interior Interior Interior Interior tl\\T ,D Interior Interior lnranor Interior Interior I ter1or Interior Interior 1111rl Interior Interior A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Handrail/Railing is missing and is needed M~--A C1Jmf!Yilnl I le llilJel 1ocm9 all!! n t II~ ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet room is not full com liant VCT flooring requires replacement Lock/Latchset requires replacement ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet room is not fully compliant ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant AliJI -1\\c.ce!'.s.all\\!l 'lllel-1D fJiil/alSra r,a \"1.illy edttlp1t,i l Ceramic Tile requires replacement VCT flooring requires replacement Al'.IA-fiioomd ime :.Ian 1.8~ este ~ 11k: lill!!J fMl'fl ls. not fLlW'jl lllf1111phar11 ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully compliant ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant ..,\"\"\"'mltT s re~ r s r 111 :i:im~ VCT flooring requires replacement ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 05520-001 59572 ~Olill 335257 335259 09658-009 59351 08710-012 59356 ~ ~ 321683 332022 ..,B~tl27 09310-002 59377 09658-009 59378 '.12\\5 1:l~ 321687 322078 ~!i1 Oil 5141 09658-009 59414 332051 Qty 8,515 ~ 8 10 2,885 8 96 3.730, 9G 2.511 1 Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status SF 2 $ 29,072 Estimated I ,11 111I1i f Ea. 2 $ 7,104 Estimated LF 2 $ 234 Estimated LS i ,J\n!7 EsiIIITTBIO LS 2 $ 543 Estimated LS 2 $ 3,391 Estimated SF 2 $ 14.304 Estimated Ea. 2 $ 4,905 Estimated Ea 2 1.TrE'i c:a~ LS 2 $ 3,090 Estimated LS 2 $ 154 Estimated LSi 4!1.1 ~ mall!!l\nj SF 2 $ 1\n283 Estimated SF 2 $ 18,493 Estimated LS ::! .P77 E~\" 'il~ LS 2 $ 461 Estimated LS 2 $ 153 Estimated $i' '\nI $ 1-\ni Em. ,:j SF 2 $ 12,450 Estimated LS 2 $ 153 Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 5 of 18 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 01/20/2005 Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cyde Status In' r Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully 332063 LS 2 $ 461 Estimated compliant Interior Acoustical Suspension requires replacement 09130-003 59485 300 SF 2 $ 717 Estimated I t\"'fl Oeiln-9 11!':l!eJ, . rt,fll- 119:ilO ):f .'j[l T .u s- 2 in m11mi11 Interior Lock/Latchset requires replacement 08710-012 59491 8 Ea. 2 $ 4,905 Estimated Interior Panic Device requires replacement 08710-015 59493 2 Ea. 2 $ 1,776 Estimated lril , r lo Jl2fill2 l..s .:! ~1 Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 332071 LS 2 $ 170 Estimated Interior ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet 332077 LS 2 $ 1,061 Estimated room is not full com liant 405 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 197761 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 406 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 197762 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 01 11\\111 011 i loo I E 'lh~ a,i,1~1!-iiii 1 Jnfl \u0026amp;.4l\nJ H~ IUJJ -='lmalE:: 501 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201820 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 202 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179023 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated (1~ IPll!!!I 31\n.,-o  m rloo, acits ii P~flr1 -, \"1.111 ~I,  l.l(tl G!~I '\" 1,, l.='d 404 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 197763 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 401 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 197764 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated \" Ii ~t CJa\u0026amp;\u0026amp;mom doo~ la~ lhe, !,J ,1 . ., ~ - fmMoJ 503 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201822 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 504 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179020 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated t,(llf 1,,1r1 ,-r -a~r!I -1::t1aa1Nare_ E.A-Oilfl ,~ J. E..c\n:1nm11ed 402 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179022 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 402 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 197765 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 A.P.P.L.E@. Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 6 of 18  State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Listing 01120/2005 Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Interior Wood Door (Single Hung) requires replacement 08210-007 59562 24  Ea. 3 $ 17,050 Estimated Interior Carpet requires replacement 09680-003 59353 840 SF 3 $ 2,469 Estimated ~~j~iJ~{\n~Jt~f~ill~\u0026amp;~~W411~-~lii!~,~t~l11~lt~lf~i'1fi8~~4f4- Interior Paint/Coating requires replacement 09910-002 59379 5,636 SF 3 $ 4,814 Estimated Interior Wood Door (Single Hung) requires replacement 08210-007 59380 12 Ea. 3 $ 8,525 Estimated i-1 110!' r. r I I u nea Interior Interior lrt\\ fl Interior Interior rnfE'-ior Interior Interior HVAC HVAC IV HVAC HVAC HVAC A.P.P.L.E @, Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Paint/Coating requires replacement Wood Door (Single Hung) requires replacement u C\"ab ei: ran ,- rn~a~m Countertop requires replacement Countertop needs minor repairs Cu m C.ilhin l or\nUli\"' 1.\np1a1:E411rml Custom Cabinet requires replacement Countertop requires replacement Exhaust Fan - Restroom 4800 CFm 2 H.P. is missing and is needed Classroom ventilation inadequate lail n F-!Qtrs1c l.!pla rn,in! End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires replacement End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split D/X Unit requires re lacement End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires replacement 09910-002 08210-007 06415-003 06415-002 +1, !J{IO~ 06410-003 06415-003 I 18JMIDI! 15830-002 15830-001 15800-900 15700-902 15800-900 t, 59416 5,498 59489 8 ~ 59568 14 59382 16 !iQ ~ . - 59495 8 59497 8 ~J~' .. 59574 2 59575 3 5~ ,..mi 299463 4,127 310398 4,127 299472 4,109 9F\nill!lil SF 3 $ 4,696 Estimated Ea. 3 $ 5,684 Estimated IF .,,. . 7 l:\n,111\n,L,,ij LF 4 $ 654 Estimated LF 4 $ 758 Estimated LT _ _I __ .imB.llE!i:I LF 4 $ 4,249 Estimated LF 4 $ 374 Estimated E: il,1 6!ilimalc I Ea. 2 $ 7,618 Estimated Room 2 $ 30,525 Estimated  ~Tl 2.T ~ 11TH tt SF 2 $ 20,032 Estimated SF 2 $ 37,168 Estimated SF 2 $ 19,944 Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 7 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units- Split DIX 15700-902 310399 il~tMfJtiiii\nii,iiji11EJZi~~If~ll:11l~1~19i HVAC End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires 15800-900 299480 replacement HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units- Split D/X 15700-902 310400 HVAC HVAC Plumbing Plumbing fllnl! Plumbing Plumbing 111111b1, Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Unit uires re lacement End of Life: Controls - DDC requires replacement End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX Unit uires re lacement End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require replacement  End of Life: Sanitary Sewer requires replacement E ~ fl.ifi Ji: l.:r - Ip !l S:):~ , yl,g1 Ill ADA - Drink Fountains are not fully compliant ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant Grall 891 is rne\nng. an IF n End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require replacement End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System requires replacement ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System uires replacement ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant End of Life: Sanitary Sewer requires replacement 15900-902 15700-902 15400-900 15100-908 $,\\\\ 15400-900 15100-907 299500 310402 299456 299457 J.9 ~ 321679 322072 _j :l.5!1 299464 299466 332033 15100-907 299474 322082 15100-908 299484 Qty UOM 4,109 SF Rs:!EJm 4,102 SF 4,102 SF 4,537 SF 4,537 SF 26 Ea. 14,489 SF . ' ~ LS LS ~ 15 Ea. 4,127 SF LS 4,109 SF LS 4,102 SF Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 2 \"$ 37,006 Estimated c ,t\u0026gt;b~ Ifft 1, 2 $ 19,910 Estimated 2 $ 36,943 Estimated 2 $ 9,007 Estimated 2 $ 40,861 Estimated 2 $ 31,900 Estimated 2 $ 33,907 Estimated IL,1!31 In, 2 $ 4,882 Estimated 2 $ 543 Estimated ~ 2 $ 18,404 Estimated 2 $ 4,452 Estimated 2 $ 154 Estimated 2 $ 4,433 Estimated 2 $ 153 Estimated 2 $ 9,599 Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 8 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Plumbing Grab Bar is missing and is needed Plumbing End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require replacement Plumbing ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant 403 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. l'I~ Cilasaror:,m t: lll/1 \"'3QII number ~i~~ 406 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. 501 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. I~ I? \"'1llli111 :ilk:!:. Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed l!C l::jl r\nA R~t=t, 1  -1 and ~:.n. ecll~cl Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed ji,\n.11 G~I ~rJlln.t~ ,., !!!Salga \u0026amp; nEEdEii Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed l:ieqrjc 0f llacii ,a rn1 ~ntJ a - II rl Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed Electrical Exterior Light - Wall Mount is missing and is needed Electrical End of Life: Electrical Seivice requires replacement Electrical Exterior Light - Wall Mount is missing and is needed A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD  10820-004 59479 15400-900 299498 335270 EA-064 257410 - 'II,. ,., 1 EA-064 257412 EA-064 257413 5!!.-llE' :C51\\I 16140-001 59577 16140-001 59579 ~ 4ft U(ll ~9.13ii1'1 16140-001 59362 16140-001 59384 ~r, 4,Jl, tlf11 !il!!J 16140-001 59404 16140-001 59406 i!i1~D, i'iQ.1,7~ 16140-001 59472 16520-007 59578 16400-901 299462 16520-007 59361 Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 2 Ea. 2 $ 669 Estimated 13 Ea. 2 $ 15,950 Estimated LS 2 $ 170 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated l:ia. \u0026amp;7!! Eli 1ml Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated ti E ~rttii~d 2 Ea. $ 271 Estimated 4 Ea. $ 542 Estimated '\n31 Eslim~rl. 4 Ea. $ 542 Estimated 2 Ea. $ 271 Estimated ~ Er\n: -\n2 Ea. $ 271 Estimated 4 Ea. $ 542 Estimated E3:. 71 [ii\n,ii ll 4 Ea. $ 542 Estimated 2 Ea. 2 $ 1,032 Estimated 14,489 SF 2 $ 1,897 Estimated 2 Ea. 2 $ 1,032 Estimated 6003 - Horner Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 9 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Electrical Electrical Deficiency Exterior Light - Walkway is missing and is needed Electrical Electrical Med~ C Elacini::aJ End of Life: Electrical Service requires replacement Exterior Light - Walkway is missing and is needed Room i\nai\n11151.1~11c1t 1 103 lll:l 102 102 10 101 104 1\n14. 201 201 :a 202 301 - 1 302 302 Technology End of Life: Telephones - School Wide Telephones require replacement Technology Room has insufficient dataports. l ed-lBDI 1 Ro11m Bells ll!!IE!llhOOI! n11,. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology I 11!'11!\\Q:,\u0026gt; Room lacks telephone wiring. nitt 111ll ffi~emd 21ai00rtsc, Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. E011!Wl109''1R' ocm~ !El~ on wir,1,g, Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. I ., limil~~ Rvom 111e n5utf nt Qaf.apPrl.s. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. T ' hi I'll '~ I I llm I  ,.,,, fjhQll'lt n~g. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 16520-004 59386 16400-901 2994 73 16400-901 16520-004 v.,..n1e 299481 59471 n~ 16700-900 299453 EA-022 129888 E-IYR 162\u0026amp; EA-022 129889 EA--027 I: 162526 U'.ll!lg!J EA-027 162523 EA-022 129887 EA- ' 7 tti:2:M EA--022 129895 EA-027 166848 M, 1 .9gg5 EA-027 166849 EA-022 129891 1oi\nin$ EA-022 129892 EA-027 152406 Qty UOM Priority 2 Ea. 4,109 SF 4,102 SF 3 Ea. Eil. 14,489 SF 3 Ea. 3 Ea. Ea. E~ Ea. 3 Ea. l:\n1 3 Ea. Ea. Ea. 3 Ea. Ea. 2 Ea. Ea. 2 $ 2 $ 2 2 -4 $ $ 3 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ :4 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cyde Status 2,528 13,104 13,104 3,673 Oil 7,137 542 l!iT 542 167 7 i 167 542 Hi1 542 167 167 542 16? 361 167 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated ,1,r,11 1ti.:d Estimated Estimated ~ITitJ ' Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated E:s'J!1al.i!d Estimated Estimated I 1111I1 I Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 10 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Listing 01/20(2005 Deficiency Code AssesslO Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 303 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152407 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 304 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129894 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated ~ an l.52!l\u0026lt;O\u0026lt;l 1er ~~Ima.I 203 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129897 3 Ea .. 4 $ 542 Estimated 203 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 166850 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated llil er:hnt! Qg~ R-ottri h r\"'5Uffig~ !11~ al~~ - 0~ -,-ge~r, E, 4 m 204 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 166847 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 403 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152399 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated ~ T!!ehf\\'lll.:. \".!m ~ tmJ, 1 ,I I !!I' JJU 1T Im, ti 406 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129883 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 406 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152397 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated :o,\noona 'I Rmirn ll in I I l dia, ptl\\19, A I lit!!-' .. 501 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170280 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 202 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129900 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated ,ma Tl!lci1111 ~ ~\nI 1 - pt1011'1Nei1 ng. -1!1:_li' 70'Ul1 7~7 E$g~li!llj 404 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129884 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 404 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152402 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated D1 11 ci1 t.ii,ll},\u0026gt;' nt c:leleoort~, ~ IYl' 1'9llE!!: .I. 2 Estimm d 401 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152403 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 503 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129901 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated Ull -edi!nDI ~:r Rrn\nim ~, Md 1, ph II win , l:.A~7 11'112~ E\n.. 117 504 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129902 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 504 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170283 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 4u_ T __ na - _y l~mm hBS In, ffii\nI r ! lllp , ~ T2BIIW ~lli l5!si L:11 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 11 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency 402 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Media Cer Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. ~ l!' \u0026amp; Sef~ Eia~rn,yP .:a fir! l!!t1\u0026lt;:.yu !j , t! r1169tf1aDf'd\n,s n~e Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed  Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 11 ~r,31, ..:. 1?1 Dl:\nW3e/\u0026lt;11~ rll J) lrtg .tnd ~ 11_ _ 0,!'fj Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Fire Alarm requires replacement Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Security System requires \"' laici!mi!!,I Fl~ \u0026amp; Slif11 El:i-J- ,r p - ,, I 9einq' Ll1J~i ~ m Ir ,d l!t fl j Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed ,., 5:.al-ly 113 dett ie mf:ssin\nmli Iii , I! _ I Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Fire Alarm requires replacement t r,, g S3fety 8'o :af Lie: Sncwncy:\n11JII l'J!Pl~c,.e-, n Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed !l liiar.ot~ 11 n/51 111~1 11d1 1111ae~ Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed I , \" .i tety E ::1o l Life F11\u0026lt;A1la rm mqUI/CS\" rillK\u0026gt;ernenr Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Security System requires replacement A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-027 152398 EA-027 152401 ,:w u,, , BG 13910-019 59581 13910-022 59582 L 5!l[l liS ~ 13850-900 299454 13850-901 299461 l!lll 511383 13910-004 59364 13910-019 59365 s_ 1m 13910-025 59367 13850-900 299468 _ tu 13910-001 59388 13910-004 59389 u 10. . ~ - 90 13910-022 59391 13910-025 59392 Ii! 'ilt 7f\n, 13850-901 299477 Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 3 F..::.. I 7 ll5illlflilii!a 8 Ea. $ 2,967 Estimated 6 Ea. $ 1,664 Estimated ~., a faii111 14,489 SF $ 20,431 Estimated 14,489 SF $ 27,607 Estimated E~ 1,,M 4 Ea. $ 1,044 Estimated 4 Ea. $ 1,484 Estimated ' m Eslfmulnd 4 Ea. $ 1,315 Estimated 4,127 SF $ 5,820 Estimated ~ ...::f 7 , E\u0026lt;slimalt!rl 4 Ea. $ 1,114 Estimated 4 Ea. $ 1,044 Estimated ,\\ Ba .. 11l1!Jl 1h I 11 ' 4 Ea. $ 1,109 Estimated 4 Ea. $ 1,315 Estimated IIJ E\nfrnal d 4,109 SF $ 7,829 Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 12 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is needed Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority 13910-001 59407 4 Ea. 1 ~tt~!~Kt,a~\u0026amp;Jk~IE4.tJ~--~-tiJli-~1~$'9~l4 I II Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910-022 59409 Ea. Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Fire Alarm requires replacement Fir II SIi V Fj,,I  1( f 1 !'ii!41 (~ S:r-i,temr e11UI r I 111 Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed ,i I~ I LJISI lalion iJ. m i\n1n0 iloml I Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Fire Alarm requires replacement Fire \u0026amp; Safe.ly End cl Lilt!' ::i:~d.1'111~ Em~Wi-.ae fqll~ n Specialties ADA - Counter Height is not fully compliant Specialties ADA - Food Service Line is not fully compliant ~:rl'Ni i Specialties Specialties .Speciii\nll,s~ Specialties Specialties Jlr'\"IA S !!,\nii!!CIIISI.S-1 11 I fl! ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant Afli!i.-Grao ll ra WI 111J\u0026amp;11 ,111a m 11m1 ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant Specialties Exterior Signage requires replacement Specialties Stage Curtain requires replacement A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 L1i,1 er Llfi: Puo _aA C, -I mun~n- re 13850-900 5\\1--91]1 13910-001 13910-019 13910-025 13850-900 lit !'itt-!'01 lm.111:rJ 10430-003 11063-003 II [.I-IQ~ 299483 'i!~ ~ 59473 59474 W.il'!i 59476 299497 :ise !.:!1 321675 321677 .Jl' '75. 332016 335262 m 335266 321697 \"!.158: 59570 59571\n!. 51 4 4,102 SF '{] ~I 4 Ea. 4 Ea. \"' 4 Ea. 4,537 SF ~~7 9' 11 LS LS LS LS LS LS 10 Ea. 725 SF ' lill -31, 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 a Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status $ 1, 114 Estimated ~I caltl1llil~ $ 1,109 Estimated $ 5,784 Estimated ~, frf I ti $ 1,114 Estimated $ 1,484 Estimated 1100 E5till19J $ 1,315 Estimated $ 6,398 Estimated ll,5115 \"' lm.11,d $ 2,925 Estimated $ 2,925 Estimated --~ kn 12d $ 271 Estimated $ 77 Estimated 7  11111 r, $ 77 Estimated $ 85 Estimated $ 719 Estimated $ 6,956 Estimated .. ,:urr E'alif!l d 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 13 of 18 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 0112()(2()()5 Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost life Cycle Status Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement 10155-003 . 59358 4 Ea. 3 $ 5,008 Estimated Specialties End of life: Public Address and Intercom - 11130-901 299467 4,127 SF 3 $ 4,633 Estimated Specialties End of life: Public Address and Intercom - 11130-901 299482 4,102 SF 3 $ 4,605 Estimated Communications require replacement Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement 10155-003 59498 6 Ea. 3 $ 7,511 Estimated IQ~ iSi,er::. I -~ ~ jfOO l~U E!!ii Kl 103 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229559 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,170 Estimated 103 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 240767 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated sto 102 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 125011 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 102 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213101 2 Ea. 4 $\" 1,905 Estimated 1D? S?SC11Bllies Room ha!\nne1i~ I, E_ll,-05[j 22.9!ili8 = ~ :1:,1vo ,,1,,,.\" 102 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 240768 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 102 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283811 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated !l1 S~mcia.,i Fl\nicm lilw -.s _\n,,1 !!!~ Defft II Oil, i/lii Ea s 101 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213103 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 101 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229556 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,170 . Estimated Ill iipedallies Room lil~E\npjJ--p l'I' lllill\"l! EA-0ou 2-40765.l ~SC !isl r11,1iII mgs, 101 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283810 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated 104 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213102 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated I) - - l!ie!= EM:15.5 n 57 -. 1D 104 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 240766 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 A.P.P.l.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 14 of 18 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 01/20/2005 Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code Assessl0 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 104 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283809 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated rr,f~~\\ $pB~S:,i121!' Roorrr.,\nis\nr1sufii n, EAJ..~ ~\\3[19,l a. 1,'!116 c'!:tJm tea 201 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229550 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,170 Estimated 201 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 242211 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,453 Estimated sto e. 202 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213092 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 202 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229548 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,170 Estimated Aolll cli!ii -sprnpr1alE amaunl1af I\" a\\-115!'1, \"2 21112 I'_ - ~E 202 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283802 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated 301 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213099 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated  l ~flC!CG)ll1!lli f'i~,, Ill~ fl!wBJ,t i'.:Jcl.1:ioaid-arEB f1'F ~ ~ ~, EsLrm!et! 301 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 240000 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 301 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283807 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated P.oam JI~ t1!tliffll::f$nWl U g \u0026lt;!Ill\u0026gt;. EA~ 2.L30Ba - 302 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229552 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 302 Specialties EA-058 240001 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated 303 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213097 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 303 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229553 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 0~ ,5'peela I~ Rooml3C P?Tll~!'II m 111 ,II ,,,l11, EA-I.I _.-0002 ~.:'\n!. lrt l11d !iiQr.lql!L 303 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283808 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated 304 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213096 3 Ea. 4 $ 2.858 Estimated 0.0 ~a11c\nh mxm1, 11 !xis Bi 6 ~~- :! - 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 15 of 18 - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 01/20/2005 Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 304 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 240003 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 304 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283806 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated Speciallmli IClert 'l'ffltl ~ [1fj 2 l'!!J95 i\n- fl5ll ~ - 203 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229551 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 203 . Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-05B 242213 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,453 Estimated st 204 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213093 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 204 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229549 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated - , r:jlil ll!!l R~ l\ndlls .iirpn311 i:uiey~n af t!!f~n Ei =-1:, ,! ,l ,_ Est\nt\ntorage, 204 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283804 20 SF Surf 4 $ 23B Estimated 403 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213089 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 403 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 2399B1 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 403 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-0B5 2B3797 20 SF Surf 4 $ 23B Estimated 15 S !iciBfiiBE HEllilITT ii n\u0026amp;U .rr\"\"'1bl'g.a,-aa \\ I I~ 9\\l 53 I a e-.\" 111r1 405 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229543 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 405 Specialties EA-058 239982 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated 406 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213091 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 406 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229542 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated {/Ii l)ecia]tie 6 ,_,1tJ3 E:Um 406 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-OBS 283798 20 SF Surf 4 $ 23B Estimated 501 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213105 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 6003 - Horner Adkins Elem. School 3090 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 16 of 1B State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficie11cy Deficiency Listing 01/'2012005 Deficie11cyC ode AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 501 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amou11ot f teacher EA-058 240337 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 202 202 404 404 401 01 503 Specialties Room has i11sufficie1w1tr iti11ga rea. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amou11ot f teacher storage. Specialties Room has i11sufficie1t1atc kboard area. pec1 be!IE appmprisl~ a,oolm c, I~ Specialties Specialties S dulll_ Specialties Bli11dsa re missi11go r i11p oor co11ditio11. Room has i11sufficie1t1atc kboard area. oorr, ~ p~~- , 11tJ.11r1.1lf1le sch r i!ll!O!!l!l~ Room has i11sufficie1t1atc kboard area. 503 Specialties 504 Specialties Room has insufficie11ta ckboard area. 504 Specialties 402 Specialties Room has insufficient writi11ga rea. 402 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. t\nec..al~B!, Roa..i 1-dl.s il~r QP I now ,t 04 !aimi\"! '5rdlilijlf!, Cafeteria Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. Cafeteria Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor conditio11. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 EA-053 213104 EA-058 240338 EA-055 229545 - s '~!11':1,1 EA-085 283796 EA-055 229546 E~ 2l'i'ion EA-055_ 229563 EA-058 240339 EA-055 229562 EA-058 241826 EA-053 213088 EA-055 229547 ~!ffi ~- EA-020 118582 EA-085 283800 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated Estimated 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 1E\n,, ll !I 5-. ma r.d 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated E, 4 1, Esmm,l:!!d Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,453 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,453 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,736 Estimated Ea 4 ,,Hi! l!!J\nI I I' Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 824 SF Surf 4 $ 9,788 Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 17 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room # System Deficiency Media Cer Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Media Cer Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. i'l?J f l_i:4 pp!Qp IC ,.--71 in \"l ,,111~ I A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-053 213087 EA-055 229541 jl!il\u0026lt;ir!' SubTotal by Building Grand Total by Campus Qty UOM 2 Ea. 2 Ea. E:s 329 387 Priority 4 $ 4 $ $ $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 1,905 Estimated 868 Estimated II, I E I l I 1,853,905 2,608,731 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 18 of 18 - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3137 6003 -Arnold Drive Elementary School 01/2Al2005 Campus: 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementarv School Building: Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Site Asphalt requires replacement 02740-002 59065 10,000 SF 2 $ 16,936 Estimated Site Sidewalk requires replacement 02775-002 59072 4,725 SF 2 $ 22,931 Estimated SI~ Ml\" J\\l\n:,\n~lbllB:ni1J!n1f1l' llrn 1:1artcinurg. aw.ilt\n. ll5'7U::l L:c :r,650 I I I I ID tiullu.n9 e,e twit~ !I' ~run~ JeJ1l Site ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant 331434 LS 2 $ 2,106 Estimated Site ADA - Handicap parking spaces are not fully 331527 LS 2 $ 702 Estimated compliant Site Playfield Equip (2nd to 5th) requires replacement 02880-009 59067 4 Ea. 4 $ 153,089 Estimated Site 02880-012 59070 4 Ea. 4 $ 95,060 . Estimated Site School has insufficient football/soccer fields. EA-007 107479 Ea. 4 $ 34,649 Estimated Site School has insufficient baseball fields. EA-008 108386 Ea. 4 $ 32,188 Estimated lt i.iln!\nff!r ..001 L:!\u0026amp;i'li 4 I ~r:J l:!slim2E_ Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 337874 LS 2 $ 1,404 Estimated HVAC Computer room lacks independent AC. EA-025 110739 Ea. 4 $ 13,636 Estimated foi\nlnllill ~ -al - rD'11iataJ f9r\nb,r,~ 'Ii. ll.Jru!.~1 \u0026amp;!I. , :11 1,,.,,t l Specialties Computer room lacks appropriate furniture. EA-026 111310 Ea. 4 $ 363 Estimated Specialties School's PBX is undersized. EA-030 112126 Ea. 4 $ 17,550 Estimated Sp I ~~ s iilllP~prr,i\"bz Wil'tifl1~1 El\n-Da I t\n,, b I Ill! I SubTotal by Building 18 $ 448,121 Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Roofing Sheet Metal Roofing requires replacement 07610-003 59078 31,080 SF 2 $ 254,935 Estimated 6003-Arnold Drive Elementary School 3137 A.P.P.LE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 1 of 8 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3137 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School 01124/2005 Campus: 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Roofing End of Life: Roofing System1 - 4-Ply Built-Up 07500-900 341650 1,902 SF 2 $ 16,770 Estimated Exterior Aluminum Window (Sliding) requires replacement 08520-017 59076 681 SF 2 $ 38,044 Estimated Exterior Aluminum Windows (Fixed Casement) requires 08520-018 59077 38 SF 2 $ 2,123 Estimated lacement Interior Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is 08710-001 59091 2 Ea. $ 10,986 Estimated needed Interior VCT flooring requires replacement 09658-009 59079 26,912 SF 2 $ 133,430 Estimated 1-1, or V\\l::O~re.i- i,A gn T~i.JlmE reolaca.,ient o~,::so m fi~i.l:l \"25,'\ni27 - -,-1!: \u0026amp;\n:st)),1I .till Interior Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement 09510-003 59085 26,627 SF 2 $ 90,909 Estimated Interior Lock/Latchset requires replacement 08710-012 59093 48 Ea. 2 $ 29,428 Estimated 1, AfJ/1,,- I! 1\"1.w1I II r111~a 11na ~S!IJ,1J \"=' - ,Z'~ ~mat_rl Interior f,,JJA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet 335982 LS 2 $ 7,640 Estimated room is not fully compliant Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully 335984 LS 2 $ 3,668 Estimated compliant 16 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199902 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 018 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199903 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated  l'.l l11fl!f10r C qgm do- faciis aAJ)roariaie re EA ffl!ll0i1 E,1.. 2 l!I 019 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199905 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 017 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199906 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated l)t3 111 .-01 il~-n.1m1 doer la,~ appro,Iin e h\nrf~ 1 @1,-D/~O ,gg~. l:a.. 1. . !!f 003 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 . 201508 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 005 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201509 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 001 I11!.!!tlar apfJI II ~ ~ !ail L) 1ii1 4a 6003 -Arnold Drive Elementary School 3137 A.P.P.L.E @, Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 2 of 8 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3137 6003 -Arnold Drive Elementary School 0112412005 Campus: 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 009 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201511 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 101 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201512 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated :: I t.l~or iJl==m aoOI' t,,1i: af!Frn l!ltt, .,. J:A..[I .i.016'3 ea. 39 Ecr,,1111l,d 008 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199898 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 01 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201507 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated Ill IMI r!Dr \"'\\ua,oornll l l:i  Hl51iJ.!l!'l ~:m Esilmsied 12 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199900 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 014 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199901 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated Ol '\" arl::v :J an, 11 I II~ ~llilruprl Ill ,1w-11 -mm 1999t.17 Ea. ,! 5 4 - i=J.{1,11,t1!t 1 Interior Carpet requires replacement 09680-003 59081 2,568 SF 3 $ 7,548 Estimated Interior Wall Covering requires replacement 09720-003 59087 11,668 SF 3 $ 24,300 Estimated lnb~rfo, P.a1llllr.. Ir, /fi rfll! 005119-[IOO ~:lllllll I [J !,~ a Interior Wood Door (Single Hung) requires replacement 08210-007 59090 50 Ea. 3 $ 35,521 Estimated Interior Custom Cabinet requires replacement 06410-003 59094 30 LF 4 $ 15,935 Estimated l~rl\" !Mi' 15-IID:I ~- IIG Ml Li- I fl 12:1\"\"1 HVAC Furnace requires replacement 15530-003 59103 10 Ea. 2 $ 29,320 Estimated HVAC Classroom ventilation inadequate 15830-001 59107 14 Room 2 $ 141,952 Estimated VN= EJ~~rk - 1--~ I sulalic!,f~1 ,ms IJ0.!155 ,32.6 Sf\" ~ I HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Window 15700-900 310537 400 SF 2 $ 1,153 Estimated Units require replacement HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Roof Top 15700-901 310538 12,828 SF 2 $ 198,885 Estimated Units require replacement Plumbing Grab Bar is missing and is needed 10820-004 59113 8 Ea. 2 $ 2,677 Estimated Plumbing End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require 15400-900 300450 62 Ea. 2 $ 76,069 Estimated replacement 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School 3137 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 3 of 8 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3137 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School 01/24120115 Campus: 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Plumbing ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant 333553 LS 2 $ 1,223 Estimated Plumbing ADA - Drink Fountains are not fully compliant 335988 LS 2 $ 11,003 Estimated 01 I F'I - lritJ oom\n1i::l!!5\"p rr~aiar l:111~ EA iS/l11\n.5 L I~ I I I~ I 011 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257428 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,356 Estimated 16 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257422 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated ti ~ Pt1mlll _ gn, 1~1:l,i fh I Ulr. TJU~r cF 1511\" ~~ .$74\\ll E\n,  II 1-,,111\\E11J 020 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257424 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 019 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257425 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated H lumbM!g l:::!iE!~rlJtltnl~ s lh=!r \u0026gt;llqu,ud nllmtl ~\"\"' li i l:3U111.0em 013 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257427 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 003. Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257415 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 007 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. 257417 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 009 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257418 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 11:\u0026lt;,1 Plwn:,ing Jllo!!Eroon1.,\nCl\\J.s l'BIJUll\"ej umb r .:lfsr\nfn' E e- :.i:rn~fJ 102 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257420 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 008 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257421 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated ~ ~I GF'1~ ~ 11111 ~ al I H.l I\u0026amp; - E:: Sstlhtakl!cl Electrical End of Life: Electrical Service requires 16400-901 300456 32,652 SF 2 $ 4,274 Estimated replacement Technology End of Life: Telephones - School Wide 16700-900 300454 32,652 SF 3 $ 16,083 Estimated Telephones uire re acement 011 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152639 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 16 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129908 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 6003 -Arnold Drive Elementary School 3137 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page4 of 8 State of Arkansas 3137 6003 -Arnold Drive Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# 018 018 I 0 020 . 019 fl 017 017 1\n\\ 013 003 ,g~ 005 007 00!.I 101 102 ,n2 008 01 n 010 12 System Deficiency Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. T-eah I~,~ kf)fln\\ II 11,11 aia1'\" r Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. T :h'll!I~ f\u0026lt;!Klm alll!, elepll 11[1 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Tm -ooDl~'f Floomfui9 m~u I ~r d.11.Ji,:,rr Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. I l t\"1,i~ fwgrn ho. !m\nU - n , lBIB,ig_rtE Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. recrmo Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Te..hnolc r Ruortr locls t!!l~t, - 11111: . Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. ,i,til,\n,g~ fwgrn hi3.5 in!\nIJfiii,lsrn =a oru: Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. \"\"\"'\"b, 1 lwtim _al\njq\nI\nI h\"'ll rl A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-022 129909 EA-027 152644 El ~a:_ !1.9\"1a EA-027 152645 EA-022 129911 E-Au 1:W II EA-022 129912 EA-027 152641 - ttJ2 1~i~ EA-027 152638 EA-027 152656 EA- 'I 1~ l EA-027 152657 EA-027 152652 1~ EA-027 152654 EA-022 129904  r 1.\u0026amp;'l~ EA-027 152650 EA-027 152655 :z\n~m\n:s EA-027 152646 EA-022 129906 Qty UOM Priority 2 2 Ea. Ea. BL Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. E\n._ Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. 2 Ea. Ea Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. 3 Ea. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 - 4 4 4 4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ .::. $ $ Deficiency Listing 01124/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 361 Estimated 167 Estimated 1,1 ~- ta,i 167 Estimated 181 Estimated 1:/ EaI!maied 361 Estimated 167 Estimated\nl E n\nr,j rt 167 Estimated 167 Estimated 167 Estimated 167 Estimated 11:IT ~3411n I ti 167 Estimated 361 Estimated \"l'iir Fo 1ltna, ti 167 Estimated 167 Estimated -1~ l lrrt ti 167 Estimated 542 Estimated ~,!lil'lal!!_d 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School 3137 Page 5 of 8 - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3137 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School 01/24/2005 Campus: 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 014 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129907 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 014 Technology Room lacks t~lephone wiring. EA-027 152648 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 11 1:,m1.1\n,JegR C! i~r, ,. a . l'!lll illll Eoi lrrraiu11 015 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152642 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Media Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152651 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Stlire1)1l !laill!\u0026lt;P!1:i\"e ..E. :meijjet1i.: h ~ml= ,fl_glln,tiS - fl~ n I ,7' 11,i 1rl llmd'!'d Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed 13910-019 59119 12 Ea. $ 4,451 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910-022 59121 Ea. $ 277 Estimated 11 ~Ir S1 g~ D !1Ji\nklrl1,m 1,-. nt11 n\"  ~rl ~ ills 5'a1 Ill 1::3 3m 3'tim31B!! Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Emergency Lighting - Standby Battery 16500-901 300452 6 Ea. $ 2,415 Estimated Lighting System requires replacement Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant 335986 LS 2 $ 611 Estimated jl T II I lll ~\u0026amp;ml~ SM7 a,J Ea. - - ::.I : Specialties Exterior Signage requires replacement 10430-003 59098 4 Ea. 3 $ 288 Estimated Specialties End of Life: Public Address and Intercom - 11130-901 300453 32,652 SF 3 $ 36,658 Estimated Communications require re lacement 011 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230299 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,170 Estimated 011 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 253263 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated sto e. 16 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 253256 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage. 018 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213680 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 1il ~\"' j~ t !In\\ I 1raf I'll r E, \"\"'12!' ~ !:!I - 111~1i i 020 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213679 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 020 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230297 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School 3137 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page6 of 8 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3137 6003-Arnold Drive Elementary School 01/24/2005 Campus: 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 019 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213678 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 019 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230296 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated lj!, Ho rn 10lol\"~ ep13rDpna13.\nmau r !Ji tE,Bcne, Ui\nw 26\"3Z!i9 BL ,\n11\n1 5sllmiil9d s.l,t,t\"l\\Je 017 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213677 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 017 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230294 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 017 Sp:,r:,gllli!!s- !\nA-~ J\n160 ci :I l B1Jr11.ti\nt!!.1 013 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213676 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 013 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230298 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated v-ig piae.,151~ Roa, li!!\n,1/,1:i1 ppl'llpil\nit\n\u0026gt;\niiml gkJ11oLf hlacilEc Ell,-~ 1M '4:1~ ._g(,i'j In,\n~lt!~!Ji!!,. 003 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213685 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 003 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230301 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 1)1,- fop! Illes. Ro11ml eelo\u0026amp;a p?fap I 1111c 11mal l! \" E :c- 2Gll~li\nz,a, ~maied ~\u0026amp; 005 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213684 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 005 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230295 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated ltl:i ,,11 rt IJffl 12 9 eppfopru:itl\nl'l'ICIU i ~1 bll--\n0-!i! 258248- f t:.2. ' 0 i.::d Elarageo\" 1 007 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230291 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 007 Specialties EA-058 253247 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated 009 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 253248 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 1 101 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213683 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated u s,, I ' ~m has i~sliffii:11~ 1B~1:1,v ~raia E1cD6!! mac Ei~ 1.802 mii d 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School 3137 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 7 of 8 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3137 6003-Arnold Drive Elementary School 01124/2005 Campus: 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 101 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 253249 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 102 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213682 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated U- ..e11 fl\nom h1i1l5n su 1c1e 'IJdi!ca,it ~ .csr\n'2!10292 ti It E::,sU! ~rl 102 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 253250 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 008 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213681 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated a. e~,~ Room I, I, YI f'I.Jiol n'I 1'114 EA-U-E ~0\".!!l!l ~ E\ne. ,]1,ij: 1\n51:lma~ 008 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 253251 8 Ea. 4 $ 3,875 Estimated storage. 01 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 253244 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,453 Estimated 5'1\n:,,age QUI ndiMli9\u0026amp; RnamJaw P'1\u0026lt;!'PnT i!i 1\u0026lt;\u0026gt;u,e, l1 ~ . 1l: im!'E - fill E~tma1ed ge, 12 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230302 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 12 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 253254 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,453 Estimated i'peo:, \"-~ 53~ I,,. E:sllma~d ~' 015 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230303 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 015 Specialties EA-058 253261 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,453 Estimated Media Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213674 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated Media Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230289 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated ',11\n!01 flagi'n laciai apj]OCP,rTE.18i!IDl!Unll D ~r. ~~ :32 Ea 1-=,~11 E:'.iUmaf d ::ii g ' ---- --- SubTotal by Building 159 $ 1,599,161 Grand Total by Campus 177 $ 2,047,282 6003 -Arnold Drive Elementary School 3137 A.P.P.l.E Cl, Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 8 of 8 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3092 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. 01'20/2005 Campus: 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. Building: Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Site ADA - Accessible routes from parking or sidewalks 331407 LS 2 $ 5,850 Estimated to building are not fully compliant Sile ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant 340891 LS 2 $ 2,106 Estimated flllfi, n 1\nire, Ef.bim1lml ~ Site ADA - Handicap parking spaces are not fully 331414 LS 2 $ 702 Estimated compliant Site ADA  Access to playgroundso r athleticf ieldsIs 3\"0892 LS 2 $ 3,510 Estimated notfu com ant Site School lacks marquee or marquee in poor EA-001 105277 Ea. 4 $ 11,635 Estimated condition. Site School lacks dedicated K playground/equipment. EA-004 106665 Ea. 4 $ 24,309 Estimated Sile l) I w 1\n:urr~nl ToP.!b !,i\\iel:la\nr I![ I au '1 fi E\n.. 4 d Site School has insufficient baseball fields. EA--008 108362 Ea. 4 $ 32,188 Estimated Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 337834 LS 2 $ 1,404 Estimated HVA C m1 UfilJJI eA-112.! D'l E'II, I Ellll,,l!d Electrical School site lacks appropriate lighting. EA-041 106188 Ea. 2 $ 2,437 Estimated Specialties School lacks an appropriate surveillance system. EA-033 113255 Ea. $ 20,411 Estimated 5pecfaltl1!5 ch V 21NF, I-1wu Estlm Jti Specialties Elementary S\u0026lt;:1100laI cks appropriate waylinding EA-088 114556 Ea. 4 $ 14,327 Estimated IYIJ(em. SubTotal by Bulldlng 16 $ 204,955 Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Roofing Gutters/Downspouts are missing and are needed 07710-002 52036 125 LF 2 $ 753 Estimated ~ll\"I IL 111~1 ~~ow4Awnm1il~ uirl!S re,:11, .filll18 00 1I ,- - E~tm1 II Exterior Soffit requires replacement 07460--001 52017 950 SF 2 $ 4,718 Estimated 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. 3092 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 1 of 4 State of Arkansas 3092 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. Campus: 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room # System Exterior ~m Exterior Exterior 1[1 Exterior Structural I larlia1 Interior Interior I t rl Interior Interior In 1  Interior Interior lniennr Interior Interior \\rne l3f Interior Interior lni!! 'at Interior A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency End of Life: Exterior Doors require replacement ~ Siding requires replacement Soffit requires replacement II ~ r~U _ f\u0026gt;!I~ 1 fll ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant ADA - Stairs are not fully compliant tt CIQgr - -l'ldii:\n,p ~ mlr.5m!J n~deo Ceramic nIe requires replacement VCT flooring requires replacement /\\il!iUSllc.il Cei!illl!J -q Lock/latchset requires replacement End of Life: Ceramic Tile requires replacement DA .I\\ 111,lIt !U .L 'banll am 1J!! 1 V , ~ illtfll ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet room is not fully compliant ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant mill,~ std]F .j , aJ)).111:Q rli! r.l!fW!l'! ADA - Door Hardware Is not fully compliant Carpet requires replacement Pe l1Co.1n g rnq!lrt!lr~\nlilri!lfflllll'M Wood Door (Single Hung) requires replacement Custom Cabinet requires replacement Cw,Jnm Cabim!l rl?ll Ir pi\n, n,e'1! Countertop requires replacement Deficiency Code AssesslD 08100-900 299504 3 II 07 460-005 52031 07460-001 52032 OT-\u0026lt;tll 0~ -li2Dl:l 321706 321709 oa71lU!01 ~\ni.o:z:7 09310-002 52022 09658-009 52023 Qa tlHMl!I ffl2S 08710-012 52028 09600-903 299507 llt''HIO 322098 335272 ,m111\\J ~ 321708 09680-003 52024 Q ~ - 08210-007 52037 06410-003 52029 1H 06415-003 52039 Qty UOM Priority 14 Door I ' 2,500 350 Vift SF SF LS LS E.a. 375 SF 350 SF 1 !it\\! Sr 45 Ea. 571 SF LS LS LS 2,000 SF 3 Ea. 600 LF c\n8 LF 2 $ 2 2 2 $ $ $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 3 $ 3 $ 4 $ 4 $ Deficiency Listing 01'20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 48,197 ,-4 r 9,544 1,738 '.36D 674 2,340 ID.HO 5,013 1,735 !i,1 27,589 7,634 H.8 8,047 644 ' !i 54 5,879 ,6.1 2,132 318,708 374 Estimated e_r,. II Estimated Estimated EE !illiil Estimated Estimated E\"~llm1e1 Estimated Estimated Eillmil Ei-11 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated F Uni Pil Estimated Estimated E.\u0026lt;1trn Estimated Estimated !\n_q.,IJllaiJ!d Estimated 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. 3092 Page 2 of4 State of Arkansas 3092 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. Campus: 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room fl. System HVAC lilll'I HVAC HVAC HVAC HVAC Plumbing Plumbing IU[TI!b l'llJ Plumbing Plumbing ~IH,.Ii Deficiency Classroom ventilation inadequate jil i:e111, 11 End of life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX Unit requires replacement End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Roof Top Units re ire lacement End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires replacement End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX Unit ~11, , Eml of rn , D11111 1!1 l:Jll 1J1!,ail\n!~I 111 End of life: Faucets and Fixtures require replacement ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require replacement ADA - Drink Fountains are not fully compliant L', 01 r, r._a m I .,.\nr11tee I  l!lfl Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Securtty System requires replacement Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Fire Alann requires replacement - Sala!'!}' E!ili:dI f llfec Eraetg,em\ny,L 'W)lifl\\j - 1 1 h~ I I ry  g J3 SJ FEm raqu p 1 1,1 Specialties End of Life: Closed-Circuit TV System requires replacement Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant B~li1UI /1, uri I I'll I r I ~ill'I,', u11 1~\"1 A.P.P.LE@, Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 15830-001 52041 1~1100-UII , !HJ5[]11 15700-902 310403 15700-901 310404 15600-900 299513 15700-902 310405 I I 15400-900 299506 321701 ~2097 15400-900 299512 335276 lidl.'I OB [I 13650-901 299502 13650-900 299506 13700-900 299503 321703 ,, I j Qty UOM Pr1ortty 16 Room 2 $ 6,875 SF 2,291 SF 1,440 SF 1,440 SF 91 Ea. LS 3 Ea. LS 34,389 SF 34,369 SF fl Ea. 34,369 SF LS 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 2 $ 2 $ $ $ 2 $ 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 162,212 I tt If, 61,917 35,520 6,989 12,969 111,650 515 I I 3,661 466 .1111 65,523 46,492 ill 92,279 257 ,11!: Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated l:'!il!mal Estimated Estimated B(j,rl Estimated Estimated ltm~ Estimated Estimated EsllRIGlai.:i 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. 3092 Page 3 of4 State of Arkansas 3092 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. Campus: 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. Building: Elementary or Primary Floor # Room  System Deficiency Specialties ADA- Food Service Line is not fully compliant Specialties ADA - Stage accessibility is not fully compliant ei r ' rnJiiliPBl'Sri rall1ill\"1lt rep \"~lli Iii Specialties End of Life: Public Address and Intercom - Communications require replacement Specialties End of Life: Public Address and Intercom - Communicationresq uirer eplacement A.P .P .LE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty 332093 335274 I 01 ) 1:1 =, 11130-901 299505 34,389 11130-901 299514 1,440 SubTotal by Building 62 Grand Total by Campus 68 UOM Priority LS 2 $ LS 2 $ - SF 3 $ SF 3 $ $ $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cyde Status 2,925 Estimated 14,040 Estimated I ,w l\nfllf1111l-1 38,608 Estimated 1,617 Estimated 1,514,440 1,719,394 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. 3092 Page4 of 4 State of Arkansas 3146 6003 - Bates Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bates Elementary School Building: Floor# Room# System Deficiency Site K playground has inappropriate impact material. Site Playground lacks appropriate impact surface. :-1: _ 011,I !! In ,rjjJ ei,tmol L u~~G i.j- Site School has insufficient baseball fields. Specialties School lacks an appropriate surveillance system. ~ I JII (cc f0Dm I!:  ~ p pm::!: 'furn 111, Specialties School lacks appropriate central PA equipment. A.P.P.LE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-005 106762 EA-013 108958 = IJ B EA-008 108390 EA-033 113278 le' 11 EA-036 114311 SubTotal by Building Grand Total by Campus Qty UOM Priority Ea. 2 $ 4 Ea. 2 $ Ea. 4 $ Ea. $ Ea. 4 $ 7 $ 7 $ Deficiency Listing 01/200006 Repair Cost Life Cyde Status 2,467 Estimated 9,867 Estimated Eatlmul 32,188 Estimated 20,411 Estimated I llm!atell 101,796 Estimated 201,739 201,739 6003- Bates Elementary School 3146 Page 1 of 1 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementarv School Building: Floor# Room# System Site Site It Site Site Site Site le, Site Site Site Site HVAC Electrical Deficiency Sidewalk requires replacement Traffic Sign is missing and is needed Tml1 - ... n 11hMI f ,1,, \"'' I ADA - Accessible routes from parxlng or sidewalks to building are not fully compliant ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant ADA - Handicap parxing spaces ere not fully compliant ADA - Access to playgrounds or athletic fields is 1101 I llv oomplitlr ~ i 1 6 II IJ~Bllfl[i!t l!Di41J,Obe I ill! I I Playlield Equip (2nd to 5th) requires replacement School lacks marquee or marquee In poor -1 1111, mlll School has Insufficient baseball fields. Bus drop-off area does not have a canopy. A A~wle Cloon.11a,ap\nncl T!d Jv 111111 1 Computer room lacks independent AC. Exterior Light - Light Pole - Parlcing \u0026amp; Road is mlssin and Is needed Specialties School lacks an appropriate suNeillance system. Specialties School's PBX is undersized. A.P.P.l.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 02775-002 69123 02690-001 69113 IJ f,Ofl I\\ , 340696 337635 331423 331427 , . 02880-009 69116 EA-001 105278 EA-008 106364 EA-031 112667 ,r EA-025 110716 16520-001 69126 EA-033  113256 EA-030 112100 SubTotal by Building Qty UOM Priority 2,000 SF 2 $ 4 Ea. 2 $ E.c LS LS I LS LS 3 Ea. Ea. Ea. LF Ea. 4 Ea. 20 Ea. Ea. 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2 $ $ 4 $ $ Deficiency Listing 01/2W2005 Repair Cost life Cycle Status 9,706 660 \"' 5,650 2,106 3,510 3,510 I' 114,817 11,635 32,166 19,750 I, I 13,636 6,788 20.411 17,550 321,096 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated BUrniloled Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated EilifmalE!d Estimated Estimated 11!1 I cl Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 Page 1 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementary School Building: 1st Grade Wing Floor# Room # System Deficiency ?j11},~\nii~~r~f:[if~faf~Jfi:~~itWtl~lili~Jtij.cih~ Interior Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is needed 125 u 127 128 Interior lftl Interior Interior ln_1_t I Interior HVAC Elrolcii1 Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. 1!19:! 111 Ill Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. 129 Cl!Juib 111d ocI 1111 1 I Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom ventilation inadequate GFl Ro.t!FJl dt I ,1 ~ 129 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. 125 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. ~ ITTli! i!:l\\E jSBJI IIIlll !lit I 126 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. 126 Room lacks telephone wiring. mh 127 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. 128 T echnotogy Room has insufficient dataports. Ill f h1 IDIJI' W!Ir 129 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. 129 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. f I S~I  ,Slnd '!lJ I 1111tri_g1 '1/11 125 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 125 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 08710--001 69399 EA-040 182390 1Jll!il 1 EA-040 182392 EA--040 182388 -~- I! ~ EA-040 182389 15830--001 69406 ,ll !1\\1} EA-084 267481 EA-022 142721 ,6 EA-022 142722 EA-027 152409 . 1 I ff EA-027 152410 EA--022 142724 E'A:-0~7 51 1 EA-022 142771 EA-027 152412 (i.ll EA-053 213131 EA-055 229590 Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status t\n~]mlii~,~j.~~ijji\nJ\n~~1[lc~' Ea. $ 5,493 Estimated Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 8L l=!it11m11aii Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 100 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 4 Room 2 $ 40,655 Estimated ?'I lnmii Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated E\n.. 1_, EaIm j 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Ee E:11.!1 \"II Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated E.z 1 , Esil 11,i.l 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated u. ~I I 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated i:,,,.\n..~. ..~. m~~~~~\"l,~-rn:.-\"=T.r~ .... ~~.\nq:=.,,, 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 Page 2 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementarv School Building: 1st Grade Wing Floor# Room # System Deficiency 125 Specialties Blinds are missing or In poor condition. 126 Specialties Room has insufficient tack.board area. I I I{ I Milqllge, 127 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 127 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 12? S~im R-o ll1era11a- 128 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 128 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. ::!I! s i!!GlaJ!m e-mm1 llICJ\\s~.PP pn.1118 8\"1 U~T Dfl01!!~tJ\n,r iilaf~ 129 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 129 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. Building: Elementary or Primary Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-085 283819 EA-055 229591 D 48ffl EA-053 213130 EA-055 229592 ,i,(l EA-053 213129 EA-055 229593 EA-tJlffi Q! Si!11 EA-055 229594 EA-058 246812 SubTotal by Building Deficiency Listing 01/2Q.l2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 24 SF Surf 4 $ 285 Estimated 1 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated ~ ~lu,IJ!!il. 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated ~ -- 131Ed Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated ~ I  ~Ill it Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated 36 $ 114,008 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status    i .:. .J\\\n)~,::~t''.tt:Jf\nijj~J\n.:\"~!0~Q~iljl~:~_~#9.il4{,i~'~~t[~\n:11J~.f~tlf~~li1@:::i[c~1:f\n~:\ni ~'(1~fA$,l(:t'\n'::'ii\n*ti\\\n~:g1:i:@::r:~1-~1t:~., .~\ntiI'1i,.Exterior Aluminum Window (Awning) requires replacement 08520-003 69177 240 SF 2 $ 13,600 Estimated Exterior ~ior Interior Interior 11 , or A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 EIFS needs minor repairs /\\Cl ri1i  I Doorti'il~ ~,e Plll !!!lly Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is needed Ceramic Tile requires replacement 07240-002 69181 Im 08710-001 69210 09310-002 69197 FJii'Ull 400 SF 2 $ 2 Ea. 1,425 SF 2 $ 2,451 1,1 10,986 19,050 Estimated I 1 lad Estimated Estimated IIMI 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 Page 3 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room # System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority 115 I ' 116 116 Ill 109 110 1 It 111 111 Interior Interior Interior Interior I r, Interior Interior l Eff,]f Interior Interior l!illU Interior Interior ln!u  t Interior Interior Acoustical Suspension requires replacement Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement Oi.llJ ICh Panic Device requires replacement ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant I o ~r151(\nn , I U  ttr,, I m I lly mm~IIBrt\" ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully compliant Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Ol!D ~p Jll1~ !l -, I a,e. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. ,roamdk ll!l!i ~N' Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. 1plfl1) 14!1,1 1 Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. 09130-003 69206 09510-003 69207 l!. I Ill II 08710--015 69212 322102\n!! I07 322110 EA-039 176782 E'A.-ilD ~112I, EA--039 176783 EA-040 202110 EA-11 i! 1IITTfil EA-040 202103 EA--039 176777 U ~II HI EA-039 176778 EA--040 2021 05 21,475 SF 21,475 SF i 7 Ea. LS .s LS Ea. \"\"\n1 Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. 1i~\n~x~?~~~\n~~~-r:~~i~~%@~:~r~J-~~~~~~~~~:~~~1~1e~1,~lP.'1t~~~g~~~~~i:\n!~~ , E 1 112 Interior Classroomdoorlacksappropriatehardware. EA-040 202106 1 Ea. 117 118 118 1 II Interior 1111II ~ Interior Interior A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. d!!)Of I Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. I :1 , m 11aM 11 !Ilia prop IE 111 111 I, EA-039 0..t\u0026gt; I EA-039 EA--040 t/lJ,4 0 176784 ~,,1, 176785 202112 ' ~ Ea. Ea. Ea. ~ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20l2006 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 51,309 73,319 I ' 6,216 827 I ' 4,965 190 190 439 439 190 if II 190 439 I rl 439 190 4.1 190 439 111:i Estimated Estimated Es lma1e,I Estimated Estimated I I 11.0 eJ!I Estimated Estimated fl1T1nled Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 1=~11m 11!!1 Estimated Estimated Esilmi\nl'etl Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated I 11111 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School 3094 Page 4 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# 119 120 121 121 122 123 124 124 101 103 I ' 104 104 11~c 105 105 11 106 107 II) 108 System Interior Interior I~ ul r Interior Interior 1H Interior Interior h1u rim Interior Interior 111 Interior Interior u-,, Interior Interior 11, 11[1 Interior Interior ltl II Interior Interior lhf or Interior A.P .P .LE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. r.:\nJ\nissf 0111~ llf)F I ~mp I 1 I Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. l~\"I I LIJjL t\n,i, ll\u0026lt;i!Jt,:.I, Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. .J I ,I '\"Ill anode - li!IJ!)flllJllBlil Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. IIJflJQIJI 01 ta Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. m, p cprj , lllflll ClassfOOm door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. ,:::Jaam11111 a 1 ~- li I Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Lnaunom doc liiJJ:9i,\nc.!'II !'' !)Iii I 1, 1 Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Deficiency Code AssesslO  EA-040 201890 EA-039 t I EA--039 EA-040 'rP EA-040 EA--039 II EA--039 EA--040 -os EA--040 EA-039 ,41,l EA-039 EA--040 E/\\fl EA--039 EA--040 ~ 9 EA-040 EA-039 EA-039 176787 HI 1 176788 201892 T ~ 201893 176790 'I ' 176791 201895 -,1- 202096 176769 - ..!tl!I 176770 202098 l71fl'1i 176772 202099 202100 176774 mi lJ 176775 Qty UOM Priority Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 8 Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. '2,. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. '=,31. Ea. Ea. E3 Ea. Ea. Ea. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Deficiency Listing 01na2005 Repair Cost Life Cyde Status 439 Estimated 190 \\ll 190 439 11m 439 190 190 439 I l 439 190 JI Ill 190 439 1 \" 190 439 100 439 190 190 Estimated Bo.lim\ni11W Estimated Estimated t:llllmated Estimated Estimated Eisll11 1, ~ Estimated Estimated 111111 Estimated Estimated I,, Estimated Estimated n,m~!j, Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Ee-1 i..ir LI Estimated 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School 3094 Page 5 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room # System 108 113 114 Interior 11 b .. m, Interior Interior I I I ltlf Interior Interior Interior HVAC I II/ . HVAC HVAC HVAC Plumbing 1111 111ll Plumbing Plumbing A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. I.lit.a 1 nm .ioE IJ,~ lras,111rnmlls ~/llm, ,.a11 Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. I.J __\ni 1111 _DOI p11mr,, ~ 11 , , lw'11 Paint/Coaling requires replacement Wood Door (Single Hung) requires replacement ,\n.,q l.:i -- r-,,JJ~ fl ~1,1i1!11~il Countertop requires replacement Furnace requires replacement flVI LI I 0~ M:f tn. \\14 , ,epl llEllllffll Evaporative Condenser -Air Cool 5 Ton requires replacement Evaporative Condenser -Air Cool 10 Ton requires re lacement Ductwork requires replacement Classroom ventilation inadequate ~1ill1 I rl Ut1ih Qlllr r.cil , n End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Window Units require replacement End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require replacement E:11 \" ~ cmes, M-11 squlree repli!.17:!n,em ADA - Drink Fountains are not fully compliant ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-040 202102 ! rL It EA-040 202107 EA-039 176781 _L 0~ 09910-002 69208 08210-007 69209 U ..a M 06415-003 69214 15530-003 69216 15660-006 69220 15660-009 69221 15810-002 69239 15830-001 69240 11'.1,!fl'I 15700-900 310410 15400-900 299526 1ill llllf i\" 322113 335278 Qty UOM Priority Ea. :: Ea. Ea. 4,360 SF 81 Ea. J 225 LF 10 Ea. E,\na Ea. 4 Ea. 32,000 SF 22 Room -1,,., 0 1,200 SF 86 Ea. Ill LS LS 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 3 $ 3 $ 4 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01 /2lll2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 439 1111 439 190 .\\ 3,724 57,544 J\ni 10,506 29,320 I I 7,536 34,534 154,814 222,990 , 3,460 105,515 14,896 1,656 Estimated E~Hm~1au Estimated Estimated [ Iii JiJ ti Estimated Estimated 11,11 j1 ' Estimated Estimated EUlm Ir Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Esi,mul LI Estimated Estimated 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 Page 6 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# 115 116 11 109 110 112 118 Ill 120 121 System Plumbing Plumbing l11rll ttg Plumbing Plumbing 11111 t, JI Plumbing Plumbing 11  1nl1 Plumbing Plumbing F11UI11iJIHII Deficiency Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. Room lacks private toilets. Cl1t!is11i , Lok r11 ,.q um 1 11j  Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. -l3ssl!Ujl!f1 I ' Ired m,.m~m t ltUt Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. 1111100 I 1h11, Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. Classroom law the required number of sinks. ,\nI I __ 123 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. 124 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. !i~J!f:(ii\n'/1{,f~~~i:t ulfl I r 111 111 115 115 I t11 116 109 j Electrical Electrical i3actris.il GFI Receptacle is missing and Is needed GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed Ell 114g 1 ~. 111 ~II M I JTiJ Ii\\'! I II I ~ l Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. \u0026gt;It Al ll!tks j !!JJf,011C 11 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-064 EA-063 EA-064 EA-064 E,WJ EA-064 EA-064 EA-064 EA-064 I , I 261087 256456 1nl11 !I 261079 261080 IWI 261083 261092 261094 261095 I EA-064 261097 EA--064 261 099 11.172 16140-001 69241 16140--001 69244 ' i~ ~ EA--022 142749 EA-027 170456 E i\nl%i\nEA--027 170457 EA-022 142738 7 ,fi\\l Qty UOM Priority Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. E3 2 Ea. 6 Ea. 3 Ea. Ea. Ea. 3 Ea. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ - Deficiency Listing 01'20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 678 4,915 678 678 678 678 ,1' 678 678 678 678 ii1 271 814 ,011~ 542 167 167 542 '\" Estimated Estimated -11111111 I Estimated Estimated 6!11m I 1! Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 11 ,,., 11 Estimated Estimated E,\nlfl1lil !!ti Estimated Estimated t=I II rl Estimated Estimated Esllnt\u0026lt;M Estimated Estimated 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 Page 7 of 14 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School 01/200005 Campus: 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 110 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142739 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 110 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170451 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated I , , jf):'.tI:t\n~t\nltf:~~~ lrI I 11 I p\nu, ~2 b!A111a 111 Technology Room lacks telephone wilfng. EA-027 170452 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 112 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142742 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated ,1, U !loitl (j,le,:1, nE WII\n11 ~ I, E l'l\"I 117 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142755 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 117 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170458 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated I ITI ~hl'ID!I~ :l , Ol'I c...i.n\"i!f tl 119 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142757 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 119 Technology EA-027 170460 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated IIW T.a1n ,y 11 II\" 120 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170461 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 121 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142760 Ea. 4 $ 161 Estimated i 1 T~ttll1\u0026gt;Ulu 1 m .. I ,\n!\\~ Ii, fl  n!I 'NII' (UL 11.'r ~lf al 122 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142762 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 122 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170463 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated -y rltll ii 1  17 ~t!i iiie 123 Technology Room lacks telephone wilfng. EA-027 170464 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 124 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142765 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated I rm!.\\! ~~ t7U \u0026amp;ii ~ If E:1tmnled 101 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142728 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated 101 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170442 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated J\nf 11!Ch'10 l!.Y flrrzorn ttes lnsu E Ee. 51111 103 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170443 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 A.P.P.l.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 8 of 14 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School 01fl0'2005 Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cyde Status 104 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170444 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated l'Jll' ! ,rnI I I I a a,::,oM!!!i' -0 lill.7~1 . .' . ~f I I 102 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170445 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 105 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170446 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated I I Ill.'? !gphona1 WI ll!JI, e,, __ 12.7 70~,7 1 ,, ,I 107 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142737 3 Ea. 4 s 542 Estimated 107 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170448 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 1111! T .. 1]\"1111 00m1nki\ni!pllO!le 1111, 11~ \"I I,, Bi i~,11\"11 113 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142744 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 113 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170454 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 11 TectmnlQl!Jil' ftoo~ ll!ll!l Ulr~dlll \u0026gt; j,df. I - 2 _!l 114 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170455 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is 13910-001 69245 6 Ea. $ 1,671 Estimated needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910-022 69249 2 Ea. $ 555 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed 13910-025 69252 40 Ea. $ 13,151 Estimated 1\n,1.. 1111, fl I~ ,~r: i]{!C2'.l.6[i\n:11J - Hal U 11111 11' f L:ic - '  Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant 335280 LS 2 $ 827 Estimated Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement 10155-003 69215 32 Ea. 3 $ 40,061 Estimated 11 IQ llllff111 ht l\\li1ttl1- I I EA- v 151 ,- lme\\~cl 115 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229573 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,170 Estimated 115 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 246412 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated 51cir:,Jtj' qpedallleEi Room has lfi::iEJllW Iii ,g atl.lili igwjfl3 ~, '',, 1, I I 13511nl,e 116 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229574 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,170 Estimated 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School 3094 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 9 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# 116 111 109 109 System Deficiency Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher ,\\o:ra ,,\u0026amp;J..,\n,jl E lifoom tm ~ 1/!.,\\iMI I II Hl,UI II Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. ~i~].i~{lit~t~t~~!fi]ffiJJf~~-~--I ~n'.m!~a !~fi l 11 O Specialties Room has insufficient tack board area. 110 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher liill I 111 111 112 112 117 117 11 118 118 ii I 119 119 $\\'iB(Aal E hi ! Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher\nl'Ql\n!I !\n~ Illes Rcmm rn1e  i\nufr.- 11t,1ij I Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher Specialties Specialties Specialties Specialties ,l\"lr ~f' Room has insufficient tackboard area. Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher .Jlli .r,1 i1ff11 fl!I Room has insufficient tackboard area. I ui  , 111 11 II,, 1 ii wnllng arss, Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-058 246413 EM~ I Tl EA-055 229578 EA--058 246406 ~- _\\.l' t EA-055 229575 EA-058 246407 l EA--055 229576 EA--058 246408 I fl EA--055 229577 EA--058 246409 EA-055 EA-058 -ll!i , EA-055 EA--058 L rn 229572 246414 l!I !1 229565 246415 EA-055 229570 EA--058 246416 Qty UOM Priority 5 Ea. 4 $ 5 Ea. 7 Ea. Es 5 Ea. 8 Ea. 5 Ea. 8 Ea. EL 5 Ea. 7 Ea. 3 5 3 6 Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Eai 3 Ea. 5 Ea. 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 4 4 4 4 $ 4 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cyde Status 2.422 .100 2,170 3,391 I I 2,170 3,875 I flt:!i 2,170 3,875 ' 11, 2,170 3,391 1,302 2,422 1,302 2,906 1,302 2,422 Estimated 1,,, I Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Jma.uW Estimated Estimated E l!ll'-!ci Estimated Estimated I Ullf~i Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated E!l 1111!tB Estimated Estimated 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 Page 10 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room f. System Deficiency 120 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 120 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher sto 121 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 121 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher sto 122 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 122 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher 123 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 123 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 1- sa .. c1~11~1 I I 123 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. 124 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 1 (I ~1 ~- 124 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. 101 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 1111 I 1141 101 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. 1 103 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. s'llt111 11m1 I+ , ,111 1 a~ n,,u M1!1H1I ~c~ A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Listing 01l20/2005 Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status EA-055 229568 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated EA-056 246417 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated ted EA-055 229569 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated EA-058 246418 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated EA-055 229571 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated EA-056 247828 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated EA-053 213108 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated EA-055 229567 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 11m E E!.111! IAII EA-065 283814 24 SF Surf 4 $ 285 Estimated EA-053 213107 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated E. ~5 :1.2\nmz ind EA-058 247830 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated EA-053 213123 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated I . lli ' E-=_ EA-058 246398 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated EA-053 213126 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated - ~ ~, E,,\nr1m, 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School 3094 Page 11 of14 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School 01/2W2005 Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code Assessl0 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 103 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 246399 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage. 1,0.4 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213127 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated -5pec!J\nJt RoOIII II I fll f1 1\u0026gt;1511-, llm 1~ 104 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 246400 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 102 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 125764 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 1L -\nro,1111 = nDtn Jlll! Ins llleJa nl 1\n,nnt 11 ' 8 II~ - ~ E\u0026amp;1,n1 I ,,l 102 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229587 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 102 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 246401 8 Ea. 4 $ 3,875 Estimated StOI' 105 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229579 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 105 Specialties EA-058 246402 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated ,LIil 106 Specialties Room has insufficient tack.board area. EA-055 229583 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 106 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 246403 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated sto e. 107 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229585 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 107 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 246404 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,938 Estimated s e. 108 Specialties Room has Insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229580 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 108 Specialties EA-058 246405 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated 113 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 246410 Ea. 4 $ 484 Estimated storage. 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 12 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency 114 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher .,.. 111, MC Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. MC Specialties Room lacks a fixed TV. all - iiii 101 ih In.! Ill '111 MC Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. MC Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. Building: Title 1 Bldg Floor# Room # System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-058 246411 II I ,1i7'1l' EA-020 125763 EA-045 203945 E _,.1 0~ EA-055 229564 EA-085 283816 SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD Deficiency Listing Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Ea. 4 $ 484 Estimated 111 - !Mad 1 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 3.833 Estimated ltl~ I llni I 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated 240 SF Surf 4 $ 2,851 Estimated 225 $ 1,836,276 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Exterior Siding requires replacement 07460-005 69335 800 SF 2 $ 3,054 Estimated Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 321715 LS 2 $ 674 Estimated lnlL llll \" f ,I li~ll11LI 1H 19JflD ~ Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully 322116 LS 2 $ 161 Estimated compliant Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 335282 LS 2 $ 54 Estimated 111 4111~ 1 J,11 n~i1m 10 tll .. Ill ' LI!\u0026gt; !:.sUT l i _rfll CDl!lploant P3A Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176794 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated P3B Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176792 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated IW1 LIi r~ l I -,r~n\n.ii u 1 l II llfl _J _, 111lill!J HVAC End of life: Controls - DOC requires replacement 15900-902 299528 1,440 SF 2 s 2,859 Estimated HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX 15700-902 310411 1,440 SF 2 $ 12,969 Estimated Unit requires replacement 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 13 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003- Bayou Meto Elementarv School Building: Title 1 Bldg Floor# Room # P3B P3A PJB P3B P3A P3A I ,U PJB P3B System Electrical Electrical Electrical Technology r - ~a~ Technology Technology ~ Deficiency GFI Receptacle Is missing and is needed Exterior Light - Wall Mount is missing and is needed  ... m1 , - IIRll rr1 - 11 r,,\nrl II nfm lfij) Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. Room has insufficient dataports. ,., ', , Room has insufficient dataports. Room lacks telephone wiring. B l'IB\"~ ii Ei ~ 1111 na.\nds~ Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Hom/Strobe Is missing and is needed I 111I1I ,,! fy 111 1111 19-1111-Dln!l.tas nn ead'ed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant II l'l '11 h lliliUffi i'!FI tr1E\n!fr,:l\ni a. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. hi 11 l!,lt i.-,. IS res. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 16140-001 69356 16520-007 69358 EA-084 EA-022 EA 12.7 ITT 7 - 267480 142725 no~ EA-022 142726 EA-027 167039 I, 11,111! lili~- ~ 13910-004 69363 13910-019 69364 l:.Wm-411 13910-025 69367 335286 Ii/-  ~I M EA-058 248429 EA-085 283817 5 222,lj EA-058 248430 EA-085 283818 SubTotal by Building Grand Total by Campus Qty UOM Priority 2 Ea. Ea. Ea. 3 Ea. t=a 3 Ea. Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. E\nm Ea. LS L 2 4 4 4- 4 4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2 $ 3 Ea. 4 $ 20 SF Surf 4 $ Ea. 4 $ 20 SF Surf 4 $ 33 314 $ $ Deficiency Listing Ol/2CY.l005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 271 516 3 399 542 542 167 522 742 329 27 1,453 238 484 238 70,067 2,341,446 Estimated Estimated I 1,, H~ Estimated Estimated 1,5\\ilfle: ~ Estimated Estimated {:!, O! Estimated Estimated 11111l Estimated Estimated ~, li!II Estimated Estimated I I Estimated Estimated 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 Page 14 of 14 State of Arkansas 3129 6003 - Cato Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Cato Elementarv School Building: Floor# Room# System Site Site Site Site Site Site Site Exterior Electrical Deficiency ADA - Accessible routes from parking or sidewalks to building are not fully compliant ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant AJ.J'_-'.lA ~ t,le r11..i e!i t!al!,,,een tru,ldl~J d r cilitle,3ar e ~.atr u r.ornllanl ADA - Handicap parking spaces are not JIIIIY compliant - ADA - Access to playgrounds or athletic fields is not fully co t Playfield Equip (Pre-K to 1st) needs minor repairs The school has insufficient parking. -Sehl: _I I1ai\nin31dffic:i Bus drop-off area does not have a canopy. ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant uim,IEr mo 13d 111,i fl ,, I I 1 School site lacks appropriate lighting. Specialties School lacks an appropriate surveillance system. - j!E'Gl2.llie! Si::Jm :!e p- ls !1ml~1 I i:l Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Roofing Roofing !IINJ Roofing A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement Gutters/Downspouts need minor repairs \u0026amp;,d ol L~: RQ fr P 15w t-U\" reo\niu~e-nipra..,m 1 End of Life: Roofing System1 - Single Ply requires replacement Deficiency Code AssesslD 02880--011 331413 340929 337869 68733 EA-002 105704 U O 2 EA-031 112675 331418 ~ 111111i EA-041 106207 EA-033 113270 FA,,lllo 1n-,n SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 07510-003 68749 07710-003 68750 , ~SD 94-U 07500-904 341649 Qty UOM Priority LS LS LS LS Ea. 1,750 SF 15 la,a LF LS Ea. Ea. Ea 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2 $ 2 $ $ $ Qty UOM Priority 47,800 SF 100 LF 2,280 SF 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 2,340 936 jj 702 3,510 11,698 2,636 19,750 585 2,437 20,411 - I 132,190 Estimated Estimated 11,mb,~ Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated llm t..d Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 379,306 999 9,672 Estimated Estimated Estimated 6003 - Cato Elementary School 3129 Page 1 of 8 State of Arkansas 3129 6003 - Cato Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Cato Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# 4-2 103 SIP SIP I I 101 2-1 2-2 2-3 System Exterior Interior I, I ~I Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior 11'14 Interior Interior I I ,ir Interior Interior In Interior Interior A.P.P.L.E, Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Steel Door (Single Hung) requires replacement 5\\'~l!l'!'IB ~UI , H!L t l!'nl ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant End of Life: Ceramic Tile requires replacement I= 'Cl L! : 031\"'1Q~, ~  II o TIie:\nfl311Lli\"ll 4\"QP!iriCi!mtHil End of Life: Door Hardware requires replacement End of Life: Ceilings - Suspended TIies require re lacement ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully compliant ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet room is not full com liant Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. ~ .apl)rapiiela /1e~tL Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Dltl ,ft '' l  PJlJ13iPfli1hlee ~!ll!3n, Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. -'1~~?'1~~ liQrd al! Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Cl~ fi'.I m II\"' II ~ r 11 l 1 w.:sre. Deficiency Code AssesslD 08110-006 687 48 lll!!i!!~ anilr., 322119 09600-903 300363 08200-900 300369 09500-900 300373 EA-040 EA-039 11-!ll EA-039 EA-040 I ~  322654 333520 182523 177124 1!!i'lii.li 177119 182524 EA-040 182519 EA-039 177120 0 EA-040 182526 EA-040 182527 ~,-0 1'!!25 Qty UOM Priority 2 Ea. s-=- LS 612 SF 11\\(1 ~1: 60 Door 47,874 SF LS LS Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea Ea. Ea. 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 2 2 2 $ $ $ $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01120/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 3,671 THl 9,366 8,182 36,785 163,450 1,873 11,708 439 190 lB 190 439 \\\\ _\n439 190 439 439 Estimated lrrn1l'i!d Estimated Estimated le, Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated E ltnifiir Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated E!.111 tJ!jl:d 6003 - Cato Elementary School 3129 Page2 of 8 State of Arkansas 3129 6003 - Cato Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Cato Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# 1-1 1-2 System Interior Interior Deficiency Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-040 182529 EA-040 182530 !1li~r!~}lif\n.Q1~~JiitfI=!J~efl(-Jt'.(~lrS'-I-Jffl?i1r'[\nf/{\nf,Y 1-4 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182532 K-1 K-2 K-3 K-4 5-1 5-3 5-4 3-1 3-1 3-2 3-3 \\-1 3-4 Interior Ii I  r Interior Interior inleri Interior Interior I ,Bier Interior Interior 1111Br1r Interior Interior 1\"'1.E!r Interior Interior Interior Interior !~8\",o~ Interior A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Dia~ m 0011\" I Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. C Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Gl=rrmrti r.lwCIII s- pptop - l,e tJl-Vl9r' Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. ,-1 \"'ll\\lam !lb r IRl!4 ll'le ~!ll\"raplie~ ~ !1fJ~ n~ Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. GI nn  itflu, I   p ~p 31e rrl , Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. I '!\u0026gt;BIii i1u .. , la~ lh!! uF!IIJI fl:! ~ltiarr P:3fle!. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Cl =, 'f tin,,, J i 11, .!!!pprnplif= 1Ja11l Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177121 ~~ B2.e7!9 EA-040 182534 EA-039 177116 EA--':IJ\\D I _ 1: EA-040 182536 EA-039 177117 EA--039 177118 EA-040 182538 1171 I! EA-040 182539 EA-039 177114 EA-ll-,lc, a D EA-039 177115 EA-040 182543 II i ll 11/J EA--040 182544 EA--039 177111 E !i EA-039 177112 Qty UOM Ea. Ea. ~o Ea. Ea. E\nEa. Ea. E\n, Ea. Ea. I! Ea. Ea. 'i':a-, Ea. Ea. E\nEa. Ea. Ea. Ea. ~-- Ea. Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 2 $ 439 Estimated 2 $ 439 Estimated - -I~~ EE 2 $ 439 Estimated 2 $ 190 Estimated ~I E!s!lITTa rl 2 $ 439 Estimated 2 $ 190 Estimated !!al E51.1'1Tul 2 $ 439 Estimated 2 $ 190 Estimated ~ l:sl1n ii ,,~ 2 $ 190 Estimated 2 $ 439 Estimated ~ It I 11 2 $ 439 Estimated 2 $ 190 Estimated\n11111,1,, 2 $ 190 Estimated 2 $ 439 Estimated If( Estfrmne11 2 $ 439 Estimated 2 $ 190 Estimated E,111111 ,rl 2 $ 190 Estimated 6003 - Cato Elementary School 3129 Page 3 of 8 State of Arkansas 3129 6003 - Cato Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Cato Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency 3-4 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-040 182546 1 w,1~,i i'.~Wljl~~,~a1~t~?~ ~t~~~-~J\n!~~J.,~,~~P,i,ff,1~t:~~ii4'-:~-':~, ~1AA~m9l ,a~~ 102 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182520 MP-1 101 J2 4-1 4-1 Interior lri/AL HVAC HVAC JI\\C HVAC HVAC Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing Electrical Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. E\u0026amp;naw\nt f1 n - ~a.ro\u0026amp; 8Q,\nl'1 rtn 11 m !f:E.11~,i mt,, ~ n i,t1 Make-up air inadequate Ductwork requires replacement 111\u0026gt;111 11:Jr1m ,, lit End of Life: Controls - DOC requires replacement I' iJl]fb To(!: Ill End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require replacement End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System re uires re lacement ADA - Drink Fountains are not fully compliant Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. 11oi1 ,11 mu ~ ml/ End of Life: Lighting Fixtures require replacement Electrical End of Life: Electrical Service requires lli!i\n.,ac.,menl 1110 -~ E'IT ~r r-e: sii\nWr T~leia l!E uire f1!I lar.11mi,[ Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 EA--040 182541 Jaa o s~ 15810-001 68755 15810-002 68756 .!i il-OOi 15900-902 300361 15900-900 300371 15400-900 300359 15100-907 300365 333526 EA-064 261058 l! f\\ . 16500-900 300362 16400-901 300370 EA--022 142640 EA--027 152616 Qty -, 50,034 50,034 25,017 25,017 85 50,034 2 13,237 50,034 !Hf,{~ Deficiency Listing 01/2Qi2005 UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated =3 I, -::1a:1 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated EslJmal:s-d SF 2 $ 115,433 Estimated SF 2 $ 242,062 Estimated Flm11 1 \" Eal1 ~ SF 2 $ 49,664 Estimated SF 2 $ 49,664 Estimated i\n: - 1r- - - Ea. 2 $ 104,288 Estimated SF 2 $ 53,977 Estimated LS 2 $ 16,860 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 1,356 Estimated = 1 I I SF 2 $ 51,526 Estimated SF 2 $ 6,550 Estimated :!! , E\n~E:!1 Ea. 4 $ 181 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 6003 - Cato Elementary School 3129 Page4 of 8 State of Arkansas 3129 6003 - Cato Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Cato Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Listing 01/20/200S Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 4-2 Teehnology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152617 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 103 Teehnology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142631 3 Ea. )n 1111 ~QY EP,-017 1/nll, I SIP R-1 101 101 2-2 2-3 1-1 1-2 1- 1-4 K-1 K-3 K-4 ~1 5-2 5-3 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. T3!:ihocl ~ R Ill~ al~no Yp 11tl Teehnology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. dn ~~ ~.a= 1~i.11ilr. ,I ti , 1J1\u0026amp; Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Tr I f y Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. lJI ltxl Teehnology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. ui _ ~ on, i\ni~ 1ns11ffi\u0026lt;\n,i,,'n lai:t Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. T~chnci'- ,\n, 11 111'3 i J l,j\n.tar, r Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Tec\nhn~lcigv R ft! I 1!. In iJtl fll oa\\.i A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 EA-027 152618 EA-022 142683 u EA-022 142629 EA-027 152619 I~ :!a i ii1l:~ EA-022 142649 EA-022 142650 E,J!..[l l'ci'6fj1 EA-022 142652 EA-022 142653 \" 1'42654 EA-022 EA-022 \"!\n:.,.022. EA-022 EA-022 EA-022 EA-022 ,-~ 142657 142667 1~ 142671 142672 1 i57r, 142676 142677 7i Ea. 3 Ea. l:a. 3 Ea. Ea. 3 Ea. 3 Ea. 3 Ea. 3 Ea. 3 3 2 2 2 I: Ea. Ea. Eo1 Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated !Al 4 $ 167 Estimated 4 $ 542 Estimated ~ lltqaJ,\nQ. 4 $ 542 Estimated 4 $ 167 Estimated -= u.1111 11,l 4 $ 542 Estimated 4 $ 542 Estimated e!Jif 111 4 $ 542 Estimated 4 $ 542 Estimated t-!Umaetl 4 $ 542 Estimated 4 $ 181 Estimated 4 '7 \"ii ::~- 4 $ 542 Estimated 4 $ 361 Estimated ~rnet:c!rl 4 $ 361 Estimated 4 $ 361 Estimated E91i,-iee 6003 - Cato Elementary School 3129 Page 5 of 8 State of Arkansas 3129 6003 - Cato Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Cato Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# 3-1 3-2 System Deficiency Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-022 142716 EA-022 142717 :~ft~Jiitt!~~-~t~~liiiil~tt,ilft\"frl~S~l1~\u0026amp;i~mJ 3-4 102 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142719 MP-1 4-1 4-1 l 4-2 4-2 ,,-2: 103 R-1 101 2-1 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. \\l'I' , \"\" li!!t 12/enl1omr wlrtng. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Emergency Lighting - Standby Battery Specialties ADA - Counter Height is not fully compliant Specialties ADA - Food Seivice Line is not fully compliant ~~I~~ rl :S.\ngn--~ i!i mi:!1.Slnag f1lli E n ci Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. .s a~,iiop!ia e am,ml I C,-- .II~ Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. PfTII Bi.fl\n: - proflria1a illlDLl,.1~ ri r 111111 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher sto e. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 EA-022 142630 FA I' 6:'W EA-022 142682 16500-901 300366 333522 333524 l!l,II Cl-001 fJBT.52 EA-053 213601 EA-055 230198 EA-053 213602 EA-055 230197 r= -O!ill' 2~ -20!ii EA-058 246203 EA-058 246206 EA-058 24 7794 EA-085 284026 Qty 3 3 3 2 29 2 2 .: 2 2 3 UOM Ea. Ea. l::a- Ea. Ea. Ea Ea. Ea. LS LS Eal Ea. Ea. Ea Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. 24 SF Surf Priority 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 11 4 $ $ 2 $ 2 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 542 Estimated 542 Estimated E.sum3l_d 542 Estimated 361 Estimated 1Jri,1 ~I 181 Estimated 11,672 Estimated 1,170 Estimated 1,170 Estimated 1- mall!.ti. 1,905 Estimated 868 Estimated E'.\nbrr 953 Estimated 868 Estimated - q f\nSil'me eel 484 Estimated 969 Estimated 1,453 Estimated 285 Estimated 6003 - Cato Elementary School 3129 Page 6 of 8 State of Arkansas 3129 6003 - Cato Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Cato Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 1 102 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230195 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 102 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 247795 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. I ~111121\u0026amp;liK:~ls.%{ NJ,. I ~. MC Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213600 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated MC Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230194 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated SubTotal by Building 128 $ 2,761,542 Building: Title 1 Bldg Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Interior End of Life: Door Hardware requires replacement 08200-900 300374 1 Door 2 $ 613 Estimated Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 333528 LS 2 $ 27 Estimated 1 ,1 11JI D 1345 lm:\n,a rupois woeI n penal, EA ijilS: ~ n ~ I 1 1 I: 1111Sret:I P4 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177122 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX 15700-902 310527 720 SF 2 $ 6,484 Estimated Unit uires replacement P3 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159114 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated P4 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142596 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated ,~ T I li:!\u0026gt;\n!rr I h:t,l\\o.is wma\n11017 Ea. ~ 'liT llj I Specialties Exterior Signage is missing and is needed 10430-001 68898 3 Ea. 3 $ 150 Estimated P3 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230200 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 3 '-plld I ni l~i.k flP _m,i IITI,Quf\\101, E,l-:Jll51l 2\u0026gt;tn~ .!l~ 15\n- a\n[?: 111 a P3 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284029 8 SF Surf 4 $ 95 Estimated 6003 - Cato Elementary School 3129 A.P.P.L.E@, Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page7 of 8 State of Arkansas 3129 6003 - Cato Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Cato Elementarv School Building: Title 1 Bldg Floor# Room # System Deficiency P4 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. P4 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. A.P.P.l.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-055 230199 EA-085 284028 SubTotal by Building Grand Total by Campus Qty UOM Priority Ea. 4 $ 8 SF Surf 4 $ 17 s 160 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 434 Estimated ' 11111,,i1 95 Estimated 12,336 2,906,069 6003- Cato Elementary School 3129 Page 8 of 8 State of Arkansas 3095 6003 - Clinton Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Clinton Elementarv School Building: Floor# Room# System Sile Site 111:1 Site Site 1~ Site Sile Site Site 511 Exterior HVAC Ela::irical Electrical Specialties Sp~lli.s Deficiency Asphalt requires replacement Concrete requires replacement - e.wsii1!' 1'qUirelEn !'PI !111 Asphalt Coating is missing and is needed Fence/Gate (Chain Link) requires replacement P,D - ~sflb ,ou !'r!.111a1 iny uMal~ lo ulkiing I ~ co n illnt ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant ADA - Accessible routes between buildings and i~cll ii,.\n~-.. ,,i,I [LIU 1211flp1,anr ADA - I nru,\n-, kl\" ~5 ..!J!! Ml II ~]i,!ltl. ADA - Access to playgrounds or athletic fields is not fully compliant School has insufficient football/soccer fields. Scl1ool '1es1nliU~ 11 ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant Computer room lacks independent AC. u: r W!:!1I h Pcile - P.arli\nl -~Ing n' ~ ., School site lacks appropriate lighting. School lacks an appropriate surveillance system. Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Site Concrete requires replacement A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 02740-002 63471 02750-002 58325 )277 i-OOl!. - 7 5 02785-001 63472 02820-003 63476 Oll9a 331429 340899 331435 EA-007 107461 \u0026gt;U 10!33~ 331309 EA-025 110717 :im-OOi ~7 EA-041 106190 EA-033 113257 11:110. SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 02750-002 104582 Qty UOM Priority 11,000 SF 2,000 SF .:'F 93,000 SF 15 LF 18 L6 LS LS LS Ea. E:3 LS Ea. Ea. Ea. 2 2 C 2 2 :l 2 2 2 2 4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2 $ 4 $ 2 $ $ $ Qty UOM Priority 2,000 SF 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 18,629 10,831 ~ 3:\n!!! 138,189 325 ' B 117 468 111 117 34,649 \" 117 13,636 ' !IJ 2,437 20,411 !,Sil 305,916 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated I:,. Ir !!!I Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated ~ 'rml!!tl Estimated Estimated ~111,1.\nI Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 10,831 Estimated 6003 - Clinton Elementary School 3095 Page 1 of 13 State of Arkansas 3095 6003 - Clinton Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Clinton Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Exterior In Ii Interior Deficiency ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant ra,s firs lila :\nr~ ,n.~l!a umrm!!!:dU' VCT flooring requires replacement Deficiency Code AssesslD 332113 ~~1fI 09658-009 63481 Interior End of Life: Ceilings - Suspended Tiles require 09500-900 299532 Qty UOM Priority LS f', 4,528 SF 152,930 SF 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ replacement IB-ira .... .,._\n~-: ..~:._ . .~ . :_ , \"\n:11~,~-J!ll'flllt Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully compliant Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant \u0026lt;I l111!La 'll'r ~om 1j. 1 I t~ n\\i!!-=! 11~rop11sV.!l!eii cn n 36 Interior 35 Interior 'ii I 11!\u0026gt;11Clf 33 Interior 33 Interior IH l11L~r1~ 01 Interior 30 Interior lnh1 I 32 Interior 32 Interior :11  ,1 ,t,o 29 Interior 12 Interior a 11111I1 03 Interior A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Cl' u I !I app1opnala he Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Ola- ~Clll'l d  ~ill 1he. p~r1iilE Yis on -n!!L Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. li\"Jtr!Jm JJCJQler! aks. app1:,op (  o't Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. l'OOlll ~Gt - , lt1a aflllr,\nip11~r \\ Ii Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. ~ EA-040 EA-039 A.I! EA-039 EA-040 r,.l)\nl~ EA-040 EA-039 E.6--0il) EA-039 EA-040 E\\A-038 EA-040 EA-039 cA4J D EA-039 322118 1 LS 2 $ 332119 LS 2 $ 79 t) ~\n182409 Ea. 2 $ 179035 Ea. 2 $ 1 e:r.1 E:: 1 . 179036 Ea. 2 $ 182405 Ea. 2 $ f,~06il ,~ 182428 Ea. 2 $ 179038 Ea. 2 $  _-\\I'll Ea 179039 Ea. 2 $ 182406 Ea. 2 $ rnm12 ~ \"' 182401 Ea. 2 $ 179033 Ea. 2 $ ,e!!!~\" ' 179060 Ea. 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 3,798 Estimated\n,~17 1\n3tlrrta12d 22,450 Estimated 522,130 Estimated 759 Estimated 3B0 Estimated 1/4 ~- 439 Estimated 190 Estimated ~ ~ 1M 190 Estimated 439 Estimated so P-:11 1a~-i:f 439 Estimated 190 Estimated  0 I I ' 190 Estimated 439 Estimated IJI) - r-,:\n1?:1 439 Estimated 190 Estimated ]11110111 190 Estimated 6003 - Clinton Elementar\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_257","title":"Arkansas Task Force to Joint Committee on Educational Facilities, part three","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2004/2005"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Education--Finance","Education and state","School facilities","Arkansas--History--21th century"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Task Force to Joint Committee on Educational Facilities, part three"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/257"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nState of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Building: Lounge Floor# Room# 1 _ Lounge System Interior Interior Deficiency Acoustical Ceiling requires r~pla~mefiL Paint/Coating requires replacement Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed Electrical . ,. E)cterior t:.i\"gh(0 W,ill M\n~nt ifm issing andi s \u0026lt; needed -,. ' . . ' .. '.,' Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed Sp~~ialtie\n:~-iBJinds are missing or in poi:/i:ondition. - Building: Office, Rm 100-104 Floor# Room# System Roofing Roofing  Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior interior' A.P.P.LE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement Gutters/Downspouts are missing and are needed . Steel Win,dow (A\nning) req~i\n:\ns:replai:ernent  Siding requires replacement Soffit requires replacement  Fascia requires replacilment Steel Door/Frame (Single Hung) requires replacement ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant '. Auto Door Open - Handicap i\nmissin~ :\n'\nd is. ::, needed          -r:. _,,..,L,..~\ni, Deficiency Code AssesslD ,( 84278 09910-002 84281 16140-001 84287 13910-001 84290 13910-004 84293 13910-022 84302 13910-025 84313 SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 07510-003 80283 07710-002 80285 ~-~~.---- . ,---  80275 07460-005 80277 07460-001 80279 ,07 460-00'2 80280 08110-012 80282 321958 J 30294 \\'\\:,-, -~~-,-: Qty 1.800 4 4 15 Qty 22,709 650 UOM SF Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea:. Ea. Ea. UOM SF LF ---- -. -- 55 SF 10,950 SF 2,200 SF 2,000 SF .. 6 Ea. LS 6 Ea. Priority iJ:2 . 3 $ s $ $ $ $ 4 ~) ' $ Priority 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 2 $ 2 $ 1 Deficiency Listing 01/21/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 1,537 542 278 261 277 1,315 19,597 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated ' Estirnai~ct  Estimated Estimated Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 180.202 3,917 41 ,802 10,927 . 18,070 11 ,014 14,433 Estimated Estimated . -Es\\ilrtf!ted Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated EstiITiated   6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 3 of 35 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 01/2112005 Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Office, Rm 100-104 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost life Cycle Status Interior Quarry Tile requires replacement 09330-002 80286 1,408 SF 2 $ 18,110 Estimated Interior Wood Strip Flooring (\u0026lt;\n,ymnasium) requires 09648-003 80287 7,000 SF 2 $ 76,994 Estimated replacement Interior VCT flooring requires replaceriient 09658-009 . 80288 5,550 SF 2 $ 27,517 Estimated Interior Acoustical Suspension requires replacement 09130-003 80290 6,650 SF 2 $ 15,889 Estimated Interior Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement 09510-003 80291 6,650 SF 2 $ 22,704 Estimated Interior . Lock/Latchset requires replacement 08710-012 , 80295 70 Ea. 2: $ 42,916 Estimated Interior Panic Device requires replacement 08710-015 80296 20 Ea. 2 $ 17,761 Estimated Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 321960 LS 2 $ 1,155 Estimated .... --.- - --- .---.  Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms ~re not fully 1 LS 3,464 Estimated compliant Interior ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet 333092 LS 2 $ 23,093 Estimated room is not fully compliant 103 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179179 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 103 interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199512 Ea. -2 $ 439 Estimated 104 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179182 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 100 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199510 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated ~~-- -- - ----. ---~ 101 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-03$ 179183 190 Estimated\n',..: .. _ 101 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199511 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 102 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179184 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated int~rior Carpet requires replacement 09680-003 ' . : 80289 3,370 SF 3 :_s. 9,906 .Estimated . Interior PainUCoating requires replacement 09910-002 80292 26,750 SF 3 $ 22,847 Estimated Interior Wood Door/Frame (Single Hung) requires 08210-012 80293 70 Ea. 3 $ 137,948 Estimated replacement Interior Custom Cabinet requires repla~ment 06410-003 80297 28 LF 4 $ 14,873 Es!imated Interior Countertop requires replacement 06415-003 80298 28 LF 4 $ 1.307 Estimated HVAC Furnace requires replacement 15530-003 80304 9 Ea. 2 $ 26,388 Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 4 of 35 State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Office, Rm 100-104 Floor# Room# System Deficiency .HVAC Evaporative Condenser -Air Cool 1.5 Ton requires '.'[eplacernent ::       HVAC Evaporative Condenser -Air Cool 5 Ton requires replacement HVAC Evaporative Condenser -Air Cool 10 Ton requires replacement i\nvAc End of Life~ Ductwork - l~side ins~lati~n requlre\"f replacement_ . . . HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split D/X Unit requires replacement HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Window -~ .... . ... ~ : '. '. _. Piumbing Units require replacement .G\n~bBar i{ mi~_s\"fn~~\nj~ne~ded ':. Plumbing End of Life: Sanitary Sewer requires replacement Plumbing End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System .. : , Plumbing: requires replacement : ('. ~~1a~~~\n:~~llceif ~~d Fixiures .~equire , :  Plumbing ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant Plumbing ADA - Shower Stall is not fully compliant .... F'lurnbing  ' .. ADA'~ D_rink 'i=b-~nt~ini ar~ nbttu,ily 9\n-.\np,i~hr Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed . Eiectrical . ' Enexetedreiodr L...l gh...l c W. all _Mouni .is ,m is. sing .a ..r..i.d. 103 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. 100 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. 1 10.1 E]ecirital .  Room lacks controls to partialiy dim llghts. 102 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. Cafe 2 Electrical Room has insufficient electrical outlets. -1 103 Technology Room has insufficiei'ildataports,_ A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 15660-006 80307 15660-009 80309 .~,  1sa80,960 30005Ei ..\n\u0026amp;..-'~ .. -=~ 15700-902 310483 15700-900 310484 15100-908 300057 15100-907 300058 321962 321966 16140-001 80313 16140-001 80317 EA-084 267519 EA-084 267520 EA-084' 2Jl7521 EA-084 267522 EA-018 115831 . ?\n:-EA-022141433 Deficiency Listing 01/2 1/2005 Qty UOM Priority Life Cycle Status ,3 ' '\nEa. 2, 4 Ea. 2 $ 29,737 Estimated 2 Ea. 2 $ 17,335 Estimated 0 30,840. .. SF 149,691 Estimat\u0026lt;l 14,000 SF 2 s 126,085 Estimated 4,800 SF 2 s 13,839 Estimated . .4 , .Eac: :. Estimated 30,840 SF 2 $ 72,171 Estimated 30,840 SF 2 s 33,270 Estimated LS 2 $ 1,155 Estimated LS 2 s 3,510 Estimated .. 10,392 : .  I\n:stimated 4 Ea. $ 542 Estimated 10 Ea. $ 1,356 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated Ea. 4 s 399 Estimated 1 Ea._ 4 . '$ 399.- Estimated Ea. 4 s 399 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 453 Estimated . 5 : Ea . . 4 : 903  :E~li~ated  6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 5 of 35 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 01/2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Office, Rm 100-104 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 103 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167196 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 104 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141434 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 104 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167.197 Ea. 4 $ 167  Estimated 100 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141430 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 100 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167193 Ea. 4 167 Estimated Roo-\n, has insuffi\nient dataports. - --. ~ - --,--,-- 101 Technology EA-022  141431 5 903 Estimated 101 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167194 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 102 Technology Room has insufficient dalaports. EA-022 141432 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 102 -:, Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA:()27  167195 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Gym Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141438 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated Gym Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167199 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated MC Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167198 Eac\" 4 s 167 ' Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is 13910-001 80319 6 Ea. $ 1,671 Estimated needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed 13910-004 80321 12 Ea. $ 3,131 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Hom/Strobe is missing and is needed 13910\n019 80324 15 Ea. $ 5,563 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910-022 80326 12 Ea. $ 3,327 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed 13910-025 80328 35 Ea. $ 11 ,507 Estimated Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant \"*--------- 321964 LS' 2 $ 577 Estimated Specialties ADA - Counter Height is not fully compliant 335722 LS 2 $ 2,925 Estimated Specialties ADA - Food Service Line is not fully compliant 335723 LS 2 $ 2,925 Estimated Specialties Toilet Compartment requires r~placement 10155-.003 80299 2 Ea. 3 $ 2,504 Estimated Specialties Shower/Dressing Compartment requires 10185-003 80300 4 Ea. 3 $ 5,256 Estimated replacement Specialties Exterior Signage requires replacement 10430-003 80301 16 Ea. 3 $ 1,150 Estimated Specialties Metal locker requires replacement 10505-003 - 80302 700 Ea. 3 $ 197,807 Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 6 of 35 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 01/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Office, Rm 100-104 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Specialties Gymnasium Bleacher requires replacement 11486-006 80303 15 Ea. 3 $ 2,325 Estimated 103 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229957 2 Ea. 4 s 868 Estimated 103 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teache_r EA-058 242712 3 Ea. 4 s 1,453 Estimated storage. 104 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213451 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 104 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229956 Ea. 4 s 434 Estimated 104 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058  242713 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,938 Estimated storage. 100 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 118606 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 100 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229958 Ea. 4 s 434 Estimated 100 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher i:A-058\n242710 2 Ea. 4 s 969 -Estimated storage. 101 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229959 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 102 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 118607 Ea. 4 s 369 Estimated 102 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229960 Ea. 4 s 434 Estimated 102 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 242711 Ea. 4 s 484 Estimated storage. Gym Specialties Room lacks a fixed TV. EA-045 203840 Ea. 4 s 1,039 Estimated Cafe Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 118604 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated Cafe 2 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 118605 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated Cafe 2 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283975 80 SF Surf 4 $ 950 Estimated --- -- -- MC Specialties . Room lacks a fixed TV. EA-045 203839 Ea. 4 s 1,039 Estimated MC Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213450 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated MC Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229955 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated MC Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 242714 29 Ea. 4 $ 14,047 Estimated ----- --storage. ----- ~ ' SubTotal by Building 99 $ 1,612,419 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 7 of 35 State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 11-14 Floor# Room# 11 11 12 14 13 System Deficiency ADA - Accessible Doorv,iays are not fully compliant ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant Classroom door lacks the appropriate 11isicin paneL Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision paneL Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Furnace requires replacement Deficiency Code AssesslD 321976 322506 EA0 039 ''179168 EA-040 193369 EA-039 179171 EA-039  179167 EA-039 179172 15530-003 82401 Exterior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior HVAC ' HVAC  -Evaporative Condenser -Air Cool 1.5 Tori re.quires '. .. 15660-003 .  82405 ,1 11 12 14 13 11 11 12 12 14 14 13 HVAC HVAC f:IVAC Electrical Electrical Electrical Electrical Electrical replacemerit . . . Classroom ventilation inadequate End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires replacement E~d ~tlite: Cooling Packaged Units \\ Window. Units require replacement . Exterior Light - Wall Mount is missing and is needed Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. -,----- -- .,, . .,.---...   Room lacks controls to partially dim lights., Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Rooin lacks telephone wiring . Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . Technoidgy Room has irisufficient d~tap\nrts. APP.LE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 15830-001 82407 15800-900 300078 . .. .--, .. -.~.- . 310489 16520-007 82412 EA-084 267536 ''EA0 oil4. .. 267537 EA-084 267535 EA-084 267534  EA'.022  ,141477 EA-027 163274 EA-022 141478 --EA,021: : 163275 EA-022 141480 EA-027 163277 ------------ EA-022 141479 Qty 4 4 . 3 3,240 3,240  2 \":\n. . 1 5 , 5 4 . - -: --- 4 Deficiency Listing 01/21/2005 UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status LS 2 $ 1,516 Estimated LS 2 $ 122 Estimated Ea. 2, , .. $ .. 190 Estimated ., Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated  Ea. $ 190 -Estimated Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated Ea. 2 $ 11.728 Estimated Ea.:- 2 $ 21\n336 Estimated Room 2 $ 30,525 Estimated SF 2 $ 15.726 Estimated SF: ,.,. '$ 9,341 Estimated ' Ea. 2 $ 1,032 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated    .. - ... -., .. _._, .. , ....... ,.Ea: 399 , E\nstimated, Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated Ea\n4 903 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated Ea. 4,, '-$. 167 . Estimated: Ea. 4 $ 722 Estimated Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated ' ......\n. ~' --A--- - - . _.,... er-~.--: Ea. 722 Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 8 of 35 State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 11-14 Floor# Room# System Deficiency 13 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Hom/Strobe is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed 11 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 11 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 11 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. 12 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 12 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 12 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. 14 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 14 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. - - ~-- - 14 Specialties Room lacks appropriate arnount of teacher storage. 13 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 13 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-027 163276 13910-001 82414 13910-004 82416 13910-019 82417 13910-022 82418 13910-025 82419 EA-053 213466 EA-055 229981 -,-.- - . -~ --- EA-058.' 242276 EA-053 213465 EA-055 229982 EA-058 242277 EA-053 213467 EA-055 229983 EA-058 242279 EA-055 229980 EA-058 242278 --- - - --------- ------ -------------- ---- --------- --------- -- SubTotal by Building Building: Rm 1-3 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Roofing Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires repl~cement 07510-003 82240 Roofing Flexible Flashing needs minor repairs 07650-002 82245 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Listing 01/21/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 4 Ea. s 1,114 Estimated 4 Ea. 1 $ 1,044 Estimated 4 Ea. $ 1.484 Estimated 4 Ea. $ 1,109 Estimated - - 4 Ea. $ 1,315 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated 5 Ea. 4 .$ .2,422 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 s 1,905 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,736 Estimated 3 Ea. 4 $ 1.453 Estimated ---.. -------------- - ------------- 41 $ 122,931 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 3,430 SF 2 s 27,218 -E\ntimated 225 LF 2 $ 2,633 Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 9 of 35 State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 1-3 Floor# Room# 2 2 3 3 System Roofing Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Interior lnierior Interior Interior ' Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Deficiency Gutters/Downspouts are missing and are needed Joint Sealant requires replacement Soffit requires replacement Fascia requires replacement Steel Door/Frame (Single Hung) requires replacement ,  ADA  Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant VCT flooring requires replacement Acoustical Suspension requires replacement Acoustical Celling requires replacement Lock/Latchset requires replacement Panic Device requires. replacement ADA Door Hardware is not fully compliant Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel.  Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Wood Door/Frame (Single Hung) requires replacement Interior Interior HVAC HVAC . Custom Cabinet requires replacement HVAC A.PP.LE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Countertop requires replacement Furnace requires replacement Evaporative Condenser -Air Cool 1-5 Ton requires replacement Classroom ventilation inadequate Deficiency Code AssesslD 07710-002 82246 - -.- -----. -- 07920-002 , 82232 07 460-001 82233 07460-002 82235 08110-012:,_ 82236 335729 09658-009 82248 09510-003 82252 08710-012 82258 08710-01 5\" ~ 82261. 0 ~ 335731 EA-039 179175 EA-040 . 190244 EA-039 179170 EA-040 190246 EA-039. 179174 EA-040 190247 08210-012 82256 06410-003.\"\n82263 06415-003 82266 15530-003 82269 15660-003 82271 --~- 15830-001 82274 Qty UOM Priority 110 LF 100 LF 175 SF 125 SF 3 Ea. LS 3,050 SF 3,050 SF 3,050 SF 3 Ea. 3 Ea. LS Ea. 1 . Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. 5 Ea. 55 LF 36 LF 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 3 Room 2 $ 2 ,,. S 2 $ 2 $ 2 S 2 $ 2 $ 2  $ 2 S 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 S 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 ' . s 2 $ 3 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/21/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 663 494 869 1,129 5,507 642 15,122 7,287 10,413 1,839 2,664 129 190 439 190 439 190 439 9,853 29,215 1,681 5,864 10,736 30,525 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estim~ted Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated  Estimated Estimated Estimate!l Estimated Estimated - 'P-\"\"'....,.., Estimated Estimated 6003  Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 10 ol 35 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 01 /2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 1-3 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status HVAC End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires 15800-900 300077 3,430 SF 2 $ 16,648 Estimated replai::~1_nen_t_ -- ----- - HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Window 15700-900 ., 310488 2,230 SF 2 ::s,  5:.fas Estimated Units require replacement 2 HVAC Lab lacks an air exchange system. EA-061 255872 Ea. 2 $ 4,286 Estimated 3 HVAC Lab lacks an air exchange system . EA-061 255871 Ea. 2 $ 4,286 Estimated 1. 2 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. : EA-064 260742. 2 Ea. 4 s. 1,356 Estimated 3 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 260743 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed 16140-001 82278 8 Ea. s 1,085 Estimated -- . --,.---~--- - Electrical End of Life: Electrical Service requi~es 16400-901 300076 3,430 SF 2 $ . 13,104 Estimated replacement Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 162669 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 2 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141475 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 2 Technology- Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 162670 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 3 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141476 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 3 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 162671 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is 13910-001 82279 3 Ea. $ 835 Estimated needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed 13910-004 82283 3 Ea. $ 783 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed 13910-019 82284 3 Ea. $ 1,113 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Sialion is missing and is needed 13910-022 82286 3 Ea. s .. 832 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed 13910-025 82289 3 Ea. s 986 Estimated Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213464 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated Specialties Room has Insufficient tackboard area. EA-055  229979 4 Ea. 4 $ . 1,736 Estimated Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 239788 3 Ea. 4 s 1,453 Estimated storage. 2 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213463 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 2 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229977 4 Ea. 4 $ 1\n736 Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 11 of35 ---------------- - ------- --- -- State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 1-3 Floor# Room# System Deficiency 3 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Building: Rm 15-17 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Roofing Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement Exterior  ._, occur Exterior Soffit requires replacement Exterior Fascia requires replacement ,, Exterior -c:Steel DooriFraine (Sin~le.Hung) :requires replacerrierii .     Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant Interior VCT flooring requires replacement Interior Aco~-stical Suspension require-s repl,icemerit Interior Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement Interior Lock/Latchset requires replacement interior . Panic De'Jce requires r_\nplac~ment 15 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. 16 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. 16 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware' -,,,-, 17 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Interior PainUCoating requires replacement Interior Wood Door/Frame (Singie Hung) requires\"'\"' replacement . . .. HVAC Furnace requires replacement A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K1 2 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-055 229978 SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 07510-003 82579 04910-001 '  82573 ..... 07460-001 82574 07460-002 82575 , 08110-012- 82577 333299 09658-009 82581 0913(F,oof \" 82582 09510-003 82583 08710-012 82587 08710'015 . 112588 EA-039 179165 EA-039 179166 --- -- .,-- \"EA-0'10  186176 EA-039 179161 09910-002 82584 .08210-012 . : 82586 ' 15530-003 82589 Qty UOM Priority 3 Ea. 4 $ 50 $ Qty UOM Priority 2,430 SF 2 $ 1,415 SF 2 $ 1,655 SF 2 $ LS 2 $ 2,130 SF 2 s .. 800 SF 2 .. $ 800 SF 2 s 3 Ea. 2 $ 3 !\n:a. '2 $ Ea. 2 $ Ea. 2 Ea. 2 $ 1,650 SF 3 s 3 s 3 Ea. 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/21/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 1,302 231,136 Repair Cost 19,283 7,028 14,953 1,137 10,561 1,911 . 2,731 1,839 2,!364 190 190 439 190 1,409 5,912. 8,796 Estimated Life Cycle Status Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimatt\nld Estimated Estimated  Estimated Estimated Estimated '' Estimated Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 12 of 35 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 01/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 15-17 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status HVAC Evaporative Condenser -Air Cool 1.5 Ton requires 15660-003 82590 3 Ea. 2 $ 16,036 Estimated replacement_ HVAC Classroom ventilation inadequate 15830~001 ' '82591 3 Room 2 s 30,525 Estimated HVAC End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires 15800-900 300081 2,430 SF 2 $ 11 ,795 Estimated replacement HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Window 15700-900 310491 2,430 SF 2 $ 7,006 Estimated Units require replacement ----~------ Electrical Exterior Light : Wall Mountis\\1\ni~singa~d ls- 16520-007 82593 Ea. 2 $ 516 Estimated needed 15 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 269786 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 16 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 269787 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 17 . Electrical Room lacks controls to partiallY:dim lights. EA-084  269788 Ea.  $ 399 Estimated 15 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141486 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 15 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . EA-027 156814 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 16 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 C 141487 5 Ea. 4 s 903 Estimated 16 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 156815 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 17 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141488 5 Ea. 4 s 903 Estimated 17 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 156816 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is 13910--001 82594 3 Ea. $ 835 Estimated needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed 13910-004 82595 3 Ea. $ 783 Estimated Fire .\u0026amp; Safety Hom/Strobe is missing anct\" is needed 13910-019 82596 3 Ea. s 1,113 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910--022 82597 3 Ea. $ 832 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed 13910-025 82598 3 Ea. $ 986 Estimated Room has ins~fficient taci\u0026lt;board area. ----- .. - ----- 15 Specialties l:A-055 229986 2 Ea. 4 . $ 868 .Estimated 15 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 242449 5 Ea. 4 s 2,422 Estimated storage. 16 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213469 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 16 Specialties Room has insufficient tac~board area. EA~055 229987 2 Ea. . 4 $ 868 Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 A.P.P.l.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 13 of 35 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 0 1/2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 15-17 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 16 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 242450 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 17 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 242451 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. ---- -- --- --- - -- ------- -------- -------- SubTotal by Building 43 $ 171,121 Building: Rm 18-23 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status .Roofing Roof \u0026amp; Deck Insulation requires replacement 07220-003 , 80748 9,280 SF 2 $ 84,199 Estimated Roofing Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement 07510-003 80749 9,280 SF 2 $ 73,639 Estimated Exterior Steel Window (Awning) requires replacement 08510-003 80742 54 SF 2 $ 1,511 Estimated ........ -- Exterior Siding requires replacement 074600005 80743 200 SF 2 $ 764 Estimated Exterior Soffit requires replacement 07460-001 80744 506 SF 2 $ 2,513 Estimated Exterior Fascia requires replacement 07460-002 80745 298 SF 2 $ 2,692 Estimated Exterior Steel Door (Single Hung) requires replacement 08110-006 80746 10 Ea. 2 $ 18,357 Estimated Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 321969 LS 2 $ 2,870 Estimated Interior Ceramic Tile requires replacement 09310-002 80750 396 SF 2 $ 5,294 Estimated Interior VCT flooring requires replacement 09658-009 ' 80751 4,680 SF 2 $ 23,203 Estimated Interior Acoustical Suspension requires replacement 09130-003 80752 4,712 SF 2 $ 11 ,258 Estimated Interior Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement 09510-003 80753 4,712 SF 2 $ 16,088 Estimated .. -------~--- Interior End of Life: Ceramic Tile requires replacement 09600-903  300067 462 SF .2 $ 6,176  Estimated , __ Interior ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet 322502 LS 2 $ 4,592 Estimated room is not fully compliant Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 335725 LS 2 $ 229 Estimated Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully - ,,...,,.~-:---~-- - 335727 LS . ? f 689 -Estimated compliant 18 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179180 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 14 of 35 State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 18-23 Floor# 1 . Room# 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 23 System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179181 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropr)ate :vision panel.  l:AQ39  '17_9176 Interior Interior Interior - Interior Interior Interior: Interior Interior Interior Interior HVAC HVAC HVAC HVAC HVAC HVAC Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. . Clas~room.door lacks_ app\nopriate hard'l'iarf,!. - Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks th~-appiopriate visio~pk'nei .. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. PainUCoating requires replacement .. Wood Door (Single Hung) requires replacf\nlmerit , Custom Cabinet requires replacement Furnace requires replacement -Evaporative Coridenser-Air Criol 1.5 Toniecjuires -.:replace_ment  EA-040 197687 EA-039 179177 EA,040\"' 197688 . EA-039 179178 EA-040 197689 EA,039 179173- EA-040 197690 09910-002 80756 . 08210,001 \\\ncao758 ' \u0026lt; 06410-003 80759 15530-003 Classroom ventilation inadequate 15830-001 80764 End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires 15800-900 300068 repl_acement _ End of.Life: _ Cooling Packaged Units ~Window . 310486 \\ Units require replacemeh~ \u0026gt;  . . Lab lacks an air exchange system. EA-061 255873 End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require 15400-900 300065 replacement End otlii~: S~nitary Sewer require~ replacement' .. .. 15100-908\n' 360066 . ~ ,t End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System requires replacement ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant 15100-907 300069 322504 A.P .P .L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Qty UOM Priority Ea. Ea. Ea. '1 Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. 7,388 SF 92 LF 7 Ea. 5 Room 6,133 SF 4,676 .. Ea. 23 Ea. 6\n133 SF 6,133 SF LS 2 S 2 S 2 $ 2.: 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 3 $ 4 $ 2 $ 2 2 2 2 s $ 2 $ 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01'2.1/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 190 439 190 '439 190 439 439 6,310 48,869 20,524 50,785 29,768 4,286 28,219 6,616 229 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated ~Estimated Estimated Estimated - Estimaied  Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated  Estimated  Estimated Estimated - Etimated\n: Estimated Estimated Estimated-  .. ,.).:.~ 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 15 of 35 - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 01 /21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 18-23 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed 16140-001 80766 4 Ea. $ 542 Estimated Electrical Exterior Light - Wall Mount is missing and is 16520-007 80765 2 Ea. 2 s 1,032 Estimated needed 18 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 267526 Ea. 4 s 399 Estimated 19 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 267527 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 20 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 267528 Ea. 4 s 399 Estimated 21 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. .EA-\\)84 267523 1 Ea. ,_4 , $ 399 Estimated 22 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 267524 Ea. 4 s 399 Estimated 23 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 267525 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated . :r echnol~(ly '\" Room has insufficient dat\npohs. . -- --. ,.\n-.---- ' 141458 903 y_,- .,---,- 18 EA,022 5 . Estimated 18 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 168726 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 19 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141459 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 19 Tech_nology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA,o:ff'\":':168723 Ea .. ,:4 $ 167 Estimated 20 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141460 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 20 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 168724 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 21 Technology Room has insufficient datapiirts. EA' 022- \" 141461 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 21 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 168725 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 22 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141462 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated Technology -~ --- --------------------- \" .. , , _-_,_ ...... -,...,.-- ----- 22 Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-i:l27 168721 Ea. 4 _ $ 167 Est11nated t,, 23 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141463 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 23 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 168722 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Ugh! is missing ind is 13910-00)~ , 80767 6 Ea. $ 1,671 Estimated needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed 13910-004 80768 6 Ea. $ 1,565 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed 13910-019 80769 6 Ea. $ 2,225 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is_ needed 13910-022_ . 80771  6 Ea. -- / 1 $ 1,664  Estimated , 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 16 of 35 - - State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 18-23 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed 13910-025 80772 Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant 321971 Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement 10155-003 - 80760 18 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229971 18 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 242657 storage. 19 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053  213456 19 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229970 19 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 242658 storage . 20 . Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard: area. EA\n0~5- 229969 20 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 242659 storage. 21 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213457 21 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229968 21 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 242660 storage. 22 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213458 22 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. -.r,---.. --.--.-- EA-055 229967 22 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 242661 storage. 23 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213455 23 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA'.055 ' 229966 ------- - SubTotal by Building Building: Rm 24-25 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Roofing Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement 07510-003 82458 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 ----- ------ - Deficiency Listing 01/21/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 8 Ea. $ 2,630 Estimated LS 2 $ 115 Estimated 6 Ea. -3 -S - 7,511 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 484 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 .' s 1,905 Estim~ted 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 969 Estimated 2 Ea,, a4 . $ 868 Estimated . .. 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,938 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 s 1,905 Estimated . -- .. --.------- --- --------- ----- - 2 Ea. .4 $ 868 Estimated 9 Ea. 4 $ 4,359 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated -- 4 Ea. 4 $ ' 1,736   Estimated -------- ---------- ------------- 82 $ Qty UOM Priority 4,788 SF 2 $ 578,262 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 37,994 Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 17 of 35 State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 24-25 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD 24 24 25 25 24 24 25 Soffit requires replacement - Fa~cia requires replacement - Steel Door (Single Hung) requires replacement ADA -Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant . VCT flooring requires replace~Eiilt - Acoustical Suspension requires replacement Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classro-om.. d.o o. r la..c k__s_ the appropriate vision panei.\" . :- . : : ,... ,. . Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Paint/Coating requires replacement Wood Door (Single Hu~gj requires repi\ncemeilt Custom Cabinet requires replacement Furnace requires replacement 07460-001 .' 07460'002 82455 08110-006 82457 322508 096!!1)=009 82459 .\n.. 09130-003 82460 09510-003 82461 ' ,322510 EA-039 179164 EA-040 195129 : i:\nA-039 ' EA-040 195130 09910-002 82462 08210:007 06410-003 82463 ' 82465 15530-003 82467 Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior  Interior HVAC Hi.iAC Evapor:athle Condenser -Air C6ol 1 ~ii To~ tequir'eS : .. ~- . 1sa6ri:.Oo3 / 82469 .... - replacement HVAC HVAC HVAC Electrical Classroom ventilation inadequate End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires replacement End of Ufe: Cooiing Packaged Units : wi~dow Units require replacement  Exterior light - Wall Mount is missing and is needed Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology  Room lacks teleph~ne wiiirig~ Technology Room has insufficient dataports. 15830-001 82472 15800-900 300079 1 5700-900 '310490 16520-007 824 73 EA-022 141483 EA-021 165326  EA-022 141485 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Qty UOM Priority 532 SF _ sp :' 3 Ea. LS . 2\n539 SF 2,539 SF 2,539 SF Ea. Ea. Ea: Ea. 3,796 SF .. 8 8 Ea.\nLF 2 Ea. Room 2,656 SF 156 SF . 2 Ea. 5 Ea. 2 $ 2 $ 2 S 2 S 2 $ 3 $ 3 4 $ s 2 $ .:$ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 4 $ 1 Ea . .  4 .  S 3 Ea. 4 $ Deficiency Listing 0112112005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 2,642 5,507 1,243 '012:ss:s 6,066 8,669 99 ., . 190 439 439 3,242 5,684 4,249 5,864 10,265 12,892 1,032 903 167 542 Estimated . Estimated Estimated Estimated \" Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated   Estimated Estimated ' Estimaied, , Estimated Estimated . Estirhat~d Estimated Estimated Estimated  Estimated Estimated Estimated  Estimated Estimated Estiinaied Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 18 of 35 State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 24-25 Floor# Room# 25 System Deficiency Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Fire \u0026amp; Safety Baitery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is  needed  .. Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Hom/Strobe is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and js needed ,' Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed 24 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 24 Specialties Room lacks appropriate\namount of teacher storage.   \"   25 25 25 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. ' Specialties , Room lacks .appropriate amount of ieacher : $torage.:   Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-027 165327 - 13910-ooiC . 82475 .. ::., 13910-004 82476 1391()...019 82477 13910'022 82478 13910-025 82479 EA-055 229985 EA-058 240867. EA-053 213468 EA-055 229984 EA-058 .240868 .. ,_ ........ , __ .............. ,-......... .. ...................... __ _ ----- ............. _._.,_ .. Building: Rm 26-31 Floor# Room# System Roofing Roofing Exterior  Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior ' Interior  A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Roof \u0026amp; Deck Insulation requires replacement Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement Brick Wall require.s replacement Siding requires replacement Soffit requires replacement Fascia req~ir\nreplac~m~nt . Steel Door (Single Hung) requires replacement ADA - Accessible Dooiways are not fully compliant VCT flooring requires replacement SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 07220-003 82754 07510-003 82756 0481CF002 1!2742 07460-005 82744 07460-001 82747 07460-002 82749  08110-006 82752 333301 09658-009. 82761 Deficiency Listing 01/2 1/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 557 . _Estim\u0026lt;!ted 2 Ea. $ 522 Estimated 2 Ea. s 742 Estimated Estimated 2 Ea. $ 658 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 5 Ea. 4 \u0026gt;s .2\n422 . Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,736 Estimated 3 ... Ea . . 4  1,453 E\nstimated ----- .. --. --------------- -- 36 $ 145,809 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 7.200 SF 2 $ 65,327 Estimated 7,200 SF 2 57,134 Estimated 100 .. : SF 1,818. E:stirriated 160 SF 2 $ 611 Estimated 480 SF 2 $ 2,384 Estimated 270 ~F 2 s  2,439 Estimated 6 Ea. 2 $ 11 ,014 Estimated LS 2 s 2,202 Estimated 4,176  .. .,-c'.:. SF 2'.'. $ ,20,705 . Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 19 of 35 State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 26-31 Floor# 1 Room# 26 System Interior Interior _Interior Interior Interior ------- -- -- 26 Interior 27 27 29 29 30 30 31 31 28A 28A Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior interior Interior HVAC HVAC HVAC HVAC HVAC A.P.PLE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Acoustical Suspension requires replacement Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement 09130-003 82764 09510-003 82767 End of Ufe: D\nor Hardware requires repla~ement ,.,.. 08200-900 ... 300089 -, ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 322512 Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. ciassroom ctqor Jacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom d_oor l~cks ttie app\nopriate \\iisio\n' pariel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. '. , - \"\"' Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom d~ot lacks the appropriate visi9n. paf\n-, ... Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Paint/Coating requires replacement Wood Door/Frame (Single Hung) requires : replacement - Custom Cabinet requires replacement Furnace requires replacement . . ' ' ~  . ~vaporative Condenser -Air Cool 1.5 Ton requires . replacement     Classroom ventilation inadequate EA-039 179160 EA-039 179162 EA-040 188676 EA'.939_ )79155 EA-040 188678 EA-039 179158 EA-.040 . ,188679 EA-039 179159 EA-040 188680 EA~039  179163 EA-040 188677 09910-002 82770 08210-012 82772 06410-003 82775 15530-003 82778 82783~ 15830-001 82785 End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires 15800-900 300092 [tla::fit Cooling Packaged Units=:spiit'DIX:-- -- ,,,,. 15700:902:\nj i 0493 Unit requires replacement '  Qty UOM Priority 4,176 SF 4,176 SF 6_ Doo/ LS Ea. . Ea. Ea. Ea. 1  .Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea.Ea. 5,088 SF 6 22 LF 4 Ea. '5 5 Room 4,706 SF 2 S 2 $ 2\n\u0026gt;$ 2 $ 2 S 2 S 2 S i s 2 S 2 $ :, 2  :,_$ 2 $ 2 $ $ ' 2 $ 3 $ $ 4 S 2 $ 2 $ 2 S Deficiency Listing 01/2112005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 9,978 14,258 _3,678 177 190 439 190 439 i!io  439 190 439 190 439 190 439 4,346 11 ,686 11 ,728 50,785 22,842 7\n061 Estimated Estimated Es~imated Estimated Estimated .Estimated Estimated Estimated Estim,ited Estimated Estimated .Estiniated Estimated Estimated ' Estimated Estimated Estimated . Estimated . Estimated Estimated , Estirn\"aied Estimated Estimated Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 20 of 35 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 01rl.1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 26-31 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Window 15700-900 310494 3,922 SF 2 $ 11,308 Estimated Units require replacement Electrical Exterior Light - Wall Mount is missing and is 16520-007 82789 2 Ea. 2 $ 1,032 Estimated needed 26 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 274191 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 27 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 274192 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 29 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 274193 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 30 _ Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 274189 Ea: 4 $ 399 Estimated 31 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 274190 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 26 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141495 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 26 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. E:A-027,'c 160552 Ea\n4  $ 167 Estimated 27 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141498 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 27 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 160553 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated . -- - .. -~- - 29 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141505 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 29 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 160550 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 30 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141507 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 30 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027_  .160551 Ea. -= 4 $ 167 .Estimated 31 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141509 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 31 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 160548 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 28A Technology Room has insufficientdataports, .EA-022 141500 5 Ea. 4 ., $ :903 Estimated 28A Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . EA-027 160549 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is 13910-001 82792 6 Ea. $ 1,671 Estimated needed -.------- -- Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed 13910-004 82796 6 Ea. $ 1,565 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed 13910-019 82799 6 Ea. $ 2,225 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910-022 82804 6 Ea. $ 1,664 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing .and is needed - 13910-025 82806 6 Ea. $ 1,973 Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 A.P.PLE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 21 of 35 State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 26-31 Floor# Room# 26 26 26 27 27 27 29 29 29 30 30 30 31 31 31 28A Building: Rm 32 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialiies Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Sp~cialties Room lacks appropriaie amount of teacher storage. Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage.  Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. System Roofing Exterior Exterior Deficiency Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement Brick Wall requires replacement Steel Door/Frame (Double Hung) requires replacement A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-053 213471 EA-055 229992 EA-058 239713 EA-053 213474 EA-055 229990 EA-058 -239714 EA-053 213475 EA-055 229991 EA-058 239715 EA-053 213473 EA-055 229989 EA:oss'. 239716 EA-053 2134 72 EA-055 229994 EA:058--239111 EA-055 229993 SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 07510-003 82662 04810-002\" 82656 08110-009 82659 Qty UOM Priority 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 4 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 7 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 5 Ea. Ea. 2 Ea. 5 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. - Ea. 73 4 $ 4 S 4 $ 4 $ 4 S 4 $ 4 $ 4 S 4 S 4 $ 4 $ 4 S 4 $ 4 S 4 S 4 $ $ Qty UOM Priority 1,470 SF .100 SF 3 Ea. 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/21/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 1,905 868 1,936 1,905 868 -3,391 1,905 868 :(422 953 868 -~\n422 1,905 868 969 434 396,744 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 11 ,665 1,818 10,328 Estimated Estimaied Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 22 of 35 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 01 /2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 32 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 321978 LS 2 $ 688 Estimated -- --,.-,-- ---- - -- ---, --------. - - Interior Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is 08710-001 82672 \" Ea. s 5,493  Estimated needed Interior VCT flooring requires replacement 09658-009 82665 1.092 SF 2 s 5,414 Estimated Interior Acoustical Suspension re_qu ires replacement 09130-003 82667 1,191 SF 2 s 2,846 Estimated .. _ Interior Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement - 09510-003 - 82668 1,191 SF 2 s 4,069 Estimated Interior End of Life: Door Hardware requires replacement 08200-900 300086 3 Door 2 $ 1,839 Estimated Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 335733 LS 2 s 55 Estimated Interior Paint/Coating requires replacement 09910-002 82669 2,026 SF 3 s 1,730 Estimated Interior Wood Door/Frame (Single Hung) requires 08210-012 82671 3 Ea. 3 $ 5,912 Estimated replacement HVAC Classroom ventilation inadequate 15830-001 82674 Room 2 s 10,265 Estimated HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Window 15700-900 310492\" 518 SF 2 s 1,493 - Estimated Units require r~placement 32 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 260746 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 32 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 276728 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 32 Technology _Room lacks teiephone wiring. EA-027 171057 C Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is 13910-001 82675 Ea. $ 278 Estimated needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed 13910-004 82677 Ea. s 261 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Hom/Strobe is missing and_ is needed 13910-019 . 82679 Ea. S. 371 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910-022 82682 2 Ea. $ 555 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed 13910-025 82685 3 Ea. $ 986 Estimated 32 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213470 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 32 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229988 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated 32 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 239646 2 Ea. 4 $ 969 Estimated storage. SubTotal by Building 25 $ 71,051 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 23 of 35 State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 33-35,37 Floor# Room# System Deficiency . . . Roofing ' -Roof \u0026amp; Deck lnsu,lati~n require~ ~eplae\u0026lt;\nlment , Roofing Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement Roofing End of Life: Roofing System1 -Asphalt Shingles require replacement ,: Exterior -.. '.) jilck WaU requii~s ~e-pla\nemeni Exterior Soffit requires replacement Exterior Fascia requires replacement Deficiency Code 07510-003 07300-900 07460-001 07460-002 -.Exierior -\n- ' Steel Do~-~,F~ame (Single Hu~g)ismissinr/a\n:\n-cl is',\n.. ,-, 68110:010 .  needed   ..  Exterior End of Life: Window Systems require 08500-900 replacement Exterior End of Life: Exterior Doors require replacement 08100-900 , Exterior . ADA  ,Accessible Doorw~ys are riot tull'f compliint\"-, Interior Ceramic Tile requires replacement 09310-002 Interior VCT flooring requires replacement 09658-009 ------------- .----------- Interior Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement . 09510-003 Interior End of Life: Door Hardware requires replacement 08200-900 Interior End of Life: Ceilings, Non-Suspended, No Tiles 09500-902 ... require,_repla_cement -\n Interior  End of Life: Cer.a-mic Tile requires replacement 09600-903 .. Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant Interior ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet room. is not fully c~mpliant Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not-fully compliant 01 33 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 01 33 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 01 34 . lnierior Classr\nom door lacki the appropriate visi\nn pariel. EA0039 01 34 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Listing 01/21/2005 AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 84359 - 880 / SF , . Estimated 84362 5,570 SF 2 $ 44,200 Estimated 341731 4,690 SF 2 s 31,785 Estimated ,,, 50 '.. SF :.Estimated 84354 80 SF 2 $ 397 Estimated 84355 20 SF 2 s 181 Estimated --- -- .. - .---- 84358 ' , '4:,. Ea. , , 2 '\u0026gt;$ .. 7,343 \"'' ,.,, Estimated 307326 2,516 SF 2 $ 7,176 Estimated 307327 4 Door 2 $ 13,770 Estimated 84364 396 SF 2 s 5,294 Estimated 84366 153 SF 2 s 759 Estimated 84368  ' 100 307325 3 Door 2 s 1,839 Estimated 307329 628 SF 2 $ 345 Estimated .. 307331 453 SF 2 6,056 Estimated 327440 LS 2 $ 164 Estimated 327442 LS 2 $ 3,280 Estimated '327913 LS .... Estimated 179154 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 183823 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 179149 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 183820 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 24 of 35 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 01/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 33-35,37 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 01 35 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179152 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated . ~----- - 01 35 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 .  183821 Ea. 2 $  439 Estimated 01 37 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179153 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 01 37 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 183822 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated Interior PainUCoating requires replacement 09910-002 84370 6,678 SF 3 $ 5,704 Estimated Interior Custom Cabinet requires replacement 06410-003 84373 18 LF 4 $ 9,561 Estimated HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX 15700-902 311257 4,000 SF 2 $ 36,024 Estimated Unit requires replacement HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Window 15700-900 .311258 300 SF 2 s 865 .Estimated  Units require replacement Plumbing End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System 15100-907 307324 4,380 SF 2 $ 4,725 Estimated requires replacement Plumbing End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require 15400-900 307332 26 Ea. 2 s 31,900 Estimated replacement . . , Plumbing End of Life: Sanitary Sewer requires replacement 15100-908 '307333 4,380 SF 2 s 10,250 Estimated Plumbing ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant 336220 1 LS 2 $ 164 Estimated Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed 16140-001 84380 6 Ea. s 814 Estimated 01 33 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141426 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 01 33 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 154629 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 01 34 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141427 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 01 34 Technology Room lacks telephonl:! wiring. - EA\n027 154630 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 01 35 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141428 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 01 35 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 154631 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 01 37 Technology Room has insufficient datapoits. EA-022_ 141429 5 Ea. 4 s 903 Estimated 01 37 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . EA-027 154628 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is 13910-001 84381 4 Ea. s 1,114 Estimated needed . Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed 13910:004 , 84382 6 Ea. $ 1,565 Estimated 6003- Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 25 of 35 State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 33-35,37 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Fire \u0026amp; Safety Hom/Strobe is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed Sp\nclalties ADA- Grab Bars are not fu1iy\"compliant Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement 01 33 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 01 33 ~pecialties . Room latks appropriate amotJlit of t~actier . storage. 01 33 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. 01 34 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. 01 35 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. , 01 35 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. 01 35 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. 01 37 Specialties . Room has insufficient tackboard area: 01 37 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. 01 37 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. Building: Rm 36,38 Deficiency Code AssesslD 13910-019 84385 13910-022 84386 327446 -~ c~ = .. 10155-003 84375 EA-053 217137 EA~o~il  '2405250' EA-085 285972 EA-058 240526  El\\-055 : 235358 EA-058 240527 EA-085 285973  EA:oi\ns ::,,,235i5'1, EA-058 240528 EA-085 285974 SubTotal by Building Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD 36 36 Interior Interior Interior . B~ili-Up BiiufT!i~oi.Js R.oofirig requires fe_placeinent :. End of Life: Vinyl or Sport Flooring require replacement Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Cl~ssroo~ door lacks ~ppropriate hardw\nre. 36 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. A.P.P.LE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 09600-906 300102 EA-039 179157 EA-o4o t :i9.3370 EA-022 141519 - Qty UOM Priority 6 Ea. $ 6 Ea. s _1 .LS 2 $ 6 Ea. 3 $ 2 Ea. 4 $ 3 E.a. 10 SF Surf 4 s 5 Ea. 4 $ 2 Ea. 4 ... 4 Ea. 4 s 10 SF Surf 4 $ ~\n7. Ea. .4 . ~:s .-:, .. 5 Ea. 4 s 10 SF Surf 4 $ - M -----MMM- MM-- \" -- 0 60 $ Qty UOM Priority ) ,920 . SF ' 2 . . .-S_ 1,740 SF 2 $ Ea. 2 $ 1 Ea_, 2 s 5 Ea. 4 $ Deficiency Listing 01/21/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 2,225 1,664 82 : 7,511 1,905 119 2,422 868 1,938 119 . 434 2,422 119 267,125 Repair Cost .15,236 -~ :. 8,627 190 , 439' 903 .. Life Cycle ., Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated  Estimated Estimated Estimated i=:s1imatec1 , Estimated Estimated Estimaieci Estimated Estimated Status Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 26 of 35 State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 36,38 Floor# 1' Room# 36 36 36 System Deficiency Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is  needed  Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed - - -- --c----- -- ~ire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing andJS needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage, , Specialties Blinds are_ missing or in poor condition. Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-027 166852 13910-001 . 82975 13910-004 82976 13910-019 82977 . . 1391 ci--02{ ' 7 82978 13910--025 82979 EA-058 242218 EA-085 283976 - ----~----~---- - -- --- --------- --~--.:...:~'-- _:_. SubTotal by Building Building: Rm 39 (F.H. / Old Band) Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Roofing Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement 07510-003 82927 Roofing Gutters/Downspouts are damaged beyond repair 07710-001 82928 - .. -\" - . ------ Exterior Siding requires replacement  07460-005 82924 Exterior Fascia requires replacement 07460-002 82925 Exterior Steel Door/Frame (Single Hung) requires 08110-012 82926 replace!T.lent Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not tuily ~\nmpliant 335736 Interior Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is 08710-001 82934 needed Interior VCT flooring requires replacement 09658-009 82929 Interior Acoustical Suspension requires replacement 09130-003 82930 Interior Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement 09510-003 82931 Interior End of Life: Door Hardware requires replacement 08200-900 300096 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Listing 01/2 1/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated -. -. -,..--- 2 Ea. s 557 . Estimated 2 Ea. $ 522 Estimated 2 Ea. s 742 Estimated \"'\n-\"'.'' . 2 Ea. $ . 555 Estimated 2 Ea. s 658 Estimated 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,938 Estimated 10 SF Surf 4 $ 19 Estiflated -- ~- - 13 $ 30,650 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 5,796 SF 2 $ 45,993 Estimated 20 LF 2 158 Estimated 100- = =,--- - --- - --- -- SF 382 - Estimated 500 SF 2 $ 4,518 Estimated 4 Ea. 2 $ 7,343 Estimated LS 2 $ . 2,712 Estimated Ea. $ 5,493 Estimated 2,600 SF 2 $ 12,891 Estimated 2,600 SF 2 $ 6,212  Estimated 2,600 SF 2 $ 8,877 Estimated 15 Door 2 $ 9,196 Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 27 of 35 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 01/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 39 (F.H. / Old Band) Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not f\\Jlltcompliant 321981 LS - 2 $ 216 Estimated . Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully 333303 LS 2 $ 651 Estimated compliant Interior ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet 335738 LS 2 $ 4,340 Estimated room is not fully compliant 2 39 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. _ EA-039 , 179156 Ea .. 2 $ 190 Estimated 2 39 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 193604 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated Interior Paint/Coating requires replacement 09910-002 82932 9,724 SF 3 $ 8,305 Estimated . - - - -- -- -~ ... --. -. Interior Wood Door/Frame (Single Hung) requires 08210-012 82933 . 15 Ea . 3 $ 29,560 Estimated replacement Interior Custom Cabinet needs minor repairs 06410-002 82935 7 LF 4 $ 2,537 Estimated HVAC Classroom ventilation inadequate 15830-001 82937 Room 2 10,265 Estimated HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units c Window 15700-900 . - 310495 800 SF 2,307 Estimated Uniis require replacement Plumbing End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require 15400-900 300098 41 Ea. 2 $ 50,304 Estimated replacement Plumbing End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System 15100-907 300100 5,796 SF 2 $ 6,253 Estimated requires replacement Plumbing End of Life: Sanitary Sewer requires replacement 15100-908 ' 300101 5,796 SF 2 $ 13,564 Estimated Plumbing ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant 321983 LS 2 $ 216 Estimated Plumbing ADA - Shower Stall is not fully compliant 322514 LS 2 $ 3,510 Estimated -Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing anci' is neediid -16140-001 82938 4 Ea. s- 542 - Esti~ated 2 39 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141516 4 Ea. 4 $ 722 Estimated 2 39 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 166851 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated ___ .,_ - - ------- ----.- ----- Fire, \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Ughtis missing and is  needed 13910-001. . , 82939 4 Ea. 1 $' 1,114 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed 13910-004 82940 3 Ea. $ 783 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Hom/Strobe is missing and is needed 13910-019 82941 4 Ea. $ 1,484 Estimated 1391.0,622 -\n~~ 82942 _- 1 ---------. -- - . Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and js needed 3 Ea. - $, . 632 Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 28 of 35 State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 39 (F.H. / Old Band) Floor# Room# System Deficiency Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement 2 39 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. 2 39 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. - 2 39 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 2 39 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. - ----- Building: Rm 4-6, 105-108 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Roofing Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement Roofing Gutters/Downspouts are missing and are needed Exterior Unit Masonry Restoration - Pointing - needs to occur Exterior Siding requires replacement Exterior Soffit requires replacement Exterior Fascia requires replacement Exterior Steel Door/Frame (Single Hung) requires replacement Exterior Steel Window (Awning) requires replacement Exterior Brick requires replacement Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant Interior Ceramic Tile requires replace_ment Interior VCT flooring requires replacement Interior Acoustical Suspension requires replacement A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 13910-025 82943 333305 10155-003 82936 EA-020 118609 EA-053 213476 EA-055'\".: 229995 EA-058 242150 SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 07510-003 80570 07710:002 80574 04910-001 80559 07460-005 80561 07460-001 .: 80563 07460-002 80565 08110-012 80566 08510-003 80567 04210-003 80568 322494 09:310-002 . 80577 09658-009 80579 09130-003 80582 Qty UOM Priority 12 Ea. LS 2 2 Ea. :\n3 Ea. 4 2 Ea. 4 ,. , ., . 4 Ea. - 4 5 Ea. 4 40 Qty UOM Priority 5,500 SF 2 250 LF ' 2 - 30 SF 2 1,200 SF 2 300 SF 2 500 SF 2 10 Ea. 2 40 SF 2 15 SF 2 LS 2 450 SF 4,250 SF 2 2,575 SF 2 s $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ s $ $ s $ $ s $ $ $ $ $ Deficiency Listing 01 /2 1/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 3,945 Estimated 109 Estimated _2,504 Estimated 369 Estimated 1,905 Estimated 1,,736 -Estimated 2,422 Estimated 255,064 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 43,644 Estimated - 1,506 Estimated 156 Estimated 4,581 Estimated 1,490 E~timated 4,518 Estimated 18,357 Estimated 1,119 Estimated 270 Estimated 2,544 Estimated ---- - 6,016 Estimated 21,071 Estimated 6,152 Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 29 of 35 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 01,\"21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 4-6, 105-108 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Interior Acoustical Ceiling requires .replacement 09510-003 80584 2,575 SF 2 s 8,792 ___ Estimated Interior Lock/Latchset requires replacement 08710-012 80591 13 Ea. 2 $ 7,970 Estimated Interior ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet 321967 LS 2 $ 4,070 Estimated _r_oom is no~ fully_ comp!i_a11\\_ . ------r =~------ Interior ADA - Door Hardware is 1101 fully compliant 322496 LS 2 $ 204 Estimated ,. Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully 333095 LS 2 s 611 Estimated compliant 4 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel . EA-039 179148 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated . -- ------ .. - -- - 5 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. - EA:039 :179143 Ea. . 2 $ 190 Estimated 5 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 184128 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 6 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179144 Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated --------, ,-----~---- Classroom door lacks the appr?priate vision panel.  -A-=--.. - -!':-- 107 Interior EA-039_, 179147 Ea. , 2 ' s 190 Estimated 105 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179151 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 106 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179146 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 106 Interior . Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 184129 Ea. '.2 s 439 Esiimated Gym 1 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179150 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated Gym1 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 184130 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated ... ,,,,_.~.- - . -.----- Interior PainVCoating requires replacement 09910-002 80585 7,100 .SF 3 $ 6.064  Estimated Interior Wood Door/Frame (Single Hung) requires 08210-012 80588 3 Ea. 3 $ 5,912 Estimated replacement Interior Custom Cabinet requires replacement 06410-003 80593 60 LF 4 s 31 ,871 Estimated .-.--.--,,..-------. HVAC Furnace requires replacement 15530-003 : 80603 6 17,592  Estimated HVAC Evaporative Condenser -Air Cool 1.5 Ton requires 15660-003 80609 6 Ea. 2 $ 31 ,936 Estimated replacement HVAC Classroom ventilation inadequate 15830-001 80614 5 Room 2 $ 50,785 Estimated --- ----- ------ .. -- ---- - HVAC End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires 15800-900_: _300061 5,436 ,SF_ 2 $ 26,385 Estimated replacement HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Window 15700-900 310485 4,660 SF 2 $ 13,436 Estimated Units require replacement 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 30 of 35 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 01 /2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 4-6, 105-108 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Plumbing Grab Bar is missing and is needed 10820-004 80617 2 Ea. 2 $ 669 Estimated - ..... ----- - . Plumbing End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require 15400-900 300060 20 Ea. 2 $ 24,538 Estimated replacement Plumbing End of Life: Sanitary Sewer requires replacement 15100-908 300062 5,436 SF 2 $ 12,721 Estimated Plumbing End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System 15100-907 300063 5,436 SF 2 $ 5,864 Estimated requires replacemerit ----------- ... - Plumbing ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant 322498 LS 2 $ - 204, Estimated Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed 16140-001 80622 10 Ea. $ 1,356 Estimated Electrical Exterior Light - Wall Mount is missing and is 16520-007 80620 3 Ea. 2 $ 1,549 Estimated needed 4 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-oax-- 269642 Ea,, 4 $ 7 399 Estimated 5 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 269643 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 6 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 269644 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 107 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 269647 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 105 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 269645 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 106 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 269646 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated Gym 1 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 269648 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 4 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141445 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 4 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 155502 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated -- 5 Technology Room has insufficient dat~ports. EA-022- 141447 5 Ea. . 4 $ 903 Estimated 5 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 155503 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 6 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141449 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 6 Technology Room lacks .telephone wiring. EA-027 155504 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 107 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 155507 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 105 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141451 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 105 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 155505 Ea.  4 $ 167 Estimated 106 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141453 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 31 of 35 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 01 /2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 4-6, 105-108 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 106 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 155506 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is 13910-001 80624 6 Ea. $ 1,671 Estimated needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed 13910-004 80626 6 Ea. s 1,565 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed 13910-019 80628 8 Ea. s 2,967 Estimated .. ,.- - ---~.-- \" - Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910-022. 80630 8 Ea. s 2,218 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed 13910-025 80633 9 Ea. s 2,959 Estimated Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant 322500 LS 2 $ 102 Estimated Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement 10155-003 80597 24 Ea . . 3 $ 30,046 Estimated Specialties Exterior Signage requires replacement 10430-003 80600 10 Ea. 3 $ 719 Estimated 4 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 241507 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,453 Estimated storage. 5 Specialties Room has i11sufficient writing area. EA-053 213453 2 Ea. 4 s  1,905 Estimated 5 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229964 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated 5 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 241508 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,938 Estimated storage . . 6 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213454 2 Ea. 4 s 1,905 Estimated 6 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229963 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated 6 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 241509 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage. 107 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053  213452 2 Ea. 4 s 1,go5 Estimated 107 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229965 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated 107 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 241510 Ea. 4 s 484 Estimated storage. 105 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229961 Ea. 4 s 434 Estimated 106 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229962 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated --- -- --~ -- --- ___ ..,._ - . --------- - --n --- -- SubTotal by Building 81 $ 433,609 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 32 of 35 State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 7-10 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Roofing Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement 07510-003 82110 . -------~.----- - - ---- Exterior Siding requires replacement : 07460-005 82105 Exterior Soffit requires replacement 07460-001 82106 Exterior Fascia requires replacement 07460-002 82107 7 Exterior steel Oo\n(Single Hung) requires replac~ment 081 1o'.'006 -i2108 Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 333297 Interior VCT flooring requires replacement 09658-009 82111 -  .. --- -.. ..,.._. ____ ,,,,, - Interior Acoustical Suspension. requires replacement . 0913o=iioT - 82114 Interior Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement 09510-003 82117 Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 321974 --- ---,.,....-,-- 7 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039  179141 7 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 196097 8 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179142 9 Interior Classwom door lacks the appropriate visio~ pane( EA,,039: 179139 10A Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179145 10A Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 196098 Classroom door i i cks the appropriate vision pilriel. ~-.- - 10B Interior EA-039 179140 Interior PainUCoating requires replacement 09910-002 82120 Interior Wood Door/Frame (Single Hung) requires 08210-012 82121 replacement -- -~------- - -- ------ - Interior Custom Cabinet requires replacement 06410-003 82122 HVAC Furnace requires replacement 15530-003 82123 HVAC Evaporative Condenser -Air Cool 1.5 Ton requires 15660-003 82124 replacement --~-- HVAC Classroom ventilation inadequ.ate --- . ,r,.... . :15830-001 82125 HVAC End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires 15800-900 300070 replacement A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Listing 01 /2 1/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 5,556 SF 2 s 44,088 Estimated ~ ~ _.,._ .. 320 SF 2 s .1,222  Estimated 654 SF 2 s 3,248 Estimated 350 SF 2 $ 3,162 Estimated 4 Ea. 2 s 7,34.3 Estimated -:-~: . LS 2 $ 1,748 Estimated 3,216 SF 2 s 15,945 Estimated 3,216 SF 2 $ 7,684  Estimated 3,216 SF 2 s 10,980 Estimated LS 2 s 140 Estimated Ea. 2 $ 190 : Estimated Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated Ea. 2 $ 190 Estim,ited Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated Ea .. 2 $ 190 Estimated 4,352 SF 3 s 3,717 Estimated 4 Ea. 3 $ 7,883 Estimated 102 LF 4 $ 54,180 Estimated 6 Ea. 2 $ 17,592 Estimated 5 Ea. 2 s 26,636 Estimated .5 Room 2 $ 50,785 Estimated 3,736 SF 2 s 18,134 Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 33 of 35 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 01/2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Svlvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 7-10 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Window 15700-900 310487 3,736 SF 2 $ 10,772 Estimated __ Units reg','i~ replacef!le_n_!. _ _ ------r-  -~ -. Plumbing End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System 15100-907 300072 3,736 SF 2 $ 4,030 Estimated requires replacement Plumbing End of Life: Sanitary Sewer requires replacement 15100-908 300073 3,736 SF 2 $ 8,743 Estimated Plumbing End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require 15400-900 300074 7 Ea. 2 $ 8,588 Estimated replacement .. . Electrical Exterior Light - Wall Mount is missing and is 16520-007 - 82126 2 Ea. 2 $ .1,032 Estimated needed Electrical End of Life: Electrical Service requires 16400-901 300075 3,736 SF 2 $ 13,104 Estimated replacement 7 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 267533 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 1 8 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 267529 1 Ea. 4 $ \"\u0026gt;399 rj ,\nt.i mated 9 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 267530 Ea. 4 s 399 Estimated 10A Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 267531 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated - 10B Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 . 267532 Ea: 4 $ 399 Estimated 7 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141464 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 7 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167543 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 8 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022T-141466 5 Ea. 4 s 903 Estimated 8 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167544 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 9 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141468 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 9 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA0021 .167545 Ea. 4 ., , $ 167  Eitiriiiied 10A Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 141471 4 Ea. 4 $ 722 Estimated 10A Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . EA-027 167546 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 10B Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022  141473 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 10B Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167547 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is 1391 0-001 82127 5 Ea. $ 1,392 Estimated needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and Is needed 13910-llPil 82128 5 Ea. $ 1,305 Estimated 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 34 of 35 - - State of Arkansas 3122 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Campus: 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School Building: Rm 7-10 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Fire \u0026amp; Safety Hom/Strobe is missing and is needed 13910-019 82130 Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910-022 82131 Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke_ Detector is missing and is needed 13910-025 82134 Specialties End of Life: Public Address and Intercom - 11130-901 300071 Communications require replacement 7 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213462 7 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229975 7 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 241511 storage. 8 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area . EA-053 213459 8 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229976 8 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 241 512 storage. 9 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 118608 9 Specialties Room has in~ufficient writing area. EA:053 2.13460 9 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229974 10A Specialties Room has insufficient writing area . EA-053 213461 Specialties ------ - -- EA-Ms-:  - --- 10A Room has insufficient tackfioard area. 229972 10A Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 241513 storage. 108 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229973 10B Specialties Rooni lacks appropriate amount of teacher ---=--- .- . -.-- EA-058 241514 storage. ---- - ----- -------- --- SubTotal by Building Grand Total by Campus A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Qty UOM Priority 5 Ea. 5 Ea. 5 Ea. 3,736 SF 3 2 Ea. 4 2 Ea. 4 4 Ea. 4 2 Ea. 4 2 Ea. 4 4 Ea. 4 Ea. 4 2 Ea. 4 2 Ea. 4 Ea. 4 2 Ea. . -4 4 Ea. 4 2 Ea. 4 7 Ea. 4 ------ - ---------- 65 759 $ $ s $ $ $ $ $ $ $ s $ s $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Deficiency Listing 01/2:1/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 1,854 Estimated 1,386 Estimated 1,644 Estimated 4,194 Estimated 1,905 Estimated ' 868 Estimated 1,938 Estimated 1,905 Estimated _,868 Estimated 1,938 Estimated 369 Estimated 1,905 Estimated 868 Estimated 953 Estimated \" 868 Estimated 1,938 Estimated 868 Estimated -- 3,391 Estimated 362,104 5,292,904 6003 - Sylvan Hills Middle School 3122 Page 35 of 35 State of Arkansas 3117 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. Campus: 6003 - Jacksonville Junior Hiqh Sch. Building: Floor# Room# System Deficiency Asphalt requires replacement Concrete requires replacement Pavement Marking requires rep\\acement Sidewalk requires replacement Asphalt Coating is missing and is needed Site Site Site Site Site Site Site Site Site Site ,-.,-----,-.---. ..,...,.,-.,-~----- - -- --------- , Site Site Site Site Site Site Site Site Site Site Site Exterior HVAC A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Fence/Gate (Chain Link) requires replacement .,\nGuard Rail is missing and is needed Backstop requires replacement - - ~' Traffic Sign requires replacement ADA - Accessible routes from parking or sidewalks to building are not fully compliant ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant ADA - Accessible rouies between buildings and  facilitie.s are not fully compliant  ADA - Handicap parking spaces are not fully compliant ADA - Access to playgrounds or athletic fields is not fully complian.t Flagpole requires replacement Paved play area markings require repainting Basketball goal/post requires replacement School lacks marquee or marquee in poor condition. The school has insufficient parking. School has insufficient baseball fields. Bus drop-off ate a does not have a canopy. ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant Computer room lacks independent AC. Deficiency Code AssesslD 02740-002 72322 02750-002 72323 02766-002 72325 02775-002 72333 02785-001 72324 02s20-00:r . 12334-: 02840-003 72326 02880-003 72331 02890-002\"\n, . 72327 340916 340917 f 340918 331355 331357 10355-003_ . 72335 02766-003 72329 02880-014 72332 EA~oor   105285 EA-002 105702 EA-008 108374 EA-031 112671 337861 EA-025 110728 Qty UOM Priority 83,130 SF 30,300 SF 800 . LF 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 5,550 11 ,600 720 SF 2 $ SF 2 $ LF \"\n, ? $ 340 LF Ea. 2 $ 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01 /20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 140,786 164,092 ,1\n028 26,934 17,236 15,605 6,245 3,896 12 $ ....,-.- 1_,488 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated . LS Estimated LS LS 2 $ 2,340 LS LS Ea.. 2 $ 2 $ 20,000 SF 2 $ 2 $ 3 ' $ 3 $ 6 Ea. 3 $ . 1 15,050 3 SF 4 Ea. 4 LF c ' 4 LS 2 Ea. 4 s $ $ $ $ 936 2\"340 702 3,510 ,J,580 1,287 14,391 11,635 22,669 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 96,564 Estimated --.... ---..------ 19,750 , Estimated 1,404 Estimated 13,636 Estimated 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 3117 Page 1 of 34 State of Arkansas 3117 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. Campus: 6003 - Jacksonville Junior Hii:1h Sch. Building: Floor# Room# System Deficiency Electrical Exterior Light - Light Pole_- Parking \u0026amp; Road is missing and is needed Electrical School site lacks appropriate lighting. Specialties School lacks an appropriate surveillance system. Specialties .. School lacks a pull video distribution system_. Specialties School lacks a dedicated computer equipment room. Specialties Computer room lacks appropriate furniture. ---- Sp~cialties School's PBX is undersized. . . Specialties Elementary School lacks appropriate wayfinding system. Deficiency Code AssesslD 16520-001 .72336 EA-041 106200 EA-033 113268 EA~0-1!( c'. 10~498 EA-024 110095 EA-026 111303 ~- EAc030 112114 EA-088 114689 ------- ----- --------- ----- ---------- ------- -------------- ------------- SubTotal by Building Building: 100 Wing N. Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Roofing Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement 07510-003 76489 Exterior Ste~I Window (Awning) requires replacemeni .. 08510-003 76484 Exterior Siding requires replacement 07460-005 76485 Exterior Soffit requires replacement 07460-001 76486 Exterior ---Fascia requires replacement , . , ~ . \"'r ... 07460-00~,\n~. ,_76487 . Exterior Steel Door/Frame (Single Hung) is missing and is 08110-010 76488 needed Exterior End of Life: Exterior Doors require replacement 08100-900 299981 ADA -Accessible Doorways ar~ not fully COJ11pliarit -7:::- -- ........ - --- Exterior 333033 Interior Ceramic Tile requires replacement 09310-002 76490 Interior VCT flooring requires replacement 09658-009 76491 --- --- - -- - Interior Acoustical Suspension requires replacement_  .,, 09130-1)03 76492 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 10 Ea. .... 2 S. '16,613 Estimated Ea. 2 s 2,437 Estimated Ea. $ 20,411 Estimated Ea. = . 4 $ 25,097 Estimated 150 SF 4 $ 24,660 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 363 Estimated Ea.  4 s 17,550 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 14,327 Estimated 31 $ 691,511 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 10,168 SF 2 $ 80,686 Estimated 603 SF . 2 $ 16,876 Estimated 368 SF 2 s 1,405 Estimated 2.642 SF 2 $ 13,122 Estimated .. 807 SF , 2 $ .  7,291 Estimated 8 Ea. 2 $ 14,685 Estimated 8 Door 2 $ 27,541 Estimated LS - 2 $ 3,090 Estimated 549 SF 2 $ 7,339 Estimated 5,887 SF 2 $ 29,188 Estimated 5,887 SF 2 $ J4,066 Estimated 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 3117 Page 2 of 34 State of Arkansas 3117 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. Campus: 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. Building: 100 Wing N. Floor# Room# System Deficiency Interior Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant lnteriot  .. ADA-Room dim~~sion to cr\n~ti~~t:1lsible iiillet room is not_funy cgmpliant : ,\\ '.'/, .. Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully compliant 101 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Deficiency Code 09510-003 EA-039 1 104  Interior :' Cla~sroom. do,o~ Jack~)b~ ap'jii9~ri~ie v~ilifi\na~F\n'.~{,\ny---~EA\noifi 106 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 110 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 Interior 112 Classr~~m door iacks the ap~~oprtaie\\t'i'stciii p~~\nI. ,::, ''.EA-039\n._- \n, : ~a :\n. :. :. {\n ., ..   -,~,: --,/' ~-, ,cf 102 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 108 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 AssesslD 76493 321914 335691 179110 \"\"\"'.17910E( \" 179113 179109  f79112 179111 179114  . f:'aint/C:oating requires ~eplacem\nnt .. - -~- -~ -. --.- ... : interior ,. 09910-002 \\ ,75494 Interior Custom Cabinet requires replacement 06410-003 76497 HVAC Evaporative Condenser -Air Cool 1.5 Ton requires 15660-003 76500 replacen1E!11_t HVAC ClasSroQm v~ntilation inadequate . HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Window 15700-900 310467 Units require replacement Plumbing Grab Bar is missing and is needed 10820-004 76506 End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require .. . .\n': ' repiac-ernent\" Plumbing End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System 15100-907 299976 requires replacement Plumbing ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant 322418  ~\nEle~tiic~i :  \": GFI ~ecepiacte\nis mis.sing and i{ne-~1( '.(\n.  .. ,, '\" 161 :40:oil1 \u0026gt; fr6508'' Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed 16140-001 76510 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 5,887 SF 2 s 20,099 Estimated LS 2 s 247 Estimated . 1 Cs\", i Estimated:' :/. \n:~- LS 2 s 742 Estimated Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated - e, '. ,1 Ea .. -Estimated Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated ,, .. E,j\n,c . Estimate\u0026lt;!. Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated 16 LF 4 $ 8,499 Estimated 2 Ea. 2 s 10,736 Estimated Estiitiat~d ' - . ___ .:.,,:c: ,\n,~ 6,603 SF 2 s 19,038 Estimated 2 Ea. 2 s 669 Estimated 6,603 SF 2 $ 7,1 23 Estimated LS 2 $ 247 Estimated .''\n\"Estimated \":' . : ' 2 Ea. $ 271 Estimated 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 3117 Page 3 of 34 State of Arkansas 3117 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. Campus: 6003 - Jacksonville Junior Hi~h Sch. Building: 100 Wing N. Floor# Room# System Deficiency Electrical Exterior Light - Wall Mount is missing and is needed 101 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. 104 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. 106 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. 110 Electrical Room lacks controls to partiaJly diml ight\n.  112 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. 102 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights . ..,..... - - --- 1 108 . Electrical  -- Room lacks controls to pahiaiiy ~im light[\"' 101 Technology Room has Insufficient dataports. 101 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. 104 Technology . Room has_ insufficient dataports. 104 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. 106 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. 106 Techriology Room lacks telephone wjring . 110 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. 110 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. 112 Technology Room has insufficient dataports.  112 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. 102 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. - =- -- 1 102 Technology Room lacks telephone wipng.-, 108 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. 108 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is nETeded Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed A.P.P.l.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 16520-007 76509 EA:os.ai\u0026gt; 267513 EA-084 267515 EA-084 267510 - EA-084 ...,\"167512 ~- 2:- EA-064 267509 EA-084 267514 EA0084 .e:267511 ' : .. :',~ : EA-022 140570 EA-027 167315 EA-022 ',i 140573 _.,_,_,., ___ EA-027 167317 EA-022 140575 EA-027 16!318 EA-022 140577 EA-027 167320 EA-022.- 140576 EA-027 167321 EA-022 140571 _ .. , ____________ , ____ _,, .-.-- .- EA~0?i ,t 167316 - '::,,.,,-\"' EA-022 140576 EA-027 167319 13910-_0, 04- 76511 13910--019 76512 13910-025 76513 Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 3 Ea. 2 $ 1,549 Estimated Ea . . ., .. A $ 399 - Estimated Ea. 4 s 399 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated Ea, -\u0026lt; 4 s 399 Estimated \" Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 1 , ...  ---- Ea, 399 .  :: .. Estimated 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 5 903 Estimated Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated Ea. :-. 4~ s 167 Estimated 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated -~- .- .. \"' __ , 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Esti.:Oated Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 167 - Estimated 5 Ea. 4 s 903 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 7 Ea. s 1,826 Estimated 7 Ea. s 2,596 Estimated 9 Ea. $ 2,959 Estimated 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 3117 Page 4 of 34 State of Arkansas 3117 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. Campus: 6003 - Jacksonville Junior HiJ:1h Sch. Building: 100 Wing N. Floor# Room# 101 101 101 104 104 104 106 106 System Deficiency Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: F.ire 'Alarm requires replacement ,, .. Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of life: Security System requires replacement Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant . Specialti~s\nToilet Compartmentreq~irei-replaceineilt Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialties\n.~,~ Specialties Specialties Roon, l,icks appropriate arriourit storage,\"''t.  ..... Room has insufficient writing area. Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialties . Room l!ICKS appropri~te ,amount of teacher . \"storage.':     Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 1 ' 106 ' ,: : SpecialUes T Room lacks~PPfOP~iate :~~~-J~t o'6eache\n~ storagec_       110 110 112 112 112 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. S-pecialties- j :~oom has iasuffi~ient Writing are\n.\n ~ \",  Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage . ...\n102 , ..  ... Speciaities ~, Roo\nhasihsufficieni tackboard area:: 108 108 Specialties Room has Insufficient tackboard area. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 13850'900 :, i..29~977: 13850-901 299978 322421 '. . 10155-003:- \u0026lt;\n16498 :: EA-053 213368 EA-055 229873 EA-053 EA-055 213369 229870 245?01 EA-053 213371 EA-055 229869 EA-055 229868 EA-058 245204 .- ,i, EA-055 229867 EA-058 245205 EA-055 229872 EA-058 245203 SubTotal by Building Qty UOM Priority -6:603\u0026lt; _s.1\n6,603 SF LS 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 2 Ea. Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 5 Ea. 2 Ea. 6 Ea. Ea. 5 Ea. 79 2 $ 4 $ 4 S 4 4 $ $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 S 4 $ 4 S 4 4 S 4 $ $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost life Cycle Status 12,581 124\n~:511 : 1,905 868 1,905 868 1,905 868 868 2,422 868 2,906 434 2,422 446,640 Estimated Estimated Estimated  Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated\nE~timated . . Estimated Estimated : Estimated Estimated Estimated 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 3117 Page 5 of 34 State of Arkansas 3117 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. Campus: 6003 - Jacksonville Junior Hi~h Sch. Building: 100 Wing S. Floor# Room# 105 105 109 109 107 107 111 111 113 113 103 103 105 109 107 111 113 103 System Exterior Exterior Interior . Interior Interior Interior lr\n\"t~rior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Inferior Interior Interior Interior HVAC Electrical Eiectrical Electrical Electrical Electrical Electrical Electrical Electrical A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Soffit requires replacement Soffit requires replacement VCT flooring requires replacement Acoustical Cetting requires\" replacem\nrit Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks_ appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom ventilation inadequate GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed GFI Receptacle is missing ~pd is needed Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. R\n~~ lacks cont~ols to -p-\nrti\ni~ 0 dim lig.ht\n. Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. Room lacks controls to partiaUy dim lights. Deficiency Code AssesslD ,07460-001 . -  82483 07460-001 82510 09658-009 82486 09510-003 82488 EA-039 179121 EA-040 187351 - EA-039 _ 119123 EA-040 187352 EA-039 179118 EA-039 179125 EA-040 187354 EA~039= 179122 EA-040 187355 EA-039 179126 EA-040 187350 15830-001 82491 16140-001 82492 16140-001 . 82494 . EA-084 272325 EA-084 272326 EA-084 272327 EA-084 272328 EA-084 272329 EA-084'~' 272324. Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 70 - SF 70 SF 380 SF ' 2 S 2 S $ 348 348 1,884 1,000= SF. 2 2. 2 2 ------ - $ 3,414 1 Ea. $ 190 Ea. $ 439 Ea,  ~- 2 '~$ Ea. 2 S Ea. 2 $ Ea. Ea. 2 $ Ea. 2 $ =,,......, ___ .-- - - Ea. - Z $ Ea. Ea. Ea. - 5 Room 2 Ea. 2 Ea. Ea. 2 $ 2 $ ~- s 2 $ s ' $ 4 $ Ea. 4 $ Ea.- . 4 $ Ea. 4 $ Ea. 4 $ Ea. ' 4 S 190 . 439 190 439 190 439 190 439 190 439 50,785 271 271 399 399 399 399 399 399 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated r .. \" . Esiimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimaied Estimated Estimated i,stimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 3117 Page 6 of 34 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3117 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 01 120/2005 Campus: 6003 - Jacksonville Junior HiQh Sch. Building: 100 Wing S. Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 105 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 140602 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 105 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 158706 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 109 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 140603 5 Ea. 4 $ _903 . Estimated 109 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . EA-027 158707 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 107 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 140604 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 107 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring, ,- .. . . ' . . EA~027' 158708 ... -\"'1------- - ---~,.,-~- Ea. 4 $ . 167 - Estimated 111 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 140605 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 111 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 157410 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 1 113 Technology Roo~ his insufficie~t dataports. EA,022\u0026gt; 140606 5 Ea. 4 $ 903  Estimated 113 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 157411 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 103 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 140601 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 1 103 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EX'.027 158705 Ea. 4 s . 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed 13910-004 82497 6 Ea. s 1,565 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Emergency Lighting (Fluorescent - 2'x4') is 16530-001 82500 6 Ea. s 2,789 Estimated missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Hom/Strobe is missing and _is needed ... 13910-019 82501 6 Ea: $ 2,225 Esiimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910-022 82505 6 Ea. $ 1,664 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed 13910-025 82508 6 Ea. $ 1,973 Estimated 105 Specialties . Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 . .244840 5 Ea. 4 s : 2\n422 Estimated storage. c' 109 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 244841 4 Ea. 4 s 1,938 Estimated storage. 107 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 244842 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 111 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA053 ' 213384 2 Ea. 4 s 1,905 Estimated 111 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 244843 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,938 Estimated storage. 113 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213383 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimaied 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 3117 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 7 of 34 State of Arkansas 3117 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. Campus: 6003 - Jacksonville Junior Hi~h Sch. Building: 100 Wing S. Floor# Room# System Deficiency 113 Room lacks appropriaie amouni of teathe  storage,'  103 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 103 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. 103 , specialties '' .Bl.ihds are missing or in poor@ridition?'. - -----. -.- --------- ---- - '- ------ -- ------------- - ----------::: -- - _-__ --~  'C' Building: 200 Wing Floor# Room# System Roofing Exterior .. Exterior '' Exterior Exterior Deficiency Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement Steel Window (Awning) requires replacement Siding requires repl a-\n~rnent  : ,Joint Sealant requires replacement Soffit requires replacement '. Exterior.,,. F~scia requiresi'eplacElh)Jnt: -- Exterior Steel Door/Frame (Single Hung) is missing and is needed Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-053 213385 EA-056 244639 SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 07510-003 73969 08510-003 73962 014po:oos-~ 7JS63  07920-002 73964 07460-001 73965 ,- .. . .. , .... ~--, 07460-002 .. 08110-010 73967 Exterior Coiling Door/Grille requires replacement 08330-002 73968 Exterior .. E~d of Life: Exterior Doors re\"ii'uii~ r~placirt1ent ...\n()810_0,900 ' - 299~6cf . Exterior Interior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant Ceramic Tile requires replacement . lnteribr - .. - ~--- - Interior Interior Interior Interior A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 VCJ,floi\u0026gt;ring /equite~ replacement Acoustical Suspension requires replacement Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement Lcick/Latchset,fequirEls. replac\nm~nt Lock/Latchset requires replacement 335602 09310-002 73970    os5M,00S: 73971   09130-003 73973 09510-003 73977 .. ::\n08110-01 ~Ei:?~991 08710-012 74016 Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 2 Ea. 4 s 1,905 Estimated 5 Ea. 4 s 2,422 Estimated  Estim\niied D,-\n-~ i'.:.'J- ~-- ~-~ 52 $ 99,034 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 7,380 SF 2 s 58,562 Estimated 515 SF 2 $ 14,413 Estimated 1.so  SF - ~E\ntim'ated ' 45 LF 2 $ 222 Estimated 2,635 SF 2 s 13,087 Estimated 700 ~siirnateci ,,\u0026lt; 14 Ea. 2 $ 25,699 Estimated Ea. 2 s 5,945 Estimated 14: Door . ~stirnated . LS 2 s 3,454 Estimated 385 SF 2 s 5,147 Estimated 4,550: ii:iiiif ., . \\/2:.:, Estimaied _'(' 3,450 SF 2 s 8,243 Estimated 3,450 SF 2 $ 11,779 Estimated .14 Ea. -: Estimated 0 ~:,:,\n.~-,. 14 Ea. 2 $ 8,583 Estimated 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 3117 Page 8 of 34 State of Arkansas 3117 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. Campus: 6003 - Jacksonville Junior Hi~h Sch. Building: 200 Wing Floor# Room# System Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior 1  ., 201. , i lriterior\n/ 203 Interior Interior 1.hterior  HVAC Deficiency Panic Device requires replacement Lock/Lai,chset requires replacement ' Panic Device requires replacement End of Life: Ceramic Tile requires replacement ADA/ Room ,din1ensi_on to create ati\nessible roci111 __ is_ not_fully ~cimpUant,i\u0026gt;.i. ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant Deficiency Code AssesslD 08710-015 74018 08710'012  740~7.f 08710-015 74041 09600-903 299961 335604 ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully 335685 .. __ C(\u0026gt;rnpliant ________ . ...... __________ _ Classr9om door11\n1cks the approprlate _visioh panel. '., ... ,, .. EA~039\n.,, -~7~}?6 Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Wall Covering requires replacement . PainVCoating\\ equires ieplacei'neni ..  . Classroom ventilation inadequate EA-039 179137 09'720-003 73983 - :0~91 (i:002 . -. 73987\n, . 15830-001 74036 HVAC End of Life: Controls - DOC requires replacement 15900-902 299964 HVAC .. -~i~ ~}~f ~l~ 1ii:f i!~~~~ged 9,ri1tF, sp.1i1\n9nC lf-{ .,, 1 ?y,o,o,~jlo.2.,~:,::ffq1s4: HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Window 15700-900 310465 205 Units require replacement HVAC Lab lacks an air exchange system. Plumbing , :: Backfl6W0Pr~veriter )~ is ,missing and j~'nekded Plumbing Plumbing Grab Bar is missing and is needed Mop Sink requires replacement _End of life( F\naucet~\n~d-Fl\nt~~s r~cjuire : replacement.\": ., .. ' '. . \u0026lt;\\ \u0026lt;_- Plumbing End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System requires replacement Plumbing ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant 1 ~- \"' 26s'f, i' piJ\n:\n-bing ,-:-c Classr~~m 1a'ck~ the} ~uired h~inbet otiin~s:t:' A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 EA-061 255869 10820-004 7 4056 15418-006 7 4057 ,\\~?~95i: . 15100-907 299962 321908 260480: . Qty 5 .14_ 5 1,368 675 1\n150 5 7,380 3,690 4 20 7,380 1''\"::'J 1 UOM Ea. Ea) Ea. SF LS LS Ea. SF .s~ , Room SF SF Ea. \"i:a., Ea. Ea. SF LS Ei/ Priority 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 S 2 $ 2 s 3 s 3 $ 2 s 2 $ 2 s 2 $ 2 2 s 2 s 2 S 2 S Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 4,440 _: ij\n583 s/ 4,440 18,288 276 828 190 1,406 50,785 14,651 10,639 4,286 4,651 '\n' 1,338 999 7,962 276 Estimated ESlilTiateil . Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated \u0026lt;'Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated  '\nEsti~~teci'--'/ ,\n. 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 3117 Page 9 of 34 State of Arkansas 3117 6003 -Jacksonville Junior High Sch. Campus: 6003 - Jacksonville Junior Hi~h Sch. Building: 200 Wing Floor# Room# System Deficiency Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed Technology End of Life: Telephones - School Wide Telephones require replacement 1 201  Technology Room has insufficient dataports. 201 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. 202 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Room lacks telephone wiring. - 202 Technology 203 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. 203 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. 205 . Technofogy Room lac~s telephone wiring .\nFire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is needed Fite \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is rieedea Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed -- . - - Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Fire Alarm requires replacement Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Security System requires -' -~ ------ replacement Specialties ADA - Grab Bars ate noi full~ compliant Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement Specialties Exterior Signage requires replacement Specialties Ext\nrior Signage requires replace\n,ent Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement Specialties Exterior Signage requires replacement 201 ---=-= --------- ~--- .Specialties Room has insufficient tackboatd\nea. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 16140-001 74058 16700-900 299963 EA-022 140558 EA-027 152527 EA-022 140559 - EA-on ...  152528 EA-022 140560 EA-027 152529 EA-027 :. , :152s26 13910-001 74051 13910-001 74053 13910-004 74054 13910-019 74059 13910-022 74060 -~~---- -- 13910:025 ' : ('4061 13850-900 299958 13850-901 299959 \" .\n 335687 10155-003 74023 10430--003 74028 10430-003 - : 74032 10155-003 74045 10430-003 74047 .. EA-055 : 229860 Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 4 Ea. s 542 Estimated 7,380 SF 3 s 3,635 Estimated 2 Ea. 4  s 361 Estimated Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 4 Ea. 4 s 722 Estimated Ea. .'\n- 4 167 Estimated 5 Ea. 4 903 Estimated Ea. 4 167 Estimated Ea . 167 - Esti~at~d : 6 Ea. s 1,671 Estimated 6 Ea. s 1,671 Estimated 6 Ea. s 1,565 Estimated 6 Ea. s 2,225 Estimated 2 Ea. s 555 Estimated - y .---- - --------- 5 Ea. Yi $ . 1,644 Estimated 7,380 SF $ 10,406 Estimated 7,380 SF $ 14,061 Estimated LS 138 Estimated 8 Ea. 3 $ 10,015 Estimated 10 Ea. 3 $ 719 Estimated 10 Ea .. -3 $ 719 Estimated . 8 Ea. 3 $ 10,015 Estimated 10 Ea. 3 $ 719 Estimated 4 Ea. : A s 1,736 Estimated 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 3117 Page 10 of 34 State of Arkansas 3117 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. Campus: 6003 - Jacksonville Junior HiQh Sch. Building: 200 Wing Floor# Room# System Deficiency 201 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. 202 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 202 ~- specT~fues --~Rao\n, has insufficient tackboard area: 202 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. 203 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 203 Speciaitie_'s 'Room has inSIJffiCieni tacklio~r d 'ara. 205 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 205 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-058 244481 EA-053 213361 , , EA-055 ~' 229861' .. ~,.~t,\"r EA-058 244482 EA-053 213362   EA-055 EA-055 229858 EA-058 244483  -u----- -- ....... ------- ------ ---- . ---------- ----- -------.... -------- SubTotal by Building Building: 300 Wing Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Roofing Roofing Exterior Extendr . Exterior Exterior . : Buiit-Up Bituminous' Roofing requires replacemf\n)nt . :, b7510C()03' 74975\u0026lt; . Exterior Interior Interior Interior .. Interior A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Gutters/Downspouts are missing and are needed 07710-002 74977 Steel Window (Awning) requires replacement 08510-003 74972  Soffit requires replacement Fascia requires replacement Steel Door/Frame (Single Hung} requires replacement ADA_-,Accessible Doorways \u0026lt;!ff! r_ipt fully compliant Ceramic Tile requires replacement VCT flooring requires replacement Acoustical Suspension requires replacemehF .Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement 07460-002 74974 08110-012 74975 1i21'1)_10 09310-002 74978 09658-009 74979 09130-003, . '7 4.980 09510-003 74982 Deficiency Listing 01120/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 4 - Eac': -4~-:s 1,736. --,-:-,.-, . Estirha!ed 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,938 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated .  . Estimated --\n. .. ,. Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 15 Ea. 4 $ 7,266 Estimated ----- ____________ ........ ............... _____ ------ -~--- - --------- 71 $ 530,682 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status e,sao :- SF ' --:,2 . s , 54'.595 . 600 LF 2 s 3,615 Estimated 500 SF 2 s 13,993 Estimated :. 3,325 SF 16,514 - '. --~ Estimated :_ 1,250 SF 2 $ 11 ,294 Estimated 12 Ea. 2 $ 22,028 Estimated 1 LS Estimated .-. _ 385 SF 2 $ 5,147 Estimated 4,300 SF 2 $ 21 ,319 Estimated s-': -- .. , .... - ,,,-~- 7\n280 17:394 Estimated ' 7,280 SF 2 s 24 ,855 Estimated 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 3117 Page 11 of34 State of Arkansas 3117 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. Campus: 6003 - Jacksonville Junior Hi~h Sch. Building: 300 Wing Floor# Room# 29 302 304 305 System Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior HVAC HVAC Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing Electrical Electrical Electrical Electricai A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Lock/Latchset requires replacement Panic Device requires replacement ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully compliant ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet room is not full'.( compliant_ .. -- _ADA - Door Hardware is not {Ullycompliant Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Paint/Coating requires replacement Custom Cabinet requires replacement Countertop requires replacement Classroom ventilation inadequate End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Window Units require replacement Grab Bar is missing and is needed Mop Sink requires replacement En.d of Life: Domestic Water Piping System requires replacement End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require replacement ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed Exterior Light - Wall Mount is missing and is needed End of Life: Lighting Fixfures require replacement Deficiency Code AssesslD 08710-012 74988 ~---,.. ~- - . ., ~ 08710-015 7 4989 321912 332966 335689 EA-039 179115 EA-039 179116 EA:039 / 179117 EA-039 179120 09910-002 7 4985 06410-003 ~-. 74l}90 06415-003 7 4991 15830-001 15700-900 74995 . --~ -,-,.----- . 310466 10820-004 7 4996 15418-006 7 4999 15100-907 299967 15400-900 299970 333029 16140-001 - 75002 16140-001 75006 16520-007 75004 \" 16500-90\u0026lt;( '\" 299971 Qty UOM Priority 14 Ea. 2 S 7 Ea. , . .2 . $ LS LS LS Ea. Ea. Ea .. Ea. 8,000 SF 70 : LF 70 LF 5 Room 6,880 SF 2 Ea. Ea. 6,880 19 Ea. LS 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 3 Ea. 6,880 SF 2 $ 2 $ 2 . $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 3 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2 2 $ $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 1 $ $ 2 $ 2 S Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 8,583 6,216 772 1,610 257 190 190 190 190 6,833 37,183 3,269 50,785 19.836 669 999 7,422 23,311 257 271 271 1,549 26,781 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated . Estimated Estimated Estimated . Estimated Estimated Estimated Est_imated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 6003 -Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 3117 Page 12 of 34 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3117 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 01 /20/2005 Campus: 6003 - Jacksonville Junior HiAh Sch. Building: 300 Wing Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD. Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Electrical End of Life: Electrical Service requires 16400-901 299972 6,880 SF 2 $ 901 Estimated replacement 29 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 267506 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 302 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights: EA-084 267507 - Ea. 4. $ 399 Estimated 303 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 267508 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 304 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 267504 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 305 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 267505 Ea. 4 $\n399 Estimated Technology End of Life: Telephones - School Wide 16700-900 299968 6,880 SF 3 $ 3,389 Estimated Telephones require replacement 29 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 140561 5 Ea. 4 $ . 903 Estimated 29 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring, EA'.027 167734 Ea. . 4 $ 167 Estimated 302 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 140562 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 302 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167735 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated - --,--,...,,-~ - - - - - - --~  .. --. - 1 303 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 140564 5 Ea. $ . 903 Estimated 303 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167736 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 304 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 140565 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 304 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 . -167737 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 305 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 140567 4 Ea. 4 $ 722 Estimated 305 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . EA-027 167738 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed 13910-004 . 75007 7 Ea, .. . $ 1\n826 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Emergency Lighting (Fluorescent - 2'x4') is 16530-001 75009 7 Ea. $ 3,254 Estimated missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed 13910-019 75011 7 Ea. $ 2,596 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Hom/Strobe is missing and is needed 13910-019 75013 7 Ea. $ 2,596 Estima_ted Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910-022 75015 7 Ea. $ 1,941 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed 13910-025 75016 7 Ea. $ 2,301 Estimated 13850-900 . . .. -:-- Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Fire Alarm requires replacement 299966 6,880 SF s 9.702 Estimated 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 3117 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 13 of 34 State of Arkansas 31.17 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. Campus: 6003 - Jacksonville Junior Hiah Sch. Building: 300 Wing Floor# Room# 29 29 2$ 302 302 System Deficiency Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement _specia\\tieS . . Exterior Sigoa9e re~quires rePiacement Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Spet ialties Room l~cks appropriate amou~t oneifh\n~ .. storage. '. . . . Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Deficiency Code AssesslD 333031 10155-003 74992 10430-003-~ 7 4993 EA-053 213363 EA-055 229864 243438 EA-053 213364 EA-055 229865 302 . Spetr\nlties . Ro\n:\nm i\ncks appiopriate amount of t~ach.~r- ,-, ., .\u0026gt;'.fr ' storage. .    243439- 303 303 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 303 :\n~'. .... ,s\niaiii\n~ ~ ., R~om lacks_ ~ppropriate amou\n:\nt ofte\ncher -. ) storage. . . . . .. . 304 304 304 305 305 305 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Sp'\n9ia1lies \"C ''Room l~~k\napp\npriaie a\n,\n-~t-of tJ~~h~i . . storage: .. . . Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amouiit of teacher .. storage.  Building: 400 Wing Floor# Room# System Deficiency Roofing Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 EA-053 213365 EA-055 229862 '  EA~o~f \" 243440 .. EA-053 213366 EA-055 229866 .. EAa058 24~441 EA-053 213367 EA-055 229863 '\n. 243442 : SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 07510-003 80686 Qty UOM Priority LS 8 Ea. 1.ci Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 76 2 S 3 S 3  4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 S 4 $ 4 $ 4 S 4 $ 4 $ $ Qty UOM Priority 8,440 SF 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 129 10,015 719 1,905 868 1,905 868 1,905 868 1,905 868 1,905 868 464,118 Estimated Estimated Estimated : Estimated Estimated  Estim~t\nd Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 66,974 Estimated 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 3117 Page 14 of 34  - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3117 6003 - Jacksonville Junior High Sch. 01/20/2005 Campus: 6003 - Jacksonville Junior HiQh Sch. Building: 400 Wing Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesstD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Exterior Steel Window (Awning) requires replacement 08510-003 80678 565 SF 2 s 15,812 Estimated   Exterior Brick requires replacement 20 SF 2 ' $ 360 Estimated Exterior Joint Sealant requires replacement 07920-002 80680 225 LF 2 s 1,112 Estimated Exterior Soffil requires replacement 07460-001 80683 3,840 SF 2 $ 19,072 Estimated Exterior Fascia requires replacement 07460-002 . 80684 1,560 Sf' 2 s 14,095 Estimated Exterior Steel Door/Frame (Single Hung) requires 08110-012 80685 12 Ea. 2 $ 22,028 Estimated replacement Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 333049 LS 2 $ 3,585 Estimated :_Interior VCT flooring requires replacement 09658-009, ,\n80688 5,810 SF . 2 s 28,806 Estimated ,. Interior Lock/Latchset requires replacement 08710-012 80690 12 Ea. 2 $ 7,357 Estimated Interior Panic Device requires replacement 08710-015 80691 7 Ea. 2 $ 6,216 Estimated ----, Interior ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet 321932 LS 2 $ 1,792 Estimated room is not fully compliant Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully 333052 LS 2 $ 860 Estimated compliant Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 335701 LS 2 $ 287 Estimated 401 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 1_79134 Ea. 2  $ 190 Estimated 405 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179131 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 402 Interior Classroom door tacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179135 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 408 Interior Classroom\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_260","title":"Arkansas Task Force to Joint Committee on Educational Facilities, part two","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2004/2005"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Education--Finance","Education and state","School facilities","Arkansas--History--21th century"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Task Force to Joint Committee on Educational Facilities, part two"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/260"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n- - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3139 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School 01/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Exterior End of Life: Exterior Doors require replacement 08100-900 300464 14 Door 2 $ 48,197 Estimated Interior VCT flooring requires replacement 09658-009 69014 3,500 SF 2 s 17,353 Estimated Interior End of Life: Door Hardware requires replacement 08200-900 300457 61 Door 2 $ 37,398 Estimated Interior End of Life: Ceilings - Suspended Tiles require 09500-900 300463 33,716 SF 2 $ 115,112 Estimated replacement 03 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 188631 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 04 fnterior . Classroom door lacks appropriate tiardw.are. EA-040 188632 1 Ea: \" .. 2 .s . -439  . Estimated 05 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 188633 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 17 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 188645 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated - .. - . - EA'.040 . ! 18 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. 188646 Ea. 2  439 Estirnated 19 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 188647 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 20 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179264 Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated 20 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 188648 Ea. 2 $ 439 . Estimated 06 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 188634 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 07 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 188635 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 08 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 188636 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated ' 09 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 188637 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 10 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 188638 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated -- ---- .. ., .. 11 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-b40 188639 1. Ea. ,2 $ 439 Estimated 12 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 188640 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 13 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 188641 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 14 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA,040 188642 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 01 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 188629 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 02 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 188630 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 15 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 188643 Ea. 2 s 439 .Estimated 16 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 188644 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School 3139 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 2 of 10 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3139 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School 01 /21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status HVAC Exhaust Fan - Restroom 4800 CFm 2 H.P. is 15830-002 69018 5 Ea. 2 $ 19,044 Estimated _111issing and is needed .... , ... HVAC End of Life: Controls - Electric requires 15900-901 300460 3,000 SF 2 s . 5,956 Estimated replacement HVAC End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires 15800-900 300462 33,716 SF 2 $ 163,650 Estimated replacement HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - RoofTop 15700-901 310539 6,000 SF 2 $ 93,024 Estimated Units require replacement Plumbing End of Life: Domestic Water Piping 'System . 15100-907 300458 33,716 SF 2 $ . 36\n373 Estimated  requires replacement Plumbing End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require 15400-900 300459 58 Ea. 2 $ 71 ,161 Estimated replacement 06 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257319 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 07 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257320 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 08 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257321 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 09 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257322 Ea. 4 s 678 Estimated 10 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257323 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 11 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257324 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 12 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257325 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 13 _Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257326 1 Ea. 4 s 678 Estimated  14 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257327 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 16 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257328 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,033 Estimated Electrical GFI Receptacle .is missing and Is needed 16140-001 69020 6 Ea. $ 814 Estimated 11 Electrical Room has insufficient electrical outlets. EA-018 114974 3 Ea. 4 $ 680 Estimated 03 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129605 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 03 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159076 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 04 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129606 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 04 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159077 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 05 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129609  3 Ea. 4 s 542 Estimated 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School 3139 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 3 of 10 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3139 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School 01/2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 05 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159078 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 17 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129620 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 17 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159090 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated , 18 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129621 2 Ea. 4 s 361 Estimated 18 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159091 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 19 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129622 2 Ea. 4 s 361 Estimated 19 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159092 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 20 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129623 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 06 Technology Room has insufficient datapm:ts. EA-022 129610 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated 06 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159079 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 07 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129611 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated 07 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159080 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 08 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129612 2 Ea. 4 s 361 Estimated 08 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159081 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 09 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129613 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated 09 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159082 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 10 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129614 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated 10 Technology Roo.m lacks teiephone wiring. EA-027 159083 f , Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 11 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159084 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 12 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129615 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 12 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159085 Ea. 4 s  167 !estimated 13 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129616 Ea. 4 s 181 Estimated 13 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159086 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 14 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA~022 129617 2 Ea. 4 $ -361 .Estimated 14 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159087 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School 3139 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 4 of 10 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3139 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School 0112112005 Campus: 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 01 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129603 3 Ea. 4 s 542 Estimated 01 - Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA,027 159074 _  Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 02 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129604 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 02 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159075 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 15 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129618 2 Ea. 4 s 361 Estimated 15 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159088 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 16 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129619 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 16 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159089 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is 13910-001 69026 6 Ea. $ 1,671 Estimated needed Specialties Exterior Signage is missing and is needed 10430-001 69017 3 Ea. 3 $ 150 Estimated - - - 03 Specialties  . Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 239833 5 Ea. 4 $_. , 2,422\nEstimated storage. 04 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 239834 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,938 Estimated storage. 05 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 239835 5 Ea. 4 s 2,422 Estimated -~torage. 17 -Specialiies -Room has. in.s ufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230309 :2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated 17 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 239846 4 Ea. 4 s 1,938 Estimated storage. 17 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284072 90 SF Surf 4 $ 1,069 Estimated 18 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area_. EA-055 230308 1 Ea._ 4 $ 434 Estimated 18 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284071 90 SF Surf 4 $ 1,069 Estimated 19 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230307 3 Ea. 4 s 1,302 Estimated 19 , Specialties , Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 239847 4 Ea. 4 s 1,938 Estimated , storage. 20 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213688 3 Ea. 4 s 2,858 Estimated 20 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230306 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 06 Specialties Room has i~~ufficient writi~g area. EA-053 213689 2 Ea. 4 s 1,905 _ Estimated 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School 3139 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 5 of 10 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3139 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School 01/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 06 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 239836 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 07 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 122584 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated - . 07 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213690 2 Ea. 4 ' $ 1,905 Estimated 07 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 239837 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 08 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 239838 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated s_torage. 09 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area .. EA-055 230305 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 09 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 239839 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 10 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 239840 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated __ storage. c- -. ,. . _...,..,~ 10 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284073 . 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated 11 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 239841 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 12 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213691 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated -Specialties -- - -H---HHH H - 12 Room lacks appropriate amount of teactier EA-058 239842 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated . storage. 13 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213692 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 13 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 239843 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 14 Specialties - Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213693 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 14 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 239844 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,938 Estimated storage. 15 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284070 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated 16 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230310 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 16 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 239845 3 Ea. 4 s 1,453 Estimated storage. 21 Specialties Room lacks a fixed TV. EA-045 203002 2 Ea. 4 $ 3,833 Estimated 21 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213687 2 Ea. -. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School 3139 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 6 of 10 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3139 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School 01/2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 21 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230304 2 Ea. 4 s 868 Estimated SubTotal by Building 121 $ 1,069,256 Building: Kindergarten/Pre-School Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Roofing Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement 07510-003 68946 1,000 SF 2 s 7,935 Estimated ---~ - - Roofing End of Life: Roofing Systemr - 4-Ply Built-Up 07500-900 341651 1,000 SF 2 . $ 8,817 Estimated requires replacement\" Exterior Soffit requires replacement 07460-001 68945 350 SF 2 s 1,738 Estimated Exterior End of Life: Exterior Doors require replacement 08100-900 300466 13 Door 2 $ 44,754 Estimated ~erior .. --~ - - End of Life: Window Systems require 08500-900 300469 10,733 SF ,-. 2 s 30,613 Estimated replacement Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 335990 LS 2 s 2,009 Estimated Interior End of Life: Door Hardware requires replacement 08200-900 300465 30 Door 2 $ 18,392 Estimated Interior End of Life: Ceilings - Suspended Tiles require 09500-900 300470 9,758 SF .. 2 s 33,316 Estimated .. replacement Interior ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet 322144 LS 2 $ 2,512 Estimated room is not fully compliant Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 335992 LS 2 $ 401 Estimated Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully 335994 LS 2 $ 401 Estimated compliant 19 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179266 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 19 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 191921 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated . - - . 1 18 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 191922 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 25 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 191920 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 22 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 191917 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated - . . - 23 Interior Classroom door lacks apprnpriate hardware . ., EA-040 191918 Ea. 2 s .439 Estimated 24 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 191919 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School 3139 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 7 of 10 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3139 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School 01/2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementarv School Building: Kindergarten/Pre-School Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 21 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 191916 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 42 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179265 Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated 42 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 191923 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated HVAC Exhaust Fan - Restroom 4800 CFm 2 H.P. is 15830-002 68950 3 Ea. 2 $ 11,426 Estimated missing and i\n_needed HVAC End of Life: Controls - Electric requires 15900-901 300467 4,467 SF 2 $ 8,868 . Estimated replacement , HVAC End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires 15800-900 300468 10,733 SF 2 $ 52,096 Estimated replacement HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX 15700-902 310540 4,470 SF 2 $ 40,257 Estimated . Unit requires replacement Plumbing ADA - Drink Fountains are not fully compliant 322145 1 LS 2 $ 3,616 E:stimated Plumbing ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant 322736 LS 2 $ 401 Estimated 19 Plumbing Room lacks private toilets. EA-063 256181 Ea. 4 $ 4,915 Estimated 19 Plumbing .Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257336 Ea. 4 s 678 Estimated 18 Plumbing Room lacks private toilets. EA-063 256182 Ea. 4 $ 4,915 Estimated 18 Plumbing .Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257337 2 Ea. 4 s 1,356 Estimated -. 21 Plumbing Room lacks a private shower area. EA-066 262946 Ea. 4 s 3,629 Estimated Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed 16140-001 68951 4 Ea. $ 542 Estimated 19 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129642 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated .. 19 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring, EA-027 161551 -1 Ea. 4 s 167 Esiimated 18 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129644 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated 18 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 161552 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 25 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129641 3 Ea. 4 $ 542  Estimated 25 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 161550 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 22 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129634 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 22 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 161547 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 23 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129636 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School 3139 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 8 of 10 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3139 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School 01/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementarv School Building: Kindergarten/Pre-School Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 23 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . EA-027 161548 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 24 Technology Room has insufficient datap9rts. EA-022 129638 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated 24 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 161549 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 42 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129645 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated 42 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring, EA-027 161553 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is 13910-001 68953 4 Ea. $ 1,114 Estimated needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light requires 13910-003 68955 3 Ea. $ 904 Estimated .. __ replacement __ .. Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant 335996 LS 2 s 201 Estimated Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement 10155-003 68948 Ea. 3 s 1,252 Estimated Specialties Exterior Signage is missing and is needed 10430-001 68949 3 Ea. 3 $ 150 Estimated 19 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230312 2 Ea. 4 s 868 Estimated 19 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 240764 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 18 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 23031 1 2 Ea. 4 s 868 Estimated 18 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 240765 , 5 l:a. . 4 $ 2,422, Estimated .storage. 25 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230313 3 Ea. 4 s 1,302 Estimated 25 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 240763 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,938 Estimated storage: 25 Specialties . , Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284075 90 SF Surf 4 $ 1,069 Estimated 22 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284074 40 SF Surf 4 s 475 Estimated 42 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 123569 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 42 Specialties Room lacks a fixed TV. EA-045 203004 Ea. 4 $ 1,039 Estimated 42 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284076 100 SF Surf 4 $ 1,188 Estimated - -- --- -~- --- __ .. ___ SubTotal by Building 63 $ 309,477 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School 3139 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 9 of 10  State of Arkansas 3139 6003 - Oakbrooke Elementary School Grand Total by Campus 199 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 $ Deficiency Listing 01/2 1/2005 1,532,084 6003  Oakbrooke Elementary School 3139 Page 10 of 10 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3142 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 01 /2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School Building: Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Site Asphalt requires replacement 02740-002 58697 26,800 SF 2 $ 45,387 Estimated Site Pavement Marking requires replacement 02766-002 58698 1,500 LF 2 s 1,798 Estimated - - -~- Site Traffic Sign is missing and is needed 02890-001 . 58699 2, Ea. . 2 $ 330 Estimated Site ADA - Accessible routes from parking or sidewalks 331542 LS 2 $ 5,850 Estimated to building are not fully compliant Site ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant 331463 LS 2 $ 2,106 Estimated Site ADA - Accessible routes between buildings and 331466 1 LS 2 $ 2,340 Esiimated facilities are not fully compliant Site ADA - Handicap parking spaces are not fully 340939 LS 2 $ 702 Estimated compliant Site ADA - Access to playgrounds or athletic fields is 340940 LS 2 $ 3,510 Estimated !!DI fully compliant Site School lacks marquee or marquee in poor EA-001 105294 1 Ea, 4 $ 11 ,635 Estimated condition. Site The school has insufficient parking. EA-002 105707 9,100 SF 4 $ 13,707 Estimated Site School lacks dedicated K playground/equipment. EA-004 106671 Ea, 4 $ 24,309 Estimated Site School has insufficient football/soccer fields. EA-O0T 107480 Ea. ,.4 s 34,649 Estimated Site School has insufficient baseball fields. EA-008 108389 Ea. 4 $ 32,188 Estimated Site Bus drop-off area does not have a canopy. EA-031 112680 LF 4 $ 19,750 Estimated Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 331470 LS 2 $ 1,404 Estimated HVAC Computer room lacks independent AC. EA-025 110742 Ea. 4 $ 13,636 Estimated Electrical Exterior Light - Light Pole - Parking \u0026amp; Road is 16520-001 58702 4 Ea. 2 $ 6,788 Estimated missing and is needed Electrical School site lacks appropriate lighting. EA-041 106213 .1 Ea, 2 $ 2,437 Estimated Specialties School lacks an appropriate surveillance system. EA-033 113276 Ea. $ 20,411 Estimated Specialties School lacks a dedicated computer equipment EA-024 110100 150 SF 4 $ 24,660 Estimated room. Specialties Computer room lacks appropriate furniture. EA-026: 111 311 Ea, 4 $ 363 Estimated Specialties School's PBX is undersized. EA-030 112130 Ea. 4 $ 17,550 Estimated 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 3142 A.P.PLE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 1 of 12 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3142 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 01 /2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School Building: Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Specialties Elementary School lacks appropriate wayfinding EA-088 114566 Ea. 4 $ 14,327 Estimated system. ------- ---- ----------. - ---------. -- ---  .... __ - - ---- ------- ------- - . -. ------- SubTotal by Building 23 $ 299,837 Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Roofing Gutters/Downspouts are missing and are needed 07710-002 58712 300 LF 2 s 1,808 'Estimated Exterior Unit Masonry Restoration - Pointing - needs to 04910-001 58711 1,500 SF 2 $ 9,653 Estimated occur Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 333569 LS 2 $ 18,736 Estimated Interior Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is 08710-001 58718 4 Ea. $ 21-:S?:l Esti7oated needed Interior Quarry Tile requires replacement 09330-002 58713 1,450 SF 2 $ 18,650 Estimated Interior VCT flooring requires replacement 09658-009 58714 350 SF 2 $ 1,735 Estimated Interior LockiLiichset. requires repi~cement 08710-012 58719 42 Ea .. 2 $ ' 25,749 Estimated Interior End of Life: Ceilings - Suspended Tiles require 09500-900 300486 80,072 SF 2 $ 273,380 Estimated replacement Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully 322148 LS 2 $ 4,496 Estimated compliant Interior ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet 333583 LS . . 2, $ 29,979 Estimated room is not fully compliant Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 336013 LS 2 $ 1,499 Estimated 111 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177200 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 111 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182564 Ea. . 2 $ 439 Estimated 112 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177195 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 112 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182565 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 113 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177202 Ea. --:. '2 $ - 190 Estimated 113 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182566 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 114 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177203 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 3142 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 2 of 12 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3142 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 01 /2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 114 Interior Classroom door lacks approp~aie hardware. EA-040 182561 Ea. 2 $ 439 .Estimated 202 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177191 Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated 202 Interior Classroom door tacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182573 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 203 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177186 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 203 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182574 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 106 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177189 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 106 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182571 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 107 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177196 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 107 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182572 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 108 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177197 Ea . .. .. 2 s 190 Estimated 108 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182567 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 109 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177192 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 109 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182568 Ea. ' 2 $ 439 Estimated 110 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177199 Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated 110 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182569 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 115 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177198 Ea. 2  $ 190 Estimated 115 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182562 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 116 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177205 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated Interior  Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. ., --,.,.- 116 EA-040 182563 Ea. 2 's 439 C E-\nti\n'\nated 117 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177206 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 117 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182558 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 118 Interior Classroom door lacks the appr~priate vision panel. EA-039 177201 Ea.: $ 190 -' Estimated 118 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182559 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 101 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177187 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 104 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-0?9 . 177193 Ea. 2 $ 190  E$tjmated 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 3142 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 3 of 12 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3142 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 0112112005 Campus: 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 104 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182575 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 105 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177194 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 105 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182570 Ea. 2 $ 439. Estimated 119 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177207 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 119 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182560 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 120 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177208 Ea.  2 $ 190 Estimated 120 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182555 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 123 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177204 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 123 Interior Classroo-m door lacks appropr-ia te hardware. EA:040 182556 Ea. 2 $ _ 439 Estimated 124 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182557 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 102 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177188 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 102 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182576 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 103 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177185 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 201 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177190 Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated 201 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA,040 182577 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated Interior Carpet requires replacement 09680-003 58715 16,650 SF 3 $ 48,941 Estimated Interior PainVCoaling requires replacement 09910-002 58717 9,500 SF 3 s 8,114 Estimated Interior Countertop requires replacement 06415-003 58720 15 LF 4 $ 700 Estimated HVAC Classroom ventilation inadequate 15830-001 58722 23 Room 2 s 233,120 Estimated Plumbing End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require 15400-900 300481 46 Ea. 2 $ 56,438 Estimated replacement Plumbing End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System 15100-907 300487 40,036 SF 2 s 43,191 Estimated requires replacement Plumbing ADA - Drink Fountains are not fully compliant 322149 LS 2 $ 13,490 Estimated Plumbing ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant 333585 LS 2 $ 1,499 Estimated 111 Plumbing Room lacks private toilets. EA-.063 256128 Ea. 4 $ A,915 ~stimated 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 3142 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 4 of 12 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3142 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 01'21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pine Forest Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 111 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 256873 Ea. 4 s 678 Estimated 112 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 256874 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 113 Plumbing  Cl~ssroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 256875 Ea. 4 s 678 Estimated 114 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 256876 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 202 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 256866 Ea. 4 s 678 Estimated 203 Plumbing cIassrooni lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 256867 1 Ea. -. $ Estimated ' .:.  , \u0026lt;\" ~ 106 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 256870 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 108 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 256871 Ea. 4 s 678 Estimated 109. Plumbing Classroom lacks the required _number of sinks. EA-064 256872 . Ea. 4 .$ 678. Estimated 118 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 256877 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 101 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 256865 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 104 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 256868 Ea. 4 s 678 Estimated 105 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 256869 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 120 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 256878 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed 16140-001 58724 2 Ea. $ 271  Estimated Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed 16140-001 58725 4 Ea. $ 542 Estimated . 111 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights . EA-084 275064 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 112 Electrical Room lacks .controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275065 Ea. 4 $  399  Estimated 113 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275066 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 114 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275067 Ea. 4 s 399 Estimated 203 Eiectrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275056 . Ea, 4 s 399 Estimated 106 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275059 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 107 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275060 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 108 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275061 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated - 109 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275062 Ea. 4 s 399 Estimated 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 3142 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 5 of 12 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3142 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 0 112112005 Campus: 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 110 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275063 Ea. 4 s 399 Estimated 115 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 - 275068 Ea. 4 s -, 399 Estimated 116 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275069 Ea. 4 s 399 Estimated 117 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275070 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 1 118 Electrical Roo~ la-\nks controls to partially -dim lights. l=A-084 ' 275071 1 Ea: 4 s 399 Estimated 101 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275052 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 104 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275057 Ea. 4 s 399 Estimated 105 Electrical Room la_cks controls to partialiy dim lights. EA-084 275058 Ea. . --.- -- .,~ --.. 4 s 399 Estimated 119 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275072 Ea. 4 s 399 Estimated 120 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275073 Ea. 4 s 399 Estimated 123 Electrical Room l_acks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275075 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 124 Electrical Room has insufficient electrical outlets. EA-018 114914 2 Ea. 4 s 453 Estimated 124 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275076 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 102 Electrical Roa~ lacks controls to partially 'clim fights. EA'.084  275053 Ea. 4 $ ,/' .399 . Es(imattid 103 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275054 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 201 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim fights. EA-084 275055 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated Ro~~ has insufficie~i electri~af outleii : - ..  ,.,.,---.---, ,------- 121 Electrical EA-018 114912 4 Ea. 4 s - 906 E\ni~ated 121 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275074 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 122 Electrical Room has insufficient electrical outlets. EA-018 114913 2 Ea. 4 s 453 Estimated Technology End of Life: Telephones - School Wide 16700-900 300488 40,036 SF 3 $ 19,721 Estimated Telephones require replacement 111 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127905 2 Ea. 4 s 361 Estimated 111 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152711 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 112 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127906 4 Ea. . .. s . 722 Estimated  112 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152706 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 113 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127907 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary Schoof 3142 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 6 of 12 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3142 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 01/2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pine Forest Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 113 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027. 152707 Ea. 4 $ .167 Estimated 114 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127908 3 Ea. 4 s 542 Estimated 1 114 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152708 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated -- 1 202 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127896 . 3 Ea,- 4 $ -' 542. Estimated 202 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152720 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 203 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127897 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 203 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152715 Ea. 4 $ ~ 67 Estimated 106 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127900 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 106 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152712 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 107 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 \"127901 4 Ea. $ 722 Estimated 107 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . EA-027 152713 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 108 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127902 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated ----- 108 Technology Room iacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152714 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 109 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127903 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated 109 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . EA-027 152709 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 1 110 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127904 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated 110 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152710 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 115 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127909 2 Ea. 4 s 361 Estimated \" 1 115 Technology  Room lacks telephone wiring: EA-027 152703 Ea. 4 $ ... 167 Estimated 116 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127910 2 Ea. 4 s 361 Estimated 116 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152704 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 1 117 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127911 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 117 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152705 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 118 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152700 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 1-s. 101 -Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 - 127892 2 Elf. '_,.:., 4 $ :, 361 Estimated 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 3142 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 7 of 12 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3142 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 01/2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 101 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152721 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 104 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127898 2 Ea. 4 s 361 Estimated 104 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152716 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 105 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127899 2 Ea. 4 s 361 Estimated 105 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152717 Ea. 4 167 Estimated Room lack\ntelephorie wiring, -. --- ------- 119 Technology EA-027 152701 167 Estim!lted 120 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152702 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 123 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127912 4 Ea. 4 $ 722 Estimated 123 -Technology Room lacks telephone wiring: EA-027 .. 152699 E\n,1. s 167 Esiimated 124 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127913 3 Ea. 4 s 542 Estimated 102 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127893 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 Estimated 102 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-021 152722 Ea. - 4 s 167 Estimated 103 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127894 5 Ea. 4 s 903 Estimated 103 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152718 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated - 201 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 -127895 5 Ea. 4 $ 903 . Estimated 201 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152719 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 122 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152698 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed 13910-019\n-58726 12 Ea. 1 : .. $ 4,451 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910-022 58727 2 Ea. $ 555 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed 13910-025 58728 60 Ea. $ 19,726 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Emergency Lighting - Standby Battery 16500-901 300482 30 E~. s . 12,074 Estimated Lighting System requires replacement Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Fire Alarm requires replacement 13850-900 300484 40,036 SF $ 56,454 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Security System requires 13850-901 300485 40,036 SF $ 76,282 Estimated replacement Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant 322758 LS . 2 $ 750 Estimated 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 3142 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K1 2 Inc. 2004 Page 8 of 12 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3142 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 01/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Specialties ADA - Counter Height is not fully compliant 336015 LS 2 s 2,925 Estimated Specialties ADA - Food Service Line is not fully compliant 336017 LS 2 $ 2,925 Estimated Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement 10155-003 58721 9 Ea. 3 $ 11,267 Estimated Specialties End of Life: Public Address and Intercom - 11130-901 300483 40,036 SF 3 s 44,948 Estimated Communications require replacement 111 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230361 5 Ea. 4 s 2,170 Estimated 111 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249296 6 Ea . . 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 112 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230360 5 Ea. 4 s 2,170 Estimated 112 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249297 7 Ea. 4 s 3,391 Estimated storage. 113 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area .. EA-055 230357 4 Ea. $ 1,736 Estimated 113 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249298 9 Ea. 4 s 4,359 Estimated storage. 114 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213734 2 Ea. 4 s 1,905 Estimated 114 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230356 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,736 Estimated 114 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 251219 8 Ea. 4 s 3,875 Estimated storage. 202 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213728 Ea. 4 s 953 Estimated 202 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area . EA-055 230345 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated 202 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249287 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 202 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284103 50 SF Surf 4 $ 594 Estimated 203 - Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Ea.' - EA-053 213729 4 $ 953 Estimated 203 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230343 2 Ea. 4 s 868 Estimated 203 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249288 5 Ea. 4 s 2,422 Estimated storage. 203 . -Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition . EA-085 284104 50 SF Surf 4 $ 594 Estimated 106 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213730 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 3142 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 9 of 12 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3142 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 01 /2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 106 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230344 3 Ea. 4 s 1,302 Estimated - -- 106 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249291 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 107 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213731 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 107 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230355 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 107 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA'.058  249292 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 108 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213733 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 108 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230346 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 108 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 - 249293 6 ' ......... ~-.--. Ea. 4 s  2,906 Estimated storage. 109 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213727 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 109 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area . EA-055 230348 2 Ea. 4 s 868 Estimated 109 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249294 8 Ea. 4 $ , 3,875 Estimated storage. 110 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213722 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 110 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230349 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated 110 Specialties Room lacks appropriaie amount of teacher EA-058 249295 5 Ea. . 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 115 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area . EA-053 213735 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 115 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230350 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated , . 115 Specialties Rocim lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 251220 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 ., Esiimated storage. 116 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213732 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 116 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230351 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 116 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 251221 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 117 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area . EA-053 213736 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 117 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230352 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 3142 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 10 of 12 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3142 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 01 /2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pine Forest Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 117 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 251222 5 Ea. 4 s 2,422 Estimated storage. 118 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213737 3 Ea. 4 s 2,858 Estimated 118 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230353 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 118  Specialties  Room lacks appropriate afiiount of teacher EA-058 251223 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 101 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213721 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 101 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230342 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 101 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA~058 249283 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. . . 104 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213723 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 104 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230359 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated 104 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249289 6 Ea. 4 s 2,906 Estimated storage. 105 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213724 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 105 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230358 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated 105 Specialties Room lack~ appropriat\n~mount of teacher EA'058 .. 249290 5 Ei' 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 119 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213725 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 119 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230354 Ea. 4 s 434 Estimated - Room lacks ~ppropriate amount of teacher ---- 119 Specialties EA-058 251224 5 Ea. 4 $ - 2,422 Estimated storage. 120 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213726 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 120 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230347 2 Ea. 4 s 868 Estimated 120 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 251225 5 Ea. s 2.422 Estimated storage. 123 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230363 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 123 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 251227 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage. 124 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 125895 Ea. 4 s 369 Estimated 6003 - Pine Forest Elementary School 3142 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 11 of 12 -  - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3130 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 01 /2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pinewood Elementarv School Building: Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Site Asphalt requires replacement 02740-002 58034 23,000 SF 2 $ 38,952 Estimated Site Pavement Marking requires replacement 02766-002 58035 175 LF 2 s 340 Estimated Site Sidew\n,\nk requires replacement 02775-002 58042 1,250 SF 2 s 6,066 E\niimated Site Traffic Sign requires replacement 02890-002 58037 10 Ea. 2 $ 1,240 Estimated Site End of Life: Fencing - Fencing requires 02800-900 308991 245 LF 2 $ 5,310 Estimated replacement Site ADA - Accessible routes from parking or sidew_alks 331510 LS 2 $ 2,340 Estimated to building are not fully compliant Site ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant 331422 LS 2 s 936 Estimated Site ADA - Accessible routes between buildings and 331426 LS 2 s 5,850 Estimated facilities are not fully complian~ Site ADA - Handicap parking spaces are not fully 340930 LS - 2 s .,702 Estimated compliant Site ADA - Access to playgrounds or athletic fields is 340931 LS 2 $ 3,510 Estimated not fully compliant Site Curb/Gutter requires replacement 02770-002 58036 110 LF 3 $ 1,376 Estimated --~-- . ,-,- Site School lacks marquee or marquee in poor EA-001  105290 Ea. 4 . .$ 11,635 E\nstimated condition. .- ~:. Site School lacks dedicated K playground/equipment. EA-004 106670 Ea. 4 $ 24,309 Estimated Site School has insufficient football/soccer fields. EA-007 107477 Ea. 4 $ 34,649 Estimated Site School has insufficient baseball fields. EA-008 108383 Ea. . 4 $ 32,188 Estimated Site Bus drop-off area does not have a canopy. EA-031 112676 LF 4 $ 19,750 Estimated Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 331514 LS 2 $ 1,404 Estimated HVAC Computer room lacks independent AC. EA-025 110737 Ea. 4 $ C 13,636 Estimated Electrical Exterior Light - Light Pole - Parking \u0026amp; Road is 16520-001 58075 6 Ea. 2 $ 10,063 Estimated missing and is needed Electrical School site lacks appropriate lighting. EA-041 106208 Ea. 2 $ 2,437 Estimated Specialties School lacks an appropriate surveillance system:  EA-033 113271 Ea. s 20,411 Estimated Specialties School lacks a dedicated computer equipment EA-024 110099 150 SF 4 s 24,660 Estimated room. 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 3130 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 1 of 13 State of Arkansas 3130 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Pinewood Elementarv School Building: Floor# Room# System Deficiency Specialties Computer room lacks appropriate furniture. Specialties School's PBX_is undersized. Specialties Elementary School lacks appropriate wayfinding system. -------- ------ - Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Roofing Gutters/Downspouts need minor repairs Roofing Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement Roofing Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement Exterior Aluminum Window (Sliding) requires replacement Exterior Joint Sealant requires repla~e\n'n\nnt Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant Interior Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is needed Interior Ceramic Tile requires replacemeni Interior Acoustical Suspension requires replacement Interior Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement Interior Lock/Latchset requires replacement Interior Panic Device requires replacement Interior Handrail/Railing requires replacement Interior End of Life: _Ceramic Tile requires replacement Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant Interior ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet room is not fully compliant A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-026 111308 - -- ------ EA-030 112123 EA-088 114564 SubTotat by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 07710-003 58124 .... 07510-003 58257 07510-003 58269 08520-017 58106 07920-002 58107 333530 08710-001 58150 09310-002 58144 .. 09130-003 58146 09510-003 58147 08710-012 58151 08710-015 58152 05520-003 58160 ..  09600-903 300375 322658 333532 Deficiency Listing 0 1/21/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Ea. 4 $ 363 Estimated Ea. 4 s 17,550 Estimated Ea. 4 s 14,327 Estimated - ------ - 25 $ 294,003 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 50 LF 2 s 500 Estimated 7,840 si=\n2 s 62,213 Estimated 7,840 SF 2 s 62,213 Estimated 32 SF 2 $ 1,815 Estimated 600 LF ' '2 $ Estimated LS 2 s 18,232 Estimated 4 Ea. s 21 ,973 Estimated 350 SF 2 L . .,,,_- _.,\n-:::----. ~-- 4,679 Estimated 35,495 SF 2 $ 84,807 Estimated 35,495 SF 2 s 121 ,186 Estimated 55 Ea. 2 $ 33,719 Estimated 6 Ea. 2 s 5,328 Estimated 250 LF 2 s 13,016 Estimated ------ 670 SF . -2 s 8,957 Estimated LS 2 s 1,459 Estimated LS 2 s 9,117 Estimated 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 3130 Page 2 of 13 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3130 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 01/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully 333534 1 LS . 2 $ 4,376 Estimated compliant Interior VCT flooring requires replacement 09658-009 58270 241 SF 2 $ 1,195 Estimated 101 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177144 Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated 101 Jnterior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 .  200309 Ea.\n2' $- A39 Estimated 102 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177145 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 102 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 200310 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 103 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision pahel. EA-039 177142 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 103 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 200311 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 104 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177147 Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated 104 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 200312 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 105 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177148 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 105 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 200313 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated Classroom door.lacks _the app\n:-~priate vision.panel. - -- ~ ------- ., 106 Interior EA-039 177143 Ea. 2. $ 190 Estimated 106 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 200314 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 107 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177149 Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated 107 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 200315 Ea. 2 ,$ 439 Estimated 108 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177146 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 108 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 200316 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated .,, , r 2-1 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA:039 177139 Ea. 2 $ :,190 Estimated 2-1 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199530 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 2-2 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177140 Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated 2-2 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199531 Ea. 2. s 439 Estimated 2-3 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177141 Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated 2-3 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199532 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 3-1 Interior Classroom door lacks lhe appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177136 Ea: 2 $ 190 Estimatea 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 3130 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 3 of 13 - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3130 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 01/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pinewood Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 3-1 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199527 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 3-2 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177137 Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated 3-2 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199528 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 3-3 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177138 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 3-3 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199529 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 4-1 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177133 Ea. .:: 2 $ 190 Estimated 4-1 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199524 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 4-2 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177134 Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated 4-2 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199525 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 5-1 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177135 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 5-1 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199526 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 5-2 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177130 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 5-2 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199521 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 4-3 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177131 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated  4-3 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199522 1\" Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated A-1 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177132 Ea. 2 s 190 Estimated A-1 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199523 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated Speech Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177128 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated Tltle1 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177129 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated Tltle1 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199516 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated SpEd1 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177126 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated ' SpEd1 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199517 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated Music Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199520 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 1 IMP-1  Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate visio~ panei. EA-039 177127 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated IMP-1 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199518 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 3130 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 4 of 13 - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3130 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 01 /2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pinewood Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status PMP-1 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199519 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated ~ . Interior Paint/Coating requires replacement 09910-002 58148 7,893 SF 3 $ 6,741 Estimated Interior Custom Cabinet requires replacement 06410-003 58153 115 LF 4 $ 61,086 Estimated Interior Countertop requires replacement 06415-003 58154 152 LF 4 $ 7.098 Estimated - HVAC Classroom ventilation inadequate 15830-001 58198 14 Room 2 s 141 ,952 Estimated HVAC End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires 15800-900 300376 19,479 SF 2 $ 94,547 Estimated replacement HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Roof Top 15700-901 310528 38,958 SF 2 s 604,005 Estimated Units. require repl.i_c!lment _ --, . Plumbing Grab Bar is missing and is needed 10820-004 58222 6 Ea. .2 $ 2,00\u0026amp; Estimated Plumbing Sink is missing and is needed 15418-007 58223 Ea. 2 s 1,258 Estimated Plumbing End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require 15400-900 300377 69 Ea. 2 $ 84,658 Estimated replacement Plumbing End of Life: Domestic W\nter Piping System requires replacement 15100-907 300378 38,958 .: sF 2 $ 42,028 Estimated Plumbing ADA - Shower Stall is not fully compliant 333536 LS 2 s 3,510 Estimated Plumbing ADA - Drink Fountains are not fully compliant 333538 LS 2 s 13,127 Estimated Plumbing ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant 335941 .LS 2 s _, 1,459 Estimated Plumbing End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require 15400-900 300380 24 Ea. 2 s 29,446 Estimated replacement 101 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257976 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 103 Plumbing . Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257977 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 104 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257978 Ea. 4 s 678 Estimated 2-1 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257979 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 2-2 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257980 Ea. 4 s 678 Estimated 2-3 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257981 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 3-1 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257982 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 3-2 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257983 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 3130 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 5 of 13 ..__ __________________ - - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3130 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 01 /2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pinewood Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 3-3 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257984 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 4-1 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257985 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 4-2 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257986 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 5-1 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257987 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 5-2 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257988 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 4-3 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of siriks. EA-064 257989 Ea. $ 678 . Estimated Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed 16140-001 58229 2 Ea. $ 271 Estimated Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed 16140-001 58243 20 Ea. $ 2,712 Estimated Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed 16140-001 58271 2 Ea. $ 271 Estimated Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed 16140-001 58272 8 Ea. $ 1,085 Estimated Electrical Exterior Light - Walkway is missing and is needed 16520-004 58230 20 Ea. 2 $ 23,136 Estimated 101 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 277954 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 102 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 277951 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 103 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 277952 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated . ---- --- -- - 104 Electrical_ Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 277953 - Ea. 4 399,_ Estimated 105 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 277948 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 106 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 277949 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 107 Electrical - - Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 277950 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 108 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 277947 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 2-1 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275333 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 2-2 Electrical Room lacks coritrols to partially dirh lights. EA-084 275334 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 2-3 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275335 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 3-1 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275336 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 3-2 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275337 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 3-3 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275338 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 3130 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 6 of 13 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3130 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 01/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pinewood Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 4-1 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275339 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 4-2 Electrical Room lacks controls to partiaUy dim lights. EA-084 275340 1  Ea. 4 $ .. 399 Estimated 5-1 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275341 Ea. 4 s 399 Estimated 5-2 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275342 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 4-3 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084. 275343 Ea, 4 $ :. 399 ~slimated A-1 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275344 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated Speech Electrical Room lacks controls to partfally dim lights. EA-084 275346 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated ----~ ...... -.. - ...... .,.~ r - Tltle1 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275347 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated  SpEd1 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275348 Ea. 4 s 399 Estimated Music Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 275345 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated Technology End of Life: Telephones - School Wide 16700-900 300379 7,200 SF 3 $ 3,547 Estimated Telephones require replacement 101 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131908 Ea. 4 s 181 Estimated 101 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152627 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated -- 102 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131909 2 :: Ea. 4 $ - 361 Estimated 102 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152628 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 103 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131910 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated 103 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152629 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 104 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131911 Ea. 4 $ 181 Estimated 104 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152624 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated - --- - r - 105 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131912 3 Ea. 4 s 542 Estimated 105 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152625 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 106 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131913 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated 106 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027  152626 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 107 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131914 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated 107 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152622 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 3130 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 7 of 13 ------------------- - - - --- - - -- - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3130 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 01 /2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pinewood Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 108 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131915 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated 108 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152623 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 2-1 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131916 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated - .. ,.,- ~----- . - - 2-1 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167353 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 2-2 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131917 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 2-2 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167354 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 2-3 . Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131918 3 Ea. 4 s 542 Estimated 2-3 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167355 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 3-1 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131919 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 3-1 TichnoloiiY . Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167356 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 3-2 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131920 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 3-2 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167357 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated --- 3-3 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 13,1921 3 Ea. 4 s 542 Estimated 3-3 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167358 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 4-1 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167359 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 4-2 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167360 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 5-1 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131922 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 5-1 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . EA-027 167361 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 5-2 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131923 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 5-2 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . EA-027 167362 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 4-3 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131924 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated - 4-3 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . EA-027 167363 Ea. 4 $ 167_ Estimated A-1 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131925 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated A-1 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . EA-027 167364 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Speech Technology Room has insufficient dataports.- - EA-022 131928 3 Ea. 4 s 542 Estimated 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 3130 A.P .P .L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 8 of 13 '---------------- - ----- - - -- - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3130 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 01/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Tltle1 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167367 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated SpEd1 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131929 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated SpEd1 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167368 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated Music Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131927 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated Music Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167366 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated PMP-1 Technology Room has insufficient dataports.  EA-022 131926 2 Ea. s 361 Estimated MC Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 167365 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is 13910-001 58244 2 Ea. $ 557 Estimated needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe requires replacement 13910-021 58245 4 Ea. s 1,811 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Strobe is missing and is needed 13910-028 58246 20 Ea. $ 7,418 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed 13910-004 58273 8 Ea. $ 2,087 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Hom/Strobe is missing and is needed 13910-019 58274 4 Ea. $ 1,484 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910-022 58275 8 Ea. s 2,218 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Emergency Lighting - Standby Battery 16500-901 300381 8 Ea. $ 3,220 Estimated Lighting_ System requires replacement Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant 335943 LS 2 s 729 Estimated Specialties ADA - Counter Height is not fully compliant 335945 LS 2 s 1,170 Estimated Specialties ADA - Food Service Line is not fully compliant 335947 LS 2 $ 1,170 Estimated Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement 10155-003 58157 24 Ea. 3 $ 30,046 Estimated Specialties Exterior Signage requires replacement 10430-003 58159 55 Ea. 3 $ 3,954 Estimated 101 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area . EA-053 213617 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 101 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230222 Ea.  4 $ 434 Estimated 101 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 245774 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage. 101 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284036 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated 102 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213623 Ea. ., 4 $ 953 Estimated 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 3130 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 9 of 13 ~------------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3130 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 01/2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pinewood Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 102 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230223 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 102 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 245775 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage. 102 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284040 20 SF Surf 4 . $ 238 Estimated 103 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213620 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 103 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230224 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 103 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of .teacher EA-058 245776 7 Ea: 4 $ 3,391 . Estimated storage. 103 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition . EA-085 284033 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated 104 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213621 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 104 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230225 2 Ea. ' 4 $ 868 Estimat~d 104 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 245777 8 Ea. 4 $ 3,875 Estimated storage. 104 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284034 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated 105 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area: EA-053 213618 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimate_d 105 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230218 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 105 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 245778 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage. 105 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284035 20 SF Surf  4 $ 238 Estimated 106 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213622 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 106 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area . EA-055 230220 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 106 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 245779 6 Ea. . ,~ ~ ,\n4 s 2,906 Estimated storage. 106 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284037 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated 107 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213619 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 107 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230221 Ea. 4 434 Estimated 107 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 245780 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage. 107 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284038 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 3130 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 10 of 13 ---------------------- - -- - - -- - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3130 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 01/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 108 Specialties Room lacks the appropriate PA equipment. EA-037 173144 Ea. .4 s 606 Estimated 108 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213616 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 108 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230219 Ea. 4 s 434 Estimated 108 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 245781 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage. 108 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition . EA-085 284039 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated 2-1 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213607 3 Ea. 4 s 2,858 Estimated  M~ - .. 2-1 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230210 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 , Estimated 2-1 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 248282 6 Ea. 4 s 2,906 Estimated storage. 2-2 Specialties Room lacks the appropriate PA equipment. EA-037 173140 Ea. 4 s 606 Estimated 2-7 Specialties Room has !~sufficient writing area.  EA-053 213608 3 Ea. .c4 $ 2,858 Estimated 2-2 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230211 3 Ea. 4 s 1,302 Estimated 2-2 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 248283 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated . _storage. 2-3 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213609 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 2-3 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area . EA-055 230212 3 Ea. 4 s 1,302 Estimated 2-3 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 248284 8 Ea. 4 s 3,875 Estimated _storage. 3-1 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213606 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 3-1 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230203 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 3-1 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 248285 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated .. st()rage. 3-2 Specialties Room lacks the appropriate PA equipment. EA-037 173136 Ea. 4 s 606 Estimated 3-2 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213610 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 3-2 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230204 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 3-2 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 248286 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 3-2 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284031 42 SF Surf 4 $ 499 Estimated 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 3130 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 11 of13 ------------------ ----- - - - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3130 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 01/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Pinewood Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 3-3 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213605 3 Ea. 4 s 2,858 Estimated .... 3-3 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230213 3 Ea. 4 ,.$ 1,302 Estimated 3-3 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 248287 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 3-3 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284030 42 SF Surf 4 s 499 Estimated 4-1 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213611 3 Ea. 4 s 2,858 Estimated 4-1 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230209 3 Ea. 4 s 1,302 Estimated 4-1 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 248288 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage._ 4-2 Specialties Room lacks the appropriate PA equipment. EA-037 173137 Ea. 4 $  606 Estimated 4-2 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213614 3 Ea. 4 s 2,858 Estimated 4-2 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230208 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 4-2 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058  248289 6 Ea. -4 ,$ 2,906 Estimated storage. 5-1 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213615 3 Ea. 4 s 2,858 Estimated 5-1 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230207 3 Ea. 4 s 1,302 Estimated 5-1 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 248290 7 Ea. 4 s 3,391 Estimated storage. 5-2 Specialties Room lacks the appropriate PA equipment. EA-037 173143 Ea. 4 s 606 Estimated 5-2 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213613 3 Ea. 4 s 2,858 Estimated 5-2 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230206 3 Ea. 4 s t,302 Estimated 5-2 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 248291 8 Ea. 4 $ 3,875 Estimated storage. 4-3 Specialties Room lacks the appropriate PA equipment. EA-037 173138 Ea. 4 $ 606 Estimated 4-3 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213612 3 Ea._ 4 s 2,858 Estimated 4-3 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230205 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 4-3 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 248292 6 Ea. 4 s 2,906 Estimated storage. A-1 Specialties Room lacks the appropriate PA equipment. EA-037 173139 Ea. 4 s 606 Estimated 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 3130 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 12 of13 ---------------- - - - - --- - - - - - - - State of Arkansas 3130 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Pinewood Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD A-1 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230215 Speech Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 118632 Speech Specialties  Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230216 Tltle1 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230217 Tltle1 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 248295 storage. $pEd1 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. - EA-055 230214 SpEd1 Specialties Roorn lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 248296 storage. Music Specialties Room lacks the appropriate PA equipment. EA-037 173142 Music Specialties Room has insufficient writi\nlg ~_rea. EA-053 213603 Music Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230201 Music Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 248294 sto~age. PMP-1 Specialties Room lacks the appropriate PA equipment. EA-037 173141 PMP-1 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284032 MC Specialties Room lacks a fixed TV. EA-045 203144 MC Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213604 MC Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230202 MC Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 248293 storage . ----~ ----.---- SubTotal by Building Grand Total by Campus A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Qty UOM Priority Ea. 4 Ea. 4 Ea. Ea. 4 4 Ea. 4 Ea.  .---.,4' 3 Ea. 4 Ea. 4 2 Ea. :,4 4 Ea. 4 5 Ea. 4 Ea. 4 42 SF Surf 4 2 Ea. 4 2 Ea. 4 2 Ea. 4 32 Ea. 4 274 299 s $ s $ s $ $ $ $ $ s $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - Deficiency Listing 01/21/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 434 Estimated 369 Estimated 434 Estimated 434 Estimated 1,938 Estimated 434 . Estimated 1,453 Estimated 606 Estimated 1,905 Estimated 1,736 Estimated 2,422 Estimated 606 Estimated 499 Estimated 3,833 Estimated -- 1,905 Estimated 868 Estimated 15,500 Estimated 1,850,746 2,144,749 6003 - Pinewood Elementary School 3130 Page 13 of 13 State of Arkansas 3110 6003 -Joe T. Robinson Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School Building: Floor# Room# System Site Site _Site Site Site Site Site Site Siie Exterior HVAC Deficiency Asphalt requires replacement Wheel Stop requires replacement ADA - Accessible routes from parking or sidewalks to building are not fully compliant ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant ADA - Accessible routes between buildings and facilities are not fully compliant ADA - Handicap parking spaces are not fully compliant ADA - Access to playgrounds or athletic fields is not fully compliant Steps are missing and are needed Retaining Wall is missing and is needed ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant Computer room lacks independent AC. Electrical School siie lacks appropriate lighting. Specialties School lacks an appropriate surveillance system. Specialties School's PBX is undersized. Specialties Elementary School lacks appropriate wayfinding system .. Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Exterior Exterior Exterior Interior A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency End of Life: Window Systems require replacement End of Life: Exterior Doors require replacement ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant Ceramic Tile requires replacement Deficiency Code AssesslD 02740-002 55447 02840-006 55448 337849 337850 340906 340907 340908 02778-002 55449 02830-001 55450 340909 EA-025 110723 EA-041 106197 EA-033 113264 EA-030 112109 EA-088 114562 SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 08500-900 299710 08100-900 299721 322289 09310-002 55478 Qty UOM Priority 68,714 SF 24 Ea. LS LS LS LS LS 12 LF 2,000 SF LS Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. 2 $ 2 S 2 S 2 S 2 $ 2 $ 2 S 3 $ A $ 2 $ 4 $ $ $ 4 $ Ea.  4 S 15 $ Qty UOM Priority 37,539 SF 2 $ 4 Door 2 $ - LS 2 $ 400 SF 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 116,371 Estimated 2,274 Estimated 2,340 Estimated 2,106 Estimated 5,850 Estimated 3_,510 Estimated 3,510 Estimated 521 Estimated 59,654  Estimated 1,404 Estimated 13,636 Estimated 2,437 . Estimated 20,411 Estimated 17,550 Estimated _14,327 Estimated 265,902 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 107,071 Estimated 13,770 Estimated -7_\n621 Estimated 5,347 Estimated 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School 3110 Page 1 of 9 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3110 6003- Joe T. Robinson Elem. School 01/20/2005 Campus: 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Interior End of Life: Ceramic Tile requires replacement 09600-903 299711 538 SF 2 s 7,192 Estimated .-,-,--- - ---- Interior End of Life: Ceilings - Suspended Tiles require 09500-900 . 299712 37,539 SF .: 2 $ 128,165 Estimated replacement Interior End of Life: Door Hardware requires replacement 08200-900 299713 56 Door 2 $ 34,332 Estimated Interior End of Life: Vinyl or Sport Flooring require 09600-906 299718 3,840 SF 2 s 19,039 Estimated replacement . - .. \" -----. _..,.., ----_-, ____ Interior ADA - Doo~Hard~~re is not fullY-rompliant 321829 LS 2 s 703 Estimated Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully 322293 LS 2 $ 4,217 Estimated compliant Interior ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet 332897 LS 2 $ 28,109 Estimated room is not fully c~ITlpliant Interior End of Life: Vinyl or Sport Flooring require 09600'.906 ' 299722 1,002 SF $ 4,968 ) , Estimated replacement . 101 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176862 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 101 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 187129 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 20 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA=039 176859 Ea. 2 S  190 Estimated 20 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 184258 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 21 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176865 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 21 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate_ hardware. EA-040 184259 Ea.  '. 2 ' $ 439 Estimated 102 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176858 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 102 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 187130 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 18 lnierior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 184256 E~' 2 $ 439 E~ti.\nated 19 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 184257 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 01 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176873 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 01 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 184239 Ea. 2 s 439 .Estimated 02 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176875 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 02 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 184240 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated --- -------- - ------- -~ ------ --- . - ---- . - --- 03 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 J76876 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School3110 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 2 of 9 State of Arkansas 3110 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD 1. Interior Interior Interior  Interior Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom dpor l?ci\u0026lt;~pprcipri~te hard~are . . Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. 03 04 04 05 05 06 07 07 08 08 09 lnt~rior ' .. . Classroom \\foor lacks appropria_te hardw~r~ , 09 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 Interior Interior . Interior Interior Interior .Jntericir. Interior Interior --interior Interior Interior _Interior Interior Interior . -:Interior Interior Interior 15  .. ,.- Interior 16 Interior A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. , Classroorn. doo_r lacks the appropriate vis-icfri panei, Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. .Classroom door lacks appniprtate hardw\nne, Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriateyision panei: Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. : Classroom dbo/lac~~ a fpropriate hardW~re. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware.  Classroom dooi\"lacksthe appropriate vision panEil,  ' .. , . . .~ ' ( ,' . ,' ... ,. , Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom _door lacks appropriate har~ware ' ,, . ..' Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-040 184241 EA-039 176870 ~,c-~-040 184242 EA-039 176877 EA-040 184243 EA-040 184244, EA-039 176872 EA-040 184245 'EA:039 176867 EA-040 184246 EA-039 176874 ,EA-040. 184247 EA-039 176869 EA-040 184248 EA:039 176864 --... EA-040 184249 EA-039 176871 . . EA0040 184250 EA-039 176866 EA-040 184251 . , EA-039  176861_,.\u0026lt; EA-040 184252 EA-039 176868 EA-040 184253 .- EA-039 176863 Qty UOM Priority J . 1 Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. . Ea.' Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 S Deficiency Listing 0 1/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 439 Estimated 190 Estimated ,Estimated 190 Estimated 439 Estimated  Estim.- at-\nd  190 Estimated 439 Estimated Estimated 439 Estimated 190 Estimated 439 Estimated , . ~ 190 Estimated 439 Estimated 439 Estimated 190 Estimated 190 Estimated 439 Estimated Estimated 439 Estimated 190 Estimated '\" Estimated '' 190 Estimated 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School3110 Page 3 of9 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3110 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School 01/20/2005 Campus: 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 16 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 184254 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 17 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 - 184255 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 22 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176860 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 22 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 184260 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated HVAC End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires 15800-900 299719 37,539 SF 2 $ 182,206 E-\ntimated replacement HVAC End of Life: Cooling - Air Handlers - RoofTop 15700-904 310435 18,670 SF 2 $ 162,413 Estimated Units - Single Zone requires replacement HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Roof Top 15700-901 310436 18,670 SF 2 $ 289,460 Estimated __ Units requir~ replacef_!lerit ... . ~ . -~ .  .. Plumbing End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require 15400-900 299714 78 Ea'. 2 :$ 95,700 Estimated replacement Plumbing End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System 15100-907 299720 37,539 SF 2 $ 40,497 Estimated requires replacement Plumbing ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant 322296 LS 2 $ 1,405 Estimated Plumbing ADA - Drink Fountains are not fully compliant 332902 i.s 2 $ . 12,649 Estimated 101 Plumbing Room lacks private toilets. EA-063 256127 Ea. 4 $ 4,915 Estimated 101 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 256862 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 20 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required  number of sinks . . ,,,,,.,.,-----\n-- EA-064 256863 Ea .. 4 $ 678 Estimated 21 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 256864 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed 16140-001 55548 2 Ea. $ 271 Estimated Electrical 16140-001 Ea. 1 --,,,- -~ GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed 55552 4  $ .542 Estimated Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed 16140-001 55562 3 Ea. $ 407 Estimated Electrical Exterior Light - Wall Mount is missing and is 16520-007 55549 4 Ea. 2 s 2,065 Estimated needed Electrical End of Life: Electrical Service requires 16400-901 299715 37,539 SF   2 $ 4,914 Estimated . replacement_ --- Electrical Exterior Light - Wall Mount is missing and is 16520-007 55561 2 Ea. 2 $ 1,032 Estimated needed 101 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 270456 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School 3110 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 4 of 9 State of Arkansas 3110 6003- Joe T. Robinson Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# r Room# 102 18 19 03 05 12 14 16 17 22 101 101 20 20 21 21 102 102 18 18 19 19 01 02 System Electrical Electrical Electrical Electrical Electrical Electrical Electrical Electrical Electrical Electrfcal Deficiency Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. Room laclis controls to partially dim lights. Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. Room lacks controls to partiaiTy dim lights. Technology End of Life: Telephones - School Wide Telephones require replacement Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . . Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient oataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-084 270457 EA-084 269893 EA-084 269894 EA-084 269887 EA-084 269888 EA-084 269889 EA-084 269890 EA-084 269891 EA-084 269892 EA-084 269895 16700-900 299717 EA-022 127868 EA-027 157375 EA-022 127889 EA-027 155670 EA-022 127890 EA-027 155671 EA-022 127869 EA-027 157376 EA-022 127887 EA-027 155668 EA-022 1271188 EA-027 155669 EA-022 127870 Qty UOM Priority Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. 37,539 SF 3 Ea. Ea. 3 Ea. Ea. 3 Ea. Ea. 3 Ea. 1 Ea. 3 Ea. Ea. 4 Ea. Ea. 3 Ea. 4 S 4 $ 4 S .4 $ 4 S 4 $ 4 $ 4 S 4 $ 4 $ 3 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ :.i s 4 S 4 $  4 S 4 $ 4 EA-022 127871 4 Ea. Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 399 399 399 - . ~  -- ~ . '-~ ' 399 399 399 ,. 399 399 399 . 399 18,491 542 :, 157 542 167 542 167 542 167 542 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated  Estimated Estimated 167 Estimated 722 Estimated 167 Estimated 542 722 Estimated Estimated 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School 311 O Page 5 of 9 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3110 6003- Joe T. Robinson Elem. School 01120/2005 Campus: 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 03 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127872 4 Ea. 4 $ 722 Estimated 04 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127873 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 05 ,.technology Room has Insufficient dataports. EA-022 127874 3 Ea. 4  $ 542 Estimated 06 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127875 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 07 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127876 4 Ea. 4 $ 722 Estimated - Room has ins~fficient dataports. --- ~----- . ---- - . ~. ~ 08 Technology EA-022 127877 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 E:s_tlmated 09 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127878 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 10 Technology Room has Insufficient dataports. EA-022 127879 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 11 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 -. 127880 3 Ea. 542 Estimated 12 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127881 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 13 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127882 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated - 14 Tectinology Rocim has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127e83 3 Ea . .  4 $ 542 Estimated 15 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127884 3 Ea. 4 s 542 Estimated 16 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127885 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated - -- - - --- 17 Technology Room has insufficient dataport~. EA-022 127886 .4  Ea. ~4 $ 722 =~ Estimated 22 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 127891 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated Media Cer Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 155667 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is 13910-001 55553 10 Ea. , $ - - 1 2,785 Estimated needed =i:1,\n Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light requires 13910-003 55554 Ea. $ 301 Estimated replacement Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed 13910-004 55555 4 Ea. $ 1,044 Estimated -- - Fire \u0026amp; Safety Hom/Strobe is missing and is needed 13910-019 55556 10 Ea. ,$ 3,709 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910-022 55557 4 Ea. $ 1,109 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed 13910-025 55558 20 Ea. $ 6,575 Estimated -~ire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light iii missing and is 13910-001 . 55563 3 Ea. - 1 $ 835 Estimated needed 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School 3110 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 6 of 9 State of Arkansas 3110 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Fire \u0026amp; Safety Hom/Strobe is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Hom/Strobe requires replacement --  :fire \u0026amp; Safety ,.Smoke Detector is missing ano_is needed  Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant Specialties End of Life: Public Address and Intercom - Communications require replacement 101 Specialties _ Rdom lacks\\ictess to '.yideo\"ciisirtbuti6~. 101 101 101 20 Specialties Specialties .  S~eciaities Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage . Blinds are missing or in poor i:ondition.  Room lacks access to video distribution. 20 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 20 :speclaities , Roorn.has i_nsufficienftackboafd ariia. 20 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. 20 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. 21 Specia}iles '.' Room lacks_ access to video diMribuUon.  21 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 21 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 21 Specialties \u0026lt; \"Room lacki(~ppropriate amo\"G~t of teacher . storage. , . . ' .. . .. . 102 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. 102 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. 102 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor} ondiiion: 18 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. 18 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area, A.P.P.LE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 13910-019 55564 13910-021 55565  13910-025 55566 ,' C 332899 11130-901 299716 EA-020 :. \"121934 EA-055 229792 EA-058 245840 EA-085 . 283920 EA-020 121914 EA-053 213303 EA\no55 '229789 EA-058 248510 EA-085 283917 :EA,020 \"iii915 EA-053 213302 EA-055 229788 EA-058  .248511 EA-020 121935 EA-058 245841    rn-,,-,~'\" ,,, ~ - - EA-085 283919 EA-020 121913 EA-055 229791 Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 3 Ea. $ 1,113 Estimated 2 Ea. s 906 Estimated 3 , Ea 1 . '' $ .. 986 Estimated , .. LS 2 $ 703 Estimated 37,539 SF 3 $ 42 ,145 Estimated --~ a. \"r'~ Estim~i ed ' C { 1 -i S_: 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated SF Surf ,\n: 14':t -:-- - 12 4 s. Ei\ntimated  Ea. 4 s 369 Estimated 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated 64 SF Surf 4 $ 760 Estimated -.--.,. -,,,-::r7~-- .- Estimated  3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 3 Ea, 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 13 Estimated. Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 484 Estimated 12 Estimated . Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School 31 1 O Page 7 of 9 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3110 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School 01120/2005 Campus: 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 18 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition, EA-085 - 283918 42 SF Surf ._4 - s 499 Estimated 19 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229790 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 19 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 248509 11 Ea. 4 $ 5,328 Estimated storage. -- . -- ,.. ____ ..,.,,.., -- --- - ~- ---- -- 19 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283916 8 SF Surf .. 4 $ 95 Estimated 01 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 121932 Ea. 4 s 369 Estimated 02 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 121933 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 03 Specialties Room lacks access to video di~tribution. EA-020 , 121928 Ea.  4 . . $ 369 Estimated 04 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 121929 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 05 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 121930 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 06 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020_ 121925 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 07 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 121926 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 08 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 121927 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 09 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 121922 Ea. .\n, 4 $ 369 Estimated 10 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 121923 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 11 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 121924 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated ----- ---- -- . --.-,....---.- .- 12 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA'.020 1.21919 1 ' Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 13 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 121920 Ea. 4 s 369 Estimated 14 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 121921 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 15 .. -Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 121916 Ea :i:4 $ 369 :Estimated 16 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 121917 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 17 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 121918 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 22 Sp_ecialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 121912 Ea. -- 4 $ 369 \" . Estimated Media Cer Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 121931 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated Media Cer Specialties Room lacks a fixed TV. EA-045 202885 2 Ea. 4 $ 3,833 Estimated Media Cer Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. --- .,.7.: __ EA0053 213301 2 Ea.: 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School 3110 A.P.P.l.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 8 of 9 State of Arkansas 3110 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor # Room # System Deficiency Media Cer Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Media Cer Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty EA-055 229787 2 EA-058 248508 32 ------- SubTotal by Building 173 Grand Total by Campus 188 Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 15,500 Estimated $ 1,335,946 $ 1,601,848 6003 - Joe T. Robinson Elem. School 3110 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 9 of 9 State of Arkansas 3111 6003 - Scott Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Scott Elementary School Building: Floor# Room# System Deficiency Site ADA - Accessible routes from parking or sidewalks to building are not fully compliant Site ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant Site ADA - Accessible routes between buildings and facilities are not fully compliant. Site ADA - Handicap parking spaces are not fully compliant Site ADA - Access to playgrounds or athletic fields is no\\_fully con,pliant . . Site . Schopl has insufficiept baseball fields. Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant HVAC Computer room lacks independent AC. . Plumbing Backflow Preventer =:2'\nreq~ire\n' replacement Specialties School lacks an appropriate surveillance system. Specialties School's PBX is undersized. Building: Cafeteria Floor# Room# System Deficiency ' Exterior Steel Window (Awning) require.s replacement Exterior Brick requires replacement Exterior Unit Masonry Restoration - Pointing - needs to occur -- -- Exterior Steel Door/Frame (Single Hung) is missing and is needed Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully compliant ,.interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant A.PP.LE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty 337851 337852 337853 337854 331345 EA-ooa . 108370 337855 EA-025 110724 15140-004 93037 EA-033 113265 EA-030 112110 ---------- -- - ------- -------- - SubTotal by Building 11 Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty 08510-00.~ 93038 400 04210-003 93039 2,890 04910-001 93040 1,800 08110-010 93041 1 335528 322300 332906 1 UOM Priority LS 2 $ LS 2 $ LS 2 $ LS 2 $ LS 2 $ $ LS 2 $ Ea. 4 $ . ~ ... , . - Ea. -- 2 $ Ea. $ Ea. 4 $ $ UOM Priority SF \n:pi .. - 2 $ SF 2 $ SF 2 $ Ea. ' i LS 2 $ LS 2 $ LS --\".'\n- 2 s Deficiency Listing 01/2 1/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 2,340 Estimated 936 Estimated - .. - 2,340 Estimated 702 Estimated 3,510 Estimated 32:188 Estimated 1,404 Estimated 13,636 Estimated  1,861   Estimated 20,411 Estimated 17,550 Estimated 96,878 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 11 ,195 ,~ Estimated. . ~'.'-'. 52,084 Estimated 11 ,583 Estimated -~ . -- _,,,.,. . . - . 1,836 _ Estimated 987 Estimated 592 Estimated 98 ,cEstimated 6003 - Scott Elementary School 3111 Page 1 of9 State of Arkansas 3111 6003 - Scott Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Scott Elementary School Building: Cafeteria Floor# Room# System Deficiency Interior ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet room is not fully compliant HVAC Exhaust Fan - Restroom 4800 CFm 2 H.P. is mi~_~ing _and is_ needed HVAC Make-up air inadequate HVAC End of Life: Controls - DOC requires replacement HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX ---- -------- ~flit__i:equires_replacemefl~ --- r!VAC End of Life: Cooling Pack_aged Units - Window ~ Units require replacement ' Plumbing End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System requires replacement Plumbing End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require repl_acement Plumbing ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant Plumbing ADA - Drink Fountains are not fully compliant Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed -~Eiect~ic~~ Panelboa~d - 100 Amp r\nq~i\n~\n: replacem~nt. Electrical End of Life: Electrical Service requires replacement Fire \u0026amp; Safety Fire Protection System is missing and is needed Specialties ADA - Gr~.b Bars are not tuliy c~mpliani Specialties ADA - Stage accessibility is not fully compliant Cafe Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Roofing A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency End of Life:.Roofing System1 -4-Ply Built-Up  requires replacement Deficiency Code AssesslD 335530 15830-002 93042 15810-001 ,93043 . 15900-902 299724 15700-902 310437 15700-900 310438 15100-907 299723 15400-900 299725 332908 332911 16140-001 93044 16440:003 93045 16400-901 299726 13910-010 93046 321830 332913 EA-020 118585 SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 07500-900\" 299729 .:.:: Deficiency Listing 01 /2 1/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 5,273 5,273 2,360 552 5,273 25 2 2 5,273 5,273 24 LS 2 $ Ea. 2 $ SF SF 2 SF 2 ,.,.. -~...,. SF 2 $ SF 2 $ Ea. LS LS Ea. Ea. SF SF LS LS Ea. 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ $ $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 4 $ $ Qty UOM Priority 27,399 SF - 2 $ - 3,949 Estimated 3,809 Estimated 12,165 CEstimated . :.-:.-.--.... ~ 10,468 Estimated 21.254 Estimated -1,592 Estimated 5,689 Estimated 30,673 Estimated - ::198 Estimated 1,777 Estimated 271 Estimated . ... - ,-. ' . . ~- 5,066 Est1mated 13,104 Estimated 12,859 Estimated . -------- -- 98 E:st!mated 14,040 Estimated 369 Estimated 215,755 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 217,419 Estimated 6003 - Scott Elementary School 3111 Page 2 of9 - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3111 6003 - Scott Elementary School 01/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Scott Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Exterior Soffit requires replacement 07460-001 93047 400 SF 2 $ 1,987 Estimated Exterior Fascia requires replacement 07460-002 93048 900 SF 2 s 8,132 Estimated Exterior End of Life: Window Systems require , 08500-900 299732 27,399 SF 2 $ . \"' - 78,149 Estimated replacement Exterior End of Life: Exterior Doors require replacement 08100-900 299735 13 Door 2 s 44,754 Estimated Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 322305 LS 2 s 5,129 Estimated Interior VCT flooring requires replacement 09658-009 93049 24,699 SF 2 s 122,457 - Estimated Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 321833 LS 2 $ 1,026 Estimated Interior ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet 322310 LS 2 $ 20,516 Estimated room _is not fully compliant_ Interior_ ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully 335532 1_ LS 2 $ 3,077 Estimated compliant 09 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176886 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 09 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201086 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 10 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176887 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estima\\ed 10 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201087 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated 04 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176878 Ea, 2 $ 190 Estimated --- .. -- 06 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176884 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 07 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176879 Ea, 2 $ 190 Estimated 01 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176880 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated -1\nierior - . - 03 Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176881 Ea. '2 s 190  Estimated 11 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176882 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 11 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201088 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated . 1 12 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176889 Ea, .2 $ 190 Estimated 12 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201089 Ea, 2 s 439 Estimated 12A Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176885 Ea, 2 190 Estimated . .,..-,..,...-,.-- - . ~ --, - - -- ----- --- ,12A Interior Classro_om door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201091 - .... Ea. 439 Estimated 6003 - Scott Elementary School 3111 A.P.P.LE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 3 of 9 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3111 6003 - Scott Elementary School 0 1/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Scott Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 128 - Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176888 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 128 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201092 Ea. 2 s 439 Estimated - - 05 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176883 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 17 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176890 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 17 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201090 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated HVAC\na Make:up air inadequate 15810-001 93051 , 27,399 SF 2 $ . 63,212  ..  Estimated HVAC End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires 15800-900 299730 27,399 SF 2 $ 132,989 Estimated replacement HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX 15700-902 310439 1,803 SF 2 $ 16,238 Estimated Unit requires replacement _ .. 05 HVAC Lab iacks an air exchange system. EA-061 255867 Ea, 2 s 4,286 Estimated Plumbing End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require 15400-900 299731 46 Ea. 2 $ 56,438 Estimated replacement Plumbing End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System 15100-907 299733 27,399 SF 2 s 29,558 Estimated requires replacement Plumbing  -.End of Life: Sanitary Sew~r-requires replacement 15100-908 299734 27,399 SF 2 s 64,119 Estimated Plumbing ADA - Drink Fountains are not fully compliant 321837 LS 2 $ 9,232 Estimated Plumbing ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant 335540 LS 2 $ 1,026 Estimated 09 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required ~-~mber of sinks. EA-064 257973 Ea. 4 s - 678 - Estimated 10 Plumbing Room lacks private toilets. EA-063 256261 Ea. 4 s 4,915 Estimated 10 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257974 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,356 Estimated 04 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257969 Ea. 4 $ ' 678 Estimated 06 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257971 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 07 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257972 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 01 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257967 Ea. 4 $ 678 ' Estimated 03 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257968 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 05 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257970 3 Ea. 4 s 2,033 Estimated 17 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required nu-\n:\n,ber of sinks. EA-064 257975 u .. ~-u   ,- .Ea .. 4 678 ' Estimatei:I 6003 - Scott Elementary School 3111 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 4 of9 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3111 6003 - Scott Elementary School 01 /2 1/2005 Campus: 6003 - Scott Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed 16140-001 93055 Ea. $ 136 Estimated Electrical Interior Light - Surface Round requires 16510-016 93057 Ea. 2 $ 879 Estimated replacement - Eiectrical ,End ohife: .Electrical Service requires . 16400-901 299728 21\n399 SF 2 $ 3,587\n,: Estimated : replacement ... :':.i: - 09 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 276184 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 12A Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 276186 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated ~ ~~ - c-c~4 \"'\"'.l:' - --.-. 12B Electrical Room lacks controls to _partially dim lights. . EA-084 276187..\nEa. $ 399 Estimated 17 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. EA-084 276185 Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 09 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131901 4 Ea. 4 $ 722 Estimated 09 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 169547 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 10 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131902 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 10 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 169548 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated .04 Technology Roon1 has insufficient.dataports. EA-022 131897 . 3 Ea. $ 542   Estimated 04 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 169543 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 06 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131899 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 06 T~chnology- Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 169545 1 Ea. 4 $ .,, 167' . Estimated 07 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131900 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 07 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 169546 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated ~ - 01 . Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131895\n3 Ea . . 4 $ 542 Estimated 01 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . EA-027 169541 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 03 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131896 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated ----- -- -- T --- 03 T~chnology  Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 169542 . 1 -., Ea . $ 167 ' c ,_ ~stimated ~ 11 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131903 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 11 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 169549 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 12 Te\nhnology Room has in\nufficient dataports. EA-022 131904 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 -, . Estimated 6003 - Scott Elementary School 3111 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 5 of 9 - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3111 6003 - Scott Elementary School 01n112oos Campus: 6003 - Scott Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 12 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 169550 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated 12A Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131906 4 Ea. 4 $ 722 Estimated 12A Technology , Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 169553 1 Ea . . 4 $ \"7 16? Estimated 128 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131907 4 Ea. 4 $ 722 Estimated 12B Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . EA-027 169554 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 05 Technology :' Room has Insufficient dataports. EA-022 131898 5 Ea. ' 4 $ 903 Estimated 05 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring . EA-027 169544 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 17 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 131905 3 Ea. 4 s 542 Estimated 17 -rechnology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 169551 Ea. 4 $ \" 167 Estimated MC Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 169552 Ea. 4 s 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is 13910-001 93056 5 Ea. $ 1,392 Estimated needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Fire Protection System is missing and is needed 13910-010 93058 '' .. 27,399 SF 2 $ 66,816 Estimated Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant 321835 LS 2 s 512 Estimated Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement 10155-003 93050 12 Ea. 3 $ 15,023 Estimated 09 Speci\u0026lt;jlties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 118593 ... 1 Ea. 4 s 36.9\n\\._ Estimated 09 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229796 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,736 Estimated 09 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249990 8 Ea. 4 s 3,875 Estimated storage. 10 Specialties . , ,Room lacks access to video distribution,- EA-020 118588 . 1 Ea: 4 $ 369 ' Estimated 10 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229795 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 04 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 118595 Ea. 4 s 369 Estimated 04 Specialties _Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213305 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905  Estimated 04 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249986 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage. 06 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 118591 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 06 Specialties \"\" Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213306 :-: 2 Ea.,'\":'' 4 . $ : 1,905  - Estimated 6003 - Scott Elementary School 3111 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 6 of9 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3111 6003 - Scott Elementary School 01/21/2005 Campus: 6003 - Scott Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 06 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249988 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage. 07 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 118592 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 07 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213307 2 Ea. ,.. 4 s 1,905 Estimated 07 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249989 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage. 01 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 118597 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 01 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213309 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 01 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249984 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage. 03 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 118594 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 03 -Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213308 2 Ea. -\n4' s 1,905 Estimated 03 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249985 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage. 11 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249991 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,938 Estimated 1 stor~ge .. ----- .-... --. 12 . Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249992 4 Ea . .$ . ,1,938  E~tilnated storage.  12A Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 118586 Ea. 4 s 369 Estimated 12A Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229797 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated . ,, ...... ----- --. -- - -1 12A Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher - EA-058 249995 2 Ea. __ ,,,. 4 $ 969 Estimated ' storage. , ,' J~ ,. 12B Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 118587 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 12B Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249996 2 Ea. 4 $ 969 Estimated storage,_._ 12B Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 . 283921 8 SF Surf 4 s 95 E~limated 05 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 118596 Ea, 4 $ 369 Estimated 05 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 249987 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,453 Estimated stprage. ,.-.,  ... ., 17 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA:020 . 118589 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 17 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboanl area. EA-055 229793 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 6003 - Scott Elementary School 3111 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc, 2004 Page 7 of 9 State of Arkansas 3111 6003 - Scott Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Scott Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System 17 Specialties 17 -Specialties MC Specialties MC Specialties MC Specialties MC Specialties MC Specialties Building: Multi-Purpose Floor# Room# System Exterior Exterior Exterior Interior HVAC HVAC HVAC HVAC HVAC Plumbing A.P.P.LE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. ------,- Blinds are missing or in poor c6~dltion. Room lacks access to video distribution. Room lacks a fixed TV. Room has insufficient writing area. Room has insufficient tackboard area. Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. - .... ------ .. ____ ----- . ----- Deficiency End of Life: Exterior Doors require replacement End of Life: Window Systems require replacement ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant Exhaust Fan - Restroom 4800 CFm 2 H.P. is missing and is needed Make-up air inadequate End of Life: Ductwork : Inside Insulation requires replacement End of Life: Controls - Electric requires replacement End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX Unit requires replacef!lent End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System requires replacement Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-058 249993 - ------ --- --- EA-085 283922 EA-020 118590 EA-045 203143 ---------~ --- EA-053 213304 EA-055 229794 EA-058 249994 SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 08100-900 299738 08500-900 299743 321839 335543 15830-002 93061 15810-001 93062 15800-900 299739 15900-901 299742 15700-902 310440 15100-907 2.99736 Deficiency Listing 01/21/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 5 Ea. 4 s 2,422 Estimated 20 SF Surf .c: ~4 238 Estima_ted Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 s 3,833 Estimated ---- -- - -- -----. - -- ,..,,..,.._ --~-.- ------- 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimaied _\n,_-- - - - Ea. 4 s 434 Estimated 40 Ea. 4 $ 19,375 Estimated --------- ------- 126 $ 1,072,808 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cyde Status 5 Door 2 $ 17,213 Esti\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_882","title":"\"Board of Education Meeting Agenda,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-01/2004-06"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Educational planning","Education--Finance","School boards","School employees"],"dcterms_title":["\"Board of Education Meeting Agenda,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/882"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nRECEIVED JAN 1 C) 2004 OFFIOCFE DESEGREMGAOTNIIOTONR ING BOARD OF EDUCATION NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Thursday. January 15, 2004 5:00 P.M. MEETING AGENDA NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT AGENDA REGl'LAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUC..\\ TIO!\\ Administration Building, 2700 Poplar Thursday, January 15, 200-t 5:00 P.1\\1. PUBLIC COMMENTS I. CALL TO ORDER, Teresa Burl. President II. INVOCATION, Ketron Howard. Lynch Dri\\'e Elementary Fifth Grader. III. FLAG SALUTE IV. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Tere a Burl. President Mart~ Moore. \\\"ice President Trent Cox. Secretar~ Rochelle Redus. Parliamentarian Charles Hoskyn. Member Mable Mitchell. Member John Rile). Member son of Lisha Ho\\rnrd \\\". RECOG'.':ITIOJO\\' F PEOPLE/E\\'El\\'TS/PROGRAMS .\\. Superintendents Honor Roll - S. Brazear I. Liz Thompson. Spet!ch Pathologist --, Karen Baker. pecial l:.ducation Teacher at Pike View Elementary B. Partners in Education - . L3r\n.izear Page : - L3oard . \\gcnJ.1 .lanuan I~. :oti...\nI. Duke Energ) and Lynch Driw Elernentar:- chool .., ~orth Little Rock Athletic Club anJ the ~orth Little Rock School District 3. C .. Bank and the Business Leadership Academ:- at ~orth Linle Rock High School C. Recognition of Two\n\\ational Board Ceniticd Teachers-A. Bell \\'I. DISPOSITIO:\\ OF :\\Ill\\TTES OF PRIOR :\\IEETI~GS .--\\. Thursda:-. December 18. :003. 5:00 P.\\ I. t Regular) - Page A - I VII. ACTIOJ'i ITEMS- l 1NFINISHED BUSI ESS B. Consider Updated Board Gonrnance and Operations Policies ( Second Reading) - J. mith VIII. ACTIO~ ITEMS- NEW BUSI ESS A. Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report B. Cla sified Personnel Policie  Committee Report C. Consider Motion for Consent Agenda - .I. Smith I. Consider monthly financial report - Page O - 1 .., Consider employment of personnel - Page P - I .,. Consider payment of regular bills - Page T - I IX. I:\\FORMATIOl\\AL ITEl\\1S X. CALENDAR Of EVENTS Page :, - Bo:.ird .-\\g~nda Januan I 5. 200--l A Teacher Work Day - Frida) . .January 16. 200--l 8. Dr. \\lartin Luther 1--:.ingJr. . Holida) - \\londay . .lanuar) 19. 200 C. 1\\ext Board :\\leering (Regular)- Thursda). February! 9. 200  - 5 P.I\\I. XI. EXECUTIVE SESSIO 1 XII. ADJOURNME 'T ORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent REGl'LAR MEETl:\\G, BOARD OF EDl'CA TIO:\\ \\11:\\TTES December 18, 2003 The :'.\\orth Little Rod. cl1l)OI District Board met in regular ession on Thursda). December 18. 2003 in the Board Room of the A.dministration Building of the !\\orth Little Rock School District. 2700 Poplar treet. 'orth Little Rock. Arkansas. One teacher addressed the Board concerning her opposition against the possibility of changing the middle leYel schools to Grades 5 - 8. One teacher and one student spoke against any changes in the block scheduling at the high school le\\'el. President Teresa Burl called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. Brittany Harris. a Rose Cit) '.\\ liddle School eighth grader. ga,e the inYocation. The flag salute followed. ROLL CALL OF 1EMBER Present Teresa Burl. President Marn Moore. Vice-President Trent Cox. Secretary Rochelle Redus. Parliamentarian Charles Hoskyn. Member Mable Mitchell. Member John Riley. Member Others Present .lames Smith. Superintendent: Bobby Acklin. Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation: Donald Watkins. Assistant Superintendent for Business Ser\\'ices: representatives from the Personnel Policies Committees. PT A and press: se\\'eral other staff members: and Darlene Holmes. Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Du\\'all (audio) and Jim Billings ( ,ideo) taped the meeting. RECOG OF PEOPLE 1EVE\\.'TS'PROGRAMS None A- I DISPOSITIO:--: OF \\11:--:lTES \\1OTIO '\n'-.1arty Moore 1110\\ed to accept the minutes of the :\\o\\'ember 20. 2003 tRegular) Board meeting as printed. Rochelle Redus seconded the motion. YEAS: . AYS: Burl. Cox. Hoskyn. Mitchell. Moore. Redus and Riley None lf:\\:FINISHED BUSI\u0026gt;JESS Cpdated Student Policies MOTIO' Trent Cox moved to accept the Student Policies as presented. l\\1arty l\\loore seconded the motion. YEAS: 'AYS: Burl. Cox. Hoskyn. Mitchell. l\\1oore. Redus and Riley None EW BUSINESS Certified Personnel Policies Report Chairman Rick Kron presented the report. There '\"ere no proposals. Classified Personnel Policies Report Secretary Glenda Tucker presented their report. There were no proposals. ACSIP Plan orth Little Rock School District\" s Arkansas Consolidated School Improvement Process (ACSIP) Plan was prese111ed by Letitia Martin. Director of Federal Programs. Each Board member received a copy of the Plan. MOTIO Marty Moore moved to accept the 2003-200-l ACSIP Plan as presented. Rochelle Redus seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl. Cox. Hoskyn. Mitchell. 1oore. Redus and Riley one The Updated Board Governance and Operational Policies \\\\ere presented b\\' Mr. Smith for a first readina. Recommendation for 1 004- ,,005 Schedule Chanue for Grades 9 - I' Mr. Smith presented his recommendation Ill change the present block schedule to a modified block schedule and 10 change graduation requirements from 26 10 24 credits. A- 2 J\\-10TlO1\\i John Riley moved to accept Administration s recommendation for the changes in the modi tied block schedule as presented. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl. Cox. Hoskyn. Moore. Redus and Riley Mitchell Consent A2:enda Mr. Smith presented the consent agenda as printed. MOTION Charles Hoskyn moved to accept the consent agenda as printed. Marn ~-loore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl. Cox. Hoskyn. Mitchell. Moore. Redus and Riley None Mr. Smith requested to add one more item to the agenda. Chairman Burl yielded to Mr. Smith. At this time. Mr. Smith read his letter of his intent to retire from the North Little Rock School District on June 30. 2004. Chairman Burl immediately called for an executive session. The Board went into a closed session at 6:05 p.m. The Board reconvened in open session at 6:7 5 p.m. MOTION Rochelle Redus reluctantly 1110\\'ed to accept Mr. Srniths letter of his intent to retire on June 30. 2004. Mable Mitchell seconded the motion. YEAS: 1 AYS: Burl. Cox. Hoskyn. Mitchell. Moore. Redus and Riley None ADJOURNME T John Riley moYed to adjourn the meeting. Rochelle Redus seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl. Cox. Hoskyn. Mitchell. Moore. Redus and Riley None Chairman Burl declared the meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. Teresa Burl. President Trent Cox, Secretary A-3 Daphne Gallot-Knighten Lou Ross '\\ORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT l\\onh Little Rock. Arkansas Board Agenda - January I 5. 200-+ ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSFERS From Rose City ]'diddle Alternati\\'e. Assistant Principal To Lake\\\\ ood l'vild die School. .. \\ssistant Principal CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS Ridgeroad Middle School. Special Education Effective 1/15/03 CERTIFIED PERSONNEL CHANGES AND TRANSFERS Monica Ball Debra Finton Ceceila Jarry Debora Rozzell Brenda V/ilson National Board Certification achie\\'ed EffectiYe 8/13/03 From Ridgeroad Middle Charter School. Special Education To Lynch Drive Elementary. Special Education Effective I /5/04 National Board Certification achieved Effective 8/13/03 From District VIPS Coordinator .75 To Title I Parent Involvement Coordinator . 75/VIPS Coordinator .25 Effecti\\e I 1510-+ From L \\\\'MS. Special Education/Family \u0026amp; Consumer Science To L WMS. Career Orientation Effective 1/20/04 P-1 Anna Haustein Andrea Ne\\'ille Letitia utherlen \\'orth Little Rock chool District Board Agenda - .January 15. 200-l \\'E\\\\. CERTIFIED PERSO~l'\\EL :'\\orth Heights Elementar:-. Fourth Grade Effecti\\'e I 5 0-l. Category I. Step 0. 187 days Park Hill Elementary. Third Grade Effecti,e I 5 0-l. Categor:- I. Step 0. 187 days Lakrnood i\\liddle School. English Effecti,e I 5/0-l. Category I. tep 8. 187 days NEW CERTIFIED PERSO fNEL RECOMMEND A TIO S At-1E: PROPOSED ASSIGN:-1ENT: EDUCATIO : CERTIFICATIO 1: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATIO : NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGN 1E T: EDCCATIO ': CERTIFICATIO : STUDE, 1T TEACHING: RECOMME DATIO : NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: ED CATION: CERTIFICATION: EXPERIENCE: RECOl\\1ME DATIO. : Anna Haustein :'forth Heights Elementar:-. Fourth Grade SSE - Uni,ersity of Central Arkansas. Conv..-ay.A R 12/03 Early Childhood Education P--l \\'ilonia Elementary. Vilonia. AR J/03 - 12/03 Dana Snowden. Principal K.aye Lo\\\\e. Administrati\\'e Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed. Administrati\\'e Director of Personnel/Special Services Andrea Neville Park Hill Elementary. Third Grade BSE- Cni,ersity of Central Arkansas. Conway. AR 12/03 Earh Childhood P-4 Theodore Jones Elementary. Conway. AR 8/03 - 12103 Julia Lee i\\1oore Elementary. Conwa:-. AR 1/03 - 5103 Barbara Hart\\\\ick. Principal K.aye Lowe. Administrati,e Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed. Administrati\\'e Director of Personnel/Special Services Letitia Sutherlen Lakewood Middle School. English SSE - University of Memphis. Tennessee 12/95 Elementary Education P--l: Middle School Language Arts. Social Studies. Math. and Science Springdale School District. Springdale. AR 8/02 - 12/03 Shelby County Schools. Memphis. Tl\\' 1/96 - 5/02 Dr. Ginger Wallace. Principal Dana Chadwick. Administrative Director of Secondary Education Danny Reed. Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services P-2 Lynn Berr:, Carla Randall Bro,\\'n Robert Burnett Norman Gill Debra Pruss Da\\'id Tate Terri L. Bro\\\\11 Alw. ter Boyd Cand: Finne, Credell Jordan Cassandra :\\oid Laquita Pratt Clition D. Robinson 1arsha Rochelle Simon :\\orth Littk Rock School Di~trict Board Agenda - January 15. 200-+ CLAS IFIED PERSO:'\\:S:EL RESIG~ . .\\ TlO~S Transportation Department. Bus Driwr Effectiw 12 I 9 03 I\\orth Heights Elementar:. Lunch . .\\ide Effecti\\'e 12 1 03 Transportation Departn1tcnt. Custodian Effecti\\'e 12.'29/03 . LRHS West Campus. Custodian Effecti\\'e 12/1 03 NLRHS East Campus. Computer Lab Aide Effectiw l 5. 0-+ Plant Ser\\'ices. 1' laintenance Custodian Effectiw l l 'I-+ 03 CLAS IFIED PERSON 'EL. EW HIRE Food Senice Department. Food Senice Assistant Effectiw 12 '8/03. Category 90 I. Step 15. I 91 days\n\\LRH East Campus. Custodian Effecti, e 12 I 03. Categor\n- 600. tep 23. 252 days Ridgeroad 1iddle Charter School. Olfo.:e 'ecretary Effecti\\'e 12 5 03. Categor:, 225. Step -+9. 207 days Transportation Department. Bus Dri,er Effecti\\'e 12 I 03. Categor: 507. Step 43. 190 days :\\LR! IS Cast Campus. Custodian Effecti,e 12 I 03. Categor\n- 600. Step 22. 252 days \\:LRH.' \\\\'est Campus. Custodian [!Tecti,e 12 I 03. Categor\n- 600. Step 20. 252 days Ridgeroad \\1iddle Charter School. Offo:e ecretar) Effectin: 12 5 03. Categor: 225. tep 55. 207 days Lakewood Middle School. recial Education Aide Effecti\\'e 12 15 03. Categor: 2-+0. Step 5 L 185 days P-3 Eunice Conklin Bob Green Rose Robinson Hazel \\\\.illiams James Williams ~orth Little Rod. chool District Board Agenda - .January 15. 200-l CL.-\\SSIFIED PER O~\"\\:EL TR.:-\\~SFI:-R :-\\~D CH . .\\~GE From Pik.e \\ie\\\\ Elementan. Food en ice Assistant To Boone Park Elementan. Food Sen ice Assistant Effecti,e 12 15 0.3 From Plant Ser\\'ices. Sub titute Custodian To Plant Sen ices. Custodian Effecti\\'e 12 15 03 From Boone Park Elementar~. Food Senice Assistant To Pike \\ie\\\\\" ElementarY. Food Senice Assistant Effectiw 12 1: 03 From Food er\\'ice Department. Food Senice Substitute To !\\LR.HS East Campus. Food Ser\\'ice Assistant Effecti\\'e 12 15103 From NLRHS East Campus. 'ight Custodian To 1LR.H East Campus. Night Lead Custodian Effecti\\'e 8 18 03 P-4 Y-T-D SUMMAROYF :UNDS FUN!l 1-SALARY FUND 2-0PER.\".TING FUND 4-DEBT SERVICE (FUNDS 1 ~ 2 ~ 4) FUNC-3-9U!LDit~3 FUND 5-C.\".PIT.U. OUT:..JI.~ FUND 6-FEDERAL FUND 8-F'OO- SERVICE TO-:\"lu.\nr. fU!J:)5 - MONTHLYS UMMAROYF FUNDS Fund :-salar:\n: f ..:rd 2-0peratin\nFund\nJebt Se!\"\\'lCe f\\onc 3-Bu!.ld1n:\nFund S-Capital Cc~:ay Fund f-Federal fund :-feed Se:-,:1ce T~~. ,r- ~:o::'!'H:.F~U NDS NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRI::7 FINANCilu. RE?OR, DECEMBER, 200: BEGINNING Y-T-C B..!..ANCE REVEN:JE .00 12,862,343.2: 2,892,475.81 16,311,605.95 1,597,982.00 .00 ,,490,457.81 29,173,949.16 5,253,624.0C 26,134.56 9\"5,029.15 905,920.34 1,192,522.35 2,780,121.97 22,796.77 1,244,868.83 ::,934,430.06 3\n, 132,994. BE MONTH RE\\'ENUE 2,711, 90?. 54 -,6215,523.15 .00 J, 100.0G 520,00:.7'\" l, ~25, 726.2-, ,Fl~,5S:.03 13,o9:,e: ... J5 0 - ~--T-C :URREN':' E:XPENDITURES B.'-1.A.\"ICE i2,862,35i.91 l\n. -c::\nR 10,886,551.51 8,317,53C.2: 476,315.94 1,121,666.06 24,225,225.36 9,439,181.61 229,\"14.84 5,052,043.7: 1,160,684.77 720, 26\n. \"\"2 2,417,301.63 1,555,342.69 1,482,533.38 2H, 867. 78CR 29,515,459.98 lc,551,06\n.9 MONTH REVENUE EXPENDITURES OVER/UNDER EX?ENCE 2,011,9~4.24 14.70CR 1,535,963.51 5,7('\",530.64 .00 .00 320.00 :-, -eo.oo 239,700.53 26,301.23 454,768.92 1,213,951.35 _S\",620.40 2:1,9Jl.23 5,533,31\".60 7,5 .. ,4cq 75 REVENUE FUND 1 SALARY FUND Transfer Fund FUND 2 OPERATING fUND LOCAL REVENUE Current Taxes Pullback Delinquent Taxes Land Redemption Interest Soft Drink Sales Spec Ed Preschool Local Misc Local TOTAL LOCAL REVSNUE STATE REVENUE State Equalization Aid State Incentive Funding Pathwise Mentoring Sp Ed Supv/ESY/Res/Cat Special Ed Preschool K-1 Proverty Aid ABC Preschool Smart Start Literacy M-to-M Program Magnet/M-to-M Trans General Facility fund Debt Service F'unding Deseg-Teach Retire/Insu Miscellaneous State TOTAL ST/I.TE REVENUE TRANSFERS TOTAL OPERA,ING FUND FUND 4 DEBT SERVICE Transfers TOTAL REVENUE FUNDS 1, 2, 4 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FINANCIAL REPORT DECEMBER, 2003 BUDGETED COLLECTED REVENUE THIS MONTH 32,975,000.00 2,711,909.54 12,200,000.00 6,063,215.69 5,475,000.00 .00 1,400,000.00 828,661.26 160,000.00 6,878.36 175,000.00 33,532.99 100,000.00 8,505.22 400,000.00 .00 229,068.00 5,993.00 20,139,068.00 6,948,786.54 28,075,080.00 2,552,280.00 1,156,301.00 . 00 .OD . 00 212,792.00 6,110.00 542,449.00 .00 225,269.00 .00 469,956.00 52,000.00 6,,850.00 . 00 2,650,000.00 518,056.00 750,000.00 . DO 179,079.00 .00 249,690.00 .00 1,350,000. 00 224,921.26 175,466. 00 36,278.89 36,100,932. 00 3,389,646.15 34,570,000. OOCR 2,711,909. 54CR 21,670,000.00 7,626,523.15 1,675,000. 00 .00 56,320,000. 00 10,338,432.69 0 - 2 COLLECTED BUDGE, % COLLECTED TO DATE BALANCE TC DATE 12,862,343.21 20,112,656.79 39.00% 11,467,777.67 732,222.13 93. 99% .OD 5,475,000.00 . 00% 2,164,165.48 764,165.46CR 154.58% 80,655.64 79,344.36 50. 4 0% 93,003.19 81,996.61 53. 14% 36,621.06 61,376.94 38.62% .00 400,000.00 .00% 47,278.17 181,789.83 20.63% 13,691,501.41 6,247,566.59 68. 97% 12,761,400.00 15,313,680.00 45.45% .DO 1,156,301.00 .00% .DO .00 .00% - 6,110.00 206,682.00 2. 87% .00 542,449.00 .00% 112,632.00 112,637.00 49.99% 169,489. 00 300,467.00 36.06% 64,850. 00 .00 100.00% 1,036,112. 00 1,613,886 . 00 39 . 09% 263,000.00 487,000 . 00 35. 06% 89,539.0D 89,540. 00 4 9. 99% 124,844.00 124,846. 00 49.99% 562,303. 15 767,696. 85 41.65% 91, 111. 89 84, 354 .11 51.92% 15,281,391 .04 20,819,540. 96 42.32% 12,861,286. 50CR 21,708,713. 50CR .00% 16,311,605. 95 5,358,394 .OS 7 5. 27% .00 1,675,000. 00 . 00% 29,173,949. 16 27,146,050. 84 51. 80% REVENUE (CONTINUED) FUND 3 BIJILDING FUND Interes: O:her TOT\"'1 BUiLDING FUND FUND 5 CP.PITr.:.O. UTLAY Current Taxes Pullback Delinquen: Taxes Other TOThL CAPIT,\".L OU7LJ..'i FUND 6 FEDERJl.:R.. E\\SNUS ROTC TITLE I\"i-3 21st Century TI'!'LE TITLE V-B C!\"',arce= s=hoc Reading Excel-Lance - Vocatior1a: Carl Per :ins TI!LE: V!-9, p:, 94-142 Spe.:ia.i.. Ed ?re-Schoo: Medicaid TIT:.E I:-\n.. Im~rove Teac TITLE l-h:cour.tac1!:ty r-:!s ee :.1aneous teoeral -:-o-:-\n,.:F.. E::ERr..:,.r ::::1,, FUND e FCO::l SE?::c::: Sales Federal Reirr.bursement Othe: TCTh:. FOOC SER.\nr:c: :-o:-\n..:R. E\".c\n:::\n NORTH1 :~T:E ROCYs.: HOO~ o:srR::: :'!NAN:!\n..:. RSPOR:' DECE:MBER2, 003 BUDGETED COLLECTED REVENUE THIS MONTH 22,SOC.OC .00 3,,200.0C 3,100.00 6C,OOO.OO 3,100.00 78C,000.00 462,756.69 550,000.00 . 00 110,000.00 63,245.07 10,000.00 .00 1,450,000.00 526,001.76 100,000.00 9,361.40 '19, '13.00 61,635.00 :,43,,22C.00 549,980.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 377,974.00 .00 194,378.00 16,200.00 l, ST\n, 791.00 788,895.00 4-9,435.00 .00 305,000.0C 26,907.87 642,789.00 125,747.00 9,000.00 .00 10,000.00 .00 7,00C,C00.00 1,728, '26.27 E7C,000.00 '3, 03~. 65 2,050,000.00 424, 325.6- 60,000.00 2. 1 e . 31 3,000,000.00 499,551.63 c,-3:,occ.o: : ,, oc.s, c1:. 15 C - COLLECTED TO DAE 9,53,.56 18,600.0~ 28,134.56 740,761.56 . 00 165,158.78 .00 905,920.34 43,092.52 474,635.00 549,980.00 150,000.00 409,800.00 99,992.20 788,895.00 .oo 53,980.25 200,747.00 9,000.00 .00 2,760,121.07 ~19,014.53 804,607.49 ::,246.81 1,244,866.83 :?4, :32, q~.\n. 86 B.\".LANC:C%: co:.LECTEc' P..MO1NLT TC DAE 13,265 . .:~ 4:. B:, 16, 600.0C 50.CO, 3:,865.H 46.e9t 39,238.44 94.96% 550,000.00 .00% 55,158.78CR 150. 14% 10,000.or- .00% 544,079.66 62. 47% 56, 907. 4 8 43.09% 244,776.00 65. 97% 1,88,, 240.00 2:.59% .00 100.00% 31,826.00CR 106.42\\ 94,385.80 51. 4 4t 786,896.00 4 9. 99\\ 470,435.00 .00\\ 251,019.75 17. 69% 442,042.00 31.23\\ .00 100.00% 10,000.00 .00\\ 4,219,878.03 39.,1\\ 450,985.47 4 S. 16% 1,245,392.51 39.24\\ 58,753.19 26.55% 1,755,131.17 41. 4 9% 33, E9\", 005. Is 50.32% EXPEND!TURES BY fUNCTION FUND l SALARY fUND Regular Programs Special Educatiof\nWorkforce Education Compensation Education Other Instruct Program Student Support Instruct Staff Support General Adrnin Support School Ad~in Support Business Support Maintenance \u0026amp; Operation Transportation Central Office Other Support TOTA:-SALARY fUND 2 OPERATING FUND Regular Programs Special Education ViorY.:'orce Ea'Jcatior. Compensac~on Education Other Ins:ruct Prograrr. Student Supper: Instruct Staff Support General Acmin Support School Adrnin Support Business Support Maintenance \u0026amp; Operation Transportatior, Central Office Other Support TOTAL OPERATING fUND FUND 4 DEeT SERVICE FUND Other Support TOTAL DEBT SERVICE TOTAL FUND l, 2, 4 NORTH :IT7L~ RO:K SCHOO~ D:STRI:7 FINANCIAL REPORT DECEMBER, 2003 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES 16,605,519.0C 4,865,940.0C 1,640,05'.00 101,859.00 1,143,910.00 2,531,292.00 1,653,677.00 316,585.00 2,631,652.00 81,017.00 61,060.00 66,050.00 210,835.00 .00 31,937,453.00 5,044,622.00 1,986,396.00 491,732.00 63,340.00 731,404.00 2,703,132.00 1,883,736.00 247,221.00 1,513,554.00 447,236.00 5,609,526.00 3,446,599.00 739,298.00 1,515,436.00 26,423,232.00 1, 65\", 76C.OC l,65\",760.00 60,018,445.00 0 - 4 EXPENDITURES TH!S MONTH 1,474, 99\u0026lt;. 9E 402,098.7: 111,543.33 .00 100,125.25 215, 72.,. 56 131,288.43 27,200.86 212,354.2: 6,767.50 6,7\"1.05 5,417.61 17,634.73 .00 2,711,924.24 343,349.65 129,643.71 24,007.55 2,875.32 41,753.52 19-,707.41\n03,086.57 32,724.00 122,743.07 38,557.34 337,157.94 259,010.53 52,976.58 153,390.32 1,838,983.51 .00 .00 4,550,907.75 EXPSNDITURSS TO DATE 6,59~,E7C.6.: 1,829,655.86 617,893.71 .00 458,952.42 1,061, 00\". 66 707,149.45 173,826.76 1,193,674.34 43, 30\". 66 43,216.78 30,949.57 107,853.04 .00 12,862,357.91 2,031,429.34 659,637.44 179,898.52 11,908.28 209,814.64 828,663.64 520,034_55 146,644.81 669,305.41 835,940.10 2,595,034.94 1,444,079.55 387,647.98 358,512.31 10,886,551.51 476,315.94 06,315.94 24,225,225.36 AMOUNT%EX PENDITURES DUE lC, 0:3, 646. 36 3,039, 28C 12 1,022,163.29 101,859.00 684,95.5e 1,470,284.34 946,527.55 142,758.24 1,437,977.66 37,709.34 37,843.22 37,100.43 102,981.96 .00 19,075,095.09 3,013,192.66 1,326,758.56 311,833.48 51,431.72 521,589.36 1,874,468.36 1,355,701.45 100,576.19 844,248.59 388,704.lOCR 3,014,491.06 2,002,519.45 351,650.02 1,156,923.69 15,536,680.49 1,181,444.06 1,181,444.06 35,793,219.64 TO DATE 3'.'.57% 3.,. 67% .00% 4 0. 1 :, 41.91% 42.76% 54.90% 45.35% 53.45% 53. 31% 45.48\\ 51.15\\ .00\\ 40.27\\ 40.26\\ 33.20% 36.58% 18.80\\ 28.68% 30.65% 28.03% 59. 31% 44.22% 186. 91% 4 6. 2 6% 41.89% 52. 43% 23.65% 41. 20\\ 28.73\\ 28.73\\ 40.36% - EXPENDITURES BY fUNCTION fUND 6 FEDER.l\\L fUNDS Reg!.llar Programs Special Education Workforce Education Compensation Education Other Instruct Program Student Support Instruct Staf: Support General Adrnin Support School Ad~in Support Business Support Maintenance \u0026amp; Operation Transportation Central Office Suppo=t Othec Support TOTJl.L FEDERJl.L fUNDS FUND 3 fUND 5 FUND BUILDING :\"UNO CAPITAL OUTL!\\Y FOOD SERVICE ALL FUND, FUNCTION TOThLS REGULAR PROGRAMS SPECIAL ED~CATION WORKFORCEE DUCATION COMPENSATIONE DUCJl.TION OTHE\nINSTRUCT!Nhl. D STUDENT SUPPORT INSTUC:- STAfF SUPPORT GENSR.i:i.L J-..D!H!i SUPPORT SCHOOL ADMIN SUPPORT BUSINESS SU?FC\u0026gt;r.T M.'-.INTEN.l\\NC\u0026amp;S OPER.'-.ITO N TRANSPORT.L.7ION CENTR.l\\L O!'Tl CE OTHER SUPPORT ALL :\"UNDS TCTAL EXPE!-:DITt'RES NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FINANCIAL REPORT DECEM3ER, 2003 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES 636,862.00 1,164,720.00 179,195.00 2,106,983.00 872,123.00 1,422,934.00 1,612,181.00 80,602.00 2,000.00 .00 .00 127,316.00 102,850.00 125,012.00 8,432,778.00 288,141.00 2,227,788.00 2,953,606.00 22,302,756.00 8,020,056.00 2,310,984.00 2,282,182.00 2,74\"'?,977.00 6,657,358.00 5,149,594.00 644,408.00 4,147,206.00 528,253.00 6,604,580.00 3,641,965.00 1,634,074.00 7,249,365.00 C - 5 EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH 35,832.79 79,427.26 6,746.66 142,025.85 48,205.40 94,837.47 40,851.21 5,129.50 .00 .00 .oc 157.25 .00 1,555.53 454,768.92 320.00 239,700.53 287,620.40 1,854,177.40 611,169.72 142,297.54 144,901.17 190,084.17 508,272.14 2.,5,226.21 65,054.36 335,097.28 406,789.67 264,585.39 123,313.16 567,024.2: 5,533, 3'.7.6G EXPEN'.lITURES TO DAT 270,53~.7! 360,765.89 65,194.o- 615,301.74 218,016.03 448,831.09 388,217.29 33,586.59 . 00 .00 .00 763.85 9,313.90 6,776.44 2,417,301.63 229,714 . s.\n1,160,684 .77 1,482,533. 38 8,896,834.72 2,850,059.21 862,986.30 627,210.02 886,783.09 2,338,502.39 1,623,401.29 354,058.16 1,862,979.75 964,683. 32 3,156,673. 10 1,475,792. 97 824,284 . 25 2,791,211.41 29,515,459.98 BALANCE%E XPE~D:TcRES A.\"10UNT 366,32\"7.26 4:.47% 803,954.11 30. 97% 11 ~, 000. 93 36.38% 1,491,661. 26 29.20% 654,106. 9- 24. 99% 974,102. 91 31 .54% 1,223,963. 71 24 .08% 47,015. 41 41 .66% 2,000 . 00 .00% .00 .00% .00 .oo, 126,552. 15 . 59!, 93,536.10 9. 05% 118,235.56 5. 42% 6,015, 06.37 28.66% 58,426.16 7 9. 72, 1,067,103.23 52. 10% 1,471,072.62 50. 19% 13,405,921.28 39.89% 5,169,996.79 35.53% 1,447,997.70 37. 34% 1,654,971.98 27.48% 1,861,193.91 32. 27% 4,318,855.61 35.12% 3,526,192. 71 31.52% 290,349. 84 54.94% 2,284,226 25 4 4. 92% 436,430. 32CR 182. 61\\ 3,447,906.90 47. 7 9% 2,166,172.03 4 0. 52% 809,789.75 50.44% 4,458,153.59 38.50% 44,405,298.02 39.92% EXPENDITURES BY OBJEC7 rtJNC l TEACHERS S.\nLARY FUN: Salaries Fringe Benefits Other 707,\n:. TEACHER SALARY FUND 2 OPSRA'!'lt:G F'JNI: Salaries Fringe Bene!:.:s Purchasea Services Supplies Capital Out ay Other ftlllD 4 DE:T SERVICE P:-inc1pal Interest Fees TOTPl. DEBT SER\\'ICE FUIJC 3 B\nJILDING :Ut,::- Supplies Capital 0.1t ay Othec TOThL su:LDI~.JG FUtJQ FUND 5 CAFIThL OUTLAY Purchased Services Suppl!eS Capital Outlay Other TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY NORTs :!TTLE ROCK SCHOO: CISTR!CT rINANCI.'u- REPORT DECEMBER, 2003 BUDGE,ED AMOUNT 29,629,199.0C 2, 308,254.0C .00 31,93,,453.00 9,856,263.00 9,513,3:2.0C 3,694,063.00 2,963,446.0C 319,84'.00 76,304.00 26,423,232.00 635,360.0 99-, 500.00 24,900.0C 1,657,760.00 62,256.0C 155,602.0G .00 286,141.00 941,796.00 531,466.00 536,406.0C 21e,100.oc 2,227,788.00 EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH 0 - 6 2,530,370.96 lS:,553.2 .00 2,-:1,924.24 755,565.75 74,092.23 84,813.66 135, 3\"2. 6C 5,125.86 110,013.39 1,838,983.51 .00 .oc .00 .oo 320.00 . oc .00 .00 320.00 59,225.25 30,00-.-: 25,170.56 125,297.00 239,700.53 EXPEN!J!TURES TO D!\\TE 12,084,323.53 778,03~.3 .oc 12,862,35,.9: 4,200,885.62 4,015,368.95 902,288.24 1, 4 60, 644 . 58 134,686.91 169,677.21 10,886,551.51 2,162.19 474,133.75 .00 476,315.94 57,766.8\" 63,326.71 106,619.26 .00 229,714.84 305,679.30 24\",43\".89 420,699.86 186,861.72 1,160,684.77 AMOUNT BALANCE TO D.\u0026gt;,TE 1,530, :19. 62 .00 19,075,095.09 5,655,377.38 5,49~,943.05 2,791,774.76 1,502,601.42 185,157.09 93,373.21CR 15,536,680.49 633, 1\"7.81 523,366.25 2~,900.00 1,181,444.06 12,516.13 1,072.71CR 46,982.74 .00 58,426.16 636,116.70 284,048.11 115,706.14 31,232.28 1,067,103.23 4C.18t 33.70\\ .00\\ 24.42% 49.20% 42.11% 222.37% 41. 20% .34\\. 47.53%. .00% 28.73% 82. 19\\ 101.72% 69.80\\ .00\\ 79.72% 32. 4 5% 46.55\\ 78.42% 85. 67\\ 52.10\\ EXPENDITURESS Y OBJECT FUND 6 FE~SRAL FUNDS Salaries E\"ringe Benefits Purchased Services Supplies Capital Oi.:tla'.l Other TOTA:. FEDER!'.!. flillDS fUNC 8 FOOJ SSR'-1::C:ES Salaries fringe Benfits Pur=haseo Servi.::es Supplies Capital Outlay Other - TOTA:. FOOD SER'.'ICS ALL rur\ncs TOTA:.S SALARIES FF:NJE ES!~SFI'!'S PURCHASECS ER'-:!CES SUPF:E2 CAP::::-.:....:O. UTLAY OTHER TOTAL ALL ,UNDS NORTE LI':'TL:\" ROCK s::Eoc:, c:sTR:c:FINANCI. C..R:..E PORT DECEMBER, 2003 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES AMOUNT THIS MONTH 3,867,280.00 262,048.6\" 1,194,302.0C 81,111.89 1,644,955.00 68,639.69 1,290,598.00 40,602.66 334,556.00 2,366.01 101,085.00 . 00 6,432,778.00 454,768.92 l, 07, 530.00 136,036.57 497,525.00 n, 356. 62 38,276.00 700. 2\" 975, 575,0C 101,524.94 4,600.00 .00 100.00 . 00 2,953,606.00 287,620.40 H, 790,272.00 3,686,021.95 13,513,393.00 :, 05e, 116.c2 6,369,373.00 213,698.8\" S,:3,36:.o~ 30\",50\".9: 1,351.010.00 32,662.45 2,053,349.00 235,310.39 1 3,920,758.00 5,533,31'.60 EXPENDITURES BALANCE EX?Ern,TURES TO DATE AMOUN':\" TO ~A7E 1,313,109.93 2,55~,1-o.o 33.95% 360,263.11 834,038.89 30. 16% 353,136.9: 1,291,818.09 21 . .\no, 321,376.52 969,221.46 24.90% 63,952.96 270,605.02 19 .11% 5,462.16 95,622.62 5. 4 o, 2,417,301.63 6,Cl5,47E.31 28.66% 642,281.42 795,248.56 44.67% 239,239.05 256,285.95 48.08% 12,099.56 26,P6.44 31. 61% 585,305.15 390,269.85 59.99% 3,608.20 991.80 78.43% .00 100.00 .00% 1,482,533.38 1,471,072.62 50.19\\ 16,240,600.50 26,549,671.50 40.72% 5,395,905.49 8,117,487.51 39.93% 1,630,970. 0e 4, \"58,402. :2 25.52% 2,676,092.65 3,,45,268.15 45.98% 73:,56\".21 619,44:.79 54 .14% 838,323.05 1,215,025. 95 40.82% 29,515,459.% 44,405,298. 02 39.92% ACCOUNT NORTH L=T~LE ROCK SCHOOL D=STR=c~ CHECK LISTING FOR DECEMBER, 2003 AMOUNT A \u0026amp; A FIRE AND SAFETY COMPANY A PLUS BAKERY A PLUS BAKERY A-PLUS ~EACHING SUPP~IES A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES A'TEST CONSULTANTS INC A'TEST CONSULTANTS INC A'TEST CO SULTANTS INC AAEA AAEA AAMSCO AASBO ABA EDUCATIONAL ART ABC BLOCK COMPANY ABC SCHOOL SUPPLY ABILITATIONS ACCESS CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC ACCESS CRED:T MA AGEMENT INC ACCESS CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC ACCESS CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC ACCESS SCHOOLS ACCU CUT ACE GLASS COMPANY, INC. ACE GLASS COMPANY, INC. ACI PLASTICS ACI PLASTICS AEA AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AETNA LIFE \u0026amp; CASUALTY AETNA LIFE \u0026amp; CASUALTY AHA PROCESS INCORPOARTED AIMEE STEPP-KUYKENDALL AIMEE STEPP-KUYKENDALL AIMEE STEPP-KUYKENDALL AIMEE WRIGHT ALAN CROWNOVER ALARMTEC SYSTEMS ALICIA YARBROUGH ALIGN ALIG ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN T- 1 266.21 9.87 27.50 423.32 1,017.91 117.00 1,060.00 155.00 100.00 159.66 337.74 115. 00 118.25 2,377.51 68.95 57.95 115. 53 209.90 209.90 115. 53 450.00 1,940.70 226.89 1,596.73 25.37 325.24 1,213.40 400.00 1,225.00 1,225.00 400.00 1,437.56 1,421.51 3,581.09 4,217.50 3,101.00 2,047.50 45.00 78. 96 45.00 22.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 CHK. NO. 89263 89034 89299 89089 89316 89000 89288 89431 88769 89107 88971 89365 89445 89180 89179 88928 88756 89110 89135 89157 88794 89302 88770 89181 88780 89372 89174 88748 89099 89127 89149 88771 89367 89432 88914 89257 89416 88984 88778 89224 89031 88742 88751 88767 89093 89105 89121 89133 89143 ACCOUNT NORTH L:~~~S ROCK SCHOO~ DISTRICT CHECK LISTI G FOR DECEMBER, 2003 AMOUNT ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIG ALIGN ALIGN ALISHA HERRING ALISHA HERRING ALL AMERICAN INC. ALLIED SUPPLY, INC. ALLIED THERAPY ALLIED THERAPY ALLIED THERAPY ALLISON CALLAHAN ALLISON CALLAHAN ALLTEL MOBILE ALPHASMART INC ALPS PUBLISHING AMANDA STUCKEY AMANDA SYMANCYK AMANDA WARE AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL AMERICAN GUIDANCE SERVICE, INC AMERICAN GUIDANCE SERVICE, INC AMERICAN MATHEMATICS AMERICAN MINORITY REPORTS AMERICAN RED CROSS AMERICAN SPEECH-LANGUAGEAMTREX INTERNATIONAL AMY VOLLMAN AMY VOLLMAN ANDREA HAIN ANDRIA SMITH ANDRIA SMITH ANGIE CHANDLER ANGIE COLCLASURE ANN KINCL ANNAN. VAMMEN ANNIE KIRKPATRICK ANTHONY CANTRELL APPLE COMPUTER INC ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE ARCHILD, INC. ARCOM SYSTEMS ARK DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL T- 2 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 97.44 113.40 2,066.84 3,683.24 2,733.75 2,096.25 450.00 75.60 60.48 402.73 410.00 56.40 45.00 41. 36 57.60 400.00 10,111.78 10,111.78 400.00 46.59 1,753.87 118.00 495.00 1,444.50 1,890.00 505.00 65.24 39.20 45.00 121.24 86.24 138.00 45.00 45.00 11. 67 56.00 95.20 351.37 4 4. 17 300.00 752.50 330.00 CHK. NO. 89152 89168 89177 89278 89344 89351 89364 89017 89435 89184 89369 88953 89270 89422 89051 89440 89191 89281 89213 88993 89038 88894 88747 89098 89126 89148 88774 89186 88977 89311 88859 88929 88862 88898 89410 89026 88973 89424 88723 88884 89073 89279 89309 89024 89381 88812 89178 88996 89366 ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR DECEMBER, 2003 AMOUNT ARKANSAS AGENCY FOR FEDERAL ARKANSAS BAG \u0026amp; EQUIPMENT CO ARKANSAS BAG \u0026amp; EQUIPMENT CO ARKANSAS CENTER FOR ARKA SAS DEMOCRAT GAZETTE ARKANSAS DEPT OF HEALTH DIV OF ARKANSAS DEPT OF HEALTH DIV OF ARKANSAS SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIA ARKANSAS STATE POLICE ARKANSAS STATE POLICE ARKANSAS STATE POLICE ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT ARNOLD - BLEVINS ELECTRIC CO. ARTIS LOFTON ASCO HARDWARE COMPANY, INC. ASCO HARDWARE COMPANY, INC. ASCO HARDWARE COMPANY, INC. ASHLEY HANAN ASHLEY-WOODSON \u0026amp; ASSOC. ASHLEY-WOODSON \u0026amp; ASSOC. ASPMA ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERVISION \u0026amp; ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERVISION \u0026amp; BANK CARD CENTER BANK OF AMERICA-FED INCOME TAX BANK OF AMERICA-FED INCOME TAX BANK OF AMERICA-FED INCOME TAX BANK OF AMERICA-FED INCOME TAX BANK OF AMERICA-PAYROLL ACCT. BANK OF AMERICA-PAYROLL ACCT. BANK OF AMERICA-PAYROLL ACCT. BANK OF AMERICA-PAYROLL ACCT. BARBARA BROWN BARBARA EVANS BARBARA GUMP BARBARA HARTWICK BARBARA LYNN MALO E BARNES AD NOBLE BARRY KINCL BASICS PLUS BASICS PLUS BASICS PLUS BECKY WITCHER BECKY WITCHER BENEFITS-NLRSD BEST WESTERN INN OF THE OZARKS BEVERLY KELSO BILL A. BOWERS BILL DUVALL T- 3 60.00 868.99 1,086.24 417.36 467.91 75.00 200.00 1,002.00 480.00 380.00 20.00 3,262.38 320.00 45.00 229.17 946.13 515.11 45.00 13,320.88 9,715.33 195.00 3,621.10 89.80 40.25 14,075.02 148,031.95 149,509.75 16,457.98 161,473.62 1,038,877.73 1,067,549.99 182,550.60 150.15 20.00 9.95 45.00 1,942.50 347.73 45.00 835.53 2,065.40 268.89 122.64 98.56 1,098,556.20 132. 02 45.00 45.00 40.38 CHK. NO. 88806 89085 89314 88966 88811 88916 89259 88779 88784 88785 89193 89176 88820 88955 88772 89182 89368 89025 88857 89393 89183 88783 89192 88810 88744 89095 89123 89145 88743 8 9094 89122 89144 88952 88930 88943 88870 89008 89194 88775 88782 89190 89373 88882 89402 89169 88 97 6 88883 88938 88788 ACCOUNT ORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOO~ c=sTR:CT CHECK LIST- G FOR DECEMBER, 2003 AMOUNT BILL LEFEAR BILL WHITTEN BILL'S LOCK \u0026amp; SAFE BILL'S LOCK \u0026amp; SAf2 BLI D AMBITIO IC BLUE HILL WRECKER SERVICE BLUE HILL WRECKER SERVICE BOBBIE J RIGGINS BOBBY ACKLIN BOILER INSPECTION DIVISION BOUND TO STAY BOUND BOOKS BRANDY YORK NESSELRODT BRANDY YORK NESSELRODT BRENDA BUTLER BRENDA CREWS BRENDA PARKER BROMLEY PARTS \u0026amp; SERVICE BROUKE REYNOLDS BROWN JANITOR SUPPLY BRYAN DEAVER BUCKEYE BUSINESS PRODUCTS INC. C \u0026amp; W TOOL REPAIR C \u0026amp; W TOOL REPAIR C.T.A. CABOT HIGH SCHOOL CALLOWAY HOUSE, INC. CAPITOL STARTER SERVICE CAROL SOULSBY CAROL THOR TO CCI OF ARKANSAS, INC. CENTAR INDUSTRIES INC CENTER POINT ENERGY ARKLA CENTER POINT ENERGY ARKLA CENTRAL STATES BUS SALES, INC. CENTRAL STATES BUS SALES, INC. CHARLES BARNWELL WELDING SER CHARLIE JONES CHARLOTTE BULL CHARLOTTE VIRDEN CHERYL BING CHERYL HALL CHILDCRAFT EDUCATION CORP CHRISTINE HICKMAN CI CI'S PIZZA CINTAS CINTAS CINTAS CLAUDIA MORAN CLEAR MOUNTAIN T- 4 95.20 13.30 39.42 19.50 5H .81 150.00 75.00 45.00 45.00 119.00 113. 63 91.28 78. 96 45.00 175.16 45.00 84.77 22.50 318.54 19.90 342.14 42.44 35.13 8,734.46 70.00 73.50 524.41 30.80 45.00 260.00 296.00 18,264.20 63.50 196. 97 25.99 640.85 45.00 45.00 19.90 95.20 45.00 1,353.52 45.00 140.01 232.08 42.68 232.88 45.00 121.43 CHK. NO. 88936 89082 88822 89383 89~09 88..,8 9 89196 88923 88877 88790 88791 89052 89441 88985 89307 89060 88793 88978 89197 89047 89090 88885 89403 89170 89203 89199 89075 89408 88933 89433 89291 89188 89322 88937 89265 89256 88934 88802 88964 89050 88910 89200 89081 89395 88754 89109 89155 89029 88960 ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR DECEMBER, 2003 AMOUNT CLEAR MOUNTAIN COBB AND SUSKIE LTD. COMCAST CABLEVISION COMPASS LEARNING INC COMPTREE, INC. CORA SMITH CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DF104423 COURTNEY MEADOR CRANFORD CONSTRUCTIO COMPANY CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION CREWS \u0026amp; ASSOCIATES, INC. CROSS COUNTRY UNIVERSITY CROW BURLINGAME CO CRYSTAL EVANS CUSTOM PRINTING CYNTHIA MELTON DAN RUSSELL DANA CHADWICK DA A CHADWICK DANA MCCOY DANA MCCOY DA AS OWDEN DANNY REED DARLE E HOLMES DARRELL MCCOY DATEK, INC. DATEK, IC. DAVID D. COOP DAVID D. COOP DAVID D. COOP DAVID MCPHERSON DAW SIMPSON DAWE CARROLL DEANN ROACH DEANE C. ICKLER DEBBIE DAVE PORT DEBBIE ROZZELL DEBBIE TATE DEBRA BUTLER DEBRA PRUSS DELTA DE TAL DEMCO DE ISE WADLEY DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINISTRAT DFA-SALES \u0026amp; USE TAX T- 5 104.13 14,062.50 51.42 50,933.88 109.27 20.00 1,516.95 3,545.99 4 35. 72 28.86 81.16 165.90 34.74 139. 38 106,999.86 298.00 259.98 102.20 837.76 45.00 219.00 220.00 34.25 111.72 77.28 45.00 45.00 467.18 194.60 1,027.92 1,203.95 1,250.29 4,112.64 1,250.29 20.00 4 4. 51 40.88 45.00 980.00 20.00 24.58 34.02 21.56 19.58 51,033.02 93.38 61.26 143,002.96 1,554.00 CHK. NO. 89271 89247 89189 88886 8 92 95 89019 88920 89260 89417 88764 89022 887 68 88758 89159 89323 89056 88921 89419 89202 88949 88968 88808 89376 89053 89442 88798 88945 88906 88800 89088 89315 88752 89106 89153 89080 88888 88965 89030 89048 89049 89233 88986 88915 89361 89349 88805 89010 8 9171 89448 ACCOU T NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOO~ D:STRICT CHECK LISTING FOR DECEMBER, 2003 AMOUNT DIAMOND INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS DIANA MATHIS DIANA MATHIS DIANE CRITES DINAH ALLEN DOMINIE PRESS INC DONALD R. WATKINS DOROTHY FARRIS DOROTHY FARRIS DOTTIE MURDAUGH DOYALENE WASSON DREW CAMP EDS SUPPLY CO. EDS SUPPLY CO. EDUCATION DEBT SERVICES INC EDUCATION DEBT SERVICES INC ELENA REYES ELGIN SCHOOL SUPPLY EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISION ETA CUISENAIRE EULETA WARE EVA ALLEN F \u0026amp; E CHECK PROTECTOR COMPANY FAMILY SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER FAMILY SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER FAWNDA WHITE FINANCIAL DATA SERVICES INC FINANCIAL DATA SERVICES INC FLEET TIRE SERVICE OF NLR, INC FLEET TIRE SERVICE OF NLR, INC FLEET TIRE SERVICE OF NLR, INC FLEXBEN CORPORATION FLEXBEN CORPORATION FLEXBEN CORPORATION FLEXBEN CORPORATION FLEXBEN CORPORATION FLEXBEN CORPORATION FLIBS FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FORTIS DI ASI FRAN JACKSON FRANK WISE FRANKLIN COVEY FURNITURE MALL GAYE LONG GE BUSINESS PRODUCTIVITY GINGER WALLACE GLOBAL DOCUGRAPHIX T- 6 881.96 328.80 328.80 45.00 75.00 715.00 45.00 91. 56 37.52 21.84 28.67 45.00 822.94 71.78 56.58 56.58 14.70 76.12 380,346.84 336.49 125.66 83.33 647.04 54.00 54.00 35.42 125.00 125.00 479.93 27 4. 96 17.14 166.58 5,081.04 2,141.60 5,318.54 2,141.60 166.58 1,650.00 102 .17 98.56 13,129.64 45.00 40.13 23.85 5 62. 41 26.32 30.52 45.00 165.27 CHK. NO. 89227 89112 89137 89084 88803 892 62 88889 88983 89426 89430 89370 89086 88809 89204 89118 89142 89319 88892 89356 8 92 64 88860 88799 88852 89115 89140 89444 89104 89132 88814 89207 89379 88750 89102 89103 89130 89131 89151 88721 88760 89161 89357 89061 89012 89212 89436 89415 88830 88948 89286 ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR DECEMBER, 2003 AMOUNT GLORIA SMITH GLOVERS TRUCK PARTS \u0026amp; EGUIP GLOVERS TRUCK PARTS \u0026amp; EGUIP GOLDEN CORRAL GOPHER GOVCONNECTION INC GRAINGER GRAINGER GREG DANIELS GREGG THOMPSON GRETCHEN LAUIPPA GRUENYS GRS INC GWEN WIGGINS HANDWRITING WITHOUT TEARS HAROLD D STARK HAROLD GWATNEY CHEVROLET CO. HAROLD GWATNEY CHEVROLET CO. HART PHYSICAL THERAPY SERVICE HART PHYSICAL THERAPY SERVICE HEINEMAN LIBRARY HELPING HAND CHILDRENS HENDERSON STATE UNIVERSITY HICKS RENTALS-SUNNY HICKS HOME DEPOT/GECF HOUSEHOLD BANK FSB HOUSEHOLD BANK FSB ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT IN DYER NEED ENTERPRISES ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS I G RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS INMAN QUEST INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP I TER AL REVE UE SERVICE I TERNAL REVENUE SERVICE JACKS THREE STAR MUFFLER SHOP JACQUELINE HAMPTON JACQUELINE SUMLER JAMES HUMPHREY JAMES KIMMER JAMES R. SMITH JAMES REED JAMES W. WOODARD, JR JAMIE EUBANKS JANET E. THOMAS P.T. JANET FOSTER T- 7 45.00 179.69 1,386.24 45.50 835.80 702.38 160.50 751.14 45.00 45.00 115.89 13. 86 166.77 132. 55 45.00 25.00 25.00 1,540.00 1,714.80 1,211.76 2,766.25 70.00 2.02 266.74 140.54 605.47 290.00 290.00 96.41 425.00 2,830.83 2,830.83 425.00 2,970.65 1,826.97 3,507.50 136.00 136.00 74.90 8.60 45.00 58.80 10.40 18.80 95.20 45.00 2,310.00 1,122.34 171.36 CHK. NO. 89083 88817 89209 89267 88816 88807 88869 89243 89068 8 90 63 89434 89210 88900 89283 89071 88765 89167 88989 89427 89015 88981 89205 89162 88876 89009 89292 89116 89141 88777 88746 89097 89125 89147 89306 88967 89273 89114 89139 88864 89062 89064 89021 89353 89059 88868 89066 89007 89245 88901 'ORTH :::..,:\n:TT:::R...OE CK SCHOO\" DIS~RICT CHECK LISTING FOR DECEMBER, 2003 ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. JANET FOSTER 123.20 89413 JANIS MASTERS 202.50 88907 JA IS MASTERS 180.00 89253 JASO 'S DEL::: 145.12 89057 JASON'S DELI 123.15 89312 JEFFERSO NATIONAL LIFE 290.58 89350 JENNY OBANNON 45.00 88992 JERRY MASSEY 133.52 88904 JODY EDRINGTO 45.00 88899 JOHN HAYNIE 126.95 88890 JOHN HAYNIE 73.51 89406 JOHN TALLEY 21.28 88911 JOH TURNER SCHOOL SUPPLIES 168.83 89304 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN 2,152.87 88759 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN 1,371.38 89117 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN 2,168.02 89160 JUST FOR KIDS THERAPY SERVICES 765.00 89035 JUST FOR KIDS THERAPY SERVICES 570.00 89300 KAREN POWELL 42.14 88931 KATHRYN HALE 153.59 89023 KATHY VANCE 71.12 88922 KATHY VANCE 4 6. 7 6 89418 KATIE BILLINGS 8.00 88997 KAYE LOWE 71. 99 88797 KAYE LOWE 8.50 89198 KEITH FAULKNER 7.24 88762 KEITH FAULKNER 112.37 89164 KELLIE SHEFFIELD 36.71 88918 KENNETH A. KIRSPEL 45.00 89069 KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN 138. 4 3 88927 KERR PAPER \u0026amp; SUPPLY CO. 266.03 89317 KESSLERS TEAM SPORTS 1,200.16 89305 KETCHER METAL PRODUCTS co. 26.72 88926 KEVA RODGERS 25.76 88987 KIDS DIRECTORY LLC 525.00 89282 KIM PEARSON 116.48 88972 KIM REYNOLDS 75.88 88801 KIM WILMOT 45.00 88982 KOOLVENT ALUM. AWNING CO. 1,460.11 88823 KREBS BROS. SUPPLY CO., INC. 105.96 88824 KROGER #639 177.92 88881 KROGER #639 400.00 8 924 6 KROGER #639 29.65 89401 KROGER COMPANY/INDIAN HILLS 21.00 88825 KROGER COMPANY/INDIAN HILLS 8.42 89214 KROGER COMPANY/PERSHING 151.35 88878 KROGER COMPANY/PERSHING 55. 72 89400 - KWIK-KOPY PRINTING 184.84 89384 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 6,762.83 88843 T- 8 ACCOUNT NORTH L:TTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR DECEMBER, 2003 AMOUNT LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS LARA HUMPHRIES LAURA JENNINGS LAURIE PRATHER LCR-M CORPORATION LCR-M CORPORATION LCR-M CORPORATION LEASE ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION LETITIA MARTIN LEWIS AND LEE DISTRIBUTING LEWIS AND LEE DISTRIBUTING LEWIS AND LEE DISTRIBUTING LIBRARY VIDEO COMPANY LIBRARY VIDEO COMPANY LINDA P. STEWART LINDA WILSON LINGUI SYSTEMS, INC. LINGU: SYSTEMS, INC. LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON CO. LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON CO. LRP PUBLICATIONS LYNN FLOYD LYNN NASH LYNN NASH MB ELECTRONICS M J COMMUNICATIONS MAE BRIGGS MAGG:E B:LLI GS MARCIA CHAPPLE-DEAN MARDEL CORPORATE OFFICE MARIE PIERCE MARISSA MYERS MARSHA MAJORS MARSHA SATTERFIELD MARTHA FEWELL MARTHA K ASTI MARTHA K ASTI MARY BETH COX MARY CAROLY 1 EAST MARY LOU FERGUSO MARY ELL BLACKWELL MARY SHUFFIELD MAURI DOUGLAS MAVIS CHERRY MCCLURE LANDSCAPING MCM MEDICAL MANAGER HEALTH SYSTEMS MEDICAL MANAGER HEALTH SYSTEMS MEDICAL MANAGER HEALTH SYSTEMS T- 9 3,539.63 45.00 61.43 92.82 342.64 291.50 120.51 1,747.97 45.00 2,240.00 864.00 838.00 375.23 98.45 11. 52 45.00 79.90 83.90 1,053.13 282.96 208.00 167.66 45.00 5.83 391.62 560.87 8.38 16.00 60.48 50.00 216.08 56.00 45.00 172.92 45.00 45.00 25.83 138.00 57.60 50.27 199.23 48.17 78.54 45.00 3,175.00 47.56 2,366.01 1,741.19 381.72 CHK. NO. 89226 89027 88773 89004 88908 89254 89414 89001 89065 88990 89284 89428 88827 89215 88902 89077 88826 89385 88834 89218 88919 88995 88887 89405 89289 89091 88939 89429 88950 88776 88872 89310 88954 88913 88836 89042 89439 88722 89074 89072 89362 88796 88828 88880 89293 88912 88893 89248 89407 ACCOUNT ORTH ~ITTLE ROCK SCHOO~ D:STRICT CHECK LISTING FOR DECEMBER, 2003 AMOUNT MELISSA A LEE MELISSA CANNON METRO FOODS MHS MICHAEL HE DERSON MICHAEL KENT MICHAEL KENT MICHELLE KEATON MITCHS TIRE SERVICE MOLLY FLOYD MOVIES 10/TANDY 10 MSS MURIELENE CAMPBELL MUSWICK COMPANY INC. N.L.R. WINTEMP SUPPLY N.L.R. WINTEMP SUPPLY NAEIR NANCY C. GREEN NANCY MARSHALL NANCY MARSHALL NANCY MARSHALL NANCY SHEEHAN NANCY STEWART NANCY STEWART NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NASCO NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY NLR WELDING SUPPLY NLRHS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB NLRSD ADMN OFFICE CHECKING NLRSD ADMN OFFICE CHECKING NLRSD TRANSPORTATION DEPT. NLRSD TRANSPORTATION DEPT. NLRSD WAREHOUSE NLRSD-BACKGROUND CHECK NO. LITTLE ROCK EDUCATORS CRED NORTH LITTLE ROCK DIESEL NORTH LITTLE ROCK POLICE \u0026amp; NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. T-10 50.00 161.09 22,091.93 59. 4 0 44.10 29.82 27.34 45.00 48.00 45.00 250.00 601.68 16. 8 6 239.37 4 62. 4 6 13. 92 195.21 45.00 45.00 183.14 158.55 20.02 201. 32 101.36 1,217.73 506.23 134.31 859.87 102.00 389.81 67.44 375.00 127.84 163.30 1,148.25 1,035.38 6,275.00 205.97 83,192.30 1,855.58 40.00 58.00 74.00 50.00 185.00 37.00 8,452.50 602.57 1,184.86 CHK. 8 92 94 88905 89412 89018 89359 89006 89346 89028 88994 89037 88917 89002 89195 88831 88833 89217 89244 88935 88829 89216 89386 88835 88944 89421 88815 89208 89380 89219 89220 89387 89221 88941 8 87 63 89165 89240 89396 89313 89175 89172 88832 89437 88725 88837 89222 89223 89277 89355 89438 89119 0. ACCOUNT ORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOO~ DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR DECEMBER, 2003 AMOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITIES NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITIES NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITIES NORTHSIDE SALES COMPANY NOVA STAGGS OCSE OCSE OCSE OCSE OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT ONE SOURCE HOME \u0026amp; BUILDING OPTUS INC OTIS SPUNKMEYER, INC PAM GLOVER PAM HANDLOSER PAM w=Lcox PAM WILCOX PATRICK LINDSEY PAUL H. BROOKES PUBLISHING CO. PAUL TAYLOR PEARSON EDUCATION PEARSON EDUCATION PEDIATRIC THERAPY SERVICES PEDIATRIC THERAPY SERVICES PERMA-BOU D PERMA-BOU D PERRY PARR PETREVIA BOARDMAN POSTAL PRIVILEGE PREMIER PRO ED QUALITY FOODS, INC. QUALITY WHOLESALE BUILDING RAMO A MCGEE RA DY SANDEFUR RA UELL BARTO REBECCA HEATHCOCK REBECCA R CARR REBECCA R CARR REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU IC REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU INC RELLIA DILLINGER RELLIA DILLINGER REMMY S. JACKSON RENAISSANCE LEARNING INC REXEL DAVIES RHONDA BA KS T-11 548.65 97. 94 34,792.54 34,522.59 149.92 45.00 2,537.41 1,630.73 1,630.73 2,562.97 1,199.14 223.61 129.58 857.02 2,399.00 21.50 630.00 45.00 668.90 127.51 71.50 114.66 711.47 308.11 1,473.75 1,076.25 20.01 1,909.17 95.20 18.40 150.00 700.00 39.60 6,900.82 1,362.63 22.40 95.20 150.15 75.92 3,694.90 2,186.88 62.61 62.61 45.00 44.28 127.84 139.00 594.71 45.00 CHK. NO. 89363 88813 89206 89378 88839 89087 88753 89108 89134 89154 88896 89249 88781 89275 89420 89345 89003 88951 89269 88861 88875 88957 89014 89296 89036 89301 88818 89211 88969 88959 88865 88956 89225 89389 88958 89039 88932 89016 89079 88970 89274 89113 89138 89076 89446 89166 89394 89377 88962 ORTH LITT~E ROCK SCHOO~ DISTR=CT CHECK LISTING FOR DECEMBER, 2003 ACCOUNT RHONDA TOLLETT RICHARD ALEXANDER RICKEY JONES RIGBY EDUCA':'ION RIGBY EDUCATION ROBIN GRAY ROBIN GRAY ROBIN TIBBS ROS IE COLEMAN ROTO-ROOTER SEWER-DRAINER ROY SPRADLIN RUSSELL CHEVROLET CO. RUSSELL CHEVROLET CO. RUSSELL CHEVROLET CO. RUSSELL CHEVROLET CO. RYAN BONA S.R. ROBERTS SADDLEBACK EDUCATIONAL, INC. SAFETY - KLEEN, INC. SAM MASCUILLI SAMS CLUB DIRECT SANDERS SUPPLY SANDRA CAMPBELL SARA GILLISON SAX ARTS \u0026amp; CRAFTS SBC SBC SBC LONG DISTANCE SBC LONG DISTANCE SBG-VAA SBG-VAA SBG-VAA SBG-VAA SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS SCHOLASTIC INC SCHOLASTIC INC SCHOOL SPECIALITY SCHOOL SPECIALITY SECURITY BENEFIT GROUP SECURITY BENEFIT GROUP SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION SHANNON OBERLAG SHARA BRAZEAR SHARA BRAZEAR SHARON BURRALL SHARON ELDRED T-12 AMOU T 31.86 95.20 45.00 306.38 4,016.77 25.08 15.68 146.84 45.00 148.45 45.00 44.92 21,300.96 104.86 30.12 56.00 987.48 179.83 296.10 14.03 33.51 81.83 45.00 99.48 160. 62 71.58 176.75 129.74 230.31 25.00 1,290.50 1,290.50 25.00 3,571.29 1,175.30 433.15 1,263.73 1,522.21 400.00 400.00 327.09 154.55 154.55 421.22 56.98 45.00 310.43 10.47 92. 4 0 CHK. NO. 89358 88895 88897 88855 89236 88980 89276 89360 88851 88844 88841 88755 88846 89156 89390 89308 89375 88786 89092 88891 88842 89040 89070 88940 89229 88787 89045 89041 89303 88749 89100 89128 89150 89297 88848 89391 88849 89230 89101 89129 88757 89111 89136 89158 89044 88947 89266 88909 89067  ., ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR DECEMBER, 2003 AMOUNT SHAWN MCCRACKEN SHAY FORTUNE SHEILA SMITH SHERRY RATLIFF SHERYLL SMITH SHIRLEY SCOTT SHIRLEY SCOTT SHRED-IT SOFTWARE MEDIUM SOUTHERN ICE EQUIPMENT SOUTHWEST SPORTING GOODS CO STANLEY HARDWARE CO. STANLEY HARDWARE CO. STANLEY HARDWARE CO. STAR BOLT \u0026amp; SCREW CO., INC. STAR BOLT \u0026amp; SCREW CO., INC. STATE BUSINESS SUPPLY STEPHANY BARNETTE STERLING PAINT STERLING PAINT STEVEN PORTER STUDIES WEEKLY INC. SUBWAY SANDWICHES SUNBURST VISUAL MEDIA SUNDANCE SUPER DUPER INC SUPER DUPER INC SUPERIOR SPRING CLUTCH \u0026amp; GEAR SUPERIOR SPRING CLUTCH \u0026amp; GEAR SUPREME FIXTURE CO. SUSAN HYDEN SUSAN HYDEN SUSAN MILLER SUSIE BALLARD-JACKSON SUZZETTE PATTERSON SYMTRAX CORPORATION SYSCO FOOD SERVICE OF ARKANSAS SYSCO FOOD SERVICE OF ARKANSAS TARGET TAYLOR DIESEL SERVICE TEACHERS VIDEO COMPANY TEACHING RESOURCE CENTER TELETOUCH THE HONEYBAKED HAM THE MCGRAW HILL COMPANIES THE MEDICINE SHOPPE THE OUTSIDER POWER CLEANING THE PARENT INSTITUTE THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CORPORATION T-13 25.70 56.28 47.60 45.00 45.00 121. 52 63.00 55.00 78.45 457.55 947.71 69.62 40.78 93.89 28.06 60.81 88.50 45.00 405.61 43.29 55.72 234.00 138.32 142.91 290.00 442.11 97.80 3,778.72 491.39 134.89 136.36 111.44 29.68 45.00 138.00 450.00 478.75 37,873.68 32.13 774.94 156.68 96. 58 97.19 309.78 27. 96 85.71 150.00 388.80 555.01 CHK. NO. 88975 89054 89011 88879 89078 89055 89443 89280 89058 89043 89231 88853 89234 89392 88854 89235 89272 89032 88856 89237 88999 89046 88961 88858 89020 88795 89374 88847 89228 89238 88821 89382 89013 88850 88724 89290 88867 89399 89239 88946 88942 89258 89185 88988 89268 88979 88974 89255 88819 ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR DECEMBER, 2003 AMOUNT THE SPORTSTOP INC. THE WHISPER GLIDE COMPANY THELMA JASPER THERAPY PROVIDERS, P.A. THERAPY PROVIDERS, P.A. TOP GUN PEST CONTROL INC TRANS AMERICAN TIRE COMPANY TROUTMAN OIL CO.,INC. TROUTMAN OIL CO.,INC. TURNER DAIRY TURNER DAIRY TWIN CITY PRINTING \u0026amp; LITHO INC TWIN CITY PRINTING \u0026amp; LITHO INC TWIN CITY PRINTING \u0026amp; LITHO INC US ABLE LIFE US ABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO US ABLE LIFE INSURANCE/CANCER U S FUEL US FUEL U.S. TOY COMPANY INC. UALR UALR UNITED ART \u0026amp; EDUCATION SUPPLY UNITED WAY OF PULASKI COUNTY UNIVERSAL CARD SERVICES CORP UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS UNUM LIFE INSURANCE OF AMERICA USCB INCORPORATED USCB INCORPORATED UTILITY BILLING SERVICES UTILITY BILLING SERVICES VALERIE TORRES VALIC - VARIABLE VALIC - VARIABLE VALIC - VARIABLE VALIC - VARIABLE VICKY ROBERTSON ANNUITY ANNUITY ANNUITY ANNUITY VIRCO MFG. CORPORATION VIRCO MFG. CORPORATION WALMART COMMUNITY BRC WALMART COMMUNITY BRC WANDA HAWKINS LIFE LIFE LIFE LIFE WARD TRANSPORTATION SERVICES  WEEKLY READER WESTERN FOODS T-14 10.69 188.65 123.07 8,898.75 7,398.75 945.00 361.51 8,168.98 8,507.32 11,774.57 1,409.95 2,485.18 246.39 89.99 3,598.00 5,254.60 13,310.20 112.24 87.94 83.40 1,649.84 824.88 163.98 1,413.92 7,038.24 90.00 610.00 612.00 70.00 3,320.56 5,094.30 109.76 109.14 6,476.32 1,525.46 97.83 575.00 29,341.29 29,396.29 575.00 148.67 110. 27 6,770.63 8 67. 08 240.50 63.30 831.05 225.25 10,095.56 CHK. NO. 89232 89033 89250 88903 89252 88840 88792 88924 89261 89318 89447 88863 89241 89397 89347 89348 89352 88963 89423 89201 88991 89285 88845 89173 89321 89242 89251 8 9411 89187 89371 89354 88761 89163 88838 89388 88874 88745 89096 89124 89146 88925 88866 89398 88998 89287 89005 88871 88873 89404 11  ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL D:STRICT CHECK LISTING FOR DECEMBER, 2003 AMOUNT WESTERN SIZZLIN WHIPPLE FAMILY LIMITED WIN-HOLT EQUIPMENT GROUP WINSTON TURNER CHECK TOTALS FOR DECEMBER, 2003 T-15 186.80 124,458.00 249.28 45.00 CHK. NO. 89425 89324 89298 88804 5,549,694.46 RECEIVED FEB1 2004 OFFIOCFE DESEGREGMAOTNIOITNO RING BOARD OF EDUCATION NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:00 P.M. MEETING AGENDA NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT. OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT AGENDA 4:45 P.M. - Poplar Street Middle School Robotics Team Demonstration REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION Administration Building, 2700 Poplar Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS I. CALL TO ORDER, Teresa Burl, President II. INVOCATION, Danielle Jackson, NLRHS East Campus Sophomore, daughter of Louis and Chantel Ford III. FLAG SALUTE IV. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Teresa Burl, President Marty Moore, Vice President Trent Cox, Secretary Rochelle Redus, Parliamentarian Charles Hoskyn, Member Mable Mitchell, Member John Riley, Member V. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS A. Superintendent's Honor Roll - S. Brazear 1. North Little Rock School District Nurses B. Partners in Education - S. Brazear l. Duke Energy and Lynch Drive Elementary 2. US Bank and the Business Leadership Academy at North Little Rock High School Page 2 - Board Agenda January 15, 2004 C. Special Recognition - S. Brazear 1. North Little Rock High School West Campus PTA VI. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETINGS A. Thursday, January 15, 2004 5:00 P.M. (Regular) - Page A- I B. Thursday, January 22, 2004 5:00 P.M. (Special) - Page A - 5 C. Thursday, February 11, 2004 5:30 P.M. (Special)- Page A- 8 VII. ACTION ITEMS - UNFINISHED BUSINESS None VIII. ACTION ITEMS - NEW BUSINESS A. Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report B. Classified Personnel Policies Committee Report C. Consider Updated Board Administration Policies (First Reading) - J. Smith D. Consider Updated Board School, Home and Community Relations Policies (First Reading) - J. Smith E. Consider Date Revision of March 2004 Board Meeting - J. Smith (Date Change Due to Spring Break- Possibly to March 11, 2004) F. Consider Motion for Consent Agenda- J. Smith 1. Consider monthly financial report - Page O - 1 2. Consider employment of personnel - Page P - 1 3. Consider payment of regular bills - Page T - 1 IX. ADJOURNMENT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES January 15, 2004 The North Little Rock School District Board met in regular session on Thursday, January 15, 2004 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. Lorene Joshua, N.A.A.C.P president, thanked the Board for spreading the word about the speech tournament and reported it was a great success. President Teresa Burl called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. Ketron Howard, a Lynch Drive Elementary fifth grader, gave the invocation. The flag salute followed. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Teresa Burl, President Marty Moore, Vice-President Trent Cox, Secretary Rochelle Redus, Parliamentarian Charles Hoskyn, Member Mable Mitchell, Member John Riley, Member Absent None Others Present James Smith, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation\nDonald Watkins, Assistant Superintendent for Business Services\nrepresentatives from the Personnel Policies Committees, PT A and press\nseveral other staff members\nand Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall (audio) and Jim Billings (video) taped the meeting. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS Shara Brazear, Communication Specialist, presented two new well-deserving members to the Superintendent's Honor Roll. They were Liz Thompson, Speech Pathologist and Karen Baker, Special Education Teacher from Pike View Elementary. Both were given certificates and thanked for a job well done. Mrs. Brazear also presented North Little Rock Athletic Club and the North Little Rock School District as new Partners in Education. A-1 Rick Kron, Meadow Park Elementary Teacher, presented North Little Rock High School West Campus Teachers, Monica Ball and Cecelia Jarry, as new recipients of their National Board Certification. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES MOTION Rochelle Redus moved to accept the minutes of the December 18, 2003 (Regular) Board meeting as printed. Charles Hoskyn seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None UNFINISHED BUSINESS The Updated Board Governance and Operation Policies were presented by Mr. Smith for a second and final reading. MOTION Marty Moore moved to accept the Board Governance and Operations Policies as printed. Rochelle Redus seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None NEW BUSINESS Certified Personnel Policies Report Chairman Rick Kron presented the report. One proposal presented was to add the following wording to Policy CCDA (National Board Certification) as follows: \"Adjustments shall be done upon receipt by the personnel office by December 31, of paperwork or computer notice of completion. If not received by the above date, the additional certification will be recognized on the following year's contract.\" MOTION Marty Moore moved to accept the proposal as presented. Rochelle Redus seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None Classified Personnel Policies Report Chairman Frank Wise presented their report. There were no proposals. A-2 Consent Agenda Mr. Smith presented the consent agenda as printed. MOTION Trent Cox moved to accept the consent agenda as printed. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: MOTION Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None Trent Cox moved to enter into Executive Session to discuss an employee matter. Rochelle Redus seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None The Board went into executive session at 5:30 p.m. The Board reconvened at 6:05 p.m. MOTION Rochelle Redus moved to accept Superintendent James Smith's offer to remain as interim Superintendent if a replacement has not been hired before his retirement date of June 30, 2004. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None A discussion ensued concerning the process to select a new Superintendent. Bobby Lester, a representative of the McPherson, \u0026amp; Jacobson, L.L.C, an Executive Recruiting Firm presented a proposal that his consulting firm handle the search for a new Superintendent. He answered questions from the Board and discussed the fee for this search at approximately $18,000 plus expenses. MOTION Charles Hoskyn moved to schedule a Special Board meeting for Thursday, January 22, 2004 at 5:00 p.m. Mable Mitchell seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None A-3 ADJOURNMENT Trent Cox moved to adjourn the meeting. Rochelle Redus seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Iloskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None Chairman Burl declared the meeting adjourned at 6:52 p.m. Teresa Burl, President Trent Cox, Secretary A-4 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent SPECIAL MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES January 22, 2004 The North Little Rock School District Board met in a special session on Thursday, January 22, 2004 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. President Teresa Burl called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Teresa Burl, President Marty Moore, Vice President Trent Cox, Secretary Rochelle Redus, Parliamentarian Charles Hoskyn, Member Mable Mitchell, Member John Riley, Member Absent None Others Present James Smith, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation\nDonald Watkins, Assistant Superintendent for Business Services\nDanny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel\nseveral staff members\nthe press and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall taped (audio) the meeting. MOTION Trent Cox moved that the North Little Rock School Board move forward in its own search to hire and fill the position of Superintendent immediately. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, and Riley Hoskyn, Mitchell, and Redus A-5 MOTION Trent Cox moved that the North Little Rock School District post the attached job - advertisement in the Arkansas School Board Association and the Arkansas Administrator Educators Association newsletters at their next publication and to start accepting job applications immediately with the understanding that the North Little Rock School Board may identify and pursue qualified candidates. Marty Moore seconded the motion. Amendment John Riley moved to have the job posting also listed on the school district's website. Charles Hoskyn seconded the motion. Vote on the Amendment YEAS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley NAYS: None Vote on the Motion YEAS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley NAYS: None MOTION Marty Moore moved to designate Teresa Burl as the gatekeeper and that all applications are directed to the Office of the Superintendent. Rochelle Redus seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None Rochelle Redus exited the meeting at 5:50 p.m. MOTION Charles Hoskyn moved that each Board member forward to the Superintendent's office a ranked priority list of their top five characteristics for a new Superintendent. John Riley seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: MOTION Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, and Riley None (Redus absent) Charles Hoskyn moved that no Board member solicit any applications. John Riley seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: MOTION Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, and Riley None (Redus absent) Charles moved that the Board enter into Executive Session to discuss possible candidates. Trent Cox seconded the motion. A-6 The Board entered into Executive Session at 6:20 p.m. - The Board reconvened in Open Session at 6:55 p.m. MOTION Charles Hoskyn moved that the Board not offer any invitations to any candidates and the Board will wait on applications. John Riley seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, and Riley None (Redus absent) ADJOURNMENT MOTION Trent Cox moved to adjourn the meeting. Mable Mitchell seconded the motion. President Burl declared the meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m. Teresa Burl, President Trent Cox, Secretary A-7 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent SPECIAL MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES February 11, 2004 The North Little Rock School District Board met in a special session on Wednesday, February 11, 2004 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. President Teresa Burl called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Teresa Burl, President Marty Moore, Vice President Trent Cox, Secretary Rochelle Redus, Parliamentarian Charles Hoskyn, Member Mable Mitchell, Member John Riley, Member Absent None Others Present James Smith, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation\nseveral staff members\nthe press and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall taped (audio) the meeting. MOTION Marty Moore moved to consider employment applications and possible interviews. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None The Board entered into Executive Session at 5:33 p.m. A- 8 Rochelle Redus exited the Executive Session and the meeting at 6:12 p.m. The Board reconvened at 6:45 p.m. MOTION Trent Cox moved that the Board set up interviews for only two of the three applicants. The two to be interviewed are Mr. Bobby Acklin and Dr. Tom Kimbrell. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, and Riley None (Redus absent) ADJOURNMENT MOTION Charles Hoskyn moved to adjourn the meeting. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, IIoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, and Riley None (Redus absent) President Burl declared the meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m. Teresa Burl, President Trent Cox, Secretary A-9 Y-T-D SUMMAROYF FUNDS FUND 1-SALARY FUND 2-0PERATING FUND 4-DEBT SERVICE (FUNDS 1 + 2 + 4) FUND 3-BUILDING FUND 5-CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 6-FEDERAL FUND 8-FOOD SERVICE TOTAL ALL FUNDS MONTHLYSU MMAROYF FUNDS - Fund I-Salary Fund 2-0perating FUnd 4 Debt Service FUnd 3-Building Fund 5-Capital Outlay FUnd 6-Federal Fund 8-Food Service TOTAL MONTHLYF UNDS NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FINANCIAL REPORT JANUARY, 2004 BEGINNING Y-T-D BALANCE REVENUE .00 15,586,099.46 2,892,475.81 16,962,708.32 1,597,982.00 .00 4,490,457.81 32,548,807.78 5,253,624.00 31,234.56 975,029.15 918,066.50 1,192,522.35 3,252,066.42 22,796.77 1,551,752.98 11,934,430.08 38,301,928.24 MONTH REVENUE 2,723,756.25 651,102.37 .00 3,100.00 12,146.16 471,944.45 306,884.15 4,168,933.38 0 - 1 Y-T-D CURRENT EXPENDITURES BALANCE 15,686,937.72 100,838.26CR 12,813,229.57 7,041,954.56 476,315.94 1,121,666.06 28,976,483.23 8,062,782.36 229,714.84 5,055,143.72 1,381,877.33 511,218.32 2,988,437.60 1,456,151.17 1,714,783.78 140,234.03CR 35,291,296.78 14,945,061.54 MONTH REVENUE EXPENDITURES OVER/UNDER EXPENSE 2,723,741.55 14.70 2,045,825.12 1,394,722. 75CR .00 .00 .00 3,100.00 221,192.56 209,046.40CR 552,827.17 80,882. 72CR 232,250.40 74,633.75 5,775,836.80 l,606,903.42CR REVENUE FUND 1 SALARY FUND Transfer Fund FUND 2 OPERATING FUND LOCAL REVENUE Current Taxes Pullback Delinquent Taxes Land Redemption Interest Soft Drink Sales Spec Ed Preschool Local Misc Local TOTAL LOCAL REVENUE STATE REVENUE State Equalization Aid State Incentive Funding Pathwise Mentoring Sp Ed Supv/ESY/Res/Cat Special Ed Preschool K-1 Proverty Aid ABC Preschool Smart Start Literacy M-to-M Program Magnet/M-to-M Trans General Facility Fund Debt Service Funding Deseg-Teach Retire/Insu Miscellaneous State TOTAL STATE REVENUE TRANSFERS TOTAL OPERATING FUND FUND 4 DEBT SERVICE Transfers TOTAL REVENUE FUNDS 1, 2, 4 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FINANCIAL REPORT JANUARY, 2004 BUDGETED COLLECTED REVENUE THiS MONTH 32,975,000.00 2,723,756.25 12,200,000.00 .00 5,475,000.00 .00 1,400,000.00 159,143.55 160,000.00 6,995.91 175,000.00 24,149.48 100,000.00 7,646.58 400,000.00 .00 229,068.00 2,893.00 20,139,068.00 200,828.52 28,075,080.00 2,552,280.00 1,156,301.00 .00 .00 .00 212,792.00 77,782.00 542,449.00 542,449.00 225,269.00 .00 469,956.00 .00 64,850.00 .00 2,650,000.00 .00 750,000.00 .00 179,079.00 .00 249,690.00 .00 1,350,000.00 .00 175,466.00 .00 36,100,932.00 3,172,511.00 34, 5.70, 000. OOCR 2,722,237.15CR 21,670,000.00 651,102.37 1,.675,000.00 .00 56,320,000.00 3,374,858.62 0 - 2 COLLECTED BUDGET % COLLECTED TO DATE BALANCE TO DATE 15,586,099.46 17,388,900.54 47.26% 11,467,777.87 732,222.13 93. 99% .00 5,475,000.00 .00% 2,323,309.03 923,309. 03CR 165.95% 87,651.55 72,348.45 54.78% 117,152.67 57,847.33 66. 94% 46,267.64 53,732.36 46.26% .00 400,000.00 .00% 50,171.17 178,896.83 21. 90% 14,092,329.93 6,046,738.07 69.97% 15,313,680.00 12,761,400.00 54. 54% .00 1,156,301.00 .00% .00 .00 .00% - 83,892.00 128,900.00 39.42% 542,449.00 .00 100.00% 112,632.00 112,637.00 4 9. 99% 169,489.00 300,467.00 36.06% 64,850.00 .00 100.00% 1,036,112.00 1,613,888.00 39.09% 263,000.00 487,000.00 35.06% 89,539.00 89,540.00 49.99% 124,844.00 124,846.00 49.99% 562,303.15 787,696.85 41.65% 91,111.89 84,354.11 51. 92% 18,453,902.04 17,647,029.96 51.11% 15,583,523 .. 65CR 18,986,476.35CR .00% 16,962,708.32 4,707,291.68 78.27% .00 1,675,000.00 .00% 32,548,807.78 23,771,192.22 57. 79% - REVENUE (CONTINUED) FUND 3 BUILDING FUND Interest Other TOTAL BUILDING FUND FUND 5 CAPITAL OUTLAY Current Taxes Pullback Delinquent Taxes Other TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 6 FEDERAL REVENUE ROTC TITLE IV-B 21st Century TITLE I TITLE V-B Charter Schoo Reading Excellance Vocational earl Perkins - TITLE VI-B, PL 94-142 Special Ed Pre-School Medicaid TITLE II-A Improve Teac TITLE I-Accountability Miscellaneous Federal TOTAL FEDERAL REVENUE FUND 8 FOOD SERVICE Sales Federal Reimbursement Other TOTAL FOOD SERVICE TOTAL REVENUE NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FINANCIAL REPORf JANUARY, 2004 BUDGETED COLLECTED REVENUE THIS MONTH 22,800.00 .00 37,200.00 3,100.00 60,000.00 3,100.00 780,000.00 .00 550,000.00 .00 110,000.00 12,146.16 10,000.00 .00 1,450,000.00 12,146.16 100,000.00 9,259.90 731,299.00 182,777.00 2,434,220.00 .00 150,000.00 .00 377,974.00 .00 194,378.00 16,204.00 1,577,791.00 .00 479,435.00 239,717.50 305,000.00 23,986.05 642,789.00 . 00 9,000.00 . 00 10,000.00 . 00 7,011,886.00 471,944.45 870,000.00 85,191.61 2,050,000.00 188,828.11 80,000.00 32,864.43 3,000,000.00 306,884.15 67,841,886.00 4,168,933.38 0 - 3 COLLECTED BUDGET % COLLECTED TO DATE BALANCE TO DATE 9,534.56 13,265.44 41.81% 21,700.00 15,500.00 58.33% 31,234.56 28,765.44 52.05% 740,761.56 39,238.44 94.96% .00 550,000.00 .00% 177,304.94 67,304.94CR 161.18% .00 10,000.00 .00% 918,066.50 531,933.50 63. 31% 52,352.42 47,647.58 52.35% 657,412.00 73,887.00 89. 89% 549,980.00 1,884,240.00 22. 59% 150,000.00 .00 100.00% 409,800.00 31,826.00CR 108.42% 116,196.20 78,181.80 59. 77% 788,895.00 788,896.00 49. 99% 239,717.50 239,717 .so 50.00% 77,966.30 227,033.70 25.56% 200,747.00 442,042.00 31.23% 9,000.00 .00 100.00% .00 10,000.00 .00% 3,252,066.42 3,759,819.58 46.37% 504,206.14 365,793.86 57.95% 993,435.60 1,056,564.40 4 8. 4 6% 54,111.24 25,888.76 67.63% 1,551,752.98 1,448,247.02 51. 72% 38,301,928.24 29,539,957.76 56.45% EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION FUND 1 SALARY FUND Regular Programs Special Education Workforce Education Compensation Education Other Instruct Program Student Support Instruct Staff Support General Admin Support School Admin Support Business Support Maintenance \u0026amp; Operation Transportation Central Office Other Support TOTAL SALARY FUND 2 OPERATING FUND Regular Programs Special Education Workforce Education Compensation Education Other Instruct Program Student Support Instruct Staff Support General Admin Support School Admin Support Business Support Maintenance \u0026amp; Operation Transportation Central O.ffice Other Support TOTAL OPERATING FUND FUND 4 DEBT SERVICE FUND Other Support TOTAL DEBT SERVICE TOTAL FUND 1, 2, 4 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FINANCIAL REPORT JANUARY, 2004 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH 16,608,519.00 1,473,681.45 4,868,940.00 402,912.63 1,640,057.00 122,304.16 101,859.00 .00 1,143,910.00 100,432.27 2,531,292.00 216,503.51 1,653,677.00 131,694.59 316,585.00 26,928.97 2,631,652.00 212,693.08 81,017.00 6,767.50 81,060.00 6,771.05 68,050.00 5,417.61 210,835.00 17,634.73 .00 .00 31,937,453.00 2,723,741.55 5,044,334.00 368,343.42 1,986,396.00 130,561.36 491,752.00 32,493.33 63,340.00 2,749.66 731,404.00 48,330.86 2,703,332.00 182,796.50 1,924,093.00 89,637.19 247,221.00 23,652.57 1,514,154.00 128,435.88 447,236.00 60,386.25 5,609,526.00 541,494.08 3,446,599.00 297,405.96 739,298.00 53,209.46 1,515,436.00 86,328.60 26,464,121.00 2,045,825.12 1,657,760.00 .00 1,657,760.00 .00 60,059,334.00 4,769,566.67 0 - 4 EXPENDITURES BUDGET % Of' TO DATE BALANCE BUDGET 8,145,771.88 8,462,747.12 4 9. 04% 2,240,308.51 2,628,631.49 46. 01% 740,272.87 899,784.13 45.13% .00 101,859.00 .00% 575,456.89 568,453.11 50.30% 1,276,217.44 1,255,074.56 so. 41% 838,844.04 814,832.96 so. 72% 200,755.73 115,829.27 63. 41% 1,406,367.42 1,225,284.58 53.44% 50,075.16 30,941.84 61.80% 49,987.83 31,072.17 61.66% 36,367.18 31,682.82 53.44% 125,487.77 85,347.23 59.51% 1,025.00 1,025.00CR .00% 15,686,937.72 16,250,515.28 4 9 .11% - 2,316,856.16 2,727,477.84 45.92% 782,458.80 1,203,937.20 39. 39% 212,406.85 279,345.15 4 3. 19% 14,657.94 48,682.06 23.14% 242,073.30 489,330.70 33. 09% 1,007,058.88 1,696,273.12 37.25% 610,939.74 1,313,153.26 31. 75% 170,207.38 77,013.62 68.84% 797,556.29 716,597. 11 52. 67% 896,326.35 449,090.35CR 200.41% 3,136,529.02 2,472,996.98 55. 91% 1,741,485.51 1,705,113.49 50.52% 440,857.44 298,440.56 59.63% 443,815.91 1,071,620.09 29.28% 12,813,229.57 13,650,891.43 48.41% 476,315.94 1,181,444.06 28.73% 476,315.94 1,181,444.06 28.73% 28,976,483.23 31,082,850.77 48 .24% - EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION FUND 6 FEDERAL FUNDS Regular Programs Special Education. Workforce Education Compensation Education Other Instruct Program Student Support Instruct Staff Support General Admin Support School Admin Support Business Support Maintenance \u0026amp; Operation Transportation Central Office Support Other Support TOTAL FEDERAL FUNDS FUND 3 FUND 5 FUND BUILDING FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY FOOD SERVICE ALL FUND, FUNCTION TOTALS REGULAR PROGRAMS SPECIAL EDUCATION WORKFORCED UCATION COMPENSATIONE DUCATION OTHER INSTRUCTINAL ED STUDENT SUPPORT INSTUCT STAFF SUPPORT GENERAL ADMIN SUPPORT SCHOOL ADMIN SUPPORT BUSINESS SUPPORT MAINTENANCE\u0026amp; OPERATION TRANSPORTATION CENTRAL OFFICE OTHER SUPPORT ALL FUNDS TOTAL EXPENDITURES NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FINANCIAL REPORT JANUARY, 2004 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES 636,862.00 1,164,895.00 179,195.00 2,116,983.00 872,123.00 1,423,384.00 1,611,556.00 80,602.00 2,000.00 .00 .00 127,316.00 102,850.00 125,012.00 8,442,778.00 288,141.00 2,242,413.00 2,959,606.00 22,302,468.00 8,020,231.00 2,311,004.00 2,284,845.00 2,747,977.00 6,658,008.00 5,189,326.00 644,408.00 4,147,806.00 528,253.00 6,613,047.00 3,641,965.00 1,634,074.00 7,268,860.00 73,992,272.00 EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH 0 - 5 29,833.78 79,087.08 3,304.22 137,280.76 63,440.46 97,863.33 53,119.76 5,586.99 .00 .00 .00 717. 59 79,729.67 2,863.53 552,827.17 .00 221,192.56 232,250.40 1,871,858.65 612,561.07 158,101.71 140,030.42 212,203.59 497,163.34 274,451.54 56,168.53 341,128.96 115,693.69 642,472.10 303,541.16 196,978.41 353,483.63 5,775,836.80 EXPENDITURES TO DATE 269,869.02 441,553.97 63,175.46 750,642.04 316,616.00 552,389.41 454,853.14 39,173.58 .00 .00 .00 1,481.44 89,043.57 9,639.97 2,988,437.60 229,714.84 1,381,877.33 1,714,783.78 10,732,497.06 3,464,321.28 1,015,855.18 765,299.98 1,134,146.19 2,835,665.73 1,904,636.92 410,136.69 2,203,923.71 1,080,377.01 3,799,145.20 1,779,334.13 1,021,262.66 3,144,695.04 35,291,296.78 BUDGET BALANCE 366,992.98 723,341.03 116,\"019.54 1,366,340.96 555,507.00 870,994.59 1,156,702.86 41,428.42 2,000.00 .00 .00 125,834.56 13,806.43 115,372.03 5,454,340.40 58,426.16 860,535.67 1,244,822.22 11,569,970.94 4,555,909.72 1,295,148.82 1,519,545.02 1,613,830.81 3,822,342.27 3,284,689.08 234,271.31 1,943,882.29 % OF BUDGET 42. 37% 37.90% 35.25% 35.45% 36.30% 38.80% 28.22% 48.60% .00% .00% .00% 1.16% 86.57% 7. 71% 35.39% 7 9. 72% 61. 62% 57.93% 48.12% 43.19% 43.95% 33.49% 41. 27% 42. 59% 36.70% 63.64% 53 .13% 552,124.0lCR 204.51% 2,813,901.80 1,862,630.87 612,811.34 4,124,164.96 38,700,975.22 57. 4 4 % 48.85% 62.49% 43.26% 47.69% EXPENDITURES BY OBJECT FUND 1 TEACHERS SALARY .UND Salaries Fringe Benefits Other TOTAL TEACHER SALARY FUND 2 OPERATING FUND Salaries Fringe Benefits Purchased Services Supplies Capital Outlay Other TOTAL OPERATING FUND FUND 4 DEBT SERVICE ...., Principal Interest Fees TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 3 BUILDING FUND Purchased Services Supplies Capital Outlay Other TOTAL BUILDING .UNO FUND 5: CAPITAL OUTLAY Purchased Services Supplies Capital Outlay Other TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FINANCIAL REPORT JANUARY, 2004 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES AMOUNT THIS MONTH 29,629,199.00 2,541,080.81 2,308,254.00 182,660.74 .00 .00 31,937,453.00 2,723,741.55 9,856,263.00 853,951.22 9,513,312.00 788,984.68 3,712,359.00 193,773.46 2,982,767.00 200,013.06 322,461.00 5,752.93 76,959.00 3,349.77 26,464,121.00 2,045,825.12 635,360.00 .00 997,500.00 .00 24,900.00 .00 1,657,760.00 .00 70,283.00 .00 62,256.00 .00 155,602.00 .00 .00 .00 288,141.00 .00 962,008.00 71,665.40 520,314.00 33,071.45 541,991.00 102,962.87 218,100.00 13,492.84 2,242,413.00 221,192.56 0 - 6 EXPENDITURES BUDGET % OF TO DATE BALANCE BUDGET 14,726,265.78 14,902,933.22 49.70% 960,671.94 1,347,582.06 41. 61% .00 .00 .00% 15,686,937.72 16,250,515.28 49.11% 4,939,995.07 4,916,267.93 50.12% 4,803,048.34 4,710,263.66 50.48% 1,096,026.10 2,616,332.90 29.52% 1,660,693.24 1,322,073.76 55. 67% 140,439.84 182,021.16 43. 55% 173,026.98 96,067.98CR 224.83% 12,813,229.57 13,650,891.43 48.41% 2,182.19 633,177.81 .34% 474,133.75 523,366.25 47. 53% - .00 24,900.00 .00% 476,315.94 1,181,444.06 28 .. 73% 57,766.87 12,516.13 82.19% 63,328.71 1,072. 71CR 101. 72% 108,619.26 46,982.74 69.80% .00 .00 .00% 229,714.84 58,426.16 79.72% 377,344.70 584,663.30 39.22% 280,509.34 239,804.66 53. 91% 523,662.73 18,328.27 96. 61% 200,360.56 17,739.44 91. g6% 1,381,877.33 860,535.67 61. 62% Terri Baker Angela Guinn Karen McMurray Courtney Meador Laura McDowell Deborah Cline Rebecca Darnell Julie Denton Jessica Ganus Robin Lee NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT North Little Rock, Arkansas Board Agenda - February I 9, 2004 CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS Poplar Street Middle School, Special Education Effective 1/22/04 Poplar Street Middle School, 6th Grade Language Arts Effective 1/10/04 Poplar Street Middle School, 6th Grade Science Effective 1/13/04 Lakewood Middle/Poplar Street Middle, Vocal Music Effective 1/21/04 CERTIFIED PERSONNEL CHANGES AND TRANSFERS From Lakewood Middle School, Health/PE To Lakewood Middle School, Health/PE/Coaching Effective 1/20/04 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL Boone Park Elementary, Fourth Grade Effective 8/13/03, Category I, Step 0, 187 days Boone Park Elementary, Math Cooperating Teacher Effective 1/8/04, Category 1, Step 0, 187 days Ridgeroad Middle Charter School, Special Education Effective 1/30/04, Category, I, Step 5, 187 days Lakewood Middle/Poplar Street Middle, Vocal Music Effective 1/30/04, Category I, Step 0, 187 days Belwood Elementary, Fifth Grade Effective 8/13/03, Category IV, Step 1, 187 days P-1 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - February 19, 2004 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: CERTIFICATION: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: CERTIFICATION: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: CERTIFICATION: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: .EDUCATION: CERTIFICATION: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: Deborah Cline Boone Park Elementary, 4th Grade BSE- UALR, Little Rock, AR 7/03 Early Childhood P-4 Boone Park Elementary, North Little Rock, AR 1/03 - 7/03 Mavis Cherry, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services Rebecca Darnell Boone Park Elementary, Math Cooperating Teacher - Grant Position BSE-Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR 12/03 Early Childhood P-4 Valley View Elementary, Jonesboro, AR 8/03 - 12/03 Mavis Cherry, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services Julie Denton Ridgeorad Middle Charter School, Special Education BSE- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 1/71 Special Education Access Schools, Little Rock, AR 7/98 - 7/99 Glendale Unified School District, Glendale, CA 8/96 - 6/98 Tobinworld School, Glendale, CA 8/95 - 6/96 Arkansas Pediatric Facility, North Little Rock, AR 1994-95 Winston Turner, Principal Martha Kay Asti, Director of Special Services Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services Jessica Ganus Lakewood Middle/Poplar Street Middle, Vocal Music BA - Harding University, Searcy, AR 12/03 Middle School Math, Vocal Music K-12 Ahlf Jr. High, Searcy, AR 9/03 - 12/03 Dr. Ginger Wallace, Principal, Lakewood Middle School Bill Bowers, Principal, Poplar Street Middle School Lynn Nash, Supervisor for Middle Level Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services P-2 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - February 19, 2004 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: CERTIFICATION: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: Terri Brown J. W. Burkes Robert Burnett Patrice Dunn Norman Gill Saneicia Hall Lamonica Lewis Shelia Mayweather Mary McCullough Mose Randall Robin Lee Belwood Elementary, Fifth Grade BSE- University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 5/01 MSE- University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 5/02 Early Childhood Education P-4\nMiddle Childhood Language Arts, Social Studies, Science and Math 4-8 Helena-West Helena School District, 8/02 -5/03 Cynthia Melton, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS Food Service Department, Food Service Assistant Effective 12/19/03 Boone Park Elementary, Custodian Effective 2/19/04 Transportation Department, Custodian Effective 12/29/03 NLRHS West Campus, Food Service Assistant Effective 1/20/04 Plant Services Department, Custodian Effective 12/1/03 NLRHS West Campus, Custodian Effective 1/8/04 Boone Park Elementary, Lunch Aide Effective 1/5/04 Lynch Drive Elementary, Teacher's Aide/Pre-School Effective 1/22/04 Glenview Elementary, Lunch Aide Effective 2/3/04 Argenta Academy, Custodian Effective 2/13/04 P-3 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda- February 19, 2004 CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS CONTINUED Teronica Snell David Tate Benji Belton Gloria Clarks Angela Dandridge Jerry Dowdy Eldra Land Bill Ed White Robbi Williamson Linda Roseberry LaQuania Janell Saine Boone Park Elementary, Lunch Aide Effective 1/30/04 Plant Services, Maintenance Custodian Effective 11/14/03 NEW CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL Transportation Department, Bus Driver Effective 1/20/04, Category 507, Step 51, 186 days Transportation Department, Bus Driver Effective 2/05/04, Category 507, Step 85, 190 days Transportation Department, Bus Aide Effective 1/20/04 Administration Annex, Computer Technician Effective 1/30/04 Lynch Drive Elementary, Teacher's Aide/Pre-School Effective 2/11/04 Transportation Department, Bus Driver Effective 1/20/04 Argenta Academy, Teacher's Aide/Special Education Effective 1/21/04 CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND CHANGES From Plant Services, Substitute Custodian To Ridgeroad Middle Charter School, Night Lead Custodian From Plant Services, Substitute Custodian To Pike View Elementary, Custodian P-4 ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JANUARY, 2004 AMOUNT *VOID* *VOID* A PLUS BAKERY A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES A'TEST CONSULTANTS INC A'TEST CONSULTANTS INC AAA AUDIO METRICS/MEDICAL AAEA AAEA AAMSCO AASBO ABC SCHOOL SUPPLY ABC SUPPLY CO. INC. ABERNATHY COMPANY ABILITATIONS ACCESS CREDIT MANAGEMENTIN C ACCESS CREDIT MANAGEMENTIN C ACCESS CREDIT MANAGEMENTIN C ACCESS CREDIT MANAGEMENTIN C ACE GLASS COMPANY, INC. ADE JOB FAIR ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. AEA AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AHA PROCESS INCORPOARTED AHA PROCESS INCORPOARTED AHA PROCESS INCORPOARTED AIMEE STEPP-KUYKENDALL AIMEE WRIGHT AIMEE WRIGHT ALARMCO INCORPORATED ALICIA YARBROUGH ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN T- 1 .00 .00 30.53 304.37 724.23 368.00 155.00 4,088.21 159.66 310.00 383.85 115. 00 172. 45 785.98 430.83 319.53 115.53 115. 53 116.58 117. 83 315.27 150.00 1,142.86 1,142.86 1,213.40 400.00 1,325.00 400.00 1,325.00 8,200.00 9,873.93 2,835.00 1,939.50 45.00 44.35 959.63 22.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 CHK. NO. 88700 88900 89910 89764 89928 89896 90043 89810 89614 89774 89771 89650 89652 89519 89520 89870 89329 89633 89952 90019 89775 90044 89477 89686 89971 89341 89605 89646 89937 89553 89739 89897 89865 89547 89890 89542 89567 89325 89335 89449 89599 89612 89618 89629 89640 89649 89727 89773 8 9883 ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JANUARY, 2004 AMOUNT ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALL AMERICAN INC. ALL AMERICAN INC. ALL-STORAGE PRODUCTS ALLIED THERAPY ALLTEL MOBILE ALPHASMART INC AMANDA STUCKEY AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL AMERICAN GUIDANCE SERVICE, INC AMERICAN GUIDANCE SERVICE, INC ANDREA HAIN ANGELA GUINN ANGIE COLCLASURE ANN KINCL ANNAN. VAMMEN ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE ARCHILD, INC. ARCOM SYSTEMS ARKANSAS AGENCY FOR FEDERAL ARKANSAS AIR FRAGRANCE CO ARKANSAS ART CENTER ARKANSAS ASSOCIATION OF ARKANSAS BUSINESS ARKANSAS CENTER FOR WOMENS ARKANSAS CENTER FOR WOMENS ARKANSAS COUNCIL OF TEACHERS ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ARKANSAS DEPT. OF EDUCATION ARKANSAS LAMINATION PRODUCTS ARKANSAS MAILING SYSTEM ARKANSAS STATE BOARD OF ARKANSAS STATE POLICE ARKANSAS STATE POLICE ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT ARTIS LOFTON ASCO HARDWARE COMPANY, INC. T- 2 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2,598.12 475.64 327.00 2,055.00 365.74 369.00 45.00 400.00 10,286.78 400.00 10,211.78 241.50 70.66 45.00 19.40 45.00 45.00 20.64 561.55 724. 00 324.73 47. 92 562.50 617.98 154.00 257.10 725. 00 130.00 625.00 209.90 209.90 10.00 25.00 6,667.71 1 71. 92 368.24 75.00 220.00 264.00 3,037.38 45.00 115. 82 CHK. NO. 89901 89931 89946 89962 89965 89974 90057 89654 89777 90020 89877 89659 89888 89550 89340 89604 89645 89936 89452 89655 89562 90070 89506 89588 89887 89470 89673 89793 89986 89651 8 9736 89464 90010 89704 89453 89878 89767 90026 89500 89799 89778 90008 8 9783 8 9795 89660 89661 89973 89537 89653 ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JANUARY, 2004 AMOUNT ASCO HARDWARE COMPANY, INC. ASCO HARDWARE COMPANY, INC. ASHLEY HANAN ASHLEY-WOODSON \u0026amp; ASSOC. ASHLEY-WOODSON \u0026amp; ASSOC. ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERVISION \u0026amp; ATC COMPUTER SERVICES INC ATC COMPUTER SERVICES INC B \u0026amp; D RADIATOR SERVICE BACKGROUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS BAM INSTITUTIONAL SALES BAM INSTITUTIONAL SALES BANK CARD CENTER BANK OF AMERICA-FED INCOME TAX BANK OF AMERICA-FED INCOME TAX BANK OF AMERICA-FED INCOME TAX BANK OF AMERICA-FED INCOME TAX BANK OF AMERICA-FED INCOME TAX BANK OF AMERICA-PAYROLL ACCT. BANK OF AMERICA-PAYROLL ACCT. BANK OF AMERICA-PAYROLL ACCT. BANK OF AMERICA-PAYROLL ACCT. BANK OF AMERICA-PAYROLL ACCT. BARBARA EVANS BARBARA HARTWICK BARBARA LYNN MALONE BARNES AND NOBLE BARRY KINCL BASICS PLUS BASICS PLUS BASICS PLUS BENCHMARK EDUCATION COMPANY BENEFITS-NLRSD BEVERLY KELSO BILL A. BOWERS BILL DUVALL BILL'S LOCK \u0026amp; SAFE BLAINECO STRUCTURAL MOVERS BLUE HILL WRECKER SERVICE BLUE HILL WRECKER SERVICE BOB CALLAHAN SERVICES BOBBIE J RIGGINS BOBBY ACKLIN BOILER INSPECTION DIVISION BRENDA BUTLER BRENDA LEE BRENDA PARKER BROMLEY PARTS \u0026amp; SERVICE BROMLEY PARTS \u0026amp; SERVICE T- 3 39.95 54.88 45.00 4,645.55 5,307.90 189.00 755.96 377.98 145.75 315.00 501.35 3,197.14 56.60 11,299.51 148,648.03 11,209.87 153,265.28 16,727.17 137,265.63 1,031,536.15 132,680.42 1,053,551.10 181,963.05 20.00 45.00 1,995.00 96 .17 45.00 587.43 999.45 54.50 1,468.50 1,144,735.61 45.00 45.00 54.18 33.64 1,000.00 150.00 150.00 14,275.98 45.00 45.00 68.00 45.00 22.08 45.00 84.77 157.06 CHK. NO. 89776 89975 89561 89703 89835 89779 89523 90021 89867 89916 89558 89748 894 68 89337 89601 89642 89933 89964 89336 89600 89641 89932 89963 89724 89499 89899 89457 89454 89456 89658 89979 89884 89966 89505 89526 89459 89807 89720 89781 89981 89873 89518 89501 89782 89548 89575 89577 89663 89784 ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JANUARY, 2004 AMOUNT BROUKE REYNOLDS BROWN JANITOR SUPPLY BROWN JANITOR SUPPLY BYE WAY BOOKS INC C.T.A. CAMBRIDGE EDUCATIONAL CAPITOL STARTER SERVICE CARLTON-BATES CO. CARLTON-BATES CO. CAROL BUTTS CAROL THORNTON CARRIER MIDSOUTH CCI OF ARKANSAS, INC. CDW GOVERNMENT, INC CENTAR INDUSTRIES INC CENTER FOR MOURNING SLOT 669 CENTER POINT ENERGY ARKLA CENTERPOINT QUIZ BOWL CENTRAL ARKANSAS PEDIATRIC CENTRAL STATES BUS SALES, INC. CHARLIE JONES CHARLOTTE BULL CHEMSEARCH CHERYL HALL CHILDCRAFT EDUCATION CORP CHRISTINE HICKMAN CHROMATE INDUSTRIAL CORP. CINTAS CINTAS CINTAS CINTAS CLASSROOM DIRECT CLASSROOM DIRECT CLAUDIA MORAN CLAUDIA MORAN CLEAR MOUNTAIN CLEAR MOUNTAIN CLEAR MOUNTAIN COCA-COLA USA, A DIVISION OF COCA-COLA/DR PEPPER BOTTLING COLUMBIA BUSINESS SYSTEMS COMMUNICATION PLUS+ COMMUNICATION PLUS+ COMMUNICATION PLUS+ CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRI COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL CORA SMITH CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS T- 4 22.50 1,993.89 795.69 338.00 8,714.36 129.49 373.04 12.05 150.25 531.00 45.00 1,916.62 292.50 1,920.16 170.00 1,320.00 40,440.22 45.00 13,195.00 328.19 45.00 45.00 269.97 45.00 158.37 45.00 786.26 232.88 42.68 232.88 232.88 444.37 352.41 45.00 50.00 214.91 338.32 19.87 31,166.28 135. 00 266.67 2,896.88 656.25 525.00 1,597.49 33.22 20.00 711. 60 3,641.49 CHK. NO. 89544 8 9785 89982 89921 89967 89528 90053 89665 89786 90015 89522 89598 89555 89922 89744 90052 89657 89902 89735 89726 89524 89462 89843 89515 89666 89593 89759 89328 89616 89632 89950 89543 89732 89565 89905 89729 89880 90025 89805 89858 90054 89716 89859 90011 89800 90003 89559 89517 89722 ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JANUARY, 2004 AMOUNT CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS COURTNEY MEADOR CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION CUMMINS MID SOUTH INC CUMMINS MID SOUTH INC CUSTOM PRINTING CYNTHIA MELTON DAN RUSSELL DANA CHADWICK DANA CHADWICK DANA CHADWICK DANA CHADWICK DANA SNOWDEN DANNY REED DATAMAX OF ARKANSAS DATEK, INC. DAVID D. COOP DAVID D. COOP DAVID D. COOP DAVID D. COOP DAVID MCPHERSON DAWSON EDUCATION COOPERATIVE DEANN ROACH DEANNE C. ICKLER DEBBIE DAVENPORT DEBRA BUTLER DEBRA PRUSS DELTA DENTAL DEMCO DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINISTRAT DFA-SALES \u0026amp; USE TAX DIAMOND INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS DIAMOND INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS DIANA MATHIS DIANA MATHIS DIANE CRITES DISCOUNT DICTIONARIES DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY DISCOUNT TROPHIES, INC. DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION DIVERSIFIED ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO DONALD R. WATKINS DREW CAMP EARLY LITERACY CONFERENCE EDS SUPPLY CO. EDS SUPPLY CO. EDS SUPPLY CO. EDS SUPPLY CO. T- 5 564.79 179.02 19.58 24.71 19.59 73.76 87.85 45.00 45.00 45.00 242.14 44.48 429.62 45.00 45.00 48,539.94 69.26 1,250.29 3,548.00 1,250.29 1,250.29 20.00 692. 42 45.00 1,569.17 20.00 17. 64 9.79 50,825.92 441.11 147,611.65 2,771.00 8.03 174.47 328.80 328.80 45.00 89.28 194.55 63.98 30.48 37.30 45.00 45.00 2,455.00 795.57 113. 68 372.50 424.70 CHK. NO. 89866 90016 90068 89954 89728 90024 89668 89533 89541 89465 89669 89790 90058 89461 89529 89945 89763 89326 89613 89630 89947 89592 89857 89566 89758 89573 89721 90078 90065 89788 89968 90055 89696 89823 8 9620 90031 8 9595 89747 8 9871 8 9791 8994 9 89680 89509 89596 90004 8 9467 89670 89792 89944 ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JANUARY, 2004 AMOUNT EDUCATION DEBT SERVICES INC EDUCATION DEBT SERVICES INC EDUCATION OPPORTUNITY CENTER EDUCATORS BOOK DEPOSITORY OF EL LATINO ELGIN SCHOOL SUPPLY EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISION ETA CUISENAIRE FAMILY SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER FAMILY SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER FINANCIAL DATA SERVICES INC FINANCIAL DATA SERVICES INC FLEET TIRE SERVICE OF NLR, INC FLEET TIRE SERVICE OF NLR, INC FLEXBEN CORPORATION FLEXBEN CORPORATION FLEXBEN CORPORATION FLEXBEN CORPORATION FLEXBEN CORPORATION FLEXBEN CORPORATION FLINN SCIENTIFIC COMPANY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FOLLETT LIBRARY RESOURCES FOLLETT LIBRARY RESOURCES FORTIS DI ASI FRAN JACKSON FRANCES MALONE FRANK FLETCHER DODGE FRANKLIN COVEY GALE GROUP GARETH STEVENS PUBLISHING GE BUSINESS PRODUCTIVITY GEORGIA WILLIAMS GINGER WALLACE GLOBAL DOCUGRAPHIX GLORIA SMITH GOLDEN CORRAL GOLDEN CORRAL GOODMAN MIDWEST GPN GRAINGER GRAINGER GRAINGER GREENSGROOMER WORLD WIDE INC GREG DANIELS GREGG THOMPSON HARDING UNIVERSITY T- 6 56.58 56.58 19,200.00 840.84 26.00 91. 51 377,900.72 492.31 54.00 54.00 125.00 125.00 311. 92 532.77 166.58 5,306.04 2,141.60 166.58 5,306.04 2,349.93 168.10 95.66 84.79 96. 75 324.31 920.62 13,129.64 45.00 171.48 1,497.11 48.45 680.00 155.00 3.05 282.32 45.00 1,946.82 45.00 201. 50 372 .14 68.65 3,837.18 270.86 75.67 60.33 3,512.07 45.00 45.00 100.00 CHK. NO. 89626 90047 89772 89671 89898 89853 90073 89725 89623 90037 89610 89942 89676 89797 89343 89608 8 9609 89648 89940 89941 89977 89332 89636 89956 89675 89796 90074 8 9578 89560 89761 89472 89824 89753 89476 89617 89531 89551 89594 89532 89875 89803 89527 89498 89844 90005 89991 89584 89579 90040 ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JANUARY, 2004 AMOUNT HARDING UNIVERSITY HAROLD D STARK HAROLD GWATNEY CHEVROLET CO. HAROLD GWATNEY CHEVROLET CO. HAROLD GWATNEY CHEVROLET CO. HASLER INC HEALTH ADVANTAGE/HMO HELPING HAND CHILDRENS HELPING HAND CHILDRENS HENRY SCHEIN INC HERAL ENTERPRISES, INC. HIGHSMITH INC HOME DEPOT/GECF HOME DEPOT/GECF HOUGHTON-MIFFLIN CO. HOUSEHOLD BANK FSB HOUSEHOLD BANK FSB HOUSEHOLD BANK FSB HUGH DANIELS TRUCKING ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT IN DYER NEED ENTERPRISES ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERSTATE MUSIC SUPPLY IOWA PAINT MANUFACTURING IOWA PAINT MANUFACTURING IOWA PAINT MANUFACTURING J LS BRUSHES JACK T CARTER COMPANY JACQUELINE SUMLER JAMES KIMMER JAMES W. WOODARD, JR JAMIE EUBANKS JAMIE EUBANKS JANET E. THOMAS P.T. JANET GROSSMAN JANET RODGERS JEFFERSON NATIONAL LIFE JENNY OBANNON JERRY MASSEY T- 7 600.00 45.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 196.23 36.62 3,893.75 2,292.50 602.66 95.25 52.90 274.14 51. 36 7 68. 93 140.55 194.57 172. 97 250.00 290.00 290.00 192.83 425.00 2,843.33 425.00 2,843.33 2,105.15 16,989.25 1,254.62 115,362.22 136.00 136.00 225.03 644.92 814.39 109.42 507.50 872.40 45.00 1. 89 45.00 2,065.00 1,050.00 1,020.84 180.00 474.28 290.58 45.00 153.59 CHK. NO. 90041 89587 89334 89639 89961 89734 89556 89733 89886 90050 89677 89678 89710 8984 9 89679 89557 89746 89900 89713 89624 90042 89976 89339 89603 89644 89935 89540 89731 89882 90029 89622 90036 89804 89569 89754 89907 89920 89806 89580 90069 89582 8 9745 90045 89709 89755 90059 90066 8954 9 89514 ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JANUARY, 2004 AMOUNT JERRY MASSEY JODY EDRINGTON JOHN HAYNIE JOHN HENSLEY JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN JUST FOR KIDS THERAPY SERVICES K \u0026amp; E OUTDOOR POWER EQUIPMENT KAREN MCMURRAY KAREN POWELL KATHY ARMAN KAYE LOWE KEITH FAULKNER KENNETH A. KIRSPEL KERR PAPER \u0026amp; SUPPLY CO. KERRY EVANS KIDS DIRECTORY LLC KIM WILMOT KITTLES GARAGE INC. KONE INC KREBS BROS. SUPPLY CO., INC. KROGER #639 KROGER COMPANY/INDIAN HILLS KROGER COMPANY/PERSHING LAB SAFETY SUPPLY LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS LARA HUMPHRIES LAURA JENNINGS LCR-M CORPORATION LCR-M CORPORATION LEANN NANNEN LEASE ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION LEES SCHOOL OF COSMETOLOGY LEGO DACTA-PITSCO LLC LETITIA MARTIN LEWIS AND LEE DISTRIBUTING LEWIS AND LEE DISTRIBUTING LIBRARY VIDEO COMPANY LINDA WILSON LINDSEY'S BARBECUE LINGUI SYSTEMS, INC. LITERACY EMPOWERMENT LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON CO. LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON CO. LIVING ARTS FOR STUDENTS LOVING GUIDANCE T- 8 48.72 45.00 45.00 1,936.00 2,281.24 1,371.38 2,101.07 2,030.67 735.00 659.51 68.56 43.43 4.16 45.00 51.77 45.00 310.28 52.20 525.00 45.00 232.82 1,900.50 1,393.90 157.21 89.79 88.24 714.75 77.18 743.24 45.00 42.73 127.83 138. 36 53.62 1,747.97 11,425.00 515 .13 45.00 1,505.60 300.00 442.56 45.00 117.56 41. 95 130. 00 102.26 55.39 65.00 46.80 CHK. NO. 89862 89513 89510 89715 89331 89625 89635 89955 89912 89927 90075 89521 90060 89460 89958 89585 89765 90077 89889 89546 89808 89850 89682 90009 89683 89502 89474 89695 89820 89563 89450 89719 89863 89538 89740 90038 89473 89581 89892 90039 89809 89590 89684 89990 89909 89688 89812 8 9879 89574 ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JANUARY, 2004 AMOUNT LULA TURNER LYNN NASH MB ELECTRONICS M LOU ROSS MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTIONS MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTIONS MAGGIE BILLINGS MARSHA MAJORS MARSHA SATTERFIELD MARSHA SATTERFIELD MARTHA FEWELL MARTHA K ASTI MARTHA NORTON MARY NELL BLACKWELL MARY WALKER MAVIS CHERRY MEDICAL MANAGER HEALTH SYSTEMS MICHELLE KEATON MIDDLE SCHOOL CONSULTING INC MITCH CRUNKLETON MOLLY FLOYD MONICA TALBERT MR DICTIONARY/BOOKS TOO MSS N.L.R. WINTEMP SUPPLY N.L.R. WINTEMP SUPPLY N.L.R. WINTEMP SUPPLY NAEIR NANCY C. GREEN NANCY MARSHALL NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NASCO NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY NCS PEARSON NEA REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEWLINE PRODUCTS NLR WELDING SUPPLY NLRHS WEST CAMPUS NLRSD ADMN OFFICE CHECKING NLRSD TRANSPORTATION DEPT. NLRSD WAREHOUSE NLRSD-BACKGROUND CHECK NO. LITTLE ROCK EDUCATORS CRED NO. LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON CO. NORTH LITTLE ROCK CHAMBER OF NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER T- 9 1,344.00 45.00 62.29 11. 50 20.27 169.84 8.00 45.00 83.78 98.80 45.00 45.00 3,885.00 415.56 7.70 45.00 5,019.91 45.00 35.00 121.97 45.00 1,062.00 356.64 1,725.41 781.58 326.26 486.69 112. 62 45.00 45.00 1,468.17 799.58 1,739.89 125.82 2,646.91 85.00 2,995.19 93.73 950.00 104.26 1,150.01 3,975.00 312.81 83,625.80 10,444.30 550.00 160.12 157.21 99.00 CHK. NO. 90049 89508 89742 90076 89466 89984 89894 89536 89516 89864 89480 89572 89756 90079 89545 89504 89854 89564 89918 89891 89570 90046 897 60 89741 89478 89687 89811 89845 89525 89475 89798 89988 89479 89992 89743 90048 89904 89993 89815 89959 89839 89925 89972 89969 89481 89813 89611 89768 89943 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JANUARY, 2004 ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER 150.00 89994 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST 9,058.06 90072 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. 919.04 89576 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. 285.56 89628 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. 1,079.89 90080 NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITIES 62.34 89471 NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITIES 539.34 89674 NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITIES 59,548.23 89794 NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITIES 745.44 89987 NOVA STAGGS 45.00 89597 OCSE 2,364.92 89327 OCSE 1,630.73 89615 OCSE 2,492.08 89631 OCSE 2,576.25 89948 OCSE 1,630.73 89980 OFFICE DEPOT 333.70 89511 OFFICE DEPOT 88.52 .89714 OFFICE DEPOT 23.88 89856 ONE SOURCE HOME \u0026amp; BUILDING 151.80 89978 PAM GLOVER 10.75 90061 PAM HANDLOSER 647.50 89554 PAM WILCOX 45.00 89535 - PAULA MCCARTHER 6,465.00 89711 PBS 89.64 89860 PC ASSISTANCE 215.00 89751 PEARSON EDUCATION 237.05 89750 PEDIATRIC THERAPY SERVICES 1,012.50 89913 PERMA-BOUND 1,821.29 89802 PERMA-BOUND 1,034.69 89989 PITNEY BOWES 142.77 89691 PITNEY BOWES CREDI~ CORP. 143.63 89787 PLANK ROAD PUBLISHING 195.00 89872 POSTAL PRIVILEGE 67.97 89706 POSTAL PRIVILEGE 73.67 89842 PRO ED 64.90 89484 PRO ED 42.90 89692 PRO ED 800.80 89995 PROGESSIVE PHYSICAL THEARAPY 109.46 89638 PROGESSIVE PHYSICAL THEARAPY 108.88 89960 PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 759.36 89752 PULASKI COUNTY JUVENILE 6,475.00 89851 PULASKI COUNTY TREASURER 6,114.99 89770 RAINEY ELECTRONICS 117. 54 89818 READING A-Z 180.00 89924 REFRIGERATION \u0026amp; ELECTRIC 677.66 89694 REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU INC 62.61 89621 REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU INC 62.61 90033 - RELLIA DILLINGER 45.00 89589 RENAISSANCE LEARNING INC 532.41 89836 T-10 ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JANUARY, 2004 AMOUNT RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION REXEL DAVIES REXEL DAVIES REXEL DAVIES REYNOLDS RUBBER STAMP CO., INC RHONDA BANKS RICKEY JONES RIGBY EDUCATION RIVENDELL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH RIVER CITY JANITORIAL ROBBI S CHAMBERS ROSEWOOD TEACHER PUBLICATIONS ROSIE COLEMAN ROTO ROOTER PLUMBING \u0026amp; DRAIN ROY SPRADLIN ROYAL BUSINESS MACHINES RUSSELL CHEVROLET CO. SAFETY - KLEEN, INC. SAFETY - KLEEN, INC. SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC SAMS CLUB DIRECT SAMS CLUB DIRECT SAMS CLUB DIRECT SAMS CLUB DIRECT SANDERS SUPPLY SANDRA CAMPBELL SANDRA CAMPBELL SARA GILLISON SAX ARTS \u0026amp; CRAFTS SBC SBG-VAA SBG-VAA SBG-VAA SBG-VAA SCANTRON CORPORATION SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS SCHOLASTIC INC SCHOLASTIC INC SCHOLASTIC INC SCHOLASTIC INC SCHOLASTIC MAGAZINES SCHOOL BUS EXHAUST \u0026amp; SUPPLY CO SCHOOL BUS EXHAUST \u0026amp; SUPPLY CO SCHOOL SELF-INSURANCE PROGRAM SCHOOL SPECIALITY SCHOOL SPECIALITY SCHOOL SPECIALITY SCHOOL SPECIALITY T-11 56.80 153.77 167.93 513.68 22.35 45.00 45.00 11,255.91 495.00 469.16 531. 00 187.90 45.00 864.90 45.00 196.19 102.88 116.06 302.00 146.48 158.57 418.74 295.37 401.31 600.00 26.06 45.00 113.80 531. 00 62.69 71. 58 25.00 1,290.50 25.00 1,290.50 2,412.51 303.88 105.01 2,296.58 910.01 279.00 182.25 192.46 4 41. 67 85,497.00 2,538.63 52.27 2,771.08 29.93 CHK. NO. 89816 8 9469 89672 89985 89821 89539 89512 89702 90013 90030 90032 89914 89492 89822 89485 89487 8 9951 89766 89930 89458 89780 89486 89693 89817 89996 89571 89586 89926 90022 89827 89662 89342 89606 89647 89938 89819 89906 89489 89698 89826 89998 89999 89700 89830 89664 89490 89699 89828 90000 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JANUARY, 2004 - ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. SOE 825.00 90034 SECURITY BENEFIT GROUP 541. 66 89607 SECURITY BENEFIT GROUP 541.66 89939 SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION 226.10 89330 SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION 154.55 89619 SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION 221. 43 89634 SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION 229.64 89953 SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION 154.55 90023 SHARA BRAZEAR 45.00 89530 SHARI BROWN 540.00 90017 SHARON ELDRED 105.64 89583 SHEILA MAYWEATHER 100.68 90062 SHERRY RATLIFF 45.00 89503 SHERYLL SMITH 45.00 89591 SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP 271. 26 89801 SKATE CONNECTION 300.00 90014 SKILLPATH SEMINARS 298.00 -89718 SOCIAL STUDIES SCHOOL SERVICE 354.88 89493 SOCIAL STUDIES SCHOOL SERVICE 83.47 89829 SOUTHERN ICE EQUIPMENT 27.75 89915 SOUTHWEST SPORTING GOODS co 59.47 89701 SOUTHWEST SPORTING GOODS co 4.31 90001 - STAGE STEP 360.05 90028 STAGEWORKS INC 49,402.54 89681 STANLEY HARDWARE CO. 62.37 89494 STANLEY HARDWARE CO. 264.81 89831 STANLEY HARDWARE CO. 28.92 90002 STAR BOLT \u0026amp; SCREW CO., INC. 39.68 89832 STATE BUSINESS SUPPLY 442.49 89881 STECK-VAUGHN COMPANY 207.84 89834 STEPHANY BARNETTE 45.00 89568 STEPHEN COBB PA 117. 83 89627 STEPHEN COBB PA 117. 83 90051 STERLING BOOKS CONNECTION 422.06 89762 STERLING PAINT 108.15 89495 STERLING PAINT 357.83 89833 SUMMIT LEARNING 1,738.25 89712 SUPERIOR SPRING CLUTCH \u0026amp; GEAR 333.02 89697 SUPERIOR SPRING CLUTCH \u0026amp; GEAR 114. 60 89825 SUPERIOR SPRING CLUTCH \u0026amp; GEAR 354.39 89997 SUSAN CHAPMAN 300.00 89757 SUSAN COLLIE 7.70 89483 SUSAN MILLER 16.83 89749 SUSIE BALLARD-JACKSON 45.00 89491 SYSCO FOOD SERVICE OF ARKANSAS 1,759.00 89497  SYSCO FOOD SERVICE OF ARKANSAS 841.59 89707 TARGET 56.41 89837 - TASSI INC 200.00 90035 TEACHER'S DISCOVERY 94.45 89507 T-12 ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JANUARY, 2004 AMOUNT TEACHER'S DISCOVERY TEACHERS VIDEO COMPANY TEACHERS' DISCOUNT TELE TOUCH THE COLLEGE BOARD THE MCGRAW HILL COMPANIES THE MCGRAW HILL COMPANIES THE TIMES THE TIMES THE TREE HOUSE, INC. THERAPY PROVIDERS, P.A. THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR TIRES FOR LESS TIRES FOR LESS TOP GUN PEST CONTROL INC TRI-STATES VIDEO SYSTEMS TROUTMAN OIL CO.,INC. TROUTMAN OIL CO.,INC. TROUTMAN OIL CO.,INC. TURNER DAIRY TWIN CITY PRINTING \u0026amp; LITHO INC TWIN CITY PRINTING \u0026amp; LITHO INC US ABLE LIFE US ABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO US ABLE LIFE INSURANCE/CANCER US FUEL US FUEL US MAP \u0026amp; BOOK CO US POSTAL SERVICE(AMS-TMS) UALR UALR SPEECH \u0026amp; HEARING CLINIC UC REGENTS-CASHIER'S OFFICE UNITED ART \u0026amp; EDUCATION SUPPLY UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL UNITED WAY OF PULASKI COUNTY UNIVERSAL CARD SERVICES CORP UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT UNUM LIFE INSURANCE OF AMERICA USCB INCORPORATED USCB INCORPORATED USCB INCORPORATED UTILITY BILLING SERVICES UTILITY BILLING SERVICES UTILITY BILLING SERVICES VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE VARSITY SPIRIT FASHIONS T-13 67.12 133.98 204.82 107.83 325.00 119. 78 664.90 136.00 57.00 105.00 8,347.50 53.54 14.47 14.47 945.00 425.43 7,526.80 1,008.53 1,084.02 11,067.37 61. 06 30.00 3,598.00 5,253.40 13,293.00 406.40 175.58 99.55 3,700.00 824.88 240.00 43.35 254.07 2,500.00 1,413.92 927.08 1,143.75 5,094.30 109.76 65.67 108.39 5,290.84 532.30 440.45 575.00 30,672.95 575.00 30,772.95 743.94 CHK. NO. 89852 89874 89919 89451 89667 89534 89876 89496 89838 89737 89861 89855 89789 89983 89690 89840 89723 89868 90018 89929 89705 89841 90063 90064 90067 89730 90027 89869 89685 89893 90012 89917 89488 89847 89970 89885 89717 90071 89333 89637 89957 89482 89689 89814 89338 89602 89643 89934 90006 ACCOUNT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JANUARY, 2004 AMOUNT VERONICA DAVIS --WALMAR7 COMMUNITY BRC WALMART COMMUNITY BRC WALMART COMMUNITY BRC WARD TRANSPORTATION SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENTO F ARKANSAS WASTE MANAGEMENTO F ARKANSAS WEEKLY READER WILLIAMS WINCHESTER WINDFALL WINSTON TURNER WOLVERINE SPORTS XEROX CORPORATION ZARTIC INC CHECK TOTALS FOR JANUARY, 2004 T-14 490.34 1,090.30 878.96 2,233.19 191.07 4,826.78 5,228.17 74.60 214.75 242.50 45.00 259.78 10,884.84 1,533.36 CHK. NO. 89903 8 955\"2 89738 89895 90007 89455 89656 89846 89923 89911 89463 89708 89848 89908 5,761,299.26 BOARD oF EDUCATION NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Thursday, March 11, 2004 5:00 P.M. MEETING AGENDA NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT AGENDA REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION Administration Building, 2700 Poplar Thursday, March 11, 2004 5:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS I. CALL TO ORDER, Teresa Burl, President II. INVOCATION, Kyle Shadid, NLRHS West Campus Senior, III. FLAG SALUTE IV. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Teresa Burl, President Marty Moore, Vice President Trent Cox, Secretary Rochelle Redus, Parliamentarian Charles Hoskyn, Member Mable Mitchell, Member John Riley, Member son of Brenda and Steve Shadid V. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS A Superintendent's Honor Roll - S. Brazear 1. Roy Spradlin - Coordinator of Technology 2. Betty Martin - Intervention Aide at Pike View Elementary - Page 2 - Board Agenda March 11, 2004 VI. DISPOSITION OF MI UTES OF PRIOR MEETINGS A. Monday, February 16, 2004 4:45 P.M. (Special)- Page A- 1 B. Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:00 P.M. (Regular)- Page A- 3 C. Tuesday, February 24, 2004 7:00 P.M. (Special) - Page A - 7 D. Monday, March l, 2004 6:30 P.M. (Special) - Page A-10 VII. ACTION ITEMS - UNFINISHED BUSINESS None VIII. ACTION ITEMS - NEW BUSINESS A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report Classified Personnel Policies Committee Report Consider 2002 - 2003 School Year Audit- D. Watkins Consider Proposed 2004 - 2005 School Calendar - J. Smith - Page B - 1 Consider Board Personnel Policy CAK Revision - J. Smith - Page C- l, Consider Updated Board Administration Policies (Second Reading) - J. Smith Consider Updated Board School, Home and Community Relations Policies (Second Reading) - J. Smith Consider Elementary and Secondary Summer School - J. Smith - Page D-1 Consider Motion for Consent Agenda - J. Smith I. Consider monthly financial report - Page O - 1 2. Consider employment of personnel - Page P - 1 3. Consider bid items - Page R - 1 4. Consider payment of regular bills - Page T - l IX. CALENDAR OF EVENTS Page 3 - Board Agenda March 11, 2004 1. Staff Development Day - Friday, March 12, 2004 2. Spring Break- Monday, March 15, 2004 through Friday, March 20, 2004 3. Board Meeting (Regular) -Thursday, April 15, 2004 - 5:00 p.m. X. EXECUTIVE SESSION XI. ADJOURNMENT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent SPECIAL MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES February 16, 2004 The North Little Rock School District Board met in a special session on Monday, February 16, 2004 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. President Teresa Burl called the meeting to order at 4:45 p.m. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Teresa Burl, President Marty Moore, Vice President Trent Cox, Secretary Rochelle Redus, Parliamentarian Mable Mitchell, Member John Riley, Member Absent Charles Hoskyn, Member Others Present Bobby Acklin, Assistant. Superintendent for Desegregation\nthe press and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall taped (audio) the meeting. MOTION Trent Cox moved that the Board enter in to Executive Session for Employment Interview for New Superintendent. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None (Hoskyn-absent) The Board went into Executive Session at 4:46 p.m. A-1 Rochelle Redus exited the meeting at 6: 12 p.m. The Board reconvened in Open Session at 7: 12 p.m. ADJOURNMENT MOTION John Riley moved to adjourn the meeting. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, and Riley None (Hoskyn and Redus-absent) President Burl declared the meeting adjourned at 7:12 p.m. Teresa Burl, President Trent Cox, Secretary A-2 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES February 19, 2004 The North Little Rock School District Board met in regular session on Thursday, February 19, 2004 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. Robert Lee, N.A.A.C.P. representative, reminded the Board that the community wanted to be more involved. President Teresa Burl called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. MOTION Trent Cox moved to amend the agenda to add two Executive Sessions. John Riley seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, and Riley None (Redus - absent) Danielle Jackson, an East Campus Sophomore, gave the invocation. The flag salute followed. - ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Teresa Burl, President Marty Moore, Vice-President Trent Cox, Secretary Charles Hoskyn, Member Mable Mitchell, Member John Riley, Member Absent Rochelle Redus, Parliamentarian Others Present James Smith, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation\nDonald Watkins, Assistant Superintendent for Business Services\nrepresentatives from the Personnel Policies Committees, PT A and press\nseveral other staff members\nand Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall (audio) taped the meeting. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS Shara Brazear, Communication Specialist, presented new members to the Superintendent's Honor Roll. The District's nurses were introduced first. They were all nominated for their professionalism and efforts to meet the State Standards for completing the body mass index measuring all District students. Marty Moore and John Riley presented all seven nurses with a certificate. A - 3 As a surprise, Mrs. Brazear introduced Board member Mable Mitchell as a new member also. Three principals nominated her for helping obtain new playground equipment for their - schools. Teresa Burl presented her with a certificate. Mrs. Brazear presented new Partners in Education: 1. Duke Energy and Lynch Drive Elementary - Charles Hoskyn presented them with certificates. 2. U.S. Bank and The Business Leadership Academy at NLRHS West - Trent Cox presented certificates to both. Also recognized was the Parent Teacher Association (PTA) from NLRHS West Campus for being named as an Outstanding Chapter at the National level. John Riley presented a certificate and introduced all of the officers of the PT A at our NLRHS West Campus. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES MOTION Trent Cox moved to accept the minutes of the January 15, 2004 (Regular) Board meeting, January 22, 2004 (Special) Board meeting and the February 11, 2004 (Special) as printed. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, and Riley None (Redus - absent) UNFINISHED BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS Certified Personnel Policies Report Chairman Rick Kron presented the report. There were no proposals Classified Personnel Policies Report Chairman Frank Wise pres\nnted their report. There were no proposals. Updated Board Administration Policies and Updated Board School, Home, and Community Relations Policies Mr. Smith requested the Board accept these two sections of policies for a first reading. He requested if any questions to contact him. MOTION Marty Moore moved to accept both sections of the updated Board policies as a first reading. Mable Mitchell seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, and Riley None (Redus - absent) A-4 March Board Meeting Date Revision Due to the normal Board meeting date of the third Thursday of the month which is during Spring break, Mr. Smith suggested changing the date of the Regular March Board meeting to Thursday, March 11, 2004 at 5:00 p.m. MOTION John Riley moved to change the March Board meeting to March 11, 2004. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, and Riley None (Redus - absent) Consent Agenda Mr. Smith presented the consent agenda with an additional late bid. The late bid was for two trucks for Food Service. MOTION John Riley moved to accept the consent agenda as presented. Mable Mitchell seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: MOTION Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, and Riley None (Redus - absent) Marty Moore moved to enter into an Executive Session to discuss potential candidate interviews for the position of Superintendent. Mable Mitchell seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, and Riley None (Redus - absent) The Board went into executive session at 5:50 p.m. The Board reconvened at 6:42 p.m. MOTION Trent Cox moved to offer an interview to Dr. Kieth Williams for the position of Superintendent. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: MOTION Burl, Cox, Iloskyn, Mitchell, Moore, and Riley None (Redus - absent) John Riley moved to enter into an Executive Session to interview Dr. Tom Kimbrell for the position of Superintendent. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Iloskyn, Mitchell, Moore, and Riley None (Redus - absent) A-5 The Board went into executive session again at 6:44 p.m. The Board reconvened in open session at 10:35 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Mable Mitchell moved to adjourn the meeting. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, IIoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, and Riley None (Redus - absent) Chairman Burl declared the meeting adjourned at 10:36 p.m. Teresa Burl, President Trent Cox, Secretary A-6 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent SPECIAL MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES February 24, 2004 The North Little Rock School District Board met in a special session on Tuesday, February 24, 2004 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. President Teresa Burl called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Teresa Burl, President Marty Moore, Vice President Trent Cox, Secretary Rochelle Redus, Parliamentarian Charles Hoskyn, Member Mable Mitchell, Member John Riley, Member Absent None Others Present James Smith, Superintendent, Dr. Kieth Williams, staff members, the press, and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall taped (audio) the meeting. NEW BUSINESS Mr. Dan Russell, Athletic Director, presented changes to be made in the Spirit Groups Handbook. Changes included the squad organizations, in the demerit system and excused absences. MOTION Charles Hoskyn moved to accept the proposed squad organization portion as proposed with changing the Varsity maximum numbers to 24 girls and 6 boys. Rochelle Redus seconded the motion. A-7 AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION John Riley moved to change the Varsity maximum numbers to 16 girls and 4 boys. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: Cox, Moore, and Riley NAYS: Burl, Hoskyn, Mitchell, and Redus Vote on original motion: YEAS: Burl, Hoskyn, and Redus NAYS: Cox, Moore, Mitchell and Riley MOTION John Riley moved to accept the Squad Organization Section as presented. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: MOTION Burl, Cox, Moore, and Riley Hoskyn, Mitchell and Redus Charles Hoskyn moved to accept the changes in the Demerit System and Excused Absences as presented. Trent Cox seconded the motion. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION Marty Moore moved to change the word \"will\" to \"could\" in the sentence in the Demerit System that reads \"Insubordination to a spirit group coach will result in removal from squad.\" John Riley seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None Vote on original motion. YEAS: Burl, Cox, Moore, and Riley NAYS: Hoskyn, Mitchell and Redus EXECUTIVE SESSION John Riley moved to enter into executive session for employment interview for new Superintendent. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None A-8 The Board entered into Executive Session at 7:50 p.m. The Board reconvened in Open Session at 1 :05 a.m. MOTION Trent Cox moved to offer Dr. Tom Kimbrell a second interview on Monday, March 1, 2004 at 6:30 p.m. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None ADJOURNMENT Rochelle Redus moved to adjourn the meeting. Mable Mitchell seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None Teresa Burl declared the meeting adjourned at 1 :06 a.m. Teresa Burl, President Trent Cox, Secretary A-9 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent SPECIAL MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES March 1, 2004 The North Little Rock School District Board met in a special session on Monday, March 1, 2004 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. President Teresa Burl called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Teresa Burl, President Marty Moore, Vice President (entered the meeting at 7:15 p.m.) Trent Cox, Secretary Rochelle Redus, Parliamentarian Charles Hoskyn, Member Mable Mitchell, Member John Riley, Member Absent None Others Present James Smith, Superintemdent, Dr. Tom Kimbrell, the press and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall taped (audio) the meeting. MOTION Rochelle Redus moved that the Board enter in to Executive Session for a second interview with a candidate for the position of Superintendent. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Redus and Riley None (Moore-absent) A- IO The Board went into Executive Session at 6:35 p.m. Marty Moore entered the meeting and Executive Session at 7: 15 p.m .. The Board reconvened in Open Session at 10:29 p.m. MOTION Rochelle Redus moved to extend an offer of employment to Dr. Tom Kimbrell as Superintendent of the North Little Rock School District, subject to final contract approval, effective July 1, 2004. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None Dr. Tom Kimbrell was congratulated by all present. ADJOURNMENT MOTION Rochelle Redus moved to adjourn the meeting. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Hoskyn, Mitchell, Moore, Redus and Riley None President Burl declared the meeting adjourned at l 0:30 p.m. Teresa Burl, President Trent Cox, Secretary A-11 to ......  DRAFT IMO TH  NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 2004-2005 SCHOOL CALENDAR  DRAFT .  JULY '04 1 2 5 6 ------------ 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 16 19 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30 :ilili:~,il~SD SD SD W f* -AUG-US-T ---2 -3 -4 -5- -6 -9 10 11 12 13 16 17 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 30 31 9 SEPTEMBER H 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 i--=2::..\n:.o-+-=2-=-1+-=-2=-2-t-=2-=-3_.,.2_,4---=2..\n_7~28=-+-=-=29~-=-OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER 1 2 1 SD SD SD 3 4 5 451 SD f 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 i--.::1~8-+-,:lc:::...9.....,.\n.2~0..:::2..\n.,l-+-112ii11i.2,._u_--:2--.=::-:2..05~+=1 -26~:.:H H H 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 29 30 16 CV CV H CVCVCV CV CV 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 27 28 29 30 31 15 451 H f 7 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 20 21 24 25 26 27 28 31 19 JANUARY '04 Sf 4 5 6 --------11--------11 SD i1-F_E_B_R_U_A_R_Y_-+--+_\nl:......+---=2--+-...\n.3-+_4~1--'-7~-=8-+1--49 ~_1\n51\n..1\n6.0 ---1+7-- \"1~118 21 22 23 24 25 2R 19 471 SD SB SB SB SB ,1-M_A_R_C _H -+--+--=l--+--=-2-+--=3__..,_4..,._...:..7~-=-8-+-9~-=1:.1.:4\n. 0-+1-5- =11:.6:. ..il 17 18 21 22 23 24 25 28 29 30 31 18 SB f ,1-A_P_R_I__ L --+--+---+-----t-___..,.,.1..,._....\n4~-=-5-+-6.::.__+._7--+-.1.\n1 8~1 2 13 14 15 18 19 20 21 22 25 26 2 7 28 29 ---=-20--11 H 41#1 MA y 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 t--=1::..\n:.-6t---+=--=1l8..=\n_-7t-- -+=--=12~-9= 0-it-=-23=-+-=-24~2=-7=~53-+._-0::....,..:_2,63'\n-.-.l:-=-1=--+2- -+-~---\n------2\"\"'\"'-11 w JUNE 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 27 2R 29 30 0 * = First day for students PC= Parent Conferences CY= Christmas Vacation H = Holiday SB= Spring Break GF = Good Friday KEY ----------, lw = 'l\\'ork Day lso = Staff Development Ir= Begin Grade Period 11 = End Grade Period I#= Last Day for Students MN on-student day DRAFT TOT AL 178 1st grade period - 2nd grade period - 3rd grade period - 4th grade period - TOTAL STAFF DEV. WORKDAYS 45 45 47 41 178 10 2 190 PROPOSED POLICY REVISION PREVENTION OF NEPOTISM CAK No person employed by the North Little Rock School District in any capacity, shall be assigned duties which require him or her to evaluate or be evaluated by any relative. Relative includes spouse, parent, child, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew or first cousin. PRESENT POLICY PREVENTION OF NEPOTISM CAK No person shall be approved to begin employment in the North Little Rock School District in any capacity who is related to the North Little Rock School District Board of Directors or Superintendent whether by blood or marriage including spouse, parent, child, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, or first cousin. No person, employed by the North Little Rock School District in any capacity, shall be assigned duties which require him or her to evaluate or to be evaluated by any relative as defined in paragraph one. JUNE 1988 C-1 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ~-= = -== TO: JAMES SMITH, SUPERINTENDENT FROM: KA YE LOWE, ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION SUBJECT: ELEMENTARYSUMMERSCHOOL DATE: MARCH I, 2004 Proposed Elementary Summer School Program Location: Eleven elementary schools Dates: June 7, 2004 - June 30, 2004 Student Hours: 7:45 a.m.-11:15 a.m. Students Served: Approximately 170 first grade students - Teachers: Total of 14 teachers with a teacher student ratio of I: 12 Estimated Cost: 14 Teachers at $90.00 per day for 18 days Total Fringe 1 Special Assistance Aide (if needed) at $59 .00 per day for 18 days Total Fringe Transportation Breakfast Snacks Supplies and Materials Total Estimated Cost $22,680.00 4,763.00 1,062.00 223.00 7,500.00 3,000.00 750.00 $39,978.00 Boone Park and Lynch Drive will serve K-3 students. Their summer schools will be paid for through an Arkansas Reading Excellence Grant. D-1 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT February 24, 2004 MEMO TO: James Smith, Superintendent FROM: Dana Chadwick, Administrative Director of Secondary Education SUBJECT: Secondary Summer School Programs Summer school programs for secondary students are listed below with specific information regarding dates, locations, funding sources, and tuition rates. I recommend Board of Education approval of these programs for the summer of 2004. 1. Summer Quest Summer Quest is a two-week program for gifted and talented students. It will be conducted for approximately 200 students in grades K-8. Students do not need to be formally identified to participate, but must be recommended jointly by a classroom teacher and a GT teacher/facilitator. Location: Dates: Lakewood Middle School June 14 - 25 Times: 8:30 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. Funding Amount: $22,500 Fu\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_382","title":"Compliance remedy","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004/2006"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","School improvement programs","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Compliance remedy"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/382"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nJ. As to the educational acronyms, Counsel has requested that the authors of the comprehensive evaluations immediately prepare a glossary of acronyms used in their respective evaluations. These will be consolidated into a single glossary for all exhibits and provided to the Court as soon as possible. Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark. Christopher Heller (#81083) 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 BY: Christopher Heller 1 Page 2 of 3CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following people by depositing a copy of same in the United States mail on May 13, 2004: Mr. John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp;. Jennings 2200 Nations Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Arm Marshall Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Tim Gauger Mr. Mark A. Hagemeier Office of the Attorney General Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 323 Center Street 200 Tower Buildin! Little Rock, AR 72201 Judge J. Thomas Ray U. S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 ig Christopher Heller Pa-. Page 3 of 3 0.!- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION received may 1 4 200^ DKEGREGATIO? fSoNITORJNG LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. NO.4\n82CV00866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1,ETAL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF FIT.iNG DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO THE COURTS ORDER FILED MAY 12, 2004 Plaintiff Little Rock School District (^ERSD) for its Notice of Filing states: 1. Attached are the following documents requested by the Court in its Order filed May 12, 2004: A. Little Rock School District Proposed Compliance Plan Revised Plan  2.7.1 (Appendix 1 of which is IL-Rl\")\nB. Letter from John W. Walker to Chris Heller dated October 10, 2002\nand. C. Letter from John W. Walker to Chris Heller dated October 23, 2002 (received by fax on October 24, 2002). 2. As to Mr. Walker s references to your document, the Court is correct that Mr. Walker is referring to the Proposed Compliance Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A. Page 1 of 3Little Rock School District Compliance Committee Proposed Compliance Plan Revised Plan  2.7.1.The District Courts Compliance Remedy On September 13, 2002, the District Court issued its Memorandum Opinion (hereinafter Opinion ) finding that the Little Rock School District (LRSD) had substantially complied with all areas of the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (Revised Plan), with the exception Revised Plan  2.7,1. Section 2.7.1 provided: LRSD shall assess the academic programs implemented pursuant to Section 2.7 after each year in order to determine the effectiveness of the academic programs in improving Afincan-American achievement. If this assessment reveals that program has not and likely will not improve Afiican-American achievement, LRSD shall take appropriate action in the form of either modifying how the program is implemented or replacing the program a The District Court s Opinion set forth a detailed Compliance Remedy to be implemented by the LRSD. The Opinion first stated: Because LRSD failed to substantially comply with the crucially important obligations contained in 2.7.1, it must remain under court supervision with regard to that section of the Revised Plan until it: (a) demonstrates that a program assessment procedure is in place that can accurately measure the effectiveness of each program implemented under 2.7 in improving the academic achievement of African-American students\nand (b) prepares the program evaluations identified on page 148 of the Final Compliance Report and uses those evaluations as part of the program assessment procedure contemplated by  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan. The Opinion then outlined the details of the Compliance Remedy as follows: A. For the entire 2002-03 school year and the first semester of the 2003-04 school year, through December 31, 2003, LRSD must continue to assess each of the programs implemented under  2.7 to improve the academic achievement of Afidcan-American students. LRSD now has over three years of testing data and other information available to use in gauging the effectiveness of those programs. I expect LRSD to use all of that available data and information in assessing the effectiveness of those prograrhs and in deciding whether any of those programs should be modified or eliminated. Revised Plan  2.7 provided, LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to improve and remediate the academic achievement of Afiican-American students, including but not limited to Section 5 of this Revised Plan. 1 1B. C. F. LRSD must maintain written records regarding its assessment of each of those programs. These written records must reflect the following information: (a) the written criteria used to assess each program during the 2002-03 school year and the first semester of the 2003-04 school (b) the results of the annual assessments of each program, including whether the assessments resulted in program modifications or the year\nelimination of any programs\nand (c) the names of the administrators who were mvolved with the assessment of each program, as well as at least a grade level description of any teachers who were involved in the assessment process {e.g., all fourth grade math teachers\nall eighth grade Enghsh teachers, etc.).  LRSD must use Dr. Nunnerlw or another expert from outside LRSD with equivalent qualifications and expertise to prepare program evaluations on each of the programs identified on page 148 of the Final Compliance Report. I will accept all program evaluations that have already been completed by Dr. Nunnerly or someone with similar qualifications and approved by the Board. All program evaluations that have not yet been completed on the remaining programs identified on page 148 of the Final Comphance Report must be prepared and approved by the Board as soon as practicable, but, in no event, later than March 15, 2003. In addition, as these program evaluations are prepared, LRSD shall use them, as part of the program assessment process, to determine the effectiveness of those programs in improving African-American achievement and whether, based on the evaluations, any changes or modifications should be made in those programs. In addition, LRSD must use those program evaluations, to the extent they may be relevant, in assessing the effectiveness of other related programs. * * * On or before March 15, 2004, LRSD must file a Comphance Report which documents its compliance with its obligations under  2.7.1. Any party, including Joshua, who wishes to challenge LRSDs substantial compliance with  2.7.1, as specified above, may file objections with the court on or before April 15, 2004. Thereafter, I will decide whether the LRSD has substantially complied with  2.7.1, as specified in the Compliance Remedy, and should be released from all further supervision and monitoring. The Court is clearly referring to Dr. John Nunnery. 2 iProposed Compliance Plan As the Compliance Committee understands the District Courts Opinion, the Compliance Remedy requires the LRSD to: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Continue to administer student assessments through the first semester of 2003-04\nDevelop written procedures for evaluating the programs implemented pursuant to Revised Plan  2.7 to determine their effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of Afiucan-American students\nMaintain written records of (a) the criteria used to evaluate each program\n(b) the results of the annual student assessments, including whether an informal program evaluation resulted in program modifications or the elimination of any programs\nand (c) the names of the administrators who were involved with the evaluation of each program, as well as at least a grade level description of any teachers who were involved in the evaluation process\nPrepare a comprehensive program evaluation of each academic program implemented pursuant to Revised Plan  2.7 to determine its effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of Afiican-American students and to decide whether to modify or replace the program\nand Submit for Board approval the program evaluations identified on page 148 of the LRSD s Final Compliance Report that have been completed, and complete, with the assistance of an outside expert, the remaining evaluations identified on page 148 of the LRSDs Final Compliance Report. What follows is an explanation of how the Compliance Committee derived these five requirements from the District Courts Opinion, and what the Compliance Committee proposes to do to comply with each requirement. Assessment and Evaluation When first read, the District Courts Compliance Remedy seemed simple and straightforward, but as the Compliance Committee attempted to develop this Proposed Compliance Plan, numerous questions arose. The most fundamental question related to the District Courts use of the term assessment in Paragraphs A and B of the Compliance Remedy. The ambiguity of this term was the subject of testimony at the hearing. The District Court included in its Opinion Dr. Lesleys testimony on the difference between assessment and evaluation, see Opinion, p. 152, but it is unclear whether the Court accepted this testimony. 3It is clear that the District Court understood the distinction between testing data, which are derived from student assessments, and program evaluations, which are used to determine the effectiveness of programs. Opinion, p. 152 (LRSD ackno^vledged in the Interim Compliance Report that it was required\n(a) to use both the testing data and the program evaluations to determine the effectiveness of the key academic programs implemented pursuant to  2.7 . .. (emphasis in original)). Even so, the District Court appears to have used the term assessment in some instances to refer to only student assessments and in other instances to refer to both student assessments and evaluations. This required the Comphance Committee to determine the District Courts intended meaning. In making this determination, the Compliance Committee considered the context in which the term was used, the District Courts findings of fact as set forth in the Opinion, what would be in the best interest of African-American students, and hopefully, common sense. An explanation of each requirement of the Compliance Remedy is provided below. To avoid any ambiguity, Compliance Committee hereinafter uses the term assessment to refer to student assessments and the term evaluation to refer to the program evaluations, whether formal or informal. 1. Continue to administer student assessments through the first semester of 2003-04. This requirement derives from Paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy. Given Paragraph A s reference to testing data, it seems clear that Paragraph A concerns, in part. ^'1* A X WAA w A IO XXX XXX Uj student assessments. The Compliance Committee proposes to comply with this part of Paragraph A by implementing the 2002-03 Board-approved assessment plan. The 2002-03 Board-approved assessment plan incorporates four changes that have been made since the LRSDs Final Compliance Report. First, the Board eliminated the fall administrations of the Achievement Level Tests (ALTs) in 2001-02. The administration recommended this for three reasons\n(1) the loss of instructional time resulting from testing and test preparation\n(2) fall results did not provide significantly different information from the previous springs results\nand (3) the cost of administering and scoring the tests. Second, the fall administration of the Observation Surveys and Developmental Peading Assessment will only be used by the teacher for diagnostic purposes. The scores will not be reported to or maintained by the LRSD. This change saves considerable time in test administration and allows more time for instruction. It was approved by the Board on September 26, 2002. Third, the LRSD will no longer admimster the ALTs. The administration recommended the complete elimination of the ALTs for the following reasons: (1) the lack of alignment with the content and format of the State Benchmarks\n(2) the loss of instructional time resulting from 4testing and test admimstration\n(3) the new federal accountability requirements in the No Child Left Behind Act require annual testing by the State in grades 3-8, making the LRSDs administration of the ALTs redundant\nand (4) the costs of administering and scoring the tests. The Board approved this change on September 26, 2002. Finally, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) has moved the admini stratinn of the SAT9 from the fall to the spring, effective 2002-03. The 2002-03 Board-approved assessment plan calls for the administration of the following student assessments in English language arts and mathematics: Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grades 7-10 Grades 9-11 Grade 10 Grade 11 Observation Surveys (5) Developmental Reading Assessment Observation Surveys (5) Development Reading Assessment Observation Surveys (3) Development Reading Assessment Norm-referenced test to be identified for gifted/talented screening Benchmark Literacy examination Benchmark Mathematics examination SAT9 Total Battery Benchmark Literacy examination Benchmark Mathematics examination SAT9 Total Battery Benchmark Literacy examination Benchmark Mathematics examination End-of Course Algebra I examination End-of Course Geometry examination SAT9 Total Battery End-of-Level Literacy examination All of these assessments are administered in the spring. Consequently, the final student assessment before March 15, 2004, will be administered in the spring of 2003. 7 Develop written procedures for evaluating the programs implemented pursuant to  2.7 to determine their effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students. This requirement derives from the opening paragraph of the Compliance Remedy. To comply with this requirement, two proposed regulations have been drafted, EL-Rl for formal evaluations and IL-R2 for informal evaluations, attached as Appendixes 1 and 2, respectively. 5 1Proposed regulation IL-Rl combines generally accepted principles of program evaluation with practices that have been in place in the LRSD for the past two years. See, e.g., Robby Champion, Map Out Evaluation Goals, Journal for Staff Development, Fall 2002, attached as Appendix o. This regulation will be submitted to the Board, Office of Desegregation Monitoring ( ODM ) and the Joshua Intervenors (Joshua) for review and comment before being finalized. Proposed regulation IL-R2 specifically addresses the next requirement and is discussed therewith. 3. Maintain written records of (a) the criteria used to evaluate each program\n(b) the results of the annual student assessments, including whether an informal program evaluation resulted in program modifications or the elimination of any programs\nand (c) the names of the administrators who were involved with the evaluation of each program, as well as at least a grade level description of any teachers who were involved in the evaluation process. This requirement derives from Paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy. Paragraph B apparently came about as a result of the District Courts concern about the LRSD making program modifications based on informal evaluations of student assessment data. See Opinion, p. 155 ( I have grave reservations about anyone this side of Solomon being wise enough to use two or three semesters worth of erratic composite test scores to make reliable decisions about which remediation programs for LRSD s Afihcan-American students were actually working.). Proposed regulations IL-R2 was drafted to specifically address this requirement. It prohibits substantial program modifications from being made without a written record as required by Paragraph B. This regulation will also be submitted to ODM and Joshua for review and comment before being finalized. Proposed regulation IL-Rl also complies with this requirement. It mandates that the criteria used to formally evaluate a program be identified as the research questions to be answered, the first of which will be, Has this curriculum/instruction program been effective in improving and remediating the academic achievement of Afincan-American students?. See Appendix 1, IL-Rl, p. 5. Recommended program modifications and the members of the evaluation team are routinely included in formal evaluations. As to the results of annual student assessments, the LRSD will continue to maintain a computer database with the results of annual students assessments administered pursuant to the Board-approved assessment plan. 64. Prepare a comprehensive program evaluation of each academic program implemented pursuant to  2.7 to determine its effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students and to decide whether to modify replace the program. or This requirement derives from Paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy. To comply with this requirement, the Compliance Committee proposes to prepare the following new, comprehensive evaluations: (a) Primary Readingkanguage Arts, (b) Middle and High School Literacy and (c) K-12 Mathematics and Science, Each evaluation will be prepared in accordance with proposed Regulation IL-Rl and will incorporate all available student assessment data relevant to the program being evaluated. Based on Paragraph F of the Compliance Remedy, the LRSD understands these evaluations must be submitted to the Court on or before March 15 2004. Some may argue that Paragraph A and Paragraph C together require the LRSD to prepare new, comprehensive evaluations of all the programs identified on page 148 of the LRSDs Final Compliance Report. The Compliance Committee considered and rejected this argument for three reasons. First, Paragraph As description of the programs to be evaluated differs from that of Paragraph C. Paragraph A states that the LRSD must continue to assess each of the programs implemented imder  2.7 . . . The Compliance Committee understands this to mean that the LRSD should continue to prepare evaluations of some of the key programs, as identified in the Interim Compliance Report. See Opinion, p. 151 (In addition to the Assessment Plan,  2.7.1 of the Interim Compliance Report noted that the LRSD was preparing evaluations of some of the key programs designed to improve African-American achievement in order to provide a more in-depth look at the effectiveness of those programs. (emphasis in original)), In contrast to Paragraph A, Paragraph C requires the LRSD to prepare evaluations of each of the programs identified on page 148 of the Final Compliance Report. The Compliance Committee understands this to mean that the LRSD should complete all of the evaluations identified on page 148 of the Final Compliance Report and submit those to the Court. S^ Opinion, p. 156 ( [A]s of March 15, 2001, the date the Final Compliance Report was filed with the Court. (1) PRE had prepared only draft evaluations of some of the programs in question\n(2) none of those evaluations had been approved by the Board . .. . (emphasis in original)). The District Court s statement in Paragraph C that it will accept evaluations already completed and approved by the Board further indicates that Paragraph C does not require new, comprehensive evaluations. Second, recognizing this distinction between Paragraph A and Paragraph C resolves a potential conflict between Paragraph C and Paragraph F. Paragraph C provides, All program evaluations that have not yet been completed on the remaining programs identified on page 148 7 1 Iof the Final Compliance Report must be prepared and approved by the Board as soon as practicable, but, in no event, later than March 15, 2003. However, Paragraph F does not require the LRSD to file a compliance report on its compliance with Revised Plan  2.7.1 until March 15, 2004. The Compliance Committee concludes that March 15,2004, is the deadline for submitting the new, comprehensive evaluations of the programs implemented pursuant to  2.7. See Paragraph A of Compliance Remedy. This is consistent with Paragraph As requirement that the LRSD include assessment data through December 31, 2003. Obviously, such data could not be included in an evaluation filed on or before March 15, 2003. Finally, it makes the most sense for the LRSD to expend the greatest time and resources preparing evaluations of the programs designed to improve Afincan- American achievement. While the requirement for new, comprehensive evaluations derives from Paragraph A, some may argue that Paragraph Cs requirement that the LRSD use an outside expert to prepare evaluations of each of the programs identified on page 148 of the Final Compliance Report applies to the new, comprehensive evaluations. The Compliance Committee hopes the District Court and the parties agree that the team approach to program evaluation set forth in proposed regulation IL-Rl renders this argument moot. Proposed Regulation IL-Rl states that the program evaluation team must include [a]n external consultant with expertise in program evaluation, the program area being evaluated, statistical analysis, and/or technical writing . . . Appendix 1, p. 4. The exact role of the  external consultant may vary, depending upon the expertise required for the production of the program evaluation. Id. The Compliance Committee believes that the LRSDs practice over the last two years of using the team approach to program evaluation has produced credible evaluations. Moreover, participation of the LRSD staff on the evaluation team provides them an excellent learning experience that they do not typically receive when an evaluation is prepared entirely by an outside expert. The evaluations prepared over the last two years using the team approach are as follows: 1. 2. Dr. Steve Ross was the external consultant in the production of the Early Literacy program evaluation for 1999-2000 and 2000-01. He was asked to read a nearfinal draft and to provide feedback, which he did. His suggestions were then incorporated into the final report before it was published and disseminated. Other team members included Bonnie Lesley (associate superintendent), Patricia Price (program director), Pat Busbea (program specialist), Ed Williams (statistician)^ and Ken Savage (computer programmer). Dr. Julio Lopez-Ferraro is the National Science Foundation (NSF) program officer who over-sees the LRSDs implementation of the grant-funded 8 j iComprehensive Partnership for Mathematics and Science Achievement ( CPMSA ). NSF trained a team of LRSD staff to produce the mandated annual program evaluations for this initiative and then assembled an external team of practitioners and researchers who came to the LRSD each year to validate findings and provide written feedback. The LRSD team members who OUT participated in writing of the annual progress reports included Vanessa Cleaver (project director), Dennis Glasgow (director of mathematics and science), Bonnie Lesley (associate superintendent and co-project investigator), Virginia Johnson (CPMSA program evaluator), Ed Williams (statistician), and Ken Savage (computer programmer). 3. 4. Mr. Mark Vasquez, an attorney and former employee of the Office for Civil Rights in Dallas, has been retained by the LRSD for the past three years to provide guidance in the design and production of the English as a Second Language (ESL) program evaluation. Other team members have been Bonnie Lesley (associate superintendent), Karen Broadnax (program supervisor), Ed Williams (statistician), Ken Savage (computer programmer), and Eddie McCoy (program evaluator). Dr. Larry McNeal, a professor at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock in education admimstration and a private consultant in program evaluation, was retained by the LRSD to lead the team that produced the program evaluation for the Charter School. Other members of that team included Linda Watson (assistant superintendent), Knsta Young (program director), and Ed Williams (statistician). Dr. McNeal wrote this report. The team approach, supported by an external expert, ensures that all areas of expertise (program, implementation, techmeal and evaluative) are included. No one person would have all the knowledge and skills that a team would have. As these examples show, the external expert does not always perform the same role in every project. Rather, the role changes, depending the expertise that is required for a credible report. on 5. Submit for Board approval the program evaluations identified on page 148 of the LRSDs Final Compliance Report that have been completed, and complete, with the assistance of an outside expert, the remaining program evaluations identified on page 148 of the LRSDs Final Compliance Report. The following program evaluations identified on page 148 of the Final Compliance Report have been completed: 1. Early Literacy. A comprehensive report for 1999-2000 and 2000-01 was prepared, completed, and presented to the Board in fall 2001. An update to this report for 2001-02 was presented to the Board in June 2002, with an emphasis on 9the improved achievement of African-American students and closing the achievement gap. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Mathematics and Science. Three years (1998-99, 1999-2000, and 2000-01) of program evaluations as required by the NSF were prepared, presented to the Board, and submitted to NSF, and NSF has responded to each evaluation. Extended Year Schools. The LRSD staff prepared, completed, and presented to the Board in the spring of 2002 an evaluation of the Extended Year Schools. Elementary Summer School. The LRSD staff prepared, completed, and provided to the School Services Division an evaluation of elementary summer school programs for 2000-01. 5 HIPPY. The HIPPY program was evaluated by the LRSD staff in July 1999. The report was prepared, completed, and submitted to the program director and the Cabinet. Charter School. This program evaluation was prepared, completed, and presented to the Board in June 2001. ESL. The Office for Civil Rights has required the LRSD to prepare a program evaluation in this area for each of the past three years: 1999-2000, 2000-01, and 2001-02. The first two of these reports have been prepared, completed, submitted to the Board, and submitted to OCR. (A third program evaluation will be completed in October when state scores arrive and will be ready by the March 15, 2003 deadline). Lyceum Scholars Program. Two separate evaluations of this alternative education school program were prepared by the LRSD staff. Southwest Middle School's SEDL Program. Southwest Middle School was the recipient of a two-year technical assistance grant from the Southwest Educational Development Lab (SEDL) to build professional community. SEDL prepared a comprehensive program evaluation that included Southwest among other grant recipients outside the LRSD. The LRSD staff provided SEDL data for this evaluation. Onward to Excellence (Watson Elementary). A grant from ADE funded a partnership between Watson Elementary and the Northwest Educational Development Lab to implement a school improvement initiative. The LRSD staff provided data to Watsons principal for preparation of program evaluations. The principal submitted two armual program evaluations to ADE. 10 t11. 12. Collaborative Action Team (CAT). This one-year partnership with SEDL provided in 2000-01 for establishing and training a Collaborative Action Team of parent and community volunteers supported by LRSD staff to improve parent involvement. SEDL wrote a 249-page evaluation of their three-year grant-funded program, of which LRSD was included only the last year. The LRSD staff provided SEDL data for this evaluation. Vital Link. The LRSD staff prepared a program evaluation, and it was provided to the project director. A question arises as to which of these evaluations are acceptable to the Court without additional work. The first sentence of Paragraph C of the Compliance Remedy provides, LRSD must use Dr. Nunnerly (sic) or another expert from outside LRSD with equivalent quahfications and expertise to prepare program evaluations of each of the programs identified on page 148 of the Final Compliance Report. The second sentence of Paragraph C states that the District Court will accept all program evaluations that have already been completed by Dr. Nunnerly (sic) or someone with similar qualifications. It is unclear whether an expert from outside the LRSD must have prepared the completed evaluations for them to be accepted by the District Court, whether it is sufficient that they were prepared by someone within LRSD with similar or qualifications. \u0026gt;5 The District Courts findings of fact suggest that the District Court will accept only program evaluations already completed by an outside expert. The District Court noted that Dr. Lesley testified hhat, by the end of November 2000, it was her opinion that no one in PRE had the expertise to prepare program evaluations. Opinion, p. 153. Thus, the District Court likely concluded that the only acceptable program evaluations would be those prepared by persons outside the LRSD. Applying this standard, the Compliance Committee believes that the following evaluations are acceptable to the Court, following Board approval, without additional work: Early Literacy, Mathematics and Science, Charter School, ESL, Southwest Middle Schools SEDL Program and CAT. The remaining program evaluations identified on the bottom of page 148 of the Final Compliance Report must be completed by an outside expert. They are: Extended Year Schools, Middle School Implementation, Elementary Summer School, HIPPY, Campus Leadership Teams (CLTs), Lyceum Scholars Program, Onward to Excellence and Vital Link. The Compliance Committees proposal for completing each of these evaluations will be discussed below. In deciding how to go about completing these evaluations, the Comphance Committee focused on what makes sense to do at this time considering the goal of improving Afincan-American achievement and the limitations inherent in asking an expert to complete an evaluation. 11Extended Year Schools. This evaluation was completed by the LRSD staff. The Compliance Committee proposes retaining an outside expert to review the report and, if possible, draw conclusions and make recommendations based on the existing data. Middle School Implementation. A draft of this evaluation was presented to the Board in July and August 2000, but it was never completed. The Compliance Committee proposes retaining an outside expert to rewrite the report and, if possible, prepare an evaluation based on the existing data. Elementary Summer School. This evaluation was completed by the LRSD staff. The Compliance Committee proposes retaining an outside expert to review the report and, if possible, draw conclusions and make recommendations based on the existing data. HIPPY. This evaluation was completed by the LRSD staff. The Compliance ComTnirtee proposes retaining an outside expert to review the report and, if possible, draw conclusions and make recommendations based on the existing data. CLTs. The LRSD staff conducted a survey of CLTs during 2000-01. A summary of the survey findings was presented during a CLT training session, but no formal report was ever prepared. The Compliance Committee proposes retaining an outside expert to review the survey data and, if possible, prepare an evaluation based on the existing survey data. Lyceum Scholars Program. This evaluation was completed by the LRSD staff. The Compliance Committee proposes retaining an outside expert to review the report and, if possible, draw conclusions and make recommendations based on the existing data. Onward to Excellence. This evaluation was completed by the LRSD staff. The Compliance Committee proposes retaining an outside expert to review the report and, if possible, draw conclusions and make recommendations based on the existing data. Vital Link. This evaluation was completed by LRSD staff. The Compliance Committee proposes retaining an outside expert to review the report and, if possible, draw conclusions and make recommendations based on the existing data. 12Action Plan Timeline The Compliance Committee proposes implementation of this Compliance Plan in accordance with the following timeline. 1. Provide copies of this proposed Compliance Plan to ODM and Joshua for their reactions. 2. Incorporate, as possible, suggested revisions from ODM and Joshua.______ 3. Place Compliance Plan on the agenda for Board review and approval.______ 4. Place 2002-03 Program Evaluation Agenda on the Boards agenda for review and approval. 5. Place on Board agenda for approval two previously presented program evaluations (early literacy, and charter school).______ 6. Place on Board agenda for approval the evaluations of Southwest Middle Schools SEDL program and the Collaborative Action Team (also conducted by SEDL). 7. Place on Board agenda for approval the previously jresented ESL program evaluations for 1999-2000 and 2000-01, plus the new evaluation for 2001-02. Week of September 30, 2002 Week of October 7, 2002 October 10, 2002 October 24, 2002 October 24, 2002 November 2002 November 2002 13 Clay Pendley Ken James Attorneys Ken James Compliance Team Ken James Attorneys Ken James Bonnie Lesley Bonnie Lesley Linda Watson Bonnie Lesley Bonnie Lesley Karen Broadnax8. Place on Board agenda for approval the three previously presented program evaluations for the NSF-funded CPMSA program, plus the new Year 4 report for 2001-2002. 9. Issue Request for Proposals (RFPs) from available external experts to review and complete the eight remaining program evaluations listed on page 148.________________ 10. Form a screening team to determine recommendations to the Superintendent for designating external experts to review and complete the eight remaining program evaluations listed on page 148.____________________ 11. Select and negotiate consulting contracts with designated external experts. 12. Assign appropriate staff to each external expert to provide needed information, data, access to program staff, etc.________ 13. Monitor the work to ensure timely completion. 14. As each paper is completed and ready for circulation, send copies to ODM and Joshua for their review and comments. December 2002 Mid-October 2002 Late October 2002 Mid-November 2002 Mid-November 2002 Mid-November 2002^February 2003 December 2002^February 2003 14 Bonnie Lesley Vanessa Cleaver Dennis Glasgow Bonnie Lesley Darral Paradis Ken James Compliance Team Bonnie Lesley Ken James Bonnie Lesley Bonnie Lesley Bonnie Lesley15. As each paper is completed, place on the Boards agenda the item to be reviewed and approved. 16. Write Interim Compliance Report relating to programs on page 148 to be completed. 17. Establish staff teams for each of the three programs on the Boards Program Evaluation Agenda to be completed for 2002-2003 (Elementary Literacy, Secondary Literacy, and K- 12 Mathematics/ Science). 18. Publish RFPs to identify external experts to serve on each of the two staff teams for the Boards Program Evaluation Agenda (K-12 mathematics/science external experts are provided by NSF). 19. Establish consulting contracts with the two external experts required for the Elementary Literacy and Secondary Literacy program evaluations. 20. Train each program evaluation team, including the external expert, on the requirements of the approved Compliance Plan and IL-R. December 2002F ebruary 2003 March 15, 2003 March 1, 2003 March 1, 2003 Late March 2003 May 2003 15 Ken James Bonnie Lesley Attorneys Compliance Committee Bonnie Lesley Bonnie Lesley Darral Paradis Bonnie Lesley Bonnie Lesley21. Monitor the completion MayOctober 2003 of the work on all three program evaluations required in the Boards Program Evaluation Agenda.___________ 22. Send copies of the completed Elementary Literacy program evaluation to ODM and Joshua for information.___________ 23. Complete the evaluation of the Elementary Literacy program and place on the Boards agenda for approval. 24. Send copies of the Secondary Literacy program evaluation to ODM and Joshua for information. 25. Complete the evaluation of the Secondary Literacy program and place on the Boards agenda for approval._____________ 26. Send copies of the completed CPMSA program evaluation to ODM and Joshua for information. 27. Complete the five-year evaluation of the CPMSA moject (science and mathematics) and place on the Boards agenda for approval.___________ 28. Write Section 2.7.1 \"inal Compliance Report or federal court and file with Court. With October 2003 Board agenda packet October board meeting, 2003 With November 2003 Board agenda packets November board meeting, 2003 With December 2003 Board agenda packet December board meeting, 2003 March 15, 2004 16 Bonnie Lesley Ken James Bonnie Lesley Bonnie Lesley Pat Price Ken James Bonnie Lesley Bonnie Lesley Pat Price Ken James Bonnie Lesley Bonnie Lesley Vanessa Cleaver Dennis Glasgow Ken James Attorneys Compliance Team JAppendix 1 Proposed IL-Rl ILITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPNCODE: IL-R1 PROGRAM EVALUATION AGENDA Purpose The purpose of these regulations is to provide guidance to the staff involved in the evaluation of programs required in the Boards Program Evaluation Agenda. They do not necessarily apply to grant-funded programs if the funding source requires other procedures and provides funding for a required evaluation. Criteria for Program Evaluations Policy IL specifies that the evaluations of programs approved in its Board- approved Program Evaluation Agenda shall be conducted according to the standards developed by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (See Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, James R. Sanders, Chair (1994). The Program Evaluation Standards, 2^ Edition: How to Assess Evaluations of Educational Programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.) They are as follows: Utility Standards The utility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will serve the information needs of intended users. These standards are as follows: Stakeholder identification. People involved in or affected by the evaluation should be identified so that their needs can be addressed. Evaluator credibility. The people conducting the evaluation should be both trustworthy and competent to perform the evaluation so that the evaluation findings achieve maximum credibility and acceptance. Information scope and sequence. Information collected should be broadly selected to address pertinent questions about the program and should be responsive to the needs and interests of clients and other specified stakeholders. Values identification. The perspectives, procedures, and rationale used to interpret the findings should be described carefully so that the bases for value judgements are clear. Report clarity. Evaluation reports should describe clearly the program being evaluated, including its context and the purposes, procedures, and findings of the evaluation, so that essential information is provided and understood easily. 1Report timeliness and dissemination. Significant interim findings and evaluation reports should be disseminated to intended users so that they can be used in a timely fashion. Evaluation impact. Evaluations should be planned, conducted, and reported jn ways that encourage follow-through by stakeholders, so that the likelihood that the evaluation will be used is increased. Feasibility Standards Feasibility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will be realistic, prudent, diplomatic, and frugal. Practical procedures. Evaluation procedures should be practical so that the disruption is kept to a minimum while needed information is obtained. Political viability. The evaluation should be planned and conducted with anticipation of the different positions of various interest groups so that their cooperation may be obtained, and so that possible attempts by any of these groups to curtail evaluation operations to vias or misapply the results can be averted or counteracted. or Cost-effectiveness. The evaluation should be efficient and produce information of sufficient value so that the resources expended can be justified. Propriety Standards The propriety standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will be conducted legally, ethically, and with due regard for the welfare of those involved in the evaluation, as well as those affected by its results. Service orientation. Evaluations should be designed to assist organizations to address and effectively serve the needs of the full range of targeted participants. Formal agreements. Obligations of the formal parties to an evaluation (what is to be done, how, by whom, and when) should be agreed to in writing so that these parties are obligated to adhere to all conditions of the agreement or to formally renegotiate it. Rights of human subjects. Evaluations should respect human dignity and worth in their interactions with other people associated with an evaluation so that participants are not threatened or harmed. Complete and fair assessments. The evaluation should be complete and fair in its examination and recording of strengths and weaknesses of the program being evaluated so that strengths can be built upon and problem areas addressed. Disclosure of findings. The formal parties to an evaluation should ensure that the full set of evaluation findings, along with pertinent limitations, are made accessible to the people affected by the 2 (evaluation, as well as any others with expressed legal rights to receive the results. Conflict of interest. Conflict of interest should be dealt with openly and honestly so that it does not compromise the evaluation processes and results. Fiscal responsibility. The evaluators allocation and expenditure of resources should reflect sound accountability procedures and be prudent and ethically responsible so that expenditures are accounted for and appropriate. Accuracy Standards Accuracy standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will reveal and convey technically adequate information about the features that determine the worth of merit of the program being evaluated. Program documentation. The program being evaluated should be described and documented clearly and accurately so that it programs is identified clearly. Context analysis. The context in which the program exists should be examined in enough detail so that its likely influences on the program can be identified. Described purposes and procedures. The purposes and procedure of the evaluation should be monitored and described in enough detail so that they can be identified and assessed. Defensible information sources. The sources of information used in a program evaluation should be described in enough detail so that the adequacy of the information can be assessed. Valid information. The information-gathering procedures should be chosen or developed and then implemented in a manner that will ensure that the interpretation arrived at is valid for the intended use. Reliable information. The information-gathering procedures should be chosen or developed and then implemented in a manner that will ensure that the information obtained is sufficiently reliable for the intended use. Systematic information. The information collected, processed, and reported in an evaluation should be review systematically so that the evaluation questions are answered effectively. Analysis of quantitative information. Quantitative information in an evaluation should be analyzed appropriately and systematically so that the evaluation questions are answered effectively. Analysis of qualitative information. Qualitative information in an evaluation should be analyzed appropriately and systematically so that the evaluation questions are answered effectively. Justified conclusions. The conclusions reached in an evaluation should be justified explicitly so that stakeholders can assess them. 3Impartial reporting. Reporting procedures should guard against distortion caused by personal feelings and biases of any party the evaluation reports reflect the evaluation findings fairly. Metaevaluation. The evaluation itself should be evaluated so formatively and summartively against these and other pertinent standards so that its conduct is appropriately guided, and on completion, stakeholders can closely examine its strengths and weaknesses. Program Evaluation Procedures The following procedures are established for the evaluation of programs approved by the Board of Education in its annual Program Evaluation Agenda: 1. 2. 3. The Division of Instruction shall recommend to the Superintendent annually, before the budget for the coming year is proposed, the curriculum/instruction programs for comprehensive program evaluation. The recommendation shall include a proposed budget, a description of other required resources, and an action plan for the completion of the reports. Criteria for the proposed agenda are as follows: A. Can the results of the evaluation influence decisions about the program? B. Can the evaluation be done in time to be useful? C. Is the program significant enough to merit evaluation? (See Joseph S. Wholey, Harry P, Hatry, and Kathryn Newcomer (1994). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass Publishers. 5-7.) The Superintendent shall recommend to the Board of Education for approval the proposed Program Evaluation Agenda^with anticipated costs and an action plan for completion. For each curriculum/instruction program to be evaluated as per the Program Evaluation Agena, the Associate Superintendent for Instruction shall establish a staff team with a designated leader to assume responsibility for the production of the report according to the timelines established in the action plan approved by the Board of Education. 4. Each team shall include, at a minimum, one or more specialists in the curriculum/instruction program to be evaluated, a statistician, a programmer to assist in data retrieval and disaggregation, and a technical writer. If additional expertise is required, then other staff may be added as necessary. 5. An external consultant with expertise in program evaluation, the program area being evaluated, statistical analysis, and/or technical writing shall be retained 4as a member of the team. The role of the external consultant may vary, depending upon the expertise required for the production of the program evaluation. 6. The team leader shall establish a calendar of regularly scheduled meetings for the production of the program evaluation. The first meetings will be devoted to the following tasks: A. Provide any necessary training on program evaluation that may be required for novice members of the team, including a review of the Board s policy IL and all of the required criteria and procedures in these regulations, IL-R. B. Assess the expertise of each team member and make recommendations to the Associate Superintendent for Instruction related to any additional assistance that may be required. C. Write a clear description of the curriculum/instruction program that is to be evaluated, with information about the schedule of its implementation. D. Agree on any necessary research questions that need to be established in addition to the question, Has this curriculum/instruction program been effective in improving and remediating the academic achievement of African-American students? (See Policy IL, 2.7.1 of the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, and Judge Wilsons Compliance Remedy.) E. Generate a list of the data required to answer each research question, and assign responsibility for its collection and production. All available and relevant student performance data must be included. (See Judge Wilsons Compliance Remedy.) F. Decide who will be the chief writer of the program evaluation. G. Plan ways to provide regular progress reports {e.g., dissemination of meeting minutes, written progress reports, oral reports to the Superintendent s Cabinet and/or Compliance Team) to stakeholders, including the Associate Superintendent for Instruction, the Superintendent of Schools, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (until Unitary Status is achieved), and the Joshua Intervenors (until Unitary Status is achieved). (See Joellen Killion (2002). Assessing Impact: Evaluating Staff Development Oxford, OH. National Staff Development Council (NSDC)\nRobby Champion (Fall 2002). Map Out Evaluation Goals.\" Journal of Staff Development. 78-79\n5Thomas R. Guskey (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, CA. Corwin Press\nBlaine R. Worthen, James R. Sanders, and Jody L. Fitzpatrick (1997). Participant-Oriented Evaluated Approaches. Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines\n153-169\nBeverly A. Parsons (2002). Evaluative Inquiry: Using Evaluation to Promote Student Success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press\nand Joseph S. Whoiey, Harry P. Hatry, and Kathryn E. Newcomer (1994). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.) 7. Subsequent meetings of the program evaluation team are required for the following tasks: to monitor the completion of assignments\nto collaborate in the interpretation and analysis of data\nto pose any necessary new questions to be answered\nto review drafts and provide feedback to the writer\nto formulate recommendations, as required, for program improvement, especially to decide if a recommendation is required to modify or abandon the program if the findings reveal that the program is not being successful for the improvement of African- American achievement\nI? to assist in final proofreading\nand to write a brief executive summary, highlighting the program evaluation findings and recommendations. I s 8. A near-final copy of the program evaluation must be submitted to the Associate Superintendent for Instruction at least one month before the deadline for placing the report on the Boards agenda for review and approval. This time is required for final approval by staff, for final editing to ensure accuracy, and for submission to the Superintendent. 9. When the program evaluation is approved for submission to the Board of Education for review and approval, copies of the Executive Summary and complete report must be made for them, for members of the Cabinet, for ODM (until Unitary Status is achieved), and for the Joshua Intervenors (until Unitary Status is achieved). s I 3 I 10. The program evaluation team shall plan its presentation to the Board of Education on the findings and recommendations. i j 611 .The Associate Superintendent for instruction shall prepare the cover memorandum to the Board of Education, including all the required background information (see Judge Wilsons Compliance Remedy): A. If program modifications are suggested, the steps that the staff members have taken or will take to implement those modifications. If abandonment of the program is recommended, the steps that will be taken to replace the program with another with more potential for the improvement and remediation of African-American students. (See Section 2.7.1 of the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan and Judge Wilsons Compliance Remedy.) B. C, D. Names of the administrators who were involved in the program evaluation. Name and qualifications of the external expert who served on the evaluation team. Grade-level descriptions of the teachers who were involved in the assessment process (e.g., all fourth-grade math teachers, all eighth grade English teachers, etc.). 10. When the program evaluation is approved by the Board of Education, the team must arrange to have the Executive Summary and the full report copied and design a plan for communicating the program evaluation findings and recommendations to other stakeholders. This plan must then be submitted to the Associate Superintendent for approval. 11. Each program evaluation team shall meet with the Associate Superintendent for Instruction after the completion of its work to evaluate the processes and product and to make recommendations for future program evaluations. (See Joeilen Killion (2002).  Evaluate the Evaluation. Assessing Impact: Evaluating Staff Development. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development u Council. 46, 123-124.) 7Appendix 2 Proposed IL-R2LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPNCODE: IL-R2 INFORMAL PROGRAM EVALUATION Introduction The purpose of this regulation is to ensure that a written record exists explaining a decision to significantly modify an academic program. It is not the intent of this regulation to require a formal program evaluation before every significant program modification. Definitions Academic Program means one of the core curriculum programs of English/Language Arts, Mathematics, Science or Social Studies. Significantly modify means a material change in the content or delivery of an academic program implemented throughout the entire District. Written Record A written record must be prepared and maintained explaining a decision to significantly modify an academic program. The written record required by this regulation must include the following information: (a) the written criteria used to evaluate the program, (b) a summary of the student assessment data or other data on which the decision was based\nand (c) the names of the administrators who were involved with the evaluation of each program, as well as at least a grade level description of any teachers who were involved in the evaluation process (e.g., all fourth grade math teachers\nall eighth grade English teachers etc.). 1Appendix 3 Robby Champion, Map Out Evaluation Goals, Journal for Staff Development, Fall 2002 ?9t a k i n g ROBB-Y CHAMPION Map out evaluation goals A master plan can guide you down the rocky path of evaluation when you launch a major professional development evaluation, regardless of the projects scope, you may quickly find yourself on a slippery, often rocky road, v/ith twists and unexpected turns. Before venturing too far and becoming disillusioned about program evaluation, create a master plan. 'While it requires an upfront investment of time and may delay starting, it quickly becomes an invaluable road map that helps you avoid delays and detours along the way. Developing an evaluation master plan is most useful when you are launching a major, summative program evaluation. A summative evaluation is done at major junctures in a programs fife cycle and emphasizes documenting impact. Information from summative evaluations is used to make important decisions about the initiative, such as whether to continue, alter, expand, downsize, or eliminate it A formative evaluation, on the other hand, means monitoring and collecting data, often informally and spontaneously, throughout program implementation. Formative evaluation helps show implementers where to make adjustments so a program can eventually achieve significant results. A thoughtfully prepared master plan for a major evaluation effort would\n Focus the evaluation effort and help implementers avoid being sidetracked by leadership changes and new opinions\n Create a realistic timeline and work plan that B Robby Champion is president of Champion Training \u0026amp; Consulting, You can contact her at Champion Ranch at Trumbeli Canyon, Mora. NM 87732, (505) 387-2016, fax (505) 387-5581, e-mail\nRobbychampion@aol.com. provides needed momentum for the work\n Be a key informational document to provide an overview and answer specific questions throughout the process\n Help recruit people to assist with the project on the myriad evaluation tasks\ne Give the message that the evaluation will be open and not secretive. Whether your evaluation must be completed within a few months or wdl extend for several years, think through four phases of work before starting. PHASE 1: ORGANIZE THE PROCESS 1. Form a steering committee, including any needed outside expertise. 2. Learn more about program evaluation together. 3. Write a clear description of each program to be evaluated. 4. Agree on the primary purpose of the evaluation. .5. Plan how you will keep everyone informed along the way. Steering committees, charged specifically , with program evaluation, are important to focus attention and maintain the energy and momentum needed for the evaluation. They also help build a spirit of 'collaboration and open inquiry. And they keep the evaluation on track when other priorities might push the effort aside. Provide steering committee members with the tools to succeed. Members need not be evalu- 78 National Staff Development Council JSD Fall 2002 t. a\nltj 3l jg: JE St a JI r X I ation experts, but they do need information, support, and guidance to make informed decisions. They need background material to learn about program evaluation and examples of good evaluation studies. Finally, ey need access to experts on professional development, measurement, and the content areas of the training programs. - Before launching any evaluation effort, have a written description of each program to be evaluated. You would be amazed at the number of people who do not have a clear idea of what you mean by the New TeacherJmduction Program or the Early Literacy Initiative since so many different initiatives are being undertaken simultaneously around the school or district PHASE II: DESIGN THE EVALUATION 1. Generate questions to guide the evaluation. 2. Generate potential data sources/ instruments to address the questions. 3. Using a matrix to provide a birds-eye view, agree on e most important questions and the best data sources. 4. Decide if collecting data from a sample group is warranted to make the evaluation manageable. 5. Determine the evaluation approach that makes sense\nquantitative vs\nqualitative/naturalistic. 6. Gather or create the instruments for data collection. .7. Determine a realistic schedule for coUecting data. 8. Create a system for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data. Decisions made in Phase EI are critical. They determine the technical quality of your evaluation. In the questions you select, you determine what to examine and what to ignore. When you finish with the design phase, your program evaluation wiU be shaped, to use a quantitative or a , quahtative model  or a mixture of the two. In the design phase, you make oer major decisions, such as whether to use a sample group. You also decide whether to do an in-depth case study, wheer to ON THE WEB. See an example of a matrix to help guide evaluations at\nwww.nsdc.org/library/jsd/ champion234.html. survey the whole population, whether to use examples of smdent work instead of official documents such as student grades or standardized test scores, or whether to judge adult learners understanding of the training content with performance tasks during training or by exit tests, classroom observations, or smdent feedback. If the programs to be evaluated already have stated indicators of longterm impact, generating appropriate evaluation questions is much simpler than when programs have only vague, lofty goals. The steering committee may drift into the realm of program planning as you encounter hurdles like fuzzy program outcomes. To avoid making misinformed evaluation design decisions, involve program leaders in your discussions. Developing or gathering instruments and then collecting the data are the most expensive steps in any evaluation. Think strategically about which data to collect, from whom to collect it or where to find it, and the best time to collect it. Your organization may already be collecting data for another purpose that now can be used for program evaluation. Some public records, such as smdent attendance, may be valuable if, for example, 20% increase in smdent attendance at aU grade levels is one of your programs indicators of impact. PHASE III\nPREPARE TO REPORT 1. Determine which audiences wiU want to know the results. 2. Consider several forums and formats to disseminate the results. 3. Plan reports, presentations, photo displays, graphs, charts, etc. Remember that your job is to make the evaluation results useful to your organization, so consider a range of ways to provide information to various groups. Consider briefs in the school or district newsletter, a handout updating staff about the schedule for data collection, five- minute progress updates in faculty meetings, bulleted statements on your web site, a digital picture- album of the programs results in classrooms with photos of smdents, and hallway displays of smdent work. If your final report is a formal document complete with examples of your data collection instruments, consider writing an executive summary of five pages or less to help.readers get the essential information. PHASE IV: CREATE THE WORK PLAN 1. List aU tasks to be completed for the whole evaluation.. 2, Create a realistic timeline. 3. Assign work. .4. Distribute the master plan. You -will have to be creative to accomplish ail the evaluation tasks. In education, we rarely have the luxury of contracting outsiders for the entire project Enlist steering committee members, partners, graduate smdents from the local university, and other talented critical friends to get the work done. One caution: For formal or summa- tive evaluations to be credible, avoid using insiders such as the program designers or implementers (coaches, mentors, trainers, or facilitators) to perform critical evaluation tasks that call for objectivity and distance. And be sure to get ongoing, high-quaiit)' technical expertise for the critical technical analysis. A CATALYST FOR REFLECTION Completing a major program evaluation usually serves as the catalyst for serious reflection on the current designs, policies, and practices of your professional development programs  their goals, content, processes, and contexts. In fact, revelations are often so powerful that they bring about the realization that major changes are needed if significant results' are reaUy expected from professional development People frequently conclude that designing the evaluation should be the first step in the program planning process, rather than an afterthought during implementation. B JSD Fall 2002 National Staff Development Council 79John W. Walker, P.a. Attorney At Law 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Telephone (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 JOHN W. WALKER SHAWN CHILDS Via Facsimile - 376-2147 October 10, 2002  OF COUNSEL ROBERT McHenry, pa donna J. McHenry 8210 Henderson Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 Phone: (501) 372-3425  Fax (501) 372-3428 Email: mchenryd^wbeU.net Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Little Rock School District v. PCSSD, et al. Case No. 4:82CV00866 Dear Chris: Plan. This refers to your letter of October 4, 2002, providing LRSDs proposed Comphance The carts remedy and the general subject matter are too complex for us to provide all comments and objections we may ultimately have before todays Board meeting. We do note the following: 1. More consideration is needed of the programs to be identified as implementation , which are to be subjected to a comprehensive program evaluation cJocument at page 7 identifies three areas. We note the absence of specific reference and detail reg^dmg mteiventions / scaflFolding - areas of vital importance given the achievement patterns of .African Amencan students. We note also that the LRSD compliance report cited pursuant to Section 2.7 . . many more programs as designed to fulfill Section 2.7. 2. In a discussion prior to his testimony in the hearing Judge Wilson, we understood Dr Ross to indicate that the existing evaluation of the Pre-K - 2 literary program was not adequate' hp nntfitinn oorta A J_______ r-.i , , * The notation at page 4 of your document of the changed use u 3 DRA relates to part of the concerns he expressed. This undermines the LRSD of the Observation Survey and the in  r .  -------- ------------------- argument (page 1) that the existing evaluation, upon Board approval, will satisfy a part of the courts remedy. 3. The LRSD discussion about satisfying the courts order regarding the evaluations EXHIBITmentioned at page 148 of the compliance report does not seem to take account of the material provided, which describes an adequate evaluation. 4. We question the period for implementation of a remedy which the court has identified and, therefore, the LRSD schedule. Once again, these comments should not be taken to be the full range of concerns which Joshua may ultimately have about the courts remedy and the Compliance Plan. Nor do we intend to waive our concerns about the court setting forth a remedy, without first hearing from the parties and the ODM with regard to the courts views on an appropriate remedy. ihc^ly. ohn W. Walker JWW:js cc: Ms. Ann Marshall All Counsel of Record, OCT. 24.2002 8:06ftM JOHN W WALKER P A NO.963 P.E JOHN w. Walker SHAWN CHILDS I John W. Wllker, p.a. Attorne? At Law 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Telephone (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 October 23, 2002 OR COUNSEL ROBERT McHENKT P^ 8210 Hendeksqn BqaD Lrrtm Sock, Arkansas 722i n Phone: (501) 372-3425  Faz (501) 372-3428 Email\nmcheciydgawbolLaet Mr. Christopher Heller FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re\nLRSD V. PCSSD Dear Chris\nThis letter sets forth additional Compliance Plan. We comments of the Joshua Intervenors concerning the LRSD , ----------------* LLiC jUIkOU the dataJ  In tol^TSD attention should be given to the quality of e oata. m_the past, LRSD has used results on the RA and the Observation in consistent Txnth rr  ^nd the Observation SuTvcy in wcvs not nsistent with the purposes of those instruments. In addition, because teanherc 4., In addition, because teachers provided scores for to own students, the past use made of the data was in conflict with the diS newly enacted Regulation IL-Rl that Conflict of Interest .55 must be avoided. :s recognition in the for 2. We are concerned about the .  manner in which the regulation describes the team nropAg-\nprepari^ evaluauons, again in the context of conflict of interest  L - - isavoided,e external consultant needs to write the report and control the conflict of interest In order to insure that context of the analysis. Paragraphs 3, 5 and 6 of the guarantee that the external ti' which w= describe,-JI Program Evaluation Procedures do not iizitk , cNfv   .' --------LRSD staff preparing comments to the Board with a differing interpretation of the evaluation results. Continue to be concerned about the global, general manner in which the content of P desenbed (page 7 of the document, first paragraph). For example the Board is bXwX'^sSStoe with remediation for students whose petoanc, is oe ow par Studying the actual implementation of these stotuds im an or a re more T' because class membersare so much AcibeiSn^esS Srf i 1 P^rfoxmauce on the Benchmark and Stanford /vcnievement lests. A. satisfactory desenpuon by e School Board :e standards (in all or a representative of the evaluations which it : exhibit I 10/24/2002 THU 09:03 [TX/Ri: NO 85S0] @002' . CX^. 24.2002 8:07flM JOHN W WALKER P R N0.9S3 P.3 Page Two October 23, 2002 ^dert^c should make clear that the actual implementation of remediation acmvines m ehstnet schools is to receive careful consideration. This is surely an important contextual factor (see Accuracy Standards, para. 2), i^onicxiuai . Plan that the LRSD plans evaluations ofprograms deemed pamculmly direcmd to achievement of African American students for the Uidefiuiu: ' necessary to satisfy the court. We would Uke to receive the Boards assurance mat inns is me case. to be indefinite future, not We would appreciate your providing this letter to the Superintendent and the members of the school board. Walker Sincerely, JWW:Ip cc: AU Counsel Ms. Ann Marshall Judge Thomas Ray 10/24/2002 THU 09:03 [TX/RI NO 8580] @003 MEMORANDUM To: From: Subject: Date: Dennis Glasgow Gene Jones Compliance Remedy August 9, 2004 Thank you for providing time for Margie and me Wednesday and for making our conversation both pleasant and informative. We are pleased to be invited to participate in the planning for and implementation of the Courts June 30 Compliance Remedy. We will be available as much as necessary to complete the work. The proposed responses to the Compliance Remedy that you shared with us should be helpful to the people to be assigned those tasks. As you refine and update the document, it may be worth considering that the language of paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy includes the term statisticians in the list of people to be hired. The language of the list of staff members of the Research, Assessment and Evaluation Department in the proposed response document does not. 1 also note that the term is plural in the Compliance Remedy. Significant tasks ordered by the Compliance Remedy in paragraphs F and G include written notification to Joshua and ODM of the eight programs to be targeted for step 2 evaluations and the quarterly updates. The proposed response document does not include these and may not need to, but they should be prominent on the list of things to do when the staff of the Research, Assessment, and Evaluation Department is assembled. The first of the quarterly updates is due December 1. Thank you for arranging our meeting with the superintendent this Thursday.PROJECTED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT STATUS OF LRSD SCHOOLS BASED ON 2004 ACTAAP ASSESSMENT RESULTS SUMMARY:  Fifteen (15) elementary schools fully met standards for all subgroups in both mathematics and literacy. These schools are not on school improvement status.  Of the remaining nineteen (19) elementary schools that are on school improvement status, seven (7) met Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in both math and literacy.  Bale, Baseline, Chicot, Cloverdale (Elementary), Dodd, Fair Park, and Rockefeller met AYP for 1 year. These seven schools can come off school improvement if they make AYP next year.  One elementary school moves up to Year 3 status: Mitchell.  Meadowcliff, Rightsell, and Western Hills are projected to be on alert since they failed to meet AYP for one or more subgroups in mathematics. These schools will be on Year 1 of School Improvement should they fail to meet AYP next spring.  At the middle level Mann and Pulaski Heights Middle Schools met the adequate yearly progress standard. They will remain on Year 1 of School Improvement. The other six middle schools will move up a year on school improvement, five to Year 2 and one (Southwest) to Year 3.  All five high schools were on Alert status last year. Four of them will move to Year 1 status due to not meeting AYP in literacy and math. Parkview met AYP in literacy and math and will move off school improvement status. SCHOOLS THAT MET OR EXCEEDED THE STANDARD IN MATH AND LITERACY FOR 2004: Bale Booker Chicot Dodd Forest Park Geyer Springs Jefferson McDermott Pulaski Heights Romine Wakefield Mann Middle Parkview High School Baseline Carver Cloverdale Elementary Fair Park Fulbright Gibbs Mabelvale Elementary Otter Creek Rockefeller Terry Williams Pulaski Heights Middle received AIIR - A 200H OFFICE OF desegregation monitoringSCHOOLS THAT WERE ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT STATUS FOR THE 2003-04 SCHOOL YEAR: Current Status (Based on 2002-03 Scores) Level/School ELEMENTARY Chicot Year 3 Bale Baseline Fair Park Mitchell Wakefield Brady Cloverdale Dodd Franklin ML King Mabelvale Rockefeller Stephens Washington Watson Year 2 Year 2 Year 2 Year 2 Year 2 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Projected Status (Based on 2003-04 Scores) Year 3 Year 2 Year 2 Year 2 Year 3 Off School Improvement Year 2 Year 1 Year 1 Year 2 Year 2 Off School Improvement Year 1 Year 2 Year 2 Year 2 Subgroup/Subject not meeting AYP All students: Math and Literacy All students\nMath All students: Math African-American students\nMath All students\nMath and Literacy African-American students: Math and Literacy All students: Math and Literacy Comments Met AYP for 1 year Met AYP for 1 year Met AYP for 1 year Met AYP for 1 year Met AYP for 2 consecutive years Met AYP for 1 year Met AYP for 1 year Met AYP for 2 consecutive years Met AYP for 1 yearWilson Woodruff Year 1 Year 1 Year 2 Year 2 All students: Math All students: Math Meadowcliff Alert Rightsell Western Hills Alert Alert African-American students: Math All students: Math All students: Math MIDDLE SCHOOL Cloverdale Dunbar Forest Heights Henderson Mabelvale Mann Pulaski Heights Southwest HIGH SCHOOL Central Hall Fair McClellan Parkview Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 2 Alert Alert Alert Alert Alert Year 2 Year 2 Year 2 Year 2 Year 2 Year 1 Year 1 Year 3 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Not on School Improvement All students: Math and Literacy African American students: Math and Literacy All students: Math All students: Math and Literacy All students: Math and Literacy All students: Math and Literacy African-American students: Literacy All students: Literacy All students: Literacy All students: Literacy Met Safe Harbor provision Met Safe Harbor provision 34% improvement in black students below basic in math compared to last year 88% of white students proficient in literacy Met AYP in literacy and mathEASTI IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION FILED U.8. DISTRICT ^URT 'ESN district ARKANSAS JUN 30 2004 JAMES W. McCORMACK, CLERK By\n. DEP CLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. 4:82CV00866 WRW/JTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1,ETAL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS MEMORANDUM OPINION' I. Warning to the General Reader The general reader, if any there be, should realize that educators, like lawyers, have developed their own language. To the extent that time, patience, and skill would permit, I have tried to Gamerize'^ this Memorandum Opinion. I have fallen short, but hope the effort will be of some help. IL Background On September 13,2002,1 entered a Memorandum Opinion (the September 13 Decision) holding that the Little Rock School District (LRSD) had substantially complied with all of its I would be seriously remiss if I did not once again note the tremendous amount of work United States Magistrate Judge Joe 'Hiomas Ray has done on this case. -Bryan Gamer, of Dallas, Texas, has published several excellent books and articles for the legal profession on the use of plain, understandable English. .0 72A Rev.a/82)desegregation obligations set forth iii the January 16,1998 Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (the Revised Plan)/ except those obligations contained in  2.7.1, LRSD V. Pulaski County Special Sch. Dist, et al., 231F. Supp. 2d 988 (E.D. Ark. 2002)\nafPd, 359 F.3d 957 (8* Cir. 2004). Section 2.7 of the Revised Plan obligated LRSD to implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to improve and remediate African-American achievement. 2.7.1 ensured that the promise made in  2.7 would have teeth by requiring that: Section LRSD shall assess the academic programs implemented pursuant to  2.7 after each year in order to determine the effectiveness of the academic programs in improving Afiican-American achievement. If this assessment reveals that a program has not and likely will not improve Afidcan-American achievement, LRSD shall take appropriate action in the form of either modifying how the program is implemented or replacing the program. ex 871. As stated above, m the September 13 Decision, I found that LRSD had substantially complied with its obhgations under  2.7 of the Revised Plan\nhowever, I detennined there were numerous, substantial deficiencies in LRSDs efforts to comply with its obligations under 2.7.1. See LRSD, 237 F. Supp. 2d at 1076-1082. The September 13 Decision gave LRSD until March 15, 2004, to demonstrate that it had substantially complied with  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan, as specified in subparts A, B, and C of the Compliance Remedy. LRSD, 237 F. Supp. 2d at 1087-88. LRSD has been involved continuously in desegregation litigation since 1956. See LRSD, 237 F. Supp. 2d at footnote 18. As far as I can tell from the reported cases, LRSD now has the During the 2001-02 unitary status hearings, the Revised Plan was introduced into evidence as CX871. -2- AO72A (Rev.8/82)dubious distinction of having been under federal court supervision longer than any other school district in history. Thus, LRSD is well seasoned when it monitoring. comes to court supervision and On November 12, 2002, Joshua Intervenors\" (Joshua) appealed (docket no. 3704) the Septembers Decision. On March 2,2004, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. LRSD V. Joshua, 359 F.3d 957 (8- Cir. 2004). Thus, all aspects of the September 13 Decision are now final and the law of the case. On March 12, 2004, LRSD filed its Compliance Report (docket no. 3837) seeking complete unitary status on the ground that it had substantially complied with the obligations imposed under the Compliance Remedy and  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan. On April 15, 2004, Joshua filed an Opposition to LRSDs Request for Release from Court Supervision of Its I Desegregation Efforts (docket no. 3856), along with a supporting Memorandum (docket no. 3857). 1 must now decide whether LRSD has met its obligations under the Compliance Remedy, and whether it should be released from almost five decades of court supervision. in. The September 13, 2002 Compliance Remedy Almost 70% of LRSDs students are African-American. Historically, the academic achievement of many of these students, as gauged by standardized test scores, is low and poses a significant long-term challenge to LRSD teachers and administrators. Of course, because this so-called achievement gap IS a nationwide phenomenon, it is a problem that educators must are '^e Joshua Intervenors are a group of Afiican-American school children.. enrolled in each of the three Pulaski County school districts. Thus, Joshua some of whom serves as the class representative for all African-American students enrolled in LRSD, the Pulaski Countv Snecial School District, and the North Little Rock School District. -3- A0 72A (Rev.a/82)I ( ' AO72A (Rev.8/82) confront in schools throughout the-country. See LRSD, 237 F. Supp. 2d at 1073-74. Importantly,  2.7 of the Revised Plan promised only that LRSD would implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to improve and remediate Afidcan-American achievement, See docket no. 3410 at 51. However,  2.7.1 went on to require LRSD to assess the  2.7 programs annually in order to determine their effectiveness, and to modify or replace any programs that were shown not to be working to improve African-American achievement. Id. at 148. Read together, the obligations set forth in  2.7 and  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan required LRSD not only to design academic programs that were int achievement of African-American students, but also to programs to ensure that they were, in fact, effective in improving^ Expressed in the vernacular of my native Scott County, Arkan^\n^ 1 c ise It. id  2.7.1 contained the bacon. These two sections of the Revised Plan are crucially important to the future educational success of a large number of LRSDs current and future students. During the November 2001 hearings on unitary status, Dr. Bonnie Lesley, LRSDs Associate Superintendent of Instruction and Curriculum, defined a program assessment as something that is dynamic, it is interactive, its ongoing, it happens frequently, and it is a measurement, along with the analysis that you would make of whatever results are available. LRSD, 237 F. Supp. 2d at 1077. In contrast, she defined a program evaluation as more long term, it may consider observations or measurements in addition to test scores, and is guided by a series of research questions that are usually provided by whoever the consumer is of that report. Id. In other words, a program assessment is a relatively informal process that may not result in much documentation, while a program evaluation is a formal process that always A-AO 72A (Rev.B/82) I i I I I mvolves the preparation of an often lengthy written program evaluation which is centered around carefully prepared research questions that the evaluation is designed to answer. Section 2.7.1 of the Revised Plan provided that LRSD must make assessmentsnot evaluations-of the  2.7 programs in order to determine their effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students. However, as early as March 15, 2000, LRSD acknowledged, m its own Interim Compliance Report (docket no. 3356), that  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan obligated it to prepare evaluations on the key  2.7 programs so that LRSD admimstrators could make an informed decision on the effectiveness of those programs. See LRSDs Interim Compliance Report at 51-55. Furthermore, during her testimony in November of 2001, Dr. Lesley admitted that, even though  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan did not mention anything about LRSDs obligation to prepare program evaluations to determine the effectiveness of the  2.7 programs, she and other administrators interpreted that section of the Revised Plan as requinng LRSD to perform evaluations covering the most important  2.7 programs. LRSD, 237 F. Supp. 2d at 1077. Because it is so important to an understanding of the Compliance Remedy, I want to be very clear on this pomt: The evidence overwhelmingly establishes that LRSD has always construed the obligations contained in  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan as requiring It to prepare formal program evaluations on the key  2.7 programs. See Interim Compliance Report at 51-55\nFinal Compliance Report dated March 15, 2001 (docket no. 3410) at 148\nDr. Lesleys testimony cited in the September 13 Decision, LRSD, 237 F. Supp. 2d at 1077. Since my decision will turn on whether LRSD has properly implemented the September 13, 2002 Compliance Remedy, it is set forth below in full\n-5-Vn. Compliance Remedy Because LRSD failed to substantially comply with the crucially important obligations contained in  2.7.1, it must remain under court supervision with regard to that section of the Revised Plan until it: (a) demonstrates that a program assessment procedure is in place that can accurately measure the effectiveness of each program implemented under  2.7 in improving the academic achievement of Afiican-Amencan students\nand (b) prepares the program evaluations identified on page 148 of the Final Compliance Report and uses those evaluations as part of the program assessment procedure contemplated by  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan. The details of this compliance remedy are set forth below\nA. For the entire 2002-03 school year and the first semester of the 2003-04 school year, through December 31, 2003, LRSD must continue to assess each of the programs implemented under  2.7 to unprove the academic achievement of Afiican-American students. LRSD now has over three years of testing data and other information available to use in gauging the effectiveness of those AO72A (Rev.8/82) i i I i I I I B. C. programs. I expect LRSD to use all of that available data and information in assessing the effectiveness of those programs and in deciding whether any of those programs should be modified eliminated. or LRSD must maintain written records regarding its assessment of each of those programs. These written records must reflect the following information: (a) the written criteria used to assess each program during the 2002-03 school year and the first semester of the 2003-04 school year\n(b) the results of the annual assessments of each program, including whether the assessments resulted in program modifications or the elimination of any programs\nand (c) the names of the administrators who were involved with the assessment of each program, as well as at least a grade level description of any teachers who were involved in the assessment process {e.g., all fourth grade math teachers\nall eighth grade English teachers, etc.). LRSD must use Dr. Nunnery or another expert from outside LRSD with equivalent qualifications and expertise to prepare program evaluations on each of the programs identified on page 148 of the Final Compliance Report.^ I will accept all program evaluations On page 148 of its March 15, 2001 Final Compliance Report (docket no. 3410), LRSD flatly stated that it had prepared program evaluations on fourteen separate programs listed on that -6-that have already been completed by Dr. Nunnery or someone with similar qualifications and approved by the Board. All program evaluations that have not yet been completed on the remaining programs identified on page 148 of the Final Compliance Report must be prepared and approved by the Board as soon as. In practicable, but, in no event, later than March 15, 2003. D addition, as these program evaluations are prepared, LRSD shall use them, as part of the program assessment process, to determ in p the effectiveness of those programs in improving Afiican- American achievement and whether, based on the evaluations, any changes or modifications should be made in those programs. In addition, LRSD must use those program evaluations, to the extent they may be relevant, in assessing the effectiveness of other related programs. 72A Rev.8/82) D. Joshua must monitor LRSDs compliance with  2.7.1 and must immediately bring to the attention of LRSD all problems that detected in its compliance with its obligations under  2.7.1, as those obligations are spelled out in this Compliance Remedy. Thereafter, Joshua and LRSD must use the Process for Raising Compliance Issues set forth in  8.2, et seq., of the Revised Plan are E. to attempt to resolve those compliance issues. If those efforts are unsuccessful, Joshua must present the issues to me for resolution, as required by  8.2.5. Any such presentation must be timely. The ODM must also monitor LRSDs compliance with  2.7.1 and help to ensure that LRSD fulfills its obligations, as specified in this Compliance Remedy. F. On or before March 15, 2004, LRSD must file a Compliance Report which documents its compliance with its obligations under  2.7.1. Any party, including Joshua, who wishes to challenge LRSD s substantial compliance with  2.7.1, as specified above, may file objections with the court on or before April 15, 2004 Thereafter, I will decide whether LRSD has substantially complied with  2.7.1, as specified in this Compliance Remedy, and should be released from all further supervision and monitoring. page. During the 2001-02 unitary status hearings, the evidence overwhelmingly established that, as of March 15, 2001, LRSD had not prepared any of those fourteen program evaluations. See LRSD,231'?. Supp.2dat 1079-80. Henceforth, I will refer to these fourteen program evaluations as the Page 148 Evaluations. -7- I I I ILRSD,131 F. Supp. 2d at 1087-88 f-emphasis added). Even a casual reading of this Compliance Remedy reveals that it imposed four essential obligations on LRSD, Joshua, and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM): 1. 2. Preparation of Annual Assessments of  2.7 Program .s LRSD was required to annually assess each of the programs implemented under  2.7 during the 2002-2003 school year and the first semester of the 2003-2004 school year and then use those assessments, the more than three years of testing data, and all other relevant available information to determine the effectiveness of those programs and to decide whether any of the programs should be modified or eliminated. LRSD also was required to maintain written records reflecting: (a) the criteria used to assess each program\n(b) the results of the annual assessments of each program, including whether any programs were modified or eliminated\nand (c) the administrators and teachers who were involved in preparing the assessment of each program. I I Subparts A and B of the Compliance Remedy obligated LRSD to assess each of the  2.7 programs implemented during the 2002-03 school year and the first semester of the 2003-04 school year and to maintain written records of its armual assessments of each of those programs. I made no mention of LRSD preparing evaluations of  2.7 programs because, on its face, nothing in  2,7.1 of the Revised Plan obligated LRSD to perform program evaluations. However, Dr. Lesley made it clear in her testimony that LRSD administrators knew and understood that the assessment obligation in  2.7.1 included the obligation of preparing program evaluations. See discussion, supra, at 4-5. Therefore, I concluded it would be best to use the same terms in the Compliance Remedy that the parties themselves had chosen to use in  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan. Because I was tracking the parties own language, I never dreamed the use of the tenns assess and assessment would suddenly create confusion for LRSD administrators in deciding how to comply with subparts A and B of the Compliance Remedy. Preparation of Page 148 Program Evaluations. I LRSD was required to hire experts to prepare the fourteen program evaluations identified on page 148 of its March 15, 2001 Compliance Report. The Court agreed to accept all program evaluations that had already been prepared by outside consultants and ordered LRSD to hire outside consultants to complete the unfinished program evaluations, which were to be approved by the LRSD Board and filed with the Court no later than March 15, 2003. Finally, as those evaluations were prepared, LRSD was required to use them - to the extent they I -8- AO72A (Rev.e/82)might be useful - in its annual assessment of the effectiveness of the  2.7 programs. 3. Monitoring. Joshuas counsel was required to continue with its monitoring of LRSDs implementation of the Compliance Remedy and to use the procedures set forth in  8.2 of the Revised Plan to resolve any compliance problems that might arise. If Joshua and LRSD were unsuccessful in using the ODM to facilitate and resolve those problems, they were required to bring those compliance issues directly to me for resolution. Finally, the ODM was directed to monitor LRSDs implementation of the Compliance Remedy and to help ensure that LRSD fulfills its obligations specified therein. The sole purpose of subparts D and E the Compliance Remedy was to ensure that, if the ODM was unable to successfully facilitate the resolution of any compliance issues raised by Joshua, those compliance issues would be brought to my attention so that I could resolve them on a timely basis, thereby avoiding any surprises when LRSD filed its Compliance Report. 4. Preparation of Compliance Report. V LRSD was ordered to file a Compliance Report by March 15,2004, documenting its substantial compliance with  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan and the Compliance Remedy. TV. The Parties Compliance Activities after September 13, 2002 A. The Court Clarifies Joshuas Monitoring Obligation. After the entry of the September 13 Decision, LRSD did not seek clarification of any terms used in the Compliance Remedy or any of its compliance obligations. Based on its silence, I concluded that LRSD understood what it was required to do under the Compliance Remedy, and that it was proceeding apace to meet those obligations. In contrast, on October 1, 2002, Joshuas counsel wrote a letter (docket no. 3680) objecting to the monitoring obligations imposed on them under subpart D of the Compliance Remedy. Among other things, Joshuas counsel challenged the Courts decision to: (1) impose monitoring obligations on them that were contemplated to be the responsibility of the ODM\n-9- AO 72A (Rev.8/82)i and (2) place a greater burden upon Joshua than it has imposed upon the ODM. Id. By way of relief, Joshuas counsel sought clarification of their monitoring obligations under subpart D ( . of the Compliance Remedy and a hearing on this matter so that an appropriate record on the issues of the role of the ODM monitoring and Joshuas monitoring may be fully developed. Id. On October 11, 2002, I entered an Order (docket no. 3685) clarifying the monitoring obligations imposed on Joshuas counsel under the Compliance Remedy. After noting that Joshua s counsel had been engaged in monitoring LRSDs compliance with its desegregation obligations since at least 1990,1 made it clear that subpart D of the Compliance Remedy only obligated Joshua s counsel to continue to perform their monitoring role according to the same procedure they and LRSD have followed for many years in this case. LRSD, 237 F. Supp. 2d at 1091. Because the October 1,2002 letter could be read to suggest that Joshuas counsel would only continue their monitoring role, if ordered to do so by the Court, I also made it clear that: I do not believe I can force Joshuas counsel to perform monitoring duties  something that I may have mistakenly assumed they wanted to do. I will leave it up to Joshua s counsel to decide if they have an ethical and professional duty to continue monitoring LRSDs compliance with its sole remaining obligation under the Revised Plan. I hope Joshuas counsel resolves that question in favor of continuing their long-standing commitment to monitoring LRSDs compliance with its desegregation obligations. However, since they complain about my expressly directingthem to continue monitoring LRSDs compliance with  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan - something I never expected to hear -1 believe I must now clarify Section VII.D. of the Memorandum Opinion to read as follows\nJoshua may monitor LRSDs compliance with  2.7.1 and, if they choose to do so, they should bring to the attention of LRSD, on a timely basis, all problems that are detected in its compliance with its obligations under  2.7.1, as those obligations are spelled out in this Compliance Remedy. Thereafter, Joshua and LRSD must use the process for raising compliance issues set forth in  ^-2. et seq., of the Revised Plan to attempt to resolve those compliance issues. If those efforts are unsuccessful, Joshua shall -10- XO72A Rev.8/82) present the issues to me for resolution, as required by  8.2.5. Any such presentation must be timfily Id. at 1091. Finally, I emphasized that, regardless of whether Joshuas counsel decided to continue to monitor LRSDs compliance with its obligations under  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan, the ODM staff most certamly will continue their close monitoring ofLRSDs compliance with that section of the Revised Plan. Id. at 1091. My final admonition follows\non the subject of monitoring was as K Joshua s counsel decide to continue their monitoring role, which is independent from the momtonng work performed by the ODM,... I expect counsel for Joshua and LRSD to cooperate and work together to ensure that things go smoothly with regard to monitoring LRSDs implementation of its obhgations under  2.7.1. However, if actual disputes arise regarding monitoring, I wiU be available to resolve them. I at 1091. B. LRSD Adopts Compliance Plan, Approves Regulation IL-R1, and Designates Areas for  2.7.1 Program Evaluations. On October 10,2002, LRSDs Board of Directors (the Board) adopted a Compliance Plan that was specifically designed to satisfy the Courts Compliance Remedy. See Exhibit A to LRSDs May 14, 2003 Notice of Filing Program Evaluations (docket no. 3745)? The 72A Rev.8/82) During the June 14 and 15, 2004 compliance hearing (hereafter referred compliance neanng (hereafter referred to as the ), the Proposed Compliance Plan was introduced into evidence as LRSDs In most respects, the Proposed Compliance Plan is identical to the final Compliance Plan approved by the Board on October 10, 2002. However, the Proposed Compliance Plan raises a number of questions about the meaning of subparts A and B of the Compliance Remedy. All of those questions were deleted from the final Compliance Plan approved by the Board on October 10,2002. As will be discussed later, LRSD did not bnng any any of those questions to my attention, or otherwise seek clarification of the requirements of the Exhibit No. 2. Compliance Remedy. -11-Compliance Plan recognized that, in order for LRSD to meet its obligations under the Compliance Remedy, it would have to satisfy three core obligations\n(1) develop a written procedure for evaluating the programs implemented pursuant to  2.7 to determine their effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students\n(2) maintain written records of the criteria used to evaluate each [ 2.7] program\nand (3) repare a comprehensive program evaluation of each academic program implemented pursuant to ...  2.7 to determine its effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students and to decide whether to modify or replace the program.'\" Id. at 3-5 (emphasis added). Significantly, there is nothing in the Compliance Plan adopted by the Board that suggests LRSD was confused about the meaning of any of the terms in the Compliance Remedy or any of its compliance obligations. Additionally, the Compliance Plan makes it clear that LRSD construed subpart A of the Compliance Remedy as requiring it to prepare a comprehensive program evaluation of each academic program implemented pursuant to .. .  2.7 . The Compliance Plan also included a detailed Action Plan Time Line that: (1) identified the LRSD employees who were responsible for implementing each activity necessaiy to satisfy the Compliance Remedy\nand (2) provided a schedule for completing each of those activities. Dr. Bonnie Lesley, the Associate Superintendent for Curriculum and Instmction, and Dr. Ken James, LRSD s Superintendent of Schools, were assigned personal responsibility for each of the twenty-eight (28) activities identified by the Action Plan Time Line. Id. at 7-10. Thus, It was up to Dr. Lesley and Dr. James to spearhead the timely implementation of all twenty- eight activities necessary to satisfy the Compliance Remedy. Finally, at the same time it approved the Compliance Plan, the Board also adopted -12- \\O72A Rev.e/82)Regulation IL-Rl, which set forth the written procedures for evaluating the programs implemented pursuant to  2.7 to determine their effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students. See Exhibit A at 2 (docket no. 3745).' According to the Compliance Plan, Regulation IL-Rl established the criteria for preparing the program evaluations necessary to satisfy LRSDs obligations under subparts A and B of the Compliance Remedy. On October 24,2002, the Board approved a Program Evaluation Agenda for the 2002- 03 school year that authorized the preparation of evaluations in three broad areas: (1) Elementary literacy\n(2) Secondary literacy\nand (3) the National Science Foundation (NSF) K-12 Math and Science Project. See LRSDs Exhibit No. 3\nODMs March 30, 2004 Report on LRSDs Implementation of the Courts Compliance Remedy at 4 (hereinafter referred to as the ODMs Compliance Report) (docket no. 3854). LRSD subsequently construed the 2002-03 Program Evaluation Agenda as requiring it to prepare only two  2.7.1 evaluations in order to satisfy its ! I I I i I i I obligations under subpart A of the Compliance Remedy: (1) I I a comprehensive Literacy Evaluation\nand (2) a comprehensive Math and Science Evaluation. Of course, Literacy and Math and Science are not programs they are broad I i ! I i I academic areas that roughly correspond to the grouping of college courses into Arts or Sciences. Because LRSD administrators, such as Dr. Lesley, had always constmed  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan as requiring LRSD to prepare evaluations of the key  2.7 programs implemented to improve African-American achievement, the Board should have been aware that I I I During the compliance hearing. Regulation IL-Rl was introduced into evidence Joshuas Exhibit No. 2. as I -13- AO72A (Rev.a/ea)they were beingtoo general in dividing the academic universe into Literacy and Math/Science and then preparing a global evaluation of each of those areas. Nevertheless, in its March 12,2004 Compliance Report (docket no. 3837), LRSD contends that these two  2.7.1 evaluations fully satisfy all of its obligations under subpart A of the Compliance Remedy/ C. Joshua Invokes Facilitation Provision of Revised Plan. On November 4, 2002, Ms. Ann Marshall, the Director of the ODM, wrote Joshuas counsel a letter confirming that she: (a) had received their November 1,2002 letter requesting that she facilitate the dispute that had arisen between Joshua and LRSD regarding the adequacy of LRSD s Compliance Plan\nand (b) was willing to facilitate that dispute.' I Thereafter, I was never contacted by Joshuas counsel or anyone else about the outcome of the ODMs facilitation efforts. Because subpart D of the Compliance Remedy obligated Joshuas counsel to contact me only if the facilitation was unsuccessful, I concluded from the parties silence (and the ODMs silence) that the ODM had successfully resolved this dispute. On November 6, 2002,1 wrote Ms. Marshall to reinforce the crucially important role I expected herto playmmomtoring LRSDs compliance withits obligations under the Compliance As I explain later in some detail, I was notmade aware ofLRSDsPropoW Compliance Plan and Regulation IL-Rl until two months after LRSD filed its March 12, 2004 Comphance Report. LRSD did not file the October 10,2002 Compliance Plan with the Court until March 14 2003.  I Section 8.2 of the Revised Plan required the parties to use the ODM to facilitate the resolution of any compliance issues. Since the words facilitation and facilitate come directly TT*r\\-m fkio \"D c\u0026amp;irt Din., T _____j.i____... from the Revised Plan, I will use them. A copy of Ms. Marshalls November 4,2002 letter, marked Exhibit A, is attached to this Memorandum Opinion. -14- ^O72A Rev.8/82)I Remedy?* The instructions to her were: It seems to me it would be best if you worked with the parties toward implementing the remedies\nbut you should feel free to contact me in writing if a serious impasse develops. In other words, as long as everything is going along smoothly, I see no reason for you to make regular reports to me in this respect. - J. -------------- A wuywi. I emphasize, however, that you should feel free to call on me if serious problems anse. Neither the parties nor the ODM ever contacted me to request that I become involved in resolving any compliance disputes or other serious impasses between LRSD and Joshua, despite the requirement for such contact by subpart D of the Compliance Remedy and my November 6,2002 letter. D. The Six Completed or Substantially Completed Page 148 Evaluations. The September 13 Decision stated that the Court will accept all program evaluations that have already been completed by Dr. Nunnery or someone with similar qualifications and approved by the Board. LRSD, 273 F. Supp. 2d at 1088. By the time I entered that decision, LRSD had completed or substantially completed six of the fourteen Page 148 Evaluations. These SIX evaluations covered the following programs\n(1) Pre-K-3 Literacy\n(2) NSF Math and Science Project\n(3) Charter Schools\n(4) English as a Second Language\n(5) SEDL*^ Program at Southwest Middle School\nand (6) Collaborative Action Team Project. By December 31,2002, LRSDs Board had approved all six of these Page 148 Evaluations. II A copy of my November 6, 2002 letter, marked Exhibit B, is attached to this Memorandum Opinion. ^SEDL is an acronym for Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. ODMs Compliance Report at 8 (docket no. 3854). See -15- AO72A (Rev.8/82)E. The Eight Remaining Page 148 Evaluations. LRSD contracted with Dr. Steven Ross, a program evaluation expert and a member of the faculty at the University of Memphis, to prepare guidelines for completing or revising the eight remaining evaluations.'^ These eight evaluations covered the following programs\n(1) Middle Schools\n(2) Extended Year Schools\n(3) HIPPY\n'\"* (4) Campus Leadership Teams\n(5) Summer School - Elementary\n(6) Lyceum Scholars Program\n(7) Onward to Excellence - Watson Elementary\nand (8) Vital Link. In late November of 2002, Dr. Ross prepared a document captioned Guidelines for Completing Eight Program Evaluations in the LRSD.'^ On January 10,2003, LRSD contracted with Dr. Ross and two other program evaluation experts. Dr. William Moore and Dr. Larry McNeal, to prepare these eight program evaluations. Dr. Ross prepared or completed evaluations I on Vital Link, Onward to Excellence, HIPPY, and Campus Leadership Teams\nDr. Moore prepared or completed evaluations on Middle School Transition and Extended Year Education- and Dr. McNeal completed evaluations on Lyceum Scholars and Elementary Summer School. j On March 14,2003, LRSD filed all fourteen ofthe Page 148 Evaluations with the Court, as required by subpart C of the Compliance Remedy. See LRSDs Notice of Filing Program Evaluations (docket no. 3745). The six evaluations, which were substantially completed as of 1 t I 'A number of years ago, Joshua formally agreed that Dr. Ross has the qnalificatinns necessary to prepare program evaluations. 'hippy is an acronym for Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters. See ODMs Compliance Report (docket no. 3854) at 8. '^During the compliance hearing, this document was introduced as LRSDs Exhibit No. 5. -16- ^O72A flev.e/82)September 13, 2002, are bound together in Volumes I and II. The remaining eight Page 148 Evaluations are bound together in Volumes HI and IV. On April 14,2003, Joshua filed Comments on the Submission of Page 148 Evaluations. (Docket no. 3752.) These comments identify and discuss numerous alleged deficiencies, most of which are contained in the eight Page 148 Evaluations that the Board after January 1, 2003. were completed and approved by F. Dr. Lesley and Dr. James Resign. On March 14, 2003, the same day LRSD filed the fourteen Page 148 Evaluations, Dr. Lesley, who was responsible for overseeing the preparation of those evaluations, resigned. and, two months later. Dr. Janies, LRSDs Superintendent, also resigned. As indicated ( ) previously, LRSDs Compliance Plan had assigned Dr. Lesley and Dr. James direct responsibility for each of the twenty-eight time line activities necessary for LRSD to implement the Compliance '^During the compliance hearing, these fourteen program evaluations were introduced as LRSDs Exhibit No. 13. During its implementation of the Revised Plan in 1998 through early 2001, LRSD originally intended to use its own Department of Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) I to prepare the fourteen Page 148 Evaluations. Dr. Kathy Lease was the Assistant Superintendent who headed PRE and reported to Dr. Lesley. See ODMs Compliance Report at 2. According to Dr. Lesley s testimony during the November 2001 hearings on unitary status. Dr. Lease dropped the ball in preparing these evaluations, which resulted in only a few partially completed and woefully inadequate evaluations being available on March 15,2001, the deadline for LRSD to file its Compliance Report seeking unitary status. Additionally, Dr. Lesley testified that, in her opimon, no one in PRE-including Dr. Lease-had the expertise to prepare program evaluations. See LRSD, 237 F. Supp. 2d at 1077-81. I In early 2001, Dr. Lease resigned and left LRSD for other job opportunities. Since that time, PRE has functioned with only a statistician and several support employees, but no one was hired to replace Dr. Lease or take over and operate the department. In November of2003, LRSD appointed the statistician as the acting head of PRE. As a result, since Dr. Leases departure in early 2001, LRSD has essentially functioned without a meaningful Department of Planning, Research, and Evaluation. See ODMs Compliance Report at 6. -17- KO72A Rev.B/82)Remedy. i Thus, less than a year after the September 13 Decision, LRSD lost both of the crucially important leaders to whom all responsibility had been assigned for implementing LRSDs Compliance Plan. Both Dr. James and Dr. Lesley had been deeply involved for years in LRSDs implementation of its desegregation obligations under the Revised Plan, and both were thoroughly familiar with the intricacies of satisfying judicially imposed desegregation obligations. The almost simultaneous departures of Dr. James and Dr. Lesley during the early stages ofLRSDs implementation of its Compliance Plan clearly created problems for LRSD in its compliance efforts. In the ODMs Compliance Report, the authors observe that the loss of Dr. Lesley and Dr. James at a crucial time in the implementation ofLRSDs Compliance Plan, and the delays and difficulties LRSD encountered in filling those positions with acting or interim employees created a period of some uncertainty for LRSD. Id. at 5. In June of2003, LRSD appointed an Interim Superintendent to replace Dr. James. Later that month, on June 26, 2003, Mr. Dennis Glasgow, who previously had been the Director of i I LRSDs Math and Science Department, was appointed to succeed Dr. Lesley as Interim Associate Superintendent of Instruction and Curriculum. According to the Compliance Plans Action Plan Time Line, Mr. Glasgow originally was assigned responsibility for only two of the twenty-eight time line activities. Although it was not mentioned in LRSDs Compliance Report (docket no. 3837), during the recent compliance hearing, Mr. Glasgow testified that, on March 18,2003, he assumed responsibility for all of Dr. Lesleys twenty-eight activities under the Compliance Plan. In August of 2003, after the Interim Superintendent, hired only three months earlier, left that position, LRSD hired Dr. Morris Holmes as the second Interim Superintendent. Dr. Holmes -18- AO72A (Rev.a/82)has continued to serve as Interim Superintendent through the date of this Memorandum Opinion 18 LRSDs Compliance Report does not address what role, if any. Dr. Holmes had in implementing the Compliance Plan. It seems that Dr. Holmes or someone else should have been assigned I responsibility for the twenty-eight time line activities that had been assigned to Dr. James in the October 10, 2002 Compliance Plan\nbut the Compliance Report is silent on this point. G. LRSD Files Its Compliance Report Seeking Release from Court Supervision. When LRSD filed its Compliance Report (docket no. 3837) on March 12,2004, IQ  it was supported by documents attached to it as Exhibits A through G. According to LRSD, the documents attached to the Compliance Report establish that it has substantially complied with the Compliance Remedy and is entitled to be released from all fiirther court supervision and monitoring. A careful reading of the Compliance Report reveals a number of revelations that cast LRSDs efforts in a less than favorable light. First, the Report states that: (a) in October of2002, less than sixty days after the Courts September 13 Decision, Joshuas counsel raised concerns about the Board-approved Compliance Plan\n(b) subsequently, Joshuas counsel invoked the Process for Raising Compliance Issues set forth in Revised Plan 8.2\" and [the parties] met with Ms. Ann Marshall to facilitate .5, an agreement\nand (c) the parties last such meeting with Ms. Marshall was on February 28,2003, but the parties failed to reach an agreement on Joshuas or 'On June 11,2004, the Board announced that it hired Mr. Roy Gregory Brooks to serve as LRSDs new Superintendent of Schools. It is my understanding that sometime in July August Mr. Brooks will assume his new duties as Superintendent. During the compliance hearing, this document was introduced into evidence as LRSDs Eichibit No. 14. -19- AO72A (Rev.B/82)( AO72A (Rev.e/82) objections to the adequacy of the Compliance Plan. See Comphance Report (docket no. 3837) at 1-2. Thus, LRSDs March 12, 2004 Compliance Report constituted my first notice that Ms. Marshalls facilitation efforts in late 2002 had failed-neither the parties nor the ODM brought this to my attention, although they were required to do so by subpart D ofthe Compliance Remedy and by my November 6, 2002 letter to Ms. Marshall Second, LRSD contends that, by failing to bring the parties disagreement over the Comphance Plan to the Courts attention, Joshua waived any objections to the Board-approved Compliance Plan. Id. at 1-2. As I explained earlier, the sole purpose of subpart D ofthe Compliance Remedy was to require the parties to bring potential compliance problems to my attention. as soon as they arose, so that I could resolve them early enough to prevent them fi-om becoming stumbling blocks to LRSDs compliance with its obligations under the other subparts ofthe Compliance Remedy. After the ODMs facilitation efforts failed, it must have soon become obvious to LRSDs counsel and the ODM that Joshuas counsel was not going to notify the Court. It seems to me that, at this point, both LRSD and ODM should have realized that it was in LRSDs best interest to let me determine, in March of 2003-while there was still time to do something about it~if the compliance issues raised by Joshua had merit. In a school desegregation case that has its origins in the infamous 195 7 Little Rock school desegregation crisis, no court is likely to hold the silence of Joshuas counsel-even if they are to be cnticized-against the Aftican-American students they represent, and who now fill almost 70% of the total number of seats in LRSDs classrooms. I believe I would be ill advised to adopt waiver as a way to avoid reaching the merits of the adequacy of the board-approved -20- i I I I iCompliance Plan. In other words, I find that it would be inappropriate for me to default approximately 17,000 LRSD students. Third, LRSD acknowledges in the Compliance Report (docket no. 3837) that it was required to do two things to satisfy the core obligations imposed by subparts A and B of the Compliance Remedy: (1) develop written procedures for evaluating the programs implemented pursuant to  2.7 of the Revised Plan to determine their effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students\nand (2) prepare a comprehensive program evaluation of each academic program implemented pursuant to  2.7 of the Revised Plan to determine its effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students and to decide whether to modify or replace the program. See Compliance Report at page 2, paragraph 4 (docket no. 3837\nLRSDs Exhibit No. 14) (emphasis added). To satisfy this first core obligation, which is contained in subpart B of the Compliance Remedy, the Compliance Report states that the Board adopted Regulation IL-Rl. As indicated previously, the Board adopted Regulation IL-Rl on October 10,2002. But, LRSD did not make I this key Regulation an Exhibit to either its March 14,2003 Notice of Filing Evaluations Pursuant to Paragraph C of the Compliance Remedy (docket no. 3745) or its March 12,2004 Compliance Report (docket no. 3837). On May 12, 2004, after I had been unable to locate this document anywhere in the record, I entered an Order (docket no. 3864) requiring that LRSD provide a copy I of Regulation IL-Rl. The next day, LRSD filed its Response (docket no. 3865), which attached I Regulation IL-Rl as Appendix 1 to Exhibit A of that document. Regulation IL-Rl contained the following procedures that were to be followed in preparing all future  2.7.1 program evaluations: 1 -21- AO72A (Rev.8/82)I i (1) Write a clear description of the curriculum/instruction program that is to be evaluated, with information about the schedule of its implementation. (2) Agree on the necessary research questions that need to be established in addition to the question: Has this curriculum/instruction program been effective in improving and remediating the academic achievement of African-American students? (3) If program modifications are suggested, the steps that the staff members have taken or will take to implement those modifications. If abandonment of the program is recommended, the steps that will be taken to replace the program with another program with more potential for the improvement and remediation of AO 72A (Rev.8/82) I II I I I (4) (5) Afiican-American students. (See  2.7.1 of the Revised Designation and Education Plan and Judge Wilsons Compliance Remedy.) Plan ways to provide regular progress reports (e.g. dissemination of meeting minutes, written progress reports, oral reports to Superintendent\nCabinet and/or Compliance Team) to stakeholders, including the Associate Superintendent for Instruction, the Superintendent of Schools, the ODM (until Unitary Status is achieved) and the Joshua Intervenors (until Unitary Status is achieved). \u0026gt;5 The team preparing the program evaluations had to meet to monitor the completion of assignments\nto review drafts and provide feedback to the writer\nand to formulate recommendations ... for program improvement, especially to decide if a recommendation is required to modify or abandon the program if the findings reveal that the program is not being successful for the -22-I improvement of Afiican-American achievement. (6) (7) (8) A final draft of the program evaluation had to be submitted to the Associate Superintendent for Instruction at least one month before placing the report on the Boards agenda for review and approval. After the program evaluation was approved by the Board, a copy of the complete report had to be made available to the ODM and Joshua Intervenors (until Unitary Status is achieved). Each program evaluation team shall meet with the Associate Superintendent for Instruction after the completion of the work to evaluate the process and product and to make recommendations for future program evaluation. See Regulation IL-RI at 3-7 (emphasis added). In paragraph 8 of the Compliance Report, LRSD states that it satisfied the second core obligation specified in subpart A of the Compliance Remedy, by doing the following things: (1) (2) Dr. Steve Ross was hired to prepare evaluations of the Districts elementary and secondary literacy programs. Ultimately, Dr. Ross authored the global Literacy Evaluation, which the Board approved in November of2003. See Exhibit F to Compliance Report (docket no. 3837).^ Dr. Don Wold, a retired member of the faculty at UALR, authored the global Math and Science Evaluation, which covered the overall math and science curricula (grades K-12) that LRSD had implemented with the grant it received ^As indicated previously, during the compliance hearing, the Compliance Report was introduced into evidence as LRSDs Exhibit No. 14. -23- AO72A (Rev.S/82)from the NSF. The Board approved this evaluation in December 2003. See Exhibit G to Compliance Report (docket no. 3837). According to the Compliance Report, these two global evaluations satisfy all of LRSDs obligations under subpart A ofthe Compliance Remedy and constitute substantial compliance with the obligations contained in  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan. Ominously, the Compliance Report says nothing about whether these two evaluations complied with the mandatory requirements of Regulation IL-Rl. H. The ODMs Compliance Report on LRSDs Implementation ofthe Compliance Remedy. On March 30, 2004, the ODM filed its Compliance Report (docket no. 3854)^ commenting on various aspects of LRSDs implementation of the Compliance Remedy. The first four pages of the ODMs Compliance Report re-plow the now largely irrelevant events related to LRSDs earlier compliance efforts under the Revised Plan.\"- The remaining nineteen pages of the Compliance Report contain Findings and Conclusions that, for the most part, criticize LRSDs compliance efforts. Among the more significant Findings and Conclusions in the ODMs Compliance Report are the following: . (1) As of September 13,2002, the date the Court imposed the Compliance Remedy, LRSD had implemented at leastforty-six programs designed to improve African- I During the compliance hearing, the ODMs Compliance Report was introduced into evidence as LRSDs Exhibit No. 15. -\"The September 13 Decision addressed in detail all of the events described in these four pages ofthe ODMs Compliance Report. -24- ^0 72A Rev.8/82)I American achievement under  2.7 of the Revised Plan?\" Id. at 10. I AO72A (Rev.8/82) (2) (3) (4) The ODM had difficulty getting LRSD administrators to identify the specific  2.7 programs that would be evaluated under  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan. LRSD administrators finally acknowledged to the ODM that the program evaluation agenda for the 2002-03 school year would include only elementary literacy, secondary literacy, and the NSF math and science project. LRSD administrators never explained to the ODM which  2.7 programs would be covered in the literacy and math and science evaluations. Id. at 12. While the Compliance Remedy directed LRSD to use all available testing data in assessing the effectiveness of the  2.7 programs, LRSD only did so in the Evaluation of the Math and Science Programs. (Exhibit G to LRSDs Compliance Report.) In the Literacy Program Evaluation (Exhibit F to LRSDs Compliance Report), LRSD limited the testing data to the SAT9 and the benchmark literacy exams. Id. at 14. Subpart B of the Compliance Remedy required LRSD to maintain written records reflecting the results of the annual assessments of each program, including whether the assessments resulted in program modifications or the elimination of programs. LRSD, 237 F. Supp. 2d at 1087-88. The ODM concluded that, while Exhibit C to LRSDs Compliance Report describes the annual program modifications for elementary and secondary literacy and math, there is no ^During the compliance hearing, LRSD witnesses correctly pointed out that the chart on page 10 of the ODMs Compliance Report was flawed. Among other things, a number of programs are listed twice, and some of the things that are listed as programs are not. -25-( AO 72A (Rev.8/82) (5) (6) (7) discussion of annual program modifications for science.^'* Id. at 15. The ODMs Compliance Report noted numerous shortcomings in the Literacy Program Evaluation. Id. at 1677. However, the most serious criticism was that the evaluation draws no conclusions about the extent to which student performance might be affected by program components, such as Reading Recovery or Accelerated Reader, nor does it correlate any teaching practices with student achievement. Id. at 18. The ODMs most serious criticism of the Math and Science Evaluation was that it does not offer data relative to the level of uniformity of program implementation and does not identify which  2.7 programs most directly improved the academic achievement of African-American students in math and science courses. Id. at 19. By the time the Court entered its September 13 Decision, six of the fourteen Page 148 Evaluations had already been completed or substantially completed by outside consultants. Subpart C of the Compliance Remedy provided that the Court will accept all program evaluations that have already been completed by Dr. Nunnery or someone with similar qualifications and approved by the Board. Between October 24, 2002, and December 19,2002, the Board voted to approve these six evaluations which covered the following programs: (a) Pre K-3 Literacy\n(b) NSF Math and Science\n(c) Charter School\n(d) English as a Second Language\n(e) 2'Although not mentioned in the ODMs Compliance Report, Exhibit C also fails to discuss the reasons for making each of the modifications in the math and literacy programs, or and how those modifications were expected to improve the effectiveness of those programs. -26-SEDL Program.- Southwest Middle School\nand (f) Collaborative Action Team. The ODMs Compliance Report does not contain any significant criticism of these six evaluations. Id. at 20. (8) (9) As of September 13,2002, eight ofthe Page 148 Evaluations still remained to be prepared. Under subpart C of the Compliance Remedy, LRSD was obligated to hire outside consultants to prepare those eight evaluations and the\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_377","title":"Compliance report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004/2006"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","School improvement programs","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Compliance report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/377"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Date: April 5, 2004 To: Board of Education From: Through: Karen E. Broadnax, ESL Supervisor Morris L. Holmes, Ed.D. Interim Superintendent Subject: Update on the final report on Compliance Review 06995008 conducted by the Office for Civil Rights. Summary: A review of the districts progress reports was submitted to the Little Rock School District on March 18, 2004. The review addressed specific actions taken by the Little Rock School District to ensure the provision of equal educational opportunities and services to national origin language-minority students, who are limited English proficient. The report received by the district provided specific details in each on of the compliance areas that OCR has determined that the Little Rock School District has satisfactorily fulfilled the terms specified in the Commitment to Resolve. Objective: To provide an update on the progress to date that the Little Rock School District has made in meeting the terms of the Commitment to Resolve  Compliance Review 06995008. Expected Outcomes: N/A Population: National origin language-minority students, who are limited English proficient. ESL Report to Board April 22, 2004 Page 2 Budget Amount/Budget Source: ESL Department Manager: Karen E. Broadnax, Supervisor, ESL Department Long range: Continuation of the Little Rock School District ESL Program Other Agencies Involved: N/A Expectations of District: Continuation of the services provided to_national origin language-minority students, who are limited English proficient, to ensure compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), 42 U.S.C.  2000d, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504), 29 U.S.C.  794, and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Title II), 42 U.S.C.  12131-12161, and their implementing regulations. Needed Staff: N/A Comments: None Recommendation: We request that the Board of Education accept this report.XT OF u 2, ^TtSO^^ UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS SOUTHERN DIVISION, DALLAS OFFICE mar 1 8 200^ Ref: 06995008 Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Dear Dr. Holmes: The U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR), Southern Division, Dallas Office has completed a review of the progress reports, which were submitted to OCR by the Little Rock School District (LRSD), Little Rock, Arkansas, to address the specific actions taken by the LRSD to ensure the provision of equal educational opporti^ties and services to national origin language-minority students who are limited English proficient (LEP). The LRSD voluntarily submitted a Commitment to Resolve (CTR), which was, acceped by OCR on September 30, 1999, to ensure compliance with Title VI of the Civil ^ts Act of 1964 ( i e VI) 42 U.S.C.  2000d, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504), 29 U.S.C.  794 and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Title II), 42 U.S.C.  12131- 12161, and their implementing regulations. In the progress reports, the LRSD provided OCR with documentation pertinent to the implementation of the CTR. Based on a review of the progress reports md additmnal information gathered during the on-site monitoring visits conducted by OCR on December 10- 11 2002 and March 11-13,2003, OCR has determined that the LRSD has satisfactorily fulfilled the terms specified in the CTR. Provided below, by commitment provision, is an explanation of how OCR reached this determination: Identification of Students With a Primary Home Language Other Than English The progress reports revealed that, at the beginning of the 1999-2000 school year the LRSD administered a Home Language Survey (HLS) to all students to identify those students who have a primary (first-learned) or home language (language influence) that is other than Enghs (PHLOTE). In addition, the information revealed that the LRSD directed staff (i.e., principals, counselors, registrars, and secretaries) at every school site and at the Student Assignment Center to secure a completed HLS for all students upon imtial enrollment. Further, the LRSD developed a procedure that allows for other methods of identifying 1999 BRYAN STREET. SUITE 2600. DALLAS. TEXAS 75201-6810 www.ed.gov Our mission is to ensure equal access to education and to promote educational excellence throughout the nation. Page 2 - Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent PHLOTE students based on teacher referral, counselor recommendation, and interviews with parents. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Assessment of PHLOTE Students A review of the progress reports revealed that the LRSD developed and implemented procedures for assessing PHLOTE students in all four English language proficiency areas (i.e., speaking, reading, writing, and comprehension) to determine which students are LEP. The information reviewed revealed that the LRSD assessed and/or reassessed all PHLOTE students by administering an assessment instrument (i.e.. Language Assessment Scales). The information further revealed that the LRSD provided training to all LRSD staff responsible for administering the assessment instrument to ensure proper test administration and interpretation of test scores. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Placement of LEP Students and Ensuring Appropriate Services The progress reports revealed that the LRSD developed and implemented a policy requiring the district to provide alternative language program (ALP) services to LEP students through a research-based English-as-a-Second Language (ESL) program. Information reviewed revealed that PHLOTE students who score at a level 1,2, and 3 on the Language Assessment Scales (LAS) are identified as LEP and are placed in the ESL program after obtaining consent from the parent/guardian of the student. The information showed that PHLOTE students who score at a level 4, and 5 on the LAS are considered fluent in the English language and are identified as non-LEP and, as a result, are placed in the regular education program. A review of information revealed that the Language Proficiency Assessment Committee (LPAC), which is comprised of at least one or more ESL teachers, a counselor, and a campus administrator, is responsible for making placement decisions. The information revealed that the LRSD provided training to LPAC members as follows: 1) OCR, state, and LRSD laws, policies, and regulations governing LEP programs and services\n2) interpretation of language proficiency assessments\n3) laws and rules governing confidentiality of records\nand 4) procedures for identification, placement, and exiting students from the ALP. The LPAC is responsible for ensuring that the parents of LEP students placed in the ALP receive an explanation of the benefits of the ALP in a language they can understand. The information indicated that the LRSD ensures the delivery of language support services to LEP students whose parents have refused placement in the ALP by providing training to regular education teachers in ESL methodologies and instructional strategies, parental involvement, tutoring, summer school, and by monitoring the academic progress of such students. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements.Page 3 - Dr. Morris Holmes. Interim Superintendent Selected Alternative Language Services Model The progress reports revealed that the LRSD selected a research-based English-as-a-Second- Language (ESL) program to address the affective, linguistic, and cognitive needs of LEP students at all grade levels. The information showed that the goal of the ESL program is to enable LEP students to master English language skills (i.e., reading, wnting, speaking, and listening) and content area concepts and skills so that students are able to participate meaningfully in the regular education program. A review of the progress reports revealed that the LRSD established the same curriculum standards and grade-level/course benchmarks for all students, including LEP students. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Staffing and Staff Development The progress reports revealed that the LRSD developed procedures to ensure that the district has appropriate staff to implement the ALP. The information in the progress reports showed that the LRSD made significant progress with respect to the number of teachers who obtained an ESL endorsement through the Arkansas Department of Educations ESL Endorsement Program. In addition, the information revealed that the LRSD has developed an ESL Training Program to provide continuous training opportunities for all personnel (e.g., principals, regular education, special education, gifted and talented, etc.) responsible for delivering instruction to LEP students. Specifically, the LRSD provides training to staff on how to adapt the instructional strategies, materials, pacing, and assessments for the delivery of instruction to LEP students. Further, the progress reports revealed that the LRSD designed an appraisal instrument to assess the performance of teachers who deliver ALP services to LEP students. OCR reviewed documentation pertaining to the training provided to administrators on the use of the evaluation instnunent and on observation techmques to enable them to identify ESL methodologies. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Materials The LRSD developed procedures to ensure that materials and equipment are appropriate for the implementation of the ALP. The progress report revealed that the LRSD surveyed ALP staff to determine whether there was a need for additional materials and equipment. The information showed that the LRSD provided teachers with materials and equipment, which are appropriate to the curriculum, and comparable in quality, availability, and grade level to the materials provided for the instruction of non-LEP students. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Page 4 - Dr. Morris Holmes. Interim Superintendent Reclassification and Exit The progress reports revealed that the LRSD established and implemented procedures for the exiting, monitoring, and reclassification of LEP students. The information indicated that the criteria employed by the LRSD is based on objective criteria using the LAS test scores in reading, writing, speaking, and comprehension plus other criteria to determine whether students will be able to participate meaningfully in the regular education program. A review of the information showed that a LEP student must score a 3/4 or a 3/5 or at the Fully English Proficient Level on the LAS post-test prior to exiting the ALP. The information revealed that the LPAC monitors the academic progress of LEP students who exit the ALP for a period of two years to ensure academic success in the regular education program. Specifically, the LPAC ensures that exited students are successfully participating in the regular education program by reviewing the following: 1) grades in all core subject areas\n2) teacher observations\n3) counselor comments\nand 4) assessment results. When the LPAC determines that a student needs to re-enter the ESL program, the student is placed back, into the ALP after obtaining approval from the parent of the student. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Parental Notice The LRSD developed procedures for providing notice to the parents of PHLOTE students of school activities in a language they can understand. The progress reports revealed that the schools mainUin a list of all PHLOTE students whose parents are limited English proficient and require communication in another language. OCR reviewed the documents which have been translated by the LRSD, to include but not limited to the following: Home Language Survey, Notice of School Placement, Notice of ESL Program Services, Notice of Testing Exemption, Exit Letter to Parents, K-8 Curriculum Standards and Grade-Level/Course Benchmarks, Student Rights and Responsibilities Handbooks, Summer School Applications, Parent Involvement Conference Notices, and the LRSDs Parent/Student Handbook. In addition, the information showed that bilingual staff at the schools translated newsletters, notices, letters, and flyers into other languages. Further, the LRSD advertises information in local publications in Spanish. The information showed that the LRSD disseminated a list of translators/interpreters to the school sites. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Special Education The progress reports showed that the LRSD revised its policies and procedures pertaining to the process for referring, identifying, evaluating, and placing LEP students with disabilities. The progress reports revealed that ALP staff and Special Education Department staff share information to ensure that LEP students with disabilities receive special education and alternative language services concurrently. A review of the progress reports revealed that thePage 5 - Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent LRSD provided training to special education staff (i.e., speech pathologists, resource teachers, and psychological examiners) in ESL methodologies to ensure the proper delivery of both ALP and special education services. Further, the progress reports revealed that the LRSD provides information to parents in a language they can understand pertaining to their rights and procedural safeguards by utilizing an interpreter or by providing information that has been translated into a language they can understand. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Special Opportunity Programs The progress reports revealed that the LRSD implemented procedures to ensure that LEP students are afforded an equal opportunity to participate in the Gifted and Talented (GT) program at the elementary level and in Pre-Advanced Placement and Advanced Placement courses at the secondary level. The information reviewed revealed that the LRSD provided information about the GT program to parents in their native language. In addition, the progress reports revealed that the LRSD staff administered a nonverbal assessment instrument (i.e., Torrance Thinking Creatively) to test LEP students who had been referred for placement in the GT program. The progress reports further revealed that the LRSD provided cultural sensitivity training, training in identifying the characteristics of language minority gifted students, and ESL instructional strategies to LRSD staff. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Program Evaluation and Modification A review of the progress reports revealed that the LRD has adopted procedures to conduct an annual longitudinal performance evaluation of the ALP and make modifications to the ALP based on the results as required by the results of the program evaluation. The information showed that the LRSD evaluated its ALP on an annual basis in which it reviewed the following\n1) curriculum service delivery\n2) materials and resources\n3) staffing and staff development\n4) student academic progress\n5) longitudinal data comparing LEP students to non-LEP students, and LEP students in the program to LEP students not in the program with respect to academic achievement, attendance, drop-out rate, graduation rate, retention rate, gifted and talented program placement, and specid education program placement of LEP, and students who have exited the ALP, and LEP students not served in the ALP. The information showed that the LRSD made the necessary program modifications and improvements as required by the results of each program evaluation. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Maintenance of Records for LEP Students The progress reports revealed that the LRSD apprised all staff of the importance of maintaining accurate records regarding the implementation of the ALP and documenting actions pertaining to students participating and exiting the ALP. A review of student recordsPage 6 - Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent Maintenance of Records for LEP Students The progress reports revealed that the LRSD apprised all staff of the importance of maintaining accurate records regarding the implementation of the ALP and documenting actions pertaining to students participating and exiting the ALP. A review of student records revealed that the LRSD maintains, at a minimum, the following documentation in student cumulative folders: Home Language Survey, LAS assessment data\ncommumcations with parents in a language they can understand\nplacement decisions\nreport cards\nmodifications\ndecisions to exit student\nand decisions for students to reenter the ALP. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR andcomplied with the OCR reporting requirements. After analyzing the above information provided by the LRSD, OCR has determined that the LRSD has met all of the commitments as specified in the CTR. Therefore, OCR is closing tiiis compliance review contingent upon the LRSDs continued implementation of the terms delineated in the September 30, 1999. While no further progress reports are required, OCR understands that the LRSD will continue to conduct qualitative and quantitative program evaluations in accordance with its civil rights responsibilities. OCR is available to provide technical assistance to the LRSD and will work with you and LRSD staff to ensure continued compliance with the regulatory requirements imder Title VI, Section 504, and Title IL Under the Freedom of Information Act, it may be necessary to release this document and related correspondence and records upon request. In the event that OCR receives such a request, it will seek to protect, to the extent provided by law, personally identifiable information which, if released, could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwananted invasion of personal privacy. We appreciate your cooperation and that of your staff, especially the assistance provided by Ms. Karen Broadnax, ESL Supervisor. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. John F. Stephens at 214/880-2464 or Ms. Maria H. Gonzalez at 214/880-4918. Sincerely, Office for Civil Rights Southern Division, Dallas Office C: Ms. Karen E. Broadnax, ESL Supervisor Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 1 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURtR ECEIVED EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION OCT 1 7 2006 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1,ETAL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICTS COMPLIANCE REPORT I For its Compliance Report, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. This Compliance Report is filed pursuant to paragraph K of the Compliance Remedy contained in this Courts June 30, 2004 Memorandum Opinion. 2. LRSD has substantially complied with the Compliance Remedy. This compliance is documented below, as well as in the eight Quarterly Updates which were filed between December 1, 2004 and September 1, 2006, the evaluations of Compass Learning, Smart/Thrive, Reading Recovery and Year-Round Education which were previously filed, and the evaluations of A+, 21* Century Community Page 1 of 19Case 4\n82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 2 of 30 Learning Centers and READ 180 which are filed with this Compliance Report. 3. The progress of LRSDs efforts to comply with the requirement for an eighth step 2 program evaluation, the Pre-K Literacy evaluation, has been shown in LRSDs Quarterly Updates and status reports to the Court. The final evidence of LRSDs compliance with that requirement will be the evaluation itself, which the evaluator, Dr. Ross, expects to have completed on or before November 15,2006. 4. LRSD will separately describe below its compliance with each of the requirements of the Compliance Remedy except those which set out the responsibilities of the Joshua Intervenors and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 5. The requirements of paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy are\nA. LRSD must promptly hire a highly trained team of professionals to reinvigorate PRE. These individuals must have experience in\n(a) preparing and overseeing the preparation of formal program evaluations\nand (b) formulating a comprehensive program assessment process that can be used to determine the effectiveness of specific academic programs designed to improve the achievement of African-American students. I expect the director of PRE to have a Ph.D.\nto have extensive experience in designing, preparing and overseeing the preparation of program evaluations\nand to have a good understanding of statistics and regression analysis. I also expect LRSD to hire experienced statisticians and the other appropriate support personnel necessary to operate a first-rate PRE Department. Page 2 of 19Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 3 of 30 6. LRSD met the requirements of paragraph A by adding to the PRE team three new professionals who have knowledge and experience in assessment, evaluation, and statistical analysis. The qualifications of the seven people who were employed by PRE as of November 1, 2004 are shown at pages 3 through 5 of the December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update. The resumes of PRE Director Dr. Karen DeJamette and statisticians Maurecia Malcolm Robinson, James C. Wohlleb and Dr. Ed Williams are found in Appendix A to the December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update. This highly trained team of professionals has the qualifications required by paragraph A of the Comphance Remedy. 7. There have been a few changes in personnel since the first Quarterly Update, but PRE has maintained a highly trained team of professionals. Administrative Assistant Irma Shelton took medical leave in May of 2005. The Administrative Assistant position was eliminated on July 1, 2005. Testing Coordinator Yvette Dillingham left PRE in August, 2005. Dr. Ed Williams temporarily assumed her responsibilities until she was replaced in November 2005 by Arthur Olds. Olds resume can be found in Appendix A to the March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update. As reported in the June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, Olds sought reassignment to a teaching possession at Dunbar Magnet Middle School on April 14, 2006. Dr. Williams again temporarily assumed the Testing Coordinator Page 3 of 19 ICase 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 4 of 30 responsibilities. LRSD posted the Testing Coordinator position in June, 2006 and interviews were scheduled for August, 2006. See September 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. A new testing coordinator, Danyell Cummings was hired October 1, 2006. Her resume is attached as Exhibit A to this Compliance Report. 8. The current PRE staff has all of the qualifications listed in paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy. LRSD complied with paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy. 9. The requirements of paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy are\nB. The first task PRE must perform is to devise a comprehensive program assessment process. It may take a decade or more for LRSD to make sufficient progress in improving the academic achievement of Afiican-American students to justify discontinuing the need for specific  2.7 programs. For that reason, the comprehensive program assessment process must be deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSDs curriculum and instruction program. Only then will I have the necessary assurance that LRSD intends to continue using that process for as long as it is needed to determine the effectiveness of the various key  2.7 programs in improving the academic achievement of Afiican-American students. Part of LRSDs proof, at the next compliance hearing, must include evidence that it has devised and implemented a comprehensive program assessment process, which has been deeply embedded as a permanent part of its curriculum and instruction program. I suggest at LRSD use Dr. Ross to assist in developing this comprehensive program assessment process\nthen be sure that he approves that process before it is finalized and implemented. 10. LRSD has devised and deeply embedded a comprehensive program Page 4 of 19Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 5 of 30 assessment process in accordance with paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy. LRSD used Dr. Ross to assist in developing the comprehensive program assessment process. By the time of the first Quarterly Update on December 1, 2004, PRE and Dr. Ross hadj'developed and shared with ODM and the Joshua Intervenors a program assessment process to be deeply embedded in LRSDs educational operations. } December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, p. 6. The final draft of that process is found at Appendix B of the December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update. This final draft was furnished to ODM and the Joshua Intervenors more than a month in advance of its consideration by the LRSD Board of Directors. December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, p. 11. The comprehensive program assessment process was approved by the LRSD Board on December 16, 2004. March 1,2005 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 11. The comprehensive program assessment process has become deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSDs curriculum and instruction program. The embedding of the comprehensive program assessment process has included the development of school portfolios. School portfolios assemble comprehensive data about classrooms, schools, and districts from disparate sources into data bases that are accessible and informative particularly to teachers and administrators as well as to board members, parents, and other stakeholders. September 1, 2005 Page 5 of 19Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 6 of 30 Quarterly Update, p. 3. School portfolios are useful for formative evaluations of student achievement and educational programs. LRSD began implementing school portfolios during the 2005-06 school year. Id. As part of the process of the development and implementation of portfolios, four PRE department members attended an institute for data analysis during the summer of 2005, and a consultant visited LRSD and reviewed its data collection procedures and resources. Id. 12. LRSD has continued to develop the infrastructure to support its comprehensive assessment process. School and district data portfolios are an important part of this infrastructure. These portfolios allow PRE staff as well as others to more easily analyze data and intersect various types of data sets to answer research questions about comprehensive school improvement efforts. December 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 3. During April of 2006, an expert on school portfolios provided professional development for LRSD principals, administrators. and the PRE staff regarding the creation and use of school portfolios. June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 13. As of December 1,2005, PRE had identified the data to be included in the district portfolio and had designed a draft district portfolio. Id. District administrators and principals were making use of the portfolio and steps were being taken to allow a more efficient collection of data related to educational Page 6 of 19Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 7 of 30 processes. Id. Dr. Catterall used data from LRSDs portfolio in his step 2 evaluation of the Year-Round Education program. March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 14. The development of portfolios is a continual process. As new data becomes available {e.g. new test results) they are added to the data base. The infrastructure is in place, and LRSD continues to expand and update its portfolios. See March 1,2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 15. LRSD has also sought to deeply embed the comprehensive program assessment process by hiring a consultant, the Janis Group, to help develop a data warehouse. The Janis Group has expertise in storing, integrating, and efficiently accessing data. March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. The data warehouse will support frequent updates of the portfolio and allow timely data reports for purposes of planning, research, evaluation and developing policy. Reports can be generated by program, classroom, school, grade, or district-wide. Id. 16. There was some debate within LRSD about whether to purchase an internet-based data warehouse from a company called TetraData or to continue the in-house design and construction of a data warehouse using the Business Objects software and the database already available to LRSD. LRSD decided, with some dissent from PRE, to continue to use and improve the Business Objects software. Page 7 of 19Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 8 of 30 Business Objects is state of the art software which can be effectively used in the assessment of academic programs. The capabilities of the Business Objects data warehouse, including updating and reporting student data, are shown in the Business Objects Reporting Tools document attached as Exhibit B to this Compliance Report. 17. The process of developing school and district portfolios, and creating a data warehouse, has revealed the need for LRSD to take steps to insure that the data entered into its database is accurate. The accuracy of the data would be a concern whether the district used the Business Objects system, the TetraData system or some other software system. To improve the accuracy of data reporting within LRSD, LRSD has increased the number of error checking routines in its computer software. LRSD also has a full time training coordinator whose job it is to train school registrars and other LRSD personnel in the proper entry of student data, to work with those people to identify and correct recurring data entry errors, and to generally assure the accuracy and completeness of student data wiin the LRSD database. The accuracy of the data in LRSDs database, including its portfolios, continues to improve. 18. Finally, as another part of embedding the comprehensive program assessment process, PRE has designed feasible, ongoing assessments of the four Page 8 of 19Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 9 of 30 programs which Drs. Catterall and Ross subjected to step 2 evaluations last year. June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. LRSD also plans to have PRE conduct ongoing assessments of the programs currently being evaluated by Drs. Ross and Catterall. 19. LRSD has devised a comprehensive program assessment process as required by paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy. That process has been deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSDs curriculum program. LRSD has complied with paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy. 20. The requirements of paragraph C of the Compliance Remedy are: C. During each of the next two academic school years (2004-05 and 2005-06), LRSD must hire one or more outside consultants to prepare four (4) formal step 2 evaluations. Each of these step 2 evaluations must cover one of the key  2.7 programs, as it has been implemented in schools throughout the district. Thus, over the course of the next two academic school years, LRSD must hire outside consultants to prepare a total of eight (8) formal step 2 evaluations of key  2.7 programs. During the recent compliance hearing. Dr. Ross made it clear that LRSD must conduct these formal step 2 evaluations of the key  2.7 programs in order to continue to make progress in improving the academic achievement of African- American students. Again, I suggest that LRSD hire Dr. Ross - to perform the following tasks: (1) identify the four key  2.7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2004-05 school year and the four key  2.7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2005-06 school year\nand (2) prepare as many of the eight step 2 evaluations as possible. If Dr. Ross cannot prepare all eight of the step 2 evaluations, I recommend that LRSD hire someone that Dr. Ross recommends as possessing the experience and ability necessary Page 9 of 19Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 10 of 30 to prepare those evaluations. 21. In accordance with paragraph C, LRSD hired Dr. Ross to identify the four key  2.7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2004-05 school year and the four key  2.7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2005-06 school year, and to prepare as many of the eight step 2 evaluations as possible. 22. Dr. Ross was provided a copy of the Compliance Remedy and he endorsed the first Quarterly Update as representing an accurate portrayal of accomplishments to date and a viable plan for addressing the requirements of the Remedy. December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, Appendix C (p. 45). Dr. Ross assumed responsibility for preparing six of the required eight formal step 2 evaluations. Three of those cover the 2004-05 school year and were filed on February 6, 2006. Two others are for the 2005-06 school year and will be filed today. The sixth step 2 evaluation being prepared by Dr. Ross, Pre-K Literacy, has been delayed due to the unavailability of necessary data and is expected to be completed no later than November 15,2006. 23. Two of the required eight formal step 2 evaluations were prepared by Dr. James Catterall. One covered the 2004-05 school year and was filed on February 6, 2006. The other will be filed today. Page 10 of 19Case 4\n82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 11 of 30 24. PRE, in collaboration with Dr. Ross, selected Reading Recovery, Smart/Thnve, Compass Learning and Year-Round Education to be formally evaluated during the 2004-05 school year. December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, pp. 7-9. Those evaluations have been completed. 25. Dr, Ross initially identified the following four  2.7 programs for step 2 evaluations in the 2005-06 school year: Arkansas A+ School Network\nKnowledgePoints\nPLATO Learning and Pre-Kindergarten Literacy Development. June 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp. 3-4. At the request of the Joshua Intervenors, and with the agreement of Dr. Ross, 2U Century Community Learning Centers was substituted for PLATO Learning as the subject of an evaluation for the 2005- 06 school year. September 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp. 3-4 and Appendix C, (pp. 19-21). KnowledgePoints was also replaced as the subject of evaluation by the READ 180 program because the supplier of KnowledgePoints withdrew its support of the program in Arkansas. December 1,2005 Quarterly Update, pp. 3-4. 26. Dr. Ross and Dr. Catterall possess the experience and ability necessary to prepare the eight required step 2 evaluations. Their qualifications are found in Appendix C to the first Quarterly Update (pp. 46-54). They are both familiar with the requirements of the Compliance Remedy and have agreed to prepare their evaluations in accordance with those requirements. LRSD has Page 11 of 19Case 4\n82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 12 of 30 complied with the requirements of paragraph C of the Compliance Remedy, 27. The requirements of paragraph D of the Compliance Remedy are: D. Each of the eight step 2 evaluations must answer the following essential research question: Has the  2.7 program being evaluated improved the academic achievement of Afiican-American students, as it has been implemented in schools throughout the district? The eight step 2 evaluations may also answer as many other research questions as the designers of each evaluation deem necessary and appropriate. Each of the step 2 evaluations must be organized and written in such a way that it can be readily understood by a lay person, I will allow the outside experts preparing each of these evaluations to decide on the appropriate number of years of test scores and other data that need to be analyzed in preparing each evaluation, PRE must: (1) oversee the preparation of all eight of these step 2 evaluations\n(2) work closely with Dr, Ross and any other outside consultants hired to prepare these step 2 evaluations\nand (3) provide the outside consultants with any and all requested assistance and support in preparing these step 2 evaluations. 28. Each of the eight step 2 evaluations answers the essential research question of whether the program being evaluated improved the academic achievement of Afiican-American students, as it has been implemented in schools throughout the district. Each of the eight step 2 evaluations also answers other important research questions. Each is organized and written so that it can be readily understood by a lay person. In each case, the outside experts and the evaluation teams determined the evaluation design, including the appropriate number of years of test scores and other data necessary to the utility of each Page 12 of 19Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 13 of 30 evaluation. 29. PRE has overseen the preparation of all eight step 2 evaluations and worked closely with Drs. Ross and Catterall, and those associated with them, to support their work and provide any and all requested assistance. See June 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp.6-7\nMarch 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 4\nJune 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, pp. 5-6\nSeptember 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 6 and Appendix A. LRSD has met the requirements of paragraph D of the Compliance Remedy. 30. The requirements of paragraph E of the Compliance Remedy are: E. In order to streamline LRSDs record-keeping obligation, I am going to require that each of e eight step 2 evaluations contain, in addition to the traditional information and data, a special section which: (1) describes the number of teachers and administrators, at the various grade levels, who were interviewed or from whom information was received regarding the effectiveness of the key  2.7 program being evaluated\n(2) lists each of the recommended program modifications, if any, that were deemed necessary in order to increase the effectiveness of each of the  2.7 programs in improving the academic achievement of African-American students\nand (3) briefly explains how each of the recommended modifications is expected to increase the effectiveness of the  2.7 program. This requirement is intended to relieve LRSD of any independent record-keeping obligations under  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan and the Compliance Remedy. 31. In accordance with paragraph E of the Compliance Remedy, each of the eight step 2 evaluations contains a section concerning data collection which Page 13 of 19Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 14 of 30 describes the number of teachers and administrators at various grade levels who were interviewed or from whom information was received regarding the effectiveness of the program being evaluated. Each of the eight evaluations also contains recommended program modifications and explains how the recommended modifications can be expected to increase the effectiveness of the program. See March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, pp. 4-5. 32. On April 18, 2006, LRSD convened the four evaluation teams which worked on the 2004-05 evaluations to consider the feasibility and the timeframe for implementing the external evaluators recommendations. June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. A summary of LRSDs commitments to the modifications recommended by the external evaluators is found in Appendix A (pp. 7-11) to the June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update. LRSD will follow the same process of reviewing the evaluators recommended modifications following receipt of the evaluations for the 2005-06 school year. LRSD has complied with the requirements of paragraph E of the Compliance Remedy. 33. The requirements of paragraph F of the Compliance Remedy are: F. As soon as PRE and Dr. Ross identify the eight  2.7 programs targeted for step 2 evaluations, PRE must notify the ODM and Joshua in writing of the names of those eight programs. _ addition, after PRE and Dr. Ross have formulated a comprehensive In program assessment process and reduced it to a final draft, PRE must Page 14 of 19Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 15 of 30 provide a copy to the ODM and Joshua at least thirty days before it is presented to the Board for approval. I expect the Board to approve LRSDs comprehensive program assessment process no later than December 31,2004. 34. In accordance with paragraph F of the Compliance Remedy, PRE notified ODM and Joshua in writing of the names of the eight  2.7 programs targeted for step 2 evaluations. See June 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 8. PRE also provided to ODM and Joshua a final draft of the comprehensive program assessment process more than thirty days before it was presented to the Board for approval. December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, pp. 6 and 11. The LRSD Board of Directors approved the comprehensive program assessment process on December 16, 2004, in advance of the December 31, 2004 deadline. March 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 3. LRSD has met the requirements of paragraph F of the Compliance Remedy. 35. The requirements of paragraph G of the Compliance Remedy are: G. PRE must submit quarterly written updates on the status of the work being performed on the four step 2 program evaluations that will be prepared during the 2005-06 school year. These quarterly updates must be delivered to the ODM and Joshua on December 1, March 1, June 1, and September 1 of each of those two academic school years. As soon as each of the eight step 2 evaluations has been completed and approved by the Board, LRSD must provide a copy to the ODM and Joshua. 36. In accordance with paragraph G of the Compliance Remedy, Page 15 of 19Case 4\n82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 16 of 30 LRSD submitted quarterly written updates to the Court and delivered them to ODM and Joshua on or before December 1, 2004, March 1, 2005, June 1, 2005, September 1, 2005, December 1, 2005, March 1, 2006, June 1, 2006 and September 1,2006. Those quarterly written updates reported the status of the work being performed on the four step 2 program evaluations prepared during the 2004-05 and 2005-06 school years. The quarterly updates also provided information on the status of compliance with other components of the Compliance Remedy. 36. As soon as the four step 2 evaluations for the 2004-05 school year were completed and approved by the LRSD Board, LRSD provided them to ODM and Joshua. Three of the four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005-06 school year will be filed with the Court and provided to ODM and Joshua on October 16, 2006. The fourth will be filed with the Court and provided to ODM and Joshua on or before November 15, 2006. As soon as the four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005-06 school year are approved by the LRSD Board, LRSD will provide final copies of those evaluations to ODM and Joshua. LRSD has complied with paragraph G of the Compliance Remedy. 37. The requirements of paragraph J of the Compliance Remedy are\nPage 16 of 19Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 17 of 30 J. The four step program evaluations for the 2004-05 school year must be filed with the Court no later than October 1, 2005. The four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005-06 school year must be filed with the Court no later than October 1, 2006. 38. The four step 2 program evaluations for the 2004-05 school year were filed with the Court on February 6, 2006 in accordance with extended deadlines approved by the Court. Three of the four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005- 06 school year will be filed on today in accordance with extended deadlines approved by the Court. Dr. Ross requires additional time to complete the Pre-K Literacy evaluation because of the delayed availability of necessary testing data. LRSD has requested an extension of time for the filing of that step 2 evaluation to and including November 15, 2006, and expects to file that evaluation by that date. LRSD has substantially complied with paragraph J of the Compliance Remedy. 39. The requirements of paragraph K of the Compliance Remedy are: K. On or before October 15, 2006, LRSD must file a Compliance Report documenting its compliance with its obligations under  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan, as specified in this Compliance Remedy. If Joshua wishes to challenge LRSDs substantial compliance, they must file objections on or before November 15, 2006. Thereafter, I will schedule a compliance hearing and decide whether LRSD has met its obligations under the Compliance Remedy and should be released from all further supervision and monitoring. 40. LRSD is filing this Compliance Report on October 16, 2006 in accordance with paragraph K of the Compliance Remedy and the Courts July 12, Page 17 of 19Case 4\n82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 18 of 30 2006 letter to the parties (docket no, 4027). WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above and in the eight Quarterly Updates which have been filed with the Court, and on the basis of the completion of eight step 2 program evaluations by Drs. Ross and Catterall, LRSD prays for an order finding it to be in substantial compliance with the Compliance Remedy contained in the Courts June 30, 2004 Memorandum Opinion, declaring LRSD to be a unitary school district, and releasing LRSD from all supervision and monitoring by the Court. Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark Christopher Heller (#81083) Khayyam M. Eddings (#02008) 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501)376-2011 /sZ Christopher Heller CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on October 16, 2006,1 have electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such filing to the following: Page 18 of 19Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 19 of 30 mark.hagemeier@ag.state.ar.us siones@mwsgw.com siones@ili.com iohnwalkeratty@aol.com and mailed by U.S. regular mail to the following addresses: Gene Jones Office of Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr, Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Judge J. Thomas Ray U. S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 /s/ Christopher Heller Page 19 of 19Case 4\n82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 20 of 30 Danyell Crutchfleld Cummings 5 Ben Hogan Cove Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 (501)407-8097 (501) 447-1737 Career Objective: To utilize proven academic and professional experience to obtain a challenging position as an administrator that will allow for growth and an opportunity to contribute to a progressive educational environment. Professional Experience: 2004-Prescnt High Schools That Work Coordinator J. A. Fair Systems Magnet Hi^ School Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 Randy Rutherford, Principal 1998-Pre8eiit English Teacher J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 Randy Rutherford, Principal Education: May, 2005 Educadonal Specialist, Educational Administration and Supervision, University of Arkansas at Little Rock December, 1998 Master of Education, Secondary Education, University of Arkansas at Little Rock May, 1997 Bachelor of Arts, English, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Professionally Related Activities: Acting Assistant Principal Section 504 Coordinator Council of Secondary Education Stakeholder Southern Regional Education Board Literacy Team member Teacher of the Year Educational Specialist I 3 I I EXHIBIT ACase 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 21 of 30 References: Linda Young Granta Coordinator (501)447-3372 work (501)225-5439 home Jill Brooks Principal David O'Dodd Elementary (501)447-4300 work (501)680-3767 home William Broadnax, Ed.D Student Hearing (501)447-3582 work (501)407-0817 home Sharon Cauley, Ed.0 Assistant Principal J.A. Fair Systems Magnet High School (501) 447-1700 ext. 1710 work \u0026lt;501) 666-6216 homeCase 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 22 of 30 Danyell Crutchfield Cummings 5 Ben Hogan Cove Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 (501)407-8097 (501) 447-1737 Career Objective: To utilize proven academic and jxofessional experience to obtain a challenging position as an administrator that will allow for growdi and an opportunity to contribute to a progressive educational environment, Professional Experience: 2004-Present High Schools That Work Coordinator J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 Randy Rutherford, Principal 1998-Present English Teacher L A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 Randy Rutherford, Principal Education: May, 2005 Educational Specialist, Educational Administration and Supervision, University of Arkansas at Little Rock December, 1998 Master of Education, Secondary Education, University of Arkansas at Little Rock May, 1997 Bachelor of Arts, English, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Professionally Related Activities: Acting Assistant Principal Section 504 Coordinator Council of Secondary Education Stakeholder Southern Regional Education Board Literacy Team member Teacher of the Year Educational SpecialistCase 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 23 of 30 References\nLinda Young Granta Coordinator \u0026lt;501)447-3372 work \u0026lt;501)225-5439 home Jill Brooks Principal David O'Dodd Elementary (501)447-4300 work (501)680-3767 home William Broadnax, Ed.D Student Hearing \u0026lt;501)447-3582 work (501)407-0817 home Sharon Cauley, Ed.D Assistant Principal J. A, Fair Systems Magnet High School (501) 447-1700 ext 1710 work \u0026lt;501) 666-6216 homeCase 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 24 of 30 Little Rock School District Business Objects Reporting Tools Bl Platform Business Objects Enterprise is a scalable, adaptive platform that delivers insight and corporate information to all your end users. With a platform designed to help you confidently deploy and manage your Business Intelligence (BI) implementations. Business Objects provides the Little Rock School District with the extreme insight you need to extend your competitive advantage. The BI Platform provides a set of common services to simplify deployment and management of BI tools, reports, and applications. The reporting system at the Little Rock School District includes information delivery in subject areas including Student Demographics, Student Performance, Budget and Finance, Employee Attendance, Child Nutrition, Human Resources, Accounts Payable, Payroll, Procurement, and Procurement Warehouse, to name a few. Flexible Services-Oriented Platform By building the Little Rock School Districts BI solutions with Business Objects Enterprise, we have the flexibility to deploy a solution for a single information challenge, while being able to simultaneously expand the deployment as our needs evolve. Designed for Scalability and High Performance Business Objects Enterprise is designed for scalability, reliability, fault-tolerance, extensibility, and 24/7 availability. This platform recognizes the importance of diverse global deployments, supports Unicode, and is compliant with Microsoft Windows, Sun Solaris, IBM AIX, HP-UX, and Linux. So you can start with a single BI project on one platform, and easily grow to support an enterprise-wide standardization initiative on multiple platforms. With BI content now being delivered via intranet and extranet, BI platform scalability is a key issue. Business Objects Enterprise has the scalability you need to accommodate increasing numbers of users, process growing volumes of information, and scale on a single machineor clusters of machines while maintaining high performance. Proven Reliability This platform s key attributesperformance, reliability, and scalabihtyare proven by extensive, real- world testing and third-party certification. Enterprise is the only BI platform to achieve Microsoft Windows 2003 Datacenter certification. Business Objects Enterprisi covered by a 24/7 technical customer supporthas demonstrably installed and run on a 32-processor system, remained stable through rigorous stress testing, and stayed available after being subject to extensive failover conditions. We also continually conduct extensive benchmarking and performance testing to ensure our platform scales to meet the needs of the Little Rock School District today and tomorrow. EXHIBIT LRSD B/ Tools 3 I Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 25 of 30 Reporting Fundamentals The fundamental requirements of any reporting system are a normalized database and a reporting tool. Data from disparate systems and formats is collected in a centralized database platform and transformed into a consistent, well orgamzed reporting database. Many reports have been created and delivered from this reporting database using Crystal Reports as the reporting tool. Normalized Data Ihis data, securely housed at the Little Rock School District Technology Center, has been normalized to 3 normal form on a Microsoft SQL Server database server. The original database management software is DB2 residing on an IBM AS/400 application server, which houses a majority of the studentbased data. Other student data resides in Microsoft Access or is provided to the CIS department via Microsoft Excel spreadsheets. Automated processes have been developed and scheduled to update the student data nightly, where required. Processes have also been designed and implemented to update data in key financial, human resources and accounting subject areas. Business Objects provides the industrys leading suite of integrated business intelligence products. The products are categorized into three groups: Reporting allows all levels of the Little Rock School District to access, format, and deliver data as meamngful information to large populations of information consumers like teachers and school administrators both inside and outside the organization. This is provided through detailed reports created using Crystal Reports and accessed via a web browser using the Business Objects Enterprise Info View application. Query and Analysis tools allow end users to interact with District information and answer ad hoc questions, without advanced knowledge of the underlying data sources and structures. This is provided through a product called Web Intelligence or WEBI. This allows users to create dynamic reports from their desks with little or no required knowledge of the underlying database schema. In-depth analysis is performed using OLAP Intelligence, a powerful OnLine Analytic Processing tool that provides detailed, fast, multidimensional data for sophisticated comparative analysis and reporting. Performance Management products help users align with strategy by tracking and analyzing key business and educational metrics and goals via management dashboards, scorecards, and alerting. This is provided through Performance Manager and Dashboard Manager products that present Key Performance Indicators in user-friendly, interactive graphical tools. Crystal Reports A world standard for enterprise reporting, Crystal Reports is an intuitive reporting solution that helps customers rapidly create flexible, feature-rich, high-fidelity reports and tightly integrate them into web and Windows applications. The Crystal Reports enterprise reporting solution consists of: LRSDBlToois Page 2 of!Case 4\n82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 26 of 30  Powerful report design: Report authors can use the visual report designer (with a complete set of layout and design controls), to design highly formatted, interactive, and professional-looking reports. And they can design within the leading .NET and Java development tools without having to step out of their chosen development environment.  Flexible application development: Developers can leverage cross-platform support for Java, .NET, and COM development technolo^es. HTML is generated directly by Crystal Reports, allowing developers to focus on application business logic, rather than tedious, time-intensive hand coding. Separation of appEcation development and report design tasks allow developers to focus on application development, while the report authors can focus on report design.  Report management and delivery\nReports are easily published to the web, for better business decisions in all areas of the Little Rock School District. Reports can be exported and repurposed to the electronic formats used by most end users (e.g. PDF and Excel). IT can centralize the management of operational reporting while distributing the report authoring function out to departments of the District that need them. The following themes are an overview of what features are available in Crystal Reports XI:  Powerful data access and report design  Enhanced productivity and maintenance  Report management and delivery Dynamic and Cascading Prompts Report prompts can be based on dynamic values. This means that report designers no longer have to maintain static prompt value lists within individual reports. Instead, they can reuse existing prompts stored in the repository. HTML Preview The iterative report design/view process is streamlined, with a new HTML preview that allows report authors to see how reports will look when published to the web. Editable RTF Format This new feature is ideal for report export editing. It delivers reports to end users in a new RTF format, so they can easily make their own document modifications. Report Export Configuration The report designer can save report export configuration infonnation within the report itself so that the end user forgoes the time and trouble of reconfiguring the export each time a report is mn Dependency Checker With the new dependency checker, report authors can quickly find broken links, formula errors, and dependency issues. This greatly reduces the time spent on QA. Business Views Speed Report Design and Maintenance Cycles Crystal Enterprise Business Views helps you better manage reporting across multiple data sources and applications by simplifying data access, change management, and data-Ievel security processes. An LRSD BI Tools Page i of!Case 4\n82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 27 of 30 optional service in Crystal Enterprise, Business Views allow you to integrate data from disparate sources, handle promotion/demotion between development and production environments, and control security at both the row and column level. Simplified Data Access Data access is one of the most fundamental, yet difficult aspects of designing a report. Locating the right data, joining tables appropriately, and filtering the data to focus on a specific subject area requires an indepth knowledge of the underlying data structures. The Business View Manager allows you to simplify data access for your report designers by insulating them from the raw data structures. You can build connections to multiple data sources, join tables, alias field names, create calculated fields, and then surface this simplified structure as a Business View in Crystal Enterprise. Your report designers can then connect to Crystal Enterprise and use the Business View as the basis for their report, rather than accessing the data directly and building their own queries. Business Views helps administrators pull data together from disparate sources. Data Connections (created visually or with complex SQL statements) can be integrated into a Data Foundation. Once the Data Foundation is built. Business Elements (a collection of related fields from the Data Foundation) can be created and combined into a Business View, The modular architecture of Business Views also allows you to readily re-use various components of one Business View to build other Business Views. A single, broad data foundation can serve as the basis for multiple, specialized Business Views. Used carefully, these capabilities allow you to minimise the number of changes required to introduce new data, fields, or formulas into your system. Granular Data-Ievel Security Many reporting scenarios involve complex security requirements. Each user is entitled to see a slightly different slice of District data, based on their School, Department or level of seniority. Data in the Little Rock School District is commonly segregated by School and Teacher-based information. Business Views allow teachers to view data regarding their students and prevents them form seeing data regarding students that are NOT assigned to them. Rather than creating a number of different reports to meet this need, we can create a single report and use the security features of Business Views to filter data appropriately for each user. Using the Business View Manager, you can set up row- or column-level filters and map these filters to users or user groups stored in your existing LDAP, Active Directory, or Windows authentication provider. This security is then consistently applied at the data level, ensuring that any report design based on a Business View will respect the underlying data security. You can then choose to schedule the report to run regularly. Or you can allow users to refresh it on demand. Regardless, Crystal Enterprise can generate a master instance of the report (with all the data included if you run the report under an administrator context) and then filter the report every time a user views iL All exporting, printing, and report modification requests will also return only the data the user is entitled to see. LRSD 31 Tools Page 4 of!Case 4\n82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 28 of 30 Change Management and Re-use Maintaining a large set of reports is often more time-consuming and complex than new development. Activities such as making small changes in response to user needs, updating business calculations, changing formatting, and moving your reports between development and production data sources all delay you from addressing new requirements. Business Views includes two key features to help you spend less time on report maintenance. First, you can use Dynaimc Data Connections to store connections to multiple instances of the same database (e.g., development, test, and production). By passing a parameter when youre designing (or scheduling) the report, you can select which data source the report runs against. Second, you can store commonly-used functions, text objects, and logos directly in your data foundation. This allows you to easily roll changes across multiple reports by changing the object once. Business Objects Enterprise Info View Business Objects InfoView is a completely redesigned web interface that enables user to navigate, create, and interact with District mformation. Integrated search and navigation tools allow users to easily find the information they need. Users can also personalize their interactions to simplify consumption of District information. InfoView is built to support Java and Microsoft based web servers, to easily fit within youre the Little Rock School District IT infi:astructure. Web Intelligence Many organizations find it difficult to access information not contained in standard reports. And requests to IT for new information simply add to the report backlog. Even when ad hoc query capabilities are available, theyre typically difficult to use and dont provide your non-technical with a simple method of exploring information, to really understand the business issue at hand. users With Business Objects Web Intelligence, both self-service access to information and data analysis are available in one product, helping your users turn educational analysis into effective decisions. Users can create a query from scratch, format the information retrieved, and analyze it to understand underlying trends and root causes. If the frill power of query capabilities is not required, users can simply analyze information in existing reportsformatting and exploring them to meet specific needs. OLAP Intelligence Business Objects OLAP Intelligence is a powerful and easy-to-use tool that allows you to access and analyze data stored in the leading OLAP servers. It uniquely satisfies the analysis requirements of both information analysts (power users) and less sophisticated knowledge workers (business users). With OLAP Intelligence, power users can slice and dice, drill, rank, sort, filter, create calculations on the fly, and perform speed-of-thought data exploration. And business users can interact with pre-built OLAP workbooks that contain highly intuitive, graphical views of educational activity, guided navigation and workflows, and flexible ad hoc analysis. Its advanced analysis capabilities, shared security, and relational drill-through allow you to standardize on Business Objects for all of your BI needs. OLAP Intelligence delivers:  Best-of-breed ad hoc OLAP  Managed OLAP authoring and distribution  Integration with the market leading, trusted BI platform UtSD Bl Tools Pages o/7Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 29 of 30 Best-of-Breed Ad Hoc OLAP The primary driver for implementing an OLAP database is to provide users with fast access to multidimensional data. IT develops focused OLAP cubes to provide users with a structured data environment, optimized for analysis. But in order for users to take advantage of the pre-aggregated data within an OLAP cube, they require an interface that allows them to drill, slice, and dice while leveraging the response times that the predefined OLAP cube environment offers. Specd-of-Thought Analysis clap Intelligence provides an intuitive, web-based interface that allows users to select dimensions and members from a query panel as well as perform similar analysis from integrated Windows, Microsoft Excel, and ActiveX client interfaces. Users can interact with their data and ask spontaneous questions to uncover trends and identity anomalies. And because OLAP Intelligence takes advantage of the power of the OLAP cube, users are guaranteed speed-of-thought response time. Intuitive, Function-Rich Interface The OLAP Intelligence interface is both intuitive and function-rich. Common functions such as ranking, filtering, highlighting, quick calculations, zero suppression, and axis swapping are available with a single click of e mouse. More advanced analyses are only a few mouse clicks away and provide an uncluttered, intuitive user interface that requires minimal training. With OLAP Intelligence, users can also asymmetrically display data and hide specific dimensions that are irrelevant to data exploration. Deep, Open .Access to Microsoft, Hvperion, and SAP OLAP Servers With OLAP Intelligence, you get best-of-breed, ad hoc OLAP for todays leading, multidimensional database serversMicrosoft SQL Server Analysis Services, Hyperion Essbase, IBM DB2 OLAP, and SAP BW. For example, native Hyperion Essbase 7.x support for free-form calculations and cube actions means that orgamzations are maximizing their OLAP server investments and taking advantage of key enhancements and optimizations. Managed OLAP Authoring and Distribution OLAP Intelligence goes further than most OLAP clients on the market today by not only providing powerful ad hoc analysis, but also delivering a flexible, managed OLAP environment. With OLAP Intelligence, you can easily create sophisticated workbooks that exploit the power of the underlying OLAP server, and enable users to build in predefined navigation paths and workflows. Then you can securely deploy and deliver the workbooks live to business users who dont necessarily fit the powerdata analyst profile. These OLAP workbooks may contain custom buttons and multi-page reports that recipients can view and interact with over the web. Publish Live OLAP Workbooks to Business Users When users view an OLAP Intelligence workbook over the web, it may appear as a dashboard with custom functionality specific to one area of the business, or as an ad hoc interface that allows them to perform advanced analysis. Because OLAP Intelligence has a flexible design and was created to meet powerful ad hoc and managed analysis needs, the deployment possibilities are limitless. Built-In Guided Navigation and Data Exploration LRSDBlToois Page 6 of?Case 4\n82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 30 of 30 With OLAP Intelligence you can guide users through the OLAP data navigation and exploration process. For example, a user can highlight a group of cells in a report, click a custom analysis button and view a new graph that has drilled down on the chosen group, displaying variances as a worksheet and chart. A show trend analysis button could then be made available that displays a new page in the workbook with a year-over-year comparison. Open drill-through capabilities in OLAP Intelligence empower users to drill from aggregated OLAP data down to relational details. This means that users can navigate and explore summarized informatinn and drill through and pass context to more detailed Crystal Reports or Business Objects Web Intelligence documents. This contextual drill-through technology provides users with intelligent navigation without the need to understand the complexities of underlying data and metadata structures. LRSDBIToois Page 7 of 7Page 1 of 2 Margie From: To: Sent: Attach: Subject: \"Dejarnette, Karen\" \u0026lt;Karen.Dejarnette@lrsd.org\u0026gt; \"Margie\" \u0026lt;mqpowell@odmemail.com\u0026gt; Friday, October 20, 2006 7:06 AM CompRepoct06.doc: ComplyRep06oct19.doc FW: Re: compliance report From: Dejarnette, Karen Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 7:05 AM To: HELLER@fec.net Cc: Brooks, Roy G\nRoberts, Olivine\nHattabaugh, Hugh Subject: RE: Re: compliance report Okay. I am enclosing two documents compiled by myself and the statisticians. From: Brenda Kampman [mailto:Brendak@fec.net] Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 4:26 PM To: Dejarnette, Karen Cc: Chris Heller Subject: RE: Re: compliance report Chris Heller will be in the office tomorrow. He would like to schedule a meeting but would like to be provided a written response in advance of any meeting. Brenda \u0026gt;\u0026gt;\u0026gt; \"Dejarnette, Karen\" \u0026lt;Karen.Dejarnette@lrsd.org\u0026gt; 10/19/2006 2:52 PM \u0026gt; Brenda/Chris, PRE has further discussed our concerns and we can provide the information requested. Let us know if you want to meet. Karen From: Brenda Kampman [mailto:Brendak@fec.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 4:38 PM To: Dejarnette, Karen Cc: Brooks, Roy G Subject: Fwd: Re: compliance report Karen: I spoke with Chris again and he said to tell you he finds it hard to understand that PRE would have concerns about the Compliance Report when most of the report came from the Quarterly Updates that PRE prepared. In order to respond to the concerns PRE has, he would like to have the following as soon as possible: 1) Who exactly is concerned at PRE and what specifically is their concern\n2) Quote the language that is a concern\n3) Explain in detail the basis for each concern. It would also be helpful if you have any information or documents which supports PRE's concerns. 10/20/2006Page 2 of 2 Brenda \u0026gt; \"Dejarnette, Karen\" \u0026lt;Karen.Dejarnette@lrsd.org\u0026gt; 10/18/2006 3:33 PM Chris, \u0026gt; PRE staff members have concerns about your statements on the following topics included in the Compliance Report submitted to the Court on Monday: 1) 2) 3) Karen school portfolios, accuracy of data, and readable reports. 10/20/2006Paragraph \u0026amp; Subject Comments on Compliance Report October 19, 2006 Comments 2. Compliance demonstrated by [updates \u0026amp; evaluation^ irocess (mentioned below). 5-8 Personnel independence. Only dept without administrative support. 7. Testing coordinators Errors Omits deeply embedded evaluation I Net loss of personnel since fall 04. On^its demotion of PRE \u0026amp; lack of ] ___________________________ Olds was 0.5 FTE. LRSD has had non\nFT from Aug 05 to Oct 06. 10. Deeply embedded assessmerjt process LRSD lessened PREs independence (reorganization) \u0026amp; its resources. LRSD violated policy by keeping much of PREs S* update \u0026amp; Dr. Dreyfus magnet 3 report from B/D. [ 11. Portfolios poi Q irtfolios. 12. Portfolios portfolios. [ 13. Portfolio content LRSD has not deeply embedded assessment process.___________ I Any school portfolios? Dr. Bemhardtb name omitted. There are no school I Any school portfolios? Dr. Bernhardt^ name omitted. There are no school ___________________I Portfolio design includes validated clijnate surveys, which LRSD stopped, and wellness data, which LRSD opposes. 14. Portfolio infrastructure 15. Janis Group 16. Election of BO which PRE reacted. [ 17. Data errors What infrastructure? What did it accomplish? This was not in-house. There was no debate, only a decision to removing/correcting, deleting, \u0026amp; protecting data. I What has been the error rate, \u0026amp; what ib it now? LRSD has no overall plan for Is there any evidence for claiming that errors have decreased?______________________________________________ [ 28. Essential research question [ Evaluators \u0026amp; PRE chose programs whjich were not district-wide. ] ] Evaluated | programs were not implemented in schools throughout the district. Evaluations were not readily understood by a lay person. _______________________________________________ I 34. Disclosure of evaluations \u0026amp; [approval of assessment process failed to enroll new policy in its official file of policies. I Although B/D approved the process, LRSD [ Exhibit A Exhibit B quality of neither LRSD data nor its use. Included tvidce Why so much about a matter not in th\u0026lt;\n2004 compliance remedy? BO affects theDRAFT Comments Re: Compliance Report of October 2006 October 19,2006 After review of the Compliance Report, submitted to the U.S. District Court on October 16, 2006 by LRSD, members of the PRE Department have the following comments. School portfolios 11. The embedding of the comprehensive program assessment process has included the development of school portfolios. [p. 5] 12. School and district data portfolios are an important part of the infrastructure. [p. 6] 14. ... LRSD continues to expand and update its portfolios. [p 7] 16. ... to continue the in-house design and construction of a data warehouse ... [p. 7] 16. LRSD decided, with some dissent from PRE, to continue to use and improve the Business Objects software. [p. 7] PRE has no documents to support assertions about school portfolios. PRE produced only a single draft portfolio of the district in 2005 and anticipates a second in 2006. PRE has prepared no LRSD school portfolios and knows of none prepared by anyone else for any schools of the district. During the workshop attended by three PRE staff at EFE, conducted by Dr. Vicky Bernhardt in summer of 2005, they took part in exercises related to school portfolios then launched the first draft of a portfolio for LRSD with the help of Dr. Bernhardt and her staff at EFF. Dr. Bernhardt described school portfolios and their utility to principals and others during her visit to Little Rock, arranged by PRE as part of embedding assessment in e districts operations. However, in reply to a principals desire to send a school team to EFFs 2006 Summer Institute to learn more about developing a school portfolio. Dr. Roberts stated, in Dr. DeJamettes hearing, No, schools are not yet ready to begin portfolios. The data warehouse design and construction appears to be carried out for the district by an external contractor rather than in-house. PRE has not dissented from use and improvement of Business Objects software. PRE did not participate in the decision to use Business Objects products for the data warehouse. Rather, as part of its plan for deeply embedding assessment, begun in October 2004, PRE recommended TetraData, which develops data warehouses for school districts, edits old data incorporated into them, and interfaces with the variety of software programs in use. TetraDatas proposal gave summer of 2006 as an expected completion date. PRE did express its opinion that this seemed superior to the districts choice.Accuracy of LRSD data 17. The accuracy of the data in LRSDs database, including its portfolios, continues to improve. [p. 8] PRE knows of no evidence which would support this claim. On the contrary, external evaluators impressions are that errors encountered during 2005-2006 evaluations exceed those of the previous year. In her recent magnet report. Dr. Jeanne Dreyfus remarked, The academic achievement of students enrolled in the schools with embedded magnet programs could not be tracked in Year I because the available data are not consistent and appear umeliable. [Executive Summary, p. 2] Moreover, during the same week of this compliance reports submission, two LRSD departments discovered that their counts of the current years enrolled students differed by several hundred. PRE is aware of neither a district policy nor a district plan for comprehensively managing its data and ensuring their accuracy, integrity, and security. Consistent with this, no evidence has come to light of attempts by LRSD to quantify the accuracy of its data\nalthough recent action possibly involved them. Absent results of such efforts, verifying the above claim is very difficult. While evidence might exist to support the statement, PRE is unaware of any\nand updates submitted to ODM and Joshua included none. Readability of evaluations 28. Each is organized and written so that it can be readily understood by a lay person. [p. 12] PRE staff found the evaluation reports submitted in 2005 by CREP to be written on a professional level. During the reviews of these reports with the evaluation teams and the authors, PRE asked CREP to simplify their language. CREP revised the reports with the addition of nearly equally complex summaries inserted at their beginnings. The reports were not formally rated for their reading levels, so far as PRE knows\nthus, how readily they were understood by lay persons is not known.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_368","title":"Comprehensive program assessment process","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Education--Evaluation","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Comprehensive program assessment process"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/368"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nJ . Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 November 22, 2004 Dr. Karen DeJamette, Director Department of Planning, Research, and Evaluation Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Dear Dr. DeJamette\nThank you for sending us a copy of the revised regulation IL-R Comprehensive Program Assessment Process and for including us in some of the thinking that went into its preparation. Our observations and questions are listed below. The third paragraph on page 1 of the document uses the words spectrum and continuum of activities that review District programs and identifies summative (step 2?) evaluations as being at one end of the spectrum. The second sentence says that other activities in the continuum include formative evaluations, assessments, and snapshots. The following chart also lists these categories as apparent types of evaluations. Are these the only types of evaluations or are they representative of the activities included in the continuum? The processes described in the regulation apply to the summative (step 2) evaluations of the programs approved by the board in its annual program agenda. Are there procedures for other types of evaluations? Paragraph 3 of the procedures on page 3 obligates the district to summative (step 2) evaluations of all programs on the districts evaluation agenda. Is there a likelihood that less rigorous evaluations of programs on the agenda would be more appropriate at some point in the future? Or, is the evaluation agenda by definition concerned only with summative (step 2) evaluations? The directive in Subsection 1 of paragraph E (pg. 64) of the Compliance Remedy requires the district to include a special section in the evaluations which describes the number of teachers and administrators...who were interviewed or from whom information was received. Is this requirement included in the procedures? J it Page 2 pie Human Interaction standard for program evaluation is included in the chart on page of the regulation but is omitted from the definitions on page 1. Is this an oversight? Has the role of the associate superintendent for instruction in program evaluation been diminished or eliminated by the revised regulation? If so, why? Is the revised regulation IL-R to be presented to the LRSD Board for approval bv December 31, 2004 as required by the Courts Compliance Remedy? (Paragraph F 65) pg- These observations and questions are intended only to assist the district with meeting \u0026amp;e requirements of the Courts Compliance Remedy. Your responses to them may be in writing or in an informal conversation. ODM compliments you and the district on the quality of staff assembled at PRE. Please keep us informed as you proceed with your work. Sincerely, Margie Powell, Associate Monitor Gene Jones, Associate Monitor C: Dennis GlasgowCF !An Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge November 12, 2004 HAND DELIVERED Mr. Gene Jones, Associate Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring US District Court 1 Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 RECEIVED NOV 1' 200* Dear Mr. Jones: OFFICE OF DESEGREGATiON idONITORlNG We are pleased to deliver the final draft of the comprehensive program assessment process required of LRSD by the June 30, 2004 Memorandum Opinion of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Perhaps it was not clear earlier when I proposed that we meet last week. The intention of our Plaiming, Research, \u0026amp; Evaluation (PRE) department was a preliminary conversation with representatives of Joshua in which we were inviting you into decision-making with respect to selecting and conducting the eight step 2 evaluations that outside consultants are commencing this school year. We would still like to meetat your convenienceand anticipate useful conversations about fulfilling our responsibilities to the US District Court as well as to the students of the Little Rock School District. Sincerely yours, Karen DeJamette, Ph.D. Director, PRE xc: John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Chris Heller Friday Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.kl2.ar.us 501-324-2000  fax: 501-324-2032 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPNCODE: IL-R Comprehensive Program Assessment Process Purpose The purpose of these regulations is to provide guidance in the appraisal of programs and to comply with requirements of the US District Court for the Eastern District. They do not necessarily apply to grant-funded programs if the funding source requires other procedures and provides resources for a required evaluation. Criteria for Program Evaluations Policy IL specifies that the evaluations of programs approved in its Board-approved Program Evaluation Agenda will be conducted according to the standards developed by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (See Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, James R. Sanders, Chair (1994). The Program Evaluation Standards, 2' Edition: How to Assess Evaluations of Educational Programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.) nd Prospective, controlled, summative evaluations are at one end of a spectrum of activities that review District operations. Other activities in this continuum include formative and less formal and rigorous evaluations, regular and occasional assessments, and fast or brief snapshots. As rigor and formality diminish along the range of reviews, fewer standards apply. Examples of how the standards apply are found following table, adapted from The Program Evaluation Standards, pages 18 and 19: Checklist for Applying the Standards The reader should interpret the information provided in this table with reference both to the Standards (cited above) and the peculiar circumstances of given program reviews. Double plus signs (++) indicate that standards are fully addressed. Single pluses (+) mean that the standard is a concern but not necessarily fully addressed, and zeros (0) point to standards not usually applicable. Not all summative evaluation will fully satisfy every standard, and other examples may observe more standards than indicated here. Note, however, that all reviews fully observe human rights and impartial reports. 1LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: IL-R Checklist of Evaluation Standards for Examples of Program Reviews standard U1 Stakeholder Identification U2 Evaluator Credibility U3 Information Scope \u0026amp; Selection U4 Values Identification U5 Report Clarity U6 Report Timeliness \u0026amp; Dissemination U7 Evaluation Impact Fl Practical Procedures F2 Political Viability F3 Cost Effectiveness P1 Service Orientation P2 Formal Agreements P3 Rights of Human Subjects P4 Human Interaction P5 Complete \u0026amp; Fair Assessment P6 Disclosure of Findings P7 Conflict of Interest P8 Fiscal Responsibility A1 Program Documentation A2 Context Analysis A3 Described Purposes and Procedures A4 Defensible Information Sources A5 Valid Information A6 Reliable Information A7 Systematic Information A8 Analysis of Quantitative Data A9 Analysis of Qualitative Data AIO Justified Conclusions Al 1 Impartial Reporting A12 Meta-evaluation Summative evaluations Informa! Assessments ++ 0 F ++ + + + 0 + Formative Assessments (Schoo! Portfolios) 0 + + Snapshots 0 0 + + + ++ ++ ++ -t-+ H- -H- -H- -H- ++ ++ -H- -l-l- ++ + + + \"o\" ++ ++ -H- + + + -H- + ++ V -H- + + v + + o\" T + + + V + ++ + + + + + T + + ++ V 0 + 0 + + IT ++ V + + v 0 + + + + + + + + + -H 2LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPNCODE: IL-R Program Evaluation Procedures The following procedures are established for the evaluation of programs approved by the Board of Education in its annual Program Evaluation Agenda: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) Department will recommend to the Superintendent annually, before the budget for the coming year is proposed, the curriculum/instruction programs for comprehensive program evaluation. The recommendation will include a proposed budget, a description of other required resources, and an action plan for the completion of the reports. Criteria for the proposed agenda are as follows: A. Will the results of the evaluation influence decisions about the program? B. Will the evaluation be done in time to be useful? C. Will the program be significant enough to merit evaluation? (See Joseph S. Wholey, Harry P. Hatry, and Kathryn Newcomer (1994). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers. 5-7.) The Superintendent will recommend to the Board of Education for approval the proposed Program Evaluation Agendawith anticipated costs and an action plan for completion. For each curriculum/instruction program to be evaluated as per the Program Evaluation Agenda, the Director of PRE will establish a staff team with a designated leader to assume responsibility for the production of the report according to the timelines established in the action plan approved by the Board of Education. Each team will include, at a minimum, one or more specialists in the curriculum/instruction program to be evaluated, a statistician, a programmer to assist in data retrieval and disaggregation, and a technical writer. If additional expertise is required, then other staff may be added as necessary. An external consultant with expertise in program evaluation, the program area being evaluated, statistical analysis, and/or technical writing will be retained as a member of the team. The role of the external consultant may vary, depending upon the expertise required for the production of the program evaluation. The team leader will establish a calendar of regularly scheduled meetings for the production of the program evaluation. The first meetings will be devoted to the following tasks: A. Provide any necessary training on program evaluation that may be required for novice members of the team, including a review of the Boards policy IL and all of the required criteria and procedures in these regulations, IL-R. B. Assess the expertise of each team member and make recommendations to the Director of PRE related to any additional assistance that may be required. 3LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPNCODE: IL-R 7. C. D. E. F. G. Write a clear description of the curriculum/instruction program that is to be evaluated, with information about the schedule of its implementation. Agree on any necessary research questions that need to be established in addition to the question, Has this curriculum/instruction program been effective in improving and remediating the academic achievement of African-American students Generate a list of the data required to answer each research question, and assign responsibility for its collection and production. All available and relevant student performance data should be included. (See Judge Wilsons Compliance Remedy.) Decide who will be the chief writer of the program evaluation. Plan ways to provide regular progress reports (e.g., dissemination of meeting minutes, written progress reports, oral reports to the Superintendents Cabinet) to stakeholders. (See Joellen Killion (2002). Assessing Impact: Evaluating Staff Development. Oxford, OH. National Staff Development Council (NSDC)\nRobby Champion (Fall 2002). Map Out Evaluation Goals. Journal of Staff Development. 78-79\nThomas R. Guskey (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press\nBlaine R. Worthen, James R. Sanders, and Jody L. Fitzpatrick (1997). Participant-Oriented Evaluated Approaches. Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines: 153-169\nBeverly A. Parsons (2002). Evaluative Inquiry: Using Evaluation to Promote Student Success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press\nand Joseph S. Wholey, Harry P. Hatry, and Kathryn E. Newcomer (1994). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.) Subsequent meetings of the program evaluation team are required for the following tasks: to monitor the completion of assignments\nto collaborate in the interpretation and analysis of data\nto pose any necessary new questions to be answered\nto review drafts and provide feedback to the writer\nto formulate recommendations, as required, for program improvement, especially to decide if a recommendation is required to modify or abandon the program if the findings reveal that the program is not being successful for the improvement of African-American achievement\nto assist in final proofreading\nand to write a brief executive summary, highlighting the program evaluation findings and recommendations. 4LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPNCODE\nIL-R 8. A near-final copy of the program evaluation must be submitted to the Director of PRE at least one month before the deadline for placing the report on the Boards agenda for review and approval. This time is required for final approval by staff, for final editing to ensure accuracy, and for submission to the Superintendent. 9. When the program evaluation is approved for submission to the Board of Education for review and approval, copies of the Executive Summary and complete report must be made for them, for members of the Cabinet. 10. The program evaluation team will plan its presentation to the Board of Education on the findings and recommendations. II. The Director of PRE will prepare the cover memorandum to the Board of Education, including all the required background information\nA. If program modifications are suggested, the steps that the staff members have taken or will take to implement those modifications. If abandonment of the program is recommended, the steps that will be taken to replace the program with another with more potential for the improvement and remediation of African-American students. B. Names of the administrators who were involved in the program evaluation. C. Name and qualifications of the external expert who served on the evaluation team. D. Grade-level descriptions of the teachers who were involved in the assessment process (e.g., all fourth-grade math teachers, all eighth grade English teachers, etc.). 12. When the program evaluation is approved by the Board of Education, the team must arrange to have the Executive Summary and the full report copied and design a plan for communicating the program evaluation findings and recommendations to other stakeholders. This plan must then be submitted to the Director of PRE for approval. 13. Each program evaluation team will meet with the Director of PRE after the completion of its work to evaluate the processes and product and to make recommendations for future program evaluations. (See Joellen Killion (2002). (( Evaluate the Evaluation. Assessing Impact\nEvaluating Staff Development. Oxford, OH\nNational Staff Development Council. 46,123-124.) Approved\n[date] 5LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: IL-R Evaluation Standards Criteria for Program Evaluations Policy IL specifies that the evaluations of programs approved in its Board-approved Program Evaluation Agenda will be conducted according to the standards developed by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (See Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, James R. Sanders, Chair (1994). The Program Evaluation Standards. 2' Edition: How to Assess Evaluations of Educational Programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.) They are as follows: ,nd Utility Standards The utility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will serve the information needs of intended users. These standards are as follows: Stakeholder identification. People involved in or affected by the evaluation should be identified so that their needs can be addressed. Evaluator credibility. The people conducting the evaluation should be both trustworthy and competent to perform the evaluation so that the evaluation findings achieve maximum credibility and acceptance. Information scope and sequence. Information collected should be broadly selected to address pertinent questions about the program and should be responsive to the needs and interests of clients and other specified stakeholders. Values identification. The perspectives, procedures, and rationale used to interpret the findings should be described carefully so that the bases for value judgements are clear. Report clarity. Evaluation reports should describe clearly the program being evaluated, including its context and the purposes, procedures, and findings of the evaluation, so that essential information is provided and understood easily. Report timeliness and dissemination. Significant interim findings and evaluation reports should be disseminated to intended users so that they can be used in a timely fashion. Evaluation impact. Evaluations should be planned, conducted, and reported in ways that encourage follow-through by stakeholders, so that the likelihood that the evaluation will be used is increased. Feasibility Standards Feasibility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will be realistic, prudent, diplomatic, and frugal. Practical procedures. Evaluation procedures should be practical so that the disruption is kept to a minimum while needed information is obtained. Political viability. The evaluation should be planned and conducted with anticipation of the different positions of various interest groups so that their cooperation may be obtained, and so that possible attempts by any of these groups to curtail evaluation operations or to vias or misapply the results can be averted or counteracted. Cost-effectiveness. The evaluation should be efficient and produce information of sufficient value so that the resources expended can be justified. 6LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPNCODE: IL-R Propriety Standards The propriety standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will be conducted legally, ethically, and with due regard for the welfare of those involved in the evaluation, as well as those affected by its results. Service orientation. Evaluations should be designed to assist organizations to address and effectively serve the needs of the full range of targeted participants. Formal agreements. Obligations of the formal parties to an evaluation (what is to be done, how, by whom, and when) should be agreed to in writing so that these parties are obligated to adhere to all conditions of the agreement or to formally renegotiate it. Rights of human subjects. Evaluations should respect human dignity and worth in their interactions with other people associated with an evaluation so that participants are not threatened or harmed. Complete and fair assessments. The evaluation should be complete and fair in its examination and recording of strengths and weaknesses of the program being evaluated so that strengths can be built upon and problem areas addressed. Disclosure of findings. The formal parties to an evaluation should ensure that the full set of evaluation findings, along with pertinent limitations, are made accessible to the people affected by the evaluation, as well as any others with expressed legal rights to receive the results. Conflict of interest. Conflict of interest should be dealt with openly and honestly so that it does not compromise the evaluation processes and results. Fiscal responsibility. The evaluators allocation and expenditure of resources should reflect sound accountability procedures and be prudent and ethically responsible so that expenditures are accounted for and appropriate. Accuracy Standards Accuracy standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will reveal and convey technically adequate information about the features that determine the worth of merit of the program being evaluated. Program documentation. The program being evaluated should be described and documented clearly and accurately so that it programs is identified clearly. Context analysis. The context in which the program exists should be examined in enough detail so that its likely influences on the program can be identified. Described purposes and procedures. The purposes and procedure of the evaluation should be monitored and described in enough detail so that they can be identified and assessed. Defensible information sources. The sources of information used in a program evaluation should be described in enough detail so that the adequacy of the information can be assessed. Valid information. The information-gathering procedures should be chosen or developed and then implemented in a manner that will ensure that the interpretation arrived at is valid for the intended use. 7LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPNCODE: IL-R Reliable information. The information-gathering procedures should be chosen or developed and then implemented in a manner that will ensure that the information obtained is sufficiently reliable for the intended use. Systematic information. The information collected, processed, and reported in an evaluation should be review systematically so that the evaluation questions are answered effectively. Analysis of quantitative information. Quantitative information in an evaluation should be analyzed appropriately and systematically so that the evaluation questions are answered effectively. Analysis of qualitative information. Qualitative information in an evaluation should be analyzed appropriately and systematically so that the evaluation questions are answered effectively. Justified conclusions. The conclusions reached in an evaluation should be justified explicitly so that stakeholders can assess them. Impartial reporting. Reporting procedures should guard against distortion caused by personal feelings and biases of any party so the evaluation reports reflect the evaluation findings fairly. Metaevaluation. The evaluation itself should be evaluated formatively and summatively against these and other pertinent standards so that its conduct is appropriately guided, and on completion, stakeholders can closely examine its strengths and weaknesses. 8RECEIVED November 23, 2004 Mr. Gene Jones, Associate Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring US District Court 1 Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 DEC 1 6 2004 nror.n OFHCEOF desegregation LiONITOHING Dear Mr. Jones\nThank you for your careful review and comments regarding the Comprehensive Program Assessment Process delivered to you November 12. Responses to each point are below in the same order as in your letter.  The words spectrum and continuum are synonymous in that document, and the formative evaluations, assessments, and snapshots are examples of efforts over that range. They are not the only types of assessments or evaluations. While others might give the most rigorous such effort a name other than summative evaluation, it is the familiar term we have chosen. The comprehensive process we are introducing anticipates using these and additional examples to measure academic achievement (including disparities among groups) in practical, timely, and appropriately accurate ways according to circumstances and demands.  Summative (step 2) evaluations, the most rigorously designed and conducted, will address all the standards and follow all the procedures as much as possible. Other program appraisals will follow them less rigorously. The degree of fidelity to all the standards will depend on the time and resources permitted for them. There are not separate procedures (or standards) for various types of reviews.  The District will oversee eight summative evaluations, as required by the Court. Thereafter, the District will conduct the most appropriate types of evaluations, assessments, appraisals, reviews, or other similar activities of other names most apt to fit the Districts needs for this kind of information and its ability to do so. The full panoply will continue indefinitely as a permanent, imbedded activity of the District, but we anticipate practical trade-offs between the greater expense and longer time period, on one hand, usually required for summative evaluations, and limits of resources and time demanded for timely decisions based on data on the other hand  The first sentence of the revised regulation states that it complies with the Courts requirements. Thus, it encompasses all actions desired by the Court, including the number of LRSD employees who provide data for evaluations. The summary of the human interaction standard was combined with the summary of the standard for human rights, which precedes it in the table.  The Associate Superintendents is no longer responsible for program evaluation. Rather, the Director of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, who reports directly to the Superintendent, oversees the comprehensive program assessment process, as indicated in the current organizational chart found in an appendix of the update that is due December 1. The reason for the change is to give more independence to the assessment process.  The revised IL-R, entitled Comprehensive Program Assessment Process meets one of the Courts requirements. Accordingly, it was delivered to ODM and to Joshua a month prior to its presentation before the LRSD Board of Directors for approval. We appreciate your detailed attention to IL-R and hope these comments satisfactorily respond to your excellent questions. Please let us know if we may supply any more information or clarification. Sincerely yours, Karen DeJamette, Ph.D. Director, PRE xc: John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Chris Heller Friday Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201Jeanne P. Dreyfus 5118 Maytime Lane Culver City, CA 90230 (310) 559-9563 jpdrey@aol.com EDUCATION: 09/90 - 06/94 University of California, Los Angeles EdO - Curriculum Studies Received 09/88 - 06/90 University of California, Los Angeles MA \" Educational Psychology DEC 1 6 200^ 09/79-12/80 Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles CA Teaching Credential, K -12 DESEGREGAnOKMNirOflfNG 09/62 - 06/65 University of San Diego, CA BA \" Sociology/English EMPLOYMENT: 01/95 - Present Independent Evaluator - Education External Evaluator for the Teaching American History Project, Los Angeles Unified School District, Chern-Tech Program, L.A. Trade Tech Community College, Federal Magnet Schools Assistance Program (8 years). Long Beach Unified School District\nthe Galef Institutes Capacity Building Grant and its Different Ways of Knowing Comprehensive School Reform program\nTechnology/Literacy Program\nTree Peoples Environmental Education Program 08/91 -12/94 Galef Institute, Los Angeles, CA Research and Evaluation Coordinator\nResearch Associate Designed/coordinated research \u0026amp; evaluation studies - included formulating budgets, supervising research assistants, designing research instruments, analyzing data, writing reports and presenting findings to school boards 07/89 - 07/91 Center for the Study of Evaluation, UCLA Graduate Student Researcher Collected and analyzed data and co-authored technical reports for U.S. Government Agencies and the Los Angeles Unified School District 09/71 - 06/89 SKILLS: Assistant Principal, Teacher Involved in the daily operation of a school including conducting faculty meetings and supervising the computer lab\nEnglish and U.S. History teacher Research and Evaluation: design studies and evaluation tools, collect/analyze data, supervise assistants, author evaluation reports and academic publications Administration: five years as an assistant principal Teaching: English and History - elementary, middle and senior high schools REFERENCES: Available upon requestJeanne P. Dreyfus, Ed.D. Jeanne Dreyfus is an independent evaluator of educational programs. Currently, she is the external evaluator for the Los Angeles Unified School District 6s Teaching American History grant. This three year program focuses on raising student achievement in U.S. History by providing teachers of at-risk children with quality professional development in innovative instruction and content. In addition, Dr. Dreyfus is in her third year as program evaluator for the High School Chemical Technology program at Los Angeles Trade Tech Community College. Working with at-risk students, she is part of a team which has created a program that provides participants with hands-on chemistry and industry based laboratories in areas such as forensics and waste water management. In addition, the program includes site-visits and career education and preparation. From 1995-2003, Dr. Dreyfus was the external evaluator for the federally-funded Magnet Schools Assistance Program for the Long Beach Unified School District (LBUSD), a multi-year program dedicated to alleviating minority-group isolation in schools and raising student achievement. During that time she worked with 15 magnet schools at all grade levels providing school leaders with formative and summative input and evaluation. As the outside evaluator, she worked with the program director, principals, teachers, curriculum teams and site liaisons providing insights into the status of their magnet programs, their successes and challenges. Additionally, she was the external evaluator often LBUSD middle schools that participated in the California Technology Literacy Program, a program created to expand the use of technology across core curriculum. Dr. Dreyfus has also evaluated educational programs for TreePeople, a California non-profit environmental organization, the California State Parks Foundation, the National Park Service, the YWCA and Wilmington Community Health Clinic. From 2001-2003, Dr. Dreyfus acted as the third party formative evaluator to the Galef Institute under a Comprehensive School Reform Capacity Building Grant. In this work, she conducted educational research to help the Institute improve and expand their Different Ways of Knowing program which uses the arts to enhance core content learning. At that time, the Institute was working with low-achieving schools across the nation which were participating in the federal Comprehensive School Reform effort. In the early 199Os, Dr. Dreyfus was affiliated with the Galef Institute designing and coordinating research and evaluation studies, creating evaluation instruments, formulating and overseeing budgets, and presenting study findings to school boards and non-profit organizations. Dr. Dreyfus has a B.A. in Sociology and English from the University of San Diego, an M.A. in Educational Psychology and an Ed.D. from UCLA. Prior to receiving her advanced degrees, she taught Language Arts/Engiish, and History/Social Studies in elementary, middle and secondary schools for fifteen years and served as a K-8 assistant principal for five years. Dr. Dreyfus has extensive experience with diverse racial and ethnic groups and the realistic viewpoint of a former school administrator and classroom teacher. Over the years, she has conducted both qualitative and quantitative research, authored many program evaluations and provided significant on-going input into a number of multi-year educational programs.Summary of the Case and Request for Oral Argument This appeal is in the longstanding Little Rock school desegregation case, in which the parties' agreements have emphasized steps to address the lagging achievement of African American students. Appeal of LRSD. 949 F.2d. 253, 256 (Sth Cir.1991). On April 10, 1998, the district court approved a Revised Desegregation and Education Plan proposed by the parties. Its duration was three years, assuming substantial compliance with its terms. On September 13, 2002, the district court granted LRSD partial unitary status, finding that LRSD had complied with all aspects of the Revised Plan challenged by Joshua Intervenors, except for Plan Sec. 2.7.1, concerning assessment of academic programs. LRSD v. PCSSD, 237 F.Supp.2d 988, 1086 (E.D.Ark.2002). Based upon considerable evidence, the court construed Sec. 2,7.1 to require program evaluations of the key academic programs designed to build African American achievement. Id. at 1077-78. The court found that LRSD had not completed these evaluations and imposed a Sec. 2.7.1 Compliance Remedy. Id. at 1087-88. The LRSD did not appeal the Section rulings (fipdingg of fact, conclusions of law, or remedy). On appeal by Joshua Intervenors, this court affirmed the judgment as to issues raised unsuccessfully below by Intervenors. Armstrong. 359 F.3d 957 (Sth Cir.2004). LRSD V. LRSD appeals challenging: [i] the court's June 30, 2004 ruling that LRSD did not provide the evaluations required by the first Compliance Remedy [Add.3758] and [ii] the content of the revised Compliance Remedy, designed to secure the requisite evaluations. [Add.61-67] Oral argument is warranted. RECEIVED 1 DEC 1 6 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION I.iONlTORlNGTable of Contents Page No. Summary of the Case and Request for Oral Argument 1 Table of Contents ii Table of Authorities iv Statement of Issues 1 Procedural History 1 Statement of the Case 2 A. The Revised Plan of 1998 and Its Relevant Text 2 B. The LRSD's Recognition of the Ambiguity of the Term \"Assessment\" in the Context of The Revised Plan 4 C. The LRSD Repeatedly Interprets Plan Section 2.7.1 to Call for Program Evaluations of the Key Section 2.7 Programs 5 D. The LRSD Seeks in March 2001 a Declaration of Unitary Status and Its Release from Court Supervision 7 E. The Basis for the Court's Ruling in September 2002 of Non-compliance with Plan Section 2.7.1 Due to the Absence of Any Completed Program Evaluations 8 F. The District Court's Entry of a Compliance Remedy in September 2002 and the Lack of an Appeal by LRSD 12 G. Faced with the Court-ordered Compliance Remedy, the LRSD Again Fails to Provide the Requisite Program Evaluations, Resulting in the Court's Imposition on June 30, 2004 of a More Detailed Compliance Remedy 12 H. The Basis for the District Court's June 30, 2004 Ruling and Revised \"Compliance Remedy\" 13 Standard of Review 22 Summary of Argument 23 Argument 24 A. The District Court, Faced with a Second LRSD Failure to Provide the Requisite Program Evaluations, Has Sought, in a Manner Consistent with this Court's Guidance, to Provide Joshua Intervenors the Benefit of their 11 1 ISection 2.7.1 Bargain 25 1. The LRSD's Initial Failure to Provide the Requisite Program Evaluations and the court's First Compliance Remedy of Sept. 2002 26 2. The LRSD's Second failure to Provide the Program Evaluations and the Court's More Detailed Compliance Remedy of June 30, 2004 29 a. Introduction 29 b. The Basis for Imposing a Revised Compliance Remedy 30 c. The Dist. Court's Second Compliance Remedy 32 B. The LRSD Argument Ignores the Elements of the Governing Standards of Review and Is Otherwise Without Merit 33 1. The Assertion that the Term 'Assessment\" Is Unambiguous 34 2. The Request for De Novo Review of the Parties' Agreement 34 3. The Asserted \"Volunteering\" and Its Impact 35 4. The \"Importing\" of an Evaluation Obligation into the Plan 35 5. The Asserted Imposition of New Obligations 36 6. The Contention that LRSD Assessed Academic Programs 37 7. The Contention that LRSD Evaluated Academic Programs 38 8. LRSD's Argument Regarding the Burden of Proof and Contempt 39 Conclusion 41 Certification 42 Addendum After page 42 iiiTable of Authorities P^g-Np, Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564 (1985) 22 Appeal of LRSD, 949 F.2d 253 (8thCir.l991) 4, 25, 41 E.E.O.C. V. New York Times Co., 196 F.3d 72 (2ndCir.1999) 28 Foundation Telecommunications, Inc. v. Moe Studio, 16 S.W.3d 531 (Ark.2000) 34 Grand State Marketing v. Eastern Poultry Distribs., 975 S.W.2d 429 (Ark.App.1998) 35 Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, 413 U.S. 189 (1973) 29 Knight v. PCSSD, 112 F.3d 953 (8thCir.l997) 35 LRSD V. Armstrong, 359 F.3d 957 (Sth Cir.2004) 22, 36 LRSD V. PCSSD, 83 F.3d 1013 (8thCir.l996) 34 LRSD V. PCSSD, 971 F.2d 160 (Sth Cir.1992) 1, 22, 29, 34 LRSD V. PCSSD, 921 F.2d 1371 (SthCir. 990) 1, 13, 22, 25, 27, 37 LRSD V. PCSSD, 237 F.Supp. 988 (E.D.Ark. 2002) passim Mears v. Nationwide Insurance Co., 91 F.3d 1118 (8thCir.l996) 27 Nash Finch Co. v. Rublioff Hastings, L.L.C., 341 F.3d 846 (8thCir.2003) 22 Rufo V. Inmates of the Suffolk Cty. Jail, 502 U.S. 367 (1992) 27 Sturgis v. Skokos, 977 S.W.2d 217 (Ark.1998) 35 Swann v. Charlotte-Meckelenberg Bd. of Educ., 402 U.S. 1 (1971) 23, 26 United States v. City of Miami, Fla., 664 F.2d 435 (5thCir.1981) 28 United States v. ITT 420 U.S. 233 (1975) :ontinental Baking Co., 34 iv -statement of Issues (1.) Whether the LRSD establishes any basis for a departure from the law of the case with regard to the relevant parts of the district court's September 2002 ruling (findings of fact, conclusions of law, Compliance Remedy), which it did not appeal? * Little Rock Sch, Dist, v, Pulaski County Special Sch. Pist.. 971 F.2d 160, 165 (SthCir.1992) (2.) Whether the LRSD establishes that any of the findings of fact in the June 30, 2004 ruling are clearly erroneous? * LRSD V. Armstrong. 359 F.3d 957, 963 (SthCir.2004) (3.) Whether in the light of the LRSD's second failure to provide any adequate program evaluations, the district court's second, more-detailed Compliance Remedy, designed to secure preparation of the requisite evaluations, was an abuse of discretion? LRSD V. PCSSD. 921 F.2d 1371, 1394 (paras. 8-9) (SthCir. 1990) Procedural History This appeal is in the longstanding Little Rock school desegregation case. See LRSD V. PCSSD. 921 F.2d 1371, 1376-83 (SthCir.1990) (history of case). On April 10, 1998, the district court approved a Revised Desegregation and Education Plan proposed by the parties. [J.Add.5,7] Its duration was three years, assuming substantial compliance with its terms. [Add.95 (Sec. 11)] On September 13, 2002, the district court held, in part, that the LRSD had failed to substantially comply with Revised Plan Sec. 2.7.1, concerning assessment of academic programs. LRSD v. PCSSD. 237 F.Supp.2d 988, 1086 (E.D.Ark.2002). Based upon considerable 1I I I I evidence, including LRSD admissions, the court construed Sec. 2.7.1 to require program evaluations of the key academic programs designed to build African American achievement and implemented I I I pursuant to Plan Sec. 2.7. 1^. at 1077-78. The court found that LRSD had not prepared the requisite evaluations, refused to release the LRSD from court supervision regarding Plan Section 2.7.1, and imposed a Compliance Remedy to secure the promised evaluations and. thereby, substantial compliance with Section 2.7.1. Xd. at 1079-80, I 1087-88. The LRSD did not appeal the Section 2.7.1 rulings (findI ings of fact, conclusions of law, or remedy1. In March 2004, the LRSD again sought a release from court supervision, contending that it had substantially complied with the Section 2.7.1 Compliance Remedy. [Add.3] Joshua Intervenors opposed the LRSD request\nthe court heard the matter in June 2004. [Add.3] I LRSD's appeal challenges: [i] the court's June 30, 2004 ruling that the LRSD did not provide the program evaluations required by the first Compliance Remedy [Add. 37-58] and [ii] the content of the revised Compliance Remedy, designed to secure the promised evaluations, thereby avoiding another LRSD default. [Add. 61-67]  Statement of the Case I I I A. The Revised Plan of 1998 and Its Relevant Text In 1998, the Joshua Intervenors^ and the Little Rock School See Add. 3, n.3 (\"The Joshua Intervenors are a group of African-American school children, some of whom are enrolled in each of the three Pulaski County school districts. Thus, Joshua serves as the class representative for all African-American students enrolled in LRSD, the Pulaski County Special School District, and the North Little Rock School District.\") 2District [LRSD], two of the parties in this case, agreed upon and submitted to the district court for approval. \"Revised a Desegregation and Education Plan.\" [Add.67\nAdd.72-95 (CX 871)] On April 10, 1998, the district court (then Hon. Susan Webber Wright) approved the Revised Plan, characterizing it as \"an entirely new consent decree or settlement agreement\" \"binding on the parties.\" [J.Add.3,5,7] While the Revised Plan in Section 9 provided for implementation through \"the last day of classes of the 2000-01 school year\" [Add.94], Section 11 of the plan also addressed, implicitly. the duration of the Plan. That Section provides [Add.95, emphasis added]: At the conclusion of the 2001-02 school year, the district court shall enter an order releasing LRSD from court year supervision and finding LRSD unitary with regard to all aspects of school operations orovided that -LRSD has substantially complied with its obligations set forth in this Revised Plan, In anticipation of release, LRSD shall issue a report on March 15, 2001 indicating the state of UiSD's compliance with this Revised Plan. Any party challenging LRSD's compliance bears the burden of proof. If no party shallenqas LRSD's compliance, the above-described order shall be entered without further proceedings. As can be seen from this text, the Revised Plan did not address, explicitly: [i] the duration of the Plan, if a party contested substantial compliance and prevailed on this challenge (as later occurred here regarding Section 2.7.1 of the Plan)\n[ii] the range of remedies available to the court in the event of non-compliance\nand [iii] allocation of the burden of later establishing compliance with any such remedy. See Add.36-37 (district court's discussion of \"Burden of Proof\"). 3Section 2 of the Revised Plan set forth a series of LRSD \"Obligations.\" [Add.73-78] Among these, Sections 2.7 and 2.7.1 read as follows [Add.76-77, emphasis added]: 2.7. LRSD shall implement programs. policies and/or procedures designed to improve and remediate the academic achievement of African-American students, including but not limited to Section 5 of this Revised Plan. 2.7.1. LRSD shall assess the academic programs implemented pursuant to Section 2.7 after each year in order to determine the effectiveness of the academic programs in improving African-American achievement. If this assessment reveals that a program has not and likely will not improve African-American achievement. LRSD shall take appropriate action in the form of either modifying how the program is implemented or replacing the program. These sections evidenced the parties' continuing recognition that attention to the lagging achievement of African-American students was an important part of the remedial process in the LRSD. See, for example, Appeal of LRSD. 949 F.2d 253, 256 (SthCir.1991) . B. The LRSD's Recognition of the Ambiguity of the Term tt Assessment\" in the Context of The Revised Plan Various elements of the record establish the need to reach beyond the text of Section 2.7.1 to determine the obligation which the LRSD voluntarily assumed by agreeing to its terms. First. The term \"assessment\" is most often used to refer to the program of standardized testing of students imposed by state law or a school district's policy\nit is frequently used in this manner in Arkansas and the LRSD. 2 However, Section 2.7.1 addresses the \"assessment\" 2 See J.Add.24 (Tr., 11-19-01, at 243) (state-mandated system in Arkansas)\nCX 869 at 56-57 (LRSD Interim Compliance Report refers to the District's \"Assessment Plan, K-12\")\nCX 870 at 55-56 (LRSD Compliance Report discusses six tests under heading \"Assessments\")\nLRX 1 (memorandum regarding \"Revisions to the LRSD Assessment Plan\" deals with standardized tests). 4of programs. not students. Second. During the hearing in 2001 before Judge Wright on Joshua Intervenor's challenge to LRSD's compliance with certain features of the Revised Plan, Dr. Bonnie Lesley, Associate Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction testified that \"part of the confusion 11 in identifying the scope of Section 2.7.1. is due to the fact that \"we have sometimes used [the] terms [assessment and evaluation] interchangeably. . It [J.Add.24 (Tr.,11-19-01, 242)] Third. Later, in a memorandum discussing the requirements of the \"Compliance Remedy,\" imposed by Judge William Wilson on September 13, 2002, LRSD administrators referred back to the hearings conducted by Judge Wright in 2001. [LRX 2 at 3] LRSD staff wrote [id. 3]: \"The ambiguity of this term [\"assessment\"] was the subject of testimony at the hearing.\" C. The LRSD Repeatedly Interpreted Plan Section 2.7.1 to Call For Program Evaluations of the Key Section 2.7 Programs_ The record is clear that until Joshua Intervenors challenged compliance with Section 2.7.1, the LRSD repeatedly construed Section 2.7.1 of the Revised Plan to require program evaluations of programs implemented to fulfill the requirements of Section 2.7 of the Revised Plan. See Add. 76 (Sec. 2.7.1) and LR^, 237 F.Supp. 2d at 1078 (para. 10).] A summary of this evidence follows. (a) After approval of the Revised Plan, the LRSD formed a \"Compliance and Quality Assurance Committee\" consisting of the Associate Superintendents of Administrative Services, Instruction, Operations, and School Services, and the Special Assistant to the superintendent.\" [CX 869 at 1] \"The committee [had] responsibility for the development, implementation, oversight, review and revision 5of the compliance program. rid.1 The Committee developed a \"Compliance Plan for the LRSD Revised Desegregation and Education Plan\" dated June 10, 1999. [CX 544] The text concerning Section 2.7.1. identified relevant \"Board Policies\" to include those on \"Testing Programs\" and \"Program Evaluation.\" [ id. at 12] The text on \"Procedures (Regulations, Administrative Directives, Handbooks, etc.\") relevant to Section 2.7.1 provides as follows [id. at 11-12, emphasis added]: 1. Program Evaluation Agenda - in progress 2. Title I Restructuring Plan provides for Title I evaluation 3. National Science Foundation Project provides for program evaluation 4. Application for waiver includes an evaluation design from State or District rules 5. In progress: second-year evaluation of Success for All Thus, as seen, every sub-paragraph referred to \"evaluation.\" (b) In a June 1999 position paper. on the LRSD's PreK-3 literacy program, staff wrote: Er.eK-3 Literacy_Program evaluation. In keeping with the obligations in the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, the District shall employ with Title I funding a program gyaluatpr, who shall annually report on the level of effectiveness of the innovations in this PreK-3 Literacy Plan. [CX 703, Doc. 1, at 44\nemphasis added] See also J.Add.25 (Tr., 11-19-01, at 278) (Dr. Lesley) (\"[W]e noted the importance of a program evaluation, as a part of the commitment that we were making.\") (c) The LRSD's Interim Compliance Report of March 15, 2000 described steps said to be underway to comply with the Revised Plan. The material addressing Section 2.7,1 refers to If [i]mprove- 6I I I I rnents in the assessment of academic programs. II [CX 869 at 51] It also cites, inter alia, the \"Program Evaluation Plan\" [at 51], a draft policy on \"Curriculum Evaluation\" [at 52], and \"[t]he 1999- 2000 program evaluation agenda . . . approved by the Board of I Education in August 1999.\" [At 53] In sum, there are repeated references to evaluations. (d) The LRSD submitted on March 12, 2001, \"Compliance a Report\" designed to provide a predicate for the district's release from court supervision. See CX 870 and Add. 95, para. 11. The material in this Report addressing Section 2.7.1 is headed \"Program Evaluation\"  a title which is repeated at a later point in the I discussion. The text (page 148 of the report) includes at least nine other references to \"evaluation.\" (e) During her testimony before Judge Wright on August 1, \u0026gt; 2001, Assoc. Superintendent Lesley agreed that LRSD had interpreted 2.7.1, which does not use the word evaluation, as nevertheless I I raising the topic of program evaluation. [J.Add.19-21 (Tr., 8-1-01, at 705, 24 to 707, 12)\nsee also J.Add.22-23 (Tr., 8-2-01, at 842- 43, 7-15) (Judge Wright noting that LRSD \"voluntarily undertook . . obligation to have program evaluations of the programs that are designed to enhance African-American achievement\")] D. The LRSD Seeks in March 2001 a Declaration of Unitary Status and Its Release from Court Supervision_____ On March 15, 2001, acting pursuant to Section 11 of the Revised Plan [Add. 95] , the LRSD filed the above-mentioned Compliance Report, as a predicate for a finding of unitary status and a termination of court jurisdiction. [CX 870] Thereafter, on 7June 25, 2001, the Joshua Intervenors filed an [0]pposition to [the LRSD's] Compliance Report. 11 [LRSD App. 38] The district court ultimately conducted hearings on 9 days, concerning Joshua Intervenors' contention that the LRSD had not substantially complied with certain sections of the Revised Plan, including Sections 2.7 and 2.7.1. Judge Wilson ruled on all issues 3 raised by Joshua Intervenors on September 13, 2002. 237 F.Supp. 2d 988 (E.D.Ark. 2002). The court held that Intervenors had failed to establish a lack of substantial compliance in each area addressed, with one exception, implementation of Plan Section 2.7.1. LESfi, 237 F.Supp. 2d 1086. The court set forth findings of fact and conclusions of law, supporting its ruling, as well as a \"Compliance Remedy,\" geared to the specific problems identified in Section 2.7.1 compliance. LESD, 237 F.Supp. 2d at 1076-82, 1087-88. E. The Basis for the Court's Ruling in Sept. 2002 of Non- Compliance with Plan Section 2.7.1 Due to the Absence of Any Completed Program Evaluations_____________________ Based upon the hearing record. including the evidence summarized suora at 5-7, the district court made a series of findings showing the LRSD's lack of substantial compliance with Section 2.7.1, as the LRSD had construed it. These findings, part of the law of the case, include the following: In Secs. 2.7 and 5.1 through 5.4 of the Interim Compliance Report, LRSD identified almost 100 programs that it had implemented to 'improve and remediate the academic Prior to her withdrawal from the case [LRSD App. 51], Judge Wright heard the matter on July 5-6, 2001, August 1-2, 2001, and November 19-20, 2001. [LRSD App. 38-39, 40, 49] Judge Wilson completed the hearings on July 22-25, 2002. [LRSD App. 61] 3 8achievement of African-American students.' At certain grade levels, it appears students were exposed to multiple programs aimed at improving their literacy and math skills. F.Supp. 2d at 1076 n. 135 (para. 3)] [237 Under Sec. 2.7.1 of the Interim Compliance Report, LRSD discussed at length its plan for 'assessing' the programs implemented under Sec. 2.7. [footnote omitted] This plan consisted entirely of administering numerous tests to students in various grades levels and then comparing those tests scores with past test results to gauge how the programs were working to improve African-American achievement, [footnote omitted] see Interim Compliance report at 56-58. In addition to this 'Assessment Plan,' Sec. 2.7.1 of the Interim Compliance Report noted that LRSD was preparing ^evaluations' on some key programs designed to improve African-American achievement, in order to provide a more in-depth look at the effectiveness of those programs. . . . See Interim Compliance report at 53-54. Thus in order to comply with its obligations under Sec. 2.7.1, LRSD acknowledged in the Interim Compliance Report that it was required: (a) to use both the testing data and the 'program evaluations' to determine the effectiveness of the key academic programs implemented pursuant to Sec. 2.7\nand (b) to modify or eliminate those programs which the testing data and evaluations revealed were not effective in improving African- American achievement. [237 F.Supp. 2d at 1076-77, para, emphasis in original] 3\n. . . . Dr. Lesley admitted that, even though Sec. 2.7.1 of the Revised Plan does not use the phrase 'program evaluation,' LRSD interpreted that section of the Revised Plan to include an obligation to perform program evaluations. Tr. August 1, 2001, at 706-07. [237 F.Supp. 2d at 1077, para. 4] . . . . Thus, at least as early as March 15, 2000, LRSD went on record as recognizing that effective and timely written evaluations of the key programs implemented under Sec. 2.7 were essential in order for LRSD to accurately assess the effectiveness of those programs and to make the determinations required under Sec. 2.7.1 regarding whether the programs should be changed or eliminated.[237 F.Supp.2d atl078, para.6] During the hearings on unitary status, LRSD took the position that Sec. 2.7.1 only obligated it to perform 'assessments' and that it was not required to perform aCY program 'evaluations.' Dr. Lesley testified that preparing program evaluations was ' very expensive.'Tr. November 20, 2001, at 339. Based upon the amount of time, effort, and money 9that LRSD expended on preparing program evaluations.an\u0026lt;3 its efforts to document the preparation__ofthoseprogram evaluations in both the Interim and Final Compliance reports the record is clear that LRSD viewed those program evaluations as an integral part of the assessment process describee^, -in [237 F.Supp. 2d at 1078, para. 10\nemphasis Section 2.7.1. added in part] I I I I . I find that the much more in-depth and analytical program evaluations, which LRSD agreed to prepare on certain key remediation programs identified in the Interim Compliance Report, were an integral and essential part of LRSD's obligation under Sec. 2.7.1. [237 F.Supp. 2d at 1079, para. 13]  \u0026gt; In February of 2001, only one month before March 15, 2001 deadline for filing LRSD's Final Compliance Report, the Board enacted Policy IL (evaluation of instructional programs). [footnote 138: 'To the extent that LRSD was required to prepare evaluations on various programs designed to improve the academic achievement of African-American students as part of its obligation under Sec. 2.7.1, it was a little late in the day for the Board to be getting around to enacting a policy on how those evaluations should be prepared.\"[Policy IL recognized the crucial importance of program evaluations in providing 'valuable insights into how programs are operating, the extent to which they are serving the intended purpose of increasing student achievement, the strengths and weaknesses, the cost effectiveness, and directions for the future.' [CX 719] [237 F.Supp. 2d at 1078, para. 7] 'more . . . . Dr- Lesley defined a 'program evaluation' as long term, [it] may consider observations or measurements in addition to test scores, and is guided by a set of research questions that are usually provided by whoever the consumer is of that report. Tr. November 19, 2001, at 242-43. [237 F.Supp. 2d at 1077, para. 4] . . . .Dr. Lesley testified that, by the end of November 2000, it was her opinion that no one in PRE had the expertise to prepare program evaluations. Tr. August 1, 2001, at 710. [237 F.Supp. 2d at 1077, para. 5] The evidence introduced during the unitary status as of March 15, hearings overwhelmingly established that, 2001, the date the Final Compliance report was filed with the court: (1) PRE had prepared only draft evaluations of some of the programs in question\n(2) none of those evaluations had 10been approved by the Board\n(3) in the fall of 2000, LRSD presented the Board with evaluations of the Pre-K-3 Literacy Program, the National Foundation Project, and the implementation of the middle school curriculum, but the Board LRSD tabled approval of each of those evaluations because of serious problems with their form and content\nand (4) february of 2001, only a few weeks before the deadline for in filing the Final Compliance Report, LRSD formed a new research Committee and charged it with the responsibility of preparing and finalizing the evaluations on at least some of the programs listed on page 148 of the Final Compliance Report. The Final compliance Report's discussion of 'Program Evaluations\" 148 fails to disclose anv of the Compliance of on page any of foregoing facts. 'When one has to eat crow, one should take big bites.' it would have been far better for LRSD to candidly set forth in the Final Compliance Report that it had dropped the ball in preparing the program evaluations outlined in the Interim Compliance report, rather than presenting a misleading picture of the actual status of those program evaluations. [237 F.Supp. 2d at 1079-80, para. 15\nemphasis added in part] After discovering the serious problems with LRSD's incomplete and inadequate draft evaluations. Dr. Lesley sent several e-mails to other top administrators making it quite clear that LRSD had failed to carry out its obligation to prepare timely and reliable evaluations to assist in determining the effectiveness of the key remediation programs implemented by LRSD to improve the academic achievement of African-American students. para. 16] . . [237 F.Supp. 2d at 1080, These findings may be summarized as follows: [i] LRSD interpreted Sec. 2.7.1 consistently to obligate the district to prepare program evaluations of the key Section 2.7 programs, which by the text of that Section were not limited to the programs in Plan Section 5. [ii] The School Board adopted a policy on evaluation belatedly, i,e^, in February 2001, only in the month before it filed its Compliance Report (at the time specified in the 1998 plan), seeking a complete release from court supervision. [iii] LRSD lacked the personnel needed to prepare adequate evaluations, [iv] LRSD's March 2001 Compliance Report was marked by 11a lack of candor, exaggerating the extent of completion of evaluations\nnone were complete. [v] In view of its earlier consistent position that Sec. 2.7.1 required the preparation of evaluations of key Section 2.7 programs, URSD's contrary position in the hearing also evidenced a lack of candor. F. The District Court's Entry of a Compliance Remedy in September 2002 and the Lack of An Appeal by the LRSD In response to the default of the LRSD regarding Section 2.7.1, the district court set forth in its September 13, 2002 ruling a \"Compliance Remedy.\" 237 F.Supp 2d at 1087-88. The LRSD did not file an appeal or cross appeal challenging any aspect of the Compliance Remedy, a point noted in the district court's subsequent decision of June 30, 2004 from which this appeal is taken. [Add. 55] The lower court also observed there that \"LRSD did not seek clarification of any terms used in the Compliance Remedy or any of its compliance obligations.\" [Add. 9] G. Faced with the Court-ordered Compliance Remedy, the LRSD Again Fails to Provide the Requisite Program Evaluations Resulting in the Court's Imposition on June 30, 2004 of a More Detailed Compliance Remedy The Compliance Remedy established a series of steps necessary to fulfill the requirements of Section 2.7.1. As authorized by Paragraph F of the Remedy, the LRSD filed on March 12, 2004 a \"Compliance Report\" maintaining that it had substantially complied with the \"Compliance Remedy,\" warranting a release from court supervision. [Add. 19] Thereafter, on April 15, 2004, the Joshua Intervenors opposed LRSD's request. [App. 29\nsee also Add. 29-32 {district court's summary of Intervenors' objections)] 12The district court heard the matter on June 14-15, 2004. The LRSD presented witnesses, who were cross-examined [Add. 35], and the court received each parties' exhibits.\" Intervenors' exhibits included an office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) report of March 30, 2004, titled \"The [LRSD's] Implementation of the Court's Compliance Remedy. II [JX 11] The report addresses relevant staffing in the LRSD, as well as ODM discussions with LRSD officials concerning their efforts (or lack thereof) during the period in which LRSD was to implement the initial compliance Remedy. [JX 11 at 2-3, 5-6, 16, 23] (This court directed the creation of ODM. IRSD, 921 F.2d at 1388, 1394.) On June 15, 2004, at the close of the LRSD's evidence, the district court granted, in part, the Joshua Intervenors' motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Rule 52(c), Fed.R.Civ.Pro. [Add. 35] The court granted the motion as to Parts A and B of the Compliance Remedy, but not Part C. [1^. ] On June 30, 2004, the court filed a 69-page Memorandum Opinion. In substance, the court concluded in detailed findings that in the face of the \"Compliance Remedy,\" the LRSD had again defaulted. The court therefore restated the \"Compliance Remedy\" in more detailed terms. [Add. 61-67] H. The Basis for the District Court's June 30, 2004 Ruling and Revised \"Compliance Remedy\"------- A summary of the district court's June 30, 2004 findings of fact and conclusions of law follows. A footnote at the end of each \" Intervenors' witnesses did not testify due to the court's granting Intervenors' motion for judgment pursuant to Rule 52(c), Fed.R.Civ.Pro., after the LRSD rested. [Add. 35\nTr. at 297-304] 13paragraph sets forth support in the record for the court's ruling. On October 10, 2002, Board\") adopted a \"Compliance Plan LRSD's Board of Directors (\"the It that was specifically designed to satisfy the Court's Compliance Remedy. . Compliance Plan recognized that, in order for LRSD to meet its obligations under the Compliance Remedy, it would have to satisfy three core obligations: (1) 'develop a written procedure for evaluating the programs implemented pursuant to Sec. academic 2.7 to determine their effectiveness in improving the achievement of African-American students\"\n(2) 'maintain written records of the criteria used to evaluate each [sec. 2.7] program\"\nand f3]'fplrepare a comprehensive program evaluation of each academic program__Linpl emen ted pursuant to . . . Sec. 2.7 to determine..its effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students and to decide whether to modify or replace_the program.\" Id. at 3-5 (emphasis added). [Add. 11-12\n54] . The \u0026amp; The Compliance Plan also included a detailed 'Action Plan Time Line' that: (1) identified the LRSD employees who were responsible for implementing each 'activity' necessary to satisfy the Compliance Remedy\nand (2) provided a schedule for completing each of these activities. Dr. Bonnie Lesley, the Associate Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction, and Dr. Ken James, LRSD's Superintendent of Schools, were assigned personal responsibility for each of the twenty-eight (28) activities identified by the \"Action Plan Time Line.\" Id. at 7-10. Thus, it was up to Dr. Lesley and Dr. James to spearhead the timely implementation of all twenty-eight activities' necessary to satisfy the Compliance remedy. [Add. 12] Finally, at the same time it approved the compliance Plan, the Board also adopted Regulation 'IL-Rl,' which set forth 'the written procedures for evaluating the programs implemented effectiveness pursuant to in African-American improving students.' Sec. r the 2.7 to academic determine achievement their According to of the Compliance Plan, regulation Il-Rl established the criteria for preparing the program evaluations necessary to satisfy LRSD's obligations under subparts an of the Compliance A B 5 See J.Add.11-13 (\"[Final] Compliance Plan\"). 6 See J.Add. 15-18\nTr. at 116-18 (Lesley). 14Remedy.[Add. 12-13] the Board approved a 'Program On October 24, 2002, tii= i-t---- - ---=\u0026gt;--- Evaluation Agenda' for the 2002-03 school year that authorized  n . j J 2  X. V. .M. o A ** *\u0026gt; V* A e*  t T 1 On October 2 4, the preparation of evaluations in (1) Elementary literacy\n(2) Secondary literacy\nand (3) the National Science Foundation ('NSF') K-12 Math and Science Elementary literacy\nthree broad areas\nProject, [citations to record] LRSD subsequently construed the 2002-03 Program Evaluation Agenda as requiring it to prepare only two Sec. 2.7.1 evaluations in order to satisfy its obligations under subpart A of the Compliance Remedy: comprehensive 'Literacy Evaluation\"\nand (2) a comprehensive Math and Science Evaluation.\"[Add. 13\nsee also at Add. 23-24 (1) a (identifying the two \"evaluations\" submitted)] Of course 'Literacy' and 'Math and Science' are not  they are broad academic areas that roughly tn the orouDino of collecie courses into 'Arts' or 'programs'  correspond to grouping college   'Sciences.' Because LRSD administrators, such as Dr. Lesley, had always construed Sec. 2.7.1 of the Revised Plan as 2.7.1 requiring LRSD to prepare evaluations of the key Sec. programs implemented to improve African-American achievement, the Board should have been aware that they were being too general in dividing the universe into 'Literacy' and 'Math/Science' and then preparing a global evaluation of each of those areas. Nevertheless, in its March 12, 2004 Compliance in 'Literacy' Report . . . , LRSD contends that these two Sec. 2.7.1 evaluations fully satisfy all of its obligations under subpart A of the Compliance Remedy, [footnote omitted] [Add.13-14\n55 The district court found, as detailed in the ODM report and  See JX 2 (Reg. IL-Rl)\nJ.Add. 12. Also noteworthy are the following: [i] JX 1 (LRSD evaluation policy states: \"All program evaluations will follow standards established by the National Joint Committee on Standards for Education Evaluation.\")\n[ii] LRSD's Proposed Compliance Plan states: \"Proposed Reg. IL-Rl combines generally accepted principles of program evaluation with practices that have been in place in the LRSD for the past two years.\" See LRX 14 at 3-4\nLRX 3 at 3-4\nJX 11 at 4. See evidence discussed supra at 5-7\nCX 870 at 148 (planned evaluations of parts of the curriculum)\nJ.Add.11 (para.4) (Compliance Plan refers to preparing evaluation of \"each [Sec. 2.7] program\")\nTr. at 195 (Ross) (\"every school and every district has many subprograms\" which can be and should be evaluated)\nLRX 14 at 3-4. 15I   I I I I the testimony, that the problem of inadequate staffing persisted. Dr. Bonnie Lesley and Dr. Ken James, whom the \"time line\" in the Compliance Plan identified as having \"personal responsibility for each of the twenty-eight (28) activities identified\" as necessary \"to satisfy the Compliance Remedy,\" resigned in March and May, 2003, respectively. [Add. 12, 17] The district court found that no document identified a successor. [Add. 18-19] The court noted that the LRSD originally envisioned its Department of planning, Research, and Evaluation ('PRE') preparing evaluations. [Add. 17 n. 17] The court found that after the Assistant superintendent in charge of PRE resigned \"in early 2001,\" she was not replaced until a \"statistician\" was designated \"acting head\" in November 2003. [Id.] \"As a result, since Dr. Lease's departure in early 2001, LRSD has essentially functioned without a meaningful Department of Planning, Research and Evaluation. See ODM's Compliance Report [JX 11] at 6. If [Id\nsee also Add. 39-40 (paras. 6-7)] lO LRSD Regulation IL-Rl contained the following procedures that were to be followed in preparing all future Sec. 2.7.1 evaluations [Add. 21]: (1) Write a clear description of the curriculum/instruction program that is to be evaluated, with information about the schedule of its implementation. [Add. 22] (2) Agree on the necessary research questions that need to be established in addition to the question: 'Has this curriculum/instruction program been effective in improving and lO 269 (Glasgow). Tr. at 116-18 (Dr. Lesley)\nJX 11 at 2-3, 5-6, 16\nTr. at 11 The LRSD policy on \"Evaluation of Instructional Programs\" . . program evaluations can provide valuable states in part: \" insights into how programs are operating . . .\" [JX 1] 16remediating the academic achievement of African-American students?' [Add. 22] . . . . (4) Plan ways to provide regular progress reports fe.q.. dissemination of meeting minutes, written progress reports, oral reports to Superintendent, Cabinet and\\or Compliance Team) to stakeholder, including the Associate Superintendent for Instruction, The Superintendent of Schools, the ODM (until Unitary Status is achieved) and the Joshua Intervenors (until Unitary Status is achieved). [Add. 22] (5) The team preparing the program evaluations had to meet 'to monitor the completion of assignments'\n'to review drafts and provide feedback to the writer'\nand to 'formulate recommendations . . . for program improvement, especially to decide if a recommendation is required to modify or abandon the program if the findings reveal that the program is not being successful for the improvement of African-American achievement.' [Add. 22-23] . . 12 The district court's summary of the ODM report on compliance included the following content: (2) The ODM had difficulty getting LRSD administrators to identify the specific Sec. evaluated under Sec. 2.7.1 2.7 of programs the Revised that would be Plan. administrators finally acknowledged to the ODM that LRSD 'the program evaluation agenda for the 2002-03 school year would include only elementary literacy, secondary literacy, and the NSF math and science project.' LRSD administrators never explained to the ODM which Sec. 2.7 programs would be covered in the literacy and math science evaluations. 1^. at 12. [Add. 24-25] 13 While developing its Compliance Plan, the LRSD prepared a proposed regulation, I1-R2. \"'Proposed Regulation IL-R2' was 12 See JX 2. 13 JX 11 at 23. On this topic, ODM wrote: \"Over the course of our monitoring, we have repeatedly asked district employees which programs the district viewed as subject to the program assessment requirement. For the most part, responses have been evasive, but in January 2004, an ODM monitor again asked a senior-level administrator if the district had ever identified the programs subject to the assessment requirement. additional comment.\" Id. His reply was 'no,' without 17intended to govern the preparation and content of ' Informal program Evaluation.' The stated purpose of this regulation was 'to ensure that a written record exists explaining a decision to significantly modify an academic program.' [citations omitted] / II [Add. 33] \"Proposed Regulation IL-R2 clearly was intended to meet certain of the obligations imposed on LRSD under subpart B of the Compliance Remedy. LED, 237 F.Supp. 2d at 1087-88.\" [Add. 34] The School Board failed to adopt Regulation I1-R2. rid.1 The district court found that \"LRSD'S Literacy Program Evaluation fails to substantially comply with subparts A and B of the Compliance remedy\" due to many \"significant deficiencies.\" [Add 42-45] [i] It did \"not evaluate each Sec. 2.7 academic program\" \"much less analyze 'whether to modify or replace' any of those programs.\" [Add. 42-43] [ii] The \"research question[s]\" addressed did not include the key question identified as necessary in LRSD's Regulation IL-Rl, \"based on: 'Policy IL, Sec. 2.7.1 of the [Revised Plan] and Judge Wilson's Compliance remedy.\" [Add. 43] [iii] It did not satisfy the fundamental requirement of Regulation IL-Rl that there be \"a clear description of the curriculum/instruction program that is to be evaluated, with information about the schedule for its implementation.\" [Add. 43] The descriptions of the middle school and high school programs were particularly deficient. [Add. 44] The court noted the concession of LRSD expert Dr. Ross that X4 LRX 2 at 6\nJ.Add. 12-13 (\"[Final] Compliance Plan\"]). 18these program descriptions were \"amorphous.\" [Add 44] 15 [iv] The court also wrote: \"During the evidentiary hearing, the testimony established that LRSD failed to provide the ODM and Joshua with any 'progress reports' on the Literacy Program Evaluation as required 16 by Regulation IL-Rl.\" [Add. 45] The district court found that the \"LRSD's Math and Science Evaluation also falls short of substantial compliance with subparts A and B of the Compliance Remedy.\" [Add. 45] \"[MJore obvious deficiencies\" include: \"In violation of its own Compliance Plan, LRSD prepared a comprehensive Math and Science Evaluation that examined 'areas of knowledge'  not specific Sec. 2.7 programs.\" [Add. 46] Furthermore, the document does not address modification or replacement of programs. [IXJ. ] The evaluation covers curriculum chances made to LRSD's math and science programs  not the specific Sec. 2.7 programs that were designed and implemented to improve the academic achievement of African-American students in math and science. II [Add. 47] The evaluation, as conceded by an LRSD witness, was II primarily an analysis of test scores.\" [Add. 47-48] Moreover, the evaluation included an unsound analysis of test 15 Dr. Ross earlier prepared \"guidelines\" for LRSD emphasizing the importance of program descriptions. [LRX 8 at 2, 3, 4] 16 Compare LRX 14F at 8 (Exhs. 2195) (research questions focus on analysis of student test scores) with Tr. at 195 (Dr. Ross testifies that every district and school had sub-programs which can be and should be evaluated)\ncompare JX 2 at 5 (para. D) with LRX 14F at 8 (Exhs. 2195) (key research question omitted)\ncompare JX 2 at 3 (clear description of program needed) with LRX 14F at 10-11 (Exhs. 2197-98) (little or no description of programs)\nTr. at 192 (\"amorphous\" program descriptions)\nTr. at 197-98 and 279-80 (lack of progress reports). 19scores. [Add. 49-50] The evaluation did not address implementation of the program at each school. [Add 48] \"[T]he LRSD failed to provide regular 'progress reports' on the Math and Science Evaluation to the ODM and Joshua, as required by Regulation IL-Rl.\" [Add. 50]\" The LRSD's witness. Dr. Ross, testified that it is now necessary to \"perform program evaluations to determine the effectiveness of the specific Sec. 2.7 literacy programs as they have been implemented at each of the schools in the district in order to fulfill the purposes of Section 2.7.1. [Add. 50-51] The LRSD's witness, Mr. Glasgow, the Interim Superintendent of Curriculum and Curriculum, \"testified that the single best way to improve the academic achievement of African-American students was to evaluate, on a school-by-school basis. the effectiveness of specific Sec. 2.7 programs, as they have been implemented at the classroom level. II [Add. 53] la At the hearing, the LRSD again argued, by the testimony of Dr. Lesley, whose credibility the district court faulted [Add.54], that to satisfy Section 2.7.1 the district was \"required to perform only annual informal assessments.\" [Add. 52 emphasis in original]. The district court noted the testimony of LRSD witness Dr. Ross, 2236-2354) (math-science \" See generally LRX 14G (Exhs. evaluation)\nTr. at 241 (primarily a test score analysis)\nTr. at 244-47 (unsound anlysis of test scores)\nTr. at 240-43 (lack of data on implementation at each school)\nTr. at 197-98 and^279-80 (lack of progress reports)\nTr. 241-43 (evaluation deficient in light of standards articulated by Dr. Ross in LRX 5). xa Tr. at 195 (Dr. Ross)\nTr. at 273-74 (Glasgow). 20Id rejecting the adequacy of such informal steps. [Add.52-53] Dr. Ross testified that a district the size of the LRSD could reasonably be expected to perform four or five program evaluations of individual programs. [Add. 56] The district court found Dr. Ross to be It well-qualified expert in preparing program evaluations a [and a person with] extensive knowledge about programs and strategies that schools can implement to improve the academic achievement of African American students.\" [Add. 53] The court \"further [found] Dr. Ross's testimony was both informative and credible regarding the Literacy Evaluation that he prepared.\" [Id-] \"Subpart B of the Compliance Remedy required LRSD to maintain written records of its assessment of each Sec. 2.7 program. These written records were required to include the following: (a) the criteria that LRSD used to assess each Sec. 2.7 program during the 2002-03 school year and the first semester of the 2003-04 school year\nand (b) the 'results of the annual assessment of each program. including whether the assessments resulted in program modifications or elimination of any programs.' 237 F.Supp. 2d at 1088. Proposed Regulation IL-R2, which was never approved by the Board, appears to have been designed to satisfy the requirements of subpart B of the Compliance Remedy.\" [Add.56-57, emphasis in original] 21 \"The evidence established that LRSD failed to maintain any of Id Tr. at 151-55 (Dr. Lesley)\nTr. at 177, 203 (Dr. Ross). 20 Tr. at 158-59, 210. 21 LRX 2 at 6\nJ.Add. 12-13. 21the separate written records on each of the Sec. 2.7 programs that were required by subpart B of the 1 attached to its Compliance Report Compliance remedy. Instead, three documents that LRSD contain a confusing compilation of random changes in various described academic vaguely programs during the 2001-02, 2002-03, and 2003- 04 school years, [citations omitted]\" The district court described additional shortcomings in this area. [Add.57-58] The district court concluded that the LRSD complied with Subpart C of the substantially Compliance Remedy. [Add. 58-61] Standard of Review The LRSD having failed to seek the court's rulings of September 13, reconsideration of or to appeal 2002, regarding Section 2.7.1 of the Plan, those rulings are the law of the showing of clear case, absent \"a error and manifest injustice\" subsequent change in the facts of the or a substantial. case. LRSD v. PCSSD. 971 F.2d 160, 165 (Sth Cir. 1992). In XB.SD V. Armstrong J court wrote: 359 F.3d 957, 963 (Sth Cir. 2004), this We review the District Court' error. See Nash Finch Co. F.3d 846, 850 (8th Cir. V ^^ndings of fact for clear I Rublioff Hastings. L.L.C r.OU 04b, 850 (Sth Cir. 2003). Thus, we must 2^ findings are, in our opinion, clea^ir that we must have a 'definite n H f 4 \u0026gt; District Court a was permissible views of the between them cannot be Anderson v. defini-i-o a /I erroneous, which means definite and firm conviction' mistaken. Ibid. If 'there \u0026gt; evidence. that the If 'there are two factfinder's choice clearly erroneous.' 14. at 851 (quoting ------ 470 U.S. 564, 574 (1985)). Xisid. City of Bessemer City. The district court' review by the abuse of discretion s second Compliance Remedy is subject to standard. LRSD PCSSD. supra. 23 LRX 14C-E (Exhs.2174-86). 22 921 r.2d at 1394, paras. 8-9\ncompare Swann v. Charlotte-HecRlen- hfirg Board of Educ. . 402 U.S. 1, 15-16 (1971) (remedial authority of federal district court when local school authority defaults) . Summary of Argument The LRSD has twice failed to provide any adequate program evaluations of its key programs designed to build African-American achievement, despite its voluntary promise to do so in Plan Section 2.7.1. Its appeal challenges the court's second, more-detailed Compliance Remedy, designed to prevent a third such default. LRSD pledged not only to implement programs \"to improve and remediate the academic achievement of African-American students .\" (Sec. 2.7), but also \"assessment\" of the Sec. 2.7 programs after each year for effectiveness. allowing informed decisions about the need for modification and program replacement (Sec. 2.7.1). When Intervenors challenged LRSD's compliance, the evidence revealed the ambiguity of the term \"assessment.\" Based upon consid- erable evidence. including LRSD admissions, the district court construed Sec. 2.7.1 to require program evaluations of the key academic programs designed to build African American achievement. Drawing upon its residual authority in the absence of relevant provisions in the parties' plan (LESE, 921 F.2d at 1394 [paras. 8- 9]), the court set forth a Compliance Remedy to secure the requisite evaluations and cure other deficiencies in LRSD's performance. LRSD did not appeal. In 2004, when LRSD sought release from court supervision. Intervenors contended that LRSD had not adequately implemented the 23Compliance Remedy and again failed to provide the requisite program evaluations. The court agreed, in detailed findings and rulings which LRSD essentially ignores. The court found again that LRSD had construed its obligation to encompass preparation of program evaluations, not the less rigorous study it proffered as adequate at the hearing. The lower court, as noted, set forth a revised more detailed Compliance Remedy. LRSD's arguments also ignore the governing standards of review. In particular, LRSD ignores the import, under the law of the case doctrine, of its failure to appeal from those parts of the lower court's Sept. 13, 2002 decision concerning failure to implement Plan Sec. 2.7.1 (findings, conclusions. Compliance Remedy). LRSD, 971 F.2d at 165. Generally, LRSD's arguments lack substance, when viewed in the light of the court's findings and the record. Argument In keeping with the parties' historic emphasis in this case. the LRSD promised in Plan Section 2.7.1 to undertake a program evaluation of each key Section 2.7 program to judge effectiveness in building African American achievement and to identify any needed program changes. The first Compliance Remedy rested on LRSD's default in this regard\nLRSD did not appeal. The second, more detailed Compliance Remedy rests on well-supported findings that LRSD again defaulted and failed to fulfill this vitally important pledge. The district judge need not allow the LRSD to outlast him. The LRSD, in substance, seeks a de novo review. LRSD errs. Pursuant to each element of the applicable standard of review, the 24I ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft proper focus is wrong. whether the district court's As LRSD did not appeal from or action is clearly otherwise challenge the relevant findings, conclusions, and remedy set forth on September 13, 2002, they are the law of the case, absent a showing which LRSD does not undertake. The district court's must be accepted if they rest evidence.\" LRSD must abuse of discretion. on June 2004 findings of fact \"permissible [view] of the show that the second \"Compliance Remedy\" is an This argument first shows that the court, faced with a second LRSD failure to provide the promised program evaluations. has sought, in an appropriate manner, to benefit of their Section 2.7.1 bargain. provide Intervenors the Intervenors then address a particular flaws in the LRSD argument. \u0026gt; A. The District Court, Faced With A Second LRSD Failure to^ Provide the Requisite Program Evaluations, Has Sought, in a Manner Consistent with this Court's Guidance, to Provide Intervenors the Benefit of Their gectjon 2.7.1 Bargain The quest for \"the equal and integrated education of black children\" in the LRSD (LESfi, 921 F.2d at 1380) has been governed by agreements of the parties since 1990. The parties have emphasized steps to address the lagging achievement of African American students. The district court recognized the relationship and the 33 importance of Sections 2.7 and 2.7.1 of the \"Revised Desegregation \u0026gt; and Education\" Plan. [Add.4,68] The LRSD pledged not only to At an earlier time, when LRSD pledged actions to reduce the this court cited \"the agreed effort to racial achievement gap, eliminate achievement disparity between the races\" elements of the . . . plan that we consider crucial, and with respect to which no retreat should be approved.\" 949 F.2d 253, 256 (Sth Cir. 1991). as one of \"those . . plan that Appeal of LRSD. 25 23implement programs \"to improve and remediate the academic achievement of African-American students . . It [2.7], but also to study the Section 2.7 programs after each year for effectiveness, allowing informed decisions about the need for modification and program replacement [2.7.1] 1. The LRSD's Initial Failure to Provide the Requisite Program Evaluations and the Court's First Compjli9ng$ ReiPgcb: When Intervenors opposed release of court jurisdiction as to Section 2.7.1, addressing this core educational concern, the court in September 2002 found (and ruled), based upon considerable evidence, including an admission by Dr. Lesley, that the \"assessment\" of \"academic programs \" to which Section 2.7.1 referred envisioned \"program evaluations\" \"of the key programs implemented under Sec. 2.7 . . .\" LRSD, 237 F.Supp. 2d at 1078- As noted, Dr. Lesley also testified to a tendency to use the terms \"assessment\" and \"evalauation\" interchangeably. 24 The court found that the LRSD had prepared only draft, unapproved evaluations \"of some of the programs in guestion\"  a fact which the LRSD had not disclosed in its Compliance Report. 237 F.Supp. at 1079-80. The court also found that the School Board adopted a policy on evaluation belatedly and, in any event, noted Dr. Lesley's acknowledgement of a lack of the staff necessary to do evaluations. 237 F.Supp. at 1077-78. Viewed objectively, the court determined that in this sphere, the LRSD had \"defaulted\" (compare Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg, supra 401 U.S. at 15-16), and then sought to mask this fact by advancing a diluted 24 See supra at 4-5 (need to reach beyond Section 2.7.1 text to construe word \"assessment\" as used there). 26version of its obligation at the hearing. 237 F.Supp. at 1078. The parties' plan indicated, implicitly, that the implementation period could be extended, if Intervenors' demonstrated a lack of substantial compliance. \"[C]ontract terms are interpreted with strong consideration for what is reasonable.\" Mears__3L Nationwide Mutual Insur. Co.. 91 F.3d 1118, 1122 (8thCir.1996). It would be senseless to allow the challenge on which Intervenors succeeded, if no substantive relief followed. On the other hand, the parties' agreement did not address the content or duration of a compliance remedy, or which party would have the burden of later establishing compliance (or a lack thereof). Supra at 3-4. In this setting, the court followed guidance from this court in this case in 1990 and kindred precedent. In 1990, also in the context of an agreed upon plan, this court addressed the district court's responsibilities regarding compliance with the agreements. This court \"instructed\" the district court \"to take whatever action is appropriate. in its discretion, to ensure compliance with the agreements and otherwise to proceed as the law and the facts require.\" LRSD V. PCSSD. 921 F.2d at 1394 (para. 8). This court added that should the parties be unable to agree upon a transition from operation under court order to their agreements \"the District Court is authorized to take such action as may be just.\" Id. at para. 9. 3S 25 See also Rufo v. Inmates of the Suffolk Cty. Jail. 502 U.S. 367, 378 (1992) (\"A consent decree no doubt embodies an agreement of the parties and thus in some respects is contractual in nature. But it is an agreement that the parties desire and expect will be reflected in, and be enforceable as, a judicial decree that is 27I I I I I ) ) )   I I I I The district court's action following LRSD's initial default mirrors precisely this court's 1990 road map. In brief, the first \"Compliance Remedy\" (237 F.Supp. 2d at 1087-88) is designed \"to ensure compliance with [Section 2.7.1 of the Revised Plan]\" as construed by the court (based upon its text and the LRSD's acknowledgement of its obligations). A key provision of the first \"Compliance Remedy\" provides: to . . [LRSD] must remain under court supervision with regard [Section 2.7.1] of the Revised Plan mtil it Xal demonstrates that a program assessment procedure is in place that an accurately measure the effectiveness of each program implemented under Section 2.7 in improving the academic achievement of African-American students\n. . . [237 F.Supp. 2d at 1087, emphasis added] This language portends the court's later decision placing on the LRSD the burden of proof on the issue of compliance with the first \"Compliance Remedy.\" [LRSD App. 100-01 (hearing on 4-22-04)] On burden, the lower court \"proceed[ed] as the law and the facts require\" and in a manner which was \"just.\" The parties' agreement did not address the burden issue in the context of a Compliance Remedy. The court chose to allocate the burden as is normal in a desegregation setting, as its citation to precedent shows. [Add.36-37] This placed the burden on the party (LRSD) which created the need for the additional proceeding by its default. It is also germane that the LRSD was best positioned to have the information demonstrating compliance (if any there was). Compare subject to the rules generally applicable to other judgments and decrees.\")\nE,E.0.C v. New York Times Co. . 196 F.3d 72, 79 (2ndCir. 1999) (\". . . courts have equitable powers to enforce consent decrees . . .\")\nU.S, v. City of Miami. Fla.. 664 F.2d 435, 440 n.8 (Sthcir.1981) (en banc) (opinion for five judges). V. Miami, Fla. 28Kg-Ve^-V-.-. school Dist. No. 1. 413 U.S. 189, 209-10 (1973) (role of considerations of policy and fairness in allocating burden of proof). As noted, the LRSD did not appeal from the court's ruling. It did not cross appeal, after the appeal by Intervenors. The district court's findings, conclusions, and remedy thereby became a part of the law of the case. LRSD, 971 F.2d at 165. Moreover, the LRSD did not, as the district court noted, seek reconsideration or clarification of any aspect of the September 2002 decision. [Add.9] 2. LRSD's Second Failure to Provide the Program Evaluations and the court's Second More Detailed Compliance Remedy a. Introduction The court's detailed findings of fact establish that faced with the Compliance Remedy the LRSD again defaulted. The district court responded appropriately and justly, namely, with a more specific remedy designed to give class members the benefit of the vitally important Section 2.7.1 bargain (evaluations of key programs) and to minimize the possibility of a third default. In describing LRSD's remedial obligation in the first \"Compliance Remedy,\" the district court employed the words \"assess\" and \"assessments\" not evaluate or evaluation. 237 F.Supp. 2d at 1987-88. The court determined to use the words used by the parties, which LRSD understood to encompass program evaluations. [Add.8] The court's June 2004 findings show that the LRSD understood its obligation under the Compliance Remedy. First, in its \"Compliance Plan\" adopted on October 10, 2002, LRSD recognized that it was obligated [i] to develop a written 29procedure to evaluate the Sec. 2.7 programs, [ii] to maintain written records of the criteria used for these evaluations. and [iii] to (3)Ifplrepare a comprehensive program evaluation of each agademiccrograinimplemented pursuant to . . Sec. to 2^ determine its pffectivengss in improving the academic achievement a Africsn-Aweripan students and to decide whether to notify or fgplacs 'Vhs prpgraro.\" Jd. at 3-5 (emphasis added). [Add.11-12\nalso Add.5 and J.Add.11-13] see Second, the written procedure developed by the LRSD is set forth in its Regulation IL-Rl, also adopted on October 10, 2002. [JX 2] The court found: \"According to the Compliance Plan, Regulation Il-Rl established the criteria for preparing the program evaluations necessary to satisfy LRSD's obligations under subparts A and B of the Compliance Remedy.\" [Add.12-13] Basis for Imposing a Revised Compliance Remedy The district court's articulation of a predicate for imposing a second Compliance Remedy is by no means limited to showing that at the outset LRSD recognized its obligation. Personnel problems persisted and LRSD again sought in the hearing to dilute its obligation. Supra at 15, 20. in the latter regard, the court noted that Dr. Ross specifically rejected as inadequate the tact on which LRSD relied (\"annual informal assessments\"). Supra at 20. LRSD staff could not articulate for ODM staff the programs subject to assessment. S.Upra at 17. LRSD did not provide Intervenors promised progress reports. [Tr. 197-98, 279-80] The court rejected the notion that LRSD had fulfilled its 30I I I \u0026gt;    obligation II by providing for only \"global evaluation[s]\" of Literacy\" and \"math/science.\" [Add.13-14] While some LSD witnesses argued that the system had only a area, single uniform program in each and could not do more [Tr. debunked this notion. at 87-88, 253-54], Dr. Ross [Tr. at 195] Dr. Ross also made it clear that LSD could comply. Individual programs could be identified\nLSD should be able to so undertake multiple evaluations each year\ndoing would be valuable. [Tr. 195, 198, 210-11] The court These found multiple shortcomings in each \"evaluation. included in each case program evaluated and in the schools, professional an inadequate description of the lack of information on actual implementation areas recognized as important by LSD and the standards which LSD voluntarily chose to draw upon. Supra at 18-19, 19-20. In the absence of such data. possible to attribute any progress it is not made to the program, or to judge whether better implementation in one or more schools would yield more progress . Also noteworthy is that under Section 2.7.1, possible result of the required study program is implemented. . . .\" [Add. 77] was 2fi one \"modifying how the Earlier, Dr. Ross prepared for the LSD guidelines for use in completing the \"Page 148 evaluations.\" See LRX 5 and Add. 15-17 (describing these evaluations). He wrote in part (LRX 5 at 1 2): program evaluations that focus predominately on achievement outcomes while lacking sufficient implementation data have reduced value due to inability to determine the nature of the BLenchmark-- T es t r- esults for , bl, a, ck students in math revealed that there is great room for additiional progress. 26 [Tr. at 237-39 (Ms. Cleaver)]] 31 'treatment.' The study will also fail to inform policymakers about the practicality of the program, how it was used and reacted to by the stakeholders, or whether and/or how it needs to be improved to impact at-risk learners. .  The The suggested plan for the third-party evaluators is presented below followed by a brief review of each evaluation. . . . B. The supplement should begin with an expanded description of the program, its goals, and its history in LRSD. . . . This text serves to illuminate the problems with LRSD's two global evaluations. They lack anything like adequate program descriptions and implementation data. The testimony and their content show that they focus on analyzing student test scores. not 27 the effectiveness of particular programs. a c. The District Court's Second .Compliance RemodV. The district court again turned to the question of a remedy in context where the parties' agreement did not address the subject. The second Compliance Remedy is grounded in this court's guidance in 1990 and like precedent (supra at 26-27), applied in the light of the shortcoming identified in the court's findings. Outside a court hearing context, the LRSD had repetitively recognized an obligation to provide program evaluations of the key (or each) Sec. 2.7 program. Faced with a second default and ng such evaluations resulting from its first remedy, the court which had trusted LRSD to work out the details [Add. 39, 41], was no longer willing to do so. It crafted a Second Compliance remedy, detailing 27 Literacy evaluation: see LRX 14F at 8-9, 24 42, 44 46 (Exhs. 2195-96, 22111 -2293,, 2231-33) and Tr. at 163-65, 186, 194, 199-200, Ross)\nMath/Science: LRX 14G at 23-72, 90-103 (Exhs. 2333-46 and Tr. at 241, 243-44 (Cleaver). 205-07 (Dr. 2267-2315, 32 the components and steps needed to guarantee Intervenors the benefit of their bargain (adequate program evaluations). The remedy identifies a two year implementation period to allow for meaningful preparatory steps and evaluations, [Add. 61] Given the personnel problems, it addresses this topic from multiple perspectives (PRE staff, outside consultants, and use of Dr. Ross). [Add. 61, 63, 64] An assessment process must be approved. [Add. 62] Given past problems, the court requires identification of the particular programs to be evaluated [Add. 63], and requires four such evaluations each year [Add. 63], a number identified as feasible. Given past problems, the court requires inclusion of the core research question and study of actual implementation of programs in the schools. [Add. 63-64] The court sets time lines for preparation, approval and dissemination of evaluations. [Add. 65, 66] It addresses ODM assistance to the LRSD [Add. 65-66] and Intervenors' monitoring. [Add. 66] B. The LRSD Argument Ignores the Elements of the Governing Standards of Review and Is Otherwise Without Merit______________________________ As shown, the court faced with two defaults crafted a remedy rooted in the law of the case (established in its September 13, 2002 ruling), its detailed June 30, 2004 findings, and its remedial authority, as previously articulated by this and other courts. LRSD ffoJ^ts had twice yielded no adequate program evaluation responsive to the Sec. 2.7.1 mandate. The court has acted in a restrained manner, while seeking to provide Intervenors' the promised 2.7.1 evaluations. For example, it did not invoke the remedy of contempt, 33which LRSD nevertheless discusses at length. Intervenors next show that each LRSD contention lacks merit. 1. Itlg Aaa^rtjpn that the Term \"Assessment is Unambiguous A considerable part of the LRSD brief is rooted in the contention that the term \"assessment\" in Section 2.7.1 is unambiguous. [Brf. 31-33, 38-39] This brief has demonstrated the contrary and the need, therefore, to reach outside of that Section to define its parameters. Supra at 4-5. 2. She.Reguest for De Novo Review of the Parties^ Agreement In seeking to avoid the requirement for evaluations. LRSD notes precedent in this court that interpretation of the Parties' agreement is subject to de novo review. [Brf. 31] However, LRSD ignores the law of the case, established by the district's court's rulings of September 13, 2002, which LRSD did not appeal. See LRSD. 971 F.2d at 165. The court's interpretation was correct in any event. The term \"assessment\" was ambiguous. The court found twice. based on considerable evidence. that LRSD interpreted Section 2.7.1 to require program evaluations of key Sec. 2.7.1 programs. 237 F.Supp.2d at 1076-79\nAdd.5,11-12. Findings bearing on contract interpretation are reviewed for \"clear error.\" LRSD v. PCSSD. 83 F.3d 1013, 1017 {8thCir.l996) ]\nLRSD shows no such error. In this light, the court's interpretation is correct. as 28 Continental Bakina Co.. 420 U.S. 233, 238 (1975) (reliance on \"any technical meaning words used may have had J:\" parties\")\n.f:pundation.Telecommunications. Inc, v. Moe S.W.3d 531, 538 (Ark.2000) (reliance on \"acts practical construction placed upon a contract by the parties\" 233, 238 S.W.3d Inc. on of to 343. The Asserted \"Volunteering and Its Impact LRSD argues that it has been subjected to additional obligations because it volunteered to perform some program evaluations, which were not required by the Revised Plan. [Brf. 33 \u0026amp; n.5, 38-39] However, the district court found twice based upon LRSD writings and testimony that LRSD interpreted Section 2.7.1 to require program evaluations of the key (or all) Section 2.7 programs\nand the first such findings are the law of the case. The volunteering gambit has no support in the record below, another reason to reject this \"after-thought.\" Knight v. PCSSD. 112 F.3d 953, 955 (SthCir.1997). 4. The \"Importinq\"of an Evaluation Obligation into the Plan The same argument responds to another of LRSD's complaints, namely, that \"the district court imported a 'program evaluation' requirement into the Revised Plan. . .\" [Brf. 35] LRSD is again inattentive to the evidence, findings, rulings, and law of the case. Indeed, each of LRSD quotations from the June 2004 opinion includes the lower court's reliance on LRSD's construction of its Section 2.7.1 obligation. [Brf. 35-36] LRSD complains as to the court's finding of an admission by Dr. Lesley, supporting an evaluation obligation. [See Brf. 36 \u0026amp; n. 6 and J.Add. 19-21] Particularly in view of other evidence that LRSD recognized an resolve uncertainty)\nSturgis v. Skokos. 977 S.W.2d 217, 223 (Ark.1998) (ambiguity resolved by reliance on parties' \"subsequent statements, acts, and conduct\")\nGrand State Marketing v. Eastern PoultryDistribs^, 975 S.W.2d 429, 442 (Ark.App.1998) (\"In particular, when a technical term is used, the trier of fact may determine in what sense the term was used.\") Skokos 35 217, (Ark.App.1998)I I I evaluation obligation [supra at 5-7], LRSD does not show \"clear [factual] error.\" LBSE, 359 F.3d at 963.   I I I 5. The Asserted Imposition of New Obligations LRSD's contention that the court has imposed new obligations [Brf. 37-38] is wrong in substance. Faced with two defaults, the court has simply spelled out those actions inherent in and necessary for fulfillment of LRSD's voluntary Section 2.7.1 commitment. Generally, the district court's second remedy simply mirrored LRSD's wholly, or partially unfulfilled plans and policies. Regarding the staffing and reinvigoration of the Department of Planning, Research and Evaluation (PRE), LRSD first intended for PRE to prepare evaluations [Add.17]\nthereafter, it identified an active in-house role in this work [JX 2 at 4-7], which did not occur. [LRX 14F (no LRSD employee listed as involved in literacy evaluation) (Exhs. 2187)\nTr. 279] LRSD had long allowed PRE to function without adequate staff [JX 11 at 2-6, 16], a problem which Interim Associate Superintendent Glasgow testified he had rec- I ommended be addressed. [Tr. at 269] LRSD argues that the Plan did not provide for hiring the evaluation personnel. [Brf.37] True, it assumed their presence. Words on a page are not self-imlementing. I The hiring requirement responds to continued personnel shortcomings, which, in part. caused noncompliance with the I I original Section 2.7.1 commitment and then the first Compliance Remedy. The requirement in the second Compliance Remedy is grounded in the court's reserved authority and its responsibility \"to take whatever action is appropriate, in its discretion. to ensure 36 Ii I compliance with the . . LRSD adopted an . agreement. ...\" LESU, 921 F.2d at 1394. evaluation policy [JX 1] and detailed regulation governing the content of evaluations. [JX 2] LRSD adopts annual plans of programs to be evaluated. [LRX 3, 21] These LRSD documents manifest an intent to embed an evaluation process in the system's operation  and this is stated expressly. See LRX 18 at 2, LRX 21 at 2 (\"Program evaluation is embedded in the job expecta- tions of staff\nconsequently this is an ongoing commitment for our staff.\") LRSD recognized an obligation to provide program evaluations of key Section 2.7 programs, but failed to do so. [Add.5,38] The staff's proposed program evaluation plan for 2004-05 included six evaluations and suggested use of \"external consultants.\" [LRX 21] LRSD witness Dr . Ross testified that it was feasible and desirable for the district to perform four or five evaluations a year. [Tr. 210] In this light, LRSD's complaint about being required to a provide for eight evaluations in the two year remedy period, utilizing consultants, lacks any substance. 6. The Contention that LRSD Assessed Academig Programs LRSD contends that it \"substantially complied with any reasonable interpretation of the Revised Plan and the 2002 Compliance Remedy\" by assessment activities short of program evaluations. [Brf. 44-46] This argument lacks merit. As to the Revised Plan, the court found in Sept. 2002 that LRSD construed Sec. 2.7.1 to require program pvaluatipps of key Sec. 2.7 programs\nthe court adopted this interpretation of LRSD's 37obligation. tESD, 237 F.Supp. 2d. 1077-78. These rulings, not appealed, are the law of the case, a point not addressed by LRSD. Given evidence as to ambiguity of the term \"assessment,\" LRSD does not justify departure from the law of the case by simply asserting that Sec. 2.7.1 contains \"plain language.\" [Brf.44] LRSD asserts the adequacy of \"informal evaluations.\" [Brf. 46] However, the district court found them an inadequate substitute based upon the testimony of LRSD witness. Dr. Ross. [Add. 52-53] The adequate assessment gambit fares no better in the context of the Compliance Remedy. The evidence in the June 2004 hearing again supported findings that LRSD interpreted its Sec. 2.7.1 obligation as encompassing program evaluations. [Add. 11-13,54 ] LRSD does not show the findings to constitute \"clear error.\" [Brf.44-46] The court repeated its interpretation of LRSD's obligation.[Add.56] Dr. Ross's criticism of informal evaluations also applies here. 7. The Contention that LRSD Evaluated Academic Programs LRSD contends that any evaluation requirement under Sec. 2.7.1 was satisfied. [Brf. 46-49] The court found that LRSD advanced its literacy and math/science evaluations as its effort to comply with the first Compliance Remedy. [Add.13,23-24\nLRX 14 at 3-4, para.8] LRSD does not challenge, as \"clearly erroneous,\" this finding, or the many findings [Add.42-50] showing the inadequacy of those two evaluations, other arguments lack merit. Preliminarily, LRSD does not show that it advanced below the argument made at pages 46-49. LRSD writes that the court did not \"[make] any findings about what particular academic programs 38implemented pursuant to Sec. 2.7 must be evaluated under Sec. 2.7.1,\" [Brf. 47] However, the court noted that LRSD failed to present such information to the court. [Add.44 n. 35] Moreover, LRSD administrators could not identify such a list for ODM. [JX 11 at 23] LRSD cites as evidence of compliance 14 evaluations, which it claimed, erroneously, to have completed prior to its March 2001 Compliance Report. LRSD, 237 F.Supp. at 1079-80. The court required their completion for a different part of the remedy. Jd- at 1088 (para, c)\nsee Add.58-61. LRSD is silent as to important facts about these evaluations. Four programs had been discontinued before the September 2002 decision. [Add.60] Based upon his review. Dr. Ross viewed eight of these studies as worthless. [LRX 16 at 1] Lastly, LRSD does not show that other evaluations mentioned were done to implement the annual assessment cycles [Add. 76 (Sec. 2.7.1)] relevant to compliance with the first Compliance Remedy. 8- LRSD's Argument Regacfling the Burden of Proof and Contempt LRSD contends that the lower court improperly allocated to it the burden of proof regarding compliance with Sec. 2.7.1. [Brf. 49 54] This argument lacks merit, in part misstating events below. LRSD writes: This case concerns LRSD's substantial compliance with contract (the Revised Plan) l..! _ __ Compliance Remedy). The burden of proof should be on the party alleging the breach. [Brf. 49] i and a court order (the 2002     The district court was wrong to assign LRSD the burden of proving its compliance with the consent decree and the 2002 Compliance Order. . . . [Brf. 52] Insofar as LRSD alludes to compliance with the Revised Plan (or a \"consent decree\"), LRSD misstates events below. Intervenors had and 39satisfied the burden of proving Sec.2.7.1. non-compliance. [Add.36] As noted (supra at 3), the Revised Plan did not address the steps to be followed in the event Intervenors proved a lack of substantial compliance with a Plan provision. Allocation of the burden of proving compliance with any further remedy was not addressed. In this setting, the court drew upon its residual authority and estab- lished law to allocate the burden of proof to LRSD. See Add.36-37 and supra at 27-29. LRSD did not appeal\nit shows neither a basis to depart from the law of the case, nor an abuse of discretion. II as LRSD states that this court \"may\" treat the proceeding below if [the district court's second 'Compliance Remedy'] were a sanction imposed on an order of contempt.\" LRSD argues that in this scenario, Intervenors would have to establish LRSD agents in contempt by clear and convincing evidence, in order to support a remedy like the one ordered in June 2004. [Brf. 50-54] There are multiple reasons for rejecting this approach. First. LRSD was fore-warned. The text of the Compliance Remedy (note 29) allocated the burden of proof to LRSD, which did not appeal. Second. The district court's choice in 2002 regarding burden of proof was grounded in precedent. Supra at 28-29. Third. There is not a \"substantial supplemental remedy,\" but instead a spelling out of the steps needed to fulfill LRSD's Sec. 2.7.1 promise, an action The first paragraph of the first Compliance Remedy provided for continued \"court supervision\" \"until fLRSDI(ajdsjnongtEatgs that a program assessment procedure is in place that can accurately measure the effectiveness of each program implemented under Sec. in improving the academic achievement of African-American .\" [Add.6\nemphasis added] 2.7 29 students\n. 40 I designed to prevent a third default. Supra at 36-37. Fourth. LRSD's argument as to sanctions is also unpersuasive. The first asserted sanction [Brf. 52] is merely the cost of providing the program evaluations which LRSD. promised. The fact that a voluntary remedy has a cost does not render it improper. Appeal of LRSD. 949 F.2d at 256. I The second \"sanction\" relates to an agreement between the Ark. Department of Education and LRSD, in which Intervenors and the district court had no role. [Brf. 52-53] LRSD cites no basis for I its contention that this factor, foreign to this proceeding, should affect how compliance with the court's order is determined. Conclusion The challenged judgment and rulings should be affirmed. Respectfully submitted. B B Robert Pressman 22 Locust Avenue Lexington, MA 02421 781-862-1955 John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 501-374-3758 I Norman Chachkin Legal Defense Fund 99 Hudson Street New York City, NY 10013 212-965-2259 Certificate of Service B B I hereby certify that I have on December 3, 2CC4 .ualicd uwu brief to Chris Heller, Friday, Eldredge, and Clark, 400 West Capitol Ave, #2000, Little Rock, AR 72201. 2004 mailed two B 41Certificate of Attorney I hereby certify that this brief has been prepared using a word perfect 5.1 program. It contains from page 1 through the conclusion 1212 lines of text, including material that is single spaced. A provided. virus free disk containing this brief has also been 42 -0 4-TO Vr, I I \u0026gt;  \u0026gt; I  I \u0026gt; I \u0026gt; \u0026gt;  I \u0026gt; \u0026gt; I \u0026gt; I \u0026gt; \u0026gt; \u0026gt; I \u0026gt;  \u0026gt; I 'I J i- Joshua Intervenors' Addendum 1 \u0026gt; I \u0026gt; \u0026gt; \u0026gt;   IIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION hlsd APR 1 0 1996 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff, vs.  * No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., Defendants,  MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., Intervenors, * KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al., Intervenors. MEMORANDTJM OPTNTQN AND ORDER Before the Court are the initial joint motion and the renewed joint motion filed by the Little Rock School District (LRSD\") and the Joshua Intervenors (Joshua\") requesting that this Court approve the LRSDs proposed Revised Desegregation and Education Plan dated January 16, 1998 (LRSD Proposed Revised Plan\" or \"proposed Plan\")? L Approval of the Proposed Plan After evaluating the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan, this Court hereby grants the joint motions filed by the LRSD and Joshua and hereby approves the proposed Plan.  Docket Nos. 3107 and 3136. 1 J.Add. 1 A. In 1990, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals approved the current version of LRSD Desegregation and Education Plan or the 1990 Plan. In 1996, after the LRSD had operated under the 1990 Plan for six (6) years, this Court scheduled a series of hearings to gather evidence upon which to evaluate the success of the 1990 Plan, along with the settlement plans of the other districts, and the desegregation remedies endorsed therein.^ At that time, even though the Court had withdrawn supervision over certain aspects of the 1990 Plan, there remained portions of that Plan which were of concern to the Court. Therefore, the Court called expert witnesses to testify, and invited the parties to call other expert witnesses to testify, regarding desegregation remedies in general in an attempt to aid the Court and the parties in evaluating the effectiveness of the 1990 3 Plan. Those evidentiary hearings were held in May of 1996. At those hearings and on several other occasions, the Court has noted that the parties themselves must develop and present for Court approval any proposed modifications to the desegregation and education plans under which they operate. In December of 1996, the LRSD requested and this Court approved a plan development period\" in which the LRSD could concentrate its efforts on developing such modifications to the 1990 Plan, in an attempt to 2 3 Docket No. 2631. ' The following expert witnesses testified: (1) Herbert J. Walberg, Ph.D., then a Professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago. See Docket No. 2692. (2) David J. Armor, Ph.D., then a Research Professor at George Mason University in the Institute of Public Policy. See Docket Nos. 2693, 2694. (3) Gary Orfield, Ph.D., then a Professor of Education and Social Policy at Harvard University and the Director of The Harvard Project on School Desegregation. See Docket No. 2768. 2 J.Add. 21 I improve education and desegregation within the district.* Some time during this period, the LRSD commenced negotiations with Joshua regarding modifications to the 1990 Plan. As a result of those negotiations, the LRSD and Joshua agreed upon the provisions included in the I I I I I I t I I I I I I I ) I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I ) 1 I 1 I  1 1 1 1 1 LRSD Proposed Revised Plan currently before the Court. B. The LRSD and Joshua have agreed that, if approved, the proposed Plan. shall supersede and extinguish all prior agreements and orders in the Lill/e Tiock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District^ U.S.D.C. No. LR-C-82-866, and all consolidated cases related to the desegregation of the Little Rock School District (LRSD) with the following exceptions\na. The Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement as revised on September 28, 1989 (Settlement Agreement)\nb. The Magnet School Stipulation dated February 27, 1987\nc. d. Order dated September 3, 1986, pertaining to the Magnet Review Committee\nThe M-to-M Stipulation dated August 26, 1986\nand. e. Orders of the district court and court of appeals interpreting and enforcing sections a. through d. above to the extent not inconsistent with this Revised Plan. Based upon this provision, this Court considers the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan an entirely new consent decree or settlement agreement between the LRSD and Joshua. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that because the law strongly favors settlements, courts should hospitably receive them, especially in cases such as this in which the parties have engaged in protracted, highly divisive litigation and in which any lasting solution necessarily depends upon the good faith and cooperation of all of the parties. Little Rock Sch. Dist. V. Pulaski County Spec. Sch. Dist., 921 F.2d 1371, 1383 (8* Cir. 1990). When evaluating a settlement agreement, [jjudges should not substitute their own * Docket No. 2901. 5 Docket No. 3107, Exhibit A, at 1. 3 J.Add. 3judgment as to optimal settlement terms for the judgment of the litigants and their counsel. 921 F.2d at 1385 (quoting Armstrong v. Board of Sch. Dirs, of the City of Milwaukee, 616 F.2d 305, 315 (7' Cir. 1980)). The district court must consider the proposal as submitted by the parties. Of course, the district court may suggest modifications but ultimately, it must consider the proposal as a whole and as submitted. Approval must then be given or withheld. Id. at 1383 (quoting Officers for Justice v. Civil Serv. Comm 'n of the City and County of San Francisco, 688 F.2d 615, 630 (9'*' Cir. 1982), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1217 (1983)). Although settlement agreements carry with them a presumption of acceptability, id. at 1385, a district court need not automatically approve every settlement agreement the parties submit, id at 1383. A court has a strong interest in not involving itself, along with the prestige of the law, in an ongoing equitable decree which is either manifestly unworkable or plainly unconstitutional on its face. In addition, this is a class action, and courts are not obliged (indeed, they are not permitted) to approve settlements that are unfair to class members, or negotiated by inadequate class representatives. Id. at 1383. [Bjefore a settlement agreement may be rejected because it initiates or authorizes a clearly illegal or unconstitutional practice, prior judicial decisions must have found that practice to be illegal or unconstitutional as a general rule. Id. at 1385 (quoting Armstrong, 616 F.2d at 321). In the area of desegregation law, the Supreme Court has determined that the Constitution does not of its own force forbid all-African-American schools. Sv/ann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 402 U.S. 1, 26 (1971). The Constitution of its own force also does not require any particular racial percentage in various schools in the districts. Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717, 740-41 (1974). Furthermore, the Constitution of its own force does not demand that all students 4 J.Add. 4 regardless of race satisfy national achievement norms. Missouri v, Jenkins, 515 U.S. 70, 100-01 (1995). Obviously, parties in a desegregation case may and indeed should agree to eliminate the effects of prior de jure segregation to the extent practicable. However, the details of such efforts are not specifically dictated by the Constitution. Even if the court is uncertain that the means proposed in the settlement agreement will succeed in integrating the district or concerned that the lack of sufiBcient detail in the settlement agreement may impede successful implementation, such concerns alone do not render the settlement agreement unconstitutional on its face, especially when the parties to the settlement agreement have consented to continued monitoring. 921 F.2d at 1385-86. This Court has carefully reviewed the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan as jointly submitted by the LRSD and Joshua and concludes that the Revised Plan is not manifestly unworkable or plainly unconstitutional on its face. The parties have consented to continued monitoring by this Court. Although the Court acknowledges that the Revised Plan will present new challenges in regard to monitoring, these anticipated challenges do not render the Revised Plan unworkable or plainly unconstitutional. Therefore, this Court concludes that the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan should be and hereby is approved. C. In the alternative, if this Court were to consider the proposed Plan as simply a modification of the 1990 Plan, this Court would approve the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan. A party seeking modification of a consent decree must establish that a significant change in facts or law warrants revision of the decree. Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail, SQl U.S. 367, 393 (1992). If the moving party meets this burden, the District Court 5 J.Add. 5must then determine whether the proposed modification is suitably tailored to the changed circumstance. Id. at 391. The modification must not create or perpetuate a constitutional violation, nor strive to rewrite a consent decree so that it conforms to the constitutional floor. Id. Little RockSch. Dist. v. Pulaski County Special Sch. Dist., 56 F.3d 905, 914 (8* Cir. 1995). This Court concludes, after reviewing the circumstances of this case and the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan, that this standard for modifying a consent decree has been satisfied. Based upon the voluminous Court record generated by this case since the 1990 Plan was instituted and based upon the conclusions which may be drawn from the evidentiary hearings conducted by this Court in May of 1996, this Court concludes that circumstances and conditions have changed which warrant modifying the 1990 Plan. Specifically, there are certain aspects of I the 1990 Plan that have been successfully implemented by the LRSD. Some areas of the 1990 1 Plan have been so successfully implemented that this Court has withdrawn supervision over those I areas. However, there are other stated goals in the 1990 Plan which have not been achieved. I 1 Evidence in the record tends to indicate that the LRSD has put forth minimal effort to achieve I I certain of these stated goals. More importantly, however, there are certain goals in the 1990 Plan I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1  1 1 1 which are out of date for the current situation that exists in the LRSD* and other specific, rigid goals in the 1990 Plan which expert testimony indicates may never be met, regardless of the amount of effort and good faith put forth by the LRSD. Therefore, the 1990 Plan warrants For example, the sections of the 1990 Plan regarding Student Assignment and Facilities are out of date with regard to the current situation that exists in the LRSD.  Specifically, the goals in the 1990 Plan regarding achievement disparity may never be met, regardless of the effort put forth by the LRSD. See the testimony of Dr. Walberg, Docket No. 2692, at 17-25\nDr. Armor, Docket No. 2693, at 18-39\nand Dr. Orfield, Docket No. 2768, at 25-31. J.Add. 6 6 6modification. Furthennore, this Court concludes that the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan funhers the original purpose of the decree in a more efficient way, without upsetting the basic agreement between the parties. The LRSD Proposed Revised Plan is suitably tailored to the changed circumstances, does not create or perpetuate a constitutional violation, and has not been rewritten to conform only to the constitutional floor. Therefore, this Court concludes that the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan should be approved. D. Having approved the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan, this Court notes that once a modification to a consent decree or a decree itself has been approved by the Court, its terms, including the details, become binding on the parties. 921 F.2d at 1384. Although at this time the Court does not anticipate the need for further modification, the Court does wish to clarify that if progress under this Revised Plan is clearly insufficient or if certain sections of the Revised Plan should prove to be unworkable, the parties may again apply for a modification of the Revised Plan. Consent decrees partake of the nature of contracts, as well as of judicial action, and parties seeking to change them bear an extremely heavy burden. They are not, however immiifokla \u0026lt;* A.1. .x_____ 1 * immutable in any absolute sense, and extraordinary circumstances can arise that would enable the District Court, within its discretion, to consider modifications. Id. at 1387. n. Objections to the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan By previous Order, this Court directed the LRSD to provide notice of the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan and set March 13, 1998 as the deadline for receiving objections to the 7 J.Add. 7I I ) I 1 I I I t I 1 I I I I 1 t 1 I I I I I t I I I 1 I I I I Little Rock School District Compliance Plan Revised Plan  2.7.1 Approved by the Board on October 10. 2002 5 EXHIBIT J. Acta\". 8 AThe District Courts Compliance Remedy On September 13,2002, the District Court issued its Memorandum Opinion (hereinafter Opinion) finding that the LirJe Rock School District (LRSD) had substantially complied with all areas of the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (Revised Plan), with the exception Revised Plan  2.7.1, Section 2,7.1 provided: LRSD shall assess the academic programs implemented pursuant to Section 2.7 after each year in order to deterrnina the effectiveness of the academic programs in improving African-American achievement. If this assessment reveals that a program has not and likely will not improve Afiican-Amcrican achievement, LRSD shall take appropriate action in the form of either modifying how the program is implemented or replacing the program. The District Courts Opinion set forth a detailed Compliance Remedy to be implemented by the LRSD, The Opinion first stated\nBecause LRSD failed to substantially comply with the crucially important obligations contained in 2.7.1, it must remain under court supervision with regard to that section of the Revised Plan until it: (a) demonstrates that a program assessment procedure is in place that can accurately measure the eSectivencss of each program implemented under 2.7 in improving the academic achievement of Afiican-American students\nand (b) prepares the program evaluations identified on page 148 of the Final Compliance Report and uses those evaluations as part of the program assessment procedure contemplated by  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan. The Opinion then outlined the details of the Compliance Remedy as follows: A. For the entire 2002-03 school year and the first semester of the 2003-04 school year, through December 31, 2003, LRSD must continue to assess each of the programs implemented under  2.7 to improve the academic achievement of African-American students. LRSD now has over three years of testing data and other information available to use in gauging the effectiveness of those programs. I expect LRSD to use aU of that available data and information\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1761","title":"Court filings concerning Office of Desegregation Management report, ''Rezoning of Schools in the Sherwood Area of the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD)'', motion for extended time to file responses, and a situation involving a child in the Little Rock School District.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["2004-01/2004-02"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st century","Education--Arkansas","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","School districts","Little Rock School District","High schools","Sylvan Hills High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Joshua intervenors","School enrollment","School integration","Students","Parents","Teachers","School facilities"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning Office of Desegregation Management report, ''Rezoning of Schools in the Sherwood Area of the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD)'', motion for extended time to file responses, and a situation involving a child in the Little Rock School District."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1761"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["60 page scan, typed"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\u003c?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\"?\u003e\n\u003citems type=\"array\"\u003e  \u003citem\u003e   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_description type=\"array\"\u003e   \n\n\u003cdcterms_description\u003eDistrict Court, joint stipulation; District Court, order; District Court, notice of filing, Office of Desegregation Management report, ''Rezoning of Schools in the Sherwood Area of the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD)''; Court of Appeals, motion for extension of time in which to file reply and response to cross-appeal; District Court, motion; District Court, order; a situation involving a child of the Little Rock School District.    This transcript was create using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. CASE NO. 4:82CV00866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KA THERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. JOINT STIPULATION RECEIVED JAN G 200~ OFFIC~ OF DESEGREGA110N MON\\10R\\NG PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTERVENORS On December 23, 2003, the Pulaski County Special School District No. I (PCSSD) filed a motion seeking court approval for \"two temporary portable buildings at Sylvan Hills High School.\" The Joshua Intervenors, having been sufficiently informed regarding capacity figures, school assignments, transfer practices, and the racial balance at Sylvan Hills High School which now exceeds 40% African American students, and the PCSSD seek prompt approval of the motion because of exigent necessity for the requested additional school facilities. These two parties hereby stipulate that the PCSSD request is meritorious and that it will not otherwise undermine existing desegregation and education obligations of the PCSSD. WHEREFORE, these parties respectfully request that the Court approve the PCS SD motion. M:,,Samuel Jones, III,,AR Bar No. 76060 Respectfully s~_pmitted,, / . C. ---,X'f-_/ ..  , \u0026lt;- \u0026lt;.:..-., I~ ~: / .:..' X,::. u ?'\\....A..,,..._. v I .. L---' v l-'-- '-  r( _,t__ _ Jo}:in W. Walker, AR Bar No. 64046 / l_ .. / WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Building 200 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 371-0808 (501) 376-9442 (Fax) Attorney for the Pulaski County Special Special School District JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 (501) 374-3758 (501) 374-4187 (Fax) Attorney for Joshua lntervenors CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On January 7, 2004, a copy of the foregoing was served via U.S. mail on each of the following: Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Marshall QOM One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Judge J. Thomas Ray U.S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 249234-v1 Mr. Mark A. Hagemeier Assistant Attorney General Arkansas Attorney General's Office 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 M. Samu~I Jones Ill ( / -  -,_____ _/ 2 r~~ THE L~lITED STATES D1STPJ:CT C01JRT T\"' , _.._,..._\",T ~.--_..,....,..,-.._ \"..-, J _,.r' .\": -...'I'(\" t \u0026lt;\"' ,.t\\..::\u0026gt; .l L.l'\\.l 'I v.1..:, .l ~'--.l vr .a~\"\"r\\..::, i..iTTi.E ROCK DiV1SiQ7; LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. No. 4:82CV00866 WRW/JTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LO!H'NE JOSHUA, ET AL. Ki~\"'TP...EPJNE Kl\\qIGHT, ET .A .. L. ORDER Fu en ILL-U' 'I c:\" M I CTOl(\"\"T r.()URT eASTEi:tN 01s'rR1c, ARKANSAS JAN - 9 200~ 6y ---------;:;;c\"Ecprc~LE\"'RR,\u0026lt; PLAiNT.iFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTER VEN ORS Pending is Puiaski County Special Schooi District's Motion for Two Temporary Portable Building at Sylvan Hills School (Doc. No. 3826). No parties have Objected to the t'CSSD's motion, and their time for doing so has now expired. ln its motion, PCSSIJ requests authorization to lease two portable bmldings for the second semester and for the 2004-2005 school year at Sylvan .Hills High School. due to the unexpected increase m enrollment ct,:u-ing the current school year. PCSSD and the Joshua lntervenors have stipulated (Doc. !'To . 3828) that the request is meritorious a.~d ,.vill not underrr1ine eristing A t\"-,...,.. _ _ ,., ...__._: ,,.. _ ,.._,..J ...,,.:: ,,,..,.. .., ; __ .,.. t..1 ; __ ._ :...., _ .... ,,.. .\u0026amp;'-1., - D/'\"\"-C\"C,~ '-\"'--.:,\"-'!'S\"\"\"!S\"'UUJ.J. a.u.u. .... uu.\\..a\\.J.UJ.L UUHl!!::,aUU.iL,=:, U.L UJ.C ),. \\...,..JLH . ./. Because no parties have objected to the motion and based on the stipulation between PCSSD and the Joshua intervenors. the PCSSD's Motion for Two Temporary Portabie Building at Sylvan Hills School is GRANTED. .,......_ IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of January, 2004. , / / -~J~ . It I fl /4 r ~..--- _ ---f If {/f.,,1 / VIA.~ /IV IJ ~ UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT JUDGE WM. R. WILSON. JR. TO: DATE: JTNTTED ~T ATF.~ fl!~'T'R lf'\"f ( ,(ll l R'T' EASTJ!,RN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS Chris .Heller Sam Iones ~teve Jones John Walker Timothy Gauger Mark Hagemeier l1 nn tv1'o.-Qho 11 liK ., ..... t,. D-. -. - o +4-.o '- \"' \"''\"\"'-'-A),, J-''\"4.1. AA\"-''-'-\\,,, I__, () I L  ~ -../ Telephone: 501-604-5140 F:ix Nnrnher: S01-604 Sl 49 376-2147 3 76-9442 375-1027 374-4187 682-2591 6R2-2591 371-0!00 .\".l, .',~.., 10Af\\ J..  .T V There are 0ages, including this Cover Sheet, being sent by this facsimile transmission. -4 /} ,4 ~ . ~ , #' ,~L- -~7~,V-, 'II .~,,- 1 // Ottice of Judge Wm. R. Wi1s9)( Jr. U.S. District Court / 600 West Capitol. RoOI#23 Little Rock, Arkam a\" 72?0) ,~1att ~1orgaJl, LRSD La1vv Clerk: t;\" A'I r l\"\\ A :; \u0026lt;t A 1 JV J VV\"?~ J \"? .( I  I I I I I I I Ill I I I I I I I REZONING OF SCHOOLS IN THE SHERWOOD AREA OF THE PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Ann S. Marshall Federal Monitor SECOND UPDATE January 14, 2004 Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Little Rock, Arkansas Horace R. Smith Associate Monitor L... L... u u.,. J.  J. ,. WILL BOND cone \u0026amp; ~namcer11n BOND \u0026amp;. CHAMBERLIN TRIAL LAWYERS 602 W. MAIN JACKS0t14\"Yl~LE, AAiW'iJSAS 72U76 501 J 882 - 9414 p.2 NEIL CHAMBERLIN January 22, 2004 TELEPHONE: (501) 982.9081 FAX: (501) 982-9414 VIA FAX (314)244-2780 Michael E. Gans, Clerk Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals 24.329 Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 S. 10~ Street St. Louis, MO 63101 (314) 244-2400 RE: United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, Case No. 03-3088 - Motion for Extension Dear Mr. Gans : Attached is a Motion for Extension of Time in the abovereferenced case. Please file and return a file-marked copy to me. Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. TWB:ab Atch(s) cc: Greg Bollen Sam Jones Scott Smith Christopher Heller John W. Walker P.A. Mark Burnette Stephen Jones Ann Marshall Karla Burnett Tim Gauger With Warmest Regards, Will Bond l.sc.hool district detach.ment.e1ghth circuic.appeal\\clerk.jan.22. 04 uu 11u ac wr1c:1mue r - 1 1 n l!:\u0026gt;Ul I 982 - 9414 m..TITED STATES COURT OF ~-.?PEALS ~OR TE:E XIGHTK CIR~ul~ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINT:tFF V. No. 03-3088 PULASKI COO?,.'TY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRXCT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERUm KNIGHT, ET AL. GREG BOLLEN, ET AL. APPELLBES INTERVENORS INTERVENOR$ APPELLANTS MOTION POR BXTlfflSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE REPLY AND RESPONSB TO CROSS-APPEAL Come the Appellants , the proposed Bollen Intervenors, by and through their attorney, Will Bond, and for their Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File Their Reply Brief and Response to Cross-Appeal, state: 1. On or about December 23, 2003, Appellees filed a Response and Cross-Appeal to Appellants Brie. Appellant's Reply and Response are due January 22, 2004. 2. An extension of time in which to file Appellants' Reply and Response to Cross-Appeal is necessitated because: (a) Appellants' counsel, Will Bond, is a State Representative elected to represent the City of Jacksonville, Arkansas in the Arkansas House of Representatives. The Arkansas General Assembly is currently in special session. The special session began on December 8, 2003 and is still ongoing. It is the longest special session in history. Appellants' counsel has p.3 ouria.,. 1.,namcer11n l~Ul J ::H:lc - ::1414 been the lead sponsor on legiBlation during the session and nas been unable to complete the Reply and Response Brief. 3 . Although the Reply and Response will be very short, Mr. Bond requests an additional eight (8) days in which to file his brief. This would make the brief due on January 30, 2004 . Respectfully Submitted, Bond \u0026amp; Chamberlin Trial Lawyers 602 West Main Street Jacksonville, AR 72076 Telephone (501) 902-9081 Telefax (501) 982-94i4 By: Will Bond ~.R Bar 95145 CERTIFICATE OP SERVICE r. Will Bond, do hereby certify that I have served a copy of the foregoing plea.ding by tJnit:ed States Mail I add.reseed to such attorney or party with suffici~l}.t prepaid postage to ensure rirst-class delivery this ,.Q.;2.fiiciay of January, 2004: Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings, LLP 200 W. Capitol, Ste. 2300 Little Rock, AR 72201-3699 Telephone (501)371-0808 Scott Smith State Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark, LLP 2000 Regions Center 400 W. Capitol Little Rock. AR 72201 Telephone 376-2011 Via Fax@ 376-9442 Via Fax@ 682-4249 Via Fax@ 376-2147 2 ...,c:311 L..L.. L..UV\"'T J,.V  J.\"'T cone \u0026amp; Lnamoer11n John W. Walker P.A. 1723 S . Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Telephone {501)374-3758 (501) 982-9414 Via Fa..'X @ 374-4187 Mr. Mark Burnette Via Fax@ 375-1940 Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 378-7870 Mr. Stephen Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones, P .A. 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 Telephone (501)375-1122 Ann Marshall Office of Desegregation Monitoring , n.,,.;,.....,.., 1\\T::iti ...... ,..,::,l Pl;1za 124 w. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock , AR 72201 Ms. Karla Burnett Suite 400, 201 South Broadway Little Reck, ]).R 72201 Telephone 340-8285 Ti~ Gauger Senior Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201- 2610 Telephone 692-2586 By: Via Fax@ 375- 1027 Via Fax@ 3 7 1 -0100 Via Fax \u0026amp; 340- 8282 Via Fax \u0026amp; 682 - 2591 Will Bond, AR Bar 95145 l.  chool di  trict det  chmnt . eigh~b circuit.appeal . .mo tion Lor exceru;ion.jan.22.04 3 p.S ...,-  ._._ ._.....,....., I .L U .L \"'T oursu\"' L.namoer11n lb: Ann Marshall From: Win Bond Fax: 371-0100 Pag- Including Coversheet 5 Dair. Jaooary 22. 2004 Re: Littte Roel\u0026lt; School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, et al. The informatton contained In this tu nnsrnttal Is confldentlal attomey-dlent privileged information and Is iranded solely tor the uee of the lndlvldual or entity named as recipient. If this inauase its received by -one other than the :rn..r~ TiClpief'K, you are prohiblied from I ny dillumlnatioll, dielribution or copying d this communication eXC9PI to the add,.._ If this communication ha9 been nte8Mld by you In error, or If you arc not s1on1 al It. intend.d dilltrtbutlon, please notify lhe a~ced office at 1-aBa-2A5-1ffl. p. 1 . ,',--.- RECE\\\\JED FE.B :- l\\ 2004   :- \". .;  ' OFflCEOF .. ;,:  . OiSEGREGAl\\ON MOtUlOR\\MG : . ~::'\u0026gt;\u0026gt; -_. ,. .. . . .~ .... IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. V. CASE NO. 4:82CV00866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MOTION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT The court has entered an order limiting the Joshua Intervenors' counsel with respect to monitoring activities. Although the court's order is on appeal, counsel has sought to abide by the letter and spirit of the court's order. Counsel, however, brings to the court's attention an egregious situation involving a child of the Little Rock School District, who elected to attend a PCS SD school Clinton Elementary, with a request that the court assign the matter for inquiry and report to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. ( see Enclosure) Respectfully submitted, Jqhn W. Walker, P.A. 1 723 Broadway _ Little Rock, AR 72206 501-374-3758 501-374-4187(fax) J 0119,w . walker  I CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing pleading has been served on all counsel of record on this 3rd day of February 2004 by placing copy in the United States mail postage prepaid. '!Ti Lj son., , Lee. ......I.., _ _ -J 01 _..o , o r_ \" TH+r i _u . :i o.,.. . s+ -u. olQ__.~,... ct ,.. ,c t_,~ rr l ____ \\_T\\ .. , 1' Y'iu q v-u...,.t I:. le..n\"- . Lee.. 1 .$ Lo U e- Q .tt_/ ~ ccni ... J ~ - \\.). t , 1..ul I I j  . J he, 1 s i n + h.s;., I' 1 ~ r a de_ . L1 l'L Fe h -- 1.J c. ,~_l:j J.., 1 .;:z L'G ~ Lee.s ie o c. he. r 5 en+ I-LUY\\. J1ome --l'=rum St \\rioo C  LL, , 'f h '-I\", c, S h:::,e s l)n. h..t. s -f-e e i: . +I er h c, n1 e I s {Y'\\ rs En\", s. On Feb ;J., 1 i. Luo s ~Lu n, n5 c-\"':'d C1 I S O + /,e., -it. rr, { l t. \"IC, 'tLVt..L LU Q S 30 . ft C) o-\\ u -FT l4 }, , s b u s eel -10~ 1o... mo, r o c_ CV.d Luc, \\ k_a cl .t,. ~ unu d, G ih 'fron r u c'.- +o ,;!(,;r\"'- V cu, e, u r -c n Lu NY\\ I S o w =\u0026lt;j S ore h e.- 10 cv::i f\\ c-d j-Qt e d ,.,J.!f J,.,v) ~ ,., 1,J ..__. li., R..Luu1,..__,c.,; h,V) ,nus e k 10t_n R.-LlfUo_; ~q L , , .,, \" \u0026lt;' f-,, ,. ,., ., A _.,  -.. .J1 1 ~, ~ 1 r U v\\.....,/u:_, ,.J , ) 1 c._ t'\\....L, '9 1 .. CJ,..'i..,l.J'--q Cu,~ h..t I:_ u1.tl dJ\"-T '1'Yll, v e.. h , s +e ct , rv e u1-,JJ cr1 P:icvv L~fJ Io, I K, J__ c_ u i L, cl ;' Fm S Cu1d ~'-) c Qnu__ +c, ~ r-ic 17v__, GLn d i: I\\.., ct_,l_.,, d cf- e. e. -i-o, d ~ . 171 e rns ice, s +r ':\\ \"'j -lo , b r , 'j :i)rn e., htQ:.t bacK I ruo 1--v, s 6~. J_ c,, i so ccruuctrd ~ L. Po V ~ -e... ,j e() t ~ -tu:, K. o  efo rt Cl.rd cl-10/1.1: d Truv:i :-r-Jn \\ s Lui -+k__ E ndan3-e (r, +1-u___ Lue\\ fo.r -e.,, o-f Cl ~Or(.  L lt\u0026lt;) o tor1...:i uc 't-e. d Sn-e I loo OU u. -u;---,. e,_, p t b' u;-,t- ~ - -, d cn~t- 1 ru__y 1yj CLA'l... t: to --t-a k...t__ ~--L ~ e..ro rt - j h ; S 1 S th_ -e_ kJo r- s t . ')~ of' . nuj L 1 fe., buc,.,u~ i T , S e e m._,s ,L : k.t., no o ~ l\u0026lt;.)a.rul: s +o do Q ~-lkc.,~ cu00Lct -th.vi . Cu-u.fuzl -ij ou er-eq S G .De--e c:...-t m-c -+o Som e 00.Ju who C.etf -r .s Q o Lct Lc) h.cL;t ~ o__,p_p-e1u1 cl +o n~ '5 i. x ...t.~UV\\__; o 1 cl o t\\. Fe 6 {)., _ :1 co ~ . RECEIVED FEB 1 o 2004 - OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. No. 4:82CV00866 WRW/JTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. ORDER FEB -6 1004 CORMACK, CLERK JAMES W  Mc oEP cLERK .B'f PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS In their motion filed February 3, 2004 (Doc. No. 3832), Joshua Intervenors assert that \" [t]he court has entered an order limiting the Joshua Intervenors' counsel with respect to monitoring activities.\" I have no idea what order Joshua Intervenors are referring to. I do not believe that I have entered an order that would, in anyway, limit Joshua Intervenors' counsel's duty to represent his clients, or to take appropriate steps to address the \"egregious situation\" alleged in the February 3 motion. To the contrary, I would expect counsel to \"do the necessary\" with respect to clients. Accordingly, Joshua Intervenors' Motion (Doc. No. 3832) is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED this ~ay ofFebruary, 2004. WM. R . WILSON, JR. Office of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 de Case: 4:82-cv-00866    This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e\n   \n\n\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/items\u003e"}],"pages":{"current_page":30,"next_page":31,"prev_page":29,"total_pages":155,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":348,"total_count":1850,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":1843},{"value":"Sound","hits":4},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":3}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":289},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":220},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":179},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","hits":69},{"value":"United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit","hits":30},{"value":"North Little Rock School District","hits":12},{"value":"Bushman Court Reporting","hits":11},{"value":"Walker, John W.","hits":6},{"value":"Joshua Intervenors","hits":5},{"value":"Arkanasas State University. Office of Educational Research and Services","hits":4},{"value":"Arkansas Association of Educational Administrators","hits":4}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":1745},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":1244},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":1207},{"value":"Education--Evaluation","hits":886},{"value":"Educational law and legislation","hits":721},{"value":"Educational planning","hits":690},{"value":"School integration","hits":604},{"value":"School management and organization","hits":601},{"value":"Educational statistics","hits":560},{"value":"Education--Finance","hits":474},{"value":"School improvement programs","hits":417}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Springer, Joy C.","hits":6},{"value":"Walker, John W.","hits":3},{"value":"Heller, Christopher","hits":2},{"value":"Wright, Susan Webber, 1948-","hits":2},{"value":"Armor, David","hits":1},{"value":"Eddington, Ramsey","hits":1},{"value":"Intervenors, Joshua","hits":1},{"value":"Intervenors, Knight","hits":1},{"value":"Jones, Sam","hits":1},{"value":"Jones, Stephen W.","hits":1},{"value":"Joshua, Lorene","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":6},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":1849},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":1836},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":1799},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":1539},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, North Little Rock, 34.76954, -92.26709","hits":10},{"value":"United States, Missouri, 38.25031, -92.50046","hits":5},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Maumelle, 34.86676, -92.40432","hits":4},{"value":"United States, Missouri, Saint Louis City County, Saint Louis, 38.65588, -90.30928","hits":3},{"value":"United States, Kansas, 38.50029, -98.50063","hits":2},{"value":"United States, New York, 43.00035, -75.4999","hits":2},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Chicot County, 33.26725, -91.29397","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":1836},{"value":"Missouri","hits":5},{"value":"Kansas","hits":2},{"value":"Massachusetts","hits":2},{"value":"New York","hits":2},{"value":"Connecticut","hits":1},{"value":"Illinois","hits":1},{"value":"Maryland","hits":1},{"value":"Michigan","hits":1},{"value":"Ohio","hits":1},{"value":"Oklahoma","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1994","hits":385},{"value":"1995","hits":376},{"value":"1996","hits":334},{"value":"1993","hits":312},{"value":"1992","hits":292},{"value":"1999","hits":273},{"value":"1997","hits":268},{"value":"1991","hits":255},{"value":"2001","hits":252},{"value":"2000","hits":251},{"value":"1998","hits":245},{"value":"2002","hits":182},{"value":"1990","hits":173},{"value":"2003","hits":164},{"value":"2004","hits":148},{"value":"1989","hits":134},{"value":"2005","hits":119},{"value":"2006","hits":86},{"value":"2011","hits":62},{"value":"2010","hits":60},{"value":"2007","hits":57},{"value":"1988","hits":51},{"value":"2008","hits":47},{"value":"2009","hits":47},{"value":"1987","hits":35},{"value":"1986","hits":30},{"value":"2012","hits":30},{"value":"1984","hits":27},{"value":"1985","hits":23},{"value":"2013","hits":19},{"value":"1983","hits":16},{"value":"1982","hits":15},{"value":"1980","hits":13},{"value":"1981","hits":13},{"value":"1974","hits":12},{"value":"1975","hits":12},{"value":"1976","hits":12},{"value":"1977","hits":12},{"value":"1978","hits":12},{"value":"1979","hits":12},{"value":"1973","hits":11},{"value":"2014","hits":11},{"value":"1967","hits":9},{"value":"1968","hits":9},{"value":"1969","hits":9},{"value":"1970","hits":9},{"value":"1971","hits":9},{"value":"1972","hits":9},{"value":"1954","hits":8},{"value":"1966","hits":8},{"value":"1950","hits":7},{"value":"1951","hits":7},{"value":"1952","hits":7},{"value":"1953","hits":7},{"value":"1955","hits":7},{"value":"1956","hits":7},{"value":"1957","hits":7},{"value":"1958","hits":7},{"value":"1959","hits":7},{"value":"1960","hits":7},{"value":"1961","hits":7},{"value":"1962","hits":7},{"value":"1963","hits":7},{"value":"1964","hits":7},{"value":"1965","hits":7},{"value":"2017","hits":6},{"value":"2015","hits":5},{"value":"2016","hits":5},{"value":"2018","hits":5},{"value":"2019","hits":5},{"value":"2020","hits":5},{"value":"2021","hits":5},{"value":"2022","hits":5},{"value":"2023","hits":5},{"value":"2024","hits":5}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1950","max":"2024","count":5114,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":904},{"value":"reports","hits":255},{"value":"judicial records","hits":232},{"value":"legal documents","hits":207},{"value":"exhibition (associated concept)","hits":67},{"value":"project management","hits":62},{"value":"budgets","hits":38},{"value":"correspondence","hits":23},{"value":"handbooks","hits":20},{"value":"agendas (administrative records)","hits":17},{"value":"handbills","hits":16}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}