{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_783","title":"SWAT visits","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2005/2006"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School principals","School facilities"],"dcterms_title":["SWAT visits"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/783"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 September 8, 2005 Mr. Charles Green, Principal Alpha Academy 7123 1-30 Suite 4 Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Dear Mr. Green: In your absence, the staff at Alpha Academy were courteous and friendly to me during my first of the year walk-through of your campus last Tuesday. Two staff members showed me aroimd the complex of offices and classrooms and one explained the program to me. The purpose of the visit was to give ODM an impression of the climate at Alpha Academy and an understanding of the way the new school year is going. I found the interior of the building to be clean and functional. The graduation gowns decorating the walls were attractive and appropriately symbolic. The foyer is particularly inviting and the staff make everybody feel welcome. The combinations of course offerings and times, as explained by a staff member, appear to make it possible for a large number of students to succeed in school. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments concerning my visit. Best wishes for a successful school year. Sincerely, /I Gene Jones\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_49","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2004-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/49"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District, plaintiff vs. Pulaski County Special School District, defendant\nArkansas DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 4 STATE CAPITOL MAU  UITlE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-1071  (501) 682-4475  http://arkedu.state.ar.us Dr. Kenneth James, Director of Education December 27, 2004 Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon  P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 RECEIV D OEC ~'. J 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATIOh :t10NITORING RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. US. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 WRW Dear Gentlemen: Per an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of December 2004 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier I ATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair - JoNell Caldwel~ Little Rock  Vice Chair - Jeanna Westmoreland, Arkadelphia Members: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro  Shelby Hillman, Carlisle  Calvin King, Marianna  Randy Lawson, Bentonville MaryJane Rebick, Little Rock  Diane Tatum, Pine Bluff  Naccaman Williams, Johnson An Equal Opportunity Employer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for December 2004. Respectfully Submitted, j!giJsF General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on December 27, 2004, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 ~, m1th IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Based on the information available at November 30, 2004, the ADE calculated the State Foundation Funding for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of Dece~ber 31, 2004 Based on the information available at November 30, 2004, the ADE calculated for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 On November 30, 2004, distributions of State Foundation Funding for FY 04/05 were as follows: LRSD - $23,666,432 NLRSD - $12,110,604 PCSSD - $21,728,076 The allotments of State Foundation FundinQ calculated for FY 04/05 at November 30, 2004, subject to periodic adjustments, were as follows: LRSD - $65,082,694 NLRSD - $33,304,168 PCSSD - $59,752,214 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at November 30, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal SeNices Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal SeNices Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at November 30, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. G. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Based on a Court Order on AuQust 27, 2004 for FY 03/04, an adjustment was made in the expense per child. A final maQnet payment of 56,074 for FY 03/04 was made to the LRSD on November 10, 2004. Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at November 30, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Distributions for FY 04/05 at November 30, 2004, totaled $4,685,644. Allotment calculated for FY 04/05 was $12,305,271 subject to periodic adjustments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month,_ August - June. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Calculated for FY 02/03, subject to periodic adjustments. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Distributions for FY 04/05 at November 30, 2004, were: LRSD - $1,244,739 NLRSD - $1,131,465 PCSSD - $3,476,802 The allotments calculated for FY 04/05 at November 30, 2004, subject to periodic adjustments, were: LRSD - $4,149,129 NLRSD -$3,771,548 PCSSD - $11,589,336 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 In September 2002, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 02/03 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 In September 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the third one-third payment for FY 03/04 to the Districts. In September 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the first one-third payment for FY 04/05 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function instead of Reginald Wilson as indicated in the Implementation Plan. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 In February 2004, General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At February 2004, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $2,487,682.66 NLRSD - $526,000.00 PCSSD-$1,454,813.26 In September 2004, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2004, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $4,019,063.00 NLRSD - $772,940.15 PCSSD - $2,478,863.72 In September 2004, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 04/05 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2004, the following had been paid for FY 04/05: LRSD - $1,325,043.67 NLRSD - $275,333.33 PCSSD - $845,221.22 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. - 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 In July 1999, each district submitted an estimated budget for the 99/00 school year. In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M tr\n,msportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2004, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 04/05 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD -14. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD - 12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. The ADE accepted a bid on 16 buses for the Magnet and M/M transportation program. The buses will be delivered after July 1, 1999 and before August 1, 1999. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nPCSSD - 6. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724, 165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001. The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two type C 47 passenger buses and fourteen type C 65 passenger buses. Prices on these units are $43,426.00 each on the 47 passenger buses, and $44,289.00 each on the 65 passenger buses. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42, 155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. Specifications for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M school buses have been forwarded to State Purchasing for bidding. Bids will be opened on May 12, 2003. The buses will have a required delivery date after July 1, 2003 and before August 8, 2003. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. 0. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. 10 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued} V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. (Continued} 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 04/05. 11 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 12 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 13 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process.  The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 15 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 16 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 26, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is finalized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 18 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearence Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 19 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On November 4, 2004, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ADE is required to check laws that the legislature passes to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Clearence Lovell was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he has retired, the ADE attorney will find out who will be checking the next legislation. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 6, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 20 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 21 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. C. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 22 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17- 1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81 st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 23 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 24 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 25 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11, in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 26 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, A letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 1748 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, A letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. 27 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Ongoing C. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of AD E's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 28 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 29 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMTwas the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the AD E's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 30 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 31 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lntervenors filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 32 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua intervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lntervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lntervenors were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 33 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21, 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 34 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 1 O, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11 , 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 35 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 36 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of AD E's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11 , 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 37 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of AD E's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 11, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September.  On November 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 38 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 39 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 40 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvem~nt planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 41 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 42 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. D. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1 . Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. 43 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31, 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. 44 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 45 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts. In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further assistance to schools, i.e., Title I Summer Planning Session, ADE session on Smart Sta.rt, and the School Improvement Workshops. All schools and districts in Pulaski County were invited to attend the \"Smart Start'' Summit November 9, 1 O, and 11 to learn more about strategies to increase student performance. \"Smart Start\" is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. Representatives from all three districts attended. On January 21, 1998, the ADE provided staff development for the staff at Oak Grove Elementary School designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement. Using achievement data from Oak Grove, educators reviewed trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. On February 24, 1999, the ADE provided staff development for the administrative staff at Clinton Elementary School regarding analysis of achievement data. On February 15, 1999, staff development was rescheduled for Lawson Elementary School. The staff development program was designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement using achievement data from Lawson, educators reviewed the components of the Arkansas Smart Initiative, trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. Student Achievement Workshops were rescheduled for Southwest Jr. High in the Little Rock School District, and the Oak Grove Elementary School in the Pulaski County School District. 46 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On April 30, 1999, a Student Achievement Workshop was conducted for Oak Grove Elementary School in PCSSD. The Student Achievement Workshop for Southwest Jr. High in LRSD has been rescheduled. On June 8, 1999, a workshop was presented to representatives from each of the Arkansas Education Service Cooperatives and representatives from each of the three districts in Pulaski County. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On June 18, 1999, a workshop was presented to administrators of the NLRSD. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On August 16, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for teaching assistant in the LRSD. On August 20, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for the Accelerated Learning Center in the LRSD. On September 13, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program were presented to the staff at Booker T. Washington Magnet Elementary School. On September 27, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to the Middle and High School staffs of the NLRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On October 26, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to LRSD personnel through a staff development training class. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On December 7, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was scheduled for Southwest Middle School in the LRSD. The workshop was also set to cover the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. However, Southwest Middle School administrators had a need to reschedule, therefore the workshop will be rescheduled. 47 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On January 1 O, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for both Dr. Martin Luther King Magnet Elementary School \u0026amp; Little Rock Central High School. The workshops also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On March 1, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for all principals and district level administrators in the PCSSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On April 12, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for the LRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. Targeted staffs from the middle and junior high schools in the three districts in Pulaski County attended the Smart Step Summit on May 1 and May 2. Training was provided regarding the overview of the \"Smart Step\" initiative, \"Standard and Accountability in Action,\" and \"Creating Learning Environments Through Leadership Teams.\" The ADE provided training on the development of alternative assessment September 12-13, 2000. Information was provided regarding the assessment of Special Education and LEP students. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate in professional development regarding Integrating Curriculum and Assessment K-12. The professional development activity was directed by the national consultant, Dr. Heidi Hays Jacobs, on September 14 and 15, 2000. The ADE provided professional development workshops from October 2 through October 13, 2000 regarding, ''The Write Stuff: Curriculum Frameworks, Content Standards and Item Development.\" Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems by video conference for Special Education and LEP Teachers on November 17, 2000. Also, Alternative Assessment Portfolio System Training was provided for testing coordinators through teleconference broadcast on November 27, 2000. 48 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On December 12, 2000, the ADE provided training for Test Coordinators on end of course assessments in Geometry and Algebra I Pilot examination. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation conducted the professional development at the Arkansas Teacher Retirement Building. The ADE presented a one-day training session with Dr. Cecil Reynolds on the Behavior Assessment for Children (BASC). This took place on December 7, 2000 at the NLRSD Administrative Annex. Dr. Reynolds is a practicing clinical psychologist. He is also a professor at Texas A \u0026amp; M University and a nationally known author. In the training, Dr. Reynolds addressed the following: 1) how to use and interpret information obtained on the direct observation form, 2) how to use this information for programming, 3) when to use the BASC, 4) when to refer for more or additional testing or evaluation, 5) who should complete the forms and when, (i.e., parents, teachers, students), 6) how to correctly interpret scores. This training was intended to especially benefit School Psychology Specialists, psychologists, psychological examiners, educational examiners and counselors. During January 22-26, 2001 the ADE presented the ACT AAP Intermediate (Grade 6) Benchmark Professional Development Workshop on Item Writing. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were invited to attend. On January 12, 2001 the ADE presented test administrators training for mid-year End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. On January 13, 2001 the ADE presented SmartScience Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This was shared with eight Master Teachers. The SmartScience Lessons were developed by the Arkansas Science Teachers Association in conjunction with the Wilbur Mills Educational Cooperative under an Eisenhower grant provided by the ADE. The purpose of SmartScience is to provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. The following training has been provided for educators in the three districts in Pulaski County by the Division of Special Education at the ADE since January 2000: On January 6, 2000, training was conducted for the Shannon Hills Pre-school Program, entitled ''Things you can do at home to support your child's learning.\" This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. The school's director and seven parents attended. 49 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On March 8, 2000, training was conducted for the Southwest Middle School in Little Rock, on ADD. Six people attended the training. There was follow-up training on Learning and Reading Styles on March 26. This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. On September 7, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Chicot Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Karen Sabo, Kindergarten Teacher\nMelissa Gleason, Paraprofessional\nCurtis Mayfield, P.E. Teacher\nLisa Poteet, Speech Language Pathologist\nJane Harkey, Principal\nKathy Penn-Norman, Special Education Coordinator\nAlice Phillips, Occupational Therapist. On September 15, 2000, the Governor's Developmental Disability Coalition Conference presented Assistive Technology Devices \u0026amp; Services. This was held at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On September 19, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Jefferson Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Melissa Chaney, Special Education Teacher\nBarbara Barnes, Special Education Coordinator\na Principal, a Counselor, a Librarian, and a Paraprofessional. On October 6, 2000, Integrating Assistive Technology Into Curriculum was presented at a conference in the Hot Springs Convention Center. Presenters were: Bryan Ayers and Aleecia Starkey. Speech Language Pathologists from LRSD and NLRSD attended. On October 24, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On October 25 and 26, 2000, Alternate Assessment for Students with Severe Disabilities for the LRSD at J. A. Fair High School was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. The participants were: Susan Chapman, Special Education Coordinator\nMary Steele, Special Education Teacher\nDenise Nesbit, Speech Language Pathologist\nand three Paraprofessionals. On November 14, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On November 17, 2000, training was conducted on Autism for the LRSD at the Instructional Resource Center. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. 50 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On December 5, 2000, Access to the Curriculum Via the use of Assistive Technology Computer Lab was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter of this teleconference. The participants were: Tim Fisk, Speech Language Pathologist from Arch Ford Education Service Cooperative at Plumerville and Patsy Lewis, Special Education Teacher from Mabelvale Middle School in the LRSD. On January 9, 2001, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. Kathy Brown, a vision consultant from the LRSD, was a participant. On January 23, 2001, Autism and Classroom Modifications for the LRSD at Brady Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Beverly Cook, Special Education Teacher\nAmy Littrell, Speech Language Pathologist\nJan Feurig, Occupational Therapist\nCarolyn James, Paraprofessional\nCindy Kackly, Paraprofessional\nand Rita Deloney, Paraprofessional. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcast on February 5, 2001. Presenters were: Charlotte Marvel, ADE\nDr. Gayle Potter, ADE\nMarcia Harding, ADE\nLynn Springfield, ASERC\nMary Steele, J. A. Fair High School, LRSD\nBryan Ayres, Easter Seals Outreach. This was provided for Special Education teachers and supervisors in the morning, and Limited English Proficient teachers and supervisors in the afternoon. The Special Education session was attended by 29 teachers/administrators and provided answers to specific questions about the alternate assessment portfolio system and the scoring rubric and points on the rubric to be used to score the portfolios. The LEP session was attended by 16 teachers/administrators and disseminated the common tasks to be included in the portfolios: one each in mathematics, writing and reading. On February 12-23, 2001, the ADE and Data Recognition Corporation personnel trained Test Coordinators in the administration of the spring Criterion-Referenced Test. This was provided in 20 sessions at 10 regional sites. Testing protocol, released items, and other testing materials were presented and discussed. The sessions provided training for Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Pilot Tests. The LRSD had 2 in attendance for the End of Course session and 2 for the Benchmark session. The NLRSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. The PCSSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. 51 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued} F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued} 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued} On March 15, 2001, there was a meeting at the ADE to plan professional development for staff who work with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students. A $30,000 grant has been created to provide LEP training at Chicot Elementary for a year, starting in April 2001. A $40,000 grant was created to provide a Summer English as Second Language (ESL) Academy for the LRSD from June 18 through 29, 2001. Andre Guerrero from the ADE Accountability section met with Karen Broadnax, ESL Coordinator at LRSD, Pat Price, Early Childhood Curriculum SupeNisor at LRSD, and Jane Harkey, Principal of Chicot Elementary. On March 1-2 and 8-29, 2001, ADE staff performed the following activities: processed registration for April 2 and 3 Alternate Portfolio Assessment video conference quarterly meeting\nanswered questions about Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) and LEP Alternate Portfolio Assessment by phone from schools and Education SeNice Cooperatives\nand signed up students for alternate portfolio assessment from school districts. On March 6, 2001, ADE staff attended a Smart Step Technology Leadership Conference at the State House Convention Center. On March 7, 2001, ADE staff attended a National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Regional Math Framework Meeting about the Consensus Project 2004. On March 8, 2001, there was a one-on-one conference with Carole Villarreal from Pulaski County at the ADE about the LEP students with portfolios. She was given pertinent data, including all the materials that have been given out at the video conferences. The conference lasted for at least an hour. On March 14, 2001, a Test Administrator's Training Session was presented specifically to LRSD Test Coordinators and Principals. About 60 LRSD personnel attended. The following meetings have been conducted with educators in the three districts in Pulaski County since July 2000. On July 10-13, 2000 the ADE provided Smart Step training. The sessions covered Standards-based classroom practices. 52 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 19-21, 2000 the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were 200 teachers from across the state in attendance. On August 14-31, 2000 the ADE presented Science Smart Start Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This will provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. On September 5, 2000 the ADE held an Eisenhower Informational meeting with Teacher Center Coordinators. The purpose of the Eisenhower Professional Development Program is to prepare teachers, school staff, and administrators to help all students meet challenging standards in the core academic subjects. A summary of the program was presented at the meeting. On November 2-3, 2000 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching. This presented curriculum and activity workshops. More than 1200 attended the conference. On November 6, 2000 there was a review of Science Benchmarks and sample model curriculum. A committee of 6 reviewed and revised a drafted document. The committee was made up of ADE and K-8 teachers. On November 7-10, 2000 the ADE held a meeting of the Benchmark and End of Course Mathematics Content Area Committee. Classroom teachers reviewed items for grades 4, 6, 8 and EOC mathematics assessment. There were 60 participants. On December 4-8, 2000 the ADE conducted grades 4 and 8 Benchmark Scoring for Writing Assessment. This professional development was attended by approximately 750 teachers. On December 8, 2000 the ADE conducted Rubric development for Special Education Portfolio scoring. This was a meeting with special education supervisors to revise rubric and plan for scoring in June. On December 8, 2000 the ADE presented the Transition Mathematics Pilot Training Workshop. This provided follow-up training and activities for fourth-year mathematics professional development. On December 12, 2000 the ADE presented test administrators training for midyear End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. 53 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcasts on April 2-3, 2001. Administration of the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy took place on April 23-27, 2001. Administration of the End of Course Algebra and Geometry Exams took place on May 2-3, 2001. Over 1,100 Arkansas educators attended the Smart Step Growing Smarter Conference on July 10 and 11, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The Smart Step effort seeks to provide intense professional development for teachers and administrators at the middle school level, as well as additional materials and assistance to the state's middle school teachers. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the first keynote address on \"The Character-Centered Teacher''. Debra Pickering, an education consultant from Denver, Colorado, presented the second keynote address on \"Characteristics of Middle Level Education\". Throughout the Smart Step conference, educators attended breakout sessions that were grade-specific and curriculum area-specific. Pat Davenport, an education consultant from Houston, Texas, delivered two addresses. She spoke on \"A Blueprint for Raising Student Achievement\". Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. Over 1,200 Arkansas teachers and administrators attended the Smart Start Conference on July 12, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Start is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the keynote address. The day featured a series of 15 breakout sessions on best classroom practices. Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. On July 18-20, 2001, the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were approximately 300 teachers from across the state in attendance. 54 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) The ADE and Harcourt Educational Measurement conducted Stanford 9 test administrator training from August 1-9, 2001. The training was held at Little Rock, Jonesboro, Fort Smith, Forrest City, Springdale, Mountain Home, Prescott, and Monticello. Another session was held at the ADE on August 30, for those who were unable to attend August 1-9. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by video conference at the Education Service Cooperatives and at the ADE from 9:00 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on September 5, 2001. The ADE released the performance of all schools on the Primary and Middle Level Benchmark Exams on September 5, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Core Teacher In-Service training for Central in the LRSD on September 6, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for Hall in the LRSD on September 7, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for McClellan in the LRSD on September 13, 2001. The ADE conducted Basic Co-teaching training for the LRSD on October 9, 2001. The ADE conducted training on autism spectrum disorder for the PCSSD on October 15, 2001. Professional Development workshops (1 day in length) in scoring End of Course assessments in algebra, geometry and reading were provided for all districts in the state. Each school was invited to send three representatives (one for each of the sessions). LRSD, NLRSD, and PCSSD participated. Information and training materials pertaining to the Alternate Portfolio Assessment were provided to all districts in the state and were supplied as requested to LRSD, PCSSD and David 0. Dodd Elementary. On November 1-2, 2001 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching at the Excelsior Hotel \u0026amp; Statehouse Convention Center. This presented sessions, workshops and short courses to promote exceptional teaching and learning. Educators could become involved in integrated math, science, English \u0026amp; language arts and social studies learning. The ADE received from the schools selected to participate in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a list of students who will take the test. 55 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) On December 3-7, 2001 the ADE conducted grade 6 Benchmark scoring training for reading and math. Each school district was invited to send a math and a reading specialist. The training was held at the Holiday Inn Airport in Little Rock. On December 4 and 6, 2001 the ADE conducted Mid-Year Test Administrator Training for Algebra and Geometry. This was held at the Arkansas Activities Association's conference room in North Little Rock. On January 24, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by ADE compressed video with Fred Jones presenting. On January 31, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by NSCI satellite with Fred Jones presenting. On February 7, 2002, the ADE Smart Step co-sponsored the AR Association of Middle Level Principal's/ADE curriculum, assessment and instruction workshop with Bena Kallick presenting. On February 11-21, 2002, the ADE provided training for Test Administrators on the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Exams. The sessions took place at Forrest City, Jonesboro, Mountain Home, Springdale, Fort Smith, Monticello, Prescott, Arkadelphia and Little Rock. A make-up training broadcast was given at 15 Educational Cooperative Video sites on February 22. During February 2002, the LRSD had two attendees for the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The NLRSD and PCSSD each had one attendee at the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education SeNice Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 2, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. The ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education SeNice Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 9, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. 56 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) The Twenty-First Annual Curriculum and Instruction Conference, co-sponsored by the Arkansas Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and the Arkansas Department of Education, will be held June 24-26, 2002, at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs, Arkansas. \"Ignite Your Enthusiasm for Learning\" is the theme for this year's conference, which will feature educational consultant, Dr. Debbie Silver, as well as other very knowledgeable presenters. Additionally, there will be small group sessions on Curriculum Alignment, North Central Accreditation, Section 504, Building Level Assessment, Administrator Standards, Data Disaggregation, and National Board. The Educational Accountability Unit of the ADE hosted a workshop entitled \"Strategies for Increasing Achievement on the ACTAAP Benchmark Examination\" on June 13-14, 2002 at the Agora Center in Conway. The workshop was presented for schools in which 100% of students scored below the proficient level on one or more parts of the most recent Benchmark Examination. The agenda included presentations on \"The Plan-Do-Check-Act Instructional Cycle\" by the nationally known speaker Pat Davenport. ADE personnel provided an explanation of the MPH point program. Presentations were made by Math and Literacy Specialists. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, gave a presentation about ACTAAP. Break out sessions were held, in which school districts with high scores on the MPH point program offered strategies and insights into increasing student achievement. The NLRSD, LRSD, and PCSSD were invited to attend. The NLRSD attended the workshop. The Smart Start Summer Conference took place on July 8-9, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. The Smart Start Initiative focuses on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event included remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. After comments by the Director, Bena Kallick presented the keynote address \"Beyond Mapping: Essential Questions, Assessment, Higher Order Thinking\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On the second day, Vivian Moore gave the keynote address \"Overcoming Obstacles: Avenues for Student Success\". Krista Underwood gave the presentation \"Put Reading First in Arkansas\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. 57 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 (Continued) The Smart Step Summer Conference took place on July 10-11, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The event included remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. After comments by the Director, Vivian Moore presented the keynote address \"Overcoming Obstacles: Avenues for Student Success\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On the second day, Bena Kallick presented \"Beyond Mapping: Essential Questions, Assessment, Higher Order Thinking\". Ken Stamatis presented \"Smart Steps to Creating a School Culture That Supports Adolescent Comprehension\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On August 8, 2002, Steven Weber held a workshop at Booker T. Washington Elementary on \"Best Practices in Social Studies\". It was presented to the 4th grade teachers in the Little Rock School District. The workshop focused around the five themes of geography and the social studies (fourth grade) framework/standards. Several Internet web sites were shared with the teachers, and the teachers were shown methods for incorporating writing into fourth grade social studies. One of the topics was using primary source photos and technology to stimulate the students to write about diverse regions. A theme of the workshop included identifying web sites which apply to fourth grade social studies teachers and interactive web sites for fourth grade students. This was a Back-to-School In-service workshop\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1063","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School boards","School board members","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1063"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nAgenda C DEC 1 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION 1110NITORING Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting Happy Holidays! 2 0~ .\u0026gt; :mc ,- ,- r- - -1:I: Oz o\u0026gt; :c :c c-\u0026lt; m-.. :c C: -z\n,aO 0 .... ,- 0 r-z (\")(/) \u0026gt; F\nJC \u0026gt;m \"'c3 C:\nJC ~ .... :-\u0026lt;5!? o:c ~m \u0026gt;C') .... 8 Oz z~ \"'o z (/) !D C') 0~ . N ,-m\ncZ n.... \":c' \u0026gt;m f\n:c ::0: (/) :\u0026lt; :c m\n\u0026gt; c3 a,\nc o--\u0026lt; \u0026gt;\"' :ec n- :1:0 m:I: :I: :I: a, C: m~ :c C') (/).\u0026gt;... 0 z (/) I. 11. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS December 16, 2004 5:30 p.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Welcome to Guests B. Student Performance - Rockefeller Show Choir Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) C. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: V. A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Update G. Discussion: Internal Auditor H. Discussion: Appointment of Staff for Monitoring Legislative Session/ Governmental Affairs Liaison I. Discussion: Port TIF APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes: Regular Meeting: 11-16-04 ,... c-,-., \u0026gt;.\nmD r- rr- - ....,\ni: Oz o\u0026gt; ~~ m..,\nDC: -z\nD (\") o ..... r- c5 r- z (\")Cl\u0026gt; \u0026gt; F :\u0026lt; :,::, m\n,,,~ a,\nD 0-4 \u0026gt; en :,::,on ~i ~~ m~\nD (\") en.\u0026gt;.... c5 z (I) Regular Board Meeting December 16, 2004 Page2 VI. CURRICULUM \u0026amp; INSTRUCTION A. Quarterly Update with Revised Regulation IL-R B. Elementary Reading/ Language Arts Textbook Adoption C. Proposed Changes to Middle / High School Curriculum Programs VII. HUMAN RESOURCES A. Personnel Changes VIII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Mitchell Elementary School B. Fair Park Elementary School C. Donations of Property D. Financial Report IX. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions X. EMPLOYEE HEARINGS XI. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Goal Setting/ Process for Superintendent's Evaluation XII. ADJOURNMENT n\"tl \u0026gt;.. -:,.:.m0.. ,.... _ _,\ni: Oz o\u0026gt; El~ m-..\n,:, C: -z ::,:,n ,o....\" i\"5' r-z nu, ~ I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOME/PERFORMANCE 111. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. CITIZENS REMARKS C. LR CTA IV. REPORTS/ COMMUNICATIONS A. BOARD MEMBERS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: December 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: December 2004 Construction Report - Bond Projects BACKGROUND: Please note in this month's report the number of school projects that have been moved from \"Under Construction\" to \"Completed\". The completed projects are at Brady, Dunbar, Parkview, Pulaski Heights and Southwest. You may still see workmen at these schools performing \"Punch List\" items, but students and staff occupy the new and remodeled areas. Our plan is to have an addition to Forest Heights Middle School under construction during the spring of 2005, along with roof replacements for the gymnasium and an older classroom building. RATIONALE: Monthly reports are submitted to the Board to keep members up-to-date on construction projects in the District. FUNDING: Bond Funds RECOMMENDATION: Report item\nno action necessary. PREPARED BY: Bill Goodman, District Engineer p z .m.... c_\n\u0026gt;:]Cl) zn ,.. C: r-CJ\u0026gt; ~~ CZ =l I 0\n\u0026gt;:l ,.... c3~\n,:,(\") ..... C: -_-,CvJ\u0026gt;, ..,0 z !\"\" 2 rT :x ,2, r,, C s: C\n, :,, ..... m (\") ::i:: z 0,.. .. 8 -\u0026lt; .C.,: C ~ m CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD DECEMBER 16, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION I I 1 1:::st. Lompletion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Central Renovation - Interior __ __ ~ $10,200,266 Aug-05 Fair Park Roof ___ _ ___ $245,784 I Jan-05 Henderson I Lockers ________ $43,854 Dec-04 Scott Field Track Renovations ____ I $289,056 I Dec-04 Wakefield I Rebuild I $5,300,000 Dec-04 Wilson 1HVAC for Cafeteria $56,000 Jan-05 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - WINTER/ SPRING 2004-05 I I I !::st. c.\nomplellOn Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Carver I Media Center Expansion $167,490 I Unknown Forest Heights Remodel 1 $1,547,000 Unknown Gibbs !Addition 1 $705,670 I Jiin-05 Meadowcliff IRemodel _____ I $164,150 . Mar-05 Mitchell !Renovation ___ I $2,212,493 1 Unknown Oakhurst (Adult Education) New Windows $215,000 Jun-05 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED I I I t:Sl. vompletlon Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Booker Electrical Upgrade ___ _ Unknown I Unknown Chicot Electrical Upgr~ _ Unknown I Unknown Cloverdale Elementary Addition __ $520,750 _ Unknown Fair Park Addition $799,000 Unknown Garland Pulaski Hgts. MS Rightsell Western Hills Woodruff ~model Unknown Unknown Energy monitoring system installation Unkno~ Unknown Renovation - $2,494,000 _j_ _ Unknown I Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC - $640,000 Aug-05 Parking addition $193,777 Unknown BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Administration Administration Administration Administration Administration Annex Alternative Learning Ctr. Alternative Learning Ctr. Badgett Badgett Bale Bale Bale Bale Baseline Booker Booker Booker Booker Booker Booker Brady Brady Brady I I I Est. Completion Project Description Cost Date Asbestos abatement $380,495 Mar-03 Fresh air system $55,000 Aug-03 Fire alarm _ - $32,350 Aug-03 HVAC $70,000 Nov-04 Energy monitoring system installation May-02 Energy monitoring system installation $15,160 Oct-01 Energy efficient lighting _ $82,000 Partial asbestos abatement _ $237,237 Fire alarm _ $18,250 Classroom addition/renovation $2,244,524 -Energy monitoring system Partial roof replacement HVAC Renovation Gym Roof ADA Rest rooms Energy efficient lighting Energy monitoring system installation Asbestos abatement Flre alarm Addition/renovation Energy efficient lighting Asbestos abatement + $269,587 $664,587 $953,520 $48,525 $25,000 $170,295 $23,710 $10,900 $34,501 $973,621 $80,593 $345,072 Dec-01 - Jul-01 Aug-02 Dec-02 Mar-02 Dec-01 Aug-01 Aug-04 Oct-04 Aug-04 Apr-01 Oct-01 Feb-02 Mar-02 Nov-04 Sep-02 Auq-02 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD DECEMBER 16, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Est. Completion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Carver Energy monitoring system installation $14,480 May-01 Carver Parking lot 1 $111,742 1 Aug-03 Central HVAC Renovation - Band Area 1 $225,000 Dec-04 Central ,Reflecting Pond $57,561 i Sep-04 Central Parking Student parking 1 $174,000 Aug-03 Cc-e-_n_tr_a_l/-Q_u_i_g,,~le--y\"_ ___~ Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrica_l re__p,__a_ir_ _____ $:c2.::-6=--5=-'-0\",-=0--0=----'------'A---'-u.:...g,,_--0-'---3'--- l Central/Quigley IAthletic Field Improvement $38,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley I Irrigation System $14,500 1 Aug-03 Central Purchase land for school I Unknown Dec-02 Central I Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations $2,000,000 , Dec-02 Central Ceiling and wall repair , $24,000 i Oct-01 t-:C=--e-_n--t,-r_a.,I.. .________F~ ir_e_A-,-l-ar_m_ S-y'--s-,--t_em_D_e_s_i\ng\"-n_/_ln_s_ta_ll_atio_n_ __,! ___$' --8_0--,'-8_7_6--i-l __ Aug-01 Central Front landing tile repair $22,470 Aug-01 Chicot Drainage $64,700 Aug-04 Chicot Sound Attenuation $43, 134 Jul-04 1C-_lo_v_e_rd_a_le_E_le_m_._ ___- -l-E-''n--e=-_rg,,.,y__e=f-f ic ::..i..e.::..n:.c.t.:..cl.i..,g,,_'h-'-t'-i'-n.:g\n'---------- ~, ___$_ 1_32,~6_78-+1-- __J_ ul-01 Cloverdale MS IEnergy efficient lighting $189,743 _J_u_l-_0_1 t=C,-l-o_v,..e.,_rd_a_le_M_S_ _____M_ a_,j_o_r_r_eno_v_a_ti_on_\u0026amp;_a_d_d_it_io_n_ ____. ..._ __ $c._1.,,3_9_3.,,_8_2_2_1..._ Nov-02 Dodd Fire Alarm Upgrade ,____ ___ $:_9,2_0_0--'-_ _ Oct-04 Dodd Energy efficient lighting $90,665 Aug-01 Dodd Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile - - _ - $156,299 __ Jul-01 Dodd Replace roof top HVAC _ $215,5_7_0 __ ~ -02 t=D,--u_n_ba_r ________ Renovation/addition _ $6, 149,0_2_3~-- Nov-04 Facilities Serv_ic_e_ ____ln te_ri_or re_n_ova_t_io_n____ __ _ $84,672 Mar-01 Facility Services Fire alarm $12,000 Aug-03 Fair Park I HVAC renovation/fire alarm - _ - ~ 15,956 _ Apr-02 FairPark Energy efficient lighting $90,162 Aug-01 Fair P_a_rk_ _______A_ sbestos abatement-ceiling - $59,310~ Aug-01 J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music room addition ------+E_n_e_rg, y efficient lighting Press box J. A. Fai_r ________ S_e_c-ur-ity - cameras J. A. Fair +Athletic Field Improvement - J. A. Fair Irrigation System ---- J. A. Fair __J3_oof repairs ____ _ Forest Park - Replace window units w/central HVAC Forest Park ___ -=_ ~ Diagonal parking-- Forest Park _ Energy efficient lighting Fulbright Energy efficient lighting Fulbright Energy monitoring system installation Fulbright Replace roof top HVAC units Fulbright Parking lot -- Fulbright Roof repairs Franklin Renovation Geyer Springs Gibbs Gibbs Hall Hall Hall Hall Roof Repair Energy efficient lighting Energy monitoring system installation Major renovation \u0026amp; addition Asbestos abatement Energy efficient lighting Energy efficient lighting $3,155,640 $277,594 $10,784 $12_,500 $38,000 $14,000 $391 ,871 $485,258 $111,742 $119,788 $134,463 $11 ,950 $107,835 $140,000 $200,000 $2,511 ,736 $161 ,752 $76,447 $11 ,770 $8,637,709 $168,222 $42,931 $296,707 Aug-04 Apr-01 Nov-00 Jun-01 Jul-03 Jul-03 Aug-03 Nov-03 Aug-03 May-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Sep-02 Oct-02 Mar-03 Jun-04 Apr-01 Jul-01 Sep-03 Aug-01 Jul-01 Aor-01 2 z -m\u0026lt;_c\na en zn )\u0026gt;C r- en \u0026gt;c!o!! CZ =I I 0\n:a ~!2 ocn\n:an -4 C _, en -CJ\u0026gt; ..,0 z :-,, m-\u0026lt; n ::c z 0 8 -\u0026lt; C ~ C ~ m CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD DECEMBER 16, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Project Description Cost I Est. Completion Date Hall Infrastructure improvements $93,657 1 Aug-01 Hall ' Intercom I I Feb-01 Hall Security cameras $1Q,6QQ I Jun-01 - Henderson Energy efficient lighting $193,679 Jul-01 Henderson _Boot replacement gym $107,835 i May-01 Henderson - I Asbestos abatement Phase I $500,000 I Aug_:Q_!_ !Asbestos abatement Phase 2 - Henderson $250,000 Aug-02 --- IRC Energy efficient lighting $109,136 Jul-02 Jefferson Asbestos abatement $43,639 I Oct-01 Jefferson Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm I $1,630,000 Nov-02 Laidlaw  Parking lot L $269,588 Jul-01 Mablevale Elem Fire Alarm Upgrade $12,000 Oct-04 Mabelvale Elem. I Energy monitoring system installation -r $12,150 I Aug-01 Mabelvale Elem. ___ ~lace HVAC units -+ $300,000 Aug-02 - Mabelvale Elem. - A sbestos Abatement $107,000 I Aug-02 -- Mabelvale Elem.  Energy efficient lighting I $106,598 Dec-02 Mabelvale MS Renovate bleachers $134,793 Aug-01 Mabelvale MS I Renovation $6,851,621 Mar-04 Mann 1 Partial Replacement --i-- $11,500,000 Apr-04 Mann !Asphalt walks -, Dec-01 Mann The total $1.8 million Dec-01 -- Walkway canopies ----- . is what has been Mann I Boiler replacement used so far on the Oct-01 Mann Fencing -- projects listed __S ~-01 Mann - Partial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. Aug-01 McClellan ~letic Field Improvement - $38,000 Jul-03 McClellan Irrigation System $14,750 Jul-03 McClellan Security cameras _ ~ $36,300 Jun-01 McClellan Energy efficient lighting $303,614 May-01 McClellan Stadium stands repair $235,000 Aug-01 --- - Intercom_ __ 1 McClellan $46,000 Feb-02 -- - $~55,622 C ---- McClellan Classroom Addition Jul-04 --- -- ----- -- McDermott Fire Alarm Upgrade $7,700 . Sep-04 -- - - ~ McDermott Energy efficient lighting ~9,411 Feb-01 Replace roof top HVAC units - - -- ~ - McDermott - - $476,000 Aug-02 ~ Meadowcliff Fire alarm $16,175 Jul-01 ~ Meadowcliff Asbestos abatement $253,412 ~ Aug-02 Meadow-cliff - - Engergy efficient lighting $88,297 Dec-02 Metropolitan Replace cooling tower $37,203 Dec-00 - Metropolitan Replace shop vent system $20,000 May-01 Metropolitan Energy monitoring system installation $17,145 Aug-01 Mitchell Building Remediation $165,000 Jul-04 Mitchell Energy efficient lighting $103,642 Apr-01 Mitchell Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 Jul-01 Mitchell Asbestos abatement $13,000 Jul-01 Oakhurst HVAC renovation $237,237 Aug-01 Otter Creek Energy monitoring system installation $10,695 May-01 Otter Creek -Energy efficient lighting $81,828 Apr-01 Otter Creek Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 Otter Creek Parking lot $138,029 Aug-02 Otter Creek 6 classroom addition $888,778 Oct-02 Otter Creek Parkinq Improvements $142,541 Auq-03 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD DECEMBER 16, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED l Est. Completion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Parkview Addition $2,121,226 Dec-04 Parkview HVAC controls $210,000 I Jun-02 Parkview Roof replacement $273,877 I Sep-01 Parkview Exterior lights , $10,784 Nov-00 Parkview HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls $301,938 Aug-01 Parkview Locker replacement 1 $120,000 Aug-01 Parkview Energy efficient lighting I $315,000 Jun-01 Procurement Energy monitoring system installation $5,290 : Jun-02 Procurement Fire alarm $25,000 I Aug-03 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Renovation $1, 193,259 Nov-04 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground $17,000 Dec-02 Pulaski Hgts. MS Renovation $3,755,041 ' Nov-04 Rightsell Energy efficient lighting $84,898 , Apr-01 Rockefeller I Energy efficient lighting $137,004 I Mar-01 Rockefeller 'Replace rooftop HVAC $539,175 1 Aug-01 Rockefeller , Parking addition $111,742 Aug-02 Romine Asbestos abatement I $10,000 Apr-02 Romine 1Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $3,534,675 Mar-03 Security/Transportation I Bus cameras I $22,500 Jun-01 Southwest Addition 1 $2,000,000 I Nov-04 Southwest I Asbestos abatement $28, ~ Aug-00 Southwest New roof ---------+- $690,000 Oct-03 Southwest Energy efficient lighting I - $168,719 Jan-02 Southwest Drainage / street widening -- ---+--- ~o.ooo Aug-03 Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installatio_n_-+- $4,830 - - Aug-02 Student Assignment Fire alarm - --,--- $9,0~ - Aug-03 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation __ $275,000 - Dec-01 Tech Ctr/ Metro Renovation !Addition/Renovation - Phase II $3,679,000 Jun-04 Technology Upgrade Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data - ___ ---,.- Nov-02 Terry Energy efficient lighting --___ .....___ $73,8~ - Feb-01 Terry ____ Driveway \u0026amp; Parking ,____ $83,484 Aug-02 Terry 'Media Center additi~ _-_-_ -_-_-_-_-___ $704,932 Sep-02 Wakefield __ Security cameras __ _ _ _.,__ $8,000 Jun-01 Wakefield__ Energy efficient lighting __ $74,776 Feb-01 Wakefield ___ Demolition/Asbestos Abatement .___ $200,000 _ Nov-02 Washington Fire Alarm Upgrade $11,600 Oct-04 Washington ~ ~ Security cameras - $7,900 -_ Jun-01 Washington Energy efficient lighting $165,281 Apr-01 Watson _ Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 Jul-01 Watson Asbestos abatement $182,241 Aug-01 Watson _ Energy efficient lighting _ $106,868 _ _ Aug-01 Watson Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 Watson Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $800,000 Aug-02 Western Hills Fire Alarm Upgrade $8,400 Oct-04 Western Hills ADA Rest rooms $25,000 Aug-04 Western Hills Asbestos abatement $191,946 Aug-02 Western Hills Intercom $7,100 Dec-01 Western Hills Energy efficient lighting $106,000 Jul-01 Williams Renovation $2,106,492. Mar-04 Williams Parking expansions _ $183,717 Dec-03 Williams Energy efficient lighting $122,719 Jun-01 Wilson Renovation/expansion $1,263,876 Feb-04 Wilson Parking Expansion $110,000 Aug-03 Woodruff Renovation $246,419 Auq-02 4 z ~5!\na\"' ZC'l \u0026gt;c: r-u, \u0026gt;c:!!o! CZ ~ I\na ~~\na C\") .... C: _.en .-.\",0' z .7..1. m C\") :c z 0 8 -\u0026lt; C: \"C ~ m LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: December 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Board Auditor Report BACKGROUND: Monthly report to School Board. RATIONALE: Summary report of activities. FUNDING: No changes. RECOMMENDATION: None. PREPARED BY: Sandy Becker z ~2 ~!!l )\u0026gt;,C:: ,-v, \u0026gt;!!! c::o CZ a\no ,- m :::c C). inc ...,-!!l ~~ CJ) ,- c5 \u0026gt;ig z z ~~\non --,c:: --,CJ\u0026gt; .-.C, Jc\u0026gt;5 z .'..T..i m n :::c z 0,- 8 -\u0026lt; c:: ~ m Date: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS December 16, 2004 To: Board of Directors (~---- From: ~Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - December This is the sixty-second communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with one high school, two middle schools and three elementary schools to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology Training a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and ewspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff. a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of uts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. Audit Report - December 2004 Page 2 of2 b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. c) Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. d) Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. e) Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. f) Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. g) Reviewing leave accountability system. a) Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. b) Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. c) Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2004) and on planning committee for 2005. Sharefest participating schools this year were: Otter Creek, Mabelvale Middle, J.A. Fair, Romine Elementary, Henderson Middle, Southwest Middle, Cloverdale Middle, Dunbar Middle, Adult Education, Franklin Elementary, and the Alternative Learning Center (off of 6th Street in East End). A narrative report is attached for Sharefest 2004. d) Have advertised for assistant auditor position and hope to have filled soon. Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. z -m\u0026lt;_c z\n,:, nen \u0026gt;c r- en c\u0026gt;!o!? cz ~ I 0 \"' r-m ::c C) . enc .... -~ ~~en \u0026gt;r- zc5 c:\n. 0 z .,,2 oen\n,\n,n ..\nC --\u0026lt;e enn ..., c5 z .'..'.\". m n :r: z 0 8 -\u0026lt; .C, , C ~ m Between fifteen hundred and two thousand Sharefest 2004 volunteers partnered with eleven Little Rock School District schools. We gratefully acknowledge their hard work and assistance in building stronger community ties and providing assistance to the students and staff of the Little Rock School District. At Southwest Middle School volunteers from Fellowship Bible Church - landscaped. front beds with plants and mulch, painted student playground, cleared park area for outdoor classroom and park, installed picnic tables in park area, installed 1600 ceiling tiles in all hallways, four wall murals were painted, painted the parent center, painted inspirational words in gym, provided large amount of school supplies for students. There is an ongoing relationship including tutoring, student sponsorship, mentoring throughout the year. At Otter Creek Elementary volunteers from Geyer Springs First Baptist Church: painted the small student restrooms in the classrooms, painted the lounge and the restrooms in the lounge, built a box to house the sound system in the cafeteria, created 3 sidewalks around the new wing, landscaped - trimmed and added mulch, and built a table that will collapse in the lounge. Volunteers from Hunter United Methodist Church re-landscaped the main flower bed of Romine Elementary School. Second Baptist - John Barrow volunteered at Henderson Middle School. With persons from the PT A and staff they created a new landscape bed in front of the Henderson Memorial, planted new plants all planting beds, re-mulched all flower beds, painted all railings and posts, painted a new crosswalk to the athletic field, painted all of the picnic tables for student and staff use, and re-did the bulletin board in the assistant principal hallway. At the Alternative Center, the front doors in the Main building were painted, all hallway doors in the Main building was painted along with Cubicles in several rooms were painted. The men of St. Mark Baptist Church have committed to come back once a month to do detailed projects for the ALC. Cloverdale Middle School's partner was Second Baptist - John Barrow. They re-painted the large area map of Arkansas on the front parking lot, mulched the landscape beds, improved the drainage in the front of the building to allow water to drain better, and spread three loads of compost onto the low areas in the front of the school. At Franklin Elementary, volunteers from Fellowship Bible Church painted a mural all around the auditorium. The stage was repainted. The teachers lounge was made over (added counter top, new furniture, appliances, pictures, lamps, new curtains, and painted). They added an outdoor classroom on the south side of the building, they painted the outside concrete wall and added the school name and mascot to the wall, they planted trees, created new flower beds, added seating benches around the school outside, built bookshelves for classrooms, mulched areas with wood chips, installed soccer goals in the back of the school, they painted a new entrance mural (the falcon) at the entrance of the building. Fellowship Bible has officially partnered with the Franklin School and the surrounding community. At J.A. Fair Magnet High School volunteers from Geyer Springs First Baptist Church, staff members, and community volunteers build planting beds with landscape timbers, and improved the front part of the school by installing the small bridge, and moving and spreading approximately twelve tons of compost and top soil to create a new plant environment. Dunbar Magnet Middle School's partner was Fellowship Bible Church. The following projects were completed at Dunbar: Thirty-seven (37) plus whiteboards were installed, team names and logos painted in assigned areas, character names and phrases painted, the office was painted, office curtains installed and hung, auditorium seats fixed and oiled, library shelves built, 55 gallon trash cans painted, landscaping projects completed were a) holly bushes pulled, b). hardwood mulch, c) pea gravel, d) bushes planted, e) flowers planted, f) potting soil distributed, the library books were organized and pictures hung up, character education and international banners were hung up, two trophy cases were built and installed, an oak tree was trimmed, and a bobcat mural was painted. Mabelvale Magnet Middle School had as a returning partner Geyer Springs First Baptist Church. The projects undertaken by the volunteers were: building picnic tables (12), painting classroom doors (6), replacing and planting additional shrubbery, pruning the shrubbery at the front of the gymnasium, raking and cleaning existing flower beds, painting the concession area in the gymnasium, building and staining bookcases (18), general cleanup, and hanging three murals created by the art students as a tribute to Mabelvale Magnet Middle School. The Adult Education Center's partner was Fellowship Bible Church. Volunteers from Fellowship painted five classrooms to include bookshelves and trim, the library, hallways, the assistant principal's office, three bathrooms, and the outside doors. Also painted was a beautiful mural at entrance of the auditorium. They refinished the wood banisters on the stairwell, spread gravel on a muddy driveway, put woodchips around Head Start play ground, painted the teachers lounge, installed new blinds in the teachers lounge, replaced furniture in the teachers lounge, put two concrete benches on the campus, and are working on a outside sign for the building. The library is being recarpeted by Facilities to complete the library project. General partners with the ShareFest 2004 project was the City of Little Rock which provided free mulch and compost for the various sites and the Little Rock School District Facilities Department which provided paint, paint supplies, and delivery for the donated mulch and compost from the City of Little Rock, for wood chips from a lumber mill, and topsoi I from a nursery. p z ~2 ~~ \u0026gt; C: r-u, \u0026gt;!!! c:o oz a' ::0 r-m ::c C') . se\nn:c.... ~ ~~ (/) r- c5 \u0026gt;en z 0z \"V 52 QUI\n:on .... C: --1U\"I' -nc5 z :..n.. m (') :z:c 0 8 -\u0026lt; C: \"V ~ m LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: December 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D., Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Technology Report BACKGROUND: Since the last Board meeting the following technology activities took place:  Installation of the Safari media retrieval system at Wakefield Elementary was completed. Staff attended the initial training sessions during the week of November 29 and immediately began to use the system. Additional training will be scheduled that emphasizes integration of the system into classroom instruction. Training begins January 10 for Watson Elementary.  Training for teachers at Parkview in using Edline for parent access to grades will begin in January. Core district staff will receive training the week of December 13.  E-rate filing season opened on December 15. This year we plan to file for telecommunications services and network electronics.  Mr. Sandy Becker has been working with Cloverdale Middle School to pilot a program to allow students to take home older computers that have been taken off the LRSD network but still have some educational value. He will be available if there are questions about this project. RATIONALE: To implement the LRSD Technology Plan 2003 - 2006 FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept this report. PREPARED BY: Lucy Neal, Director, Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director, Computer Information Services z ~5!\n:o rn zn ,. C: l\"'\"(J) ,. !!! c:o oz =I I 0\n:o \"ti !2 om\n:on _, C: _, (J) -..r,n0 z .,,. C: ,\"0_. ', m\n,:, m C) C: ~ 0z\n=\n, DATE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 December 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Quarterly Update Report with Revised Regulation IL-R BACKGROUND: A quarterly written update by the Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) Department was completed in accordance with the District Court's 2004 Compliance Remedy (Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004, pp. 61-67). This report includes an expanded evaluation agenda (revised IL-R), descriptions of four program step-two evaluations to be completed this school year, and resumes of two external evaluators available to conduct the step-two evaluations. RATIONALE: We must broaden our Program Evaluation Agenda and perform step-two evaluations to comply with Judge Wilson's order and to accommodate changes in responsibilities in carrying out evaluation activities. FUNDING: No additional funding requirements. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept the Quarterly Update Report and approve the revised regulation ILR. r\u0026gt; n C: n~ C,...:. C: :I: n ::c ?\nG') m \"'\n,,,~ :I:,=. a:, nc: :m:c\"z' rm ,-Cl) mCJ\u0026gt; ,-Cl) mm [I:~ n m DATE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 December 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Elementary Reading/Language Arts Textbook Adoption BACKGROUND: The Elementary Reading/Language Arts Textbook Selection Committee of the Little Rock School District has completed the textbook selection process as outlined in the Board of Education's Policies and Regulations manual. The committee participated in the District's textbook caravan and other informal meetings, including a one-day study session, to be able to make a quality recommendation to the Board. Textbook samples were also available in the Elementary Schools and at the IRC for review by teachers and principals. RATIONALE: As a result of the process, the committee recommends that the Board authorize purchase of the Houghton-Mifflin Reading Series as the textbook of choice for the Little Rock School District Elementary (K-5) Reading/Language Arts program. The Houghton Mifflin Reading/Language Arts Textbook was selected for, but not limited to, the following reasons:  Quality of literature included in the student anthology  Organization of the instructional materials  Alignment of instruction with the District's Literacy Plan  Alignment of scope and sequence with the Arkansas State Standards and Framework The textbooks will be made available for review by the Board upon the request of the Board. Once the Board has approved the selection, the textbooks will be available for review by the general public in the VIPS office or in Room 1 of the IRC.  fl n C: ~ n C....:. C: 31: n ::r:: ~ C) m \"' ?-\n:i 31: :~ a, nc: m::r::z\"' i= rn men ..... \"' mm ~~ n m ~ .., \"\ni \"[ \"\nt\n, ,n. n ~ It was the textbook committee's charge to intensely study the various reading/language arts textbook samples and to make a quality, informed decision. In all of my years of working with committees, this committee was by far the most professional and most committed to the process to ensure a quality decision. A list of the committee members will be made available upon request. FUNDING: Textbook funding is provided by the District and by the State. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept the recommendation of the Elementary Reading/Language Arts Textbook Selection Committee. PREPARED BY: Krista Underwood, Director of Early Childhood and Elementary Literacy DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 December 16, 2004 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Proposed Changes in the Middle and High School Curriculum Programs for 2005-2006 BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Board Policy IG, Curriculum Development, Adoption, and Review, and Board Policy IGA, Curriculum Program Alignment and Coherence, all curricular revisions are to be approved by the Board of Directors. RATIONALE: In response to the diverse needs of our students as well as our commitment to continuous cultivation of their growth, new courses were developed and current course descriptions and assignment levels were amended. Furthermore, upon review of our Middle and High School Curriculum Programs, it was deduced that courses were being offered year-after-year in which students were not enrolled. Consequently, due to a lack of enrollment or program termination such courses are slated to be deleted. MIDDLE SCHOOL A summary of the proposed middle school curriculum changes for the 2005-2006 school year are as follows: Business Education 1. Delete Exploratory Multimedia - duplication of course numbers 2. Delete Introductory Economics - continued lack of enrollment 3. Delete Real World Economics - continued lack of enrollment 4. Delete International Economics and the World of Business - continued lack of enrollment Career \u0026amp; Technical 5. Add Environmental and Spatial Technology (EAST Lab - 6th graders)\n,,,~ s: := l a, .-,c: ::c (J) mz I= ~ mv, .... (J) mm ~~ ,n,, English 6. Delete 7. Delete 8. Delete Reading \u0026amp; Writing Workshop (Alt Prog) - program no longer exists Reading \u0026amp; Writing Workshop 7 (Alt Prog)- program no longer exists Reading \u0026amp; Writing Workshop 8 (Alt Prog)- program no longer exists Foreign Languages 9. Delete Exploratory Foreign Language \u0026amp; Culture - grades 7 \u0026amp; 8 (offered only at grade 6) 10. Delete 11. Change 12.Change 13. Change 14. Change Math 15. Delete 16. Delete 17. Delete 18. Delete 19. Delete 20. Delete 21. Delete 22. Delete Science 23. Delete 24. Delete 25. Delete 26. Delete 27. Delete 28. Delete 29. Delete 30. Delete Exploratory German - continued lack of enrollment French I Grade 8 - using high school course number Spanish I Grade 8 - using high school course number German I Grade 8 - using high school course number Latin I Grade 8 - using high school course number Mathematics 6 (Alt Prog) - program no longer exists Mathematics 6 (Alt Prog)- program no longer exists International Money Grade 7 - continued lack of enrollment International Money Grade 7 \u0026amp; 8 - continued lack of enrollment Mathematics 7 (Alt Prog-double block) - program no longer exists Mathematics 7 - (Alt Prog)- program no longer exists Geometry Pre-AP - not offered in middle school any longer Mathematics 8 (Alt Prog)- program no longer exists Science 6 (Alt Prog) - program no longer exists Scientific Illustration - continued lack of enrollment Technical Writing - continued lack of enrollment Science 7 (Alt Prog) - program no longer exists Seminar in Health Science - continued lack of enrollment Health Science I - continued lack of enrollment Seminar in Health Science - continued lack of enrollment Science 8 (Alt Prog) - program no longer exists Social Studies 31 . Delete Exploring the Teaching Profession - course no longer offered due to lack of enrollment 32. Delete 33. Delete 34. Delete 35. Delete 36. Delete 37. Delete Social Studies 6 (Alt Prog) - program no longer exists Economics 11 - continued lack of enrollment Amateur Radio - continued lack of enrollment International Economics and the World of Business - lack of enrollment Social Studies 7 (Alt Prog) - program no longer exists Social Studies 8 (Alt Prog) - program no longer exists Special Education 38. Delete Mathematics 6 Resource Room (two-period block) - lack of enrollment 39. Delete Mathematics 7 Resource Room (two-period block) - lack of enrollment 40. Delete Mathematics 8 Resource Room (two-period block) - lack of enrollment 41 . Add Directed Studies HIGH SCHOOL A summary of the proposed high school curriculum changes for the 2005-2006 school year are as follows: Art 1. Delete Pottery A \u0026amp; Pottery B - they were combined to make Pottery a full year course Business Education 2. Change Financial Planning course description to clarify course content 3. Change International Finance course description to clarify course content 4. Change Web Design and Animation course description to clarify course content 5. Change Securities and Insurance course description to clarify course 6. Delete 7. Delete 8. Delete 9. Change content and change grade levels to be taught Rapid Writing A - continued lack of enrollment Rapid Writing B - continued lack of enrollment Junior Executive Training - continued lack of enrollment Banking \u0026amp; Finance Operations to Banking \u0026amp; Finance Operations/Teller Training Career and Technical Education 10. Change Introduction to Engineering Design course description to clarify course content and change grade levels to be taught 11. Change Computer Integrated Manufacturing course description to clarify course content 12. Change Principles of Engineering course description to clarify course content and change grade levels to be taught 13. Change Economics and the World of Finance change grade levels to be taught 14. Change Introduction to Financial Services course description to clarify course content 15. Add 16. Delete 17. Delete 18. Add 19. Add Engineering (Project Lead the Way) (McClellan only} Introduction to Medical Professions Education - duplication of course number Salesmanship - continued lack of enrollment Engineering Design and Development (EDD) (Project Lead the Way) (McClellan only) Guide to Networks (J. A Fair only) r\u0026gt; C 0 z .... 0 z en .0.,. ,,\n,, 0 ~ 19\n,,,~ ii: ,= I a, nc: ::c!!! mz rremn m en r- en mm ~~ ,c,=.,\n!..l ):\ni \"t ):\n,\n, n,. n ~ English 20. Delete 21 . Delete 22. Delete 23. Delete 24. Delete 25. Delete 26. Delete 27. Delete 28. Delete 29. Delete 30. Delete Drama I International Studies - continued lack of enrollment English II Workshop (double block) - lack of enrollment English II Pre-AP Workshop (double block) - lack of enrollment Journalism II - replaced by Journalism II Newspaper 052404 or Journalism II Yearbook 052402 Journalism Ill - replaced by Journalism Ill Newspaper 053404 or Journalism Ill Yearbook 053402 Journalism IV - replaced by Journalism IV Newspaper 054404 or Journalism IV Yearbook 054402 English IV International Studies AP - continued lack of enrollment English I Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place English II Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place English Ill Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place English IV Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place Foreign Languages 31. Delete Spanish II (University Course) - continued lack of enrollment Mathematics 32. Add 33. Delete 34. Delete 35. Delete 36. Delete 37. Delete 38. Delete 39. Delete 40. Delete 41 . Delete Metropolitan 42. Add 43. Delete 44. Delete 45. Delete 46. Delete 47. Delete 48. Delete 49. Delete Music 50. Delete Science 51 . Change 52. Delete Transition to College Mathematics Calculator Applications - ADE failed to approve ACT Preparation: Mathematics - ADE failed to approve ESL Modeling Algebra I - no longer offered Modeling Algebra I Pre-AP - no longer offered ESL Algebra I Pre-AP - no longer offered Algebra II Pre-AP (double block)- no longer offered Algebra I Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place Algebra II Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place Geometry Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place GIS Spatial Projects and Community Exchange (S.P.A.C.E.) Lab (Homeland Security and Economic Development) Machine Tools I - never reached minimum number of students to make class Industrial Technology Education - continued lack of enrollment Exploring Industrial Technology- continued lack of enrollment Residential Construction I - continued lack of enrollment Machine Tools II - never reached minimum number of students to make class Residential Construction II - continued lack of enrollment Residential Construction Ill - continued lack of enrollment Music of the Movies - class never made Physics 11 AP to Physics 11 AP-B Biology I Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place 53. Delete 54. Delete Chemistry I Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place Physics I Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place Social Studies 55. Delete Psychology (TOT), course no longer offered due to continued lack 56. Delete 57. Delete 58. Delete 59. Delete 60. Delete 61. Delete 62. Delete 63. Delete 64. Delete 65. Delete 66. Delete of enrollment Sociology (TOT), course no longer offered due to continued lack of enrollment Teacher Apprenticeship (TOT), course no longer offered due to continued lack of enrollment Service Learning (TOT), course no longer offered due to continued lack of enrollment Introduction to Education (TOT), course no longer offered due to continued lack of enrollment Community Resources for Children and Families (TOT), course no longer offered due to continued lack of enrollment World Cultures, course no longer offered due to lack of enrollment Global Studies - continued lack of enrollment Economics - continued lack of enrollment Civics Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place World History Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place US History Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place Special Education 67. Add Directed Studies 68. Delete Reading I RR - continued lack of enrollment 69. Delete Communications IA RR - continued lack of enrollment 70. Delete Read I SC - continued lack of enrollment 71 . Delete Reading II RR - continued lack of enrollment 72. Delete Reading II SC- continued lack of enrollment 73. Delete Reading Ill RR- continued lack of enrollment 74. Delete Reading Ill SC- continued lack of enrollment 75. Delete Reading IV SC - continued lack of enrollment Non-Credit 76. Delete Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Instruction would like to recommend that the Board of Education approve these additions, deletions, and modifications to the middle school and high school curriculum programs for 2005-2006. PREPARED BY: Dr. Olivine Roberts p ..., z \u0026gt;z n ~\nr, m ~ ?-~ !I: := l a, nC :c !!? ,m- mz ,- (/) mcn ,- (/) mm ~~ n DATE: December 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Personnel Changes BACKGROUND: None RATIONALE: To staff allocated positions within the District FUNDING: Operating Fund RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.C.A. 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) consecutive years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 19, 2004 for regular schools are considered intern teachers. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 9, 2004 for EYE are considered intern teachers. PREPARED BY: Beverly Williams, Director of Human Resources !.:.,I z \u0026gt;z (\") ~\n:r, m ~ ?\u0026lt; !\u0026gt;\u0026lt; ~~ \"llo 5!!! m-\u0026lt; cz , m\n:o :z:m ,\n:! ~ 2!!::o z:,c\nC) u, U\u0026gt;\n,-~\nc := la, nC :z:!!! mrmz r- U\u0026gt; mU\u0026gt; r- U\u0026gt; mm\nI:~ n Personnel Changes Page2 December 16, 2004 NAME START DATE/ SALARY POSITION/ SCHOOL END DATE CLASS Resignations/Terminations Certified Employees Vinson, Willie Consulting Teacher/ 8-13-98 6-07 Reason: Accepted another CLOVERDALE ELEM 12-16-04 TCH925 position New Certified Employees Austin, Robert Chemistry/ 11-08-04 4-10 MCCLELLAN TCH925 Beard, William Social Studies/ 9-15-04 1-01 MCCLELLAN TCH925 Boyd, Debbye General Science/ 10-21-04 2-16 ALC TCH925 Bryant, Sharon Title I/ 10-19-04 6-16 HENDERSON TCH925 Ervin, Nickey Algebra I/ 11-8-04 4-09 J. A. FAIR TCH925 Hooper, Ruth Music/ 11-10-04 2-16 TERRY TCH925 FULBRIGHT Rybard , Aleta English/ 9-27-04 1-04 HENDERSON TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 43500.00 43818.00 annual 29668.44 prorated 34575.00 annual 30253.13 prorated 47715.00 annual 35290.70 prorated 53898.00 annual 40423.50 prorated 42662.00 annual 28885.73 prorated 47717.00 annual 31811 .33 prorated 32350.00 annual 26958.33 prorated Personnel Changes Page3 December 16, 2004 NAME Sullivan, Martha Thomas, Homer Turner, Ressie POSITION/ SCHOOL 4 Yr Old/ RIGHTSELL Social Studies/ ALC English/ ALC Certified Promotion NONE Certified Transfer NONE START DATE/ END DATE 11-15-04 10-6-04 11-2-04 SALARY CLASS 1-16 TCH925 6-13 TCH925 2-02 TCH925 Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Burnett, Tarneisha Care/ 9-13-04 2-03 Reason: Resigned without CARE 11-01-04 CARE notice Carter, Noda Instructional Aide/ 4-05-02 33-11 Reason: Resigned without CHICOT 11-10-04 INA925 notice Geisler, Sherry Bookkeeper/ 10-12-98 45-15 Reason : Personal CHILD NUTRITION 12-1-04 AN12 ANNUAL SALARY 46215.00 annual 30087.89 prorated 50434.00 annual 40188.00 prorated 30617.00 annual 21368.11 prorated 7.85 per hour 13875.00 33528.00 fl C 0 ~ 0z tJ\u0026gt; ..0,. ,, ~ ~\n,o !.=.,' z \u0026gt;z n \u0026gt; r-\n,o m c3 .\n.,.o. ?\u0026lt; ?\u0026lt; mn 1::,- -oo r- tJ\u0026gt; 0-\u0026lt; z- m c, m\n,o %m ~~ ~ ~ C, tJ\u0026gt; tJ\u0026gt;\n,,~ I:::= I 0:, nC %!!! mz r- m r- tJ\u0026gt; mtJ\u0026gt; r- tJ\u0026gt; mm I: :\n\u0026lt;,o \u0026lt;'i Personnel Changes Page4 December 16, 2004 START DATE/ SALARY NAME ANNUAL POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY New Non-Certified Employees Blackman, Margie Care/ 10-25-04 1-05 7.56 CARE CARE per hour Brewington, Kimberly Bus Driver/ 11-18-04 2-01 9481.00 TRANSPORTATION BUSDRV annual 6338.42 prorated Coakley, Kevin Instructional Aide/ 11-11-04 33-03 5795.02 CHICOT INA925 annual 3915.55 prorated Dickerson, Bobbie Care/ 11-08-04 1-07 7.89 CARE CARE per hour Faulkner, Janet Child Nutrition/ 11-01-04 3-01 9350.00 CHILD NUTRITION FSH550 annual 6786.29 prorated Glover, Jimmie Instructional Aide/ 10-29-04 33-03 10934.00 HENDERSON INA925 annual 7801 .56 prorated Gonzalez, Luis Security Officer/ 11 -1-04 36-16 18491 .00 HALL SOFR9 annual 13,106.26 prorated Hodrick, Marcia Child Nutrition/ 11 -18-04 16-01 14012.00 HALL FSMGRS annual 9193.06 prorated Khabeer, Renette Child Nutrition/ 11 -15-04 3-01 9350.00 ROMINE FSH550 annual 6384.14 prorated Personnel Changes Page 5 December 16, 2004 ~ START C DATE/ 0 SALARY ANNUAL z .... NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY 0 z \"' .0. , \"'D ~ Logan. Ira Nurse/ 11-03-04 52-07 32544.00 ~ :,0 FRANKLIN NURSES annual 22543.50 prorated Maxwell, Marilyn Child Nutrition/ 11-09-04 3-01 9350.00 MCDERMOTT FSH550 annual !=' 6585.22 .., z prorated  z 0 \u0026gt; 9481 .00 ,... Montgomery, Timothy Bus Driver/ 11-18-04 2-01 :,0 m TRANSPORTATION BUSDRV annual ~ :,0 6338.42 .... prorated Morehead, Maudella Instructional Aide/ 11-22-04 33-03 10934.00 BOOKER INA925 annual ?\u0026lt; !i\u0026lt; 6974.12 mo !I:,... prorated \"\"Do ,-Cl\u0026gt; 0-\u0026lt; z-m Cl 5689.50 m:,o Ogorio, Rosa Custodian/ 11-15-04 31-01 ::cm ~ ~ ROMINE CUS925 annual ~ $i1 3834.23 Cl en \"' prorated Scaife, James Custodian/ 11-8-04 34-04 14532.00 FRANKLIN CUS12 annual 11563.76 prorated\n,,~ Sterley, Pamela Care/ !I: :- 11 -8-04 1-02 7.13 =l a, oC CARE CARE per hour ::c:!!! mz r-m r-cn men ,... \"' mm !I: :,0 Watson, Phyllis Bus Driver/ 11-18-04 2-04 11450.00  \u0026lt; n TRANSPORTATION BUSDRV annual 7654.78 prorated White, Donna Bus Driver/ 11-18-04 2-04 11450.00 TRANSPORTATION BUSDRV annual ?' ... 7654.78 :,,\ni prorated :\",',\n:t :, n r n ~ Personnel Changes Page6 December 16, 2004 NAME Tucker, Debbie Tate, Sharrell START DATE/ POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE Reclassification PO Entry/Inventory Control 7-1-04 Specialist/ PURCHASING DEPT. Special Programs 7-1-04 Coordinator/ PURCHASING DEPT. Approved leave as recommended by the Superintendent Nichols, Valerie- medical leave without pay (effective 11-19-04) SALARY ANNUAL CLASS SALARY 48-20 42576.00 AN12 48-20 42576.00 AN12 DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 December 16, 2004 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Mitchell Elementary School BACKGROUND: Mitchell Elementary, with a capacity of 283, had only 156 students enrolled on October 1, 2004, with 125 of those students living in the Mitchell attendance zone. Taking into account the fifth grade students who will move on to middle schools, only 114 attendance zone students will be affected by this action. Based on the current enrollment, the instructional cost per pupil is $10,167.55, which is approximately twice the amount spent at other elementary schools in the District. Constructed in 1908, Mitchell is unable to meet current educational standards without extensive and costly repairs and renovations. In January 2004, the Board approved funding for remediation work at Mitchell. Projects have been undertaken with approximately $356,395 spent for asbestos removal and moisture and mold remediation. Additional renovation work would bring the facility up to current codes but not in line with neighboring state-of-the-art schools, and would require additional allocation of resources. RATIONALE: The operation of low enrollment schools has been a concern in the District for several years. In May of 2000 the Board of Directors adopted Policy FBC-Closing of Schools, that allows for the consideration for closure based on factors such as excessive cost of operation due to enrollment and excessive cost of renovation and repair due to the age and physical condition of the facility. Schools in similar situations, such as Stephens, Garland, Badgett and lsh, were closed because of low enrollment coupled with high operational and renovation costs. FUNDING: N/A )\u0026lt; )\u0026lt; ,... =m  )\u0026lt; \u0026gt;m c\u0026lt;\"\u0026gt; \u0026lt;... C: 0-\u0026lt; ~~ Zcr 3: rr mer Zcr -\u0026lt;c :z RECOMMENDATION: The recommendation for closing Mitchell Elementary School was provided in detail in the October report to the Board District Operation of Schools with Low Enrollment. Consideration has been given to the decline in enrollment, the capacity to accommodate the current attendance zone students at neighboring schools, and an analysis of per pupil instructional and construction costs. It is not in the best interest of students, nor is it financially prudent, to continue to use Mitchell as an elementary school. The administration recommends that we work with the community to develop other options for utilizing this facility in the future. The recommendation, which will affect students currently assigned to Mitchell Elementary School, would be effective at the beginning of the 2005-06 school year. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen, Manager Financial Services DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 December 16, 2004 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Fair Park Elementary School BACKGROUND: Fair Park Elementary, with a capacity of 304 and an October 1, 2004 enrollment of 187, is the second lowest enrollment school in the District. Constructed in 1929, Fair Park has an unusually high instructional cost per pupil at $7,016, with a low utilization factor of 61 %. The bond issue provided funding for projects in the amount of $1.3 million. To date, heating and ventilation systems have been updated, asbestos has been removed, and energy efficient lighting has been installed. The funds remaining from the bond/ millage allocation, approximately $800,000, will remain at Fair Park and be used to convert the facility for use as an Early Childhood Center. RATIONALE: As the second lowest enrollment school in the District, Fair Park Elementary warrants a review of the options available. Board Policy FBC---Closing of Schools, provides for consideration to close a school if certain factors exist, including excessive cost of operation due to enrollment. However, converting the Fair Park facility to an early childhood education center will provide alternate educational use for the facility within a reasonable budget and timeframe. The District could realize an enhanced environment for young children and a better utilization of resources by reconfiguring the use of the Fair Park facility to an early childhood center. Focusing more attention and resources on early intervention for children will not only better prepare them for elementary and secondary grades, but most likely would bring additional students into the District that would carry into the future. We believe the community will support using the facility as an early childhood center. FUNDING: N/A X X ,- = mX  m on \u0026lt;- C: 0--\u0026lt; C: - i: zm er ...., cer 2 RECOMMENDATION: The recommendation for converting Fair Park Elementary School into an Early Childhood Education Center was provided in detail in the October report to the Board District Operation of Schools with Low Enrollment. Consideration has been given to the decline in enrollment, the capacity to accommodate the current attendance zone students at neighboring schools, and an analysis of per pupil instructional and construction costs. The benefits of operating an early childhood education center at that location would provide a better utilization of District resources and an extension of educational services to the community. Based on these facts and dialogue with the educational community, the administration recommends the reconfiguration of Fair Park from a Pre-K - 5 to an early childhood education center. The recommendation, which will affect students currently assigned to Fair Park, would be effective at the beginning of the 2005-06 school year. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen, Manager Financial Services DATE: TO: December 16, 2004 Board of Directors LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District receives donations from businesses and individuals on a regular basis. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District that donations are not formally accepted until they are approved by the Board of Directors. RATIONALE: District policy states that, in order to maintain the centralized fixed asset property accounting system, all property donation requests are forwarded to the Director of Procurement. The Procurement Department forwards the requests, along with the appropriate recommendations, to the Board of Directors for acceptance and approval. In order for proper recognition and appreciation to be conveyed to the donor, donor's name and current mailing address should be included in the donation memo. FUNDING: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached donation requests be approved and accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. PREPARED BY: 0-{j Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement \\:'1 Gwen Caraway, Fixed Asset Property Manager X X ,- ,= mX  m en ~c:: c0-:-:\u0026lt;- ~~ ~ g: ~~ C 2 DATE: TO: December 16, 2004 Board of Directors LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District receives donations from businesses and individuals on a regular basis. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District that donations are not formally accepted until they are approved by the Board of Directors. RATIONALE: District policy states that, in order to maintain the centralized fixed asset property accounting system, all property donation requests are forwarded to the Director of Procurement. The Procurement Department forwards the requests, along with the appropriate recommendations, to the Board of Directors for acceptance and approval. In order for proper recognition and appreciation to be conveyed to the donor, donor's name and current mailing address should be included in the donation memo. FUNDING: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached donation requests be approved and accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. PREPARED BY: (}(j Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement \\ '1 Gwen Caraway, Fixed Asset Property Manager DONATIONS School/Department Item Donor Bale Elementary $1,000.00 cash The Payless Shoe Source School to be placed in Business-School Partnership the school activity Program fund Central High School $300.00 cash to the Mr. Ronald Crawford, in girl's basketball team behalf of the Arkansas Amateur Basketball Foundation Central High School $250.00 cash to the Mr. Rush Harding girl's basketball team Central High School $250.00 cash to the Mr. Robert Lyle art department Central High School $120.00 cash to be Ms. Paula Aultz used for student incentives Otter Creek Elementary $500.00 cash to be Otter Creek Land School applied toward the Company purchase of shirts fo, teachers and staff Romine Elementary $200.00 cash for use Hunter United Methodist School by pupil service team Women's Unit, Hunter toward purchase of United Methodist Church school uniforms and/ or supplies for needy students/families Romine Elementary $100.00 cash to be Crain Chevrolet School placed in activity fund for Romine Day Treatment Program student incentives Department Item Donor Woodruff Elementary $16,000.00 cash to the Arkansas A+ Schools School A+ program for providing Network arts enrichment activities for students, professional development for teachers and art supplies. Funds will also be used for enhancement activities for strings instrument, dance, art and drum !.=.,' ensemble programs and z \u0026gt; to bring artisans to Woodruff nz 5,: to work with staff, parents ,-\na:, and students. m\ng .\na.:., Woodruff Elementary School supplies The Veterans of Foreign School valued at $100.00 Wars of the U.S., Lt. Walter E. Parker Post #1316 Woodruff Elementary $1,000.00 cash to be Wal-Mart #124 ?\u0026lt; ?\u0026lt; mo School applied toward the !I:,- ,--ceon construction of 0- -\u0026lt;Z me, \"Peaceable Place\" m\na:, :cm mediation garden ~ ~ on the grounds ~~ c, en en Woodruff Elementary $1,250.00 cash Wal-Mart #126 School ($500.00 donated as a match for volunteer hours from Woodruff parent and Wal-Mart \u0026gt;\u0026lt; employee, Tamela Warren \u0026gt;\u0026lt; ,- =m and $750.00 to be applied  \u0026gt;\u0026lt; \u0026gt;m toward the construction on \u0026lt;-C 0-\u0026lt; of \"Peaceable Place\" ~~ mediation garden) ~ g: ~~ \"\"'cz BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DATE: November 9, 2004 TO: Darral Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management FROM~arbara Anderson, Principal Bale Elementary RE: Donation The Payless Shoe Source Business-School Partnership Program has generously donated $1000.00 to Bale Elementary School on ovember 9, 2004. The money will be put in the school activity fund. We would like to especially thank Ms. Sherry Young, Training Supervisor with Payless Shoes for making the presentation of the check at Bale's morning assembly. It is my recommendation that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 NOVEMBER 12, 2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL 1iltU-dJ,a0 SUBJECT: DONATION Ronald Crawford, in behalf of the Arkansas Amateur Basketball Foundation, graciously donated $300.00 to our girl's basketball team. It is my recommendation that this be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. \u0026gt;\u0026lt;,\u0026gt;..\u0026lt;. = m\u0026gt;\u0026lt; e\u0026gt;mn c...c c0---\u0026lt; ~~w~ mv Zv --\u0026lt;c\nz DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 NOVEMBER 12, 2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL Y}eu~u SUBJECT: DONATION Rush Harding of 4 Valley Creek View, Little Rock, AR 72223, graciously donated $250.00 to our girl's basketball team. It is my recommendation that this be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 NOVEMBER 12, 2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF---~OCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL J /CJ.,,tl!.J.i,{lt,U SUBJECT: DONATION Robert Lyle of 40 River Ridge Circle, Little Rock, AR 72227, graciously donated $250.00 to Little Rock Central High School's art department. It is my recommendation that this be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-447-1400 Fax 501-447-1401 11/23/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT vj,Y,, SUBJECT: ANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL J}l{t.\nJttf,Lv DO ATIO \\ Paula Aultz of 36 St. Andrews, Little Rock, AR 72212, contributed $120.00 to Little Rock Central High School for student incentives. It is my recommendation that this be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. OTTER CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO: FROM: DATE: RE: \"Team Work makes the Dream Work\" Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Janis Tucker, Principal Novemberl6,2004 Donation Otter Creek Land Company has donated $500.00 to help purchase shirts for the teachers and staff at Otter Creek Elementary. It is recommended that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. Thank you for your consideration. \u0026gt;\u0026lt; \u0026gt;\u0026lt;,.... = m\u0026gt;\u0026lt; e\u0026gt;mn c....c:: 0--\u0026lt; ~~ Zen\ni: rr mer. ~~ :z ROMINE INTERDISTRICT SCHOOL Theme: Computer Science and Basic Skills November 12, 2004 TO: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement FROM: Lillie Scull, Principal RE: Donation ~' ~ t' The donor listed below has generously donated $200.00 to be used by our pupil service team toward purchase of school uniforms and/or school supplies for students/families needing assistance: Hunter United Methodist Women Hunter United Methodist Church 330 l Romine Road Little Rock, AR 72204 Contact person { s}: Mable Donaldson, Treasurer It is recommended that this donation be approved with thanks in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors. Thank you for your consideration. H1mter Ullited Mell10dist w0111e11 Hunter united Methodist church November 2, 2004 Dear Ms. Scull: 3301 Romine RMd Little Ri1ck1 Arki111s,1S 7220-J-The United Methodist Women's Unit of Hunter United Methodist Church and Hunter United Methodist Church members have contributed a total of $200.00 to be used by your school counselor to purchase uniforms and school supplies for those students who need the assistance in the purchase of these items. We donate this money in honor of Ms. Jean Piggee. Ms. Piggee is the oldest member of our Women's unit and so we honor her by contributing the enclosed funds for your students. Mrs. Gracie Carter is the coordinator for this project. We had a rummage sale and members donated funds for this project. We plan to have this as an ongoing project as a part of our church's outreach ministry. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Mrs. Carter. Yours truly, __ 1}(cJ--fL/ (/\nz)~ Mable Donaldson, Treasurer Hunter United Methodist Women \u0026gt;\u0026lt; \u0026gt;\u0026lt;,.... = m\u0026gt;\u0026lt; \u0026gt;m on c....c:: 0--\u0026lt; ~~ ~g: ~~ --\u0026lt;c :z ROMINE INTERDISTRICT SCHOOL Theme: Computer Science and Basic Skills November 30, 2004 TO: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement FROM: Lillie Scull, Principal f. '$. .,. SUBJECT: Donation Crain Chevrolet has generously donated $100.00 to Romine Elementary School. This money will be put into the Activity Fund and used for incentives for students in the Romine Day Treatment Program. It is my recommendation that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Contact Person: Ms. Crystal France Crain Chevrolet 6700 South University Little Rock, AR 72209 WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ''Jin 'Eztenefecf :)ear 'Eaucation Schoo[\" To: Mr. Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Janice M. Wilson, Principal Date: November 17, 2004 Re: Donations Arkansas A+ Schools Network has donated $16,000.00 to the Woodruff Elementary A+ program. We sincerely appreciate this donation, which will provide arts enrichment activities for Woodruff students, professional development for teachers, and art supplies. Funds will also be used to support activities for enhancement of our strings instrument program, dance, art, and drum ensemble programs. These funds will also be used to bring artisans to Woodruff to work with our staff, parents, and students. We recommend that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. Marie A. Parker, Director Arkansas A+ Schools Network College of Education University of Arkansas 311 West Avenue Annex Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 3010 West 7th Street  Phone (501) 447-7300  Fax (501) 447-7301  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 \u0026gt;\u0026lt;,\u0026gt;..\u0026lt;. = m\u0026gt;\u0026lt;  m on c....c c0--\u0026lt; ~ r? :I: V. ~ u: -4 ~ C :z WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ''Jl.n 'E?\u0026lt;__tcncfecf ')ear 'Eaucation ScfiooC) To: Mr. Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Janice M. Wilson, Principal Date: November 1 O, 2004 Re: Donations The Veterans of Foreign Wars of the U.S., Lt. Walter E. Parker Post #1316, graciously donated school supplies to Woodruff Elementary, valued at $100.00. We sincerely appreciate this donation, which will be given to students in need of supplies. We recommend that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. Adj. Napoleon Tillman Veterans of Foreign Wars of the U.S. Lt. Walter E. Parker Post #1316 2304 Arch Street Little Rock, AR 72206 3010 West 7th Street  Phone (501) 447-7300  Fax (501) 447-7301  Little Rock, Arkansas 7220 WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL '~n fzte.naccf ')ear faucation Schoo[\" To: Mr. Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Janice M. Wilson, Principal Date: November 9, 2004 Re: Donations Wal-Mart #124 has donated $1000.00 to Woodruff Elementary, to be used to assist in construction Woodruff's \"Peaceable Place\" mediation garden on the grounds. we sincerely appreciate this donation, which will provide plants and building materials for our mediation garden. We recommend that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. Wal-Mart #124 Jason Manns, Store Manager 8801 Baseline Road Little Rock, AR 72209 Ms. Bumiegha Combs Assistant Manager Wal-Mart #124 8801 Baseline Road Little Rock, AR 72209 3010 West 7th Street  Phone (501) 447-7300  Fax (501) 447-7301  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 \u0026gt;\u0026lt; \u0026gt;\u0026lt; :- ~ ~  m on '-C 0 --\u0026lt; ~~ Zv, lC IT mv z..., vc 2 WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ''Jln 'Ei(tencfecf ']car 'Ecf ucation Scfioof 11 To: Mr. Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Janice M. Wilson, Principal Date: November 1 0, 2003 Re: Donations Wal-Mart #126 has donated a total of $1, 250.00 to Woodruff Elementary. A portion of the funds, $500.00, was contributed as a match for volunteer hours to our school from Woodruff parent and Wal-Mart employee Tamela Warren. The remainder of the funds, $750.00, will be used to assist with the construction of Woodruff's \"Peaceable Place\" mediation garden. We sincerely appreciate this donation, and recommend that it be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. Wal-Mart #126 Renita Thompson, Personnel Manager 700 Chenal Little Rock, AR 72211 Tamela D. Warren 912 Johnson Street Little Rock, AR 7204 3010 West 7th Street  Phone (501) 447-7300  Fax (501) 447-7301  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: December 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Financial Reports BACKGROUND: Financial reporting is designed to keep the Board of Directors up-to-date regarding the District's current financial condition. Financial reports are submitted monthly to the Board for review and approval. RATIONALE: November 2004 financial reports are submitted for the Board's review and approval. FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve the November 2004 financial reports as submitted. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen, Manager Financial Services X \u0026gt;\u0026lt; := mX  m on \u0026lt;-C 0-\u0026lt; ~~ ~\"' m z -\u0026lt; LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2003/04 11/30/03 COLLECTED 2004/05 11/30/04 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 57,547,800 20,927,350 36.37% 61 ,436,691 23,738,299 38.64% DELINQUENT TAXES 10,100,000 6,939,208 68.71% 12,135,000 3,879,273 31 .97% 40% PULLBACK 29,600,000 31 ,250,000 EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 210,000 205,000 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 180,000 155,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 150,000 185,000 MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 380,000 220,826 58.11% 485,000 66,215 13.65% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 200,000 56,591 28.30% 245,000 138,537 56.55% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 240,000 118,641 49.43% 215,000 124,843 58.07% TOTAL 98,607,800 28,262,617 28.66% 106,311,691 27,947,166 26.29% REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 21 ,000 11 ,594 55.21% 22,000 11 ,183 50.83% TOTAL 21,000 11,594 55.21% 22,000 11,183 50.83% REVENUE-STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 53,226,139 19,354,959 36.36% 65,082,694 23,704,408 36.42% ALTERNATIVE LEARNING 1,927,250 963,624 50.00% ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 193,739 NATL SCHL LUNCH STUDENT FUNDING 6,498,240 2,362,996 36.36% PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1,141 ,165 1,141 ,165 100.00% REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 8,300,000 2,024,292 24.39% 8,275,000 2,775,052 33.54% VOCATIONAL 1,400,000 430,364 30.74% 1,350,000 528,811 39.17% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,675,000 93,470 5.58% 2,100,000 95,850 4.56% EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 135,094 49.42% 5,542,510 2,593,434 46.79% TRANSPORTATION 3,875,562 1,243,841 32.09% 4,125,000 1,325,044 32.12% INCENTIVE FUNDS - M TO M 3,900,000 736,844 18.89% 4,575,000 1,244,739 27.21% ADULT EDUCATION 920,337 152,263 16.54% 934,380 159,488 17.07% POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 560,545 267,486 47.72% TAP PROGRAM 285,245 142,623 50.00% 382,903 7,645 2.00% AT RISK FUNDING 360,000 395,000 9,400 2.38% TOTAL 74,776,187 24,581,235 32.87% 102,522,882 36,911,656 36.00% REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 770,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,350,000 18,519 1.37% 1,295,000 8,155 0.63% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,632,430 1,849,008 TOTAL 3,752,430 18,519 0.49% 3,914,008 8,155 0.21% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 177,157,418 52,873,965 29.85% 212,770,581 64,878,160 30.49% REVENUE - OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 24,075,790 4,554,092 1892% 21,531,929 5,898,962 27.40% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 725,821 18.15% 4,500,000 686,501 15.26% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 3,440,020 27,964,934 4,700,776 16.81% TOTAL 52,765,141 8,719,933 16.53% 53,996,863 11 ,286,239 20.90% TOTAL REVENUE 229,922,559 61 ,593,898 26.79% 266,767,444 76,164,399 28.55% LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 2003/04 11/30/03 EXPENDED 2004/05 11/30/04 EXPENDED EXPENSES SALARIES 100,684,982 29,777,981 29.58% 117,324,912 34,814,130 29.67% BENEFITS 26,483,772 7,729,211 29.18% 36,185,811 9,790,728 27.06% PURCHASED SERVICES 19,719,297 6,769,882 34.33% 20,959,918 6,423,581 30.65% MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,185,459 4,033,046 49.27% 8,725,914 3,462,370 39.68% CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,575,580 195,999 12.44% 2,760,600 457,890 16.59% OTHER OBJECTS 8,384,567 331 ,506 3.95% 10,770,418 440,411 4.09% DEBT SERVICE 12,098,342 4,699,176 38.84% 12,474,809 4,590,834 36.80% TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 177,131,999 53,536,801 30.22% 209,202,382 59,979,945 28.67% EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 26,056,193 5,641,014 21.65% 23,853,134 5,488,675 23.01% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 1,869,745 46.74% 5,007,809 1,520,297 30.36% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 6,278,304 25.43% 27,964,934 7,196,468 25.73% TOTAL 54,745,544 13,789,063 25.19% 56,825,877 14,205,441 25.00% TOT AL EXPENSES 231,877,543 67,325,865 29.04% 266,028,259 74,185,386 27.89% INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (1,954,984) (5,731,968) 739,184 1,979,012 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; DED M \u0026amp; 0 3,558,580 3,558,580 4,005,957 4,005,957 OPERATING 9,026,855 9,026,855 6,531 ,706 6,531 ,706 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; DED M \u0026amp; 0 1,578,177 (1 ,510,550) 1,176,943 1,086,755 OPERATING 9,052,274 8,364,018 10,099,905 11,429,921 TOTAL 10,630,451 6,853,468 11,276,848 12,516,676 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2004 PROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 11-30-04 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE FAIR 17,956.90 2,900.00 15,056.90 MCCLELLAN 77,219.02 77,219.02 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE 396.12 396.12 CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 95,572.04 0.00 0.00 2,900.00 0.00 92,672.04 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 4,906.21 80,000.00 34,521.12 50,385.09 NEW WORK PROJECTS 6,088,520.49 799,000.00 2,477,070.65 887,411.05 3,523,038.79 SECURITY PROJECTS 14,541.25 14,541.25 LIGHTING PROJECTS 20,856.80 20,856.80 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 7,567,591.92 575,970.21 233,032.23 6,758,589.48 RENOVATION PROJECTS 13,366,715.04 4,437,368.56 2,008,638.40 6,920,708.08 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 1,569,424.27 1,143,377.19 238,874.77 238,046.83 2,235,879.86 SUBTOTAL 28,632,555.98 1,143,377.19 879,000.00 7,763,805.31 3,367,128.51 19,523,999.35 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALE 445,618.31 181,104.00 626,722.31 DUNBAR PROJECT 5,266.71 5,266.71 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 14,143,144.75 (879,000.00) 13,264,144.75 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 INTEREST 5,037,437.95 386,399.64 5,423,837.59 SUBTOTAL 20,925,288.69 567,503.64 (879,000.00) 0.00 0.00 20,613,792.33 GRAND TOTAL !l~ ~a !ll Zl l Zl!l llll!l aa QJli2 Z Z Z!l~ al a aZ l~ ~l !l!l i:a!l !l~ Zi: PROJECT ALLOCATIONS EXPENSE PROJECT CATEGORIES THRU 11-30-04 2000-01 ADMINISTRATION 753,846.55 889,772.32 NEW WORK PROJECTS 39,585,097.95 443,467.00 SECURITY PROJECTS 265,814.17 113,930.47 LIGHTING PROJECTS 4,883,405.13 2,641,482.13 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 18,920,386.34 791 ,385.63 RENOVATION PROJECTS 51 ,641 ,607.54 397,615.34 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 12,878,988.97 575,016.53 UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS 14,557,965.72 TOTAL 143,487,112.37 5,852,669.42 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY THRU THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2004 EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 I THRU 11-30-04 (485,325.77) 149,597.63 114,896.16 1 34,521 .12 4,589,606.29 11 ,671,442.11 15,993,062.06 2,477,070.65 109,609.73 I 27,732.73 0.00 1,832,392.06 379,661.38 9,012.76 0.00 4,218,294.40 3,455,350.67 2,887,763.72 575,970.21 4,119,045.21 15,666,239.90 I 18,091,992.05 4,437,368.56 4,325,201.40 4,500,374.61 I 765,594.97 238,874.77 I I 18,708,823.32 35,822,666.30 37,890,054.45 7,763,805.31 ~ ENDING ENCUMBERED ALLOCATION THRU 11-30-04 SUBTOTAL 11-30-04 I 0.00 t 703,461.46 50,385.09 887,411 .05 36,062,059.16 3,523,038.79 0.00 251,272.93 14,541 .25 0.00 I 4,862,548.33 20,856.80 23~.032.23 l 12,161,796.86 l 6,758,589.48 2,008,638.40 44,720,899.46 6,920,708.08 238,046.83 10,643,109.11 2,235,879.86 14,557,965.72 3,367,128.51 109,405,147.31 34,081,965.07 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER.30, 2004 - Fund Purchase I Maturity I Institution Interest Rate Type Principal Date Date j j I I Operating 11-29-04 TFN Bank of America 1.870% Repo 5,340,000.00 Operating 11-29-04 t 12-01-04 Bank of America 1.880% Treasury Bills 5,499,425.56 t Operating 11-10-04 I 12-10-04 Twin City Bank 2.250% CD 4,659,613.28 Total I 15,499,038.84 Activity Fund 11-23-04 TFN Bank of America 1.790% Repo 1,225,000.00 Total - 1,225,000.00 Bond Account 09-06-04 03-07-05 Regions - 1.843% CD 400,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 07-14-04 01-10-05 Metropolitan 1.930% CD 1,000,934.31 Capital Projects Fund 01 -30-04 j 01-31 -05 Bancorp South 1.850% CD 2,100,244.72 Capital Projects Fund 08-17-04 l 08-16-05 Twin City Bank 2.610% CD 11,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 06-10-04 01-10-05 Bank of America 1.670% -Treasury Bills 5,385,005.84 f Capital Projects Fund 08-02-04 I 02-05-05 Twin City Bank 2.580% CD 4,500,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 08-02-04 l 08-02-05 Twin City Bank 3.030% CD 4,500,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 09-15-04 03-15-05 Bank of the Ozarks 2.210% CD 10,366,251 .16 Capital Projects Fund 11-23-04 TFN Bank of America 1.790% Repo 3,665,000.00 Total 42,917,436.03 - Deseg Plan Scholarship 06-22-04 12-08-04 I Bank of America 1.600% Treasury Bills 779,103.78 Total 779,103.78 Rockefeller Scholarship 06-10-04 I 01-10-05 Bank of America I 1.670% Treasury Bills - 252,468.56 Total I 252,468.56\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_746","title":"\"Quarterly Update to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) and Joshua,'' Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-12-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational planning"],"dcterms_title":["\"Quarterly Update to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) and Joshua,'' Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/746"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District (LRSD) QUARTERLY UPDATE to Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) and Joshua received DEC 1 - 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING December 1,2004 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, PLAINTIFF V PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.l ETAL., DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ETAL., INTERVENORS 111 KATHERINE KNIGHT, ETAL., INTERVENORS Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) Little Rock School District 3001 South Pulaski Little Rock, AR 72206 LRSD QUARTERLY UPDATE TO PPM AND JOSHUA DECEMBER 1.2004 Introduction This is the first quarterly written update by the Little Rock School District (LRSD) and its Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) Department which is done in accordance with the District Courts 2004 Compliance Remedy (Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004, pp. 61-67). The organization of this report is that of the Compliance Remedy: A. B. c. D. E. F. LRSD must promptly hire a highly trained team of professionals to reinvigorate PRE. The first task PRE must perform is to devise a comprehensive program assessment process. ... the comprehensive program assessment process must be deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSDs curriculum and instruction program. During each of the next two academic school years (2004-05 and 2005-06), LRSD must hire one or more outside consultants to prepare four (4) formal step 2 evaluations. PRE must (1) oversee the preparation of all eight of these step 2 evaluations\n(2) work closely with Dr. Ross and any other outside consultants . . and (3) provide the outside consultants with any and all requested assistance and support. . . [These requirements relate to evaluation products. PRE will address them in future updates.] . . . PRE must notify the ODM and Joshua in writing of the names of those eight programs. In addition, after PRE and Dr. Ross have formulated a comprehensive program assessment process and reduced it to a final draft, PRE must provide a copy to the OD and Joshua at least thirty days before it is presented to the Board 99 for approval... by December 31, 2004. G. PRE must submit quarterly written updates on the status of the . . . four step 2 program evaluations . . .during the 2004-05 school year and the four step 2 program evaluations that will be prepared during the 2005-06 school year ... to ODM and Joshua on December 1, Mar 1, June 1, and September 1.. 99 H. I. J. K, L. [ODMs responsibilities.] [Joshuas responsibilities.] [Four step 2 program evaluations due to the Court October 1, 2005 and four more due October 1,2006.] [Compliance Report due October 15,2006.] [This Compliance Remedy supersedes earlier one.] Page 2 of 2LRSD QUARTERLY UPDATE TO ODM AND JOSHUA DECEMBER 1,2004 Status as of December 1, 2004 A. Hire a highly trained team of professionals LRSD changed PREs position in the organization. Previously in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, PRE now reports directly to the Superintendent. To cany out the 2004 Compliance Remedy, LRSD added three new professionals who have knowledge and experience in assessment, evaluation, and statistical analysis to the PRE team: This action brings the number of PRE staff to seven. As of November 1, 2004, the PRE staff consists of: Karen DeJamette, PhD, Director, began September 27, 2004. Dr. DeJamettes Ph D., from UCLA, is in Education Policy. She has over 10 years experience in the field of educational research. Prior to joining LRSD, Dr. DeJamette evaluated school reform partnerships for Education Development Center and onsite school assessments for Arkansas Department of Education. She served as the executive director of the Arkansas Division of The National Faculty and as Research and Evaluation Director of the Galef Institute, where she focused on the development and implementation of qualitative and quantitative research methodologies to assess public school performance. I I Maurecia Malcolm, MS, Statistician, transferred from Curriculum Coordinator with the Magnet Schools Assistance Program to PRE on October 4, 2004. She earned the Bachelor of Science Degree in Art Education from the University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff and the Master of Science Degree in Administration and Supervision from Henderson State University. Ms. Malcolm is currently a Doctoral Candidate at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. While in the doctoral program, Ms. Malcolm has studied Qualitative Research, Advanced Statistics, Advanced Research Methods and Techniques, and Scholarly Writing. Her research interest is in Teacher Efficacy and Student Achievement. Prior to her position as a Curriculum Coordinator, she was an Elementary School Principal with the Camden Fairview School District. As a principal, she was responsible for program initiatives, implementing and developing quality educational plans, program evaluations and assessments, and leadership skills and development. Ms. Malcolm experiences in the field of education have been broad, and she has served in such capacities as strategic planning, technology leadership, effective communication skills, team building, curriculum design, cultural diversity, and desegregation strategies. She is currently a trainer for the Arkansas Leadership Academy Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. During her career Maurecia Malcolm has also served as a classroom teacher. She is currently certified in the areas of Art Education K-12, Elementary and Secondary Administration, and Curriculum Specialist. James C. Wohlleb, MS, Statistician, began his current position October 1, 2004. He earned his masters degree from the University of Texas, where he studied human nutrition, epidemiology, and statistics. His experience has been gained in program evaluation, public and professional health education, research design, and multivariate analysis with the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Tulane University, Page 3 of 3LRSD QUARTERLY UPDATE TO PPM AND JOSHUA DECEMBER 1,2004 University of Texas, and Baylor College of Medicine. He continues to review behavioral research for the UAMS Institutional Review Board (IRB) and medical research for the Arkansas IRB. While with UAMS, he administered educational programs for a range of groups from lay people in the Arkansas Delta to physicians in Arkansas and in Russia. With Tulane University and UAMS, he developed the Master of Public Health Program for Arkansas. He brings to PRE skills in data collection and management, statistical analysis and interpretation, presentations, and publication. Ed Williams, PhD, Statistical Research Specialist, earned his doctorate from the University of Arkansas in educational research, with an emphasis in vocational rehabilitation and a cognate in special education and a M.Ed. from the University of Arkansas in Rehabilitation Counseling. Dr. Williams is an Arkansas certified teacher in grades 7-12 social studies, a Certified Rehabilitation Counselor, and a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC). Dr. Williams has conducted applied research at the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville, Arkansas Children s Hospital, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, and in his current position with the LRSD which he began in 1998. Dr. Williams has experience in student assessment and designing and conducting formative and summative program evaluations, and interpreting and communicating complex data. Dr. Williams developed the Equitable Allocation Worksheet to insure compliance with section 2.9 of the 1998 Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. Finally, Dr. Williams has made oral presentations at local, state, national, and international conferences and workshops and has a number of peer-reviewed publications. Yvette Dillingham, MA, earned a Master of Arts Degree from the Ohio State University in Special Education K-12 with an emphasis in Deaf Education. Her undergraduate degree is from the University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff in Special Education. Mrs. Dillingham is an Arkansas certified teacher in grades K-12 special education, and has elementary principal certification. She was a classroom teacher for four years and has previously worked for the Arkansas Department of Education in the Student Assessment Office as Program Manager. Her duties as Program Manager included coordinating the state's norm- referenced assessment program, and providing in-service to Arkansas public schools on the interpretation of test data and using the data to improve instruction. She has also presented at local and state level conferences and workshops. Other positions held while employed with the Arkansas Department of Education include Program Manager of the state's Home School Office, Public School Program Advisor in Federal Programs and the Professional Licensure OfBce. Mrs. Dillingham currently coordinates the administration of the state- mandated assessments for the Little Rock School District. Irma Shelton, Administrative Assistant for PRE since 1993, has become familiar with all the programs and staff involved in educational programs of the LRSD. Prior to her employment with LRSD, Ms. Shelton owned and operated Truett Shoes, a retail business with revenue in excess of $1 million. Previous experience was with the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, as assistant purchasing agent, and in its Mathematics and Statistics Department, as office manager. Page 4 of 4LRSD QUARTERLY UPDATE TO ODM AND JOSHUA DECEMBER 1,2004 Melinda Allen, MA, Testing Assistant, earned a masters degree from Philander Smith College. She started in Curriculum and Instruction in 1973 and became a part of PRE in 2001 as Testing Assistant. She assists with all state-mandated testing. Page 5 of 5LRSD QUARTERLY UPDATE TO ODM AND JOSHUA DECEMBER 1, 2004 B. Devise and embed a comprehensive program assessment process. The new PRE team, with Dr. Ross assistance, has developed and shared with ODM and the Joshua Intervenors a program assessment process to be deeply embedded in LRSDs educational operations. A copy of the final draft, Comprehensive Program Assessment Process (IL-Rl), is in Appendix B of this update. C. Hire outside consultant(s) to prepare four formal step 2 evaluations. PRE has begun work with two experts, Dr. Steven M. Ross and Dr. James S. Catterall, to conduct four Step 2 evaluations this year and four more Step 2 evaluations next year. The programs which will be the subject of Step 2 evaluations this year are described in the following section of this report. The qualifications of Dr. Ross and Dr. Catterall are set forth below. Steven M. Ross received his doctorate in educational psychology from Pennsylvania State University. He is currently a professor and executive director of the Center for Research in Educational Policy at the University of Memphis and holds the Lillian and Morrie Moss Chair of Excellence in Urban Education. He joined the University of Memphis in 1974 and became a noted lecturer on school programs and evaluation. Dr. Ross has authored six textbooks and more than 115 journal articles about at-risk learners, educational reform, educational technology, computer-based instruction, and individualized instruction. He is the editor of the research section of the Educational Technology Research and Development journal, and a member of the editorial board for two other professional journals. In the 1993, he was the first faculty recipient of the University of Memphis Eminent Faculty Award for teaching, research, and service. He recently testified on school restructuring research before the U. S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Youth, and Families and was an invited panelist at U. S. Secretary of Education Rileys national town meeting on educational reform. The Court, acquainted with his evaluation skills and efforts for LRSD, recommended contracting with Dr. Ross to conduct required step-two evaluations. His curriculum vita is in Appendix C. During this first period, Dr. Ross has agreed to help draft an assessment policy, to assist the selection of the eight interventions for step-two evaluations, and to undertake one or more of these step-two evaluations. James S. Catterall, Ph.D., on the faculty at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) in the Graduate School of Education \u0026amp; Information Studies since 1981, has extensive knowledge and experience with educational program evaluations. Since 1998, Dr. Catterall has chaired the National Technical Advisory Panel for Accountability and Assessment for the Kentucky State Legislative Research Commission. This panel advises the legislature. State Board of Education, and State Commissioner of Education on design and technical quality of Kentucky's multi-faceted annual student testing and Page 6 of 6LRSD quarterly UPDATE TO ODM AND JOSHUA DECEMBER 1,2004 assessment system. In 2003, the State of California appointed him to its Public School Assessment Advisory Committee, where Dr. Catterall also serves with the Technical Design Group. Discussions began in September with Dr. Catterall about comprehensive assessment processes and his conduct of one step-two evaluation this school year. He supports PREs approach and anticipates one or more evaluations during this school year and next. Subsequent updates will more fully describe his participation. D. PRE (1) oversees the preparation of the step-two evaluations, (2) works closely with Drs. Ross and Catterall, and (3) assists them. In collaboration with Dr. Ross, PRE has selected the following four LRSD interventions for evaluation during the 2004-2005 school year. Design of the evaluations began in November. 1. Reading Recovery Program Description: Reading Recovery is one of the eight literacy programs, interventions, and/or models used by various LRSD schools. LRSD funds are used to support the Reading Recovery Program. Currently, Reading Recovery is implemented by seventeen elementary schools: Bale: 82% African-American student population Booker: 53% African-American student population Chicot: 73% African-American student population Dodd: 54% African-American student population Franklin: 96% African-American student population Geyer Springs: 88% African-American student population Gibbs: 53% African-American student population Meadowcliff: 78% African-American student population Mitchell: 96% African-American student population Otter Creek: 60% African-American student population Rightsell: 100% African-American student population Stephens: 95% African-American student population Terry: 53% African-American student population Wakefield: 78% African-American student population Watson: 96% African-American student population Williams: 52% African-American student population Wilson: 89% African-American student population Page 7 of 7LRSD QUARTERLY UPDATE TO ODM AND JOSHUA DECEMBER 1,2004 2. Smart/Thrive Program Description: The Smart/Thrive program was designed as an intervention for 8^- and 9*-grade African-American students who need to gain the knowledge, skills, and confidence needed for success in Algebra 1. This program engages approximately 10 percent of the total African-American student population enrolled in Algebra I classes for the upcoming school year. Last year, the program served 264 students. Participants were offered pre-algebra instruction for two weeks during the summer and 10 Saturdays across the school year. Various local grants have funded this program since 1999. Currently, Smart/Thrive serves students from all eight LRSD middle schools: Cloverdale: 82% African-American student population Dunbar\n61% African-American student population Forest Heights: 77% African-American student population Henderson: 82% African-American student population Mablevale: 81% African-American student population Mann: 52% African-American student population Pulaski Heights: 57% African-American student population Southwest: 94% African-American student population 3. Compass Learning Program Description: Compass Learning is a computer based program that helps to develop skills in reading, writing, and spelling. Compass Learning is designed to help teachers manage student performance, personalize instruction, and connect communities of learners. The theme-based lessons and activities take a cross-curricular approach and offer a real world context for learning. The Compass Management system assessment is either automatic or customizable. A Technology Specialist assists classroom teachers with any technology question or need. Currently, 21 elementary schools, two middle schools, and 1 high school utilize Compass Learning programs: Elementary Schools Bale\n82% African-American student population Booker\n53% African-American student population Brady: 78% African-American student population Carver: 52% African-American student population Chicot: 73% African-American student population Fair Park: 75% African-American student population Fonest Park: 20% African-American student population Franklin: 96% African-American student population Fulbright: 26% African-American student population Geyer Springs: 88% African-American student population Gibbs: 53% African-American student population Mabelvale: 80% African-American student population McDermott\n62% African-American student population Mitchell: 96% African-American student population Otter Creek: 60% African-American student population Page 8 of 8LRSD QUARTERLY UPDATE TO PPM AND JOSHUA DECEMBER 1. 2004 Rightsell: 100% African-American student population Rockefeller: 67% African-American student population Stephens: 95% African-American student population Wakefield: 78% African-American student population Williams: 52% African-American student population Middle Schools: Cloverdale: 82% Afncan-American student population Henderson. 82% African-American student population High School: Accelerated Learning Center (ALC): 92% African-American student population 4. Year-Round Education (YRE) Program Description: Commencing the school year in early August and ending in late June, the YRE calendar shortens the traditional summer vacation to the month of July and observes additional, short vacation periods throughout the school year. Thus, students separate from LRSD curricula for several shorter periods and experience less lengthy interruptions in their education. National research indicates that while YRE costs more, students achieve as well or better than in traditional calendars and exhibit more positive attitudes toward school\nand parents and teachers express satisfaction with it. Currently, five schools operate on YRE calendars: Cloverdale: 77% African-American student population Mablevale: 80% African-American student population Mitchell: 96% African-American student population Stephens: 95% African-American student population Woodruff: 91% African-American student population Page 9 of 9LRSD QUARTERLY UPDATE TO ODM AND JOSHUA DECEMBER 1,2004 The table combines the interventions for evaluation with their sites percentages of African American (AA) students. Sites Accelerated Learning Center Bale Elementary____________ Booker Elementary__________ Brady Elementary___________ Carver Elementary___________ Chicot Elementary___________ Cloverdale Middle__________ Dodd Elementary___________ Dunbar Magnet_____________ Fair Park Elementary________ Forest Heights Middle School Forest Park Elementary______ Franklin Elementary_________ Fulbright Elementary________ Geyer Springs Elementary Gibbs Elementary___________ Henderson Magnet__________ Mabelvale Elementary_______ Mann Magnet______________ McDermott Elementary______ Meadowcliff Elementary_____ Mitchell Elementary_________ Otter Creek Elementary______ Pulaski Heights Middle School Rightsell Elementary________ Rockefeller Elementary______ Southwest Middle__________ Stephens_________________ Terry Elementary___________ Wakefield Elementary_______ Watson Elementary_________ Williams Elementary________ Wilson Elementary_________ Woodruff Elementary_______ Percent AA 92 82 53 78 52 73 82 54 61 75 77 20 96 26 88 53 82 81 52 62 78 96 60 57 100 67 94 95 53 78 96 52 89 91 Reading Recovery Smart/Thrive COMPASS Year-Round Education X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Page 10 of 10 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XLRSD QUARTERLY UPDATE TO ODM AND JOSHUA DECEMBER 1,2004 F. Comprehensive program assessment process final draft to the ODM and Joshua at least thirty days before its presentation to the Board for approval, by December 31,2004 PRE and Dr. Ross have fashioned a comprehensive process to assess LRSD programs for the indefinite future and furnished a final draft to ODM and Joshua more than a month in advance of its expected approval by the LRSD Board of Directors on December 18, 2004. G. PRE will submit its second quarterly report on or before March 1,2005. Page 11 of 11LRSD QUARTERLY UPDATE TO PPM AND JOSHUA DECEMBER 1.2004 Appendices A. Reinvigorated PRE Resumes of PRE Director and Statisticians  Karen DeJamette, Ph D., Director  Maurecia Malcolm, M.S.  James C. Wohlleb, M.S.  Ed Williams, Ph.D. Page 12 of 12LRSD QUARTERLY UPDATE TO ODM AND JOSHUA DECEMBER I, 2004 B. Comprehensive program assessment process O O Comprehensive program assessment process (draft IL-Rl) Evaluation Standards, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation C. Outside consultants Commitment to LRSD evaluations by Dr. Ross Dr. Steven M. Ross curriculum vitae Dr. James S. Catterall curriculum vitae Page 13 of 13LRSD QUARTERLY UPDATE TO ODM AND JOSHUA DECEMBER 1,2004 Little Rock School District Planning, Research, \u0026amp; Evaluation Resumes Karen DeJamette, Ph.D., Director Ed Williams, Ph.D. Maurecia Malcolm, M.S. James C. Wohlleb, M.S. Page 14 of 14Dr. Karen DeJarnette 16 McGovern Drive Little Rock, AR 72205 Phone: H 501.954.7343 Cell 501.425.3109 Email: dejarn@aol.com WORK HISTORY 2004-current Planning, Research, and Evaluation Director, Little Rock School District, Little Rock, AR 1 am currently serving as Director of Little Rock School District's Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department. I lead a team of 7 staff members and various external consultants to conduct formative assessments and summative evaluations of District-wide and school-specific instructional programs. We also assist District personnel to compile and analyze data for a variety of purposes. 2002-2004 Site Developer, Education Development Center, Newton, MA I served as Site Developer to facilitate comprehensive school reform partnerships in Arkansas, Mississippi, and Louisiana. Specifically, I assisted public school administrators and teachers to build leadership skills, effective teaching practices, and organizational management. I also conducted data analysis and provide formative assessments of organizational change. 1999-2003 Research Associate, DCLA and The Galef Institute, Los Angeles, CA I consulted with UCLA staff and the Galef Institute to conduct formative and summative assessments of Different Ways of Knowing comprehensive school reform partnerships in California, Nebraska, Connecticut, and Massachusetts. 2001-2002 Academic Monitor, Arkansas Department of Education, Little Rock, AR As a consultant to the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE), I served as Monitor for schools determined to be in Academic Distress. 1 reported directly to the Director of the ADE and my responsibilities included data analysis to prioritize needs, formative evaluation of professional development and instructional programs, and monitoring school assurance/compliance to Arkansas standards. 1999-2001 Executive Director, The National Eacultv, Pine Bluff, AR My directorship focused on the facilitation of collaborative school reform efforts between The National Faculty, University of AR faculty, various public schools, and State and local educational agencies. Specifically, I was responsible for professional development program design, overseeing implementation of training Page 15 of 15sessions, and conducting formative evaluations of teacher growth using qualitative and quantitative data from teachers and students. 2001 Research and Evaluation Director, The Galef Institute, Los Angeles, CA I served as director of research and evaluation, working with local personnel employed by public schools in 14 states. My responsibilities included contributing to program development, writing grants, monitoring program implementation, data collection, and writing formative and summative evaluation reports of grant-funded programs. 1996-1997 Policy Advisor, Options For Youth Charter Schools, Los Angeles, CA I served as policy advisor for a consortium of four charter schools. My responsibilities included grant development, program development, ensuring alignment with local, state and federal policies, and evaluation of schools. 2002 Educational Consultant, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA I served as a member of a UCLA evaluation team. The team was contracted by various organizations to conduct external summative evaluations of school reform partnerships. I reported directly to Dr. James Catterall, Assistant Dean of the UCLA Graduate School of Education, and performed various research and evaluation tasks. 1992-1993 Assistant Professor, University of Arkansas, Pine Bluff I served as an assistant professor in the art department. My responsibilities included teaching studio and art history classes. I also developed and monitored art education partnerships with local public schools. 1991-1992 Instructor, University of Arkansas, Little Rock I served as an instructor in the art department. My responsibilities included teaching studio and art history classes. 1992-2004 Additional Program Evaluations-Individual Consultant Contracts\nYoung Artists/Young Aspirations (YA/YA) in New Orleans LA St. Francis County Community Development Center in Fonest City, AR Very Special Arts in Atlanta, GA, Tree People in Los Angeles, CA California State Parks in Los Angeles, CA, Arkansas Arts Council in Little Rock, AR Arts and Academics in Helena, AR Page 16 of 16EDUCATION 1993-1997 Ph.D., Education Policy Analysis, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 1989-1991 Columbia University, New York, NY M.F.A., Fine Arts, 1985-1989 B.F.A., Fine Arts, Pratt Institute, Brooklyn, NY 1980 High School Diploma, White Hall School District, White Hall, AR RESEARCH, PUBLICATIONS, AND PRESENTATIONS My research and evaluation interests focus in two areas: 1970 organizational change, and 2) arts-infused learning. school and 2004 1997 The Arts, Language, and Knowing\nStudents Know More Than They Write. (This manuscript is in preparation for publication by Heinemann Press and focuses on the relationship between arts-based teaching and learning and increased academic achievement for adolescent learners.) The Arts, Language, and Knowing\nAn Experimental Study of the Potential of the Visual Arts for Assessing Academic Learning by Language Minority Students. Research study completed in 1997, presented at the American Educational Research Association conference in New York City, 1997. 1996 1997 Visual Expression in the Assessment of Student Learning. The Elementary School Journal, 1999. (DeJamette with James Catterall) Look What I Know: An Investigation of the Utility of the Visual Arts as an Assessment Tool. Research study completed in 1995, presented at the California Education Research Association conference in Lake Tahoe, 1995. Page 17 of 17P.O Box 195035 Little Rock, AR 72219 Home No. (501) 416-7810 (501) 447- 3382 Work No. Maurecia Malcolm Professional Profile  Broad experience in educational leadership, designing, implementing and administering programs for effective schools.  Creative problem solver with ability to drive education improvement, resolve conflict, improve morale and consistently exceed professional growth for improving teaching and learning for all students.  Consultant in areas such as strategic planning, technology leadership, effective communication skills, team building, curriculum design, cultural diversity and desegregation strategies. Trainer for the Arkansas Leadership Academy Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.  Seminar leader for principals and superintendents, providing hands-on technology experience in educational leadership.  Demonstrated strong leadership skills in principalship at the elementary level. Experientially and academically prepared for educational leadership, grades K-12. Education Doctoral Candidate (2002- Present) University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, Arkansas Major in Educational Administration Dissertation - Teacher Efficacy and Expectations of Student Achievement Master of Science in Education (1992) Henderson State University, Arkadelphia Arkansas Major in Administration and Supervision Bachelor of Science (1985) University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, Pine Bluff Arkansas Major in Art Education Page 18 of 18Professional Experience 2001-Present Middle School, Little Rock, AR Cloverdale Magnet Curriculum Coordinator 1999-2001 Camden Fairview Whiteside Elementary, Camden, AR Principal 1996-1999 Camden Fairview Whiteside Elementary, Camden, AR Assistant Principal 1993- 1996 Camden Fairview Junior High, Camden, AR Teacher Art Teacher 1989- 1993 School, Hampton, AR Special Education Hampton High Art Teacher 1988-1989 Arkadelphia Human Development Center, Arkadelphia, AR Institutional Instructor II 1987-1988 Grady High School, Grady, AR Art Teacher Gifted Talent Coordinator Page 19 of 191986- 1987 Chidester Elementary, Chidester, AR Teacher - Sixth Grade Professional Development  Teacher Center Committee Representative, Camden Fairview School District  Smart Start/High Yield Strategies -Teaching  Pathwise Mentoring Training for Principal  Smart Steps to Technology Leadership .n  Gates Grant - \"Grand Gathering  Smart Step Growing Smarter Conference  Step Up To Writing, Writing Primary (Grade 4) Benchmark  Curriculum Designer / EDVision  Coach/Facilitator for Arkansas Leadership Academy  Technology Training - SPSS Software, TAGLIT, ACSIP (Arkansas Consolidated School Improvement Plan), APSCN (Arkansas Public School Network), EDDS (Educational Data Delivery Systems), SEDL (Southwestern Educational Development Laboratory -Active Learning with Technology), NCA (North Central Accreditation), NORMES/E-GUIDE (National Office for Rural Measurement and Evaluation Systems)/ (Enterprise Guide)  Classroom Walk-through  NCLB (No Child Left Behind)  MPH (Measuring Performance Honors)  Teaming  Curriculum Mapping  Block/Master Scheduling/Student Registration/Scheduling Professional Organizations  Arkansas Educational Association/National Educational Association  MSAP (Magnet School Assistance Program)  AAMLE (Arkansas Association for Middle Level Educators) Page 20 of 20I James C. Wohlleb EDUCATION Master of Science (M, S.) University of Texas Health Science Center 1982 Houston, Texas Master of Divinity (M. Div.) Harvard University 1973 Cambridge, Massachusetts f Bachelor of Arts (B. A.) DePauw University 1968 Greencastle, Indiana EXPERIENCE Statistician, Planning, Research, \u0026amp; Evaluation LITTLE Rock School District Arkansas 2004 to present Little Rock, Clinical Assistant Professor of Public Health TULANE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER Louisiana 1994 to 2004 New Orl-eans, Assistant Director, Area Health Education Center Program UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES (UAMS) 1991 to 2002 LITTLE Rock, Arkansas Director Delta Health Education Center Arkansas 1991 to 1994 Helena, Assistant to the Director Epidemiologist Arkansas Department of Health 1990 1984 to 1990 LITTLE Rock, Arkansas Research Associate UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK 1984 through 1990 Little Rock, Arkansas Evaluation Consultant Diet Modification Clinic, The Methodist Hospital 1982 to 1984 Houston, Texas Epidemiologist University of Texas School of Public Health 1981 to 1982 Houston, Texas Consultant, Infant Nutrition Center Baylor College of Medicine 1980 Houston, Texas Research Assistant, Human Ecology University of Texas School of Public Health 1978 to 1980 Houston, Texas Administrative Assistant, New England Enzyme Center Tufts University School of Medicine Massachusetts 1976 to 1978 Boston, Research Assistant, Biochemistry and Pharmacologj 1975 to 1976 Page 21 of21Tufts University School of Medicine Massachusetts Boston, Data Analyst Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center for Mental Retardation Massachusetts Boston, 1974 to 1976 Biochemical Technician, Clinical Genetics Childrens Hospital Massachusetts BCJSTON, 1973 to 1975 Research Assistant, Neurosurgery Massachusetts General Hospital Massachusetts 1971 to 1973 Boston, Field Education Assistant Supervisor Harvard University Divinity School Massachusetts 1970 to 1971 Cambridge, Chaplain Assistant Peter Bent Brigham Hospital Massachusetts 1969 to 1970 Boston, Draftsman Detailer Frigidaire Division, General Motors Corporation Ohio 1962 to 1964 Dayton, PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Wohlleb, J.C., Anderson, A.A., Harvey, S.S., Cranford, C O Introducing an MPH in Arkansas. The Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society, October 2004. Wohlleb, J.C., Anderson, A.A., Jones, J., Harvey, S.S., Cranford, C O : Three approaches to education of public health professionals in Arkansas. American Public Health Association, San Francisco, November 17, 2003. I Wohlleb, J.C., Anderson, A.A., Harvey, S.S., Cranford, C.O.: Cross-boundary graduate education: Arkansas MPH program. American Public Health Association, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, November 12, 2002. Wohlleb, J.C. and Harvey, S.S.: Development of a Regional Master of Public Health Program in an AHEC Program, National AHEC Workshop, Little Rock, Arkansas, April 2002. Wohlleb, J.C.: History of the Arkansas-Volgograd Partnership. Second Russian-American Conference on Tuberculosis, Volgograd Medical Academy, November 2000. Cranford, C.O., Lewis, Y L., Wohlleb, J.C., Ward, H P.: Developing the interdisciplinary- education network. In: Catalysts in Interdisciplinary Education: Innovation by Academic Health Centers. D E Holmes and M. Osterweis, eds. Association of Academic Health Centers, Washington, DC, 1999. Wohlleb, J.C., Harvey, S.S., Cranford, CO, Anderson, A.A : The Master of Public Health Prouramfor Arkansas. The Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society 1997\n94: 155-159. Page 22 of 22Johnson, R. D., Howerton, D.L., Enger, J.M., Wohlleb, J.: Violence prevention: An evaluation of the Prothrow-Stith curriculum. AAAS, February 18, 1995, Atlanta. Elders, M.J., Barnes, A O., Wohlleb, J.C.: Adolescent health: Are we willing to pay the price for inaction? Policy Studies Re view 1994\n13. 177-186. Wohlleb, J., Truax, K., DeAngelis, S.: Primary prevention of oral disease in the Mississippi Delta. American Public Health Association, November 1, 1994, Washington, DC. Easterling, W., Leist, J., Wohlleb, J.: Implementing a statewide continuing education delivery system using the Area Health Education Center model. Alliance for Continuing Medical Education 19th Annual Meeting, February 3, 1994, San Diego Leist, J., and Wohlleb, J.: Effective information dissemination through Area Health Education Center networks. Alliance for Continuing Medical Education 19th Annual Meeting, February 2, 1994, San Diego. Acton, P.A., Farley, T., Freni, L.W., Ilegbodu, V.A., Sniezek, J.E., Wohlleb, J.C.: Traumatic spinal cord injury in Arkansas, 1980 to 1989. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1993\n74:1035-1040. Mattison, D.R., Wohlleb, J., To, T., Lamb, Y., Faitak, S., Brewster, M.A., Walls, R.C., Selevan, S.G.: Pes-ticide concentrations in Arkansas breast milk. Journal of Arkansas Medical Society 1992\n553-557. Wohlleb. J.C., Ricketts, T., Hawes, M.L., Siegel, C., Jenson, K., Herriage, E., Berry, D.: The role of rural hospitals in professional education. American Public Health Association, November 11, 1991, Atlanta. Wohlleb, J.C., Hunter, CF, Blass, B., Kadlubar, F.F., Chu, D.Z.J., Lang, N.P.\nAromatic amine acetyltransferase as a marker for colorectal cancer: Environmental and demographic associations. International Journal of Cancer 1990\n46. 22-30. I. li Thomasson, B., McCluer, S., Hickman, P., Wohlleb, J., Robinette, R. . Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injuries in Arkansas. American Public Health Association, October 24, 1989, Chicago. Wohlleb, J.C., Dennis, L., Cunningham, V.A., Eatmon, J.M., Lindburgh, S.: Healthy Beginnings: Prospective evaluation of an 11-county pilot intervention for maternal and infant health services in east Arkansas. American Public Health Association, November 16, 1988, Boston. l To, T., Mattison, D.R., Faitak, S.E., Wohlleb, J.C., Walls, R.C., Brewster, M.A., Selevan, S.G., Hom, R., Lamb, Y.: Arkansas breast milk pesticide concentrations following 1986 dairy product contamination with heptachlor. American Public Health Association, November 16, 1988, Boston. Stehr-Green, P.A., Burse, V W., Wohlleb, J.C.: Persistence of heptachlor in serum of people consuming contaminated dairy products. (Letter) Lancet 1988, 2: 570-571. Stehr-Green, P.A., Farrar, J.A., Burse, V.W., Royce, W.G., Wohlleb, J.C.: A survey of measured levels and dietary sources of selected organochlorine pesticide residues and metabolites in human sera from a rural population. American Journal of Public Health 1988, 78'. 828-830. I' Page 23 of 23Stehr-Green, P.A., Wohlleb, J.C., Royce, W., Head, S.L.: An evaluation of serum pesticide residue level and liver function in persons exposed to dairy products contaminated with heptachlor. Journal of the American Medical Association 1988\n259: 374-377. Wohlleb, J.C.: Heptachlor contamination in Arkansas. Heptachlor Workshop: Heptachlor Contamination of Breast Milk: Health and Scientific Issues. Ferndale, AR, March 25, 1987. Stehr-Green, P.A., Schilling, R.J., Burse, V.W., Steinburg, K.K., Royce, W., Wohlleb, J.C., Donnell, H.D.: Evaluation of persons exposed to dairy products contaminated with heptachlor. (Letter) Journal of the American Medical Association 1986\n256: 3350-3351. Foreyt, J.P., Reeves, R.S., Darnell, L.S., Wohlleb, J.C., Gotto, A.M.: Soup consumption as a behavioral weight loss strategy. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1986\n86: 524-526. Wohlleb, J.C.: Maternal supplementation and postnatal growth: A review. Archives Latino- americanos de Nutricion 1983\n33: 642-648. Wohlleb, J.C., Pollitt, E., Mueller, W.H., Bigelow, R.: The Bacon Chow study: Maternal supplementation and infant growth. Early Human Development, 1983\n9:19-9\\. Green, L.W., Mullen, P.D., Quillian, J., Gordon, R.A., Wohlleb, J.C., Benedict, M.E., Emerson, O.B., Martin, C.E.: Measuring patient drug information transfer: An assessment of the literature. Report prepared for the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association. University of Texas, Houston, TX, 1983. Reeves, R.S., Foreyt, J.P., Scott, L.W., Mitchell, R.E., Wohlleb, J.C., Gotto, AM.: Effects of a low cholesterol eating plan on plasm lipids: Results of a three-year community study. American Jourttal of Public Health 1983\n73: 873-877. Wohlleb, J.C., Pollitt, E., Mueller, W.H., Bigelow, R.: Maternal supplementation and postnatal growth. Presented at the XII International Congress of Nutrition, August 1981, San Diego. DeMark, W., Wohlleb, J.C., Smith, E.O., Garza, C.. Illness and growth in infants of two socioeconomic groups fed human or artificial milk. Baylor Infant Nutrition Research Institute, Houston, TX, 1981. Mueller, W.H., and Wohlleb, J.C.: Anatomical distribution of subcutaneous fat and its description by multivariate methods: How valid are principal components? American Journal of Physical Anthropology 1981\n54: 25-35. Wohlleb, J.C., and Razavi, L.: Dermatoglyphic laterality, sex chromosome mosaicism, and temporal-lobe epilepsy. In: Dermatoglyphics: An International Perspective,]. Mavalwala, editor. Mouton Publishers, The Hague, 1978. I' Latt, S.A., and Wohlleb, J.C.: Optical studies of the interaction of 33258 Hoechst with DNA, chromatin, and metaphase chromosomes. Chromosoma 1975\n52: 297-302. Razavi, L.M., Reed, T.J.E., Wohlleb, J C.: Descriptive Statistics of Fingerprintsfrom the Files on NYSIIS. Terminal Report, N.I.L.E. Project NI-71-128-G, 1973. Wohlleb, J.C.: Research on prisoners (Letter) New England Journal of Medicine \\973: 289 325. Page 24 of 24SELECTED GRANTS AND CONTRACTS The Master of Public Health Program. Assisi Foundation, Memphis, Tennessee, 2000- 2004. Scholarships for Master of Public Health Program from SHARE and Murphy Foundations, El Dorado, 1999-2001 (with Tulane University) Tuberculosis Project with Volgograd Medical Academy, to the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 1999-2001, from Health Research, Inc., Albany, NY (grant from Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health). Arkansas-Volgograd Partnership\nTuberculosis Project, to the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 1997-1999, from the American International Health Alliance (contract with US Agency of International Development). Scholarships for Arkansas Master of Public Health Program, Entergy Corporation, 1996- 1997. The Arkansas Master of Public Health Program, to the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 1993-2002, from Tulane University Medical Center, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine. Projects in the Mississippi River Delta of four public health graduate students, to the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 1992 and 1993, from the W. K. Kellogg Foundation. Training in HIV and AIDS, to the Delta Health Education Center, 1991-1993, from the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Delta Health Education and Training Center, to the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 1990-1995, from US Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration (director for principals Joan Faubion and Charles Cranford). Injury Prevention Program, to the Arkansas Department of Health, 1988-1990, from the US Centers for Disease Control. Attitudes and knowledge about HIV-AIDS in Arkansas ascertained through random-digit dialing, 1988, National Center for Health Statistics. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE ACTIVITIES Instructor, College of Public Health, UAMS, 2002 to present Secretary, Academic Senate, UAMS, 2002 Co-chair, Human Research Advisory Committee for Behavioral Sciences, UAMS, 2002 to present Member, Advisory Board, Pastoral Care and Education Program, UAMS, 2001 to present Member, Human Research Advisory Committee, UAMS, 2000 to 2002 Page 25 of 25Member, Obesity Taskforce, Arkansas Department of Health, 2000 Representative, Institutional Advancement Officers Council, UAMS, 1998 to 2001 Coordinator, Tuberculosis Project, Volgograd Medical Academy, 1997 to 2001 Member, Arkansas State Commission on Child Abuse, Rape, and Domestic Violence and of Rape Committee and Victims of Crime Act Committee, 1996 to 1998 Coordinator of capstone projects. Master of Public Health Program for Arkansas, 1995 to 2003 Member, The U. S. Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc. Patient Education/Consumer Interest Advisory Panel, 1995 to 2000 Editor, UAMS Rural Health Progressive, 1993 to 1998 Administrator, Master of Public Health Program for Arkansas, 1993 to 2003 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS American Public Health Association, 1978 to present Medical Care Section, Continuing Education Liaison, 2002 to present Arkansas Public Health Association, 1984 to present\nExecutive Committee, 2002 to present Association of Fundraising Professionals, 1995 to 2003 Council for Advancement and Support of Education (CASE), 1998 to 2002 History of Medicine Associates (Arkansas), 1996 to present\nExecutive Committee, 1999 to 2002 Medical Library Association, Government and Legislation Committee, 1994 to 2002 Medical Library Association South Central Region, 1994 to 2002\npast chair. Research Committee COMMUNITY MEMBERSHIPS Rebsamen Fund Board of Directors, 2003 to present Member, Arkansas Economic Developers, 2002 to present Planned Parenthood of Arkansas and Eastern Oklahoma, founding board member, 1998 to 2003 Planned Parenthood of Greater Arkansas, Board of Directors President, 1995 to 1997 American Red Cross Arkansas Chapter Blood Services Committee member, 1987 to 1991 Our House (homeless shelter) founding board member 1988 to 1990 Ozark Mission Project, United Methodist Church, steering committee 1986 to 1989 The Rotary Club of West Little Rock, 1985 to present\nPresident, 1998 to 1999 First United Methodist Church, Little Rock, 1984 to present Contemplative worship music committee chair, 2002 to present Stephen Minister, 2002 to present Missions committee, 1999 to present Representative to the Arkansas Area Russia Initiative, 1998 to present Child Development Center, Budget Committee, 1998 to 1999 Chancel Choir member and teacher, 1984 to present PERSONAL INFORMATION Birth date and place: May 3, 1946, Dayton, Ohio Married to Cynthia Jane Stabler, 1967 to 1977 Daughters Sara Wohlleb and Beth Adel, bom 1970 in Boston, Massachusetts Married to Mary Elizabeth Remmel, 1989 to present 1018 North Arthur, Little Rock, Arkansas 72207-6302 501/680-9244 (mobile), 501/686-2585 (facsimile), wohllebiamesc@aristotle net Interests: Tennis, religion, history, and travel Page 26 of 26F Vita Ed R. Williams, Ph.D. Little Rock School District Instructional Resource Center 3001 S. Pulaski Little Rock, AR 72206 501-447-33861 Fax: 501-447-7609! ed.williams@lrsd.org Educational History 1. Doctor of Philosophy 1995 University of Arkansas - Fayetteville, Arkansas Specialty: Vocational Rehabilitation Research and Education 2. Master of Education 1992 University of Arkansas - Fayetteville, Arkansas Specialty: Vocational Rehabilitation Counselor. Deafness and Hard of Hearing 3. Bachelor of Arts 1972 Upper Iowa University - Fayette, Iowa Major: Political Science/Secondary Education Minor: Psychology Certifications Teachers License, #483665503, Social Studies, Grades 7-12, Valid through 12/31/2007 Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), #P9702006, Valid through 7/1/2006 Certified Rehabilitation Counselor (CRC), #27328, Valid through 3/31/2007 Sign Communication Proficiency Interview (SCPI) rating of intermediate Current Employment Statistical Research Specialist: Little Rock School District, 1998 to present Analyze, interpret, and compile reports using test and other District data. Provide research support, statistical information and interpretation, and disaggregate data. More specifically, authored the evaluation design for the Districts English as a Second Language (ESL) Page 27 of 27 bF Compliance Plan and Charter School. Authored or co-authored the School Board approved evaluation agenda reports. Authored data analysis reports for the Districts Divisions of Curriculum \u0026amp; Instruction, School Services, and Student Assignment. Present workshops to a wide range of audiences on using test results and other data to improve instruction. Assist with various tests administered by the District. Use SPSS, ACCESS, EXCEL, and other specialized software to gather, analyze, and publish data. Implement the assigned portions of the Districts Compliance Remedy order. Previous Public Sector Employment Assistant Professor: University of Arkansas! Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (RTC-311 for Persons who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing, 1997-1998 Conducted applied research to enhance employability for persons who are deaf, late deafened, or hard of hearing. Conducted training and dissemination activities to bring project results to key professional and consumer groups. Taught within the Universities graduate programs in rehabilitation counseling and independent living. Project Director: Successful Transition to Employment for Postsecondary Students with Disabilities (STEPS), University of Arkansas at Little Rock (UALRl, 1994-1997 Provided career and personal counseling to students. Developed and taught a 4000/senior level career development class. Trained various state agency personal and UALR faculty/staff. Recruited and organized advisory councils. Supervised project marketing and publicity, collected and analyzed evaluation data using SPSS, presented at national and international conferences, and traveled the state to present at various consumer groups. Project Manager: Arkansas Children's Hospital, 1994 Established and maintained field sites for the project: Assessment of Rural Adolescent Alcohol Use. Coordinated: (a) collection dates\n(b) appointments to collect extent data\n(c) data entry\nand (d) data analysis. Consulted: (a) to maintain validity of project\nand (b) to determine predictor variables for project outcomes. Graduate Assistant: University of Arkansas, 1992-1994 Identified, established, and maintained field sites. Collected and analyzed data through developing statistical programs using SPSS. Wrote reports, journal articles and gave conference presentations. Research Associate: Transition Project, Little Rock, Arkansas, 1992-1994 Page 28 of 28Scheduled 112 parent and student interviews statewide. Collected data utilizing a face-to-face interview format. Interviewed parents and students on their perception about the transition process. Entered \u0026amp; analyzed data and wrote progress and final report of findings. Client Advocate: Client Assistance Program (CAP), Little Rock, Arkansas, 1992-1993 Assisted and advocated for individuals with disabilities in their relationships with projects, programs, and facilities providing services under the Rehabilitation Act. In addition, provided clients with information on available services and benefits under the Rehabilitation Act and Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Peer Reviewed Grants Planning Dunbar-Hunter, 2004-2005 (2003). Arkansas Humanities Council and the National Endowment for the Humanities. $5,240.00 Mouth of the Cache (2003). Arkansas Heritage Commission. $4,900.00 French Migration into Arkansas (2001). Arkansas Heritage Commission. $1,770.00 Dye Workshop (2000). Arkansas Humanities Council and the National Endowment for the Humanities. $2,500.00 Cultures in Contact (1999). Arkansas Humanities Council and the Rockefeller Foundation. $2,000.00 Dean Shostak: Colonial Musician (1998). Arkansas Humanities Council and the National Endowment for the Humanities. $ 1,500.00 Individuals with Disabilities: Potential, Accommodation \u0026amp; Style (ID:PAS), (1997-2000). U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS), Postsecondary Education Programs for Individuals with Disabilities, Model Demonstration Projects to Improve the Delivery and Outcomes of Postsecondary Education for Individuals with Disabilities (CFDS No. 84.078C). $403,886.00 Music and Militia (1997). Arkansas Humanities Council and the National Endowment for the Humanities. $2,000.00 Peer Reviewed Publications Roessler, R., Shearin, A., \u0026amp; Williams, E. (2000). Three recommendations to improve transition planning in the lEP. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 22(2), 31-36. Geyer, P. D. \u0026amp; Williams, E.R. (1999). The role of technical assistance centers in addressing employer concerns about accommodating workers who are deaf or hard of hearing. Labor Law Journal, 50(4), 280-288. Page 29 of 29Williams, E. R. (1998). Essential functions worksheet. Journal of Rehabilitation Administration, 22(2), 123-128. Williams, E. R. (1998). Developing awareness and sensitivity to communication barriers encountered by people who are deaf or hard of hearing. In S. Totten \u0026amp; C, Johnson (Eds ), Preparing middle level educators: Practicing what we preach. Williams, E. R. (1998). Personal Perspective - Disclosure of a disability during the job interview\nAvoidance of deviance. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 13(1), 75-76.. Williams, E. R., \u0026amp; Akridge, R. L. (1997). Test-retest reliability of the responsible assertion scale (RAS). Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Bulletin, 30(2/3), 44. Williams, E. R. (1997). Work personality profile: Validation within the supported employment environment. Journal of Rehabilitation, 63(2), 26-30. Williams, E. R. (1996). Middle school teacher attitudes towards the placement of students with disabilities. Current Issues in Middle School Education, 5(2), 73-85. Williams, E. R., \u0026amp; Akridge, R. L. (1996). The Responsible Assertion Scale: Development and evaluation of psychometric qualities. Vocational Evaluation and Work Adiustment Bulletin, 29(1), 19-23. Andrew, J., Getch, Y., Bellini, J., \u0026amp; Williams, E. (1996). University support for doctoral education in rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Education, 10(4), 319-330. Williams, E. R. (1995). Interpersonal problem-solving training: Job maintenance through acquisition of interpersonal problem-solving skills. International Association of Special Education\nEmpowering children with special needs (pp. 36-38). Whitewater, WI: University of Wisconsin-White water. Schriner, K. F., Bellini, J. L., \u0026amp; Williams, E. R. (1995). Implementing IDEA\nlEP meetings in demonstration and nondemonstration sites in a systems chance state. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 14(3). 36-42. Other Publications Boone, S., Watson, D., VanBiervliet, A., McGee, S., Lefebure, H., \u0026amp; Williams, E. (1998). Multimedia job accommodations curriculum for persons who are deaf or hard of hearing: Annual report one. (NIDRR Field Initiated Grant: H133G70104, 1997-2000). Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas RRTC for Persons who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing. University of Arkansas Page 30 of 30I Williams, E. R., Tuttle, C, \u0026amp; Dahmen-Jones, D. (1997). STEPS: Equal employment opportunities for people with disabilities class 1CD1. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas at Little Rock. Williams, E. R. (1996). Validation of a work behavioral rating instrument for people receiving supported employment services (Doctoral dissertation. University of Arkansas at Fayetteville, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(03), A. Williams, E. R. (1996). How to use the Essential Functions Worksheet. Point of Departure, 2(2), 5. Williams, E. R. (1995). Postsecondary education options and services in the state of Arkansas. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas-Little Rock, Educational and Student Services. Williams, E. R. (1995). Resume assessment and training (RAT). Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas-Little Rock, Education and Student Services. Williams, E. R. (1994). Student evaluation of school-based transition activities. Fayetteville: Arkansas Research and Training Center in Vocational Rehabilitation. Teaching Activities Professor, Rehabilitation Education (RHAB) #5453, Psychological Aspects of Disability, University of Arkansas-Fayetteville, 1998 Adjunct Professor, Rehabilitation Education (RHAB) #5453, Psychological Aspects of Disability, University of Arkansas-Fayetteville, 1997 Adjunct Professor, Teacher Education (TCED) #7337, Life Adjustment for Persons with Severe Disabilities, University of Arkansas-Little Rock, 1997 Instructor, Personal Awareness (PEAW) #4124 Leadership Practicum: Equal Employment Opportunities for People with Disabilities, University of Arkansas-Little Rock, 1995-1997 Instructor, Personal Awareness (PEAW) #1200 First Year Experience, University of Arkansas- Little Rock, 1995-1997 Lecturer, PSYC #3320 Intro to Applied Psychology, and Teacher Education (TCED) #5300 Disability in Peoples Lives, University of Arkansas - Little Rock, 1995 Lecturer, Rehabilitation Education (RHAB) #5433 Medical Aspects of Disability, University of Arkansas, 1994-96 Page 31 of 31 liLecturer, RHAB #3493 Vocational Evaluation, Assessment \u0026amp; Placement, University of Arkansas, 1994-96 Lecturer, Curriculum and Development (CID) #3151 Survey of Exceptionality, University of Arkansas, 1993-1994 Presentations at International, National, and State Conferences Williams, E. R. (1998, July). Get that job: Tips for success in the job interview. Paper presented at the annual Association on Higher Education and Disability (AHEAD), Las Vegas, NV. Williams, E. R. (1998, July). Critical thinking. Invited presentation. College ONE summer orientation program for students who are deaf. University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR. Williams, E. R. \u0026amp; Geyer, P. (1998, July). Who do you call? Ghostbusters! Addressing employer concerns about workplace accommodations. Paper presented at the biennial conference of the National Association of the Deaf (NAD), San Antonio, Texas. Watson, D., Anderson, G., Boone, S. Williams, E. R., \u0026amp; McGee, S. (1998, June). Success in the workplace for people who are deaf or hard of hearing. Paper presented at the biennial International Convention of the Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf (AGB), Little Rock, AR. Geyer, P., \u0026amp; Williams, E. R. (1998, June). Using job-forecasting information when making career decisions. Paper presented at the biennial International Convention of the Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf (AGB), Little Rock, AR. Williams, E. R. (1998, May). The role of technical assistance centers in addressing employer concerns about accommodating workers who are deaf or hard of hearing. Invited presentation, Kentucky Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, Frankfort, KY. Williams, E. R., \u0026amp; Boone, S. (1997, November). ADA: An overview. Invited class lecture. Orientation to Deaftiess, University of Arkansas at Little Rock. Geyer, P. D., \u0026amp; Williams, E. R. (1997, September). Working in \"Hot Jobs\": A career strategy for adults with disabilities. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Rehabilitation Association (NRA), Tulsa, OK. Williams, E. R. (1996, July). To disclose or not to disclose.... Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association on Higher Education and Disability (AHEAD), New Orleans, LA. Page 32 of 32Williams, E. R. (1995, November\n1996, March, September, November). Leadership through chaos. Paper presented at a workshop sponsored by Disability Support Services at UALR on leadership training, Little Rock, AR. Williams, E. R. (1995, October\n1996, March, September). Improving your GPA by maximizing your learning strength. Paper presented at a workshop sponsored by Disability Support Services on learning styles. Little Rock, AR. Williams, E. R., Queller, S., Smelser, A., \u0026amp; Serebrini, R. (1995, October). Supporting students with disabilities in post secondary education. Paper presented at the Transition: Investment in the Future conference. Little Rock, AR. Williams, E. R. (1995, August). Assessing and enhancing the social problem solving skills of deaf adolescents. Paper presented at the fourth biennial conference of the International Association of Special Education, Brighton, England. Williams, E. R., Jones, C., McNamara, M., Koslowski, L., Bhattacharyya, A. (1995, June). Enhancing assertive behavior. Paper presented at the Foundation for Rehabilitation Counseling seminar on Counseling Skills that Facilitate Client Empowerment, Newport Beach, CA. Johnson, V. A., Williams, E. R., \u0026amp; Boone, S. E. (1993, June). Empowering people for interpersonal problem-solving. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Southwest Regional Rehabilitation Association (SRRA), Dallas, TX. Johnson, V. A., Williams, E. R., (1993, June). Get that job: Skills for success in the job interview. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Southwest Regional Rehabilitation Association (SRRA), Dallas, TX. Current Association Membership American Educational Research Association (AERA) Community Service Board member, Arkansas Urban Gardening Educational Resources, Inc., 2002 to present Assistant Scoutmaster, Arkansas School for the Deaf, 1991 to present President, Early Arkansas Reenactors Association, 2001 to present Member, Pulaski Enterprise Council, 1996 to present Volunteer, Dunbar Adult Gardeners, 1998 to present Page 33 of 33Previous Private Sector Employment Owner: Insty-Prints, Little Rock. Arkansas. 1988-1990 Sales calls, sales presentations, customer prospecting, delivery of merchandise and follow-up. Planned production schedules, trained all employees on counter sales techniques, use of all equipment, including desk top publishing and printing press. Ordered all supplies, completed all financial and tax reporting. Financial Planner: IDS Financial Services. Inc.. Little Rock. Arkansas. 1987 Prospected and interviewed clients. Developed financial plans to fit the needs and resources of clients. Developed sales presentations and closings. Responsible for all customer follow-up. Store Manager: K-Mart Corporation. Troy. Michigan. 1972-1986 Trained and supervised 100 employees. Bought merchandise for stores generating $11,000,000 in sales. Acquired expertise in federal and state employment laws. Enacted hiring and disciplinary actions. Conducted bi-annual evaluations of all employees, held weekly and daily organizational meetings. Planned all local sales promotions: (a) newspaper ads, (b) good news promotions and (c) local fund-raising events. Prepared sales, expense budgets and weekly cash audit Page 34 of 34B. Comprehensive Program Assessment Process Comprehensive Program Assessment Process (draft IL-R) Little Rock School District Evaluation Standards Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation Page 35 of 35PROGRAM EVALUATION AGENDA Purpose The purpose of these regulations is to provide guidance to the staff involved in the evaluation of programs required in the Boards Program Evaluation Agenda. They do not necessarily apply to grant-funded programs if the funding source requires other procedures and provides funding for a required evaluation. Criteria for Program Evaluations Policy IL specifies that the evaluations of programs approved in its Board-approved Program Evaluation Agenda will be conducted according to the standards developed by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (See Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, James R. Sanders, Chair (1994). The Program Evaluation Standards, 2^ Edition: How to Assess Evaluations of Educational Programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.) Prospective, controlled, suimnative evaluations are at one end of a spectrum of activities that review District operations. Other activities in this continuum include formative and less formal and rigorous evaluations, regular and occasional assessments, and fast or brief snapshots. As rigor and formality diminish along the range of reviews, fewer standards apply. Examples of how the standards apply are found following table, adapted from The Program Evaluation Standards, pages 18 and 19\nChecklist for Applying the Standards The reader should interpret the information provided in this table with reference both to the Standards (cited above) and the peculiar circumstances of given program reviews. Double plus signs (++) indicate that standards are fully addressed. Single pluses (+) mean that the standard is a concern but not necessarily fully addressed, and zeros (0) point to standards not usually applicable. Not all summative evaluation will fully satisfy every standard, and other examples may observe more standards than indicated here. Note, however, that all reviews fully observe human rights and impartial reports. 1 Page 36 of 36Checklist of Evaluation Standards for Examples of Program Reviews ______________standard_______ Ul Stakeholder Identification_________ U2 Evaluator Credibility_____________ U3 Information Scope \u0026amp; Selection U4 Values Identification_____________ U5 Report Clarity _______________ U6 Report Timeliness \u0026amp; Dissemination U7 Evaluation Impact_______________ Fl Practical Procedures_____________ F2 Political Viability_______________ F3 Cost Effectiveness_______________ Pl Service Orientation______________ P2 Formal Agreements______________ P3 Rights of Human Subjects P4 Human Interaction_______________ P5 Complete \u0026amp; Fair Assessment______ P6 Disclosure of Findings___________ P7 Conflict of Interest______________ P8 Fiscal Responsibility_____________ Al Program Documentation_________ A2 Context Analysis_______________ A3 Described Purposes and Procedures A4 Defensible Information Sources AS Valid Information_______________ A6 Reliable Information____________ A7 Systematic Information__________ A8 Analysis of Quantitative Data A9 Analysis of Qualitative Data______ AIO Justified Conclusions___________ Al 1 Impartial Reporting_____________ A12 Meta-evaluation Summative evaluations -H- ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Page 37 of 37 Informal Assessments -H- 0 + + + 0 + + + + (F + + ++ ++ + V Formative Evaluation Process (School Portfolios) ________0 ________+________ + ________+________ _______++_______ ________+________ ________+________ ________0 ________+________ ________+_______ ________0 ________++_______ ________0 ________+_______ +_______ -I- ________0 ________+_______ -H- + + + + 0 + + ++ \"o' Snapshots 0 0 + 4- + 0 -I- -l-l- 0 + + 0 0 + + \"o 0 + + + + + + +Program Evaluation Procedures The following procedures are established for the evaluation of programs approved by the Board of Education in its annual Program Evaluation Agenda: 1. The Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) Department will recommend to the Superintendent annually, before the budget for the coming year is proposed, the curriculum/instruction programs for comprehensive program evaluation. The recommendation will include a proposed budget, a description of other required resources, and an action plan for the completion of the reports. Criteria for the proposed agenda are as follows: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. A. Will the results of the evaluation influence decisions about the program? B. Will the evaluation be done in time to be useful? C. Will the program be significant enough to merit evaluation? (See Joseph S. Wholey, Harry P. Hatry, and Kathryn Newcomer (1994). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers. 5-7.) The Superintendent will recommend to the Board of Education for approval the proposed Program Evaluation Agendawith anticipated costs and an action plan for completion. For each curriculum/instruction program to be evaluated as per the Program Evaluation Agenda, the Director of PRE will establish a staff team with a designated leader to assume responsibility for the production of the report according to the timelines established in the action plan approved by the Board of Education. Each team will include, at a minimum, one or more specialists in the curriculum/instruction program to be evaluated, a statistician, a programmer to assist in data retrieval and disaggregation, and a technical writer. If additional expertise is required, then other staff may be added as necessary. An external consultant with expertise in program evaluation, the program area being evaluated, statistical analysis, and/or technical wnting will be retained as a member of the team. The role of the external consultant may vary, depending upon the expertise required for the production of the program evaluation. The team leader will establish a calendar of regularly scheduled meetings for the production of the program evaluation. The first meetings will be devoted to the following tasks: Page 38 of 38A. Provide any necessary training on program evaluation that may be required for novice members of the team, including a review of the Boards policy IL and ail of the required criteria and procedures in these regulations, IL-R. 7. B. C. D. E. F. G. Assess the expertise of each team member and make recommendations to the Director of PRE related to any additional assistance that may be required. Write a clear description of the curnculum/instruction program that is to be evaluated, with information about the schedule of its implementation. Agree on any necessary research questions that need to be established in addition to the question, Has this curriculum/instruction program been effective in improving and remediating the academic achievement of African-American students Generate a list of the data required to answer each research question, and assign responsibility for its collection and production. All available and relevant student performance data should be included. (See Judge Wilsons Compliance Remedy.) Decide who will be the chief writer of the program evaluation. Plan ways to provide regular progress reports (e.g., dissemination of meeting minutes, written progress reports, oral reports to the Superintendents Cabinet) to stakeholders. (See Joellen Killion (2002). Assessing Impact: Evaluating Staff Development. Oxford, OH. National Staff Development Council (NSDC)\nRobby Champion (Fall 2002). Map Out Evaluation Goals. Journal of Staff Development. 78-79\nThomas R. Guskey (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, CA\nCorwin Press\nBlaine R. Worthen, James R. Sanders, and Jody L. Fitzpatrick (1997). Participant-Oriented Evaluated Approaches. Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines\n153-169\nBeverly A. Parsons (20021. Evaluative Inquiry: Using Evaluation to Promote Student Success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press\nand Joseph S. Wholey, Harry P. Hatry, and Kathryn E. Newcomer (1994). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA\nJossey-Bass Publishers.) Subsequent meetings of the program evaluation team are required for the following tasks\nPage 39 of 39I to monitor the completion of assignments\nto collaborate in the interpretation and analysis of data, to pose any necessary new questions to be answered\nto review drafts and provide feedback to the writer\nto formulate recommendations, as required, for program improvement, especially to decide if a recommendation is required to modify or abandon the program if the findings reveal that the program is not being successful for the improvement of African-American achievement\nto assist in final proofreading\nand to write a brief executive summary, highlighting the program evaluation findings and recommendations. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. A near-final copy of the program evaluation must be submitted to the Director of PRE at least one month before the deadline for placing the report on the Boards agenda for review and approval. This time is required for final approval by staff, for final editing to ensure accuracy, and for submission to the Superintendent. When the program evaluation is approved for submission to the Board of Education for review and approval, copies of the Executive Summary and complete report must be made for them, for members of the Cabinet. The program evaluation team will plan its presentation to the Board of Education on the findings and recommendations. The Director of PRE will prepare the cover memorandum to the Board of Education, including all the required background information: A. If program modifications are suggested, the steps that the staff members have taken or will take to implement those modifications. If abandonment of the program is recommended, the steps that will be taken to replace the program with another with more potential for the improvement and remediation of Afiican-American students. B. Names of the administrators who were involved in the program evaluation. C. Name and qualifications of the external expert who served on the evaluation team. D. Grade-level descriptions of the teachers who were involved in the assessment process (e.g., all fourth-grade math teachers, all eighth grade English teachers, etc.). When the program evaluation is approved by the Board of Education, the team must arrange to have the Executive Summary and the full report copied and design a plan for communicating the program evaluation findings and recommendations to other stakeholders. This plan must then be submitted to the Director of PRE for approval. Page 40 of 40 AT 13. Each program evaluation team will meet with the Director of PRE after the completion of its work to evaluate the processes and product and to make recommendations for future program evaluations. (See Joellen Killion (2002).  Evaluate the Evaluation. Assessing Impact: Evaluating Staff Development. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council. 46,123-124.) I I Approved: [date] Page 41 of 41 fl Evaluation Standards Criteria for Program Evaluations Policy IL specifies that the evaluations of programs approved in its Board-approved Program Evaluation Agenda will be conducted according to the standards developed by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (See Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, James R. Sanders, Chair (1994). The Program Evaluation,Stand^ds. 2\nEdition: How to Assess Evaluations of Educational Programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.) They are as follows: )Dd Utility Standards The utility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will serve the information needs of intended users. These standards are as follows: Stakeholder identification. People involved in or affected by the evaluation should be identified so that their needs can be addressed. Evaluator credibility. The people conducting the evaluation should be both trustworthy and competent to perform the evaluation so that the evaluation findings achieve maximum credibility and acceptance. Information scope and sequence. Information collected should be broadly selected to address pertinent questions about the program and should be responsive to the needs and interests of clients and other specified stakeholders. Values identification. The perspectives, procedures, and rationale used to interpret the findings should be described carefully so that tiie bases for value judgments are clear. Report clarity. Evaluation reports should describe clearly the program being evaluated, including its context and the purposes, procedures, and findings of the evaluation, so that essential information is provided and understood easily. Report timeliness and dissemination. Significant interim findings and evaluation reports should be disseminated to intended users so that they can be used in a timely fashion. Evaluation impact. Evaluations should be planned, conducted, and reported in ways that encourage follow-through by stakeholders, so that the likelihood that the evaluation will be used is increased. Feasibility Standards Feasibility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will be realistic, prudent, diplomatic, and frugal.  Practical procedures. Evaluation procedures should be practical so that the disruption is kept to a minimum while needed information is obtained.  Political viability. The evaluation should be planned and conducted with anticipation of the different positions of various interest groups so that their cooperation may be obtained and so that possible attempts by any of these groups to curtail evaluation operations or to bias or misapply the results can be averted or counteracted.  Cost-effectiveness. The evaluation should be efficient and produce infonnation of sufficient value so that the resources expended can be justified. Page 42 of 42Propriety Standards The propriety standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will be conducted legally, ethically, and with due regard for the welfare of those involved in the evaluation, as well as those affected by its results.  Service orientation. Evaluations should be designed to assist organizations to address and effectively serve the needs of the full range of targeted participants.  Formal agreements. Obligations of the formal parties to an evaluation (what is to be done, how, by whom, and when) should be agreed to in writing so that these parties are obligated to adhere to all conditions of the agreement or to formally renegotiate it.  Rights of human subjects. Evaluations should respect human dignity and worth in their interactions with other people associated with an evaluation so that participants are not threatened or harmed.  Complete and fair assessments. The evaluation should be complete and fair in its examination and recording of strengths and weaknesses of the program being evaluated so that strengths can be built upon and problem areas addressed.  Disclosure of findings. The formal parties to an evaluation should ensure that the full set of evaluation findings, along with pertinent limitations, are made accessible to the people affected by the evaluation, as well as any others with expressed legal rights to receive the results.  Conflict of interest. Conflict of interest should be dealt with openly and honestly so that it does not compromise the evaluation processes and results.  Fiscal responsibility. The evaluators allocation and expenditure of resources should reflect sound accountability procedures and be prudent and ethically responsible so that expenditures are accounted for and appropriate. Accuracy Standards , Accuracy standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will reveal and convey technically adequate information about the features that determine the worth of merit of the program being evaluated. Program documentation. The program being evaluated should be described and documented clearly and accurately so that it programs is identified clearly. Context analysis. The context in which the program exists should be examined in enough detail so that its likely influences on the program can be identified. Described purposes and procedures. The purposes and procedure of the evaluation should be monitored and described in enough detail so that they can be identified and assessed. Defensible information sources. The sources of information used in a program evaluation should be described in enough detail so that the adequacy of the information can be assessed. or Valid information. The information-gathering procedures should be chosen developed and then implemented in a manner that will ensure that the interpretation arrived at is valid for the intended use. Reliable information. The information-gathering procedures should be chosen or manner that will ensure that the developed and then implemented in a information obtained is sufficiently reliable for the intended use. Systematic information. The information collected, processed, and reported in an evaluation should be review systematically so that the evaluation questions are answered effectively. Page 43 of 43Analysis of quantitative information. Quantitative information in an evaluation should be analyzed appropriately and systematically so that the evaluation questions are answered effectively. Analysis of qualitative information. Qualitative information in an evaluation should be analyzed appropriately and systematically so that the evaluation questions are answered effectively. Justified conclusions. The conclusions reached in an evaluation should be justified explicitly so that stakeholders can assess them. Impartial reporting. Reporting procedures should guard against distortion caused by personal feelings and biases of any party so the evaluation reports reflect the evaluation findings fairly. Metaevaluation. The evaluation itself should be evaluated formatively and summatively against these and other pertinent standards so that its conduct is appropriately guided, and on completion, stakeholders can closely examine its strengths and weaknesses. Page 44 of 44C. Outside consultants Commitment to LRSD evaluations by Dr. Ross Dr. Steven M. Ross curriculum vitae Dr. James S. Catterall curriculum vitae Page 45 of 45-THEUNiVEFStlYOF MEMPHIS Center tor Researct: in Ediicaticnal Policy A Tennessee Center of Excellence 325 Browning Hall Memphis, TN 38152-3340 Office: 901.678.2310 Toll Free: 866.670.6147 Fax\n901.678.4257 www.memphis.edu/crep November 11, 2004 Dr, Karen DeJamette Director, PRE Little Rock School District 3001 S. Pulaski Little Rock, AR 77206 Dear Dr. DeJamette\nreviewed the document entitled, First Quarterly Progress Update, prepared with I have reviewed the document entitled, irsr i^uaneriy riugicss upuaiu, respect to the new Compliance Remedy (Memorandum Opinion, June 30, 2004, add. 64-67). As an evaluation expert and past and present consultant to the Little Rock School District, I am satisfied with its content and endorse it as representing an accurate portrayal of accomplishments to date and a viable plan for addressing the requirements of the Remedy. 1 look forward to working with you, PRE, and other district leaders in completing the evaluation studies described in the document. Please feel free to contact me if any additional information is needed. Sincerely, Steven M. Ross, Ph.D. Faudree Professor and Director Center for Research in Educational Policy A Tennessee Board of Regents Institution An Equal Opportunity  Affmative Action University IBRIEF VITA Steven M. Ross 224 Eagle Spring Cove Cordova, TN 38018 PERSONAL DATA____________ Home: (901)755-6654 Office: (901)678-3413 E-Mail: smross@memphis.edu EDUCATION The Pennsylvania State University The Pennsylvania State University The Pennsylvania State University B.A. M.S. PhD. 1969 1972 1974 Undergraduate Major: Graduate Major: Psychology Educational Psychology ________________________PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS________ American Psychological Association American Educational Research Association Mid-South Educational Research Association Association for Educational Communications \u0026amp; Technology International Congress for School Effectiveness and School Improvement Fellow Member Member Member Member Instnjctor Continuing Education Instnjctor Psychology EXPERIENCE Evaluator Assistant Professor Associate Professor Professor Senior Researcher Director Mitre Corporation Educational Psychology Educational Psychology Educational Psychology Center for Research in Educational Policy Center for Research in Educational Policy The Pennsylvania State University Lock Haven State College, Lock Haven, PA McLean, Virginia The University of Memphis The University of Memphis The University of Memphis The University of Memphis The University of Memphis COURSES RECENTLY TAUGHT Theories of Learning Individual Differences and Learning Educational Statistics Educational Research Computers in Education Thesis Writing Educational Assessment 1973-1974 Spring Semester 1974 Summer, 1974 1974-1979 1980-1985 1985 - Present 1995-2001 2001 - Present Undergraduate Graduate Undergraduate and Graduate Graduate Undergraduate and Graduate Graduate Graduate________ HONORS AND DISTINCTIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. NDEA Fellowship for graduate study at the Pennsylvania State University, 1971-1973. Graduate Student Associate, Southwest Regional Laboratory, Summer, 1971. Distinguished Teaching Service Award, University of Memphis, 1980. Phi Delta Kappa Professional Research Award, Memphis Chapter, 1983. Elected Fellow, Division 15, American Psychological Association, 1986. Visiting Scholar. National Center for Research on Improving Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. University of Michigan, Summer 1987. Distinguished Research Award, University of Memphis, 1987. Page 46 of 46r i 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Distinguished Teacher Service Award, University of Memphis, 1988. (First eligibility since 1980\nno longer eligible) Memphis State University nominee, CASE Professor of the Year Award, 1989 Superior Performance in University Research (SPUR) Award, University of Memphis, 1990, 1991, 1992 Distinguished Research Award, University of Memphis, 1993. Board of Visitors Eminent Faculty Award, University of Memphis (first recipient), 1993 Editor, Educational Technology Research and Development, 1993-present Editorial Board, Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk. 1995-present Editorial Board, Computers and Human Behavior, 1994-present Invited testimony, U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Youth, and Families, Committee on Education and the Workforce, June 26, 1998. ___ _ 17. Invited panelist on comprehensive school reform, discussion with Secretary of Education Richard Riley, 18. 19. March 16. 1999. Lillian and Morrie Moss Chair of Excellence in Urban Education, 2001 Provosts Professorship, 2004-2005, The University of Memphis SCHOLARSHIP Publications in Refereed Journals Books Book Chapters Papers Presented at Professional Meetings 122 7 28 224 SELECTED RECENT PUBLICATIONS Ross, S. M., \u0026amp; Smith, L. J. (1998). Improving school achievement and inter-group relations for children placed at risk. European Journal of Intercultural education, 9(2), 141-154. Smith, L. J., Ross, S. M., McNelis, M, Squires, M., and others (1998), The Memphis restructuring initiative. Analysis of activities and outcomes that impact implementation success. Education and Urban Society, 30(3), 296-325. Stringfield, S., \u0026amp; Snively, F. (1998). Scaling up school restructuring in multicultural multilingual Datnow, A., Ross, S., , --------=-r-------------- - oazox -nc qkv contexts: Early observations from Sunland County. Education and Urban Society, 30(3), 326-357. Ross S. M., Smith, L. J., \u0026amp; Casey, J. P. (1999). \"Bridging the gap\": The effects of the Success For All Program on elementary school reading achievement as a function of student ethnicity and ability level. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(2), 129-150. Momson, G. R., Ross, S. M., \u0026amp; Kemp, J. E. (2000). Designing effective instruction (3*^ ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan College Publishing. Ross S M Alberg, M., Smith. L., Anderson, R., Bol, L., Dietrich, A., Lowther, D., \u0026amp; Phillipsen, L. I xwww,  O _ _____I____*rUA KAAmrkhie eff\u0026gt;kr\\/ 9f VAar (2000). Using whole-school restructuring to improve Teaching and Change. 7(2), 111-126. 1 I, r\\., UWI, W., IWI   I  - I  educational outcomes: The Memphis story at year 3. Ross, S. M., \u0026amp; Seidel, S. (2000). The introduction to the NEA Teacher Education Initiative. Teachirig and Change, 8, 5-9. Nath LR \u0026amp; Ross S.M. (2001). The influence of a peer tutoring training model for implementing cooperative groupings with elementary students. Educational Technology, Research and Developmerit, (2), 41-56. Ross S M , Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., Stringfield, S., Wang, L. W., \u0026amp; Alberg, M^September 2001). Two- and three-year achievement results from the Memphis Restructuring Initiative. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, 323-346. Page 47 of 47 iBol, L., Nunnery. J., Ross S.M. \u0026amp; Alberg, M. (2002). A comparison of Teachers assessment practices in school restructuring^ ' . n i_ z_..1. DIxLz t A\\ models by year of implementation. Journal of Educational Research for Students Placed at RJsk, 7(4), 407- 423. Reynolds, A., Ross, S.M., Rakow, J.H. (2002). Teacher retention, teaching effectiveness, and professional preparation: A comparison of professional development school and non-professional development school graduates. Teaching and Teacher Education. 18, 289-303. Ross, S. M. (2002) (2002). Developing Capacity for Scaling-Up Comprehensive School Reform Models: Aggregate Results for Provider Teams Receiving Capacity-Building Grants (Prepared for OERI). Memphis, TN: The University of Memphis, Center for Research in Educational Policy. Ross, S. M. \u0026amp; Hom, R. A. (2002). Introductory Statistics: An Individualized Approach Third Edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing. Ross S. M. \u0026amp; Lowther, D. L. (2003). Impacts of the Co-nect school reform design on classroom instruction, school climate, and student achievement in inner-city schools. Journal for Educational Research on Students Placed at Risk, 8(3), 215-246. Ross, S.M Ross, S.M., Stringfield, S., Sanders, W.L., \u0026amp; Wright, S.P. (2003). Inside systemic Elementary school reform: Teacher effects and teacher mobility. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(1), 73-110. Ross, S. M. \u0026amp; Morrison, G.R. (2003). Experimental research methods. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Education Communications and Technology, 2 Ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Ross, S.M., Stringfield, S., Sanders, W.L., \u0026amp; Wright, S.P. (in press). Fourth-year achievement results in the Tennessee value-added assessment system in restructuring schools in an inner-city district. Education Administration Quarterlv. Lowther, D. L., \u0026amp; Ross, S. M. (2003). When each one has one: The influences on teaching strategies and student achievement of using laptops in the classroom. Educational Technology Research and. Development, 51(3), 23-44. Monison, G. R., Ross, S, M., \u0026amp; Kemp, J. E. (2004). Designing Effective Instruction 4*^ Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley \u0026amp; Sons. Ross, S. M., Nunnery J. A., Goldfeder, E., McDonald, A., Rachor, R., Hornbeck, M., \u0026amp; Fleischman, S. (2004). Using school reform models to improve reading achievement: A longitudinal study of Direct Instruction and Success For All in an urban district. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 9 (4), 357-388. Ross, S. M., Morrison, G., \u0026amp; Lowther, D. L. (in press). Using experimental methods in higher education research. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. McDonald, A.J., Sterbinsky A., Lowther, D., Ross, S.M., Redfield, D., Apodaca, M., \u0026amp; Martelli, S. (in press). Demonstrating comprehensive school reform. A review of two longitudinal studies. The International Journal of Educational Policy, Research and Practice, 4 (4). Ross S.M. \u0026amp; Gil L. (2004) The past and future of comprehensive school reform: Perspectives r\\Ud5, O.IVl., w VII, J I  iw  - --  , from a researcher and practitioner in Christopher T. Cross (Ed.). Putting the Pieces Together, Lessons from CSR Research (pp. 151-174). Washington, DC: NCCSR. -----------------------------------------------------------SUMMARY OF INTERESTS ten years, I ------------------------------- During the past have worked extensively with school districts, both regionally and locally, to develop and Page 48 of 48 I* evaluate programs for improving student achievement. The primary focus of these studies has been schools predominantly serving disadvantaged inner-city minority children. Currently, I am working on the formative and summative evaluation of Comprehensive School Reform (CSR) projects at schools in various states. Additional ongoing research projects are studies of school restructuring designs as they are implemented in Memphis City Schools and other school districts and of professional development schools in seven national sites as part of the NEA Teacher Education Initiative (NEA-TEI). Page 49 of 49 INAME: Catterall CURRICULUM VITAE James S. ADDRESS: 1840 Deerhill Trail Topanga Canyon, CA 90290 (310) 455-2720 University of California Graduate School of Education \u0026amp; Information Studies Los Angeles, CA 90024 (310) 825-5572\n825-0267 EDUCATION: Ph.D. Educational Policy Analysis/Finance Stanford University, 1982 M.A. Public Policy Analysis University of Minnesota Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, 1973 A.B. Economics (with honors) Princeton University, 1970 EMPLOYMENT: UCLA Graduate School of Education \u0026amp; Information Studies 1995 to present: Professor of Education (appointed Assistant Professor in 1981) 1996-97 1995- Elected Chair of the Faculty Associate Editor, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, a journal of the American Educational Research Association. 1993-97 Assistant Dean 1 Program leadership and development responsibilities include: Chair, National Technical Advisory Panel for Accountability and Assessment Kentucky State Legislative Research Commission, 1998 to present. This panel advises the KY legislature. State Board of Education, and State Commissioner of Education on the design and technical quality of Kentucky's multi-faceted annual student testing and assessment system. I Appointed member. State of California Public School Assessment Advisory Committee. Also Member of the PSAA Technical Design Group, 2003 to present. UCLA Principals' Leadership Institute. Core faculty member in assessment and statistics for school leaders. Head, Division of Administration, Curriculum and Teaching Studies (1988- 90\n1992-94) 1989 -1991 Elected Chair of the Faculty Page 50 of 50II 1978 to 1980 Courses taught: Organizational Theory and Leadership Policy Analysis in Education\nPolitics of Education Educational Planning and Change Research and statistics for School Leaders Evaluation of Teaching and Learning\nDirector, Center for the Study of Educational Policy, Palo Alto, California. Editor, The School Choice Forum. 1977 to 1980 Institute Fellow, Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance, Stanford University. Ford Foundation Fellow in School Finance, Stanford University. Research and Teaching Assistant, School of Education, Stanford University. Three years teaching economics of education\ntwo years teaching school finance seminar. 1976 to 1977 1973 to 1976 Instructor of mathemabcs, Oregon Episcopal School, Portland, Oregon (1/2 time). Consultant and writer, Oregon state school finance reform project, Salem, Oregon (with Prof. Larry Pierce, Department of Political Science, Univ, of Oregon (1 / 2 time). Principal and Assistant Director, Summer Programs\ninstructor of mathematics (7 through Calculus AB), economics and sociology\nvarsity tennis and girls' basketball coach\nhousemaster. Shattuck School, Faribault, Minnesota. 1972 to 1973 1972 Chief Committee Consultant, Taxation. State of Minnesota House of Representatives, St. Paul, Minnesota. Researcher and writer. State of Minnesota Tax Study Commission. 1970 to 1971 Program Officer, Budget and Fiscal Planning, New Jersey State Department of Higher Education. Page 51 of 51PUBLICATIONS: BOOKS AND MONOGRAPHS \"The Arts and Learning\nNew Opportunihes for Research.\" Washington, DC\nAmerican Educational Research Association / Arts Education Partnership (2004), \"Critical Links: The Arts and Academic and Social Development.\" Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership, National Endowment for the Arts. (2003) \"Champions of Change: The Impact of the Arts on Human Development.\" Washington, DC: The National Endowme. nt for thce, Arts, the 5M acArthur Foundmatioonn,F tFheim GdE Fanudn dfh, pa nAdr ttqh eE Adurtcsa Etiodnucation \"The Partnership, 1999 Kentucky Instructional Results Information System: A Technical Review.\" With W. Mehrens, J. Ryan, G. Flores, and P. Rubin. Frankfort, KY: KY Legislative Research Commission, January 1998. \"An Assessment of Student Content Knowledge in Urban Environmental Issues.\" Lm Angeles, CA: Tree SSSlllCllK VI -------O~ --------------------- , , 1 I*, I A 1100'7 People, Inc. / County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. April IW/. \"Assessment of the Oak Hill School Curriculum.\" Eugene OR\nOak Hill School. 1996. \"Different Ways of Knowing, Report of the Three-year National Longitudinal Study.\" Los Angeles, CA: The Galef Institute (1995). \"Different Ways of Knowing. 1990-91 Field Test.\" Summary Report of Program Effects on Teachers and Students. Los Angeles, CA: The Galef Institute (1991). \"Discovering What Schools Really Teach. Designing Improved Coursework Indicators/ (With L. .  \u0026lt;r- y-s_______ aL_____ 1 Carba Monica CAl' TnpRAND 11 V V I lal i-zCI IVV13 iwtti ly j v i. a .q ....p  - Mr\u0026gt; McDonnell, L. Burstein, T. Ormseth, and David Moody). Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation, 1990. \"Reducing the High School Dropout Rate in California.\" (With David Stern, Charlotte Alhadeft iand Maureen Ash.) (Berkeley, CA: Institute for Governmental Studies, University of California) 1986 (Research Monograph, 120 pp.). \"Economic Evaluation of Public Programs.\" (Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985. \"Education Vouchers.\" Bloomington, Indiana: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation (Fastback Series), 1984. \"Tuition Tax Credits: Fact and Fiction.\" Bloomington, Indiana\nPhi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation (Fastback Series), 1983. -resting in the Nations Schools and Districts\nHow Much? What Kind? To What Ends? At What C^ts?\" (With James Burry, Bruce Choppin, and Donald Dorr-Bremme.) Los Angeles, CA. Center for the Study of Evaluation Report No. 94,1982. 'The Linkages Between Policy and Planning: An Exploratory Study\" Anaheim, CA: Orange County Department of Education, 1982. PUBLISHED POLICY ANALYSES \"Activities to 1P -l-a-n-- -a--n--d- I-m---p-l-e--m---e--n--t -t-h e Re.p or_ting of School Dropout and Retention Indicators.\" Report to the United States Congress, PL 110-297, April 1989. \"Los Angeles Schools and Tomorrow's Workforce\" Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles 21X10,1988. \"Social Capital and the Improvement of Instruction.' Administration and Leadership. 1988. .\" California Commission on Public School Page 52 of 52 I \"School Reforms and School Dropouts in California: Tracking the Linkages California State Department of Education, 1988. \"An Assessment of Audience Needs for School Reform Assessment Information.' United States Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, 1988. \"School Dropouts: Policy Prospects.\" Report for the Policy and Planning Center, Appalachia Educational Laboratory, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, United States Department ot Education, 1986. \"Dropping Out of School in the North Central Region of the United States: The Dimensions of The Problem -P , . ! ____inoo n.Ji/n, C'ontral R (Xxinnal F.o VlCStlonsl Based on Available Evidence,\" 1988. Policy Report, North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. \"Dropping Out of School in the North Central Region of the United States: The Costs and Consequences of  * P. . . r_____I. Krx^..i-u Dzat-rmnal PH 11 rafifina1 1 .annratorv. School Leaving,\" 1988. Policy Report North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. \"School Dropouts: Policy Prospects.\" Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory. \"Testing and Excellence in Education: Some Questions About Costs and Benefits.\" (With D L. Baker and ]. L. Herman.) Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation. CSE Report 288,1984. -The Costs of Instructional Information Systems.\" UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation, Evaluation Systems Project Report, 1982. \"Proposition 13: The Campaign, the Vote, and the Immediate After-effects for California Schools,\" with Thomas Thresher, Stanford University, Institute for Research on Educational Finance and -Tuition Governance (IFG) Program Report 79-D5, March 1979. Tax Credits for Schools: A Federal Priority for the 1980's,\" IFG Policy Perspective Stanford University, spring 1981. \"Schools in the Aftermath of Proposition 13: Perspectives, Prospects, and the Impertinence of the School in ine/Miei iiidiii VI 1 I vipvoitiMii xw. a --------- , , , m-ro Voucher Pundits,\" Center for the Study of Educahonal Policy, Program Report, February 1979. \"Passing the Baton at the State Department of Education.\" Education, W, winter 1983. Los Angeles, UCLA Graduate School of Education. SELECTED ARTICLES 'The Costs and Benefits of Large-scale Assessment.\" journal of Education Finance, winter 1989. \"Still Up and Running After All These Years: From Practice to Theory on Sustaining Funded School *  .. I . __ -inna Programs.\" Chicago Policy Review, Winter 2003. Involvement in the Arts and Human Development: General Involvement and Intensive Involvement^in Music and the Theatre Arts.^' Fairfield, CT: The GE Fund and the MacArthur Foundation, The Arts and Learning: Champions of Change Research Reports, 1999. Also forthcoming, Washington, DC: Americans for the Arts Monograph series, fall 1999. The Chicago Arts Partnerships in Education: Summary' of 1993 to 1999 Evaluations? With Lynn A. caRO Aris rdruieisiiivs in i-uueaiivM.. * - . ' , Waldorf. Fairfield, CT: The GE Fund and the MacArthur Foundation, Champions ot Change Research Reports, 1999. \"Does Experience in the Arts 1998. Boost Academic Achievement? A Response to Eisner.\" Art Education, July \"Involvement in the Arts and Success in Secondary School.\" Washington D. C.: Americans for the Arts. Monograph Series V. 1, No. 9, January 1998. \"Risk and Resilience in Student Transitions to High School.\" American lournal of Education, 106/2 (February, 1998), 302-333. Page 53 of 53\"Where excellence and prep^edness meet: Increased course at^r^k students.\" (With n.:\n\"rM^yv7he High School loumab 80/2 (December/January 1997). \"The Emergence of Private Postsecondary Education in the Former Sovi^st Republic of Azerbaijan.\" (with _ . 1 . X i-.i__rAii/'ni-inn S iQMn. .S-b. Raymond McGhee Jr.). International Higher Education, 5,1996, 3-5. \"Making Drama Special: Developing Drama Practice to Meet Special Education Needs.\" (Review Essay). t .r r____I. T^lia/i/ra fi W/1nr/]hf^n - vol. 1(1). 1 TzO. With Sherry Kerr. Research on Drama and Theatre in Education, Vol. IH). 1996. \"Cognition, Community, a. Theater in Education: ' and Assessment\nToward Integrated Inquiry on Drama in Education.\" Drama and ' Contrary Research, John SomeA, Ed., North York, ON, Canada: Captus University Publications, 1996,147-158. and the Arts: A National Endowment for the Arts. \"The Fourth R: The Arts and Learning\" (with Jaye T. Darby). Teachers College Record, 96(2), 1994. \"Marketplace Education Revisited.\" Business and Economic Review, 40(2), Jan-Mar 1994,11-16. \"Theory and Practice of Family Choice m Education: Taking Stock.\" Economics of Education Review 10(2), 1992. \"A Reform Cooled Out: Tests Required for High School Graduation.\" The High School |oum.ab 75(1), 1991 (November). \"Los Angeles Schools and Tomorrow's Work Force.\" Education, 5(5), winter 1990,18-20. \"School Dropouts: Hero Today, Here Tomorrow.\" UCLA |oumal ofEducahon, 4(1), spring 1990. \"Estimates the Costs and Benefits of Large Scale Assessments: Lessons from Recent Research.\" loumalof Educational Finance, 16(1), summer 1990,1-20. \"Standards and School Dropouts: A National Study fjests Required for High School Graduation.\" American lournal of Education, 98(1), November 1989,1-34. \"Contemporary Reforms and the Equality of Educational Opportunity.\" 1 ICl,A lournal of Education, 3(2), spring 1989, 27-36. With and Without High School Diplomas.\" (With D. Stem, I. Paik, \"Labor Market Experience of Teenagers \" a V i Economics of Education Review, 8(3), 1989,233-246. \"A Group Counseling Dropout Prevention Intervention: Some Cauhons on L .. . . t . A_________r* J.,Pocoarrh Intimal. z4(4l lyo? High Schools.\" American Educational Research lournal, 24(4), 1987, 521-540. Isolating Adolescents Within \"A Process Model of Dropping Out of School: Implications for Research, Policy, and Practice.\" The Urb^ Educator, 8(2), Spring/Summer 1987,23-38. \"On The Social Costs of Dropping Out of School.\" 19-30. The High School lournal, 71(1), October-November 1987, 'The Supplv and Demand for Private Education: Raking tte impact of Tuition Tax Credits\" (Review Essay), lournal of Education Finance, fall 1987, 205-215. \"School Completion Indicators for Education Monitoring Systems: The Long Road to Satisfactory School bcnooi statistics.\" The Urban Educator, 8(2), Spnng/Summer 1987, 23-38. \"Vocational Potential.\" (Review Essay) Science, 2(6), 10 April 1987. \"The Effect of Alternative School Programs on (With David Stem.) uul P. on High School Completion and Labor Market Outcomes.\" F.ducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 8(1), spring 198b. Page 54 of 54\"America's Presbge Schools: Boot camps for Upper class Survivalists or Academic Citadels?\" Review of Educabon 12(3), 1986. \"Proposition 13: Effects on High School Curricula, 1978-1983.\" American lournal of Education, 93(3), May 1985. \"Polibes and Aid to Private Schools.\" Educabonal Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6(4), winter 1985, 435- 440. \"Notes on the New Politics of Education.\" (With Milbrey W. McLaughlin.) Education and Urban Society, 16(3), May 1984. \"Assessing the Economic Outcomes of Vocational Education.\" Studies in Educational Evaluabon, 10,1984. \"Public and Private SchcKils: Evidence on Tuibon Tax Credits.\" (With Henry Levin.) Sociology of Educabon, 55, April/July, 1982. Kappan Special Report, \"Some Hypotheses on Voucher Plan's Failure to Attract Support from Interest Groups.\" (With Michael W. Kirst.) Phi Delta Kappan, May 1980. \"Here Comes the Voucher-A Trojan Horse?\" California School Boards, March 1979. \"Perspeebve: A Year on the Finance Treadmill.\" California School Boards, March 1979. BOOK CHAPTERS \"Cost Benefit Analysis and Faculty Productivity in Engineering, Science, and Mathematics teaching.\" Chapter in book Assessing Productivity in Higher Education based on ongoing work with Worcester Polytechnic Institute (MA) studying reforms of teaching in introductory engineering classes using group projects, peer mentoring, technology, and reduced use of faculty lecturing. Additional contributors include William Massey and Henry M. Levin (1998). \"California Education Policy for the 21st Century: Betting Heavily on Reduced Class Size.\" (with Marilyn Korostoff, Ed. D.). Chapter in California Policy Options, 1997. Los Angeles, CA\nCalifornia Business Forecast and the UCLA Anderson School of Management. (1997) \"Competency, Certificabon, and Authentic Assessments.\" (With Lynn Winters.) Chapter in H. J. Walberg and W. Steven Barnett (Eds.) Advances in Educabonal Productivity/Cost Analysis for Education Decisions: Methods and Examples. Greenwich, CT\nJAI Press, Inc., 1994. \"The Promise and Prospects of Keeping Students in School.\" (With David Stem). Chapter in J. Simon and D Stipek (Eds.), Exit Age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991. \"The Educabonally At-Risk Children: Demographics, Consequences, and Policy Prospects.\" (With E, Cota Robles.) Chapter in Henry M. Levin and Robert Polkinghorn (Eds.), Accelerating the Education of At-Risk Students, 1993, Rockefeller Foundation. 'Tomorrow's Workforce: Over Credentialed and Underprepared?\" Chapter in Can California Be Competitive and Caring? Daniel Mitchell and Jane Wildhorn (Eds.), Monograph and Research Series 49, pp. 181-217. UCLA Institute of Industrial Relations, 1989. 'The Politics of Education Reform.\" (With Harry Handler.) Chapter in: From the Campus: Perspectives on the School Reform Movement, S. Cohen and L. Solmon (Eds.), New York: Praeger, 1989, pp. 188- 201. 'Tuition Tax Credits and Issues of Equity.\" Chapter in Public Dollars for Private Schools: The Case of Tuition Tax Credits, Temple University Press, T. James and H. Levin (Eds.), 1983. \"Resource Indicators for Mathematics and Science Indicator Systems\" Indicators for Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation, 1988. \"School Completion and Dropout Measures for Mathematics and Science Indicator Systems.\" Indicators for Mathemabcs, Science, and Technology Education. Santa Monica, CA\nThe RAND Corporation, 1988. Page 55 of 55\"Private School Participation and Public Policy.\" Chapter in Comparing Public and Private Schools, 1. T. James and H. Levin (Eds.), Falmer Press, 1988. \"A Theoretical Model for Examining the Costs of Testing.\" Chapter in Costs of Evaluation, Marvin C. Alkin (Ed.). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1984. \"Fundamental Issues in the Costing of Testing Programs.\" Chapter in Costs of Evaluation, Marvin C. Alkin (Ed.), Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 98. CONSULTANC1E5/ADV15ORY APPOINTMENTS: Expert Witness in judicial cases: Liberties Union vs. CA Secretary of State (Prop. 187,1998). Separation of Church and State vs. State of Iowa (1986). Westminster Christian Academy, CA (1990). American Civil Americans for the vs. Kwak vs. Whillock et al. (San Diego, CA), 2001-2001. Board of Advisors, Performing Tree of Los Angeles. 1999-2004. Board of Advisors, Sage Hill School, Newport Beach, CA 1998- Board of Trustees, Wildwood School, Santa Monica, 1988-91. Lead Designer and Advisory Board Head, Riverside (CA) School of the Performing and Media Arts. 1997- Research Advisor, Davis Foundation Program for the Improvement of Teaching in Engineering and the Applied Sciences, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA. 19%- Member, Advisory Board, The Charter School of Education, California State University at Los Angeles, Alan Mori, Dean, (1997-). Member, Advisory Board: RAND Corporation \"Arts and Public Safety Project,\" Sally Ann Law and David Mac Arthur, Principal Investigators (1997-). Advisor to Project Marte - NASA/JPL collaboration with LA Artist George Yepes and the Lennox CA Schools to create a mural for permanent installation at JPL to commemorate the Pathfinder Project. Evaluation of student science learning. Chair, Research Advisory Board, Annenberg Trust/ Galef Institute National Initiative for the Arts and Learning, $10 million, 1996-2000. Galef Institute, Los Angeles, Senior Advisor. Founding Member, Los Angeles Learning Centers Design Team, New American Schools Development Corporation. Principal Consultant on Education, Los Angeles 2000 Committee, The 2000 Partnership. Consulting writer for California State School Superintendents Wilson Riles and Bill Honig. Consulting writer for U.S. Secretary of Education, Lauro Cavasos (1989). Chair, Final Review Panel, United States Secretary of Education's Field Initiated Studies Program, 1987. Member, U.S. Department of Education Task Force, Educational Data Improvement Project, 1987-88. Page .56 of 56I Appointed Member, Task Force on Instructional Improvement: Panel advising California State School Superintendent Bill Honig on the development of the School Accountability Report Card mandated by Proposition 98, Fall 1988. The RAND Corporation. Consultant under long term contract. Participant in the Design of Education Quality Indicator Prototype Systems. Manuscript reviewer. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Consulting economist on Children at Risk in the Midwest. Technical Assistance Development Systems. Design of cost analysis components of research studies (in support of federally funded early education programs). Wildwood School (Santa Monica, CA). Consultant to the Board of Directors on board policy and practice, evaluation of the school head, and school evaluation. Oak Hill School (Eugene, OR). Consultant to the Board on school curriculum and organization (1996). American Educational Research Association. Louisiana State Department of Education\nFlorida Educational Research Association. Training of evaluators in economic analysis. CIVIC AND VOLUNTEER ACTIVITIES: Member, Board of Trustees, Wildwood School, Santa Monica, CA, 1987-90. Head, Strategic Planning Committee. Member, Board of Trustees, The Keys School, Palo Alto, CA, 1979-81. Music in the Schools: Demonstration and performance in local elementary schools with my daughter (cello and violin). Charter member. The Topanga (CA) Symphony (1982-present)\nmember. The Topanga Brass (1988-present). HONORS: I 2003 2000 1988 1987 1977-81 1977-78 1971 California Arts Council Award, \"Outstanding Arts Educator of the Year. (One of 15 recipients across the State of California.) Named a \"Kentucky Colonel\" by Governor Paul Patton, State of Kentucky (the highest award for public service Kentucky awards for non-citizens involved in Kentucky public affairs. Named as one of the Los Angeles Times \"88 for '88,\" Civic Achievement Award. One of two recipients in the field of higher education. The Susan and Mark Greenfield Award for Applied Research Learning and Achievement. Awarded annually to the UCLA faculty member whose work is judged to have had the most significant influence on educational policy or practice. Ford Foundation Fellow in School Finance, Stanford University School of Education. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare fellow, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota. Omicron Delta Epsilon (national economics honor society). Princeton University. PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES: American Educational Research Association Learning and Human Development Division Arts and Learning Special Interest Group Page 57 of 57i Neuroscience and Learning Special Interest Group American Educational Finance Association ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Birth date: February 20,1948 Family Married to Rebecca Catterall. Children: Lisa, 1973\nHannah, 1984\nand Grady, 1987. Recreational Interests: music (cello, guitar, bass, baritone horn), cooking, cartooning. Tennis, sailing. Page 58 of 58\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1428","title":"\"2004-05 Enrollment and Racial Composition of the Pulaski County Special School District,\" Office of Desegregation and Monitoring","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["2004-11-23"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School enrollment","School integration","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["\"2004-05 Enrollment and Racial Composition of the Pulaski County Special School District,\" Office of Desegregation and Monitoring"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1428"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["469 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_40","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2004-11"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/40"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District, plaintiff vs. Pulaski County Special School District, defendant\nArkansas DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 4 STATE CAPITOL MALL  UfTI.E ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-1071  (501) 682-4475  http:// arkedu.state.ar.us Dr. Kenneth James, Director of Education November 30, 2004 Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 RECEIVED DEC 1 - 2004 OFF/C F ESEGREGATION :,iONITORING RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 Dear Gentlemen: Per an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of November 2004 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, ~~ General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier --------------- ST A TE BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair - Jo Nell Caldwell, Little Rock  Vice Chair - Jeanna Westmoreland, Arkadelphia Members: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro  Shelby Hillman, Carlisle  Calvin King, Marianna  Randy Lawson, Bentonville MaryJane Rebick, Little Rock  Diane Tatum, Pine Bluff  Naccaman Williams, Johnson An Equal Opportunity Employer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS . WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for November 2004. Respectfully Submitted, ~~-tr Scott Smith, # 9251 General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on November 30, 2004, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr.M. SamuelJones,III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 INTHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Based on the information available at October 31, 2004, the ADE calculated the State Foundation Funding for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) 8. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Based on the information available at October 31, 2004, the ADE calculated for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 On October 31, 2004, distributions of State Foundation Funding for FY 04/05 were as follows: LRSD - $17,749,824 NLRSD - $9,082,953 PCSSD - $16,296,057 The allotments of State Foundation FundinQ calculated for FY 04/05 at October 31, 2004, subject to periodic adjustments, were as follows: LRSD - $65,082,694 NLRSD - $33,304, 168 PCSSD - $59,752,214 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at October 31, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at October 31, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at October 31, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Distributions for FY 04/05 at October 31, 2004, totaled $3,355,982. Allotment calculated for FY 04/05 was $12,305,271 subject to periodic adjustments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Calculated for FY 02/03, subject to periodic adjustments. I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Distributions for FY 04/05 at October 31, 2004, were: LRSD - $829,826 NLRSD - $754,310 PCSSD - $2,317,868 The allotments calculated for FY 04/05 at October 31, 2004, subject to periodic adjustments, were: LRSD - $4,149,129 NLRSD - $3,771,548 PCSSD - $11,589,336 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 In September 2002, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 02/03 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 In September 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the third one-third payment for FY 03/04 to the Districts. In September 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the first one-third payment for FY 04/05 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function instead of Reginald Wilson as indicated in the Implementation Plan. L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 In February 2004, General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At February 2004, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $2,487,682.66 NLRSD - $526,000.00 PCSSD - $1,454,813.26 In September 2004, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2004, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $4,019,063.00 NLRSD - $772,940.15 PCSSD - $2,478,863.72 In September 2004, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 04/05 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2004, the following had been paid for FY 04/05: LRSD - $1,325,043.67 NLRSD - $275,333.33 PCSSD - $845,221.22 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 In July 1999, each district submitted an estimated budget for the 99/00 school year. In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2004, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 04/05 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD - 14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD - 12. 6 l. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. The ADE accepted a bid on 16 buses for the Magnet and M/M transportation program. The buses will be delivered after July 1, 1999 and before August 1, 1999. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nPCSSD - 6. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001. The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two type C 47 passenger buses and fourteen type C 65 passenger buses. Prices on these units are $43,426.00 each on the 47 passenger buses, and $44,289.00 each on the 65 passenger buses. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42, 155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. 0. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. Specifications for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M school buses have been forwarded to State Purchasing for bidding. Bids will be opened on May 12, 2003. The buses will have a required delivery date after July 1, 2003 and before August 8, 2003. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773, 105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. S. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) u. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. 10 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring.(Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 04/05. 11 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 12 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 13 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 15 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 16 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On July 26, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is finalized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 18 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearence Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 19 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On November 4, 2004, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ADE is required to check laws that the legislature passes to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Clearance Lovell was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he has retired, the ADE attorney will find out who will be checking the next legislation. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 6, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 20 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 21 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. C. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 22 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation.  2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17- 1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81 st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 23 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 24 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 25 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11, in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 26 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, A letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 1748 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, A letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. 27 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. C. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Ongoing Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 28 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the te!\nl.cher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 29 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the ADE's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 30 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 31 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lntervenors filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 32 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua intervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lntervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lntervenors were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 33 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21, 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 34 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 35 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On July 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 36 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 37 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 11 , 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 38 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 39 . e VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed.  The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties . 40 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 41 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. 8. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 42 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. D. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1 . Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. 43 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31, 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. 44 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 45 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts. In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further assistance to schools, i.e., Title I Summer Planning Session, ADE session on Smart Start, and the School Improvement Workshops. All schools and districts in Pulaski County were invited to attend the \"Smart Start\" Summit November 9, 10, and 11 to learn more about strategies to increase student performance. \"Smart Start'' is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. Representatives from all three districts attended. On January 21, 1998, the ADE provided staff development for the staff at Oak Grove Elementary School designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement. Using achievement data from Oak Grove, educators reviewed trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. On February 24, 1999, the ADE provided staff development for the administrative staff at Clinton Elementary School regarding analysis of achievement data. On February 15, 1999, staff development was rescheduled for Lawson Elementary School. The staff development program was designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement using achievement data from Lawson, educators reviewed the components of the Arkansas Smart Initiative, trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. Student Achievement Workshops were rescheduled for Southwest Jr. High in the Little Rock School District, and the Oak Grove Elementary School in the Pulaski County School District. 46 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On April 30, 1999, a Student Achievement Workshop was conducted for Oak Grove Elementary School in PCSSD. The Student Achievement Workshop for Southwest Jr. High in LRSD has been rescheduled. On June 8, 1999, a workshop was presented to representatives from each of the Arkansas Education Service Cooperatives and representatives from each of the three districts in Pulaski County. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On June 18, 1999, a workshop was presented to administrators of the NLRSD. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On August 16, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for teaching assistant in the LRSD. On August 20, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for the Accelerated Learning Center in the LRSD. On September 13, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program were presented to the staff at Booker T. Washington Magnet Elementary School. On September 27, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to the Middle and High School staffs of the NLRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On October 26, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to LRSD personnel through a staff development training class. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On December 7, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was scheduled for Southwest Middle School in the LRSD. The workshop was also set to cover the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. However, Southwest Middle School administrators had a need to reschedule, therefore the workshop will be rescheduled. 47 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On January 1 O, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for both Dr. Martin Luther King Magnet Elementary School \u0026amp; Little Rock Central High School. The workshops also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On March 1, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for all principals and district level administrators in the PCSSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On April 12, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for the LRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. Targeted staffs from the middle and junior high schools in the three districts in Pulaski County attended the Smart Step Summit on May 1 and May 2. Training was provided regarding the overview of the \"Smart Step\" initiative, \"Standard and Accountability in Action,\" and \"Creating Learning Environments Through Leadership Teams.\" The ADE provided training on the development of alternative assessment September 12-13, 2000. Information was provided regarding the assessment of Special Education and LEP students. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate in professional development regarding Integrating Curriculum and Assessment K-12. The professional development activity was directed by the national consultant, Dr. Heidi Hays Jacobs, on September 14 and 15, 2000. The ADE provided professional development workshops from October 2 through October 13, 2000 regarding, \"The Write Stuff: Curriculum Frameworks, Content Standards and Item Development.\" Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems by video conference for Special Education and LEP Teachers on November 17, 2000. Also, Alternative Assessment Portfolio System Training was provided for testing coordinators through teleconference broadcast on November 27, 2000. 48 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On December 12, 2000, the ADE provided training for Test Coordinators on end of course assessments in Geometry and Algebra I Pilot examination. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation conducted the professional development at the Arkansas Teacher Retirement Building. The ADE presented a one-day training session with Dr. Cecil Reynolds on the Behavior Assessment for Children (BASC). This took place on December 7, 2000 at the NLRSD Administrative Annex. Dr. Reynolds is a practicing clinical psychologist. He is also a professor at Texas A \u0026amp; M University and a nationally known author. In the training, Dr. Reynolds addressed the following: 1) how to use and interpret information obtained on the direct observation form, 2) how to use this information for programming, 3) when to use the BASC, 4) when to refer for more or additional testing or evaluation, 5) who should complete the forms and when, (i.e., parents, teachers, students), 6) how to correctly interpret scores. This training was intended to especially benefit School Psychology Specialists, psychologists, psychological examiners, educational examiners and counselors. During January 22-26, 2001 the ADE presented the ACTAAP Intermediate (Grade 6) Benchmark Professional Development Workshop on Item Writing. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were invited to attend. On January 12, 2001 the ADE presented test administrators training for mid-year End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. On January 13, 2001 the ADE presented SmartScience Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This was shared with eight Master Teachers. The SmartScience Lessons were developed by the Arkansas Science Teachers Association in conjunction with the Wilbur Mills Educational Cooperative under an Eisenhower grant provided by the ADE. The purpose of SmartScience is to provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. The following training has been provided for educators in the three districts in Pulaski County by the Division of Special Education at the ADE since January 2000: On January 6, 2000, training was conducted for the Shannon Hills Pre-school Program, entitled \"Things you can do at home to support your child's learning.\" This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. The school's director and seven parents attended. 49 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued} On March 8, 2000, training was conducted for the Southwest Middle School in Little Rock, on ADD. Six people attended the training. There was follow-up training on Learning and Reading Styles on March 26. This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. On September 7, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Chicot Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Karen Sabo, Kindergarten Teacher\nMelissa Gleason, Paraprofessional\nCurtis Mayfield, P.E. Teacher\nLisa Poteet, Speech Language Pathologist\nJane Harkey, Principal\nKathy Penn-Norman, Special Education Coordinator\nAlice Phillips, Occupational Therapist. On September 15, 2000, the Governor's Developmental Disability Coalition Conference presented Assistive Technology Devices \u0026amp; Services. This was held at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On September 19, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Jefferson Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Melissa Chaney, Special Education Teacher\nBarbara Barnes, Special Education Coordinator\na Principal, a Counselor, a Librarian, and a Paraprofessional. On October 6, 2000, Integrating Assistive Technology Into Curriculum was presented at a conference in the Hot Springs Convention Center. Presenters were: Bryan Ayers and Aleecia Starkey. Speech Language Pathologists from LRSD and NLRSD attended. On October 24, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On October 25 and 26, 2000, Alternate Assessment for Students with Severe Disabilities for the LRSD at J. A. Fair High School was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. The participants were: Susan Chapman, Special Education Coordinator\nMary Steele, Special Education Teacher\nDenise Nesbit, Speech Language Pathologist\nand three Paraprofessionals. On November 14, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On November 17, 2000, training was conducted on Autism for the LRSD at the Instructional Resource Center. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. 50 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On December 5, 2000, Access to the Curriculum Via the use of Assistive Technology Computer Lab was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter of this teleconference. The participants were: Tim Fisk, Speech Language Pathologist from Arch Ford Education Service Cooperative at Plumerville and Patsy Lewis, Special Education Teacher from Mabelvale Middle School in the LRSD. On January 9, 2001, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. Kathy Brown, a vision consultant from the LRSD, was a participant. On January 23, 2001, Autism and Classroom Modifications for the LRSD at Brady Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Beverly Cook, Special Education Teacher\nAmy Littrell, Speech Language Pathologist\nJan Feurig, Occupational Therapist\nCarolyn James, Paraprofessional\nCindy Kackly, Paraprofessional\nand Rita Deloney, Paraprofessional. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcast on February 5, 2001. Presenters were: Charlotte Marvel, ADE\nDr. Gayle Potter, ADE\nMarcia Harding, ADE\nLynn Springfield, ASERC\nMary Steele, J. A. Fair High School, LRSD\nBryan Ayres, Easter Seals Outreach. This was provided for Special Education teachers and supervisors in the morning, and Limited English Proficient teachers and supervisors in the afternoon. The Special Education session was attended by 29 teachers/administrators and provided answers to specific questions about the alternate assessment portfolio system and the scoring rubric and points on the rubric to be used to score the portfolios. The LEP session was attended by 16 teachers/administrators and disseminated the common tasks to be included in the portfolios: one each in mathematics, writing and reading. On February 12-23, 2001, the ADE and Data Recognition Corporation personnel trained Test Coordinators in the administration of the spring Criterion-Referenced Test. This was provided in 20 sessions at 1 O regional sites. Testing protocol, released items, and other testing materials were presented and discussed. The sessions provided training for Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Pilot Tests. The LRSD had 2 in attendance for the End of Course session and 2 for the Benchmark session. The NLRSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. The PCSSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. 51 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On March 15, 2001, there was a meeting at the ADE to plan professional development for staff who work with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students. A $30,000 grant has been created to provide LEP training at Chicot Elementary for a year, starting in April 2001. A $40,000 grant was created to provide a Summer English as Second Language (ESL) Academy for the LRSD from June 18 through 29, 2001. Andre Guerrero from the ADE Accountability section met with Karen Broadnax, ESL Coordinator at LRSD, Pat Price, Early Childhood Curriculum Supervisor at LRSD, and Jane Harkey, Principal of Chicot Elementary. On March 1-2 and 8-29, 2001, ADE staff performed the following activities: processed registration for April 2 and 3 Alternate Portfolio Assessment video conference quarterly meeting\nanswered questions about Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) and LEP Alternate Portfolio Assessment by phone from schools and Education Service Cooperatives\nand signed up students for alternate portfolio assessment from school districts. On March 6, 2001, ADE staff attended a Smart Step Technology Leadership Conference at the State House Convention Center. On March 7, 2001, ADE staff attended a National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Regional Math Framework Meeting about the Consensus Project 2004. On March 8, 2001, there was a one-on-one conference with Carole Villarreal from Pulaski County at the ADE about the LEP students with portfolios. She was given pertinent data, including all the materials that have been given out at the video conferences. The conference lasted for at least an hour. On March 14, 2001, a Test Administrator's Training Session was presented specifically to LRSD Test Coordinators and Principals. About 60 LRSD personnel attended. The following meetings have been conducted with educators in the three districts in Pulaski County since July 2000. On July 10-13, 2000 the ADE provided Smart Step training. The sessions covered Standards-based classroom practices. 52 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On July 19-21, 2000 the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were 200 teachers from across the state in attendance. On August 14-31, 2000 the ADE presented Science Smart Start Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This will provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. On September 5, 2000 the ADE held an Eisenhower Informational meeting with Teacher Center Coordinators. The purpose of the Eisenhower Professional Development Program is to prepare teachers, school staff, and administrators to help all students meet challenging standards in the core academic subjects. A summary of the program was presented at the meeting. On November 2-3, 2000 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching. This presented curriculum and activity workshops. More than 1200 attended the conference. On November 6, 2000 there was a review of Science Benchmarks and sample model curriculum. A committee of 6 reviewed and revised a drafted document. The committee was made up of ADE and K-8 teachers. On November 7-10, 2000 the ADE held a meeting of the Benchmark and End of Course Mathematics Content Area Committee. Classroom teachers reviewed items for grades 4, 6, 8 and EOC mathematics assessment. There were 60 participants. On December 4-8, 2000 the ADE conducted grades 4 and 8 Benchmark Scoring for Writing Assessment. This professional development was attended by approximately 750 teachers. On December 8, 2000 the ADE conducted Rubric development for Special Education Portfolio scoring. This was a meeting with special education supervisors to revise rubric and plan for scoring in June. On December 8, 2000 the ADE presented the Transition Mathematics Pilot Training Workshop. This provided follow-up training and activities for fourth-year mathematics professional development. On December 12, 2000 the ADE presented test administrators training for midyear End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. 53 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcasts on April 2-3, 2001. Administration of the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy took place on April 23-27, 2001. Administration of the End of Course Algebra and Geometry Exams took place on May 2-3, 2001. Over 1,100 Arkansas educators attended the Smart Step Growing Smarter Conference on July 1 O and 11, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The Smart Step effort seeks to provide intense professional development for teachers and administrators at the middle school level, as well as additional materials and assistance to the state's middle school teachers. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the first keynote address on ''The Character-Centered Teacher''. Debra Pickering, an education consultant from Denver, Colorado, presented the second keynote address on \"Characteristics of Middle Level Education\". Throughout the Smart Step conference, educators attended breakout sessions that were grade-specific and curriculum area-specific. Pat Davenport, an education consultant from Houston, Texas, delivered two addresses. She spoke on \"A Blueprint for Raising Student Achievement\". Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. Over 1,200 Arkansas teachers and administrators attended the Smart Start Conference on July 12, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Start is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the keynote address. The day featured a series of 15 breakout sessions on best classroom practices. Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. On July 18-20, 2001, the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were approximately 300 teachers from across the state in attendance. 54 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) The ADE and Harcourt Educational Measurement conducted Stanford 9 test administrator training from August 1-9, 2001. The training was held at Little Rock, Jonesboro, Fort Smith, Forrest City, Springdale, Mountain Home, Prescott, and Monticello. Another session was held at the ADE on August 30, for those who were unable to attend August 1-9. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by video conference at the Education Service Cooperatives and at the ADE from 9:00 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on September 5, 2001. The ADE released the performance of all schools on the Primary and Middle Level Benchmark Exams on September 5, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Core Teacher In-Service training for Central in the LRSD on September 6, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for Hall in the LRSD on September 7, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for McClellan in the LRSD on September 13, 2001. The ADE conducted Basic Co-teaching training for the LRSD on October 9, 2001. The ADE conducted training on autism spectrum disorder for the PCSSD on October 15, 2001. Professional Development workshops (1 day in length) in scoring End of Course assessments in algebra, geometry and reading were provided for all districts in the state. Each school was invited to send three representatives (one for each of the sessions). LRSD, NLRSD, and PCSSD participated. Information and training materials pertaining to the Alternate Portfolio Assessment were provided to all districts in the state and were supplied as requested to LRSD, PCSSD and David 0. Dodd Elementary. On November 1-2, 2001 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching at the Excelsior Hotel \u0026amp; Statehouse Convention Center. This presented sessions, workshops and short courses to promote exceptional teaching and learning. Educators could become involved in integrated math, science, English \u0026amp; language arts and social studies learning. The ADE received from the schools selected to participate in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a list of students who will take the test. 55 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) On December 3-7, 2001 the ADE conducted grade 6 Benchmark scoring training for reading and math. Each school district was invited to send a math and a reading specialist. The training was held at the Holiday Inn Airport in Little Rock. On December 4 and 6, 2001 the ADE conducted Mid-Year Test Administrator Training for Algebra and Geometry. This was held at the Arkansas Activities Association's conference room in North Little Rock. On January 24, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by ADE compressed video with Fred Jones presenting. On January 31, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by NSCI satellite with Fred Jones presenting. On February 7, 2002, the ADE Smart Step co-sponsored the AR Association of Middle Level Principal's/ADE curriculum, assessment and instruction workshop with Bena Kallick presenting. On February 11-21, 2002, the ADE provided training for Test Administrators on the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Exams. The sessions took place at Forrest City, Jonesboro, Mountain Home, Springdale, Fort Smith, Monticello, Prescott, Arkadelphia and Little Rock. A make-up training broadcast was given at 15 Educational Cooperative Video sites on February 22. During February 2002, the LRSD had two attendees for the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The NLRSD and PCSSD each had one attendee at the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 2, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. The ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 9, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. 56 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) The Twenty-First Annual Curriculum and Instruction Conference, co-sponsored by the Arkansas Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and the Arkansas Department of Education, will be held June 24-26, 2002, at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs, Arkansas. \"Ignite Your Enthusiasm for Learning\" is the theme for this year's conference, which will feature educational consultant, Dr. Debbie Silver, as well as other very knowledgeable presenters. Additionally, there will be small group sessions on Curriculum Alignment, North Central Accreditation, Section 504, Building Level Assessment, Administrator Standards, Data Disaggregation, and National Board. The Educational Accountability Unit of the ADE hosted a workshop entitled \"Strategies for Increasing Achievement on the ACTAAP Benchmark Examination\" on June 13-14, 2002 at the Agora Center in Conway. The workshop was presented for schools in which 100% of students scored below the proficient level on one or more parts of the most recent Benchmark Examination. The agenda included presentations on ''The Plan-Do-Check-Act Instructional Cycle\" by the nationally known speaker Pat Davenport. ADE personnel provided an explanation of the MPH point program. Presentations were made by Math and Literacy Specialists. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, gave a presentation about ACTAAP. Break out sessions were held, in which school districts with high scores on the MPH point program offered strategies and insights into increasing student achievement. The NLRSD, LRSD, and PCSSD were invited to attend. The NLRSD attended the workshop. The Smart Start Summer Conference took place on July 8-9, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. The Smart Start Initiative focuses on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event included remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. After comments by the Director, Bena Kallick presented the keynote address \"Beyond Mapping: Essential Questions, Assessment, Higher Order Thinking\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On the second day, Vivian Moore gave the keynote address \"Overcoming Obstacles: Avenues for Student Success\". Krista Underwood gave the presentation \"Put Reading First in Arkansas\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. 57 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 (Continued) The Smart Step Summer Conference took place on July 10-11, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The event included remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. After comments by the Director, Vivian Moore presented the keynote address \"Overcoming Obstacles: Avenues for Student Success\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On the second day, Bena Kallick presented \"Beyond Mapping: Essential Questions, Assessment, Higher Order Thinking\". Ken Stamatis presented \"Smart Steps to Creating a School Culture That Supports Adolescent Comprehension\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On August 8, 2002, Steven Weber held a workshop at Booker T. Washington Elementary on \"Best Practices in Social Studies\". It was presented to the 4th grade teachers in the Little Rock School District. The workshop focused around the five themes of geography and the social studies (fourth grade) framework/standards. Several Internet web sites were shared with the teachers, and the teachers were shown methods for incorporating writing into fourth grade social studies. One of the topics was using primary source photos and technology to stimulate the students to write about diverse regions. A theme of the workshop included identifying web sites which apply to fourth grade social studies teachers and interactive web sites for fourth grade students. This was a Back-to-School In-service workshop. The teachers were actively involved in the workshop. On August 13 Steven Weber conducted a workshop at Parkview High School in the LRSD. Topics of the workshop included: 1. Incorporating Writing in the Social Studies Classroom 2. Document Based (open-ended) Questioning Techniques 3. How to pr\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1070","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-11"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1070"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nC NOV 1 5 2004 Agenda Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting NOV~/v1g6R 200-4 DOm D !Jl 0 0 =l  N ,-m :,0 z OU\u0026gt; _,:,o \u0026gt;m ~ :,0\n,,\nU\u0026gt; :\u0026lt; :,0 -\u0026gt;m~ CD :,o 0 ..... \u0026gt;U\u0026gt; jg 0 31::0 ml!:: 31::ll:: CDC: ml!: :,on U\u0026gt; .\u0026gt;.. .. iz5 U\u0026gt; I. 11. 111. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS REGULAR MEETING November 16, 2004 5:30 p.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Welcome to Guests B. Student Performance - Parkview Theater/Dance REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) C. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: V. A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Update APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes: Regular Meeting - 10-28-04 Special Meeting - 11-11-04 ,- \u0026lt;\"\u0026gt;\"\" \u0026gt;:0 ,\n.-.~_ ... :11:: Oz o\u0026gt; el~ m..,\no C: -z\no (\") o-\u0026lt; F\n(\") (I) \u0026gt; F Regular Board Meeting November 16, 2004 Page 2 VI. HUMAN RESOURCES A. Personnel Changes VII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Donations of Property B. Financial Report VIII. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions IX. ADJOURNMENT !Jl (\") ~~ ~~ ~: '\"I U\u0026gt; I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOME/PERFORMANCE Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. CITIZENS REMARKS C. LRCTA IV. REPORTS/ COMMUNICATIONS A. BOARD MEMBERS DATE: November 18, 2004 TO: Board of Directors LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: November 2004 Construction Report - Bond Projects BACKGROUND: Planning has started on several small construction projects for our schools. The architects are under contract with LRSD, and they are in the process of developing schematic plans and construction cost estimates for the following projects: 1. Media Center expansion at Carver Elementary. 2. Classrooms addition at Gibbs Elementary. 3. Minor renovations of Meadowcliff Elementary. 4. Window replacement at Oakhurst [Adult Education]. 5. Remodeling of Forest Heights Middle. The new Field House at Parkview has been completed and is being utilized by the staff and students. The Contractor has not finished the Parkview project because the punch list [discrepancies], developed by LRSD and the Architect, has not been completed. RATIONALE: Monthly reports are submitted to the Board to keep members up-to-date on construction projects in the District. FUNDING: Bond Funds RECOMMENDATION: Report item\nno action necessary. PREPARED BY: Bill Goodman, District Engineer ~ ::r:: \u0026gt;c:: ~! :o Rl ~~ zc:: ,m-\nn,o !\" .z.. m :0 ~ c\u0026gt;:: 0 :::. 0 :0 m tn =...\". IT' C, :r z C,.. ~ -\u0026lt; .C.,: C: )\u0026gt; IT Facility Name Administration Brady Central Central -- Dunbar Fair Park Henderson Parkview Pulaski Hgts. Elem Pulaski Hgts. MS Scott Field Southwest Wakefield Wilson CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD NOVEMBER 18, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION I Project Description I Cost I t:st. CompletIon Date .HVAC $70,000 Nov-04 Addition/renovation $973,621 I Nov-04 Renovation - Interior $10,200,266 Aug-05 HVAC Renovation - Band Area $225,000 I Dec-04  Renovation/addition $6,149,023 Nov-04 Roof $245,784 Jan-05 Lockers $43,854 Dec-04 Addition $2,121 ,226 Dec-04 Renovation $1,193,259 Nov-04 Renovation $3,755,041 I Nov-04 Track Renovations $289,056 Dec-04 Addition $2,000,000 Nov-04 Rebuild $5,300,000 Nov-04 HVAC for Cafeteria $56,000 Jan-05 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - FALL/ WINTER 2004-05 Facilitv Name I Project Description I Cost I t:st. \u0026lt;.,\nompIetion Date Carver Media Center Expansion $167,490 Unknown Gibbs Addition $705,~ Jun-05 Meadowcliff Remodel I $164,150 Mar-05 Mitchell Renovation I $2,212,493 Unknown Oakhurst (Adult Education) New Windows $215,000 Jun-05 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I t:SL l,OmpIeuon Date Booker Electrical Upgrade I Unknown1 Unknown Chicot !Electrical Upgrade ' Unknown Unknown Cloverdale Elementary Addition I $520,750 I Unknown Fair Park Addition I $799,000 I Unknown Forest Heights Remodel I $1 ,547,000 Unknown Garland Remodel I Unknown i Unknown Pulaski Hgts. MS 'Energy monitoring system installation I Unknown Unknown Rightsell I Renovation I $2,494,000 Unknown Western Hills I Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC I $640,000 Aug-05 Woodruff I Parking addition $193,777 Unknown BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Administration Asbestos abatement $380,495 Mar-03 Administration 1 Fresh air system I $55,ooo I Aug-03 Administration 1Fire alarm $32,350 I Aug-03 Administration Annex 1 Energy monitoring system installation May-02 Alternative Learning Ctr. I Energy monitoring system installation $15,160 I Oct-01 Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy efficient lighting $82,000  Dec-01 Badgett Partial asbestos abatement $237,237 Jul-01 Badgett Fire alarm $18,250 Aug-02 Bale Classroom addition/renovation $2,244,524 Dec-02 ---- Bale . Energy monitoring system Mar-02 -- -- Bale Partial roof replacement $269,587 Dec-01 -- - - -- --- Bale HVAC $664,587 Aug-01 Facility Name Baseline Booker Booker Booker Booker Booker Booker Brady Brady Carver Carver Central Central Parking Central/Quigley Central/Quigley Central/Quigley Central Central Central Central Central Chicot Chicot Cloverdale Elem. Cloverdale MS Cloverdale MS Dodd Dodd Dodd Dodd Facilities Service Facility Services Fair Park Fair Park Fair Park J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair Forest Park Forest Park Forest Park Fulbright ___ Fulbright Fulbright Fulbright Fulbright Franklin Geyer Springs Gibbs Gibbs CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD NOVEMBER 18, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Project Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Renovation $953,520 Aug-04 Gym Roof $48,525 Oct-04 ADA Rest rooms $25,QQQ I Aug-04 Energy efficient lighting $170,295 I Apr-01 Energy monitoring system installation $23,710 I Oct-01 ,Asbestos abatement I $10,900 I Feb-02 Fire alarm I $34,501 I Mar-02 ,Energy efficient lighting $80,593 I Sep-02 Asbestos abatement $345,072 . Aug-02 Energy monitoring system installation $14,480 May-01  Parking lot $111 ,742 Aug-03 Reflecting Pond I $57,561 I Sep-04 Student parking $174,ooo I Aug-03 Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair $265,000 Aug-03 Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 I Aug-03 'Irrigation System $14,500 Aug-03 Purchase land for school I Unknown I Dec-02 Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations $2,000,000 Dec-02 1 Ceiling and wall repair $24,000 Oct-01 Fire Alarm System Design/Installation -+-- I $80,876 Aug-01\nFront landing tile repair I $22,470 I Aug-01 1Drainage $64,700 Aug-04 Sound Attenuation $43,134 I Jul-04 Energy efficient lighting I $132,678 Jul-01 i Energy efficient lighting $189,743 I Jul-01 Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $1 ,393,822 Nov-02  Fire Alarm Upgrade $9,200 Oct-04 Energy efficient lighting I $90,665 I Aug-01 Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile $156,299 I Jul-01 Replace roof top HVAC I $215,570 I Aug-02 Interior renovation I $84,672 Mar-01 Fire alarm I $12,000 I Aug-03 HVAC renovation/fire alarm $315,956 I Apr-02 Energy efficient lighting I $90,162 Aug-01 Asbestos abatement-ceiling I $59,310 T Aug-01 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music room addition I $3.155.640 I Aug-04 Energy efficient lighting I $277,594 I Apr-01 Press box I $10,784 Nov-00 Security cameras I $12,500 I Jun-01 Athletic Field Improvement I $38,000 I Jul-03 Irrigation System I $14,ooo I Jul-03 Roof repairs $391 ,871 Aug-03 - Replace window units w/central HVAC $485,258 I Nov-03 Diagonal parking $111 ,742 Aug-03 ' Energy efficient lighting . $119,788 May-01 Energy efficient lighting $134,463 Jun-01 Energy monitoring system installation I $11,950 Aug-01 Replace roof top HVAC units $107,835 - Aug-02 Parking lot I $140,000 Sep-02 Roof repairs $200,000 Oct-02 - - -- Renovation $2,511,736 Mar-03 Roof Repair $161,752 Jun-04 Energy efficient lighting $76,447  Apr-01 Energy monitoring system installation $11,770 Jul-01 2 ~ ::c \u0026gt; C: ~! ::a Rl ~ is z C: m\na r-n !\" z ..... m ,i... \u0026gt; C: C ~\na m U\u0026gt; Facility Name Hall Hall Hall Hall Hall Hall Hall Henderson Henderson Henderson Henderson IRC Jefferson Jefferson Laidlaw Mablevale Elem Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale MS Mabelvale MS Mann Mann Mann Mann Mann Mann McClellan McClellan McClellan McClellan McClellan McClellan McClellan McDermott McDermott McDermott Meadowcliff Meadowcliff Meadowcliff Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Mitchell Mitchell Mitchell Mitchell Oakhurst Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD NOVEMBER 18, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Project Description Cost Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $8,637,709 Asbestos abatement $168,222 Energy efficient lighting $42,931 Energy efficient lighting $296,707 I Infrastructure improvements $93,657 Intercom Security cameras $10,600 Energy efficient lighting I $193,679 Roof replacement gym $107,835 Asbestos abatement Phase I $500,000 Asbestos abatement Phase 2 $250,000 Energy efficient lighting I $109,136 Asbestos abatement $43,639 Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm I $1 ,630,000 Parking lot $269,588 Fire Alarm Upgrade $12,000 Energy monitoring system installation $12,150 Replace HVAC units $300,000 Asbestos Abatement I $107,000 Energy efficient lighting $106,598 Renovate bleachers $134,793 Renovation $6,851 ,621 Partial Replacement $11 ,500,000 Asphalt walks The total $1 .8 million Walkway canopies is what has been Boiler replacement used so far on the Fencing projects listed Partial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. Athletic Field Improvement $38 ,000 Irrigation System $14,750 Security cameras $36,300 Energy efficient lighting $303 ,614 Stadium stands repair $235,000 I Intercom $46,000 Classroom Addition $2,155,622 Fire Alarm Upgrade $7,700 Energy efficient lighting $79,411 Replace roof top HVAC units $476,000 Fire alarm $16,175 !Asbestos abatement I I $253,412 Engergy efficient lighting $88,297 I Replace cooling tower $37,203 I I Replace shop vent system $20,000 Energy monitoring system installation I $17,145 I Building Remediation I $165,QQQ I\nEnergy efficient lighting I $103,642 Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 Asbestos abatement $13,000 I HVAC renovation $237,237 Energy monitoring system installation $10,695 I Energy efficient lighting $81 ,828 I [Asbestos abatement $10 ,000 , Parking lot $138,029 6 classroom addition I $888 ,778 Parkinq Improvements $142,541 Est. Completion Date Sep-03 Aug-01 Jul-01 Apr-01 Aug-01 Feb-01 Jun-01 Jul-01 May-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Jul-02 Oct-01 Nov-02 Jul-01 Oct-04 Aug-01 Aug-02 Aug-02 Dec-02 Aug-01 Mar-04 Apr-04 Dec-01 Dec-01 Oct-01 Sep-01 Aug-01 Jul-03 Jul-03 Jun-01 May-01 Aug-01 Feb-02 Jul-04 Sep-04 Feb-01 Aug-02 Jul-01 Aug-02 Dec-02 Dec-00 May-01 Aug-01 Jul-04 Apr-01 Jul-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 May-01 Apr-01 Aug-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Auq-03 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD NOVEMBER 18, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facilitv Name Project Description Cost Parkview , HVAC controls $210,000 Parkview Roof replacement $273,877 Parkview Exterior lights $10,784 Parkview HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls $301 ,938 I Parkview , Locker replacement $120,000 Parkview Energy efficient lighting $315,000 Procurement 'Energy monitoring system installation $5,290 . Procurement ,Fire alarm I $25,000 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground I $17,000 Rightsell 1Energy efficient lighting $84,898 I Rockefeller Energy efficient lighting I $137,004 Rockefeller , Replace roof top HVAC $539,175 Rockefeller Parking addition I $111,742 Romine IAsbestos abatement $10,000 I Romine Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $3,534,675 . Security/Transportation Bus cameras $22,500 I Southwest Asbestos abatement $28,138 Southwest New roof $690,000 Southwest Energy efficient lighting I $168,719 Southwest Drainage I street widening $250,000 I Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installation - $4,830 - Student Assignment Fire alarm I ~ 9,000 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation I $275,000 I Tech Ctr/ Metro Renovation Addition/Renovation - Phase II I $3,679,000 Technology Upgrade Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data Terry Energy efficient lighting $73,850 Terry Driveway \u0026amp; Parking $83,484 Terry Media Center addition $704,932 Wakefield Security cameras $8,000 Wakefield Energy efficient lighting $74,776 Wakefield Demolition/Asbestos Abatement $200,000 Washington Fire Alarm Upgrade $11 ,600 Washington Security cameras $7,900 Washington Energy efficient lighting $165,281 Watson Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 Watson Asbestos abatement $182,241 Watson Energy efficient lighting $106,868 Watson Asbestos abatement $10,000 Watson Major renovation \u0026amp; addition I $800,000 Western Hills Fire Alarm Upgrade $8,400 Western Hills . ADA Rest rooms $25,000 Western Hills  Asbestos abatement $191 ,946 Western Hills Intercom $7,100 Western Hills Energy efficient lighting $106,000 Williams Renovation $2,106,492 Williams Parking expansions $183 ,717 Williams I Energy efficient lighting $122,719 Wilson Renovation/expansion $1,263,876 Wilson Parking Expansion I $110,000 Woodruff Renovation I $246,419 Est. Completion Date Jun-02 Sep-01 Nov-00 Aug-01 Aug-01 Jun-01 Jun-02 Aug-03 Dec-02 Apr-01 Mar-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Apr-02 Mar-03 Jun-01 Aug-00 Oct-03 Jan-02 Aug-03 Aug-02 Aug-03 Dec-01 Jun-04 Nov-02 Feb-01 Aug-02 Sep-02 Jun-01 Feb-01 Nov-02 Oct-04 Jun-01 Apr-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Aug-02 Oct-04 Aug-04 Aug-02 Dec-01 Jul-01 Mar-04 Dec-03 Jun-01 Feb-04 Aug-03 Auo-02 4 !\" z -I m I \u0026gt; C: C ~\na\n,i -I nm :,: :z C r- ~ -\u0026lt; C: ,\"C,\": rr LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: November 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Board Auditor Report BACKGROUND: Monthly report to School Board. RATIONALE: Summary report of activities. FUNDING: No changes. RECOMMENDATION: None. PREPARED BY: Sandy Becker ~ % . c: ~\nllz ::0 fll ~~ zc: m::o r-n m en !..ll, z  z C') \u0026gt;,... cn =\"' -m\u0026lt; c-, :r z C,.. ~ -\u0026lt; C: \"'C \nIT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Date: November 16, 2004 To: Board of Directors GP From: Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - November This is the sixty-first communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with one high school, two middle schools and three elementary schools to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology Training a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and Newspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff. a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of Nuts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. Audit Report - November 2004 Page 2 of2 b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. c) Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. d) Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. e) Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. f) Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. g) Reviewing leave accountability system. a) Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. b) Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. c) Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2004) and on planning committee for 2005. Sharefest participating schools this year were: Otter Creek, Mabelvale Middle, J.A. Fair, Romine Elementary, Henderson Middle, Southwest Middle, Cloverdale Middle, Dunbar Middle, Adult Education, Franklin Elementary, and the Alternative Learning Center (off of 6th Street in East End). A narrative report will be sent to the Board on Sharefest 2004. d) Have advertised for assistant auditor position and hope to have filled soon. Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-44 7-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. .!.I,' z \u0026gt;z C') ~ (I) DATE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 November 18, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Technology Report BACKGROUND: Since the last Board meeting the following technology activities took place:  Installation of the Safari media retrieval system at Rockefeller Elementary was completed. Staff attended the initial training sessions during the week of November 8 and immediately began to use the system. Additional training will be scheduled that emphasizes integration of the system into classroom instruction. Training begins at Wakefield the week of November 29.  We are moving forward with plans to offer web access to parents for student grades. This year we will bring up the high schools. Parkview will be the first site to go online. RATIONALE: To implement the LRSD Technology Plan 2003 - 2006 FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept this report. PREPARED BY: Lucy Neal, Director, Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director, Computer Information Services !El \"z,T.l z C') \u0026gt; ~ DATE: November 18, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Personnel Changes BACKGROUND: None RATIONALE: To staff allocated positions within the District FUNDING: Operating Fund RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.C.A. 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) consecutive years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 19, 2004 for regular schools are considered intern teachers. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 9, 2004 for EYE are consid~~jd intern teachers. PREPARED BY: Beverly Williamsfoirector of Human Resources !.J.,I z \u0026gt;z C\") ~ \"' Personnel Changes Page 2 November 18, 2004 NAME Powell, Rosie Reason: Retired Smith, James Reason: Deceased Anders, Mika Henry, Lauren Hill, Dorothy Hughes, Alicia Lloyd, Anna Nichols, Susan START DA TE/ SALARY POSITION/ SCHOOL END DATE CLASS Resignations/Terminations Certified Employees Elem V/ 8-20-90 1-15 FAIR PARK 11-5-04 TCH 925 Social Studies/ 8-16-02 2-03 MCCLELLAN 9-1-04 TCH925 New Certified Employees Writing/ 9-15-04 3-06 MABELVALE MIDDLE TCH925 Kindergarten/ 10-4-04 1-01 CARVER K925 Elem II/ 10-4-04 4-18 MEADOWCLIFF TCH925 Elem IV/ 10-6-04 1-09 CHICOT TCH925 Music/ 10-8-04 1-01 DODD TCH925 Oral Communications/ 8-11-04 4-18 CENTRAL TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 45059.oo 32697.oo 28248.75 annual 24717.66 prorated 30040.00 annual 24251 .04 prorated 53061.00 annual 42835.70 prorated 38127.00 annual 30382.45 prorated 30040.00 annual 23625.21 prorated 59969.00 Personnel Changes Page 3 November 18, 2004 NAME Ogren, Kathryn Page, Taranah Robinson, Preston Wise, Steven START DATE/ SALARY POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS 4 Yr Old/ 10-8-04 1-01 ROMINE TCH925 Elem V/ 9-27-04 1-02 ROMINE TCH925 Social Studies/ 8-18-04 6-10 ALC TCH925 Certified Promotion ANNUAL SALARY 30340.00 annual 23625.21 prorated 30617.00 annual 25514.17 prorated 46966.00 annual 45742.93 prorated Promoted from 9.25 mo. teacher to Assistant Principal at J. A. Fair High School Certified Transfer NONE Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Aguilar, Alicia Child Nutrition/ 8-12-03 3-03 9442.00 Reason: Personal PARKVIEW 10-28-04 FSHR2 Dobbins, Tonya Instructional Aide/ 8-31-00 33-14 15179.00 Reason: Returning to school KING 10-15-04 INA925 Holmes, Antjonne Care/ 8-19-04 2-10 8.95 Reason: None Given CARE 10-22-04 CARE per hour Personnel Changes Page4 November 18, 2004 START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL NAME POSITION/ SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY Humphrey, Deborah Instructional Aide/ 8-13-01 33-17 16595.oo Reason: Accepted Another WILSON 10-25-04 INA925 Position McReynolds, Ashley Care/ 8-19-04 2-05 8.18 Reason: None Given CARE 10-22-04 CARE per hour Privett, Reanetta Instructional Aide/ 8-11-04 33-03 10934.00 Reason: Personal CHICOT 10-20-04 INA925 Sobba, Earle Child Nutrition/ 8-17-04 3-01 9350.00 Reason: Personal J. A. Fair 10-20-04 FSH550 New Non-Certified Employees Baggett, Jeffery Custodian/ 10-4-04 46-7 27216.00 CENTRAL CUS12 annual 19919.80 prorated Bealer, Dechandra Instructional Aide/ 10-11-04 33-9 13070.00 GIBBS INA925 annual 10244.05 prorated Bennett, Georgetta Instructional Aide/ 8-30-04 33-11 13875.00 ALC INA925 annual 12900.00 prorated Chambliss, Ruby Custodian/ 10-6-04 31-1 5689.50 MABELVALE MIDDLE CUS925 annual 4607.26 prorated Chan, Sabrina Instructional Aide/ 10-14-04 33-3 10392.00 TERRY INA925 annual 8392.58 prorated Personnel Changes Page 5 November 18, 2004 START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY Chestnut, Andrew Custodian/ 9-27-04 1-01 5689.50 HALL CUS925 annual 4761.86 prorated Davis, Theresa Nurse/ 9-20-04 52-7 32544.00 WESTERN HILLS NURSES annual OTTER CREEK 27967.50 prorated Grafals, Wademar Instructional Aide/ 10-19-04 33-3 10934.00 OTTER CREEK INA925 annual 8215.28 prorated Gray, Aisha Instructional Aide/ 10-18-04 33-3 3280.20 ~ GIBBS INA925 annual ,.m 2482.31 . c= 8~ prorated zm ,_ui -, u, i5 u, zm Guest, Jr., Maurice Instructional Aide/ 10-13-04 33-16 13459.00 u,~ FOREST PARK INA925 annual m u, 10403.44 prorated Hayes, Freddie Custodian/ 9-10-04 31-1 14532.00 MANN CUS12 annual 11563.76 prorated ~ Islam, Neatera Secretary/ 10-4-04 40-1 19020.00 -n z SAFETY AND SECURITY CLK11 annual  z 13919.18 C') ,- prorated u, Jones, Vicky Nurse/ 9-20-04 52-8 33528.00 METRO NURSES annual 28813.13 prorated Mayberry, Anthony Security Officer/ 8-16-04 36-5 15463.00 ~ MANN SOFR9 ?,\u0026lt;. .~- cO .... u, Oz c= G') sl ill ~~ ~$i! u, Personnel Changes Page 6 November 18, 2004 START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY Page, Wilbur District-Wide Security 10-11-04 28-14 20184.oo SAFETY AND SECURITY AN950 annual 15616.04 prorated Pittman, Silster Custodian/ 9-27-04 31-1 5869.50 DUNBAR CUS925 annual 4761 .86 prorated Qaasim, Najiyyah Media Clerk/ 10-21-04 31-6 18872.0Q WAKEFIELD CLK925 annual WILSON 12474.51 prorated Renaud, Randall Technology Specialist/ 9-9-04 4-12 29760.0Q CENTRAL AN11 annual 24078.55 prorated Roberson, Carolyn Trainee/ 10-11-04 2-01 13330.00 CHILD NUTRITION FSMEAL annual 10508.84 prorated Robinson, Dorothy Care/ 10-18-04 1-07 7.89 CARE CARE per hour Staten, Allison Nurse/ 10-4-04 52-8 33528.00 GIBBS NURSES annual 27066.87 prorated Sveum, Rob Instructional Aide/ 10-5-04 33-3 5467.00 PHMS INA925 annual 4403.15 prorated Taylor, Alton Parent Facilitator/ 9-27-04 37-20 30660.00 PUPIL SERVICES AN10 annual 25141.20 prorated Personnel Changes Page 7 November 18, 2004 NAME Tillman, Mary Webb, Brenda White, John POSITION / SCHOOL Instructional Aide/ CARVER Nurse/ WILSON Instructional Aide/ GIBBS START DATE/ SALARY END DATE CLASS 10-14-04 33-9 INA925 9-28-04 52-8 NURSES 10-11-04 33-3 INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 10145.60 annual 7787.43 prorated 13411 .20 annual 11106.15 prorated 3280.20 annual 2570.97 prorated ~ \u0026gt;. ac:,: g\nzm \u0026gt; VJ .... VJ i5 VJ zm VJ~ m VJ !.D., z \u0026gt;z n ~ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: November 18, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District receives donations from businesses and individuals on a regular basis. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District that donations are not formally accepted until they are approved by the Board of Directors. RATIONALE: District policy states that, in order to maintain the centralized fixed asset property accounting system, all property donation requests are forwarded to the Director of Procurement. The Procurement Department forwards the requests, along with the appropriate recommendations, to the Board of Directors for acceptance and aproval. In order for proper recognition and appreciation to be conveyed to the donor, donor's name and current mailing address should be included in the donation memo. FUNDING: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached donation requests be approved and accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. PREPARED BY: \\),Q Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement ~ Gwen Caraway, Fixed Asset Property Manager .!%.,' z \u0026gt;z 0 ,\u0026gt;- en / DONATIONS School/Department Item Q2nQ! Alternative Learning 400 pairs of pants, Levi Strauss Center valued at $5.00 per pair, for a total of $2,000.00 Bale Elementary $1,000.00 cash John H. Bale, Jr. School to be deposited into activity fund to be used for student incentives Central High School $650.00 cash Robert \u0026amp; Lisa Beach to the baseball team Central High School $4,500.00 grant, in Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. Christopher behalf of the Keller Keller Family Endowment, to support school programs Central High School $1,700.00 cash to Mr. Jeff Poe the Baseball Booster Club Central High School $115.00 cash to Miriam Hundley the Troubadour Club J.A. Fair High School Donation of a Thomas \u0026amp; Sherry refrigerator, including Nichols, Nichols' delivery \u0026amp; removal of Appliance Co., Inc. of old one, valued at $260.00, for the girls' locker room J.A. Fair High School Labor and materials, Thomas \u0026amp; Sherry valued at $144.00, for Nichols, Nichols' servicing refrigerator Appliance Co., Inc. in Ms. Steele's room J.A. Fair High School Donation of a computer Thomas \u0026amp; Sherry desk, valued at $50.00, Nichols, Nichols' for Sammie Jamel! Appliance Co., Inc. J.A. Fair High School Labor and materials, Thomas \u0026amp; Sherry valued at $210.00, for Nichols, Nichols' servicing dryer in field Appliance Co., Inc. house School/Department Item Donor J.A. Fair High School Donation of a Thomas \u0026amp; Sherry refrigerator, valued Nichols, Nichols' at $300.00, for Appliance Co., Inc. Ms. Ayers room Forest Park Donation of the Jeff \u0026amp; Melanie Fox Elementary School following terns: painting valued at $1,456.84, file cabinet valued at $153.14, a weed eater valued at $110.00, a safe valued at $600.00, mailbox system valued at $7 42.12 \u0026amp; Pre-K storage valued at $432.69 Franklin Elementary Four (4) new UN#55 Mr. Lawrence Williams School gallon open top Gesco Co., Inc. barrels, valued at $200.00, to be placed on campus Fulbright Elementary Cash donations as Fulbright PT A School follows: $190.14 for purchasing a book cart for 5th grade\n$506.1 O for reimbursement for May, 04 field trip\n$374.85 for speech articles and $341.88 for 5th grade Thesaurus !.,I.I, z \u0026gt; Fulbright Elementary $50.00 cash to the Ms. Jennae Stewart z (\") \u0026gt; School \"Reading Buddies\" I\"'\" (/) program Fulbright Elementary $30.00 cash to the Fox Consulting School \"Reading Buddies\" program Fulbright Elementary $70.00 cash to the Jamie Mitchell ~ School \"Reading Buddies\" ,?..\u0026lt;,.~.. program c:,O \u0026lt;..C/1 Oz Cc\n) Fulbright Elementary $15.00 cash to the Stephanie Hymel ~ ~ ~ f\nSchool \"Reading Buddies\" !i ~ program (/) School/Department Item Donor Fulbright Elementary $700.00 cash for Delta Esther Pipkin, Arkansas School Society Pet Partners Childrens' Hospital Course \u0026amp; Evaluations Fulbright Elementary Materials, valued at Home Depot School $130.00, to help bring Ms. Shuffield's Pre-K loft to OHS guidelines Fulbright Elementary Cornelius Model #530X Kevin \u0026amp; Angela Chase School ice machine, valued at $2,800.00, to be used by staff, students and school nurse Fulbright Elementary Educational \u0026amp; fun Mr. Jim Harvey, CEO, School materials, valued at Central Arkansas Water $750.00, for the new outdoor classroom Fulbright Elementary Books \u0026amp; guides, Mr. Rob Beadel, ADEQ, School valued at $95.80, Environmental Preservation for the new outdoor Division classroom Mann Magnet $2,000.00 cash to Family of the late Middle School purchase a podium James L. Matthis with accommodations for musical attachments. The podium is to be I placed in the James L. Matthis Auditorium. The family requests that Mr. Matthis' name be inscribed on the podium. Otter Creek $200.00 cash to be used Truman Ball \u0026amp; Associates Elementary School to purchase shirts for Realtors teachers and staff Otter Creek $500.00 cash to be used The Women's Club of Elementary School for student recognition in Otter Creek the Accelerated Reader Program Little Rock School $1,000.00 cash for the Lisenne \u0026amp; Winthrop P. District Dunbar Garden Project Rockefeller STUDENT DISCIPLINE Fax:501234-0536 Oct 22 2004 08 :55 P. 02 810 West Markham Little Rock. AR 72201 Phone: (501) 447-3580 Lll\\'DA WATSO.N,Ed.D. E-mail: !hula.watson@lrsd.org DATE: TO: October 21 , 2004 Darral Paradis Director of Procurement ASSIST A.NT SUPERINTENDENT STUDENT DISCIPLI~E Fax: (501) 447-3581 FROM: Jodie Carter, Princj~l Alternative Leaming Center Dr. Linda Watsor~ssistant Superintendent SUBJECT: Donation l...evi Strauss has made a contribution of four hundred (400) pairs of pants to the Alternative Learning Center. The pants cost $5.00 per pair. We are grateful to Levi Strauss for this generous donation. It is ecommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. C: Junious Babbs, Associate Superintendent Michael Thrasher, Administrator ALC Cindy Lewis, Levi Strauss !.D., z \u0026gt;z C') ~ . , ...... ,... .1\n- ... BALE ELEfvlENTARY SCHOOL DATE: October 19, 2004 TO: Darral Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management FROM:\\}jlarbara Anderson, Principal f iale Elementary RE: Donation John H. Bale, Jr., 13101 Chenal Parkway - PO Box 22070, has generously donated $ 1000.00 to Bale Elementary School on October 19, 2004. This money will be put into the Activity Fund and used for incentives for good behavior, completing math activities for the Math Word of the Week and other student activities. It is my recommendation that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. - ,-,.... \" DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-447-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 10/13/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL , ({2~ {A,lj_ftlV SUBJECT: DONATION Robert \u0026amp; Lisa Beach of 17924 Agee Lane, Little Rock, AR 72223, donated $650.00 to the Central High School baseball team. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. RECE]\\!ED .!.l,l z \u0026gt;z C') ~ DATE: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 10/11/2004 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT /) FROM: ANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL --\n)V:,,tlL/_lLU . ../ SUBJECT: DONATION Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. Christopher Keller of 5224 Country Club Boulevard, Little Rock, AR 72207, in behalf of the Keller Family Endowment, donated a $4,500.00 grant to Little Rock Central High School. The purpose of the grant is support for Central High School programs. It is my recommendation that this be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 10/7/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF 1:RRCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL f f~U SUBJECT: DONATION Jeff Poe of 1521 Mountain Drive, Little Rock, AR 72227, very generously donated $1,700.00 to the Little Rock Central High School Baseball Booster Club. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. ., .!E.,l z  z C') ~ Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 DATE: 10/6/2004 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NA CY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL ~ SUBJECT: DO ATIO Miriam Hundley of 5123 Edgewood Road, Little Rock, AR 72207, donated $115.00 to the Little Rock Central High Troubadour Club. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. J. A. Fair Magnet High School Science and Technology Systems 13420 David 0. Dodd Road Little Rock, AR 72210 Phone 501-447-1700. Fax 501-447-1701 To: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Cassandra Norman, Principal ef(\"' Re: Donations Date: October 20, 2004 I would like to recommend that the following donations to J. A. Fair Magnet High School be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District: Thomas \u0026amp; Sherry Nichols Nichol's Appliance Co., Inc. 3110 Midland Road Alexander, AR 72002 See attached list of items and services. OCT Z 2 20D4 Thomas \u0026amp; Sherry Nichols Nichols' Appliance Co. Inc. 311 O Midland Rd. Alexander, AR. J.A. Fair High School Aug. 25th , 2004 The following services were donated to J.A. Fair: 1 Refrigerator for the girls locker room. $225.00 delivered \u0026amp; removed old one. $ 35.00 Sep.9,2004 Checked refrigerator in Ms. Steele Room Replaced blower motor and cleaned coil Sep.9,2004 $ 35.00 Labor $ 39.00 Material $ 70.00 Labor Computer desk donated \u0026amp;delivered to Sammie Jamell Value of computer desk $50.00 Oct. 14, 2004 Checked Dryer in Field House Needed new belt Replaced Belt @ Labor Aug 20, 2004 Refrigerator for Ms.Ayers Room Total Donation for 2004 $45.00 Labor $165.00 Parts \u0026amp; Labor $300.00 Value of Refrigerator $964.00 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: 10/22/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT THERESA COURTNEY-KETCHER, PRINCIPAL,-( DONATION Jeff and Malanie Fox of 5300 Edgewood Rd., Little Rock, AR 72207, donated the following items, valued at $3,494.90, to Forest Park Elementary School. Painting File Cabinet Weed Eater Safe Mailbox System Pre-K Storage $1,456.84 153.14 110.00 600.00 742.12 432.69 It is my recommendation that these items be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. .!l.:,l z \u0026gt;z 0 \u0026gt; I'\"' U\u0026gt; To: From: Date: Re: MEMORANDUM Darrell Paradis, Director of Procurement Ethel B. Dunbar[ irincipal Tuesday, November 2, 2004 Donation ************************************************************************* Lawrence Williams of Gesco Co, Inc., Little Rock, Arkansas, has donated four new UN#55 gallon open top barrels valued at $200.00 to Franklin Elementary. These barrels will be placed on the campus. It is my recommendation that these items be accepted in accordance with the policies of the LRSD. EBD:mls 1701 S. Harrison  Little Rock, AR 72204  Phone (501) 447-4600 Fax (501) 477-4601 Fulbright Elementary Memo To: From: Darral Paradis, Director Of Procurement Deborah Mitchell, Principal CC: Date: October 26, 2004 Re: Donations to Fulbright Elementary The Fulbright PTA, 300 Pleasant Valley Drive, Little Rock, Arkansas 72212, has generously donated the following to Fulbright: $190.14 For a Book Cart for 5th Grade\n$506.10 reimbursement for May 2004 field trip\n$374.85 reimbursement Speech articles\n$341.88 reimbursement for 5th grade Thesaurus. Reading Buddies, our canine-assisted literacy intervention program, has received donations from the following persons: Ms. Jennae Stewart, 3814 Wynne St., Little Rock, AR 72204 $50 Fox Consulting, 2603 Wentwood Valley, Dr., Little Rock, AR 72212 $30 Jamie Mitchell, 500 Napa Valley Drive, Little Rock, AR 72211 $70 Stephanie Hymel, 59 Rocky Valley Rd. Little Rock, 72211 $15 Esther Pipkin, Arkansas Childrens Hospital, 800 Marshall St. 72202 $700 donation for Delta Society Pet Partners Course and Evaluations Home Depot, Darren Lomas and Gerald Little, 1261 O Chenal Parkway, Little Rock, AR 72211, donated $130 worth of materials to help bring Ms. Shuffields PreK's loft to OHS guidelines. ECu\\!ED OCT 2 8 200~ It is recommended that these donations be approved with thanks in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District board of Directors. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, OOM~ Deborah Mitchell Principal DM:lam  Page2 RECEIVED OCT 2 8 2004 ~r-nt   TT i-  .,\n...,. ~ ._1 ..... -.. ..... w.1~ Fulbright Elementary Memo To: From: CC: Date: Re: Darral Paradis, Director Of Procurement Deborah Mitchell, Principal October 28, 2004 Donations to Fulbright Elementary Kevin and Angela Chase, 5 Longlea Cover, Little Rock, AR 72212, has generously donated a Cornelius Model 530 X Ice Machine valued at $2,800 to Fulbright Elementary School. The machine will be available to staff, students, and the nurse. Central Arkansas Water, Jim Harvey, CEO, 221 East Capitol Avenue, PO Box 1789, Little Rock, AR 72203, has contributed educational and fun materials for Fulbright's new outdoor classroom in the amount of $750. Mr. Rob Beadel, ADEQ, Environmental Preservation Division, 8001 National Drive, PO Box 8913, Little Rock, AR 72219-8913, has donated $95.80 in books and guides for the outdoor classroom. It is recommended that these donations be approved with thanks in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District board of Directors. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, \u0026amp;lf411,J! n\"~t1tet Deborah Mitchell Principal DM:lam OCi 2 8 2004 !.D., z z\u0026gt; C') ~ October 28,2004 To: Dr. Roy Brooks Superintendent Little Rock School District From:~stelle Matthis and Family of the late James L. Matthis Subject: Donation to Horace Mann Middle School The family of the late James L. Matthis wishes to donate $2000.00 to Mann Middle School to purchase a podium with accommodations for musical attachments to be placed in the James L.Matthis Auditorium .We request that his name be inscribed on the podium. We are deeply appreciative of the many acts of kindness that the Board of Directors, district administrators, staff, students and parents of Mann Middle School have shown to us over an extended period of time. Please feel free to contact me if additional information is needed and/or if additional funds are needed to purchase the podium.You may reach me at 501-682-4240-during the day and 501-664-7324 after work. I RECEIVED MOV 4 2004 OTTER CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO: FROM: DATE: RE: \"Team Work makes the Dream Work\" Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Janis Tucker, PrincipaliJ ,T. October 20, 2004 Donation Truman Ball and Associates Realtors has donated $200.00 to help purchase shirts for the teachers and staff at Otter Creek Elementary School. It is recommended that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. Thank you for your consideration. RECEIVEO OCT 2 Z 2Gu4 / OTTER CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO: FROM: DATE: RE: \"Team Work makes the Dream Work'' Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Janis Tucker, Principali :1 . October 20, 2004 Donation The Women's Club of Otter Creek has donated $500.00 for student recognition in the Accelerated Reader Program at Otter Creek Elementary School. It is recommended that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. Thank you for your consideration. RECEIVED OCT 2 2 2004 16000 Otter Creek Par~way  Phons 5011 ..\n.. 7-5800  Fax (501 1 447-5301  Little Rock, Arkansas 722 .e, PROCUREMENT \u0026amp; MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 1800 East 6th Street  Little Rock, AR 72202  (501) 447-2260  Fax: (501) 447-2261 DATE: November 9, 2004 TO: jBoard of Directors FROM: V Darral Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management THROUGH: Roy G. Brooks, Ed. D., Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donation Lisenne and Winthrop P. Rockefeller donated a check in the amount of $1,000.00 to the Little Rock School District for the Dunbar Garden Project. The donor's mailing address is: Lisenne and Winthrop P. Rockefeller, P. 0 . Box 3157, Little Rock, AR 72203. It is recommended that this donation request be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. Thank you. .!.I,' z \u0026gt;z n ~ \"' ~ ?\u0026lt; ~ \u0026gt;,... oO c...V\u0026gt; Oz c: Cl ~ill ifi~ ~~ \"' LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: November 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Financial Reports BACKGROUND: Financial reporting is designed to keep the Board of Directors up-to-date regarding the District's current financial condition. Financial reports are submitted monthly to the Board for review and approval. RATIONALE: October 2004 financial reports are submitted for the Board's review and approval. FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve the October 2004 financial reports as submitted. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen, Manage~ Financial Services LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES ANO CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2003 ANO 2004 APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2003/04 10/31 /03 COLLECTED 2004/05 10/31 /04 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 57,547,800 20,927,350 36.37% 61.436,691 23,738,299 38.64% DELINQUENT TAXES 10,100,000 1,040,302 10.30% 12,135,000 1,209,714 9.97% 40% PULLBACK 29,600,000 31 ,250,000 EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 210,000 205,000 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 180,000 155,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 150,000 185,000 MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 380,000 209,253 55.07% 485,000 23,723 4.89% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 200,000 47,449 23.72% 245,000 105,513 43.07% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 240,000 92,899 38.71% 215,000 89,581 41 .67% TOTAL 98,607,800 22,317,253 22.63% 106,311,691 25,166,829 23.67% REVENUE-COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 21 ,000 5,420 25.81% 22,000 11 ,183 50.83% TOTAL 21,000 5,420 25.81% 22,000 11,183 50.83% REVENUE - STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 53,226,139 14,516,219 27.27% 65,082,694 17,787,800 27.33% ALTERNATIVE LEARNING 1,927,250 481 ,812 25.00% ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 193,739 NATL SCHL LUNCH STUDENT FUNDING 6,498,240 1,772,247 27.27% PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1,141 ,165 1,141,165 100.00% REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 8,300,000 2,024,292 24.39% 8,275,000 2,081 ,289 25.15% VOCATIONAL 1,400,000 385,365 27.53% 1,350,000 308,278 22.84% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,675,000 630 0.04% 2,100,000 31 ,050 1.48% EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 135,094 49.42% 5,542,510 1.430,540 25.81% TRANSPORTATION 3,875,562 1,243,841 32.09% 4,125,000 1,325,044 32.12% INCENTIVE FUNDS - M TO M 3,900,000 736,844 18.89% 4,575,000 829,826 18.14% ADULT EDUCATION 920,337 152,263 16.54% 934,380 159.488 17.07% POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 560,545 267.486 47.72% TAP PROGRAM 285,245 142,623 50.00% 382,903 7,645 2.00% AT RISK FUNDING 360,000 395,000 9.400 2.38% TOTAL 74,776,187 19,604,656 26.22% 102,522,882 27,365,584 26.69% REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 770,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,350,000 18,519 1.37% 1,295,000 8,155 0.63% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,632.430 1,849,008 TOTAL 3,752,430 18,519 0.49% 3,914,008 8,155 0.21% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 177,157,418 41,945,848 23.68% 212,770,581 52,551,752 24.70% REVENUE - OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 24,075,790 2,939,886 12.21% 21 ,531 ,929 2,623,611 12.18% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 467,668 11 .69% 4,500,000 572,263 12.72% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 3.437 ,595 27,964 ,934 3,312,124 11 .84% TOTAL 52,765,141 6,845,149 12.97% 53,996,863 6,507,998 12.05% TOTAL REVENUE 229,922,559 48,790,996 21.22% 266,767,444 59,059,750 22.14% ~ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2003 AND 2004 - APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 2003/04 10/31/03 EXPENDED 2004/05 10/31/04 EXPENDED EXPENSES SALARIES 100,684,982 25,532,613 25.36% 117,324,912 25,389,710 21 .64% BENEFITS 26,483,772 6,677,467 25.21% 36,185,811 6,545,838 18.09% pURCHASED SERVICES 19,719,297 4,572,136 23.19% 20,959,918 4,904,019 23.40% MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,185,459 3,336,724 40.76% 8,725,914 3,068,675 35.17% CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,575,580 175,425 11.13% 2,760,600 412,709 14.95% OTHER OBJECTS 8,384,567 315,182 3.76% 10,770,418 429,294 3.99% DEBT SERVICE 12,098,342 4,578,079 37.84% 12,474,809 4,590,834 36.80% ~TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 177,131,999 45,187,626 25.51% 209,202,382 45,341,080 21.67% EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 26,056,193 4,420,649 16.97% 23,853,134 3,686,901 15.46% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 970,932 24.27% 5,007,809 1,476,865 29.49% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 5,290,907 21.43% 27,964,934 5,151 ,960 18.42% TOTAL 54,745,544 10,682,488 19.51% 56,825,877 10,315,726 18.15% TOTAL EXPENSES 231,877,543 55,870,114 24.09% 266,028,259 55,656,806 20.92% INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (1,954,984) (7,079,119) 739,184 3,402,943 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M \u0026amp; 0 3,558,580 3,558,580 4,005,957 4,005,957 OPERATING 9,026,855 9,026,855 6,531 ,706 6,531,706 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M \u0026amp; 0 1,578,177 (278,760) 1,176,943 198,229 OPERATING 9,052,274 5,785,077 10,099,905 13,742,378 TOTAL 10,630,451 5,506,317 11,276,848 13,940,607 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31 , 2004 PROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01 -04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 10-31-04 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE FAIR 17,956.90 2,900.00 15,056.90 MCCLELLAN 77,219.02 77,219.02 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE 396.12 396.12 CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 95,572.04 0.00 0.00 2,900.00 0.00 92,672.04 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 4,906.21 80,000.00 34,521.12 50,385.09 NEW WORK PROJECTS 6,088,520.49 799,000.00 2,103,385.07 929,024.70 3,855,110.72 SECURITY PROJECTS 14,541 .25 14,541.25 LIGHTING PROJECTS 20,856.80 20,856.80 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 7,567,591.92 537,160.27 262,272.87 6,768,158.78 RENOVATION PROJECTS 13,366,715.04 4,037,938.95 1,957,666.51 7,371 ,109.58 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 1,569,424.27 1,143,377.19 238,765.02 237,888.58 2,236,147.86 SUBTOTAL 28,632,555.98 1,143,377.19 879,000.00 6,951,770.43 3,386,852.66 20,316,310.08 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALE 445,618.31 181,104.00 626,722.31 DUNBAR PROJECT 5,266.71 5,266.71 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 14,143,144.75 (879,000.00) 13,264,144.75 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 INTEREST 5,037,437.95 361 ,740.47 5,399,178.42 SUBTOTAL 20,925,288.69 542,844.47 (879,000.00) 0.00 0.00 20,589,133.16 GRAND TOTAL ~l!65HlliZl l !ill!i :.l:.ll !i!i .Q.l!.12 !i l!:i~ !iZ!l~\ni ~ ~II 11:ijl !i!i ~!l l!l!ll ll:i :.lll LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY THRU T-HE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2004 PROJECT CATEGORIES ADMINISTRATION NEW WORK PROJECTS SECURITY PROJECTS LiGHTING PROJECTS 1 I PROJECT ALLOCATIONS THRU 10-31-04 EXPENSE 2000-01 EXPENSE 2001-02 EXPENSE 2002-03 753,846.55 889,772j2 - (485,325.77( 149,597.63 39,585,097]5 443,467.00 - 4,589,606.29 11,671,442.11 265,814.17 113,930.47 ------:,09,609.73 4,883,405.13 2,641~3 1,832,392.06 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR - - 18,920,386~ 791,385.63 4,218,294.40 379,661.38 3,455,350.67 RENOVATION PROJECTS --~ 51,641,607.54 397,615.34 4,119,045.21 15,666,239.90 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 12,878,988.97 575,016.~3 -4,32520f\"40 - - - 4,500,374.61 UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS TOTAL 1N3WNMnorm, 'Xl S)IM\\IW3M ~NISOl::\u0026gt; 'Ill,\\ 143,487,112.37 5,852,669:42 - 18, 708,823]2 35,822,666.30 - --- - EXPENSE 2003-04 EXPENSE ENCUMBERED THRU 10-31-04 THRU 10-31-04 ~- SUBTOTAL 114,896.16 34,521.12 0.00 703,461.46 15,993,062.06 2,103,385.07 929,024.70 35,729,987.23 27,732.73 0.00 0.00 251,272.93 9,012.76 - 0~00 6.00 4,862,548.33 2,887,763.72 537,160.27 262,272.87 12,152,227.56 18:091,992.05 4,037,938.95 ~ 1,957,666.51 44,270,497.96 765-,59-4.97- - 238,765.02 237,888.58 10,642,841.11 37~,890,-054-.45 6,951,770.43 3,386,852.66 f 08~612,836.58 - ENDING ALLOCATION 10-31-04 50,385.09 3,855,110.72 14,541.25 - 20,856.80 - -- 6,768,158.78 7,371,109.58 _ 2,~36,147.86 14,-557,965.72 - 34,874,275.80 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31 , 2004 Fund Purchase Maturity Institution Interest Rate Type Principal Date Date Operating 10-28-04 TFN Bank of America 1.610% Repo 9,825,000.00 Operating 10-15-04 11 -15-04 Bank of America 1.690% Treasury Bills 6,000,255.24 Operating 10-12-04 11-10-04 Twin City Bank 2.250% CD 4,651,035.55 Total 20,476,290.79 Activity Fund 10-18-04 TFN Bank of America 1.530% Repo 1,160,000.00 Total 1,160,000.00 I Bond Account 09-06-04 03-07-05 Regions 1.843% CD 400,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 07-14-04 01-10-05 Metropolitan 1.930% CD 1,000,934.31 Capital Projects Fund 01-30-04 01 -31 -05 Bancorp South 1.850% CD 2,100,244.72 Capital Projects Fund 08-17-04 08-16-05 Twin City Bank 2.610% CD 11,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 06-10-04 01-10-05 Bank of America 1.670% Treasury Bills 5,385,005.84 Capital Projects Fund 08-02-04 02-05-05 Twin City Bank 2.580% CD 4,500,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 08-02-04 08-02-05 Twin City Bank 3.030% CD 4,500,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 05-03-04 11-05-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.350% CD 3,076,650.06 Capital Projects Fund 09-15-04 03-15-05 Bank of the Ozarks 2.210% CD 10,366,251 .16 Capital Projects Fund 10-28-04 TFN Bank of America 1.590% Repo 1,350,000.00 Total 43,679,086.09 Deseg Plan Scholarship 06-22-04 12-08-04 Bank of America 1.600% Treasury Bills 779,103.78 Total 779,103.78 Rockefeller Scholarship 06-10-04 01 -10-05 Bank of America 1.670% Treasury Bills 252,468.56 Total 252,468.56\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_130","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2004-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/130"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District, plaintiff vs. Pulaski County Special School District, defendant\nArkansas DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 4 STATE CAPITOL MAU  LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 -1071  (501) 682-4475  http://arkedu.state.ar.us Ot+vbu :lOOL( September 27, 2.004 Dr. Kenneth James, Director of Education Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Mr. Christopher Heller Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 C, Mr. John W. Walker Mr. Stephen W. Jones ~ m C\u0026gt; John Walker, P.A. Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones = 0 m CJ 1723 Broadway 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 C\u0026gt; c::, -f \u0026gt;\"Tl :::! \"Tl ~ Little Rock, AR 72201 Little Rock, AR 72201 o- :z:~ 00 ~o C\u0026gt; \"Tl ~ Mr. Mark Burnette Office of Desegregation Monitoring :z: c::::, ::j c::::, c::, - Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, One Union National Plaza ~ Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 :z C\u0026gt; P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 Dear Gentlemen: Per an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Ar-~ v Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of ~\nnibeP 2004 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. 1/Jti- General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier :a m -m0 m\u0026lt; C STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair - JoNell Caldwell, Little Rock  Vice Chair- Jeanna Westmoreland, Arkadelphia Members: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro  Shelby Hillman, Carlisle  Calvin King, Marianna  Randy Lawson, Bentonville MaryJane Rebick, Little Rock  Diane Tatum, Pine Bluff  Naccaman Williams, Johnson An Equal Opportunity Employer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for October 2004. Respectfully Submitted, General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 ., CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on October '2'1\"~004, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the AD E's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Based on the information available at September 30, 2004, the ADE calculated the Equalization Funding for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Based on the information available at September 30, 2004, the ADE calculated for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 On September 30, 2004, distributions of State Foundation Funding for FY 04/05 were as follows: LRSD - $11 ,833,216 NLRSD - $6,055,302 PCSSD - $10,864,038 The allotments of State Foundation FundinQ calculated for FY 04/05 at September 30, 2004, subject to periodic adjustments, were as follows: LRSD - $65,082,694 NLRSD - $33,304, 168 PCSSD - $59,752,214 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at September 30, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date  Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at September 30, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at September 30, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Distributions for FY 04/05 at September 30, 2004, totaled $2,237,321. Allotment calculated for FY 04/05 was $12,305,271 subject to periodic adjustments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Calculated for FY 02/03, subject to periodic adjustments. I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Distributions for FY 04/05 at September 30, 2004, were: LRSD - $414,913 NLRSD - $377,155 PCSSD - $1, 158,934 The allotments calculated for FY 04/05 at September 30, 2004, subject to periodic adjustments, were: LRSD - $4,149,129 NLRSD - $3,771,548 PCSSD - $11,589,336 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 In September 2002, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 02/03 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 In September 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the third one-third payment for FY 03/04 to the Districts. In September 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the first one-third payment for FY 04/05 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function instead of Reginald Wilson as indicated in the Implementation Plan. L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 In February 2004, General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At February 2004, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $2,487,682.66 NLRSD - $526,000.00 PCSSD - $1,454,813.26 In September 2004, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2004, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $4\n019,063.00 NLRSD - $772,940.15 PCSSD - $2,478,863.72 In September 2004, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 04/05 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2004, the following had been paid for FY 04/05: LRSD - $1,325,043.67 NLRSD - $275,333.33 PCSSD - $845,221.22 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 In July 1999, each district submitted an estimated budget for the 99/00 school year. In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2004, paperwork was Qenerated for the first payment in the 04/05 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD -14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD - 12. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. The ADE accepted a bid on 16 buses for the Magnet and M/M transportation program. The buses will be delivered after July 1, 1999 and before August 1, 1999. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nPCSSD - 6. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001. The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two type C 47 passenger buses and fourteen type C 65 passenger buses. Prices on these units are $43,426.00 each on the 47 passenger buses, and $44,289.00 each on the 65 passenger buses. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42, 155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. 0. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. Specifications for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M school buses have been forwarded to State Purchasing for bidding. Bids will be opened on May 12, 2003. The buses will have a required delivery date after July 1, 2003 and before August 8, 2003. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) u. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97 /98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01 /02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. 10 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring.(Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01 /02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 04/05. 11 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 12 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring .visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 13 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 15 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 16 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 26, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is finalized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 18 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearence Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 19 111. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 20 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. C. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 21 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17- 1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81 st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 22 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 23 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 24 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11, in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 25 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, A letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 1748 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, A letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. 26 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Ongoing C. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 27 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 28 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the AD E's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. ' In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 29 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of AD E's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the AD E's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 30 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lntervenors filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 31 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua intervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lntervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lntervenors were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 32 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21, 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 33 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11\n2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 34 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the _month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 35 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 36 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of AD E's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 11, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. 37 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 38 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 39 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 40 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 41 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. D. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued} 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. 42 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31, 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. 43 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 44 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts. In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further assistance to schools, i.e., Title I Summer Planning Session, ADE session on Smart Start, and the School Improvement Workshops. All schools and districts in Pulaski County were invited to attend the \"Smart Start\" Summit November 9, 10, and 11 to learn more about strategies to increase student performance. \"Smart Start\" is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. Representatives from all three districts attended. On January 21, 1998, the ADE provided staff development for the staff at Oak Grove Elementary School designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement. Using achievement data from Oak Grove, educators reviewed trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. On February 24, 1999, the ADE provided staff development for the administrative staff at Clinton Elementary School regarding analysis of achievement data. On February 15, 1999, staff development was rescheduled for Lawson Elementary School. The staff development program was designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement using achievement data from Lawson, educators reviewed the components of the Arkansas Smart Initiative, trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. Student Achievement Workshops were rescheduled for So!,Jthwest Jr. High in the Little Rock School District, and the Oak Grove Elementary School in the Pulaski County School District. 45 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On April 30, 1999, a Student Achievement Workshop was conducted for Oak Grove Elementary School in PCSSD. The Student Achievement Workshop for Southwest Jr. High in LRSD has been rescheduled. On June 8, 1999, a workshop was presented to representatives from each of the Arkansas Education Service Cooperatives and representatives from each of the three districts in Pulaski County. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On June 18, 1999, a workshop was presented to administrators of the NLRSD. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On August 16, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for teaching assistant in the LRSD. On August 20, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for the Accelerated Learning Center in the LRSD. On September 13, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACTAAP program were presented to the staff at Booker T. Washington Magnet Elementary School. On September 27, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to the Middle and High School staffs of the NLRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On October 26, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to LRSD personnel through a staff development training class. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On December 7, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was scheduled for Southwest Middle School in the LRSD. The workshop was also set to cover the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. However, Southwest Middle School administrators had a need to reschedule, therefore the workshop will be rescheduled. 46 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On January 10, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for both Dr. Martin Luther King Magnet Elementary School \u0026amp; Little Rock Central High School. The workshops also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On March 1 , 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for all principals and district level administrators in the PCSSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On April 12, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for the LRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. Targeted staffs from the middle and junior high schools in the three districts in Pulaski County attended the Smart Step Summit on May 1 and May 2. Training was provided regarding the overview of the \"Smart Step\" initiative, \"Standard and Accountability in Action,\" and \"Creating Learning Environments Through Leadership Teams.\" The ADE provided training on the development of alternative assessment September 12-13, 2000. Information was provided regarding the assessment of Special Education and LEP students. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate in professional development regarding Integrating Curriculum and Assessment K-12. The professional development activity was directed by the national consultant, Dr. Heidi Hays Jacobs, on September 14 and 15, 2000. The ADE provided professional development workshops from October 2 through October 13, 2000 regarding, ''The Write Stuff: Curriculum Frameworks, Content Standards and Item Development.\" Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems by video conference for Special Education and LEP Teachers on November 17, 2000. Also, Alternative Assessment Portfolio System Training was provided for testing coordinators through teleconference broadcast on November 27, 2000. 47 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On December 12, 2000, the ADE provided training for Test Coordinators on end of course assessments in Geometry and Algebra I Pilot examination. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation conducted the professional development at the Arkansas Teacher Retirement Building. The ADE presented a one-day training session with Dr. Cecil Reynolds on the Behavior Assessment for Children (BASC). This took place on December 7, 2000 at the NLRSD Administrative Annex. Dr. Reynolds is a practicing clinical psychologist. He is also a professor at Texas A \u0026amp; M University and a nationally known author. In the training, Dr. Reynolds addressed the following: 1) how to use and interpret information obtained on the direct observation form, 2) how to use this information for programming, 3) when to use the BASC, 4) when to refer for more or additional testing or evaluation, 5) who should complete the forms and when, (i.e., parents, teachers, students), 6) how to correctly interpret scores. This training was intended to especially benefit School Psychology Specialists, psychologists, psychological examiners, educational examiners and counselors. During January 22-26, 2001 the ADE presented the ACT AAP Intermediate (Grade 6) Benchmark Professional Development Workshop on Item Writing. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were invited to attend. On January 12, 2001 the ADE presented test administrators training for mid-year End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. On January 13, 2001 the ADE presented SmartScience Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This was shared with eight Master Teachers. The SmartScience Lessons were developed by the Arkansas Science Teachers Association in conjunction with the Wilbur Mills Educational Cooperative under an Eisenhower grant provided by the ADE. The purpose of SmartScience is to provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. The following training has been provided for educators in the three districts in Pulaski County by the Division of Special Education at the ADE since January 2000: On January 6, 2000, training was conducted for the Shannon Hills Pre-school Program, entitled \"Things you can do at home to support your child's learning.\" This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. The school's director and seven parents attended. 48 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On March 8, 2000, training was conducted for the Southwest Middle School in Little Rock, on ADD. Six people attended the training. There was follow-up training on Learning and Reading Styles on March 26. This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. On September?, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Chicot Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Karen Sabo, Kindergarten Teacher\nMelissa Gleason, Paraprofessional\nCurtis Mayfield, P.E. Teacher\nLisa Poteet, Speech Language Pathologist\nJane Harkey, Principal\nKathy Penn-Norman, Special Education Coordinator\nAlice Phillips, Occupational Therapist. On September 15, 2000, the Governor's Developmental Disability Coalition Conference presented Assistive Technology Devices \u0026amp; Services. This was held at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On September 19, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Jefferson Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Melissa Chaney, Special Education Teacher\nBarbara Barnes, Special Education Coordinator\na Principal, a Counselor, a Librarian, and a Paraprofessional. On October 6, 2000, Integrating Assistive Technology Into Curriculum was presented at a conference in the Hot Springs Convention Center. Presenters were: Bryan Ayers and Aleecia Starkey. Speech Language Pathologists from LRSD and NLRSD attended. On October 24, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On October 25 and 26, 2000, Alternate Assessment for Students with Severe Disabilities for the LRSD at J. A. Fair High School was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. The participants were: Susan Chapman, Special Education Coordinator\nMary Steele, Special Education Teacher\nDenise Nesbit, Speech Language Pathologist\nand three Paraprofessionals. On November 14, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On November 17, 2000, training was conducted on Autism for the LRSD at the Instructional Resource Center. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. 49 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On December 5, 2000, Access to the Curriculum Via the use of Assistive Technology Computer Lab was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter of this teleconference. The participants were: Tim Fisk, Speech Language Pathologist from Arch Ford Education Service Cooperative at Plumerville and Patsy Lewis, Special Education Teacher from Mabelvale Middle School in the LRSD. On January 9, 2001, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. Kathy Brown, a vision consultant from the LRSD, was a participant. On January 23, 2001, Autism and Classroom Modifications for the LRSD at Brady Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Beverly Cook, Special Education Teacher\nAmy Littrell, Speech Language Pathologist\nJan Feurig, Occupational Therapist\nCarolyn James, Paraprofessional\nCindy Kackly, Paraprofessional\nand Rita Deloney, Paraprofessional. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcast on February 5, 2001. Presenters were: Charlotte Marvel, ADE\nDr. Gayle Potter, ADE\nMarcia Harding, ADE\nLynn Springfield, ASERC\nMary Steele, J. A. Fair High School, LRSD\nBryan Ayres, Easter Seals Outreach. This was provided for Special Education teachers and supervisors in the morning, and Limited English Proficient teachers and supervisors in the afternoon. The Special Education session was attended by 29 teachers/administrators and provided answers to specific questions about the alternate assessment portfolio system and the scoring rubric and points on the rubric to be used to score the portfolios. The LEP session was attended by 16 teachers/administrators and disseminated the common tasks to be included in the portfolios: one each in mathematics, writing and reading. On February 12-23, 2001, the ADE and Data Recognition Corporation personnel trained Test Coordinators in the administration of the spring Criterion-Referenced Test. This was provided in 20 sessions at 1 O regional sites. Testing protocol, released items, and other testing materials were presented and discussed. The sessions provided training for Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Pilot Tests. The LRSD had 2 in attendance for the End of Course session and 2 for the Benchmark session. The NLRSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. The PCSSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. 50 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On March 15, 2001, there was a meeting at the ADE to plan professional development for staff who work with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students. A $30,000 grant has been created to provide LEP training at Chicot Elementary for a year, starting in April 2001. A $40,000 grant was created to provide a Summer English as Second Language (ESL) Academy for the LRSD from June 18 through 29, 2001. Andre Guerrero from the ADE Accountability section met with Karen Broadnax, ESL Coordinator at LRSD, Pat Price, Early Childhood Curriculum Supervisor at LRSD, and Jane Harkey, Principal of Chicot Elementary. On March 1-2 and 8-29, 2001, ADE staff performed the following activities: processed registration for April 2 and 3 Alternate Portfolio Assessment video conference quarterly meeting\nanswered questions about Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) and LEP Alternate Portfolio Assessment by phone from schools and Education Service Cooperatives\nand signed up students for alternate portfolio assessment from school districts. On March 6, 2001, ADE staff attended a Smart Step Technology Leadership Conference at the State House Convention Center. On March 7, 2001, ADE staff attended a National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Regional Math Framework Meeting about the Consensus Project 2004. On March 8, 2001, there was a one-on-one conference with Carole Villarreal from Pulaski County at the ADE about the LEP students with portfolios. She was given pertinent data, including all the materials that have been given out at the video conferences. The conference lasted for at least an hour. On March 14, 2001, a Test Administrator's Training Session was presented specifically to LRSD Test Coordinators and Principals. About 60 LRSD personnel attended. The following meetings have been conducted with educators in the three districts in Pulaski County since July 2000. On July 10-13, 2000 the ADE provided Smart Step training. The sessions covered Standards-based classroom practices. 51 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 19-21, 2000 the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were 200 teachers from across the state in attendance. On August 14-31, 2000 the ADE presented Science Smart Start Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This will provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. On September 5, 2000 the ADE held an Eisenhower Informational meeting with Teacher Center Coordinators. The purpose of the Eisenhower Professional Development Program is to prepare teachers, school staff, and administrators to help all students meet challenging standards in the core academic subjects. A summary of the program was presented at the meeting. On November 2-3, 2000 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching. This presented curriculum and activity workshops. More than 1200 attended the conference. On November 6, 2000 there was a review of Science Benchmarks and sample model curriculum. A committee of 6 reviewed and revised a drafted document. The committee was made up of ADE and K-8 teachers. On November 7-10, 2000 the ADE held a meeting of the Benchmark and End of Course Mathematics Content Area Committee. Classroom teachers reviewed items for grades 4, 6, 8 and EOC mathematics assessment. There were 60 participants. On December 4-8, 2000 the ADE conducted grades 4 and 8 Benchmark Scoring for Writing Assessment. This professional development was attended by approximately 750 teachers. On December 8, 2000 the ADE conducted Rubric development for Special Education Portfolio scoring. This was a meeting with special education supervisors to revise rubric and plan for scoring in June. On December 8, 2000 the ADE presented the Transition Mathematics Pilot Training Workshop. This provided follow-up training and activities for fourth-year mathematics professional development. On December 12, 2000 the ADE presented test administrators training for midyear End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. 52 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcasts on April 2-3, 2001. Adminfstration of the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy took place on April 23-27, 2001. Administration of the End of Course Algebra and Geometry Exams took place on May 2-3, 2001. Over 1,100 Arkansas educators attended the Smart Step Growing Smarter Conference on July 1 O and 11, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The Smart Step effort seeks to provide intense professional development for teachers and administrators at the middle school level, as well as additional materials and assistance to the state's middle school teachers. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the first keynote address on ''The Character-Centered Teacher''. Debra Pic~ering, an education consultant from Denver, Colorado, pre?ented the second keynote address on \"Characteristics of Middle Level Education\". Throughout the Smart Step conference, educators attended breakout sessions that were grade-specific and curriculum area-specific. Pat Davenport, an education consultant from Houston, Texas, delivered two addresses. She spoke on \"A Blueprint for Raising Student Achievement\". Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. Over 1,200 Arkansas teachers and administrators attended the Smart Start Conference on July 12, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Start is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the keynote address. The day featured a series of 15 breakout sessions on best classroom practices. Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. On July 18-20, 2001, the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were approximately 300 teachers from across the state in attendance. 53 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) The ADE and Harcourt Educational Measurement conducted Stanford 9 test administrator training from August 1-9, 2001. The training was held at Little Rock, Jonesboro, Fort Smith, Forrest City, Springdale, Mountain Home, Prescott, and Monticello. Another session was held at the ADE on August 30, for those who were unable to attend August 1-9. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by video conference at the Education Service Cooperatives and at the ADE from 9:00 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on September 5, 2001. The ADE released the performance of all schools on the Primary and Middle Level Benchmark Exams on September 5, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Core Teacher In-Service training for Central in the LRSD on September 6, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for Hall in the LRSD on September 7, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for McClellan in the LRSD on September 13, 2001. The ADE conducted Basic Co-teaching training for the LRSD on October 9, 2001. The ADE conducted training on autism spectrum disorder for the PCSSD on October 15, 2001. Professional Development workshops (1 day in length) in scoring End of Course assessments in algebra, geometry and reading were provided for all districts in the state. Each school was invited to send three representatives (one for each of the sessions). LRSD, NLRSD, and PCSSD participated. Information and training materials pertaining to the Alternate Portfolio Assessment were provided to all districts in the state and were supplied as requested to LRSD, PCSSD and David 0. Dodd Elementary. On November 1-2, 2001 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching at the Excelsior Hotel \u0026amp; Statehouse Convention Center. This presented sessions, workshops and short courses to promote exceptional teaching and learning. Educators could become involved in integrated math, science, English \u0026amp; language arts and social studies learning. The ADE received from the schools selected to participate in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a list of students who will take the test. 54 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On December 3-7, 2001 the ADE conducted grade 6 Benchmark scoring training for reading and math. Each school district was invited to send a math and a reading specialist. The training was held at the Holiday Inn Airport in Little Rock. On December 4 and 6, 2001 the ADE conducted Mid-Year Test Administrator Training for Algebra and Geometry. This was held at the Arkansas Activities Association's conference room in North Little Rock. On January 24, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by ADE compressed video with Fred Jones presenting. On January 31, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by NSCI satellite with Fred Jones presenting. On February 7, 2002, the ADE Smart Step co-sponsored the AR Association of Middle Level Principal's/ADE curriculum, assessment and instruction workshop with Bena Kallick presenting. On February 11-21, 2002, the ADE provided training for Test Administrators on the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Exams. The sessions took place at Forrest City, Jonesboro, Mountain Home, Springdale, Fort Smith, Monticello, Prescott, Arkadelphia and Little Rock. A make-up training broadcast was given at 15 Educational Cooperative Video sites on February 22. During February 2002, the LRSD had two attendees for the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The NLRSD and PCSSD each had one attendee at the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the  End of Course Exam training. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 2, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. The ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 9, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. 55 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) The Twenty-First Annual Curriculum and Instruction Conference, co-sponsored by the Arkansas Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and the Arkansas Department of Education, will be held June 24-26, 2002, at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs, Arkansas. \"Ignite Your Enthusiasm for Learning\" is the theme for this year's conference, which will feature educational consultant, Dr. Debbie Silver, as well as other very knowledgeable presenters. Additionally, there will be small group sessions on Curriculum Alignment, North Central Accreditation, Section 504, Building Level Assessment, Administrator Standards, Data Disaggregation, and National Board. The Educational Accountability Unit of the ADE hosted a workshop entitled \"Strategies for Increasing Achievement on the ACT AAP Benchmark Examination\" on June 13-14, 2002 at the Agora Center in Conway. The workshop was presented for schools in which 100% of students scored below the proficient level on one or more parts of the most recent Benchmark Examination. The agenda included presentations on ''The Plan-Do-Check-Act Instructional Cycle\" by the nationally known speaker Pat Davenport. ADE personnel provided an explanation of the MPH point program. Presentations were made by Math and Literacy Specialists. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, gave a presentation about ACTAAP. Break out sessions were held, in which school districts with high scores on the MPH point program offered strategies and insights into increasing student achievement. The NLRSD, LRSD, and PCSSD were invited to attend. The NLRSD attended the workshop. The Smart Start Summer Conference took place on July 8-9, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. The Smart Start Initiative focuses on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event included remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. After comments by the Director, Bena Kallick presented the keynote address \"Beyond Mapping: Essential Questions, Assessment, Higher Order Thinking\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On the second day, Vivian Moore gave the keynote address \"Overcoming Obstacles: Avenues for Student Success\". Krista Underwood gave the presentation \"Put Reading First in Arkansas\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. 56 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) The Smart Step Summer Conference took place on July 10-11, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The event included remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. After comments by the Director, Vivian Moore presented the keynote address \"Overcoming Obstacles: Avenues for Student Success\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On the second day, Bena Kallick presented \"Beyond Mapping: Essential Questions, Assessment, Higher Order Thinking\". Ken Stamatis presented \"Smart Steps to Creating a School Culture That Supports Adolescent Comprehension\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On August 8, 2002, Steven Weber held a workshop at Booker T. Washington Elementary on \"Best Practices in Social Studies\". It was presented to the 4th grade teachers in the Little Rock School District. The workshop focused around the five themes of geography and the social studies (fourth grade) framework/standards. Several Internet web sites were shared with the teachers, and the teachers were shown methods for incorporating writing into fourth grade social studies. One of the topics was using primary source photos and technology to stimulate the students to write about diverse regions. A theme of the workshop included identifying web sites which apply to fourth grade social studies teachers and interactive web sites for fourth grade students. This was a Back-to-School In-service workshop. The teachers were actively involved in the workshop. On August 13 Steven Weber conducted a workshop at Parkview High School in the LRSD. Topics of the workshop included: 1. Incorporating Writing in the Social Studies Classroom 2. Document Based (open-ended) Questioning Techniques 3. How to practice writing on a weekly basis without assigning a lengthy research report 4. Developing Higher Level Thinking Skills in order to produce active citizens, rather than passive, uninformed citizens 5. Using the Social Studies Framework 6. Identifying state and national Web Sites which contain Primary Sources for use in the classroom The 8:30 - 11 :30 session was for the 6 - 8 grade social studies teachers. The 12:30 - 3:00 session was for the 9 - 12 grade social studies teachers. Several handouts were used, also PowerPoint, primary source photos and documents, and Internet web sites (i.e., Library of Congress, Butler Center for Arkansas Studies, National Archives, etc.). This was a Back-to-School In-service workshop. The teachers were actively involved in the workshop. Marie McNeal is the Social Studies Specialist for the Little Rock School District. She invited Steven Weber to present at the workshop, and was in attendance. 57 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On September 30 through October 11, 2002, the ADE provided Professional Development for Test Administrators on the End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Exams. The train\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_213","title":"Enrollment, LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD, gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2004-10-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","School integration","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County"],"dcterms_title":["Enrollment, LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD, gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/213"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nM TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002000 COUNTY: NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED TO (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 DISTRICT: 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NON- DAYS TRANSPORTED ABSENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25528.40 1194. 60 QUARTER NO. 1 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 554.97 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 580.92 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 554.97 580.92 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002050 COUNTY: PULASKI NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NON-TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 309.00 AMBOY ELEMENTAR 4 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 13. 00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUARTER NO. 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 6. 72 1 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 7.00 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 6.72 7.00 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 1 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002055 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: CRESTWOOD ELEME QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 53.00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 6.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 1.15 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 1. 28 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 1.15 1.28 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 4 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002057 COUNTY: PULASKI NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: INDIAN HILLS EL QUARTER NO. 1 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 136.00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 2.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 2.96 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 3.00 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 2.96 3.00 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 6 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002058 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD ELEMEN QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 547.50 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 9.50 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 11. 90 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 12 .11 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 11.90 12.11 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 7 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002059 COUNTY: PULASKI NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: POPLAR STREET M QUARTER NO. 1 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 1834.50 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 62.50 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 39.88 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 41. 24 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 39.88 41.24 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 8 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002060 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LYNCH DRIVE ELE QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 4 6. 00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 1.00 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 1.00 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 1.00 1.00 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 9 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002063 COUNTY: PULASKI NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NO. HEIGHTS ELE QUARTER NO. 1 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 179. 00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 5.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 3. 89 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 4.00 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 3.89 4.00 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 11 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, ANO ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002064 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PARK HILL ELEME QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 41. 00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 5.00 5 AOT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 0.89 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 1.00 TOTAL AOT, ADA, ANO ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 0.89 1.00 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 12 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002065 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PIKE VIEW ELEME QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 32 9. 00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 9.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 7.15 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 7.35 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 7.15 7.35 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 13 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002070 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD MIDDLE QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 6495.00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 304.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 141.20 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 147. 80 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 141,20 147.80 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 16 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002075 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NLR HIGH SCHOOL QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DAYS DAYS IN PRESENT QTR TRANSPORTED 46 46 46 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 8612.00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 332.00 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 187.22 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 194. 4 3 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 187.22 194.43 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 17 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002076 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NLR HIGH SCHOOL QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED o.oo 0.00 6677.40 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 414. 60 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 145 .16 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 154.17 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 145.16 154.17 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 18 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002702 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: RIDGEROAD CHART QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 269.00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 32.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 5.85 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 6.54 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 5.85 6.54 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 20 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM RECEIVED OCTOBER 1, 2004 NO2V 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS OFFIOCEF OESEGREGOANTIITOOtUR,I NG joo1-C E TRAL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 09 II 9 189 225 4 8 0 153 144 744 10 7 7 152 140 7 2 2 0 107 136 560 II 6 14 125 104 2 0 0 0 126 107 484 ---- 12 s 4 92 98 3 4 0 105 103 415 TOT AL FOR: CE TRAL 29 34 558 567 16 14 2 2 491 490 2,203 ,_.. I ~:5 __,,,, J I - ., _/ 1002-HALL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL1 09 2 2 223 197 20 34 24 22 526 IO 2 3 137 125 22 26 0 22 18 356 II 4 107 133 13 IS 0 0 27 32 334 12 2 97 84 IO II 2 0 17 22 248 TOTAL FOR: HALL 9 12 564 539 65 86 4 90 94 1,464 ,- //C3 177 I ~ ... ~ 1003-MANN M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 06 6 91 59 8 4 0 0 73 SI 293 07 s 7 94 54 5 4 0 0 73 52 294 08 8 s 83 58 6 6 0 59 60 286 - TOTAL FOR: MANN MIS 19 13 268 171 19 14 0 205 163 873\"\" ~a? / (, ~(,,../ .$ joos- p ARK.VIEW GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 09 7 3 87 64 8 0 71 57 301 IO 4 83 62 6 6 60 56- 280 II 6 3 80 59 5 4 2 0 65 50 274 12 2 6 83 47 6 3 0 0 66 40 253 - TOTAL FOR: PARKVIEW 16 16 333 232 25 16 3 2 262 203 1,108..., L5l~ .,, 7 -y\"i::= COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 1 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 006-BOOKER GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I Ol 2 0 30 24 2 0 0 15 21 95 02 0 0 26 29 0 0 32 18 107 03 26 29 2 2 0 0 28 15 104 04 23 24 2 2 0 25 16 95 05 0 34 27 2 3 0 0 25 20 l 12 K 0 0 23 28 2 0 0 20 18 92 TOT AL FOR: BOOKER 5 2 162 161 10 9 3 0 145 108 605.. .......- _J\n'.\nf3 d(9 ~53 ~ 1001-ou BARM/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL1 06 3 7 77 85 9 4 0 0 30 40 255 ------- 07 3 3 81 68 5 9 0 0 25 48 242 08 6 74 68 7 11 0 37 43 250 TOTAL FOR: DUNBAR MIS 12 13 232 221 21 24 0 92 131 747.....- _-fl\n\u0026gt;~ 71 ~\nr~ ~I 7- 008-FAIR GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL ---- 09 0 3 157 150 6 6 0 12 27 362 --- - 10 0 0 130 133 2 2 15 21 305 ll 0 102 89 3 2 0 10 12 220 12 0 0 61 75 0 16 12 171 ---- -- TOTAL FOR: FAIR 1 3 450 447 12 15 4 53 72 1,058 ..-- gq',\" /~'5 - ?.~-'o 009 -FORST HTS MIS GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM M WF WM TOTAL ------ 06 0 84 84 3 4 0 0 20 24 222 - -- 07 0 92 95 2 0 0 15 24 230 ---- --- - -- 08 2 88 90 2 3 0 0 27 23 236 - -- TOTAL FOR: FORST HTS M/S 2 5 264 269 7 8 0 0 62 71 688.....- 53~ ~~ ')7/. - ---------------- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 2 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 010 - PUL HTS M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOTAL I 06 0 62 58 0 0 46 56 225 07 2 67 65 0 0 0 61 47 244 08 0 74 78 0 0 0 40 45 239 TOTAL FOR: PUL HTS MIS 4 203 2101 2 0 147 148 708 ..,...- .fo CJ\nJ,15 65'7~ 011- SOUTHWSTM IS GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM F NM WF WM TOTAL: 06 0 0 66 72 2 2 0 0 5 3 150 07 0 82 72 0 0 3 165 08 0 85 89 0 0 0 0 2 178 TOT AL FOR: SOUTHWST MIS 233 233 7 3 0 0 8 7 493 ........- ~i(.p\na- /-5 9~7. 012-MCCLELLA GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM F NM WF WM TOTAL! 09 0 0 126 146 5 2 0 0 7 II 297 10 0 145 107 2 4 0 2 9 271 11 0 0 82 81 4 2 0 0 6 8 183 12 0 0 77 85 0 0 4 4 174 TOTAL FOR: MCCLELLA 0 430 419 12 11 1 0 19 32 925-- j~9 ~5 ~I 2\n).7,. 013- HENDERSNM /S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 06 0 95 IOI 6 0 0 15 10 235 ----- 07 3 64 87 12 0 0 9 7 184 - -~---- 08 92 79 9 12 0 7 9 211 TOTAL FOR: HENDERSN MIS s 2 251 267 17 30 1 0 31 26 630 - - --- . - a-lg- ~-s ~1 ___ 8'3-?. 015-CLOVR M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM -\nOTAL] 06 0 0 105 84 18 17 0 3 5 233 07 0 94 105 IS 19 0 0 5 2 241 08 0 99 73 12 14 0 0 8 208 TOT AL FOR: CLOVR MIS 298 262 45 50 0 16 a.i 682 - a\"P ~~ 3'\nt?. COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 3 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 016 - MABEL M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL _I - 06 0 0 95 77 4 2 0 0 14 17 209 07 0 0 73 87 4 0 0 9 17 l9l 08 0 0 88 95 2 4 0 0 20 25 234 ------ - TOTAL FOR: MABEL MIS 0 0 256 259 10 7 0 0 43 59 634 - 815 17 /0 c}-1 81~ f 017 - BALE GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 14 17 5 0 0 0 4 2 42 02 0 0 23 16 5 4 0 0 2 51 03 0 0 19 20 3 0 0 2 48 04 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 0 34 05 0 0 20 19 0 0 5 47 K 0 29 21 0 0 2 3 60 p 0 0 20 12 I .\nl,. 0 0 I 3 2 37 ..,l-~ TOTAL FOR: BALE 0 138 124 16 12 10 16 319 - _., ..... ~I ------- .?\\ ~~ \"\"\"'  1018-BRADY GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! L - --- Ol 0 18 22 0 0 0 4 47 02 0 0 JO 16 2 0 0 4 2 35 03 0 16 22 4 0 0 3 3 50 04 0 0 22 12 3 0 0 0 2 40 05 0 17 19 0 0 0 4 3 45 - -- - ------ K 0 18 29 3 2 0 0 4 7 64 - p 0 0 13 14 o 0 0 0 0 6 n4 37 ~i? - TOTAL FOR: BRADY I 3 114 134 11 7 0 0 23 25 318 i--- ~..\u0026gt;.r8' ~~ -1? 78\"?. - - COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 4 of16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 020 - MCDERMOT GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM M WF WM TOTAL 01 2 0 23 15 4 3 0 0 IO 6 63 02 3 24 22 0 4 0 0 6 65 03 3 0 14 23 2 2 0 0 9 IO 63 04 2 26 18 2 4 0 0 7 8 68 05 0 13 14 2 3 0 0 14 4 51 K 2 2 18 16 3 0 0 9 5 56 p 2 0 16 ~'111 0 2-\"/ 0 0 4 c:. 5 40 ~r1. TOTAL FOR: MCDERMOT 14 5 134 119 11 21 0 0 59 43 406 _- ol'53 BJ/ /oc).J ~\n,. 1021 - CARVER GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 2 17 28 0 0 16 16 82 02 20 21 2 0 17 16 80 03 4 15 31 2 0 15 21 91 04 0 0 25 18 3 0 0 II 26 84 OS 25 20 3 0 0 13 22 86 K 0 23 17 0 0 0 18 13 73 TOTAL FOR: CARVER 6 7 125 135 6 9 2 2 90 114 496-- ~Ceo s\n,.... d:}Gi .,g~- 1022 - BASELINE GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 01 2 0 II 20 3 2 0 2 3 44 02 0 0 16 21 3 0 0 0 42 -- --- ------ - 03 0 0 20 19 2 0 0 2 45 ---- ----- 04 0 0 12 16 3 2 0 0 3 2 38 --- ----- --- -- - - 05 0 0 16 17 3 0 0 4 42 ---- K 0 0 17 18 4 0 0 0 41 p 0 0 11\n::\u0026gt; 21 \"' 0 0 3 ~ 2 39 _,7. - - TOT AL FOR: BASELINE 2 0 103 132 13 15 0 I 15 10 291 --- _\ni,~.t\n~, ~-s 8Vo COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 5 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1023 - FAIR PRK GRADE AF AM BF BM HF RM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 2 10 II 0 0 0 0 2 4 29 02 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 2 2 25 03 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 16 04 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 19 OS 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 3 2 26 K 0 II IO 0 0 0 4 7 34 p 2 15 13 0 3 0 0 0 5 .. 2 38 ,. TOTAL FOR: FAIR PRK 2 5 67 74 1 0 0 20 17 ~  pl/ Cf ~7 ~7- 1024 - FORST PK GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM ~OTAL] 01 2 8 2 0 0 0 28 27 69 02 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 22 23 58 03 0 6 7 2 0 0 21 18 56 04 2 6 9 0 0 0 6 18 43 05 6 9 0 0 0 0 8 10 35 K 3 0 0 0 26 27 60 p 2\n)... 0 0 .., 0 0 0 18\n18 40 7- TOTAL FOR: FORST PK 5 9 36 35 3 129 141 -361,,,,..- '11 \u0026lt;f\n..O 6170 ~o? 1025 - FRAl~KLIN GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM F NM WF WM TO~A~] 01 0 0 37 30 0 0 0 0 0 68 02 0 26 3 I 0 0 0 0 0 59 03 0 0 26 26 0 0 0 0 2 0 54 04 0 22 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 05 0 0 18 28 0 0 0 0 48 K 0 26 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 p 0 0 26~-26 0 0 I 0 57 \"' 7,. - TOTAL FOR: FRANKL! 3 0 181 192 0 0 4 5 387 ....-- ,?73 .tr 1 9c.- ~ ------ COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 6 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1027 - GIBBS GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 II 14 2 0 0 0 7 II 45 02 0 2 13 10 0 0 0 8 10 44 03 2 15 10 0 2 0 0 4 11 45 04 0 2 20 15 2 0 0 12 13 65 05 3 19 17 2 0 0 17 II 71 K 2 8 12 0 0 0 3 13 40 -- ------- TOT AL FOR: GIBBS 6 8 86 7 5 7 0 0 51 69 310 ....- /(, ~(, /oiO ~7 jo2s - CHICOT GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF -w~ ~--T~TAL I 01 0 0 23 33 10 5 0 2 2 76 - -- --------- 02 0 0 29 33 5 11 0 0 3 86 ---- 03 0 0 33 27 6 6 0 0 4 79 - -------- -- 04 0 0 24 26 5 8 0 4 3 71 -- - ----- --- 05 0 0 26 37 7 8 0 0 5 86 K 0 0 26 29 IO 6 0 0 2 6 79 p 0 0 29 ..,4 17 8 3 0 0 0 ~2 59 '78il, TOTAL FOR: CHICOT 0 0 190 202 51 47 2 0 20 24 536 V- ~q ..... /00 -# ~~ jo29 - WEST HIL -- - - -- GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM T-~T~~J ----- - 01 0 0 17 15 0 0 0 3 6 42 - ----- - 02 0 0 22 12 0 0 4 0 40 - --- - - 03 0 0 16 12 2 2 0 0 5 0 37 04 0 0 17 16 0 4 0 0 3 7 47 05 0 0 14 14 0 0 0 3 4 36 K 0 0 12 19 0 0 0 4 4 40 p 0 0 9 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 ~? .. -- --- TOT AL FOR: WEST HIL 0 0 107 99 5 7 0 22 21 262 _.- _:\n,\u0026lt;O~ ~ -t.3 7Q  ----- ---- -- ------- -- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 7 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 030 - JEFFRSN GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 8 13 0 0 0 0 20 19 60 02 0 0 17 II 0 0 0 IS 16 60 03 I 3 18 0 0 0 25 14 73 04 0 0 13 13 0 0 0 0 21 21 68 OS 0 0 14 12 0 0 0 21 18 66 K 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 22 22 62 p 0 3 6 2 0 o I 0 0 12 22 40 I TOT AL FOR: JEFFRSN 2 77 78 3 0 0 0 136 132 429,,.....--\n-5 t,, e\nP41f .:!Jt. /. 1031 - CLOVR EL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! I 01 0 0 21 31 13 7 0 0 74 02 0 0 18 28 s s 0 0 0 2 58 03 0 0 20 13 6 0 0 2 0 42 04 0 0 17 16 2 4 0 0 2 3 44 05 0 0 17 17 4 4 0 0 0 43 K 0 26 20 4 5 0 0 2 59 p 0 0 19- 13 2 4 ,, 0 0 40 ~ TOTAL FOR: CLOVR EL 0 138 138 36 30 0 0 7 10 360 ,__. c\n).7{, \u0026amp;1 /7 77,7. t2-DODD - GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 10 11 3 3 0 0 3 4 34 02 0 0 12 8 4 6 0 0 3 6 39 - --- 03 0 0 8 17 0 0 0 4 6 36 04 0 0 7 13 3 5 0 0 5 8 41 05 0 0 9 8 5 2 0 0 10 3 37 K 0 0 6 10 5 3 0 0 4 9 37 p 0 0 10 ...... 12 23 0 0 8 4 r~~ TOTAL FOR: DODD 0 0 62 79 22 21 0 0 37 40 261 _. 1-1// 1/3 '7-, .i 1- -------- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 8 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1033 - MEADCLIF GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM M WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 21 17 3 0 0 2 7 51 02 0 0 14 20 2 2 0 0 2 4 44 03 0 17 18 3 0 0 2 3 45 04 0 0 24 22 2 2 0 0 3 3 56 05 0 23 17 3 0 0 4 4 53 K 0 0 17 27 3 0 0 8 4 60 p 0 0 18a=.11 l _\n0 0 I 3 2 40 ?a TOT AL FOR: MEADCLIF 134 138 13 13 0 0 22 27 349 _. ~1G1-- ~'! 9 ?t!,, ~4 - MITCHELL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF TOTAL-I 01 0 0 12 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 02 0 0 17 6 0 0 0 0 0 24 03 0 0 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 04 0 0 9 13 0 0 0 0 0 23 05 0 0 16 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 K 0 0 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 17 p 0 0 5 13 0 0 (' 0 0 20 7- .. TOT AL FOR: MITCHELL 0 0 79 71 0 0 . 0 2 3 156 -\n~P I ~ 9~?- 1035 - M L KING GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 01 2 29 33 0 0 0 0 19 16 100 02 3 26 21 0 0 15 22 90 ------ 03 0 0 22 25 0 0 0 0 17 11 75 04 21 31 0 0 15 13 84 05 3 2 29 21 0 0 0 18 13 87 K 0 2 28 31 0 13 14 91 - p 3 16 c:, 30 0 3 8 17 80 .~?. TOTAL FOR: ML KING 10 10 171 192 6 2 4 105 106 607 ....... ~i?\u0026gt;- 6)~ al/ '-o?o COMPUTER INFORMATIONS ERVICESD EPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 9 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS io36 - ROCKFELR GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL L __ 01 0 2 22 22 0 0 0 9 10 66 02 0 28 24 2 0 0 7 8 71 03 0 0 21 20 0 0 6 7 56 04 0 0 18 17 0 0 0 11 4 51 05 0 0 22 12 2 0 0 6 8 51 K 0 0 19 22 0 0 0 6 7 55 p 28 31 4 '7 0 0 19 3rl 18 103 ~,-7. TOTALFOR:ROCKFELR 4 158 148 6 9 0 64 62 453 ,._... ~ ~ al /~~ t8'I 037 - GEYER SP GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 20 21 2 2 0 0 47 02 0 0 24 14 0 0 0 41 03 0 0 16 15 0 0 0 4 41 04 0 0 27 15 0 2 0 0 0 0 44 05 0 0 22 22 0 0 0 47 K 0 0 17 15 4 0 0 2 40 p 0 0 18 .\ni. . 17 2 0 ~ 0 0 0 2 39 7- TOTALFOR:GEYERSP 0 0 144 119 10 11 0 0 6 9 299 ...- ~\"'a J ~8' .. 038 - P L HT E GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 12 16 0 0 0 9 7 46 - --- 02 0 2 11 8 0 0 0 0 9 8 38 ------- 03 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 0 12 12 44 04 0 14 II 0 0 0 0 12 10 48 05 12 15 0 0 0 0 12 9 50 --- K 0 0 7 8 0 0 0 0 10 15 40 p 5 ~ 0 0 \"I 0 0 8 4 20 ao?. -- - - .. TOTAL FOR: PUL HT E 3 5 68 72 0 0 0 72 65 286 .....- ,10 '7 r~7 r, t COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 10ofl6 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1039 - RIG-HTSEL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM F M WF WM TOTAL! 01 0 0 26 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 02 0 0 21 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 03 0 0 17 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 04 0 0 15 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 05 0 0 19 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 K 0 0 23 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 p 0 0 20 \"20 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 .. /.) TOTAL FOR: RIGHTSEL 0 0 141 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 262 ..,_., ol,(,:V (0 0 /O?- 1040 - ROMINE GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! I 01 0 0 19 17 4 0 0 0 6 47 02 0 0 17 16 3 4 0 0 3 4 47 03 0 0 12 12 2 0 0 3 3 35 04 0 0 17 23 2 2 0 2 48 05 0 14 22 3 0 0 3 47 K 0 0 21 24 8 6 0 0 0 60 p 0 14 - 17 4 (, 0 0 0 0 37 u 7- -- TOTAL FOR: ROMINE 114 131 20 321 '- 2~c/ 0 12 15 ~~6 ~7 76A r \\041- STEPHENS GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOT~ 01 0 0 39 32 0 0 0 74 ----- 02 0 0 30 39 0 0 (I 0 0 0 69 --- - . 03 0 45 32 2 0 0 3 85 ----- 04 0 0 32 30 0 0 0 0 64 05 0 0 30 35 0 0 0 0 69 K 0 0 37 38 0 0 2 80 ------ - --. p 0 0 286\"1 26 0 oo 0 0 0 4 58 '1 2 ----- - -- TOT AL FOR: STEPHENS 0 241 232 5 5 0 0 7 8 499 _.- -11 ~ // /'5 1~?- ---------- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 11 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 042 -WASHNGTN GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 32 38 5 5 0 0 4 9 95 02 0 24 35 7 2 0 0 3 5 79 03 0 32 27 2 2 0 0 3 6 73 04 3 26 29 4 7 0 0 7 7 84 05 0 22 34 5 2 0 0 4 3 71 K 2 31 30 0 8 6 81 p 0 2 34 rl 33 2 0 0 0 4 5 80 ~ TOTAL FOR: WASHNGTN 6 10 201 226 26 19 0 33 7:) 563 _., .\n/').7 t,~ ?lJo 1043 - WILLIAMS ---- - GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 01 4 19 16 2 0 0 0 13 13 68 02 4 3 19 15 0 0 0 7 19 68 03 3 3 23 25 0 0 0 20 14 89 04 6 6 22 25 0 0 0 15 13 88 05 2 5 29 18 2 0 II 20 89 K 20 9 0 0 0 12 15 59 - -- TOTAL FOR: WlLLIAMS 20 19 132 108 6 2 2 0 78 94 461 ....- ~ 0 -YQ 17~ ~ , - E4-WILso __ GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOTALj __] 01 0 0 15 22 2 0 0 0 2 0 41 02 0 0 24 22 2 0 0 0 2 51 -- ------- 03 0 0 15 19 0 0 38 . ------ 04 0 2 13 16 0 0 0 0 33 --- 05 0 0 21 32 0 0 3 59 K 0 0 14 24 2 0 0 43 p 0 0 7 9 11 0 0 0 0 0 2 O 20 l- - . - . ---- TOTAL FOR: WILSO 0 2 109 146 8 4 2 0 6 8 285 - ~5S /~ /7 S: ~ ------------ - COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVJCES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 12 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1045 - WOODRUFF GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 18 17 0 0 0 0 37 02 0 0 13 13 0 0 0 0 4 3 33 03 0 0 18 15 0 0 0 2 37 04 0 0 11 15 0 0 0 0 28 OS 0 0 IS 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 K 0 0 17 18 0 0 0 0 0 36 p 0 0 15 520 0 0 0 0 0 39 -- .  -~ ....... TOTAL FOR: WOODRUFF 0 0 107 108 0 0 8 10 ~/0 _\ni- 'g- C, ?- 1046 - MABEL EL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM -~ TOTAL I 01 0 0 8 18 0 0 0 5 3 35 02 0 16 17 0 0 0 2 2 39 03 0 0 14 12 0 2 0 0 4 33 04 0 0 21 11 0 0 2 0 36 05 0 0 8 22 0 0 0 3 6 40 K 0 14 13 3 0 0 0 2 38 p 0 0 13 al 18 2 1 :a 0 0 I\n), I 36 .I?. TOTAL FOR: MABEL EL 94 111 8 4 1 0 16 21 257 ,_. ~c5 15 ~1 ~(!) - 1047-TERRY GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM ~OTALI 01 6 28 34 2 0 0 16 15 103 02 7 3 27 25 7 0 0 0 14 14 97 03 6 24 24 2 4 0 0 16 10 87 04 3 2 18 18 0 3 0 0 13 17 74 05 3 18 20 6 2 0 0 I 5 15 80 K 6 3 24 29 4 2 0 0 14 14 96 p 2 3 12 I 6 0 ' I 0 0 8 /l. 8 40~?.. TOTAL FOR: TERRY 28 19 151 156 21 13 0 0 96 93 577 ...-- ~o1 ~, /?SJ ~\"\nl7. -------- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 13 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1048 - FULBRIGH GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF W\n~ TOTAL\\ 01 2 14 0 2 2 0 27 37 88 02 0 14 16 2 0 0 0 23 24 80 03 0 4 13 2 0 0 0 37 37 94 04 0 0 12 IO 0 0 18 36 78 05 4 0 14 18 0 0 19 26 83 K 3 15 3 0 0 34 33 91 p 0 3 'l 5 0 1 _\n)- 0 0 13':, 17 40 .., TOTAL FOR: FULBRIGH 7 7 65 7 7 5 3 0 171 210 554 ,.......- J.)./ ~1 $' ~ll- \\oso - OTTER CR GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM -~OTALI 01 3 0 15 24 5 3 17 12 81 ----- 02 0 30 25 3 2 0 0 14 15 90 03 0 0 20 27 0 0 0 0 9 12 68 ----- 04 0 0 23 23 3 0 0 0 12 IO 71 05 0 33 21 2 0 0 10 I 3 81 K 0 0 26 25 4 14 8 80 p 0 0 14 \"' 8 1 \" 0 0 10 ,I 6 40 ?- TOTAL FOR: OTTER CR 3 2 161 153 14 12 2 2 86 76 511V' _a5 /~~ (,I l \\os1 - W AKEFIEL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOT~ 01 0 0 23 30 9 7 0 0 0 71 02 0 0 24 32 6 10 0 0 2 0 74 03 0 0 17 26 4 2 0 0 0 50 ---- 04 0 0 32 30 8 7 0 0 2 80 ------ 05 0 0 25 23 3 3 0 0 0 2 56 K 0 0 29 33 6 IO 0 0 2 0 80 - -- -- p 0 0 14 ...,a15 4 7 I I 0 0 0 I) O -~..,\n,? .. ------ - TOTAL FOR: WAKEFIEL 0 0 164 189 40 46 0 0 6 6 451-- ~~3 s\"' I~ 1%1 --- --- ---------- COMPUTER INFORJv!ATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 14 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 052-WATSON GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM F 'M WF WM TOTAL OJ 0 0 28 44 0 0 0 0 2 75 02 0 31 41 0 0 0 0 75 03 0 0 30 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 04 0 0 25 35 0 0 0 0 62 OS 0 0 32 28 0 0 0 63 K 0 0 35 41 0 0 0 2 80 p 0 0 21 17 0 0 0 I I o 40 ~\n2. - - TOTAL FOR: WATSON 0 I 202 237 4 0 0 6 5 456...,.. -19-q ~ I/ ~?- \\ns-AGE CY GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 3 6 13 02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 8 03 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 13 04 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 5 12 OS 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 9 06 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 2 JO 07 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 7 ----- 08 0 0 5 II 0 0 0 0 4 3 23 09 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 2 5 21 10 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 16 - - -- ------------ 11 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 6 12 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 -- - - --- K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 -------- --- -- TOT AL FOR: AGE CY 2 0 25 47 0 0 0 2 34 38 148 ..... 1~ 3/ 7:\n)..\n. . COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 15 ofl6 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENTR EPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1766-ALC GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 06 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 07 0 0 7 20 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 8'~ 08 0 0 117126 0 0 0 0 0 l (_, l 39 ~~?. ~ 09 0 0 22 67 0 0 0 0 3 93 10 0 14 25 0 0 0 3 45 11 0 0 10 18 0 0 0 0 2 31 12 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 9 TOT AL FOR: ALC 0 70 ~J 0 0 0 5 13 261 178' J/..,\n)..\n}~ '9\n/ 1767-ACC L~ GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL\\ j 09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 10 11 0 0 14 16 0 0 0 3 35 12 0 37 37 2 0 0 0 2 11 90 -- TOT AL FOR: ACC LP 0 58 54 4 0 4 1 0 3 ,iJS 1361,1\"\"' I ~ 'R\nl, GRAND TOTAL: 227 230 8849 8876 643 647 39 28 3125 3204 25,868 - A.\nJ-\"rl \u0026lt;!., ~ 0 \" ,. ~rf{ ..J ~\n1.6 '8'a~/ t13 ~, ~o~J ~~, ,\no .,.l~O \u0026lt;zs\u0026amp;c\n\\9 {.,J./7 ~~ ~,~t,. 17\nl53 1,~10 l,~ 7\n:::. ~ 7 (~) ( (w (1 ?7~ COMPUTER INFORMATIONS ERVICESD EPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 16ofl6 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 LRSD ENROLLMENT REPORT W /0 METRO FINAL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM 01 27 14 649 729 78 47 8 2 245 273 02 19 22 678 684 67 59 2 2 229 243 03 15 20 620 660 45 50 3 266 234 04 16 21 638 645 46 61 6 2 216 251 05 22 17 662 671 54 51 2 242 236 - 06 10 12 679 635 51 40 2 0 208 208 07 13 15 656 656 37 48 0 0 200 204 08 18 12 699 667 39 50 2 205 2 II 09 20 17 812 856 43 53 4 270 269 10 10 16 672 597 42 40 6 3 209 248 II 16 21 521 503 27 23 3 2 236 215 12 9 14 449 _!34 23 26 193 K 19 17 656 682 63 63 3 4 250 266 p l3 l2 45811~57 28 36 q\n.,, 2 13~~ '.53 GRAND TOTAL: 227 230 8849 8876 643 647 39 28 3125 3204 (-:f\n)') {D) (wJ i:le ,-,-) g) 1 1)037 ,,,3,\n9~ (771 ----- LRSD INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 TOTAL I 2072 2005 1914 1902 1958 1845 1829 1904 2345 1843 1567 1365 2023 [296 7'1- 25,868 (. T /~, 110 lo S' (o ?\no 7\n:\nJ.-- te, 8\"~ l,\n,,l.l )) \\ 707/ ~5 ?\nJ.o l9~ Page 1 of! LEA: 6002050 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 1 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: AMBOYE LEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi ITOTALI WHITE M F M BLACK F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 581 81 61 171 241 21 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 551 101 51 141 241 11 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 541 101 81 191 141 11 11 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 591 91 81 181 231 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 571 91 81 201 191 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 421 51 41 191 141 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ---\n) CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 01 0 r,: t!- ~--------+~I-+ __ ./+-- ++--2+-- C: +-- o +-- t'?+-- o+-- o+-- o+-----+---- ENRoLLI 3251 511 391 1071 1181 51 '- 41 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ~/5 -% 11./ /_:\nV / C\u0026gt; c\u0026gt; 7\u0026lt;? ~::5 / LEA: 6002053 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 3 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: BELWOODE LEMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi !TOTAL! WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 2 4 I 3 I 1 I 9 I 10 I 11 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 291 61 41 111 Bl 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 281 31 41 101 111 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 241 51 11 61 91 21 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 23 I 2 I 3 I 5 I 13 I OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 171 21 21 Bl 41 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 0 I O I ~ 0 I 0 I oi O I 0 I ~ O I O I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+----+-----+~---+-----+~----+-----+--2--+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 1451 211 151 491 551 31 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002054 PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 5 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: BOONEP ARK ELEMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 72 I 2 I 2 I 28 I 331 71 0 I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 721 11 01 341 361 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 621 01 01 361 251 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 561 21 01 211 321 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 571 21 01 271 261 11 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 671 01 11 331 321 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 3861 71 31 1791 1841 91 41 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- --:R, 1\u0026lt; d .?- _\ni .5(/~ ~ I 0 0 C' 0 ~~I -\nJ,Y-0 ? 5 ,\n?o3 ~o1 I/ 5 c\n..\u0026gt; (!_-. e:-, 0 9~?0 1! _,\n10 /',, LEA: 6002055 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 7 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: CRESTWOODEL EMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 791 301 201 111 171 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 101 51 51 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 511 161 191 71 91 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 571 221 191 121 31 01 01 01 01 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 751 281 261 131 71 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 651 241 251 41 81 21 01 11 01 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 491 201 151 31 101 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI 0 I O I 0 I O I O I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+ r +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- cHoicE I 0 I 0 I {/f 0 I 0 I I 0 I 0 I (1 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+-- -+-----~---+-----+m--+-----+-~---+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL1 3761 1401 1241 501 541 41 11 11 01 21 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 121 61 61 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ' -ne-J\u0026lt; --\n::\nJ g./lo LEA: 6002056 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 9 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: GLENVIEWE LEMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC I PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 321 2 I 2 I 71 20 I OI OI OI OI OI 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 191 11 31 51 91 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 181 01 01 81 101 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 291 61 31 121 Bl 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 321 21 2 I 15 I 13 I OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 321 21 11 121 161 01 01 01 01 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 1621 131 111 591 761 11 01 01 01 01 2 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- /7 0 / ? g 0 r C\u0026gt; C, r, f-\"\") /77 /3 /__\n2 ~7 g~ I e:\u0026gt; c) D 0 ._S)._, _.\nA9 /9/ a LEA: 6002057 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 11 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 751 281 301 71 81 11 01 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 201 91 101 01 01 01 01 11 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 94 I 38 I 33 I 71 141 11 11 0 I OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 21 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 921 301 331 151 121 01 11 01 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 21 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 821 291 301 81 101 21 11 01 21 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 881 311 321 71 151 01 01 11 21 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 771 311 281 101 51 21 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01,.,_1~01 Old~ 01 01 l1 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+- .I!-----+' --+-----+-----+-----+-- --+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- \"b1- ENROLLI 5081 1871 1861 541 641 61 41 21 51 01 0 ~ ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 7' CHOICE I 251 141 101 01 01 01 01 11 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002058 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 13 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: LAKEWOOEDL EMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi !TOTAL! WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ !AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISL!ALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 591 161 251 41 111 11 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 51 11 41 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 641 161 271 71 111 11 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 621 221 231 61 91 21 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 691 171 281 121 101 01 21 01 01 OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 11 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 561 191 121 91 111 11 31 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 511 201 141 101 61 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O ll'l1i O I O I O~ 0 I O I J~ 0 I O I O I O I 0 ---------+---r+-----+~----+-----+1----+-----+ ----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 3611 1101 1291 481 581 61 91 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 71 11 61 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002059 PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 15 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: POPLAR STREET MIDDLE SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 OJ OJ 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 OJ OI 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 11 01 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 6801 1161 1101 2011 2141 181 151 11 41 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 ~(,01 01,l)lt 01 01 ~ 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+~ ---+-----+~----+-----+:\u0026gt; --+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 6811 1161 1101 2011 2151 181 151 11 41 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002060 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 17 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: LYNCHD RIVE ELEMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi !TOTAL! WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ !AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISL!ALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 50 I 2 I 4 I 22 I 22 I OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 551 41 31 251 221 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 551 71 01 23 I 241 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 471 11 41 201 221 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 681 41 41 281 30! 21 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 55 I 1 I 5 I 22 I 27 I OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 01 01 01 Oi 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 330! 191 201 1401 1471 21 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- r // c\n. 0 / 0 0 0 LEA: 6002061 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 19 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: MEADOWPA RK ELEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC IPACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 331 4 I 11 151 131 0 I OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 261 21 11 121 91 11 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 281 21 31 111 121 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI ~91 31 41 161 251 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 311 31 31 101 131 01 01 11 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 281 21 21 141 101 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 ~Q 01 01 (LOOI 01 6 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-- 1-----+l:!.---+-----+J----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- /')_,,1- ENROLL! 1951 161 141 781 821 21 11 11 11 01 0 l::,\n, ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002063 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE SCHOOL: NO. HEIGHTS PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEMENTARYSC HOOL PAGE: 21 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 I GRADEi ITOTALI WHITE M BLACK ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV F M F I M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 811 13 I 10 I 2 9 I 16 I 6 I 7 I OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 OJ OJ OJ 01 01 OJ 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 761 91 91 171 261 111 41 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 611 91 31 201 181 31 81 01 OJ OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 OJ OJ 01 OJ 01 01 OJ 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 611 111 31 201 201 51 21 01 OJ 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ OJ OJ 01 01 OJ 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 681 31 131 211 171 61 BJ 01 OJ 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 821 191 71 201 231 71 61 OJ OJ OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ 01 OJ OJ OJ 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 OJ 01 01 OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 01 OJ OJ 01 OJ 01 01 OJ OJ OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 OJ 01 OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 8 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ OJ OJ 01 OJ OJ 01 01 OJ OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 4291 641 451 1271 1201 381 351 01 OJ OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ OJ 01 01 01 01 OJ OJ OJ OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ? .:5 7 0 LEA: 6002064 PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 23 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: PARK HILL ELEMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi !TOTAL! M WHITE BLACK F M F ASIAN/ !AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISL!ALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 65! 161 131 141 121 61 21 01 01 11 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 571 121 121 141 151 21 11 01 01 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 45! 91 161 111 61 01 31 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 49! 141 91 101 101 41 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 551 121 61 171 171 21 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 501 111 41 141 151 41 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 0I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- OB ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 0 I 0 I 'l 0 I 0 I ? 0 I 0 I -? .,/ 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+--v-+-----+t~---+-----+i----+-----+ ----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 3211 741 601 801 751 181 111 01 01 11 2 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002065 PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 25 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 761 81 121 271 251 01 21 11 01 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 851 81 91 391 271 11 01 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 681 161 71 241 131 41 31 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 461 111 71 101 141 11 31 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 471 71 51 201 141 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 551 51 51 201 211 31 01 01 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+--- -+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I of) 0 I O I ,.f,,,\n0 I O I .\n~O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+---\nf-+-----+J----+-----+~~--+-----+-C--+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 3771 551 451 1401 1141 101 81 31 11 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 41 01 01 31 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002067 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 27 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: REDWOODPR E-SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC IPACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 DI 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 OJ 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI OI OI OI OJ OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI OI OI OJ OI OI OI OI O I OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI O I OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 7 9 71 0 0 0 !I -n.,I\u0026lt; ,,,.,. ~,._/ !'ft J .. LEA: 6002069 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: SEVENTH STREET ELEM. SCHOOL PAGE: 29 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M BLACK ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 601 01 01 261 321 21 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 621 11 01 291 311 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 421 01 01 231 191 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 511 11 01 251 251 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 511 01 01 231 281 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 481 01 01 211 261 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 3151 21 01 1481 1611 31 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- :5?0 G- 0 9 // C C (') 0 C'\u0026gt; :\n\u0026gt;~ ~ 1~7 /7~ -~ } r r\u0026gt; 0 _: ~:)7 .i/ LEA: 6002070 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 31 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: LAKEWOOMD IDDLE SCHOOL !GRADEi I TOTALI M WHITE F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 Oi 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI O I O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 Oj 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 3751 1211 1121 701 651 21 Si 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OI 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 3481 1071 1111 621 641 31 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ---=~~==~l-.\nl----~l~~~l---_-~~l l-.-2-~-~~l~--l---~-l~--lJ--l~ l----~+---- l,7. ENROLL! 7231 2281 2231 1321 1291 Si 61 01 01 01 0 - ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002075 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 33 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST CAMPUS I GRADEi ITOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002075 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST CAMPUS PAGE: 34 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 09 ENROLLI 7191 1261 1551 2361 1761 121 101 21 21 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 01 01 21 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 10 ENROLLI 7111 1381 1531 2171 1771 121 91 41 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 01 11 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 11 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 12 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 13 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- EE ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- SM ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ss ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ---~~~=~~l--v\"\"'~l----~l~1~l----~l~1-~l----~l2~~l----~l----~~,.1,  ENROLLI 1431 I 264 I 308 I 454 I 353 I 241 19 I 6 I 3 I OI 0 ti\" ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 41 01 11 21 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ******************************************************************************** NUMBERO F GRADUATESF OR PREVIOUS SCHOOLY EAR TOTAL ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- GRADUATEIS 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- Has your district voted to participate in School Choice? Y ******************************************************************************** LEA: 6002076 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WESTC AMPUS PAGE: 36 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 I GRADEI I TOTALI WHITE M BLACK ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 09 ENROLLI 441 41 11 201 171 01 01 21 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 10 ENROLLI 1091 161 51 511 321 11 41 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 11 ENROLLI 6471 1511 1571 1551 1631 121 61 01 21 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 01 01 21 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 12 ENROLLI 5091 1241 1251 1181 1221 91 51 11 21 21 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 13 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- EE ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- SM ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ss ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ---=~~==~l---)l----~l?..~~~l----~!tr~~-~l----~l:11\u0026gt;--~l----~l----~fl\"'7, ~~~~~~l-==~=l--===l--=~~l--=~~l--==~l---==l---==l----=CHOICEI 41 01 01 41 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ******************************************************************************** NUMBERO F GRADUATESF OR PREVIOUS SCHOOLY EAR TOTAL ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- GRADUATEIS 5251 1321 1641 951 1131 51 101 21 41 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- Has your district voted to participate in School Choice? Y ******************************************************************************** LEA: 6002077 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 37 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL !GRADEi !TOTAL! WHITE M F M BLACK F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 131 31 01 81 21 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 1061 101 51 411 491 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 1021 91 41 441 451 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 2221 221 91 941 961 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002077 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL PAGE: 38 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 I GRADEi !TOTAL! WHITE M BLACK ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 09 ENROLL! 31 01 01 31 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 10 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 11 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I OI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 12 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 13 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- EE ENROLLI 0 I 0 I OI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I O I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- SM ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ss ENROLLI 0 I OI OI 0 I 0 I OI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 0 I 0 I ~ \\ 0 I 0 I J~~ 0 I 0 I I 0 I 0 I 0 I O I 0 I ---------+--v-+-----+~---+-----+ ----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 2251 221 91 971 961 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ******************************************************************************** NUMBERO F GRADUATESF OR PREVIOUS SCHOOLY EAR TOTAL ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- GRADUATEIS 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- Has your district voted to participate in School Choice? Y ******************************************************************************** LEA: 6002702 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 39 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: RIDGEROADC HARTERM IDDLE SCHOO JGRADEI JTOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ JAM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 OJ OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! OJ 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 OJ 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI O I OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 OJ 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 2311 311 231 881 781 51 51 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 2801 211 251 991 1091 131 111 11 OJ 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+---r-+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 001 OJ~\n, 01 01 2:.1 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+---./-+-----+1----+-----+9----+-----+7-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 5111 521 481 1871 1871 181 161 21 01 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002000 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENTB Y DISTRICT SCHOOL CHOICE BY DISTRICT ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: PAGE: 1 SIS: rpt304 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:38 I GRADEi I TOTAL I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ WHITE M F M BLACK F I HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 7641 1321 1261 2161 2431 271 141 21 01 11 3 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 371 161 191 11 01 01 01 11 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 7451 1241 1251 2211 2411 191 131 11 01 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 31 21 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 6721 1301 1161 2181 1761 101 181 21 11 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 31 21 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 6971 1371 1231 1911 2151 161 131 01 21 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL I 6991 118 I 1131 206 I 225 I 15 I 141 4 I 3 I 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 6541 1181 881 2071 2091 201 101 01 11 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 31 11 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 6951 1191 1101 2111 2161 181 151 11 41 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 7121 1621 1401 1991 1921 81 101 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 7301 1371 1401 2051 2181 161 121 11 01 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 63681 11771 10811 18741 19351 1491 1191 121 111 51 5 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 501 231 221 31 11 01 01 11 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002000 PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY DISTRICT COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY DISTRICT ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: PAGE: 2 SIS: rpt304 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:38 I GRADEi ITOTALI ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ WHITE M BLACK I HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 09 ENROLLI 7661 1301 1561 2591 1931 121 101 41 21 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 01 01 21 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 10 ENROLLI 820 I 154 I 158 I 268 I 2091 131 131 4 I 11 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 31 01 11 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 11 ENROLLI 6471 1511 1571 1551 1631 12 I 61 01 21 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 01 01 21 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 12 ENROLLI 5091 1241 1251 1181 1221 91 51 11 21 21 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 01 11 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 13 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- EE ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- SM ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ss ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 91101 17361 16771 26741 26221 1951 1531 211 181 71 7 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 581 231 231 91 21 01 01 11 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+--jOf-+-----+--rr-+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- -r\np..,. J,) .... ,..,  11 \u0026amp;'b .q l' 7\"' 31P/1 ~ ~ 1:5 C? 0 0 0 1~ Has your district voted to participate in School Choice? Y ~ --1 ~.i/5! - .a / o7,,. 9-v1C::-r ,.. ~ ?(,, ..,~ ,\nrn I\n, '\u0026gt;\u0026lt;' ,\nJ. / I~ 7 7 A~ 7o ******************************************************************************** ~ f NUMBERO F GRADUATESF OR PREVIOUS SCHOOLY EAR TOTAL ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- GRADUATEIS 5251 1321 1641 951 1131 51 101 21 41 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ******************************************************************************** LEA: 6002050 PRESCHOOLE NROLLMENTB Y SCHOOL PAGE: 1 SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: AMBOYE LEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I M WHITE F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLL! 211 41 41 71 61 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002054 COUNTY: PULASKI PRESCHOOL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL PAGE: 3 SIS: rpt455 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLLI 541 21 21 241 231 21 11 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002056 COUNTY: PULASKI PRESCHOOL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL PAGE: 5 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLLI 171 01 11 81 81 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002060 COUNTY: PULASKI PRESCHOOLE NROLLMENBT Y SCHOOL PAGE: 9 SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: LYNCHD RIVE ELEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI M WHITE F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLLI 201 21 01 11 I 61 01 11 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002063 PRESCHOOL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL PAGE: 11 SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: NO. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLL! 411 41 31 121 81 51 91 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002067 PRESCHOOLE NROLLMENTB Y SCHOOL PAGE: 14 SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: REDWOODP RE-SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLL! 2131 71 91 991 871 71 41 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002069 COUNTY: PULASKI PRESCHOOLE NROLLMENTB Y SCHOOL PAGE: 15 SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: SEVENTH STREET ELEM. SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLLI 201 01 01 91 111 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- r 0 C') _ .. C2 :a :-c: Set.cc: :-o:. 54 ::02 C:-ysc.a: r:1.:: :\"lag::.e: z:em ?K K School :-oc ocs 3ay::n.:. -1ec:::: c:eme!:tar~ K Sc::.ccl :-::~ K 24 ,8 26 23 ,5 30 19.1 :o ,o :c 35 22 30 3:\n: :s 29 208 :as !.2 :o 54 5 5 35 5) !.S 32 32 32 20 23 :s :a 23 23 :s 29 25 42 32 36 :5 :so 9 :2 - - ~e 1c6 -P'6 -- -I SC 35 s 3- 29 25 26 :a 23 :9 :as - 19 :.3 11 # 1:: 33 24 2G 29 33 ,, ?fr?) :!.\"'3 ,, :2 ~\\ 43 1 p ,~ .\n-l :s 2 C 2 s 5 0 4\n: C.o 0 JS 4:\n: 26 3- ,5 ,6 ./ 235 ..... 52. 2-t \\ :ss 5\nEO ~1 ' :.22 1:5 :cs 1:2 95 9- 95 S:4 -54 61 48 4E 63 59 65 70 -2 63 ...,.... 3 93 24 26 24 33 42 49 48 --, 2E\\v ,-, 66\\ 49 ,H 50 74\\ \u0026lt;, 33\\- K PK K !?K K Sc::cc:. Tot :-c.:. :r:c:.ud.:.ng PK Schee::. '!'c,:.. 'rot :::c~'.lC:.r:g ?K School :'oc . !.3 ,\nacks:mv:::e ::::::.ement.:i.r:1 3 13 11 57 13 10 9 14 aG 78 55 2E 26 24 29 21 25 o'I. 13 10 ::..1 16 205 16 13 23 16 18 12 34 10 6 5 11 7 10 5\" 50 20 21 22 n 15 d-.,Y:20 Sc ::.i. 20 11 83 55 55 sa 158 32 24 20 2- 20 24 13 20 :.12 12 5 :3 ::.a 28 24 14 23 12:\n~I ::..s 20 13 16 79 43 51 14 6 14 :o 8 l\" :..o 14 :\n_7 18 19 !.C 9 101 20 :.s :s 60 EJ () 55 53 71 36 40 56 242 252 735\"\"\" 38 44 JS 34 27 28 242  206 51 52 54 56 3 c 3 .....- 54. :.si : 9 :::\nil 7., -a 54 54 34 79 a- 545 V 526 55 91% 4.5.85% 16 50% ,c 2 5 %- 48 26% ?K K 60 62 :o 3: :2 !.'.) -- 1: !.S 62 JS (l a'i \\\\le oC s 5 5 4 ze a 7 ~5 25 :5 :a 9 31 :. s (I 2: :2 6 0 2\n/t 52 ,a 4c 48 50 50 4C 53 :\nos.,...\ns ,a 43 4- 35 4\" ~as  -5 54 5.\n4'J .\n6\n: ::: :\n:a::ec::: #1- .:\n56'  ,, :s, 20 2:1 V ~~7-- 25.5:\\.,,,,,. 74. 3 S \\ '.7i7~ 1\n- . :4 _., o: : 5 ?:.. K ?!\u0026lt; 22 :s SC~OC..1. Toe. s, :o 30 13 56 36 23 ~1:::- :: .-i.\n..:.z ='='.:-1.\n:..z :. 9 :a 63 50 .\ns ,2 39 2Z3 :a :s 42 :.J 53  59 50 52 \"= ZO\\: V 7- 38 SC\\ 6: SC% oo Jat ...., 69 92 \\ ,,. 95\\ 59 05% 56 95\\ .. __ a:t .,,.., ?K 55 6J 59 20 20 34 23 3C 2: 1 6 :s 45 55 6'J 53 s::: 26 3C :a :9 :.s 96 cs 239 2S 25 20 22 :s 69 2J-t 50 6J :s : 0 {6 _, 26 L, 66 53 62 -J sa s:. 63 55 E: 3-.\n, ...... 259 305 ... CSO V 71 :6.6H -2 ~\u0026lt;\u0026gt;/- :n ::J :~s :. as 5-i2 V 5,C 69 56 63\n7\\ 4- 5: t ?K K ... c!:co_ ':I- - ..... a:. c4 3C 43 30 JS J (I 24 :se 35 35 _6! ,2 :s :s -6 66 49 JS .\n3 89 34 0.3 52 ... 66 0 I 59 o- ES a, 58 15 :s 4 3 2C 69 55 204 )40 062 :_4 S 53 sa 3-:, ? . .:..,:\n::\nsa \u0026amp;ct sa S4\\ 55 ......, 44 40\\ 63 32\\: ,o\nst :s /t'rr\"  tj ! ( ~.f.t, .d-'('ot- 0 I , /4r:?-- A ~,9.J.// --r..,I:. , 32\n: 9\n:3 :E :5 2J 25 :.2 9 #9t/ -::t\ns\n). '5~ ~1\n.,,,1 -1{90~ -t~ ~ 93 !?9 as 96 550 io17? ~I~/ ~7?-. ...y'\ne . ' 286 266 2cz: 259 :ss ?K 455 39:Z 3 94 364 440 29 2.\n:c 0 32 28 3:. 13 :a J' 2 ! 42 5 :352 138~ :320 lG435 :.3449 4l 56% 60 39% 50 95\\ ~ L\\\\I PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT October 22, 2004 Horace Smith, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Smith: 925 East Dixon Road/P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 72216-8601 ( 501) 490-2000 Attached is the October 1, 2004, enrollment counts for Pulaski County Special School District and the 2004-2005 School Profiles. Guidelines for racial balance for the 2004-2005 school year are: 20-50% at the elementary level and 20-54% at the secondary level. Pre-K enrollment is not included in the elementary racial balance guidelines. Sincerely, Dr. Brenda Bowles, Director of Equity and Multicultural Education c Dr. Don Henderson, Superintendent of Education Karl Brown, Assistant Superintendent for Equity and Pupil Services Sam Jones, Attorney PulaskCi ountyS peciaSl chooDl istrict Equity and Pupil Services Date: To: Fax:: Re: - - -- --  .   -  -- --- - - 925 E. Dixon Rd/P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 72216 (501) 490-6215 (501) 490- 1352 Fax FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET rJ O( ) Q. rh-- k r J_ /\n2 () 0 l-/ 3'71-0100 Sender: 'r' c.. )e__ .. YOU SHOULD RECEIVE 1 [ PAGE (S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. IF YOU T MESSAGE: DO NOT RECEIVE AU THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL (501) 490-6215. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT November 2, 2004 925 East Dixon Road/P.o Box 8601 little Rock, Arkansas 72216-8601 Horace Smith, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Smith\n(501) 490-2000 Attached is a copy of the Pulaski County Special School District Summary of Building Capacities and Enrollments for 2002-2003. Building capacity remained Pthuel assakmi Hei gehx cSecphto foorl. RobinsonH igh School, RobinsonM iddle Schoola nd North , Robinson High School building capacity has increased from 770 to 780, additional capacity provided by the portable building that was installed at 8R3o0b.i nson High School in January 2004 increasedt he building capacity to  Robinson Middle School building capacity based on changes at the school 6d7u0ri.n g the summer of 2004 has increasedt he building capacity to 650 to  North Pulaski High School building capacity based on changes at the fsrcohmo o1l 0d5u0ri tnog 1th0e6 0s.u mmer of 2004 has increasedt he building capacity Sincerely, Vi\u0026gt; A,,,,_)._,__ B,-,vt~ Dr. Brenda Bowles, Director of Equity and Multicultural Education c Karl Brown, Assistant Superintendent for Equity \u0026amp; Pupil Services Jar.nes Warren, Assistant Superintendent for Support Services SUMMARY OF BUILDING CA?AC!11ES AND ENROLLMENTS I Revised May 2. 200s PULASKl COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT I (APRIL 28. 2003) l I '  SCHOOL CAPACITY ' RE.COMMENDED I 2002-2003 I INFORMATION I SCHOOi.. CAPACITY ' I ENROLLMENT\"! (jAN, 7, 2003 SHEET), (A?RIL 28, 2003 INFO) HIGH SCHOOLS ' I I I I JA.CKSONVILLE HIGH (10-12) ' 825 I 1,025 I 1,360 (FOR S-12) 1,127 i I MILLS HIGH ' 908 I 780 I 1,130 NORTH PULASKI HIGH ' 626 I 900 I ,.ese I /Of\u0026amp;.0 OAK GROVE HIGH (M2) I 795 I 935 1,130 - I (FOR 9-12) I 537 I ,/ ROSINSON HIGH I :i94 I 556 I\ni:\ne '1 ii) 8.3 D u, , SYLVAN HILLS HIGH I 1,055 998 ! i,120 fDI'\"' I I I ! i MIDDl..E/JR. HIGHS I I ! I I I FULLER MIDDLE I 664 : 945 I 1,360 JACKSONVILLE JR. {8-9) I 620 I 800 I 990 JACKSOIIIVILLE MIDDLE (6-7) 1 643 I 800 I 980 NORTHWOOD MIDDLE I 651 I 964 1,030 - ROBINSON MIDDLE I 451 I 486 I 569 ~r,[) __ SYLVAN HILLS MIDDLE I 901 925 I 1,080 ' I I I ,\n,,\nI i:::LEMENTARY I I / I I I ADKINS ' I 216 I 370 526 ARNOLD DRIVE I 347 I ~o I 453 BAKER I 268 I 330 428 BATES I 612 I aoo I 863 BAYOU METO I 460 I 660 I 697 CATO 367 II 576 I 800 CLJNTON I 615 I 833 840 COLLEGE STATION I 212 I 340 439 CRYSTAL rilLL I 757 I 620 I 870 DUPREE I 310 : 465 498 HARRIS I 175 : 52.5 I 906 JACKSONVILLE 457 I 785 I 850 LANDMARK I 306 I 568 I n, LAWSON 242 I 325 I 372 OAK GROVE 385 i -476 I 626 I OAl\u0026lt;9RODKE I 309 I 500 553 PINE FORR.=sr ' 505 I 556 554 PINE'NOOD 410 I 523 I 677 ROBINSON I 387 450 I 544 1scon 108 I 280 I 294 $~:~WOOD I 355 I 460 I 561 SYLVAN HILLS 393 i 456 606 ,, 348 450 j 566 / T/l.Y_QR 570 I 561 _,::.. 10LESON I 342 I ,,r. - I I I ,,, 7 !:\nN?.OL.LMEN\nlN:--ORMATION BASED ON 3RD QUAR~R 2002-Z003 ~ROLLMENT :\u0026gt;A7E.0 MAR'.::rl 2\"\\, 2D03 :\nAGE 02 SUMMARY OF BUILDING CAPACmEs AND ENROLLMENTS ! Revised May 2. 2003 PULASKl COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT I (APRIL 28. 2003} ' SCHOOL CAPACl1Y 1 RECOMMENDED I 2002-2003 I INFORMATION I SCHOOL CAPACJTY !ENROLLMENT\" (JAN. 7. 2003 SHEET) (APRIL. 28, 2003 INFO) HIGH SCHOOLS I I I JACKSONVIUE HIGH (1012) 1 826 I 1.025 1.360 (FORS-12) I 1,127 ' I MILLS HIGH 908 780 I 1,130 NORTH PULASKI HIGH I 826 I 900 1,050 OAK GROVE HIGH (712) I 795 935 I 1.130 (FOR S-12) 537 I  I RO6INSON HIGH I 594 556 ! 770 SYLVAN HILLS HIGH 1.055 998 I 1,120 I I I MIDDLE/JR. HIGHS I I I I ' I FULLER MJDDLE ! 664 I 945 I 1,360 JACKSONVILLt\nJR. {6-9) I 620 I 800 I 990 JACKSONVILLE MIDDLE (6-7) I 643 I 800 I 980 NORTHWOOD MIDDLE I 651 I 964 I 1,030 R.OBINSON MIDDLE I 451 I 486 I 650 SYLV..o.NH ILLS MIDDLE I 901 I 925 I 1.080 I I I I I ELEMENTARY ' I I I I I ADKJNS . I 216 I 370 I 526 ' ARNOLD DRfVE I 347 I 420 I 453 BAKER I 268 I 330 I 428 BATES I 612 I 800 I 863 BAYOU METO 460 I 660 l 697 CATO I 367 ! 576 I 800 CLINTON I 615 I 833 840 COLLEGES i ATION I 212 I 340 I 43S CRYSTA l HILL I 757 I' 820 I 870 DUPREE I 310 I 465 I 498 HARRIS I 175 I 525 I 906 JACKSONVILLE I 467 I 785 I 850 LANDMARK I 306 I 568 ! 711 LAWSON I 242 I 325 I 372 OAK GROVE I 385 ' 476 I 626 OAKBROOK!:: 309 ! 500 553 PINE FORREST I 505 I 556 I 554 PINEWOOD I 410 i 523 I 677 ROBINSON I 387 ' 450 I 544- SCOTT I 108 I 280 I 294 SKE:RWOOD I 355 I 460 i 561 SYLVAN HILLS I 393 456 : 606 TAYLOR 348 I 450 I 566 TOLLESON I 342 I 570 ' 561 I I ! I : ITENROL.L.M:=1N I NFO?..M~.noN BASED oN 3RD ouAR-:-ER I \\ 2002-2003 ENROLLMENT DATED MAR.CH 21, 2003 I fl -r.\n-~ ~~ ~- ~//.4\":J - - /d,\u0026gt;-.J /~ /$0. (5 /7.,/4 -\n:\u0026gt; -0: %: Gf .\n)- ~f Z_  __\ns,A,l{ ) - ~.- \"-1/ ( ,Yf 0- C,,diJ() ~r7 ~0/Y) ~~u /~9~2 ~~ AJJ._l(_~v . ~-=\u0026lt;. 4' //2~-~ /4/S0 -a- ~~ -=5ff2 ?:9--, t-'Abt. tl:.'./t:14 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT November 2, 2004 Horace Smith, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock,A R 72201 Dear Mr. Smith: 925 East Dixon Road/P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 72216-8601 (501) 490-2000 Attached is a copy of the Pulaski County Special School District Summary of Building Capacities and Enrollments for 2002-2003. Building capacity remained Pthuel assakmi Hei gehx cSecpht ofoorl. Robinson High Schoo/, Robinson Middle School and North  Robinson High School building capacity has increased from 770 to 780, additional capacity provided by the portable building that was installed at 8R3o0b.i nson High School in January 2004 increased the building capacity to  Robinson Middle School building capacity based on changes at the school 6d7u0ri.n g the summer of 2004 has increased the building capacity to 650 to  North Pulaski High School building capacity based on changes at the school during the summer of 2004 has increased the building capacity from 1050 to 1060. Sincerely, (6 ~)_l_- BuvV!~ Dr. Brenda Bowles, Director of Equity and Multicultural Education c Karl Brown, Assistant Superintendent for Equity \u0026amp; Pupil Services James Warren, Assistant Superintendent for Support Services ~'-'!UJ. I y t-'Ut-' J.L ::,t.KV J.\\..,t. n.,:::,::,v t-'LAN DDPT SUMMARY OF BUILDING CAPACTTlES AND ENROLLMENTS Revised May 2. 200~ PULASK1 COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (APRIL 28. 2003) I SCHOOL CAPACITY RECOMMENDl:D 20022003 I INFORMATION SCHOOi. CAPACITY ENROLLMENT\"' (JAN. 7. 2003 SHEET) (APRIL 28, 2003 INFO) HIGH SCHOOLS I JACKSONVILLE HIGH {10-12) 825 1,025 1.360 (FOR .9-12) 1,127 MILlSHIGH 908 780 1,130 NORTH PULASKI HIGH 826 900 1,050 OAK GROVE HIGH (712} 795 935 1,130 (FOR 9-12) 537 ROBINSON HIGH ~94 556 770 SYLVAN HILLS HIGH 1,056 998 1,120 MIDDJ...E/JRH. IGHS FULL.ER MIDDLE I 664  I 945 1.360 JACKSONVILLE JR. {8--9) I 620 800 990 JACKSONVILLE MIDDLE (6-7) 643 I 800 980 NORTHWOOD MIDDLE: I 651 964 1,030 ROBINSON MIDDLE 451 486 650 SYLVAN HILLS MIDDLE 901 925 1,080 I I ELEMENTARY I ADKINS ' 216 370 526 ARNOLD DRIVE 347 420 453 BAKER 268 330 428 BATES 612 aoo 863 BAYOU METO I 460 660 697 CATO 367 576 I 800 CLJNTON I 615 833 T 840 COLLEGE STATION I 212 340 I 439 CRYSTAL HILL 757 820 870 DUPREE I 310 465 498 HARRIS 175 I 525 906 JACKSONVILLE 487 785 850 LO.NDMARK 306 568 711 LAWSON I 242 325 sn OAK GROVE I 385 I 476 626 OAKBROOKE I 309 500 553 PINE FORREST I 505 556 554 PINEWOOD ' 410 I 523 I o77 ROBINSON I 387 I 450 544 SCOTT I 108 I 280 294 SHERWOOD I 355 I 460 561 SYLVAN HILLS I 393 i 456 I 606 450 566 TAYLOR 348 570 561 TOLLESON I 342 I \"ENROLLMENT INFORMATION BASED ON 3RD QUARTER 2002-2003 ~ROLLMENT DATED tMRCH 21, 2003 t-'AGE 04/04 PAGE 02 _...,...,' ...-. , ...,..., C:.l\u0026gt;!UJ. I 'i l'\"'Ut\"' lL ::it.t-\u0026lt;V 1\\.-t. ,--._\n~.L) P!...AN DDFT SUMMARY OF BUILDING CAPACmES AND ENROLLMENTS I Revised May 2. 2003 PULASKl COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT I {APRIL 28. 2003) I '. SCHOOL CAPACl1Y RECOMMENDED 2002-2003 I INFORMATION SCHOOL CAPACITY I ENROLLMENT*' (JAN. 7. 2003 SHE:ETJ I (APRIL 28. 2003 INFO) HIGH SCHOOLS I I JACKSONVILLE HIGH (1012) 1 826 1.025 1.360 (FOR 9-12) 1,127 MILLS HIGH 908 ' 780 1,130 NORTH PULASKI HIGH 826 900 1.050 OAK GROVE HIGH (7-12) 795 935 1,130 (FOR S-12) 537 ROBINSON HIGH 594 556 770 SYLVAN HILLS HIGH 1,055 998 1,120 I MIDDLE/JR. HIGrlS I FULLER MIDDLE I 664 I 945 1,360 JACKSONVILLE JR.. {8-9) I 620 800 990 JACKSONVILLE MIDDLE (6-7) I 643 800 980 NORTHWOOD MIDDLE 651 964 1,030 ~OBINSON MIDDLE 451 486 650 SYLVAN HILLS MIDDLE 901 925 1,080 I ELEMENTARY ADKINS  I 216 370 I 526 ' ARNOI..D DRIVE 347 420 453 BAKER 268 330 428 BATES 612 800 863 BAYOUMETO I 460 660 697 CATO 367 576 800 CLINTON i 615 833 840 COLLEGE STATION 212 340 I 439 CRYSTAL HILL 757 820 870 DUPREE 310 465 498 HARRIS 175 I 525 906 JACKSONVILLE 487 785 850 LANDMARK 306 568 711 LAWSON 242 325 372 OAK GROVE 385 I 476 626 OAKBROOKE I 309 500 553 PINE FORREST 505 556 554 PINEWOOD I 410 523 677 ROBINSON 387 450 544 SCOTT 108 I 280 294 SKE'.RWOOD 355 i 460 561 SYLVAN HILLS I 393 I 456 606 TAYLOR 348 450 566 TOLLESON I 342 570 561 ' ! \"ENROLLMENT !NFORMAnON BASE:D ON 3RD QUARTER 2002-2003 ENROLLMENT DATED MAF{CH 21, 2003 t-'AGE 03/04 PAG:: 02\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1090","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1090"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nAgenda OCT ? ~UU't OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION foONITORfNG Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting OCTOBER 2004 RECEIVED OCT 2 , 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION r, ONITORING ,... n-,:, .\u0026gt;\n,m:J r- rr..-. :-11: Oz o\u0026gt; ~~ m..,\n,::, C: -z\n,::,n o-\u0026lt; r- i5 r-z nu, ~ !\"' n ::::\n!='~ r- z\n,::, u, n\n,::, -\u0026lt; m \u0026gt;~ !ll u, I. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS REGULAR MEETING October 28, 2004 5:30 p.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS 111. A. Welcome to Guests B. Student Performance - Parkview Madrigals REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Partners In Education - New Partnerships Franklin Elementary- Ethel Dunbar and Carolyn Gray Fellowship Bible Church - Ray Williams Pulaski Heights Middle School - Dan Whitehorn Arkansas Department of Health - Maria Jones McClellan Magnet High School - Larry Buck and Carol Overton Gifts in Kind - Little Rock - Pamela Boles C. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) D. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Update ,.. n.., .\u0026gt;\nma ,,-- ,_.... :i: Oz o\u0026gt; El~ m..,\na C: -z\nan o,--i\u0026lt;5 r-z C')V, ~ .\u0026gt; ~.., \"'O .C.,:\n..a.. :-'!!! n::a :::im \u0026gt;n .... 8 Oz z=I \"'o z \"' Regular Board Meeting October 28, 2004 Page 2 V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes - Regular Meeting: 09-23-04 - Special Meeting: 10-14-04 SCHOOL SERVICES A. Second Reading: Policy JIH - Student Searches HUMAN RESOURCES A. Personnel Changes BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Donations of Property 8. Financial Report CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions EMPLOYEE HEARINGS ADJOURNMENT 0-0 \u0026gt; ,m:, r,..-. r_-\u0026lt; E Oz o\u0026gt; el~ m..,\nx, C: -z\nx,O o-\u0026lt; r- l5 r-z 0 V, ~ ~\n= m-o 1\n:x, og Em me - C: ~~ cS ~\nx,::1 ~m z\nx, 0 V, m- \u0026gt;~ i,, c3 -Co:\n..x.., ~5!? o\nx, :::im \u0026gt;o -\u0026lt;8 Oz Z:::i V, 0 z V, I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOME/ PERFORMANCE Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. err ATIONS C. CITIZENS REMARKS 0. LRCTA LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Partners in Education BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District Partners in Education program is designed to develop strong relationships between the community and our schools. The partnership process encourages businesses, community agencies and private organizations to join with individual schools to enhance and support educational programs. Each partnership utilizes the resources of both the school and the business for their mutual benefit. RATIONALE: The following schools and businesses have completed the requirements necessary to establish a partnership and are actively working together to accomplish their objectives. FUNDING: Not applicable. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the board approve the following partnerships: Franklin Elementary and Fellowship Bible Church Pulaski Heights Middle School and Arkansas Department of Health McClellan Magnet High School and Gifts in Kind-Little Rock PREPARED BY: Debbie Milam, ViPS Director !I' !!l C: 0 m ~ \u0026gt; gi ci z !C m .z.. . fl a, C: 8 !!l C: ~ m !=' (\") 0z Ill ,X,. ~ X Franklin Elementary School \u0026amp; Fellowship Bible Church Education Partnership 2004-2005 School Year Fellowship Bible Church will: l. Complete facility and campus projects as prioritized by Franklin Elementary School for ShareFest 2004. 2. Seek to provide at least 30 STEP Encouragers. 3. Provide a teacher appreciation event to support and encourage the faculty and staff. 4. Partner with the PTA to strengthen and encourage increased parental involvement. 5. Provide speakers and support to student recognition events. Franklin Elementary School will: 1. Make available selected student art for display at Fellowship Bible Church. 2. Recognize Fellowship Bible Church as a Partner-in-Education in monthly school newsletters and at school functions. 3. Provide promotion and facility for parent life skills classes. 4. Enlist interested students to correspond with Fellowship selected International Partners. Pulaski Heights Middle School and Arkansas Department of Health Education Partnership 2004-2005 School Year Pulaski Heights Middle School will:  Provide artwork for the Arkansas Department of Health employee break room  Provide use of its facility for functions/ceremonies  Participate in the annual Christmas program  Allow its Spanish students to participate in Christmas caroling at the Department Arkansas Department of Health will:  Provide tutors for PHMS' after school program  Allow students enrolled in Career Orientation to job shadow employees  Organize a school supply drive for students that need supplies !I' !!l C: C .~....  g: iz5 I: zm ..... ~ n 0 z V, McCLELLAN MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL THE ACADEMIES: BUSINESS FINANCE, ENGINEERING, MULTIMEDIA PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT GIFIS AND KIND will provide on-going:  Supplies for families of McClellan students in need.  Incentives for volunteers promoting student achievement at McClellan.  Incentives for outstanding student performance at the nine weeks for McClellan to motivate students to achieve high standards.  Door-prizes for the PTSA meetings to get parents involved in promoting student achievement at McClellan.  Service-learning/community service opportunities for students to promote student achievement at McClellan. MCCLELLAN MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL will provide:  Free community education multimedia classes for two Gifts in Kind employees (if the class makes).  Inclusion of Gifts in Kind in McClellan's volunteer resource book.  Desktop Publishing services to Gifts in Kind.  Recognition at PTSA meetings for Gifts in Kind.  Recognition in the yearbook for Gifts in Kind.  Multimedia services for Gifts in Kind.  Students for community service/service learning opportunities for McClellan clubs and organizations at Gifts in Kind. 9417 Geyer Springs Road  Phone 447-2100  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: BACKGROUND: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 October 28, 2004 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools NCLB 2004 Update Junious Babbs The federal \"No Child Left Behind\" (NCLB} Act promotes educational choice by offering parents in low performing schools the opportunity to transfer to another school. LRSD has now completed the third year of implementation for this choice option. Attached report information notes 2004-05 results and provides a three year comparison since the 2002-03 school year. Request to void 6 approved NCLB transfers were received from parents. All request were granted and changes are reflected in the charts below. LRSD NCLB APPLICATION SUMMARY - OCTOBER 2004 APPROVED/ ACCEPTED APPLICATIONS BY SENDING SCHOOLS SCHOOL TOTAL Bale 1 Baseline 4 Brady 5 Chicot 3 Cloverdale Elem. 5 Fair Park 2 Franklin 4 Kinq 1 Mitchell 1 Rockefeller 5 Stephens 3 Wakefield 3 Washinqton 1 Watson 8 Wilson 5 Woodruff 4 TOTAL 55 :c::\na \u0026gt;- o~ ~~ ~! (/J ..... f\u0026gt; ti! C: C C) !!l C: ~ m m\na (/J !=' n 0 z !!l rn ~ C ::\n0 ~\na m \"C 0 :l APPROVED/ ACCEPTED APPLICATIONS BY RECEIVING SCHOOLS SCHOOL TOTAL Dodd 6 Geyer Springs 1 Mabe Iva le 5 Meadowcliff 1 Otter Creek 5 Romine 5 Western Hills 5 Forest Park 3 Fulbright 3 Jefferson 4 McDermott 6 Pulaski Heights 6 Rightsell 4 Terry 1 TOTAL 55 Applications Mailed 9-24-04 4364 students eligible for transfer (Bale, Baseline, Brady, Chicot, Cloverdale, Fair Park, Franklin, King, Mitchell, Rockefeller, Stephens, Wakefield, Washington, Watson, Wilson, Woodruff) Applications Received (10-1-04 5:00 p.m.) 69 ( .02%) Applications Approved 61 (88%) 6 Declined 55 Accepted Students report to \"Receiving School\" site on October 25, 2004. \"NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND\" 3 YEAR SUMMARY 2002-03 2003-04 Applications Mailed 3323 7619 Applications Received 202 128 (6%) (1.7%) Applications Approved 135 72 (67%) (56%) 2004-05 4364 69 (1.6%) 61 (88%) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: October 2004 Construction Report - Bond Projects BACKGROUND: The renovation and media additions at Pulaski Heights Middle and Elementary Schools are complete except for a punch list (discrepancies) that has been developed by the architect. Shelving for the media center has been installed, and the books are in place. The classroom and cafeteria additions at Parkview have been completed and are being used by students and staff. The new field house is nearing completion and should soon be in operation, pending installation of the gas line to the facility. The renovation of Scott Field has begun. The renovation is a partnership between LRSD and UALR. When completed in March 2005, UALR will use the track as part of their athletic program. RATIONALE: Monthly reports are submitted to the Board to keep members up-to-date on construction projects in the District. FUNDING: Bond Funds RECOMMENDATION: Report item\nno action necessary. PREPARED BY: Bill Goodman, District Engineer .:.n. Pl ::c C: ~ m ~ 1\"::c .., C: m~\n,c z is\n,c zm zu, mo .... C: ~ m Cl) CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 28, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION I I t:st. 1.\nompIet1on Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Administration HVAC $70,000 Oct-04 Brady ___ Addition/renovation - ~-- $973,6~ _ _Q_ct-04 1-C_e_n_tral _____ --~Renovation - Interior ~ $10,200,266 Aug-05 Central HVAC Renovation - Band Area__ _ ~ $225,000 Dec-04 Dodd Fire Alarm Upgrade ____ $9,200 Oct-04 Dunbar _ R enovation/addition -___ ___ $6,149,023 Nov-04 Henderson MablevaleElem ~ Lockers- ---+--- $43,854 Dec-04 --Fire Alarm Upgrade -- - $12,000 Oct-04 Parkview - Addition _____ ~ $2,121 ,226- Oct-04 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Renovation -- - - $1 ,193,259- - Oct-04 Pulaski Hgts. MS -- - Renovation -- ___ _._ $3,755,041 Oct-04 Scott Field --~Track Renovations -- --- $289,056 Dec-04 -W-a-ke- fi-1eld- Rebuild - - - -- - $5,300,000 Oct-04 Washington Western Hills ___F1_ re Alarm Upgrade __ _: :::: $11]oa -- Oct-04 Fire Alarm Upgrade $8,400 Oct-04 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - FALL/ WINTER 2004-05 I I t:st. 1.\nompIe1Ion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Carver Media Center Expansion $167,490 Unknown Fair Park Roof _____ $245,784 Jan-05 Gibbs --,._ddition -- _______________ $705,670 Jun-05 Meadowcliff Remodel __ $164,150 Mar-05 Mitchell IRenovation ___ $2,212,493 Aug-05 Oakhurst (Adult Education) New Windows ________ $215,000 Jun-05 Wilson HVAC for Cafeteria $56,000 Jan-05 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED Facility Name I I 1:sc. 1..,ompIe11on Project Description Cost Date Chicot Electrical Upgrade ____________U_ n_kn_o_w_n_ ___U_ n_kn_o_w_n, !Electrical Upg~rad-e ---------+, -- Unknown Unknown Booker CI over da Ie Elem_e_n_ta_r~y ---.-A~.d...,d~i.t..i.o,_n_ __________- -,... __.$ .c.5_2_0__,,_7_5_0_ ___A _u,g._-_0-51 Fair Park Addition $799,000 Unknown Forest Heights I Remodel $1,547,000 Unknown Garland Remodel Unknown Unknown Pulaski Hgts. MS Energy monitoring system installation Unknown Unknown Rightsell Renovation I $2,494,000 Aug-06 Scott Field Renovate Track $200,000 Unknown Western Hills I Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC $640,000 I Aug-05 Woodruff Parking addition $193,777 Unknown BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I I Est. Completion Project Description Cost Date Administration Administration -- !Asbestos abatement $380,495 Mar-03 Fresh air system $55,000 Aug-03 Administration Fire alarm $32,350 Aug-03 Administration A- n-nex - -~,-E-ne_r_gy_m_o_n-ito- r-in_g_s_y-ste_m_i_n-st_a_lla-t-io_n_--+_ ---~-----M~ay~ 02__, Alternative Learnin_g_c=-t-r_--=Ene_r=gy~m-o-n\"i\"t\"o- r-icn-~g-s~y-st,.e..-m\"\"'i-n\"s\"t'-a,l,l-a...t.,i,.o.._n_-+----$=-1,...5.,,.,.. 1.,..6,,...0.,-,-----cOCc\"\"~t:.o,,-.11 Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy efficient lighting $82,000 Dec-01 Badgett ----+-P--ar-ti~a~la_s_b_e-st_os~a~ba- t~e~m-e-nt------+----$23_7~,2- 3-7~----J-u-1--0-1-, Badgett !Fire alarm $18,250 Aug-02 Bale Classroom addition/renovation $2,244,524 I Dec-02 Bale Energy monitoring system Mar-02 Bale I Partial roof replacement $269,587 ' Dec-01 Bale HVAC I $664,587 Aug-01 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 28, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED I I 1Es t. Completion Facility Name Project Descriotion Cost Date Baseline ___ Renovation __ ___ $953,520 Aug-04 Booker Gym Roof ____ $48,525 Oct-04 Booker ADA Rest rooms___ ~ $25,000 ' -- Aug-04 Booker --Energy efficient lighting -- ~ - $170,295 ~ Apr-01 1-B-o_o_k-er______ --rnergy monitoring system installation ~ $23,710 Oct-01 Booker Asbestos abatement -~~---- ~ - $10,900 ~ 1-B,--o_o_k-er ________ Fire alarm $34,501 Mar-02 Brady Energy efficient lighting - ---~ - $8(),593 -- Sep-02 ,-~-~-ai - 1 ~~r---------+-~- ~~~\n0 ~i~i~~~i~\n~~stem installation ---,- $i~~:~~~ -- ~~ 1C-,-a-_rve_r_ _______P_ a_rking lot __-_ -_-- __ ~ $111 ,742 _ Au~ ,C_e_n_tr_al ________R_ efle_cting Pond __ ___ ____ $57,561 _ Sep-04 Central Parking Student parking ___ _ _ $174,000 Aug~ Central/Quig~ --S-tadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair $265,000 _c- Aug-03 Central/Quigley AthleticFleid Improvement ___ ___ $38,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley Irrigation System ___ $14,500 Aug-03 Central ~ rchase land for school ______ Unknown Dec-02 Central --r--cR_o_of \u0026amp; exterior renovations 1 $2,000,000 I De~ ,_C_e_n_tr_al --------~C_e_ilin~g~a_n_d wall repair ______ $24,000 Oct:.Q.!_ Central Fire Alarm System Design/Installation $80,876 Aug__:_Q_!_ Cen_t_ra_l _______ _,.F_ro_n_t _la_n_din~g_ti_le_r_e~pai_r _ -----------.-- $22,470 Aug-01 ,_C_h_ic_o_t _______ --+-D_r_a_in_a=g_e______ 1 $64,700___ Aug-04 Chicot ____ ----'--S_ound Attenuation I $43,134 Jul-04 Cloverdale Elem. Energy efficient lighting I $132,678 ~ Cloverdale MS Energy efficient lighting ___ , $189,743 ___ Jul::Q_1_ Cloverdale MS Major renovation \u0026amp; addition i $1 ,393,822 Nov-02 Dodd ~ nergy efficient lighting I $90,665 - Au9.::Ql Dodd Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile I $156,299 Jul-01 Dodd Replace rooftop HVAC 1 $215,570 Aug~ Facilities Service Interior renovation I $84,672 ' Mar-01 Facility Services jFire alarm I $12,000 -- Aug-03 Fair Park IHVAC renovation/fire alarm I $315,956 Apr-02 f-F-_air_P_ark_____ _ !Energy efficient lighting I $90,162 Aug-01 Fair Park Asbestos abatement-ceiling~--- $59,310 , Aug-01 16 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music J. A. Fair room addition $3,155,640 Aug-04 J. A. Fair Energy efficient lighting $277,594 Apr-01 J. A. Fair Press box I $10,784 Nov-00 J. A. Fair Security cameras I $12,500 , Jun-01 J. A. Fair 'Athletic Field Improvement $38,0QQ I Jul-03 J. A. Fair Irrigation System I $14,000 Jul-03 J. A. Fair Roof repairs I $391,871 Aug-03 Forest Park Replace window units w/central HVAC I $485,258 Nov-03 -- -- Forest Park Diagonal parking I $111 ,742 Aug-03 -- Forest Park Energy efficient lighting I $119,788 May-01 Fulbright - - -- E nergy efficient lighting I $134,463 ~ Fulbright -  Energy monitoring system installation _[_ $11,950 Aug-01 Fulbright Replace roof top HVAC units I $107,835 Aug-02 Fulbright - Parking lot - $140,000 - Sep-02 Fulbright Roof repairs I $200,000 Oct-02 Franklin Renovation I $2,511,736 , Mar-03 Geyer Springs 1 Roof Repair --- I $161,752 Jun-04 Gibbs Energy efficient lighting $76,447 Apr-01 Gibbs Energy monitoring system installation I $11 ,770 Jul-01 2 ~\n\u0026gt; :c -.::, C: ms\n:oz is\n:o zm zu, mo r- C: ~ m \"' rn \u0026gt; C: C :::\n0\n:o \"' ~  CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 28, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Hall ~ or renovation \u0026amp; addition $8,637,709 Sep-03 -- Hall Asbestos abatement I $168,222 Aug-01 Hall -- ~ rgy efficient lighting L $42,931 Jul-01 Hall Energy efficient lighting $296,707 Apr-01 Hall - Infrastructure improvements T- $93,657 __ Aug-01 Hall - Intercom I -Fe-b-01 Hall - - --Security cameras I $10,600 Jun-01 Energy efficient lighting $193,679 --- Henderson I Jul-01 Roof replacement gym - _I_ $107,835  - Henderson May-01 Henderson -- -- ~ sbestos abatement Phase I $500,000~ Aug-01 Asbestos abatement Phase 2 -- -1-- $250,000 Henderson -- Aug-02 IRC Energy efficient lighting I $109,136 Jul-02 Jefferson Asbestos abatement I $43,~ Oct-01 ---- Jefferson- - Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm $1 ,630,000 Nov-02 _l:'arking lot -- ~ $269,588 - Laidlaw -- Jul-01 Energy monitoring system installation --ru-,150 -- Mabelvale Elem. Aug-01 Replace HVAC units -- - - $300,000 - Mabelvale Elem. I Aug-02 Mabelvale Elem. -- Asbestos Abatement $107,000 Aug-02 Energy efficient lighting - - - $106.~ - Mabelvale Elem. I Dec-02 Mabelvale MS Renovate bleachers -- $134,793 - Aug-01 Mabelvale MS Renovation $6,851 ,621 Mar-04 Mann Partial Replacement __ $11 ,500,00-0 - Apr-04 Mann Asphalt walks The total $1 .8 million Dec-01 Mann Walkway canopies is what has been Dec-01 Mann Boiler replacement , used so far on the -- Oct-01 Mann Fencing I projects listed Sep-01 Mann --Partial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. Aug-01 McClellan Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 Jul-03 McClellan Irrigation System I $14,750 Jul-03 McClell-an -- - - _ ~ urity cameras - I $36,300 Jun-01 McClellan 1 Energy efficient lighting $303.~ - May-01 -- McClellan Stadium stands repair $235,ooo I Aug-01 McClellan Intercom $46,000 Feb-02 McClellan Classroom Addition I $2,155,622 Jul-04 McDermott 1 Fire Alarm Upgrade I $7,700 I Sep-04 McDermott 'Energy efficient lighting $79,411 I Feb-01 McDermott Replace roof top HVAC units $476,000 I Aug-02 -Me-adowcliff 1Fire alarm $16,175 Jul-01 Meadowcliff Asbestos abatement $253,412 Aug-02 Meadowcliff - - IEngergy efficient lighting - $88,297 Dec-02 Metropolitan 1 Replace cooling tower $37,203 Dec-00 Metropolitan - Replace shop vent system $20,000 May-01 Metropolitan Energy monitoring system installatio~ _ $17,145 Aug-01 Mitchell -- Building Remediation - $165,000 Jul-04 Mitchell Energy efficient lighting $103,642 1 Apr-01 Mitchell Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 Jul-01 -Mitchell Asbestos abatement I $13,000 Jul-01 Oa-khu-rst HVAC renovation $237,237 Aug-01 Otter Creek --- Energy monitoring system installation I $10,695 May-01 Otter Creek Energy efficient lighting I $81 ,828 Apr-01 -- Otter Creek Asbestos abatement $10,000 I Aug-02 Otter Creek Parking lot $138,029 I Aug-02 Otter Creek 6 classroom addition I $888,778 Oct-02 Otter Creek I Parking Improvements $142,541 Aug-03 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 28, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Project Description Cost I Est. Completion Date Parkview HVAC controls - $210,000 Jun-02 Parkview Roof replacement $273,877 Sep-01 -- ~- - -Parkview Exterior lights $10,784 -- -N-ov-00 Parkview HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls $301 ,938 ~ g-01 + Parkview Locker replacement $120,000 ___Au g-01 --- Parkview Energy efficient lighting $315,000 Jun-01 Procurement ~ rgy monitoring system installat~ $5,290 --- Jun-02 Procurement Fire alarm + - - $25,000 ~ g-03 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground $17,000 Dec-02 -- Rightsell Energy efficient lighting - - - - $84,898 ~ -01 Rockefeller Energy efficient lighting $137,004 Mar-01 Rockefeller Replace roof top HVAC $539,175 ~ g-01 Parking addition ___ + Rockefeller $111 ,742 Aug-02 + - Romine Asbestos- a-batem-ent - $10,000 ~ pr-02 Romine Major renovation \u0026amp; addition - $3,534,675 Mar-03 -- Security{fransportation Bus cameras $22,500 Jun-01 Southwest Addition $2,000,000 Sep-04 - Southwest Asbestos abatement $28,138 Aug-00 Southwest 'New roof $690,000 Oct-03 Southwest Energy efficient lighting $168,719 Jan-02 Southwest i Drainage / street widening --,----- $250,000 - ~ g-03 Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installation $4,830 Aug-02 Student Assignment Fire alarm $9,000 Aug-03 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation I $275,000 Dec-01 Tech Ctr / Metro Renovation Addition/Renovation - Phase II $3,679,000 Jun-04 Technology U~grade Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data Nov-02 Terry 1 Energy efficient lighting I $73,850 Feb-01 Terry 1 Driveway \u0026amp; Parking $83,484 Aug-02 Terry - Media Center addition $704,932 Sep-02 Wakefield Security cameras $8,000 Jun-01 Wakefield 1 Energy efficient lighting I $74,776 Feb-01 Wakefield I Demolition/Asbestos Abatement $200,000 I Nov-02 Washington !Security cameras $7,900 Jun-01 Washington Energy efficient lighting $165,281 Apr-01 Watson I Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 Jul-01 Watson Asbestos abatement I $182,241 I Aug-01 Watson Energy efficient lighting $106,868 I Aug-01 Watson 1Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 Watson I Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $800,000 I Aug-02 Western Hills IADA Rest rooms $25,000 Aug-04 Western Hills 1Asbestos abatement I $191 ,946 Aug-02 Western Hills Intercom I $7,100 Dec-01 Western Hills Energy efficient lighting $106,000 - I Jul-01 Williams Renovation I $2,106,492  Mar-04 W-il-liams - Parking expansions I $183,717 Dec-03 Energy efficient lighting - -- $122,719 - -- Williams I Jun-01 Wilson Renovation/expansion I $1 ,263,876 Feb-04 Wilson Parking Expansion I $110,000 Aug-03 Woodruff Renovation I $246,419 Aug-02 4 .:n.. Pl :c C: ~ m ~\n,,, :c -0 C: m~\noz ~\no zm zc,, mo ,.... C: ~ m u, !\"' \u0026gt; C: 0 :::\n0\no \"\no' m c3 =l LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Board Auditor Report BACKGROUND: Monthly report to School Board. RATIONALE: Summary report of activities. FUNDING: No changes. RECOMMENDATION: None. PREPARED BY: Sandy Becker .:n.. ~ ::,: C: \"0 C ~ m ~ l\"::i:: \"0 C: m!f\naz is\na zm zu, mo .... C: ill m U\u0026gt; LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARIZA SAS Date: October 28, 2004 To: Board of Directors From:@Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - October This is the sixtieth communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with two high schools, two middle schools and three elementary schools to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and Newspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff Training a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of Nuts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. Audit Report - October 2004 Page 2 of2 b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. c) Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. d) Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. e) Working with Information Services on streamlining of data processes regarding SIS reporting. f) Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. g) Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. h) Reviewing leave accountability system. a) Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. b) Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. c) Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2004) and on planning committee for 2005. Sharefest participating schools this year are: Otter Creek, Mabelvale Middle, J.A. Fair, Romine Elementary, Henderson Middle, Southwest Middle, Cloverdale Middle, Dunbar Middle, Adult Education, Franklin Elementary, and the Alternative Learning Center (off of 6th Street in East End). d) Have advertised for assistant auditor position and hope to have filled soon. Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org.\n,,, 23\ns ~~ -\u0026lt; ::z: \u0026lt;-0 :_i,:..O.. ..., en lm :,c~ ! (\") cz m en C) ~ l\"'::z: ~i :,c  is~ zm zmcon ,.... C: ~ emn DATE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Technology Report BACKGROUND: This month the following technology activities took place:  The district was recently notified that E-rate funding appeals were approved by the SLD for 2003-04 funding year. Total approved on appeal was $1.7 million. This is in addition to the already approved amount of $1 .3 million for media retrieval systems in 2003-2004.  Riverdeep math program is now available to Middle and High School students from home via the internet. This application can be accessed from the districts' web page under the \"Parent\" tab.  Technology training classes for teachers are being offered at the Technology Center and have been well attended. RATIONALE: To implement the LRSD Technology Plan 2003 - 2006 FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept this report. PREPARED BY: Lucy Neal, Director, Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director, Computer Information Services !Jl -n z \u0026gt;z (\") ! ~\n,,,::c \"DC: m~ ::Oz ~\no zm Z Ul mo ,- C: ~ m U) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: FROM: Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: SECOND READING: POLICY JIH - STUDENT SEARCHES BACKGROUND: Attorney Chris Heller provided a report at the September board meeting regarding the recent ruling from the Eighth Circuit Court of appeals on our student search procedures. At that time, the Board approved policy JIH on first reading. RATIONALE: The Board of Directors and the LRSD administration have an obligation to provide a safe and secure learning environment for our students. It is therefore necessary for our security staff to conduct constitutionally lawful searches when necessary and appropriate. Legal counsel has recommended implementing a Board policy that will provide for those searches to be conducted for administrative rather than for law enforcement purposes. FUNDING: No additional funding required. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the need for additional research by our attorneys, it is recommended that the Board table action on second reading of policy JIH, Student Searches at this time. After additional review, the policy will be returned for second reading approval and implementation. PREPARED BY: Sadie Mitchell Chris Heller ~ ?\" :r \"0 C: m~\noz lS\no zm zu, mo ,... C: ~ m \u0026lt;n .?.,' z z\u0026gt; n 5,: ~ ~ ?\"~ cer. o~ Zcr. ~er. 6~ z\n:c \u0026lt;n \u0026lt; c,,'.: er. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: JIH STUDENT SEARCHES It is the policy of the Little Rock School District Board of Education to conduct administrative searches of students for the purpose of detecting and deterring the presence of weapons and drugs in schools. In order for the District to implement an effective search policy in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, student searches will be conducted for administrative, rather than law enforcement purposes. Accordingly, to the extent this policy does not conflict with state or federal law, any contraband discovered during an administrative search of a student will subject that student to appropriate Little Rock School District administrative sanctions but will not be reported to law enforcement authorities. Any student found in possession of drugs or any contraband will be given an administrative sanction as outlined in the Little Rock Students Rights and Responsibilities Handbook. DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Personnel Changes BACKGROUND: None RATIONALE: To staff allocated positions within the District FUNDING: Operating Fund RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.CA 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) consecutive years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 19, 2004 for regular schools are considered intern teachers. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 9, 2004 for EYE are considf.rJd intern teachers. PREPARED BY: Beverly William7oirector of Human Resources .., z  nz ! Personnel Changes Page2 October 28, 2004 NAME POSITION SCHOOL START DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Resignations/Terminations Certified Employees NONE New Certified Employees Baker, Deborah Reading Rec. 9-13-04 1-07 STEPHENS TCH925 Balmaz, Bettye Elem II 9-9-04 5-20 BOOKER TCH925 Binyon, Jonathan English 8-11-04 1-03 PARKVIEW TCH925 Brown, Carleton English 8-11-04 4-01 CENTRAL TCH925 Durham, Karen Special Ed 8-11-04 2-10 PHMS SPE925 England, Patricia English 8-11-04 1-01 PHMS TCH925 Forehand, Shirley Math 8-11-04 1-09 MABELVALE MID TCH925 Fuss, Amy American History 8-11-04 1-01 FOREST HGTS. TCH925 Gardenhire, Carroll Special Ed. 8-11-04 4-05 ALT LRNG CNTR SPE925 Green, Sarah English 8-11-04 1-01 PHMS TCH925 Horne, Wanda Special Ed. 8-11-04 1-04 HENDERSON SPE925 ANNUAL SALARY 37318.00 annual 31681.43 prorated 57276.00 annual 51309.75 prorated 31195.00 34575.00 40785.00 30040.00 38127.00 30040.00 38041 .00 30040.00 32350.00 Personnel Changes Page 3 October 28, 2004 NAME Ledoux, Kim Miller, Kasey Myton, Debra Pritz, Colleen Rizzardi, Marcia Roberts, Melanie Shue, Mary Trammell, Brett Walker, Sharon Warren, Alyson Whaley, Andress POSITION SCHOOL Math JA FAIR Math MANN Counselor PARKVIEW Pre-Algebra PHMS English PARKVIEW English FOREST HGTS. English FOREST HGTS. Spanish CENTRAL Math ALT LRNG CNTR Business Ed PARKVIEW English HALL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS 8-11-04 4-01 TCH925 8-11-04 1-01 TCH925 8-16-04 4-11 CNL10 8-11-04 2-17 TCH925 8-11 -04 4-08 TCH925 8-11-04 1-01 TCH925 8-18-04 4-18 TCH925 8-11-04 1-01 TCH925 9-13-04 4-05 TCH925 8-20-04 1-01 TCH925 8-11-04 4-07 TCH925 Certified Promotion ANNUAL SALARY 34575.00 30040.00 50560.00 annual 49277.25 prorated 49217.00 41507.00 30040.00 53061 .00 annual 51679.20 prorated 30040.00 38041 .00 annual 33682.01 prorated 30040.00 annual 29101 .25 40351.00 Sebourn, Karen Promoted from 9.25 mo. teacher to 9.25 mo. librarian position split between Carver and Washington ?\u0026lt; 0 ~ 0 en z C'l\na m ~\no: en 2:5 ~ ?\u0026lt; 0 :c ls~ C\na ~z 31:C'l men .z. . ~ \u0026gt; ~u. o- 0~ z u. ~: 0 IT Z\n,t en\u0026lt; c': IT u. Personnel Changes Page4 October 28, 2004 NAME POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Certified Transfer NONE Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Bealer, Henry Driver Asst. 1-27-98 42-09 Reason: None Given PROCUREMENT 10-28-04 AN12 Bluford, Jacqueline Trainee 9-14-03 2-02 Reason: Terminated CHILD NUTR 9-21-04 FSMEAL Brown, Ann Deseg Monitor 7-26-88 1-01 Reason: Retired DESEGRATION 10-28-04 DESMON Campbell, Paul Instr. Aide 8-11-04 33-13 Reason: None Given DODD 9-21-04 INA925 Clark, Tenisha Instr. Aide 4-17-97 33-16 Reason: None Given CLOVERDALE 8-10-04 INA925 Dokes, Joann Child Nutrition 3-10-04 3-01 Reason: None Given MCDERMOTT 8-16-04 FSH550 Foster, Napoleon Bus Driver 8-14-98 3-11 Reason: Health TRANSPORT 9-10-04 BUSDRV Johnson, Lott Security Officer 4-12-04 36-10 Reason: None Given JA FAIR 9-16-04 SOFR9 Jones, Taneadra Care 8-30-04 2-02 Reason: None Given CARE 10-28-04 CARE Mitchell, Tolice Care 8-30-04 1-03 Reason: None Given CARE 10-11-04 CARE Crosby, Darlene Instr. Aide 1-31-91 33-17 Reason: Personal WAKEFIELD 10-01-04 INA925 Payne, Celeste Instr. Aide 8-11-04 33-13 Reason: Personal FOREST PARK 9-15-04 INA925 Pitts, Joe Custodian 8-28-01 31-05 Reason: None Given DUNBAR 5-28-04 CUS925 ANNUAL SALARY 25632.00 13472.00 119022.00 14735.00 16109.00 9350.00 16390.00 15463.00 7.70 per hour 7.28 per hour 16595.00 14735.00 12821.00 Personnel Changes Page 5 October 28, 2004 NAME Reeves, Sharon Reason: Retired Simpson, Sylvia Reason: None Given Smith, Jimmy Reason: None Given Tidwell, Paula Reason: Personal Ye, Weiwen Reason: Personal Alexander, Betty Anderson, Carroll Baker, Paul Boyd, April Brown, Darrell POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Secretary 4-1-82 51-20 MAINTENANCE 9-13-04 MAINT Custodian 1-26-04 31-03 MABELVALE JR 5-28-04 CUS925 Instr. Aide 4-7-03 33-17 ALE 8-10-04 INA925 Custodian 8-18-00 31-07 ROMINE 9-27-04 CUS925 Instr. Aide 10-21-98 33-20 GIBBS 11-8-04 INA925 New Non-Certified Em~lo~ees Child Nutrition 9-11-04 3-01 PHMS FSH550 Custodian 9-7-04 31-01 MITCHELL CUS12 Custodian 9-20-04 31-01 MANN CUS925 Nurse 9-13-04 52-08 WOODRUFF NURSES FOREST PARK PUL. HGTS. ELEM. Custodian 10-04-04 31-01 FRANKLIN CUS928 ANNUAL SALARY 46572.00 12085.00 16595.00 13616.00 18149.00 9350.00 annual 8394.89 prorated 14532.00 annual 11749.00 prorated 11379.00 annual 9832.94 prorated 33528.00 annual 28463.87 prorated 11379.00 annual 9338.20 prorated ?\u0026lt; (\") 5 (I) z Cl\n,:, m ~\n:,\u0026lt;\n(I) ~ :,.. ?\u0026lt; C::c ls~ C:::::,:, ~z I: Cl me,, :!:j ~ .\u0026gt; a: ~ c- 0~ z er. ~: o rr Z\n:t Cl\u0026gt;\u0026lt; ?\nrr er. Personnel Changes Page 6 October 28, 2004 NAME Bryant, Caroline Burnett, Tarneisha Cartznes, Jerome Clayton, Bobby Cross, Dunte Curry, Tangela Davis, Arrysen Dorsey, Betty Doss, Jimmy Draper, James Evans, Felicia POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Care 10-18-04 3-17 CARE CARE Care 9-13-04 2-03 CARE CARE Care 9-13-04 2-02 CARE CARE Custodian 9-07-04 31-01 PHMS CUS12 Custodian 8-23-04 31-01 MEADOWCLIFF CUS925 Care 9-17-04 3-08 CARE CARE Care 10-11-04 2-01 CARE CARE Child Nutrition 9-11-04 3-01 HALL FSH550 Instr. Aide 8-12-04 33-19 MABELVALE MIDDLE INA925 Maintenance 9-8-04 40-01 PLANT SERVICES MAINT Instr. Aide 8-25-04 33-05 FOREST HEIGHTS INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 10.36 per hour 7.38 per hour 7.70 per hour 14532.00 annual 11749.28 prorated 5689.50 annual 5503.97 prorated 8.85 per hour 7.55 per hour 9350.00 annual 8394.00 prorated 17621 .00 annual 17525.75 prorated 19020.00 annual 15216.00 prorated 11600.00 annual 10972.97 prorated Personnel Changes Page7 October 28, 2004 NAME Ewing, Pavia Fields, Samia Foreman, Lakeisha Geeter, Lula Gregory, Regena Hamilton, Ronita Harvell, Lola Hendrix, Christal Higgins, Greogory POSITION SCHOOL Clerical BRADY Instr. Aide CHICOT Child Nutrition HALL Care CARE Nurse STEPHENS Care CARE Child Nutrition PARKVIEW Clerical STEPHENS Maintenance ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS 9-13-04 39-08 CLK10 10-06-04 33-04 INA925 9-01-04 3-01 FSH550 10-11-04 4-01 CARE 9-20-04 38-03 NURSES 9-13-04 1-08 CARE 8-30-04 3-01 FSH550 9-13-04 39-04 CLK10 10-04-04 49-07 PLANT SERVICES MAINT ANNUAL SALARY 25632.00 annual 22096.55 prorated 11253.00 annual 9002.40 prorated 9350.00 annual 8797.04 prorated 6.25 per hour 19020.00 annual 15651.87 prorated 8.05 per hour 9350.00 annual 8897.58 prorated 20184.00 annual 16306.29 prorated 29760.00 annual 21781.79 prorated :-\u0026lt; n,... 0 U\u0026gt; z Q\n,:, m I ~ U\u0026gt; :!S :,.. ?\u0026lt; O::r:: 5~ C:\n,:, ~z :1:0 mu, .z.. . ~\n,,,,~ V. 8~ z V. ~::: Oz\n:rcr U\u0026gt; \u0026lt; 1\" rr V. Personnel Changes Page 8 October 28, 2004 NAME Holliman, Darren Jackson, Debbie Jackson, Gwendolyn Jackson, Laura Johnson, Mildred Jones, Valerie Madden, Andrea Marsh, Janice Mathis, Taurus POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Maintenance 9-13-04 49-07 PLANT SERVICES MAINT Child Nutrition 9-01-04 3-01 HALL FSH550 Instr. Aide 9-15-04 33-16 CLOVERDALE ELEM. INA925 Custodian 8-16-04 1-01 J. A. FAIR CUS925 Child Nutrition 9-01-04 3-01 HALL FSH550 Care 9-13-04 1-06 CARE CARE Child Nutrition 9-27-04 7-01 WILLIAMS FSH650 Child Nutrition 9-01-04 3-01 WILLIAMS FSH550 Instr. Aide 9-21-04 33-16 HENDERSON INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 29760.00 annual 23554.72 prorated 9350.00 annual 8797.04 prorated 16109.00 annual 14019.18 prorated 5689.50 annual 5658.58 prorated 9350.00 annual 8797.04 prorated 7.74 per hour 11050.00 annual 9327.15 prorated 9350.00 annual 8797.04 prorated 16109.00 annual 13670.88 prorated Personnel Changes Page9 October 28, 2004 NAME McCoy, Betty McKenzie, Sherman Mitchell, Cecelia Muhammad, Kaye Nash, Niketa Nolly, Carolyn Nounanno, Christain Ollison, Yolanda Peterson, Montez Pondexter, Brack POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Child Nutrition 10-05-04 3-01 GEYER SPRINGS FSH550 Instr. Aide 8-16-04 33-16 FOREST HEIGHTS INA925 Child Nutrition 8-24-04 3-01 J.A. FAIR FSH550 Instr. Aide 9-28-04 33-09 WAKEFIELD INA925 Instr. Aide 8-11-04 33-06 ALC INA925 Instr. Aide 8-23-04 33-03 FOREST HEIGHTS INA925 Instr. Aide 8-25-04 33-01 J. A. FAIR INA925 Care 9-13-04 1-04 CARE INA925 Security Officer 8-16-04 36-16 CENTRAL SOFR9 Instr. Aide 8-17-04 33-9 ALC INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 9350.00 annual 7691 .13 prorated 16109.00 annual 5847.77 prorated 9350.00 annual 9098.66 prorated 5228.00 annual 4295.44 prorated 11946.00 10934.00 annual 10461 .00 prorated 10295.00 annual 9738.51 prorated 7.41 per hour 18491 .00 13070.00 annual 12787.41 prorated ?\u0026lt; C'\u0026gt; r- 0 (/) z C)\nIll m !\n,,: (/) ?S ~ ?\u0026lt; 0::,: 5!\n! \u0026lt;=\n,o ~z :I: C) mu, .z.. . ~ ,,.a: . C c,, g~ Zc,, ~~ 0 IT z\n,c U\u0026gt;\u0026lt; c': IT c,, Personnel Changes Page 10 October 28, 2004 NAME Reams, Bernard Simpson, Nena Spaight, Linda Stricklen, Lisa Taylor, Lee Thompson, Dian Vanderpool, Milagros William, Adam Williams, Mary Wilson Murray, Judy POSITION SCHOOL Instr. Aide BASELINE Child Nutrition MCCLELLAN Instr. Aide ROCKEFELLER Child Nutrition HENDERSON Security Officer MCCLELLAN Custodian CARVER Care CARE Maintenance START DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS 9-20-04 33-13 INA925 8-27-04 3-01 FSH550 9-20-04 33-09 INA12 8-30-04 3-01 FSH550 8-16-04 36-11 SOFR9 9-27-04 31-01 CUS925 9-20-04 1-06 CARE 9-9-04 40-01 PLANT SERVICES MAINT Care 10-4-04 1-05 CARE CARE Clerical 9-22-04 39-12 BOOKER CLK10 ANNUAL SALARY 14735.00 annual 12584.49 prorated 9350.00 annual 8947.85 prorated 16603.00 annual 12858.49 prorated 9350.00 annual 8897.58 prorated 15929.00 5689.50 annual 4761.86 prorated 8.33 per hour 19020.00 annual 15135.06 prorated 7.56 per hour 25632.00 annual 21212.69 prorated Personnel Changes Page 11 October 28, 2004 NAME Wilson, Tina Woodley, Stephanie Cooper, Floyd Davis, Johnnie Williams, Ed POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Child Nutrition 8-30-04 3-01 WESTERN HILLS FSH550 Instr. Aide 9-10-04 33-04 WASHINGTON INA925 Reclassification Supervisor 7-1-04 60-20 TRANSPORTATION AN12 Supervisor 7-1-04 60-20 TRANSPORTATION AN12 Research Spec. 7 -1-04 64-20 PRE ADC12 ANNUAL SALARY 9350.00 annual 8897.58 prorated 5964.09 annual 5287.09 prorated 60924.00 60924.00 64668.00 ?\u0026lt; ,(.\"..). 0 (/) z Cl :,0 m I (/) ?S :,.. ?\u0026lt; 0::,:: 5~ C: :,0 ~z :I: Cl mU\u0026gt; z --t DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District receives donations from businesses and individuals on a regular basis. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District that donations are not formally accepted until they are approved by the Board of Directors. RATIONALE: District policy states that, in order to maintain the centralized fixed asset property accounting system, all property donation requests are forwarded to the Director of Procurement. The Procurement Department forwards the requests, along with the appropriate recommendations, to the Board of Directors for acceptance and aproval. In order for proper recognition and appreciation to be conveyed to the donor, donor's name and current mailing address should be included in the donation memo. FUNDING: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached donation requests be approved and accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. PREPARED BY: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Gwen Caraway, Fixed Asset Property Manager ?\u0026lt; n g z C) I DONATIONS School/Department Item Donor Central High School Desk, chair, HP Tonja, Michael and Pavilion 17\" monitor Chris Hettinger and HP Desktop scanner. Total value of all donated items is $200.00. Central High School $500.00 cash to the Jeanie Brown Swim Team Central High School $80.00 cash toward Bob and Wanda the \"Spirit Banner\" Wimberley Central High School $245.00 cash toward Sol Alman Company the \"Spirit Banner\" Central High School $300.00 cash to the Randal and Jan Hundley Troubadours Club Central High School $250.00 cash toward Rosie Dunham, the completion of the Class of 1943-44 reflecting pool and $250.00 cash to be used as needed Cloverdale Magnet Large sandwich food Burger King/Allied Food Middle School coupons valued at Industries, Inc. approximately $50.00 Cloverdale Magnet Employee of the Ryan's Grill, Buffet and Middle School month food coupons Bakery valued at approximately $50.00 Gibbs Magnet Six (6) computer Nuvell Financial Services Elementary School monitors, valued at $600.00, to be used for student advancement Hall High School Weight and training Mr. Fred Barofsky and equipment, valued at friends in memory of approximately Donnie Dietz, a 1962 $20,000.00, for new graduate from Hall gym and Donnie Dietz Scholar Athletes Citizenship Award to be presented to a Hall student each year .!J.,I z  School/Department Item Donor z (') \u0026gt;,... (/) Martin L. King, Jr. $100.00 cash for Reza Hakkak, parent lnterdistrict Magnet use by counselors Elementary School in purchasing uniforms and school supplies McClellan Magnet $1,000.00 cash to be Mr. Jerome Tidemore, High School distributed equally to Algebra I teacher ~ (') students who scored ,... 0 (/) proficient and advanced z C\u0026gt; on the End of Course\n,:, m Exam ~ :,\n: (/) Pulaski Heights Sound system, valued Pulaski Heights Elementary Elementary School at $2,765.00, for the and Middle School PT A auditorium Pulaski Heights Services of a full-time Pulaski Heights Elementary Elementary School art teacher, valued at PTA $21,640.50, for the i!S ~ ?\u0026lt; 2004-05 school year O:z: 5~ C:\n,:, Rightsell Academy $300.00 cash to be J. R. and Mary Sue 2lz ~C\u0026gt; m\u0026lt;n applied toward the Gusewelle ~ school uniform drive Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street DATE: Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 9/2/2004 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT ~ FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRI CIPAL --(V:, ci-LL(tu. \\__, SUBJECT: DONATION Tonja, Michael \u0026amp; Chris Hettinger of 4 Butterfly Cove, Little Rock, AR 72210, donated the following items, valued at $200.00, to Central High School: 1. Desk 2. Chair 3. HP Pavilion 17\" Monitor 4. HP Desktop Scanner It is my recommendation that these items be accepted m accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. .:  ~ f\":'. t, ....... . l,.-\nDATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 9/10/2004 SUBJECT: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NA CY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL~ DO ATION Jeanie Brown of 60 Longlea Court, Little Rock, AR 72212, very generously donated $500.00 to the Little Rock Central High School Swim Team. It is my recommendation that these items be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. r. :.~ :- r~ 1 ... }~: :,-:. j j f!  I\n1 ~  - .... DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 9/13/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL ~ SUBJECT: DO ATION Bob \u0026amp; Wanda Wimberley of 6502 Pleasant Place, Little Rock, AR 72205, very graciously donated $80.00 toward the \"Spirit Banner\" for LRCH. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. ~ DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-447-1401 9/13/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIP SUBJECT: DO ATION Sol Alman Company of 1300 East 9th Street, Little Rock, AR 72203, very graciously donated $245.00 toward the \"Spirit Banner\" for LRCH. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. ~ n 5 u, z C) :,::, I u, DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 9/24/2004 SUBJECT: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF !)}OCURE~ENT A CY ROUSSEAU, PRI CIPAL ~ ~ DO ATIO Randal \u0026amp; Jan Hundley of 5515 Country Club Blvd., Little Rock, AR 72207, graciously contributed $300.00 to the Troubadours Club. It is my recommendation that this contribution be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District.   ~  ~ r -  t-' \\ - - - : - ~ ,.~ f: :t~ t: DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 9/21/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT A CY ROUSSEAU, PRI CIPAL ~ SUBJECT: DO ATIO Rosie Dunham, in behalf of Little Rock High School's class of 1943-1944, graciously contributed $250.00 toward the completion of the reflecting pool and $250.00 to be spent as we desire. Ms. Dunham's address is 3017 N. Grant, Little Rock, AR 72207. It is my recommendation that these items be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. CLOVERDALE MAGNET MIDDLE SCHOOL October 4, 2004 To: Mr. Darral Paradis Director of Procurement From: Angela '2tt},,,ncipal RE: Donation Please accept the donation listed below to Cloverdale Magnet Middle School. Jeffery Williams, District Manager Burger King Large Sandwich Allied Food Industries, Inc. Food Coupons 3300 S. University Ave. Little Rock, AR 72204 Approximate Value $50.00 n\n'-:- i~ ?r~ 1~ ~ t . ~ \\,.:- - -  6300 Hinkson Road  Phone /501) 447-2500  Fax /501) 447 -2501  Little Rock. Arkansas CLOVERDALE MAGNET MIDDLE SCHOOL October 4, 2004 To: Mr. Darral Paradis Director of Procurement a /vl1 From: Angela Munns, Principal RE: Donation Please accept the donation listed below to Cloverdale Magnet Middle School. RYA 'S Grill, Buffet \u0026amp; Bakery 8815 Baseline Rd. Little Rock, AR 72209 Employee of the Month Food Coupons Approximate Value $50.00 6300 Hinkson Road  Phone (501) 447-2500  Fax 1501) 447-2501  Little Rock. Arkansas 72209 ?\u0026lt; (\") 5 en z Cl\na I rn GIBBS MAGNET Memo To: Darral Paradis, Director Procurement J / From: Felicia Hobbs, Principakft\\ I CC: Dr. Sadie Mitchell Oats 9/28/2004 Ra: Donations Nuvell Financial Services, a loan servicing company in Little Rock, wishes to donate six (6) computer monitors to be used for student advancement in education. The monitors are valued at $100.00 each in which there is a total of $600.00 It is recommended this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. In advance, thank you for your consideration. FH:kt # hall high school 6700 \"H\" Street  (501 } 447-1900  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 To: From: Darral Paradis, Director of Prqcurement Vernon Smith, Jr., Principal V~C[f'RE: Donated Equipment Date: October 5, 2004 Mr. Fred Barofsky and friends are donating equipment for the weight and training room for our new gym in the name of Donnie Dietz who graduated from Hall High School in 1962. Mr. Barofsky and friends attended West Point Military Academy and were football teammates of Mr. Dietz. Mr. Dietz died in Vietnam. Mr. Dietz teammates would like to present the Donnie Dietz Scholar Athletes Citizenship Award to a Hall High School student each year. The following equipment should arrive in the next four to six weeks: The donation will total approximately $20,000.00 dollars. A list of donated equipment is as follows:  Stationary Bike (2)  Bicep Curl  Lat Pull Down (2)  Seated Row Press  Abdominal Press  Leg Press  Seated Leg Curl  Leg Extension  Shoulder Press (2)  Chest Press  Standing Calf Machine  Dual Adjustable Pulley (2)  Ice Machine  Training Table  Training Supplies !.J.,I z \u0026gt;z (\") \u0026gt; ~ MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. INTERDISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOL To: Darral Paradise, Director of Procurement J.H, From: Tyrone Harris, Principal Date: September 1, 2004 Re: Donation A parent of Martin Luther King Elementary Magnet School has generously donated $100.00 to our counselors. The money will serve the purpose of assisting in purchasing uniforms and school supplies for our students. The parent is Reza Hakkak of 12680 Rivercrest Dr., Little Rock, AR 72212. It is recommended that this donation request be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. t{ 905 Martin Luther King , Jr. Drive  Phone (501) 447-5100  Fax (501) 447-5101  Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 ' McCLELLAN MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL THE ACADEMIES: BUSINESS FINANCE, ENGINEERING, MULTIMEDIA To: Darral Paradis, Director - Procurement and Materials Management From: Larry Buck, Principal ~ McClellan Magnet~ Re: Donation Date: September 7, 2004 Mr. Jerome Tidemore, an Algebra I teacher on staff at McClellan Magnet High School, has generously donated to the students of McClellan $1 ,000.00. This donation will be equally divided between these students who scored proficient and advanced on the End of Course Exam during the Spring 2004 Assessment. It is my recommendation that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. r~~ ~-: ~ ~= r : r r.~ ~ L ..i :-, '\":\n\n.J : ~. i. l- ~ 9417 Geyer Springs Road  Phone 447-2100  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 ?\u0026lt; n 5 u, z C) ::,:, I u, PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement FROM: Lillie Carter, Principal/,~ DATE: September 8, 2004 RE: Donation The Pulaski Heights Elementary P.T.A. and the Pulaski Heights Middle School P.T.A. has generously donated a sound system for the auditorium valued at $2,765.00. Equipment donated is as follows:  Mackie DFX Mixer $380.00  Crown PCC 160 Microphones(3) 900.00  Gemini CDJ -10 CD player 225.00  Crown XL5202 Amplifier 410.00  Yamaha MSP3 Power Monitor 150.00  Miscellaneous wire connections 500.00  Power Master Switch 200.00 It is recommended that this generous donation be approved in accordance with the polices of the Board of Education. cc: Frances Jones Assistant Superintendent 3' 9 North Pine src-f-'  F\"\"'11C 4.i!.--5900  Fax 447-5901  Little Rock. Arkansas 72205 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO: FROM: DATE: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Lillie Carter, Principal J 4, September 8, 2004 RE: Donation The Pulaski Heights Elementary P.T.A. wishes to donate the service of a full-time art teacher for the 2004-2005 school year. The P.T.A. will pay the art teacher $21,640.50. This includes supplies and materials. It is recommended that this generous donation be approved in accordance with the polices of the Board of Education. cc: f ranees Jones Assistant Superintendent 319 North Pine Su,::co  r  = .1.17-5900  Fa, .1.1--sao  Little Rock Arkansas 72205 RIGHTSELL A CADEMY \"Great Expectations: Believe! Achieve! Succeed!\" TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement r/ Eunice M. Thrasher, Principani \\ Rightsell Academy I\" September 22, 2004 Donation The donor listed below has generously donated $300.00 towards the school uniform drive: J.R. and Mary Sue Gusewelle 13824 Pleasant Forest Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors. Thank you. /lh 'I 911 W,s! 1 9 Stree:  Phone (501 .:.:--61QO  Fa,: 150 ~.:---::::-  Little Roe\u0026lt; A,rk2'7sas 72205- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Financial Reports BACKGROUND: Financial reporting is designed to keep the Board of Directors up-to-date regarding the District's current financial condition. Financial reports are submitted monthly to the Board for review and approval. RATIONALE: September 2004 financial reports are submitted for the Board's review and approval. FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve the September 2004 financial reports as submitted. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen, Manager Financial Services LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2003/04 09/30/03 COLLECTED 2004/05 09/30/04 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 57,547,800 11 ,111,439 19.31% 61,436,691 12,467,263 20.29% DELINQUENT TAXES 10,100,000 807,595 8.00% 12,135,000 986,045 8.13% 40% PULLBACK 29,600,000 31 ,250,000 EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 210,000 205,000 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 180,000 155,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 150,000 185,000 MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 380,000 198,137 52.14% 485,000 13,590 2.80% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 200,000 43,822 21 .91% 245,000 82,243 33.57% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 240,000 42,599 17.75% 215,000 48,071 22.36% TOTAL 98,607,800 12,203,593 12.38% 106,311,691 13,597,212 12.79% REVENUE-COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 21 ,000 5,420 25.81% 22,000 5,644 25.65% TOTAL 21,000 5,420 25.81% 22,000 5,644 25.65% REVENUE  STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 53,226,139 9,677,479 18.18% 65,082,694 11 ,852,204 18.21% ALTERNATIVE LEARNING 1,927,250 481 ,812 25.00% ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 193,739 NATL SCHL LUNCH STUDENT FUNDING 6,498,240 1,181,498 18.18% PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1,141 ,165 1,141 ,165 100.00% REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 8,300,000 8,275,000 1,387,526 16.77% VOCATIONAL 1,400,000 266,989 19.07% 1,350,000 195,052 14.45% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,675,000 2,100,000 EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 68,340 25.00% 5,542,510 1,430,540 25.81% TRANSPORTATION 3,875,562 1,243,841 32.09% 4,125,000 1,325,044 32.12% INCENTIVE FUNDS  M TO M 3,900,000 368,422 9.45% 4,575,000 414,913 9.07% ADULT EDUCATION 920,337 8,417 0.91% 934,380 109,000 11.67% POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 560,545 267,486 47.72% TAP PROGRAM 285,245 142,623 50.00% 382,903 7,645 2.00% AT RISK FUNDING 360,000 395,000 9,400 2.38% TOTAL 74,776,187 12,043,596 16.11% 102,522,882 19,535,799 19.06% REVENUE OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 770,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,350,000 18,519 1.37% 1,295,000 8,416 0.65% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,632,430 1,849,008 TOTAL 3,752,430 18,519 0.49% 3,914,008 8,416 0.22% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 177,157,418 24,271,129 13.70% 212,770,581 33,147,071 15.58% REVENUE  OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 24,075,790 2,160,329 8.97% 21 ,531,929 1,972,536 9.16% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 21 ,884 0.55% 4,500,000 57,924 1.29% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 2,282,885 27,964,934 2,191,329 7.84% TOTAL 52,765,141 4,465,099 8.46% 53,996,863 4,221,789 7.82% TOTAL REVENUE 229,922,559 28,736,225 12.50% 266,767,444 37,368,861 14.01% LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 200~ 04 09/30/03 EXPENDED 2004/05 09/30/04 EXPENDED EXPENSES SALARIES 100,684,982 12,825,743 12.74% 117,324,912 14,828,817 12.64% BENEFITS 26,483,772 3,473,524 13.12% 36,185,811 4,383,568 12.11% PURCHASED SERVICES 19,719,297 2,914,009 14.78% 20,959,918 2,682,273 12.80% MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,185,459 2,284,946 27.91% 8,725,914 1,850,893 21 .21% CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,575,580 91 ,687 5.82% 2,760,600 283,330 10.26% OTHER OBJECTS 8,384,567 69,173 0.83% 10,770,418 73,741 0.68% DEBT SERVICE 12,098,342 4,705,779 38.90% 12,474,809 4,590,834 36.80% TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 177,131,999 26,364,861 14.88% 209,202,382 28,693,456 13.72% EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 26,056,193 2,515,820 9.66% 23,853,134 2,332,732 9.78% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 1,235,893 30.90% 5,007,809 1,061 ,880 21 .20% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 2,491,447 10.09% 27,964,934 2,989,585 10.69% TOTAL 54,745,544 6,243,159 11.40% 56,825,877 6,384,197 11 .23% TOTAL EXPENSES 231,877,543 32,608,020 14.06% 266,028,259 35,077,653 13.19% INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (1 ,954,984) (3 ,871 ,796) 739,184 2,291 ,207 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M \u0026amp; 0 3,558,580 3,558,580 4,005,957 4,005,957 OPERATING 9,026,855 9,026,855 6,531 ,706 6,531 ,706 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M \u0026amp; 0 1,578,177 1,780,520 1,176,943 1,843,550 OPERATING 9,052,274 6,933,120 10,099,905 10,985,321 TOTAL 10,630,451 8,713,640 11,276,848 12,828,871 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 PROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01 -04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 09-30-04 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE FAIR 17,956.90 2,900.00 15,056.90 MCCLELLAN 77,219.02 77,219.02 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE 396.12 396.12 CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 95,572.04 0.00 0.00 2,900.00 0.00 92,672.04 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 4,906.21 80,000.00 21 ,393.23 63,512.98 NEW WORK PROJECTS 6,088,520.49 1,939,015.99 955,096.57 3,194,407.93 SECURITY PROJECTS 14,541 .25 14,541.25 LIGHTING PROJECTS 20,856.80 20,856.80 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 7,567,591 .92 401 ,306.82 251 ,312.38 6,914,972.72 RENOVATION PROJECTS 13,366,715.04 3,444,763.38 2,449,707.91 7,472,243.75 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 1,569,424.27 1,143,377.19 175,433.96 265,415.90 2,271,951 .60 SUBTOTAL 28,632,555.98 1,143,377.19 80,000.00 5,981 ,913.38 3,921 ,532.76 19,952,487.03 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALE 445,618.31 445,618.31 DUNBAR PROJECT 5,266.71 5,266.71 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 14,143,144.75 (80,000.00) 14,063,144.75 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 INTEREST 5,037,437.95 359,962.12 5,397,400.07 SUBTOTAL 20,925,288.69 359,962.12 (80,000.00) 0.00 0.00 21,205,250.81 GRAND TOTAL ~l! ~~ ~Hi Zl l ~!l~ ~\nHI ~l l2.J2l2 li !Ill~ Ill~ ~II ~ l!~l ~~~ Zli ~l ~~!l !l!ll! Ill! PROJECT CATEGORIES ADMINISTRATION NEW WORK PROJECTS SECURITY PROJECTS LIGHTING PROJECTS MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR RENOVATION PROJECTS TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS TOTAL LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY THRU THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 I r I PROJECT I ALLOCATIONS THRU 09-30-04 EXPENSE 2000-01 EXPENSE 2001-02 EXPENSE 2002-03 EXPENSE 2003-04 '1 EXPENSE ENCUMBERED ' THRU 09-30-04 1 THRU 09-30-04 1 SUBTOTAL 753,846.55 38,786,097.95 265,814.17 4,883,405.13 18,920,386.34 51,641,607.54 12,878,988.97 15,356,965.72 889,772.32 443,467.00 113,930.47 2,641,482.13 791,385.63 397,615.34 575,016.53 (485,325.77)1 149,597.63 4,589,606.29 11,671,442.11 109,609.73 1,832,392.06 379,661 .38 . 4,218,294.40 3,455,350.67 j 4,119,045.21 15,666,239.90 4,325,201.40 4,500,374.61 I I . 143,487, 112.37 1 5,852,669.42 ! 18,708,823.32 I 35,822,666.30 I I I I I 114,896.16 15,993,062.06 27,732.73 9,012.76 2,887,763.72 18,091,992.05 765,594.97 I 37,890,054.45 21,393.23 1,939,015.99 0.00 0.00 401,306.82 1 3,444,763.38 175,433.96 I 5,981,913.38 I I I 0.00 690,333.57 955,096.57 35,591,690.02 0.00 I 251,272.93 I 0.00 4,862,548.33 251,312.38 12,005,413.62 2,449,707.91 I 44,169,363.79 I 265,415.90 I 10,607,037.37 I 3,921,532.76 108,177,659.63 I ENDING ALLOCATION 09-30-04 63,512.98 3,194,407.93 14,541.25 20,856.80 6,914,972.72 7,472,243.75 2,271,951 .60 15,356,965.72 35,309,452.75 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 Fund Purchase Maturity Institution Interest Rate Type Principal Date Date Operating 09-30-04 TFN Bank of America 1.710% Repo 11 ,220,000.00 Operating 09-01-01 10-11-04 Twin City Bank 2.110% CD 4,640,334.89 Total 15,860,334.89 Activity Fund 09-16-04 TFN Bank of America 1.280% Repo 760,000.00 Total 760,000.00 Bond Account 09-06-04 03-07-05 Regions 1.843% CD 400,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 07-14-04 01-10-05 Metropolitan 1.930% CD 1,000,934.31 Capital Projects Fund 01-30-04 01-31-05 Bancorp South 1.850% CD 2,100,244.72 Capital Projects Fund 08-17-04 08-16-05 Twin City Bank 2.610% CD 11 ,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 06-10-04 01-10-05 Bank of America 1.670% Treasury Bills 5,385,005.84 Capital Projects Fund 08-02-04 02-05-05 Twin City Bank 2.580% CD 4,500,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 08-02-04 08-02-05 Twin City Bank 3.030% CD 4,500,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 05-03-04 11-05-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.350% CD 3,076,650.06 Capital Projects Fund 09-15-04 03-15-05 Bank of the Ozarks 2.210% CD 10,366,251 .16 Capital Projects Fund 09-30-04 TFN Bank of America 1.540% Repo 2,140,000.00 Total 44,469,086.09 Deseg Plan Scholarship 06-22-04 12-08-04 Bank of America 1.600% Treasury Bills 779,103.78 Total 779,103.78 Rockefeller Scholarship 06-10-04 01-10-05 Bank of America 1.670% Treasury Bills 252,468.56 Total 252,468.56\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_974","title":"Report: ''Student Achievement,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-09-16"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Student Achievement,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/974"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_112","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2004-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/112"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District, plaintiff vs. Pulaski County Special School District, defendant\nArkansas DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ~ STATE CAPITOL MALL  LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 -1071  (501) 682-H75  http://arkedu.s1a1e.ar.us Dr. Kenneth James, Director of Education September 30, 2004 Mr.M. SamuelJones,ill Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Rf Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark Cf fVfO 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 02\n1 - 200\nMr. Stephen W. Jones DESE OFFICEpF Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones GREGAT/ON i,tONITORJNG 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 Dear Gentlemen: Per ail agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of September 2004 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier .A TE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Ch,\n, - JoNoll Coldw,11, Ulllo R0\u0026lt;k  Vie, C .. 1'. Jmn, Wo,tmo,..Jaod, Mkaddphlo Members: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro  Shelby Hillman, Carlisle  Calvin King, Marianna  Randy Lawson, Bentonville MaryJane Rebick, Little Rock  Diane Tatum, Pine Bluff  Naccaman Williams, Johnson An Equal Opportunity Employer .\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for September 2004. Respectfully Submitted, '--s'cott Smilli, Bar # 92251 General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on September 30, 2004, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. l 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENOR$ KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL RECEIVED O'\"'T 1 - 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION l,1ONITORING In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Based on the information available at AuQust 31, 2004, the ADE calculated the Equalization Funding for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Basedo-n theinforrriation available at August 31', 2004, the ADE calculated for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 On AuQust 31, 2004, distributions of State Equalization Funding for FY 04/05 were as follows: LRSD - $5,916,608 NLRSD - $3,027,651 PCSSD - $5,432,019 The allotments of State Equalization FundinQ calculated for FY 04/05 at August 31, 2004, subject to periodic adjustments, were as follows: LRSD - $59, 166,086 NLRSD - $30,276,517 PCSSD - $54,320,195 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at August 31, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Basedonthe.fnformairon available, the ADE calculated at August 31, 2004 for.FY 04/05, subjept to periodic adjustments. It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at August 31, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Distributions for FY 04/05 at August 31, 2004, totaled $1,118,660. Allotment calculated for FY 04/05 was $12,305,260 subject to periodic adjustments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Calculated for FY 02/03, subject to periodic adjustments. I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Distributions forJ:Y 03/04 atAugust31, 2004,_were: LRSD - $4, 149, 129 NLRSD - $3,771,548 PCSSD - $11,589,336 The allotments calculated for FY 03/04 at August 31, 2004, subject to periodic adjustments, were: LRSD - $4, 149, 129 NLRSD - $3,771,548 PCSSD - $11,589,336 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date 2. Ongoing, December of each year. Actual as of September 30, 2004 In September 2002, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 02/03 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 In January 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the second one-third payment for FY 03/04 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function instead of Reginald Wilson as indicated in the Implementation Plan. L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 In September 2003, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 02/03 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2003, the following had been paid for FY 02/03: LRSD - $3,835,562.00 NLRSD - $742,399.62 PCSSD - $2,252,050.92 In September 2003, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2003, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $1,243,841.33 NLRSD - $263,000.00 PCSSD - $727,406.63 In February 2004, General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At February 2004, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $2,487,682.66 NLRSD - $526,000.00 PCSSD - $1,454,813.26 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. N. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 In July 1999, each district submitted an estimated budget for the 99/00 school year. In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD -14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD -12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. The ADE accepted a bid on 16 buses for the Magnet and M/M transportation program. The buses will be delivered after July 1, 1999 and before August 1, 1999. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nPCSSD - 6. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD-6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001. The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two type C 47 passenger buses and fourteen type C 65 passenger buses. Prices on these units are $43,426.00 each on the 47 passenger buses, and $44,289.00 each on the 65 passenger buses. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42, 155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. Specifications for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M school buses have been forwarded to State Purchasing for bidding. Bids will be opened on May 12, 2003. The buses will have a required delivery date after July 1, 2003 and before August 8, 2003. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. 0. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1 , 1994. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) u. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01 . Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. 10 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring.(Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued} Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01 /02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 04/05. 11 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 12 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued} The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 13 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Ass.istant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 15 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 16 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On July 26, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is finalized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 18 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearence Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 19 111. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 20 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. C. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D.  Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 21 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17- 1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81 st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for _distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 22 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 23 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 24 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11, in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 25 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued} E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued} 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, A letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 1748 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, A letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. 26 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Ongoing C. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 27 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 28 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of AD E's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 thmugh May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the ADE's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 29 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued} The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 30 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed arid approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lntervenors filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 31 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued} In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua intervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lntervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lntervenors were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 32 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30: 2004 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21, 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 33 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 34 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On July 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2oo'1, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 35 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 36 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. 37 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field seNice specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field seNice representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field seNice specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 38 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued} In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 39 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued} A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 40 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 41 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. D. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. 42 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31, 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. 43 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 44 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts. In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further assistance to schools, i.e., Title I Summer Planning Session, ADE session on Smart Start, and the School Improvement Workshops. All schools and districts in Pulaski County were invited to attend the \"Smart Start\" Summit November 9, 10, and 11 to learn more about strategies to increase student performance. \"Smart Start\" is a .standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. Representatives from all three districts attended. On January 21, 1998, the ADE provided staff development for the staff at Oak Grove Elementary School designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement. Using achievement data from Oak Grove, educators reviewed trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. On February 24, 1999, the ADE provided staff development for the administrative staff at Clinton Elementary School regarding analysis of achievement data. On February 15, 1999, staff development was rescheduled for Lawson Elementary School. The staff development program was designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement using achievement data from Lawson, educators reviewed the components of the Arkansas Smart Initiative, trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. Student Achievement Workshops were rescheduled for Southwest Jr. High in the Little Rock School District, and the Oak Grove Elementary School in the Pulaski County School District. 45 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On April 30, 1999, a Student Achievement Workshop was conducted for Oak Grove Elementary School in PCSSD. The Student Achievement Workshop for Southwest Jr. High in LRSD has been rescheduled. On June 8, 1999, a workshop was presented to representatives from each of the Arkansas Education Service Cooperatives and representatives from each of the three districts in Pulaski County. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On June 18, 1999, a workshop was presented to administrators of the NLRSD. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On August 16, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for teaching assistant in the LRSD. On August 20, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACTAAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for the Accelerated Learning Center in the LRSD. On September 13, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program were presented to the staff at Booker T. Washington Magnet Elementary School. On September 27, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to the Middle and High School staffs of the NLRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On October 26, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to LRSD personnel through a staff development training class. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On December 7, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was scheduled for Southwest Middle School in the LRSD. The workshop was also set to cover the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. However, Southwest Middle School administrators had a need to reschedule, therefore the workshop will be rescheduled. 46 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On January 10, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for both Dr. Martin Luther King Magnet Elementary School \u0026amp; Little Rock Central High School. The workshops also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On March 1, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for all principals and district level administrators in the PCSSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On April 12, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for the LRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. Targeted staffs from the middle and junior high schools in the three districts in Pulaski County attended the Smart Step Summit on May 1 and May 2. Training was provided regarding the overview of the \"Smart Step\" initiative, \"Standard and Accountability in Action,\" and \"Creating Learning Environments Through Leadership Teams.\" The ADE provided training on the development of alternative assessment September 12-13, 2000. Information was provided regarding the assessment of Special Education and LEP students. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate in professional development regarding Integrating Curriculum and Assessment K-12. The professional development activity was directed by the national consultant, Dr. Heidi Hays Jacobs, on September 14 and 15, 2000. The ADE provided professional development workshops from October 2 through October 13, 2000 regarding, \"The Write Stuff: Curriculum Frameworks, Content Standards and Item Development.\" Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems by video conference for Special Education and LEP Teachers on November 17, 2000. Also, Alternative Assessment Portfolio System Training was provided for testing coordinators through teleconference broadcast on November 27, 2000. 47 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On December 12, 2000, the ADE provided training for Test Coordinators on end of course assessments in Geometry and Algebra I Pilot examination. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation conducted the professional development at the Arkansas Teacher Retirement Building. The ADE presented a one-day training session with Dr. Cecil Reynolds on the Behavior Assessment for Children (BASC). This took place on December 7, 2000 at the NLRSD Administrative Annex. Dr. Reynolds is a practicing clinical psychologist. He is also a professor at Texas A \u0026amp; M University and a nationally known author. In the training, Dr. Reynolds addressed the following: 1) how to use and interpret information obtained on the direct observation form, 2) how to use this information for programming, 3) when to use the BASC, 4) when to refer for more or additional testing or evaluation, 5) who should complete the forms and when, (i.e., parents, teachers, students), 6) how to correctly interpret scores. This training was intended to especially benefit School Psychology Specialists, psychologists, psychological examiners, educational examiners and counselors. During January 22-26, 2001 the ADE presented the ACT AAP Intermediate (Grade 6) Benchmark Professional Development Workshop on Item Writing. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were invited to attend. On January 12, 2001 the ADE presented test administrators training for mid-year End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. On January 13, 2001 the ADE presented SmartScience Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This was shared with eight Master Teachers. The SmartScience Lessons were developed by the Arkansas Science Teachers Association in conjunction with the Wilbur Mills Educational Cooperative under an Eisenhower grant provided by the ADE. The purpose of SmartScience is to provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. The following training has been provided for educators in the three districts in Pulaski County by the Division of Special Education at the ADE since January 2000: On January 6, 2000, training was conducted for the Shannon Hills Pre-school Program, entitled \"Things you can do at home to support your child's learning.\" This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. The school's director and seven parents attended. 48 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On March 8, 2000, training was conducted for the Southwest Middle School in Little Rock, on ADD. Six people attended the training. There was follow-up training on Learning and Reading Styles on March 26. This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. On September 7, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Chicot Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Karen Sabo, Kindergarten Teacher\nMelissa Gleason, Paraprofessional\nCurtis Mayfield, P.E. Teacher\nLisa Poteet, Speech Language Pathologist\nJane Harkey, Principal\nKathy Penn-Norman, Special Education Coordinator\nAlice Phillips, Occupational Therapist. On September 15, 2000, the Governor's Developmental Disability Coalition Conference presented Assistive Technology Devices \u0026amp; Services. This was held at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On September 19, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Jefferson Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Melissa Chaney, Special Education Teacher\nBarbara Barnes, Special Education Coordinator\na Principal, a Counselor, a Librarian, and a Paraprofessional. On October 6, 2000, Integrating Assistive Technology Into Curriculum was presented at a conference in the Hot Springs Convention Center. Presenters were: Bryan Ayers and Aleecia Starkey. Speech Language Pathologists from LRSD and NLRSD attended. On October 24, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On October 25 and 26, 2000, Alternate Assessment for Students with Severe Disabilities for the LRSD at J. A. Fair High School was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. The participants were: Susan Chapman, Special Education Coordinator\nMary Steele, Special Education Teacher\nDenise Nesbit, Speech Language Pathologist\nand three Paraprofessionals. On November 14, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On November 17, 2000, training was conducted on Autism for the LRSD at the Instructional Resource Center. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. 49 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On December 5, 2000, Access to the Curriculum Via the use of Assistive Technology Computer Lab was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter of this teleconference. The participants were: Tim Fisk, Speech Language Pathologist from Arch Ford Education Service Cooperative at Plumerville and Patsy Lewis, Special Education Teacher from Mabelvale Middle School in the LRSD. On January 9, 2001, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. Kathy Brown, a vision consultant from the LRSD, was a participant. On January 23, 2001, Autism and Classroom Modifications for the LRSD at Brady Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Beverly Cook, Special Education Teacher\nAmy Littrell, Speech Language Pathologist\nJan Feurig, Occupational Therapist\nCarolyn James, Paraprofessional\nCindy Kackly, Paraprofessional\nand Rita Deloney, Paraprofessional. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcast on February 5, 2001. Presenters were: Charlotte Marvel, ADE\nDr. Gayle Potter, ADE\nMarcia Harding, ADE\nLynn Springfield, ASERC\nMary Steele, J. A. Fair High School, LRSD\nBryan Ayres, Easter Seals Outreach. This was provided for Special Education teachers and supervisors in the morning, and Limited English Proficient teachers and supervisors in the afternoon. The Special Education session was attended by 29 teachers/administrators and provided answers to specific questions about the alternate assessment portfolio system and the scoring rubric and points on the rubric to be used to score the portfolios. The LEP session was attended by 16 teachers/administrators and disseminated the common tasks to be included in the portfolios: one each in mathematics, writing and reading. On February 12-23, 2001, the ADE and Data Recognition Corporation personnel trained Test Coordinators in the administration of the spring Criterion-Referenced Test. This was provided in 20 sessions at 10 regional sites. Testing protocol, released items, and other testing materials were presented and discussed. The sessions provided training for Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Pilot Tests. The LRSD had 2 in attendance for the End of Course session and 2 for the Benchmark session. The NLRSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. The PCSSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. 50 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On March 15, 2001, there was a meeting at the ADE to plan professional development for staff who work with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students. A $30,000 grant has been created to provide LEP training at Chicot Elementary for a year, starting in April 2001. A $40,000 grant was created to provide a Summer English as Second Language (ESL) Academy for the LRSD from June 18 through 29, 2001. Andre Guerrero from the ADE Accountability section met with Karen Broadnax, ESL Coordinator at LRSD, Pat Price, Early Childhood Curriculum Supervisor at LRSD, and Jane Harkey, Principal of Chicot Elementary. On March 1-2 and 8-29, 2001, ADE staff performed the following activities: processed registration for April 2 and 3 Alternate Portfolio Assessment video conference quarterly meeting\nanswered questions about Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) and LEP Alternate Portfolio Assessment by phone from schools and Education Service Cooperatives\nand signed up students for alternate portfolio assessment from school districts. On March 6, 2001, ADE staff attended a Smart Step Technology Leadership Conference at the State House Convention Center. On March 7, 2001, ADE staff attended a National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Regional Math Framework Meeting about the Consensus Project 2004. On March 8, 2001, there was a one-on-one conference with Carole Villarreal from Pulaski County at the ADE about the LEP students with portfolios. She was given pertinent data, including all the materials that have been given out at the video conferences. The conference lasted for at least an hour. On March 14, 2001, a Test Administrator's Training Session was presented specifically to LRSD Test Coordinators and Principals. About 60 LRSD personnel attended. The following meetings have been conducted with educators in the three districts in Pulaski County since July 2000. On July 10-13, 2000 the ADE provided Smart Step training. The sessions covered Standards-based classroom practices. 51 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On July 19-21, 2000 the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were 200 teachers from across the state in attendance. On August 14-31, 2000 the ADE presented Science Smart Start Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This will provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. On September 5, 2000 the ADE held an Eisenhower Informational meeting with Teacher Center Coordinators. The purpose of the Eisenhower Professional Development Program is to prepare teachers, school staff, and administrators to help all students meet challenging standards in the core academic subjects. A summary of the program was presented at the meeting. On November 2-3, 2000 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching. This presented curriculum and activity workshops. More than 1200 attended the conference. On November 6, 2000 there was a review of Science Benchmarks and sample model curriculum. A committee of 6 reviewed and revised a drafted document. The committee was made up of ADE and K-8 teachers. On November 7-10, 2000 the ADE held a meeting of the Benchmark and End of Course Mathematics Content Area Committee. Classroom teachers reviewed items for grades 4, 6, 8 and EOC mathematics assessment. There were 60 participants. On December 4-8, 2000 the ADE conducted grades 4 and 8 Benchmark Scoring for Writing Assessment. This professional development was attended by approximately 750 teachers. On December 8, 2000 the ADE conducted Rubric development for Special Education Portfolio scoring. This was a meeting with special education supervisors to revise rubric and plan for scoring in June. On December 8, 2000 the ADE presented the Transition Mathematics Pilot Training Workshop. This provided follow-up training and activities for fourth-year mathematics professional development. On December 12, 2000 the ADE presented test administrators training for midyear End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. 52 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcasts on April 2-3, 2001. Administration of the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy took place on April 23-27, 2001. Administration of the End of Course Algebra and Geometry Exams took place on May 2-3, 2001. Over 1,100 Arkansas educators attended the Smart Step Growing Smarter Conference on July 10 and 11, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The Smart Step effort seeks to provide intense professional development for teachers and administrators at the middle school level, as well as additional materials and assistance to the state's middle school teachers. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the first keynote address on \"The Character-Centered Teacher''. Debra Pickering, an education consultant from Denver, Colorado, presented the second keynote address on \"Characteristics of Middle Level Education\". Throughout the Smart Step conference, educators attended breakout sessions that were grade-specific and curriculum area-specific. Pat Davenport, an education consultant from Houston, Texas, delivered two addresses. She spoke on \"A Blueprint for Raising Student Achievement\". Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. Over 1,200 Arkansas teachers and administrators attended the Smart Start Conference on July 12, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Start is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the keynote address. The day featured a series of 15 breakout sessions on best classroom practices. Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. On July 18-20, 2001, the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were approximately 300 teachers from across the state in attendance. 53 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) The ADE and Harcourt Educational Measurement conducted Stanford 9 test administrator training from August 1-9, 2001. The training was held at Little Rock, Jonesboro, Fort Smith, Forrest City, Springdale, Mountain Home, Prescott, and Monticello. Another session was held at the ADE on August 30, for those who were unable to attend August 1-9. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by video conference at the Education SeNice Cooperatives and at the ADE from 9:00 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on September 5, 2001. The ADE released the performance of all schools on the Primary and Middle Level Benchmark Exams on September 5, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Core Teacher ln-SeNice training for Central in the LRSD on September 6, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for Hall in the LRSD on September 7, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for McClellan in the LRSD on September 13, 2001. The ADE conducted Basic Co-teaching training for the LRSD on October 9, 2001. The ADE conducted training on autism spectrum disorder for the PCSSD on October 15, 2001. Professional Development workshops (1 day in length) in scoring End of Course assessments in algebra, geometry and reading were provided for all districts in the state. Each school was invited to send three representatives (one for each of the sessions). LRSD, NLRSD, and PCSSD participated. Information and training materials pertaining to the Alternate Portfolio Assessment were provided to all districts in the state and were supplied as requested to LRSD, PCSSD and David 0. Dodd Elementary. On November 1-2, 2001 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching at the Excelsior Hotel \u0026amp; Statehouse Convention Center. This presented sessions, workshops and short courses to promote exceptional teaching and learning. Educators could become involved in integrated math, science, English \u0026amp; language arts and social studies learning. The ADE received from the schools selected to participate in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a list of students who will take the test. 54 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On December 3-7, 2001 the ADE conducted grade 6 Benchmark scoring training for reading and math. Each school district was invited to send a math and a reading specialist. The training was held at the Holiday Inn Airport in Little Rock. On December 4 and 6, 2001 the ADE conducted Mid-Year Test Administrator Training for Algebra and Geometry. This was held at the Arkansas Activities Association's conference room in North Little Rock. On January 24, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by ADE compressed video with Fred Jones presenting. On January 31, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by NSCI satellite with Fred Jones presenting. On February 7, 2002, the ADE Smart Step co-sponsored the AR Association of Middle Level Principal's/ADE curriculum, assessment and instruction workshop with Bena Kallick presenting. On February 11-21, 2002, the ADE provided training for Test Administrators on the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Exams. The sessions took place at Forrest City, Jonesboro, Mountain Home, Springdale, Fort Smith, Monticello, Prescott, Arkadelphia and Little Rock. A make-up training broadcast was given at 15 Educational Cooperative Video sites on February 22. During February 2002, the LRSD had two attendees for the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The NLRSD and PCSSD each had one attendee at the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 2, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. The ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 9, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. 55 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) The Twenty-First Annual Curriculum and Instruction Conference, co-sponsored by the Arkansas Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and the Arkansas Department of Education, will be held June 24-26, 2002, at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs, Arkansas. \"Ignite Your Enthusiasm for Learning\" is the theme for this year's conference, which will feature educational consultant, Dr. Debbie Silver, as well as other very knowledgeable presenters. Additionally, there will be small group sessions on Curriculum Alignment, North Central Accreditation, Section 504, Building Level Assessment, Administrator Standards, Data Disaggregation, and National Board. The Educational Accountability Unit of the ADE hosted a workshop entitled \"Strategies for Increasing Achievement on the ACTAAP Benchmark Examination\" on June 13-14, 2002 at the Agora Center in Conway. The workshop was presented for schools in which 100% of students scored below the proficient level on one or more parts of the most recent Benchmark Examination. The agenda included presentations on ''The Plan-Do-Check-Act Instructional Cycle\" by the nationally known speaker Pat Davenport. ADE personnel provided an explanation of the MPH point program. Presentations were made by Math and Literacy Specialists. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, gave a presentation about ACTAAP. Break out sessions were held, in which school districts with high scores on the MPH point program offered strategies and insights into increasing student achievement. The NLRSD, LRSD, and PCSSD were invited to attend. The NLRSD attended the workshop. The Smart Start Summer Conference took place on July 8-9, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. The Smart Start Initiative focuses on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event included remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. After comments by the Director, Bena Kallick presented the keynote address \"Beyond Mapping: Essential Questions, Assessment, Higher Order Thinking\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On the second day, Vivian Moore gave the keynote address \"Overcoming Obstacles: Avenues for Student Success\". Krista Underwood gave the presentation \"Put Reading First in Arkansas\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. 56 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) The Smart Step Summer Conference took place on July 10-11, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The event included remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. After comments by the Director, Vivian Moore presented the keynote address \"Overcoming Obstacles: Avenues for Student Success\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On the second day, Bena Kallick presented \"Beyond Mapping: Essential Questions, Assessment, Higher Order Thinking\". Ken Stamatis presented \"Smart Steps to Creating a School Culture That Supports Adolescent Comprehension\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On August 8, 2002, Steven Weber held a workshop at Booker T. Washington Elementary on \"Best Practices in Social Studies\". It was presented to the 4th grade teachers in the Little Rock School District. The workshop focused around the five themes of geography and the social studies (fourth grade) framework/standards. Several Internet web sites were shared with the teachers, and the teachers were shown methods for incorporating writing into fourth grade social studies. One of the topics was using primary source photos and technology to stimulate the students to write about diverse regions. A theme of the workshop included identifying web sites which apply to fourth grade social studies teachers and interactive web sites for fourth grade students. This was a Back-to-School In-service workshop. The teachers were actively involved in the workshop. On August 13 Steven Weber conducted a workshop at Parkview High School in the LRSD. Topics of the workshop included: 1. Incorporating Writing in the Social Studies Classroom 2. Document Based (open-ended) Questioning Techniques 3. How to practice writing on a weekly basis without assigning a lengthy research report 4. Developing Higher Level Thinking Skills in order to produce active citizens, rather than passive, uninformed citizens 5. Using the Social Studies F\namework 6. Identifying state and national Web Sites which contain Primary Sources for use in the classroom The 8:30 - 11 :30 session was for the 6 - 8 grade social studies teachers. The 12:30 - 3:00 session was for the 9 - 12 grade social studies teachers. Several handouts were used, also PowerPoint, primary source photos and documents, and Internet web sites (i.e., Library of Congress, Butler Center for Arkansas Studies, National Archives, etc.). This was a Back-to-School In-service workshop. The teachers were actively involved in the workshop. Marie McNeal is the Social Studies Specialist for the Little Rock School District. She invited Steven Weber to present at the workshop, and was in attendance. 57 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On September 30 through October 11, 2002, the ADE provided Professional Development for Test Administrators on the End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Exams. The training was held at the Holiday Inn Airport. All three districts in Pulaski County sent representatives to the training. On October 3, 2002, Charlotte Marvel provided in-service training for LEP teachers in the Little Rock School District. On December 6, 2002,\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":27,"next_page":28,"prev_page":26,"total_pages":155,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":312,"total_count":1850,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":1843},{"value":"Sound","hits":4},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":3}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":289},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":220},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":179},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","hits":69},{"value":"United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit","hits":30},{"value":"North Little Rock School District","hits":12},{"value":"Bushman Court Reporting","hits":11},{"value":"Walker, John W.","hits":6},{"value":"Joshua Intervenors","hits":5},{"value":"Arkanasas State University. Office of Educational Research and Services","hits":4},{"value":"Arkansas Association of Educational Administrators","hits":4}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":1745},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":1244},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":1207},{"value":"Education--Evaluation","hits":886},{"value":"Educational law and legislation","hits":721},{"value":"Educational planning","hits":690},{"value":"School integration","hits":604},{"value":"School management and organization","hits":601},{"value":"Educational statistics","hits":560},{"value":"Education--Finance","hits":474},{"value":"School improvement programs","hits":417}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Springer, Joy C.","hits":6},{"value":"Walker, John W.","hits":3},{"value":"Heller, Christopher","hits":2},{"value":"Wright, Susan Webber, 1948-","hits":2},{"value":"Armor, David","hits":1},{"value":"Eddington, Ramsey","hits":1},{"value":"Intervenors, Joshua","hits":1},{"value":"Intervenors, Knight","hits":1},{"value":"Jones, Sam","hits":1},{"value":"Jones, Stephen W.","hits":1},{"value":"Joshua, Lorene","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":6},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":1849},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":1836},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":1799},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":1539},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, North Little Rock, 34.76954, -92.26709","hits":10},{"value":"United States, Missouri, 38.25031, -92.50046","hits":5},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Maumelle, 34.86676, -92.40432","hits":4},{"value":"United States, Missouri, Saint Louis City County, Saint Louis, 38.65588, -90.30928","hits":3},{"value":"United States, Kansas, 38.50029, -98.50063","hits":2},{"value":"United States, New York, 43.00035, -75.4999","hits":2},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Chicot County, 33.26725, -91.29397","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":1836},{"value":"Missouri","hits":5},{"value":"Kansas","hits":2},{"value":"Massachusetts","hits":2},{"value":"New York","hits":2},{"value":"Connecticut","hits":1},{"value":"Illinois","hits":1},{"value":"Maryland","hits":1},{"value":"Michigan","hits":1},{"value":"Ohio","hits":1},{"value":"Oklahoma","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1994","hits":385},{"value":"1995","hits":376},{"value":"1996","hits":334},{"value":"1993","hits":312},{"value":"1992","hits":292},{"value":"1999","hits":273},{"value":"1997","hits":268},{"value":"1991","hits":255},{"value":"2001","hits":252},{"value":"2000","hits":251},{"value":"1998","hits":245},{"value":"2002","hits":182},{"value":"1990","hits":173},{"value":"2003","hits":164},{"value":"2004","hits":148},{"value":"1989","hits":134},{"value":"2005","hits":119},{"value":"2006","hits":86},{"value":"2011","hits":62},{"value":"2010","hits":60},{"value":"2007","hits":57},{"value":"1988","hits":51},{"value":"2008","hits":47},{"value":"2009","hits":47},{"value":"1987","hits":35},{"value":"1986","hits":30},{"value":"2012","hits":30},{"value":"1984","hits":27},{"value":"1985","hits":23},{"value":"2013","hits":19},{"value":"1983","hits":16},{"value":"1982","hits":15},{"value":"1980","hits":13},{"value":"1981","hits":13},{"value":"1974","hits":12},{"value":"1975","hits":12},{"value":"1976","hits":12},{"value":"1977","hits":12},{"value":"1978","hits":12},{"value":"1979","hits":12},{"value":"1973","hits":11},{"value":"2014","hits":11},{"value":"1967","hits":9},{"value":"1968","hits":9},{"value":"1969","hits":9},{"value":"1970","hits":9},{"value":"1971","hits":9},{"value":"1972","hits":9},{"value":"1954","hits":8},{"value":"1966","hits":8},{"value":"1950","hits":7},{"value":"1951","hits":7},{"value":"1952","hits":7},{"value":"1953","hits":7},{"value":"1955","hits":7},{"value":"1956","hits":7},{"value":"1957","hits":7},{"value":"1958","hits":7},{"value":"1959","hits":7},{"value":"1960","hits":7},{"value":"1961","hits":7},{"value":"1962","hits":7},{"value":"1963","hits":7},{"value":"1964","hits":7},{"value":"1965","hits":7},{"value":"2017","hits":6},{"value":"2015","hits":5},{"value":"2016","hits":5},{"value":"2018","hits":5},{"value":"2019","hits":5},{"value":"2020","hits":5},{"value":"2021","hits":5},{"value":"2022","hits":5},{"value":"2023","hits":5},{"value":"2024","hits":5}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1950","max":"2024","count":5114,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":904},{"value":"reports","hits":255},{"value":"judicial records","hits":232},{"value":"legal documents","hits":207},{"value":"exhibition (associated concept)","hits":67},{"value":"project management","hits":62},{"value":"budgets","hits":38},{"value":"correspondence","hits":23},{"value":"handbooks","hits":20},{"value":"agendas (administrative records)","hits":17},{"value":"handbills","hits":16}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}