{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_127","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2005-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/127"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District, plaintiff vs. Pulaski County Special School District, defendant\n/ Arkan.sas DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 4 SfATE CAPITOL MALL  LITLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-1071  (501) 682-4475  http://arkedu.state.ar.us Dr. Kenneth James, Commissioner of Education October 30, 2005 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 7220 l Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones III RECEIVED OC1 31 2005 OFFICE Of DESEGREGATION MONR'ORING Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 WRW Dear Gentlemen: Per an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of October 2005 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. z.:i\nfk Scott Smith General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair - Dr. Jeanna Westmoreland, Arkadelphia, Vice Chair - Diane Tatum, Pine Bluff Members: *Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro *Shelby Hillman, Carlisle* Dr. Calvin King, Marianna *Randy Lawson, Bentonville *MaryJane Rebick, Little Rock *Dr. Naccaman Williams, Springdale An Equal Opportunity Employer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the AD E's Project Management Tool for October 2005. Res1fully Subuitted, D,-H~\nfk Scott Smith, Bar# 92251 General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on October 30, 2005, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol, Suite 1800 Little 6-7220 I .-n_J.fk Scott Smith IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RECEIVED OCT 3 1 2005 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONtTORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL  In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 Based on the information available at September 30, 2005, the ADE calculated the State Foundation Funding for FY 05/06, subject to periodic adjustme ts. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 ased on the information available at September 30 2005, tlie ADE calc r FY 05/ ,~ ....... ..-eriodic adjustments C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 On September 30, 2005, distributions of State Foundation Funding for FY 05/06 were as follows LRSD - $11,666,81-4 LRSD - $6,075,290 PCSSD-$10 104,192 The allotments of State Foundation Funding calculated for FY 05/06 at September 30, 2005, subject to periodic adjustments, were as follows: LRSD -$64,167,4771 NLRSD- $33,414,099 PCSSD - $55,573,061 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at September 30, 2005 for FY 05/06, subject to periodic adjustments. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 Base(j on the information available, the ADE calculated at Se tember 30 200 for FY 05/06 sub\"ect to eriodic ad\"ustments It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2005 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at September 30, 2005 for FY 05/06, subject to 1::1eriodic adjustments. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2005 Distributions for FY 05/06 at September 30, 2005, totaled $2,541,436. Allotment calculated or FY 05/06 was $13,977,904 subject to periodic adjustments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2005 Calculated for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 Distributions for FY 05/06 at September 30, 2005, were RSD-$404,818 NLRSD - $403, 187: PCSSD-$1,080,096 The allotments calculated for FY 05/06 at September 30, 2005, su adj ts, LRSD - $4,048,176 NLRSD - $4,031,872 pcssD - $10,aoo,964 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 In September 2002, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 02/03 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2005 In September 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the third one-third payment for FY 03/04 to the Districts. In September 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the first one-third payment for FY 04/05 to the Districts. In March 2005, General Finance was notified to pay the second one-third payment for FY 04/05 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function instead of Reginald Wilson as indicated in the Implementation Plan. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 In September 2004, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2004, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $4,019,063.00 NLRSD - $772,940.15 PCSSD - $2,478,863.72 In September 2004, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 04/05 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2004, the following had been paid for FY 04/05: LRSD - $1,325,043.67 NLRSD - $275,333.33 PCSSD - $845,221.22 In March 2005, General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 04/05 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At March 2005, the following had been paid for FY 04/05: LRSD - $2,650,087.34 NLRSD - $550,666.66 PCSSD - $1,690,442.44 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2005 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 In July 1999, each district submitted an estimated budget for the 99/00 school year. In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2004, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 04/05 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2005 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD - 14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD - 12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD-6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001. The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two 4 7 passenger buses for $43,426.00 each and fourteen 65 passenger buses for $44,289.00 each. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCS SD - 2 of the 4 7 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42,155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. In June 2005, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $52,135.00, and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $53,150.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The total amount was $849,385.00. 0. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued} P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. R. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 Final payment was distributed July 1994. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2005 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01 . Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92 ,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 05/06. 10 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 05/06. 11 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 12 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION {Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. {Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 {Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 13 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 15 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. ' On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 16 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) On July 26, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11 , 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled afterthe Desegregation ruling is finalized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201- A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 1 8 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearence Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 19 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued} On November 4, 2004, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ADE is required to check laws that the legislature passes to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Clearance Lovell was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he has retired, the ADE attorney will find out who will be checking the next legislation. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 6, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On May 3, 2005, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The PCSSD has petitioned to be released from some desegregation monitoring. There was discussion in the last legislative session that suggested all three districts in Pulaski County should seek unitary status. Legislators also discussed the possibility of having two school districts in Pulaski County instead of three. An Act was passed by the Legislature to conduct a feasability study of having only a north school district and a south school district in Pulaski County. Removing Jacksonville from the PCSSD is also being studied. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 7, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 20 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2005 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 21 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. C. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 22 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17- 1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81 st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 23 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2005 (Continued} On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 24 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 25 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11, in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 26 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued} 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, A letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 17 48 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, A letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. 27 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 Ongoing C. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 28 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT} and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 29 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the ADE's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 30 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 31 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regularoversightofthe Implementation Phase's Project ManagementTool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lntervenors filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 32 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued} D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua intervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lntervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lntervenors were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 33 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21, 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 34 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regularoversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11 , 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11 , 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 35 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) On July 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 36 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project ManagementTool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment. to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) On Sept~mber 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11 , 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 37 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued} D. Through regularoversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued} 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 11, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 11, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 38 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project ManagementTool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) On May 9, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 13, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 11, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 8, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 12, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and aQProved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. 39 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase 11 - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts: In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 40 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 41 VI. REM ED IA TION {Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. {Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 {Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NGA accreditation reports were presented to the NGA Committee, and NGA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NGA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NGA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 42 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 43 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. D. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. 44 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31, 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. 45 VI. REMEDIATION {Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 {Continued) On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. lo June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the _ ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 46 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts. In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further assistance to schools, i.e., Title I Summer Planning Session, ADE session on Smart Start, and the School Improvement Workshops. All schools and districts in Pulaski County were invited to attend the \"Smart Start\" Summit November 9, 10, and 11 to learn more about strategies to increase student performance. \"Smart Start\" is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. Representatives from all three districts attended. On January 21, 1998, the ADE provided staff development for the staff at Oak Grove Elementary School designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement. Using achievement data from Oak Grove, educators reviewed trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. On February 24, 1999, the ADE provided staff development for the administrative staff at Clinton Elementary School regarding analysis of achievement data. On February 15, 1999, staff development was rescheduled for Lawson Elementary School. The staff development program was designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement using achievement data from Lawson, educato.rs reviewed the components of the Arkansas Smart Initiative, trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. Student Achievement Workshops were rescheduled for Southwest Jr. High in the Little Rock School District, and the Oak Grove Elementary School in the Pulaski County School District. 47 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) On April 30, 1999, a Student Achievement Workshop was conducted for Oak Grove Elementary School in PCSSD. The Student Achievement Workshop for Southwest Jr. High in LRSD has been rescheduled. On June 8, 1999, a workshop was presented to representatives from each of the Arkansas Education Service Cooperatives and representatives from each of the three districts in Pulaski County. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On June 18, 1999, a workshop was presented to administrators of the NLRSD. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACT AAP). On August 16, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACTAAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for teaching assistant in the LRSD. On August 20, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACTAAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for the Accelerated Learning Center in the LRSD. On September 13, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program were presented to the staff at Booker T. Washington Magnet Elementary School. On September 27, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to the Middle and High School staffs of the NLRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On October 26, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to LRSD personnel through a staff development training class. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On December 7, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was scheduled for Southwest Middle School in the LRSD. The workshop was also set to cover the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. However, Southwest Middle School administrators had a need to reschedule, therefore the workshop will be rescheduled. 48 VI. REMEDIATION {Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. {Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 {Continued) On January 10, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for both Dr. Martin Luther King Magnet Elementary School \u0026amp; Little Rock Central High School. The workshops also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On March 1, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for all principals and district level administrators in the PCSSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On April 12, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for the LRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. Targeted staffs from the middle and junior high schools in the three districts in Pulaski County attended the Smart Step Summit on May 1 and May 2. Training was provided regarding the overview of the \"Smart Step\" initiative, \"Standard and Accountability in Action,\" and \"Creating Learning Environments Through Leadership Teams.\" The ADE provided training on the development of alternative assessment September 12-13, 2000. Information was provided regarding the assessment of Special Education and LEP students. I Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate in professional development regarding Integrating Curriculum and Assessment K-12. The professional development activity was directed by the national consultant, Dr. Heidi Hays Jacobs, on September 14 and 15, 2000. The ADE provided professional development workshops from October 2 through October 13, 2000 regarding, \"The Write Stuff: Curriculum Frameworks, Content Standards and Item Development.\" Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems by video conference for Special Education and LEP Teachers on November 17, 2000. Also, Alternative Assessment Portfolio System Training was provided for testing coordinators through teleconference broadcast on November 27, 2000. 49 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) On December 12, 2000, the ADE provided training for Test Coordinators on end of course assessments in Geometry and Algebra I Pilot examination. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation conducted the professional development at the Arkansas Teacher Retirement Building. The ADE presented a one-day training session with Dr. Cecil Reynolds on the Behavior Assessment for Children (BASC). This took place on December 7, 2000 at the NLRSD Administrative Annex. Dr. Reynolds is a practicing clinical psychologist. He is also a professor at Texas A \u0026amp; M University and a nationally known author. In the training, Dr. Reynolds addressed the following: 1) how to use and interpret information obtained on the direct observation form, 2) how to use this information for programming, 3) when to use the BASC, 4) when to refer for more or additional testing or evaluation, 5) who should complete the forms and when, (i.e., parents, teachers, students), 6) how to correctly interpret scores. This training was intended to especially benefit School Psychology Specialists, psychologists, psychological examiners, educational examiners and counselors. During January 22-26, 2001 the ADE presented the ACTAAP Intermediate (Grade 6) Benchmark Professional Development Workshop on Item Writing. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were invited to attend. On January 12, 2001 the ADE presented test administrators training for mid-year End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. On January 13, 2001 the ADE presented SmartScience Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This was shared with eight Master Teachers. The SmartScience Lessons were developed by the Arkansas Science Teachers Association in conjunction with the Wilbur Mills Educational Cooperative under an Eisenhower grant provided by the ADE. The purpose of SmartScience is to provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. The following training has been provided for educators in the three districts in Pulaski County by the Division of Special Education at the ADE since January 2000: On January 6, 2000, training was conducted for the Shannon Hills Pre-school Program, entitled \"Things you can do at home to support your child's learning.\" This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. The school's director and seven parents attended. 50 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION REPRODUCTION REQUEST FORM CONTACT PERSON# Lt' al, lJJ . ROOM # ___C ~D___...4_/t__,___ _ PHONE # __ ~l_-- L.f.2. :-:~Y~J~-- PROGRAM NAME Lt j /L,-( (NOTE: Requests will be scheduled in the order received unless special Priority is granted by the Commissioner/ Asst. Commis~ioner) DATE (o Y'J,D:{ COMMISSIONER MEMO# __ _ (REQUIRES COMMISSIONER I ASST. COMMISSIONER SIGNATURE BELOW) REG. PRINTS WORK~----( REQUIRES UNIT LEADER SIGNATURE BELOW) WRITTEN/PREPARED BY:___________ LABELS NEEDED ______ _ SPELL CHECK BY: ____________ _ PROOFED BY:_______________ SIZE OF ENVELOPE _____ _ SUPERVISOR: ______________ _ ASSOCIATE DIR./UNIT LEADER: ________ _ SERVICE REQUESTED: ~ OPY MACHINE (50 SETS OR LESS) __ PRESS WORK (51 SETS OR MORE) TYPE oF woRK~~- -~U1_...,_, _V_ cf...... .. ~V_:\u0026gt;~-2~20~5:~ _D ATE NEEDED ro-- ) 7\"\"'\nx\n-__ )__s_ __ L( NUMBER OF ORIGINALS l (O ___ _.__-=. _ NUMBER OF COPIES/SETS REQUESTED PAPERCOLOR~LU=\\ -~~-+-t-l\n!,-1~- COVER STOCK _______ _ SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS _________________________ _ _ __ SINGLE FOLD ___ LETTER FOLD ASSEMBLY REQUESTED __/ _ COLLATE(ONLY) ___ COLLATE \u0026amp; STAPLE ___ SIDE STAPLE (2) ___ S.IDE STAPLE (3) ___ .ACCORDION FOLD ___ COLLATE \u0026amp; 3 HOLE PUNCH ___ CORNER STAPLE UNIT LEADER SIGNATURE ----.,-Lf-~-=-(\n_,_f/.._,J_~EL, YtJ--:kc....= ___ DATE - COMMISSIONER I ASST. COMMISSIONER ______________ DATE ___ _ *Note: Request must be submitted at least two week in advance to ensure timely production. VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) On March 8, 2000, training was conducted for the Southwest Middle School in Little Rock, on ADD. Six people attended the training. There was follow-up training on Learning and Reading Styles on March 26. This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. On September 7, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Chicot Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Karen Sabo, Kindergarten Teacher\nMelissa Gleason, Paraprofessional\nCurtis Mayfield, P.E. Teacher\nLisa Poteet, Speech Language Pathologist\nJane Harkey, Principal\nKathy Penn-Norman, Special Education Coordinator\nAlice Phillips, Occupational Therapist. On September 15, 2000, the Governor's Developmental Disability Coalition Conference presented Assistive Technology Devices \u0026amp; Services. This was held at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On September 19, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Jefferson Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Melissa Chaney, Special Education Teacher\nBarbara Barnes, Special Education Coordinator\na Principal, a Counselor, a Librarian, and a Paraprofessional. On October 6, 2000, Integrating Assistive Technology Into Curriculum was presented at a conference in the Hot Springs Convention Center. Presenters were: Bryan Ayers and Aleecia Starkey. Speech Language Pathologists from LRSD and NLRSD attended. On October 24, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On October 25 and 26, 2000, Alternate Assessment for Students with Severe Disabilities for the LRSD at J. A. Fair High School was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. The participants were: Susan Chapman, Special Education Coordinator\nMary Steele, Special Education Teacher\nDenise Nesbit, Speech Language Pathologist\nand three Paraprofessionals. On November 14, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On November 17, 2000, training was conducted on Autism for the LRSD at the Instructional Resource Center. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. 51 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) On December 5, 2000, Access to the Curriculum Via the use of Assistive Technology Computer Lab was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter of this teleconference. The participants were: Tim Fisk, Speech Language Pathologist from Arch Ford Education Service Cooperative at Plumerville and Patsy Lewis, Special Education Teacher from Mabelvale Middle School in the LRSD. On January 9, 2001, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. Kathy Brown, a vision consultant from the LRSD, was a participant. On January 23, 2001, Autism and Classroom Modifications for the LRSD at Brady Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Beverly Cook, Special Education Teacher\nAmy Littrell, Speech Language Pathologist\nJan Feurig, Occupational Therapist\nCarolyn James, Paraprofessional\nCindy Kackly, Paraprofessional\nand Rita Deloney, Paraprofessional. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcast on February 5, 2001. Presenters were: Charlotte Marvel, ADE\nDr. Gayle Potter, ADE\nMarcia Harding, ADE\nLynn Springfield, ASERC\nMary Steele, J. A. Fair High School, LRSD\nBryan Ayres, Easter Seals Outreach. This was provided for Special Education teachers and supervisors in the morning, and Limited English Proficient teachers and supervisors in the afternoon. The Special Education session was attended by 29 teachers/administrators and provided answers to specific questions about the alternate assessment portfolio system and the scoring rubric and points on the rubric to be used to score the portfolios. The LEP session was attended by 16 teachers/administrators and disseminated the common tasks to be included in the portfolios: one each in mathematics, writing and reading. On February 12-23, 2001 , the ADE and Data Recognition Corporation personnel trained Test Coordinators in the administration of the spring Criterion-Referenced Test. This was provided in 20 sessions at 10 regional sites. Testing protocol, released items, and other testing materials were presented and discussed. The sessions provided training for Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Pilot Tests. The LRSD had 2 in attendance for the End of Course session and 2 for the Benchmark session. The NLRSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. The PCSSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. 52 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) On March 15, 2001, there was a meeting at the ADE to plan professional development for staff who work with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students. A $30,000 grant has been created to provide LEP training at Chicot Elementary for a year, starting in April 2001. A $40,000 grant was created to provide a Summer English as Second Language (ESL) Academy for the LRSD from June 18 through 29, 2001. Andre Guerrero from the ADE Accountability section met with Karen Broadnax, ESL Coordinator at LRSD, Pat Price, Early Childhood Curriculum Supervisor at LRSD, and Jane Harkey, Principal of Chicot Elementary. On March 1-2 and 8-29, 2001, ADE staff performed the following activities: processed registration for April 2 and 3 Alternate Portfolio Assessment video conference quarterly meeting\nanswered questions about Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) and LEP Alternate Portfolio Assessment by phone from schools and Education Service Cooperatives\nand signed up students for alternate portfolio assessment from school districts. On March 6, 2001, ADE staff attended a Smart Step Technology Leadership Conference at the State House Convention Center. On March 7, 2001, ADE staff attended a National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Regional Math Framework Meeting about the Consensus Project 2004. On March 8, 2001, there was a one-on-one conference with Carole Villarreal from Pulaski County at the ADE about the LEP students with portfolios. She was given pertinent data, including all the materials that have been given out at the video conferences. The conference lasted for at least an hour. On March 14, 2001, a Test Administrator's Training Session was presented specifically to LRSD Test Coordinators and Principals. About 60 LRSD personnel attended. The following meetings have been conducted with educators in the three districts in Pulaski County since July 2000. On July 10-13, 2000 the ADE provided Smart Step training. The sessions covered Standards-based classroom practices. 53 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2005 (Continued) On July 19-21 , 2000 the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were 200 teachers from across the state in attendance. On August 14-31, 2000 the ADE presented Science Smart Start Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This will provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. On September 5, 2000 the ADE held an Eisenhower Informational meeting with Teacher Center Coordinators. The purpose of the Eisenhower Professional Development Program is to prepare teachers, school staff, and administrators to help all students meet challenging standards in the core academic subjects. A summary of the program was presented at the meeting. On November 2-3, 2000 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching. This presented curriculum and activity workshops. More than 1200 attended the conference. On November 6, 2000 there was a review of Science Be_nchmarks and sample model curriculum. A committee of 6 reviewed and revised a drafted document. The committee was made up of ADE and K-8 teachers. On November 7-10, 2000 the ADE held a meeting of the Benchmark and End of Course Mathematics Content Area Committee. Classroom teachers reviewed items for grades 4, 6, 8 and EOC mathematics assessment. There were 60 participants. On December 4-8, 2000 the ADE conducted grades 4 and 8 Benchmark Scoring for Writing Assessment. This professional development was attended by approximately 750 teachers. On December 8, 2000 the ADE conducted Rubric development for Special Education Portfolio scoring. This was a meeting with special education supervisors to revise rubric and plan for scoring in June. On December 8, 2000 the ADE presented the Transition Mathematics Pilot Training Workshop. This provided follow-up training and activities for fourth-year mathematics professional development. On December 12, 2000 the ADE presented test administrators training for midyear End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. 54 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcasts on April 2-3, 2001. Administration of the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy took place on April 23-27, 2001. Administration of the End of Course Algebra and Geometry Exams took place on May 2-3, 2001. Over 1,100 Arkansas educators attended the Smart Step Growing Smarter Conference on July 10 and 11, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The Smart Step effort seeks to provide intense professional development for teachers and administrators at the middle school level, as well as additional materials and assistance to the state's middle school teachers. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the first keynote address on \"The Character-Centered Teacher\". Debra Pickering, an education consultant from Denver, Colorado, presented the second keynote address on \"Characteristics of Middle Level Education\". Throughout the Smart Step conference, educators attended breakout sessions that were grade-specific and curriculum area-specific. Pat Davenport, an education consultant from Houston, Texas, delivered two addresses. She spoke on \"A Blueprint for Raising Student Achievement\". Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. Over 1,200 Arkansas teachers and administrators attended the Smart Start Conference on July 12, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Start is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the keynote address. The day featured a series of 15 breakout sessions on best classroom practices. Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. On July 18-20, 2001, the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were approximately 300 teachers from across the state in attendance. 55 VI. REMEDIATION {Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. {Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 {Continued) The ADE and Harcourt Educational Measurement conducted Stanford 9 test administrator training from August 1-9, 2001. The training was held at Little Rock, Jonesboro, Fort Smith, Forrest City, Springdale, Mountain Home, Prescott, and Monticello. Another session was held at the ADE on August 30, for those who were unable to attend August 1-9. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by video conference at the Education Service Cooperatives and at the ADE from 9:00 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on September 5, 2001. The ADE released the performance of all schools on the Primary and Middle Level Benchmark Exams on September 5, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Core Teacher In-Service training for Central in the LRSD on September 6, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for Hall in the LRSD on September 7, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for McClellan in the LRSD on September 13, 2001 . The ADE conducted Basic Co-teaching training for the LRSD on October 9, 2001. The ADE conducted training on autism spectrum disorder for the PCSSD on October 15, 2001. Professional Development workshops (1 day in length) in scoring End of Course assessments in algebra, geometry and reading were provided for all districts in the state. Each school was invited to send three representatives {one for each of the sessions). LRSD, NLRSD, and PCSSD participated. Information and training materials pertaining to the Alternate Portfolio Assessment were provided to all districts in the state and were supplied as requested to LRSD, PCSSD and David 0. Dodd Elementary. On November 1-2, 2001 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching at the Excelsior Hotel \u0026amp; Statehouse Convention Center. This presented sessions, workshops and short courses to promote exceptional teaching and learning. Educators could become involved in integrated math, science, English \u0026amp; language arts and social studies learning. The ADE received from the schools selected to participate in the National Assessment of Educational Progress {NAEP), a list of students who will take the test. 56 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) On December 3-7, 2001 the ADE conducted grade 6 Benchmark scoring training for reading and math. Each school district was invited to send a math and a reading specialist. The training was held at the Holiday Inn Airport in Little Rock. On December 4 and 6, 2001 the ADE conducted Mid-Year Test Administrator Training for Algebra and Geometry. This was held at the Arkansas Activities Association's conference room in North Little Rock. On January 24, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by ADE compressed video with Fred Jones presenting. On January 31, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by NSCI satellite with Fred Jones presenting. On February 7, 2002, the ADE Smart Step co-sponsored the AR Association of Middle Level Principal's/ADE curriculum, assessment and instruction workshop with Bena Kallick presenting. On February 11-21, 2002, the ADE provided training for Test Administrators on the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Exams. The sessions took place at Forrest City, Jonesboro, Mountain Home, Springdale, Fort Smith, Monticello, Prescott, Arkadelphia and Little Rock. A make-up training broadcast was given at 15 Educational Cooperative Video sites on February 22. During February 2002, the LRSD had two attendees for the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The NLRSD and PCSSD each had one attendee at the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 2, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. The ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 9, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. 57 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 (Continued) The Twenty-First Annual Curriculum and Instruction Conference, co-sponsored by the Arkansas Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and the Arkansas Department of Education, will be held June 24-26, 2002, at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs, Arkansas. \"Ignite Your Enthusiasm for Learning\" is the theme for this year's conference, which will feature educational consultant, Dr. Debbie Silver, as well\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1779","title":"Court filings regarding Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) response to order and witness list, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool, and Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) motion for excused absence.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["2005-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st century","Education--Arkansas","School districts","Little Rock School District","Arkansas. Department of Education","Joshua intervenors","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Evaluation"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings regarding Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) response to order and witness list, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool, and Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) motion for excused absence."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1779"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["45 page scan, typed"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\u003c?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\"?\u003e\n\u003citems type=\"array\"\u003e  \u003citem\u003e   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_description type=\"array\"\u003e   \n\n\u003cdcterms_description\u003eCourt filings: District Court, Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) response to order; District Court, notice of hearing; District Court, order to show cause; District Court, Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) witness list; District Court, order; District Court, notice of appearance; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) motion for excused absence; District Court, order    This transcript was create using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.    Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW-JTR Document 3943 Filed 10/04/2005 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT RECEIVED V. LR-C-82-866 OCT 5 2005 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONl.:rORING LRSD'S RESPONSE TO ORDER PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS For its response to the Court's September 30, 2005 Order directing the Little Rock School District (LRSD) to file a plenary response to each of five questions, LRSD states: QuestionNo.1: How long has LRSD known that they were not going to comply with the Court's direct, specific order? Response: LRSD, Joshua and ODM have known for months that benchmark examination results had not yet been reported. LRSD has known since September 19, 2005 that the Arkansas Department of Education would receive the results of the benchmark examinations from its contractor \"around the first of October.\" LRSD has now received hard copies of the reports, but the electronic data necessary for the evaluations is not likely to be available for two or three weeks. Question No. 2: Why was the motion not filed until the 11 th hour? Response: The Motion was not filed earlier for at least three reasons, all of which were influenced by the fact that both Joshua and ODM were aware that benc;hmark examination results had not yet been reported and that the experts could not complete the Step 2 evaluations without them. First, LRSD did not know until September 19 when the 2004-05 benchmark scores would be released, and consequently would have had to request an indefinite extension of time. Second, Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW-JTR Document 3943 Filed 10/04/2005 Page 2 of 4 LRSD discussed the situation with Joshua in June or July and was told by Joshua's counsel that Joshua not only would oppose any motion to extend time but would also seek to litigate other issues upon LRSD' s filing of such a motion. LRSD decided that there was no point in provoking additional litigation during the pendency of its appeal. Finally, the need for the extension of time was dictated by matters beyond LRSD's control. The timing of the motion would not alter the facts that the experts need the benchmark results and that LRSD could do nothing to hasten the delivery of those results. Question No. 3: Does this last minute filing demonstrate that LRSD is treating the Court's directives with studied neglect? Response: No. Question No. 4: Is LRSD playing for time in the hope that the Circuit Court of Appeals - will reverse, thereby relieving LRSD of what it was plainly obliged to do, regardless of the appeal? Response: No. LRSD believes in the merits of its appeal or it would not have filed it, but LRSD is not \"playing for time.\" The requested extension of time is not based on anything LRSD did or failed to do or anything that LRSD has any control over. LRSD hired outside experts to complete four Step 2 program evaluations in accordance with the Court's Order. Those evaluations cannot be completed in any useful form without the benchmark examination results from the 2004-05 school year. Those results are only now becoming available. LRSD has no authority over the grading or reporting of benchmark examination scores. Those things are entirely within the control of the Arkansas Department of Education. 2 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW-JTR Document 3943 Filed 10/04/2005 Page 3 of 4 Finally, whether or not the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals relieves LRSD of its future obligations under the compliance order, LRSD has contracted for four Step 2 evaluations which have been substantially completed. LRSD intends to receive completed evaluations in accordance with its contracts with Drs. Ross and Catterall and to use the evaluations to help judge the effectiveness of the academic programs which are the subjects of the evaluations. Question No. 5: Why should a last minute motion like this be granted? Response: The motion should be granted for the reasons set forth in response to question four above, and for the reasons set forth in the motion, including the letters from Dr. Ross and Dr. Catterall. If the motion is denied, LRSD would be compelled to file the evaluations immediately, even though they would contain no analysis of the benchmark results and consequently would not be of much use in evaluating the effectiveness of academic programs. Drs. Ross and Catterall would - be extremely reluctant to have their work publicized before they had the chance to complete the evaluations by incorporating and analyzing the results of the benchmark exams. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 Regions Bank Bldg. 400 West Capitol A venue Little Rock, AR 72201 501/376-2011 Isl Christopher Heller 3 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW-JTR Document 3943 Filed 10/04/2005 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on October 4, 2005, I have electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/EC. system, which will send notification of such filing to the following: mark.hagemeier@ag. state. ar. us sjones@mwsew.com sjones@ jlj .com johnwalkerattv@aol.com and mailed by U.S. regular mail to the following addresses: Gene Jones Office of Desegregation Monitoring 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitols, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Black stock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Judge J. Thomas Ray U. S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 Isl Christopher Heller Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW-JTR Document 3945 Filed 10/05/2005 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS RICHARD SHEPPARD ARNOLD UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 600 W. CAPITOL, ROOM 423 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 -3325 (501)604-5140 RECEIVED Facsimile (501) 604-5149 October 5, 2005 Mr. Christopher J. Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark, LLP - Little Rock Regions Center 400 West Capitol Avenue Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Re: LRSD v. PCSSD, et al, Motion for Extension of Time Dear Counsel: OCT 6 2005 OFACEOF DESEGREGATION MONtTORINli A hearing will be held on your Motion to Extend Time (which was filed Thursday, September 29, 2005) on Monday, November 7, 2005, commencing at 8:30 a.m. It is very likely that other questions will be addressed at this hearing. An order setting forth the exact nature of the hearing will be entered furthwith. It is likely that I will want to hear testimony from the persons mentioned in your last two filings; so please arrange to have them available, as well as other witnesses you may want to call. Cordially, Isl Wm. R.Wilson,Jr. Original to the Clerk of the Court cc: the Honorable J. Thomas Ray, other lawyers of record, ODM. 10/05/2005 11 : 15 5016045149 WILSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS C-' S9f.- RICHARD SHEPPARD ARNOLD UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 500 W. CAPITOL, ROOM 423 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3325 (501) 604-6140 Facalmile (501) 604-51A9 October 5, 20~ Mr. Christopher J. Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark, LLP - Little Rock Regions Center 400 West Capitol Avenue Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Re: LRSD v. PCSSD, et al, Motion for Extension of Time Dear Counsel: PAGE 02/02 F/4t A hearing will be held on your Motion to Extend Time (which was filed Thursday, September 29, 2005) on Monday, November 7, 2005, commencing at 8:30 a.m. It is very likely that other questions will be addressed at this hearing. An order setting forth the exact nature- of the hearing will be entered forthwith. It is likely that I will want to hear testimony from the persons mentioned in your last two filings; so please arrange to have them available, as well as other witnesses you may want to call. Cordially, Isl Wm. R. Wilson.Jr. Original to the Clerk of the Court cc: the Honorable J. Thomas Ray; other lawyers of record, ODM. 10/05/2005 11:15 5016045149 WILSON FAX COVER SHEET UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TO: Chris Heller SamJone5 Steve Jones John Walker Robert Prc!lsman Mark Hagemeier ODM Mark Burnette DATE: /0 - ) ,., 0S Telephone: 501-6045140 Fax Number: 501-604 5149 376-2147 688-8807 375.1027 374-4187 781862-1955 682-2591 371-0100 375-1940 There are 7- pages, including this Cover Sheet, being sent by this :facsimile transmission. MESSAGE SENT BY: Office of Judge Wm. R Wil U.S. District Court 600 West Capitol, Room 423 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Matt Morg1w. LRSD Law Clerk 501-604-5141 PAGE 01/02 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. No. 4:82CV00866-WRW/JTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al. KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RECEIVED OCT 11 2005 OFACEOF DESEGREGATION MONtTORING PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS In the June 30, 2004 Order, I held that the LRSD had again failed to comply the desegregation obligations in 2.7.1 of the January 16, 1998 Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. 1 This Order, in part, reads: The four step 2 program evaluations for the 2004-05 school year must be filed with the Court no later than October 1, 2004.2 At the risk of being redundant, I entered a July 26, 2004 Order which read: Regardless of an appeal, LRSD is required to continue full speed ahead, on all points, with respect to the compliance remedy set forth in the Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004 (Doc. No. 3875). As was noted in the June 30 Memo, LRSD is required to do only what it volunteered to do. 3 Late on September 29, 2005, with one working day left before the October 1 deadline, LRSD filed a Motion to Extend Time to submit the four step 2 evaluations for the 2004-05 'A September 13, 2002 Order held that LRSD had substantially complied with all of its desegregation obligations except those contained in 2.7.1. 2Doc. No. 3875. 3Doc. No. 3890 (emphasis in original). school year. Because of uncompleted tasks, LRSD requested an extension until January 2006 to submit the evaluations. To date, the motion has not been granted and no evaluations have been filed. Accordingly, LRSD and its counsel are directed to appear at 8:30 a.m. on Monday, November 7, 2005 and show cause, if any there be, why they should not be held in contempt of court ( civil) for violating the June 30, 2004 Order -- specifically, the directive to file the four step 2 program evaluations for the 2004-05 school year no later than October 1, 2004. With respect to LRSD's Motion to Extend Time, filed on September 29, 2005, and with respect to LRSD's Response to Order filed on October 4, 2005, LRSD and its counsel are directed to also show cause, if any there be, why they should not be sanctioned, under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for the representations and omissions contained in these two documents. Among others, I would like for the following to appear, some of them to give testimony:  A representative from the ODM;  Dr. Karen DeJarnette;  Dr. James S. Catterall;  Dr. Steven M. Ross;  Dr. Jim Wohleb;  Each member of the Little Rock School District School Board; Dr. Roy G. Brooks, Superintendent of the Little Rock School District;  The persons at the Arkansas Department of Education who oversee benchmark examinations;  Such other person as any party may want to call as a witness. By 5 p.m., Wednesday, October 12, 2005, the LRSD is directed to file a list of the witnesses who it will call at the hearing (these persons will be expected to appear unless excused 2 by the Court). Within ten (10) days after the LRSD provides its witness list, Joshua must file its witness list (these persons will be expected to appear unless excused by the Court). IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of October, 2005. Isl Wm. R.Wilson Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT TIJDGE 3 1010 West Third Street Post Office Box 1510 Little Rock , AR 72203-1510 a rman J. Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc. 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 Timothy Gerard Gauger Arkansas Attorney General ' s Office Catlett-Prien Tower Building 323 Center Street Suite 200 Little Rock , AR 72201-2610 James M. Llewellyn, Jr Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. 412 South Eighteenth Street Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith , AR 72902-0818 Office of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock , AR 72201 William P. Thompson Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn , P.A . 412 South Eighteenth Street Post Office Box 818 - rt Smith, AR 72902-0818 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW-JTR Document 3950 Filed 10/12/2005 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL LRSD' S WITNESS LIST PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTER VEN ORS For its witness list for the hearing scheduled for November 7, 2005, the Little Rock School District provides the following: 1. 2. Gerie Jones Office of Desegregation Monitoring 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 ,Little Rock, AR 72201 - Dr. Karen DeJamette Little Rock School District Planning, Research and Evaluation 30th \u0026amp; Pulaski Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 3. Dr. James S. Catterall Professor University of California P. 0. Box 951521 Los Angeles, CA 90005 4. Dr. Steven M. Ross Fadree Professor and Director Center for Research in Educational Policy 325 Browning Hall Memphis, TN-38152-3340 RECEIVED OCT 1 3 2005 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONtTORING Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW-JTR Document 3950 Filed 10/12/2005 Page 2 of 3 5. Jim Wohlleb Planning, Research and Evaluation 30th \u0026amp; Pulaski Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 6. Dr. Roy Brooks Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 7. Dr. Gayle Potter Associate Director Academic Standards and Assessment Arkansas Department of Education #4 State Capitol Mall, Room 106A Little Rock, AR 72201 8. All witnesses listed by other parties and witnesses who may be necessary to provide rebuttal testimony Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK Christopher Heller (#81083) 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 Isl Christopher Heller , I Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW-JTR Document 3950 Filed 10/12/2005 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on October 12, 2005, I have electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such filing to the following: mark.hae:emeier@ag.state.ar.us sjones@mwsgw.com sjones@jlj.com johnwalkeratty@aol.com and mailed by U.S. regular mail to the following addresses: Gene Jones Office of Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Judge J. Thomas Ray U.S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 3 Isl Christopher Heller UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. No. 4:82CV00866-WRWIJTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al. KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al. ORDER RECEIVED OCT 2 4 2005 OFFICEOF DESEGREGATION MONA'ORING PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS Pending is LRSD's Motion to Excuse Dr. James Caterall (Doc. No. 3951) from the November 7, 2005 Hearing. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. However, Dr. Caterall must provide Mr. Heller with a phone number where he can be reached, if necessary, the day of the hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of October, 2005. Isl Wm. R.Wilson,Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW-JTR Document 3956 Filed 10/28/2005 . Page 1 of 1 ,AO 458 /Rey I Q/95} Appearance UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF APPEARANCE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. l ET AL. To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record: Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for Case No: 4:82CV00866WRW RECEIVED NOV -1 2005 OFFICEOF DESEGREGATION MONl-TORING Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark, Christopher Heller, and Little Rock School District for the limited purpose of representing them in connection with the Order to Show Cause matter pending in this Court. Date I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court. Philip E. Kaplan Print Name 68026 . Bar Number 415 Main St. Address Little Rock City S0I-372-0400 Phone Number pkaplan@kbmlaw.net E-Mail AR 72201 Stale Zip Code e. KAPLAN, BREWER, MAXEY \u0026amp; HARALSON, P.A. PHILIP E. KAPLAN JOANN C. MAXEY REGINA HARALSON Of counsel: SILAS H. BREWER, JR. ATTORNEYS AT LAW ENCLOSURE MEMORANDUM DATE: October 31, 2005 TO: Manual notice recipients: Clayton R. Blackstock Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon, PLLC 101 O West Third Street Post Office Box 151 O Little Rock, AR 72203-151 0 Norman J. Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc. 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 Timothy Gerard Gauger Arkansas Attorney General's Office Catlett-Prien Tower Building 323 Center Street Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201 -2610 James M. Llewellyn, Jr Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. 412 South Eighteenth Street Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 Office of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 METRO CENTRE MALL 415 MAIN STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 (501) 372-0400 FAX (501) 376-3612 William P. Thompson Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. 412 South Eighteenth Street Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 FROM: RE: ENCLOSURE: Philip E. Kaplan Little Rock Sch. Dist. v. Pulaski County Special Sch. Dist. et al. Notice of Appearance Page 1 of 2 Moler, Nina From: ecf_support@ared.uscourts.gov Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 1 :42 PM To: ared_ecf@ared.uscourts.gov Subject: Activity in Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW-JTR Little Rock School, et al v. Pulaski Cty School, et al \"Notice of Appearance\" ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once without charge. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was received from Kaplan, Philip E. entered on 10/28/2005 at 1:41 PM CDT and filed on 10/28/2005 Case Name: Little Rock School, et al v. Pulaski Cty School, et al Case Number: 4:82-cv-866 Filer: Little Rock School District WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 01/26/1998 Document Number: 3956 Docket Text: NOTICE of Appearance by Philip E. Kaplan on behalf of Little Rock School District (Kaplan, Philip) The following document(s) are associated with this transaction: Document description:Main Document Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1095794525 [Date=l0/28/2005] [FileNumber=509898-0 ] [412b34e7f6ff637f536357f8eae2491515cd9304e18c7fd6d0130a96c7cde7688dd bcf73 lf d6b5144c9dl 15cc34 77917 cf5695350684442050dc5ef702879e6a]] 4:82-cv-866 Notice will be electronically mailed to: Mark Terry Burnette mburnette@mbbwi.com, John Clayburn Fendley , Jr fendley 1@alltel.net, Mark Arnold Hagemeier mark.hagemeier@arkansasag.gov, belecia.bledsoe@arkansasag.gov - Christopher J. Heller heller@fec.net, brendak@fec.net; tmiller@fec.net M: Samuel Jones , ill sjones@mwsgw.com, aoverton@mwsgw.com 10/31/2005 Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj .com, kate.jones@jlj.com Philip E. Kaplan pkaplan@kbmlaw.net, nmoler@kbmlaw.net Sharon Carden Streett scstreett@comcast.net, scstreett@yahoo.com Page 2 of 2 Joh! n W. Walker johnwalkeratty@aol.com, lorap72297@aol.com; jspringer@gabrielmail.com 4:82-cv-866 Notice will be delivered by other means to: Clayton R. Blackstock . Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon, PLLC 1010 West Third Street Post Office Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Norman J. Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc. 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 Timothy Gerard Gauger Arkansas Attorney General's Office Catlett-Prien Tower Building 323 Center Street Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201-2610 James M. Llewellyn , Jr Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. 412 South Eighteenth Street Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 Office of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 William P. Thompson Thompso! n \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. 412 South Eighteenth Street Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 10/31/2005. Arkansas DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 4STATECAPITOLMALL  LITLEROCK,ARKANSAS 72201-1071  (501)682-4475  http://arkedu.state.ar.us Dr. Kenneth James, Commissioner of Education October 30, 2005 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones III RECEIVED OCT 3 1 2005 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MOKI-TORlNG Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 WRW Dear Gentlemen: Per an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of October 2005 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. J:;_J;fk Scott Smith General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair - Dr. Jeanna Westmoreland, Arkadelphia, Vice Chair - Diane Tatum, Pine Bluff Members: *Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro *Shelby Hillman, Carlisle * Dr. Calvin King, Marianna *Randy Lawson, Bentonville *MaryJane Rebick, Little Rock *Dr. Naccaman Williams, Springdale An Equal Opportunity Employer \\  - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION PLAINTIFF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT No. LR-C-82-866 WRW V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. l, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for October 2005. Resf fully Subu~tted, 5.11~;/'h. Scott Smith, Bar # 92251 General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RECEIVED OCT 3 1 2005 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONR'ORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENOR$ ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL  In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the AD E's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 C. Process and distribute State MFPA. D. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 ;,i;:~\"f~ :~~I'\u0026lt;! ;;{ij;f(;, t~ ~!!~f,i_i, i.1;,.,11.i,: ,-J:ff -;ft ~~~f\\ ~~~~!,', :,:~ ,ii~tv Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 ---AAIM-#Mii49 j . - i \u0026amp; ; It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff _ attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2005 H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2005 Calculated for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. 3 Fii:CEIVED NOV -1 2005  OFFICEOF ~ ESEGREGATION MONR'ORING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRJCT V. NO. 4:82CV00866WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. PCSSD MOTION FOR EXCUSED ABSENCE The PCSSD for its motion, states: ONIHO!lNOW NOllV93H93S30 ~o 331!0 ~OOZ 1- AON 03J\\1303H PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTERVENORS 1. Your undersigned counsel has reviewed the Court's Order of October 31, 2005, respecting witness lists and a summary of testimony. 2. The PCSSD does not intend to offer any witnesses or exhibits. 3. Indeed, unless the Court perceives that the presence of undersigned counsel would actually contribute to resolution of the issues to be addressed on November 7, 2005, then counsel for the PCSSD perceives no pressing reason to attend the hearing and requests permission to be excused. 4. The PCSSD notes that a telephone hearing may occur on Thursday, November 3, 2005. Perhaps this motion could be addressed at that time. WHEREFORE, undersigned counsel provisionally requests that his attendance be  excused at the hearing scheduled for November 7, 2005, and for all proper relief. I Respectfully submitted, MITCHELL, WILLIAMS, SELIG, GATES \u0026amp; WOODY ARD, P.L.L.C. 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 688-8800 FAX: (501) 688-8807 I / By__:~:::::::.__2~~~.,L.::.-===/-----i - .com or P Special CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 31, 2005, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such filing to the following:  Mark Terry Burnette mburnette@mbbwi.com  John Clayburn Fendley, Jr fendley l@alltel.net  Mark Arnold Hagemeier mark.hagemeier@arkansasag.gov belecia. bledsoe@arkansasag.gov  Christopher J. Heller heller@fec.net brendak@fec.net;tmiller@fec.net  M. Samuel Jones, III sjones@mwsgw.com aoverton@mwsgw.com  Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj.com kate.jones@jlj.com  Philip E. Kaplan pkaplan@kbmlaw.net nmoler@kbmlaw.net  Sharon Carden Streett scstreett@comcast.net scstreett@yahoo.com  John W. Walker j ohnwalkeratty@aol.com lorap 72297@aol .com ;j springer@gabrielmail.com 2. I certify that on October 31, 2005, I mailed the foregoing document and a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by United States Postal Service to the following non CM/ECF participants: Clayton R. Blackstock Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon, PLLC l O 1 0 West Third Street Post Office Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Norman J. Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc. 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 Timothy Gerard Gauger Arkansas Attorney General's Office Catlett-Prien Tower Building 323 Center Street Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201-2610 James M. Llewellyn, Jr Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. 412 South Eighteenth Street Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 Office of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 William P. Thompson Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. 412 South Eighteenth Street Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 Mr. Robert Pressman 22 Locust A venue Lexington, Massachusetts 02173 3 Judge J. Thomas Ray U.S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 I I Attom for Pulas  ounty Special School District 1 HELL, WILLIAMS, SELIG, GA TES \u0026amp;  WOODY ARD, P.L.L.C. 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 688-8800 FAX: (501) 688-8807 E-Mail: sjones@mwsgw.com 4. ~,n Overton From: ecf_support@ared.uscourts.gov Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 4:45 PM To: ared_ecf@ared.uscourts.gov Subject: Activity in Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW-JTR Little Rock School, et al v. Pulaski Cty School, et al \"Request\" ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once without charge. To avoid later charges, download a copy of eacl) document during this first viewing. U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Notice of Electronic Filing T--ollowing transaction was received from Jones, M. entered on 10/31/2005 at 4:44 PM CST and filed on 10/31 /2005 Case Name: Little Rock School, et al v. Pulaski Cty School, et al Case Number: 4:82-cv-866 Filer: Pulaski County Special School District WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 01/26/1998 Document Number: 3961 Docket Text: REQUEST by Pulaski County Special School District for Motion for Excused Absence. (Jones, M.) The following document(s) are associated with this transaction: 10/31/2005 Document description:Main Document oenal filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=l095794525 [Date=l0/31/2005] [FileNumber=511556-0 ] [27a796d577la86afa01 l b9claf372225fa606eee72df386cfe2017bb789360lf32c 5905b36dd505a608052f4ac23ddlb78de76dbb28lee7f264acb41754b7c28]] 4:82-cv-866 Notice will be electronically mailed to: Mark Terry Burnette mbumette@mbbwi.com, John Clayburn Fendley, Jr fendleyl@alltel.net, Mark Arnold Hagemeier mark.hagemeier@arkansasag.gov, belecia. b ledsoe@arkansasag.gov Christopher l Heller heller@fec.net, brendak@fec.net; tmiller@fec.net rvwamuel Jones, III sjones@mwsgw.com, aoverton@mwsgw.com Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj.com, kate.jones@jlj.com Philip E. Kaplan pkaplan@kbmlaw.net, nmoler@kbmlaw.net Sharon Carden Streett scstreett@comcast.net, scstreett@yahoo.com Joh! n W. Walker johnwalkeratty@aol.com, lorap72297@aol.com; jspringer@gabrielmail.com 4:82-cv-866 Notice will be delivered by other means to: Clayton R. Blackstock Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon, PLLC 1010 West Third Street Post Office Box 1510 *le Rock, AR 72203-1510 Norman J. Chachkin 10/31/2005 NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc. 9-udson Street SuTe 1600 New York, NY 10013 Timothy Gerard Gauger Arkansas Attorney General's Office Catlett-Prien Tower Building 323 Center Street Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201-2610 James M. Llewellyn , Jr Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. 412 South Eighteenth Street Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 OJiw.ce of Desegregation Monitor ca Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 William P. Thompson Thompso! n \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. 412 South Eighteenth Street Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 1013:11zoos UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. No. 4:82CV00866-WRWIJTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al. KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al. ORDER RECEIVED NOV -1 2005 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONtlORING PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTERVENORS I have received copies of the proposed witnesses of the parties. It appears that there may be an overloading of the wagon with witnesses in view of the narrow scope of the show cause hearing scheduled for one week from today, Monday, November 7, 2005. In view of this possibility, each party is directed to give a brief summary of the expected testimony of each witness (brief but sufficient to let me know what the witness is going to testify about), and an estimated time for direct examination of each of these witnesses. These lists and summaries must be sent to me by fax by noon, this Thursday, November 3, 2005. Fax copies must be sent to opposing counsel and the original is to be filed with the Clerk. We may have a telephone conference this Thursday afternoon at 2:00 p.m. regarding the witness lists, so please mark your calender to be available. IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of October, 2005. Isl Wm. R.Wilson,Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MIME-Version:1 . 0 From:ecf_support@ared.uscourts.gov To:ared_ecf@ared.uscourts.gov Message-Id:\u0026lt;5ll039@ared .uscourts . gov\u0026gt; A ce: W ubject:Activity in Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW-JTR Little Rock School, et al v. Pulaski Cty School, et al \"Order\" Content-Type : text/plain***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** There is no charge for viewing opinions . ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once without charge . To avoid later charges , download a copy of each document during this first viewing.U.S . District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 10/31/2005 at 1:53 PM CST and filed on 10/31/2005 Case Name: Little Rock School, et al v. Pulaski Cty School, et al Case Number: 4:82-cv-866 http://ecf.ared.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?26052 WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 01/26/1998 Document Number: 3958 Copy the URL address from the line below into the location bar of your Web browser to view the document: http://ecf.ared.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_case_doc?3958,26052,,MAGIC,,,2005226 Docket Text: ORDER re [3950] Witness List filed by Little Rock School District , [3 955] Witness List filed by Lorene Joshua, (3948] Order to Show Cause , [3952] Witness List filed by Lorene Joshua. Each party is directed to fax to the Court lists and summaries of the expected testimony of each witness by noon, 11/3/05 and file the original with the Court. A telephone conference may be held 11/3/05@ 2:00 . Signed by Judge William R. Wilson Jr. on 10/31/05. (dac, ) A e following document(s) are associated with this transaction: ~cument description: Main Document Original filename : n/a Electronic document Stamp: [ STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=l095794525 [Date=l0/31/2005 ] [FileNumber=511038-0] [a625af27622bca56c03133f662d7b218073ba5233ed815d89d996539dl96233fd8be6913af3657d 3b438d0fc6b9789cdfl6a9d5174dfc8f5bde806ae3aa41084]] 4 : 82-cv-866 Notice will be electronically mailed to: Mark Terry Burnette mburnette@mbbwi.com, John Clayburn Fendley, Jr fendleyl@alltel.net, Mark Arnold Hagemeier mark.hagemeier@arkansasag.gov, belecia.bledsoe@arkansasag . gov Christopher J. Heller heller@fec.net, brendak@fec .net; tmiller@fec.net M. Samuel Jones , III sjones@mwsgw.,com, aoverton@mwsgw.com Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj . com, kate.jones@jlj.com Philip E. Kaplan pkaplan@kbmlaw.net, nmoler@kbmlaw.net Sharon Carden Streett scstreett@comcast.net , scstreett@yahoo.com John W. Walker johnwalkeratty@aol.com, lorap72297@aol.com; - pringer@gabrielmail.com 4:82-cv-866 Notice will be delivered by other means to : Clayton R. Blackstock Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon , PLLC ~ . ' .. 1010 West Third Street Post Office Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 A orman J. Chachkin W AACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc. 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York , NY 10013 Timothy Gerard Gauger Arkansas Attorney General's Office Catlett-Prien Tower Building 323 Center Street Suite 200 Little Rock , AR 72201-2610 James M. Llewellyn, Jr Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P .A. 412 South Eighteenth Street Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 Office of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 William p: Thompson Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P .A. 412 South Eighteenth Street Post Office Box 818 . ort Smith , AR 72902-0818 )    This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e\n   \n\n\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/items\u003e"},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_172","title":"Enrollment, LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD, gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2005-10-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","School integration","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County"],"dcterms_title":["Enrollment, LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD, gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/172"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n1-.e. ) STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM ~ee,ltt\u0026gt; JA~ J,/\"'t)A ,-05 OCTOBER 1, 2005 10\n:3 ENROLLMENT REPORT FINAL 001 -CENTRAL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 09 9 8 226 202 5 8 0 113 137 709 IO 13 IO 182 177 4 3 152 148 691 II 8 8 151 121 IO 4 2 0 116 143 563 12 7 13 108 106 0 0 0 117 107 459 TOT AL FOR: CENTRAL 37 39 667 606 20 IS 4 498 535 2,422 ~7- J,A73 //~ /,a::\u0026gt;~3 iooz-HALL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 09 3 0 179 213 21 40 0 0 21 14 491 10 162 125 16 21 0 20 13 360 II 3 3 122 117 IS 12 0 0 16 23 311 12 3 2 80 85 6 7 0 0 20 24 227 TOT AL FOR: HALL 10 6 543 540 58 80 0 77 74 1,389 /2pf3 /5 1~/ ~.?7. 003 - MANN M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 06 7 3 93 57 4 4 0 0 70 51 289 07 7 88 50 8 4 0 0 73 48 279 08 5 5 89 52 5 3 0 0 76 47 282 TOT AL FOR: MANN MIS 19 9 270 159 17 11 0 0 219 146 850 ../~ .5C,. ~t:-5 :f'o/4, 005 - PARKVIEW GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 09 2 2 81 77 8 6 2 74 64 317 10 6 3 75 61 7 4 0 73 46 276 II 3 79 60 6 6 60 58 275 12 3 74 52 4 2 2 0 69 52 261 TOTAL FOR: PARKVIEW 12 11 309 250 25 18 5 3 276 22G 1,129 .55/ 1! -Y9t\n,,::Yo, 7. ---- --------------------------------- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page I of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2005 ENROLLMENT REPORT FINAL 1006- BOOKER GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 27 28 2 2 0 29 21 110 02 0 0 29 24 4 0 22 16 97 03 0 0 22 32 0 0 34 20 110 04 23 34 3 2 0 0 23 18 105 05 0 23 25 2 2 0 20 16 90 K 0 22 35 0 2 0 18 16 95 TOTAL FOR: BOOKER 3 146 178 12 10 3 146 107 607 ~fj 7,, ~ .#\u0026gt; ~3 \\007 - DUNBAR MIS GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! I 06 5 2 96 105 4 14 0 0 38 54 318 07 4 76 90 7 4 0 28 33 244 08 3 3 88 76 4 10 0 0 24 41 249 TOTAL FOR: DUNBAR MIS 9 9 260 271 15 28 0 90 128 811 1,a/o .15~1 t,.(\n).,, ~1? Joos- FAIR GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I I 09 2 167 170 6 5 0 0 19 27 397 10 0 160 135 3 5 0 10 24 339 II 0 0 110 109 0 2 14 17 254 12 0 88 67 4 2 0 II 179 TOTAL FOR: FAIR 2 3 525 481 13 14 3 48 79 1,169 1,00(, ~~ /~7 g'?/4 009 - FORST HTS M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 06 4 76 86 2 4 0 0 15 21 209 07 0 91 89 2 4 0 0 18 21 226 08 0 2 92 97 2 2 0 0 16 30 241 TOTAL FOR: FORST HTS MIS 4 4 259 272 6 10 0 0 49 72 676 ,~I ,\nr:, /.\n)/ 7'17- ---- COMPUTER INFORMATlON SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page 2 of 16 : STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2005 ENROLLMENTR EPORT FINAL 010 - PUL HTS M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 06 2 66 93 0 3 0 44 43 253 07 0 0 63 62 2 0 50 60 239 08 2 66 61 0 2 0 0 60 50 242 TOTAL FOR: PUL HTS MIS 2 4 195 216 7 154 153 734 ~I/ /4 Jo7 ~~~ 011 - SOUTHWST M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 06 0 80 80 4 3 0 7 177 07 0 0 67 57 3 0 0 2 6 136 08 2 0 73 62 5 2 0 0 0 3 147 TOTAL FOR: SOUTHWST MIS 2 220 199 12 6 0 3 16 460 ~9 ~::).., /J 9/7. 1012 - MCCLELLA GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 09 130 126 7 10 0 0 4 284 10 0 0 103 92 5 0 0 6 8 215 II 0 123 79 2 3 0 4 8 221 12 0 0 65 61 2 0 0 8 7 144 TOTAL FOR: MCCLELLA 2 421 358 16 15 0 23 27 864 77'1 ~5 so ft:J/2 1013 - HENDERSN M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! ! 06 2 2 88 83 13 8 0 0 18 11 225 07 0 2 94 88 II 8 0 0 15 9 227 08 3 72 78 4 8 0 0 7 178 TOTAL FOR: HENDERSN MIS 5 5 254 249 28 24 0 0 40 25 630 3ti3 ?':r' 4,6 ~olo '015 - CLOVR MIS GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 06 0 0 83 87 19 19 0 0 3 9 220 07 0 0 87 77 20 22 0 7 215 08 0 81 76 15 21 0 0 4 3 201 TOTAL FOR: CLOVR MIS 0 251 240 54 62 1 0 8 19 636 4'91 111 ~1 11/. COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page 3 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2005 ENROLLMENT REPORT FINAL r 6- MABEL M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 06 0 0 87 92 7 2 0 0 17 20 225 07 0 0 93 91 3 2 0 0 9 15 213 08 0 0 79 77 2 0 0 7 9 175 TOTAL FOR: MABEL MIS 0 0 259 260 12 5 0 0 33 44 613 ,51? )? 7'1 ?5/4 1017 - BALE GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL l I 01 0 20 22 0 0 2 2 49 02 2 0 17 20 3 0 0 3 2 48 03 24 15 3 3 0 0 2 50 04 0 0 22 21 2 2 0 0 3 51 05 2 0 16 14 2 0 0 0 2 37 K 0 31 17 3 0 0 3 59 p 2 0 15 19 2 0 0 0 40 TOT AL FOR: BALE 7 3 145 128 15 12 0 11 12 334\nJ18 ~8' ~3 plo 018- BRADY GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL: 01 0 2 29 23 2 2 0 0 4 5 67 02 0 22 24 0 0 0 0 0 2 49 03 0 15 19 0 0 5 2 44 04 0 20 27 3 0 0 2 3 57 05 0 0 33 17 0 0 0 3 2 56 K 0 0 33 39 0 2 0 0 4 ] 81 p 2 18 13 0 0 0 0 5 40 TOT AL FOR: BRADY 2 6 170 162 4 9 0 18 22 394 g?J~ ~ -0 ~\n, COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page 4 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2005 ENROLLMENT REPORT FINAL 020 - MCDERMOT GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 2 19 25 0 2 0 0 10 7 66 02 0 20 22 5 3 0 0 9 7 67 03 0 24 20 2 5 0 7 8 68 04 4 0 24 26 2 3 0 0 7 8 74 05 0 26 18 4 0 0 7 8 65 K 0 0 26 24 2 3 0 0 12 1 I 78 p 13 9 0 0 8 6 40 TOT AL FOR: MCDERMOT 7 5 152 144 13 21 1 0 60 55 458 ~~/o c::i..1(, -'11 Jl:5 021-CARVER GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTALI 01 0 26 21 0 0 0 15 16 82 02 19 28 o 2 0 0 14 20 85 03 25 20 0 14 15 79 04 4 20 28 2 0 13 24 94 05 0 0 26 23 0 3 0 0 13 28 93 K I 5 25 2 2 0 15 18 80 p 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 20 TOT AL FOR: CARVER 7 7 136 154 4 8 4 2 85 126 533 i5).' lo ~,\n}- d)II ~J: :022 - BASELINE GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 I 3 17 6 6 0 0 2 45 02 0 12 23 6 5 0 3 52 03 0 0 13 22 4 2 0 0 0 42 04 0 19 II 5 0 0 3 41 05 0 0 16 16 4 3 0 0 2 2 43 K 0 0 IS 16 4 5 0 0 0 41 p 0 0 IS II 2 4 0 0 0 0 32 TOT AL FOR: BASELINE 103 116 27 30 0 8 9 296\nri/7. dJl7 (,0 ,1 COMPUTER INFORMATTON SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page 5 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2005 ENROLLMENT REPORT FINAL 023 - FAIR PRK GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL p 3 3 52 34 0 0 0 0 18 20 130 TOTAL FOR: FAIR PRK 3 3 52 34 0 0 0 0 18 20 130 3~ C,. ~'t ~c.7 , '024 - FORSTP K GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 9 2 0 0 0 29 28 70 02 9 2 0 0 0 25 30 69 03 0 2 9 II 0 0 0 0 23 22 67 04 0 4 9 2 0 0 20 18 55 05 0 2 9 0 0 7 19 44 K 2 0 0 0 0 26 31 62 p 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 17 14 40 TOTAL FOR: FORST PK 2 8 43 38 2 3 147 162 407 81 I :5c9 =-\u0026lt;O/. 025 - FRANKLIN GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 33 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 02 0 0 39 27 0 0 0 0 0 67 03 0 0 27 28 0 0 0 0 57 04 0 0 32 28 0 0 0 0 2 63 05 0 0 25 27 0 0 0 0 0 53 K 0 0 33 40 0 0 0 2 3 79 p 0 0 28 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 TOT AL FOR: FRANKLIN 0 0 217 210 2 0 0 3 7 440 ~~7 3 /u r\n?. COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page 6 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2005 ENROLLMENT REPORT FINAL 1021-Grnss GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I _j 01 2 8 14 0 0 0 0 7 12 44 02 0 0 12 14 3 0 0 0 8 13 so 03 0 2 IS 10 0 0 0 8 II 47 04 2 17 10 0 2 0 0 7 II so 05 2 2 22 15 0 0 II 12 66 K 0 8 13 0 0 0 7 10 40 TOT AL FOR: GIBBS 5 8 82 76 4 4 0 48 69 297 1:s'8' d\n)..J /I a~?- 028-CHICOT GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM F NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 25 33 8 4 0 0 2 3 75 02 0 0 22 38 9 5 0 2 3 80 03 0 0 31 33 8 II 0 0 3 4 90 04 0 0 27 26 10 4 0 0 2 3 72 05 0 0 25 28 7 11 0 0 2 2 75 K 0 0 35 39 7 15 0 0 0 0 96 p 0 0 29 27 7 0 0 3 5 76 TOT AL FOR: CHICOT 0 0 194 224 54 57 0 14 20 564 ..YI? //,\n ~./ ~ I '029 - WEST HIL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 14 22 0 0 0 6 2 45 02 0 0 20 14 0 0 7 4 47 03 0 0 24 17 0 0 7 0 50 04 0 0 19 8 2 0 0 4 35 05 0 0 14 18 2 4 0 0 3 8 49 K 0 0 14 22 0 0 2 0 40 p 0 0 10 4 2 0 0 0 2 2 20 TOT AL FOR: WEST HIL 0 0 115 105 9 7 2 0 31 17 286 d)\n)O If -If 7?7a --------- C::OMPUTERI NFORJ\\IIATJONS ERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page 7 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2005 ENROLLMENT REPORT FINAL ------ 1030 - JEFFRS~ GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 14 8 0 0 0 0 24 28 74 02 0 0 10 14 0 0 0 0 22 22 68 03 0 0 19 13 0 0 0 0 15 17 64 04 9 14 0 ,0 0 27 16 69 05 0 II 13 0 0 0 19 21 66 K 0 7 3 0 0 0 0 18 '32 61 \\ p 0. 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 14 19 40 TOT AL FOR: JEFFRSN 3 75 67 2 0 0 0 139 155 442\n-i/().. t\n. ~7-1 ..\n3~/. I !031- CLOVR EL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 5 8 2 o 0 0 18 02 0 0 7 8 3 3 0 0 0 0 21 03 0 0 9 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 19 04 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 13' 05 0 0 7 II 0 0 22 K 0 0 2 10 2 0 2 2 20 TOT AL FOR: CLOVR EL 0 35 50 10 9 0 3 4 113 1~/4 ~ ~I 7 1032-DODD GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 3 9 7 0 0 4 7 31 02 0 0 7 19 3 0 0 5 9 46 03 0 0 14 9 3 6 0 0 8 43 04 0 0 6 18 5 0 0 0 2 36 05 0 0 8 14 4 4 0 0 3 7 40 K 0 0 16 20 3 7 0 0 6 7 59 p 0 0 4 15 0 0 0 6 8 34 TOT AL FOR: DODD 0 0 58 104 26 21 0 0 29 51. 289 /?~ ../? go ~r\n.?o COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page 8 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2005 ENROLLMENT REPORT FINAL .033 - MEADCLIF GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM I T0~3 01 0 0 23 29 5 0 0 3 68 02 0 0 22 15 3 0 0 5 47 03 0 0 15 26 2 4 0 0 49 04 0 20 I 5 2 0 0 0 4 45 05 0 0 21 25 3 0 0 2 3 55 K 0 0 21 26 3 2 0 0 5 3 60 p 0 0 16 15 0 4 0 0 2 2 39 TOT AL FOR: MEADCLIF 0 138 ISi 12 19 0 0 21 21 363 A~9 c::!,\nJ., -'I~ ,?olo 035-M L KING GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 01 0 29 37 0 0 0 10 II 89 02 30 30 0 0 0 18 10 91 03 2 29 26 0 0 16 21 97 04 0 0 28 27 0 0 0 0 16 10 81 05 25 27 0 0 13 15 84 K 3 0 31 42 0 0 9 13 100 p 0 25 23 0 0 0 13 12 77 TOT AL FOR: M L KING 9 5 197 212 3 4 95 92 619 -Ye-? ~3 /il ~ C .?'o 1036 - ROCKFELR GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 34 19 0 0 0 3 2 59 02 0 22 26 0 0 6 7 64 03 0 35 27 2 0 0 0 6 7 78 04 0 0 28 16 0 0 0 8 8 61 05 0 0 20 17 0 0 0 0 10 3 50 K 0 0 18 31 0 0 0 s 5 60 p 0 34 31 0 2 0 0 18 19 105 TOTALFOR:ROCKFELR 2 191 167 4 5 0 0 56 51 477 ~~ I~ 11 J6?c COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page 9 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2005 ENROLLMENT REPORT FINAL 1037 - GEYER SP GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM T~ 01 0 0 23 20 4 0 0 0 2 so 02 0 0 16 23 0 0 43 03 0 0 28 19 0 0 0 2 0 so 04 0 0 20 16 0 3 0 0 0 3 42 05 0 0 32 19 0 0 0 0 53 K 0 0 26 24 3 0 0 2 57 p 0 0 9 26 0 0 0 38 TOT AL FOR: GEYER SP 0 0 154 147 10 7 0 0 7 8 333 roh ,$lo/ /7 /:=\u0026gt; 038-PUL HTE GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTALi '\n01 0 9 11 0 0 0 0 15 12 48 02 0 0 13 18 0 2 0 0 6 10 49 03 0 14 13 0 0 0 0 10 II 49 04 0 0 12 16 0 0 0 12 15 56 05 0 IS 10 0 0 0 16 II 54 K 2 10 2 0 0 15 22 58 p 2 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 5 7 20 TOT AL FOR: PUL HT E 5 3 71 81 2 5 0 0 79 88 334 ._/tl /~~ /6 /(,.7 039 - RIGHTSEL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 14 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 02 0 0 23 II 0 0 0 0 0 35 03 0 0 14 IS 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 04 0 0 12 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 ----- 05 0 0 16 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 K 0 20 15 0 0 0 3 0 40 TOT AL FOR: RJGHTSEL 0 99 79 0 0 0 4 0 184 1770 118'\n\u0026gt;-- ~ ------------ COMPUTER fNFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page IO of 16 STATEWIDE INFORlVIATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2005 ENROLLMENT REPORT FINAL 040-ROMINE GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I I 01 0 0 25 25 5 8 0 0 0 64 02 0 0 19 15 3 3 0 0 2 7 49 03 0 0 18 19 3 2 0 0 2 0 44 04 0 0 17 18 4 0 0 3 4 47 05 0 0 18 24 2 2 0 49 K 0 18 27 3 4 0 0 0 4 57 p 0 25 22 3 0 0 2 55 TOT AL FOR: ROMINE 2 0 140 ISO 18 26 0 11 17 365 ~C)C .../1 ~g 1'l/4 1041 - STEPHENS GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 31 50 2 0 0 0 2 86 02 0 0 42 30 0 0 0 0 74 03 0 0 37 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 04 0 0 37 31 2 0 0 0 3 0 73 05 0 0 38 45 0 0 0 0 0 84 K 0 0 37 41 0 0 0 0 2 81 p 0 0 33 35 0 2 0 0 0 2 72 TOTAL FOR: STEPHENS 0 0 255 272 5 3 0 4 7 547 9t:-./2 ~\n)1 '1 II 042 -WASHNGTN GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I i 01 0 46 39 0 0 0 5 6 98 02 33 40 4 0 0 5 9 98 03 0 34 38 7 3 0 0 5 93 04 0 35 39 2 0 0 2 5 85 05 3 31 33 4 0 0 7 8 92 K 0 46 39 2 0 2 8 100 p 2 28 35 0 0 0 9 2 78 TOT AL FOR: W ASHNGTN 5 8 253 263 Zl IS 0 35 43 644 .l)\nt\n,. --5'() ?'6' \u0026lt;to?o ----- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page 11 of 16 i STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2005 ENROLLMENT REPORT FINAL l043 - WILLIAMS GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 01 0 3 20 12 2 0 0 0 16 16 69 02 3 2 20 15 0 0 0 10 12 63 03 5 20 21 2 0 0 0 8 22 83 04 5 4 25 25 0 0 0 25 12 97 05 4 23 25 0 0 0 17 16 91 K 0 6 16 II 0 0 0 9 14 57 TOT AL FOR: WILLIAMS 18 24 124 109 6 0 85 92 460 ~~3 ~p /7? ~/fa 1044 - WILSON GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL\\ 01 0 0 20 23 2 0 0 0 0 46 02 0 0 16 28 2 0 0 0 3 50 03 0 0 16 21 2 0 0 0 2 42 04 0 0 15 18 2 0 39, 05 0 2 13 16 2 0 0 2 37 K 0 0 16 24 0 0 0 2 44 p 0 0 12 4 0 0 0 0 18 TOT AL FOR: WILSON 0 2 108 134 8 8 I 0 7 8 276 g,Fflo ~:\nJ., 17 I~ I 045 - WOODRUFF GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 01 0 0 19 14 0 0 0 0 0 34 02 0 0 14 17 0 0 0 0 2 2 35 03 0 0 12 16 0 0 0 0 3 2 33 04 0 0 14 16 0 0 0 0 32 05 0 0 II 14 0 0 0 0 2 28 K 0 0 16 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 p 0 0 18 14 0 0 0 2 36 TOTAL FOR: WOODRUFF 0 0 104 115 0 2 0 0 9 8 238 '73 }., ci)I o/ c:i- /7 COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page 12 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2005 ENROLLMENT REPORT FINAL -----\n046 - MABEL EL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 15 20 2 0 2 6 52 02 0 0 II 25 0 0 4 49 03 0 0 20 23 0 0 2 3 50 04 0 0 16 12 0 0 0 s 39 05 0 0 18 15 0 0 0 2 0 36 K 0 0 19 14 4 0 0 2 41 p 0 0 26 23 5 2 0 2 8 71 TOT AL FOR: MABEL EL 0 125 132 16 11 2 22 28 338 cR@1 :.ii .50 ??~ 1047-TERRY GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 s 33 32 4 3 0 0 17 19 114 02 4 29 32 4 3 0 17 10 IOI 03 6 3 30 29 7 2 0 12 9 99 04 0 4 25 34 3 5 0 0 16 10 97 05 3 26 20 s 3 0 0 12 14 84 K 2 4 34 25 s II 0 0 23 17 121 p 17 9 2 0 0 3 6 40 TOTAL FOR: TERRY 19 17 194 181 29 28 3 0 100 85 656 375 ~ /86 ~/~ 048 - FULBRJGH GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTALI : 01 2 2 16 9 0 0 0 40 42 112 02 5 19 3 36 34 102 03 2 16 19 0 0 27 31 100 04 0 8 17 2 0 0 0 36 35 99 05 0 0 15 10 2 0 21 29 79 K 0 10 4 0 2 0 0 49 37 103, p 4 4 0 0 0 0 II 17 38 TOTAL FOR: FULBRIGH 9 7 74 78 9 8 2 220 225 633 ~/T- _.i,5\n1.. $,- -IP Ci:\u0026gt;MPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page I 3 of I 6 '\nSTATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1., 2005 ENROLLMENT REPORT FINAL ------ !050 - OTTER CR GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTALi 01 0 0 34 30 2 5 0 II 10 93 02 0 21 30 7 14 14 96 03 0 41 27 4 2 0 0 10 11 96 04 0 22 33 2 0 0 7 12 78 05 0 0 27 30 2 0 0 9 77 K 0 0 27 27 4 0 0 20 17 100 p 2 0 17 8 2 0 0 0 2 9 40 TOTAL FOR: OTTER CR 6 189 185 23 19 2 72 82 580 c:97-Y 5~ /~ ?,../7: 1051 - W AKEFIEL I GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTALI 01 0 0 36 39 5 11 0 0 4 0 95 02 0 0 24 29 14 6 0 0 0 74 03 0 0 28 25 4 11 0 0 2 0 70 04 0 0 16 26 3 0 0 0 51 05 0 0 27 33 7 9 0 2 5 84 K 0 0 27 30 9 12 0 0 2 0 80 p 0 0 10 16 4 4 0 0 2 37 TOT AL FOR: W AKEFIEL 0 0 168 198 46 58 0 13 7 491 .,\n.t\n. /0!5 ,\nJc\u0026gt; 7..:5/o I !052 - WATSON GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTALI I 01 0 0 35 33 2 0 0 3 75 02 0 27 39 0 0 0 74 03 0 0 22 38 5 3 0 0 0 0 68 04 0 0 27 31 2 0 0 0 0 61 05 0 0 28 32 2 2 0 0 0 0 64 K 0 30 42 2 2 0 0 79 p 0 0 17 18 0 2 0 0 0 0 37 TOTAL FOR: WATSON 186 233 17 12 0 4 3 458 q\n1. -/17 .,::\u0026gt;- 1 ---- -- ------------- ---------- ----------- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page 14 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2005 ENROLLMENT REPORT FINAL --rr1 1703 - FELDER ALC GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL . 1l,- I 08 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 I \\Jj,..., 09 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 14 )-.'\" ,3 \u0026amp; 10 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 II II 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 TOT AL FOR: FELDER ALC 0 0 10 24 0 0 0 2 38 'ifl/o ~ I ..a 725- ALT AGCY GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL i 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 9 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 04 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 II 05 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 06 0 ( 0 - 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 8 I 07 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 2 10 08 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 4 I 09 0 0 4 10 0 0 0 0 0 15 10 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 4 13 II 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 TOT AL FOR: ALT AGCY 0 111 '~35 0 0 0 0 23 30 101 ~~7c- ~ ~3 ----------------------- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page I 5 of 16 : i STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2005 ENROLLMENT REPORT FINAL 1766-ALC GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM __ TOTALj 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 07 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 29 08 0 0 11 go34 0 -~~ 0 0 0 5 3 ssd 9\n??0 ----- - 09 0 0 24 61 0 0 0 0 2 88 10 0 0 24 47 0 0 0 0 0 72 II 0 0 12 17 0 0 0 0 'I 31 12 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 9 TOTAL FOR: ALC 0 0 86 187 0 4 0 0 9 287 91?. 19~ o{ 6 ,..\n,cu 1767-ACCLP GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL\\ 09 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 12 II 0 0 12 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 12 0 0 40 36 0 0 II 94 . TOT AL FOR: ACC LP 0 0 561013 0 1 0 s 13 129 d?-- Ii ~lo GRAND TOTAL: 222 209 9089 9077 689 721 45 27 3152 3293 26,524 AJ~~\u0026lt;!j ~ 0 /I ~ 0 0 0 0 .\n?3 ,,.3o 10/ -h ~-I 0 I 0 0 /\n:2. .\n,?8'\" 0 0 /0 /.1._,tC. , /Ct-::\u0026gt;:fZ ~\n/ ., p) f,t)t\n? Cr'J -f\"5 ~1.#Y ~C,:l4'5 ~~o ~7,...,/ 0:0'1 eio18' 7.\n10 ~7' .d~~I\nf\ne\u0026gt;fC, ~710 C ::,3J - ~~~5 (13) (o} (~) '(,) (,fl,, COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page I 6 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2005 LRSD ENROLLMENT REPORT W/O METRO BY GRADE LEVEL FINAL i ------- -- GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM 01 14 17 707 724 64 59 4 2 267 269 2127 02 21 9 632 719 87 54 8 3 03 17 22 700 699 69 61 6 2 228 2043 . 04 17 20 625 05 15 18 6.61 . 06 20 II 670 07 8 8 664 Q8 09 16 13 10 20 15 715 II 12 15 520 33 27 5 2 250 - 12 14 18 4.S9 412 18 13 3 K II 20 677 760 60 88 5 p 23 9 493 455 26 41 2 GRAND TOTAL: 689 721 45 Z7 :i3 0 Z) 7 ~ \u0026lt;t/7 ) /\n/// .,::f.:5r -:. )~5~~ ~1\n-~,~ /Y(,\n,?,\u0026lt;:-\nI ~?/ .#\"I? /,~ o./ -5,./97 71 ~J/J ~OO\"d-' -/~P 0380 7\n~0~ ~? ( _\n:s~ ( 0, 1/\u0026lt;r) ( ?1'l) ~o~ /~/79~ 70 --\n::\nA I /$0 \u0026amp;  I, /10  c,~ ~~ - ~tld't\n- ~1 ----- LRSD INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page I of I ,. STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2005 LRSD ENROLLMENT REPORT HURRICANE STUDENTS ONLY BY GRADE LEVEL FINAL ,- GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTALi I ---' 01 0 0 12 9 0 0 0 4 s 31 02 0 0 s 10 0 0 0 0 3 19 03 0 0 12 6 0 0 0 0 2 21 04 0 6 7 0 0 0 17 OS 0 0 8 4 0 0 4 19 06 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 3 22 07 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 13 08 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 09 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 5 13 11 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 5 14 12 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 K 0 4 8 0 0 0 2 2 18  p 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 GRAND TOT AL: 85 78 2 0 2 27 20 217 LRSD INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Thursday, October 20, 2005 Page I of I J 11 Office of Student Affairs North Little Rack School District 2700 Poplar Street North Little Rock, AR 72115-0687 (501) 771-8010 Francical J. Jackson, Director DATE: Alov. 7, :20()5 TO: PoII ! j 'Rq 1\n,eR ' ODMo f{k,e. RE: OcJ-I Ke/J dvf- ' FAX: c37/-6 IDO PHONE: ______ _ ******************* FAX: 11 I -/JO I PHONE: __ ,7_7_1 _..\n~a.- --'(J{.JC__..J_- / COMENTS: ________________ _ This fax is .aJ.p_a ge (s) includi.rJ.gt he cover page. If you do not receive all the pages, please call our of.ice at (501) 771-8010. t~ob~f! McCa::_?1-1O ctober 1 Report 2005-2006.xls Page 1 I School Enrollment Black % Non-black % Ar:nboy 350 222 63% 128 37% Belwood 137 108 79% 29 21% Boone Park 384 349 91% 35 9% Crestwood 384 88 23% 296 77% Glenview 158 131 83% 27 17% Indian Hills 534 139 26% 395 74% Lakewood 385 109 28% 276 72% Lynch Drive 338 294 87% 44 13% Meadow Park 195 158 81% 37 19% North Heights 389 243 62% 146 0 38% Park Hill 332 168 51% ) 164 49% Pike View 376 254 68% 122 ~'q 32% Seventh Street 317  312.,,. 98 1\u0026gt;1~~ 5./ 2% Elementary Total: 4279 2575 1\u0026gt;01, 1704 40% Poplar Street Middle 618 394 64% 224 3~% Lakewood Middle 719 256 36% 463 64% Ridgeroad Middle 554 421 76% 1tl 133 24% Rose City Middle 211 175/ 83% 36{\" 1~ 17% Middle School Total: 2102 1246 59% 85 41% NLRHS-East Campus 1517 867 57% ,\nv.J 650 43% NLRHS-West Campus 1469y 761,/ 52% 708....,- 48% Total High School: 298 1628 55% 1358 I~ 45% ./  ,,,. District Total: 9367 5449 58% 3918 42% 3,/t\n/P .\u0026gt;fv!:J ~ 0 ~o~ () ~. ~/.3 /fr} ~:\nJ..\n// S5~ z\n:\n\u0026lt;,~ -/,~ ~75,s 1~/7? C./ ,/4 de-c.._. 5,o~'t o?.t?I I, ~C,\u0026lt; t ::::1:,\u0026lt;\n, :st,,Jo --r:\n~1 t.!:fffO 5,\u0026lt;:.\n) / ~..y?~ 7c,. J?: lDOBll.L 10S LEA: 6002050 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENTB Y SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. l DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: AMBOYE LEMENTARYS CHOOL PAGE: 1 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 !GRADEi )TOTAL I I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ 'ill:IITE BLACK HISPANIC I PACIFIC ISL !ALASKAN NTV M F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL I 611 10 I 9 I 23 I 14 I 3 I 2 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 Di 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL I 56 I 11 I 8 I 12 I 21 r 3 r 11 0 I O I 0 I O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I or 01 01 or OJ 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROI.LI 651 111 41 241 241 11 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 631 121 101 191 191 21 01 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I 0 I 0 I 0 I O I O I 0 I 0 I O I 0 I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 531 111 71 161 191 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I O I 0 I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 521 91 101 211 101 01 21 OJ 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I 0 I 0 I 0 I O I 0 I O I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL I 0 I O I 0 I 0 I o I 0 I 0 ! 0 I O I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI O I O I OI O I O I O I O I O I O I OI O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ~NROLLI 01 or 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 OJ 01 01 0 /I~ _,?,?Y\nt, ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL I 3501 641 481 1151 1071 91 61 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE/ OJ 01 0/ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- lOOBlll.lDS LEA: 6002053 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENTB Y SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: BELWOODE LEMENTARSYC HOOL PAGE: 3 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 !GRADEi !TOTAL I I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ WHITE BLACK HISPANIC I PACIFIC ISL !ALASKAN NTV M F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL/ 191 3/ 01 5/ 111 0/ 01 0/ 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! DI 01 01 or or Di or or DI 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 261 3/ 11 121 91 11 or OJ 0-1 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I DI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 251 21 31 111 Bl 11 01 Oi 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 211 1( 51 61 91 01 01 01 0/ 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 0/ 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 or 0/ 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL I 22 I 4 I O I B I 91 11 0 I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! DI OJ 01 or DI 01 01 01 01 01 O ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 241 21 21 ?f 131 01 01 01 01 or 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 or 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 01 0-/ 01 01 Of 0/ 0/ 01 0! 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I D I D I O I O I O I O / 0 I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL/ 0/ 01 01 0/ 0/ 0/ 0/ 0/ 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 0/ 01 0/ 0/ 01 01 0/ 01 DI 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL I 13?1 151 111 49/ 591 31 01 01 0/ 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 0/ Of 01 01 0/ 01 01 01 DI 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- _}(., 1o\u0026lt;/ 3 lDDBllllOS LEA: 6002054 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENTB Y SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: BOONE PARK ELEMENTARYSC HOOL PAGE: 5 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 !GRADEi ITOTALI WHITE BLACK ASIAN/ IJ\\M INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 751 11 11 411 271 31 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O f O I O I O f O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 661 31 21 271 30f 2f 21 01 Of 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 0 f 0 I 0 I O I 0 I 0 I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL I 65 I 3 f O I 26 f 32 f 2 f O I Of Of O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O f O I O I O I D I O I D I O I D ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL I 651 li 11 311 30f 11 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O f O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 641 21 11 281 311 11 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE t O I O I OJ O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 49l 21 01 211 231 21 11 01 01 Of 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 DI Of 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI OI O I O I DI DI DI O I DI O I OI O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I D I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 DI 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I Of O I O I O I O I O I o I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----l-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 DI 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 38 4 I 12 f S I 17 6 I 17 3 I 111 7 I O I O I OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I o I O I o I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 11 _p'fl 1\u0026lt;t 100B llllOS LEA: 6002055 PAGE: 7 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENTB Y SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: CRESTWOODE LEMENTARYSC HOOL SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASI\u0026lt;AN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 791 341 251 81 101 11 01 01 01 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O 1 0 I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 681 261 201 111 101 11 01 or 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I or 01 01 01 01 or 01 Di 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 491 161 191 11 121 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 I OJ Di 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 551 251 191 Bi 21 11 01 0\\ 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O 1 0 I O I O I O ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 751 321 251 111 sr or 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 581 211 231 41 61 01 01 11 OJ 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI O I O I O I o I O I O I O I O I O I o 1 o ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 Of 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLt I O I O 1 0 I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 OJ 01 OJ or 01 01 or 01 o ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENRO1LI 01 or or 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 01 01 01 or or 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 3841 1571 1311 431 451 41 21 11 01 OJ 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I 0 I 0 I o I 0 I 0 I O I 0 I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LE:A: 6002056 PUPIL ENROLLMENTB Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 9 SIS: rpt-404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. l DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: GLENVIEWE LEMENTARYS CHOOL !GRADEi I TOTAL/ WHJ:TE M BLACK F M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC I PACIFIC ISL I ALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 251 01 11 151 91 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------T-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 32 I 4 I 3 I 10 I 14 I OI O I O I O I OI l ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 I 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 201 21 11 11 91 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 231 51 1/ 61 111 01 01 01 01 O! 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! D! 01 01 01 0/ 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 261 31 2{ 121 91 01 01 01 01 0{ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----,-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 32 I 2 I 11 18 I 11 I O I O I O ! 0 I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O 1 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI O I OI O I OI OI OI Of Of OI O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 DI DI 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0  ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI O I O I O I OI OI OI O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 158{ 161 91 681 631 11 01 01 01 01 l ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 O! 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- lOOBTU.lOS LEA: 6002057 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL FORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. l DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PAGE: 11 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 IGRADEI ITOTALI ASI:AN/ 1AM INDIAN/ WHITE BLACK HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 821 231 341 101 111 01 01 01 41 OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 861 271 351 151 71 11 01 11 01 01 0 --- --+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 Oi 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 Oi 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL I 100 I 37 I 37 I 91 15 I 11 11 0 I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+- ---+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! Oi 01 0( 01 01 01 O! 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL( 91( 291 311 14( 141 11 11 01 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE l 0 I 0 I O I 0 I 0 I 0 I O I 0 I 0 I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL I 87 I 30 I 321 81 12 I 2 I 11 0 I 2 I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 OI OJ 01 01 01 01 0! 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL I 88 I 29 I 321 10 I 14 I O I O I 11 2 I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE( 01 01 0( 0( 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O ! O I O I O I O I O I O I O l O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+----. 07 ENROLL I O I O I O I O l O I O I O I O I O I O I O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I a ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL I 5341 1751 2011 66( 731 51 31 21 91 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 Of 01 OJ or 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- /~7o j74 (g/ I~ lOOBllllOS e11,:11 SO lO f\\OIJ LEA.: 6002058 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENTB Y SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. l PAGE: 13 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 ll:56 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: LAKEWOODEL EMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi ITOTALI WHITE M BLACK F M F .l\\SIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 621 231 251 51 51 21 21 01 Oj 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 Of 01 OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 691 201 271 81 111 01 31 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL I 68 I 171 33 I 8 I 81 0 l 2 I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE l O I O I O I O I O I O I D 1 0 I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 661 24 I 22 I 11 I 8 I 1 I O I O I O I O l 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 OI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 Oi 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 631 151 241 131 81 11 21 OJ 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I o I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 571 161 131 101 141 31 11 01 OJ 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 o I 01 O I 0 I 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 01 01 0{ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI OI OI O I O I OI OI O I O I O I OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I Oj 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 3851 1151 1441 551 54( 7( 101 OI 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 Oi OJ 01 0( 0 I O I 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ~/\noi l'J l0081U. lOS 01d LEA: 6002060 PUPIL EnROLLHENT BY SCHOOL FORM PAGE: 17 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: LYNCH DRIVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IGAADEI ITOTM I WHITE M F M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC (PACIFIC ISLJALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 551 41 41 271 181 11 11 01 01 OJ 0 ------+-----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL I 551 31 31 221 271 01 O! 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 611 41 21 261 291 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 631 31 11 341 241 01 lf 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O 1 0 I O I O I O I O I O I O I OJ O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 481 21 41 221 201 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 Of 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL I 561 Sf 61 201 251 01 01 Of OJ 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0{ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O 1 0 I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI O I O I OI O I OI O I O I o I O I O J 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OJ Of 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 01 Of 01 OJ 01 01 0/ 01 01 Of 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O l O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL I 3381 211 201 1511 1431 11 21 01 Of Of 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I DI O I O I O I O I O I O ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 11 TOOBll.llOS ett,: 11 SO LO f\\Ol,J LEA: 6002061 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL FORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. l PAGE: 19 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL \\GBADEI ITO'l'AL I WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ llU1 INDIAN/ HISPANIC \\PACIFIC ISL\\ALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 301 11 21 161 101 11 01 OI 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I D I O I o I O I O I O I O I O I DI O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL I 30 I 4 I 11 12 I 12 I O I 11 O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 231 2) 01 91 101 11 01 11 Di 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE\\ 01 Of 01 Of 01 01 01 DI 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 311 21 41 121 121 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I o I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL I 48 I 4 I 3 I 12 l 27 I 11 1 I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 0\\ Of 0( 01 Of Of 01 Of 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL( 33( 21 3( 121 14I 11 01 Of 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL I O I O l O I O l O I O l O l O I O I O ! 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O 1 0 l O l O ! 0 I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! Ol 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+----. CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 OJ OJ 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 Of Di 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 1951 151 131 731 851 51 21 11 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O l O ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 1 lOOBll.l.IOS e2v:11 so L.O 1\\01,1 21  d LEA: 6002063 PUPIL ENROT.LMENTB Y SCHOOL FORM PAGE: 21 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: NO. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL !GRADEi ITOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F 1 'ASJ.AN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 761 61 101 191 241 71 10\\ 01 0\\ 0\\ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL\\ 751 91 61 301 151 61 81 Of Of 0( l ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O ! O I O I O I O I O J D ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL I 73 I 7 I 61 17 I 2 61 12 I 5 I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE 1 0 1 0 1 0 I O ! 0 I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 581 41 21 251 181 11 81 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL I 48 I 51 2 I 18 I 14 I 7 I 2 I O I O I O I O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O f O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL I 59 I 3 I 71 19 I 18 ! 5 I 7 I O I O I O I O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL I 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 0\\ 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 DI 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 0\\ 01 01 01 01 0( 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 01 01 01 Of Of OI Of Of 01 Of 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE/ Of Of 0/ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL\\ 3891 341 331 1281 1151 381 401 01 01 OJ 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 10081 Ll 1 OS e2v:11 so l.O \"ol.J El d LEA: 6002064 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL FORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 23 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 DISTRICT: N. L.ITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: PARK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IGRADEI ITOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC )PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 621 161 121 151 131 31 31 DI 01 OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL I 571 111 8 I 151 12 I 61 q I O I O I O I l ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 511 71 101 101 181 3J 21 01 01 Di 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 I O I 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 491 91 131 161 51 11 51 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL I 5q I 131 8 I 121 131 61 2 I O I O 1 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 591 81 SI 231 161 11 31 01 Of 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL I O I O I O I O I O I O I o I O I O I O I O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O 1 o I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL I O I O I O I OJ O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! OJ 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 Di 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----~-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL I 3321 641 591 911 771 201 191 01 01 01 2 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I Oi 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- lOOBll.l.lOS LEA: 6002065 PUPIL ENROJ.LMENT BY SCHOOL FORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PAGE: 25 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 IGAADEt JTOTALJ WHITE BLACK I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALA.SKAN NTV M F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 741 101 121 221 241 51 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 0 I 01 OI 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 7lf 51 101 241 281 01 21 11 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O t O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL/ 771 91 51 311 2BJ 11 21 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLJ 641 111 71 211 131 51 SJ 21 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE t O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL I 46 I 7 I 51 13 I 18 I O I 3 f O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 441 41 6/ 171 151 11 lJ 01 0/ DI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I D I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I D ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 01 01 DI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE t O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I DI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0/ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL I 3761 461 451 1281 1261 121 141 41 lf 0/ 0 ------+-----+----~+----'+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 Ot 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ~\u0026lt;tl 11 ~-! ~I lOOBIU.105 Sl  d LEA: 6002069 PUPIL ENROLLl-IBNT BY SCHOOL FORM PAGE: 29 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: SEVENTH STREET ELEM. SCHOOL !GRADEi ITOTALl WHITE M BLACK F M F ASIAN/ JAM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISL/ALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 611 01 01 251 351 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 641 01 01 26! 371 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 DI DI 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL I 63 I 11 0 I 311 30 I Of 11 0 I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 0 I 0 I 0 I O I 0 I 0 I O I O I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 401 Di 11 221 171 01 01 01 01 Of 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 4 ENROLL I 4 9 I O I O I 2 2 I 2 7 I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O 1 0 I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 401 or 01 211 191 OJ 01 01 01 01 0 ------+----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I D I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 OJ 01 01 DI O I OJ O! OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O l O l O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O l O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL I 3171 11 11 1471 1651 21 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I OJ 01 01 O! 01 01 01 DI 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 3 1 DDBll.l.105 LEA: 6002070 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. l PAGE: 31 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: LAKEWOOMDI DDLES CHOOL !GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE I M BLACK F M F ! ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 O! 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O ! 0 I O ! 0 I O I O ! 0 I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 0[ 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I o 1 0 I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OJ OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I DI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O t O t O t O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI OI OI OI O I OI OI O I O I OI O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 Oi 01 01 01 OJ 01 Of 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 01 Of Of Of 01 01 01 01 Ol 01 0 ------+-----~-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 OI 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 I 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI O I OI OI O I OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI O I O 1 0 1 0 I OI OI O I O I OI O I O ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 3211 921 94! 71! 451 81 Si 21 31 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEl OI O I O I O I O I O I OI O I O I OI 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 398! 128! 119! 75! 65( 21 Bl 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE) OJ 01 01 01 Of 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 7191 2201 2131 1461 1101 101 131 31 31 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI Oi OI 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- a~~ LEA: 6002059 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL FORM PAGE: 15 SIS: rpl:404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: POPLAR STREET MIDDLE SCHOOL !GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M BLACK F M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLJALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! OJ OJ OJ 01 01 OJ 01 01 OI 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 OJ 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 I 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 J::NROLLI O I O1 01 0 I OI O I OI OI O I OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL[ 0/ or or 01 Of 01 01 Of 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O l O l O l O I O 1 0 l O l 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL l O I O I O I O I O I Of O l O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O 1 0 l O f O I O I O 1 O l O I O l O l 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL 1 0 I O l Of O l O I O l O I O I O l O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 0{ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL f O I O I O I o ! 0 I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! Of OJ 01 Of 01 01 01 01 DI OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 61B1 1101 B41 1951 1991 191 91 01 11 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 11 01 OJ 01 11 01 OJ 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 Of 01 01 01 Of 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- OB ENROLL I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 0/ Of OJ 01 01 OJ 01 01 OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL I 61B1 1101 841 1951 1991 191 91 01 11 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 01 01 11 01 01 Oi 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ?JT- /9j ffe9/ $~ 91 d lOOBlLLlOS n T  .J LEA\n6002702 PUPIL ENROLLMENTB Y SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 39 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: RIDGEROAD CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOO !GRADEi fTOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ I.AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI O I O I OI O I OI OI O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 Of 01 01 Of Of 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI O I O I OI OI OI OI O I O I O I OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 OI 01 01 01 01 01 Of 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 01 Of Of Of Of 01 Of 01 01 0/ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 OJ 01 OJ OJ OJ 01 OJ 01 OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI O I O I OI O I OI OI O I O I O I OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 Of 01 01 0/ 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 4 ENROLLI O I O I OI O I O I OI O I O I O I OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 OJ OJ 01 01 01 Of 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 OJ OJ OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI O I O I OI OI O I O I OI OI O I OI O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I Oj Of 0/ Of 01 01 01 Of O I 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 3001 301 211 1011 1291 91 101 OJ 01 OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O .I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I o I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 2541 28) 241 1031 881 51 61 OJ Oi OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O[ 01 01 Oi Oi 01 Oi Of Di OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 5541 581 451 2041 2171 141 161 01 01 OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+----'+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002077 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL FORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL PAGE: 37 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 }GRADEi )TOTAL I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ WHITE BLACK HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLJALASI\u0026lt;AN NTV M F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL I O I O I O I O I O I O I O 1 0 I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL I O I O I O I O I O 1 0 I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I o I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLL I 14 I 3 I l I B I 2 1 0 I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 Oi 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 961 81 31 481 361 01 01 01 l( 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 Of 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+- .---+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL[ 1011 121 71 36( 451 11 01 Of Of Of 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 Of 01 01 01 OJ 01 Of 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL I 2111 231 111 921 831 11 01 0( 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- \u0026lt;i~7, ~1 17~ ~ LEA: 6002075 PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. l DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL:N LR HIGH SCHOOL-EASTC AMPUS PAGE: 34 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 !GRADEi I TOTAL I I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ WHITE BLACK HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLfALASKAN NTV M F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 09 ENROLLI 770 I 1521 135 I 2181 228 I 20 I 13 I 21 O I 21 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI OI OI O I O I OJ OI O I O I O I OI 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 10 ENROLL! 7471 1411 1591 2371 1841 131 91 21 21 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI O I O I O I O I OJ OI OJ OI O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 11 ENROLL! Of Of 01 Of Of 01 Of Of OJ Of 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O f O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 12 ENROLLI OI OI 0 I OI O I OI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0! 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 13 ENROLLf O I OI OI O I O I O I OI OI O I OI O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OI 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+----+-----+---- EE ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 Of 01 01 OJ 0/ 01 Of 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- SM ENROLLI O I OI OI OI OI OI O I O I OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 Of 01 OI OJ 01 Of 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ss ENROLLI OI O I OI OI OI OI OI OI OI O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I 0 I 0 I O I 0 I O I O I O I O I O I ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 15171 2931 2941 4551 4121 33! 221 41 21 21 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 Of OJ Of Of 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- p? ,:\ng1 gt, 7 r..,a NUMBERO F GRADUATEFSO R PREVIOUS SCHOOLY EAR TOTAL ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- GRADUATEI S OI Ol OI OI OI OI OI O I OI O I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- Has your district voted to pArticipate in School Choice? y LEA: 6002076 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCIIOOL FORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOI. CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 36 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2005 RUN: 10/19/2005 11:56 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WEST CAMPUS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- !GRADEi JTOTALJ WHITE BLACK ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC )PACIFIC ISLJALASI\u0026lt;AN NTV -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- M r M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 09 ENROL!. I 28 I 4 I 21 91 11 I l I 1 I O I O I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 10 ENROLL I 14 5 I 16 I 8 I 7 4 I 41 I 3 I 2 I 1 I O I O I o ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 I O I O ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 11 ENROLL! 6491 1351 171( 163( 156( 13( 61 31 21 OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 OJ Of Of OJ 01 01 01 Oi OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 12 ENROLL! 6471 1541 157J 1451 1621 151 71 11 41 11 l ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 OJ 01 01 OJ 01 01 Of OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 13 ENROLL I O I O I O f O I o I O I o I O I O I o I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 or 01 Of OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- EE ENROLL! 01 01 Of 01 01 Of or Of Of Of 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 OJ OJ 01 OJ 0/ Of OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- SM ENROLL I 01 Of OJ 0/ Of 01 OJ OJ 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 01 01 01 01 OJ OJ OJ or 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- $$ ENROLL I O I O I O I O I o I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I O I O I O I O I o I 0 I o I o I 0 I ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL/ H69i 3091 3381 3911 3701 321 161 5/ 6) 11 1 -----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 0/ OJ or OJ 01 OJ 0/ 01 0 M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- jji'~Jo W7 7~ I ~ I TOTAL NUMBER OF GRADUATES FOR PREVIOUS SCHOOL YEAR ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- GRADUATESI 441 I 1061 104 I 107 I 106 I 8 I 5 I 1 I 1 I 2 I l ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- Has your district voted to participate in School Choice? Y T-=z  ,.J Of.ice of Student Affairs North Little Rock School District 2700 Poplar Street North Little Rock, AR 72115-0687 (501) 771-8010 FrancicaJJ.Jackson, Director DATE:_I_J_-_9_-_tJ___S - _ ro: __ H_J-dly_R,_a_11r._.\n.e1\u0026lt;_-_,__-__ {)_j)lr) _ FAX: FROM:~~_a_11._Ja_ClL/d--_\"_'-_-boY_1 _ FAX: _______ PHONE: ________ _ COMENTS: _______________ _ This fax is _3_ page (s) including the cover page- If you do not receive all the pages, please call our oflice at (501) 771-8010. 1008 l U. 10S BUILDING CAPACITIES Location : Capacity . Enrollment\n% of Capacity\n2005-2006\nWEST CAMPUS I 1700' 1315 77% EAST CAMPUS i 1556i 15171 97% ! LAKEWOOD MIDDLE\n779! 719\\ 92% RIDGEROAD MIDDLE CHARTER ' 791 \\ 554: 70% ROSE CITY MIDDLE I 466l 2121 45% POPLAR STREET MIDDLE\n9381 6181 66% l * Argenta Academy i 173! I 1781 103% AMBOY ELEMENTARY i 462', 3101 80% BELWOOD ELEMENTARY\n216i 137! 63% BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY I - I 602/ 4401 73% CRESTWOODE LEMENTA RY 4481 384! I 86% i GLENVIEWE LEMENTARY 254/ 1781 70% ' 5341 - INDIAN HILLS ELEMENT ARY ! 586! 91% I LAKEWOOD ELEMENT ARY ! 4251 3851 91% LYNCH DRIVE ELEMENT ARY I 549! 3781 69% I MEADOWP ARK ELEMENTARY\n! 257! 1951 76% NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENT ARY i 559i 429I 77% PARK HILL ELEMENTA RY II 3671 332! 90% PIKE VIEW ELEMENT ARY i 5071 416! 82% REDWOOD PRESCHOOL ! 2281 2281 100% SEVENTH STREET ELEMENT ARY ' 516! 3571 69% I TOTALS! 123791 9876I 79% i * Included 2 4 for Infant and Toddler program. 2  a I008 I LL. I OS Ref: ENROLlCL Date: 11/09/05 Time: 11:17:54 SCHOOL: REDWOOD GRADE TOTAL I 142 SN 0 J 71 SN 0 \u0026lt;pJ.scHOOL 213 SN 0 TOTALS STUDENT POPULATION BY SCHOOL NOVEMBER 9, 2005 PRE-SCHOOL WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI M F M F M F M F 10 8 46 70 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 27 37 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 73 107 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.3% 84.5% 5.2% .0% ~~ /\u0026lt;iO // lOOBll.L. lOS AM IND/ALS NAT M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% Officeo f DesegregationM onitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas To: Karl Brown, Assistant Superintendent Pulaski County Special School District Bobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent North Little Rock School District Junious Babbs, Associate Superintendent Little Rock School District ~llyRamer Date: October 17, 2005 Re: October l Enrollment Count One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 We are in the process of preparing our annual enrollment and racial balance report. Please forward to our office the official October l enrollment count which each district submits to the ADE as soon as it is available. Also please include the building capacities for 2005-06. You may email this information to paramer@aristotle.net or fax it to 371-0100. If the information will not be available before the end of this month, please notify us immediately. Thanks. Officeo f DesegregationM onitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas To: Karl Brown, Assistant Superintendent Pulaski County Special School District Bobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent North Little Rock School District Junious Babbs, Associate Superintendent Little Rock School District F@ony Ramer Date: October 17, 2005 Re: October 1 Enrollment Count One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 We are in the process of preparing our annual enrollment and racial balance report. Please forward to our office the official. October 1 enrollment count which each district submits to J}Je ADE as soon as it is available. Also please include the building capacities for 2005-06. You may email this information to paramer@aristotle.net or fax it to 371-0100. If the information will not be available before the end of this month, please notify us immediately. Thanks. Officeo f DesegregationM onitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas To: Karl Brown, Assistant Superintendent Pulaski County Special School District Bobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent North Little Rock School District Junious Babbs, Associate Superintendent Little Rock School District F~olly Ramer Date: October 17, 2005 Re: October 1 Enrollment Count One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 We are in the process of preparing our annual enrollment and racial balance report. Please forward to our office the official October 1 enrollment count which each district submits to the ADE as soon as it is available. Also please include the building capacities for 2005-06. You may email this information to paramer@aristotle.net or fax it to 371-0100. If the information will not be available before the end of this month, please notify us immediately. Thanks. 11/10/2005 11:11 501-447-5251 To: FACILITIES SERVICES PAGE 01/03 Facility Services Departme11t 3601 South Bryant Street Little Rock, AR 72204 _..O-=ffi=c=..).e- '.-.4..4,:~-{7.'.-.-=5_5=_20=1 5 =0 -=.F.a.. x...: (501) 447-5251 . From: ?axed to phone#\n1 7\n -() / {)C) Number of pages mcluding cover sheet _______ _ . I l~/~0/2005 11:11 501-447-5251 FACILITIES SERVICES PAGE 02/03 2005-2006 Capacities SCHOOL Capacity CentraHl S 2276 Fair HS 1200 Hal/HS 1754 McClellaHn S 1440 ParkvlewM ag.H S 1200 Sub-Total 7870 CloverdalMe iddle 885 DunbaMr iddle 888 ForesHt eightsM iddle 780 HendersoMn iddle 960 Mabe/valMe iddle 681 Mann Middle 900 Puat s kiH eightsM iddle 858 SouthwesMt iddle 912 Su~Total 6864 Bale 488 Baseline 360 Booker 645 Brady 528 Carver 556 Chicot 509 Cloverdale 489 Dodd 271 Fair Park 304 ForesPt ark 400 Franklin 532 Fulbright 565 GeyerS prings 358 Gibbs 321 Jefferson 471 King 715 Mabe/vale 443 McDermott 453 Meadowcliff 358 , .. -:\na ...,.. -- I --- OtterC reek 537 11/10/2005 11:11 PulaskHi eights Rightsell Rockefeller Romine stephens Terry Wakefield Washington Watson WesternH ills Williams Wilson Woodruff Sub-Total rand Tota( 501-447-5251 350 296 481 507 646 575 482 836 591 320 585 340 314 15909 30643 FACILITIES SERVICES -AtJ\n: 5,~~t\n. ,~33 -J0,3(',,,e\u0026gt; PAGE 03/03 LRSDO FFICIALE NROLLMENT 2005-06 vs 2004-05 1-0ct-05 1-0ct-04 HIGHS CHOOLS '- B W O TOTAL .%B LK-+_- _,__B_ -+---w--+-- o_+-T_O_TA_L--+-%_B_L_K__, CENTRAL 1273 1033 116 2422 53% 1125 981 97 2203 51% FAIR 1006 127 36 1169 86% 897 125 36 1058 85% HALL 1083 151 155 1389 78% 1103 184 177 1464 75% MCCLELLAN 779 50 35 864 90% 849 51 25 925 92% PARKVIEW 559 496 74 1129 49% 565 465 78 1108 51% i:.-A:_.=_C_..: :C ---1-_ _:_:10:..::9+--_1.:..:8+----'2+-----'1=29=+--__::_84:..:.%=+ ---1~:-..-:'-:81+1'---=--2-+=-6-+_-- _:_:13:..::6+----=8=2'c.:.i1/, ALC 193 5 2 200 96% 164 12 2 178 92% FEbDER = =-32 2------1 v\n1-\"\"---- IAIT -\n--\n: ----=- ----=- SUB TOTAL 5060 1894 421 7375 69% MIDDLES CHOOLS 29 4844 17 1853 2 423 48 7120 60% 68% CLOVERDALE 491 27 118 636 77% 560 24 98 682 82% DUNBAR 531 218 62 811 65% 453 223 71 747 61% FORESTH EIGHTS HENDERSON _:5c:_31+----'1..::21:.+--_..::24-'+---=6-:-.+c-7-6--::=.J5-3--::'-..7:39:J:_.._-_-:' _-':-_l,1 3::..:3+-----'2=2~+- - 77% 503 65 62 630 80% 518 57 55 630 82% MABEVLA LE 519 '--7.:J_7 ___.:1.:J7'----= 6138 5'/o_ 515 102 1-ZL- 634 81% MANN 429 365 56 850 50% 439 368 66 873 52% PULASKHI EIGH~+-- 4_1_1_ 3_0_,7 1_',-6- _7_34__,_----'56'1~ 404~ 2_95__,__ 9 708 57% SOUTHWEST _4'-'1_-' -'9_ _.c_19:.J..__=2_2:.J0. ..'- 9:..c1-'-%+----+--4--'6-'-6_+ --1..:_5+--_--'1-\"2!--4--93 94% ALC 80'- ~'\"- _1,__ 8_7 92% , ___ 77+- Jl+-- __Q~ ~- 93% - fE,crn-ma===....\n=:i\n.... ~ -, Ot- ~ ,. .. 0 ,- - IAi..-+,-AGENCIES\n~ 1\n'-- 2L ~-- ~ 27 13 0 40 68% SUBTOTAL 8,\n~ ~J\n: ~~~\n_:_:~\n.c_:-,i-- 1-___c3:..::99=--=_2-1--_123356~0 -+-_5_5_78+- 72% ELEMENTARY BALE , 273 23 ~,_ 3~'-- 8~'-- ~L- ~ 31 319 82% BASELINE 219 17 60 296 74% 235 25 -1!~ 2Q1~ 81% BOOKER _ 3~~2~~~ 607 53% 32~ ~+-- 2~ 605 53% BRADY 332 40 22L_ 3~ 84%'-- 248 48 22 318 78% -L-CARVER 290 211 32 533 _5 4_%__ _ , _, 2~L- ~f-- 32 496 52% CHICOT ~~34 112 564 74% CLOVERDALE , 85 7 21 113 75% DODD _ 1~ 80 47 28i) 56%'- FAIR PARK -+-- 86 38 6 130 66'(, FORESTP ARK , 81' -- 309 17 ~ 1- 20'/o_ FRANKLIN -'- ~'-- 10L_ 3_~ 44_9_ 97~+-- FULBRIGHT 152 445+-- 36+-- 6~~4'1o GEYERS PRINGS 301 15 17 333 _!Q'(o'- GIBBS '--158._ 11_7 22 29] 53% JEFFERSON ~ 1~ 294~ 6~ 44J 32'/o KING 409 1~ ~,_ 6_1J'\"- 66'1'-- MABELVALE L_ 257 '-- 50 3! 338.__.?_6% MCDERMOTT _ 2~~ 115 _+-- 458L_ 65%._ MEADOWCLIFF 289 42 32,__~~0~'-- MITCHELL ~sed_ +-- __,_ __ 1- _ '- -'- OTTERCREEK 374 154 52 580 64% PULASKHI EIGHTS 152_ 167'-- 15'- 334 45% RIGHTSELL -'-- 178 4 2'- 184 97% ROCKEFELLER 358 107 12 4!!_ 75'/o__ ROMINE STEPHENS TERRY WAKEFIELD WASHINGTON WATSON WESTERNH ILLS WILLIAMS WILSON WOODRUFF SUBTOTAL 290 28 47 365 79% 527 11 ~ 54.Z 96% _ 3~_ 185 96 ~- 57%_ -'- 366 20 10~ ~ _74% _ 516 78 50 644 80% 419 7 '- ~ 45~ 91% 220_ 48 1~f--286 77% 233 177 50 460 51% 242 15 19 276 88'/o_ _L 219 17 2 238 92%  1 4?\ntw --. 9178 3338 1112 13628 67% 717? 33d.. 11// /3,_~( (,J) GRANDT OTAL 18166 6445 1913 26524 68% 10-21-05 392 44 100 536 73% 27_,_ __ 17+ -- 67+ -- 360 77% _!i!._ __JJ_ ~~ ~ :- 54% ,_ _ 14_1 _... ... 37 9 ~ 1- 75% 1!1- 22Q~ 2Q 361 20% 373 9 __2 387 96% ~~ 381 29 554 26% 263 15 21 299 88% 164 1~~ 26'- 310~53% 1~1-- ~l-- 6 ~I-- 36% 363 211 33 60? 60% 2~L_ ~+-- ! 257 80% 253 102 51 4061-- 62% 272 4~._ ~+-- 34J~78% 150: _ 1 156 96% 314 162 35 511 60% 140 .!E__ _!! 21! 49% 2~- 0 0 2~ 100% 3~ ~- 21 45~ 67% 245 27 49 321 76% 473 1i_ 11 499 95% 307_ ~- 81 5!!__ 53% 353 12 86 ~ 78% 4ii- 74 62 563 76% 439_ 11 6 ~_96% 206 43 13 262 79% 240 172 49- 46! 52% 255 16 14 285 _ 89% 21~ 18 _1 235 91% 16 42 2 60-27% 88~f-- 3242_ 1039 _ 13170 68% 17725 6331 1812 25868 68% Polly From: Eggleston, Deana [Deana.Eggleston@lrsd.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 8:24 AM To: paramer@aristotle.net Subject: 05-06 vs 04-05 October 1 Official.xis This is a \"corrected\" copy. The totals are the same but the race is different. Thanks! Deana 10/25/2005 Page 1 of 1 LRSDO FFICIALE NROLLMENT 2005-06v s.2 004-05 1-Oct-05 -f--- - ----,..---t----- HIGH SCHOOLS CENTRAL B w O TOTAL % BLK 1273 1033 116 2422 53% FAIR 1006 127..... 36- 1169 86% HALL MCCLELLAN PARKVIEW 1083 151 155 1389 78% _......,.._7_7_91---50- 35- 864- 90%~ 559 496 74 1129 49% ACC ALC FELDER ALT. AGENCIES SUB TOTAL --~~-10-_9,_ _ 18- 2- 12984%- 193 5 -2- 200- 96% -+---3-s21-- 2 1 35 91% 26 11 0 37 70% 50601--_1~89~31--_42_1+--~7_37~4+--_6_9_%_,__ MIDDLES CHOOLS CLOVERDAL-E- +-4-9-1+---\"fi- 118 636 77/o- ---,-~r -~+----+-- -~ - DUNBAR 531 218 62 811 65% FORESTH EIGHTS 531 121 24 676 79% HENDERSON-- +-5-0~31---6-51---~--63-01---8~- - - ---+-~+--~-+-- MABELVALE 519 77 17 613 85% MANN 429 365= 56~5-0+---5-0-1/,1--- PULASKHI EIGHTS 411 307 16 734 56%- SOUTHWEST 419 19 22- 460 91% ALC -- 80 5 2 87 92%- FELDER 21 11 of-- 3- s1o/\"t ALT. AGENCIES -- 131 8 1~ 22 59% SUB TOTAL + 3929 121! 3~5522 71% ELEMENTARY -+ l- $. BALE 2~ 23 38 33~2% BASELINE JJ19I 17 60 296 74% BOOKER 24 253 30 607 53% BRADY ~=- 40r 22 394 84% CARVER 290 211 I 32 533 54% CHICOT 1 418- ~112. 564J_ 74% CLOVERDAL-E --r 85 7 21I 113T ~ DODD 162 80 471 28il_ 56% FAIR PARK 86 3~ 6 130 66% FORESTP ARK 81 309 17t 407 20% FRANKLIN FULBRIGHT GEYERS PRINGS GIBBS JEFFERSON KING 427 I 152 1 301 1ssf 142 409 MABELVALE --+-- 257 MCDERMOTT 296 MEADOWCLIFF 289 MITCHELL closed OTTERC REEK 374 PULASKHI EIGHTS 152 RIGHTSELL 178 ROCKEFELLER 358 ROMINE 290 STEPHENS 527 TERRY 375 WAKEFIELD 366 WASHINGTON 516 WATSON 419 WESTERNH ILLS 220 10 445 15 117 294 187 50 115 42 154 167 4 107 28 11 185 20 78 7 48 WILLIAMS WILSON WOODRUFF ALT. AGENCIES SUBTOTAL 233 177 242 15 219 17 8 33 9178 3338 GRANDT OTAL 18167 6444 10-21-05 3 36 17 22 6 23 31 47 32 52 15 2 12 47 9 96 105 50 32 18 440 633 333 297 442 619 338 458 363 97% 24% 90% 53% 32% 66% 76% 65% 80% 580 64% 334 45% 184 97% 477 75% 365 79% 547 96% 656 57% 491 74% 644 80% 458 91% 286 77% 50 460 51% 88% 92% 19% 19 276 2 238 1 42 1112 13628 67% 1913 26524 68% 1-Oct-04  B -~ W -:-0--+-T-OTAL % BLK 112~..... 981 97 22~~51% 897 1251-- 36 ~ 1058 85% 1103 184 177 1464 75% 849~ 51~ 25- 925 92% 565 ---,46cc5+---7=8-t-----1~10~8+-%-5 1 112 is~ 6~ 136~82% 164- -1-2+---21---178~ 92% t- - 29 17 48~ 60% 4844 1853. 423 7120 68% 560 24 - 98 682..... 82% 453- ~2~23-+---71-+--~7~47-+--61% _5_3--\u0026lt;3--133 22- 688- 77% --+---+---+- 518 57 55 630 82% -- -- ---+--- 515 102 17 634 81% 439 368 66 - 873 52% -40c-4+.l--c-29\"\"5+-- 9- -4-~--I~1 ---- J:_ ___i_ 21t 13 al-- _3_99_2+1--12_3_61315-0-- 262 26+- 3~ 235 251 3.lj_ 323 2__ 29 708 57% 493 94% 831 93% Ts8% 5578 72% 319 82% 29L81% 605 53% 2481 ~ 22 318 78% 2~2~ 32 496 392 44 100 536 52% 73% 276' 17 ~ 360 77% 141 77 43 2~ 54% 141 37 9 187 75% 71 373 144 263 164 155 363 205 253 272 150 314 140 262 306 245 473 307 353 427 439 206 240 255 215 16 8889 17725 270 20 9 5 381_L_ 29 15 21 120 26 268 6 211- 33 37 102 49 5 162 137 0 126 27 15 189 12 74 11 43 172 16 18 42 3242 6331 15 51 28 1 + 35 9 0 21 49 11 81 86 62 6 13 49 14 2 2 1039 1812 361_,_ 20% 387 96% 554 26% 299 88% 310 53% 429 36% 607 60% 257 406 349 156 511 286 262 453 321 499 577 451 563 456 262 461 285 235 60 13170 25868 80% 62% 78% 96% 60% 49% 100% 67% 76% 95% 53% 78% 76% 96% 79% 52% 89% 91% 27% 68% 68% PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 925 East Dixon Road/P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 72216-8601 (501) 490-2000 TO: Polly Ramer, Office of Desegregation Monitoring FROM: ~ Karl Brown, Assistant Superintendent of Equity \u0026amp; Pupil Services SUBJECT: PCSSD October 1, 2004 Enrollment Count DATE: October 24, 2005 Attached you will find an official October 1, 2005 enrollment count for the 2005- 2006 school year. mh Attachment 10/'1/05 PULASKIC OUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRICT PAGE 13:21:05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID #: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE 001 Homer Adkins Elem. School Class Capacity: 526 PK 4 8 2 7 0 0 21 K 12 13 14 13 1 1 54 1 10 8 7 6 0 2 33 2 17 9 9 5 0 0 40 3 6 7 10 6 1 0 30 4 15 4 4 11 0 0 34 \n/1 5 7\nJ-1 7 9 7 0 0 30 Tot. Including PK 71 56 55 //0 55 2 .6 3 242/ 52.48% 47.52% School Tot. 67 48 53 48 3 221 52. 04\\ 47.96% 002 Crystal Hill Magnet Elem. Class Capacity: 870 PK 17 14 12 14 2 1 60 K 18 32 45 37 3 3 138 l 27 34 32 33 1 1 128 2 28 30 34 30 2 2 126 3 30 28 33 27 1 2 121 4 25 29 30 32 1 0 117 .\n/1/4 5 24 0 34 24 ~ 20 0 c?I 2 104 Tot. Including PK 169 J1 201 210 ./ 0 193 10 11 794  4 6. 60% 53. 40% School Tot. 152 187 198 179 8 10 734 46.19% 53 .81% 003 Baker Interdistrict Elem. Class Capacity: 428 K 4 7 22 19 2 5 59 1 6 9 29 23 5 0 72 2 4 5 26 27 8 6 76 3 8 4 19 20 4 7 62 4 8 8 18 ) 17 0 ~,)/ 5 56 5 9 4 22 12 1 1 49 c?-,07- School Tot. 39 1tt 37 136 ~? 118 20 24 374  20.32% 79.68% ------ 005 Bayou Meta Elementary Class Capacity: 697 PK 0 0 8 12 0 0 20 K l 2 36 28 1 4 72 1 2 2 32 26 0 1 63 2 0 2 30 24 3 6 65 3 0 1 42 20 1 3 67 -I'\" 4 2 3 37 27 3 1 73 5 0 iv 1 34 j't1 33 2 ~-5 0 70 Tot. Including PK 5 11 219 170 10 15 430 V 3. 72% 96. 28% School Tot. 5 11 211 158 10 15 410 3.90\\ 96.10% 008 College Station Elem. Class Capacity: 439 K 6 10 2 1 0 0 19 1 7 8 1 3 1 0 20 2 9 6 4 7 0 1 27 3 10 10 9 10 0 0 39 4 9 5 19 12 1 2 48 307- 5 10 / I?(? 10 12 q:r 12 2 1 2 48 School Tot. 51 49 47 45 5 201  49.75% 50.25\\ -------- -------- 10/21/05 PULASKIC OUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRICT PAGE 2 13:21:05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID#: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE 011 Warren Dupree Elementary Class Capacity: 4 98 PK 4 4 6 6 0 1 21 K 13 9 18 11 1 3 55 1 8 9 13 17 1 1 49 2 10 11 13 10 0 1 45 3 13 9 18 14 2 2 58 4 11 9 8 8 0 0 36 -1/fl 5 4 8 9 1~/ 10 2\n6 1 34 Tot. Including PK 63 //\u0026gt;~ 59 85 76 6 9 298 ,/' 40. 94\\ 59.06% School Tot. 59 55 79 70 6 8 277 41.161 58. 84% 013 Fuller Middle School Class Capacity: 1360 I LJ.. 72 64 55 54 11 9 265 7 74 62 49 54 5 5 249 8 59 75 51 47 6 6 244 ~1. 205 .i./0~ 201 155 ~,o 155 22 ~ School Tot. 20 758  53.561 46.44% 015 Harris Elementary Class Capacity: 906 PK 18 13 1 0 0 0 32 K 17 16 2 3 1 0 39 1 14 15 3 3 0 0 35 2 21 23 0 1 0 0 45 3 18 18 4 1 0 0 41 ?J1el o 4 14 18 4 4 0 1 41 5 10 ).~l 16 6 _?3 1 0 ~ 0 33 Tot. Including PK 112 119 20 13 1 266  86.84' 13.161 School Tot. 94 106 19 13 234 85. 47% 14. 531 017 Oakbrooke Elementary Class Capacity: 553 PK 8 5 15 8 1 1 38 K 12 5 31 32 2 2 84 1 12 11 21 23 1 2 70 2 7 10 25 17 3 0 62 3 9 8 21 16 3 3 60 4 7 13 24 16 2 1 63 5 9 c)_ila\nJ.'o 7 19 '?9 21 0 al 0 56 Tot. Including PK 64 59 156 )_ 133 12 9 433- 28.411 71.591 School Tot. 56 54 141 125 11 8 395 27.85% 72 .15% 018 Jacksonville Elementary Class Capacity: 850 PK 12 10 8 5 2 2 39 K 27 28 18 17 7 3 100 1 25 18 15 17 6 4 85 2 29 18 17 16 4 4 88 3 27 27 29 13 3 3 102 4 34 19 18 7 2 0 80 fol\" 5 20 ~' 27 13 9 16 1 ~J5 4 81 Tot. Including PK 174 147 118\n).!!\u0026gt; 91 25 20 575 V- 55.83% 44.17% School Tot. 162 137 110 86 23 18 536 55.78% 44.22% 019 Jacksonville Middle Schoo Class Capacity: 1970 10/\u0026lt;1/05 PULASKIC OUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRICT PAGE 3 13:21:05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID#: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE /J 6 82 74 62 58 7 4 287 7 75 )6((, 82 83 55 6 5 306 1517~ 8 74 71 74 .,/0~ 70 7 ~ 3 299 School Tot. 231 227 219 183 20 12 892 ,,,- 51.35% 48.65% 020 Jacksonville High School Class Capacity: 1360 9 106 68 86 77 6 8 351 10 78 71 83 80 7 2 321 11 54 56 63 60 5 3 241 -vt.1 ., 12 40 ~49 51 xt., 41 69 2 ~'/\n5 216 School Tot. 278 r-') 244 283 286 20 18 1129 46.24% 53.76% 021 Landmark Elementary Class Capacity: 711 PK 8 9 11 9 1 1 39 K 11 10 14 16 2 0 53 1 8 8 15 11 3 0 45 2 10 14 12 11 1 1 49 3 9 10 10 12 3 1 45 4 12 10 9 7 1 2 41 #1 5 10 ,~~ 10 11 ,rj? 11 1 ,1 0 43 Tot. Including PK 68 71 82 77 12 5 315  44.131 55. 87% School Tot. 60 62 71 68 11 276 44.20% 55.80% 022 Lawson Elementary Class Capacity: 372 K 5 6 23 15 2 3 54 1 7 4 23 16 0 0 50 2 6 6 15 16 0 1 44 3 5 7 24 20 1 3 60 4 3 9 16 17 1 0 46 :?,17. 5 10 3 14 Jl'l 20 0 1 48 School Tot. 36 ,,1 35 115 104 ,!Y' 8 302  23.51% 7 6. 4 9% 023 Tolleson Elementary Class Capacity: 561 PK 1 l 11 3 2 1 19 K 10 6 21 18 3 2 60 1 9 8 13 12 1 2 45 2 8 4 15 11 0 0 38 3 6 B 19 6 2 4 45 4 4 6 13 ~97,) ,~~ 9 0 1 33 5 4 ~~ 9 15 18 1 ~~ 4 51 Tot. Including PK 42 42 107 77 9 14 291 .,,.- 28.87\\ 71.131 School Tot. 41 41 96 74 13 272 30.151 69.851 025 Maumelle Middle School Class Capacity: 1360 6 59 34 71 71 6 245 J\n-7 7 46 48 47 J.J/0 51 6 202 School Tot. 105 1 82 118 122 8 _\n0 12 447 ,, 41. 831 58 .171 027 Arnold Drive Elementary Class Capacity: 453 1-0/21/05 PULASKI COUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRICT PAGE 13:21:05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID #: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE PK 1 3 14 14 5 3 40 K 10 11 17 15 3 2 58 1 10 5 15 22 2 0 54 2 7 5 10 13 2 1 38 3 7 6 10 9 1 2 35 4 3 6 14 8 0 1 32 ,:9/7 c\u0026gt; 5 4 12 14 ~7 0 1 38 Tot. Including PK 42 qo 48 94 (1, 88 13 ~1, 10 295  30. 51% 69. 4 9% School Tot. 41 45 80 74 8 255 33.731 66. 27% 028 Oak Grove Elementary Class Capacity: 626 PK 7 13 21 16 5 3 65 K 6 8 21 18 3 2 58 1 7 5 15 19 3 2 51 2 3 9 21 10 2 2 47 3 5 8 10 10 l 1 35 4 5 2 9 15 0 2 33 ,?7/t\u0026gt; 5 7 13 t?'o'3 10 l ~1 0 35 Tot. Including PK 40 ~n 49 110 98 15 12 324  27.47% 72. 531 School Tot. 33 36 89 82 10 9 259 26. 64% 73. 36% 029 Oak Grove High School Class Capacity: 1130 8 27 29 42 37 2 3 140 9 40 32 57 37 3 5 174 10 35 20 34 22 3 1 115 11 19 12 43 31 2 2 109 ~9 /4 12 19 6 12 27 5~ 28 1 2 89 School Tot. 140 c) 105 203 155 11 ~ 13 627  39.071 60.93\\ 031 Joe T. Robinson Elementar Class Capacity: 544 PK 3 3 6 6 1 2 21 K 4 6 17 25 1 6 59 1 11 4 19 15 3 5 57 2 3 12 14 16 1 2 48 3 8 9 18 20 1 1 57 4 11 9 ,\n2.C?J~ f: ,)~~ 17 1 0 62 5 10 '\"~ 13 24 4 ?1 l 67 Tot. Including PK 50 56 113 123 12 17 371  28.57\\ 71. 431 School Tot. 47 53 107 117 11 15 350 28.57% 71. 43% 032 Joe T. Robinson High Scho Class Capacity: 770 9 48 30 51 45 3 1 178 10 48 31 59 36 3 2 179 11 33 36 57 u/~lo {6 52 2 1 181 12 36 J\u0026lt;:\u0026amp;'.\u0026gt; 21 42 36 0 1 136 School Tot, 165 118 209 169 8 5 674 y 41.99% 58.01% 034 Scott Elementary Class Capacity: 294 PK 1 2 3 10 0 0 16 K 2 3 9 10 2 0 26 1 5 3 7 7 0 0 22 2 1 2 9 3 0 1 16 10/21/05 PULASKIC OUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRICT PAGE 5 13:21:05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID ff: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE 3 3 3 6 6 0 0 18 4 3 2 6 4 1 0 16 ,\ni.11:i 5 4 2 7 4 0 ~ 0 17 Tot. Including PK 19 ~~ 17 47 11 44 3 131  27.48% 72. 52% School Tot. 18 15 44 34 3 115 28.70% 71.30% 036 No,,wood Middle School Class Capacity: 1030 6 40 29 56 56 8 5 194 ~?l\" 7 46 40 66 73 8 4 237 8 46 ,?.~, 40 73 ~,i 74 2 d1, 2 237 School Tot. 132 109 195 203 18 11 668  36.08% 63.92% 037 Sherwood Elementary Class Capacity: 561 PK 3 1 3 2 0 0 9 K 13 13 24 20 1 0 71 1 12 12 19 30 1 1 75 2 11 12 27 23 0 1 74 3 10 5 14 11 4 0 44 4 12 7 22 ~!1 94 29 0 1 71 5 17 ,~5 18 14 1 /0 0 57 Tot. Including PK 78 57 127 ,\nr. 129 3 401 ....- 33.67% 66.33% School Tot. 75 56 124 127 7 3 392 33.42% 66.58% 039 Sylvan Hills Elementary Class Capacity: 606 PK 4 4 7 3 1 0 19 K 14 11 19 20 3 0 67 1 14 11 22 19 1 2 69 2 10 18 16 19 1 1 65 3 13 14 13 19 0 1 60 4 11 17 19 Jbf\n.~\" 22 1 1 71 5 19 ,1Y i2 20 20 0 16 3 74 Tot. Including PK 85 87 116 122 8 425..,, 40.47% 59.53% School Tot. 81 83 109 119 8 406 40.39% 59. 61% 040 Sylvan Hills Middle Schoo Class Capacity: 1080 6 43 47 50 66 9 5 220 7 55 48 61 56 5 8 233 -3/~,. 8 50\nl.~59 76 ~71 62 7 -1/0 6 260 School Tot. 148 154 187 184 21 19 713 42.36% 57. 64% 041 Sylvan Hills High School Class Capacity: 1120 9 68 70 79 73 3 8 301 10 45 55 73 59 6 3 241 11 57 J:\nlo .1/l'1 47 62 116 70 7 \u0026gt;I! 2 245 12 33 54 73 59 9 3 231 School Tot. 203 226 287 261 25 16 1018 42.14' 57.86% 042 Clinton Inter. Magnet Sch Class Capacity: 840 PK 16 17 13 15 67 io121105 PULASKI COUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRICT PAGE 6 13:21:05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID ff: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE K 26 32 30 25 5 2 120 1 25 33 30 28 6 1 123 2 30 30 22 23 2 1 108 3 21 27 20 16 3 5 92 ~,7, 4 20 ~~i 21 13 21 1 1 77 5 27 21 16\n'8? 17 3 J1 1 85 Tot. Including PK 165 181 144 145 22 15 672  51. 4 9% 48. 51% School Tot. 149 164 131 130 20 11 605 51. 74% 48.26% 045 Cato Elementary School Class Capacity: 800 PK 6 4 9 8 0 2 29 K 14 6 25 12 1 1 59 1 4 6 17 17 1 2 47 2 9 6 22 11 1 1 50 3 12 4 8 22 1 1 48 4 9 7 16 25 1 3 61 ~97 5 6 ,oo 7 19 ~~ 22 1 ,~ 0 55 Tot. Including PK 60 40 116\n)_ 117 10 34 9 .,,,. 28.65% 71. 351 School Tot. 54 36 107 109 8 320 28.131 71. 881 046 Pinewood Elementary Class Capacity: 677 PK 9 15 8 5 1 3 41 K 22 18 21 15 3 0 79 1 12 17 12 25 2 3 71 2 19 15 14 25 1 1 75 3 20 14 15 13 6 1 69 4 11 12 13 22 3 1 62 -111' 5 19 _\n,l 18 18 J'Jp 14 3 ~~ 1 73 Tot. Including PK 112 109 101 119 19 10 470  47.02\\ 52.98% School Tot. 103 94 93 114 18 7 429 45.92l 54.081 047 Wilbur Mills High School Class Capacity: 1130 9 93 94 74 47 3 0 311 10 52 68 51 51 6 5 233 11 60 'Jl\" 6?-~ 75 36 ~l'.j? 61 4 2 238 12 60 52 35 40 0 ~? 3 190 School Tot. 265 289 196 199 13 10 972  57.001 43.001 04 9 North Pulaski High School Class Capacity: 1050 9 51 42 102 81 9 4 289 10 47 44 68 69 5 2 235 rtl~ 11 46 !)?\n? 43 53 ~~-':2 53 5 1 201 12 32 32 46 53 6 i~ 3 172 ~ School Tot. 17 6 161 269 256 25 10 897 / 37. 571 62. 4 31 050 Robinson Middle School Class Capacity: 650 r j77\" 6 / 20 26 50 35 5 0 136 -'I\" 26 19 42 28 2 3 120 8 36 ,~'!\u0026gt; 28 58 \u0026gt;11 34 0 ,~ 2 158 School Tot. 82 73 150 97 5 414  37.44% 62. 561 l~/21/05 PULASKIC OUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRICT PAGE 7 13:21:05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID#: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE I-I.ALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE 051 Murrell Taylor Elementary Class Capacity: 566 PK 6 7 6 2 0 0 21 K 20 13 18 16 0 2 69 1 18 18 9 16 0 2 63 2 12 21 16 16 1 0 66 3 16 10 12 13 0 1 52 4 14 ~J7., 1 21 12 9 0 1 57 5 14 14 13\nft1 9 0 1 0 50 Tot. Including PK 100 ~p 104 86 81 378 ~ 53.97% 46.03% School Tot. 94 97 80 79 6 357 53.50% 46.50% 052 Pine Forest Elementary Sc Class Capacity: 554 K 15 7 29 24 1 1 77 1 12 12 36 24 3 1 88 2 15 9 29 31 3 1 88 3 13 14 29 30 0 3 89 4 15 15 28 33 0 1 92 ~1/0 5 14 1?1 10 24 ,tb 28 0 ,~ 2 78 School Tot. 84 67 175 J 170 9 512 ......... 2 9. 4 9% 70. 51% 053 Bates Elementary Class Capacity: 863 PK 9 5 6 6 0 1 27 K 21 22 27 24 2 0 96 1 21 18 18 14 2 2 75 2 28 17 26 16 2 4 93 3 16 21 15 18 1 0 71 4 21 t\u0026gt;p ~4 22 18 ~?\n4 15 1 5 82 5 26 19 14 19 5 .\n7 2 85 Tot. Including PK 142 124 124 112 13 14 529 ...- 50.28% 49.72% School Tot. 133 119 118 106 13 13 502 50.20% 49.80% ... 10/21/05 PAGE 8 13:21:05 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID#: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE TOTAL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT ************************* -PK- -------------------13-7- ------1-3-8- -----17-0- ------1-5-1- --------23- --------25- ------64-4- -----4-2.-70-\\ -------57-.3-0-\\ ------ 303 286 297 285 279 284 316 294 278 294 272 274 275 274 503 423 426 408 394 379 344 434 426 381 352 387 369 340 50 43 37 39 20 28 44 42 34 38 44 30 26 29 1626 1490 1473 1400 1384 1361 1347 39.96% 60.04\\ Elementary W/0 PRE-K -20-50- . -1-96-1 ---2-877-\n5 ~2168-9 -- --2-61- 55. -2-4-3 -- -1-0-08-1- -----4-2.-52-\\ --- --6-3.-87-1- -- ----------- I cF\\}'.-'-4-'-,- ----1-: ?-5- ----------=-:-\n-------------d--o-- 1-w- ------ Elementary With PRE-K 2187 2099 3047 2840 284 268 10725  39. 96\\ 60. on 7 322 299 348 317 30 31 1347 8 292 302 374 324 24 22 1338 9 406 336 449 360 27 26 1604 _i/{)fa 10 305 289 368 317 30 15 1324 11 269 269 314 327 25 11 1215 12 220 220 274 285 18 17 1034 44.89\\ 55.11' Secondary Totals 1814 1715 2127 1930 154 122 7862V 44.89\\ 55 .11\\ ----3.5:J. ,---- ----~051---- -----~7q----- Dist. Tot. W/0 PRE-K 3864 3676 5004 4619 415 365 17943 43.55% 60.03\\ ----------------------------------------------------- Dist. Tot. With PRE-K 4001 3814 5174 4770 438 390 18587 .....- 42. 05\\ 57.95\\ IMPORTANT NOTES PK - \"PRE-K\" CHILDREN ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE STATE'S OCTOBER 1 ENROLLMENTC OUNT FOR THE PULASKI COUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT. THE ALPHA ACADEMYW AS NOT REPORTED, BECAUSE THE STUDENTS WERE COUNTEDA S PART OF THE SCHOOL WHICH THEY WOULDN ORMALLYA TTEND. lt-rr0 (~o~ 1/9?0 ,.3. (a 7 \u0026lt;\n,, ~\n.03 -V79 9,\n7? J ~7/4 ~~o:JP,,_9\" (.-\u0026lt;ol -.S~~ _j ~ 119 -y,7-v/ 3-Y? 9\n~07 //4 Note: The difference between PCSSD's elementary and secondary totals and ODM's elementary and secondary totals is the number of studentsi n the district'ss ixthg rade. The districti ncludest he numbero f its sixthg rade studentsi n its elementaryc ounta nd excludest hat number from its secondary count. Because the sixth grade classes are located in the middle schools, ODM includes the count of those studentsi n the seconttaryto tals, not in the elementaryt otals. (See back for a school-by-schooblr eakdowno f the sixthg rade numbers.) ..... /4.n1 ~Al?~ _ __.Oa...._=-=-~---- x,:~\n3~!), c3C) ------------ -- - -- /ez,-Jd- /-/c),-~ 2~so 9333-J  80/'\u0026gt;J l\n(:\n.,D -=-'=II'=~:3, ..l\u0026amp;...Z7G.=!.-..\n7~=------ d-l1~u _ __,2:..\n..,B:-(-p='l--\n\".\"\n.O.a,- ====-== M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2005/06 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002000 COUNTY: DISTRICT: QUARTER NO. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DAYS DAYS DAYS PRESENT IN PRESENT NON- DAYS ADT ADA ADM QTR TRANSPORTED TRANSPORTED ABSENT 2/1 2+3/1 2+3+4/1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED TO (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 40 0.00 36.00 2.00 0.00 0.90 0.95 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 40 0.00 22863.30 1000.70 0.00 571. 60 596.62 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 572.50 597.57 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 1 11RE-CEIVEE)JLACOSUNKTYI SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NOV- 7 2005 OFFIOCFE DESEGREGMAOTNIOlTNO RING 925 East Dixon Road/P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 72216-8601 (501) 490-2000 TO: Polly Ramer, Office of Desegregation Monitoring FROM: ~ Karl Brown, Assistant Superintendent of Equity \u0026amp; Pupil Services SUBJECT: PCSSD October 1, 2004 Enrollment Count DATE: October 24, 2005 Attached you will find an official October 1, 2005 enrollment count for the 2005- 2006 school year. mh Attachment 10 ,1/05 PULASKIC OUNTYS PECIAL 13.21: 05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BLACK WHITE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE 001 Homer Adkins Elem. School Class Capacity: 526 PK 4 8 2 7 K 12 13 14 13 l 10 8 7 6 2 17 9 9 5 3 6 7 10 6 4 15 4 4 11 5 7 7 9 7 Tot. Including PK 71 56 55 55 School Tot. 67 48 53 48 002 Crystal Hill Magnet Elem. Class Capacity: 870 PK 17 14 12 14 K 18 32 45 37 l 27 34 32 33 2 28 30 34 30 3 30 28 33 27 4 25 29 30 32 5 24 34 24 20 Tot. Including PK 169 201 210 193 School Tot. 152 187 198 179 003 Baker Interdistrict Elem. Class Capacity: 428 K 4 7 22 19 l 6 9 29 23 2 4 5 26 27 3 8 4 19 20 4 8 8 18 17 5 9 4 22 12 School Tot. 39 37 136 118 005 Bayou Meto Elementary Class Capacity: 697 PK K l 2 3 4 5 Tot. Including PK School Tot. 008 College Station Elem. K l 2 3 4 5 School Tot. 0 0 8 l 2 36 2 2 32 0 2 30 0 l 42 2 3 37 0 1 34 5 11 219 5 11 211 Class Capacity: 439 6 10 2 7 8 l 9 6 4 10 10 9 9 5 19 10 10 12 51 49 47 RECEIVED NOV-7 2005 OFACEOF o:~ECREC~M11O0tNU lORING 12 28 26 24 20 27 33 170 158 l 3 7 10 12 12 45 SCHOOL BY LEA MALE 0 l 0 0 l 0 0 2 2 2 3 l 2 l l 0 10 8 2 5 8 4 0 l 20 0 l 0 3 l 3 2 10 10 0 1 0 0 1 2 DISTRICT PAGE Ir~: OTHER PERCENTAGES FEMALE TOTALS BLACK 0 21 l 54 2 33 0 40 0 30 0 34 0 30 3 242 52.481 3 221 52.041 l 60 3 138 l 128 2 126 2 121 0 117 2 104 11 794 46.60% 10 734 46.191 5 59 0 72 6 76 7 62 5 56 l 49 24 374 20.321 0 20 4 72 l 63 6 65 3 67 l 73 0 70 15 430 3. 721 15 410 3.90\\ 0 19 0 20 1 27 0 39 2 48 2 48 5 201 49.75% C''T\ncr-11= DESEGREG\n.11miiamrcR/NG WHIT!': 47.52% 47.961 53. 40\\ 53. 811 79.68\\ 96.28\\ 96.10\\ 50. 25% racecnt 10/21/05 PULASKIC OUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRICT PAGE 13:21:05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID H: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE 011 Warren Dupree Elementary Class Capacity: 4 98 PK 4 4 6 6 0 1 21 K 13 9 18 11 1 3 55 1 8 9 13 17 1 1 49 2 10 11 13 JO 0 1 45 3 13 9 18 14 2 2 58 4 11 9 8 8 0 0 36 5 4 8 9 10 2 1 34 Tot. Including PK 63 59 85 76 6 9 298 40. 94\\ 59.06% School Tot. 59 55 79 70 6 8 277 41.16% 58. 84\\ 013 Fuller Middle School Class Capacity: 1360 I 6 72 64 55 54 11 9 265 7 74 62 49 54 5 5 249 8 59 75 51 47 6 6 244 School Tot. 205 201 155 155 22 20 758 53. 56\\ 46.44\\ 015 Harris Elementary Class Capacity: 906 PK 18 13 1 0 0 0 32 K 17 16 2 3 1 0 39 1 14 15 3 3 0 0 35 2 21 23 0 1 0 0 45 3 18 18 4 1 0 0 41 4 14 18 4 4 0 1 41 5 10 16 6 1 0 0 33 Tot. Including PK 112 119 20 13 266 86. 841 13. 16% School Tot. 94 106 19 13 234 85. 47% 14. 53% 017 Oakbrooke Elementary Class Capacity: 553 PK 8 5 15 8 1 1 38 K 12 5 31 32 2 2 84 1 12 11 21 23 1 2 70 2 7 10 25 17 3 0 62 3 9 8 21 16 3 3 60 4 7 13 24 16 2 1 63 5 9 7 19 21 0 0 56 Tot. Including PK 64 59 156 133 12 9 433 28. 41\\ 71.59\\ School Tot. 56 54 141 125 11 8 395 27.851 72 .15\\ 018 Jacksonville Elementary Class Capacity: 850 PK 12 10 8 5 2 2 39 K 27 28 18 17 7 3 100 1 25 18 15 17 6 4 85 2 29 18 17 16 4 4 88 3 27 27 29 13 3 3 102 4 34 19 18 7 2 0 80 5 20 27 13 16 1 4 81 Tot. Including PK 174 147 118 91 25 20 575 55.83\\ 44.17\\ School Tot. 162 137 110 86 23 18 536 55.781 44.221 019 Jacksonville Middle Schoo Class Capacity: 1970 REC NOV- 0'\",...., / ': DESEGRE, GA. ,,,., -:.s .c i./05 PULASKIC OUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD TSTRICT PAGE ~ 13:21:05 SEX/R ACE TOTJ\u0026gt;.LB Y LE!\u0026gt;. ID #: race-rr BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE 6 82 74 62 58 1 4 287 1 75 82 83 55 6 5 306 8 74 71 74 70 1 3 299 School Tot. 231 227 219 183 20 12 892 51.35\\ 48.65\\ 020 Jacksonville High School Class Capacity: 1360 9 106 68 86 11 6 8 351 10 78 71 83 80 1 2 321 11 54 56 63 60 5 3 241 12 40 49 51 69 2 5 216 School Tot. 278 244 283 286 20 18 1129 4 6. 24\\ 53.76\\ 021 Landmark Elementary Class Capacity: 711 PK 8 9 11 9 1 1 39 K 11 10 14 16 2 0 53 1 8 8 15 11 3 0 45 2 10 14 12 11 1 1 49 3 9 10 10 12 3 1 45 4 12 10 9 1 1 2 41 5 10 10 11 11 1 0 43 Tot. Including PK 68 71 82 11 12 5 315 44 .13\\ 55.87\\ School Tot. 60 62 71 68 11 27 6 44.20\\ 55.80\\ 022 Lawson Elementary Class Capacity: 372 K 5 6 23 15 2 3 54 1 1 4 23 16 0 0 50 2 6 6 15 16 0 1 44 3 5 1 24 20 1 3 60 4 3 9 16 17 1 0 46 5 10 3 14 20 0 1 48 School Tot. 36 35 115 104 8 302 23. 51\\ 76. 4 9\\ 023 Tolleson Elementary Class Capacity: 561 PK 1 1 11 3 2 1 19 K 10 6 21 18 3 2 60 1 9 8 13 12 1 2 45 2 8 4 15 11 0 0 38 3 6 8 19 6 2 4 45 4 4 6 13 9 0 1 33 5 4 9 15 18 1 4 51 Tot. Including PK 42 42 107 11 9 14 291 28. 87\\ 71.13\\ School Tot. 41 41 96 74 1 13 272 30.151 69.85% 025 Maumelle Middle School Class Capacity: 1360 6 59 34 71 71 6 245 1 46 48 47 51 6 202 School Tot. 105 82 118 122 8 12 447 41.831 58 .17% 027 Arnold Drive Elementary Class Capacity: 453 '.0 Ll 05 PULASKIC OUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRICT PAGE 13:21:05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID fl: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE PK 1 3 14 14 5 3 40 K 10 11 17 15 3 2 58 1 10 5 15 22 2 0 54 2 7 5 10 13 2 1 38 3 7 6 10 9 1 2 35 4 3 6 14 8 0 1 32 5 4 12 14 7 0 1 38 Tot. Including PK 42 48 94 88 13 10 295 30. 511 69. 4 9% School Tot. 41 45 80 74 8 255 33.73\\ 66. 27% 028 Oak Grove Elementary Class Capacity: 626 PK 7 13 21 16 5 3 65 K 6 8 21 18 3 2 58 1 7 5 15 19 3 2 51 2 3 9 21 10 2 2 47 3 5 8 10 10 1 1 35 4 5 2 9 15 0 2 33 5 7 4 13 10 1 0 35 Tot. Including PK 40 49 110 98 15 12 324 27. 4 7% 72. 53\\ School Tot. 33 36 89 82 10 9 259 26.64' 73.36\\ 029 Oak Grove High School Class Capacity: 1130 8 27 29 42 37 2 3 140 9 40 32 57 37 3 5 174 10 35 20 34 22 3 1 115 11 19 12 43 31 2 2 109 12 19 12 27 28 1 2 89 School Tot. 140 105 203 155 11 13 627 39. 07\\ 60.93\\ 031 Joe T. Robinson Elementar Class Capacity: 544 PK 3 3 6 6 1 2 21 K 4 6 17 25 1 6 59 1 11 4 19 15 3 5 57 2 3 12 14 16 1 2 48 3 8 9 18 20 1 1 57 4 11 9 24 17 1 0 62 5 10 13 15 24 4 1 67 Tot. Including PK 50 56 113 123 12 17 371 28.57\\ 71.43\\ School Tot. 47 53 107 117 11 15 350 28.57\\ 71. 4 3\\ 032 Joe T. Robinson High Scho Class Capacity: 770 9 48 30 51 45 3 1 178 10 48 31 59 36 3 2 179 11 33 36 57 52 2 1 181 12 36 21 42 36 0 1 136 School Tot. 165 118 209 169 8 5 674 41. 99\\ 58.01\\ 034 Scott Elementary Class Capacity: 294 PK 1 2 3 10 0 0 16 K 2 3 9 10 2 0 26 1 5 3 7 7 0 0 22 2 1 2 9 3 0 1 16 21 o\u0026lt; PL'LASKIC OUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRICT PhGE 13:21:05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID ~: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE fEMALE MALE fEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE 3 3 3 6 6 0 0 18 4 3 2 6 4 1 0 16 5 4 2 7 4 0 0 17 Tot. Including PK 19 17 47 44 3 131 27.481 72. 521 School Tot. 18 15 44 34 3 115 28.701 71.301 036 Northwood Middle School Class Capacity: 1030 6 40 29 56 56 8 5 194 7 46 40 66 73 8 4 237 8 46 40 73 74 2 2 237 School Tot. 132 109 195 203 18 11 668 36.081 63.921 037 Sherwood Elementary Class Capacity: 561 PK 3 1 3 2 0 0 9 K 13 13 24 20 1 0 71 1 12 12 19 30 1 1 75 2 11 12 27 23 0 1 74 3 10 5 14 11 4 0 44 4 12 7 22 29 0 1 71 5 17 18 14 1 0 57 Tot. Including PK 78 57 127 129 3 401 33. 67\\ 66.331 School Tot. 75 56 124 127 3 392 33. 42\\ 66.581 039 Sylvan Hills Elementary Class Capacity: 606 PK 4 4 7 3 1 0 19 K 14 11 19 20 3 0 67 1 14 11 22 19 1 2 69 2 10 18 16 19 1 1 65 3 13 14 13 19 0 1 60 4 11 17 19 22 1 1 71 5 19 12 20 20 0 3 74 Tot. Including PK 85 87 116 122 8 425 40.47' 59.531 School Tot. 81 83 109 119 6 8 406 40.391 59. 611 040 Sylvan Hills Middle Schoo Class Capacity: 1080 6 43 47 50 66 9 5 220 7 55 48 61 56 5 8 233 8 50 59 76 62 7 6 260 School Tot. 148 154 187 184 21 19 713 42.36\\ 57. 64% 041 Sylvan Hills High School Class Capacity: 1120 9 68 70 79 73 3 8 301 10 45 55 73 59 6 3 241 11 57 47 62 70 7 2 245 12 33 54 73 59 9 3 231 School Tot. 203 226 287 261 25 16 1018 42.141 57.861 042 Clinton Inter. Magnet Sch Class Capacity: 840 PK 16 17 13 15 2 67 1~ 21ioc PULASKIC OUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRICT PAGE 13:21:05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID,: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE K 26 32 30 25 5 2 120 1 25 33 30 28 6 1 123 2 30 30 22 23 2 1 108 3 21 27 20 16 3 5 92 4 20 21 13 21 1 1 77 5 27 21 16 17 3 1 85 Tot. Including PK 165 181 144 145 22 15 672 51. 4 9\\ 48.51\\ School Tot. 14 9 164 131 130 20 11 605 51. 74\\ 48.261 045 Cato Elementary School Class Capacity: 800 PK 6 4 9 8 0 2 29 K 14 6 25 12 1 1 59 1 4 6 17 17 1 2 47 2 9 6 22 11 1 l 50 3 12 4 8 22 1 l 48 4 9 7 16 25 1 3 61 5 6 7 19 22 1 0 55 Tot. Including PK 60 40 116 117 6 10 349 28.65\\ 71.351 School Tot. 54 36 107 109 6 8 320 28.131 71. 88\\ 046 Pinewood Elementary Class Capacity: 677 PK 9 15 8 5 1 3 41 K 22 18 21 15 3 0 79 1 12 17 12 25 2 3 71 2 19 15 14 25 1 1 75 3 20 14 15 13 6 1 69 4 11 12 13 22 3 1 62 5 19 18 18 14 3 1 73 Tot. Including PK 112 109 101 119 19 10 470 47.02\\ 52.98\\ School Tot. 103 94 93 114 18 429 45. 92\\ 54.081 047 Wilbur Mills High School Class Capacity: 1130 9 93 94 74 47 3 0 311 10 52 68 51 51 6 5 233 11 60 75 36 61 4 2 238 12 60 52 35 40 0 3 190 School Tot. 265 289 196 199 13 10 972 57.00\\ 43.00\\ 049 North Pulaski High School Class Capacity: 1050 9 51 42 102 81 9 4 289 10 47 44 68 69 5 2 235 11 46 43 53 53 5 1 201 12 32 32 46 53 6 3 172 School Tot. 176 161 269 256 25 10 897 37. 571 62. 431 050 Robinson Middle School Class Capacity: 650 6 20 26 50 35 5 0 136 7 26 19 42 28 2 3 120 8 36 28 58 34 0 2 158 School Tot. 82 73 150 97 7 5 414 37. 44\\ 62.561 ,. 05 PULASKIC .OUNTYSt 'EC:AL SCHOOLD ISTFICT PAGE -- ::CS SEX/RACE ':'07AL BY LE:A l!) #: r cecr.t BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE 051 Murrell Taylor Elementary Class Capacity: 566 PK 6 7 6 2 0 0 21 K 20 13 18 16 0 2 69 1 18 18 9 16 0 2 63 2 12 21 16 16 1 0 66 3 16 10 12 13 0 1 52 4 14 21 12 9 0 1 57 5 14 14 13 9 0 0 50 Tot. Including PK 100 104 86 81 6 378 53.97% 46.03% School Tot. 94 97 80 79 6 357 53.50% 4 6. so, 052 Pine Forest Elementary Sc Class Capacity: 554 K 15 7 29 24 1 1 77 1 12 12 36 24 3 1 88 2 15 9 29 31 3 1 88 3 13 14 29 30 0 3 89 4 15 15 28 33 0 1 92 5 14 10 24 28 0 2 78 School Tot. 84 67 175 170 9 512 29.49\\ 70.51\\ 053 Bates Elementary Class Capacity: 863 PK 9 5 6 6 0 1 27 K 21 22 27 24 2 0 96 1 21 18 18 14 2 2 75 2 28 17 26 16 2 4 93 3 16 21 15 18 1 0 71 4 21 22 18 15 1 5 82 5 26 19 14 19 5 2 85 Tot. Including PK 142 124 124 112 13 14 529 50.28\\ 4 9. 72\\ School Tot. 133 119 118 106 13 13 502 50.20\\ 49.80% 10/21/05 13:21:05 PK BLACK MALE FEMALE 137 138 PULASKIC OUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRICT SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA WHITE OTHER MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTAL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT 170 151 23 25 PAGE 8 ID #: racecnt PERCENTAGES TOTALS BLACK WHITE 64 4 42.70% 57.30% K= =------------------=3=03= ==---2-9-4= -==-5-03- -------=4 3-4- -------==50- --------4-2- ------1-62-6- ----------=-==------=-====-------==--=- 1 286 278 423 426 43 34 1490 2 297 294 426 381 37 38 1473 3 285 272 408 352 39 44 1400 4 27 9 274 394 387 20 30 1384 5 284 275 379 369 28 26 1361 6 316 274 34 4 34 0 44 29 1347 39.96% 60. 04% Elementary W/0 PRE-K 2050 1961 2877 2689 261 243 10081 42.52% 63. 87% Elementary With PRE-K 2187 2099 3047 2840 284 268 10725 39.96% 60.04% m==~=======-=-==-==-== 7 322 299 348 317 30 31 1347 8 292 302 374 324 24 22 1338 9 406 336 44 9 360 27 26 1604 10 305 289 368 317 30 15 1324 11 269 269 314 327 25 11 1215 12 220 220 274 285 18 17 1034 44.89% 55.11% Secondary Totals 1814 1715 2127 1930 154 122 7862 44.89% 55 .11% Dist. Tot. W/0 PRE-K 3864 3676 5004 4 619 415 365 17943 43.55% 60.03% Dist. Tot. With PRE-K 4001 3814 5174 4770 4 38 390 18587 42.05% 57.95% IMPORTANTN OTES PK - \"PRE-K\" CHILDRENA RE NOT INCLUDEDI N THE STATE'S OCTOBER1 ENROLLMENCTO UNTF OR THE PULASKIC OUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRICT. THE ALPHAA CADEMYW ASN OT REPORTED,B ECAUSET HE STUDENTSW EREC OUNTEDA S PART OF THE SCHOOLW HICHT HEYW OULDN ORMALLAYT TEND. 1012i1c5 PULASKIC OUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRIC':' PAGE 13:2::05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID#: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE HALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE 001 Homer J\\dkins Elem. School Class Capacity: 526 PK 4 8 2 7 0 0 21 K 12 13 14 13 l l 54 l 10 8 7 6 0 2 33 2 17 9 9 5 0 0 40 3 6 7 10 6 l 0 30 4 15 4 11 0 0 34 5 7 9 7 0 0 30 Tot. Including PK 71 56 55 55 2 3 242 52.48\\ 47.52\\ School Tot. 67 48 53 48 2 3 221 52.04' 47.96\\ 002 Crystal Hill Magnet Elem. Class Capacity: 870 PK 17 14 12 14 2 l 60 K 18 32 45 37 3 3 138 l 27 34 32 33 l l 128 2 28 30 34 30 2 2 126 3 30 28 33 27 l 2 121 4 25 29 30 32 l 0 117 5 24 34 24 20 0 2 104 Tot. Including PK 169 201 210 193 10 11 794 46.601 53. 40\\ School Tot. 152 187 198 179 8 10 734 46.19\\ 53.81' 003 Baker Interdistrict Elem. Class Capacity: 428 K 4 7 22 19 2 5 59 l 6 9 29 23 5 0 72 2 4 5 26 27 8 6 76 3 8 4 19 20 4 7 62 4 8 8 18 17 0 5 56 5 9 4 22 12 l l 49 School Tot. 39 37 136 118 20 24 374 20.321 79.681 005 Bayou Heto Elementary Class Capacity: 697 PK 0 0 8 12 0 0 20 K l 2 36 28 l 4 72 l 2 2 32 26 0 l 63 2 0 2 30 24 3 6 65 3 0 l 42 20 l 3 67 4 2 3 37 27 3 l 73 5 0 l 34 33 2 0 70 Tot. Including PK 5 11 219 170 10 15 430 3.72\\ 96.28% School Tot. 5 11 211 158 10 15 410 3.901 96.10% 008 College Station Elem. Class Capacity: 439 K 6 10 2 l 0 0 19 l 7 8 l 3 l 0 20 2 9 6 4 7 0 l 27 3 10 10 9 10 0 0 39 4 9 5 19 12 l 2 48 5 10 10 12 12 2 2 48 School Tot. 51 49 47 45 5 201 4 9. 751 50. 25% 10/21/05 PULASKIC OUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRICT PAGE 2 13:21:05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID#: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE Oll Warren Dupree Elementary Class Capacity: 498 PK 4 4 6 6 0 l 21 K 13 9 18 11 l 3 55 1 8 9 13 17 1 l 49 2 10 11 13 10 0 1 45 3 13 9 18 14 2 2 58 4 11 9 8 8 0 0 36 5 4 8 9 10 2 1 34 Tot. Including PK 63 59 85 76 6 9 298 40.941 59. 061 School Tot. 59 55 79 70 6 8 277 41.161 58. 84' 013 Fuller Middle School Class Capacity: 1360 6 72 64 55 54 11 9 265 7 74 62 49 54 5 5 249 8 59 75 51 41 6 6 244 School Tot. 205 201 155 155 22 20 758 53. 561 46.441 015 Harris Elementary Class Capacity: 906 PK 18 13 1 0 0 0 32 K 17 16 2 3 1 0 39 1 14 15 3 3 0 0 35 2 21 23 0 1 0 0 45 3 18 18 4 1 0 0 41 4 14 18 4 4 0 1 41 5 10 16 6 1 0 0 33 Tot. Including PK 112 119 20 13 266 86. 841 13.16\\ School Tot. 94 106 19 13 l 234 85.471 14. 53\\ 017 Oakbrooke Elementary Class Capacity: 553 PK 8 5 15 8 1 l 38 K 12 5 31 32 2 2 84 1 12 11 21 23 l 2 70 2 7 10 25 17 3 0 62 3 9 8 21 16 3 3 60 4 7 13 24 16 2 1 63 5 9 7 19 21 0 0 56 Tot. Including PK 64 59 156 133 12 9 433 28.411 71. 59, School Tot. 56 54 141 125 11 8 395 27.851 72.151 018 Jacksonville Elementary Class Capacity: 850 PK 12 10 8 5 2 2 39 K 27 28 18 17 7 3 100 1 25 18 15 17 6 4 85 2 29 18 17 16 4 4 88 3 27 27 29 13 3 3 102 4 34 19 18 7 2 0 80 5 20 27 13 16 1 4 81 Tot. Including PK 174 147 118 91 25 20 575 55.831 44 .171 School Tot. 162 137 110 86 23 18 536 55.781 4 4. 22, 019 Jacksonville Middle Schoo Class Capacity: 1970 10/21/05 PULASKIC OUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRICT PAGE 13:21:05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID#: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES Ml'.LE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE 6 82 74 62 58 7 4 287 7 75 82 83 55 6 5 306 8 74 7I 74 70 7 3 299 School Tot. 231 227 219 183 20 12 892 51.35% 48.65% 020 Jacksonville High School Class Capacity: 1360 9 106 68 86 77 6 8 351 10 78 71 83 80 7 2 321 11 54 56 63 60 5 3 241 12 40 49 51 69 2 5 216 School Tot. 278 244 283 286 20 18 1129 46.24% 53. 7 6% 021 Landmark Elementary Class Capacity: 711 PK 8 9 11 9 1 1 39 K 11 10 14 16 2 0 53 1 8 8 15 11 3 0 45 2 10 14 12 11 1 1 49 3 9 10 10 12 3 1 45 4 12 10 9 7 1 2 41 5 10 10 11 11 1 0 43 Tot. Including PK 68 71 82 77 12 5 315 44.13% 55.87% School Tot. 60 62 7I 68 11 276 44.20% 55. 80% 022 Lawson Elemen~ary Class Capacity: 372 K 5 6 23 15 2 3 54 1 7 4 23 16 0 0 50 2 6 6 15 16 0 1 44 3 5 7 24 20 1 3 60 4 3 9 16 17 1 0 46 5 10 3 14 20 0 1 48 School Tot. 36 35 115 104 8 302 23.51% 76. 4 9% 023 Tolleson Elementary Class Capacity: 561 PK 1 1 11 3 2 1 19 K 10 6 21 18 3 2 60 1 9 8 13 12 1 2 45 2 8 4 15 11 0 0 38 3 6 8 19 6 2 4 45 4 4 6 13 9 0 1 33 5 4 9 15 18 1 4 51 Tot. Including PK 42 42 107 77 9 14 291 28.87% 7I .13% School Tot. 41 41 96 74 7 13 272 30.15% 69. 85% 025 Maumelle Middle School Class Capacity: 1360 6 59 34 71 7I 6 245 7 46 48 47 51 6 202 School Tot. 105 82 118 122 8 12 447 41. 83% 58 .17% 027 Arnold Drive Elementary Class Capacity: 453 10/21/05 PULASKIC OUNTYS PEC:AL SCHOOLD ISTRICT PAGE 13:21:05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID#: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE PK 1 3 14 14 5 3 40 K 10 11 17 15 3 2 58 1 10 5 15 22 2 0 54 2 1 5 10 13 2 l 38 3 1 6 10 9 1 2 35 4 3 6 14 8 0 1 32 5 4 12 14 7 0 l 38 Tot. Including PK 42 48 94 88 13 10 295 30.51' 69. 4 9% School Tot. 41 45 80 14 8 255 33.13\\ 66. 21% 028 Oak Grove Elementary Class Capacity: 626 PK 1 13 21 16 5 3 65 K 6 8 21 18 3 2 58 l 7 5 15 19 3 2 51 2 3 9 21 10 2 2 47 3 5 8 10 10 l l 35 4 5 2 9 15 0 2 33 5 1 4 13 10 l 0 35 Tot. Including PK 40 49 110 98 15 12 324 27.41' 12. 53% School Tot. 33 36 89 82 10 9 259 26. 64' 73.36% 029 Oak Grove High School Class Capacity: 1130 8 27 29 42 37 2 3 140 9 40 32 57 37 3 5 174 10 35 20 34 22 3 1 115 11 19 12 43 31 2 2 109 12 19 12 27 28 1 2 89 School Tot. 140 105 203 155 11 13 627 39.011 60. 931 031 Joe T. Robinson Elementar Class Capacity: 544 PK 3 3 6 6 1 2 21 K 4 6 11 25 1 6 59 1 11 4 19 15 3 5 57 2 3 12 14 16 1 2 48 3 8 9 18 20 1 1 57 4 11 9 24 17 1 0 62 5 10 13 15 24 4 1 67 Tot. Including PK 50 56 113 123 12 11 371 28. 51' 11.43\\ School Tot. 41 53 107 117 11 15 350 28.571 71. 43\\ 032 Joe T. Robinson High Scho Class Capacity: 170 9 48 30 51 45 3 1 178 10 48 31 59 36 3 2 119 11 33 36 57 52 2 1 181 12 36 21 42 36 0 1 136 School Tot. 165 118 209 169 8 5 614 41. 991 58. 01\\ 034 Scott Elementary Class Capacity: 294 PK 1 2 3 10 0 0 16 K 2 3 9 10 2 0 26 1 5 3 1 1 0 0 22 2 1 2 9 3 0 1 16 10/21/05 PVL.~SKIC OUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD IS7RICT PAGE 5 12:21:05 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID#: race::nt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE 3 3 3 6 6 0 0 18 4 3 2 6\n1 0 16 5 4 2 7 4 0 0 17 Tot. Including PK 19 17 47 44 3 131 27.481 72.52% School Tot. 18 15 44 34 3 115 28.70\\ 71.30% 036 Northwood Middle School Class Capacity: 1030 6 40 29 56 56 8 5 194 7 46 40 66 73 8 4 237 8 46 40 73 74 2 2 237 School Tot. 132 109 195 203 18 11 668 36.08% 63.92\\ 037 Sherwood Elementary Class Capacity: 561 PK 3 1 3 2 0 0 9 K 13 13 24 20 1 0 71 1 12 12 19 30 1 1 75 2 11 12 27 23 0 1 74 3 10 5 14 11 4 0 44 4 12 7 22 29 0 1 71 5 17 7 18 14 1 0 57 Tot. Including PK 78 57 127 129 7 3 401 33.671 66.33% School Tot. 75 56 124 127 7 3 392 33.42% 66.58% 039 Sylvan Hills E_lementary Class Capacity: 606 PK 4 4 7 3 1 0 19 K 14 11 19 20 3 0 67 1 14 11 22 19 1 2 69 2 10 18 16 19 1 1 65 3 13 14 13 19 0 1 60 4 11 17 19 22 1 1 71 5 19 12 20 20 0 3 74 Tot. Including PK 85 87 116 122 7 8 425 40.47% 59.53% School Tot. 81 83 109 119 6 8 406 40.39% 59. 611 040 Sylvan Hills Middle Schoo Class Capacity: 1080 6 43 47 50 66 9 5 220 7 55 48 61 56 5 8 233 8 50 59 76 62 7 6 260 School Tot. 148 154 187 184 21 19 713 42.361 57. 64% 041 Sylvan Hills\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1099","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2005-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Curricula","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1099"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nAgenda Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting Happy RECEIVED NOV 1 5 2005 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING , .. NOVEMBER 2005 .. !II \"'D z\u0026gt;\n~ -um ~i:l ~z mm\n,:,C \":e'cn= -a: \u0026gt;.... l5 z r\u0026gt;\n,:, m .0 ~\n,:, ,-\n..: lD V\u0026gt; n-.. ~\n,:,  i 0 =I l\nj z \"' I. 11. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Welcome to Guests November 17, 2005 5:30 p.m. 111. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Partners in Education - New Partnerships Carver Magnet Elementary School and Raytheon Aircraft Company Forest Heights Middle School and Easy Cash Pawn and Jewelry Otter Creek Elementary School and the Greater Little Rock Optimist Club C. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) D. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Update V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes Regular Board Meeting- 10-27-05 :- Regular Board Meeting November 17, 2005 Page2 VI. BOARD POLICY AND REGULATIONS REVIEW A. Second Reading: AC - Nondiscrimination Second Reading: ACD - Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Religion Second Reading: ACH - Anti-Harassment VII. EDUCATIONAL SERVICES A. Policy Deletion: IHCA-Summer School B. Quarterly Update Report VIII. HUMAN RESOURCES A. Proposals for Salary Increases Building Maintenance Employees Bus Drivers, Aides and Monitors B. Personnel Changes IX. FINANCE \u0026amp; SUPPORT SERVICES A. B~ard Disbursing Officers B. Mitchell Elementary School C. Additional Funding for Bond Project Forest Heights Middle School D. Additional Funding for Bond Project Child Nutrition Bond Project E. Donations of Property F. Financial Report X. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions XI. EMPLOYEE HEARINGS XII. ADJOURNMENT :- n  -.:1 i= Rl .... c OE oz ~~ !ll~ -c::\no,..o. n.z... ,... c5 nz ,j.!.:. en .., ~~ nm oc\nEC: :~ :\n~ lii=l enm -\u0026lt;\na enen\na \u0026gt;m en~ c..:, :\n..a.. ~ ~ \u0026gt;=:inm .... g Oz z=I en i5 z en .?.,' ~~ ~ il ..,m ~~ ~z mm\naC enc: :.-.c, \u0026gt; n... . en c5 z ~\na m c~ \na ,-,-\n::aen n-.. =--~  E n =I f\nl z en I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL 11. PROCEDURAL MA TIERS/ WELCOME TO GUESTS Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. PARTNERS IN EDUCATION NEW PARTNERSHIPS C. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS 0. LRC.TA DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 November 17, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Partners in Education BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District Partners in Education program is designed to develop strong relationships between the community and our schools. The partnership process encourages businesses, community agencies and private organizations to join with individual schools to enhance and support educational programs. Each partnership utilizes the resources of both the school and the business for their mutual benefit. RATIONALE: The following schools and businesses have completed the requirements necessary to establish a partnership and are actively working together to accomplish their objectives. FUNDING: Not applicable. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the board approve the following partnerships: Carver Magnet Elementary School and Raytheon Aircraft Company Forest Heights Middle School and Easy Cash Pawn and Jewelry Otter Creek Elementary School and Greater Little Rock Optimist Club PREPARED BY: Debbie Milam, ViPS Coordinator RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY 2400 Grundfest Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Raytheon Aircraft Company Partnership with George Washington Carver Magnet School Little Rock, Arkansas 2005 Partnership Activities I. Career Day - March 19, 2005 A RAC's Chief Pilot spoke to four 2nd grade classes 1. Presentation entitled \"Planes Come in Many Shapes - How a Plane Flies\" 2. Gave each student a brochure about RAC planes and a frisbee 11. Mentoring Program A Volunteers from RAC 1. Provide support to teachers and administrators as requested 2. Provide support/services to students as identified 3. Provide motivational speakers for students Ill. Book donation A RAC's Women's Net\\vork Initiative group will donate books. Carver's Literacy Coach will present proposals for group to consider. IV. Tour of Company A 5 th grade students will tour RAC facility B. RAC will provide a pizza lunch for students V. Safety Presentation A RAC Safety Engineer will speak to students LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CARVER MAGNET SCHOOL Carver Magnet Partnership Activities with Raytheon Aircraft Company 2005-2006 1. Display of winning Invent America, Science and Math Fair projects at Raytheon. Carver specialists, Kim Washington and Suellen DiMassimo would set up and take down after contact to Arti Vanzandt.) 2. Birthday cards sent to Raytheon employees produced by Carver students during art chasses. (Raytheon to get birthday list to Erik Brown, Art Specialist.) 3. Invitations to Raytheon for classroom readers during VIPS Reading Day and Read Across America. (Carver contacts, Lori Watts and Karen Sebourn, Media Specialists) 4. Campus Leadership Representative from Raytheon. We would appreciate one of our contacts attending our four meetings per year. We will get at least a week's notice. This is an advisor activity.) 5. Building of a relationship between Raytheon team members and our Young Astronauts Specialist, Ed Scott, for further support. 6. Raytheon speakers for Career Week. (Contact\nCounselor, Tracye Thomason) 2100 East WH Street Phone 447-4000  Little Rock , Arkansas 72202 !JI !!l C 0 m ~ \u0026gt; !:l iz5 !I: m .z. . ~ ~ ~ !\"' \"m' 0~ ,. ...\",,', \"n'-\"..' :....~  11: n =I l\nj z \"' !\"' a, C 8 !!l C \"0 ~ m Outline for Partnership between Forest Heights Middle School and Easy Cash Pawn and Jewelry Easy Cash Pawn and Jewelry will provide: 1.) donated musical instruments for the school 2.) discounted musical instruments for the school. 3.) donations to silent auctions, carnivals and other appropriate school events Forest Heights Middle School will provide: 1.) acknowledgement of Easy Cash's partner status on concert programs 2.) an invitation to school events, volunteer recognition and band concerts 3.) an opportunity for Easy Cash's owner to meet students playing with donated instruments PARTNER-IN-EDUCATION CONTRACT GREATER LITTLE ROCK OPTIMIST'S CLUB AND OTTER CREEK ELEMENT ARY SCHOOL The staff and students of Otter Creek Elementary School are pleased to enter into a partnership with the Greater Little Rock Optimist's Club. As part of our willingness to become involved, all parties commit to the following activities: GREATER LITTLE ROCK OPTIMIST'S CLUB    Will sponsor the Just Say No Program for Otter Creek by funding Red Ribbon Week activities and providing \"Just Say No\" Tee shirts to Just Say No members. Will participate in the activities of Otter Creek when possible . WiU volunteer to speak on career awareness to students as requested. OTTER CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL   Student groups will perform for Club meetings such as caroling during December or performing skits related to saying no to drugs and violence. Staff will include members in activities and events taking place at school. Jan\n, Tucke., Mndp~(\\/lM./4_., 7fv {,{'--\u0026lt;'.,i/' Kathryn Varady, Counselor ~0,-ly1'1v'. /{i14-~ Paul JHg, Pre,\ndent ,Q J/M ~ a, C 8 !!l C.. , ~ m LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: November 17, 2005 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: November 2005 Construction Report - Bond Projects BACKGROUND: Demolition of the Cloverdale Elementary School building has been completed, and the site has been cleared. A reason to abandon the building because of concern about the structural integrity was verified during the demolition. The actual damage to the floor structural system was worse than an earlier engineer's opinion had indicated. Preliminary planning for adding classrooms at Fulbright and Terry has begun. The planning also includes recommendations on solving the car and bus traffic at both schools. Identification of funding sources for this will be done as well. RATIONALE: Monthly reports are submitted to the Board to keep members up-to-date on construction projects in the District. FUNDING: Bond Funds RECOMMENDATION: Report item\nno action necessary. PREPARED BY: Bill Goodman, District Engineer :,-, ..... Ill :z::c 0 8 -\u0026lt; C: ~ m .\u0026gt; :,.s.. ~~ ,- C: on -\u0026lt; ~ ~ c5 6~ c5~ zm I\n,o -\u0026lt; :::Cl\"i \u0026gt;n m en !\" .z.... m \"q'i\"~' 0 ,- :!\nl~ 0 a ~ Facility Name Central Media Gibbs CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD NOVEMBER 17, 2005 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Project Description Cost Roof $85,000 Addition $705,670 t:st. compIet1on Date Dec-05 Dec-05 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - FALL/ WINTER 2005-06 t:st. completion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Booker IHVAC (QZAB) $239,560 Unknown Brady I Metal Roof $250,000  Unknown Central HVAC (QZAB) $919,760 Unknown Dunbar HVAC (QZAB) $278,800 Unknown Fair Park HVAC (QZAB) I $79,480 Unknown J. A. Fair Sewer Line $82,900 Unknown Mann HVAC (QZAB) $382,400 Unknown BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED t:st. compIetIon Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Administration Annex I Electrical Upgrade $9,166 Unknown Alternative Learning Center IADA Adaptations $43,134 Unknown Alternative Learning Center Restroom Renovation $37,742 Unknown Alternative Learning Center I Electrical Upgrade $2,696 Unknown Booker Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown Chicot Electrical Upgrade I Unknown Unknown Child Nutrition Renovation $6,500 I Unknown Dodd Restroom Renovation $26,959 Unknown Forest Heights Remodel $1,547,000 Unknown Fulbright ADA Adaptations $21,567 Unknown Fulbright Renovate Restrooms $10,784 Unknown Fulbright Addition/Traffic Planning $2,500 Unknown Geyer Springs Replace Restroom Stalls $4,313 I Unknown ADA Adaptations $21,567 I Unknown Henderson Renovation I $450,000 I Summer2006 I - IRC ADA Adaptations I $21,567 Unknown Restroom Renovation I $21,567 I Unknown McDermott Restroom Renovation $32,350 I Unknown Mitchell Renovation $2,212,493 Unknown Pulaski Hgts. MS Energy monitoring system installation Unknown , Unknown Rightsell Renovation $2,494,000 I Unknown Terry Addition Planning $2,500 Unknown BOND PROJECTS NOT YET STARTED t:sL 1.,ompIeuon Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Administration Annex ADA Adaptations $32,351 Unknown Adult Education ADA Adaptations I $248,020 Unknown Structural Repairs $53,918 ~ Unknown Alternative Learning Center Roof Repairs $26,959 I Unknown Booker ADA Adaptations $107,835 Spring 2006 -- Cashion Buildinf\n! ADA Adaptations I $21,567 Unknown Facility Services ADA Adaptations I $32,351 I Unknown Install Water Meters at Cooling Towers $4,313 Unknown Emergency Lighting Replacement $80,876 I Unknown Land Purchase - Booker I $100,000 I Unknown Garland Renovation $900,000 Partially Complete ADA Adaptations $188,711 Unknown Facility Name Henderson Quigley Rockefeller Transportation - Laidlaw West Little Rock School Facilitv Name Administration Administration Administration Administration Administration Annex Alternative Learning Ctr. Alternative Learning Ctr. Badgett Badgett Bale Bale Bale Bale Baseline Booker Booker Booker Booker Booker Booker Brady Brady Brady Carver Central Carver Carver Central Central Central Parking Central/Quigley Central/Quigley Central/Quigley Central Central Central Central Central Chicot Chicot Cloverdale Elementary Cloverdale Elem. CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD NOVEMBER 17, 2005 BOND PROJECTS NOT YET STARTED Project Description Cost ADA Adaptations $70,093 Restroom Upgrades $53,918 Dressing Room Renovation $37,742 ADA Adaptations $26,959 Interior Renovation $16,175 ADA Adaptations $32,351 New School $11,782,638 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Project Description Cost Asbestos abatement $380,495 Fresh air system $55,000 Fire alarm $32,350 HVAC $70,000 Energy monitoring system installation I Energy monitoring system installation $15,160 I Energy efficient lighting $82,000 Partial asbestos abatement $237,237 Fire alarm $18,250 Classroom addition/renovation $2,244,524 Energy monitoring system Partial roof replacement $269,587 HVAC $664,587 1 Renovation $953,520 Gym Roof $48,525 ADA Rest rooms $25,000 Energy efficient lighting $170,295 Energy monitoring system installation I $23,710 Asbestos abatement $10,900 Fire alarm $34,501 Addition/renovation $973,621 Energy efficient lighting $80,593 Asbestos abatement $345,072 Energy monitoring system installation $14,480 Renovation - Interior $10,200,266 Media Center Expansion $167,490 Parking lot $111,742 HVAC Renovation - Band Area $225,000 Reflecting Pond $57,561 Student parking $174,000 I Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair $265,000 Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 I Irrigation System $14,500 Purchase land for school Unknown Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations $2,000,000 Ceiling and wall repair $24,000 Fire Alarm System Design/Installation $80,876 I 'Front landing tile repair $22,470 Drainage I $64,700 I Sound Attenuation $43,134 I Demolition I $520,150 I Energy efficient lighting I $132,678 Est. Completion Date Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Est. Completion Date Mar-03 Aug-03 Aug-03 Nov-04 May-02 Oct-01 Dec-01 Jul-01 Aug-02 Dec-02 Mar-02 Dec-01 Aug-01 Aug-04 Oct-04 Aug-04 Apr-01 Oct-01 Feb-02 Mar-02 Nov-04 Sep-02 Aug-02 May-01 Sep-05 Oct-05 Aug-03 Dec-04 Sep-04 Aug-03 Aug-03 Aug-03 Aug-03 Oec-02 Dec-02 Oct-01 Aug-01 Aug-01 Aug-04 Jul-04 Nov-05 Jul-01 2 :,-, ... Pl ::c z 0  C: ~ m !\" z... m ~i\ng j!: ::ID\u0026gt; ... C: C ~ ~ CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD NOVEMBER 17, 2005 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Project Description Cost Cloverdale MS Energy efficient lighting $189,743 Cloverdale MS Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $1,393,822 Dodd Fire Alarm Upgrade $9,200 Dodd Energy efficient lighting $90,665 Dodd Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile $156,299 Dodd Replace rooftop HVAC $215,570 Dunbar Renovation/addition $6,149,023 Facilities Service Interior renovation $84,672 Facility Services Fire alarm $12,000 Fair Park Remodel $799,000 Fair Park Parking Lot $185,000 Fair Park Roof $245,784 Fair Park HVAC renovation/fire alarm $315,956 Fair Park Energy efficient lighting $90,162 Fair Park Asbestos abatement-ceiling $59,310 J. A. Fair 16 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music I room addition $3,155,640 J. A. Fair Energy efficient lighting $277,594 J. A. Fair Press box I $10,784 J. A. Fair Security cameras $12,500 J. A. Fair 'Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 J. A. Fair Irrigation System $14,000 J. A. Fair Roof repairs $391,871 -Forest Park ,Restrooms $152,881 Forest Park Replace window units w/central HVAC $485,258 Forest Park Diagonal parking $111,742 Forest Park Energy efficient lighting $119,788 Fulbright  Energy efficient lighting I $134,463 Fulbright I Energy monitoring system installation $11,950 Fulbright I Replace rooftop HVAC units $107,835 Fulbright . Parking lot $140,000 ~bright Roof repairs $200,000 Franklin Renovation $2,511,736 Geyer Springs Roof Repair $161,752 Gibbs 1 Energy efficient lighting $76,447 Gibbs -- Energy monitoring system installation $11,770 Hall- - Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $8,637,709 Hall Asbestos abatement $168,222 -- - Hall - Energy efficient lighting I $42,931 Hall Infrastructure improvements $93,657 -- Hall Energy efficient lighting $296,707 I - ----intercom I Hall I Hall Security cameras $10,600 -- Henderson Skylight Replacement $319,000 Henderson --- -- I Lockers $43,854 - - Henderson Energy efficient lighting $193,679 -- Henderson Roof replacement gym $107,835 Henderson -- - 'Asbestos abatement Phase I $500,000 . I Henderson Asbestos abatement Phase 2 I $250,000 IRC - - -- Energy efficient lighting $109,136 Jefferson -- Asbestos abatement I $43,639 I Jefferson - --- - Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm I $1,630,000 Laidlaw - -----,-Parking lot $269,588 Mabelvale Elem. HVAC (QZAB) $220,000 I Mabelvale Elem. Site Work $6,000 Est. Completion Date Jul-01 Nov-02 Oct-04 Aug-01 Jul-01 Aug-02 Nov-04 Mar-01 Aug-03 Aug-05 Aug-05 May-05 Apr-02 Aug-01 Aug-01 Aug-04 Apr-01 Nov-00 Jun-01 Jul-03 Jul-03 Aug-03 Aug-05 Nov-03 Aug-03 May-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Sep-02 Oct-02 Mar-03 Jun-04 Apr-01 Jul-01 Sep-03 Aug-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 Apr-01 Feb-01 Jun-01 Nov-05 Dec-04 Jul-01 May-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Jul-02 Qct-01 Nov-02 Jul-01 Nov-05 Oct-05 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD NOVEMBER 17, 2005 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED FacilitvName Project Description Cost Mablevale Elem I Fire Alarm Upgrade $12,000 I Mabelvale Elem. Energy monitoring system installation $12,150 I Mabelvale Elem. Replace HVAC units $300,000 Mabelvale Elem. Asbestos Abatement $107,000 Mabelvale Elem. Energy efficient lighting $106,598 Mabelvale MS Renovate bleachers $134,793 Mabelvale MS Renovation $6,851,621 Mann Partial Replacement $11,500,000 Mann Asphalt walks The total $1.8 million Mann Walkway canopies is what has been Mann Boiler replacement used so far on the Mann Fencing projects listed Mann Partial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. McClellan Parking Lot Overlay $65,000 I McClellan Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 McClellan Irrigation System $14,750 McClellan Security cameras $36,300 McClellan I Energy efficient lighting I $303,614 I McClellan Stadium stands repair $235,000 I McClellan Intercom $46,000 McClellan Classroom Addition $2,155,622 McDermott Fire Alarm Upgrade $7,700 McDermott Energy efficient lighting $79,411 McDermott Replace rooftop HVAC units $476,000 Meadowcliff 1Fire alarm $16,175 Meadowcliff Asbestos abatement $253,412 I Meadowcliff Engergy efficient lighting $88,297 I-Meadowcliff Remodel $365,600 Metropolitan Replace cooling tower $37,203 I Metropolitan - Replace shop vent system I $20,000 Metropolitan Energy monitoring system installation $17,145 I Mitchell Building Remediation $165,000 Mitchell Energy efficient lighting $103,642 Mitchell Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 Mitchell !Asbestos abatement I $13,000 Oakhurst (Adult Education) New Windows $215,000 Oakhurst 1HVAC renovation $237,237 Otter Creek Energy monitoring system installation $10,695 Otter Creek Energy efficient lighting $81,828 Otter Creek Asbestos abatement I $10,000 Otter Creek Parking lot $138,029 I Otter Creek 6 classroom addition I $888,778 I- Otter Creek Parking Improvements $142,541 Parkview 'Addition I $2,121,226 Parkview HVAC controls I $210,000 I Parkview Roof replacement I $273,877 Parkview Exterior lights $10,784 Parkview HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls $301,938 Parkview Locker replacement I $120.000 I I-Parkview Energy efficient lighting $315,000 Procurement I Energy monitoring system installation I $5,290 Procurement Fire alarm I $25,000 Pulaski Heights Elem/Middle I Cafeteria Ceiling I $33,378 I Pulaski Heights Elem/Middle I Replace Entry Doors I $13,990 Est. Completion Date Oct-04 Aug-01 Aug-02 Aug-02 Dec-02 Aug-01 Mar-04 Apr-04 Dec-01 Dec-01 Oct-01 Sep-01 Aug-01 Apr-05 Jul-03 Jul-03 Jun-01 May-01 Aug-01 Feb-02 Jul-04 Sep-04 Feb-01 Aug-02 Jul-01 Aug-02 Dec-02 Oct-05 Dec-00 May-01 Aug~ Jul-04 Apr-01 Jul-01 Jul-01 Aug-05 Aug-01 May-01 Apr-01 Aug~ Aug-02 Oct-02 Aug-03 Dec-04 Jun-02 Sep-01 Nov-00 Aug-01 Aug-01 Jun-01 Jun-02 Aug-03 Aug-05 Auo-05 .\u0026gt; s:- ~ el re: c'in -\u0026lt;~ riil zc5 !!J\u0026gt; c5~ zm I\n,c -\u0026lt; ::Cl'j nm \u0026gt;cn CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD NOVEMBER 17, 2005 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Project Description Cost I Pulaski Heights Elementary Clean Exterior Walls I $98,660 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Renovation $1,193,259 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground $17,000 . Pulaski Hgts. MS Renovation I $3,755,041 Rightsell Energy efficient lighting $84,898 I Rockefeller Energy efficient lighting I $137,004 I Rockefeller Replace rooftop HVAC $539,175 Rockefeller Parking addition $111,742 j Romine Asbestos abatement $10,000 Romine Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $3,534,675 I Scott Field Track Renovations $289,056 I Security/Transportation Bus cameras $22,500 i Southwest New Corridor Ceiling $300,000 Southwest Addition I $2,000,000 Southwest Asbestos abatement $28,138 I Southwest New roof I $690,000 Southwest Energy efficient lighting $168,719 I Southwest Drainage / street widening I $250,000 Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installation $4,830 Student Assignment Fire alarm $9,ooo I Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation $275,000 Tech Ctr/ Metro Renovation Addition/Renovation - Phase II I $3,679,000 : Technology Upgrade Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data Terry Energy efficient lighting $73,850 I Terry Driveway \u0026amp; Parking $83,484 Terry Media Center addition $704,932 Wakefield Rebuild $5,300,000 Wakefield Security cameras $8,000 Wakefield Energy efficient lighting $74,776 1 Wakefield Demolition/Asbestos Abatement $200,000 Washington Fire Alarm Upgrade $11,600 Washington 1 Security cameras I $7,900 Washington Energy efficient lighting I $165,281 Watson Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 Watson Asbestos abatement $182,241 Watson Energy efficient lighting I Watson Asbestos abatement I $\n~~:~~~ I Watson Major renovation \u0026amp; addition I $8QQ,QQQ I Western Hills Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC $622,160 Western Hills Fire Alarm Upgrade $8,400 Western Hills ADA Rest rooms $25,000 Western Hills Asbestos abatement $191 ,946 Western Hills Intercom $7,100 Western Hills Energy efficient lighting $106,000 Williams Drainage Repair $29,200 Williams Renovation I $2,106,492 Williams Parking expansions $183,717 Williams Energy efficient lighting $122,719 Wilson HVAC for Cafeteria $56,000 Wilson Renovation/expansion $1,263,876 Wilson 1 Parking Expansion I $110,000 Woodruff Parking addition $175,000 Woodruff Renovation $246,419 t::st. 1_\nomp1euon Date Sep-05 Nov-04 Dec-02 Nov-04 Apr-01 Mar-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Apr-02 Mar-03 May-05 Jun-01 Aug-05 Nov-04 Aug-00 Oct-03 Jan-02 Aug-03 Aug-02 Aug-03 Dec-01 Jun-04 Nov-02 Feb-01 Aug-02 Sep-02 Dec-04 Jun-01 Feb-01 Nov-02 Oct-04 Jun-01 Apr-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 Aug-01 __ Aug-02 -- Aug-02 Aug-05 ---Oct-04 --- Aug-04 Aug-02 Dec-01 Jul-01 Nov-05 --- Mar-04 Dec-03 Jun-01 Mar-05 Feb-04 Aug-03 __ Aug-05 Auo-02 5 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: November 17, 2005 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Board Auditor Report BACKGROUND: Monthly report to School Board. RATIONALE: Summary report of activities. FUNDING: No changes. RECOMMENDATION: None. PREPARED BY: Sandy Becker Date: To: From: Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS November 17, 2005 Board of Directors Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Audit Report - November This is the seventy-third communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with two high schools, two middle school and two elementary schools to resolve financial issues in their activity and related funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. b) The AAB has forwarded a Booster Club Guidelines Package to be included in official publications of the District after review. Board Policy and Regulation a) The routing of Professional Leave and Travel Requests is being worked on to make the process more efficient and to prepare for the process being automated to improve documentation and provide information for decision making. Technology a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Working with Procurement on the use ofbarcode scanners for checking and updating inventory records. This is being done to help more quickly update and check electronic equipment records at the various sites. c) Served as a trainer for financial portion of Nuts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. Provided training with the Arkansas PT A on financials controls and financial preventive maintenance. Audit Report- November 2005 Page 2 of2 d) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. e) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. f) Developed skills test for financial positions. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) c) d) e) f) g) h) a) b) c) d) e) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. Reviewing leave accountability system. Assisting schools to track and reconcile Teacher School Supply Funds. Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2005. Eleven schools participated. Sharefest had eleven school participate on October 29, 2005. Sharefest 2005 was a success for each of the schools. A story is on the District website. Assisting LRSD PT A's in financial process training. Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. :n .... ~ :z:c\nC:\ng !\nm LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: November 17, 2005 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Technology Report BACKGROUND: Since the last Board meeting the following technology activities took place:  The Technology Plan Revision Committee continues to work on the revised technology plan for the district. Focus groups made up of teachers from all schools have been set up to gather input on needs and priorities for the plan. The new plan covers the years 2006-2009.  The online agenda project continues: - Online Technologies was selected to install audio-visual equipment in the Boardroom and administration building lobby. Installation will begin late in November, once all the equipment has been delivered. - Board members selected either a notebook or laptop computer and those have been ordered. - The NovusAgenda on-line application will be installed and configured on the LRSD servers beginning the first week of December. - Training for all district users will be held January 10 - 12, 2006 at the LRSD Technology Center. - Training for Board members will be held in conjunction with the January 12 agenda meeting in the LRSD administration building board room. RATIONALE: To implement the LRSD Technology Plan 2003 - 2006 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept this report. PREPARED BY: John Ruffins, Director, Computer Information Services Lucy Neal, Coordinator, Instructional Technology DATE: TO: FROM: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 November 17, 2005 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Policy Review and Proposed Revisions BACKGROUND: The Board conducts periodic reviews of policies and regulations to ensure that these regulatory directives remain current and complete. Board member Tony Rose requested a review of specific policies and has suggested updates as follows: Policy AC - Nondiscrimination The current policy AC, Nondiscrimination, was adopted in September 1998. The proposed revision of this policy changes the term \"sex\" to \"gender and sexual orientation.\" The changes are indicated on the first reading proposal attached. Policy ACD - Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Religion Policy ACD, Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Religion, was adopted by the Board in September 1998. The proposed revision of this policy replaces the language of the entire policy, emphasizing the Board's commitment to nondiscrimination based on religious beliefs. Policy ACH - Anti-Harrassment The current policy ACH, Anti-harassment, consists of language that should be considered as regulatory administrative directives. The proposed revision separates the policy from the directives. RATIONALE: To ensure that the Board's policies and regulations remain up-to-date and accurate. The Board approved these policies on first reading at the October board meeting. FUNDING: No funding required. .!D., !B ~ z z m r- RECOMMENDATION: The administration recommends approval on second reading of Policies AC, ACD, and ACH. PREPARED BY: Roy G. Brooks LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: AC NONDISCRIMINATION The commitment of the Little Rock School District to the most fundamental principles of academic freedom, equality of opportunity, and human dignity requires that decisions involving students and employees be based on individual merit and be free from discrimination in all its forms. It is the policy of the Board of Education that there will be no discrimination because of race, color, religion, ~. gender, sexual orientation, age, national origin, or handicap/disability in the placement, instruction, and guidance of pupils\nthe employment, assignment, training, or promotion of personnel\nthe provision and maintenance of physical supplies and equipment\nthe development and implementation of the curriculum, including the activities program\nand in all matters relating to the instruction, supervision, administration and Board policy development. Revised: Adopted: September 24, 1998 Legal References: Title VI and Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title I and Title 11, Civil Rights Act of 1991 Equal Pay Act of 1963 Executive Order 11246 of 1995 Title IX, Education Amendments of 1972 and regulations, 34 C.F.R. part 104 Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Sections 503 and 504 Section 504, 34 C.F.R. part 104 Americans with Disabilities Act, 1990 Vietnam-era Veterans Readjustment Act, 1974 Age Discrimination Act, 1975 Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 1967 Arkansas General Laws Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997 Cross References: Board of Education Policies ACA, ACB, ACC, ACD, ACE, ACF .!J,,I m ~ zz m r- .\u0026gt; s:-\ng !\nl r- C: i\"in -\u0026lt;?\niii i5 6~ iz5m en I :,0 -\u0026lt; :Ci\"\u0026gt; \u0026gt;nemn !ZI 0 C: ! m ~ C: ~ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: ACD NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF RELIGION Tho ~irst Amendment to tho United States of America's Constitution requires that public schools remain religiously neutral. All students, staff, and faculty have tho right to choose or not to choose their ovm religion and there will be no discrimination of any kind based upon an individual's religion. It is the policy of the Board of Education that no student, faculty, or staff in the Little Rock School District will, on the basis of religious belief, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any District educational program, activity, or employment. Revised: Adopted: September 24, 1998 Legal References: See Code AC Cross Reference: Board of Education Policy AC LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE : ACH ANTI-HARASSMENT POLICY It is the policy of the District to maintain a learning environment that is free from harassment. The District prohibits any and all forms of harassment because of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, national origin, religion, or disability or protected activity (i.e. opposing unlawful harassment or discrimination or participating in an investigation. Any such conduct will result in disciplinary action and notification to the proper authorities. It will be a violation of District policy for any student, teacher, administrator, or other school personnel of the District to harass a student through conduct of a sexual nature, or regarding race, color, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, national origin, religion, disability, or protected activity as defined by this policy. It will also be a violation of District policy for any teacher, administrator or other school personnel of the District to tolerate sexual harassment or harassment because of a student's race, color, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, national origin, religion, disability or protected activity as defined by this policy, by a student, teacher, administrator, other school personnel, or by any third parties who are participating in,  observing, or otherwise engaged in activities, including sports events and other extracurricular activities, under the auspices of the District. For the purpose of this policy, the \"school personnel\" includes school Board of Education members, school employees, agents, volunteers, contractors, or persons subject to the supervision and control of the District. The District will act to promptly investigate all complaints, either formal or informal, verbal or written, of harassment because of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, national origin, religion, disability or protected activity to promptly take appropriate action to protect individuals from further harassment\nand, if it determines that unlawful harassment occurred, to promptly and appropriately discipline any student, teacher, administrator or other school personnel who is found to have violated this policy, and/or to take other appropriate action reasonably calculated to end the harassment.\n,,,~ ~ :s ,.. C: c'in -\u0026lt; \u0026gt; omc\"5' 5 f\nc5:\nzm I\ni:, -:J:\u0026lt;c\"\u0026gt; Om  u, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: ACH continued This policy will be broadly interpreted as evidence of the District's commitment to equality of opportunity, human dignity, diversity, and academic freedom. No person will retaliate or threaten retaliation against another person for reporting, testifying or otherwise participating in any investigation, or proceeding relating to a complaint of harassment. Revised: Adopted: July 23, 2001 Legal References: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, 1965, 42 U.S.C.  2000d Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C.  1681 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C.  794 Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C.  12134 Cross References: Student Handbooks and Personnel Handbook 2 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: ACH-R Anti-Harassment Regulation PROCEDURE FOR COMPLAINTS OF HARASSMENT These regulations are intended to protect the rights of students, employees, administrators, the Board of Education and visitors on District property and to outline procedures, which will be followed in the event harassment occurs on District property or at an event sponsored by the District. The following definitions will be used for the purpose of enforcing the AntiHarassment Policy, ACH. DEFINITIONS Racial or Color Harassment Racial or color harassment includes unwelcome verbal, written or physical conduct, directed at the characteristics of a person's race or color, such as nicknames emphasizing stereotypes, racial slurs, comments on manner of speaking and negative references to racial customs. Sexual Harassment Sexual harassment consists of unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, sexually motivated physical conduct or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature. It also includes conduct that is not sexual in nature but that is engaged in because of the gender of the victim. It includes conduct that is also criminal in nature such as rape, sexual assault, stalking, and similar offenses. Under federal law, sexual harassment is prohibited regardless of the sex of the harasser, i.e., sexual harassment may occur even if the harasser and the person being harassed are the same sex. Sexual Orientation Harassment Harassment on the basis of sexual orientation is unwelcome verbal, written or physical conduct, directed at the characteristics of a person's sexual orientation, such as negative name-calling and imitating mannerisms. Marital Status Harassment Harassment on the basis of marital status is unwelcome verbal, written or physical conduct, directed at the characteristics of a person's marital status, such as comments regarding pregnancy or being an unwed mother or father. !D \"D m\na ~z z I!! LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: ACH-R (continued) National Origin Harassment Harassment on the basis of national origin is unwelcome verbal, written or physical conduct, directed at the characteristics of a person's national origin, such as negative comments regarding surnames, manner of speaking, customs, language, or ethnic slurs. Religious Harassment Harassment on the basis of religion or creed is unwelcome verbal, written or physical conduct, directed at the characteristics of a person's religion or creed, such as derogatory comments regarding surnames, religious tradition, or religious clothing, or religious slurs, or graffiti. Disability Harassment Harassment based on a person's disabling mental or physical condition and includes any unwelcome verbal, written or physical conduct, directed at the characteristics of a person's disabling condition, such as imitating manner of speech or movement, or interference with necessary equipment. REPORTING PROCEDURES Any person who feels he/she is being harassed may wish to consider informing the offending person that the behavior is inappropriate and not appreciated. Oftentimes, this is all that is required to stop the harassing behavior. You are not, however, required to take this step prior to filing a complaint. Any student, District personnel, or visitor who believes he/she has been the victim of harassment by a student, teacher, administrator or other school personnel of the District, or by any other person who is participating in, observing, or otherwise engaged in activities, including extracurricular activities, under the auspices of the District, is encouraged to immediately report the alleged acts to the building principal. If the principal is the perpetrator of the harassment, the report of the incident will be made to the appropriate Assistant Superintendent, Associate Superintendent for School Services or the Director of Human Resources. Any teacher, administrator or other school official who has knowledge of or receives notice that a student or visitor has or may have been the victim of harassment by a student, teacher, administrator, or other school district personnel is required to immediately report the alleged act(s) to the building principal unless the principal is the perpetrator. If the harassment involves the 2 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: ACH-R (continued) principal, the incident will be reported to the appropriate Assistant Superintendent or Associate Superintendent for School Services. Upon receipt of the report, the principal, Assistant Superintendent or Associate Superintendent will notify Safety and Security personnel to conduct an investigation of the allegation. A third party may be involved in the investigation. The parent of the student (victim) will be notified immediately, unless after consultation with the student, it is determined not to be in the best interest of the student. If the alleged harassment is committed by a student, the student's parent/guardian will be notified that an investigation is being conducted. Complaints will be kept confidential to the extent possible. A prompt, thorough and impartial investigation will be conducted of all complaints of violation of this policy. Upon completion of the investigation, a written report will be submitted to the principal, Assistant Superintendent, or Associate Superintendent. The report will include a determination as to whether the allegations have been substantiated as factual and whether they appear to have violated District policy and/or law. Notification of the outcome of the investigation will be sent to all parties involved. If the allegation is substantiated, the District will take immediate and appropriate corrective action, including the following: 1. a student will receive a disciplinary sanctioned as outlined in the Student Handbook, and/or notification to the proper authorities. 2. a staff member will receive a disciplinary sanction as outlined in the Employee Handbook and/or the proper authorities will be notified. 3. a report of the incident regarding a visitor who committed an act while on District property or at an event sponsored by the District, will be referred to the proper legal authorities. 3 !II ~ m\n,o ~ zz ,m... -- --- --------- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: ACH-R (continued) Notwithstanding this policy, .employees may file a charge of discrimination with the U.S. EEOC. Employers who wish to file a charge must do so within 180 days of the last act of alleged harassment. Revised: Adopted: July 23, 2001 Legal References: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, 1965, 42 U.S.C.  2000d Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C.  1681 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C.  794 Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C.  12134 Cross References: Student Handbook and Personnel Handbook 4 DATE: TO: FROM: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 November 17, 2005 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Policy Deletion - IHCA (Summer School) BACKGROUND In 1982, the Board of Education adopted a Summer School policy stating that operational costs of summer programs would be covered by pupil tuition and/other grants, exclusive of local and state tax funds. In July 1999, the Board adopted a revised Summer School policy that emphasized PreK-3 extended opportunities that received state funding. This funding no longer exists. During the 2003-2004 school year, the District was advised by legal counsel that according to A.C.A. 6-16-702, that summer fees could not be levied on students who qualified for free and reduced price lunch. The majority of LRSD summer school participants (2004 and 2005) qualified for free tuition thus leaving the district to bear the total financial burden. Act 2243, of the State of Arkansas 85th General Assembly, 2005, addresses Public School Assessment and Remediation. Each student identified as not meeting satisfactory pass levels on the Benchmark and end-of-course exams will be given an Academic Improvement Plan (AIP) for remediation. In response, the District will implement a comprehensive program of focused intervention and acceleration activities aligned with students' needs. Credit recovery will be made available for high school students who require make up. Credit recovery programs will be available as needed on a year round schedule. Additionally, a variety of focused intervention and acceleration activities will be made available for students requiring these services. These may include, among other things, before and after school tutoring programs, acceleration programs operating during the academic day, Saturday school or summer programs as funding allows. RATIONALE This policy has become outdated. The elimination of this policy will update efficiency and compliance. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board approve the elimination of policy IHCA. PREPARED BY: Junious Babbs Dr. Olivine Roberts DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 November 17, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Quarterly Update Report BACKGROUND: The fifth quarterly written update (December 1) by the Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) Department was completed in accordance with the District Court's 2004 Compliance Remedy (Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004, pp. 61-67). This report includes descriptions of research activities related to four step-2 evaluations currently being conducted by Ors. Steven Ross and James Catterall, and development of evaluation designs for four proposed step-2 evaluations to be completed by these researchers this school year. Ors. Ross and Catterall have completed all observations of classes, interviews, focus groups, and surveys of principals, teachers, students, and parents participating in CompassLearning, Reading Recovery, SMART/THRIVE, and Year-Round (ExtendedYear) Education. Quantative data analysis cannot be completed until electronic formatted benchmark scores are received. Dr. Catterall has signed a contract to conduct a study during this school year focused on the A+ program. Dr. Ross is expected to sign a contract soon to conduct three additional studies: Knowledge Points, Pre-K Literacy, and 21 st Century Learning Centers. RATIONALE: The Court's remedy requires PRE to perform 8 \"step-2\" evaluations. FUNDING: None Necessary RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept the Quarterly Update Report. DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 November 17, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Proposals for the 2005-06 school year: Building Maintenance Employees Bus Drivers, Aides and Monitors Security Officers BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District negotiates contracts for support personnel in conjunction with the annual negations with certified staff. RATIONALE: This Little Rock School District operates on these agreements for contract purposes. The recommendations include language changes to the contracts and a salary recommendation consistent with the salary increases provided to other employee groups. FUNDING: District Operations Budget RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the changes be approved for the three employee groups whose proposed contract revisions are attached: 1) Building Maintenance Employees\n2) Bus Drivers, Aides and Monitors\nand 3) District Security Guards. PREPARED BY: David E. Hartz, Senior Director of Human Resources 0 n ::z:113 -0 6~ z.,, C: ::0 --\u0026lt;o ::Oc... =Im c5n z--\u0026lt; !II\n:\n: ~ z z ,m- !II I: ::::i n ::c ~ rm In I: m z ij ~n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" November 1 7, 2005 To: Little Rock School District Board of Directors From: Dr. Roy Brooks, Superintendent of Schools l::\u0026gt;t'I Prepared by: David E. Hartz, Sr. Director of Human Resources RE: Proposal for the 2005-2006 school year for Maintenance Employees 1. The District will apply  percent to the 2004-2005 salary schedule to create a 2005-2006 salary schedule. 2. Tne District will give the step increase for all eligible employees for the 2005- 2006 school year. 3. The District will pay up to $263.00 for eligible health insurance plans the 2005- 2006 school year. 4. The District agrees to review this recommendation provided the result of the Lake View decision increases the State foundation funding (above 5,400) per student. 810 W. Markham  Little Rocle, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-447-1001 NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT BETWEEN BUS DRIVERS, AIDES AND MONITORS AND THE UTILE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR 2005-2006 C n  ::C CD -0 6~ z~ C: ,0 -\u0026lt;o ,0 c... =Im i5 n z-\u0026lt; !II I: =I n ::c ,p.:.!. m i:\nffi .z.. . ! ARTICLE6 EXTENT OF AGREEMENT Any individual contract between the employer and an individual bargaining unit member, heretofore executed, shall be subject to and consistent with the terms and eensisteat conditions of this Agreement. Any individual contract hereafter executed shall be expressly made subject to and consistent with the tenns of this or subsequent Agreements to be executed by the parties. If an individual contract contains any language inconsistent with this Agreement, this Agreement, during its duration, shall be controlling. ARTICLE9 DISCIPLINFJJlJST CAUSE E. Discharge during Initial Period Employees who have not completed the initial probationary period of 180 workdays may be discharged for any cause that is not arbitrary or capricious. G. Grievance during Initial Period Employees who have not completed the initial probationary period of 180 work days shall have access to the Grievance Procedure for disciplinary actions or discharge after sixty (60) days of employment. J. Serious Offenses Following examples of serious offenses for which an employee may be recommended for immediate termination. These offenses may include but are not limited to: Note: 3. Possession of a knife, box cutter, dirk, brass knuckles, martial arts implement, razor, ice pick, BB gun, pellet gun, stun gun, blackjack, unauthorized tools, sword, spear in cane, billie club, sap, facsimile weapon, or any other instruments that is specifically designed, made or adapted, to cause physical injury to another person. Last Paragraph: Private Vehicle Once an at-fault accident or moving violation is removed from an employee's driving record, it will be removed from their personnel file unless bodily injury requiring medical attention or a death was a result of the accident. District Vehicle Once an at-fault accident or moving violation committed by a driver, aide or monitor while operating an LRSD school bus is removed from the employee' driving record, it shall be removed from their personnel file after 10 years unless a bodily injury occurs requiring medical attention or a death was a result of the accident. C n  :i:: a, -0 6~ ~ :8 -\u0026lt;o\na\u0026lt;= Im c5 n z-\u0026lt; !I' \"Cl ~ z z m,... D. Reporting Time ARTICLE 14 HOURS OF WORK All transportation Drivers, Aides and Monitors will be required to report to work no later than 6:00 a.m. in the morning and 2:00 p.m. in the afternoon. E. Assignment/Re-assignment of Bus Routes 3. By Oetober l of eeeh ye\u0026amp;F By the fll\"St week in October (unless an emergency prevents the Administration from compiling the necessary information) all routes will be open for bidding. Employees will be afforded an opportunity to \"bid\" on-routes of their choice. For this purpose a route will be considered to be a combination of morning/afternoon school runs assigned to an individual bus to make most effective use of limited vehicular resources. The assignment of routes will be based on driver seniority. This will be the only time during the school year that all routes will be open for bidding. Scheduled bidding times will be established by management and strictly followed. Each driver will be allowed fifteen (15) minutes to bid. Those drivers who cannot be present may authorize a unit member or management to bid for them if their proxy is given in writing. Those who exceed their time or fail to show will be placed at the bottom of the list. E. ARTICLE 19 LEAVES Jury Service and other Related Appearances Any employee called for jury duty, or who is subpoenaed to testify during work hours in any judicial or administrative matter related to district business, including requested attendance during an arbitration fact-finding proceeding shall be paid his/her full compensation for such time with no loss of any leaves, seniority, or loss of any other benefits. Those subpoenaed during non-work hours for district related business should be paid at the staff development rate. Whee suhpoeeaed iA ROA Distriet Rllated eusie866, the le88 will ee without pay 0Meept atteooaaee iooeeti\u0026gt;,ie pay. C n ::,:: ID -0 6i ~\ng -to :,0 '= l m c5 n z-t !11 \"II m ~ z z p:! !11 I: =l n ::,:: ,m,...... m In I: zm ij ARTICLE 20 WAGES A. The salary schedule of the transportation department incorporated in this agreement will fix the employees salary for the duration of this Agreement: 1. .S% increase to the pay scale for the 2005-2006 school year. 2. The District agrees to pay bus drivers, aides and monitors the same percentage increase awarded to teachers should negotiations reopen as a result of the Lake View decision increasing the State Foundation funding per student. 3. The top out stipend of $7S0 will be paid to all eligible employees. 4. The District will pay up to $263 per employee per month to help defray insurance costs for 2005-2006. Appendix A Driver Pay Codes Laid field trips shall be calculated from 30 min11tes before scheduled pick up until 30 minutes after the last stop last drop off. Substitute Drivers will receive an increase of $2.50 a day above the normal daily rate for regular drivers. C o:z: a , -0 i\nz C ~\ng -\u0026lt;o\no \u0026lt;= Im c5 0 z-\u0026lt; !II ~\no is zz rm !II IC ~ :z: !:: m ::\nIC m !i ! r a ..,c o:z ~c u, ~ .... e :z:c.. -\u0026lt;IT !\" !: ARTICLE 25 EFFECTIVE DATES AND DURATION This agreement shall remain in full force and effect from July 1. 2005 through June 30, 2006 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused their corporate names to be hereunto subscribed by their respective presidents and attested to by the Superintendent of Schools of the Little Rock School District and the Executive Director of the Little Rock School District. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT President ATTEST: Superintendent LITTLE ROCK CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION President ATTEST: Executive Director NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT BETWEEN SECURITY GUARDS AND THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR 2005-2006 !I' \"D m\nIll ~ z z m r- TA 10-20-05 JUST CAUSE SECTION 1. SECTION 2. SECTION 3. SECTION 4. SECTION 5. SECTION 6. ARTICLES No employee shall be disciplined (including warnings, reprimands, suspensions, reductions in rank, discharge, lay-off, temtinations or other actions that would adversely affect the employee without just and sufficient cause. The specific grounds fomting the basis for disciplinary action will be made available to the employee and the Association in writing. No security officer will suffer the loss of pay for any disciplinary suspension until such time as the employee has had a decision rendered at Level II of the grievance procedure. An employee shall be entitled to have present a representative of the Association during any disciplinary action. When a request for such representation is made, no action shall be taken with respect to the employee until such representative of the Association is present provided that the Association representative must be available within twenty-four (24) hours of notice of the impending action. Further, in the event that a disciplinary action is taken, the employee shall be advised of the right to representation under this provision of the Agreement prior to the action being taken. If the employee refuses representation, he/she shall be required to sign a form affimting such refusal. The employer agrees to follow a. policy of progressive discipline which nomtally includes one (1) written warning, one (1) written reprimand, suspension without pay, and discharge with exception of certain offenses which may be grounds for immediate tem,ination or provide for a specified penalty. Any disciplinary action taken against an employee shall be appropriate to the behavior which precipitates said action. Suspension without pay will normally be for three (3) to ten (10) working days. Employees who are terminated shall be given all benefits to the date of tem,ination, at the time of temiination. Employees who have not completed the initial probationary period may be discharged for any cause that is not arbitrary or capricious. 19 SECTION 7. SECTION 8. Employees who have not completed the initial probationary period shall not have access to the grievance procedure for disciplinary action or discharge. Following are examples of serious offenses for which an employee will be recommended for immediate tennination. These offenses may include, but are not limited to: 1. Convicted, pleaded nolo contendere or forfeited collateral, for any felony or misdemeanor which is manifestly inconsistent with the safe and efficient operation or reputation of the school or department. 2. Fighting, threatening or attempting to do bodily injury to an employee or student. Bodily injury means physical pain and any impairment of physical condition. 3. Possession of a knife, box cutter, dirk, bras knuckles martial arts implement, razor, ice pick, BB gun, pellet gun, stun gun, blackjack, unauthorized tools, sword, spear in cane, blllie club, sap, facsimile weapon, or other instrument specifically designed, made or adapted to cause physical injury to another person. 4. Stealing or misappropriation of property of the School District or the employees of the Little Rock School District. 5. Malicious mischief, the abuse, misuse or deliberate destruction or damaging of property, tools or equipment of the Little Rock School District or other employees of the Little Rock School District. 6. Altering, tampering or falsification of time cards, \"sign - in or our rosters or other reporting documents relative to attendance, or promptness or departure. 7 . Drinking alcoholic beverages on the job or during the duty day\nor the possession of, or introduction of, any alcoholic beverages on LRSD property at any time. This also indudes reporting to work while under the influence of alcohol. Refusing to take an alcohol test for probabl e cause. B . Use of non-prescribed narcotics, and/or the use, possession, or transmitting on LRSD vehicles or premises of drugs or substances capable of modifying mood and/or behavior. Re f using to take a drug test for probable cause. 20 C o  ::ca, -0 6 i !:E\n-o-\u0026lt; c.o... ~m c50 z--\u0026lt; !I' ~ ~ z z ,m... !I' IC ~ 0 ::c ,,m...... m ~ IC zm ~ r a ..,c 02\n,a C m-,: !!l~ :cc.. --\u0026lt;rr !\"!: 9. Insubordination, including refusal or failure to perform work assigned and/or refusal to obey orders of supervisors. 10. Disorderly, disruptive or immoral conduct in LRSD vehicles or on LRSD premises. 11. The making of or publishing of false, vicious or malicious statements concerning a supervisor or other employee of the Little Rock School District. 12. Falsification of personnel or other official school or insurance records, or making false statements or concealing pertinent information when applying for employment. 13. Falsifying or refusing to give testimony concerning accidents involving school vehicles and/or incidents which are being investigated. 14. Failure to observe or purposefully disregard school district and department policy or procedure. 15. Use of District facilities, personnel, or equipment for nonDistrict purposes. 21 ARTICLE9 TA 10-20-05 PERSONNEL FILES SECTION 1. SECTION 2. SECTION 3. SECTION 4. SECTION 5 Employees shall, upon request, have the right to inspect all contents of their complete personnel file, kept with the employer, as well as employment references upon leaving the District. No secret, duplicate, alternate or other personnel file shall be kept anywhere in the District. Anyone, at the employee's request, may be present in this review. No item from any anonymous source may be placed in the personnel file. Any item(s) detrimental to any employee's employment status and which are without substance, no longer pertinent or otherwise in appropriate, shall be removed from the employee's personnel file and destroyed upon request by the employee. Each employee shall have the right, upon reasonable written request, to review and reproduce any contents of his/her personnel file, except personnel references. A representative of CTA may accompany the employee in such reviews and may, upon written authorization by the employee, review and reproduce any contents of the employee's personnel file. An employee's personnel file shall be open to inspection only by the employee, Superintendent or designated Administrator, or individual authorized in writing by the employee. Upon reasonable written request by the employee, the Superintendent or his/her designee shall sign to verify contents. Upon mutual consent between the employee and the Human Resources Director, a written reprimand which has not been used for a period of two years as the basis for disciplinary action against the employee may be removed from the employee's file and will be placed In a non-personnel file maintained by the Human Resources Director. This will apply only to reprimands written on August 11, 2005 or beyond. 22 0 o ::ca, -0 61 Z-o C\no .... 0\no \u0026lt;= Im l5 n z .... !ID ril\no is zz ,m... !ID TA 10-20-05 ARTICLE 10 EMPLOYEE EVALUATION SECTION 1. SECTION 2. Each employee, upon employment or at the beginning of the school year, whichever is later, shall be apprised in specific terms of his/her responsibilities, which shall be consistent with the District adopted job description. Employees will be informed of the specific criterion upon which they will be evaluated and who is responsible to evaluate the employee. Each employee shall be given a copy of the evaluation form. The evaluator shall distribute this material, including an explanation. Evaluators shall be administrative personnel of the District. Employees shall be evaluated by their immediate supervisor. However no supervisor shall be allowed to take any disciplinary action including placing an individual on probation. Evaluation criteria shall be limited to the specific skills outlined in District approved job descriptions. Evaluation criterion shall not require the employee to give unreasonable service or loyalty to any individual or to tolerate or endure abusive behavior or dangerous or threatening circumstances. (The evaluation instrument shall only denote satisfactory, unsatisfactory or very good for each criteria and overall performance and shall have appropriate space for explanatory comments.) It shall be the District's responsibility to assist employees in becoming oriented to the District and to improve their work performance through direct observation of the employee.The appropriate supervisor/administrator shall provide written summaries of these observations, together with any recommendations the administrator may have for the employee. All employees shall be evaluated at least once a year. If an employee's work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory by their immediate supervisor, then this employee should be placed on performance probation. This probationary period should normally be twenty (20) days\nhowever, this period may be extended by the supervisor/administrator if he/she believes that the deficiencies may be corrected with additional time. The initial twenty (20) day probationary period must have occurred before an annual performance evaluation can be rated as unsatisfactory. 23 SECTION 3. SECTION 4. SECTION 5. Any non-probationary employee who disagrees with an observation or recommendation may submit a written answer, which shall be attached to the file copy of the observation in question. Any overall unsatisfactory rating, observation or recommendation which adversely affects the non-probationary employee's professional standing may be grieved through the grievance procedure. In the event termination or non-renewal of the employee's contract is recommended, the employee and the Association shall be furnished a copy of such recommendation by certified mail or hand delivery with a statement of the reasons on which it is based. If an employee who has completed the required probationary period receives a notice pursuant to Section 4 above and desires a hearing, that employee is entitled to appeal the recommendation through the terms of the grievance procedure. 24 0 n  ::CID -0 6i ~:E -\u0026lt;o :,0 \u0026lt;-. =Im i5 (\") z-\u0026lt; !D \"O m ~ z z p:! f a ..,c oz ~c !!l~ :cc.. -\u0026lt;IT p\u0026gt;  ARTICLE 12 TA 10-20-05 HOURS OF WORK AND OVERTIME SECTION A. Add: On approval from both the principal and employee, the employee may elect to work eight (8) straight hours and have a thirty (30) minute lunch period that may be interrupted in the event of an emergency. If the employee does work eight straight hours, he/she is entitled to two (2) fifteen (15) minute breaks, one In the morning and one in the afternoon. SECTION E. Security Officers requested to supervise students shall be paid an additional $3.00 an hour for the major portion of each hour, rounded to the nearest  hour, up to a maximum of $6.00 per day. TA 10-20-05 ARTICLE 18 LEAVES SECTION A. Sick Leave will be granted in accordance with prevailing Public Law entitled \"Minimum Sick Leave Law for Non-Certified Employees.\" Conditions of Sick Leave Provision: At the beginning of each school year all security guards will be credited with the appropriate number of sick leave afforded them under the \"Minimum Sick Leave Law for Non-Certified Employees.\" b) If the employee resigns or leaves his/her employment position before the end of the school term, the Little Rock School District may deduct from his/her last pay check full compensation for any days ef sick leave taken in excess of the dayseamed. c) An employee is entitled to sick leave days only for reason of personal illness or illness or death in his/her immediate family. d) A record of sick leave used and accumulated must be maintained by the District. Sick leave that is unused during any school year shall be carried forward until 175 days have been accumulated. e) An employee who qualifies for sick leave may use any amount up to his/her total number of accumulated days. f) Accumulated sick leave that used may be restored up to 175 days in the same manner that they were first accumulated. g) The Superintendent of Schools may advance three days sick leave to employees upon the recommendation of the supervisor or department head. h) In cases where an employee ffequeRlly claims establishes a pattern of sick leave use for personal illness or upon an absence of 5 days or more due to personal illness, the District may require a doctor's certificate verifying the illness. i) When an employee has expended all sick leave days regardless of the nature of the absence, they must return to work, or request a Leave of Absence within five (5) days of their last sick day. Employees not adhering to this procedure will be considered as resigning their position. 37 !:D i ~z z ,m... Section 2. Section 3. Sectlon4 Qualified employees may take up to twelve (12) weeks of unpaid leave under the terms of The Family and Medical Leave Act except immediate family shall be defined as father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, husband, wife, grandparents, grandchildren, sister-inlaw, brother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, mother-in-law, fatherin- law, aunt, uncle, and other persons living in the same household. After the leave has been approved, the employee will receive his/her full normal health care coverage for up to the twelve (12) weeks of the leave. Security officers may use up to the equivalent of two sick leave days for personal reasons Attendance Incentive-Attendance will be given to all security guards who have perfect attendance. If a security guard is required to serve jury duty, these absences will not count against the employee. The employee shall not miss any days for sick leave, military leave, be on leave without pay or be taken off payroll for any reason to qualify for the perfect attendance incentive stipend. ($200, $200, $200) $200 stipend for perfect attendance the first summer $200 stipend for perfect attendance the second semester $200 additional stipend if the employee has \"perfect attendance\" for the entire school year. $100 stipend for only missing day or $50 for only missing one day each semester will be considered under the same terms above. 38 TA 11-08-05 Article 18 Section D Attendance Incentive Attendance incentive will be given to all security guards who have perfect attendance. If a security guard is required to serve jury duty or uses two sick leave days pursuant to Article 18 section C, these absences will not count against the employee. C o :Z: ID -0 Ei i!j ~ jJ\n\"o\" 'co.... =lm i5 n z\"\"' !II E =l n :z: ~ m i\nffi\nTA 11-08-05 ARTICLE21 WAGES AND BENEFITS A. The salary schedule for security officers incorporated in this Agreement will fix the employees salary for the duration of this Agreement. 1. .5% for the 2005-2006 school year. Employees that qualify will receive a step increase. 2. The LRSD agrees to pay security officers the same percentage increase awarded teachers should negotiations re-open as a result of the Lake View decision increasing the State foundation funding per student 3. Any officer who has obtained a college degree from a college accredited by the North Central Association, or by some other accrediting agency of comparable rank, shall receive an annual stipend of $500 4. The District will pay up to $263.00 per employee per month to help defray insurance costs for 2005-2006 All security officers shall receive a printed copy of the contract as amended by the parties for the years 2005-2006. B. An employee who is on an approved unpaid leave of absence shall be eligible for COBRA benefits in accordance with applicable laws and state insurance regulations. The District shall reimburse the employee for 1 year an amount equal to the District contribution for active employees after receipt of proof of payment of COBRA premiums. ARTICLE 24 EFFECTIVE DATES AND DURATION This agreement shall remain in full force and effect from July 1. 2005 through June 30, 2006 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused their corporate names to be hereunto subscribed by their respective presidents and attested to by the Superintendent of Schools of the Little Rock School District and the Executive Director of the Little Rock School District. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT President ATTEST: Superintendent LITTLE ROCK CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION President ATTEST: Executive Director C o ::ca, -0 61 ~\ng\n\",\",\" \u0026lt;'o- =l m c5 0 z\"\"\"' !%' \"V ~ z z ,m... !%' :IC ~ ::c ~ m i\n:IC mz ij DATE: TO: FROM: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 November 17, 2005 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Personnel Changes BACKGROUND: None RATIONALE: To staff allocated positions within the District FUNDING: Operating Fund RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.CA 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) consecutive years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 19, 2005 for regular schools are considered intern teachers. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 8, 2005 for EYE are considered intern teachers. l)lA PREPARED BY: David E. Hartz, Senior Director of Human Resources !II -= =l C') ::c ,p.:.!. m In -zm= ij Personnel Changes Page2 November 17, 2005 NAME START DATE/ POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE ResignationsfTerminations Certified Employees Bruhl, Rita Elementary I/ 8-22-05 Reason: Personal ROMINE 10-31-05 Meazle, Adeline Elementary II/ 5-15-94 Reason: Health KING 11-1-05 Murphy, Nancy Geometry/ 1-18-05 Reason: None given HALL 10-25-05 New Certified Employees Baker, Jennifer English/ J. A FAIR 8-11-05 Branch, Karunda Physical Education/ 9-12-05 FELDER Bufford, Christen Oral Communications/ 10-24-05 HALL Flear, Tanya Special Education/ 9-26-05 FELDER Fowler, Ruby Physics/ 9-12-05 CENTRAL Fuller, Cynthia Special Education/ 8-11-05 MANN Holland, Lynn Business Education/ 10-10-05 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE Hooper, Ruth Vocal Music/ 8-11-05 HENDERSON SALARY ANNUAL CLASS SALARY 2-04 34021.00 TCH925 4-19 55076.00 TCH925 4-10 44036.00 TCH925 3-02 33789.00 TCH925 1-04 32512.00 TCH925 annual 28956.00 prorated 1-02 30770.00 TCH925 annual 22596.72 prorated 4-04 37069.00 SPE925 annual 31083.90 prorated 1-02 30770.00 TCH925 annual 27404.53 prorated 4-15 49842.00 SPE925 4-01 34747.00 TCH925 annual 27689.02 prorated 2-16 47955.00 TCH925 Personnel Changes Page3 November 17, 2005 0 n  ::ca, -0 6~ z\"D \u0026lt;=\na START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL --\u0026lt;o\na\u0026lt;- CLASS SALARY =Im NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE c5n z--\u0026lt; Jett, Amy Elementary II/ 10-21-05 1-01 30190.00 ROMINE TCH925 annual 22328.02 prorated King, Bobby English/ 9-19-05 6-20 58812.00 ALC TCH925 annual 50847.87 !\" prorated 8 z ~ c5 Mendilllo, Maria English/ 10-1-05 6-06 42556.00 ezn FOREST HEIGHTS TCH925 annual 34576.75 prorated Mitchell, Stacey Art/ 8-11-05 1-01 30190.00 FOREST HEIGHTS TCH925 .ii.\u0026lt;, Watson, Patricia Counselor/ 9-26-05 4-19 27538.00 ,...~\naZ mn FELDER CNL10 annual is\n24239.18 l::~ .... \"Cl prorated i~\n..a.. Whitehead, Jackie Special Education/ 8-11-05 6-19 57651 .00 HALL SPE925 Certified Promotions !II Barrett, Elizabeth 9.25 teacher contract to ESL Multilingual Community Assistant I: :::i (') :,m.:.c.. ,.... m Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Emj\n!lo:iees ,.... m Im: .z.. . \u0026gt;\na Burns, Lenette Secretary/ 8-11-04 31-13 20904.00 -\u0026lt; Reason: Accepted another CENTRAL 11-04-05 CLK925 position Collier, Myra Custodian/ 2-19-01 31-20 20063.00 Reason: Resigned without CENTRAL 11-2-05 CUS928 notice f a ..,c 02 Harris, Jacqueline Instructional Aide/ 8-17-05 33-06 12002.00 i:lc .e..n. \"' ~ Reason: Returning to school FULBRIGHT 11-2-05 INA925 ::C\u0026lt;- !...\". !\": Personnel Changes Page4 November 17, 2005 NAME Hines, Terry Reason: Personal Kenter, Linda Reason: Retired Moser, Matthew Reason: Resigned without notice Presley, Vera Reason: Resigned without notice Thompson, Dian Reason: Personal Young, Barbara Reason: Resigned without notice Adams, Scott Andrews, Janice Bass, Karlah Burton, Pamela START DATE/ POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE Security Officer/ 8-8-05 FULBRIGHT 11-8-05 Instructional Aide/ 11-1-87 STEPHENS 1-1-06 Security Officer/ 4-04-04 MCCLELLAN 8-16-05 Instructional Aide/ 2-4-02 ADULT EDUCATION 11-8-05 Custodian/ 9-27-04 CARVER 11-7-05 Instructional Aide/ 2-16-01 HALL 8-11-05 New Non-Certified Employees Learning Specialist/ 9-22-05 INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY CARE/ 10-24-05 CARE Instructional Aide/ 10-17-05 MABELVALE MIDDLE Instructional Aide/ 8-23-05 FOREST HEIGHTS SALARY ANNUAL CLASS SALARY 36-10 15463.00 SOFR9 33-19 17705.00 INA925 36-10 15463.00 SOFR9 28-09 16956.00 AN10 31-01 11379.00 CUS925 33-16 16192.00 INA925 66-10 54336.00 AN12 annual 41619.00 prorated 2-01 7.58 CARE per hour 33-06 12002.00 INA925 annual 9147.47 prorated 33-09 13140.00 INA925 annual 12571 .78 prorated Personnel Changes Pages November 17, 2005 0 n ::cl:II -0 6~ !\ng START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL -\u0026lt;o\no c.. CLASS SALARY =Im NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE c5n z-\u0026lt; Dennis, Sue Child Nutrition/ 10-7-05 3-01 9350.00 PARKVIEW FSH550 annual 7590.59 prorated Freeman, Valeria Instructional Aide (.70)/ 10-17-05 33-16 11334.00 BOOKER INA925 annual 8638.65 prorated !\" 8 z Glover, Mona Instructional Aide/ 8-23-05 33-16 16192.00 ~ i5 MABELVALE MIDDLE INA925 annual z \"' 15490.81 prorated Gardner, Stephanie Instructional Aide/ 10-20-05 33-16 16192.00 FULBRIGHT INA925 annual 12078.36 ~ prorated .., \u0026gt;z - ~\no (\") Gray, Alicia Instructional Aide/ 10-28-05 33-16 16192.00 mm ~\"\" FOREST PARK INA925 annual ::::~ -\u0026lt;-o 11640.73 ~i prorated .... Jacko, Kimberly Custodian/ 10-24-05 31-01 5689.50 BALE CUS925 annual 4236.20 prorated !I' Jones, Cherise Instructional Aide/ 10-10-05 33-09 13140.00 E =I (\") FOREST PARK INA925 annual ::c m 10369.95 ,,-- m prorated In Em z... . Jones, Derrick Security Officer/ 9-22-05 36-11 15929.00 ~ MCCLELLAN SOFR9 annual -\u0026lt; 13653.43 prorated Kirby, Nathaniel Instructional Aide/ 8-15-05 33-03 16192.00 PULASKI HEIGHTS INA925 annual MIDDLE 16016.95 !\"\" Ct prorated ..,c oz fllc \"',: ~~ ~!: Personnel Changes Page6 November 17, 2005 NAME Meeks, Janice Reed, Latoya Scott, Uvita Sharp, Dawanna Spiridigliozzi, Anthony Walls, Linda Washington, Tiffany Woods, James Merritt, Reginald Palmer, Juana START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY Child Nutrition/ 10-7-05 3-01 9350.00 MABELVALE MIDDLE FSH550 annual 7590.59 prorated CARE/ 10-24-05 1-01 6.98 CARE CARE per hour CARE/ 10-24-05 3-07 8.73 CARE CARE per hour CARE/ 10-24-05 1-07 7.92 CARE CARE per hour Instructional Aide/ 10-20-05 33-16 20568.00 ROCKEFELLER INA12 annual 13916.22 prorated Instructional Aide/ 10-14-05 33-06 8041 .34 GIBBS INA925 annual 6172.27 prorated CARE/ 10-24-05 2-01 7.58 CARE CARE per hour Instructional Aide/ 10-17-05 33-16 16192.00 TERRY INA925 annual 12340.93 prorated Non-Certified Promotions 9.25 month contract to 11 month contract INA 9.25 month contract to CLK 10 month contract LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: November 17, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Board Disbursing Officers and Legislative Representative BACKGROUND: Act 671 of 2003 amended Arkansas Code 6-13-618 requiring the Board of Directors to designate, by resolution adopted by majority vote, one (1) of its members to serve as the primary board disbursing officer of the District and may designate one (1) member as an alternate Board disbursing officer in the absence of the primary Board disbursing officer. Board Policy BJ directs that a person will be designated annually to serve as the Board's legislative representative. RATIONALE: To comply with the requirements set forth in State law and Board Policy. FUNDING: No funds are required for this action. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve the attached Resolution designating the Board President as the primary disbursing officer for the Board, the Board Vice-President as the alternate disbursing officer for the Board, and Joe Mittiga as the Board's legislative representative for the 2005-06 school year. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen Chief Financial Officer C n % a, r--0z Cc z.,, C\n:a -to ::0c... =lm cz5 n_, !\"\" g z !\n0 z en RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DISBURSING OFFICERS AND A LEGISLATIVE REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR 2005-2006 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors shall designate one (1) of its members who shall serve as the primary Board disbursing officer as required by Ark. Code Ann. 6-13-618\nand WHEREAS, the Board of Directors may designate one (1) or more Board members as an alternate Board disbursing officer in the absence of the designated primary Board disbursing officer as provided by Ark. Code Ann. 6-13-618\nand WHEREAS, the Board of Directors will annually designate a person who may or may not be a member of the Board to serve as its legislative representative as required by LRSD Board Policy BJ\nNOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District of Pulaski County designates the President of the Board as the primary disbursing officer of the District, the Vice-President of the Board as the alternate disbursing officer of the District in the absence of the President of the Board, and Joseph Mittiga as the Board's legislative representative. President Vice-President Adopted: DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 November 17, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Robert M. Daugherty, Ph.D. President SUBJECT: Future Use of the Mitchell School Building BACKGROUND: The Mitchell Academy building, constructed in 1908, is unable to meet current educational standards without extensive and costly repairs and renovations. The high cost of renovation, combined with low student enrollment, led the Board to close the school in December 2004. A committee, chaired by Board President Dr. Michael Daugherty, was formed to study alternative uses for the Mitchell building and present the Board with a recommendation. The committee held its first meeting in January 2005 and hosted subsequent meetings in the Mitchell neighborhood. A survey on reuse of the building was developed for area residents and approximately 130 responses were returned. In July 2005, at the direction of the Board, the district issued a Request For Proposal for the reuse of the Mitchell building with a submission deadline of August 31, 2005. RATIONALE: RFP responses were received from Neighborhood Builders, Inc., Little Rock, AR\nthe City of Little Rock, Little Rock, AR\nand, Rivendell Health Services/Alta Care of Arkansas, Benton, AR. The Mitchell committee reviewed the proposals and selected the City of Little Rock, which plans to use the building as a neighborhood hub of community programs and services, as its first choice. The Committee chose the City's proposal because it successfully met all eight requirements in the District's RFP at a level superior to the others submitted, because such a site did not conflict with Arkansas State Law, and because the proposal has the support of the Mitchell Community. FUNDING: The Committee recommends the District enter into negotiations with the City of Little Rock to reach an agreement for mutual funding and use of the Mitchell site. C, n :Z: ID -0 6i ~\nE -\u0026lt;o ::Cc.. =Im i5 n z-\u0026lt; !\" 8 z ?i iz5 UI RECOMMENDATION: The Committee recommends the District accept the proposal submitted by The City of Little Roel\u0026lt; and begin formal negotiations for funding renovations and the future use of the Mitchell building. The Committee also recommends the Board make a decision regarding the reuse of this building as soon as possible. PREPARED BY: Robert M. Daugherty DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 November 17, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Additional Funding for Forest Heights Bond Project BACKGROUND: The Forest Heights Middle School renovation project was delayed for several months due to changes in program need, leadership and concerns from the Campus Leadership Team. Since these issues have been resolved, the architectural firm has been given approval to proceed with the schematic. RATIONALE: Funds provided through the 2000 millage election were directed toward renovating the original classrooms which are currently in poor condition. The present appearance is an aversion to prospective parents and potential students. Under the revised scope of work, curb appeal will be enhanced because two of the original classroom buildings will be replaced by new ones with bright, modern classrooms containing an increased utilization of natural light. The current project also entails major maintenance work to the gymnasium roofs, upgrading the locker room and support facilities, and an expansion with a stage which will allow the cafeteria to support school programs. The campus appearance will be enhanced by landscaping and covered walkways to the newly constructed facilities. In addition there will be driveway changes in order to facilitate the drop off and pick up of students. It is believed that these changes will attract more middle school-bound students to the District than are now choosing to attend. FUNDING: Escalating prices and the revised scope of work have resulted in a shortfall of approximately $2.5 million (see attached worksheet). Funding for this project will come from the Bond Contingency Fund that has developed from previously completed projects. This is not to be confused with interest earnings that have accrued to date. C n :Z: CD -0 6i z.,, C: ::0 :':\"o\" .o.. =Im ~n z'\"\" !\" 8 z ?\n~ z V, RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board approve the requested $2.5 million additional funding for this project which will provide a better academic environment to support District programs at Forest Heights. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen Chief Financial Officer LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: November 17, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Additional Funding for Child Nutrition Bond Project BACKGROUND: The Child Nutrition administrative offices are currently located underneath the west stands of Quigley Stadium. The warehouse facility is attached to the south end of the administrative site but not underneath the stadium seating area. Over time, weather conditions have created issues for the administrative portion of the building. RATIONALE: The permanent solution is to build a new modernized free-standing modular office building south of the present warehouse. This location is on land currently not being utilized but within the walled confines of the Quigley Stadium property. This location was chosen because of its proximity to the warehouse and the interconnectivity of the functions of both facilities that are necessary to properly feed and distribute food to all of the District's students. FUNDING: Current cost estimates for this project are approximately $396,000 but can be offset by available funds of $13,000 leaving a shortfall of $383,000. Funding for this project will come from the Bond Contingency Fund that has developed from previously completed projects. This is not to be confused with interest earnings that have accrued to date. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board approve the requested $383,000 additional funding for this project which will upgrade and modernize a facility that provides service to our students. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen Chief Financial Officer !\" 8 z ?\nCl\u0026gt; ~ ::c ~ ?\u0026lt;\nzJ,J.o. C) 0 (IJCI\u0026gt; -z \u0026gt;\u0026lt; C)\n:::\nJ) \u0026gt;m ~i ~Cl\u0026gt; :I: -- ----- Child Nutrition Financial Status (11/03/05) November Funds Available: 2005 Remarks Bond $10,000 Study $6,500 Total $16,500 Funds Spent: Study $3,307 Total $3,307 Funds Available: Total $13,193 lncomp. Projects: Cost Estimate $396,200 Add metal bldg , relocate offices Total $396,200 Shortfall: $383,007 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: November 17, 2005 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District receives donations from businesses and individuals on a regular basis. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District that donations are not formally accepted until they are approved by the Board of Directors. RATIONALE: District policy states that, in order to maintain the centralized fixed asset property accounting system, all property donation requests are forwarded to the Director of Procurement. The Procurement Department forwards the requests, along with the appropriate recommendations, to the Board of Directors for acceptance and approval. In order for proper recognition and appreciation to be conveyed to the donor, donor's name and current mailing address should be included in the donation memo. FUNDING: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached donation requests be approved and accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. PREPARED BY: ~ c~arral Paradis, Director of Procurement '...j./Gwen Caraway, Fixed Asset Property Manager DONATIONS School/Department Item Donor Central High School Refrigerator, valued at Jeannie Deloach $500.00, to the boy's basketball program Central High School $500.00 cash to the Win \u0026amp; Lisenne Rockefeller Troubadours Club Central High School $250.00 cash to assist Ted Woodings on behalf students who have !DOCUMENTS, LLC been displaced due to recent hurricanes Central High School $200.00 cash to the Frank \u0026amp; Marcene Block Science Department at Central Central High School $200.00 cash to the Frank \u0026amp; Marcene Block Communications Department at Central Central High School Time and money, Kevin \u0026amp; Cathy Crass valued at $1,770.20, to the dedication of the Bernie Cox Field Fair Park Early $5,590.00 cash to be Second Presbyterian Church Childhood Center used to purchase computer printers and software, playhouses for the playground, books for the parent center and field trip tee shirts McClellan Magnet $100.00 cash to the Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. J. F. Riddle High School Future Business Leaders of America Club at McClellan McClellan Magnet $50.00 cash to be used Regions Bank/Baseline High School for incentives for students who scored proficient and advanced on the Arkansas ACT AAP algebra test School/De~artment Item Donor McClellan Magnet $150.00 cash to be used Boll Weevil Pawn Shop High School for incentives for students who scored proficient and advanced on the Arkansas ACTMP algebra test McClellan Magnet $250.00 cash to be used R.C.N. Enterprises, Inc. High School for incentives for students who scored proficient and advanced on the Arkansas ACT MP algebra test Woodruff Elementary $250.00 cash to be used Wal-Mart #126, as a match School to provide \"good conduct\" for volunteer hours from Incentives for students Woodruff parent and Wal-Mart employee, Tamela Warren Woodruff Elementary $500.00 cash to be used E-Z Mart Stores, Inc. through School to purchase supplies the annual Jim Yates for students in need Memorial Charity Golf Tournament School supplies, valued Electronic Data Systems =\" Woodruff Elementary ... School at $500.00, for students z \u0026gt;z in need n \u0026gt; r- \"' Little Rock School Halloween stickers, Little Caesar's Pizza District valued at $640.00, to be distributed to all elementary schools ..ittfe 'Roci Centra{ Jfigfi Scfioo{ 1500 Soutli 'Park Street Litt[e 'Rock, .'Arkansas 72202 'Pfione 501-447-1400 J'ax 501-447-1401 DATE: 10/26/2005 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL~ /(. fl!J /:!tz ( t_\n '/4t'---- SUBJECT: DONATION Jeannie Deloach of 20 Heritage Park Circle, No. Little Rock, AR, 72116, graciously donated a refrigerator valued at $500 to our boy's basketball program. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted m accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. l\"'::'r' .. . ittfe 'Rock Centra{ J-fifJli Sclioo{ 1500 Soutfi Park Street Litt{e 'Rock, .'Arkansas 72202 Pfione 501-447-1400 J'ax 501-447-1401 DATE: 10/26/2005 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCU~MENT FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL ~Zdfi1 /r),(LJ:fi(U V SUBJECT: DONATION Win \u0026amp; Lisenne Rockefeller, P. 0. Box 3157, Little Rock, AR 72203, graciously donated $500 to the Troubadours. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. OCT 2 7 2Jil3 r. .. Littfe 1wck Centra{ J-filJfi Scfioo{ 1500 Soutli 'Park Street Litt{e 'Rock, .'Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-447-1400 J'ax 501-447-1401 DATE: 10/10/2005 TO: FROM: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL~ SUBJECT: DONATION Ted Woodings on behalf of !DOCUMENTS, LLC, 5272 River Road, Suite 740, Bethesda, Maryland 20816, graciously donated $250 to Central High School to assist students who are displaced due to recent hurricanes. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Litt{e 'Rock Centra{ J-[igli Sclioo{ 1500 Soutli 'Park Street .Litt{e 'Rock, .'Arkansas 72202 'Plione 501-447-1400 ]\"ax 501-447-1401 DATE: 10/20/2005 TO: FROM: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL ~ SUBJECT: DONATION Frank \u0026amp; Marcene Block of 141 El Dorado Drive, Little Rock, AR 72212, donated $200.00 to our science department. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. OCT 21 2005 LittCe 'Rock Centra[ Jftnfi Scfioo[ 1500 Soutli Park Street Litt{e 'Rock, .'Arkansas 72202 'Pfi.one 501-447-1400 :fax 501-447-1401 DATE: 10/21/2005 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL ~~ SUBJECT: DONATION Frank \u0026amp; Marcene Block of 141 El Dorado Drive, Little Rock, AR 72212, graciously donated $200 to our Communications Department. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. OCT 2 1 2005 ~ ~ ::\n~: ~:\n.~ ~~: ~~: ~:: ,:.., ... ..... 11 ... .,w\n.,\n\\o. LJ Litt{e 'Rock Centra{ 3-{ifJli Sclioo{ 1500 Soutfi 'Park Street Littfe 'Rock, .'Arkansas 72202 Plione 501-447-1400 :Jax 501-447-1401 DATE: 10/19/2005 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL 1{.twk/4Cu-._ SUBJECT: DONATION K.evin \u0026amp; Cathy Crass very graciously donated their time and money to the dedication of Bernie Cox Field. The total amount of their donation was $1,770.20. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Fair Park Early Childhood Center 616 North Harrison Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 TO: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement FROM: Judith Milam, Principal DATE: October 17, 2005 RE: Donation Second Presbyterian Church located at 600 Pleasant Valley Drive, wishes to make a cash donation to Fair Park Early Childhood Center in the amount of $5,590.00. These funds will be used to purchase computer printers, computer software, play houses for the playground, parent center books, and field trip tee shirts. It is recommended that this generous donation be approved with thanks in accordance with the policies of the board. Thank you for your consideration. CC: Dr Sadie Mitchell Associate Superintendent OCT 18 2005 Pay Date: 1om2005 Ck#: 47438 ID#: 4642 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY Invoice *Date *Description *Account# WISH LIST 2005 *9/23/2005 \"l' *000/55714 SECOND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH GENERAL FUND 600 PLEASANT VALLEY DRIVE 227-0000 1-e1 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72227 *TOTAL R~Bank LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 81-10 / 820 Net $5,590.00 $5,590.00 047438 .__c_H_E_C_K_N__O. _.L__ _D_ A_TE_ ___J. MMm ti PAY TO THE ORDER OF Five Thousand Five Hundred Ninety Dollars And No Cents FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY 616 N HARRISON ATTN JUDY MILUM LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 47438 110 i.. 7 t. :1a11 ,:oa 2000 .o g,: ao oo s  o 2 b 211 10/7/2005 $5,590.00 McCLELLAN MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL TO: FROM: RE: DATE: THE ACADEMIES: BUSINESS FINANCE, ENGINEERING, MULTIMEDIA Darrell Paradis, Director of Procurement Larry Buck, Princip@ Donation October 27, 2005 I would like to recommend that the following donation to McClellan High School be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District: A donation of $100.00 from Mr. and Mrs. J.F. Riddle, P.O. Box 987, New Albany, MS 38652, for the Future Business Leaders of America Club at McClellan High School. RECEt\\H:D OCT 2 8 2005 9417 Geyer Springs Road  Phone 447-2100  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 McCLELLAN MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL THE ACADEMIES: BUSINESS FINANCE, ENGINEERING, MULTIMEDIA TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Darrell Paradis, Director of Procurement Larry Buck, Princip# Donation October 24, 2005 I would like to recommend that the following donation to McClellan High School be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District: A donation of $50.00 from Regions Bank, Baseline Branch, 6101 Baseline Road, Little Rock, AR 72209, to be used for a Student Incentive Program. This program is to award students who scored proficient and advanced on the Arkansas ACTAAP Algebra test. OCT 2 8 2005 9417 Geyer Springs Road  Phone 447-2100  Uttle Rock, A\u0026lt;kansas 72209 ~ McCLELLAN MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL THE ACADEMIES: BUSINESS FINANCE, ENGINEERING, MULTIMEDIA TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Darrell Paradis, Director of Procurement Larry Buck, Princi~ Donation October 19, 2005 I would like to recommend that the following donation to McClellan High School be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District: A donation of $150.00 from Boll Weevil Pawn Shop (located on Geyer Springs Rd, Little Rock, AR) 2001 Moores Lane, Texarkana, TX 75503, to be used for a Student Incentive Program. This program is to award students who scored proficient and advanced on the Arkansas ACT AAP Algebra test. f.\"l' ':\" II\"'.) n~.:iry!EHJ!EO Der 2 o 2005 9417 Geyer Springs Road  Phone 447-2100  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 McCLELLAN MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL THE ACADEMIES: BUSINESS FINANCE, ENGINEERING, MULTIMEDIA TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Darrell Paradis, Director of Procurement Larry Buck, Princip@ Donation October 14, 2005 I would like to recommend that the following donation to McClellan High School be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District: A donation of $250.00 from R.C.N. Enterprises, Inc., (McDonald's on Geyer Springs Rd.) 52 Talais Drive, Little Rock, AR 72223 to be used for a Student Incentive Program. This program is to award students who scored proficient and advanced on the Arkansas ACT AAP Algebra test. OCT 1 7 2005 9417 Geyer Springs Road  Phone 447-2100  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 'Jln 'E?(tenaea :)'ear 'Eaucation Schoo[\" To: Mr. Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Janice M. Wilson, Principal Date: October 14, 2005 Re: Donations Wal-Mart #126 has donated $250.00 to Woodruff Elementary, as a match for volunteer hours to our school from Woodruff parent and Wal-Mart employee Tamela Warren. We sincerely appreciate this donation, which will provide \"good conduct\" incentives for our students We recommend that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. Wal-Mart #126 Renita Thompson, Personnel Manager 700 Chenal Little Rock, AR 72211 Tamela D. Warren 912 Johnson Street Little Rock, AR 72204 OCT 1 '7 2005 17 - ~ .._ w (..:, ~J ~ :.': ~  ~ ~- --  : .. ~ 'l 3010 West 7th Street  Phone (501) 447-7300  Fax (501) 447-7301  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ''Jl.n 'Ex:_tencfecf ')ear 'Eaucation Schoo') To: Mr. Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Janice M. Wilson, Principal Date: October 14, 2005 Re: Donations E-Z Mart Stores, Inc. has donated $500.00 to Woodruff Elementary to be used to purchase supplies for students who may not be able to obtain them otherwise. We sincerely appreciate this donation, which will provide supplies and an opportunity to help our students grow and learn. E-Z Mart selected Woodruff along with nine other campuses which serve their south/southeast area where they have stores located. The funds are made available through the Jim Yates Memorial Charity Golf Tournament held each year. We recommend that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. Kim Fowler Employee and Public Relations E-Z Mart Stores, Inc. 602 Falvey P.O. Box 1426 Texarkana, TX 75504-1426 OCT 1 7 2005 f'. :    c. ~:: ~~\n'.  ~N ~:rr .: - ~- ':_,J lo,.\n' _ .. ... :- !\n_. M. ... ..  -  .. ~ 3010 W es t 71 h Street  Phone (501) 447-7300  Fax (501) 447-7301  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ''Jl.n 'E\nctenaea :)ear 'Eaucation Schoof') To: Mr. Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Janice M. Wilson, Principal Date: October 14, 2005 Re: Donations Electronic Data Systems (EDS), graciously donated school supplies to Woodruff Elementary, valued at $500.00. We sincerely appreciate this donation, which will be given to students in need of supplies. We recommend that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. Ms. Phylinthia Givens Financial Analysis Electronic Data Systems 500 President Clinton Avenue Suite 400 Little Rock, AR 72201 OCT 1 7 2GD5 3010 West 7th Street  Phone (501) 447-7300  Fax (501) 447-7301  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 PROCUREMENT \u0026amp; MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 1800 East 6th Street  Little Rock, AR 72202  (501) 447-2260  Fax: (501) 447-2261 DATE: November 3, 2005 TO: Board of Directors L~0 FROM: ~ Darral Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management THROUGH: Roy G. Brooks, Ed. D., Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donation Little Caesar's Pizza donated Halloween stickers, valued at approximately $640.00, to the Little Rock School District. Stickers were distributed to all elementary schools within the District. The donor's mailing address is: Little Caesar's Pizza, Attn: Cathy Messer, 7500 Landers Road, Sherwood, AR 72117. It is recommended that this donation request be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. Thank you. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: November 17, 2005 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Financial Reports BACKGROUND: Financial reporting is designed to keep the Board of Directors up-to-date regarding the District's current financial condition. Financial reports are submitted monthly to the Board for review and approval. RATIONALE: October 2005 financial reports are submitted for the Board's review and approval. FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve the financial reports as submitted. PREPARED BY: Jean A Ring, Director Finance and Accounting LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2004 AND 2005 APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2004/05 10/31/04 COLLECTED 2005/06 10/31/05 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 61,436,691 23,738,299 38.64% 67,268,610 23,880,924 35.50% DELINQUENT TAXES 12,135,000 1,209,714 9.97% 9,200,000 1,215,320 13.21% 40% PULLBACK 31 ,250,000 0.00% 33,000,000 0.00% EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 205,000 0.00% 210,000 0.00% DEPOSITORY INTEREST 155,000 0.00% 145,000 0.00% REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 185,000 0.00% 204,000 0.00% MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 485,000 23,723 4.89% 365,000 55,739 15.27% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 245,000 105,513 43.07% 750,000 295,361 39.38% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 215,000 89,581 41 .67% 195,000 97,894 50.20% TOTAL 106,311 ,691 25,166,830 23.67% 111 ,337,610 25,545,239 22.94% REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 22,000 11 ,183 50.83% 21 ,500 9,963 46.34% TOTAL 22,000 11 ,183 50.83% 21 ,500 9,963 46.34% REVENUE - STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 65,082,694 17,787,800 27.33% 66,095,155 17,582,691 26.60% ALTERNATIVE LEARNING 1,927,250 481 ,812 25.00% 1,100,000 0.00% ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 193,739 0.00% 200,000 0.00% NATL SCHL LUNCH STUDENT FUNDING 6,498,240 1,772,247 27.27% 6,877,920 1,875,795 27.27% PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1,141 ,165 1,141,165 100.00% 953,144 953,144 100.00% SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS(STRS/HEAL TH) 8,275,000 2,081,289 25.15% 8,200,000 2,837,909 34.61% VOCATIONAL 1,350,000 308,278 22.84% 1,785,000 821 ,505 46.02% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 2,100,000 31 ,050 1.48% 2,425,000 315,387 13.01% EARLY CHILDHOOD 5,542,510 1,430,540 25.81% 4,000,000 2,352,400 58.81% TRANSPORTATION 4,125,000 1,325,044 32.12% 4,252,900 0.00% M TO M TRANSFERS 4,575,000 829,826 18.14% 4,100,000 809,636 19.75% ADULT EDUCATION 934,380 159,488 17.07% 926,543 127,273 13.74% AT RISK FUNDING 395,000 9,400 2.38% 10,000 0.00% TAP PROGRAM 382,903 7,645 2.00% 288,623 142,623 49.41% TOTAL 102,522,882 27,365,584 26.69% 101 ,214,285 27,818,363 27.48% REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 770,000 0.00% 770,000 0.00% TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,295,000 8,155 0.63% 1,370,524 13,285 0.97% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,849,008 0.00% 2,194,000 0.00% TOTAL 3,914,008 8,155 0.21% 4,334,524 13,285 0.31% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 212,770,581 52,551,752 24.70% 216,907,919 53,386,850 24.61% REVENUE - OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 22,887,794 2,623,611 11.46% 20,152,896 2,732,738 13.56% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,500,000 572,263 12.72% 4,784,200 501 ,410 10.48% MAGNET SCHOOLS 27,964,934 3,312,124 11.84% 28,849,578 3,829,793 13.28% CHARTER SCHOOL 1,340,000 350,000 26.12% TOTAL 55,352,728 6,507,998 11 .76% 55,126,674 7,413,941 13.45% TOTAL REVENUE 268,123,309 59,059,750 22.03% 272,034,593 60,800,791 22.35% LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES ANO CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2004 ANO 2005 APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 2004105 10131104 EXPENDED 2005106 10131105 EXPENDED EXPENSES SALARIES 117,324 ,912 25,389,710 21 .64% 122,589,665 25,307,131 20.64% BENEFITS 36,185,811 6,545,838 18.09% 35,925,642 7,196,767 20.03% PURCHASED SERVICES 20,959,918 4,904,019 23.40% 22,438,191 4,920,662 21 .93% MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,725,914 3,068,675 35.17% 10,128,394 4,697,771 46.38% CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,760,600 412,709 14.95% 2,473,965 358,990 14.51% OTHER OBJECTS 10,770,418 429,294 3.99% 10,759,804 96,874 0.90% DEBT SERVICE 12,474,809 4,590,834 36.80% 12,344,267 4,670,033 37.83% TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 209,202,382 45,341,079 21.67% 216,659,928 47,248,229 21 .81% EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 25,258,999 3,686,901 14.60% 22,422,961 3,093,252 13.80% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 5,007,809 1,476,865 29.49% 5,428,425 1,403,720 25.86% MAGNET SCHOOLS 27,964,934 5,151,960 18.42% 28,849,578 5,474,167 18.97% CHARTER SCHOOL 1,340,000 219,182 16.36% TOTAL 58,231 ,742 10,315,726 17.71% 58,040,964 10,190,321 17.56% TOTAL EXPENSES 267,434,124 55,656,805 20.81% 274,700,892 57,438,550 20.91% INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE 689,184 3,402,945 (2,666,300) 3,362,241 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET, M \u0026amp; 0 , CHARTER 4,005,957 4,005,957 3,074,390 3,074,390 OPERATING 6,531 ,706 6,531 ,706 10,753,692 10,753,692 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET, M \u0026amp; 0 , CHARTER 1,126,943 198,229 160,100 298,010 OPERATING 10,099,905 13,742,379 11 ,001 ,683 16,892,313 TOTAL 11 ,226,848 13,940,608 11 ,161 ,783 17,190,323 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2005 PROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01-05 2005-06 2005-06 2005-06 2005-06 10-31-05 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE MCCLELLAN 16,453.00 3,078.97 13,374.03 0.00 CONTINGENCY 9,989.19 9,989.19 SUBTOTAL 26,442.19 0.00 0.00 3,078.97 13,374.03 9,989.19 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 8,139.34 75,000.00 66,041 .49 12,477.63 4,620.22 NEW WORK PROJECTS 2,620,881 .45 655,309.00 1,474,919.84 425,697.07 1,375,573.54 SECURITY PROJECTS 14,541.25 14,541 .25 LIGHTING PROJECTS 0.00 0.00 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 6,796,760.46 582,300.00 1,130,153.21 473,037.24 5,775,870.01 RENOVATION PROJECTS 6,114,463.73 (83,909.00) 1,652,439.13 552,460.53 3,825,655.07 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 2,304,501 .46 1,247,947.58 435,334.20 291,480.14 2,825,634.70 SUBTOTAL 17,859,287.69 1,247,947.58 1,228,700.00 4,758,887.87 1,755,152.61 13,821,894.79 $2,189,175 QZAB BOND ISSUE CENTRAL 919,760.00 919,760.00 MANN 382,400.00 382,400.00 BOOKER 239,560.00 239,560.00 DUNBAR 278,800.00 278,800.00 FAIR PARK 79,480.00 79,480.00 MABELVALE ELEMENTARY 220,000.00 138,517.00 81 ,483.00 CONTINGENCY 69,175.43 69,175.43 0.00 0.00 2,189,175.43 138,517.00 0.00 2,050,658.43 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALES 624,935.56 624,935.56 MEADOWCLIFF PROJECT 18.00 18.00 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 14,017,116.18 (1 ,228,700.00) 12,788,416.18 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 PROCEEDS-OZAB SALE(2005) 0.00 2,189,175.43 (2,189,175.43) 0.00 INTEREST 5,829,676.83 652,359.29 6,482,036.12 SUBTOTAL 21,765,567.54 2,841,534.72 (3,417,875.43) 0.00 0.00 21 ,189,226.83 GRAND TOTAL aa ~l jll!Z ~~ ~ !!Dll ~a~ all J2.J!.I! ~ ll!l!l ~aa a~ l Za ~jl ~ az !!Zl Zll ~~ PROJECT CATEGORIES ADMINISTRATION NEW WORK PROJECTS SECURITY PROJECTS LIGHTING PROJECTS MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR RENOVATION PROJECTS TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS TOTAL PROJECT ALLOCATIONS THRU 10-31-05 895,526.80 39,489,532.86 265,814.17 4,862,548.33 19,947,450.50 51 ,071 ,693.84 15,292,448.46 14,082,237.15 145,907,252.11 EXPENSE 2000-01 889,772.32 443,467.00 113,930.47 2,641 ,482.13 791 ,385.63 397,615.34 575,016.53 I I 5,852,669.42 i LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY THRU THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBi R 31, 2005 EXPENSE 2001-02 (485,325.77) 4,589,606.29 109,609.73 1,832,392.06 EXPENSE 2002-03 149,597.63 11 ,671,442.11 379,661 .38 4,21 a.294.40 3,455.350.67 I 4,119,045.21 115,666,239.90 4,325,201.40 4,500,374.61 18,708,823.32 35,822,666.30 EXPENSE I EXPENSE 2003-04 2004-05 114,896.16 I 143,447.12 I 15,993,062.06 3,515,764.95 27,732.73 0.00 9,012.76 : o.oo I 2,aa1,163.12 I 1,215,595.62 18,091,992.05 I 6,766,246.61 I 765,594.97 I 1,573,811.91 I I I 37,890,054.45 13,214,866.21 I I WNllnorov nx / SONIHV3H 'IX S\u0026gt;IHVW3H ONISOl:l x ENCUMBERED I EXPENSE 2005-06 : THRU 10-31-05 I SUBTOTAL I 66,041 .49 12,477.63 890,906.58 I 1,474,919.84 I 425,697.07 38,113,959.32 0.00 0.00 I 251,272.93 0.00 0.00 I 4,862,548.33 1,130,153.21 I 473,037.24 14,171,580.49 1.652.439.13 I 552,460.53 47,246,038.77 \"''\"' I 291,480.14 12,466,813.76 I I 4,758,887.87 I 1,755,152.61 118,003,120.18 I I I i ENDING ALLOCATION 10-31-05 4,620.22 1,375,573.54 14,541 .25 0.00 5,775,870.01 3,825,655.07 2,825,634.70 14,082,237.15 27,904,131 .94 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2005 I Fund Purchase Maturity Institution 1 Interest Rate\nType Principal Date Date I I I I I Operating 10-28-05 TFN I Bank of America 3.720% Repo I 8,250,000.00 Operating I 10-14-05 11-14-05 Bank of America 3.660% Treasury Bills 6,275,160.26 Operating 10-28-05 11-01-05 I Bank of America 3.700% Treasury Bills I 4,298,232.22 Total I 18,823,392.48 Activity Fund 10-17-05 TFN Bank of America 3.060% Repo I 650,000.00 Activity Fund 09-30-05 03-31-06 Bank of America 3.900% Treasury Bills I 799,911.20 Total I 1,449,911.20 I Bond Account 09-05-05 03-06-06 Regions 2.966% I CD I 400,000.00 Bond Account 10-21-05 TFN Bank of America 3.370% Repo 1,600,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 01-10-05 01-10-06 Metropolitan 2.400% i CD I 1,000,934.31 I Capital Projects Fund 01-31-05 01-29-06 Bancorp South 2.750% CD 2,139,266.38 Capital Projects Fund 08-16-05 02-13-06 Twin City Bank 4.250% I CD I 11,286,805.57 Capital Projects Fund 08-02-05 02-02-06 Twin City Bank 3.720% CD 4,636,194.86 Capital Projects Fund 07-08-05 01-09-06 Twin City Bank 3.770% ' CD I 10,500,000.00 I Capital Projects Fund 09-15-05 11-07-05 Bank of America 3.450% Treasury Bills 4,647,275.21 Capital Projects Fund 10-17-05 TFN Bank of America 3.190% Repo I 3,725,000.00 I Total I I I 39,935,476.33 Deseg Plan Scholarship 09-06-05 03-07-06 Bank of America 3.600% Treasury Bills 736,350.00 Total ' I I I 736,350.00 I I Rockefeller Scholarship I I 06-28-05 01-18-06 Bank of America 3.350% Treasury Bills 258,007.38 Total I 258,007.38 i I I Risk Management Loss Fund 10-17-05 03-14-06 Bank of America I 3.960% I Treasury Bills 499,785.64 Total I 499,785.64\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_78","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2005-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/78"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District, plaintiff vs. Pulaski County Special School District, defendant\n/\n~~ Arkansas rto.~ DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ---=:..-~ 4 STA TE CAPITOL MAU.  lJTTLE ltOCX. AlJCANSAS 72201-1071  (501) 612-447$  http://arkcchutatur.ar Dr. Kenneth James, Commissioner of Education September 30, 2005 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0 . Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 I Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones III 9Nlll0l1NOW NOllV93H93S3a ~o 30lJO ~ooz 8 l:JO 031\\13031:1 Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. US. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 WRW Dear Gentlemen: Per an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of September 2005 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, (' / \\ otLIV\\ ~Smith General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier RECEIVED OCT 3 2005 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONlTORING -------------------- STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair - Dr. Jeanna Westmoreland, Arkadelphia Vice Chair- Diane Tatum, Pine Buff Members: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro  Shelby Hillman, Carlisle *Calvin King, Marianna  Randy Lawson, Bentonville *Mary Jane Rebick, Little Rock Naccaman Williams, Johnson An Equal Opportunity Employer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. No. LR-C-82-866 WRW oc 3 PLAINTIFF PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for September 2005. Respectfully Submitted, git,~~ Scott Smith, Bar # 92251 General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 IVED ns CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on September 30, 2005, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RECEIVED OCT 3  2005 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW OFFICEOF PLAINTIFtifsEGREGATION MONITORING DEFENDANTS INTERVENOR$ INTERVENOR$ ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Based on the information available at August 31, 2005, the ADE calculated the State Foundation Funding for FY 05/06, subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Based on the information available at August 31, 2005, the ADE calculated for FY 05/06, subject to periodic adjustments. C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 On August 31, 2005, distributions of State Foundation Funding for FY 05/06 were as follows: LRSD - $5,833,407 NLRSD - $3,037,645 PCSSD - $5,052,096 The allotments of State Foundation Funding calculated for FY 05/06 at August 31, 2005, subject to periodic adjustments, were as follows: LRSD- $64,167,477 NLRSD - $33,414,099 PCSSD - $55,573,061 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at August 31, 2005 for FY 05/06, subject to periodic adjustments. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at August 31, 2005 for FY 05/06, subject to periodic adjustments. It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at August 31, 2005 for FY 05/06, subject to periodic adjustments. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Distributions for FY 05/06 at August 31, 2005, totaled $1,270,718. Allotment calculated for FY 05/06 was $13,977,904 subject to periodic adjustments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Calculated for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Distributions for FY 04/05 at June 30, 2005, were: LRSD - $4,048, 176 NLRSD - $4,031,872 PCSSD - $10,800,964 The allotments calculated for FY 04/05 at June 30, 2005, subject to periodic adjustments, were: LRSD - $4,048,176 NLRSD - $4,031 ,872 PCSSD - $10,800,964 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 In September 2002, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 02/03 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 In September 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the third one-third payment for FY 03/04 to the Districts. In September 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the first one-third payment for FY 04/05 to the Districts. In March 2005, General Finance was notified to pay the second one-third payment for FY 04/05 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function instead of Reginald Wilson as indicated in the Implementation Plan. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 In September 2004, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2004, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $4,019,063.00 NLRSD -$772,940.15 PCSSD - $2,478,863.72 In September 2004, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 04/05 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2004, the following had been paid for FY 04/05: LRSD - $1 ,325,043.67 NLRSD - $275,333.33 PCSSD - $845,221 .22 In March 2005, General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 04/05 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At March 2005, the following had been paid for FY 04/05: LRSD - $2,650,087.34 NLRSD - $550,666.66 PCSSD -$1 ,690,442.44 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 In July 1999, each district submitted an estimated budget for the 99/00 school year. In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2004, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 04/05 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD -14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD - 12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD-6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD-6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD -6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001. The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two 47 passenger buses for $43,426.00 each and fourteen 65 passenger buses for $44,289.00 each. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42,155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 4 7 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. In June 2005, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $52,135.00, and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $53,150.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The total amount was $849,385.00. 0. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. R. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Final payment was distributed July 1994. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS {Continued) T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 05/06. 10 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01 . Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 05/06. 11 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 12 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 13 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans.  On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 15 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 16 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) On July 26, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION {Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. {Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 {Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool {PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is finalized . The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201- A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1:30 p.m. at the ADE. 18 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION {Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. {Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 {Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearance Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 19 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) On November 4, 2004, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ADE is required to check laws that the legislature passes to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Cleare nee Lovell was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he has retired, the ADE attorney will find out who will be checking the next legislation. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 6, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On May 3, 2005, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The PCSSD has petitioned to be released from some desegregation monitoring. There was discussion in the last legislative session that suggested all three districts in Pulaski County should seek unitary status. Legislators also discussed the possibility of having two school districts in Pulaski County instead of three. An Act was passed by the Legislature to conduct a feasability study of having only a north school district and a south school district in Pulaski County. Removing Jacksonville from the PCSSD is also being studied. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 7, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 20 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 21 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. C. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 22 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION {Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17- 1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81 st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 23 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 24 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued} 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued} The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11 , 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 25 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11, in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 26 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, A letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 1748 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, A letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. 27 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Ongoing C. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 28 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES {Continued} D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. {Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool {PMT} and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 29 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES {Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. {Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 {Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams.  During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the ADE's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 30 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the AD E's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 31 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Sellle.1.e.,t Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lntervenors filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 32 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regularoversightofthe Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua intervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lntervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lntervenors were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 33 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES {Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. {Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21, 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 34 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regularoversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 35 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES {Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. {Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 {Continued) On July 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 36 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project ManagementTool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 37 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES {Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. {Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 {Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 11, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 11, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 38 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) On May 9, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 13, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 11, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 8, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 12, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. 39 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data 9athered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCNCOE peer team visits. 40 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 41 VI. REMEDIATION {Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. {Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 {Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 42 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued} A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 43 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. D. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. 44 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31, 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. 45 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 46 VI. REMEDIATION {Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. {Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 {Continued) In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts. In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further assistance to schools, i.e., Title I Summer Planning Session, ADE session on Smart Start, and the School Improvement Workshops. All schools and districts in Pulaski County were invited to attend the \"Smart Start\" Summit November 9, 10, and 11 to learn more about strategies to increase student performance. \"Smart Start\" is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. Representatives from all three districts attended. On January 21, 1998, the ADE provided staff development for the staff at Oak Grove Elementary School designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement. Using achievement data from Oak Grove, educators reviewed trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. On February 24, 1999, the ADE provided staff development for the administrative staff at Clinton Elementary School regarding analysis of achievement data. On February 15, 1999, staff development was rescheduled for Lawson Elementary School. The staff development program was designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement using achievement data from Lawson, educators reviewed the components of the Arkansas Smart Initiative, trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. Student Achievement Workshops were rescheduled for Southwest Jr. High in the Little Rock School District, and the Oak Grove Elementary School in the Pulaski County School District. 47 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) On April 30, 1999, a Student Achievement Workshop was conducted for Oak Grove Elementary School in PCSSD. The Student Achievement Workshop for Southwest Jr. High in LRSD has been rescheduled. On June 8, 1999, a workshop was presented to representatives from each of the Arkansas Education Service Cooperatives and representatives from each of the three districts in Pulaski County. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On June 18, 1999, a workshop was presented to administrators of the NLRSD. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On August 16, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for teaching assistant in the LRSD. On August 20, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACTAAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for the Accelerated Learning Center in the LRSD. On September 13, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program were presented to the staff at Booker T. Washington Magnet Elementary School. On September 27, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to the Middle and High School staffs of the NLRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On October 26, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to LRSD personnel through a staff development training class. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On December 7, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was scheduled for Southwest Middle School in the LRSD. The workshop was also set to cover the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. However, Southwest Middle School administrators had a need to reschedule, therefore the workshop will be rescheduled. 48 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) On January 10, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for both Dr. Martin Luther King Magnet Elementary School \u0026amp; Little Rock Central High School. The workshops also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On March 1, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for all principals and district level administrators in the PCSSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On April 12, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for the LRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. Targeted staffs from the middle and junior high schools in the three districts in Pulaski County attended the Smart Step Summit on May 1 and May 2. Training was provided regarding the overview of the \"Smart Step\" initiative, \"Standard and Accountability in Action,\" and \"Creating Learning Environments Through Leadership Teams.\" The ADE provided training on the development of alternative assessment September 12-13, 2000. Information was provided regarding the assessment of Special Education and LEP students. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate in professional development regarding Integrating Curriculum and Assessment K-12. The professional development activity was directed by the national consultant, Dr. Heidi Hays Jacobs, on September 14 and 15, 2000. The ADE provided professional development workshops from October 2 through October 13, 2000 regarding, \"The Write Stuff: Curriculum Frameworks, Content Standards and Item Development.\" Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems by video conference for Special Education and LEP Teachers on November 17, 2000. Also, Alternative Assessment Portfolio System Training was provided for testing coordinators through teleconference broadcast on November 27, 2000. 49 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) On December 12, 2000, the ADE provided training for Test Coordinators on end of course assessments in Geometry and Algebra I Pilot examination. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation conducted the professional development at the Arkansas Teacher Retirement Building. The ADE presented a one-day training session with Dr. Cecil Reynolds on the Behavior Assessment for Children (BASC). This took place on December 7, 2000 at the NLRSD Administrative Annex. Dr. Reynolds is a practicing clinical psychologist. He is also a professor at Texas A \u0026amp; M University and a nationally known author. In the training, Dr. Reynolds addressed the following: 1) how to use and interpret information obtained on the direct observation form, 2) how to use this information for programming, 3) when to use the BASC, 4) when to refer for more or additional testing or evaluation, 5) who should complete the forms and when, (i.e., parents, teachers, students), 6) how to correctly interpret scores. This training was intended to especially benefit School Psychology Specialists, psychologists, psychological examiners, educational examiners and counselors. During January 22-26, 2001 the ADE presented the ACTAAP Intermediate (Grade 6) Benchmark Professional Development Workshop on Item Writing. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were invited to attend. On January 12, 2001 the ADE presented test administrators training for mid-year End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. On January 13, 2001 the ADE presented SmartScience Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This was shared with eight Master Teachers. The SmartScience Lessons were developed by the Arkansas Science Teachers Association in conjunction with the Wilbur Mills Educational Cooperative under an Eisenhower grant provided by the ADE. The purpose of SmartScience is to provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. The following training has been provided for educators in the three districts in Pulaski County by the Division of Special Education at the ADE since January 2000: On January 6, 2000, training was conducted for the Shannon Hills Pre-school Program, entitled \"Things you can do at home to support your child's learning.\" This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. The school's director and seven parents attended. 50 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) On March 8, 2000, training was conducted for the Southwest Middle School in Little Rock, on ADD. Six people attended the training. There was follow-up training on Learning and Reading Styles on March 26. This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. On September 7, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Chicot Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Karen Sabo, Kindergarten Teacher\nMelissa Gleason, Paraprofessional\nCurtis Mayfield, P.E. Teacher\nLisa Poteet, Speech Language Pathologist\nJane Harkey, Principal\nKathy Penn-Norman, Special Education Coordinator\nAlice Phillips, Occupational Therapist. On September 15, 2000, the Governor's Developmental Disability Coalition Conference presented Assistive Technology Devices \u0026amp; Services. This was held at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On September 19, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Jefferson Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Melissa Chaney, Special Education Teacher\nBarbara Barnes, Special Education Coordinator\na Principal, a Counselor, a Librarian, and a Paraprofessional. On October 6, 2000, Integrating Assistive Technology Into Curriculum was presented at a conference in the Hot Springs Convention Center. Presenters were: Bryan Ayers and Aleecia Starkey. Speech Language Pathologists from LRSD and NLRSD attended. On October 24, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On October 25 and 26, 2000, Alternate Assessment for Students with Severe Disabilities for the LRSD at J. A. Fair High School was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. The participants were: Susan Chapman, Special Education Coordinator\nMary Steele, Special Education Teacher\nDenise Nesbit, Speech Language Pathologist\nand three Paraprofessionals. On November 14, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On November 17, 2000, training was conducted on Autism for the LRSD at the Instructional Resource Center. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. 51 VI. REMEDIATION {Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. {Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 {Continued) On December 5, 2000, Access to the Curriculum Via the use of Assistive Technology Computer Lab was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter of this teleconference. The participants were: Tim Fisk, Speech Language Pathologist from Arch Ford Education Service Cooperative at Plumerville and Patsy Lewis, Special Education Teacher from Mabelvale Middle School in the LRSD. On January 9, 2001, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference atthe ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. Kathy Brown, a vision consultant from the LRSD, was a participant. On January 23, 2001, Autism and Classroom Modifications for the LRSD at Brady Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Beverly Cook, Special Education Teacher\nAmy Littrell, Speech Language Pathologist\nJan Feurig, Occupational Therapist\nCarolyn James, Paraprofessional\nCindy Kackly, Paraprofessional\nand Rita Deloney, Paraprofessional. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcast on February 5, 2001. Presenters were: Charlotte Marvel, ADE\nDr. Gayle Potter, ADE\nMarcia Harding, ADE\nLynn Springfield, ASERC\nMary Steele, J. A. Fair High School, LRSD\nBryan Ayres, Easter Seals Outreach. This was provided for Special Education teachers and supervisors in the morning, and Limited English Proficient teachers and supervisors in the afternoon. The Special Education session was attended by 29 teachers/administrators and provided answers to specific questions about the alternate assessment portfolio system and the scoring rubric and points on the rubric to be used to score the portfolios. The LEP session was attended by 16 teachers/administrators and disseminated the common tasks to be included in the portfolios: one each in mathematics, writing and reading. On February 12-23, 2001, the ADE and Data Recognition Corporation personnel trained Test Coordinators in the administration of the spring Criterion-Referenced Test. This was provided in 20 sessions at 1 O regional sites. Testing protocol, released items, and other testing materials were presented and discussed. The sessions provided training for Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Pilot Tests. The LRSD had 2 in attendance for the End of Course session and 2 for the Benchmark session. The NLRSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. The PCSSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. 52 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) On March 15, 2001, there was a meeting at the ADE to plan professional development for staff who work with Limited English Proficiency {LEP) students. A $30,000 grant has been created to provide LEP training at Chicot Elementary for a year, starting in April 2001. A $40,000 grant was created to provide a Summer English as Second Language (ESL) Academy for the LRSD from June 18 through 29, 2001. Andre Guerrero from the ADE Accountability section met with Karen Broadnax, ESL Coordinator at LRSD, Pat Price, Early Childhood Curriculum Supervisor at LRSD, and Jane Harkey, Principal of Chicot Elementary. On March 1-2 and 8-29, 2001, ADE staff performed the following activities: processed registration for April 2 and 3 Alternate Portfolio Assessment video conference quarterly meeting\nanswered questions about Individualized Educational Plan {IEP) and LEP Alternate Portfolio Assessment by phone from schools and Education Service Cooperatives\nand signed up students for alternate portfolio assessment from school districts. On March 6, 2001 , ADE staff attended a Smart Step Technology Leadership Conference at the State House Convention Center. On March 7, 2001, ADE staff attended a National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Regional Math Framework Meeting about the Consensus Project 2004. On March 8, 2001, there was a one-on-one conference with Carole Villarreal from Pulaski County at the ADE about the LEP students with portfolios. She was given pertinent data, including all the materials that have been given out at the video conferences. The conference lasted for at least an hour. On March 14, 2001, a Test Administrator's Training Session was presented specifically to LRSD Test Coordinators and Principals. About 60 LRSD personnel attended. The following meetings have been conducted with educators in the three districts in Pulaski County since July 2000. On July 10-13, 2000 the ADE provided Smart Step training. The sessions covered Standards-based classroom practices. 53 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) On July 19-21, 2000 the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were 200 teachers from across the state in attendance. On August 14-31, 2000 the ADE presented Science Smart Start Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This will provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. On September 5, 2000 the ADE held an Eisenhower Informational meeting with Teacher Center Coordinators. The purpose of the Eisenhower Professional Development Program is to prepare teachers, school staff, and administrators to help all students meet challenging standards in the core academic subjects. A summary of the program was presented at the meeting. On November 2-3, 2000 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching. This presented curriculum and activity workshops. More than 1200 attended the conference. On November 6, 2000 there was a review of Science Benchmarks and sample model curriculum. A committee of 6 reviewed and revised a drafted document. The committee was made up of ADE and K-8 teachers. On November 7-10, 2000 the ADE held a meeting of the Benchmark and End of Course Mathematics Content Area Committee. Classroom teachers reviewed items for grades 4, 6, 8 and EOC mathematics assessment. There were 60 participants. On December 4-8, 2000 the ADE conducted grades 4 and 8 Benchmark Scoring for Writing Assessment. This professional development was attended by approximately 750 teachers. On December 8, 2000 the ADE conducted Rubric development for Special Education Portfolio scoring. This was a meeting with special education supervisors to revise rubric and plan for scoring in June. On December 8, 2000 the ADE presented the Transition Mathematics Pilot Training Workshop. This provided follow-up training and activities for fourth-year mathematics professional development. On December 12, 2000 the ADE presented test administrators training for midyear End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. 54 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcasts on April 2-3, 2001. Administration of the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy took place on April 23-27, 2001. Administration of the End of Course Algebra and Geometry Exams took place on May 2-3, 2001. Over 1,100 Arkansas educators attended the Smart Step Growing Smarter Conference on July 10 and 11, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The Smart Step effort seeks to provide intense professional development for teachers and administrators at the middle school level, as well as additional materials and assistance to the state's middle school teachers. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the first keynote address on \"The Character-Centered Teacher\". Debra Pickering, an education consultant from Denver, Colorado, presented the second keynote address on \"Characteristics of Middle Level Education\". Throughout the Smart Step conference, educators attended breakout sessions that were grade-specific and curriculum area-specific. Pat Davenport, an education consultant from Houston, Texas, delivered two addresses. She spoke on \"A Blueprint for Raising Student Achievement\". Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. Over 1,200 Arkansas teachers and administrators attended the Smart Start Conference on July 12, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Start is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the keynote address. The day featured a series of 15 breakout sessions on best classroom practices. Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. On July 18-20, 2001, the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were approximately 300 teachers from across the state in attendance. 55 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) The ADE and Harcourt Educational Measurement conducted Stanford 9 test administrator training from August 1-9, 2001. The training was held at Little Rock, Jonesboro, Fort Smith, Forrest City, Springdale, Mountain Home, Prescott, and Monticello. Another session was held at the ADE on August 30, for those who were unable to attend August 1-9. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by video conference at the Education Service Cooperatives and at the ADE from 9:00 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on September 5, 2001. The ADE released the performance of all schools on the Primary and Middle Level Benchmark Exams on September 5, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Core Teacher In-Service training for Central in the LRSD on September 6, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for Hall in the LRSD on September 7, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for McClellan in the LRSD on September 13, 2001. The ADE conducted Basic Co-teaching training for the LRSD on October 9, 2001. The ADE conducted training on autism spectrum disorder for the PCSSD on October 15, 2001. Professional Development workshops (1 day in length) in scoring End of Course assessments in algebra, geometry and reading were provided for all districts in the state. Each school was invited to send three representatives (one for each of the sessions). LRSD, NLRSD, and PCSSD participated. Information and training materials pertaining to the Alternate Portfolio Assessment were provided to all districts in the state and were supplied as requested to LRSD, PCSSD and David 0. Dodd Elementary. On November 1-2, 2001 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching at the Excelsior Hotel \u0026amp; Statehouse Convention Center. This presented sessions, workshops and short courses to promote exceptional teaching and learning. Educators could become involved in integrated math, science, English \u0026amp; language arts and social studies learning. The ADE received from the schools selected to participate in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a list of students who will take the test. 56 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) On December 3-7, 2001 the ADE conducted grade 6 Benchmark scoring training for reading and math. Each school district was invited to send a math and a reading specialist. The training was held at the Holiday Inn Airport in Little Rock. On December 4 and 6, 2001 the ADE conducted Mid-Year Test Administrator Training for Algebra and Geometry. This was held at the Arkansas Activities Association's conference room in North Little Rock. On January 24, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by ADE compressed video with Fred Jones presenting. On January 31, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by NSCI satellite with Fred Jones presenting. On February 7, 2002, the ADE Smart Step co-sponsored the AR Association of Middle Level Principal's/ADE curriculum, assessment and instruction workshop with Bena Kallick presenting. On February 11-21, 2002, the ADE provided training for Test Administrators on the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Exams. The sessions took place at Forrest City, Jonesboro, Mountain Home, Springdale, Fort Smith, Monticello, Prescott, Arkadelphia and Little Rock. A make-up training broadcast was given at 15 Educational Cooperative Video sites on February 22. During February 2002, the LRSD had two attendees for the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The NLRSD and PCSSD each had one attendee at the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 2, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. The ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 9, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. 57 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued} F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2005 (Continued) The Twenty-First Annual Curriculum and Instruction Conference, co-sponsored by the Arkansas Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and the Arkansas Department of Education, will be held June 24-26, 2002, at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs, Arkansas. \"Ignite Your Enthusiasm for Learning\" is the theme for this year's conference, which will feature educational consultant, Dr. Debbie Silver, as well as other very knowledgeable presenters. Additionally, there will be small group sessions on Curriculum Alignment, North Central Accreditation, Section 504, Building Level Assessment, Administrator Standards, Data Disaggregation, and National Board. The Educational Accountability Unit of the ADE hosted a workshop entitled \"Strategies for Increasing Achievement on the ACT AAP Benchmark Examination\" on June 13-14, 2002 at the Agora Center in Conway. The workshop was presented for schools in which 100% of students scored below the proficient level on one or more parts of the most recent Benchmark Examination. The agenda included presentations on \"The Plan-Do-Check-Act Instructional Cycle\" by the nationally known speaker Pat Davenport. ADE personnel provided an explanation of the MPH point program. Presentations were made by Math and Literacy Specialists. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Directorfor Accountability, gave a presentation about ACTAAP. Break out sessions were held, in which school districts with high scores on the MPH point program offered strategies and insights into increasing student achievement. The NLRSD, LRSD, and PCSSD were invited to attend. The NLRSD attended the workshop. The Smart Start Summer Conference took place on July 8-9, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. The Smart Start Initiative focuses on improving rea\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1089","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2005-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Curricula","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1089"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nAgenda RECEIVED OCT 2 6 2005 OFFICEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting OFFICE OF DESEG. MONITORING .I . ,, -::o m 4 C: ,I z31: ,\u0026gt; 1::0 I-\u0026lt; I-.,  C: I,..Zn... -~ I Z :en\n= I io n Im \u0026gt;c I~ ,- ~~\n:::l m  ::0 '\u0026lt;II ~ .,m::0 !?~ D- :-:0, \"'S!! \")::O\nim .,n - 0 5., Czl n =. ~ z \u0026lt;II I. 11. Ill. IV. V. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS October 27, 2005 5:30 p.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Welcome to Guests REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Partners in Education - New Partnerships Carver Magnet Elementary with Raytheon Aircra'ft Company Otter Creek Elementary with Meyer Stagecoach Florist C. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) D. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A. Remarks from Board Members B. Review of Annual Report C. Student Assignment Report D. Budget Update E. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects F. Internal Auditors Report G. Technology Update APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes Regular Meeting - 09-22-0S Special Meeting - 09-14-0S Special Meeting - 10-13-0S ,  \"0 -\na m  !:: )ii: ,z ,\u0026gt; ,'\n-a\u0026lt; '.,, ,- zC: )0 - - -~ \u0026gt;z = (I) := E\nE noo ,m )C : C: n~ ~ ..... ~ ~\n=1 ~m ~ill .. ~ !?~ -\na !l- ., I\n!a! .::,imo -,o 5 C) i,:Z ~ =l z~ (I) !II \"0  ~ z m\na (I) z m C C: 0  - z~ f)\na m IS:\na \n,,: ,'\".,', '~ ' ii: 0 =l N m z (I) October 27, 2005 Page2 VI. BOARD POLICY AND REGULATIONS REVIEW A. AD: Mission Statement B. First Reading: AC - Nondiscrimination First Reading: ACD - Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Religion First Reading: ACH - Anti-Harrassment C. Second Reading: Policy GBK - Staff Concerns, Complaints and Grievances, with Regulations GBK-R D. DKC-R: Regulations for Out of Area Travel, Travel Expense Authorization, Reimbursement and Travel Limits VII. HUMAN RESOURCES A. Personnel Changes VIII. FINANCE \u0026amp; SUPPORT SERVICES A. Property Easement: J. A. Fair High School B. Property Easement: Gibbs Elementary School C. Donations of Property D. Financial Report IX. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions X. STUDENT AND/OR EMPLOYEE HEARINGS XI. ADJOURNMENT , \"ti --m\na .c ) !I: ,\u0026gt;\u0026gt;Z ,'\n-\u0026lt;a ,'- zC\"T':I )0 -t \" lS \u0026gt;z ~ u, I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ wi:1 ~nui: Tn n, ri:i:Tl: Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. PARTNERS IN EDUCATION C. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 27, 2005 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Partners in Education BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District Partners in Education program is designed to develop strong relationships between the community and our schools. The partnership process encourages businesses, community agencies and private organizations to join with individual schools to enhance and support educational programs. Each partnership utilizes the resources of both the school and the business for their mutual benefit. RATIONALE: The following schools and businesses have completed the requirements necessary to establish a partnership and are actively working together to accomplish their objectives. FUNDING: Not applicable. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the board approve the following partnerships: Carver Magnet Elementary School and Raytheon Aircraft Company Otter Creek Elementary School and Meyer Stagecoach Florist PREPARED BY: Debbie Milam, ViPS Coordinator !=' a, C: 8 !!l C: ~ m r\u0026gt;\na m '~\na ,':.\"~:.o,': 'ii: 0 =I f\n:j z Cl) RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY 2400 Grundfest Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Raytheon Aircraft Company Partnership with George Washington Carver Magnet School Little Rock, Arkansas 2005 Partnership Activities I. Career Day - March 19, 2005 A. RAC's Chief Pilot spoke to four 2nd grade classes 1. Presentation entitled \"Planes Come in Many Shapes - How a Plane Flies\" 2. Gave each student a brochure about RAC planes and a frisbee 11. Mentoring Program A. Volunteers from RAC 1. Provide support to teachers and administrators as requested 2. Provide support/services to students as identified 3. Provide motivational speakers for students Ill. Book donation A. RAC's Women's Net\\vork Initiative group will donate books. Carver's Literacy Coach will present proposals for group to consider. IV. Tour of Company A. 5 th grade students will tour RAC facility 8. RAC will provide a pizza lunch for students V. Safety Presentation A. RAC Safety Engineer will speak to students LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CARVER MAGNET SCHOOL Carver Magnet Partnership Activities with Raytheon Aircraft Company 2005-2006 1. Display of winning Invent America, Science and Math Fair projects at Raytheon. Carver specialists, Kim Washington and Suellen DiMassimo would set up and take down after contact to Arti Vanzandt.) 2. Birthday cards sent to Raytheon employees produced by Carver students during art chasses. (Raytheon to get birthday list to Erik Brown, Art Specialist.) 3. Invitations to Raytheon for classroom readers during VIPS Reading Day and Read Across America. (Carver contacts, Lori Watts and Karen Sebourn, Media Specialists) 4. Campus Leadership Representative from Raytheon. We would appreciate one of our contacts attending our four meetings per year. We will get at least a week's notice. This is an advisor activity.) 5. Building of a relationship between Raytheon team members and our Young Astronauts Specialist, Ed Scott, for further support. 6. Raytheon speakers for Career Week. (Contact\nCounselor, Tracye Thomason) Phone 447-4000 Littie Rock. Arkansas 72202 r\u0026gt; ~ C: C m :!i ~ czi ii: m :!i !=' a, C: 8 !!l C: ~ m r\u0026gt; ill ' I\nEa\n,,\n') \"' ~...,  ii: C\") =i l\nl z \"' Partnership Proposal Meyer Stagecoach Florist and Otter Creek Elementary Meyer Stagecoach Florist commits to the following partnership activities:  Provide a floral centerpiece each month to be used in the cafeteria for Super Citizens' and Peacemakers' Table of Honor. A drawing will be held and one of the students being recognized will win the centerpiece to take home.  Assist with other school activities throughout the school year when possible. Otter Creek Elementary commits to the following partnership activities:  Provide artwork for the florist  Provide choir to perform on holidays and/or special occasions  Acknowledge Meyer Stagecoach Florist as a Partner in Education  Invite the partner to school events and volunteer recognition events LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: October 27, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Annual Board Meeting BACKGROUND: The Arkansas Department of Education rules which govern Standards for Accreditation require that public school districts hold a public meeting prior to November 15 of each year to review and discuss its annual report detailing progress toward accomplishing its district's program objectives, accreditation standards, and proposals to correct deficiencies. Additionally, all accreditation and evaluation studies and reports shall be discussed. A brief review of the highlights from our annual report will be presented at the October Board Meeting. RATIONALE: To comply with 7.03.3 of the rules governing Standards for Accreditation. FUNDING: None required. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the Board accept this report. PREPARED BY: Suellen Vann, Communications Director Joseph Mittiga, Governmental/Legislative/Public Affairs Officer :n .z.... m 0~ n~ 3\u0026gt; 0 C:  0 =I 0\no en ~ ..... m C') :z: z  -\u0026lt;\no m ~ r\u0026gt; !!l C: C =g ~..... \u0026gt;  en n en 1z5 :I: m !i !:I a, C: 8 !!l C: ~ m LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 27, 2005 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed. D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: 2005 - 2006 Student Enrollment Report BACKGROUND: The district's official October 1, 2005 enrollment report was submitted to the Arkansas Department of Education on Thursday, October 20, 2005. The report reflects an increase of 656 students in grades P4 - 12, with the total 2005-2006 count being 26,524. Last year (2004-05) at this same time enrollment stood at 25,868. RATIONALE: The October 1, 2005 Enrollment Report is an annual report due to the Arkansas Department of Education. The LRSD Office of Information Services, Student Registration and individual schools work together to compile the information submitted to ADE. FUNDING: The District has the potential of an increase in funding, from the ADE, when the first two quarter average of the 2005 - 2006 school year is compared with the average daily attendance of the 2004 - 2005 school year. ATTACHMENT: A comparison of the October 1, 2005 - 2006 and October 1, 2004 - 2005 is provided for your review. PREPARED BY: Dr. Linda Watson, Senior Director of Student Services :n .z.... m 0~ n j!: 3 \u0026gt; ,ooC =i !6 \"' :\u0026lt; g ...... z m ~ m ~ !\" n 0 z ~ ~ n.... . i5 z 00 z 0 1-0cUl5 HIGH SCHOOLS B w CENTRAL 1273 1033 FAIR 1006 127 HALL 1083 151 MCCLEUAN TT9 50 PARKVIEW 559 496 ACC 109 18 ALC 193 5 FELDER 32 2 ALT. AGENCIES 26 12 SUB TOTAL 5060 1894 MIDDLE SCHOOLS CLOVERDALE 491 27 DUNBAR 531 218 FOREST HEIGHTS 531 121 HENDERSON 503 65 MABELVALE 519 TT MANN 429 365 PULASKI HEIGHTS 411 307 SOUTHWEST 419 19 ALC 80 5 FELDER 2 1 ALT. AGENCIES 12 8 SUB TOTAL 3928 1213 ELEMENTARY BALE 273 23 BASELINE 219 17 BOOKER 324 253 BRADY 332 40 CARVER 290 211 CHICOT 418 34 CLOVERDALE 85 7 DODD 162 80 FAJRPARK 86 38 FOREST PARK 81 309 FRANKLIN 427 10 FULBRIGHT 152 445 GEYER SPRINGS 301 15 GIBBS 158 117 JEFFERSON 142 294 KING 409 .187 MABELVALE 257 50 MCDERMOTT 296 115 MEAOOWCLIFF 289 42 MITCHELL dosed OTTERCREEK 374 154 PULASKI HEIGHTS 152 167 RIGHTSELL 178 4 ROCKEFELLER 358 107 ROMINE 290 28 STEPHENS 527 11 TERRY 375 185 WAKEFIELD 366 20 WASHINGTON 516 78 WATSON 419 7 WESTERN HILLS 220 48 WILLIAMS 233 177 WILSON 242 15 WOODRUFF 219 17 ALT. AGENCIES 8 33 SUBTOTAL 9178 3338 GRAND TOTAL 18166 6445 10-21-05 LRSD OFFICIAL ENROLLMENT 2005-06 vs. 2004-05 1-0cUM 0 TOTAL %BLK B 116 2422 53% 1125 36 1169 86% 897 155 1389 78% 1103 35 864 90% 849 74 1129 49% 565 2 129 8,4'1, 112 2 200 96% 164 1 35 91% 0 38 70% 29 421 7375 69% 48-44 118 636 TT% 560 62 811 65% 453 24 676 79'4 533 62 630 80% 518 17 613 85% 515 56 850 50% 439 16 734 56% 404 22 460 91% 466 2 87 92'4 TT 0 3 67% 1 22 59'4 27 380 5522 71% 3992 38 334 82% 262 60 296 74% 235 30 607 53% 323 22 394 8-4% 248 32 533 54% 260 112 564 74% 392 21 113 75% 276 47 289 56% 141 6 130 66% 141 17 407 20% 71 3 440 97% 373 36 633 24% 144 17 333 90% 263 22 297 53% 164 6 442 32% 155 23 619 66% 363 31 338 76% 205 47 458 65% 253 32 363 80% 272 150 52 580 64% 314 15 334 45% 140 2 184 97% 262 12 4TT 75% 306 47 365 79% 245 9 547 96% 473 96 656 57% 307 105 491 74% 353 50 644 80% 427 32 458 91% 439 18 286 TT% 206 50 460 51% 240 19 276 88% 255 2 238 92% 215 1 42 19% 16 1112 13628 67% 8889 1913 26524 68% 17725 w 0 TOTAL %BLK 981 97 2203 51% 125 36 1058 85% 184 177 1464 75% 51 25 925 92% 465 78 1108 51% 18 6 136 82% 12 2 178 92% 17 2 48 60% 1853 423 7120 68% 24 98 682 82% 223 71 747 61% 133 22 688 TT% 57 55 630 82% 102 17 634 81% 368 66 873 52% 295 9 708 57% 15 12 493 94% 6 0 83 93% 13 0 40 68% 1236 350 5578 72% 26 31 319 82% 25 31 291 81% 253 29 605 53% 48 22 318 78% 204 32 496 52% 44 100 536 73% 17 67 360 TT% TT 43 261 54% 37 9 187 75% 270 20 361 20% 9 5 387 96% 381 29 554 26% 15 21 299 88% 120 26 310 53% 268 6 429 36% 211 33 607 60% 37 15 257 80% 102 51 406 62% 49 28 349 78% 5 1 156 96% 162 35 511 60% 137 9 286 49% 0 0 262 100% 126 21 453 67% 27 49 321 76% 15 11 499 95% 189 81 577 53% 12 86 451 78% 74 62 563 76% 11 6 456 96% 43 13 262 79% 172 49 461 52% 16 14 285 89% 18 2 235 91% 42 2 60 27% 3242 1039 13170 68% 6331 1812 25868 68% LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 27, 2005 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: October 2005 Construction Report - Bond Projects BACKGROUND: The media center expansion at Carver and the remodeling of Meadowcliff have been completed. I hope you have had an opportunity to see the finished products because you will be impressed. The demolition of Cloverdale Elementary School has begun and will be completed by the end of November. The attached report shows six (6) new projects that are being funded by the sale of QZAB Bonds for $2,189,175. The projects, identified as priority by the LRSD Maintenance Department because of the number of service calls for, equipment failures, replaced inadequate heating and air conditioning equipment in those six schools. RATIONALE: Monthly reports are submitted to the Board to keep members up-to-date on construction projects in the District. FUNDING: Bond Funds RECOMMENDATION: Report item\nno action necessary. PREPARED BY: Bill Goodman, District Engineer ~ .... m 0 :,: z  -\u0026lt; :D m ~ Facility Name Central Media ~dale Elementary Gibbs Henderson Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Elem. WITTiams CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 27, 2005 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION I Project Description I Cost I t::st. t,\nompletJOn Date Roof $85,000 Dec-05 - - Demolition - $520,750 - Nov-05 Addition - $705,670 - Dec-05 Skylight Replacement - $319,000 - Nov-05 HVAC (QZAB) $220,0QQ__ Nov-05 - Site Work - $6,QQQ__ O-ct-05 Drainage Repair $29,200 Nov-05 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - FALL/ WINTER 2005-06 Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I Est. compIetIon Date J. A. Fair Sewer Line $82,900 Unknown -- -- Rightsell Renovation $2,494,000 Unknown BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I t:st. t,\nompIeuon Date Administration Annex Electrical Upgrade $9,166 Unknown Alternative Learning Center Electrical Upgrade - - $2,696 Unknown Booker HVAC (QZAB) --- - - - $239,56~ - - Unknown Booker Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown - - - Brady Metal Roof - $250,000 Unknown Central HVAC (QZAB) $919.~ Unknown f-- - - - - Chicot Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown I- - - - Child Nutrition Renovation $6,500 Unknown f----- -- -- - -- Dunbar HVAC (QZAB) - $278,800 Unknown Fair Park HVAC (QZAB) $79,480 Unknown f----- - - - ~tHeights Remodel $1,547,~ - Unknown Fulbright Addition/Traffic Planning -- -- $2,500- Unknown --- -- Henderson Renovation -- -- $450,000 Summer 2006 Mann HVAC (QZAB) -- $382,400 Unknown --- -- Mitchell Renovation $2,212,493 Unknown Pulaski Hgts. MS Energy monitoring system installation - Unknown Unknown Terry Addition Planning $2,500 Unknown BOND PROJECTS NOT YET STARTED I I I est. t,\nompIeuon Facilitv Name Project Descriotion Cost Date Administration Annex ADA Adaptations $32,351 Unknown Adult Education ADA Adaptations -- $248.~-- Unknown --- - -- - - -- Structural Repairs $53,918 Unknown - ~ative Learning Center ADA Adaptations $43,134 Unknown --- ~-- Roof Repairs -- $26,959 Unknown Restroom Renovation $37,742 Unknown -- Booker ADA Adaptations -- $107,835 Spring 2006 Cashion Building ADA Adaptations -- $21 ,567 Unknown Dodd Restroom Renovation $26,959 Unknown Facility Services ADA Adaptations - $32,351 Unknown Install Water Meters at Cooling Towers $4,313 Unknown I-Emergency Lighting Replacement $80,876 Unknown ~ - Land Purchase - Booker $100,000 Unknown - - - - --- Fulbright Renovate Restrooms $10,784 Unknown - -- -- ADA Adaptations $21 ,567 Unknown Garland - - - - - Renovation - $900,000 Partially Complete ADA Adaptations $188,711 Unknown - ----- Geyer Springs Replace Restroom Stalls $4,313 Unknown - ADA Adaptations $21,567 Unknown Facility Name Henderson IRC McDermott Quigley Rockefeller CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 27, 2005 BOND PROJECTS NOT YET STARTED I Project Description I Cost I _ADA Adaptations _ $70,091._ ADA Adaptations _ $21 ,567 _ Restroom Renovation _ $21 ,567 Restroom Renovation _ $32,350 Restroom Upgrades $53,918 DressingRoom Renovation - $37,742 ADA Adaptations = $26,959 - Interior Renovation $16,175 Transportation - Laid~ ADA Adaptations - $32,351 - West Little Rock School New School - $11 ,782,638 - Facility Name Administration Administration Administration Administration Administration Annex Alternative Learning Ctr. Alternative Learning Ctr. Badgett Badgett Bale Bale Bale Bale Baseline !3ooker Booker Booker Booker Booker Booker Brady Brady __ Brady Carver Central Carver BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED I Project Description I Cost I Asbestos abatement _ $380,495 ~ sh air system ___ $55,000 Flre alarm - $32,350 - HVA-C -_- ___ ~= $70,000 _ Energy monitoring system installation Energy monitoring system installation Energy efficient light~-Partial asbestos abatement Fire alarm -aassroom addition/renovatfon Energy monitoring system Partial roof replacement HVAC-- Renovation Gym Roof --A- DA Rest rooms Energy efficient lighting Energy monitoring s- y-s~te_m_i_n-st-allation -,-Asbestos abatement Fire alarm ------- Addition/renovation ~ergy efficient lighting-- - Asbestos abatement $15,160 $82,000 $237,237 $18,250 $2,244,524 $269,587 $664,587 $953,520 $48,525 $25,000 $170,295 $23,710 $10,900 $34,501 $973,621 $80,593 $345,072 Energy monitoring system installation ____ $14,480 Renovation - Interior $10,200,266 Media Center Expansion Parking lot HVAC Renovation - Band Area $167,490 $111 ,742 $225,000 Carver Central Central Central Parking Central/Quigley Central/Quigley Central/Quigley Central -=--Reflecting Pond _ $57,561 $174,000 Central Central Central Central Chicot Chicot Cloverdale Elem. Student parking Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electncal repair Athletic Field Improvement -Irr~igati-on~ Sys~tem ------- - - -- Purchase land for school - ------------- Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations Ceiling and wall repair Fire Alarm System Design/Installation Front landing tile repair Drainage Sound Attenuation Energy efficient lighting $265,000 $38,000 $14,500 Unknown $2,000,000 $24,000 $80,876 $22,470 $64,700 $43,134 $132,678 Est. Completion Date Unknown Unknown -- Unknown Unknown -- Unknown U-nknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Est. Completion Date Mar-03 Aug-03 Aug-03 Nov-04 ~y-02 Oct-01 Dec-01 Jul-01 Aug-02 Dec-02 Mar-02 Dec-01 ~g-01 Aug-04 Oct-04 --- - Aug-~ Apr-01 Oct-01 Feb-02 - Mar-02 Nov-04 - - Sep-02 Aug-02 May-01 - Sep-05 Oct-05 Aug-03 Dec-04 Sep-04 Aug-03 ~g-03 Aug-03 - Aug-03 !ID Dec-02 Dec-02 Oct-01 Aug-01 Aug-01 Aug-04 Jul-04 Jul-01 2 Facility Name Cloverdale MS Cloverdale MS Dodd Dodd Dodd Dodd Dunbar Facilities Service Facility Services Fair Park Fair Park Fair Park Fair Park Fair Park Fair Park J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair Forest Park Forest Park Forest Park Forest Park Fulbright Fulbright Fulbright Fulbright Fulbright Franklin Geyer Springs Gibbs Gibbs Hall Hall Hall Hall Hall Hall Hall Henderson Henderson Henderson Henderson Henderson IRC Jefferson Jefferson Laidlaw Mablevale Elem Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Elem. CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 27, 2005 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED I Project Description I Cost Energy efficient lighting $189,743 Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $1 ,393,822 Fire Alarm Upgrade $9,200 Energy efficient lighting $90,665 Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile $156,299 Replace roof top HVAC $215,570 Renovation/addition $6,149,023 Interior renovation $84,672 Fire alarm $12,000 Remodel $799,000 Parking Lot $185,000 Roof $245,784 HVAC renovation/fire alarm $315,956 Energy efficient lighting $90,162 Asbestos abatement-ceiling $59,310 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music room addition $3,155,640 Energy efficient lighting $277,594 Press box $10,784 Security cameras $12,500 Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 Irrigation System $14,000 Roof repairs $391 ,871 Restrooms $152,881 Replace window units w/central HVAC $485,258 Diagonal parking $111 ,742 Energy efficient lighting $119,788 Energy efficient lighting $134,463 Energy monitoring system installation $11 ,950 Replace roof top HVAC units $107,835 Parking lot $140,,000 Roof repairs $200,000 Renovation $2,511 ,736 Roof Repair $161 ,752 Energy efficient lighting $76,447 Energy monitoring system installation $11 ,770 Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $8,637,709 Asbestos abatement $168,222 Energy efficient lighting $42,931 Infrastructure improvements $93,657 Energy efficient lighting $296,707 Intercom Security cameras $10,600 Lockers $43,854 Energy efficient lighting $193,679 Roof replacement gym $107,835 Asbestos abatement Phase I $500,000 Asbestos abatement Phase 2 $250,000 Energy efficient lighting $109,136 Asbestos abatement $43,639 Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm $1 ,630,000 Parking lot $269,588 Fire Alarm Upgrade $12,000 Energy monitoring system installation $12,150 Replace HVAC units $300,000 I Est. Completion Date Jul-01 Nov-02 Oct-04 Aug-01 Jul-01 Aug-02 Nov-04 Mar-01 Aug-03 Aug-05 Aug-05 May-05 Apr-02 Aug-01 Aug-01 Aug-04 - Apr-01 Nov-00 Jun-01 Jul-03 Jul-03 Aug-03 Aug-05 Nov-03 Aug-03 May-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Sep-02 Oct-02 Mar-03 Jun-04 Apr-01 Jul-01 Sep-03 Aug-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 Apr-01 Feb-01 Jun-01 Dec-04 Jul-01 May-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Jul-02 Oct-01 Nov-02 Jul-01 Oct-04 Aug-01 Aua-02 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 27, 2005 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facili Name Proect Descri tion Mabelvale Elem. Asbestos Abatement Mabelvale Elem. Energy efficient lighting Mabelvale MS Renovate bleachers Mabelvale MS Renovation Mann Partial Replacement Mann ~phalt walks Mann Walkway canopies Mann Boiler replacement Mann Fencing Mann Partial demolition/portable classrooms McClellan -Parking Lot Overlay McClellan Athletic Field Improvement McClellan Irrigation System -- McClellan Security cameras McClellan Energy efficient lighting McClellan Stadium stands repair McClellan Intercom McClellan Classroom Addition McDermott Fire Alarm Upgrade McDermott Energy efficient lighting McDermott Replace roof top HVAC units Meadowcliff Fire alarm __ Meadowcliff Asbestos abatement Meadowcliff Engergy efficient lighting Meadowcliff Remodel Metropolitan Replace cooling tower Metropolitan Replace shop vent system Metropolitan Energy monitoring system installation Mitchell -- ~ilding Remediation Mitchell Energy efficient lighting __ Mitchell Energy monitoring system installation Mitchell Asbestos abatement - - Oakhurst (Adult Education) New Windows Oakhurst HVAC renovation Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Parkview Energy monitoring s stem installation Energy efficient lighting Asbestos abatement Parking lot 6 classroom addition Parking Improvements Addition -- Parkview HVAC controls Parkview Roof replacement __ __ Parkview Exterior lights __ _ Parkview HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls Parkview Locker replacement Parkview Energy efficient lighting __ Procurement Energy monitoring system installation Procurement 7=Tre alarm Pulaski Heights Elem/Middle Cafeteria Ceiling Pulaski Hei hts Elem/Middle Replace Ent Doors Cost $107,000 $106,598 $134,793 $6,851 ,621 $11 ,500,000 The total $1 .8 million is what has been used so far on the projects listed completed for Mann. - -- $65,000 $38,000 $14,750 - $36,300 _ $303,614 $235,000 $46,000 $2,155,622 $7,700 $79,411 $476,000 $16,175 $253,412 $88,297 $365,600 $37,203 $20,000 $17,~ $165,000 $103,642 $16,695 $13,000 $215,000 $237,237 $10,695 $81,828 $10,000 $138,029 $888,778 $142,541 $2,121,226 $210,000 $273,877 $10,784 $301 ,938 $120,000 $315,000 $5,290 $25,000 $33,378 $13,990 Est. Completion Date Aug-02 Dec-02 Aug-01 Mar-04 Apr-04 Dec-01 Dec-01 Oct-01 Sep-01 Aug-01 ~r-05 Jul-03 Jul-03 Jun-01 May-01 Aug-01 Feb-02 Jul-04 Sep-04 Feb-01 --- Aug-02 Jul-01 Aug-02 Dec-02 Oct-05 Dec-00 ~y-01 Aug-01 Jul-04 Apr-01 Jul-01 Jul-01 Aug-05 Aug-01 May-01 ~pr-01 Aug-02 Aug-0~ Oct-02 Aug-03 Dec-04 Jun-02 Sep-01 Nov-00 Aug-01 Aug-01 Jun-01 Jun-02 Au -03 Aug-05 Au -05 4 :n .z... m\n,, Dz ~n ,i!=. .o. \u0026lt;c= =l 0\n,, Cl) CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 27, 2005 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Project Description I Cost Pulaski Heights Elementary Clean Exterior Walls $98,660 --- Pulaski Hgts. Elem Renovation $1 ,193,259 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground $17,000 Pulaski Hgts. MS Renovation $3,755,041 Rightsell Energy efficient lighting - $84,898 Rockefeller Energy efficient lighting $137,004 Rockefeller Replace roof top HVAC $539,175 Rockefeller . Parking addition $111 ,742 Romine Asbestos abatement $10,000 Romine Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $3,534,675 Scott Field Track Renovations $289,056 Security IT ransportation Bus cameras $22,500 Southwest New Corridor Ceiling $300,000 Southwest Addition $2,000,000 Southwest Asbestos abatement $28,138 Southwest New roof $690,000 Southwest Energy efficient lighting $168,719 Southwest Drainage I street widening $250,000 Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installation $4,830 Student Assignment Fire alarm $9,000 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation $275,000 Tech Ctr/ Metro Renovation Addition/Renovation - Phase II $3,679,000 Technology Upgrade Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data Terry Energy efficient lighting $73,850 Terry Driveway \u0026amp; Parking $83,484 Terry Media Center addition $704,932 Wakefield Rebuild $5,300,000 Wakefield Security cameras $8,000 Wakefield Energy efficient lighting $74,776 Wakefield Demolition/Asbestos Abatement $200,000 Washington Fire Alarm Upgrade $11 1600 Washington Security cameras $7,900 Washington Energy efficient lighting $165,281 Watson Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 Watson Asbestos abatement $182,241 Watson Energy efficient lighting $106,868 Watson Asbestos abatement $10,000 Watson Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $800,000 Western Hills Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC $622,160 Western Hills Fire Alarm Upgrade $8,400 Western Hills ADA Rest rooms $25,000 Western Hills Asbestos abatement $191,946 Western Hills Intercom $7,100 Western Hills Energy efficient lighting $106,000 Williams Renovation $2,106,492 Williams Parking expansions $183,717 Williams Energy efficient lighting $122,719 Wilson HVAC for Cafeteria $56,000 Wilson Renovation/expansion $1 ,263,876 Wilson Parking Expansion $110,000 Woodruff Parking addition $175,000 Woodruff Renovation $246,419 I Est. c..\nompIetIon Date Sep-05 Nov-04 Dec-02 Nov-04 Apr-01 - Mar-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Apr-02 Mar-03 May-05 Jun-01 Aug-05 Nov-04 Aug-00 Oct-03 Jan-02 -- Aug-03 Aug-02 Aug-03 Dec-01 Jun-04 - Nov-02 Feb-01 A~g-02 Sep-02 Dec-04 Jun-01 Feb-01 Nov-02 -Oct--04 Jun-01 Apr-01 -- Jul-01 Aug-01 - Aug-01 - Aug-02 - Aug-0~ Aug-05 -- Oct-04 - ~ug-04 Aug-02 Dec-01 Jul-01 -- Mar-04 Dec-03 Jun-01 Mar-05 --- Feb-04 ---- _!\\ug-__ Aug-05 Auq-02 5 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 27, 2005 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Board Auditor Report BACKGROUND: Monthly report to School Board. RATIONALE: Summary report of activities. FUNDING: No changes. RECOMMENDATION: None. PREPARED BY: Sandy Becker !1:1 Date: To: From: Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS October 27, 2005 Board of Directors Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Audit Report- October This is the seventy-second communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with two high schools, two middle school and two elementary schools to resolve financial issues in their activity and related funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. b) The AAB has forwarded a Booster Club Guidelines Package to be included in official publications of the District after review. Board Policy and Regulation a) The routing of Professional Leave and Travel Requests is being worked on to make the process more efficient and to prepare for the process being automated to improve documentation and provide information for decision making. Technology a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Working with Procurement on the use ofbarcode scanners for checking and updating inventory records. This is being done to help more quickly update and check electronic equipment records at the various sites. a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of Nuts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. Provided training with the Arkansas PT A on financials controls and financial preventive maintenance. Audit Report - October 2005 Page 2 of2 b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) c) d) e) f) g) h) a) b) c) d) e) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. Reviewing leave accountability system. Assisting schools to track and reconcile Teacher School Supply Funds. Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2005. Eleven schools participated. Sharefest is scheduled for October 29, 2005. Assisting LRSD PT A's in financial process training. Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 October 27, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Technology Report BACKGROUND: Since the last Board meeting the following technology activities took place:  Technology Plan Revision Committee has started the process of revising the district's technology plan. The plan will be coming to the board in February 2006.  Implementation of Edline, the program that allows parents to view grades, has begun on the middle school level. Teachers at Mabelvale Middle are being trained by district technology staff.  The computer refresh program has continued at designated district sites. RATIONALE: To implement the LRSD Technology Plan 2003 - 2006 FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept this report. PREPARED BY: John Ruffins, Director, Computer Information Services Lucy Neal, Coordinator, Technology and Media Services LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: October 27, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Policy Review: AD - Mission Statement BACKGROUND: The Board conducts periodic reviews of policies and regulations to ensure that these regulatory directives remain current and complete. Board member Tony Rose requested a review of Policy AD, which consists of the Mission Statement adopted in September 1998. The current mission statement was in effect at the time the LRSD 2003-2008 Strategic Plan was developed. RATIONALE: To ensure consistency between official Board policy and other documents used to administer the District's programs, projects, goals and objectives. FUNDING: No funding required. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Strategic Planning committee take into consideration the board authorized version of the mission statement and adopt it as the mission statement for strategic planning purposes. PREPARED BY: Roy G. Brooks ~ ::c \u0026gt;c: ~!\n,o\n,o ~m zzc~: m\n,o r-n m \"' .. si .n,:_,, nZ n\u0026gt; s:z nO em \"'\"\" I en - C: ~~ ..\n,o ii-\u0026lt; !II LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: AD LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Little Rock School District is to equip all students with the skills and knowledge to realize their aspirations, think critically and independently, learn continuously, and face the future as productive contributing citizens. This mission is accomplished through open access to a diverse, innovative and challenging curriculum in a secure environment with a staff dedicated to excellence and empowered with the trust and support of our community. Adopted: September 24, 1998 DATE: TO: FROM: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 October 27, 2005 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Policy Review and Proposed Revisions BACKGROUND: The Board conducts periodic reviews of policies and regulations to ensure that these regulatory directives remain current and complete. Board member Tony Rose requested a review of specific policies and has suggested updates as follows: Policy AC - Nondiscrimination The current policy AC, Nondiscrimination, was adopted in September 1998. The proposed revision of this policy changes the term \"sex\" to \"gender and sexual orientation.\" The changes are indicated on the first reading proposal attached. Policy ACD - Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Religion Policy ACD, Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Religion, was adopted by the Board in September 1998. The proposed revision of this policy replaces the language of the entire policy, emphasizing the Board's commitment to nondiscrimination based on religious beliefs. Policy ACH - Anti-Harrassment The current policy ACH, Anti-harassment, consists of language that should be considered as regulatory administrative directives. The proposed revision separates the policy from the directives. RATIONALE: To ensure that the Board's policies and regulations remain up-to-date and accurate. FUNDING: No funding required. ~ :z: \u0026gt; C: -~ rilz\nID\nID ~m z~ z C: m\nc r- (\") m u, ..~ n:., nZ-n\u0026gt; i:z \"(\") ,:m .. go I u, - C: ~~ ..\nID 5 .... !I' c- RECOMMENDATION: The administration recommends approval on first reading of Policies AC, ACD, and ACH. PREPARED BY: Roy G. Brooks LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: AC NONDISCRIMINATION The commitment of the Little Rock School District to the most fundamental principles of academic freedom, equality of opportunity, and human dignity requires that decisions involving students and employees be based on individual merit and be free from discrimination in all its forms. It is the policy of the Board of Education that there will be no discrimination because of race, color, religion, ~. gender, sexual orientation, age, national origin, or handicap/disability in the placement, instruction, and guidance of pupils\nthe employment, assignment, training, or promotion of personnel\nthe provision and maintenance of physical supplies and equipment\nthe development and implementation of the curriculum, including the activities program\nand in all matters relating to the instruction, supervision, administration and Board policy development. Revised: Adopted: September 24, 1998 Legal References: Title VI and Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title I and Title 11, Civil Rights Act of 1991 Equal Pay Act of 1963 Executive Order 11246 of 1995 Title IX, Education Amendments of 1972 and regulations, 34 C.F .R. part 104 Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Sections 503 and 504 Section 504, 34 C.F.R. part 104 Americans with Disabilities Act, 1990 Vietnam-era Veterans Readjustment Act, 1974 Age Discrimination Act, 1975 Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 1967 Arkansas General Laws Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997 Cross References: Board of Education Policies ACA, ACB, ACC, ACD, ACE, ACF ~ :c \u0026gt; C:  ~\nl::z\nio\n,o ism z is z C: ,m-\n,no m Cl) .. ~ .n,:_., nZ n\u0026gt; i::z nO ..:m -\u0026lt;l!o I Cl) - C: ~~ ..\nlll ii-\u0026lt; ~ Cl) m\ni::: m :!:\nC LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: ACD NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF RELIGION Tho First Amendment to tho United States of America's Constitution requires that public schools remain religiously neutral. All students, staff, and faculty have tho right to choose or not to choose their own religion and thoro will bo no discrimination of any kind based upon an individual's religion. It is the policy of the Board of Education that no student, faculty, or staff in the Little Rock School District will, on the basis of religious belief, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any District educational program, activity, or employment. Revised: Adopted: September 24, 1998 Legal References: See Code AC Cross Reference: Board of Education Policy AC LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE : ACH ANTI-HARASSMENT POLICY It is the policy of the District to maintain a learning environment that is free from harassment. The District prohibits any and all forms of harassment because of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, national origin, religion, or disability or protected activity (i.e. opposing unlawful harassment or discrimination or participating in an investigation. Any such conduct will result in disciplinary action and notification to the proper authorities. It will be a violation of District policy for any student, teacher, administrator, or other school personnel of the District to harass a student through conduct of a sexual nature, or regarding race, color, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, national origin, religion, disability, or protected activity as defined by this policy. It will also be a violation of District policy for any teacher, administrator or other school personnel of the District to tolerate sexual harassment or harassment because of a student's race, color, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, national origin, religion, disability or protected activity as defined by this policy, by a student, teacher, administrator, other school personnel, or by any third parties who are participating in, observing, or otherwise engaged in activities, including sports events and other extracurricular activities, under the auspices of the District. For the purpose of this policy, the \"school personnel\" includes school Board of Education members, school employees, agents, volunteers, contractors, or persons subject to the supervision and control of the District. The District will act to promptly investigate all complaints, either formal or informal, verbal or written, of harassment because of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, national origin, religion, disability or protected activity to promptly take appropriate action to protect individuals from further harassment\nand, if it determines that unlawful harassment occurred, to promptly and appropriately discipline any student, teacher, administrator or other school personnel who is found to have violated this policy, and/or to take other appropriate action reasonably calculated to end the harassment. fl ~ :r \u0026gt;. Cf\n:\nllz\n:o~ ~lS z C: m\n:o r-n m en .. ~ .n,:_., ~~ 1:z nO a:m -\u0026lt;IIO I en - C: ~~ .. ::0 ii-\u0026lt; LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: ACH continued This policy will be broadly interpreted as evidence of the District's commitment to equality of opportunity, human dignity, diversity, and academic freedom. No person will retaliate or threaten retaliation against another person for reporting, testifying or otherwise participating in any investigation, or proceeding relating to a complaint of harassment. Revised: Adopted: July 23, 2001 Legal References: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, 1965, 42 U.S.C.  2000d Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C.  1681 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C.  794 Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C.  12134 Cross References: Student Handbooks and Personnel Handbook 2 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: ACH-R Anti-Harassment Regulation PROCEDURE FOR COMPLAINTS OF HARASSMENT These regulations are intended to protect the rights of students, employees, administrators, the Board of Education and visitors on District property and to outline procedures, which will be followed in the event harassment occurs on District property or at an event sponsored by the District. The following definitions will be used for the purpose of enforcing the AntiHarassment Policy, ACH. DEFINITIONS Racial or Color Harassment Racial or color harassment includes unwelcome verbal, written or physical conduct, directed at the characteristics of a person's race or color, such as nicknames emphasizing stereotypes, racial slurs, comments on manner of speaking and negative references to racial customs. Sexual Harassment Sexual harassment consists of unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, sexually motivated physical conduct or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature. It also includes conduct that is not sexual in nature but that is engaged in because of the gender of the victim. It includes condact that is also criminal in nature such as rape, sexual assault, stalking, and similar offenses. Under federal law, sexual harassment is prohibited regardless of the sex of the harasser, i.e., sexual harassment may occur even if the harasser and the person being harassed are the same sex. Sexual Orientation Harassment Harassment on the basis of sexual orientation is unwelcome verbal, written or physical conduct, directed at the characteristics of a person's sexual orientation, such as negative name-calling and imitating mannerisms. Marital Status Harassment Harassment on the basis of marital status is unwelcome verbal, written or physical conduct, directed at the characteristics of a person's marital status, such as comments regarding pregnancy or being an unwed mother or father. ~ ::c \u0026gt; C: - ~ ~z\n,a\n,a lS m zlS z C: m\n,o r-n m \"' ~ \":., n-Z n\u0026gt; i::z nO ,:m \"'\"\" I UI - C: ~~ \na i6--\u0026lt; ?I ~ \"m' I: mz C' tL \u0026lt;- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: ACH-R (continued) National Origin Harassment Harassment on the basis of national origin is unwelcome verbal, written or physical conduct, directed at the characteristics of a person's national origin, such as negative comments regarding surnames, manner of speaking, customs, language, or ethnic slurs. Religious Harassment Harassment on the basis of religion or creed is unwelcome verbal, written or physical conduct, directed at the characteristics of a person's religion or creed, such as derogatory comments regarding surnames, religious tradition, or religious clothing, or religious slurs, or graffiti. Disability Harassment Harassment based on a person's disabling mental or physical condition and includes any unwelcome verbal, written or physical conduct, directed at the characteristics of a person's disabling condition, such as imitating manner of speech or movement, or interference with necessary equipment. REPORTING PROCEDURES Any person who feels he/she is being harassed may wish to consider informing the offending person that the behavior is inappropriate and not appreciated. Oftentimes, this is all that is required to stop the harassing behavior. You are not, however, required to take this step prior to filing a complaint.  Any student, District personnel, or visitor who believes he/she has been the victim of harassment by a student, teacher, administrator or other school personnel of the District, or by any other person who is participating in, observing, or otherwise engaged in activities, including extracurricular activities, under the auspices of the District, is encouraged to immediately report the alleged acts to the building principal. If the principal is the perpetrator of the harassment, the report of the incident will be made to the appropriate Assistant Superintendent, Associate Superintendent for School Services or the Director of Human Resources. Any teacher, administrator or other school official who has knowledge of or receives notice that a student or visitor has or may have been the victim of harassment by a student, teacher, administrator, or other school district personnel is required to immediately report the alleged act(s) to the building principal unless the principal is the perpetrator. If the harassment involves the 2 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: ACH-R (continued) principal, the incident will be reported to the appropriate Assistant Superintendent or Associate Superintendent for School Services. Upon receipt of the report, the principal, Assistant Superintendent or Associate Superintendent will notify Safety and Security personnel to conduct an investigation of the allegation. A third party may be involved in the investigation. The parent of the student (victim) will be notified immediately, unless after consultation with the student, it is determined not to be in the best interest of the student. If the alleged harassment is committed by a student, the student's parent/guardian will be notified that an investigation is being conducted. Complaints will be kept confidential to the extent possible. A prompt, thorough and impartial investigation will be conducted of all complaints of violation of this policy. Upon completion of the investigation, a written report will be submitted to the principal, Assistant Superintendent, or Associate Superintendent. The report will include a determination as to whether the allegations have been substantiated as factual and whether they appear to have violated District policy and/or law. Notification of the outcome of the investigation will be sent to all parties involved. If the allegation is substantiated, the District will take immediate and appropriate corrective action, including the following: 1. a student will receive a disciplinary sanctioned as outlined in the Student Handbook, and/or notification to the proper authorities. 2. a staff member will receive a disciplinary sanction as outlined in the Employee Handbook and/or the proper authorities will be notified. 3. a report of the incident regarding a visitor who committed an act while on District property or at an event sponsored by the District, will be referred to the proper legal authorities. 3 ..~ :,, ,.-z n\u0026gt; .i:,::nz z:m -lllo I Cl\u0026gt; ,\".'.C,,: \"i3 \na a .... C f, c\n' LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: ACH-R (continued) Notwithstanding this policy, employees may file a charge of discrimination with the U.S. EEOC. Employers who wish to file a charge must do so within 180 days of the last act of alleged harassment. Revised: Adopted: July 23, 2001 Legal References: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, 1965, 42 U.S.C.  2000d Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C.  1681 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C.  794 Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C.  12134 Cross References: Student Handbook and Personnel Handbook 4 DATE: TO: FROM: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 September 22, 2005 Board of Directors Larry Berkley President, Board of Directors SUBJECT: Policy Revision: GBK and Regulations: GBK-R BACKGROUND: The Board of Directors periodically reviews policies and regulations which provide the district's administration a clear line of authority for operating the district in an efficient and effective manner. A review of Policy GBK, Staff Concerns/Complaints/Grievances and the accompanying regulations, GBK-R, are modeled after Act 1357 as amended by the Arkansas Legislature in 2003. These documents describe the process an employee must use in resolving work-related grievances. A copy of Act 1357 is attached for your information. The policy and accompanying regulations in their present form do not clearly encourage employees to adhere to the board approved process. School Board members are also part of the grievance process and our obligations also must be more clearly defined. In addition, Policy GBK does not strongly communicate that the Board will not tolerate reprisal or retaliation directed at employees who follow the appropriate process and policy in resolving disputes with the district or its' administrators. RATIONALE: Policies should be clear and concise and offer specific directives to staff and administration. The revision of GBK and GBK-R prescribes a more thorough process for resolving employee grievances and protects employees from retaliation. FUNDING: This policy revision carries no financial implications. 8 z ?\n0 z u, ~ ::c \u0026gt; C: f: ~z\no ill ~~ zc: m\no r-n m u, RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board adopt on second reading the revisions to Policy GBK. Although not required by board policy, endorsement of regulations GBK-R is also recommended as identified in the attached documents as underlined text. PREPARED BY: Larry Berkley President, Board of Directors LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: GBK STAFF CONCERNS/COMPLAINTS/GRIEVANCES It is the policy of the Board of Education to have written grievance procedures which will result in encouraging employees to express themselves on subjects concerning condition of employment, in fostering a better understanding of policies, and in ensuring all employees that their questions and concerns are considered fairly(,) and rapidly(,). (and without reprisals .) It is the expressed intent of the Board of Education that there shall be no reprisals or retaliation of any kind made, nor will any be tolerated, against any employee who exercises his or her rights under this policy. \"Grievance\" will mean any concern related to personnel (policies)~ (or) salary .. federal or state laws and regulations, or terms or conditions of employment raised by an employee. \"Employee\" will mean a person employed by the District under a written contract. The specific processes and provisions applicable to grievance procedures are outlined in the Grievances/Concerns/Complaints regulation, GBK-R. The Board of Education encourages an employee to resolve a grievance or any other issue through the chain of command process prescribed by this policy and regulation or by a negotiated agreement. Revised: Adopted: November 18, 1999 References: Board of Education Regulation GBK-R Legal Reference: AC.A. 6-17-208 8 ~ iz5 \"' .. ~ ,n.:_,, .,,z n\u0026gt; 11:z nO z:m -\u0026lt;IIO I en '- C: :~ ..\na 5 .... C: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: GBK-R GRIEVANCE/CONCERNS/COMPLAINTS Purpose Some groups of employees are covered by grievance procedures defined in their respective negotiated agreement. For those employees not covered by a negotiated agreement the following process will apply. Communication and discussion can resolve the majority of questions and problems that cause difficulties between the employer and employee. When resolution is not reached rapidly, the employer and the staff member may proceed to effect resolution in writing as defined in this procedure. The purpose of the resolution procedures is to secure, at the lowest possible level, equitable solutions consistent with the legal standards of \"due process,\" to problems that may from time to time arise. The purpose is to (obtain better understanding of policies, to) encourage employees to express themselves more effectively on subjects concerning conditions of employment, and to ensure to all employees that their questions and problems are considered fairly, rapidly and without reprisals. Documents and Confidentiality All documents, communications and records dealing with the processing of a grievance will be filed separately from the personnel files of the participants and will be destroyed three years after the last official entry. All parties will hold the resolution proceedings in confidentiality at all levels.  Normally, the resolution process should be conducted at times that do not interfere with the assigned duties. Process \"Grievance\" means any concern related to personnel policy, salary, federal or state laws(,) and regulations, or terms or conditions of employment, raised by an employee. \"Employee\" means a person employed by a school district under a written contract. The first step in the procedure is to seek an informal resolution between the employee and the immediate supervisor. If the grievance is not resolved at the informal phase, the grievance is to be committed to writing and sent to the applicable supervisor within five calendar days of the incident resulting in the grievance. The employee will immediately thereafter schedule a meeting with the appropriate supervisor to discuss the complaint and resolutions sought. The parties should act in good faith to expedite the process. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: GBK-R Upon request, the applicable supervisor will schedule a meeting with the grievant within five workdays of receipt of the written grievance. If the problem is not resolved in the meeting held with the supervisor, and the employee indicates a desire to pursue further, a written request must be submitted within five workdays for an appeal to the Office of the Superintendent or designee. Appeals The appeal will be heard in the Office of the Superintendent/designee within ten workdays of the request for an appeal. An employee who has not been satisfied with the answer at the Superintendent's level may request that the grievance be submitted to the Board of Education. The request will include a written statement setting forth the issue(s) to be reviewed by the Board of Education and is to be addressed to the President of the Board c/o Superintendent's Office. Other Provisions An employee seeking to resolve a grievance as defined above is required to use the terms and conditions of their negotiated agreement for resolution of grievances. Employees not covered by a negotiated agreement are bound by the provisions of this policy. In either case, the responsibility for ensuring that the prescribed due process is adhered to and will not be circumvented is shared at all levels of the district, up to and including the Board of Education. Employees who have begun or who are considering initiating a grievance procedure either under the terms of this policy or under the terms of a negotiated agreement are prohibited from undertaking any action that seeks to circumvent the prescribed process. Specifically, employees are prohibited from conveying or causing the conveyance of information about their grievance to members of the Board of Education prior to completing the chain of command process prescribed by this policy or their negotiated agreement. Employees must be aware that receipt of such information by a member of the Board may be cause for that Board member to recuse him/herself from an employee grievance hearing. Likewise, members of the Board of Education, by definition of their role in the process, must refrain from any involvement in an employee grievance until the process formally reaches the Board as prescribed in this policy or a negotiated agreement. Members of the Board should always encourage an employee to resolve a grievance or any other issue through the chain of command process prescribed by this policy or by a negotiated agreement. Date: August 5, 2005 Legal Reference: Act 1357 of 2003 f\u0026gt; 8 z ?. 0z u, .. ~ n:,, ~-z n\u0026gt; i::z nO a:m ... go I u, '--C ~~ \n10 ii ... l 2 3 4 Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to the law as it existed prior to this session of the General Assembly. State of Arkansas 84th General Assembly Regular Session, 2003 Act 1357 of 2003 SENATE BILL 913 5 By: Senators Wilkins, Broadway 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 For An Act To Be Entitled AN ACT TO AMEND ARKANSAS CODE 6-17-208 TO PROVIDE FOR PROCEDURES TO THE GRIEVANCE LAW\nAND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. Subtitle AN ACT TO AMEND ARKANSAS CODE 6-17-208 TO PROVIDE FOR PROCEDURES TO THE GRIEVANCE LAW. 19 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS: 20 21 22 23 SECTION 1. Arkansas Code 6-17-208 is amended to read as follows: 6-17-208. Grievance procedure. (a)(l) It is the public policy of the State of Arkansas that~ 24 ill~ Each school district shall have a written 25 grievance procedure which provides for an orderly method of resolving 26 concerns raised by an employee at the lowest possible administrative level 27 and in a clear and timely manner for both partiesj 28 29 30 31 (B) All school employees shall have the right to file grievances and have those grievances heard. A group of employees who have the same grievance may file a group grievance. (2)(A) \"Grievance\" means any concern related to personnel 32 palieies er salary policy, salary, federal or state laws and regulations, or 33 terms or conditions of employment, raised by an employee\nand 34 (B) \"Employee\" means a person employed by a school 35 district under a written contract. 36 (b)(l) The grievance policy shall at least include the following 11111!1111111111111111111111111~ 03082003LDH0835.JMB291 1 2 As Engrossed: S3/27/03 provisions: S8913 (A) A procedure for resolving the matter informally with 3 the employee's immediate supervisor\n4 (B) A procedure to appeal in writing an unsatisfactorily 5 resolved grievance from the immediate supervisor to the superintendent of 6 schools or his or her designee\n7 (C)(i) A procedure to appeal in writing an 8 unsatisfactorily resolved grievance from the superintendent or his or her 9 designee to the school board at the next regularly scheduled school board 10 11 12 13 14 meeting unless both parties have agreed to a different date. (ii) The hearing shall be open or closed at the discretion of the employee. (iii) If the hearing is open, the parent or guardian of any student under the age of eighteen (18) years who gives testimony may 15 elect to have the student's testimony given in a closed session\nand 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (D) The right of all parties to be represented by a person of his or her own choosing, at least at the sehool aoaFa lm,rel but not by a member of a party's immediate family at any level of the procedure. (2)(A) The determination by the principal, superintendent, or their designees that the concern expressed by the employee is not a grievance may be appealed to the school board for a final decision. (B) At the hearing, the employee shall have an adequate 23 opportunity to present the grievanceT but no less than ninety (90) minutes, 24 and both parties shall have the opportunity to present and question 25 witnesses. 26 27 28 29 30 (c) The grievance policy shall be adopted in accordance with this subchapter and other applicable policies of the district. (d) There shall be no reprisals of any kind against any individual who exercises his or her rights under this act. (e) Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring a school 31 district to enter into an agreement recognizing an organization for the 32 purpose of negotiating personnel policies, salaries, and educational matters 33 of mutual concern. 34 35 Is I Wilkins 36 APPROVED: 4/15/2003 2 03082003LDH0835.JMB291 r\u0026gt; g z ~ 0z U\u0026gt;\n!ii :c \u0026gt; C: - ~\ni,:z\no\no ig m zig zc: m\no r-n m U\u0026gt; ..~ .n. :-., .,,z n\u0026gt; i:::z nn z:m -IIIO I U\u0026gt; '-- C: .,-.:i n\n3 ..\no 5--1 !D ~ U\u0026gt; m ii: m :5 DATE: October 27, 2005 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 TO: Board of Education FROM: Roy Brooks, Ed.D Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: DKC-R - Regulations for Implementing Policy DKC - Out of Area Travel Travel Expense Authorization / Reimbursement / Travel Limits BACKGROUND: The Board of Education periodically reviews policies and regulations which provide the district's administration a clear line of authority for operating the district in an efficient and effective manner. A review of Policy DKC-R Travel Expense Authorization / Reimbursement / Travel Limits describes the process an employee must use when traveling on school business. Key changes are the addition of travel limitations, credit card one day hotel charge directions, identification of travel coordinators, and due dates for professional leave forms. These changes are recommended to make the travel process more cost efficient and timely. RATIONALE: This revised policy will enhance operational efficiency and monitor professional leave during instructional time that impacts student achievement. FUNDING: This policy revision carries no financial obligations. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept the revisions to Policy DKC-R. New text is underlined. Eliminated text is marked through. PREPARED BY: Hugh Hattabaugh, Deputy Superintendent Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Linda Austin, Grants Coordinator Valerie Hudson, Executive Assistant ~ :c  C: . f\n~z\n,,\n,, ism z is zc: m\n,, r-o m tn ~ n:., -z n  s:z nO z:m \"'\"\" .' . tCn: ~~ \n,J i5 ... !D C t.. ' LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: DKC-R TRAVEL EXPENSE AUTHORIZATION/ REIMBURSEMENT/ TRAVEL LIMITS Travel will be for necessary school business purposes. Prior approval for all travel, including prepaid expenses, will be obtained before any expenses are incurred. Economical and reasonable modes of transportation, lodging, and other expenditures in accordance with the purpose of the travel must be used. A copy of the full agenda for the conference or training will be provided with the request for travel and request for professional leave. To insure that maximum impact can be achieved, the following regulations apply to all out-of-district travel. Out-of-district travel will be defined as being outside Pulaski County, AR. Travel Limits A maximum of two out of state trips per year apply to all District staff. Additional travel may be authorized if travel expenses are funded through a non-District related source and the travel is approved as being in the best interest of the District. When additional travel is required due to the job responsibilities, travel beyond the maximum may be approved by request of their supervisor and approval of the superintendent or their designee. Travel by the superintendent is addressed in Board Policy CBG. In state travel will be approved only for necessary and reasonable school business. Travel Day The travel day will begin at 6:00 a.m., include breakfast, lunch, dinner and one night's lodging, and will end the following morning at 6:00 a.m. Request for reimbursement of expenses incurred in less than full travel days must reflect a reasonable allocation based on the expense limits directed herein for a full travel day. Meal costs will be prorated by one half for that travel day if travel begins after 2:00 p.m. and for a return time prior to 2:00 p.m. Meals and Incidental Costs Meals costs will be determined by the last accepted federal per diem schedule. An electronic copy will be available in the Teachers Lounge section of the District webpaqe. Partial days meal cost will be determined by the departure and return time as indicated in the above section. Meals included in the cost of registration will be deducted from the per diem amount as follows: breakfast (20%), lunch (30%), and dinner (50%). No deductions will be made for continental breakfasts. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: DKC-R (continued) Lodging Expenses The District will reimburse actual lodging expense incurred in travel for the District. Lodging will be reimbursed only for the days of the conference attended plus night(s) required based on the conference schedule. Economical and reasonable lodging in accordance with the purpose of the travel must be used. Reimbursement for lodging expenses will require lodging receipts that indicate the employee has paid for the lodging. Receipts from personal cred it cards will not be accepted unless accompanied by the receipt from the lodging establishment. If the rate for lodging exceeds the federal maximum for lodging, a justification must be provided (i.e. no local travel costs between hotel and conference hotel\nlegitimate safety concerns\nor room sharing to reduce cost). Travelers are encouraged to use cost saving initiatives such as appropriate sharing of rooms, car pooling and like arrangements. Using District Pro-Card for Travel After the travel form has been approved, go to your principal/ director and request to use the site's main Pro-Card (usually the principal 's / director's) to do the following: a. Secure a hotel reservation\nb. Purchase airline tickets on-line (use website of your choosing, or online service, etc). Do not use any on-line service that requires you to enter your card number to find a rate)\nc. Book airfare or obtain the estimated cost of airfare using a local travel agency\nhowever, employees are encouraged to book tickets using available on-line services. d. Pay for registration fees\ne. Purchase transportation tickets for multiple persons from same location traveling to same destination. If amount is expected to exceed $1,000 contact Procurement. f. Individual employees cannot use the Pro-Card to pay for the following~ 1. Hotel room\n2. Meals\n3. Auto rental\n4. Incidental expenses. You will receive an expense check to pay for these items that have been approved on your travel form. If an issue arises regarding a one day deposit on lodging, contact Procurement for assistance. 2 .!=.=,' z \u0026gt;z (\") ~ en ~ ::c \u0026gt; C: . ~\nllz\no~ ~ is z C: m\no r-n m en C E, t. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: DKC-R (continued) Travel Coordinator Any individual identified as a travel coordinator by Procurement that regularly handles multiple employees travel may in coordination with Procurement propose cost saving options associated with group travel. Procurement identifies travel coordinators as individuals who regularly handle travel for multiple employees. Travel coordinators may propose cost saving options associated with group travel. Such options will require written approval of the Chief Financial Officer. Travel to Destination The District will reimburse travel expenses to the maximum limit for point-to-point costs for coach fare on common carriers. Receipts or ticket stubs are required for reimbursement of common carrier costs. If an employee chooses to use a personal automobile, reimbursement will not exceed the current per mile rate approved by the District or point-to-point coach fare, whichever is less. When more than one employee travels to the same location in a personal automobile, mileage will be reimbursed only to the employee whose personal automobile is used. When automobiles are used for transportation to a destination, car pooling for multiple attendees is recommended. Mileage requests may be denied when the best interest of the District is not met after taking into account the circumstances of the request. Local Travel at Destination Actual reasonable expenses of local travel by common carriers at the destination will be reimbursed. Mass transit or taxi fare does not require receipts if all local travel claimed for the trip is less than thirty dollars. Receipts are required if the claim is over thirty dollars. Automobile Rentals - At Destination Automobiles will not be rented at District expense without prior approval of the superintendent or his / her designee and in no case without documentation, in advance, that automobile rental will be less expensive to the District than the cost of public transportation to meeting, conferences, etc. Reimbursement is conditioned upon advance authority as well as receipts from the leasing agency. Automobile Rentals - Travel to Destination If an employee chooses to rent a vehicle to travel to an approved destination, the employee will only be reimbursed the lesser of common carrier coach rates or round trip map mileage to and from the destination. If a vehicle is rented for multiple attendees, 3 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: DKC-R (continued) the limit for reimbursement will be the lesser of common carrier coach rates for two employees or round trip map mileage to and from the destination for two employees. The approval or disapproval level will be at least at the equivalency level of an associate superintendent for this type of arrangement. Reasonableness must be documented. Advance Request for Professional Leave and Travel The fif6t two forms listed below must be submitted at least thirty days prior to travel if an advance is requested. If there is no District expense for this trip or no advance required the deadline will be three weeks prior to the trip. The third form should be filled out only when multiple attendees from the same location or area are attending the same ew\u0026lt;ent. If an employee has not sent in documentation for the advanced funds within sixty days, payroll deduction will be made for the non-documented advance that has not been reimbursed.  Request for Absence for Professional Meetings - to be completed and submitted in accordance with the instructions on that form. This request must be submitted three weeks prior to the desired leave.  Travel Authorization - Advance I Actual Cost - to be submitted in accordance with the instructions on that form. Non-travel items will not be included on advances or reimbursed with travel. Registrations and common carrier expenses (to and from the destination) should be paid by separate check to the vendor unless you used your district Pro-Card.  Trav-e! 81:Jmmary for SGhoo! When multiple attendees from tho same area or school are going to tho same educational e.iont. A tra11ol summar,i will bo prepared by tho administrator of that school or area and sent with tho other documents. No employee will be reimbursed for out-of-district travel unless the required forms are submitted and approved in advance by the area supervisor, funding source manager (if required) and financial services. These forms must cover the entire cost of travel, the total days absence requested, be accompanied by the full agenda of the conference or event to be attended, and be delivered together for approval. Requests for travel will be completed in a timely manner to avoid registration penalties, and to obtain good rates for hotels, airlines, registration, etc. No travel will be paid from any source for which the required forms have not been completed and approved. Revised: March 24, 2005 Date: May 25, 2000 4 8 z !'\n0z \"' .!=.,' z \u0026gt;z n \u0026gt;,... \"' ~ :c \u0026gt;c: -~ ~z ::Ojill ~~ z C: m\na r-n m \"' ,, ~ :,, .,,-z ,,\u0026gt; i,,: :nz z:m \"\"\"\" I en '- C: :~ \na ii-\u0026lt; Request for Absence for Professional Meetings Name _____________________ _ Title ________________ _ School/ Department ______________________________________ _ Conference Name ------------------- Conference Date(s) ____________ _ Departure Date __________  AM  PM Return to Duty Date _________ 0 AM O PM SECTION I: ALL PERSONNEL  YES ONO  NIA I. This is the only state conference I will be attending this year.  YES  NO  NIA 2. This is the only national conference I will be attending this year.  YES  NO  NIA 3. My choice of airfare/ hotel was based on the moderate price range offered.  YES  NO  NIA 4. A plan has been developed to maximize coverage of sessions by all attendees for the benefit of my department and the District. (Auach conference agenda and plan)  YES ONO  NIA 5. Appropriate personal or vacation leave has been requested for pre or post conference stay.  YES ONO  NIA 6. This job-specific travel is based on my job performance responsibilities.  YES ONO  NIA 7. Request that expenses be paid by the District. If Yes, complete Travel Authorization form.  YES ONO  NIA 8. This travel will be covered by my site operating budget. If No, indicate the source of funds SEC'TIO:\\ II: l\\\"STRl 'C'TIO\\\"AL STAFF D YES D NO ON/A 9. A substitute will be requested for this absence. 0 YES ONO  N/A 10. Does extra duty pay apply? If Yes, list date(s): _______________ _ D YES ONO O N/A 11. Attendance at this conference/seminar is linked to a school-wide staff development goal that is related to the ASCIP, disparities or professional development plans. 12. Teachers requesting expenses and who will be chaperoning students should check: No. of students chaperoned___ 0 Will use personal vehicle O Will use transpgrtation other than personal vehicle 13. 1f you have answered No to any of the above questions, please provide an explanation: Please note the following:  Departments will rotate attendance of staff yearly with the expectation that returning attendees share information as a requirement of attendance.  Use of IDEA I Title funds, will be limited with a priority placed on school-based instructional staff funding for staff development. I understand that this travel is related to my professional responsibilities, must be approved by the principal, administrator or associate superintendent. In addition, I understand that this travel and expenses should be paid for by the association / organization and that temporary duty leave will be granted, with approval ofmy supervisor, for my attendance at this conference/ seminar. I certify to the best of my knowledge the above information is correct and understand that all information is subject to state and internal auditors.  Approved Signature of Teacher or Other Employee Date 0 Disapproved Signature of Principal or Immediate Supervisor - (In-State Travel) Date Associate Superintendent - (Out of State Travel only) Date I/you have any questions, contact Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor, at 447-1115. Travel Authorization - Advance/ Actual Cost Name/ Title ______________ _ School/ Dept. ________ _ Date __ _ Conference Name ________________ _ Conference Date(s) _________ _ Conference Location __________________________ (Attach copy of agenda) Departure Date ________ Time ____ _ Return Date ________ Time ___ _ Dates Covered: (Write dates in table below) ~ stJt, .': \\*\u0026lt;',M- ,-,. \"Ill C !' , w. TH F ' SA SU M :ru . w . ' TH i -,F -\"'1 ,SA\n!:'. Method of Travel: D Air D Personal Vehicle D Carpool with other D Other __________ _ Registration Amount $ __________ _ Cost of Airfare or other Transportation $ _______ _ Requisition# for Registration _________ _ Requisition# for Carrier ____________ _ Expenses Advance Actual Difference Mileage ___ _ Miles @ ___ Per Mile $ ___ _ $ ____ _ $ ___ _ Meals/ Per Diem: # of Days _______ _ $ ___ _ $ ___ _ $ ___ _ Lodging: (Attach original itemized receipt) # of Nights__ Room Rate __ Tax% __ _ $ ____ _ $ ____ _ $ ___ _ Other Expenses: (Taxi, etc.) ________ _ $ ___ _ $ ____ _ $ ___ _ Total Expenses $ __ _ $ __ _ $ __ _ Total Due: $ ______ _ D To Traveler D From Traveler SF FUNCT , OPUNIT OBJ I Requestee Supervisor Overall Supervisor Funding Source Mgr. Financial Services Approval of Travel and/ or Advance Date __ _ Date __ _ Date __ _ Date __ _ Date __ _ Approval of Actual Costs Date __ _ Date __ _ Date __ _ Date. __ _ Date. __ _ 8 z ~ iz5 \"' ~ ::c ,.. C: ~! m :a~ ~lS zc: ,m.. .:.a, m \"' \"'5!! n:., ~z n\u0026gt; 11:z n\u0026lt;\"\u0026gt; z:m ... go I c,, '- C: ~~  :0 ij .... DATE: TO: FROM: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 October 27, 2005 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Personnel Changes BACKGROUND: None RATIONALE: To staff allocated positions within the District FUNDING: Operating Fund RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A. C.A. 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) consecutive years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 19, 2005 for regular schools are considered intern teachers. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 8, 2005 for EYE are considered intern teachers. bf~ PREPARED BY: David E. Hartz, Senior Director of Human Resources 8\n0z fJ\u0026gt; .~,, z  z n ~ fJ\u0026gt; ?\u0026lt; n 5 fJ\u0026gt; z Cl\na m I fJ\u0026gt; .. ,, ~ :., ~z n  ,s,: nz z:m ... go I fJ\u0026gt; .. C: :~ ..\na :6 ... Personnel Changes Page2 September 22, 2005 NAME START DATE/ POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE Resignations/Terminations Certified Em~lo)lees Adams, Bernard Alternative Learning/ 9-18-95 Reason: Personal RIGHTS ELL 8-10-05 Bryant, Michael Science/ 7-17-02 Reason: Accepted another J. A FAIR 8-2-05 position Gall, Janet Elementary II/ 8-22-88 Reason: Leaving the city ROMINE 9-16-05 Gangluff, Tracey Speech Pathology/ 8-9-04 Reason: Leaving the city CHICOT 9-16-05 Goodman, Tamara Elementary V/ 2-24-03 Reason: Accepted another KING 8-1-05 position Kinslow, Nancy 4Yr Old/ 8-12-99 Reason: Health Reasons CHICOT 10-14-05 Mccorkle, Frances Elementary V/ 8-15-94 Reason: Retired ROCKEFELLER 9-8-05 McMurray, Victor Social Studies/ 8-27-8ii Reason: None given CENTRAL 8-2-05 Miller, Bruce Algebra 1/ 10-1-86 Reason: None given CENTRAL 8-1-05 Paige, Jr. Willie Assistant Principal (.57)/ 8-28-68 Reason: None Given MCCLELLAN 8-29-05 Peyton, Chanda English/ 2-2-00 Reason: Accepted another HENDERSON 8-4-05 position Tarpley, Glynda Special Education/ 8-14-95 Reason: Personal TERRY 9-20-05 Walther, Tammy English/ 8-13-98 Reason: Returning to school J. A FAIR 8-2-05 SALARY ANNUAL CLASS SALARY 1-17 48196.00 TCH925 4-09 42662.00 TCH10 2-17 49217.00 TCH925 62-12 50928.00 SPE925 1-17 47715.00 TCH925 6-14 51845.00 4YR925 6-18 56209.00 TCH925 4-19 54561 .00 TCH925 4-19 54561.00 TCH925 66-20 72864.00 ADC10 5-06 40756.00 TCH925 6-18 56209.00 SPE925 4-07 40351 .00 TCH925 Personnel Changes Page 3 September 22, 2005 fl 8 z \u0026gt;..... START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL 0z NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY u, New Certified Employees Bisbee, Donanne Art/ 8-16-05 1-05 33673.00 J. A. FAIR TCH925 annual 33146.86 prorated Boyd, Debbye General Science/ 8-11-05 2-17 49705.00 ALC TCH925 .!=.,' z Brakefield, Vance Band/ 8-11-05 4-04 37069.00 \u0026gt;z n PARKVIEW TCH925 \u0026gt;,... u, Bruhl, Rita Elementary I/ 8-22-05 2-04 34021 .00 ROMINE TCH925 annual 32780.00 prorated Burns, Josiah Elementary Ill/ 8-17-05 3-08 39976.00 ?\u0026lt; n KING TCH925 annual ,... 0 u, 39338.02 z C) prorated\n,\n, m Coleman, Donna Special Education/ 8-17-05 6-06 42556.00 i u, SOUTHWEST SPE925 annual 41669.42 prorated Daneshvar, Tamara Spanish/ 8-11-05 1-01 30190.00 CENTRAL TCH925 ~ Tl :.,, - Davis, Judith Special Education/ 8-11-05 5-05 39798.00 ~~ s:z Tl 0 FOREST HEIGHTS SPE925 a:m \"I \"'u\"\", '-C Dongmo, Annick Math II/ 8-11-05 4-01 34747.00 :~ \n,\nJ MCCLELLAN TCH925 5 ..... Germany, Pamela Music/ 8-24-05 6-20 58812.00 RIGHTSELU TCH925 annual WASHINGTON 56055.19 prorated Green, Raefani English/ 8-11-05 1-01 30190.00 !J:I ~ CENTRAL TCH925 u, m !I: m :5 t.. Personnel Changes Page4 September 22, 2005 NAME Grubb, Kelly Hays, Mark Hill, Natasha Hunter, Broderick Jeffus, Brandon Johnson, Harvey Madden, Sammye Mayberry, Kimberly McDonald, Thomas McMillan, Tashenia McNeil!, Janie START DATE/ POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE Kindergarten/ 8-18-05 DODD Science/ 8-11-05 MABELVALE MIDDLE English/ 8-11-05 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE Elementary V/ 10-12-05 OTTER CREEK Physics/ 8-11-05 MCCLELLAN Electronics/ 8-3-05 METRO Mathematics/ 8-11-05 FELDER Typing/ 8-22-05 MABELVALE MIDDLE Social Studies/ 8-15-05 FELDER Business Education/ 8-5-05 MCCLELLAN Algebra I/ 8-11-05 CENTRAL SALARY ANNUAL CLASS SALARY 1-01 30040.00 K925 annual 29403.80 prorated 1-02 30770.00 TCH925 1-03 31351.00 TCH925 1-09 38318.00 TCH925 annual 29736.36 prorated 4-01 34747.00 TCH925 1-12 43107.28 VOC10 annual 41801.00 prorated 2-12 43311 .00 TCH925 1-01 30190.00 TCH925 annual 29246.56 prorated 4-01 34747.00 TCH925 annual 34385.05 prorated 1-04 33359.00 TCH950 4-18 46446.00 TCH925 Personnel Changes Page 5 September 22, 2005 f\u0026gt; 8 z .\u0026gt;... START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL 0 z NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY \"' Mitchell, Mary Kindergarten/ 10-11-05 4-18 53326.00 GEYER SPRINGS K925 annual 41660.94 prorated Moye, Randall American History/ 8-17-05 1-16 46446.00 MCCLELLAN TCH925 annual 45478.37 prorated !.=.,' Perkins, Michael Physical Education/ 8-2-05 4-06 42469.50 z \u0026gt;z PULASKI HEIGHTS TCH925 C')  MIDDLE ,... \"' Priebe, Kurtis Algebra 1/ 8-11-05 3-01 33209.00 MCCLELLAN TCH925 Robinson, Renee Physics/ 8-17-05 4-07 40553.00 CENTRAL TCH925 annual ?\u0026lt; 39708.15 C,..'.) 0 prorated \"z' C)\na Scruggs, Clare Arkansas History/ 8-11-05 4-01 34747.00 m J. A. FAIR TCH925 I \"' Sharlow, Alan Band/ 8-11-05 1-5 33673.00 MCCLELLAN TCH925 Sherlin, Phillip Science/ 9-12-05 1-01 30190.00 MABELVALE MIDDLE TCH925 annual .. ~ 26887.97 ,, :., - prorated :.n, \u0026gt;z a::z ., C') z: m Staley, Jerry Art/ 8-11-05 4-18 53326.00 -\u0026lt;Do I (I) '- C: PULASKI HEIGHTS TCH925 :~ MIDDLE/DUNBAR \na ii .... Stewart, Sherrie World History/ 8-11-05 1-01 30190.00 CENTRAL TCH925 Weaver, Nellieann English/ 8-11-05 1-01 30190.00 SOUTHWEST TCH925 !I\" Wingfield, Elizabeth English/ 8-22-05 1-04 32512.00 ~ PULASKI HEIGHTS annual \"m' :I: MIDDLE 31326.67 m !\nprorated C Personnel Changes Page6 September 22, 2005 NAME POSITION / SCHOOL START DATE/ SALARY END DATE CLASS Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Anderson, Almarie Instructional Aide/ 3-13-03 33-16 Reason: Accepted another CHICOT 9-27-05 INA925 position Armstead, Victoria Secretary/ 4-11-88 39-20 Reason: Deceased ACC-METRO 10-14-05 CLK10 Bonds, Dorothy Child Nutrition/ 8-12-03 7-06 Reason: None given ROCKEFELLER 8-29-05 FSH650 Carter, John CARE/ 2-28-05 3-17 Reason: None given CARE 9-30-05 CARE Clark, Phyllis Child Nutrition/ 3-10-04 3-01 Reason: None given MANN 9-12-05 FSH550 Davis, Doris Bus Monitor/ 10-15-85 1-10 Reason: Resigned without TRANSPORTATION 9-19-05 BUSMON notice Dobbins, Malinda Instructional Aide/ 8-16-04 33-16 Reason: Accepted another FOREST HEIGHTS 8-8-05 INA925 position Ghant, Natlyn CARE/ 8-19-05 3-05 Reason: Resigned without CARE 10-04-05 CARE notice Green, James Custodian/ 9-27-04 36-07 Reason: Terminated CENTRAL 10-28-05 CUS12 (misconduct)-No appeal pending Hardman, Melissa Instructional Aide/ 2-7-05 33-16 Reason: None given FOREST HEIGHTS 8-10-05 INA925 Hart, Andrew Custodian/ 1-20-99 31-10 Reason: Deceased MABEL VALE 8-22-05 CUS925 ELEMENTARY Haynes, Danielle Instructional Aide/ 10-23-00 33-13 Reason: Accepted another WOODRUFF 10-26-05 INA925 position ANNUAL SALARY 16109.00 32544.00 11111 .00 10.36 per hour 9350.00 14107.00 16109.00 8.38 per hour 20184.00 16109.00 14897.00 14735.00 Personnel Changes Page7 September 22, 2005 r, 8 z ?\nSTART DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL i5 z NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY \"' Lewis, Johnetta CARE/ 8-29-05 2-03 7.85 Reason: None given CARE 10-2-05 CARE per hour Mays, Barbara Custodian/ 8-21-94 31-14 16781 .00 Reason: Job Abandonment KING 8-15-05 CUS928 Millen, Shirley Child Nutrition/ 2-11-91 3-14 9933.00 Reason: None given WAKEFIELD 10-20-05 FSH550 !.=.,' Murphy, Demetria Custodian/ 8-13-04 31-01 11379.00 z \u0026gt;z Reason: None given MCCLELLAN 4-19-05 CUS928 0 ,\u0026gt;- \"' Ricks, Anjanette Instructional Aide/ 2-13-05 33-16 16109.00 Reason: Personal ALC 8-17-05 INA925 Roberts, Caroline Child Nutrition/ 9-20-02 7-02 11111 .00 Reason: Job Abandonment FRANKLIN 8-8-05 FSH650 ?\u0026lt; Schultz, Barbara Instructional Aide/ 9-1-01 33-17 16595.00 ,0- Reason: Deceased MABELVALE MIDDLE 8-9-05 INA925 0 !!? z C) Scott, Frank Custodian 3-22-04 31-03 12085.00 \"m' ~ Reason: Personal BALE 10-6-05 CUS925 :\",'\n\"' Seawood, Ruth CARE/ 3-18-02 1-06 7.74 Reason: Returning to school CARE 9-15-05 CARE per hour Skinner, Melva Instructional Aide/ 8-13-01 33-13 14735.00 Reason: Personal FOREST HEIGHTS 8-1-05 INA925 ~ .., Smith, Beverly CARE/ 9-2-05 2-05 8.18 z \u0026gt;z Reason: None given CARE 9-26-05 CARE per hour 0 m \"\"\"' Swanigan, Shirley CARE/ 1-13-97 1-08 8.05 C.,,: Reason: None given CARE 9-30-05 CARE per hour ~ ~ Thomas, Anthony Custodian/ 8-27-02 31-05 16380.00 Reason: Failure to report MCCLELLAN 7-1-05 MAINT after hired Vick, Jo Ella Instructional Aide/ 10-13-89 33-10 13459.00 Reason: None given FOREST PARK 9-30-05 INA925 !JI ~ Walter, Minnie Instructional Aide/ 4-3-00 33-11 13875.00 \"m' ~ Reason: None given RIGHTSELL 8-10-05 INA925 m 3 c-\nIC \u0026lt; Personnel Changes Pages September 22, 2005 NAME Whaley, Billy Reason: Leaving the city Allen, Tracy Annamraju, Sivakamini Backus, Rebecca Bailey, Ada Bailey, Pamela Balfour, Belinda Barber, Jimmy Bealer, Carol Blackmon, Lonzell Brandon, Rita POSITION / SCHOOL Maintenance/ FACILITY SERVICES START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL END DATE CLASS SALARY 9-7-82 10-15-05 52-20 47976.00 MAINT New Non-Certified Employees Security Officer/ 9-2-05 36-10 15463.00 ALC SOFR9 annual 14358.50 prorated Instructional Aide/ 8-11-05 33-16 16109.00 FOREST HEIGHTS INA925 MIDDLE Nurse/ 8-11-05 52-09 34548.00 FOREST HEIGHTS NURSES CARE/ 9-12-05 2-05 8.18 CARE CARE per hour Instructional Aide/ 8-11-05 33-16 16109.00 J. A. FAIR INA925 Child Nutrition/ 8-31-05 3-01 9350.00 HALL FSH550 annual 8847.31 prorated Security Officer/ 9-2-05 36-16 18491.00 HALL SOFR9 annual 17170.21 prorated Instructional Aide/ 9-26-05 33-16 11759.57 TERRY INA925 annual 9789.05 prorated CARE/ 9-12-05 2-04 8.01 CARE CARE per hour Instructional Aide/ 8-28-05 33-03 13889.00 ROCKEFELLER INA12 annual 11643.12 prorated Personnel Changes Page9 September 22, 2005 !\"' 8 z ~ START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL i5 z NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY Ul Brown, Cynthia Instructional Aide/ 8-19-05 33-18 17094.00 FELDER INA925 annual 16539.60 prorated Brown, Dewayne Custodian (.5)/ 9-6-05 31-01 5689.50 MABEL VALE CUS925 annual ELEMENTARY 4947.39 !=' prorated .., z \u0026gt;z (\") Brown, Edmonda Media Clerk/ 9-16-05 31-06 16872.00 \u0026gt;,... FELDER CLK925 annual Ul 14628.38 prorated Butler, Carolyn Instructional Aide/ 8-19-05 33-16 16109.00 FOREST HEIGHTS INA925 annual 15586.55 ?\u0026lt; prorated (,.\".). 0 Ul z Butler, Kamarious Instructional Aide/ 10-6-05 33-16 16109.00 C) :,0 m CHICOT INA925 annual i 12953.80 Ul prorated Butler, Tiffani Instructional Aide/ 9-28-05 33-16 16109.00 TERRY INA925 annual 13409.65 prorated ,, ~ :., - Cogshell, Joy Instructional Aide/ 8-19-05 33-09 13070.00 ~~ II: z FELDER INA925 annual ,, (\") z:m ... go 12646.11 I Ul '- C: prorated :~  :,O :5 .... Coleman, Sharon Child Nutrition/ 8-22-05 3-01 9350.00 WASHINGTON FSH550 annual 9249.46 prorated Criswell, Chasina Instructional Aide/ 9-1-05 33-07 12307.00 ROCKEFELLER INA12 annual ?I 11309.14 ~ Ul prorated m ii:: m ~ Personnel Changes Page 10 September 22, 2005 NAME Davis, Jennifer Davis, Sandra Duty, Rochelle Garrison, Dontornice Glasper, Nancy Glenn, James Gooden, Shamekia Gonzalez, Luis Grafals, Vera Harvell, Lola START DATE/ POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE Instructional Aide/ 9-1-05 ROCKEFELLER Security Officer/ 9-2-05 J. A. FAIR Instructional Aide/ 8-19-05 FELDER Instructional Aide/ 8-17-05 FOREST HEIGHTS CARE/ 9-12-05 CARE Security Officer/ 9-2-0q WILSON Security Officer/ 9-2-05 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE Security Officer/ 9-2-05 HALL Instructional Aide/ 9-19-05 OTTER CREEK CARE/ 9-12-05 CARE SALARY ANNUAL CLASS SALARY 33-09 16603.00 INA12 annual 13707.31 prorated 36-10 15463.00 SOFR9 annual 14358.50 prorated 33-16 16109.00 INA925 annual 15586.55 prorated 33-04 11253.00 INA925 annual 11009.69 prorated 1-02 7.13 CARE per hour 36-10 15463.00 SOFR9 annual 14358.50 prorated 36-10 15463.00 SOFR9 annual 14358.50 prorated 36-11 15929.00 SOFR9 annual 14791.00 prorated 33-04 7539.51 INA925 annual 6479.90 prorated 2-08 8.64 CARE per hour Personnel Changes Page 11 September 22, 2005 p g .\u0026gt;z.. . START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL i5 z CLASS SALARY U\u0026gt; NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE Hawkins, Tony Security Officer/ 9-2-05 36-10 15463.00 CENTRAL SOFR9 annual 14358.50 prorated Higgins, Judy Assistant Registrar/ 8-2-05 39-12 25632.00 HALL CLK10 p Hines, Terry Security Officer/ 9-2-05 36-10 15463.00 .., z \u0026gt; FULBRIGHT SOFR9 annual z n 14358.50 \u0026gt;,... U\u0026gt; prorated Hunter, Roshuanda Custodian/ 8-17-05 31-01 11379.00 MCCLELLAN CUS928 annual 11255.32 prorated ?\u0026lt; n lstifan, Najat Instructional Aide/ 8-28-05 33-09 16603.00 ,... 0 !!? ROCKEFELLER INA12 annual z c:, 13918.26\no m prorated I\n,,: U\u0026gt; Jackson, Jeffery Custodian/ 8-3-0~ 31-04 12453.00 CENTRAL CUS928 Jackson, Mary Instructional Aide/ 8-19-05 33-04 11253.00 FELDER INA925 annual 10888.04 .. ~ prorated ,, :.., ~,, z\u0026gt; 1,, :nz Joiner, Lawrence Custodian/ 8-13-05 31-01 13616.00 zm -\u0026lt;!lo DUNBAR CUS925 annual I U\u0026gt; :... C: 6808.00 :~ ..\no prorated :6 .... Jones, Angela Child Nutrition/ 9-9-05 3-01 9350.00 ROCKEFELLER FSH550 annual 8495.43 prorated Lopez, Miguel Security Officer/ 9-2-05 36-10 15463.00 !JI CLOVERDALE SOFR9 annual ~ U\u0026gt; m MIDDLE 14358.50\na: m prorated !!'\nr Personnel Changes Page 12 September 22, 2005 NAME Leech, Cynthia Lewis, Alice Luster, Porchia McClendon, Marcus Mosby, Lashaun Murphy, Marc Murray, Danette Norfleet, Floyd Nuoffer, Mary START DATE/ POSITION/ SCHOOL END DATE Child Nutrition/ 8-25-05 BRADY Child Nutrition/ 9-19-05 OTTER CREEK Instructional Aide/ 8-19-05 J. A. FAIR CARE/ 9-26-05 CARE Security Officer/ 9-2-05 PARKVIEW Custodian/ 8-18-0? METRO Guidance Secretary/ 8-15-05 PARKVIEW Security Officer/ 9-2-05 J. A. FAIR Secretary/ 9-12-05 FELDER SALARY ANNUAL CLASS SALARY 3-01 9350.00 FSH550 annual 9098.66 prorated 3-01 9350.00 FSH550 annual 8193.82 prorated 33-06 16109.00 INA925 annual 15586.55 prorated 2-02 7.70 CARE per hour 36-16 18491.00 SOFR9 annual 17170.21 prorated 31-01 14532.00 CUS12 annual 12491 .34 prorated 38-12 24876.00 CLK10 annual 23773.12 prorated 36-16 18491 .00 SOFR9 annual 17170.21 prorated 39-12 25632.00 CLK10 annual 22096.55 prorated Personnel Changes Page 13 September 22, 2005 ~ 8 z ?\nSTART DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL 0 z CLASS SALARY \"' NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE Palos, Matilde Child Nutrition/ 9-28-05 3-01 9350.00 BASELINE FSH550 annual 7942.47 prorated Parker, James Security Officer/ 9-2-05 36-10 15463.00 WAKEFIELD SOFR9 annual 14358.50 !=' prorated .., z \u0026gt;z C\") Piggee, LaQuinton Custodian/ 9-19-05 31-01 11379.00 \u0026gt;,... PULASKI HEIGHTS CUS928 annual \"' ELEMENTARY 9894.78 prorated Riley, Janice Child Nutrition/ 9-28-05 3-01 9350.00 FRANKLIN FSH550 annual 7942.47 ?\u0026lt; C\") prorated ,... 0 !!! z C) Romes, Robert Custodian/ 8-15-05 31-01 11379.00\na m METRO CUS928 ~\n,,: \"' Shirrill, Annette Nurse(.5)/ 9-16-0? 52-08 13411.20 WILSON NURSES annual 11664.95 prorated Simmons, Gregory Instructional Aide/ 8-11-05 33-16 16109.00 .. si! ALC INA925 ,, :., rn -z ,, \u0026gt; a::z ,, C\") Stewart, Eddie Security Officer/ 9-2-05 36-16 18491.00 zm ... go HENDERSON SOFR9 annual I rn .... C: 17170.21 ~~ prorated \na\n6 .... Turner, Edward Custodian/ 9-15-05 31-01 14532.00 STEPHENS CUS12 annual 11440.09 prorated Ward, Angela Instructional Aide/ 8-19-05 33-16 16109.00 !I' TERRY INA925 annual \"~' m 15586.55 ii: m prorated :: C Personnel Changes Page 14 September 22, 2005 NAME Wells, Barbara White, Renetta White, Tremmel Wilborn, Cynthia Young, Monica START DATE/ POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE Custodian/ 9-6-05 CENTRAL Child Nutrition/ 8-31-05 HALL Instructional Aide/ 9-16-05 KING Nurse/ 9-26-05 GEYER SPRINGS/ WOODRUFF Instructional Aide/ 10-5-05 FRANKLIN SALARY ANNUAL CLASS SALARY 31-01 11379.00 CUS928 annual 10575.05 prorated 3-01 9350.00 FSH550 annual 8847.31 prorated 33-04 11253.00 INA925 annual 9732.32 prorated 52-08 33528.00 NURSES annual 28114.62 prorated 33-16 16109.00 INA925 annual 13432.55 prorated DATE: TO: FROM: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 October 27, 2005 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Property Easement: J. A. Fair BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District is undertaking a project to relocate the sanitary system at J. A. Fair High School from its present connection-point on Dodd Road to one that is closer and within the confines of the city streets immediately south of the school. In order for this connection to be allowed, an easement must be attained from Kenwood Estates, Inc. RATIONALE: The Little Rock School District presently operates a pumping station at J. A. Fair High School that pumps sewage approximately one-half mile to the city main. Recently another main has been relocated south of the school in the Kenwood Estates area. It is possible for us to connect to this main, eventually abandon the pumping station and the one-half mile of line that we now have, and provide much better service to the Little Rock School District. FUNDING: This project will be funded out of the bond funds for J. A. Fair High School. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board approve the attached easement and allow the administration to proceed. PREPARED BY: Douglas Eaton, Director of School Construction 8 z ?\n0z \"' ,,\u0026gt;..\u0026lt;.. .\u0026gt; \u0026lt; c:z: 5~ c::o ~z I: C) m.z.. . \"' !II ~ \"m' I: m ~ C' RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT (CORPORATION) KNOW ALL ME BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT Kenwood Estates , Inc . , GRANTOR, a corporation organized under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Arkansas , by its _________________ , and ______________ duly authorized by proper resolution of its Board of Directors, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars($~, and other valuable consideration paid by the Linle Rock Sanitary Sewer Committee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged , do hereby, subject to prior recorded mortgages and easements, if any, grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, for the use and benefit of the Little Rock Sanitary Sewer Committee, GRANTEE, and unto its successors and assigns forever, the following described easements: 1. A PERMANENT RIGHT, PRIVILEGE AND EASEMENT for the purpose of permitting the Little Rock Sanitary Sewer Committee and the Little Rock Wastewater Utility to clear and keep clear the surface of the right-of-way and to (a) lay, construct, operate , maintain , repair, replace, reconstruct, test, inspect and add sewer mains and sewer lines whether on or more, and without the payment of additional compensation therefore\n(b) keeping the easement clear of all buildings and other improvements of any kind\nand (c) having the right to free ingress and egress across adjacent land of the GRANTOR(S) to the lands hereinafter described. Subject to prior easement of record and except as hereinafter stated, the Little Rock Sanitary Sewer Committee shall have the exclusive use of this right-of-way and easement\nand the GRANTOR may hereinafter use the surface of the easement for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights hereby conveyed, but may not place a building, footing, wall, structure, or other improvement upon the right-of-way except that, after the initial sewer construction is completed , the GRANTOR may pave the easement surface and may use it for driveways, walks, or parking areas. The GRANTOR may permit other utility service to cross this easement at approximately right angles, but only if such utilities first comply with whatever specifications the Little Rock Sanitary Sewer Comminee and the Little Rock Wastewater Utility may designate at the time for the protection of its own facilities. This permanent easement shall be upon the following described lands situated in Pulaski County, Arkansas, to-wit: SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT Part of Lots 17 and 18, Kenwood Estates Subdivision - Phase 2, in the City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows\nThe East 7.5 feet of Lot 17 and the West 7.5 feet of Lot 18 of the said Kenwood Estates Subdivision - Phase 2, in the City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, said easement being a total width of 15 feet and containing 1,834 square feet more or less. 2. A TEMPORARY RIGHT, PRIVILEGE AND EASEMENT for the purpose of permitting the Little Rock Sanitary Sewer Committee and the Little Rock Wastewater Utility to remove all timber and obsrruciions therefrom and to make excavations, store excavated material s, tool s. supplies and equipment and provide working space. This temporary easement shall begin when the Little Rock Sanitary Sewer Committee and the Little Rock Wastewater Utility commence the initial work on the permanent easement and shall terminate one year after that date or when that work is completed, whichever is earlier. This temporary easement shall be upon the following described lands situated in Pulaski County, Arkansas, to-wit: None (Intentionally left blank). Upon completion of the initial or any subsequent work by the Little Rock Sanitary Sewer Committee, the Little Rock Sanitary Sewer Committee shall backfill and thoroughly compact all excavations to minimize settling and shall level the surface over its excavations and pipelines, remove all excess ex...:avated m:nerials and debris and leave the premises in a clean sanitary condition. If the initial or any subsequent work by the Little Rock Sanitary Sewer Committee damages any fence, curb or paved surface upon the rights-of-way, the Little Rock Sanitary Sewer Committee, an its expense, shall repair or replace the damaged portion with materials of like quality and as nearly possible to its prior condition. The execution of this easement does not give the GRANTOR the right to connect to or receive service from any sewer or wastewater facility\nthe right to make connections and receive service shall be subject to the rules, regulations, policies or ordinances in effect at the time of application. To have and to hold said easements, rights and privileges unto the GRANTEE, and unto its successors and assigns forever, for the purposes aforesaid. And GRANTOR(S) covenants with GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, that subject to prior recorded mortgages and easements, if any, it will forever warrant and defend the title to said easements and rights against the claims of all persons whomsoever and that GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, shall have at al! times the quiet use and enjoyment of said easements and rights. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the name of the GRANTOR is hereunto affixed by its and its seal affixed by it's ________________ , this _______ day of -------- 2005. By: ATTEST: (Corporate Sea!) ?\u0026lt; n 5 en z C)\no I en C\" STATE OF ARKANSAS ) COUNTY OF PULASKJ ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT On this day personally appeared before the undersigned, a Notary Public within and for the County and State aforesaid, duly qualified, commissioned and acting, -----------------, and --------------- to me well known, who stated that they were the ______________ and _________________ ,of _______________ _ , a corporation, and were duly authorized in their respective capacities to execute the foregoing easement for and in the name and behalf of said corporation, and further stated and acknowledged that they had so signed, executed and delivered said easement for the consideration, uses and purposes therein mentioned and set forth. WITNESS my hand and official seal on this ____ day of _______ _ 2005 Notary Public My Commission Expires: (SEAL) . , I I I I . n~ sc r \nc-.~: ~ 1.\nt~~ I 105 / '\n '::: ..... I 1:21 cs \"' 'J I\u0026gt; 0 \" 107 to (1ml L1-r n ... -s:- f\u0026lt;.o\u0026lt;'.....,:. :Sc::1-1,ool, Q 1:S1K1C..T ?_-___ :X A. FA1R.. H1(QH Sc..1'4.oc.L... -z _ _ 0 C ~ 108 g C \" 109 g 0 \" 110 1 1 1 0 C i?. 2C 112 c=- \"~L N-T=-\n: 1/: \" !PON PltlS  3 JTS YnH f'OU:r ~1E .!.$UR~G iO\nC Vt L07 u~.::s ..:.NC CL.R.\n~ \"' DISTAN:5 Sn'ji\\'N :t'~iiO OSTA~:~.:~s 5 F?OR CF C~OSt.JR C NJ \\.'::n1.:u_,\n? .\\C 7 T:--!ER:: IS :. lC TT ALJ.:.\n:::r-sr TC S7'?.~ t,C, P:,r'.7,,J,~ ct T~IS 0 ~0=::~:Y ,s ~:.),:.:.-:, wlTMn, ~r--:~ '.CC ::::.~ =-_ =~vfJ:,~y .:..s Si\n0','TM O!\"i Tr\n fLV~J-.,~~. ?LOGU C'Jur.:4~ r ~~c. F:..C INSUR.:..r-,.:E WCNr' t.1:...c r\n:,r. LiTTL:'.: ~-::CK,\n.\n:,:.:1:.:.:: t F\":r':M C0~1~.1Ur\nJi)' c.\nh_ # C:OC 131 CJ:3\n:_ CC- 1 ], ~:,: l '-------------------------- =i\n.RT (\\~ Tr S\\{l / t, SWl IJ Qt\" s:::-:Dtl ~'. T--.-\n, r-:3-'1\\, C01J , T''. ,:.~r:ArlSft3 MC'\u0026lt;[ P.1KiiCU~P.~ r C':S,:ii:E: .\\:: 3E:~liHtlf1G ,\n- i,-::: ttCRTMw::5- :c:2, .. ~\n(\nt _u\nl. !\\~,.,. .. ,cue :: ~~3:.1\\~ s1cr-i. 0 :-1..:..s~ i.:. A.t1 :..oc111ct. o Tt-1 c:r( (F u-_: P..., .A~Y.:./'JS.:.S\nfH :1\"4:E tJC8'-T''50\"W. 15 G\\J ~ iC .\nPGl!li Ut1 7r: R,Vt-C -Cr\"-'t,'\nY UH or o.:.-~1c, 0.CC:CG R~i.:..C. 3~HiV JG o\n:: r':  C~r,C[?:..1t1 ~H::F:OF. T-t~ i:::: r~: :.-cJ .i.:~ E .\n_JtiG :,11[ :::_:.~ ~ ~. '(,). t L,M[. 215.J) r\nT'\"'EN:E N:.:='='J.!''[ ::J1'fT1tJt,\n1 ..... (. A .. on:. :!Si RiVHT- OF\" - WA.Y Ufl[ , 7:?9.17 r.. TO~ ?Crtr Or.. Tr-[ f l\\-,~ T ... C:: S1 / 2 til/2 SWi/ 5t/i/.\n, s..:.,c s~:::T1()M 2i , Tr,E~l:::~ s.\n:-.:. L.Jt.C :..:.10 NJrHH Lit,. 73\n33 fi , Tt4U .. c:: sa:-0~ '. :,\",,_ I:! ~ -: !r-~\n~~ ~a~~o45#E. 500 FT Tt-K ,r.~ \".0'\":'\"'')(\n' I~ ...... : rrr, 8 z !:\n0z \"' ,\u0026gt;..\u0026lt;. \u0026gt;\u0026lt;  - c :c 5~ c\n,:, ~z :I: C'l m\"' z .... !lD DATE: TO: FROM: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 October 27, 2005 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Property Easement: Gibbs Elementary School BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District is undertaking an expansion program at Gibbs Elementary School. In order to complete this project, an easement must be granted to Entergy Arkansas, Inc., to locate a transformer on our property to meet the needs of the facility. RATIONALE: In order to provide an updated service to meet the existing and future needs of Gibbs Elementary School, a new transformer must be located on site. Entergy has requested that we grant them an easement to locate this transformer that will give them access for repairs when necessary. The easement will be as shown on the attached drawing. FUNDING: The funding for this project will be covered by the LRSD bond funds allocated to Gibbs Elementary School. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board approve the attached easement to Entergy Arkansas, Inc., for this project. PREPARED BY: Douglas Eaton, Director of School Construction :\u0026gt;\u0026lt;- \u0026gt;\u0026lt; \u0026gt;\" c:c 5~ c\n,:, ~z\nI: C'l mu, z -\u0026lt; ST A TE OF ARKA SAS COUNTY or, PULASKI Line/ProJect lden11fica11on: WR  22366 RIGHT-OF-WAY INSTRUME T ENTERGY ARKANSAS, I C. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT: ________________ , Grantor(s), acting ind1v1dually, and for, and on behalf of, my/our heir , successors, assigns and any other person claiming the ownership to the property hereinafter described, collectively \"Grantor\", for and in consideration of one dollar, in hand paid, and other good and valuable considerauon, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, assign, convey unto and warrant and defend Entergy Arkansas, Inc., and its uccessor and assigns, collectively \"Grantee\", a right-of-way, servitude and easement JO feet in width, for the location. construcuon, reconstruction, improvements, repairs, operation, inspection, patrol, replacement and maintenance of electric power and communication facilities, or the removal thereof, now or in the future, including, but not necessarily limited to, poles, cross arm , insulators, wires, cables, conduits, hardware, transformers, switches, guy wires. anchors and other equipment, structures, material and appurtenances, now or hereafter used, useful or desired in connection therewith by Grantee over, across, under or on that land of Grantor in the County of Pulaski, State of Arkansas described as follows, to-wit: See attached description Together with the right of ingre sand egress to and from said right-of-way across the adjoining land of the Grantor and the nght to attach wires and cables of any other party to Grantee's facilities. Unless otherwise herein specifically provided, the center line of the electric power and communication lines initially constructed on this right-of-way shall be the center line of said right-of-way. Grantee shall have the full and continuing right to clear and keep clear vegetation within or growing into said rightof- way and the further right to remove or modify from time to time trees, limbs, and/or vegetation outside the said right of way which Grantee considers a hazard to any of its electric power or communications facilities or a hazard to the rendering of adequate and dependable service to Grantor or any of Grantee's customers, by use of a variety of methods used in the vegetation management industry. Grantor shall not construct or permit the construction of any structure, obstruction or other hazard within the said right-of-way, including but not limited to, house, barn, garage, shed, pond, pool or well, excepting only Grantor's fence(s) and Grantee's facilities. Grantor shall not construct or permit the construction of any buildings or other structures on land adjoining said right-of-way in violation of the minimum clearances from the lines and facilities of Grantee, as provided in the National Electrical Safety Code. Grantor, if husband and wife, do hereby release and relinquish all of our rights of curtesy, dower, and homestead to the said right-of-way. 1Rc, U-1/16/%-EAIJ E00193 04/96 I ' WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this Right-of-Way Instrument on this _ da1 of GRA TOR: ACKNOWLEDGME T ST ATE OF ARKANSAS COUNTY OF ______________ _ BE IT REMEMBERED that on th1 day come before me the undersigned, a otary Public, within and for the county and state aforesaid, duly commissioned, and acting _________ to me well known as the Grantor 111 the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that had executed the same for the consideration, uses and purposes therein mentioned and set forth. The above-signed person(s) acknowledged that _________ freely and voluntarily released and relinquished all rights of dower homestead and/or curtesy in the above described easement. W11ness my hand and seal as such otary Public this __ day of ___________ , 2004. Commission Expires ____ _ otary Public !SEAL] 1Re1 . 0-1/1\u0026lt;,/%-EAI) E00193 04/96 8 ! lz5 u, !.=.,' z \u0026gt;z n\n!! u, ?\u0026lt; n 5 u, z C) ::a i u, EASEME T DESCRIPTIO Part of Block 280 of the Original City of Little Rock, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the orthwest comer of said Block 280\nthence along the Easterly rightof- way line of Cross Street, South 0932'27\" West 57.30 feet to the POI T OF BEGI 11 G\nthence South 8027'33\" East 13.00 feet\nthence South 0932'27\" West 15.00 feet\nthence North 8027'33\" West 13.00 feet to a point on the Easterly right-ofway line of Cross Street\nthence along said right-of-way line orth 0932'27\" East 15.00 feet to the POI T OF BEGI I G, containing 195.0 square feet, more or less. I vz REBAR/ FOUND / \\ w l\u0026gt; 0 1 STORY BRICK BUILDING FF 345.98 APASvtHPGH ALT\\ r----_ I I ---r-::::-r N ~ BASKETBALL GOAL I 04~ ASPHALT CLos'D\\ .// PAVING _/ ------ ------ ' I FF f/1 347.30 I \"\"'' FF 350.00 1 STORY BRICK BUILDING ----11: W, PLAYGROUN !.:.I, z z\u0026gt; C') ~ Cl) ?\u0026lt; n 5 Cl\u0026gt; z C) i Cl\u0026gt; DATE: TO: October 27, 2005 Board of Directors LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District receives donations from businesses and individuals on a regular basis. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District that donations are not formally accepted until they are approved by the Board of Directors. RATIONALE: District policy states that, in order to maintain the centralized fixed asset property accounting system, all property donation requests are forwarded to the Director of Procurement. The Procurement Department forwards the requests, along with the appropriate recommendations, to the Board of Directors for acceptance and approval. In order for proper recognition and appreciation to be conveyed to the donor, donor's name and current mailing address should be included in the donation memo. FUNDING: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached donation requests be approved and accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. PREPARED BY: .if'oarral Paradis, Director of Procurement ~ ~Gwen Caraway, Fixed Asset Property Manager !=' -n z \u0026gt;z C') ~ tJ\u0026gt; ?\u0026lt; C') 5 tJ\u0026gt; z C)\nJO m i tJ\u0026gt; i!!! )(   o::c 5~ C:\nJO ~z 31::C) m\u0026lt;J\u0026gt; .z. . DONATIONS School/Department Item Donor Bale Elementary School $1,000.00 check UALR Children International to be used for student incentives Central High School $100.00 cash to the Rita Cunningham Troubadours/Debate Club Central High School $3,000.00 cash Cheryl Miller on behalf of towards the purchase RCF Corporation of a laminator for the Ninth Grade Academy Lab Central High School $400.00 cash to the Dr. Randal Hundley Troubadours/Debate Club Central High School $100.00 cash to the John Parke Troubadours/Debate Club Chicot Elementary School supplies valued The 39er's Class of St. School at approximately James United Methodist $250.00 Church J. A. Fair High School $288.77 check for paint Otter Creek Assembly of and labor for painting God Church the baseball dug-outs Forest Heights Middle Chairs, valued at $825.00, Arkansas Capitol Corporation School for the conference room Forest Heights Middle Musical instruments Mr. Douglas Braswell of School valued at $1 ,200.00 Easy Cash Pawn Shop Forest Park Elementary Funds totaling $48,926.88 Forest Park PT A School to be distributed for the programs outlined in the attached letter from the PTA School/Department Item Donor Fulbright Elementary $966.43 cash to be Fulbright PTA School used to purchase a Dell computer Fulbright Elementary $200.00 cash for Sam Storthz Ill School volunteer expenses for the Reading Buddies Fulbright Elementary Printer, valued at $157.00, Bob Derryberry School for the Health room Fulbright Elementary Safety signs and rubber Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. Thomas H. Rains School safety mats valued at of the Federal Highway $1,661.58 Administration and Valerie .~., and Jay McDaniel z \u0026gt;z n \u0026gt;,.... UI BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL To: D\" lal Paradis, Procurement Director From.~ . arbara Anderson, Principal Datet eptember 23, 2005 Re: Donation Bale Elementary received a check in the amount of $1000.00 from UALR Children International as an incentive for completing student projects during the last school year. The money has been deposited in our school activity account to be used for student's incentives. It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with LRSD policies. We are grateful to this organization for their support of our students and their families. RECEIVED SEP 2 6 2005 6501 West 32llll Street  Phone 501-447-3600  Fax 501-447-3601  Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 .Cittfe 'Rock Centra{ J{ifJfi Scfioo{ 1500 Soutli Park Street .ittfe 'Rock, .'Arkansas 72202 'Phone 501-447-1400 :fax 501-447-1401 DATE: 9/28/2005 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCURl\nMENT FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL1f-vUt\nf fAvC~t '-- SUBJECT: DONATION  Rita Cunningham of 5424 Southwood Road, Little Rock, AR 72205 graciously donated $100 to the Troubadours/Debate Club. It is my recommendation that this donation be. accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. RECEIVED SEP 2 9 2005 pR O CURE f,\nEfJ T ?\u0026lt; (') 0 u, z C) XI I u, :\u0026gt;\u0026lt;- \u0026gt;\u0026lt; \u0026gt;. o::i: 5~ C XI ~z :I: C) mu, ~ Litt{e 'Rock Centra{ J-figfi Scfioo{ 1500 Soutfi Park Street Litt{e 'Rock, .. 'Arkansas 72202 'Phone 501-447-1400 ]'ax 501-447-1401 DATE: 9/1/2005 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCU~ME~\n:,. . _ . FROM: NA CYROUSSEAU,PRINCIPAL~~ SUBJECT: DO ATIO , V O Cheryl Miller on behalf of RCF Corporation at 5 Shackleford Plaza, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72211, generously donated $3,000 towards the purchase of a laminator to be utilized in the lab of our Ninth Grade Academy. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted m accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. RECEiVED SEP 6 2o05 w PROCUREMENT Littfe 'Rock Centra{ J-fi/Jfi Scfioo{ 1500 Soutfi 'Park Street Litt{e 'Rock, .Jlrkansas 72202 Pfione 501-447-1400 ]\"ax 501-447-1401 DATE: 9/28/2005 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL ~.,,, SUBJECT: DONATION Dr. Randal Hundley of 5515 Country Club Boulevard, Little Rock, AR 72207, very graciously donated $400 to the Troubadours/Debate Club. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. RECEIVED SEP 2 9 2005 PROCUREf.J1EtJT Littfe 'Rock Centra[ Jfigfi Scfioo[ 1500 Soutli 'Park Street Litt{e 'Rock, .Jlrkansas 72202 Plione 501-447-1400 :fax 501-447-1401 DATE: 9/28/2005 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL ~ SUBJECT: DONATION John Parke of 60 Sherrill Road, Little Rock, AR 72202 graciously donated $100 to the Troubadours/Debate Club. It is my recommendation that this ~onation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. RECEIVED SEP 2 9 2005 PROCUR~c ~.../.\\ .,I. '.f... Jr CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL To: Darral Paradis, Procurement Director From: Jane Harkey, Princip~ Date: Sept. 23, 2005 Re: Donation \\ The 39er's Class of St. James United Methodist Church has donated approximately $250 worth of school supplies to the students of Chicot. We are extremely appreciative of their generosity. It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with LRSD policies. The 39er's Class St. James United Methodist Church 321 Pleasant Valley Dr. Little Rock, AR 72212 111 00 Chicot Road Phone (501) 447-7000 Fax (501) 447-7001 Mabelvale . Arkansas 72103 ~ \u0026gt;\u0026lt; \u0026gt;\" C :C t ! C::,, ~z 31:C'l mu, .z.. . J. A. Fair Magnet High School Science and Technology Systems 13420 David 0. Dodd Road Little Rock, AR 72210 Phone 501-447-1700 . Fax 5-1-448-/701 To: Darrell Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Randy Rutherford, Princip~ Re: Donation Date: September 21 , 2005 I would like to recommend that the following donation to J. A. Fair High School be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. A check in the amount of $288. 77 for paint and labor in painting the baseball dug-outs. Otter Creek Assembly of God Church P. 0 . Box 30190 Little Rock, AR 72260 RECEIVED SEP 2 2 2005 PROCU~\n,J .'  '.\nu!,..-.\nii.. .. FOREST HEIGHTS MIDDLE SCHOOL To: From: Date: RE: Darrell Paradis p Dr. Debbie Price D October 4, 2005 Donation Forest Heights is pleased to accept the generous donation of chairs for our conference room from Arkansas Capitol Corporation. The chairs are valued at $825.00. Please accept this donation in accordance with Board policy. Mr. Jay Wisener Executive Vice President of Arkansas Capitol 200 East Commerce Little Rock, AR 72201 RECEIVED OCT 5 2005 PRO C: : :~ ~. !\nEfJ T 5901 Evergreen Street  Phone (501) 447-2700  Fax (501} 447-2701  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 ?\u0026lt; n,.. 0 U\u0026gt; z C) i U\u0026gt; FOREST HEIGHTS MIDDLE SCHOOL To: Darryl Paradis From: Dr. Debbie Price Date: October 4, 2005 Re: Donations oP Forest Heights is pleased to accept the generous donation of musical instruments from Mr. Douglas Braswell from Easy Cash Pawn. The instruments are valued at $1,200. Please accept this donation in accordance with Board policy. Mr. Douglas Braswell Easy Cash 8601 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72205 RECEIVED OCT 5 2005 5901 Evergreen Street  Phone (501) 447-2700  Fax (501) 447-2701  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL To: Darral Paradis, Director Procurement Department From: Theresa J. Courtney-Ketcher, Principal Date: September 22, 2005 Subject: Forest Park PTA Donations Darral, The Forest Park PTA has donated items totaling $48,926.88 to the school. Attached you will see an itemized statement in the form of a letter from the PTA. I recommend that these donated items be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Attachment TCK/pac ------  1\\ECE\\\\JEO\n)tr i 2 2ons 1600 North Tyler Street  (501) Phone 447-4500  Fax (501) 447-4501  Little Rock, Arkansas 72207 ?\u0026lt; (\") 5 !!? z C)\no I U\u0026gt; FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY PTA September 6, 2005 Theresa Courtney-Ketcher Principal Forest Park Elementary School 1600 N. Tyler Street Little Rock, AR 72207 RE: Donations Dear Mrs. Courtney-Ketcher, The Forest Park Elementary PTA has donated $48,926.88 to the school for the following: Staff Appreciation Principal's Discretionary Fund Classroom Supplies, Instruction and Maintenance Art Instruction \u0026amp; Materials Computer Maintenance Grounds Expense Space Camp Spanish Instruction \u0026amp; Materials Student Recognition Accelerated Reader Program Parental Involvement Field Day Fifth Grade Graduation Student Recruitment Please contact me if you have any questions. ~~9J'Mb1tl[~ Janis P. Thibault PTA Treasurer cc: Melanie Fox, Martha Hill, Christy Clark $2,236.79 $1,000.00 $12,168.35 $2,255.39 $9,445.35 $2,000.00 $13,371.05 $2631.75 $1,437.63 $719.26 $1,661.31 RECEIVED \\)tr 2 2 2005 Fulbright Elementary Memo To: From: Darral Paradis, Director Of Procurement Deborah Mitchell, Principal CC: Date: September 28, 2005 Re: Donations to Fulbright Elementary The Fulbright PTA, 300 Pleasant Valley Drive, Little Rock, Arkansas 72212, has generously donated $966.43 for a Dell computer for our website. Sam Storthz Ill, 810 N University Avenue, Little Rock, AR 72205 has donated $200 for volunteer expenses for Reading Buddies, our canine-assisted literacy intervention program. Bob Derryberry, 6800 Waterview Pl., Sherwood, AR 72120, has donated a Printer valued at $157 to our health room. It is recommended that these donations be approved with thanks in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District board of Directors. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, -t~J-cuA J1u7fiJdL Deborah Mitchell Principal DM:lam RECE\\VED \\)tr 2 9 2005 -.... - Fulbright Elementary Memo ( To: Darral Paradis, Director Of Procurement- From: Deborah Mitchell, Principal CC: Date: September 1 , 2005 Re: Donations to Fulbright Elementary Mr. and Mrs. Thomas H. Rains, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Office Bldg Room 3128, 700 West Capitol Avenue, Little Rock, AR 72201, and Valerie and Jay McDaniel, 1800 Sawgrass Drive, Little Rock, AR 72212, have generously donated Safety Signs and rubber safety mats valued at $1,661.58. It is recommended that these donations be approved with thanks in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ~~w~ Deborah Mitchell Principal DM:lam LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 27, 2005 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Financial Reports BACKGROUND: Financial reporting is designed to keep the Board of Directors up-to-date regarding the District's current financial condition. Financial reports are submitted monthly to the Board for review and approval. RATIONALE: September 2005 financial reports are submitted for the Board's review and approval. FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve the September 2005 financial reports as submitted. PREPARED BY: Jean A. Ring, Director Finance and Accounting LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES ANO CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 ANO 2005 APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2004/05 09/30/04 COLLECTED 2005/06 09/30/05 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 61,436,691 12,467,263 20.29% 67,268,610 13,829,345 20.56% DELINQUENT TAXES 12,135,000 986,045 8.13% 9,200,000 989,051 10.75% 40% PULLBACK 31,250,000 0.00% 33,000,000 0.00% EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 205,000 0.00% 210,000 0.00% DEPOSITORY INTEREST 155,000 0.00% 145,000 0.00% REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 185,000 0.00% 204,000 0.00% MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 485,000 13,590 2.80% 365,000 45,766 12.54% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 245,000 82,243 33.57% 750,000 265,233 35.36% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 215,000 48,071 22.36% 195,000 56,182 28.81% TOTAL 106,311 ,691 13,597,212 12.79% 111,337,610 15,185,577 13.64% REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 22,000 5,644 25.65% 21,500 5,021 23.35% TOTAL 22,000 5,644 25.65% 21,500 5,021 23.35% REVENUE- STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 65,082,694 11 ,852,204 18.21% 66,095,1 55 11 ,749,284 17.78% ALTERNATIVE LEARNING 1,927,250 481 ,812 25.00% 1,100,000 0.00% ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 193,739 0.00% 200,000 0.00% NATL SCHL LUNCH STUDENT FUNDING 6,498,240 1,181,498 18.18% 6,877,920 1,250,530 18.18% PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1,141 ,165 1,141,165 100.00% 953,144 953,144 100.00% SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS{STRS/HEAL TH) 8,275,000 1,387,526 16.77% 8,200,000 1,333,980 16.27% VOCATIONAL 1,350,000 195,052 14.45% 1,785,000 214,600 12.02% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 2,100,000 0.00% 2,425,000 132,581 5.47% EARLY CHILDHOOD 5,542,510 1,430,540 25.81% 4,000,000 1,341,500 33.54% TRANSPORTATION 4,125,000 1,325,044 32.12% 4,252,900 0.00% M TO M TRANSFERS 4,575,000 414,913 9.07% 4,100,000 0.00% ADULT EDUCATION 934,380 109,000 11.67% 926,543 111,615 12.05% AT RISK FUNDING 395,000 9,400 2.38% 10,000 0.00% TAP PROGRAM 382,903 7,645 2.00% 288,623 142,623 49.41% TOTAL 102,522,882 19,535,799 19.06% 101 ,214,285 17,229,857 17.02% REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 770,000 0.00% 770,000 0.00% TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,295,000 8,416 0.65% 1,370,524 0.00% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,849,008 0.00% 2,194,000 0.00% TOTAL 3,914,008 8,416 0.22% 4,334,524 0 0.00% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 212,770,581 33,147,071 15.58% 216,907,919 32,420,456 14.95% REVENUE - OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 22,887,794 1,972,536 8.62% 20,152,896 897,433 4.45% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,500,000 57,924 1.29% 4,784,200 43,067 0.90% MAGNET SCHOOLS 27,964,934 2,191,329 7.84% 28,849,578 1,274,413 4.42% CHARTER SCHOOL 1,340,000 350,000 26.12% TOTAL 55,352,728 4,221 ,789 7.63% 55,126,674 2,564,913 4.65% TOTAL REVENUE 268,123,309 37,368,860 13.94% 272,034,593 34,985,370 12.86% LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 AND 2005 APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 2004/05 09/30/04 EXPENDED 2005/06 09/30/05 EXPENDED EXPENSES SALARIES 117,324,912 14,828,817 12.64% 122,589,665 20,206,775 16.48% BENEFITS 36,185,811 4,383,568 12.11% 35,925,642 5,784,395 16.10% PURCHASED SERVICES 20,959,918 2,682,273 12.80% 22,438,191 2,985,497 13.31% MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,725,914 1,850,893 21 .21% 10,128,394 2,653,710 26.20% CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,760,600 283,330 10.26% 2,473,965 272,044 11.00% OTHER OBJ\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_34","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2005-08"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/34"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District, plaintiff vs. Pulaski County Special School District, defendant\nDr. Kenneth James, Commissioner of Education August 31, 2005 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones llI RECEIVED SEP - ,2005 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONU'ORING Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol A venue, Suite 1800  Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 WRW Dear Gentlemen: Per an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of August 2005 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, _\u0026amp;,~~'- General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair- Dr. Jeanna Westmoreland, Arkadelphia Vice Chair- Diane Tatum, Pine Buff Members: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro Shelby Hillman, Carlisle *Calvin King, Marianna Randy Lawson, Bentonville *Mary Jane Rebick, Little Rock Naccaman Williams, Johnson Ali Baual Oooortunitv Bmnlover UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DNISION RECEIVED SEP -6 2005 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITOR/Ha LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for August 2005. Respectfully Submitted, ~ 04h smit~92251 General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on August 31, 2005, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr.M. SamuelJones,III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 stftt Smith IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW RECEIVED SEP - 6 2005 OFFICE OF PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENOR$ KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL DESEGREGATION MONlfORJNB INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Based on the information available at June 30, 2005, the ADE calculated the State Foundation Funding for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Based on the information available at June 30, 2005, the ADE calculated for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 On June 30, 2005, distributions of State Foundation Funding for FY 04/05 were as follows: LRSD - $65,082,694 NLRSD - $33,304,168 PCSSD - $59,752,214 The allotments of State Foundation Funding calculated for FY 04/05 at June 30, 2005, subject to periodic adjustments, were as follows: LRSD - $65,082,694 NLRSD - $33,304,168 PCSSD - $59,752,214 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of August 31 , 2005 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at June 30, 2005 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at June 30, 2005 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at June 30, 2005 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Distributions for FY 04/05 at June 30, 2005, totaled $13,977,904. Allotment calculated for FY 04/05 was $13,977,904 subject to periodic adjustments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of August 31 , 2005 Calculated for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Distributions for FY 04/05 at June 30, 2005, were: LRSD - $4,048,176 NLRSD - $4,031,872 PCSSD - $10,800,964 The allotments calculated for FY 04/05 at June 30, 2005, subject to periodic adjustments, were: LRSD - $4,048, 176 NLRSD - $4,031,872 PCSSD - $10,800,964 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 In September 2002, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 02/03 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 In September 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the third one-third payment for FY 03/04 to the Districts. In September 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the first one-third payment for FY 04/05 to the Districts. In March 2005, General Finance was notified to pay the second one-third payment for FY 04/05 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function instead of Reginald Wilson as indicated in the Implementation Plan. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 In September 2004, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2004, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $4,019,063.00 NLRSD - $772,940.15 PCSSD - $2,478,863.72 In September 2004, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for.their FY 04/05 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2004, the following had been paid for FY 04/05: LRSD - $1,325,043.67 NLRSD - $275,333.33 PCSSD - $845,221.22 In March 2005, General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 04/05 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At March 2005, the following had been paid for FY 04/05: LRSD - $2,650,087.34 NLRSD - $550,666.66 PCSSD - $1,690,442.44 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued} 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 In July 1999, each district submitted an estimated budget for the 99/00 school year. In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2004, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 04/05 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date 2. Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. Actual as of August 31, 2005 In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD - 14. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD -12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD -6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. The ADE accepted a bid on 16 buses for the Magnet and M/M transportation program. The buses will be delivered after July 1, 1999 and before August 1, 1999. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nPCSSD - 6. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD -6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001. The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two type C 47 passenger buses and fourteen type C 65 passenger buses. Prices on these units are $43,426.00 each on the 47 passenger buses, and $44,289.00 each on the 65 passenger buses. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42, 155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. Specifications for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M school buses have been forwarded to State Purchasing for bidding. Bids will be opened on May 12, 2003. The buses will have a required delivery date after July 1, 2003 and before August 8, 2003. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. In June 2005, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $52,135.00, and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $53,150.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The total amount was $849,385.00. 0. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. R. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Final payment was distributed July 1994. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97 /98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. Disld6o6 iffiy.2005 roE1\nW05L06.was 92]00ltfiis was toe.total amounW@ toJhe' Maqhet Rey}ew..Commjttee IoCi\n\u0026amp;4Q{Pt 10 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 04/05. 11 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 12 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 13 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 15 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 16 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On July 26, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is finalized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1:30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201 -A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 18 e II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearance Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 19 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On November 4, 2004, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ADE is required to check laws that the legislature passes to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Clearence Lovell was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he has retired, the ADE attorney will find out who will be checking the next legislation. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 6, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On May 3, 2005, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The PCSSD has petitioned to be released from some desegregation monitoring. There was discussion in the last legislative session that suggested all three districts in Pulaski County should seek unitary status. Legislators also discussed the possibility of having two school districts in Pulaski County instead of three. An Act was passed by the Legislature to conduct a feasability study of having only a north school district and a south school district in Pulaski County. Removing Jacksonville from the PCSSD is also being studied. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 7, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 20 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 2005 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 21 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. C. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 22 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17- 1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 23 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued} On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 24 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 25 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11, in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001 , the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 26 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, A letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 1748 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, A letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. 27 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 2005 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. C. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Ongoing Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 28 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued} D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT} and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the .Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. I In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 29 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the AD E's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 30 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 31 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in AD E's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lntervenors filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 32 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua intervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lntervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lntervenors were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 33 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued} D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21, 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 34 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the . PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 35 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On July 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 36 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 37  V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 11, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 11, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 9, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. 38 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On June 13, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 11, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. on\nti\nugostta~oos\nWit\u0026amp;Raiisas:state:soardIQtEoucauo[reviewictataoofiMMI EMI ana 1ts,execue summar:vJorJhe,mantn ofllD 39 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 40 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 41 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 42 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 43 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. D. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued} 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. 44 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31, 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference Olil Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. 45 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 46 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts. In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further assistance to schools, i.e., Title I Summer Planning Session, ADE session on Smart Start, and the School Improvement Workshops. All schools and districts in Pulaski County were invited to attend the \"Smart Start\" Summit November 9, 10, and 11 to learn more about strategies to increase student performance. \"Smart Start\" is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. Representatives from all three districts attended. On January 21, 1998, the ADE provided staff development for the staff at Oak Grove Elementary School designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement. Using achievement data from Oak Grove, educators reviewed trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. On February 24, 1999, the ADE provided staff development for the administrative staff at Clinton Elementary School regarding analysis of achievement data. On February 15, 1999, staff development was rescheduled for Lawson Elementary School. The staff development program was designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement using achievement data from Lawson, educators reviewed the components of the Arkansas Smart Initiative, trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. Student Achievement Workshops were rescheduled for Southwest Jr. High in the Little Rock School District, and the Oak Grove Elementary School in the Pulaski County School District. 47 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued} 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On April 30, 1999, a Student Achievement Workshop was conducted for Oak Grove Elementary School in PCSSD. The Student Achievement Workshop for Southwest Jr. High in LRSD has been rescheduled. On June 8, 1999, a workshop was presented to representatives from each of the Arkansas Education Service Cooperatives and representatives from each of the three districts in Pulaski County. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On June 18, 1999, a workshop was presented to administrators of the NLRSD. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACT AAP). On August 16, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for teaching assistant in the LRSD. On August 20, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACTAAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for the Accelerated Learning Center in the LRSD. On September 13, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program were presented to the staff at Booker T. Washington Magnet Elementary School. On September 27, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to the Middle and High School staffs of the NLRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On October 26, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to LRSD personnel through a staff development training class. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On December 7, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was scheduled for Southwest Middle School in the LRSD. The workshop was also set to cover the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. However, Southwest Middle School administrators had a need to reschedule, therefore the workshop will be rescheduled. 48 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued} 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On January 10, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for both Dr. Martin Luther King Magnet Elementary School \u0026amp; Little Rock Central High School. The workshops also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On March 1, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for all principals and district level administrators in the PCSSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On April 12, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for the LRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. Targeted staffs from the middle and junior high schools in the three districts in Pulaski County attended the Smart Step Summit on May 1 and May 2. Training was provided regarding the overview of the \"Smart Step\" initiative, \"Standard and Accountability in Action,\" and \"Creating Learning Environments Through Leadership Teams.\" The ADE provided training on the development of alternative assessment September 12-13, 2000. Information was provided regarding the assessment of Special Education and LEP students. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate in professional development regarding Integrating Curriculum and Assessment K-12. The professional development activity was directed by the national consultant, Dr. Heidi Hays Jacobs, on September 14 and 15, 2000. The ADE provided professional development workshops from October 2 through October 13, 2000 regarding, \"The Write Stuff: Curriculum Frameworks, Content Standards and Item Development.\" Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems by video conference for Special Education and LEP Teachers on November 17, 2000. Also, Alternative Assessment Portfolio System Training was provided for testing coordinators through teleconference broadcast on November 27, 2000. 49 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On December 12, 2000, the ADE provided training for Test Coordinators on end of course assessments in Geometry and Algebra I Pilot examination. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation conducted the professional development at the Arkansas Teacher Retirement Building. The ADE presented a one-day training session with Dr. Cecil Reynolds on the Behavior Assessment for Children (BASC). This took place on December 7, 2000 at the NLRSD Administrative Annex. Dr. Reynolds is a practicing clinical psychologist. He is also a professor at Texas A \u0026amp; M University and a nationally known author. In the training, Dr. Reynolds addressed the following: 1) how to use and interpret information obtained on the direct observation form, 2) how to use this information for programming, 3) when to use the BASC, 4) when to refer for more or additional testing or evaluation, 5) who should complete the forms and when, (i.e., parents, teachers, students), 6) how to correctly interpret scores. This training was intended to especially benefit School Psychology Specialists, psychologists, psychological examiners, educational examiners and counselors. During January 22-26, 2001 the ADE presented the ACT AAP Intermediate (Grade 6) Benchmark Professional Development Workshop on Item Writing. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were invited to attend. On January 12, 2001 the ADE presented test administrators training for mid-year End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. On January 13, 2001 the ADE presented SmartScience Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This was shared with eight Master Teachers. The SmartScience Lessons were developed by the Arkansas Science Teachers Association in conjunction with the Wilbur Mills Educational Cooperative under an Eisenhower grant provided by the ADE. The purpose of SmartScience is to provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. The following training has been provided for educators in the three districts in Pulaski County by the Division of Special Education at the ADE since January 2000: On January 6, 2000, training was conducted for the Shannon Hills Pre-school Program, entitled \"Things you can do at home to support your child's learning.\" This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. The school's director and seven parents attended. 50 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On March 8, 2000, training was conducted for the Southwest Middle School in Little Rock, on ADD. Six people attended the training. There was follow-up training on Learning and Reading Styles on March 26. This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. On September 7, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Chicot Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Karen Sabo, Kindergarten Teacher\nMelissa Gleason, Paraprofessional\nCurtis Mayfield, P.E. Teacher\nLisa Poteet, Speech Language Pathologist\nJane Harkey, Principal\nKathy Penn-Norman, Special Education Coordinator\nAlice Phillips, Occupational Therapist. On September 15, 2000, the Governor's Developmental Disability Coalition Conference presented Assistive Technology Devices \u0026amp; Services. This was held at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On September 19, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Jefferson Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Melissa Chaney, Special Education Teacher\nBarbara Barnes, Special Education Coordinator\na Principal, a Counselor, a Librarian, and a Paraprofessional. On October 6, 2000, Integrating Assistive Technology Into Curriculum was presented at a conference in the Hot Springs Convention Center. Presenters were: Bryan Ayers and Aleecia Starkey. Speech Language Pathologists from LRSD and NLRSD attended. On October 24, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On October 25 and 26, 2000, Alternate Assessment for Students with Severe Disabilities for the LRSD at J. A. Fair High School was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. The participants were: Susan Chapman, Special Education Coordinator\nMary Steele, Special Education Teacher\nDenise Nesbit, Speech Language Pathologist\nand three Paraprofessionals. On November 14, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On November 17, 2000, training was conducted on Autism for the LRSD at the Instructional Resource Center. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. 51 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On December 5, 2000, Access to the Curriculum Via the use of Assistive Technology Computer Lab was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter of this teleconference. The participants were: Tim Fisk, Speech Language Pathologist from Arch Ford Education Service Cooperative at Plumerville and Patsy Lewis, Special Education Teacher from Mabelvale Middle School in the LRSD. On January 9, 2001, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. Kathy Brown, a vision consultant from the LRSD, was a participant. On January 23, 2001, Autism and Classroom Modifications for the LRSD at Brady Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Beverly Cook, Special Education Teacher\nAmy Littrell, Speech Language Pathologist\nJan Feurig, Occupational Therapist\nCarolyn James, Paraprofessional\nCindy Kackly, Paraprofessional\nand Rita Deloney, Paraprofessional. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcast on February 5, 2001. Presenters were: Charlotte Marvel, ADE\nDr. Gayle Potter, ADE\nMarcia Harding, ADE\nLynn Springfield, ASERC\nMary Steele, J. A. Fair High School, LRSD\nBryan Ayres, Easter Seals Outreach. This was provided for Special Education teachers and supervisors in the morning, and Limited English Proficient teachers and supervisors in the afternoon. The Special Education session was attended by 29 teachers/administrators and provided answers to specific questions about the alternate assessment portfolio system and the scoring rubric and points on the rubric to be used to score the portfolios. The LEP session was attended by 16 teachers/administrators and disseminated the common tasks to be included in the portfolios: one each in mathematics, writing and reading. On February 12-23, 2001, the ADE and Data Recognition Corporation personnel trained Test Coordinators in the administration of the spring Criterion-Referenced Test. This was provided in 20 sessions at 10 regional sites. Testing protocol, released items, and other testing materials were presented and discussed. The sessions provided training for Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Pilot Tests. The LRSD had 2 in attendance for the End of Course session and 2 for the Benchmark session. The NLRSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. The PCSSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. 52 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On March 15, 2001, there was a meeting at the ADE to plan professional development for staff who work with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students. A $30,000 grant has been created to provide LEP training at Chicot Elementary for a year, starting in April 2001. A $40,000 grant was created to provide a Summer English as Second Language (ESL) Academy for the LRSD from June 18 through 29, 2001. Andre Guerrero from the ADE Accountability section met with Karen Broadnax, ESL Coordinator at LRSD, Pat Price, Early Childhood Curriculum Supervisor at LRSD, and Jane Harkey, Principal of Chicot Elementary. On March 1-2 and 8-29, 2001, ADE staff performed the following activities: processed registration for April 2 and 3 Alternate Portfolio Assessment video conference quarterly meeting\nanswered questions about Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) and LEP Alternate Portfolio Assessment by phone from schools and Education Service Cooperatives\nand signed up students for alternate portfolio assessment from school districts. On March 6, 2001, ADE staff attended a Smart Step Technology Leadership Conference at the State House Convention Center. On March 7, 2001, ADE staff attended a National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Regional Math Framework Meeting about the Consensus Project 2004. On March 8, 2001, there was a one-on-one conference with Carole Villarreal from Pulaski County at the ADE about the LEP students with portfolios. She was given pertinent data, including all the materials that have been given out at the video conferences. The conference lasted for at least an hour. On March 14, 2001, a Test Administrator's Training Session was presented specifically to LRSD Test Coordinators and Principals. About 60 LRSD personnel attended. The following meetings have been conducted with educators in the three districts in Pulaski County since July 2000. On July 10-13, 2000 the ADE provided Smart Step training. The sessions covered Standards-based classroom practices. 53 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On July 19-21, 2000 the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were 200 teachers from across the state in attendance. On August 14-31, 2000 the ADE presented Science Smart Start Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This will provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. On September 5, 2000 the ADE held an Eisenhower Informational meeting with Teacher Center Coordinators. The purpose of the Eisenhower Professional Development Program is to prepare teachers, school staff, and administrators to help all students meet challenging standards in the core academic subjects. A summary of the program was presented at the meeting. On November 2-3, 2000 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching. This presented curriculum and activity workshops. More than 1200 attended the conference. On November 6, 2000 there was a review of Science Benchmarks and sample model curriculum. A committee of 6 reviewed and revised a drafted document. The committee was made up of ADE and K-8 teachers. On November 7-10, 2000 the ADE held a meeting of the Benchmark and End of Course Mathematics Content Area Committee. Classroom teachers reviewed items for grades 4, 6, 8 and EOC mathematics assessment. There were 60 participants. On December 4-8, 2000 the ADE conducted grades 4 and 8 Benchmark Scoring for Writing Assessment. This professional development was attended by approximately 750 teachers. On December 8, 2000 the ADE conducted Rubric development for Special Education Portfolio scoring. This was a meeting with special education supervisors to revise rubric and plan for scoring in June. On December 8, 2000 the ADE presented the Transition Mathematics Pilot Training Workshop. This provided follow-up training and activities for fourth-year mathematics professional development. On December 12, 2000 the ADE presented test administrators training for midyear End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. 54 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcasts on April 2-3, 2001. Administration of the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy took place on April 23-27, 2001. Administration of the End of Course Algebra and Geometry Exams took place on May 2-3, 2001 . Over 1,100 Arkansas educators attended the Smart Step Growing Smarter Conference on July 10 and 11, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The Smart Step effort seeks to provide intense professional development for teachers and administrators at the middle school level, as well as additional materials and assistance to the state's middle school teachers. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the first keynote address on \"The Character-Centered Teacher\". Debra Pickering, an education consultant from Denver, Colorado, presented the second keynote address on \"Characteristics of Middle Level Education\". Throughout the Smart Step conference, educators attended breakout sessions that were grade-specific and curriculum area-specific. Pat Davenport, an education consultant from Houston, Texas, delivered two addresses. She spoke on \"A Blueprint for Raising Student Achievement\". Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. Over 1,200 Arkansas teachers and administrators attended the Smart Start Conference on July 12, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Start is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the keynote address. The day featured a series of 15 breakout sessions on best classroom practices. Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. On July 18-20, 2001, the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were approximately 300 teachers from across the state in attendance. 55 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) The ADE and Harcourt Educational Measurement conducted Stanford 9 test administrator training from August 1-9, 2001 . The training was held at Little Rock, Jonesboro, Fort Smith, Forrest City, Springdale, Mountain Home, Prescott, and Monticello. Another session was held at the ADE on August 30, for those who were unable to attend August 1-9. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by video conference at the Education Service Cooperatives and at the ADE from 9:00 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on September 5, 2001. The ADE released the performance of all schools on the Primary and Middle Level Benchmark Exams on September 5, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Core Teacher In-Service training for Central in the LRSD on September 6, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for Hall in the LRSD on September 7, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for McClellan in the LRSD on September 13, 2001. The ADE conducted Basic Co-teaching training for the LRSD on October 9, 2001. The ADE conducted training on autism spectrum disorder for the PCSSD on October 15, 2001. Professional Development workshops (1 day in length) in scoring End of Course assessments in algebra, geometry and reading were provided for all districts in the state. Each school was invited to send three representatives (one for each of the sessions). LRSD, NLRSD, and PCSSD participated. Information and training materials pertaining to the Alternate Portfolio Assessment were provided to all districts in the state and were supplied as requested to LRSD, PCSSD and David 0. Dodd Elementary. On November 1-2, 2001 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching at the Excelsior Hotel \u0026amp; Statehouse Convention Center. This presented sessions, workshops and short courses to promote exceptional teaching and learning. Educators could become involved in integrated math, science, English \u0026amp; language arts and social studies learning. The ADE received from the schools selected to participate in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a list of students who will take the test. 56 VI. .e REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) On December 3-7, 2001 the ADE conducted grade 6 Benchmark scoring training for reading and math. Each school district was invited to send a math and a reading specialist. The training was held at the Holiday Inn Airport in Little Rock. On December 4 and 6, 2001 the ADE conducted Mid-Year Test Administrator Training for Algebra and Geometry. This was held at the Arkansas Activities Association's conference room in North Little Rock. On January 24, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by ADE compressed video with Fred Jones presenting. On January 31, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by NSCI satellite with Fred Jones presenting. On February 7, 2002, the ADE Smart Step co-sponsored the AR Association of Middle Level Principal's/ADE curriculum, assessment and instruction workshop with Bena Kallick presenting. On February 11-21, 2002, the ADE provided training for Test Administrators on the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Exams. The sessions took place at Forrest City, Jonesboro, Mountain Home, Springdale, Fort Smith, Monticello, Prescott, Arkadelphia and Little Rock. A make-up training broadcast was given at 15 Educational Cooperative Video sites on February 22. During February 2002, the LRSD had two attendees for the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training . The NLRSD and PCSSD each had one attendee at the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 2, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. The ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 9, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. 57 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 (Continued) The Twenty-First Annual Curriculum and Instruction Conference, co-sponsored by the Arkansas Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and the Arkansas Department of Education, will be held June 24-26, 2002, at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs, Arkansas. \"Ignite Your Enthusiasm for Learning\" is the theme for this year's conference, which will feature educational consultant, Dr. Debbie Silver, as well as other very knowledgeable presenters. Additionally, there will be small group sessions on Curriculum Alignment, North Central Accreditation, Section 504, Building Level Assessment, Administrator Standards, Data Disaggregation, and National Board. The Educational Accountability Unit of the ADE hosted a workshop entitled \"Strategies for Increasing Achievement on the ACT MP Benchmark Examination\" on June 13-14, 2002 at the Agora Center in Conway. The workshop was presented for schools in which 100% of students scored below the proficient level on one or more parts of the most recent Benchmark Examination. The agenda included presentations on \"The Plan-Do-Check-Act Instructional Cycle\" by the nationally known speaker Pat Davenport. ADE personnel provided an explanation of the MPH point program. Presentations were made by Math and Literacy Specialists. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, gave a presentation about ACTMP. Break out sessions were held, in which school districts with high scores on the MPH point program offered strategies and insights into increasing student achievement. The NLRSD, LRSD, and PCSSD were invited to attend. The NLRSD attended the workshop. The Smart Start Summer Conference took place on July 8-9, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. The Smart Start Initiative focuses on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event included remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. After comments by the Director, Bena Kallick pre\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_830","title":"\"Board of Education Meeting Agenda,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2005-08/2005-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational planning","School boards","School employees","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["\"Board of Education Meeting Agenda,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/830"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\n RECEIVED AUG1 6 2005 OFACEOF - DESEGREGMAOTNIOITNO RING ,, BOARD OF EDUCATION ,. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Thursday, August 18, 2005 5:00P. M. MEETING AGENDA NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT I. II. III. IV. V. AGENDA REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION Administration Building, 2700 Poplar Thursday, August 18, 2005 5:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS CALL TO ORDER, Teresa Burl, President INVOCATION, Will Brazear, NLRHS East Campus 9th grader, son of Kim Wilmot FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Teresa Burl, President Marty Moore, Vice President Rochelle Redus, Secretary Mable Mitchell, Parliamentarian Trent Cox, Member John Riley, Member Scott Teague, Member RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS A. Special Recognition I. Kim Douglass, 2005 NLRSD Teacher of the Year - J. Scholl 2. Rellia Dillinger, 2005 Beverly Benham Award for Outstanding Leadership in Special Education in Arkansas - S. Brazear 3. Kelsey Winchester, 2005 Girl's Nation - S. Brazear  B. New Partner in Education 1. U.S. Bank (Levy Branch) \u0026amp; North Heights Elementary - S. Brazear - VI. Page 2 - Board Agenda August 18, 2005 DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETINGS A. Thursday, July 21, 2005 5 P.M. - Regular Meeting- Page A- l VII. ACTION ITEMS - UNFINISHED BUSINESS None VIII. ACTION ITEMS - NEW BUSINESS A. B. C. D. E. Consider Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report - R. Kron Consider New Board Policy 5.16A Smart Core Curriculum and Graduation Requirements (Second Reading) - K. Kirspel - Page C - 1 Consider Primary Banking Services Proposal - G. Daniels - Page D - 1 Consider Revision to Verizon Cell Tower Locations - J. Massey- Page E - 1 Consider New Board Policy Energy Management Conservation Policy EGH (First Reading)- J. Massey- Page F - 1 F. Consider Motion for Consent Agenda - K. Kirspel l. Consider employment of personnel - Page P - 1 2. Consider bid items - Page R - 1 3. Consider building use request - Page S - 1 4. Consider payment of regular bills - Page T - 1 IX. CALENDAR OF EVENTS A. Student's First Day, Friday, August 19, 2005 B. Regular Board Meeting - Thursday, September 15, 2005 at 5:00 P.M. X. PERSONNEL HEARING XI. ADJOURNMENT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES July 21, 2005 The North Little Rock School District Board met in a regular session on Thursday, July 21, 2005 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. President Teresa Burl called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. MOTION John Riley moved to amend the agenda to add two new items under New Business. One for revision of Board Policy COE Insurance Coverages and one for revision to the original lawn care bid. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Teresa Burl, President Marty Moore, Vice President Rochelle Redus, Secretary Trent Cox, Member John Riley, Member Scott Teague, Member Absent Mable Mitchell, Parliamentarian Others Present Mr. Ken Kirspel, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation\nGreg Daniels, Chief Financial and Information Services Officer\nDanny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel and Special Services\npress\nother staff members and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall (audio) and NLRHS-TV (video) taped the meeting. Miss Burl recognized Mrs. Nellie Kirspel, Mr. Kirspel's wife and Horace Smith from the Office of Desegregation Monitoring as guests in the audience. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRJOR MEETING MOTION Marty Moore moved to accept the minutes of the June 16, 2005 Regular meeting\nJune 21, 2005 Special meeting\nJune 30, 2005 Special meeting and the July 7, 2005 Special meeting as printed. Rochelle Redus seconded the motion. A-1 YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Riley and Teague None (Mitchell - absent) NEW BUSINESS Arkansas School Boards Association Membership Mr. Kirspel explained this membership affords us many benefits in updating statewide information, and legal assistance when needed. MOTION Trent Cox moved to accept the Administratio~'s recommendation to continue our Arkansas School Boards Association membership for the 200D. - 2006 school year. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Riley and Teague None (Mitchell - absent) New Board Policy 5 .16.A Smart Core Curriculum and Graduation Requirements (First Reading) Mr. Dana Chadwick explained this policy needed to be included to meet Arkansas Department of Education guidelines. He also stated that the word \"a\" should be added on the last page under Science with one (1) unit of \"a\" physical science. MOTION John Riley moved to accept 5.16A Policy as a first reading with the insertion of the word \"a\" - on the last page of the policy. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Riley and Teague None (Mitchell - absent) Revision of Board Policy CDE Insurance Coverages Greg Daniels explained changes in the funding process of monies allocated for insurance purposes. The first paragraph of policy CDE needs to be revised to reflect the changes. MOTION Trent Cox moved to accept the revisions to Board Policy CDE as recommended. Rochelle Redus seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Riley and Teague None (Mitchell - absent) This proposed policy revision is now forwarded to the Personnel Policy Committee. Lawn Care Bid Revision Recommendation Jerry Massey explained that our current lawn care company had resigned. The company had most of its equipment stolen earlier in the month and had not recovered from the loss. A-2 MOTION Rochelle Redus moved to accept the Administration's recommendation to accept the McClure Landscaping contract for the remainder of the 2005 - 2006 school year. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Riley and Teague None (Mitchell - absent) CONSENT AGENDA ,. Mr. Kirspel requested the approval of the consent agenda with a correction of omitting Janet Rodgers from the Personnel section on Page P-26. MOTION John Riley moved to accept the consent agenda with the correction to omit Janet Rodgers from Page P - 26. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Riley and Teague None (Mitchell - absent) ADJOURNMENT MOTION Rochelle Redus moved to adjourn the meeting. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Riley and Teague None (Mitchell - absent) President Burl declared the meeting adjourned at 5:43 p.m. Teresa Burl, President Rochelle Redus, Secretary A-3 PROPOSED POLICY - 5.16A SECOND READING AUGUST 18, 2005 5.16A SMART CORE CURRICULUM AND GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS Effective with the graduating class of 2010, all students are required to participate in the Smart Core curriculum unless their parents or guardians, or the students if they are 18 years of age or older, sign an Informed Consent Form to not participate. Those students not participating in the Smart Core curriculum will be required to fulfill the Common Core curriculum or the requirements of their IEP (when applicable) to be eligible for graduation. The signed Informed Consent Form. shall be attached to the student's permanent transcript. Informed Consent Forms are required to be signed upon entry into the seventh grade or upon enrolling in the district. Counseling by trained personnel shall be available to students and their parents or legal guardians prior to the time they are required to sign the Informed Consent Form. While there are similarities between the two curriculums, following the Common Core curriculum may not qualify students for some scholarships and admission to certain colleges could be jeopardized. Students initially choosing the Common Core curriculum may change to the Smart Core curriculum providing they would be able to complete the required course of study by the end of their senior year. Students wishing to change their choice of curriculum must consult with their counselor to determine the feasibility of completing the requirements of the Smart Core curriculum. This policy, the Smart Core curriculum, and the courses necessary for graduation shall be reviewed by staff, students, and parents at least every other year to determine if changes need to be made to better serve the needs of the district's students. The superintendent, or his/her designee, shall select the composition of the review panel. Sufficient information relating to Smart Core and the district's graduation requirements shall be communicated to parents and students to ensure their informed understanding of each. This may be accomplished through any or all of the following means.  Inclusion in the student handbook of the Smart Core curriculum and graduation requirements\n Inclusion in the Course Description handbook of the Smart Core curriculum and graduation requirements\n Discussion of the Smart Core curriculum and graduation requirements at the school's annual public meeting, PTA meetings, or a meeting held specifically for the purpose of informing the public on this matter\n Discussions held by the school's counselors with students and their parents\nand/or  Distribution ofa newsletter(s) to parents or guardians of the district's students. GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS C-1 PROPOSED POLICY - 5.16A SECOND READING AUGUST 18, 2005 A minimum of 26 units are required for graduation for a student participating in either the Smart Core or Common Core curriculum. There are some distinctions made between Smart Core units and Graduation units. Not all units earned toward graduation necessarily apply to Smart Core requirements. SMART CORE REQUIREMENTS: Sixteen (16) units English Oral Communications 4 units (years) unit( year) Mathematics 4 units (years)  Algebra I  Geometry or Geometry Investigations .. A two-year algebra equivalent may be counted as two units of the four-unit requirement for the purpose of meeting the graduation requirement, but only serve as one unit toward meeting the Smart Core requirement.  Algebra II  One additional unit selected from Functional Math, Advanced Math/Trig, AP or 1B math selections Comparable concurrent credit college courses may be substituted where applicable. All students must take a mathematics course in Grade 11 or Grade 12. Science 3 units (years) with lab experience chosen from  Physical Science  Biology  Chemistry  Physics Social Studies 3 units (years)  Civics and/or American government  World History  American History Physical Education  unit ( year) While one-half () unit is required for graduation, no more than one (1) unit may be applied toward fulfilling the necessary units to graduate. Health Education Fine Arts Career Focus  unit ( year)  unit ( year) 6 units C-2 PROPOSED POLICY - 5.16A SECOND READING AUGUST 18, 2005 All career focus unit requirements shall be established through guidance and counseling based on the student's contemplated work aspirations. Career focus courses may include both required and elective courses. COMMON CORE REQUIREMENTS: Sixteen (16) units English 4 units (years) Oral Communications  unit ( year) ,. Mathematics 4 units (years)  Algebra or its equivalent * - 1 unit  Geometry or its equivalent * - 1 unit  Additional math units must build on the base of algebra and geometry knowledge and skills. Comparable concurrent credit college courses may be substituted where applicable. * A two-year algebra or geometry equivalent may each be counted as two units of the four unit requirement for graduation under the Common Core. Science 3 units (years)  one ( 1) unit of biology  one ( 1) unit of a physical science Social Studies 3 units (years)  Civics and/or American government  World History  American History Physical Education  unit ( year) While one-half () unit is required for graduation, no more than one (1) unit may be applied toward fulfilling the necessary units to graduate. Health Education Fine Arts  unit ( year)  unit ( year) Career Focus 6 units All career focus unit requirements shall be established through guidance and counseling based on the student's contemplated work aspirations. Career focus courses may include both required and elective courses. Date Adopted: C-3 Memo To: Mr. Ken Kirspel, Interim Superintendent of Schools From: Date: Re: Greg Daniels, CFO/CIO @) July 28, 2005 General Operating \u0026amp; Checking Account ,. Proposals were received from six local financial institutions:  Bank of America  Bank of the Ozarks  One Banc  Regions Bank  Twin City Bank  US Bank NLRSD-Business Office Each of these six banks submitted proposals that addressed the items in the Request for Proposal. Each of the banks clearly submitted a slightly different approach to meeting our banking needs. Each of the six financial institutions are qualified and each have the financial strength and technology to provide the type of services that would meet our banking needs. Two of the banks clearly stood out in their proposals of offering a \"No Service Fee\" plus interest on our daily balance. Bank of the Ozarks will offer 3.50% and Twin City Bank will offer 3.5172%. Each of these two financial institutions were called back for questions and a time of demonstration of the on-line web-based banking systems. Both Bank of the Ozarks and Twin City Bank offer a secure web-based banking system. In the unanimous opinion of the committee, the product offered by the Bank of the Ozarks would meet the needs of the North Little Rock School District business department as well as meet the needs of the employees of the District. Even though the interest rate of Twin City was 0.0172% higher than Bank of the Ozarks. the committee felt that the user-friendly, dynamic, secure web-based system would save the staff enough time to warrant this recommendation. -. Committee: Mr. Donald Watkins Mr. Barry Kincl Mrs. Mikki Eubank Mr. Greg Daniels D - 1 NCOIB) T IBI ILI lTTIL~ IB( O)CilCl: JFllJifIfLi I TC C CCIB [C OCO)I )L  ADMJNISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 POPLAR STREET MEMO TO: Ken Kirspel, Superintendent FROM: Jeny Masse~ector of Plant Services sUBJECT: Cell Towers DATE: August 11, 2005 The North Little Rock Planning Commission ~ recommended different sites at Indian Hills Elementary and Ridgeroad Middle Charter School than the ones the School Board approved at the June Board meeting. The attached maps show the new proposed locations. In these new locations there would be no need for attached lights and the tower at Ridgeroad would be taller to make up for the lower elevation below the football field. I would certainly recommend these changes. These changes have the support of the aldermen for each site. A third proposal for a cell tower at Boone Park Elementary will likely be presented to the Board for consideration in the near future. Thanks. AN EQuAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER P. 0. 130X 687, NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR 72115/0687 501/771-8000 E - 1 North Uttle Rock N w PROPOSED BOARD POLICY EGH (FIRST READING) ENERGY MANAGEMENT CONSERVATION POLICY EGH As the School Board of the North Little Rock School District, we believe it to be our responsibility to ensure that every effort is made to conserve energy and natural resources while exercising sound financial management. The implementation of this policy is the joint responsibility of the board members, administrators, teachers, students and support personnel and its success is based on cooperation at all levels. The district will maintain accurate records of energy consumption and cost of energy and will provide information to the local media on the goals and progress of the energy conservation program. The principal, working with the energy manager will be accountable for energy management on his/her campus with energy audits being conducted and conservation program outlines being updated Judicious use of the various energy systems of each campus will be the joint responsibility of the energy manager, plant services, principal and head custodian to ensure that an efficient energy posture is maintained on a daily basis. To ensure the overall success of the energy management program, the following specific areas of emphasis will be adopted: l. 2. 3. 4. All district personnel will be expected to contribute to energy efficiency in our district. Every person will be expected to be an \"energy saver\" as well as an \"energy consumer\". Energy management on his/her campus will be made a part of the principal's annual evaluation. Within sixty (60) days, administrative Energy Guidelines will be adopted that will be the \"rules of the game\" in implementing our energy program. Further, to maintain a safer and healthier learning environment and to complement the energy management program, the district shall follow the Arkansas Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation preventive maintenance and monitoring plan for its facilities and systems, including HV AC, building envelope, and moisture management. F-1 5. PROPOSED BOARD POLICY EGH (FIRST READING) The School Board of North Little Rock School District directs the development of short and long range plans in the areas of facilities management and preventive maintenance as prescribed by Arkansas Public School Academic, and Transportation Division. Date Adopted: ,. F-2 Pam Ferguson Raymond Cooper Robin Gray Marlo James Jennifer Lee Karen Long Kathy Mascuilli Megan Mattox Sara Rectwenwald Jonathan Shulan Patricia Smith Carol Soulsby NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PERSONNEL OFFICE Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSFERS AND CHANGES From NLRHS West Campus- Special Education To NLRHS East Campus- Assistant Principal ,. CERTIFIED PESONNEL RESIGNATIONS AND RETIREMENTS Poplar Street Middle School- PE/ Study Skills Ridgeroad Middle Charter School- Athletics Effective 8-2-05 East Campus- Special Education Effective 7-26-05 NLRHS West Campus- Spanish Effective 8-8-05 Seventh Street Elementary- Reading Recovery Effective 7-18-05 Poplar Street Middle School- Special Education Effective 8-05-05 Amboy Elementary, Literacy Coach Effective 8-8-05 North Heights/Park Hill- Elementary Art Effective 8-05-05 Indian Hills Elementary- Kindergarten Effective 7-22-05 Rose City Middle School/Lynch Drive Elementary- Music Effective 8-01-05 Pike View Elementary- Second Grade Effective 8-8-05 Tri-District Early Childhood- Psychological Examiner Effective 8-02-05 p - 1 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 CERTIFIED PESONNEL RESIGNATIONS AND RETIREMENTS CONTINUED Julie Stewart Martha Carol Teague Catherine Watson Rebecca Allen Raquel! Barton Brenda Bazil Anita Bell Jimmie Dotson Shannon Duke Susan Faith Terri Felton Sean Fleming Rebecca Gardner Vivian Harris Ridgeroad Middle Charter School- Special Education Effective 7-07-05 Poplar Street Middle School- Math and Science Effective 7-29-05 Poplar Street Middle School- Math and Science Effective 7-20-05 ,. CERTIFIED PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND CHANGES From Boone Park Elementary- Math Coach To North Heights Elementary- Media Specialist From North Heights Elementary- Media Specialist To Rose City Middle School- Media Specialist From Indian Hills Elementary- Special Education To Ridgeroad Middle Charter School- Special Education From NLRHS West Campus- Counselor To NLRHS East Campus- Instructional Counselor From Ridgeroad Middle Charter School- Special Education To Poplar Street Middle School- Special Education From NLRHS East Campus- Speech and Drama To Redwood Early Childhood Center- Pre-Kindergarten From Indian Hills Elementary- Media Specialist To Indian Hills Elementary- Second Grade From Belwood Elementary- Kindergarten To Boone Park Elementary- Pre-Kindergarten From NLRHS East Campus- Social Studies To NLRHS West Campus- Social Studies From Ridgeroad Middle Charter School- Social Studies To Rose City Middle School- English From Rose City Middle School- Special Education To Tri-District Early Childhood- Special Education P-2 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 CERTIFIED PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND CHANGES CONTINUED Jeff Huddleston Ron Ingram Leslie Joshua Robin Lee Susan McSpadden Margaret Vickers Melissa Mellon Wells Mary Alice Wiles Chrystal Ball Camille Beeks Sara Berryman Emily Carlson Jennifer Conner Erin Dees From NLRHS East Campus- English To Boone Park/ Meadow Park-Elementary Art NLRHS West Campus- Social Studies/ Athletics To NLRHS West Campus- Social Studies From North Heights Elementary-First Grade Ridgeroad Middle Charter School-Athletics/ Career Education ,. From Belwood Elementary- Fifth Grade To Pike View Elementary-Pre-Kindergarten From NLRHS East Campus- Special Education To NLRHS West Campus- Special Education From Lakewood Elementary-Fifth Grade To Poplar Street Middle School- Sixth Grade From Ridgeroad Middle Charter School, Science To Rose City Middle School, Special Education From Meadow Park Elementary- Special Education To Meadow Park/Belwood-Special Education NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL Seventh Street Elementary- Second Grade Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 0, 190 days Meadow Park Elementary- Alternative Leaming Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 0, 190 days Seventh Street Elementary, Reading Recovery Effective 8/15/05, Category IV, Step 5, 190 days Indian Hills Elementary, Special Education Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 0, 190 days Rose City Middle School- Science/ Math Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 0, 190 days Seventh Street Elementary- Third Grade Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 0, 190 days P-3 Julie Derden Sasha Dicus Emily Dumas Darla Earles Caleb Everley Anita Gray Debra Greenfield Gwendolyn Hammonds Mary Amanda Hankins Tracy Ann Harris Alaina Jorgenson Tim Koller Anna Lowrance Wanda McCrannie April Dion McKinley North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL CONTINUED NLRHS West Campus- Medical Professions Effective 8-11-05, Category I, Step 1, 195 days North Heights Elementary- Kindergarten Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 0, 190 days Ridgeroad Middle Charter School- Social Studies Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 0, 190 days Tri-District Early Childhood Program- School Psychology Specialist Effective 8-15-05, Category IV, Step 6, 200 days North Heights/ Park Hill- Elementary Art Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 0, 190 days Indian Hills Elementary- Kindergarten Effective 8-15-05, Category II, Step 1, 190 days Lynch Drive/Amboy Elementary- Elementary Art Effective 8/15/05, Category III, Step 0, 190 days Ridgeroad Middle Charter School- Social Studies Effective 8-15-05, Category IV, Step 1, 190 days Seventh Street Elementary- First Grade Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 5, 190 days North Heights Elementary- First Grade Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 11, 190 days Redwood Early Childhood Center- Pre-Kindergarten Effective 8-15-05, Category 1, Step 1, 190 days NLRHS West Campus- Chemistry Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 1, 190 days Redwood Early Childhood Center- Pre-Kindergarten Effective 8/15/05, Category I, Step 0, 190 days Crestwood Elementary- Third Grade Effective 8-15-05, Category III, Step 17, 190 days Meadow Park Elementary- Fifth Grade Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 5, 190 days P-4 Katy Monnot Megan Monroe Michelle Needler Cheryl Pennington Joshua Powell Anita Pride Carol Roper Amberly Runsick Amber Seratt Nelda Strickland Amity Tyler Katherine Vandiver Melissa West Jessica Weimer Emily Young North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL CONTINUED Ridgeroad Middle Charter School- Special Education Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 3, 190 days Indian Hills Elementary- Fourth/Fifth Grade Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 3, 190 days Redwood Early Childhood Center- Pre-Kindergarten Effective 8-15-05,, .C ategory I, Step 8, 190 days Boone Park Elementary- Fifth Grade Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 17, 190 days NLRHS West Campus- Speech/Drama Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 1, 190 days Belwood Elementary- Kindergarten Effective 8-15-05, Category II, Step 18, 190 days Pike View Elementary- Fourth Grade Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 14, 190 days Belwood Elementary, Media Specialist (half-time) Effective 8/15/05, Category III, Step 7, 192 days Boone Park Elementary-Fourth Grade Effective 8-15-05, Category IV, Step 1, 190 days Rose City Middle School- Alternative Education Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 0, 190 days Lynch Drive Elementary- Fourth Grade Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 1, 190 days NLRHS East Campus-English Effective 8-15-05, Category IV, Step 0, 190 days Belwood Elementary- Fifth Grade Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 5, 190 days Poplar Street Middle School- Band Director Effective 8-1-05, Category I, Step 0, 195 days Lakewood Elementary, Fourth Grade Effective 8/15/05, Category IX, Step 0, 190 days P-5 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: Chrystal Ball Seventh Street Elementary, Second Grade BSE- Ouachita Baptist University, Arkadelphia, AR 12/03 Early Childhood P-4, Initial 3 Year Little Rock School District, Little Rock, AR Southwest Christian Academy, Little Rock, AR Pam Wilcox, Principal 9/03 to 12/03 8/04 to 10/04 Kaye Lowe, Admrnistrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services Camille Beeks Meadow Park Elementary, Alternative Learning Class BS - University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 12/01 Early Childhood P-4, Provisional Non-Traditional Licensure Program Rosie Coleman, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services Sara Berryman Seventh Street Elementary, Reading Recovery - BSE - University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 5/99 M.Ed. - UALR, Little Rock, AR 5/03 MS Social Studies, Elementary 1-6, Reading Specialist P-8, Reading Specialist 7-12, Standard 5 year Little Rock School District, Little Rock, AR 8/00 - 6/05 Pam Wilcox, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services Emily Carlson Indian Hills Elementary, Special Education University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 5/05 Initial Licensure Pending, ALP Special Education Julia Lee Moore, Conway, AR Sallie Cone Elementary, Conway, AR  Sheryll Smith, Principal 1/05 -5/05 8/04 - 12/04 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services P-6 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: Jennifer Conner Rose City Middle School, Science/Math BSE- University of Arkansas at Little Rock, AR 05/05 Middle Level Science, Licensure Pending PCSSD, Little Rock, AR Little Rock School District, Little Rock, AR Aimee Wright, Principal 01/04 to 05/04 08/03 to 12/03 Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services ,. Erin Dees Seventh Street Elementary, Third Grade BA- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 05/02 Early Childhood P-4 Non-traditional Licensure Program Pam Wilcox, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/ Special Services Julie Derden NLRHS West Campus, Medical Professions BSE- University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 05/03 Life and Earth Science Non-traditional Licensure Program Gregg Thompson, Principal Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/ Special Services Sasha Dicus North Heights Elementary, Kindergarten BSE- University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 5/05 Early Childhood Education P-4, Initial 3 year Vilonia Elementary, Vilonia, AR 1/05 - 5/05 Dana Snowden, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services Emily Dumas Ridgeroad Middle Charter School, Social Studies BA- University of Arkansas at Little Rock, AR 08/00 History 7-12\nCommunications and Journalism\nTennessee Licensure Northeast High School, Clarksville, TN, 01/05 - 03/05 Dana Chadwick, Principal Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services P-7 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: Darla Earles Tri-District Early Childhood, School Psychology Specialist BS - University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 5/96 MS- University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 5/98 Licensed Psychological Examiner, State of Arkansas Bridge Way Hospital, North Little Rock, AR 2000 - 2005 Centers for Youth \u0026amp; Family, Little Rock, AR l 999 Thelma Jasper, Coordinator Tri-District Early Childhood Program Martha Kay Asti, Director of Special Services Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services Caleb Everley North Heights and Park Hill, Elementary Art BFA- Henderson State University, Arkadelphia, AR 05/03 Elementary Art Non-traditional Licensure Program Barbara Hartwick, Principal Dana Snowden, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Service Anita Gray Indian Hills Elementary, Kindergarten BSE - Henderson State University, Arkadelphia, AR 5/04 Early Childhood Education P-4, Standard 5 year Nashville Primary, Nashville, AR 8/04 -6/05 Sheryll Smith, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services Debra Greenfield Lynch Drive and Amboy Elementary, Elementary Music BA- UALR, Little Rock, AR 12/03 MA- UALR, Little Rock, AR 07/05 Vocal Music P-8 and 7-12, Initial Provisional License Northside Elementary, Cabot, AR 1/05 - 2/05 Sylvan Hills High School, Sherwood, AR 2/05 - 4/05 Loretta Hassell, Principal Jann Pharo, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education  Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Servi P-8 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: Gwendolyn Hammonds Ridgeroad Middle Charter School, Social Studies BSE - Southwest Missouri State University, Springfield, MO 5/02 MSE - Southwest Missouri State University, Springfield, MO 5/04 Social Studies 7-12, Reciprocity from Missouri Springfield Public Schools, Springfield, MO 8/04 - 5/05 Dana Chadwick, Principal Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services ,. Mary Amanda Hankins Seventh Street Elementary, First Grade BS - University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 12/00 Early Childhood Education P-4, Elementary K-6, Standard 6 year Little Rock School District, Little Rock, AR 1/04 - 5/05 Pleasant Grove Elementary, Texarkana, TX 8/02- 5/03 Texarkana School District, Texarkana, AR 8/01 - 8/02 Immaculate Conception, North Little Rock, AR 8/00 - 8/01 Pam Wilcox, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services Tracy Ann Harris North Heights Elementary, First Grade BSE - University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 5/93 Elementary 1-6, Standard 6 year Southwest Christian, Little Rock, AR Cloverdale Christian, Little Rock, AR Dana Snowden, Principal 8/95 -6/05 8/94-6/95 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services Alaina Jorgensen Redwood Early Childhood Center, Pre-Kindergarten BSE - University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 5/04 Early Childhood Education P-4, Initial 3 year Mayflower Elementary, Mayflower, AR 4/04 - 8/04 Sallie Cone Elementary, Conway, AR 1/04 - 3/04 Jody Edrington, Coordinator of Pre-School Programs Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services P-9 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: Tim Koller NLRHS West Campus, Chemistry BSE- Ouachita Baptist College, Arkadelphia, AR 05/01 Secondary Biology, Standard 5 Year Lake Hamilton School District, Hot Springs, AR 08/01-12/01 Gregg Thompson, Principal Danny Reed, Adplinistrative Director of Personnel/Special Services Anna Lowrance Redwood Early Childhood Center, Pre-Kindergarten BSE - University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR 5/05 Early Childhood Education P-4, Initial licensure pending Lakewood Elementary, North Little Rock, AR 8/04 - 3/05 Jody Edrington, Coordinator of Pre-School Programs Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services Wanda McCrannie Crestwood Elementary, Third Grade BA - Evangel University, Springfield, MO BA - Central Bible College, Springfield, MO Elementary 1-6, Standard 5 year Omaha Public Schools, Omaha, AR Cloverdale Christian Schools, Little Rock, AR Cloverdale Christian Schools, Little Rock, AR Linda Wilson, Principal 5/90 5/86 8/92- 6/05 8/86 -6/88 8/90-6/92 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services April McKinley Meadow Park Elementary, Fifth Grade BA- Philander Smith College, Little Rock, AR 01/00 California License Reciprocity P-4 and Elementary 1-6 King Magnet Interdistrict, Little Rock, AR 08/99 - 12/99 EC Reem Academy, Oakland, CA 10/02 -08/05 Little Rock School District, Little Rock, AR 01/00- 06/02 Rosie Coleman, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services P-10 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: Katy Monnot Ridgeroad Middle Charter School, Special Education BS- Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 12/01 Secondary English, Louisiana License, Reciprocity Pending ALP Special Education Wichita Falls ISO, Wichita Falls, TX Wichita Falls ISO, Wichita Falls, TX St. Arnant High School, St. Amant, LA Dana Chadwick, Ptincipal 12/02-05/05 09/02-12/02 03/02-05/02 Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/ Special Services Megan Monroe Indian Hills Elementary, Fourth/Fifth Grade BSE - Olivet Nazarene University, Bourbonnais, IL 5/02 Early Childhood Education P-4\nMiddle Childhood Science/Math\nMiddle Childhood Language Arts/Social Studies, Reciprocity Family Church Academy, Bryant, AR 8/03 - 6/05 Heritage Christian School, Indianapolis, IN 8/02 - 6/03 Sheryll Smith, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services Michelle Needler Redwood Early Childhood Center, Pre-Kindergarten BSE- Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR 05/05 Elementary K-6, Standard 6 Year Christ Lutheran, Little Rock, AR 08/97-06/05 Jody Edrington, Coordinator of Pre-School Programs Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/ Special Services Cheryl Pennington Boone Park Elementary, Fifth Grade BSE-Delta State University, Cleveland, MS 05/74 P-8, Elementary P-4/ Middle level 4-8, One Year Non-Renewable Reciprocity Pending Pecan Park Elementary School, Jackson, MS Mendenhall Jr. High School, Mendenhall, MS Delta Elementary School, Rohwer, AR Rolling Fork Elementary, Rolling Fork, MS Rolling Fork Elementary, Rolling Fork, MS Anguilla High School, Anguilla, MS Dillingham Elementary School, Dillingham, AK Lake Elementary, Jackson, MS Mavis Cherry, Principal 08/00-05/04 08/98-05/00 08/93-05/97 08/89-05/90 09/92-05/93 08/91-05/92 08/90-06/91 08/88-06/89 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services P - 11 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: Joshua Powell NLRHS West Campus, Speech and Drama BA- Northwestern State University, Natchitoches, LA 05/01 Speech and Drama Non-traditional ,Licensure Program Gregg Thompson, Principal Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services ,. Anita Pride Belwood Elementary, Kindergarten BSE - University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 5/74 Early Childhood Education P-4, Elementary K-6, Standard 5 year Little Rock Christian Academy, Little Rock, AR 8/93 - 6/05 Victory Baptist School, Sherwood, AR 8/90 - 6/93 Crestwood Elementary, North Little rock, AR 8/74-6/83 Cynthia Melton, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services Carol Roper Pike View Elementary, Fourth Grade BSE- Ouachita Baptist University, Arkadelphia, AR 08/73-05/77 MSE- Ouachita Baptist University, Arkadelphia, AR 08/77-05/79 Early Childhood P-4 Non-traditional Licensure Program Pam Wilcox, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/ Special Services Amber Runsick Belwood Elementary, Guidance Counselor (half-time) BSE- UALR, Little Rock, AR 12/97 MS Social Studies 5-8\nElementary K-6\nLibrary Media Specialist K-12\nStandard 6 year Pike View Elementary, North Little Rock, AR Memphis City Schools, Memphis, TN Lee County School District, Marianna, AR Cynthia Melton, Principal 8/00-6/04 8/98-6/00 1/98 - 6/98 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Servi- P-12 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION Amber Seratt Boone Park Elementary, Fourth Grade BSE - University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 5/03 MAT - University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 5/04 Early Childhood Education P-4, Initial 3 year St Edward School, Little Rock, AR 8/04 - 5/05 Mavis Cherry, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services Nelda Strickland Rose City Middle School, Alternative Education BSE- John Brown University, Siloam Springs, AR 12/03 Family and Consumer Science/ Career Orientation Non-traditional Licensure Program Aimee Wright, Principal Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services Amity Tyler Lynch Drive Elementary, Fourth Grade BSE- Lambuth University, Jackson, TN 05/04 K-8\nTennessee License\nAR Pending Reciprocity Crockett County Middle School, Alamo, TN 08/04-06/05 Loretta Hassell, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services Katherine Vandiver NLRHS- East Campus, East BA- Western State College of Colorado, Gunnison, CO ME- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN Tennessee License Pending, AR Pending Reciprocity 05/01 05/05 Woodland Middle School, Brentwood, TN 01/05-03/05 McGavock High School, Nashville, TN 03/05-05/05 Lee Tackett, Principal Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services P-13 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION Melissa West Belwood Elementary, Fifth Grade BSE - University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 5/97 Early Childhood Education P-4\nMS Social Studies\nElementary K~6\nStandard 5 year Teachers Pet Preschool, North Little Rock, AR Sylvan Learning Center, North Little Rock, AR Victory Baptist School, Sherwood, AR Cynthia Melton, Principal 8/04- 6/05 3/03 - 7/04 8/98-6/01 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services Jessica Weimer Poplar Street Middle School, Band Director BME- Harding University, Searcy, AR 05/05 Instrumental Music P-12, Initial 3 Year Cabot Public School District, Cabot, AR 02/05-05/05 Bill Bowers, Principal Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/ Special Services - Emily Young Lakewood Elementary, Fourth Grade BSE - University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 5/00 JD- UALR, Little Rock, AR 5/03 MS Social Studies, Elementary Education 1-6, Standard 6 year Marguerite Vann Elementary, Conway, AR 1/00- 5/00 Beverly Kelso, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS \u0026amp; RETIREMENTS Kenneth Alexander Ernestine Bauman Richelle Crittenden Ridgeroad Middle Charter School, Custodian Effective 7-25-05 Amboy Elementary, Lead Custodian Effective 8-12-05 Indian Hill Elementary, Teacher's Aide/ Computer Lab/ Early Effective 7-13-05 P-14 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS \u0026amp; RETIREMENTS Michael H. Garrett Henry Jackson Tommy Keener Cassandra Noid Belinda Ortner Denise Wright Cathy Barron Debora Burden Brenda Clay Sheila Cross Rosemary Eskridge Catrina Hickman Betty Moreland Malinda Palmer Ridgeroad Middle Charter School, Teacher's Aide/SAC Effective 7-26-05 Transportation, Bus Driver Effective 8-0 l-05 Transportation, Bus Driver Effective 7-19-05 ,. NLRHS East Campus, Custodian Effective 7-26-05 Administration Building, Private School Teacher's Aide Effective 8-02-05 Transportation, Bus Driver Effective 7-19-05 CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL CHANGES AND TRANSFERS From Boone Park Elementary, Child Nutrition Assistant To Park Hill Elementary, Child Nutrition Assistant From Lynch Drive Elementary, Child Nutrition Assistant To North Heights, Child Nutrition Assistant From Park Hill Elementary, Child Nutrition Manager To Redwood Early Childhood Center, Child Nutrition Manager From Meadow Park Elementary, Child Nutrition Assistant To Glenview Elementary, Child Nutrition Manager From Belwood Elementary, Teacher's Aide/ Pre-School To Boone Park Elementary, Campus Supervisor From Amboy Elementary, Teacher's Aide/ Pre-School To Redwood Early Childhood Center, Teacher's Aide/ Pre-School From Lynch Drive Elementary, Child Nutrition Manager To Argenta Academy, Child Nutrition Manager From Argenta Academy, Elementary Child Nutrition Manager To Park Hill, Child Nutrition Manager P- 15 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND CHANGES CONTfNUED Stacy Reed Carolyn Richard Rose Robinson Joyce Rodgers Tamara Rogers James Sabbs Ida Smith Lynn Underwood Willie Jean Williams Terry Adams Karen Davis Bertha Jones Danette Lawson Angela McGhee From Poplar Street Middle School, Lead Custodian To Amboy Elementary, Lead Custodian From Rose City Middle School, Teacher's Aide/Special Education To Argenta Academy, Teacher's Aide/Special Education ' From Pike View Elementary, Child Nutrition Manager To Belwood Elementary, Child Nutrition Manager ,. From Poplar Street Middle School, Secretary To Poplar Street Middle School, Principal's Secretary From Redwood Early Childhood Center, Child Nutrition Manager To Boone Park Elementary, Child Nutrition Manager From Boone Park Elementary, Lead Custodian To Crestwood Elementary, Lead Custodian From Belwood Elementary, Child Nutrition Assistant To Pike View Elementary, Child Nutrition Assistant From Redwood Early Childhood Center, Teacher's Aide/ Pre-Schee To Pike View Elementary, Teacher's Aide/ Pre-School From Amboy Elementary, Child Nutrition Assistant To Lynch Drive Elementary, Child Nutrition Manager Non-Certified NEW CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL Plant Services, Custodian Effective 07-11-05, Category 600, Step 22,252 days Transportation, Bus Driver Effective 08-15-05, Category 507, Step 46, 190 days Plant Services, Custodian Effective 07-11-05, Category 600, Step 22,252 days Redwood Early Childhood Center, Coordinator After School Program Effective 08-15-05, Category 242, Step N/ A, 185 days Boone Park Elementary, Teacher's Aide/ Pre-Kindergarten Effective 08-11-05, Category 242, Step 54, 185 days P-16 Jill Mills Stacy Reed Carla Riller Jeremy Rollins Contonia Russell North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - August 18, 2005 NEW CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL CONTINUED Tri-District Early Childhood, Teacher's Aide/ Special Education Effective 08-01-05, Category 240, Step 49, 200 days Plant Services, Custodian Effective 07-11-05, Category 600, Step 24,252 days Redwood Early Childhood Center, Teacher's Aide/ Pre-Kindergarten Effective 08-15-05, Category 242, Step $10.00, 185 days ,. Plant Services, Custodian Effective 07-/11-05, Category 600, Step 20, 252 days Pike View Elementary, Teacher's Aide/ Pre-Kindergarten Effective 08-15-05, Category 242, Step 53, 242 days P-17 NORTLHIT TLRE OCSKC HOODLIS TRICT * DIDN OTM EESTP ECIFICATIONS ** PAROT FA LLO RN ONBEI D *** NOTR ECOMMEDNUDETE ODQ UALITY **** LIMITECDO VERAGE ***** RECOMMENDED ****** RECOMMEUNPDOERNDE CEIPOTF S AMPLE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * BIDN UMBE0R6:- 07-144 HYDROHNEICA TINBGO ILER SOURCOEFF UNDCS:A PITAOLU TLAY LOCATIORNID: GEROCAHDA RTMERID DLE BOONAEN DB OONSEA LES MILLS-WILSON-GEORGE.INC. NO.L ITTLRE OCWK INNELSCOON. fil 6,750.00 6,534.00 6,018.84 ***** February 8, 2005 Mr. Barry Kincl, Director of Purchasing The North Little Rock Public Schools Atfunnistrative Offices 2700 Poplar Street North Little Rock, AR 72115-0687 Dear Mr. Kind: I, Park Bill Baptist Church would like to reserve the North Little Rock High School East Campus Auditorium for our 2006 Greater Little Rock Easter Pageant presentations. I realize to secure rmaI approval our request will be forwarded to the North Little Rock Board of Education for their authorization. We would like to utilize the East Campus Auditorium for three performances and four rehearsals April 10-13, 2006 and April 15-16, 2006. We would also like to submit a request for the foil owing dates if the aforementioned dates are not available: April 3-6, 2006 and April 8-9, 2006. We understand you will need to discuss our request with Mr. Kirspel and the drama department at the East Campus High School. Thank you for your kind consideration. Please feel free to contact me if I can provide further inf onnation. May God bless you and yours! Warmest Regards, ~~~ ~trick Minister of Music - flNANCHPLJRCHASING/AUD\\l S1 .!IM *- xu::asse 1: w .cws.4a :e,1 ~\n,, June 1, 2005 NLR School District Attn. Barry Kind-Administration 2700 N. Poplar North Little Rock, Ar. 72114 Dear Barry: ,. In appreciation for the use of the NLRHS West Campus Arena this past spring, the NLR Upward Leadership would like to make a formal request for the 2006 spring semester, for the use of the Upward Awards Event. Since the evaluation response's from our families indicated there were numerous 'conflicts' on a school night for the Upward Awards Program back in March of this spring, we would like to request the use of the NLR Arena for Sunday, March 12th from 2:30-4:30 for the actual event. This will give families an opportunity to have fewer conflicts for the afternoon in comparison with a week night. The suggested date is also a week later than the weekend the arena could be used for the state SA basketball tournament, in case it returns to central Arkansas. We would need to work out times with Dan Russell \u0026amp; Donna Anderson for 'set up' with the custodial staff. The clean up and tear down from the event would follow the 4:30 dismissal time. As we agreed, additional hours and staff would be noted for the rental agreement with NLR Upward. All precautions would also be taken for the safety of the participants and gym floor surface. We look forward hearing back from the NLR School Board when this 'request' is discussed and determined. Victory! Mark Overman NLR Upward Partnership f\nMARK OVERMAN  MINISTE/ OF ACTIVITIES S2 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JULY, 2005 ACCOUNT AAEA AAEA ABEA ACI PLASTICS AEA AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AETNA LIFE \u0026amp; CASUALTY AETNA LIFE \u0026amp; CASUALTY AIMEE WRIGHT ALARMTEC SYSTEMS ALICIA HARRISON ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #858 ALLTEL MOBILE AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL ANGIE COLCLASURE ANGIE HUTSON ANN KINCL ARKANSAS ACTE 2004 CONFERENCE ARKANSAS ASSOCIATION OF ARKANSAS AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS, ARKANSAS CASH REGISTER SYSTEMS ARKANSAS DEPT. OF EDUCATION ARKANSAS LAMINATION PRODUCTS ARKANSAS STATE POLICE ARTIS LOFTON ASCO HARDWARE COMPANY, INC. ASCO HARDWARE COMPANY, INC. ASSOCIATION FOR CAREER AND AVES AUDIO VISUAL EDUCATIONAL ,. T- 1 AMOUNT 212.96 160.00 240.00 229 .13 25.00 62.50 62.50 1,414.56 1,432.75 102.95 4,288.89 100.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4,310.54 598.42 2,375.00 375.00 2,325.00 375.00 78.88 86.80 46.22 175.00 180.00 240.00 1,770.12 200.00 143.12 100.00 780.95 283.02 139. 92 260.00 927.80 CHK. NO. 104581 104685 104618 104779 104681 104361 104566 104586 104686 104623 104797 104704 104320 104354 104363 104559 104568 104579 104585 104631 104641 104662 104667 104677 104684 104743 104756 104770 104730 104691 104360 104370 104565 104638 104 803 104594 104816 104625 104775 104740 104787 104622 104729 104592 104476 104587 104687 104620 104754 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JULY, 2005 ACCOUNT B \u0026amp; D RADIATOR SERVICE BANK OF AMERICA-FED INCOME TAX BANK OF AMERICA-FED INCOME TAX BANK OF AMERICA-FED INCOME TAX BANK OF AMERICA-FED INCOME TAX BANK OF AMERICA-FED INCOME TAX BANK OF AMERICA-PAYROLL ACCT. BANK OF AMERICA-PAYROLL ACCT. BANK OF AMERICA-PAYROLL ACCT. BANK OF AMERICA-PAYROLL ACCT. BANK OF AMERICA-PAYROLL ACCT. BILL'S LOCK \u0026amp; SAFE BILL'S OFFICE FURNITURE BRANNON CHASTAIN BRENDA BUTLER BRENT WALKER BROUKE REYNOLDS BURGER KING C \u0026amp; W TOOL REPAIR C.T.A. CABOT FLORISTS CABOT FLORISTS CAMPUS TEAM WEAR INC CARY BRADBURN CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES LLC CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES LLC CENTER POINT ENERGY ARKLA CHARLOTTE BULL CHRISTINE HICKMAN CINTAS CINTAS CINTAS CINTAS CLARK EXTERMINATING CO, INC. CLARK EXTERMINATING CO, INC. CLEAR MOUNTAIN COMCAST CABLEVISION CORKYS CYNTHIA WOODS DANA CHADWICK DANA CHADWICK DANETTE LAWSON DARRELL MCCOY DAVID D. COOP DAVID D. COOP DAVID D. COOP DAVID D. COOP DAVID GRIMM DAYS INN INNER HARBOR ,. T- 2 AMOUNT 145.75 45,957.18 22,521.37 49,176.34 22,003.41 24,840.47 107,547.71 74,075.45 137,289.11 69,456.86 80,508.38 14.80 669.60 100.00 629.34 300.00 81.60 168.00 39.30 41.08 70.79 143.49 364.14 750.00 353.35 55.86 7,401.16 34.04 200.00 130.36 130. 36 42.68 130. 36 54.00 54.00 12.35 46.25 152.54 154.62 86.40 80.84 200.00 421.80 234.47 324.47 150.00 115. 39 324.41 1,645.00 CHK. NO. 104734 104356 104365 104561 104633 104664 104355 104364 104560 104632 104 663 104709 104771 104705 104624 104814 104745 104791 104732 104678 104595 104692 104750 104789 104571 104670 104689 104693 104647 104324 104573 104583 104672 104606 104718 104616 104690 104785 104744 104695 104784 104643 104783 104321 104569 104580 104 668 104800 104598 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JULY, 2005 ACCOUNT DEBBIE ROZZELL DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINISTRAT DFA-SALES \u0026amp; USE TAX DIAMOND INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS EDS SUPPLY CO. EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY LABS ELECTRIC MOTOR SERVICE ENERGY EDUCATION INC ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, IN F \u0026amp; E CHECK PROTECTOR COMPANY FARRELL-CALHOUN PAINT CO FERRELLGAS FLEET TIRE SERVICE OF NLR, INC FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF GOLDEN CORRAL GOLDEN CORRAL GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY GTM SPORTSWEAR HAROLD D STARK HAROLD NASH HASLER INC HCAP STRATEGIES HCAP STRATEGIES HCAP STRATEGIES HCAP STRATEGIES HERAL ENTERPRISES, INC. HOUCK MUSIC COMPANY HOUSING AUTHORITY OF NLR ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS INSTRUCTIVISION INTERNATIONAL BACCALAUREATE J B KNOX \u0026amp; ASSOCIATES JEFF WINGFIELD JERRY MASSEY JODY EDRINGTON JOSTENS JOSTENS JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN KATHY GRAY KATHY HOLLAND ,. T- 3 AMOUNT 200.00 28,853.74 118. 00 85.19 12.19 6,485.00 578.74 10,100.00 150.00 1,058.40 44.55 12. 96 243. 96 84.49 84.49 90.02 744.36 302.50 890.73 1,109.68 629.34 150.00 235.04 755.30 70.83 755.30 70.83 144.03 237.60 2,400.00 425.00 425.00 405.00 275.00 405.00 275.00 1,041.70 8,590.00 4,685.00 500.00 82.81 200.00 747.04 7.33 390.68 390.68 300.46 1,086.28 214.20 CHK. NO. 104645 104757 104825 104721 104 696 104591 104599 104772 104817 104799 104700 104726 104699 104326 104576 104675 104614 104808 104786 104698 104629 104813 104621 104362 104371 104567 104640 104707 104708 104780 104333 104584 104359 104369 104564 104637 104776 104746 104792 104773 104609 104646 104619 104742 104325 104575 104674 104810 104741 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JULY, 2005 ACCOUNT KAYE LOWE KAYE LOWE KEITH JOHNSON KELLEYS UPHOLSTERY KENNETH A. KIRSPEL KESSLERS TEAM SPORTS KONE INC LAKEWOOD MIDDLE ACTIVITY FUND LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON CO. LOWE'S LYNN CHADWICK MARY CAROLYN EAST MAURI DOUGLAS MELISSA DOUGLAS MELISSA DOUGLAS MICHELLE BONES MICHELLE BONES MITCHELL BLACKSTOCK LAW FIRM MITCHS TIRE SERVICE N.L.R. WINTEMP SUPPLY N.L.R. WINTEMP SUPPLY N.L.R. WINTEMP SUPPLY NAPA AUTO PARTS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL HOME CENTER NEW HAVEN HOTEL NLR WELDING SUPPLY NLR WELDING SUPPLY NLRSD WAREHOUSE NLRSD-BACKGROUND CHECK NO. LITTLE ROCK EDUCATORS CRED NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITIES NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF OCSE OCSE OCSE OCSE OCSE ,. T- 4 AMOUNT 200.00 17.50 300.00 9,428.40 500.00 108.01 2,427.67 450.90 166.84 627. 28 3,215.44 543.00 438.13 106.31 261.47 70.17 55.44 75.60 185.42 373.22 80.00 29.00 18,876.59 114.00 2,480.40 20.09 131.96 3,634.64 210.00 206.80 2,150.40 120.58 63.72 782.54 17.52 19,821.30 350.00 196. 01 37.00 91.56 224.43 750.84 57,806.11 36.00 1,547.27 778.05 1,635.27 723.88 1,635.27 CHK. NO. 104642 104782 104777 104806 104628 104626 104731 104809 104357 104366 104562 104634 104665 104 712 104755 104804 104753 104710 104604 104605 104597 104706 104758 104748 104601 104711 104793 104701 104 715 104713 104644 104714 104794 104752 104682 104679 104602 104795 104 7 96 104328 104578 104596 104697 104738 104322 104332 104570 104582 104669 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JULY, 2005 ACCOUNT OPEN SPACE COMMUNICATIONS ORTHOARKANSAS PA ORTHOARKANSAS PA ORTHOARKANSAS PA PEARLIR TUCKER POSTMASTER, SHERWOOD PRISCILLA BENSON PRUFROCK PRESS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SY PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SY PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SY PUBLIC SCHOOL PROPERTY RAUL DALLAS RED APPLE INN RHONDA BROWN RIVERSIDE BOX SUPPLY CO. ROEPER REVIEW ROSE CITY MIDDLE ACTIVITY FUND SAMS WHOLESALE CLUB SANDRA HENSON SBC SBG-VAA SCHLOTZSKYS SEAN J FLEMING SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION SHARON ELDRED SKEETER KELL SPORTING GOODS SKILLS USA/VICA SOUTHERN ICE EQUIPMENT STANLEY HARDWARE CO. STAR BOLT \u0026amp; SCREW CO., INC. STERLING PAINT STEVE MILLS STEVE NAIL SUPERIOR SPRING CLUTCH \u0026amp; GEAR T-SHIRT SHOP TELETOUCH THE GRACE GROUP TIMPANOGOS TECHNOLOGIES TRI-STATES VIDEO AND TRI-STATES VIDEO AND TROUTMAN OIL CO.,INC. TURNER DAIRY TYLER L HOHNBAUM U S FUEL US POSTAL SERVICE(AMS-TMS) US POSTAL SERVICE(AMS-TMS) UNITED WAY OF PULASKI COUNTY ,. T- 5 AMOUNT 49.00 128.18 128.18 24.08 50.00 74.00 241.62 35.00 1,298.86 1,253.40 1,239.44 235,714.00 300.00 190.19 173.00 516.00 50.00 387.93 60.00 91. 80 72 .15 25.00 193.60 161.76 385.06 174.38 18.22 262.42 55.00 2,321.54 76. 62 184.12 33.84 585.80 200.00 617.91 1,060.61 105.37 2,177.60 7,170.00 483.76 123.36 1,938.82 341. 53 200.00 350.02 15,000.00 4,000.00 297.66 CHK. NO. 104733 104323 104572 104 671 104702 104608 104717 104735 104367 104635 104666 104781 104811 104815 104774 104720 104719 104617 104615 104610 104593 104639 104788 104747 104574 104673 104627 104737 104749 104751 104 723 104724 104725 103873 104812 104 722 104612 104589 104648 104590 104607 104798 104805 104630 104703 104739 104600 104790 104680 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR JULY, 2005 ACCOUNT UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS USCB INCORPORATED USCB INCORPORATED USCB INCORPORATED UTILITY BILLING SERVICES UTILITY BILLING SERVICES VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE VARSITY SPIRIT FASHIONS VIVIAN HARRIS VIVIAN HARRIS WARD TRANSPORTATION SERVICES WARD TRANSPORTATION SERVICES WEISSMAN'S DESIGN FOR DANCE WILBUR D MILLS COOPERATIVE XEROX CORPORATION YANA'S LAWN CARE YANA'S LAWN CARE 501 TIRE AND WHEEL CHECK TOTALS FOR JULY, 2005 T- 6 AMOUNT 3,975.00 108.25 121.17 127.19 210.48 226.52 3,921.00 605.00 3,971.00 605.00 5,777.91 91. 80 136.00 1,467.57 484.69 43.95 70.00 2,743.44 1,553.50 2,090.00 17.28 CHK. NO. 104778 104327 104577 104676 104603 104716 104358 104368 104563 104636 104727 104613 104807 104728 104801 104736 104 611 104802 104588 104688 104694 1,193,743.97 RECEIVED SEP1 2 2005 OFFOICFE DESEGREMGAOTNI~OTNO RING BOARD OF EDUCATION NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Thursday, September 15, 2005 5:00P. M. MEETING AGENDA NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT I. II. III. IV. V. AGENDA REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION Administration Building, 2700 Poplar Thursday, September 15, 2005 5:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS CALL TO ORDER, Teresa Burl, President INVOCATION, Toni Morgan McIntire, Boone Park Elementary Fifth Grader, daughter of Tony and Margaret McIntire FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Teresa Burl, President Marty Moore, Vice President Rochelle Redus, Secretary Mable Mitchell, Parliamentarian Trent Cox, Member John Riley, Member Scott Teague, Member RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS A. Superintendent's Honor Roll 1. Ann Cowart - NLRHS West Campus History Teacher 2. Sandy Tempel - Secretary to Bobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation B. New Partners in Education 1. Bank of the Ozarks (Indian Hills Branch) and Crestwood Elementary 2. Beverly Healthcare \u0026amp; Rehabilitation Center and Pike View Elementary VI. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETINGS A. Thursday, August 11, 2005 5:30 P.M. -Special Meeting-Page A-1 Page 2 - Board Agenda September 15, 2005 B. C. Thursday, August 18, 2005 5 P .M. - Regular Meeting - Page A - 3 Tuesday, August 30, 2005 5:30 P.M. - Special Meeting - Page A- 8 VII. ACTION ITEMS - UNFINISHED BUSINESS None VIIl. ACTION ITEMS - NEW BUSINESS A. Consider Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report - R. Kron B. Consider Classified Personnel Policies Committee Report-G. Tucker C. Consider 2005 -2006 Extracurricular Duty Compensation - K. Kirspel D. Consider Verizon Cell Tower Additional Location- J. Massey- Page B -1 E. Consider New Board Policy Energy Management Conservation Policy EGH (Second Reading) - J. Massey- Page C - 1 F. Consider Report to the Public to include District Goals - K. Kirspel 1. Achievement - L. Martin 2. Accountability- D. Reed 3. Acceptance - S. Brazear 4. Assets - G. Daniels (Opportunity for Comments from the Public concerning the Report to the Public) G. Consider Motion for Consent Agenda- K. Kirspel 1. Consider monthly financial report - Page O - 1 2. Consider employment of personnel - Page P - 1 2. Consider bid items - Page R - 1 3. Consider building use request -Page S - 1 4. Consider payment of regular bills - Page T - 1 IX. CALENDAR OF EVENTS A. Regular Board Meeting-Thursday, October 20, 2005 at 5:00 P.M. X. ADJOURNMENT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent SPECIAL MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES August 11, 2005 The North Little Rock School District Board met in a special session on Thursday, August 11, 2005 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. President Teresa Burl called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Teresa Burl, President Marty Moore, Vice President Mable Mitchell, Parliamentarian Trent Cox, Member John Riley, Member Scott Teague, Member Absent Rochelle Redus, Secretary Others Present Mr. Ken Kirspel, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation\nDanny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel and Special Services\nother staff members and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall taped (audio) the meeting. Resolution to Pulaski County Election Commission Mr. Kirspel explained that Act 1174 of 2005 allowed the Board to close the polls and only have early voting and absentee voting for the school election on September 20, 2005 since Board members Scott Teague and Trent Cox have no opponents and our millage is not changing. This action would save the District approximately $10,000 - $15,000. MOTION John Riley moved to accept the following resolution: A-1 In compliance with Act 1174 of 2005, the Board of Directors of the North Little Rock School District # 1 of Pulaski County hereby requests the Pulaski County Board of Election Commissioners to open no polling places on election day so that the election can be A conducted by absentee ballot and early voting only in any election year, if no more than one ., (1) candidate for school district director presents a petition or notice in writing to the Pulaski County Board of Election Commissioners as required by A. C.A. 6-14-111, and if there are no other ballot issues to be submitted to district electors for consideration. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moor'e, Riley and Teague None (Redus - absent) Employment of Personnel MOTION Scott Teague moved to go into closed session for the purpose to discuss the employment of personnel. John Riley seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Riley and Teague None (Redus- absent) The Board entered into closed session at 5:45 p.m. The Board reconvened in open session at 6:00 p.m. MOTION Mable Mitchell moved to accept the Administration's recommendation to hire June Haynie as the new Administrative Director of Secondary Education. John Riley seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: ADJOURNMENT MOTION Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Riley and Teague None (Redus - absent) Trent Cox moved to adjourn the meeting. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Riley and Teague None (Redus - absent) President Burl declared the meeting adjourned at 6:05 p.m. Teresa Burl, President Rochelle Redus, Secretary A-2 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES August 18, 2005 The North Little Rock School District Board met in a regular session on Thursday, August 18, 2005 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. President Teresa Burl called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. MOTION John Riley moved to amend the agenda to add one new item under New Business and two additions to the personnel section of the consent agenda. Marty Moore seconded the motion. Will Brazear, a NLRHS 9th grader, gave the invocation. The flag salute followed. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Teresa Burl, President Marty Moore, Vice President Rochelle Redus, Secretary Mable Mitchell, Parliamentarian Trent Cox, Member John Riley, Member Scott Teague, Member Absent None Others Present Mr. Ken Kirspel, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation\nGreg Daniels, Chief Financial and Information Services Officer\nDanny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel and Special Services\npress\nother staff members and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall (audio) and NLRHS-TV (video) taped the meeting. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS Jan Scholl, former Arkansas and NLRSD Teacher of the Year, introduced Kirn Douglass, a Seventh Street Elementary Kindergarten Teacher, as the 2005 NLRSD Teacher of the Year. Ms. Scholl presented Mrs. Douglass with a plaque and roses. A-3 Shara Brazear, Communication Specialist, introduced Rellia Dillinger as the 2005 Beverly Benham A ward for Outstanding Leadership in Special Education in Arkansas recipient this year. Mrs. Dillinger was presented a small gift of appreciation from Mrs. Moore. Kelsey Winchester, NLRHS West Campus Senior, was introduced as one of two Arkansas Girls State's Representative to Girls Nation. She presented some of the highlights and experiences of attending Girls Nation. Mr. Teague presented a small gift of appreciation to Miss Winchester. Mrs. Brazear also introduced new partners in educ~tion: US Bank (Levy Branch) and North Heights Elementary. Trent Cox presented plaques to US Bank representatives and to Dana Snowden, North Heights Elementary principal. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETING MOTION Trent Cox moved to accept the minutes of the July 21, 2005 Regular meeting as printed. Rochelle Redus seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Redus, Riley and Teague None NEW BUSINESS Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report Rick Kron, Certified Personnel Policies Committee Chairman, explained their committee had A met in a special meeting and agreed to accept the changes to Board Policy CDE Insurance W Coverages as presented in the July 21, 2005 Board Meeting. MOTION John Riley moved to accept the CDE Insurance Proposal and refer to the teachers to vote so that this will be in effect immediately. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Redus, Riley and Teague None Classifed Personnel Policies Committee Report Glenda Tucker, Classified Personnel Policies Committee Chairman, explained their committee had met in a special meeting and had a proposal for a new policy that would clear the way for the new insurance coverages to take effect for the classified staff. The new Board Policy CDE - CL Insurance Coverages is the same except for the changes in paragraph five that changes the words \"classroom instruction\" to direct performance of their job and the word \"teacher\" to employee. MOTION John Riley moved to accept new Board Policy CDE - CL Insurance Coverages as presented. Marty Moore seconded the motion. A-4 YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Redus, Riley and Teague None New Board Policy 5.16.A Smart Core Curriculum and Graduation Requirements (Second Reading) Mr. Kirspel explained this policy needed to be included to meet Arkansas Department of Education guidelines. He recommended adoption of this policy. MOTION Trent Cox moved to accept 5.16A Smart Core Curriculum and Graduation Requirement Board Policy as a second and final reading. Rochelle Redus seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Redus, Riley and Teague None Primary Banking Services Proposal Mr. Daniels explained as instructed by the Board, our Business office sent out Requests for Proposals (RFPs) to banks in the central Arkansas area. While several were returned, two were obviously the best of all of the proposals. The committee requested both banks (Bank of the Ozarks and Twin City Bank) come in and make a confirming presentation. Both of the banks did and after much deliberation the committee recommended the district use Bank of the Ozarks for our General Operating and Checking Accounts. Board members questioned Mr. Daniels extensively about the RFP and decision process. MOTION Trent Cox moved to accept the Administration's recommendation to accept Bank of Ozarks as the districts bank for General Operating and Checking accounts. John Riley seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Riley and Teague Redus Revision to Verizon Cell Tower Locations Jerry Massey, Plant Services Director, presented two proposals to change the location of the cell towers at Indian Hills Elementary and Ridgeroad Middle Charter. These changes have now been approved by the NLR Planning Commission and NLR City Council. MOTION Scott Teague moved to accept the recommendations to move the Verizon cell towers as presented. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Redus, Riley and Teague None A-5 MOTION Marty Moore moved to accept the following resolution: RESOLUTION NUMBER 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO APPROVE LEASES WITH REVISED LEASE LOCATIONS WHEREAS, Arkansas Code Annotated Section 6-13-630 authorizes the Board of Directors for each school district to lease property as Lessor\nand WHEREAS, Arkansas Code Annotated Section 6-21-108(c) requires that the execution of all contracts and conveyances and lease contracts shall be performed by the President and confirmed by the Secretary of the school board when authorized by a resolution in writing and approved by a majority of the school board\nand WHEREAS, Verizon Wireless Tennessee Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, has requested the school district to lease to Verizon Wireless Tennessee Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, real property at the Indian Hills Elementary School and Ridgeroad Middle Charter School locations for the purpose of locating towers and certain equipment that will facilitate wireless communications and other related transmissions\nand WHEREAS, the North Little Rock School District has previously approved leases for tower sites at Indian Hills Elementary School and Ridgeroad Middle Charter School at its June 16, 2005 meeting\nand WHEREAS, The North Little Rock Planning Commission has recommended the school sites be approved under North Little Rock Zoning law so long as the proposed sites are moved to revised locations on the same school sites. The revised locations are reflected in the drawings attached hereto as Collective Exhibit A. WHEREAS, the North Little Rock School District will receive rent from Verizon Wireless Tennessee Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, for such leases. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the School Board District of North Little Rock Arkansas that: The leases previously approved by the Board are hereby re-approved in the revised locations as reflected in the drawings attached hereto in Collective Exhibit A. John Riley seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Redus, Riley and Teague None New Board Policy Energy Management Conservation Policy EGH (First Reading) Mr. Massey introduced the new policy to the Board for their consideration. A-6 MOTION John Riley moved to accept Energy Management Conservation Policy EGH for a first - reading. Rochelle Redus seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Redus, Riley and Teague None CONSENT AGENDA Mr. Kirspel requested the approval of the consent agenda with the two additions under the employment section. These two transfers are Raymond Smith from East Campus Supervisor to Plant Services, Energy Educator/Manager and Richard Alexander from Assistant Boy's Basketball Coach to Head Boy's Basketball Coach at the NLRHS West Campus. MOTION John Riley moved to accept the consent agenda with the additions to the employment of personnel section. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Redus, Riley and Teague None At this time, Coach Richard Alexander, who was in the audience, was introduced and congratulated on his new position with our school district. ADJOURNMENT MOTION John Riley moved to adjourn the meeting. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Redus, Riley and Teague None President Burl declared the meeting adjourned at 6:28 p.m. Teresa Burl, President Rochelle Redus, Secretary A-7 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent SPECIAL MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES August 30, 2005 The North Little Rock School District Board met in a special session on Tuesday, August 11, 2005 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. President Teresa Burl called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Teresa Burl, President Marty Moore, Vice President Mable Mitchell, Parliamentarian Trent Cox, Member John Riley, Member Scott Teague, Member Absent Rochelle Redus, Secretary Others Present Mr. Ken Kirspel, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation\nGreg Daniels, Chief Financial and Information Services Officer\nDanny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel and Special Services\nother staff members and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall taped (audio) the meeting. 2005 - 2006 School Year Budget Greg Daniels presented the budget information. Mr. Daniels explained all of the information was the same as presented in the budget workshop on August 11, 2005. The Board inquired about the technology costs proposed and the funds available to update our technology. MOTION John Riley moved to change the monies received from the Ridgeroad Middle Charter School adjacent property of $436,000 out of the building fund to capital outlay for the purpose of using the money for technology in the district. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Riley and Teague None (Redus- absent) A-8 MOTION Trent Cox moved to accept the 2005 - 2006 School Year Budget as presented by Administration. John Riley seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Riley and Teague None (Redus- absent) ADJOURNMENT MOTION Trent Cox moved to adjourn the meeting. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Mitchell, Moore, Riley and Teague None (Redus- absent) President Burl declared the meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. Teresa Burl, President Rochelle Redus, Secretary A-9 N (0)J ET IHI ILIITTILJE JE(Q)C1KC J P1IJiffiJILIC C CClB I( Q()Q )I L ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 POPLAR STREET MEMO TO: Ken Kirspel, Superintendent FROM: Jerry Massey, Director of Plant Services SUBJECT: Boone Park Cell Tower DATE: September 7, 2005 Attached is Verizon's proposed Land Lease Agreement and resolution for Boone Park Elementary. A formal survey and site drawing will be attached when completed. I recommend Board approval of this at the September Board meeting contingent upon Planning Commission and City Council approval. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER P.O. BOX 687, NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR 72115/0687 501/771-8000 B - 1 RESOLUTION NUMBER _2_ A RESOLUTION OF THE NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO GRANT LEASING AUTHORITY TO THE PRESIDENT FOR THE NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Arkansas Code Annotated Section 6-13-630 authorizes the board of directors for each school district to lease property as lessor\nand WHEREAS, Arkansas Code Annotated Section 6-21-IOS(c) requires that the execution of all contracts and conveyances and lease contracts shall be performed by the president and confirmed by the secretary of the school board when authorized by a resolution in writing and approved by a majority of the school board\nand WHEREAS, Verizon Wireless Tennessee Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, has requested the school district to lease to Verizon Wireless Tennessee Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, real property at Boone Park Elementary School for the purpose of locating towers and certain equipment that will facilitate wireless communications and other related transmissions\nand WHEREAS, the North Little Rock School District will receive rent from Verizon Wireless Tennessee Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, for such leases. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the School Board of North Little Rock Arkansas that: The President is hereby authorized to enter into the lease, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, with Verizon Wireless Tennessee Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, related to the Boone Park Elementary School, and the Secretary is hereby authorized to confirm such agreements by also signing such agreements. APPROVED: Printed Name: -------- Title: ----------- ATTEST: Date: -------- B-2 Verizon Wireless Site: Vestal_Park_AR/166697 LAND LEASE AGREEMENT This Agreement, made this __ day of _____ __, 2005 between North Little Rock School District with its mailing address located at P.O. Box 687, North Little Rock, Arkansas 72115, Tax ID #71-6014124 hereinafter designated LESSOR and Verizon Wireless Tennessee Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, with its principal office located at 180 Washington Valley Road, Bedminster, New Jersey 07921, hereinafter designated LESSEE. The LESSOR and LESSEE are at times collectively referred to hereinafter as the \"Parties\" or individually as the \"Party\". 1. PREMISES. LESSOR hereby leases to LESSEE a portion of that certain parcel of property (the entirety of LESSOR's property is referred to hereinafter as the Property), located in North Little Rock, Pulaski County, State of Arkansas, and being described as a _' by _' parcel containing ___ square feet, as shown on the Tax Map of the Assessor's Office of Pulaski County, Arkansas as parcel number ______ and being further described in Deed Book 460 at Page 427 and Deed Book 460, Page 431, as recorded in the Office of Circuit Clerk of Pulaski County, together with the non-exclusive right for ingress and egress, seven (7) days a week twenty-four (24) hours a day, on foot or motor vehicle, including trucks, and for the installation and maintenance of utility wires, poles, cables, conduits, and pipes over, under, or along a thirty (30') foot wide right-of-way extending from the nearest public right-of-way to the demised premises, said demised premises and right-of-way (hereinafter collectively referred to as the \"Premises\") for access being substantially as described herein in Exhibit \"A\" attached hereto and made a part hereof. In the event any public utility is unable to use the aforementioned right-of-way, the LESSOR hereby agrees to grant an additional right-of-way either to the LESSEE or to the public utility at no cost to the LESSEE. 2. SURVEY. LESSOR also hereby grants to LESSEE the right to survey the Property and the Premises, and said survey shall then become Exhibit \"B\" which shall be attached hereto and made a part hereof, and shall control in the event of boundary and access discrepancies between it and Exhibit \"A\". Cost for such work shall be borne by the LESSEE. 3. TERM. This Agreement shall be effective as of the date of execution by both parties, provided, however, the initial term shall be for five (5) years and shall commence on the Commencement Date (as hereinafter defined) at which time rental payments will be due at an annual rental of Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000.00) to be paid in equal monthly installments on the first day of the month, in advance, to LESSOR, or to such other person, firm or place as the LESSOR may, from time to time, designate in writing at least thirty (30) days in advance of any rental payment date. The Commencement Date is defined as the first (1st) day of the month following the date this Agreement is executed by the parties or the first (1st) day of the month following the date LESSEE is granted a building permit by the governmental agency charged with issuing such permits, whichever event occurs last. 4. EXTENSIONS. This Agreement shall automatically be extended for four (4) additional five (5) year terms unless the LESSEE terminates it at the end of the then current term by giving the LESSOR written notice of the intent to terminate at least six (6) months prior to the end of the then current term. B-3 5. EXTENSION RENTALS. The annual rental for the first (1st) five (5) year extension term shall be increased to Thirteen Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars ($13,800.00)\nthe second (2nd) five (5) year extension term shall be increased to Fifteen Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy Dollars ($15,870.00)\nthe third (3rd) five (5) year extension term shall be increased to Eighteen Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars and 50/100 ($18,250.50)\nth and the fourth (4 ) five (5) year extension shall be increased to Twenty Thousand Nine Hundred Eighty-Eight Dollars and 08/100 ($20,988.08). 6. ADDITIONAL EXTENSIONS. If at the end of~ fourth (4th) five (5) year extension term this Agreement has not been terminated by either Party by giving to the other written notice of an intention to terminate it at least six (6) months prior to the end of such term, this Agreement shall continue in force upon the same covenants, terms and conditions for a further term of five (5) years and for five (5) year terms thereafter until terminated by either Party by giving to the other written notice of its intention to so terminate at least six (6) months prior to the end of such term. Annual rental for each such additional five (5) year term shall be equal to 115% of the annual rental payable with respect to the immediately preceding five (5) year term. 7. USE: GOVERNMENTAL APPROVALS. LESSEE shall use the Premises for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and operating a communications facility and uses incidental and all necessary appurtenances. A security fence consisting of chain link construction or similar but comparable construction may be placed around the perimeter of the Premises at the discretion of LESSEE (not including the access easement). All improvements shall be at LESSEE's expense and the installation of all improvements shall be at the discretion and option of the LESSEE. LESSEE shall have the right to replace, repair, add or otherwise modify its equipment or any portion thereof, whether the equipment is specified or not on any exhibit attached hereto, during the term of this Agreement. LESSEE will maintain the Premises in a good condition reasonable wear and tear excepted. LESSOR will maintain the Property, excluding the Premises, in good condition, reasonable wear and tear excepted. It is understood and agreed that LESSEE's ability to use the Premises is contingent upon its obtaining after the execution date of this Agreement all of the certificates, permits and other approvals ( collectively the \"Governmental Approvals\") that may be required by any Federal, State or Local authorities as well as satisfactory soil boring tests which will permit LESSEE use of the Premises as set forth above. LESSOR shall cooperate with LESSEE in its effort to obtain such approvals and shall take no action which would adversely affect the status of the Property with respect to the proposed use by LESSEE. In the event that any of such applications for such Governmental Approvals should be finally rejected or any Governmental Approval issued to LESSEE is canceled, expires, lapses, or is otherwise withdrawn or terminated by governmental authority or soil boring tests are found to be unsatisfactory so that LESSEE in its sole discretion will be unable to use the Premises for its intended purposes or the LESSEE determines that the Premises is no longer technically compatible for its intended use, LESSEE shall have the right to terminate this Agreement. Notice of the LESSEE's exercise of its right to terminate shall be given to LESSOR in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall be effective upon the mailing of such notice by the LESSEE. All rentals paid to said termination date shall be retained by the LESSOR. Upon such termination, this Agreement shall become null and void and all the Parties shall have no further obligations including the payment of money, to each other. B-4 8. INDEMNIFICATION. Each Party shall indemnify and hold the other harmless against any claim of liability or loss from personal injury or property damage resulting from or arising out of the use and occupancy of the Premises or the Property by the Party, its servants or agents, excepting, however, such claims or damages as may be due to or caused by the acts or omissions of the other Party, or its servants or agents. 9. INSURANCE. The Parties hereby waive any and all rights of action for negligence against the other which may hereafter arise on account of damage to the premises or to property, resulting from any fire, or other casualty of the kind covered by standard fire insurance policies with extended coverage, regardless of whether or not, or in what amounts, such insurance is now or hereafter carried by the Parties, or either of them. LESSOR and LESSEE each agree that at its own-cost and expense, each will maintain comprehensive general liability and property liability insurance with liability limits of not less than $1,000,000 for injury to or death of one or more persons in any one occurrence and $500,000 for damage or destruction to property in any one occurrence. LESSOR agrees that LESSEE may self-insure against any loss or damage which could be covered by a comprehensive general public liability insurance policy. 10. ANNUAL TERMINATION. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, and provided LESSEE is not in default hereunder and shall have paid all rents and sums due and payable to the LESSOR by LESSEE, LESSEE shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon the annual anniversary of this Agreement provided that three (3) months prior notice is given the LESSOR. 11. INTERFERENCE. LESSOR agrees that LESSOR and/or any other tenants of the Property who currently have or in the future take possession of the Property will be permitted to install only such radio equipment that is of the type and frequency which will not cause measurable interference the existing equipment of the LESSEE. The Parties acknowledge that there will not be an adequate remedy at law for non-compliance with the provisions of this paragraph and therefore, LESSEE shall have the right to specifically enforce the provisions of this paragraph in a court of competent jurisdiction. 12. REMOVAL UPON TERMINATION. LESSEE, upon termination of the Agreement, shall, within ninety (90) days, remove its building(s), antenna structure(s) (except footings), fixtures and all personal property and otherwise restore the Premises to its original condition, reasonable wear and tear and casualty excepted. LESSOR agrees and acknowledges that all of the equipment, fixtures and personal property of the LESSEE shall remain the personal property of the LESSEE and the LESSEE shall have the right to remove the same, whether or not said items are considered fixtures and attachments to real property under applicable law. If such time for removal causes LESSEE to remain on the Premises after tennination of this Agreement, LESSEE shall pay rent at the then existing monthly rate or on the existing monthly pro-rata basis if based upon a longer payment term, until such time as the removal of the building, antenna structure, fixtures and all personal property are completed. 13. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL. If the LESSOR during the lease term or any extension of the lease term elects to sell all or any portion of the Property, whether separately or as part of the larger parcel of which the Property are a part, the LESSEE shall have the right B-5 of first refusal to meet any bona fide offer of sale on the same terms and conditions of such offer. If LESSEE fails to meet such bona fide offer within thirty (30) days after the notice thereof from LESSOR, LESSOR may sell the Property or portion-thereof to such third person in accordance with the terms and conditions of his offer. For purposes ofthis Paragraph, any transfer, bequest or devise of the LESSO R's interest in the Property as a result of the death of the LESSOR, whether by will or intestate succession, shall not be considered a sale of the Property for which the LESSEE has any right of first refusal. 14. RIGHTS UPON SALE. Should the LESSOR, at any time during the term of this Agreement, decide to sell all or any part of the Property to a purchaser other than LESSEE, such sale shall be under and subject to this Agreement and LESSEE's rights hereunder, and any sale by the LESSOR of the portion of this Property underlying the right-of-way herein granted shall be under and subject to the right of the LESSEE in and to such right-of-way. 15. QUIET ENJOYMENT. LESSOR covenants that LESSEE, on paying the rent and performing the covenants shall peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the Premises. 16. TITLE. LESSOR covenants that LESSOR is seized of good and sufficient title and interest to the Property and has full authority to enter into and execute this Agreement. LESSOR further covenants that there are no liens, judgments or impediments of title on the Property or affecting LESSOR's title to the same and that there are no covenants, easements or restrictions which prevent the use of the Premises by the LESSEE as set forth above. 17. INTEGRATION. It is agreed and understood that this Agreement contains all agreements, promises and understandings between the LESSOR and LESSEE and that no verbal or oral agreements, promises or understandings shall be binding upon either the LESSOR or LESSEE in any dispute, controversy or proceeding at law, and any addition, variation or modification to this Agreement shall be void and ineffective unless made in writing and signed by the Parties. In the event any provision of the Agreement is found to be invalid or unenforceable, such finding shall not effect the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Agreement. The failure of either Party to insist upon strict performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement or to exercise any of its rights under the Agreement shall not waive such rights and such Party shall have the right to enforce such rights at any time and take such action as may be lawful and authorized under this Agreement, either in law or in equity. 18. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement and the performance thereof shall be governed, interpreted, construed, and regulated by the laws of the State in which the Property is located. 19. ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement may be sold, assigned or transferred by the LESSEE without any approval or consent of the LESSOR to the LESSEE's principal, affiliates, subsidiaries of its principal\nto any entity which acquires all or substantially all ofLESSEE's assets in the market defined by the Federal Communications Commission in which the Property is located by reason of a merger,. acquisition or other business reorganization\nor to any entity which acquires or receives an interest in the majority of communication towers of the LESSEE in the market defined by the Federal Communications Commission in which the Property is located. B-6 As to other parties, this Agreement may not be sold, assigned or transferred without the written consent of the LESSOR, which such consent will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. LESSEE may sublet the Premises within its sole discretion, upon notice to LESSOR. Any sublease that is entered into by LESSEE shall be subject to the provisions of this Agreement and shall be binding upon the successors: assigns, heirs and legal representatives of the respective parties hereto. 20. NOTICES. All notices hereunder must be in writing and shall be deemed validly given if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested or by commercial courier, provided the courier's regular business is delivery service. and provided further that it guarantees delivery to the addressee by the end of the next business day following the courier's receipt from the sender, addressed as follows ( or any other address that the Party to be notified may have designated to the sender by like notice): LESSOR: North Little Rock School District P.O. Box 687 North Little Rock, AR 72115 LESSEE: Verizon Wireless Tennessee Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless 180 Washington Valley Road Bedminster, New Jersey 07921 Attention: Network Real Estate Notice shall be effective upon mailing or delivering the same to a commercial courier, as permitted above. 21. SUCCESSORS. This Agreement shall extend to and bind the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the Parties hereto. 22. SUBORDINATION AND NON-DISTURBANCE. At LESSOR's option, this Agreement shall be subordinate to any mortgage or other security interest by LESSOR which from time to time may encumber all or part of the Property or right-of-way\nprovided, however, every such mortgage or other security interest shall recognize the validity of this Agreement in the event of a foreclosure of LESSOR's interest and also LESSEE's right to remain in occupancy of and have access to the Premises as long as LESSEE is not in default of this Agreement. LESSEE shall execute whatever instruments may reasonably be required to evidence this subordination clause. In the event the Property is encumbered by a mortgage or other security interest, the LESSOR immediately after this Agreement is executed, will obtain and furnish to LESSEE, a nondisturbance agreement for each such mortgage or other security interest in recordable form. In the event the LESSOR defaults in the payment and/or other performance of any mortgage or other security interest encumbering the Property, LESSEE, may, at its sole option and without obligation, cure or correct LESSOR's default and upon doing so, LESSEE shall be subrogated to any and all rights, titles, liens and equities of the holders of such mortgage or security interest and the LESSEE shall be entitled to deduct and setoff against all rents that may otherwise become due under this Agreement the sums paid by LESSEE to cure or correct such defaults. 23. RECORDING. LESSOR agrees to execute a Memorandum of this Lease Agreement which LESSEE may record with the appropriate Recording Officer. The date set forth in B-7 the Memorandum of Lease is for recording purposes only and bears no reference to commencement of either term or rent payments. 24. DEFAULT. In the event there is a default by the LESSEE with respect to any of the provisions of this Agreement or its obligations under it, including the payment of rent, the LESSOR shall give LESSEE written notice of such default. After receipt of such written notice, the LESSEE shall have fifteen (15) days in which to cure any monetary default and thirty (30) days in which to cure any non-monetary default, provided the LESSEE shall have such extended period as may be required beyond the thirty (30) days if the nature of the cure is such that it reasonably requires more than thirty (30) days and the LESSEE commences the cure within the thirty (30) day period and thereafter continuously and diligently pursues the cure to. completion. The LESSOR may not maintain any action or effect any remedies for default against the LESSEE unless and until the LESSEE has failed to cure the same within the time periods provided in this Paragraph. 25. ENVIRONMENTAL. a. LESSOR will be responsible for all obligations of compliance with any and all environmental and industrial hygiene laws, including any regulations, guidelines, standards, or policies of any governmental authorities regulating or imposing standards of liability or standards of conduct with regard to any environmental or industrial hygiene conditions or concerns as may now or at any time hereafter be in effect, that are or were in any way related to activity now conducted in, on, or in any way related to the Property, unless such conditions or concerns are caused by the activities of the LESSEE. b. LESSOR shall hold LESSEE harmless and indemnify the LESSEE from and assume all duties, responsibility and liability at LESSOR's sole cost and expense, for all duties, responsibilities, and liability (for payment of penalties, sanctions, forfeitures, losses, - costs, or damages) and for responding to any action, notice, claim, order, summons, citation, directive, litigation, investigation or proceeding which is in any way related to: a) failure to comply with any environmental or industrial hygiene law, including without limitation any regulations, guidelines, standards, or policies of any governmental authorities regulating or imposing standards of liability or standards of conduct with regard to any environmental or industrial hygiene concerns or conditions as may now or at any time hereafter be in effect, unless such compliance results from conditions caused by the LESSEE\nand b) any environmental or industrial hygiene conditions arising out of or in any way related to the condition of the Property or activities conducted thereon, unless such environmental conditions are caused by the LESSEE. 26. CASUALTY. In the event of damage by fire or other casualty to the Premises that cannot reasonably be expected to be repaired within forth-five (45) days following same or, if the Property is damaged by fire or other casualty so that such damage may reasonably be expected to disrupt LESSEE's operations at the Premises for more than forty-five (45) days, then LESSEE may at any time following such fire or other casualty, provided LESSOR has not completed the restoration required to permit LESSEE to resume its operation at the Premises, terminate this Lease upon fifteen (15) days written notice to LESSOR. Any such notice of termination shall cause this Lease to expire with the same force and effect as though the date set forth in such notice were the date B-8 originally set as the expiration date of this Lease and the parties shall make an appropriate adjustment, as of such termination date, with respect to payments due to the other under this Lease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all rental shall abate during the period of such fire or other casualty. 27. CONDEMNATION. In the event of any condemnation of the Property, LESSEE may terminate this Lease upon fifteen (15) days written notice to LESSOR if such condemnation may reasonably be expected to disrupt LESSEE's operations at the Premises for more than forty-five (45) days. LESSEE may on its own behalf make a claim in any condemnation proceeding involving the Premises for losses related to the antennas, equipment, its relocation costs and its damages and losses (but not for the loss of its leasehold interest). Any such notice of termination shall cause this Lease to expire with the same force and effect as though the date set forth in such notice were the date originally set as the expiration date of this Lease and the parties shall make an appropriate adjustment as of such termination date with respect to payments due to the other under this Lease. 28. SUBMISSION OF LEASE. The submission of this Lease for examination does not constitute an offer to lease the Premises and this Lease becomes effective only upon the full execution of this Lease by the Parties. If any provision herein is invalid, it shall be considered deleted from this Lease and shall not invalidate the remaining provisions of this Lease. Each of the Parties hereto warrants to the other that the person or persons executing this Lease on behalf of such Party has the full right, power and authority to enter into and execute this Lease on such Party's behalf and that no consent from any other person or entity is necessary as a condition precedent to the legal effect of this Lease. 29. APPLICABLE LAWS. LESSEE shall use the Premises as may be required or as permitted by applicable laws, rules and regulations. LESSOR agrees to keep the Property in conformance with all applicable, laws, rules and regulations and agrees to reasonably cooperate with the LESSEE regarding any compliance required by the LESSEE in respect to its use of the Premises. 30. SURVIVAL. The provisions of the Agreement relating to indemnification from one Party to the other Party shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement. Additionally, any provisions of this Agreement which require performance subsequent to the termination or expiration of this Agreement shall also survive such termination or expiration. 31. CAPTIONS. The captions contained in this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and are not intended to be part of the Agreement. They shall not affect or be utilized in the construction or interpretation of the Agreement. B-9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their respective seals the day and year first above written. LESSOR: North Little Rock School District ___________ By: _____________ _ WITNESS Printed Name: ------~--- Title: President Date: ___________ _ Attest: ____________ _ Printed Name: ---------- Title: Secretary Date: -------------- LESSEE: ___________ By: ____________ _ WITNESS Hans F. Leutenegger Area Vice President - Network, South Area Date: ------------- B-10 tp ........ If) . l/) l') l\\ LR f\\R -12.,111 L L-f\\t1 60-0Z.- o 5l.l 5,C ALt: \\11 \" lli q' DJ:--..-.\\ I.=:: lo / 5. 0 jg~ It.: f'- C Rt .. ~ ~,-c~1 9 r Lt\u0026gt;~e. 1 l - 0 @)~\n~,,, CJ :.:J ~~1__-~ t7J II St~\\,th ,rh ~ ()JI \".bfv' ) e, l-\n5.h\" t' A~ph,AL1 ~ -p l!\\ .t' 0 ,_, V-1\" 1 ~ ~ ~ \\J', ~- \\/ ~ 0' -\\ f!Je..:::/ / Vei\nzmWirdessSte: Veta_Rl'k_AR/166697 Extibit s- 9JvE 8 B - 12 PROPOSED BOARD POLICY EGH (SECOND AND FINAL READING) ENERGY MANAGEMENT CONSERVATION POLICY EGH As the School Board of the North Little Rock School District, we believe it to be our responsibility to ensure that every effort is made to conserve energy and natural resources while exercising sound financial management. The implementation of this policy is the joint responsibility of the board members, administrators, teachers, students and support personnel and its success is based on cooperation at all levels. The district will maintain accurate records of energy consumption and cost of energy and will provide information to the local media on the goals and progress of the energy conservation program. The building administrator, working with the energy manager will be accountable for energy management on his/her campus with energy audits being conducted and conservation program outlines being updated Judicious use of the various energy systems of each campus will be the joint responsibility of the energy manager, plant services, principal and head custodian to ensure that an efficient energy posture is maintained on a daily basis. To ensure the overall success of the energy management program, the following - specific areas of emphasis will be adopted: 1. 2. 3. 4. All district personnel will be expected to contribute to energy efficiency in our district. Every person will be expected to be an \"energy saver\" as well as an \"energy consumer\". Energy management on his/her campus will be made a part of the principal's annual evaluation. Within sixty ( 60) days, administrative Energy Guidelines will be adopted that will be the \"rules of the game\" in implementing our energy program. Further, to maintain a safer and healthier learning environment and to complement the energy management program, the district shall follow the Arkansas Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation preventive maintenance and monitoring plan for its facilities and systems, including HV AC, building envelope, and moisture management. C-1 5. PROPOSED BOARD POLICY EGH (SECOND AND FINAL READING) The School Board of North Little Rock School District directs the development of short and long range plans in the areas of facilities management and preventive maintenance as prescribed by Arkansas Public School Academic, and Transportation Division. Date Adopted: C-2 ~ North Little Rock School Distr.ic:t f' - ~-~!lr~ 11 d ~ I'\u0026lt;  LOCAL REVENUE Current Taxes J J. Pullback i ,,. ,. Delinquent Taxes Excess Commissions Land Redemption Penalties \u0026amp; Interest on Taxes Tuition-Summer School Interest on Investments Soft Drink Sales Misc Rev From Local TOTAL LOCAL REVENUE REVENUE FROM INTERMEDIATE SOURCE !Severance Tax I REVENUE FROM STATE SOURCES Unrestricted AUGUST2005 ~:::,, Current Month Budget ' Actual 13,735,000.00 488,270.30 6,530,000.00 0.00 1,410,000.00 28,189.98 150,000.00 0.00 181,000.00 55,002.11 42,000.00 674.71 102,500.00 1,585.00 360,000,00 44,822.80 90,000.00 454.12 819,990.00 4,277.02 23,420,490.00 623,276.04 13,000.001 0.001 State Equalization Aid I 33,414,099.00 3,037,645.00 Student Growth Funding Other Unrestricted Grants-in- Aid Restricted Regular Education Special Education Workforce Ed Early Childhood M-to-M Non-Instr Pgms Other Restricted Aid Misc State TOTAL REVE TOTAL REVE NUE STATE NUE OPERATIONS . 0.00 0.00 ...... ~~ 9,000.00 0.00 ' 499,745.00 0.00 4,866,499.00 234,676.00 0.00 0.00 2,155,150.00 5,000.00 '4,825,000.00 0.00 1,805,435.00 3,300.00 0.00 0.00 136,000.00 2,677.19 47,710,928.00 3,283,298.19 71,144,418.00 3,906,574.23 -1 ~ 2005-2006 ~ Budget ,  1:c~ /,oo ftudiet Y-T-D Actual ~ Balance .,,,Balance,. 2,481,298.08 1,\n11,253,701.92 ci.1::t- f\u0026gt;-1-8.:07% o.oa1 '16:-,530~000.00 \u0026lt;'f\n'_0.00% 82,480.03 I\u0026lt;\\:1 ,327'.\nSl9l .97 ,.. ::'-~ , ,::5'.85% - 0.00 150,000.00 ,,, \" '0.00% 67,738.06 ., 113,261.94 37.42% 3,256.33 38,743.67 ., ., 7.75% 2,110.00 100,390.00 2.06% 90,117.82 269,882.18 25.03% 1,526.07 . 88,47.3.93 :1.70% 7,344.49 812\n645.51 ,, 0.90% 2,735,870.88 1'20,684,619.12 : 11.68% 1,892.37! '\"11,107.63! 14.56%! 3,037,645.00 30,376,454.00 ..,.. -.... 9.09% 0.00 ., 0.00 r~- .. ,.,.,__ .. .,_ 0.00' 9,000.00 j:: 0.00% 0.00 499,745.00 I  --~ 0.00% 234,676.00 , . \"4,631,823.00 ,. ... .,. 4.82% 0.00 ,, --~-: : ,0, .00 , ~,\n- , , 626,400.00 , 1,528\n750.00 29.07% 0.00 4,825,000.00 .,,  't0.00% 206,955.00 I  1,598,480.0Q ..- ,, 11:46% 0.00 ::::: 0.00 . . 2,677.19 133\n322.81 ,,-,: 1.97% 4,108,353.19 1'43,602,574.81 , . I-\n8.61% 6,846,116.44 64,298,301.56 ,,., !9.62% BUILDING FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND FOOD SERVICES FEDERAL REVENUE Unrestricted-PL 87 4 Title I-B-4 ROTC Satellite Ed Research Commission Title I Title V-A Innovative Pgm Homeless Assistance Cari Perkins - Vocational Title 11-D Formula Grant Title VI B Head Start . Special Ed Preschool . -. Medicaid 1,\n11 Eisenhower Math/Science Title Ill - Eng Lang Acq Title IV-A Safe \u0026amp; Dn..ii:i,Free Accountability TOTAL FEDE RAL REVENUE TOTAL REV ENUE 1,s23,2s3.oo 1 3,213,000.001 2,500.00 65,549.00 120,000.00 180,000.00 3,175, 702,00 276,426.00 180,000.00 202,587.00 58,407.00 1,871,018.00 :,)~7057491.00 361,000.00 610,000.00 .. 16,976.00 - ..  73,706.00 ' 65,000.00 7,964,362.00 -I 83\n891,033.00 chool District 33,786.021 37,929.541 1,485,323.461 2.49%! 62,281.101 66,892.321 3,146,107.681 2.08%! 0.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 :.., 65,549.00 0.00% 2,692.24 2,692.24 ., 117.,3 07.76 2.24% 0.00 0.00 180,000.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 .:.3, 175', 702.00 ., 0.00% 0.00 0.00  A-276,426.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00. 180,000.00 0.00% 40.~p.00 40,646.00 1 61,941.00 \"'~2 0.06% \"\"fQ.00 0.00 . , 58,407.00 ,\n.\n~? 0.00% 0.00 0.00 .:::\n1~1:nos..:o1 oIt : ,l .. :..t~ 0:00% . . .. , . 0.00\no.oo:\n+\nit-705,491.00\n.\n_ci\n..... 0100% 5,432.94 5,432.94: 355,667.06 :~-:'t .. \n:, 1.50% . 0.00 0.00 :,:til610,000.-00 Ii? ,\n,.- ~ 0:00% . 0.00 0.00\n:Z.16,9Z6:00 ~-,::-...:\n.:' : .\n0.00% . 0.00 0.00 1. :2\n.'\n.73\n706.00 tt1.:..:.ii'.. :0f0.0 0% 12.,334.83 12,334.83. ,,\n_.:q_:52,665.1l:,i'lZ:} \\\":-: 18.,9\"8~ 61,106.01 61,106.01 I c7,903\n255,99 1,,:,.\nA:\" 0,17% 4,066,847.36 7,018,244.31 176,872,788.69[ ~,~, .. 8.37%1 0-2 - $70,405,537.89 $2,321,799.97   $1,599,2071 00 $341,990.58 BUILDING FUND $1,676,206:00 $0.00 FEDERALF.UND $9,635,909.95 $90,651.65 118,465.99 FQQf::SJ ERVICE FUND $2,942,736.00 $181,396.54 2161584.14 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $86,259,596.84 $2,935,838.74 $4,112,558.42 -3 North Little Rock School District FUNCTION-' AUGUST2 005 2005-2006 %of Current Month Budget Function Category Budget Actual Y-T-D Actual Budget Balance Balance 11XX Regular Programs-Elem/Sec $27,427,290.72 $683,729.22 756,530.46 $26,670,760.26 2.76% 12XX Special Education $9,477,206.00 $67,428.35 68,892.39 $9,408,313.61 0.73% 13XX Workforce Education $2,077,304.00 $93,945.07 98,912.11 $1,978,391.89. 4.76% 15XX Compensatory Education $3,857,957.00 $184.62 184.62 $3,857,772.38 0.00% 19XX Other Instructional $3,200,050.51 $51,928.99 $70,198.15 $3,129,852.36 2.19% 21XX Support Services-Students $7, 141,053.00 $171,600.41 192,678.21 $6,948,374.79 2.70% 22XX Suport Services-Instruction $5,587,492.92 $234,841.74 292,846.02 $5,294,646.90 .5.24% 23XX Suooort Services-Administration $1,092,984.39 $62,973.02 125,456.33 $967,528.06 11.48% 24XX Suooort Services-Sch Admin $4,337,794.80 $287,589.14 361,152.91 $3,976,641.89 8.33% 25XX Suooort Services-Business $673,014.00 $52,466.49 103,373.98 $569,640.02 15,36% 26XX ti \u0026amp; 0 Plant Services $6,521,692.50 $562,682.64 1,195,845.16 $5,325,847.34 18.34% 27XX Puoil Transportation $4,141\n782.00 $366,209.22 434,686.61 $3,707,095:39 .10.50% 28XX Suooort Services-Central $1,494,281.00 $85,326.16 155,768.84 $1,338,512.16 10.42% 29XX Other Support Services $456,555.00 $1,934.68 $1,934.68 $454,620.32 0.42% 31XX Food Services $3,615,511.00 $205,222.94 242,646.99 $3,372,864.01  6.71% 33XX Community Service Operations $71,841.00 $127.20 1,058.67 $70,782.33 1.47% 34XX Other Non-Instr Services $68,243.00 $4,834.75 4,834.75 $63\n408.25 7:08% 46XX Bldq Acq/Constr Services $45,500.00 $0.00 0.00 $45,500.00 0.00% 47XX Buildini:i Improvements $1,676,206.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,676,206.00  0.00% 51XX LEA Indebtedness $1,889,564.00 $2,743.44 5,486.88 $1,884\n077.12. 0.29%  53XX Pavment to other LEA .:$1 \\270,000.00 $0.00 0.00  $1\n210,000.00 0.00% 55XX Indirect Cost/Admin Chari:ies $136,274.00 $70.66 70.66 $136,203.34 0.05% GRAND TOTAL ,$86,-259\n596.84 $2,935,838.74 4,112,558.42 , $82,147,038.42 .'. 4\n77% 0-4 - North Little Rock School District SOURCEO F FUNDS- AUGUST2 005 2005-2006 %of Current Morith Budget Source of Funds CateQorv Budget. Actual Y-T-D Actual Budget Balance Balance 000 Non-cateQorical $67,849,075.08 $2,585,853:75 3,637,271.70 $64,211,803.38 5.36%\n020 Alternative-Local $7,047.00 $0.00 0.00 $7,047.00 0.00% 045 Summer School $58,375.00 $3,298.58 26,651.51 $31,723.49 45.66% 050 Camp Robinson Work PQm $44,000:00 $1,315.50 2,255.95 $41,744.051 5.13% 053 Gff Summer Quest $535.00 $0.00 $0.00 $535.00 0.00% 055 Soft Drink Sales $207,352.31 $2,022.39 2,022.39 $205,329.92 0.98% 083 Ark Heritage/Wildwood $640:00 $640.00 640.00 $0.00\n100.00% 090 Yale 21st Century $25,000.00 $0.00 0.00 $25,000.00 0:00% 095 ADE Gates Grant $4,283.15 $0.00 0.00. $4,283i15 . 0.00% 213 Intensive School Improvement $9,000.00 $0.00 0.00 $9,000.00 ., 0:00% 223 Prof Development Act 59 $521,961.22 $65,475.90 84,317.35 $437,643\n87\n16.1'5% 225 TechnoloQY Grant $1,724.00 $0.00 0.00, $1\n724.00 '': 0.00% 227 CPEP $71 7, 10,00 $9,207.54 18,358.69 . . $53\n351,3f \\25:60% 245 Pathwise Mentoring $63,969.00 $2,855.10 $3,094.92 $60\n874.08\n'  4:84o/d 250 Act 591 Residential $73\n000.00 $0.00 0.00 ,'\n, . $73,000.00 { 0:00% 260 Early Childhood Sp Ed $729,627.00 $25,684.42 33,670.40 , .. $695',956.60\n4\n61%' 271 GIT Advance Placement $4,000:18 $0.00 0.00 /'''  .$4',000.78  ... o.OO% 275 Alternative Learning Environmer $1,290,745.oo $14,718.98 22,726.28 $1,268,018:72 Y' -, 1.76%' 276 English Lang Learners $68,973.00 $3,119.20 $3,119.20 ,' $65\n853:80 -\n. :.''4:52% 281 NSLA $2,710,070.00 $37,252.32 43,427.56 $2\n666\n642.'44 ,\" 1:60% 340 Workforce Start-up . $28,090.00 $577.65 577.65 '$27\n512.35\n2.06%' 365 ABC Preschool $2,198,770.08 $16,197.28 16,197.28 $2, 182\n572.80  0.74% 381 Smart Start Literacy $80,619.00 $5,881.97 10,189.77  $70,42923 \n' 12:64% 392 General Facility Funding $564,409.00 $70,846.51 89,331.78 $475,077.22  15.83/d 398 OHS Preschool Improvement $10,711.27 $240,00 240.00 .$10,471.27 ' 224:i/o' 430 ROTC $120,000.00 $7,089.00 7,089.00  $.H 2,911.00 .:5:9.l% 441 Title IV-8 21st Century $242\n547.76 $8,674.84 17,695.08   $224,852.68 .\n-\":-7.30% 501 Title I-Reg Comp Ed $4,490,638.39 $13,914,35 19,839.84 $4,470,798,55 . , 0.44,% -5 North Llttle Rock School District SOURCEO F FUNDS AUGUST2 005 2005-2006 Current Month Source of Funds Category Budget Actual Y-T-D Actual 504 Title I Prooram Improvement $0.00 $123.64 $123.64 520 Title V-A Innovative Program $344,251.00 $0.00 0 523 Title I Reading First I $234,444.00 $0.00 0 530 Homeless-Stewart McKinney $19,209.00 $2,063.74 2094.84 535 Title V-B Charter Schools $131,053.54 $0.00 0 570 Carl Perkins Vocational $196,114.00 $1,977.24 6944.28 595 Title 11-DE d Technology $61,493.95 $0.00 0 702 Title VI-B PL 94-142 $1\n780,741.00 $8,641.95 8641.95 703 Title VI-B Head Start $89,910.00 $2,606.34 2606.34 .7 10 Sp Ed Preschool Sec 619 $823,280.00 $13,123.88 13123.88 720 Title VI-B Sliver Grant $99,254.00 $0.00 0 750 Medicaid $288,382.00 $4,030.32 4574.91 751 Medicaid Sp Ed Preschool l  $60,000.00 $202.07 202.07 756 Title II-A Improve Teachinci $534,343.31 $21,239.72 26815.6 761 Title Ill Enci Lanci Acaui $11,662.00 $419.98 419.98 781 Title IV-A Drug Ed . $73,586.00 $6,496.78 8246.78 796 Workforce Investment Act \\$35,000.00 $47.80 47.8 GRAND TOTAL ,$86,259,'596.84 $2,935,838.74 4,112,558.42 0-6 - %of Budget Budget Balance Balance -$123.64 $344,251.00 0.00% $234,444.00 0.00% $17,114.16 10.91% $131,053.54 0.00% $189,169.72 3.54% $6,1,493.95 0.00% $1,772,099.05 0.49% $87,303.66 2.90% $810,156.12 1.59% $99,254.00 0.00% $283,807.09 1.59% $59,797.93 0.34% $507,527.71 5.02% $11',242.02 3.60% $65,339.22 11.21% $34,952.20 0.14% $82,147,038.42 4.77% Funds Fund# Operating 1,2,4 Capital Outlay 5 BuildinQ (3) 3 Federal (6) 6 Food Service (8) 8 Total North Little Rock School District AUGUST2 005 2005-2006 Revenue Expenditures Beg-Balance** Budget Actual Budget Actual $10,174,964.45 $71,144,418.00 $6,846,116.44 $70,405,537.89 $3,431,846.47 $403,274.91 $1,523,253.00 $37,929.54 $1,599,207.00 $345,661.82 $3,803,940.28 $46,000.00 $6,200.00 $1,676,206.00 $0.00 $2,299,083.88 $7,964,362.00 $61,106.01 $9,635,909.95 $118,465.99 $232,059.83 $3,213,000.00 $66,892.32 $2,942,736.00 $216,584.14 $16,913,323.35 $83,891,033.00 $7,018,244.31 $86,259,596.84 $4,112,558.42 ** Unaudited Beginning Balances -7 Projected Ending-Balance $10,913,844.56 $327,320.91 $2,173,734.28 $627,535.93 $502\n323.83 $14,544,759.51 ' - : $80,000,000.00 $70,000,000.00  $60,000,000.00 $50,000,000.00 $40,00u,o'oo.oo $30,000,000.00 $20,000,000.00 $10,000,000.00 $0.00 1,2,4 5 05-06 EXPENDITURES 3 FUNDS 0-8 - 6 8 !!I Budget  Actual NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PERSONNEL OFFICE Board Agenda- September 15, 2005 CERTIFIED PESONNEL RESIGNATIONS AND RETIREMENTS Stephanie Fletcher David Baca Cynthia Bell Allison Callahan Thad Cochran Kathy Hale Allison Ashcraft Amber Baker Elizabeth Hart Nola Hubble Kendrick Rojay Moore Julie Parrish Belwood Elementary- Special Education Effective 8-16-05 CERTIFIED PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND CHANGES From Indian Hills Elementary- Fifth Grade To Poplar Street Middle Street- Math/Science From Extended Medical Leave To Argenta- Academy Alternative Learning From Tri-District- Speech Pathologist 1.0 To Tri-District- Speech Pathologist .60 From Argenta Academy- Instructional Aide To Argenta Academy- Computer Engineering Teacher From Poplar Street Middle/Ridgeroad Middle Charter- Band To Indian Hills/ Meadow Park- Elementary Guidance NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL Poplar Street Middle School- Language Arts/Science Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 2, 190 days Amboy Elementary- First Grade Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 0, 190 days NLRHS East Campus- Physical Therapist Effective 8-15-05, Category IV, Step 8, 190 days .60 FTE Boone Park Elementary- Math Coach Effective 9-6-05, Category II, Step 16, 190 days Ridgeroad Middle Charter School- Band Director Effective 8-25-05, Category I, Step 0, 195 days Boone Park Elementary- Fifth Grade Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 0, 190 days P-1 Betty Powell Sarah Robbins Jane Tillery Don Willis North Little Rock School District Board Agenda - September 15, 2005 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL CONTINUED NLRHS West Campus- French III/French IV Effective 8-22-05, Category III, Step 15, 190 days, .38 FIE Park Hill Elementary- First Grade Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 2, 190 days Pike View Elementary- Math Coach Effective 9-6-05, Category V, Step 19, 190 days Ridgeroad Middle School- Science Effective 8-15-05, Category I, Step 0, 190 days NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: Allison Ashcraft Poplar Street Middle School- Language Arts/Science BA- University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, ARMay-01 Middle School Language Arts/Social Studies Middles School Science/Math Standard 5 Year License PCSSD, Little Rock, AR August-03 to May-0- Bill Bowers, Principal Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services Amber Baker Amboy Elementary- First Grade BS- Texas A \u0026amp; M, Commerce, TX May-05 Early Childhood Education Reciprocity Pending-Texas License Greenville School District, Greenville, TX August 04 to May 05 Jann Pharo, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services Elizabeth Hart NLRHS East Campus- Physical Therapist .60 FIE MS- University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR December-97 BA-Arkansas Tech University, Russellville, AR May-92 State Licensed for Physical Therapy NLRSD, NLR, AR (Private Contract) September-00 to May-05 Martha Kay Asti, Director of Special Services  Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Servi\u0026lt;9 P-2 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda- September 15, 2005 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: Nola Hubble Boone Park Elementary, Math Coach BSE- Arkansas State University, Russellville, AR May-71 Elementary 1-6 Standard 6 year license Bryant School District, Bryant, AR Greene County Tech, Paragould, AR Mavis Cherry, Principal August-89 to June-91 August-71 to June-85 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services Kendrick Rojay Moore Ridgeroad Middle Charter School- Band Director BA- University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA December-04 Non-Traditional Licensure Program - Acceptance Pending None Dana Chadwick, Principal June Haynie, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services Betty Powell NLRHS West Campus, French III/ French IV .38 FTE BA- University of Mississippi, University, MS June-69 French 7-12 Standard 6 year license NLRSD, North Little Rock, AR August-98 to June-02 Gregg Thompson, Prinicpal Danny Reed, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services Julie Parrish Boone Park Elementary- Fifth Grade BSE- Clarion University, Clarion, PA May-05 Early Childhood Education Reciprocity Pending - Pennsylvania License Mary Wilson Elementary, Punxsautawney, PA Jan-05 to March 05 Paint \u0026amp; Play Pre-School, Dubois, PA March 05 to June 05 Mavis Cherry, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services P-3 North Little Rock School District Board Agenda-September 15, 2005 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: Sarah Robbins Park Hill Elementary- First Grade BSE- Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN Early Childhood Education May-02 Middle Level Language Arts/Social Studies Middle Level Science/Math Standard 5 Year ticense Child Development Center, Jacksonville, AR May-04 to July-05 August-03 to May-04 September-02 to May-03 PCSSD, Little Rock, AR Sullivan School District, Sullivan, IL Barbara Hartwick, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services Jane Tillery Pike View Elementary, Math Coach BSE- Central State University of Oklahoma, Edmond, OK July-81 MED- Central State University of Oklahoma, Edmond, OK July-89 Bldg. Admin P-8\nEarly Childhood Ed P-4\nMiddle Childhood Language Arts/Social Studies 4-8\nMiddle Childhood Science Math 4-8\nStandard 5 year license A St. Patrick Catholic School, North Little Rock, AR July-00 to Ju1'11'3 Mid-Del Schools, Midwest City, OK August-84 to June-00 Peggs Elementary/Intermediate, Peggs, OK August-83 to May-84 Diane Crites, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director for Elementary Education Danny Reed, Administrative Director of Personnel/Special Services Don Willis Ridgeroad Middle Charter School- Science BA- Ouachita Baptist University, Arkadelphia, AR Middle School Language Arts/Social Studies Middle School Math/Science Non-Traditional Licensure Progr\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1051","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2005-08"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Curricula","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1051"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nI. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL C :cza w ~ u-, c:::, Q: \u0026gt; c:::, u..c::z\u0026gt;: c-..... O::::E - 0 ~~ w ....... C\\l !\n~ -~ 0 ci... ffi ~ w UJ a: Cl) ffi -~ a: ~ Cl Q C) ~ ~ ~ C/lu ~ ~ ts ~ ~ ~ -..J 11. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOME TO GUESTS .~s ~ ~ ... ~ ~u g) -~ Q 'ci ~ ~ CXl Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. PARTNERS IN EDUCATION C. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS D. LR C.T .A. I. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS September 22, 2005 5:30 p.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A Administration of the Oath of Office, Newly Elected Board Members Zone 1 and Zone 5 B. Call to Order C. Roll Call II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A Welcome to Guests 111. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A Superintendent's Citations B. Partners in Education - New Partnerships - Fulbright Elementary School and Coldwell Banker Advantage Realty - Gibbs Magnet Elementary School and Twin City Bank - Broadway - Otter Creek Elementary School and Edward Jones Investments of Otter Creek C. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) D. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Update G. Update: Textbook Allocations 0  'O ~~ -\u0026lt;- Oil: oz ~~ m-\u0026lt;\no..,\n- oCz: o,.. n-\u0026lt; ,.. i5 oz ,,\u0026gt;.... \"' ?' 'O\nz ~ z m g n ~ iz5 Regular Board Meeting September 22, 2005 Page2 V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Election of Officers B. Minutes Regular Meeting - 08-25-05 Special Meeting- 08-31-05 Special Meeting - 09-08-05 VI. EDUCATIONAL SERVICES A. Special Education: Focus Group Recommendations VII. SCHOOL SERVICES A. Cloverdale Elementary School @ Badgett Student Reassignment Plan VIII. HUMAN RESOURCES A. First Reading: Policy GBK - Staff Concerns, Complaints and Grievances, with Regulations GBK-R B. Personnel Changes IX. FINANCE \u0026amp; SUPPORT SERVICES A. Rightsell Elementary School B. Land Use Agreement: LRSD / LR Boys \u0026amp; Girls Club C. Donations of Property D. Financial Report X. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions XI. STUDENT HEARING XII. ADJOURNMENT 0 \u0026gt;\n-\n,0o ~~ -\u0026lt;- Oil: oz el~ m-\u0026lt;\n,o.., -c:\n,oz o.....o... r-o oz ~ en\n,o \u0026gt;m (I) c3 C:\n,o ~ .... 0~ ~ m .\u0026gt;... oo oC\u0026gt; zZ en~ 0z en 0\n,o m 0 ~\n,o r-\n,\u0026lt;\n,::, VJ 0\"T1 =--~ :,.i,i.,: :. ~ VJ I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOME TO GUESTS Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. PARTNERS IN EDUCATION C. REMARKS FROM Cl\"TIZENS D. LR C.T .A. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: September 22, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Partners in Education BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District Partners in Education program is designed to develop strong relationships between the community and our schools. The partnership process encourages businesses, community agencies and private organizations to join with individual schools to enhance and support educational programs. Each partnership utilizes the resources of both the school and the business for their mutual benefit. RATIONALE: The following schools and businesses have completed the requirements necessary to establish a partnership and are actively working together to accomplish their objectives. FUNDING: Not applicable. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the board approve the following partnerships: Fulbright Elementary School and Coldwell Banker Advantage Realty Gibbs Magnet Elementary School and Twin City Bank-Broadway Otter Creek Elementary School and Edward Jones Investments of Otter Creek PREPARED BY: Debbie Milam, ViPS Coordinator !\" .z... m ~ 'ff! ~ 0 ::::i 0 :,\n, u, ~ ~ ~ Partnership Proposal Coldwell Banker Advantage Realty and Fulbright Elementary School Coldwell Banker Advantage Realty commits to the following partnership activities:  Develop volunteer opportunities for agents  Support the Spring Supper and sil~nt auction  Provide information on public school options to clients  Host a teacher appreciation luncheon or dinner  Provide Russell the mascot on first day of school  Provide career day speaker(s)  Drop school/district information into ad header  Take photos with Russell as a fundraiser Fulbright Elementary School commits to the following partnership activities:  Provide student artwork for display in Coldwell Banker's reception area  Provide the joy choir to perform at special events  Acknowledge Coldwell Banker as a Partner in Education  Invite Coldwell Banker to school events Partnership Proposal Twin City Bank-Broadway and Gibbs Elementary School Twin City Bank-Broadway commits to the following partnership activities:  Sponsor Red Ribbon Week.  Count change collected through fundraisers.  Arrange for penny, Nick and Buck to make appearances at school functions.  Recruit employees to read to the students and listen to the students read.  Job shadowing.  Provide speakers for topics such as economics, saving money, etc.  Provide other assistance when needed. Gibbs Elementary commits to the following partnership activities:  Provide artwork for display in the bank's lobby  Provide choir to perform on holidays and special occasions.  Acknowledge Twin City Bank-Broadway Branch as a Partner in Education.  Invite the bank to school events.  Work with the bank on community service projects. !\"' \"m' c~  \"' r-\n,:\n,au, n-.. :'-,'.\"i' n :::\n,:\nm % (J) PARTNER-IN-EDUCATION CONTRACT EDWARD JONES INVESTMENTS OF OTTER CREEK ' AND OTTERCREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Otter Creek Elementary School, along with its staff and students, are pleased to enter into a partnership with the Edward Jones Company. As part of our willingness to become involved, all parties commit to the following activities: Edward Jones Company:  Will host a \"Staff Appreciation Lunch\" once a quarter.  WilJ provide a guest speaker for Career Day.  Will provide volunteers to assist students as tutors/mentors.  Will assist with other activities/projects at Otter Creek as needed and when possible.  Will encourage other community organizations and businesses to become active participants in volunteer activities at Otter Creek. Otter Creek Elementary:  Will provide students' artwork for display in the Edward Jones' office.  WilJ provide seasonal choir performances for the Edward Jones' office.  Will acknowledge our Partner's participation through our newsletters and school programs throughout the school year. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: September 22, 2005 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: September 2005 Construction Report - Bond Projects BACKGROUND: As you know, the Bond construction program started during the summer of 2000. Most of the construction projects shown on the Bond Project List have been completed or the money has been obligated. Eighty-eight percent (88%) of the Bond money for construction has been spent or obligated, leaving a total of $15,300,000 available to do the remaining projects originally approved with the 2000 millage election, including the new West Little Rock School. We will keep you apprised of future decisions that will become necessary as we move through the final phase of construction. RATIONALE: Monthly reports are submitted to the Board to keep members up-to-date on construction projects in the District. FUNDING: Bond Funds RECOMMENDATION: Report item\nno action necessary. PREPARED BY: Bill Goodman, District Engineer !I' !I: z C...:. m en :\" .... m (\") :%: z\nC: -0 0 ?\nm Facility Name Carver Gibbs Henderson Meadowcliff CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD SEPTEMBER 22, 2005 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Project Description Cost Media Center Expansion $167,490 Addition I $705,670 Skylight Replacement $319,ooo I Remodel $365,600 t:.st. c.\nompIet1on Date Dec-05 --- Dec-05 Nov-05 Sep-05 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - FALL 2005 Est. completIon Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Central Media Roof $85,000 Unknown Cloverdale Elementary Demolition $520,750 I Nov-05 J. A. Fair 1Sewer Line $82,900 Nov-05 Rightsell I Renovation $2,494,000 Unknown Williams Drainage Repair I $29,200 Dec-05 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED t:.st. 1_\nompIeuon Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Booker Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown Brady Metal Roof $250,000 Unknown Chicot Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown Child Nutrition Renovation $6,500 Unk-no-wn Forest Heights Remodel $1 ,547,000 Unknow-n Mabelvale Elem. I Site Work $6,000 Unknown Mitchell Renovation $2,212,493 I Unknown -- Pulaski Hqts. MS Energy monitoring system installation Unknown Unknown BOND PROJECTS NOT YET STARTED c:si. 1.,ompIetIon Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Administration Annex ADA Adaptations $32,351 Unknown I Electrical Upgrade I $9,166 1 Unknown --- --- Adult Education ADA Adaptations $248,020 . Un-kno-wn Structural Repairs I $53,918 Unknown -- Alternative Learning Center ADA Adaptations $43,134 Unknown Electrical Upgrade -- $2,696 I Unknown Roof Repairs ~ $26,959 Unknown -- Restroom Renovation $37,742 Unknown Booker ADA Adaptations $107,835 Spring 2006 -- Cashion Building !ADA Adaptations $21 ,5~ Unknown : Restroom Renovation -- Dodd $26,959 . Unknown --- Facility Services_ _ ADA Adaptations $32,351 Unknown -- -- Install Water Meters at Cooling Towers $4,313 Unknown ~ Emergency Lighting Replacement $80,876 Unknown -- -- - -- Land Purchase - Booker $100,000 Unknown -- -- - Fulbright - - Renovate Restrooms $10,784 Unknown ADA Adaptations $21 ,567 Unknown -  Renovation --- - Garland -- -- $900,000 Partially Complete ADA Adaptations $188,711 Unknown ---- Geyer Springs ~R eplace Restroom Stalls $4,313 - Unknown -- .. ___A DA Adaptations $21 ,567 Unknown -- ~ Henderson Renovation $450,000 Summer 2006 - --- - A DA Adaptations - $70,093- Unknown - -- -- IRC - ADA Adaptations - $21 ,567 Unknown ~ - Restroom Renovation $21,567 Unknown - - - McDermott Restroom Renovation $32,350 Unknown -- - - ~ Quigley - Restroom Upgrades $53,918 Unknown Dressing Room Renovation $37,742 Unknown ----- --------- -- Facility Name Rockefeller Transportation - Laidlaw West Little Rock School CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD SEPTEMBER 22, 2005 BOND PROJECTS NOT YET STARTED Project Description I Cost I ADA Adaptations $26,959 I Interior Renovation I $16,175 I ADA Adaptations I $32,351 I New School $11,782,638 I BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Project Description I Cost I Administration Asbestos abatement $380,495 Administration I Fresh air system $55,000 Administration 1Fire alarm $32,350 I Administration HVAC $70,000 I Administration Annex Energy monitoring system installation ~lternative Learning Ctr. Energy monitoring system installation - $15,160 I Alternative Learning Ctr. I Energy efficient lighting $82,000 Badgett 'Partial asbestos abatement $237,237 I Fire alarm - Badgett $18,250 Bale\nClassroom addition/renovation I $2,244,524 I Bale Energy monitoring system I Bale Partial roof replacement I - $269,587 Bale IHVAC $664,587 Baseline Renovation $953,520 Booker Gym Roof $48,525 Booker ADA Rest rooms $25,000 I Energy efficient lighting -+-- Booker $170,295 Booker Energy monitoring system installation $23,710 I Booker Asbestos abatement -- $10,900 - Booker Fire alarm $34,501 - ---- -~ I - Brady Addition/renovation I $973,621 Brady 1Energy efficient lighting $80,593 Brady Asbestos abatement $345,072 Carver Energy monitoring system installation $14,480 I Central Renovation - Interior $10,200,266  Carver Parking lot $111,742 Central HVAC Renovation - Band Area $225,000 Central Reflecting Pond $57,561 -- Student parking --- -- Central Parking -L $174,000 I Central/Quigley -- I stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair -+--- $265,000 Central/Quigley -- Athletic Field Improvement _j__ $38,000 Central/Quigley - Irrigation System --- --l-- $14,500 Central Purchase land for school __...._ Unknown Central - Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations $2,000,000 Ceiling and wall repair Central - ~.ooo - - Central Fire Alarm System Design/Installation ~-- $80,876 Central Front landing tile repair $22,470 -.-Drainage - Chicot $64,700 -- - Chicot - Sound Attenuation - $43,134 ~ Cloverdale Elem. Energy efficient lighting $132,678 -- - - Cloverdale MS Energy efficient lighting - - $189,743 Cloverdale MS Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $1,393,822 . Est. Completion Date Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Est. Completion Date Mar-03 Aug-03 Aug-03 Nov-04 May-02 Oct-01 Dec-01 - - Jul-01 -- Aug-02 Dec-02 Mar-02 Dec-01 Aug-01 - Aug-04 Oct-04 --- ~-04 Apr-0_!_ Oct-01 Feb-02 --- - - M-a-r-02 Nov-04 -- Sep-02 Aug-02 May-01 - - - Sep-05 Aug-03 Dec-04 -- Sep-04 Aug-03 Aug-03 Aug-03 Aug-03 Dec-02 - Dec-02 - - - Oct-01 - Aug-01 Aug-01 Aug-04 Jul-04 Jul-01 Jul-01 - - Nov-02 Dodd - Fire Alarm Upgrade ---,- $9,200 - Oct-04 Energy efficient lighting - $90,665 - - - Dodd Aug-01 2 !IJ E z C: m-\u0026lt; \"' :\"' -\u0026lt; ~ ::c % 0  C...,: 0 ~ m CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD SEPTEMBER 22, 2005 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED I I Est. Completion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Dodd Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile $156,299 Jul-01 Dodd I Replace roof top HVAC I $215,570 Aug-02 Dunbar Renovation/addition $6,149,023 Nov-04 Facilities Service 1 Interior renovation $84,672 Mar-01 Facility Services ,Fire alarm $12,000 Aug-03 Fair Park I Remodel $799,000 Aug-05 Fair Park Parking Lot $185,000 . Aug-05 ---- Fair Park I Roof $245,784 I May-05 Fair Park I HVAC renovation/fire alarm $315,956 '. Apr-02 Fair Park I Energy efficient lighting $90,162 Aug-01 Fair Park I Asbestos abatement-ceiling I $59,310 I Aug-01 J. A. Fair 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music 1 room addition $3,155,640 Aug~04 J. A. Fair 'Energy efficient lighting $277,594 Apr-01 J. A. Fair Press box $10,784 Nov-00 J. A. Fair Security cameras I $12,5oc5'T-- Jun-01 J. A. Fair Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 Jul-03 J. A. Fair Irrigation System _L_ $14,000 Jul-03 J. A.' Fair I Roof repairs I $391,871i Aug-03 Forest Park I Restrooms $152,881 Aug-05 -- Forest Park  Replace window units w/central HVAC $485,258 Nov-03 -- ----- Forest Park - J Diagonal parking j_ ~.742 I __ Aug-03 Forest Park Energy efficient lighting $119,788 May-01 Fulbright Energy efficient lighting - r- $134,463 -- Jun-01 Fulbright IE nergy monitoring system installation $11,9~ -- i= Aug-01 Fulbright Replace roof top HVAC units $107,835 -- Aug-02 Fulbrig_l2_!__ _ Parking lot $140,000 Sep-02 --Roof repairs -1-- -- Fulbright - - $200,000 Oct-02 1 Renovation I $2,511,736 1 -- -- Franklin Mar-03 -- -- - - Geyer Springs . Roof Repair $161,752 1 Jun-04 -- j Energy efficient light~ I Gibbs $76,447 Apr-01 -- -- ---'--- Gibbs Energy monitoring system installation $11 ,77'L__ Jul-01 Hall Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $8,637,709 Sep-03 -- - - Hall - Asbestos abatement - $168,222 Aug-01 Hall Energy efficient lighting $42,931 Jul-01 - - Hall Infrastructure improvements $93,657 Aug-01 - - ------ $296,7~ -- Hall - Energy efficient lighting I Apr-01 Hall Intercom Feb-01 - -- I -+-- - Hall - - Security cameras $10,600 Jun-01 ~---1- $43,854 -- Henderson Lockers Dec-04 ---- -- Henderson Energy efficient lighting I $193,679 Jul-01 - -- -- Henderson Roof replacement gym I $107,835 ------ May-01 Henderson Asbestos abatement Phase I $500~ -- Aug-01 Asbestos abatement Phase 2 - Henderson - $250,000- Aug-02 Energy efficient lighti~ + $109,136 - IRC Jul-02 Jefferson Asbestos abatemeiit T $43,639 - Oci-01 Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm - I $1,630,000 - - Jefferson Nov-02 - Parking lot -- -- - Laidlaw - - $269,588- Jul-01 -+ - Mablevale Elem Fire Alarm Upgrade $12,000 Oct-04 + Mabelvale Elem. Energy monitoring system installation $12,150 Aug-01 - - Mabelvale Elem. Replace HVAC units $300,000 Auq-02 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD SEPTEMBER 22, 2005 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Project Description I Cost Mabelvale Elem. Asbestos Abatement $107,000 Mabelvale Elem. I Energy efficient lighting I $106,598 I Mabelvale MS I Renovate bleachers i $134,793 Mabelvale MS Renovation I $6,851,621 Mann Partial Replacement $11,500,000 . Mann Asphalt walks The total $1.8 million Mann Walkway canopies ~ is what has been Mann Boiler replacement used so far on the Mann Fencing I projects listed Mann Partial demolition/portable classrooms 1completed for Mann. McClellan Parking Lot Overlay I $65,000 McClellan Athletic Field Improvement I $38,000 McClellan Irrigation System I $14,750 McClellan Security cameras I $36,300 McClellan -- I Energy efficient lighting I $303,614 McClellan Stadium stands repair I $235,000 I McClellan Intercom I $46,000 McClellan 'Classroom Addition I $2,155,622 McDermott Fire Alarm Upgrade I $7,700 McDermott Energy efficient lighting ! $79,411 McDermott Replace roof top HVAC units i $476,000 I Me-adowcliff Fire alarm +- $16,175 -Meado-wc-liff Asbestos abatement $253,412 M-eadowcliff IE ngergy efficient lighting I -_$88,297 1 Metropolitan Replace cooling tower I $37,203 Metropo~ 1 Replace shop vent system _ ~0.000 Metropolitan  Energy monitoring system installation I $17,145 Mitchell Building Remediation ---- ! $165,000 I Mitchell !Energy efficient lighting I $103,642 Mitchell Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 Mitchell Asbestos abatement $13,000 - Oakhurst (Adult Education) New Windows $215,000 Oakhurst HVAC renovation $237,237 Otter Creek Energy monitoring system installation $10,695 Otter Creek Energy efficient lighting -- $81,828 O-tter Creek -- Asbestos abatement $10,000 Otter Creek IP arking lot $138,029 I --+-- Otter Creek 6 classroom addition - $888,778 Otter Creek Parking Improvements $142,54-1 - -- -- -- ---- ~ Parkview Addition $2,121,226 -- - -- - -- Parkview HVAC controls $210,000 -- Parkview Roof replacement $273,877 - $10,784 - Parkview Exterior lights -- .. $301,938 - Parkview HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls -- Parkview Locker replacement $120,000 Energy efficient lighting -- ~ Parkview $315,000 Procurement Energy monitoring system installation --$5,290 -Fire alarm - - $25,000 - Procurement -- Pulaski Heights Elem/Middle - Cafeteria Ceiling $33,378  --- Pulaski HeiQhts Elem/Middle Replace Entry Doors $13,990 Est. Completion Date Aug-02 Dec-02 Aug-01 Mar-04 Apr-04 Dec-01 Dec-01 Oct-01 Sep-01 Aug-01 Apr-05 Jul-03 Jul-03 Jun-01 May-01 Aug-01 Feb-02 Jul-04 Sep-04 Feb-01 Aug-02 -Ju-l-01 Aug-02 Dec-02 - Dec-00 May-01 -~ Aug-01 Jul-04 Apr-01 Jul-01 - Jul-01 Aug-05 Aug-01 May-01 Apr-01 Aug-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Aug-03 Dec-04 Jun-02 Sep-01 Nov-00 Aug-01 Aug-01 Jun-01 Jun-02 Aug-03 Aug-05 AuQ-05 4 !D !I: z C: -m\u0026lt; Ul\nn -\u0026lt; ~ :x: % 0  .C.,: 0 ?. m CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD SEPTEMBER 22, 2005 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED I I Est. completion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Pulaski Heights Elementary Clean Exterior Walls $98,660 Sep-05 Pulaski Hgts. Elem 1 Renovation $1,193,259 I Nov-04 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground I $17,ooo I Dec-02 Pulaski Hgts. MS Renovation - I $3,755,041 I Nov-04 Rightsell Energy efficient lighting $84,898 Apr-01 Rockefeller 1 Energy efficient lighting $137,004  Mar-01 Rockefeller iR eplace roof top HVA C - I $539,175 I Aug~ Rockefeller IP arking addition I $111,742 I Aug-02 Romine ,Asbestos abatement $10,000 : Apr-02 --- Romine Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $3,534,675 Mar-03 Scott Field\nTrack Renovations I $289,056 May-05 SecurityrTransportation 1 Bus cameras I $22,500 Jun-01 Southwest 1 New Corridor Ceiling I $300,000 I Aug-05 Southwest Addition $2,000,000 Nov-04 Southwest Asbestos abatement $28,138 Aug-00 Southwest New roof $690,000 Oct-03 Southwest Energy efficient lighting $168,719 Jan-02 Southwest 1 Drainage / street widening $250,000 I Aug-03 Student Assignment 1Energy monitoring system installation I $4,830 I Aug-02 Student Assignment\nFire alarm I $9,ooo I Aug-03 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation I $275,000 : Dec-01 -- Tech Ctr/ Metro Renovation Addition/Renovation - Phase II I $3,679,000 Jun=64 -- Technology Upgrade Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data Nov-02 Energy efficient lig~ $73,850 -- - Terry - Feb-01 $83,4~ -- Terry Driveway \u0026amp; Parking - Aug-02 Terry Media Center add~ I $704,932 + Sep-02 Wakefield Rebuild - $5,300,000 Dec-04 Wakefield Security cameras --- $8,000 --- Jun-01 W-akefield Energy efficient lighting $74,776 Feb-01 I Demolition/Asbestos Abatement --+ - $200,oooT ------ Wakefield I Nov-02 I Fire Alarm Upgrade I - $11,600 -+- -- Washington Oct-04 --=- -- --l- -- Washington Security cameras $7,900 Jun-01 Washington Energy efficient lighting j__ $165,281- Apr-01 Watson Energy monitoring system installation I $8,5~ - Jul-01 --- -- I $182,24'1 -- Watson Asbestos abatement Aug-01 1 Energy efficient lighting - + Watson $106,868 Aug-01 Asbestos abateme_n_t -- - $10,00~ - Watson Aug-02 f- --- Major renovation \u0026amp; addition - Watson $800,000 Aug-02 -- - Western Hills Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC $622,160 Aug-05 -- - ~ Western Hills Fire Alarm Upgrade $8,400 Oct-04 --- -- - Western Hills ADA Rest rooms _,__ $25,000 Aug-04 f- -- Western Hills Asbestos abatement $191,946 Aug-02 -- -- - - Western Hills - Intercom -- - + $7,100 Dec-01 We-stern Hills Energy efficient light~ - J $106,000 Jul-01 Williams Renovation $2,106,492 Mar-04 - - - - - Williams Parking expansions $183,717 Dec-03 -- -- - - + Williams - Energy efficient lighting $122,719 Jun-01 + ~ Wilson HVAC for Cafeteria $56,000 Mar-05 -- - - Wilson Renovation/expansion $1,263,876 Feb-04 -- - Wilson Parking Expansion - - $110,000 + Aug-03 Woodruff Parking addition --- - - _._ $175,000 Aug-05 -- Woodruff _,_Renovation $246,419 Aug-02 5 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: September 22, 2005 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Board Auditor Report BACKGROUND: Monthly report to School Board. RATIONALE: Summary report of activities. FUNDING: No changes. RECOMMENDATION: None. PREPARED BY: Sandy Becker !I\"\nii:: z .C..: m U\u0026gt; \u0026gt;~ . m enO -,:, C mC\"l C\"l  :\n--\u0026lt; r-0 mZ o\u0026gt; C: ,- C\"l en \u0026gt;m .... :,0 0 ?i zm en :.n.. ~ :zr: 0 i C,,: 0 ?\nm Date: To: From: Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS September 22, 2005 Board of Directors Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Audit Report - September This is the seventy-first communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with two high schools, two middle school and two elementary schools to resolve financial issues in their activity and related funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. b) The AAB has forwarded a Booster Club Guidelines Package to be included in official publications of the District after review. Board Policy and Regulation a) The Out of District Travel regulation is being reviewed. b) The routing of Professional Leave and Travel Requests is being worked on to make the process more efficient and to prepare for the process being automated to improve documentation and provide information for decision making. Technology a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and Newspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff. Training a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of Nuts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. Provided training with the Arkansas PTA on financials controls and financial preventive maintenance. ----- -- - - Audit Report - September 2005 Page 2 of2 b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) c) d) e) f) g) h) a) b) c) d) e) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. Reviewing leave accountability system. Assisting schools to track and reconcile Teacher School Supply Funds. Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April I 7, 2005. Eleven schools participated. Sharefest is scheduled for October 29, 2005. Assisting LRSD PT A's in financial process training. Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1 I 15. My e-mail is sandy.beckcr@lrsd.org. !XI I: z c:: -m\u0026lt; en ~ . m e-n., co:: mn n  \u0026gt;= r-0 mZ oc:: \u0026gt;,- n en  m -\u0026lt;\nIJ (5$ zn m \"' DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 September 22, 2005 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools Special Education In November of 2004, a group of special education instructors, representing the interests of Little Rock School District special education teachers, brought to the Board a series of concerns regarding special education issues and the delivery of instructional services to LRSD students with special needs. At the Board's direction, a special task force was formed which included the Associate Superintendent for Educational Services, Jhe Special Education Director and Staff, the CT A Executive Director and President, and a representative sample of special education teachers. The task force began monthly meetings in December of 2004 and examined the needs of special education students through the following topics:  Professional Development  Instructional Materials  Communication  Technology  Compliance  Working Conditions RATIONALE: From the outset, the goal of the task force was to develop ways of improving services to special needs students. The task force found that by modifying a number of practices currently in place and by instituting others, the concerns brought to the Board on behalf of the special needs students could be dramatically reduced and the special needs student could be better served. The task force recommendations are detailed in the accompanying report. FUNDING: Funds generated as a result of the reorganization of the District along with federal entitlement dollars will be allocated to support the implementation of the recommendations. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board approve the task force report. PREPARED BY: Barbara Barnes, Dr. Olivine Roberts, and Special Education Focus Group Representatives ?l \"ti m\n,:, ~ z z ,m... n ::c ~ C\u0026gt; m V, ?\u0026lt; ?\u0026gt; i :,:,\u0026gt; ci ~ :cm .... po ~~ ,--c m c3 ,...\n,:, ~ .... m v, zm -\u0026lt;\n,:, ~s -\u0026lt; ~ V, \u0026gt; z C C: V, m ~ ~ m l!l\n.z.. . -- Department of Exceptional Children - CT A Focus Group Recommendations !Professional Development 1. Coordinate and facilitate an August professional development activity for new teachers regarding portfolio regulations and pacing. 2. Provide joint training for paraprofessionals and assigned teachers. 3. Create a joint committee of teachers and DEC staff to address training needs and to design a system for assessing the need for and the implementation of professional development. 4. Offer appropriate professional development for general education and special education teachers, plus administrators. I Instructional Materials 1. Provide a catalog of instructional materials and resources available through the DEC. 2. Where appropriate, special education teachers will receive the same books and instructional materials as regular education teachers. 3. Provide supplemental materials/supplies as indicated by the IEP team, in a timely manner. I Communication 1. Create a quarterly DEC newsletter (hard copy or email) to address issues, identify needed information, and include a calendar of upcoming events (i.e. ADE Special Show, annual review meetings, etc.) 2. Create a school calendar to show what is required from staff for that school year. 3. Notify the administrator/teacher of a student returning to his/her zone school in a timely manner to ensure a smooth transition for the student and staff. 4. Provide teachers with all the necessary paperwork, specialized equipment, and professional development before a student is placed in their classroom, when possible. 5. Provide monthly opportunities for special education staff to meet before or after school without pay. 6. Develop a listserv for teachers/staff to use to communicate with each other. I Technology 1. Create a DEC website by the end of the 2006-2007 school year. 2. Provide district-wide professional development for special needs technology. 3. Provide modifications of existing management system for Grade Quick or Ed Line for special education. 4. Assure that special education teachers have computer work stations with Internet access in their classrooms. 5. Provide updated technology as necessary. 6. Develop a district level assistive technology committee (special education teacher, SLP, OT/PT, etc.) to address assessment needs for technology. I Compliance 1. Create an e-file for the district required DEC forms. The district required forms could be completed electronically and forwarded to DEC. 2. Collaborate with Technology Department in the creation of program that allows for forms to be completed electronically. 3. Provide a two-week notice of deadlines for reports by the DEC, except when ADE provides shorter notice. 4. Review all district forms for redundant and unnecessary information. 5. Hold every special education teacher accountable for the accuracy of his/her due process folders. 6. Create a more efficient way of tracking students' due process folders from school to school. (NOTE: No LRSD staff shall remove a due process folder without signing out in the area where all due process files are located.) 7. Reconstruction of a missing due process folder will occur within fifteen days by the IEP team and DEC. 8. Review mental health services and supports for students in order to ensure appropriate placement. 9. Provide a pacing document and guidelines aligned with the curriculum for portfolio completion. 10. Establish a district wide protocol for better distribution of IEP's in order to improve the scheduling of special education students prior to the end of each school year. 11 . Teachers will provide their principals with an itinerary for students in CBI classes prior to leaving the school. 12. Review all classroom facilities, storage, and accessibility needs to ensure compliance with state and federal mandated guidelines. 13. Purchase current Special Education Automation Software (SEAS) program for each special education staff. 14. The school team (principal, teachers, counselors, and other appropriate personnel) will place students in the self-contained classroom at the building level. I Working Conditions 1. Paraprofessionals assigned to special education assist in special education services only. (Paraprofessionals should not be pulled from their regularly assigned duties\nparaprofessionals assigned to one student should be pulled only in the event of the absence of their assigned student - assigned to special education only.) 2. Investigate the possibility of instituting differential pay/increase for paraprofessionals. 3. Develop a paraprofessional sub pool to serve in special education classes. 4. Conduct a feasibility study by the end of the 2006-2007 school year to determine the need for more self-contained classrooms and to address transportation issues with the CBI program. 5. Use District vehicles for fieldtrips and other outings. 6. Ensure new teachers receive start-up equipment and materials. 7. Redefine the role and job description of special education department chairs. 2 C')V, ,-n O:J: ~8 :,o,Ov, \u0026gt;m r\n~ mr\n,-m ~V\u0026gt; .!J,,l m :,0 ~ z z ,m... n :J: \u0026gt;z C') m V\u0026gt; !Jl \u0026gt; z 0 C V\u0026gt; m \u0026gt; C') ~ m E m .z... . 8. Provide teachers with one release day per semester to work on portfolios and/or annual reviews. These days must be used prior to March. 9. Ensure a duty free lunch and preparation period for special education teachers, as outlined in the PN Agreement. I Additional Recommendations 1. Engage teachers in the District's review of the ALC program. 2. Increase involvement of District in state and national activities regarding Special Education. 3. School-level Special Education departments will periodically review class options for special education students. 3 DATE: TO: FROM: September 22, 2005 Board of Directors LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Cloverdale Elementary School at Badgett Student Reassignment Plan BACKGROUND: Cloverdale Elementary School, built in 1959, was transferred by court order from the Pulaski County Special School District to the Little Rock School District during the 1987- 1988 school year. The school is single-story and shares a campus with Cloverdale Middle School. The elementary school was built on land considered poor for construction. The combination of the soil and techniques used in construction caused the structural beams supporting the school's floor to erode. A structural study completed in 2004 determined that structural failure is occurring and that the building is slowly sinking. In the spring of 2005, the Board approved plans to relocate Cloverdale Elementary students at the former Badgett Elementary building and to tear down the school. Cloverdale Elementary had a capacity of 448 students. In October 2004 enrollment was 360. Following the announcement that Cloverdale students would be relocated to Badgett for the 2005-2006 school year, parents began requesting Transfer No Transportation (TNT) transfers to other LRSD schools. By August 18, 2005, TNT transfers had been granted to 144 Cloverdale ES students. In addition, other students were reassigned out of Cloverdale because they moved away from the attendance zone. accepted seats at magnet schools, requested assignment to Pulaski County Special School District on Minority to Majority (M to M) transfers or were attending Cloverdale on TNT transfers and requested a return to their attendance zone school. On August 26, 2005, only 111 Cloverdale ES students were registered and attending school at Badgett. By September 6, 2005, registration had risen to only 119. An inventory reveals that there are enough vacant seats to accommodate K-1 students at Watson Elementary and !.J,,' m\n:o is z z m..... (\") ::c \u0026gt;z C) m (/) !J' r\n:: z C C: (/) m ~ ill m ~ ='i p g z ~ iz5 (/) 0 .-,n, .~,, m ~ grades 2-3 at Mabelvale Elementary. Parents of grade 4-5 students will be able to select from available seats in other schools in southwestern part of the district. RATIONALE: The continued operation of low enrollment schools and the resulting fiscal inefficiency has been a concern in the district for several years. The Cloverdale at Badgett Elementary School qualifies as a low enrollment school. FUNDING: Reassignment of the Cloverdale at Badgett students presents no additional cost to the Little Rock School District. RECOMMENDATION: It is not financially prudent for the district to continue operating Cloverdale at Badgett with its low enrollment. The students should be reassigned to Watson, Mabelvale and other southwest elementary schools. A timeline for notifying students, parents, teachers and school staff about reassignment and the options that are available has been developed. In addition, a special task force appointed by the Superintendent will examine the future of Cloverdale Elementary School. The task force report will become part of the Superintendent's recommendation on Cloverdale which will be brought to the Board before the end of the calendar year. PREPARED BY: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: September 22, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Larry Berkley President, Board of Directors SUBJECT: Policy GBK Staff Concerns/Complaints/Grievances BACKGROUND: The Board of Directors periodically reviews polices and regulations which provide the district's administration a clear line of authority for operating the district in an efficient and effective manner. A review of Policy GBK Staff Concerns/Complaints/Grievances and the accompanying Policy GBK-R, both of which are modeled after Act 1357 amended by the Arkansas Legislature in 2003, describes the process an employee must use in resolving a work-related grievance. A copy of Act 1357 is attached. However, the policy, and its companion regulations in their present forms, does not clearly encourage employees to adhere to the process. School Board members are also part of the grievance process and our obligations also must be more clearly defined. In addition, Policy GBK does not strongly communicate that the Board will not tolerate reprisal or retaliation directed at employees who make use of the policy. RATIONALE: Policies should be clear and concise and offer specific directives to staff and administration. The revision of GBK and GBK-R prescribes a more thorough process for resolving employee grievances and protects employees from retaliation. FUNDING: This policy revision carries no financial implications. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board adopt on first reading the revisions to Policy GBK and Policy GBK-R. New text is underlined text. Eliminated text is marked in (parentheses). PREPARED BY: Joseph Mittiga Government/Public Affairs Officer .?.,' m ~ z~ z ,m... n ::r:: \u0026gt;z C\u0026gt; m U) ?' \u0026gt; z C C U) m \u0026gt; C\u0026gt; ~ m m !I: m ~ 8 z ~ i5 z U) ..0.. ,, jg ~ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: GBK STAFF CONCERNS/COMPLAINTS/GRIEVANCES It is the policy of the Board of Education to have written grievance procedures which will result in encouraging employees to express themselves on subjects concerning condition of employment, in fostering a better understanding of policies, and in ensuring all employees that their questions and concerns are considered fairly(,) and rapidly(,). (and without reprisals.) It is the expressed intent of the Board of Education that there shall be no reprisals or retaliation of any kind made, nor will any be tolerated, against any employee who exercises his or her rights under this policy. \"Grievance\" will mean any concern related to personnel (policies)~ (or) salary.,_ federal or state laws and regulations. or terms or conditions of employment raised by an employee. \"Employee\" will mean a person employed by the District under a written contract. The specific processes and provisions applicable to grievance procedures are outlined in the Grievances/Concerns/Complaints regulation. GBK-R. The Board of Education encourages an employee to resolve a grievance or any other issue through the chain of command process prescribed by this policy and regulation or by a negotiated agreement. Revised : Adopted: November 18, 1999 References: Board of Education Regulation GBK-R Legal Reference: AC.A. 6-17-208 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: GBK-R GRIEVANCE/CONCERNS/COMPLAINTS Purpose Some groups of employees are covered by grievance procedures defined in their respective negotiated agreement. For those employees not covered by a negotiated agreement the following process will apply. Communication and discussion can resolve the majority of questions and problems that cause difficulties between the employer and employee. When resolution is not reached rapidly, the employer and the staff member may proceed to effect resolution in writing as defined in this procedure. The purpose of the resolution procedures is to secure, at the lowest possible level, equitable solutions consistent with the legal standards of \"due process,\" to problems that may from time to time arise. The purpose is to (obtain better understanding of policies, to) encourage employees to express themselves more effectively on subjects concerning conditions of employment, and to ensure to all employees that their questions and problems are considered fairly, rapidly and without reprisals. Documents and Confidentiality All documents, communications and records dealing with the processing of a grievance will be filed separately from the personnel files of the participants and will be destroyed three years after the last official entry. All parties will hold the resolution proceedings in confidentiality at all levels. Normally, the resolution process should be conducted at times that do not interfere with the assigned duties. Process \"Grievance\" means any concern related to personnel policy, salary, federal or state laws(,) and regulations, or terms or conditions of employment, raised by an employee. \"Employee\" means a person employed by a school district under a written contract. The first step in the procedure is to seek an informal resolution between the employee and the immediate supervisor. If the grievance is not resolved at the informal phase, the grievance is to be committed to writing and sent to the applicable supervisor within five calendar days of the incident resulting in the grievance. The employee will immediately thereafter schedule a meeting with the appropriate supervisor to discuss the complaint and resolutions sought. The parties should act in good faith to expedite the process. .!J.,I m i\"s' z z ,m- (\") ::r:: ~ C\u0026gt; m V, !JI r\nz C C V, m \u0026gt; C\u0026gt; \"m' m\nIC m ::i 8 z ~ iz5 V, 0.... ,, ~.., m s LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: GBK-R Upon request, the applicable supervisor will schedule a meeting with the grievant within five workdays of receipt of the written grievance. If the problem is not resolved in the meeting held with the supervisor, and the employee indicates a desire to pursue further, a written request must be submitted within five workdays for an appeal to the Office of the Superintendent or designee. Appeals The appeal will be heard in the Office of the SuperintendenUdesignee within ten workdays of the request for an appeal. An employee who has not been satisfied with the answer at the Superintendent's level may request that the grievance be submitted to the Board of Education. The request will include a written statement setting forth the issue(s) to be reviewed by the Board of Education and is to be addressed to the President of the Board c/o Superintendent's Office. Other Provisions An employee seeking to resolve a grievance as defined above is required to use the terms and conditions of their negotiated agreement for resolution of grievances. Employees not covered by a negotiated agreement are bound by the provisions of this policy. In either case, the responsibility for ensuring that the prescribed due process is adhered to and will not be circumvented is shared at all levels of the district, up to and including the Board of Education. Employees who have begun or who are considering initiating a grievance procedure either under the terms of this policy or under the terms of a negotiated agreement are prohibited from undertaking any action that seeks to circumvent the prescribed process. Specifically, employees are prohibited from conveying or causing the conveyance of information about their grievance to members of the Board of Education prior to completing the chain of command process prescribed by this policy or their negotiated agreement. Employees must be aware that receipt of such information by a member of the Board may be cause for that Board member to recuse him/herself from an employee grievance hearing. Likewise, members of the Board of Education, by definition of their role in the process, must refrain from any involvement in an employee grievance until the process formally reaches the Board as prescribed in this policy or a negotiated agreement. Members of the Board should always encourage an employee to resolve a grievance or any other issue through the chain of command process prescribed by this policy or by a negotiated agreement. Date: August 5, 2005 Legal Reference: Act 1357 of 2003 1 2 3 4 Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to the law as it existed prior to this session of the General Assembly. State of Arkansas 84th General Assembly Regular Session, 2003 Act 1357 of 2003 SENATE BILL 913 5 By: Senators Wilkins, Broadway 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 For An Act To Be Entitled AN ACT TO AMEND ARKANSAS CODE 6-17-208 TO PROVIDE FOR PROCEDURES TO THE GRIEVANCE LAW\nAND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. Subtitle AN ACT TO AMEND ARKANSAS CODE 6-17-208 TO PROVIDE FOR PROCEDURES TO THE GRIEVANCE LAW. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. Arkansas Code 6-17-208 is amended to read as follows: 6-17-208. Grievance procedure. (a)(l) It is the public policy of the State of Arkansas that~ ill eaeh Each school district shall have a written grievance procedure which provides for an orderly method of resolving concerns raised by an employee at the lowest possible administrative level and in a clear and timely manner for both parties\n(B) All school employees shall have the right to file grievances and have those grievances heard. A group of employees who have the same grievance may file a group grievance. (2)(A) \"Grievance\" means any concern related to personnel pelieies er salary policy, salary, federal or state laws and regulations, or terms or conditions of employment, raised by an employee\nand (B) \"Employee\" means a person employed by a school district under a written contract. (b) ( 1) The grievance policy shall at least include the following lllll!llllllllllllll rnllllllllll 03082003LDH0835.JMB291 .!,I,' m :ID ~ zz ,m- (\") ::c ~ C) m U\u0026gt; !I' 8 z ~ iz5 U\u0026gt; 0 ~ .,, ~ ~ s As Engrossed: S3/27/03 1 provisions: 2 (A) A procedure for resolving the matter informally with 3 the employee's innnediate supervisor\n4 (B) A procedure to appeal in writing an unsatisfactorily 5 resolved grievance from the innnediate supervisor to the superintendent of 6 schools or his or her designee\n7 (C)(i) A procedure to appeal in writing an 8 unsatisfactorily resolved grievance from the superintendent or his or her 9 designee to the school board at the next regularly scheduled school board 10 meeting unless both parties have agreed to a different date. 11 (ii) The hearing shall be open or closed at the 12 discretion of the employee. S8913 13 (iii) If the hearing is open, the parent or guardian 14 of any student under the age of eighteen (18) years who gives testimony may 15 elect to have the student's testimony given in a closed session\nand 16 (D) The right of all parties to be represented by a person 17 of his or her own choosing, at least at the seheel beard le..,.el but not by a 18 member of a party's immediate family at any level of the procedure. 19 (2)(A) The determination by the principal, superintendent, or 20 their designees that the concern expressed by the employee is not a grievance 21 may be appealed to the school board for a final decision. 22 (B) At the hearing, the employee shall have an adequate 23 opportunity to present the grievanceT but no less than ninety (90) minutes, 24 and both parties shall have the opportunity to present and question 25 witnesses. 26 (c) The grievance policy shall be adopted in accordance with this 27 subchapter and other applicable policies of the district. 28 (d) There shall be no reprisals of any kind against any individual who 29 exercises his or her rights under this act. 30 (e) Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring a school 31 district to enter into an agreement recognizing an organization for the 32 purpose of negotiating personnel policies, salaries, and educational matters 33 of mutual concern. 34 35 36 Isl Wilkins 2 APPROVED: 4/15/2003 03082003LDH0835.JMB291 DATE: TO: FROM: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 September 22, 2005 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Personnel Changes BACKGROUND: None RATIONALE: To staff allocated positions within the District FUNDING: Operating Fund RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.CA 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) consecutive years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 19, 2005 for regular schools are considered intern teachers. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 8, 2005 for EYE are co~pidered intern teachers. ~tlf PREPARED BY: David E. Hartz, Senior Director of Human Resources ?' r\nz C C: \u0026lt;n m \u0026gt; c\n,\n,\n, m m .z~. . p g z ~ c5 z \u0026lt;n 0 -n \"'0 ~ ~ Personnel Changes Page2 September 22, 2005 NAME START DATE/ POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE ResignationsfTerminations Certified Employees Berryman, Sara Elementary I/ 8-9-00 Reason: Accepted another KING 8-5-05 position New Certified Employees Harrison, Lauren Reading Recovery/ 8-18-05 WAKEFIELD Jacob, Melissa Special Education (.5)/ 8-11-05 FOREST PARK Keogh, Ruth Reading Recovery/ 8-11-05 BOOKER Mitchell, Avis Elementary I/ 8-1-05 STEPHENS Stevenson, Carolyn Counselor/ 8-11-05 CHICOT SALARY CLASS 4-05 TCH925 6-10 TCH925 4-07 SPE925 4-18 TCH925 1-02 TCH925 4-13 TCH925 ResignationsfTerminations Non-Certified Employees Andrews, Robert Maintenance/ 3-9-05 49-07 Reason: Resigned without FACILITY SERVICES 8-22-05 MAINT notice Baggett, Emily CARE/ 8-21-03 1-03 Reason: Position Eliminated CARE 8-1-05 CARE Bealer, Dechandra Instructional Aide/ 10-11-04 33-09 Reason: None Given GIBBS 8-26-05 INA925 Bonds, Dorothy CARE/ 9-2-03 1-07 Reason: None Given CARE 8-1-05 CARE ANNUAL SALARY 38041 .00 46966.00 annual 45742.07 prorated 20175.50 53061 .00 30617.00 47284.00 29760.00 7.28 per hour 13070.00 7.89 per hour Personnel Changes Pagel September 22, 2005 .!=.,' z  z 0 .\u0026gt;.... START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL\n,o m NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY c3 ~ Broyles, Paris CARE/ 9-2-03 3-06 8.54 Reason: None Given CARE 8-1-05 CARE per hour Carbo, Haywood Custodian/ 8-23-04 31-07 17388.00 Reason: Health STEPHENS 8-19-05 CUS12 Carter, Noda CARE/ 2-3-03 1-03 7.28 Reason: None Given CARE 8-1-05 CARE per hour ~?-\u0026lt; u....i..O.... c:0 Dunlap, Linda CARE/ 8-23-01 3-08 8.85 c!!! mzcz, Reason: None Given CARE 8-1-05 CARE per hour .....\n,o :cm ~~ Eichelberger, Rita Instructional Aide/ 9-8-04 33-16 16109.00 ~~ Reason: Leaving the city BOOKER 9-1-05 INA925 ~.., - Haggans, Monica CARE/ 8-9-04 1-02 7.13 . z\n,o  Reason: None Given CARE 8-1-05 CARE per hour i\n'i~ :cm ..... po Harvell, Lola CARE/ 8-19-04 3-08 8.85 ~,...~..., m\ng Reason: None Given CARE 8-1-05 CARE per hour .-\n,a ~ ..... m UI zm Henry, Melanie Instructional Aide/ 1-6-03 16595.00 -,\n,o 33-17  \u0026lt; ~~ Reason: None Given BRADY 6-6-05 INA925 UI Hill, Carolyn CARE/ 8-15-95 1-12 8.68 Reason: None Given CARE 8-1-05 CARE per hour Hill, Rhonda CARE/ 9-15-03 1-06 7.74 !I' Reason: None Given CARE 8-1-03 CARE per hour  z C C: Jones, Emma CARE/ 4-23-02 1-06 7.74 UI m Reason: None Given CARE 8-1-05 CARE per hour  C,\n,o m m ii: Jones 111, William CARE/ 9-2-03 3-06 8 54 m z.... . Reason: None Given CARE 8-1-05 CARE per hour Logan, Ira Nurses/ 11-03-04 52-08 33528.00 Reason: Accepted another FRANKLIN 6-06-05 NURSES p C position 0 z ..... c5 Madden, Andrea Child Nutrition/ 9-27-04 7-01 11050.00 z UI Reason: None Given WILLIAMS 6-6-05 FSH650 .0.... ,, jg McKinney, Mary Instructional Aide/ 8-11-04 33-16 16109.00 ..., m Reason: None Given OTTER CREEK 9-16-05 INA925 ~ Personnel Changes Page4 September 22, 2005 NAME Moser, Matthew Reason: Resigned without notice Perry, Mary Reason: None Given Reed, Kelly Reason: None Given Roberson, Shannon Reason: Resigned without notice Robinson, Kamesha Reason: None Given Shelton, Annie Reason: None Given Smith, Mary Reason: Retired Vick, Jo Reason: None Given Woods, Andrea Reason: None Given Bailey, Robbie Burgess, Leonard Burris, Tammy START DATE/ POSITION/ SCHOOL END DATE Security Officer/ 1-4-05 MCCLELLAN 8-16-05 Instructional Aide/ 10-5-90 WILLIAMS 8-25-05 CARE/ 8-30-04 CARE 8-1-05 Instructional Aide/ 8-11-04 JEFFERSON 8-10-05 CARE/ 1-24-05 CARE 8-1-05 CARE/ 4-7-03 CARE 8-1-05 Custodian/ 4-1-74 ROCKEFELLER 8-25-05 CARE/ 8-15-03 CARE 8-1-05 Bus Driver/ 8-14-00 TRANSPORTATION 8-16-05 New Non-Certified Employees Child Nutrition/ 8-17-05 FOREST PARK Bus Driver/ 8-17-05 TRANSPORTATION Instructional Aide/ 8-16-05 FULBRIGHT SALARY ANNUAL CLASS SALARY 36-10 15463.00 SOFR9 33-13 14735.00 INA925 3-17 10.36 CARE per hour 33-13 14735.00 INA925 2-03 7.85 CARE per hour 1-05 7.56 CARE per hour 31-20 25632.00 CUS12 1-07 7.89 CARE per hour 3-09 15316.00 BUSDRV 3-01 9350.00 FSH550 2-01 9481 .00 BUSDRV 33-09 13070.00 INA925 annual 12858.00 prorated Personnel Changes Page5 September 22, 2005 !.=.,' z \u0026gt;z n ,\u0026gt;- START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL\n,, m NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY\n:g ~ Cobb, Helen Secretary/ 8-22-05 39-12 25632.00 TERRY CLK10 annual 23864.28 prorated Davis, Ebony CARE/ 9-6-05 3-03 8.06 CARE CARE per hour\n!:5 ?\u0026lt; u,n Fields, Janice CARE/ .... ,- 8-19-05 1-08 8.05 c:0 C!!! CARE CARE per hour mz ZC) \"\"'\n,, :cm Ghant, Natalyn CARE/ 8-19-05 3-05 8.38 ! f\n~~ CARE CARE per hour ~ Green, Michael Security Officer/ 9-2-05 36-10 15463.00 .., \u0026gt;. z- OTTER CREEK SOFR9 annual\n,,\u0026gt; i5 ~ 14358.50 :cm .... II\" prorated ~,-~.., m\n:g Griffith, Keysha CARE/ 8-29-05 3-17 10.36 ~~ CARE CARE per hour mui zm --\u0026lt;\n,J \u0026gt;\u0026lt; ~~ Harris, Jacqueline Instructional Aide/ 8-17-05 33-06 11946.00 U) FULBRIGHT IN925 annual 11687.71 prorated Harrison, Jami CARE/ 8-19-05 1-08 8.85 !%1 CARE CARE per hour r\nz C C: Harton, Lanna Instructional Aide/ 8-16-05 33-09 13070.00 U) m \u0026gt; FULBRIGHT INA925 annual C)\n,, m 12858.00 m I: prorated m .z.. . Hearn, Tonya CARE/ 8-29-05 2-04 8.01 CARE CARE per hour Occupational 8-18-05 47976.00 f) Hill, Kyla 60-12 C 0 Therapist/ AN925 annual z ~ SPECIAL PROGRAMS 46762.62 ~ prorated z U) .0... ,,\n,, .0. , m ~ Personnel Changes Page 6 September 22, 2005 NAME Hunter, Kourtney Johnson, Adelras Johnson, Charles Johnson, Helen Johnson, Nikol Jones, Millie Kelley, Dorothy Lewis, Kimberly Leblanc, Emmitt Long, Carmen Marion, Rose START DATE/ POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE Instructional Aide/ 8-16-05 CHICOT Instructional Aide/ BRADY 8-15-05 Instructional Aide/ 8-22-05 CHICOT Child Nutrition/ 8-17-05 KING Instructional Aide/ 8-18-05 FULBRIGHT CARE/ 8-19-05 CARE Instructional Aide/ 8-18-05 MABEL VALE ELEMENTARY Instructional Aide/ 9-6-05 BRADY CARE/ 8-19-05 CARE Occupational 8-16-05 TherapisV SPECIAL PROGRAMS CARE/ 8-19-05 CARE SALARY ANNUAL CLASS SALARY 33-04 11253.00 INA925 annual 11070.52 prorated 33-16 16109.00 INA925 annual 15934.85 prorated 33-16 16109.00 INA925 annual 15934.85 prorated 3-01 9350.00 FSH550 33-14 15179.00 INA925 annual 14766.76 prorated 2-13 9.41 CARE per hour 33-09 13070.00 INA925 annual 12716.76 prorated 33-17 16595.00 INA925 annual 15070.05 prorated 1-03 7.85 CARE per hour 60-12 47976.00 AN925 annual 47226.38 prorated 3-09 9.00 CARE per hour Personnel Changes Page7 September 22, 2005 !=' \"Tl z \u0026gt;z n ,- START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL\na m NAME POSITION/ SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY c3 ~ McDonald, Gladys CARE/ 8-29-05 3-06 8.54 CARE CARE per hour Mosby, Jimmy Instructional Aide/ 8-11-05 33-04 11253.00 Washington INA925 Pearson, Rosalyn CARE/ 8-29-05 2-05 8.18 CARE CARE per hour ~?\u0026lt; u,n Powell, Lisa Instructional Aide/ 8-18-05 33-03 10934.00 .... ,- c:O O!!! BRADY INA925 annual mz zc, 10638.49 .....\na :Cm prorated ~~ ~~ Reed.Shonda CARE/ 8-19-05 1-05 7.56 ?\u0026lt; CARE CARE per hour \"Tl \u0026gt;. z-\na\u0026gt; Rose, Clayton CARE/ 8-19-05 2-01 7.55 i5 ~ :cm ..... QO CARE CARE per hour ~ ~ ,- .., m c3 Rose, Jason CARE/ 8-19-05 2-01 7.55 ,..\na ~ .... CARE CARE per hour mu, zm .....\na \u0026gt;\u0026lt; ~~ \"' Saine, Liltiunna CARE/ 8-19-05 2-08 8.64 CARE CARE per hour Shelton, Sharon Instructional Aide/ 8-19-05 33-16 16109.00 FAIR PARK INA925 annual !JI 15586.55 r\nz prorated 0 C: \"m' \u0026gt; Sims, Katina CARE/ 8-29-05 2-03 7.85 C)\na CARE CARE per hour m m s: m .z... . Sims, Lakisha Instructional Aide/ 8-19-05 33-16 16109.00 MEADOWCLIFF INA925 annual 15586.55 p prorated 8 z Sitton, Tanya Occupational 9-9-05 60-07 41328.00 ~ i5 Therapist/ AN925 annual z \"' 0 SPECIAL PROGRAMS 37023.00 .\".T,l prorated\na .0. , m\nPersonnel Changes Pages September 22, 2005 NAME Smith, Beverly Spearmon, Kimberly Stewart, Dale Taylor, Katherine Thomas, Arik Thomas, Lavette Tippitt, Sharella Williams, Keena Wingfield, Jennifer Wright, Lona START DATE/ POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CARE/ 9-2-05 CARE Instructional Aide/ 8-18-05 BRADY Custodian/ CHICOT 8-23-05 Instructional Aide/ 8-19-05 MEADOWCLIFF CARE/ 8-19-05 CARE CARE/ 8-19-05 CARE CARE/ CARE 8-19-05 CARE/ CARE 8-19-05 Occupational Therapist/ 8-29-05 SPECIAL PROGRAMS CARE/ CARE 8-19-05 SALARY ANNUAL CLASS SALARY 2-05 8.18 CARE per hour 33-07 12307.00 INA925 annual 11974.38 prorated 31-01 14532.00 annual 12305.82 prorated 33-04 11253.00 INA925 annual 10888.04 prorated 2-08 8.64 CARE per hour 3-09 9.00 CARE per hour 2-02 7.70 CARE per hour 1-06 8.33 CARE per hour 60-05 38928.00 AN925 annual 36495.00 prorated 1-08 8.05 CARE per hour DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 September 22, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Appointment of Assistant Principal for Southwest Middle BACKGROUND: To provide leadership to students and staff of Southwest Middle. RATIONALE: To fill the position being vacated by Andrew Bennett. FUNDING: District Operating Budget RECOMMENDATION: I am pleased to appoint Mr. David Bernard, to the position of Assistant Principal at Southwest. Mr. Bernard's resume and a job description are attached for your review. J.)l-~' PREPARED BY: David E. Hartz, Senior Director of Human Resources !\" i\nz 0 C: (JI m ~\n,\n, m m :I: m ~ 8 z ?\niz5 (JI .0. , -0 ~  I 1  I I ,,, ,: I I. ,, 'H il OB.JECTIVE A challenging administrative position in a growth-oriented school district. EDUCATION MED SCHOOL LEADERSHIP Wilmington College B.S. HEAL TH \u0026amp; PHYSICAL EDU CA TIO Delaware State University NCATE Accredited School Praxis I Taken and Passed Graduated Magna Cum Laude 2002-04 New Castle, Deluwure 1998-200 I Dover, Delmwr\u0026lt;' CORRESPO DENCE SUB-COURSE, MP1004 CIVIL DISTURBA CE PLA 'I G The Army Institute for Professional Development MAJOR: PHYSICAL EDUCATION Southwestern Christian College MAJOR: SOCIOLOGY l nfrersity ufSowhwestern Louisianu L11f, 11 , 1/(' I II/' '\"'''' F:MPLOYMENT Garland Alternative Learning Center Little Ruck Schuul District Li11le Rock. Arku11sus Taught Physical Education 6-8 Grade Acting Assistant Administrator (4 th marking period 2005 School Year) McClellan Magnet High School Little Ruck School District Little Ruck. Arka11sas Assistant Varsity Football Coach Offensive Line/Linebacker Coach Immaculate Conception Catholic School 7000 JFK Blvd-North Little Ruck. AR 72116 (501) 1135-077 I Taught Physical Education Grades K-8, Head Football Coach SUMMER SCHOOL HEALTH TEACHER Caesur Rudney High Schou! Cuesar Rudney School District Taught 9th Grade Health HEAD SOFTBALL COACH Fred Fifer J1J Middle Schou! Cuesur Rudney School District Februar~ 2005-Prcsent March 2005-Present July 2004-February 2005 Sl 1MMER 2003 Camden, Delaware Fm. 2004-MA Y 2004 Cu111cle11. Delmn1re Responsible for designing practices, supervising assistant coache . developing student-athletes ph: ically. mentally. and socially. :\u0026gt;\u0026lt;- .\u0026gt;\u0026lt; e..n.. ,n.. . c:O O!!? mz Zc, \"\"'::a :Cm ~~ ~~ !X'  z 0 C: en m \u0026gt; C) :,:, m m ~ z --\u0026lt; 8 z ~ ~z en 0.. , \"D ~ \"D m ~ HF.AD FOOTBALL COAC\"II Freel Filer 111 Middle School ( 'aesur Rod11ey Schou/ Disrricr Mi\\ Y 2003-M,\\ Y 2004 Camden, Delaware Responsible for designing practices. supervising assistant coaches. developing student-athletes physically. mentally. and socially. ASSIST A T GIRLS' BASKETBALL COACH Fred Fifer IJJ Middle School Caesar Rodney School Districr ASSIST A T SOFTBALL COACH Fred Fifer III Middle School Cuesar Rodney School District Hitting and infield coach HEALTH \u0026amp; PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHER Fred Fifer IJJ Middle School Caesar Rodney School District JAN. 200 I -MAY 2004 Camden, Delawure OCT. 200 I -FEB. 2004 Camden, Delaware JUL. 2001-M/\\Y 2004 Camden, Delaware Responsible for teaching 61 \" grade Life Skills and Physical Education. Developed the school's Peer Leader Program. Served on the District's Developmental Arts Council, which dealt with curriculum development and installation in the District. Developed the District's 61 Grade Health Curriculum. Helped develop the school's Adult Mentoring Program and responsible for the planning and implementation of the school's Red Ribbon Week Program. Served as Vice-President for Health from 2002-2003 and Vice-President for Sport during 2004 for the state of Delaware's Professional Health \u0026amp; Physical Education organization. ASSIST A T VARSITY FOOTBALL COACH Milford High School Milford School District Offensive. Defensive Line Coach J u . 2001-M,'\\Y 2003 Milford. Delall'are SOFTBAl,I, I NSTRl lCTOR De/u,rttn! State L,'11iPersi1_, , \\\"utionul ro11th Sports l'rogn1111 (l'ffSI') Responsible for teaching softba ll to students ages 8- 18 . STUDENT ACCOUNTS CUSTOMER SERVICE Delm1'tlre Stale Universiry Sl v1\"11.R 2001 Don!r. DC'lmrure MAY 1998-JAN. 2001 Dover. Delaware tudent worker responsible for third party billing. registration. and student billing inquiries. SOFTBALL STATISTICIAN Deluware Stale University Responsible for taking statistics during NCAA softball games. ASSISTANT VARSITY FOOTBALL COACH Smyrna High School Smyrna School District Defensive Line/Running Backs Coach H EAD FOOTBALL COACH East Anchorage High School Anchorage School District AUG. 1999-MA Y 2000 Dover, Delaware JUL. 1998-MA Y 1999 Smyrna, Delm1are J A . 1996-FU~. 1997 Anchorage. Alaska Responsible for the school's 3 level football program (freshman. junior varsi~ \u0026amp; varsit~) and supervised 7 assistant coaches. BRANCH MA 'AGER OCT. 1991-Fl ll. 1997 Boys \u0026amp; Girls Clubs of Greater Anchorage ,.J nchornge. Alo  Managed Branch Operations  Recruitment/Training of Professional and Volunteer Staff  Development of Branch Level Budget  Development and Implementation of Branch Level Fund-raiser  De\\'clopment of Regional Award Winning Program ( ' treet Beat \u0026amp; In the Field) ~ ?\u0026lt; .,,n -4r c:0 0111 mz ~~ :Z:m ii .?.\u0026lt;,\n,-z\n::o\u0026gt; ci ~ :z:m .... \"\" ~~ r-c m\n:3 r::o ~ .... mu, zm -\u0026lt;::O ~~ -\u0026lt;m Ill ASSIST.\\NT FOOTBALL COACH East Anchorage High Schuol . /11choraKe School District Defensive Linc Coach SR. INSTRUCTOR M,,, 1995-L\\ 1\\. 19% MA v 1990-Ocr. I 991 Buys and Girls Clubs uf Greater A11chora1-\ne Anchorage. Alaska Responsible for organizing. planning. and implementing activities for the clubs drop in program. (l\\ges 8-1 8) FIRE SUPPORT SPECIALIST (13F) United States Army MAY 1987-FEH. 1990 Plotted and located enemy targets by using maps. compasses. and binoculars Called and adjusted fire on targets PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHlPS ational Health \u0026amp; Fitness Association National Association for Sport and Physical Education American Alliance for Health, Physical Education. Recreation and Dance Kappa Delta Pi. International Educational Honor Society  National Education Association CERT\\FlCATIO S Delaware K-12 Teacher of Physical Education Delaware K-12 Teacher of Health Education Delaware Secondary Administrator Dela,,are Middle Level Teacher Arkansas Physical Education/Wellness/LEI (P-8 \u0026amp; 7-12) Arkansas Building Administrator (312: grades P-8 \u0026amp; 313: grades 7-12) Certified CPR/First AID Instructor (Certified through EM afet: erv1ces) Anchoruge. Alaska PLEASE POST LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 August 15, 2005 PLEASE POST The Little Rock School District is now accepting applications for the following position for the 2005-06 school year. POSITION: Assistant Principal - Southwest Middle School QUALIFICATIONS: 1. Master's degree or higher with eligibility for Arkansas certification as an Elementary/Middle School Assistant Principal. 2. At least three (3) years successful experience as a teacher and/or administrator in an urban school district. 3. Knowledge of the District's desegregation plan. 4. Evidence of a strong commitment to quality desegregated education. 5. Knowledge of high school curriculum\nof current educational theory and practice\nof cultural, socioeconomic, ethnic, and gender differences. 6. The ability to apply this knowledge when working with faculty, students, parents, administrators, community members, and support staff to design school programs and curriculum. 7. Commitment to staff development demonstrated by a willingness to initiate, participate in, monitor, and maintain in-service activities. 8. Demonstrates the conviction that all children can and will learn in the Little Rock School District. 9. Evidence of successful experience with parent and staff involvement in decision making. 10. Evidence of successful experience in dealing with students' problems. 11. Strong interpersonal skills. NOTE: APPLICANTS MUST BE PREPARED TO SHOW EVIDENCE OF THESE QUALIFICATIONS IN THE INITIAL SCREENING INTERVIEW. JOB GOAL: To relieve the Principal of such impediments as prevents him/her from fulfilling chief responsibilities of promoting the educational well-being of each student in the school, and to demonstrate the capacity to perform the responsibilities of an assistant principal. !.=.,' z  z n \u0026gt; r- Rl c8 ~ !%' ~ C C: \"m' ~\n,:, m m E .zm.. f\" 8 z ~ iz5 \"' .0... ,, ~.., m ~ ACCOUNT ABILITY: Reports Directly to the Principal ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS/ RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE POSITION: 1. Assists the Principal in the management of his/her school, and serves as an advisor to the Principal, Assistant Superintendent-Secondary Schools and Associate Superintendent on matters pertaining to administration and program implementation in that school.  2. Serves on such advisory groups and task forces as assigned by the Principal, Assistant Superintendent-Secondary Schools and Associate Superintendent. 3. Assists with the process whereby school-level educational programs needs are identified. Alerts the Principal, Assistant Superintendent-Secondary Schools and Associate Superintendent regarding needed logistical and consultative support in order to accomplish this task. 4. Works with staff and patrons to determine educational program priorities and goals for his/her school. 5. Assists in the development of educational programs and the plan for implementing them on the school level. 6. Assumes responsibility for encouraging and involving community, staff and where appropriate, students in decision making about educational program development and implementation at the building level. 7. Assists the Principal in developing and conducting aggressive recruitment campaigns. 8. Cooperates in conducting safety inspections and safety drill activities. 9. Works with the Principal in the preparation of the student handbook. 10. Assists in the administration of school rules regarding attendance. 11 . Assists the Principal in the general administration of the school. 12. Assumes responsibility for coordinating custodial, transportation, cafeteria, and other responsibilities. 13. Supervises conduct within the school, and oversees disciplinary action. 14. Requisitions supplies and equipment, conducting inventories, maintain records, and checking on receipts of such materials. 15. Performs such other responsibilities as the principal may assign. SALARY AND TERMS: PA Yl 0 - Grade 65 - $40,116 - $70,728, Ten and one-half (10.5) month 210 days, plus benefit package NOTE: Precise placement within the salary range will be determined based upon education and experience. EVALUATION: Performance of this job will be evaluated annually in accordance with provisions of the Board's Policy on Evaluation of Professional Personnel. APPLICATION DEADLINE: August 26, 2005, or any time later until a satisfactory applicant is recommended and approved. SEND RESUMES/INQUIRES: David E. Hartz - Senior Director HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Little Rock School District 810 W Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone 501-447-1100 Fax 501-447-1162 NOTE: INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN THE ABOVE POSITION MUST COMPLETE A VERY RIGOROUS SELECTION PROCESS. THEREFORE, BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL APPLIES FOR A POSITION DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT AN INTERVIEW WILL BE CONDUCTED. The Little Rock School District is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Equity concerns may be addressed to the Associate Superintendent for Administrative Services. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District not to discriminate on the basis of age, sex, race, color, religion, national origin, or disability in its educational programs, activities or employment practices. \u0026gt; z 0 c:: en m ~\nc Hl ii: m ~ f\u0026gt; g z ~ iz5 cn .0. , -0 ~ -0 s DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 September 22, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Rightsell Elementary School BACKGROUND: A complete executive summary report dated August 26, 2005, provided a detailed analysis of the enrollment and renovation estimates for Rightsell Elementary School. The official enrollment at Rightsell for the 2004-2005 school year was 262 students\nby comparison, the total enrollment as of August 26, 2005, was 190 students. In summary, the Rightsell facility is unable to meet current educational standards without extensive and costly repairs and renovations. In the spring of 2005, a committee of district administrative staff developed a plan to temporarily educate the students assigned to Rightsell at Badgett Elementary School so that renovation and remediation projects could proceed. After additional review, it was determined that sufficient numbers of vacant seats were available at other schools located near Rightsell, and the students were therefore relocated to Washington Elementary School. It should be noted that Washington Elementary School has a capacity of approximately 900. The total number of students now attending school at the Washington site is 821 : 631 Washington students and 190 Rightsell students. Meetings were held with Rightsell parents, community members, teachers and staff on June 28, 2005, and again on August 30, 2005. Rightsell parents have been assured that their children will continue to receive a high quality education this year, and in upcoming years in the LRSD. RATIONALE: The operation of low enrollment schools has been a concern in the District for several years. In May of 2000 the Board of Directors adopted Policy FBG--Closing of Schools, that allows for closure to be considered based on factors such as excessive cost of operation due to enrollment and excessive cost of renovation and repair due to the age !D  z 0 C CJ\u0026gt; m \u0026gt; C)\no m m I:: m ~ !\"' g z ~ c5 z CJ\u0026gt; .0. , \"ti ~ \"ti m ~ and physical condition of the facility. Schools in similar situations, such as Garland, Badgett, lsh, Fair Park (recently converted to the Early Childhood Center) and Mitchell, were closed because of low enrollment coupled with high operational and renovation costs. The detailed circumstances and conditions that lead the administration to make a recommendation to close Rightsell Elementary School at the conclusion of the 2005- 2006 school year were provided to you in an executive report attached to the August 26, 2005, edition of the Snapshot. FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is not financially prudent to renovate Rightsell Elementary School. The administration recommends that Rightsell Elementary be closed and the students currently assigned to Rightsell Elementary at Washington be reassigned effective at the beginning of the 2006-07 school year. The closure of Rightsell will allow students to attend newer schools and will not negatively impact their education. The administration further recommends that the district work with the community to develop other options for utilizing this facility in the future. PREPARED BY: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: FBC CLOSING OF SCHOOLS A school will be considered for closure based on a recommendation from the administration to the Board of Education or the recommendation may originate from the Board. Consideration for closure will be based on the following factors: excessive cost of operation due to enrollment, excessive cost of renovation and repair due to the age and physical condition of the facility, inability of the district to deliver the required curriculum in the facility, and any applicable federal court orders. A decision to close a school will be made by the Board of Education. Prior to any decision to close a school, there will be open discussion of the prospect of closure with the community in which the school is located. A public announcement of the proposal to close a school will precede the closing date by at least twelve months, except in cases of extreme emergency. Adopted: May 25, 2000 \u0026gt;:\u0026lt;- \u0026gt;.\u0026lt; c-\u0026lt;n ,nc: O CCI\u0026gt; ~z -\u0026lt; Cl ::i::\n,o ~m ~! Zr \u0026gt; z C C: Cl\u0026gt; m ~\n,o m m !IC m ~ ~ \u0026gt; ~ 0 C: ~ !IC m z -\u0026lt; 8 z ?\nc5 z Cl\u0026gt; ..0.. ,, .e.,l m ~ RIGHTSELL ELEMENTARY STUDENT ATTENDANCE ZONE ANALYSIS \u0026amp; REASSIGNMENT OPTIONS The Rightsell proposed attendance zone and reassignment analysis is depicted in the following tables: Students Who: (a) Reside in the Rightsell Attendance Zone, Pre-K - 4th Grade (b) Reside in Rightsell Attendance Zone and Attend Other Elementary Schools. (c) Attend Rightsell but do not live in Rightsell Attendance Zone (K thru 4) Currently 162 elementary-age students (Pre-K through 4th grade) live in the Rightsell Attendance Zone (see Attachment Table: A). Sixty nine (69) of these students presently attend another elementary school through choice options and would remain in their current school for the 2006-2007 school year (see Attachment Table: BJ. As of September 14, 2005, Rightsell Elementary School has a student population of 186\n28 of those students are in the 5th grade and will move into middle school for the 2006- 07 school year. The Washington Elementary School complex currently houses a total of 829 students\n186 Rightsell Elementary students and 643 students Washington Elementary School students. A total of 158 Pre-K through 4th grade students currently attend Rightsell Elementary School\n93 from the Rightsell attendance zone and 65 from out-of-zone. The sixty-five (65) students would be reassigned to their attendance zone schools for 2006-2007 school year (see Attachment Table: CJ. A total 162 students who reside in the Rightsell Attendance Zone would be impacted by the reassignments. Naturally, all students are provided choice options through magnet school placements, Transfer/ No Transportation {TNT) or Majority to Minority (M to M) transfers through established procedures provided by the Student Registration Office. With the majority of Rightsell students presently attending Washington Elementary, the disruption to students and parents should be minimal. The administration will recommend dividing the Rightsell Attendance Zone utilizing Wright Avenue / 1th Street as the zone boundary. This will result in thirty (30) students who reside north of Wright Avenue/ 17th Street to be assigned to King Elementary School\n132 students who reside south of Wright Avenue / 1 ih Street would be reassigned to Washington Elementary School. kU13dOHd :10 SNOllVNOO ':) Little Rock School District Rightsell Attendance Zone 2006 - 2007 Elementary Students Who Reside in the Rightsell Attendance Zone (P4 - 4th Grade) RIGHTSELL Grade Level Zone Blocks P4 K 1 2 434 1 2 1 435 2 1 1 448 3 2 1 449 3 8 2 450 1 0 1 454 1 3 3 455 1 2 5 456 3 6 6 464 4 4 2 Total 19 28 22 Table: A 1N3W33H~V 3S0 ONYl a 1N3WNHnorov 11x 0 2 1 6 7 5 2 5 5 33 3 2 1 3 4 3 4 4 0 5 26 \"'INIHV3H 1N3001S 'IX IHVW3H ~NISOl:\u0026gt; 'X 4 3 1 3 4 6 5 8 0 4 34 Total 9 8 13 27 18 21 22 20 24 162 1HOd3H 1111:\u0026gt;NVNl:I a Little Rock School District Rightsell Attendance Zone Study 2006-2007 Reside in Rightsell Attendance Zone and Attend Other Elementary Schools Rlghtsell Zone Current School Grade Level Total Blocks P4 K 1 2 3 4 FOREST PARK 1 1 FRANKLIN 1 1 KING 1 1 0434 MCDERMOTT 1 1 WASHINGTON 1 1 WILLIAMS 1 1 Subtotal 1 0 0 0 2 3 6 FAIR PARK 1 1 Home School 1 1 0435 JEFFERSON 1 1 KING 1 1 ROCKEFELLER 1 2 3 Subtotal 2 0 1 2 1 1 7 ALT AGENCY 1 1 BALE 1 1 GIBBS 1 1 0448 KING 1 1 STEPHENS 1 1 WASHINGTON 1 1 Subtotal 3 0 0 0 2 1 6 BALE 1 1 2 CARVER 1 1 0449 CRYSTAL HILL 1 1 1 3 FAIR PARK 3 3 GIBBS 1 1 Subtotal 3 0 1 2 1 3 10 CHICOT 1 1 0450 STEPHENS 1 1 WASHINGTON 1 1 Subtotal 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 CARVER 1 1 2 GIBBS 1 1 JEFFERSON 1 1 0454 KING 1 1 OUTSIDE DIST. 1 1 STEPHENS 1 1 WASHINGTON 1 1 Subtotal 1 2 0 2 1 2 8 BOOKER 2 1 3 GIBBS 1 1 JEFFERSON 1 1 0455 KING 1 1 ROCKEFELLER 1 1 2 4 WASHINGTON 1 1 Subtotal 1 0 2 2 2 4 11 BOOKER 2 2 CARVER 1 1 GIBBS 1 1 2 0456 KING 1 1 2 OUTSIDE DIST. 1 1 2 WASHINGTON 1 1 Subtotal 3 2 4 1 0 0 10 BOOKER 1 1 FAIR PARK 1 1 FRANKLIN 1 1 0464 KING 1 1 WASHINGTON 2 2 WILLIAMS 1 1 WOODRUFF 1 1 Subtotal 4 1 0 0 1 2 8 Grand Total 19 5 9 9 10 17 69 Table: B Little Rock School District Rightsell Study 2005-2006 Students Attending Rightsell not living in Rightsell Attendance Zone (K thru 4) Grade Attendance Zone School K 1 2 3 4 Total OUTSIDE THE DISTRICT 3 1 1 2 7 BALE 1 1 1 1 4 CLOVERDALE ELEM 1 1 1 3 FRANKLIN 2 1 3 GEYER SPRINGS 1 1 KING 1 2 2 5 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 1 1 ROCKEFELLER 5 3 4 1 2 15 - STEPHENS 1 2 3 TERRY 1 1 WASHINGTON 8 3 5 2 3 21 WATSON 1 1 Total 20 14 12 12 7 65 Table: C ..,, z \u0026gt; , z n ,\u0026gt;- ~ el ~ :\u0026gt;\u0026lt;- \u0026gt;.\u0026lt; v...,. ,nc: O C v, mz Zc, \"\"'::a :Cm ~~ z2:!\n-a r ~ \u0026gt; ~ 0 C: ~ ~ zm .... p C 0 z ~ ~z V, ..0.., ,, .e.,: m ~ DATE: TO: FROM: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 September 22, 2005 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Land-use Agreement Little Rock School District/Little Rock Boys and Girls Club BACKGROUND: The 2000 millage program identified a need for additional parking at Woodruff Elementary School. Recently, the opportunity presented itself to partner with the Little Rock Boys and Girls Club to develop property owned by them to meet the parking needs of both the elementary school and Lamar Porter Baseball Field. RATIONALE: Negotiations between the Little Rock School District and the Little Rock Boys and Girls Club provided an agreement for the joint-use of property located on the southwest corner of Johnson and th Streets upon which a parking lot has been constructed according to current City standards. The parking lot will be available for use by both Woodruff Elementary School and the Little Rock Boys and Girls Club at Lamar Porter Baseball Field. The attached agreement provides for cost-sharing in the initial development of the property and a prorated share dealing with maintenance and upkeep for a period of 25 years beginning in 2005. FUNDING: Bond funds for this project were approved by the Board of Directors as a part of the 2000 millage appropriation. On-going maintenance and repairs will be funded by the Dedicated Millage Fund. ,\u0026gt;.\u0026lt;. .\u0026gt; \u0026lt; rn n .... re: 0 om mz Zc, \"\"'\nc :\u0026gt;::m ~f\n!!\nc rz - ~ \u0026gt; E 0 C: ~ ii: .mz.. . r\u0026gt; 0 0 z ?\n0z u, 0.. , \"ti i3 \"ti ~ RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Little Rock School District Board of Directors approve the agreement with the Little Rock Boys and Girls Club as attached. PREPARED BY: Douglas Eaton, Director School Construction PARKING LOT LEASE, MAINTENANCE AND USE AGREEMENT THIS PARKING LOT LEASE, MAINTENANCE AND USE AGREEMENT (\"Lease\") is made and entered into this _ _ day of ____ , 2005 by and between the LITTLE ROCK BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB, a non-profit corporation whose mailing address is 16 I 6 West Yd Street, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (the \"B\u0026amp;G Club~') and the LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, a State of Arkansas public school district, whose mailing address is 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (\"LRSD\"). WITNESS ETH: WHEREAS, B\u0026amp;G Club is the owner of certain real property located in Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas on the  comer of ih and Johnson Streets (being approximately .25 acres, more or less) upon which a basic parking lot is located, said property being more particularly described on the site plan attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit \"A\" (the \"Parking Lot\")\nWHEREAS, the Parking Lot is located across the street from and in the immediate vicinity of the Lamar Porter Field, which is owned and operated by B\u0026amp;G Club, and across the street from and in the immediate vicinity of the campus of Woodruff Elementary School, which is owned and operated by LRSD\nWHEREAS, the Parking Lot has been recently paved by the B\u0026amp;G Club, but was not completed in full compliance with certain City of Little Rock Codes and Ordinances\nWHEREAS, the Parking Lot is primarily utilized by B\u0026amp;G Club during the summer months for sporting events at Lamar Porter Field, but is not used by B\u0026amp;G Club as frequently during the months commonly associated with the public school year\nWHEREAS, LRSD desires to make available more parking for its faculty , administration, employees, parents of students, and invitees\nwhich use would be primarily during school hours during the public school year and during certain evenings for meetings and events at Woodruff Elementary School\nWHEREAS, the parties hereto hereby recognize and acknowledge the benefits of sharing the use of the Parking Lot\nand WHEREAS, LRSD proposes to make certain upgrades, alterations, and modifications to the Parking Lot (as set forth below) and provide certain other consideration in exchange for the right to use the Parking Lot. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises set forth above and other good and valuable consideration, including the consideration recited hereinbelow, ~ .C\u0026gt;.. . 0 C ~ :I: zm ..... the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby expressly acknowledged by both of the parties hereto, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 1. TERM. The term of this Lease shall be for a period of twenty-five (25) years, beginning on the date hereof, and expiring ______ , 2030. 2. RENT: As monetary rent for the use of the Parking Lot, LRSD shall pay to B\u0026amp;G Club as of the date hereof, in full in advance, Twenty-Five and No/ 100 Dollars ($25.00), representing a rental amount of One and No/100 Dollars ($1.00) per year during the Term hereof (the \"Monetary Consideration\"). The Monetary Consideration shall be in addition to the Infrastructure Consideration, as such term is defined hereinafter. In addition to the Monetary Consideration given by LRSD for the use of the Parking Lot, LRSD also agrees to make certain \"Infrastructure Improvements\" (as such term is defined hereinafter) to the Parking Lot. The monetary value of the Infrastructure Improvements, as well as the planning, design, and labor therefore shall be known as the \"Infrastructure Consideration,\" 3. INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS. LRSD agrees to plan, design, perform, and be responsible for the costs of labor and materials to install the following improvements at the Parking Lot: - striping for parking spaces (approximately 32 spaces total)\n- curbing\n- landscaping\n- fencing along the western boundary of the Parking Lot\n- concrete drive area\n- ADA curb-cuts\nand - drainage. All such improvements to the Parking Lot as above described are general!) identified on the site plan attached hereto and incorporated herein by thi referenc~ a~ Exhibit\" A\" (the \"Infrastructure Improvements\"). B\u0026amp;G Club hereby expressly consents to LRSD placing appropriate, cuswmar~ parking lot signage on the Parking Lot to indicate that the Parking Lot ma) be util izcu by LRSD, its faculty , administration, employees , parents of students, and invitee~ . LRSD agrees to complete the installation of the Infrastructure Improvements within two hundred seventy (270) days after any and all approvals of such Infrastructure Improvements are obtained from the City of Little Rock, Arkansas . 2 4. MAINTENANCE. Once the Infrastructure Improvements are made and the Parking Lot becomes usable by the parties hereto, B\u0026amp;G Club and LRSD agree that each shall be equally responsible (on a 50/50 basis) for the costs, labor, and materials necessary to maintain and repair the Parking Lot on a day-to-day basis, including, but not limited to, such items as re-striping, re-surfacing, repairs to potholes or cracks, and repairs to curbing, drainage, fencing, or lighting\nprovided, however, any typical clean up or repair of damage to the Parking Lot which is caused by the sole and direct actions of the users of the Parking Lot associated with either B\u0026amp;G Club or LRSD shall be borne by B\u0026amp;G Club or LRSD, as the case may be [for example, if cans, bottles, or other trash are left on the Parking Lot following an event at which invitees of either B\u0026amp;G Club or LRSD are using the Parking Lot, B\u0026amp;G Club or LRSD, as the case may be, shall be responsible for the clean up of the Parking Lot, or, during any such event, damage is caused to a portion of the Parking Lot by the invitees of either B\u0026amp;G Club or LRSD, B\u0026amp;G Club or LRSD, as the case may be, shall be responsible for the necessary repairs or replacements for the damage caused). 5. COMMON USE OF PARKING LOT. The parties hereto hereby expressly acknowledge and agree that each party shall have the right of use of the Parking Lot, and that neither party's use shall be exclusive\nprovided, however, each party recognizes, acknowledges, and agrees that B\u0026amp;G Club will most often utilize the Parking Lot during summer months for sporting events held at Lamar Porter Field and LRSD will most often utilize the Parking Lot during public school year months for dayto- day school classes and events. Each party hereto agrees to cooperate in good faith so as to avoid interference with the other party's use of the Parking Lot during the expected times of use by such other party. In the case of unexpected events and the need for use of the Parking Lot by one or the other party beyond such expected uses as set forth herein, the party planning to use the Parking Lot shall use its best, reasonable, good faith efforts to provide advance notice to the other party. 6. UTILITIES. B\u0026amp;G Club shall be responsible for the prompt and full payment, as and when due, of any and all utilities charged to the Parking Lot, including but not limited to electricity and lighting. 7. TAXES. B\u0026amp;G Club shall pay all ad valorem taxes, assessments and other taxes of any kind whatsoever due to improvement districts or governmental bodies which may be levied, assessed or charged against the Parking Lot, or any improvements at any time situated thereon. 8. WARRANTIES OF TITLE. B\u0026amp;G Club hereby warrants and covenants with and unto LRSD that it has an absolute and indefeasible title to the Parking Lot, and that B\u0026amp;G Club will, during the Term hereof and the full performance by LRSD of LRSD 's obligations and covenants hereunder, defend the same and hold harmless LRSD against the lawful claims of any and all persons whomsoever with respect to the 3 ~?\u0026lt; U...I. ,n... C: 0 CUI mz ~~ :Cm ~~ ~=! r g z ~ iz3 UI .0... ,, jg ~ title thereto. Upon performance of its obligations hereunder, LRSD will be entitled to the quiet enjoyment of the Parking Lot, subject only to B\u0026amp;G Club's rights to use the Parking Lot in accordance with the terms hereof. 9. SIGNS AND ADVERTISING. Any sign displayed on any part of the outside of any improvement shall be for identification only, and not in the nature of advertising. 10. INSURANCE\nINDEMNITY AGAINST DAMAGE OR INJURY. LRSD agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless B\u0026amp;G Club against any claim, expense, loss or liability to the extent the same is caused by the direct action or inaction of LRSD, LRSD's agents, servants, employees, faculty, administration, students, parents of students, and invitees. B\u0026amp; G Club agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless LRSD against any claim, expense, loss or liability to the extent the same is caused by the direct action or inaction of B\u0026amp;G Club, B\u0026amp;G Club's agents, servants, employees, coaches , administration, B\u0026amp;G Club members , parents of B\u0026amp;G Club members, and invitees. B\u0026amp;G Club agrees to keep and maintain at all times during the term hereof, in full force and effect insurance against third party liability by reason of B\u0026amp;G Club's use or occupancy of the Parking Lot with an aggregate limit of liability thereunder of not less than $1,500,000.00, and B\u0026amp;G Club shall require that LRSD be named an additional insured in such policies, and shall be entitled to receive thirty (30) days prior written notice of any cancellation or non-renewal of such policy. 11. DEFAULT. LRSD or B\u0026amp;G Club shall be in default under the provi-sions of this Lease upon LRSD's or B\u0026amp;G Club's failure to keep or perform any of the covenants on such party's part herein to be kept or performed and such failure continues more than sixty (60) days after notice thereof given by the non-breaching party to the breaching party outlining the specific default by the breaching party and the actions necessary to cure said default\nprovided, however, that if the default is not reasonably susceptible of cure within said sixty (60) days, such breaching party will not be in default if within said sixty (60) days period it commences and continuously and diligently pursues a cure of such default until cured. 12. REMEDIES IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. In the event of a default by either party hereto, during the term hereof, such non-breaching party may, at it's option, declare this Lease thereupon terminated by written notice to the other party. 13. WAIVER OF SUBROGATIO . B\u0026amp;G Club and LRSD and all parties claiming under them hereby mutually release and discharge each other from all claims and liabilities covered by insurance in connection with the Parking Lot, regardles of the cause of the damage or loss. 4 14. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. LRSD shall not assign this Lease, nor sublet the Parking Lot or any part thereof, without the prior written consent of B\u0026amp;G Club. which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 15. CONDEMNATION. In the event all or any part of the Parking Lot should be subjected to eminent domain proceedings, and if pursuant thereto an amount of the Parking Lot shall be condemned so as to render the residue inadequate for LRSD 's purposes as herein set forth, LRSD shall have the option to terminate and cancel this Lease by giving written notice of such intention to B\u0026amp;G Club. If any such taking shall not render the residue of the Parking Lot wholly inadequate for LRSD  s purposes as herein set forth, LRSD's rentals hereunder shall be reduced in the proportion which the value of the Parking Lot taken bears to the whole value of the Parking Lot with any improvements thereon. In any such condemnation proceedings , all damages allocable to full fee simple ownership of the Parking Lot shall be payable to B\u0026amp;G Club, and any damages for loss of leasehold interest, including the unamortized portion of the value involved in such condemnation of any non-removable improvement or fixture placed on the Parking Lot by LRSD with B\u0026amp;G Club's approval, shall be payable to LRSD to the extent same would have been amortized over the term hereof. 16. BINDING EFFECT. This Lease shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto, their respective successors, legal representatives, and assigns, except as expressly limited otherwise herein. 17. TIME OF ESSENCE. The time of the making of the payments and of the keeping of the covenants herein are of the essence of this agreement and the parties hereto so agree. 18. NOTICES. Any notice called for or permitted under the terms hereof may be given in writing and sent by ordinary mail, a reputable overnight courier, to the last address of the party to whom the notice is to be given, as designated by such party in writing. The parties hereto hereby establish their notice addresses, as of the date hereof. as the addresses set forth in the introductory paragraph hereof. 19. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE. This Lease shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Arkansas. The parties hereto hereby expressly acknowledge and agree that the courts of Pulaski County, Arkansas shall be the proper venue for any dispute arising hereunder . 20. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL. If, during the Term hereof, B\u0026amp;G Club ,h.tll receive a written, bona fide offer to purchase the Parking Lot from a third party bona fide purchaser, which offer B\u0026amp;G Club would otherwise be willing to accept (a \"Third Party Offer .. ). B\u0026amp;G Club shall notify LRSD in writing of such Third Party Offer, including a copy of th1.: Tlurd Party Offer (the \"B\u0026amp;G Club Notice\"). LRSD shall have the right of first refusal to purchase the Parking Lot for a period of twenty (20) days from the date of actual receipt ofthe.B\u0026amp;G Club Notice on the same terms as set forth in the Third Party Offer (\"'Right of First Refusal\"). 1 f LRSD elects to exercise its Right offirst Refusal during such twenty (20) day period, LRSD 5 ~ \u0026gt; .C.. . 0 C ~ :I: mz -\u0026lt; shall notify B\u0026amp;G Club in writing that LRSD will purchase the Parking Lot on the same terms as set fo rth in the Third Party Offer. In the event that LRSD shall fail to exercise its Right of First Refusal within such twenty (20) day period following LRSD's actual receipt of the B\u0026amp;G Club Notice. the Right ofFirst Refusal shall automatically expire at the conclusion of such twenty (20) day period. LRSD's failure to exercise its Right of First Refusal shall not affect its lease rights hereunder. (Signatures Conmined on Following Page.) 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands below on the day and year first above written. LITTLE ROCK BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB, a nonprofit corporation Title: clu LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, a public school district By: (Print name) (Signature) Title: 7 ~  C ls C ~ :mI: .z. . NOl!S: 1. AU. NEW PARl\u0026lt;INO AAAS AN\u0026gt; Dfl\\B ARE. DElJNEAlE\u0026gt; Vl11H CURB Nm CUTltR.. 2. DCISllNO PAVEMENT, CURBS Nm WALKS NOT 'THIN PUN PA~ ARE.\u0026gt;S SH\u0026lt;\u0026gt;-. SHALL BE REMO'.fD. lHE ARE.A DRESSED Vl11H 1tlPS0L AND SEEDED OR SOOOED M OH:CTm ON PLAN. SPEQAL CONSTRUCTION NOlE: ACCESS 10 1l PARl\u0026lt;ltC LOT SHALL BE OPEN Nm UNOBSTRUCTED AT n END Of EAat W0AI\u0026lt; DAY. AA.AS Of Nf'f PAVEMENT REMOVAL OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE PROPR.Y BARRICADED~ INAO\\RTENT ENlRY BY 'tatCU:S lRA~ AL.ONO EmiER 7TH STREET OR JOtHiON SfflEET OR YflHIN lHE PARl\u0026lt;ltC LOT. _.,. .-..r.. .~,.,,: ..: ~-.-~-,-- ..rd.L -\"~- =.......-...~. , .. LMI .... AIIIJllllla EXHIBIT A 2 WIOTMOltANMil.SWALE WITH 2: 1 SIOE 9'-0PES CUT TO EXISTING ORAJ.IAG otTCH TOSOUTHWE5l VEAIFV ONNERSMIP OR EASEJ.aEHT PAIOA TO COH9TIUX:1'0H The Parking Lot PROPOSED LEGfNP _,. CURI LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY LAMAR PARKING F-,...,.F--l SITE PLAN -- g .......... lml . 41.l.l . anna-. DATE: TO: FROM: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 September 22, 2005 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District receives donations from businesses and individuals on a regular basis. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District that donations are not formally accepted until they are approved by the Board of Directors. RATIONALE: District policy states that, in order to maintain the centralized fixed asset property accounting system, all property donation requests are forwarded to the Director of Procurement. The Procurement Department forwards the requests, along with the appropriate recommendations, to the Board of Directors for acceptance and approval. In order for proper recognition and appreciation to be conveyed to the donor, donor's name and current mailing address should be included in the donation memo. FUNDING: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached donation requests be approved and accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. PREPARED BY: ~rral Paradis, Director of Procurement v~:en Caraway, Fixed Asset Property Manager ~ .C\u0026gt;. . 0 C ~ :I: z.m. . DONATIONS School/Department Item Donor Central High School $100.00 cash to be Jahn M. Oraha used to purchase tee-shirts Central High School $300.00 cash to the Mr. Gregg Heming on Cheerleading squad behalf of The Peabody Little Rock Chicot Elementary A check in the amount Ms. Stella Phillips School of $125.00 to be used for school uniforms Chicot Elementary A check in the amount UALR Children International School of $1,000.00 to be used for playground enhancement Mabelvale Elementary Contribution of goods and Johnson Controls, Inc. in School services in the amount of conjunction with the $27,075.00 over a period Performance Contract with of time. Goods and the District and funded services valued at through Qualified Zone approximately $5,668.00 Academy Bonds to be contributed during 2005-06 school year. Mann Arts/Science $300.00 cash for general Dr. Stephanie F. Gardner Magnet Middle School support of the school Pulaski Heights $500.00 cash to be used The Hillcrest Residents Elementary School to purchase school Association in honor of supplies for needy Mr. Robin Borne', retiring families Board member Pulaski Heights Wrought iron fence, Pulaski Heights PT A Elementary School valued at $21,000.00, surrounding the playground on the Colonial Court and Pine Street sides. Western Hills Student violin valued Ms. Beth Hill Elementary School $200.00 to be used by students School/Department LRSD Adult Education Center $750.00 Literacy grant to be used to purchase basic literacy textbooks and materials Donor Ms. Renita Thompson, Personnel Manager, Wal-Mart Store #126 \u0026gt;:\u0026lt;- .\u0026gt;\u0026lt; u..,.C..\"..\u0026gt;. c:O CUI mz zc\n, ...\na \"'m i! zr  ..itt{e 1wck Centra{ :f{itJli Sclioo{ 1500 Soutfi 'Park Street Litt{e 'Rock, .'Arkansas 72202 Plione 501-447-1400 :fax 501-447-1401 DATE: 8/9/2005 - - - -- TO: DARR.!\\L PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL ~~ SUBJECT: DONATION Jahn M. Oraha of 3011 W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205, graciously donated $100 to our school for tee-shirts. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Litt{e 'Rock Centra{ Jfi/Jli Sclioo{ 1500 Soutli 'Park Street Litt{e 'Rock, .. 'Arkansas 72202 'Pfione 501-447-1400 jax 501-447-1401 DATE: 8/9/2005 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, P~NCIP AL J}V,,1.,, L./.J.t{j_J~.1 SUBJECT: DONATION Gregg Herning on behalf of The Peabody Little Rock at Three Statehouse Plaza, Little Rock, AR 72201, generously donated $300 to our cheerleaders. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. i .\n. -. ~ . .' .....~.. ... ,.~ : . ~ . CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL To: Darral Paradis, Procuremecr ctor From: Jane Harkey, Principal Date: August 9, 2005 Re: Donation ./ Chicot has received a $125 check from Ms. Stella Phillips to be used for school uniforms. It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with LRSD policies. We are grateful for the support of community members like Ms. Phillips. Ms. Stella J. Phillips 3700 Cantrell Rd., Apt. 304 Little Rock, AR 72202 1 100 Chico Road Phone (501) 4.17-7000  Fax 50' ..!..!7-7QQ  AUG 11 2U05 , CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL To: Darral Paradis, Procureme7~~ From: Jane Harkey, Principal .  f1 Date: August 9, 2005  Re: Donation I Chicot Elementary has received a $1000 check from UALR Children International as an incentive for completing student projects. Per our Campus Leadership Team vote, it will  be used to enhance our playground. It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with LRSD policies. We are grateful for the assistance that UALR Children International provides our students and families. UALR Children International 2510 Fair Park Little Rock, AR 72204 RECEIVED AUG 11 2005 111 00 Chicot Road Phone (501) 447-7000 Fax (501) 447 -7001 Mabelvale. Arkansas 72103 PROCUREMENT \u0026amp; MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 1800 East 6th Street  Little Rock, AR 72202  (501) 447-2260  Fax: (501) 447-2261 DATE: TO: September 1 , 2005 Board of Directors FROM: ~I Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management THROUGH: Roy G. Brooks, Ed. D., Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donation Johnson Controls, Inc. has agreed to contribute $27,075.00 in goods and services to Mabelvale Elementary School. The contribution will continue over a period of time, beginning with the 2005-06 school year, until the total contribution is met. This contribution will be made in conjunction with the Performance Contract between Johnson Controls and the Little Rock School District that is being funded through Qualified Zone Academy Bonds. Goods and services, valued at approximately $5,668.00 as outlined in the attachment, will be contributed during the 2005-06 school year for Parts I and II of the proposed plan. The donor's mailing address is: Johnson Controls, Inc., Attn: Melanie A Hayes, Account Executive, 10801 Executive Center Drive, Suite 103, Little Rock, AR 72211. It is recommended that this donation request be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. Thank you. August 12, 2005 Mr. Darian Smith, Principal Mabelvale Elementary School 9401 Mabelvale Cut-Off Mabelvale, Arkansas 72103 ' ~HNSON CO~LS 10801 Executive Center Drive Suite 103 Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 (501) 537-2741 RE: Johnson Controls, Inc. - Private Contribution - QZAB Project Plan Summary Dear Mr. Smith, Thank you so much for your time and Ms. Cargill's time during the past weeks in working to develop an appropriate contribution for Johnson Controls, Inc. to make to Mabelvale Elementary School in conjunction with the Performance Contract between Johnson Controls and the Little Rock School District that is being funded through Qualified Zone Academy Bonds. As we have discussed, this contribution must meet 10% of the value of the improvements being installed at Mabelvale Elementary School under the Performance Contract. The contribution, totaling $27,075.00, will be made through goods and services over a period time beginning with the 2005/2006 school year and continuing until the total contribution is met. It is currently anticipated that an annual contribution will be made through the 2014/2015 school year. In conjunction with the proposed plan, our point of contact at Mabelvale Elementary School will be Ms. Kathleen Cargill. Based upon our discussion, we are proposing the following contributi0n plan for your review and acceptance. ~?\u0026lt; ....,. ,,nc: 0 cm\"z' ~~ :Cm ~~ zr - Part I Support of Mabelvale Elementary Schools' Mission to Improve Student Achievement in Math. In support of this effort, Johnson Controls will provide the following for the 2005/2006 school year: Goods/Services Cost per Item Total Everyday Math Counts Kits- One Per Grade 6 Total @ $175.00 ea. $1,050.00 Level Today's Math Student Workbooks 90 Total(@ $7.00 ea. $630.00 Today's Math-Teacher Training 12 Total(@ $50.00 ea. $600.00 Today's Math-Game Kits 12 Total @$120.00 ea. $1,440.00 Part I Total $3,720.00 I have spoken with Kathleen and she will provide us with the vendor and ordering information on the items so that we can expedite these purchases. We will order and deliver these items to you at Mabelvale Elementary School. Kathleen will obtain an invoice for JCI from LRSD for the Teacher Training component. I Part II Igniting Creative Energy Challenge Competition A. National ICE Challenge Johnson Controls will support Mabelvale Elementary School in their participation in the National Energy Foundation's \"ICE Challenge.\" (Igniting Creative Energy). This is an annual competition sponsored and funded through an educational grant by Johnson Controls, Inc. with additional support from the United States Energy Association and administered by National Energy Foundation. The ICE Challenge was developed to increase awareness among students of the growing energy crisis which has brought the impact of our energy choices closer to home. The Igniting Creative Energy Challenge asks students to use their creative talents to communicate their energy ideas and actions. The Challenge is an educational competition designed to encourage students to learn more about energy and the environment. Student entries should reflect the theme \"Igniting Creative Energy\" (ICE) and demonstrate an understanding of what an individual, family or group can do to make a difference in their home or community. Students can express their ideas in the form of documented science projects, stories, books, artwork, photographs, music, video or website projects, or via any other format. Page 2 of4 Johnson Controls, Inc. Mabelvale Elementary School QZAB Contribution Plan 8/12/2005 Each year four national grand prize winners are chosen. In past years, competition winners have received trips for themselves and a parent or guardian to the Olympics in Salt Lake City and to Hawaii. Entries are due in February of each year and winners announced mid-to-late March. Winners also participate in the National Energy Efficiency Forum in Washington D.C., held during June, where they share their Challenge entries and ideas with government and energy leaders. B. Mabe/vale ICE Challenge Johnson Controls' Little Rock Office employees will conduct a competition for Mabelvale Elementary Students in an adaptation of the national competition offering Mabelvale students additional opportunities for prizes and recognition. A total of six prizes will be awarded to Mabelvale ICE Challenge winners. One student from each grade level, (K through 5), who's work best exemplifies the Challenge criteria, will receive a $50 savings bond. Johnson Controls will present an overview of the competition and timetable for entries to Mabelvale Staff in October 2005. Entries will be due in January 2006. Winning submissions will be announced in early February and all entries will be forwarded on to compete in the national ICE Challenge competition. Kick-Off for ICE Challenge. Dari Scott with the National Energy Foundation in Utah will assist Johnson Controls, Inc. in the Mabelvale Elementary School Kick-Off for the ICE challenge. We will work with you and Ms. Cargill on an appropriate date in early October to host the contest Kick-Off at Mabelvale. Estimated Value of Contribution in Goods and Services for Part II of the contribution: Goods/Services Cost Per Item Total ICE Challenge Kick-Off One-Time School-Wide Assembly $1,000.00 Awards for Winnders 6 Total Savings Bonds (@ $50.00 ea. $300.00 JCI \u0026amp; NEF Volunteer Time* 2 JCI - 1 NEF 3 Total @ 12 hours ea. $648.00 (@$18.00/hour * Part II Total $1,948.00 Please Note: $18.00 per hour is the estimated VIPs rate for the 2005/2006 school year. We will use the actual rate to calculate the total volunteer contribution at the end of the 2005/2006 school year. I 2005/2006 - Estimated Contribution Total for Plan Parts I \u0026amp; II - $5,668.00 At the conclusion of the 2005/2006 school year, Johnson Controls shall provide a letter to LRSD and Mabelvale Elementary School certifying the actual amount contributed for the 2005/2006 school year. Page 3 of4 Johnson Controls, Inc. Mabelvale Elementary School QZAB Contribution Plan 8/12/2005 ~ .C\u0026gt;. . 0 c:: ~ :I: .zm.. Understanding that the needs of the school are dynamic and may vary from year to year, in all future years, Johnson Controls will work with the Principal ofMabelvale Elementary School to develop a contribution plan for that school year that will best meet the challenges and mission of the school. Each year, we will document the current year's plan in August and provide a letter certifying the actual contribution made for that in June. Mr. Smith , we at Johnson Controls are looking forward to our partner relationship with the students and staff ofMabelvale Elementary School. We appreciate the opportunity to work with your school in this capacity and look forward to assisting you and Ms. Cargill to measurably improve your student's performance in Math! Sincerely, Melanie A. Hayes Account Executive Johnson Controls, Inc. Little Rock, Arkansas (501) 537-2741 direct ( 501) 231-4869 cell (501) 224-4216 fax cc: Ms. Kathleen Cargill, Mabelvale Elementary School If you are in agreement, with the proposed plan, please indicate your acceptance by signing in the space below. Darian Smith, Principal, Mabelvale Elementary School ______ ,2005 Date Page4 of4 Johnson Controls, Inc. Mabelvale Elementary School QZAB Contribution Plan 8/12/2005 HORACE MANN ARTS/SCIENCE MAGNET MIDDLE SCHOOL TO: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement ~FROM: DATE: RE: James Fullerton, Principal August9,2005 Donation to Horace Mann Arts/Science Magnet Middle School Dr. Stephanie F. Gardner, 13201 Ridgehaven Road, Little Rock, AR 72211, has generously donated $300.00 for the general support of Horace Mann Arts/Science Magnet Middle School. It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Thank you for your consideration. 1000 East Roosevelt Road  Phone (501) 447-3100  Fax (501) 447-3101  Little Rock , Arkansas 72206 :\u0026gt;\u0026lt;- .\u0026gt; \u0026lt; .c...n. rnc O ccn mz Zc, ....\n:a :Cm ~~ 2!!\n:a rz - ~ \u0026gt; ~ 0 \u0026lt;= ~\nr: m .z... . PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement FROM: Lillie Carter, Principal b DATE: August 10, 2005 RE: Donation The Hillcrest Residents Association in honor of Mr. Robin Borne', retiring board member wishes to make a cash donation to Pulaski Heights Elementary in the amount of $500.00. These funds will be used to purchase school supplies for needy families during the 2005-06 school year. It is recommended that this generous donation be approved with thanks in accordance with the policies of the board. c: Dr. Sadie Mitchell Associate Superintendent RECE~VEO AUG 15 2o05 319 North Pine Street  Phone 447-5900  Fax 447-5901  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 Sep - 02 - 05 08 : 51A tRil PULASKI HEIGH1$ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ~ 001..01~ TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Darral Paraclis, Director of Procurement Lillie Qlrter f'rincipal /v August30,l005 Donation The Pulaski Heights ~.T.J\\\u0026amp; llas generously donated a wrought iron fence to th~ school. It is absolutely beautiful and enhances the appealJ:lnce of our playground on the Colonial Court and P\nne Street sides. The value of this donation is $21,000 JO. It is recommended that is cHonation be approved in accordance with the poli~ of the board. P . 02 ~ 1 a Nr, rt h P ino \"trc,r, t  f\"'hl'H'\\~ ,147.r.\nQI) ( .  1\n1x 447-5901  Little Rock. Ark:insas 72205 WESTERN HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL  DATE: August 11, 2005 TO: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement FROM: Scott Morgan, Principal SUBJECT: Donation Beth Hill of#2 Shepherd Hills Court, Little Rock, AR 72223-1977, very graciously donated a student violin valued at $200.00 for students at Western Hills Elementary School. It is my recommendation that this contribution be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District.\n~..\n~ ~. ~:\n, ' .. ~\\ . -~ !\n,.'. ..  .. 4901 Western Hills  Phone (501) 447-6900  Fax (501) 447-6901  Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 ADULT EDUCATION CENTER 4800 WEST 26m STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72204 447-1850  FAX: 447-1851 TO: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement FROM: ~ulette H. Martin, Coordinator DATE: August 25, 2005 SUBJECT: Donation Ms. Renita Thompson, personnel manager of Wal-Mart Store #126 at 700 South Bowman Road, has generously donated a $750 Literacy grant to the Little Rock Adult Education Center to purchase basic literacy textbooks/materials. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. RECE!.VEQ AUG 2 6 2005 'A.n I11divid11a!Approach to a World of Knowledge\" LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: September 22, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: July and August 2005 Financial Reports BACKGROUND: Financial reporting is designed to keep the Board of Directors up-to-date regarding the District's current financial condition. Financial reports are submitted monthly to the Board for review and approval. RATIONALE: July and August 2005 financial reports will not be submitted this month due primarily to the annual report submission to the ADE. FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: No action at this time. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen Chief Financial Officer ,\u0026gt;..\u0026lt;. .\u0026gt; \u0026lt; U...). ,(\") c::: O CU\u0026gt; mz Zc, \"\"\"\n:o :Cm ~f\n: \u0026lt;!!\n:o zr - ~  ~ 0 C: !:1 31: mz ....\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_46","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2005-07"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/46"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District, plaintiff vs. Pulaski County Special School District, defendant\nl\niKJ~: Arkansas --~i: '.J. -:-v::-7::'0:'\n... ~ DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ~ HTATCAPrTOLMA1.1.  lim.EllOCJC,\nIJUCANSAS 72201-1071  ($01)612-447S  http\n//arkccllutate.ar.aa Dr. Kenneth James, Commissioner of Education July 29, 2005 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza  124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 RECEIVED Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones III AUG - 1 2005 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONI.TORING Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 WRW Dear Gentlemen: Per an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of July 2005 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. SJ~Q~~ ~Sm~ General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier To: Return Keep or Toss D [ Post-ii\" 7668 c:JM 1993 -------------- ST ATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair - Dr. Jeanna Westmoreland, Arkadelphia Vice Chair - Diane Tatum, Pine Buff Members:* Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro  Shelby Hillman, Carlisle *Calvin King, Marianna Randy Lawson, Bentonville *Mary Jane Rebick, Little Rock *Naccaman Williams, Johnson An Equal Opportunity Employer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for July 2005. Respectfully Submitted, J~1hl General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on July 29, 2005, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 _/2 n'll \u0026amp; dl~ Scott Smith IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use.the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 a don the information available at June 30, 2005, the ADE calculated the State foundation f:unding for FY Q.4/05, .subiect to periodic adjustments B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 ~ on Ule information available at Jun.e 30, 2005, the ADE calculated fqr f..X 0~05, ~ubj~ct to perio_dic adjustments_. C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 0 June~. 20Q.5 di~tributions of ~tate Foundation Fungmg fo f ~w LRSD\nAJleZ~ NL.RSD - $33,304, 168 ~~~~J2.li [he allotments of State Foundation Funding calculated for FY 04/05 at June 30, ,oos, .subj...c.1.19..P-eriodi adjustments, wer~ as foJ!ows: L SO -:.i,65,Q82,694 NLB_SD . $33,30,t168 l.?\u0026amp;Q  5~~~Lru D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 Based Qfl th  forma ion available, the ADE calculated at June 30, 2005 for fY ~. s b.i ic adj4.stmeo1s. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005  av~i!9ble e . E calgJlat,~d at Jun..~jj)_,,2Q.QgJQf.E.Y. :\n,'-',\n== ic djl!S It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. G. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 Based on a Court Order on August 27, 2004 for FY 03/04, an adjustment was made in the expense per child. A final magnet payment of 56,074 for FY 03/04 was made to the LRSD on November 10, 2004. '=-\"\"~~-  'qp available,Jl)e ADE calcul~t~d at Ju Y  ic,.adjustments. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 P.isi,riQY.llQDs~for fY 04/05 at June 30, 2005, totaled $13,~ZZ,904. AllotmeDt ~ElQ...{gr . IS)5 was $13,977,904 subject to periodic agjustme.0ts. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 Calculated for FY 02/03, subject to periodic adjustments. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 In September 2002, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 02/03 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 In September 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the third one-third payment for FY 03/04 to the Districts. In September 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the first one-third payment for FY 04/05 to the Districts. In March 2005, General Finance was notified to pay the second one-third payment for FY 04/05 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function instead of Reginald Wilson as indicated in the Implementation Plan. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 In September 2004, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2004, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $4,019,063.00 NLRSD - $772,940.15 PCSSD - $2,478,863.72 In September 2004, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts fo~ their FY 04/05 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2004, the following had been paid for FY 04/05: LRSD - $1,325,043.67 NLRSD - $275,333.33 PCSSD - $845,221 .22 In March 2005, General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 04/05 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At March 2005, the following had been paid for FY 04/05: LRSD - $2,650,087.34 NLRSD - $550,666.66 PCSSD - $1,690,442.44 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1 , 1998 In July 1999, each district submitted an estimated budget for the 99/00 school year. In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2004, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 04/05 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date 2. Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. Actual as of July 31, 2005 In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD - 14. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD -12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD-6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. The ADE accepted a bid on 16 buses for the Magnet and M/M transportation program. The buses will be delivered after July 1, 1999 and before August 1, 1999. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nPCSSD - 6. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD -6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD-6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001. The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two type C 47 passenger buses and fourteen type C 65 passenger buses. Prices on these units are $43,426.00 each on the 47 passenger buses, and $44,289.00 each on the 65 passenger buses. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42,155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. Specifications for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M school buses have been forwarded to State Purchasing for bidding. Bids will be opened on May 12, 2003. The buses will have a required delivery date after July 1, 2003 and before August 8, 2003. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. 2005, Q bjd for 16 ew M\u0026amp;gnetpnd M-to-M_buses was aw?rde to ard ra.IlportatiQn S!3   uses fpr the LBSD i11ctuq~ ~ - 65, assen e uses for 53 150. ...es tqr t)le NLRSD irfo_ly_q_e 1 .00 ebge( b~s for J53,150,.Q.O . J  lude 6 - .(}5,passeng_er busesJor.~$53,:Jfil).00 ea~h._The.J.Q.~~ITIQ.Ynt  I ,5,.,00, 0 . Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. 10 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 04/05. 11 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 12 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 13 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 15 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 16 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On July 26, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued} 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is finalized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 18 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearence Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 19 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On November 4, 2004, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ADE is required to check laws that the legislature passes to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Clearence Lovell was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he has retired, the ADE attorney will find out who will be checking the next legislation. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 6, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On May 3, 2005, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The PCSSD has petitioned to be released from some desegregation monitoring. There was discussion in the last legislative session that suggested all three districts in Pulaski County should seek unitary status. Legislators also discussed the possibility of having two school districts in Pulaski County instead of three. An Act was passed by the Legislature to conduct a feasability study of having only a north school district and a south school district in Pulaski County. Removing Jacksonville from the PCSSD is also being studied. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 7, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 20 111. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 21 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. C. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 22 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17- 1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81 st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 23 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 24 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 25 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11, in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 26 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 3.1, 2005 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, A letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 1748 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, A letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. 27 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. C. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 Ongoing Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 Ongoing D. Through regularoversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 28 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of AD E's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 19,96, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 29 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project ManagementTool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the ADE's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997. the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 30 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 31 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII}. The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed  revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lntervenors filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 32 .e V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua intervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lntervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lntervenors were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 33 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's ProjectManagementTool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21, 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 34 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 35 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On July 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 36 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 37 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 11, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 11, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 9, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. 38 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On June 13, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 39 VI. REMEDIATION A Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 40 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 41 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 42 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 43 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. D. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. 44 - VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31 , 2005 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31, 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. 45 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31 , 2005 (Continued) On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the AD E's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly T earn V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 46 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts. In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further assistance to schools, i.e., Title I Summer Planning Session, ADE session on Smart Start, and the School Improvement Workshops. All schools and districts in Pulaski County were invited to attend the \"Smart Start\" Summit November 9, 10, and 11 to learn more about strategies to increase student performance. \"Smart Start\" is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. Representatives from all three districts attended. On January 21, 1998, the ADE provided staff development for the staff at Oak Grove Elementary School designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement. Using achievement data from Oak Grove, educators reviewed trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. On February 24, 1999, the ADE provided staff development for the administrative staff at Clinton Elementary School regarding analysis of achievement data. On February 15, 1999, staff development was rescheduled for Lawson Elementary School. The staff development program was designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement using achievement data from Lawson, educators reviewed the components of the Arkansas Smart Initiative, trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. Student Achievement Workshops were rescheduled for Southwest Jr. High in the Little Rock School District, and the Oak Grove Elementary School in the Pulaski County School District. 47 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On April 30, 1999, a Student Achievement Workshop was conducted for Oak Grove Elementary School in PCSSD. The Student Achievement Workshop for Southwest Jr. High in LRSD has been rescheduled. On June 8, 1999, a workshop was presented to representatives from each of the Arkansas Education Service Cooperatives and representatives from each of the three districts in Pulaski County. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACT MP). On June 18, 1999, a workshop was presented to administrators of the NLRSD. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACT MP). On August 16, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT MP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for teaching assistant in the LRSD. On August 20, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT MP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for the Accelerated Learning Center in the LRSD. On September 13, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT MP program were presented to the staff at Booker T. Washington Magnet Elementary School. On September 27, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to the Middle and High School staffs of the NLRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT MP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On October 26, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to LRSD personnel through a staff development training class. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT MP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On December 7, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was scheduled for Southwest Middle School in the LRSD. The workshop was also set to cover the components of the new ACT MP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. However, Southwest Middle School administrators had a need to reschedule, therefore the workshop will be rescheduled. 48 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On January 10, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for both Dr. Martin Luther King Magnet Elementary School \u0026amp; Little Rock Central High School. The workshops also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On March 1, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for all principals and district level administrators in the PCSSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On April 12, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for the LRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. Targeted staffs from the middle and junior high schools in the three districts in Pulaski County attended the Smart Step Summit on May 1 and May 2. Training was provided regarding the overview of the \"Smart Step\" initiative, \"Standard and Accountability in Action,\" and \"Creating Learning Environments Through Leadership Teams.\" The ADE provided training on the development of alternative assessment September 12-13, 2000. Information was provided regarding the assessment of Special Education and LEP students. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate in professional development regarding Integrating Curriculum and Assessment K-12. The professional development activity was directed by the national consultant, Dr. Heidi Hays Jacobs, on September 14 and 15, 2000. The ADE provided professional development workshops from October 2 through October 13, 2000 regarding, \"The Write Stuff: Curriculum Frameworks, Content Standards and Item Development.\" Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems by video conference for Special Education and LEP Teachers on November 17, 2000. Also, Alternative Assessment Portfolio System Training was provided for testing coordinators through teleconference broadcast on November 27, 2000. 49 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On December 12, 2000, the ADE provided training for Test Coordinators on end of course assessments in Geometry and Algebra I Pilot examination. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation conducted the professional development at the Arkansas Teacher Retirement Building. The ADE presented a one-day training session with Dr. Cecil Reynolds on the Behavior Assessment for Children (BASC). This took place on December 7, 2000 at the NLRSD Administrative Annex. Dr. Reynolds is a practicing clinical psychologist. He is also a professor at Texas A \u0026amp; M University and a nationally known author. In the training, Dr. Reynolds addressed the following: 1) how to use and interpret information obtained on the direct observation form, 2) how to use this information for programming, 3) when to use the BASC, 4) when to refer for more or additional testing or evaluation, 5) who should complete the forms and when, (i.e., parents, teachers, students), 6) how to correctly interpret scores. This training was intended to especially benefit School Psychology Specialists, psychologists, psychological examiners, educational examiners and counselors. During January 22-26, 2001 the ADE presented the ACT AAP Intermediate (Grade 6) Benchmark Professional Development Workshop on Item Writing. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were invited to attend. On January 12, 2001 the ADE presented test administrators training for mid-year End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. On January 13, 2001 the ADE presented SmartScience Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This was shared with eight Master Teachers. The SmartScience Lessons were developed by the Arkansas Science Teachers Association in conjunction with the Wilbur Mills Educational Cooperative under an Eisenhower grant provided by the ADE. The purpose of SmartScience is to provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. The following training has been provided for educators in the three districts in Pulaski County by the Division of Special Education at the ADE since January 2000: On January 6, 2000, training was conducted for the Shannon Hills Pre-school Program, entitled \"Things you can do at home to support your child's learning.\" This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. The school's director and seven parents attended. 50 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On March 8, 2000, training was conducted for the Southwest Middle School in Little Rock, on ADD. Six people attended the training. There was follow-up training on Learning and Reading Styles on March 26. This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. On September 7, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Chicot Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Karen Sabo, Kindergarten Teacher\nMelissa Gleason, Paraprofessional\nCurtis Mayfield, P.E. Teacher\nLisa Poteet, Speech Language Pathologist\nJane Harkey, Principal\nKathy Penn-Norman, Special Education Coordinator\nAlice Phillips, Occupational Therapist. On September 15, 2000, the Governor's Developmental Disability Coalition Conference presented Assistive Technology Devices \u0026amp; Services. This was held at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On September 19, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Jefferson Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Melissa Chaney, Special Education Teacher\nBarbara Barnes, Special Education Coordinator\na Principal, a Counselor, a Librarian, and a Paraprofessional. On October 6, 2000, Integrating Assistive Technology Into Curriculum was presented at a conference in the Hot Springs Convention Center. Presenters were: Bryan Ayers and Aleecia Starkey. Speech Language Pathologists from LRSD and NLRSD attended. On October 24, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On October 25 and 26, 2000, Alternate Assessment for Students with Severe Disabilities for the LRSD at J. A. Fair High School was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. The participants were: Susan Chapman, Special Education Coordinator\nMary Steele, Special Education Teacher\nDenise Nesbit, Speech Language Pathologist\nand three Paraprofessionals. On November 14, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On November 17, 2000, training was conducted on Autism for the LRSD at the Instructional Resource Center. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. 51 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On December 5, 2000, Access to the Curriculum Via the use of Assistive Technology Computer Lab was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter of this teleconference. The participants were: Tim Fisk, Speech Language Pathologist from Arch Ford Education Service Cooperative at Plumerville and Patsy Lewis, Special Education Teacher from Mabelvale Middle School in the LRSD. On January 9, 2001, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. Kathy Brown, a vision consultant from the LRSD, was a participant. On January 23, 2001, Autism and Classroom Modifications for the LRSD at Brady Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Beverly Cook, Special Education Teacher\nAmy Littrell, Speech Language Pathologist\nJan Feurig, Occupational Therapist\nCarolyn James, Paraprofessional\nCindy Kackly, Paraprofessional\nand Rita Deloney, Paraprofessional. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcast on February 5, 2001. Presenters were: Charlotte Marvel, ADE\nDr. Gayle Potter, ADE\nMarcia Harding, ADE\nLynn Springfield, ASERC\nMary Steele, J. A. Fair High School, LRSD\nBryan Ayres, Easter Seals Outreach. This was provided for Special Education teachers and supervisors in the morning, and Limited English Proficient teachers and supervisors in the afternoon. The Special Education session was attended by 29 teachers/administrators and provided answers to specific questions about the alternate assessment portfolio system and the scoring rubric and points on the rubric to be used to score the portfolios. The LEP session was attended by 16 teachers/administrators and disseminated the common tasks to be included in the portfolios: one each in mathematics, writing and reading. On February 12-23, 2001, the ADE and Data Recognition Corporation personnel trained Test Coordinators in the administration of the spring Criterion-Referenced Test. This was provided in 20 sessions at 1 O regional sites. Testing protocol, released items, and other testing materials were presented and discussed. The sessions provided training for Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Pilot Tests. The LRSD had 2 in attendance for the End of Course session and 2 for the Benchmark session. The NLRSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. The PCSSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. 52 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued} On March 15, 2001, there was a meeting at the ADE to plan professional development for staff who work with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students. A $30,000 grant has been created to provide LEP training at Chicot Elementary for a year, starting in April 2001. A $40,000 grant was created to provide a Summer English as Second Language (ESL) Academy for the LRSD from June 18 through 29, 2001. Andre Guerrero from the ADE Accountability section met with Karen Broadnax, ESL Coordinator at LRSD, Pat Price, Early Childhood Curriculum Supervisor at LRSD, and Jane Harkey, Principal of Chicot Elementary. On March 1-2 and 8-29, 2001, ADE staff performed the following activities: processed registration for April 2 and 3 Alternate Portfolio Assessment video conference quarterly meeting\nanswered questions about Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) and LEP Alternate Portfolio Assessment by phone from schools and Education Service Cooperatives\nand signed up students for alternate portfolio assessment from school districts. On March 6, 2001, ADE staff attended a Smart Step Technology Leadership Conference at the State House Convention Center. On March 7, 2001, ADE staff attended a National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Regional Math Framework Meeting about the Consensus Project 2004. On March 8, 2001, there was a one-on-one conference with Carole Villarreal from Pulaski County at the ADE about the LEP students with portfolios. She was given pertinent data, including all the materials that have been given out at the video conferences. The conference lasted for at least an hour. On March 14, 2001, a Test Administrator's Training Session was presented specifically to LRSD Test Coordinators and Principals. About 60 LRSD personnel attended. The following meetings have been conducted with educators in the three districts in Pulaski County since July 2000. On July 10-13, 2000 the ADE provided Smart Step training. The sessions covered Standards-based classroom practices. 53 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On July 19-21, 2000 the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were 200 teachers from across the state in attendance. On August 14-31, 2000 the ADE presented Science Smart Start Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This will provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. On September 5, 2000 the ADE held an Eisenhower Informational meeting with Teacher Center Coordinators. The purpose of the Eisenhower Professional Development Program is to prepare teachers, school staff, and administrators to help all students meet challenging standards in the core academic subjects. A summary of the program was presented at the meeting. On November 2-3, 2000 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching. This presented curriculum and activity workshops. More than 1200 attended the conference. On November 6, 2000 there was a review of Science Benchmarks and sample model curriculum. A committee of 6 reviewed and revised a drafted document. The committee was made up of ADE and K-8 teachers. On November 7-10, 2000 the ADE held a meeting of the Benchmark and End of Course Mathematics Content Area Committee. Classroom teachers reviewed items for grades 4, 6, 8 and EOC mathematics assessment. There were 60 participants. On December 4-8, 2000 the ADE conducted grades 4 and 8 Benchmark Scoring for Writing Assessment. This professional development was attended by approximately 750 teachers. On December 8, 2000 the ADE conducted Rubric development for Special Education Portfolio scoring. This was a meeting with special education supervisors to revise rubric and plan for scoring in June. On December 8, 2000 the ADE presented the Transition Mathematics Pilot Training Workshop. This provided follow-up training and activities for fourth-year mathematics professional development. On December 12, 2000 the ADE presented test administrators training for midyear End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. 54 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcasts on April 2-3, 2001. Administration of the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy took place on April 23-27, 2001 . Administration of the End of Course Algebra and Geometry Exams took place on May 2-3, 2001. Over 1,100 Arkansas educators attended the Smart Step Growing Smarter Conference on July 10 and 11, 2001 , at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The Smart Step effort seeks to provide intense professional development for teachers and administrators at the middle school level, as well as additional materials and assistance to the state's middle school teachers. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the first keynote address on \"The Character-Centered Teacher\". Debra Pickering, an education consultant from Denver, Colorado, presented the second keynote address on \"Characteristics of Middle Level Education\". Throughout the Smart Step conference, educators attended breakout sessions that were grade-specific and curriculum area-specific. Pat Davenport, an education consultant from Houston, Texas, delivered two addresses. She spoke on \"A Blueprint for Raising Student Achievement\". Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. Over 1,200 Arkansas teachers and administrators attended the Smart Start Conference on July 12, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Start is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the keynote address. The day featured a series of 15 breakout sessions on best classroom practices. Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. On July 18-20, 2001, the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were approximately 300 teachers from across the state in attendance. 55 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued} F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) The ADE and Harcourt Educational Measurement conducted Stanford 9 test administrator training from August 1-9, 2001. The training was held at Little Rock, Jonesboro, Fort Smith, Forrest City, Springdale, Mountain Home, Prescott, and Monticello. Another session was held at the ADE on August 30, for those who were unable to attend August 1-9. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by video conference at the Education Service Cooperatives and at the ADE from 9:00 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on September 5, 2001. The ADE released the performance of all schools on the Primary and Middle Level Benchmark Exams on September 5, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Core Teacher In-Service training for Central in the LRSD on September 6, 2001 . The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for Hall in the LRSD on September 7, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for McClellan in the LRSD on September 13, 2001. The ADE conducted Basic Co-teaching training for the LRSD on October 9, 2001. The ADE conducted training on autism spectrum disorder for the PCSSD on October 15, 2001. Professional Development workshops (1 day in length} in scoring End of Course assessments in algebra, geometry and reading were provided for all districts in the state. Each school was invited to send three representatives (one for each of the sessions). LRSD, NLRSD, and PCSSD participated. Information and training materials pertaining to the Alternate Portfolio Assessment were provided to all districts in the state and were supplied as requested to LRSD, PCSSD and David 0 . Dodd Elementary. On November 1-2, 2001 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching at the Excelsior Hotel \u0026amp; Statehouse Convention Center. This presented sessions, workshops and short courses to promote exceptional teaching and learning. Educators could become involved in integrated math, science, English \u0026amp; language arts and social studies learning. The ADE received from the schools selected to participate in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a list of students who will take the test. 56 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) On December 3-7, 2001 the ADE conducted grade 6 Benchmark scoring training for reading and math. Each school district was invited to send a math and a reading specialist. The training was held at the Holiday Inn Airport in Little Rock. On December 4 and 6, 2001 the ADE conducted Mid-Year Test Administrator Training for Algebra and Geometry. This was held at the Arkansas Activities Association's conference room in North Little Rock. On January 24, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by ADE compressed video with Fred Jones presenting. On January 31, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by NSCI satellite with Fred Jones presenting. On February 7, 2002, the ADE Smart Step co-sponsored the AR Association of Middle Level Principal's/ADE curriculum, assessment and instruction workshop with Bena Kallick presenting. On February 11-21, 2002, the ADE provided training for Test Administrators on the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Exams. The sessions took place at Forrest City, Jonesboro, Mountain Home, Springdale, Fort Smith, Monticello, Prescott, Arkadelphia and Little Rock. A make-up training broadcast was given at 15 Educational Cooperative Video sites on February 22. During February 2002, the LRSD had two attendees for the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The NLRSD and PCSSD each had one attendee at the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 2, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. The ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 9, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. 57 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) The Twenty-First Annual Curriculum and Instruction Conference, co-sponsored by the Arkansas Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and the Arkansas Department of Education, will be held June 24-26, 2002, at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs, Arkansas. \"Ignite Your Enthusiasm for Learning\" is the theme for this year's conference, which will feature educational consultant, Dr. Debbie Silver, as well as other very knowledgeable presenters. Additionally, there will be small group sessions on Curriculum Alignment, North Central Accreditation, Section 504, Building Level Assessment, Administrator Standards, Data Disaggregation, and National Board. The Educational Accountability Unit of the ADE hosted a workshop entitled \"Strategies for Increasing Achievement on the ACT MP Benchmark Examination\" on June 13-14, 2002 at the Agora Center in Conway. The workshop was presented for schools in which 100% of students scored below the proficient level on one or more parts of the most recent Benchmark Examination. The agenda included presentations on \"The Plan-Do-Check-Act Instructional Cycle\" by the nationally known speaker Pat Davenport. ADE personnel provided an explanation of the MPH point program. Presentations were made by Math and Literacy Specialists. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, gave a presentation about ACTMP. Break out sessions were held, in which school districts with high scores on the MPH point program offered strategies and insights into increasing student achievement. The NLRSD, LRSD, and PCSSD were invited to attend. The NLRSD attended the workshop. The Smart Start Summer Conference took place on July 8-9, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. The Smart Start Initiative focuses on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event included remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. After comments by the Director, Bena Kallick presented the keynote address \"Beyond Mapping: Essential Questions, Assessment, Higher Order Thinking\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On the second day, Vivian Moore gave the keynote address \"Overcoming Obstacles: Avenues for Student Success\". Krista Underwood gave the presentation \"Put Reading First in Arkansas\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. 58 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 (Continued) The Smart Step Summer Conference took place on July 10-11, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Conve\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1786","title":"Court filings regarding motion to remove counsel from certificate of service listing, motion for approval of temporary portable buildings, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool, Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) notice of filing quarterly update, and motion to extend time to file.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Maumelle, 34.86676, -92.40432"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["2005-07/2005-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st century","School districts","Little Rock School District","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project management","Jacksonville High School (Jacksonville, Ark.)","Joe T. Robinson High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Joe T. Robinson Middle School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Pine Forest Elementary School (Maumelle, Ark.)","Education--Evaluation","Joshua intervenors"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings regarding motion to remove counsel from certificate of service listing, motion for approval of temporary portable buildings, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool, Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) notice of filing quarterly update, and motion to extend time to file."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1786"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["95 page scan, typed"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\u003c?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\"?\u003e\n\u003citems type=\"array\"\u003e  \u003citem\u003e   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_description type=\"array\"\u003e   \n\n\u003cdcterms_description\u003eCourt filings: District Court, motion to remove counsel from certificate of service listing; District Court, motion for approval of temporary portable buildings; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool; District Court, order; District Court, Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) notice of filing quarterly update; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool; District Court, motion to extend time; District Court, order; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool    This transcript was create using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. MOTION TO REMOVE COUNSEL FROM CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE LISTING RECEIVED JUL -8 2005 OFFICEDF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS Separate Defendants State of Arkansas and the Arkansas Department of Education, by and through their attorneys, Attorney General Mike Beebe and Senior Assistant Attorney General Timothy G. Gauger, for their Motion request that the Clerk remove the following attorneys from the certificate of service list based upon the following: 1. Chief Deputy Attorney General Dennis R. Hansen and Assistant Attorney General Colette D. Honorable are no longer assigned to this case. 2. Attorneys Sammye L. Taylor and Tim C. Humphries are no longer employed with the Office of the Attorney General. WHEREFORE, Defendants State of Arkansas and Arkansas Department of Education request that Dennis R. Hansen, Colette Dodson Honorable, Sammye L. Taylor, and Tim C. Humphries, be removed from the certificate of service listing in this case for judicial economy. Defendants request that the Court and parties direct all future services and correspondence to Mark A. Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General. By: Respectfully Submitted, MIKE BEEBE Attorney General I Timothy G. Gauger, Bar Number 95019 Attorneys for Defendants State of Arkansas and Arkansas Department of Education Arkansas Attorney General's Office 323 Center Street, Suite 1100 Little Rock, AR 72201 E-mail: Tim.Gauger@arkansasag.gov CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on July 7, 2005, I presented the foregoing to the Clerk of Court for filing and uploading to the CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such filing to the following: hwallen@allenlawfirmpc.com, njjackson@allenlawfirmpc.com mbumette@mbbwi.com scurry@aristotle.net fedley l@alltel.net mark.hagemeier@arkansasag.gov hell er@fec.net, brendak@fee.net sjones@mwsgw.com., aoverton@mwsgw.com sjones@jlj .com, padams@jlj.com laveyandburnett@laveyandbumett.com, jsmith@laveyandbumett.com rroachell@aol.com, schoollaw@msn.com btrice@hfc-law.com, ajegley@hfc-law.com j ohnwalkeratty@aol.com, lorap 72297@aol.com, j springer@gabrielmail.com 2 I hereby certify that on July 7, 2005, I mailed the document by United States Postal Service to the following non CM/ECF participants: Clayton R. Blackstock Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon, PLLC 1010 West Third Street P.O. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Will Bond Bond \u0026amp; Chamberlin 602 West Main Street Jacksonville, AR 72076 Norman J. Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc. 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 Franklin A. Davis 625 Northwind Circle Conway, AR 72032-3477 Nelwyn L. Davis Attorney at Law 5 Bridle Court Little Rock, AR 72227 P.A. Hollingsworth Hollingsworth Law Firm, P.A. Main Place Building 415 Main Street Little Rock, AR 72201-3801 James M. Llewellyn, Jr. Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. 412 South Eighteenth Street P.O. Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 Robert C. Lowery Lowry Law Firm 9000 Rodney Parham Road Little Rock, AR 72205 3 - Phillip K. Lyon Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones, P.A. TCBYTower 425 West Capitol Avenue Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Jerry L. Malone Office of Chief Financial Officer 4023 Emerald Lane Suite A Bowie,MD 20716 Aubrey McCutcheon Attorney at Law Fisher Building Suite 2606 Detroit, MI 48202 Joseph Steven Mowery Stephens, Inc. 111 Center Street, Suite 2300 P.O. Box 3507 Little Rock, AR 72203-3507 Officer of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Walter A. Paulson, II Entergy Services, Inc. 639 Loyola Avenue Post Office Box 61000 New Orleans, LA 70161-1000 Samuel A. Perroni Perroni, James \u0026amp; House, P.A. 801 West Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201-2103 4 David Carl Schoen Arkansas Municipal League P.O. Box 38 North Little Rock, AR 72115-0038 Otis H. Storey, III Entergy Services, Inc., 425 West Capitol Avenue P.O. Box 551 Little Rock, AR 72203 Sharon Carden Streett Streett Law Offices P.O. Box 250418 Little Rock, AR 72225-0418 William P. Thomson Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. 412 South Eighteenth Street P.O. Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 Kenneth G. Torrence 1 721 Abigail Street Little Rock, AR 72204 Elizabeth Boyter Turner Attorney at Law 21500 Reynard Lane Little Rock, AR 72210 Larry D. Vaught Arkansas Court of Appeals Justice Building 625 Marshall Little Rock, AR 72201 Horace A. Walker Attorney at Law 518 Pyramid Place Second \u0026amp; Center Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 5 Michael K. Wilson Bond \u0026amp; Chamberlin 602 West Main Street Jacksonville, AR 72076 By: Timothy G. Gauger, ~ey General Bar Number 95019 Attorneys for Defendants State of Arkansas and Arkansas Department of Education Arkansas Attorney General's Office 323 Center Street, Suite 1100 Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 682-2007 E-mail: Timothy.Gauger@arkansasag.gov 6  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. 4:82CV00866WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. I, ET AL. . MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY PORT ABLE BUILDINGS PCSSD for its motion states: 1 RECEIVED JUL 2 6 2005 OFRCEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTER VEN ORS I. Attached as Exhibit A is a memorandum from the Assistant Superintendent for Leaming Services explaining and justifying the need for one portable at Robinson Middle School, one portable at Robinson High School and two portables at Jacksonville High School. . By way of explanation, the \"old gym\" at Robinson is being reclaimed by its actual owner having i been on loan to the District for decades. 2. , Exhibit A also explains the need on a temporary basis for one portable at Baker Elementary School and one portable Pine Forest Elementary School. l ' 3.  For the reasons set forth in Exhibit A, the PCS SD prays for an order of this Court approving the use of portable buildings for the uses and durations explained therein. 1 It should be noted that nothing in Plan 2000 or any operative orders of this Court address the issue of portable buildings one way or the other. As a general proposition, the PCSSD eschews the use of portables except for non classroom settings of when their use is unavoidable. Desegregation plans previous to Plan 2000 placed considerable restrictions upon the use of portable buildings but that language is no longer operative. However, the PCS SD has historically sought permission of the Court for the use of portable buildings, even on a temporary basis. Hence this motion. Respectfully submitted, MITCHELL, WILLIAMS, SELIG, GATES \u0026amp; WOODY ARD, P.L.L.C. 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 688-8800 FAX: (501) 688-8807 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE . I hereby certify that on July 25, 2005, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such filing to the following:  Mark Terry Burnette mburnette@mbbwi.com  John Clayburn Fendley, Jr fendley1@alltel.net  Mark Arnold Hagemeier mark. hagemeier@ag .state .ar. us  Christopher J. Heller heller@fec.net brendak@fec.net;tmiller@fec.net  M. Samuel Jones, Ill sjones@mwsgw.com aoverton@mwsgw.com  Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj.com barbie.mcadams@jlj.com;kate.jones@jlj .com  John W. Walker johnwalkeratty@aol.com lo rap 72297@aol.com ;jspringer@gabrielmail.com l certify that on July 25, 2005, I mailed the foregoing document and a copy of the Notice - of Electronic Filing (NEF) by United States Postal Service to the following non CM/ECF participants: 2 Clayton R. Blackstock Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon, PLLC 1010 West Third Street Post Office Box  1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suitel895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Robert Pressman 22 Locust A venue Lexington, Massachusetts 021 73 Judge J. Thomas Ray U.S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Atto for Pulaski nty Special School District ITCHELL, WILLIAMS, SELIG, GATES \u0026amp; WOODY ARD, P.L.L.C. 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 688-8800 FAX: (501) 688-8807 E-Mail: sjones@mwsgw.com 3 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: PCSSD Cabinet Marvin H. Jeter, ill, Assistant Superintendent for Le2rning Se.-vices 15 July 05 Rationale for requesting portable buildings Robinson Muldle School -1 Portable As we will be losing the old gym at Robinson, there is a need to have a portable for students to be used as changing rooms until the new gym is completed and ready for usage in August 2006. Robinson High School -1 Portable The enrollment during the 2004-2005 school year was 674, and the projected enrollment at Robinson is 690 students which is over-enrolled for the building capacity. Therefore, we need pennission to continue the usage of the portable that is located there until such tim.e as additional classrooms can be built. Jacksonville High School - 2 Portables Several weeks ago, I was asked to prepare this recommendation regarding the placement of portables at JackSOnville High School, so I have copied it to this document. I do have sonic concerns based upon the conversations over the transition of ninth grade to the high school campus. In the town meetings and in related conversations, the community expressed their strong desire to keep the ninth grade as separate as possible for safety, focus, and support. After reviewing and discussing some of the recent data on high school reform, Dr. Henderson and I agreed that this would be best. He instructed us to figure it out. When we considered the estimate of 300 ninth .grade studentsrwe projected.thata:ll:)inimum of eight classrooms would be needed according.to the follovving arrangement: 2 rooms for Ninth Grade Language Arts - English I 2 rooms for Ninth Grade Mathematics - Algebra I or Intermediate Algebra A 2 rooms for Ninth Grade Social Studies - 2 rooms for Ninth Grade Strategies for Success The advanced classes, science classes, and electives could be taught in the main building. For this reason, Mr. Clark recommended that we move art to the print shop and establish the K Building as the Ninth Grade Center. Now that we are planning on using the print shop for this pUipose and that building can provide at most four classrooms, Mr. Warren's suggestion to place two portables is the only way to provide the eight classrooms. This would fulfill our district commitment to the Jacksonville community to offer a more separate and protected environment for the ninth grade students. There is a great deal ofresearch and support .from USDE supporting concepts of\"Ninth Grade Academies\" and such designs to offer support as students transition from middle school and acclimate to the high school St-\"tting. Should we decide to provide this design, I recommend that we collect data regarding academic performance and attendance/retention to consider this for our other high school environments. EXHIBIT I Baker Elementary School -1 Portable PCSSD has begun plans for a new Chenal Elementary School which will open in August 2007. The 2004-2005 Baker enrollment was 362. Projected enrollment for 2005-2006 is 380 with 15 on a waiting list. With students on a waiting list to enroll at Baker Elementary, one portable will allow the school to retain as many of these students as possible within the public education system until such time as the new facility opens and allows 800 additional seats in this feeder. Pine Forest Elementary School - 1 Portable It is the strong opinion of the PCS SD Board Representative from the Mawnelle/Oak Grove zone that there is going to be a need for this pqrtable based upon the expected increase in enrollment due to additional neighborhoods in this attendance zone. Therefore, we are requesting permission to delay moving the portable until after the 8th day count so that we have an accurate number of students enrolled.  f1~~ Arkansas ~ = DEPARTMENT OF f:DUCATION 4 STATE CAPITOL MALL  UT11.E IC\u0026gt;a. A1XANSAS 72201-1071  (SC)I) 112-447S  lallp://arkalu.atate.ar.u Dr. Kenneth James, Commissioner of Education July 29, 2005 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones III RECEIVED AUG - 1 2005 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONI.TORlNG Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. US. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 WRW Dear Gentlemen: Per an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of July 2005 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. s)~~ Q ~ -4dsm~ General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier ST ATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair - Dr. Jeanna Westmoreland, Arkadelphia Vice Chair - Diane Tatum, Pinc Buff Members: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro Shelby Hillman, Carlisle *Calvin King, Marianna  Randy Lawson, Bentonville *Mary Jane Rebick, Little Rock *Naccaman Williams, Johnson An Equal Opponunity Employer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for July 2005. Respectfully Submitted, , General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on July 29, 2005, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 Scott Smith IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use.the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2005 aasea:,91) .tn~. information availabl~,,~t:.,J.!,JD~{~Q;:~OQ~.Jh~.A,01; cal~!.l.!a.t~.d ~h~_$tate Coia ' dati . ' J. r;:  d'n t : c:-v_, ... Fl . __ Jm\u0026amp;1Y.ll.~ 9 .t P.1. b t !JJn,Aa /.o. ~'1!!,111's.,i.iiw-LeQ =Kto\"~Pc,~ -JJ'o . ._d_i_c,'.a_c fJ u .s.+! l!m, ,e_J 'l.t. s.,'- B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. No. 4:82CV00866 WRW/JTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. ORDER RECEIVED AUG 11 2005 OFFJCDF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS Pending is Pulaski County Special School District's Motion for Approval of Temporary Portable Buildings (Doc. No. 3931 ). No party has objected, and the time for doing so has passed. For good cause shown and because no party has objected, PCSSD's Motion for Approval of Temporary Portable Buildings is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of August, 2005. Isl Wm. R.Wilson Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL LRSD'S NOTICE OF FILING OUARTERL Y UPDATE RECEIVED SEP - 6 2005 OFACEOF DESEGREGATION MONlTORING PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") for its Notice of Filing Quarterly Update dated September 1, 2005 states: 1. The attached document is the fourth quarterly written update by the Little Rock School District and its Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department. It has been provided to the Joshua Intervenors and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring in accordance with the District Court's 2004 Compliance Remedy (Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004). 2. LRSD is filing this Quarterly Update so that the Court may be aware of the compliance work done by LRSD to comply with the Court's Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004. WHEREFORE, the LRSD submits its Quarterly Update as required by the Cow:t. Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK Christopher Heller (#81083) 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 BY: ~ ~Jf-. lo r Christopher Heller D CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following. people by depositing a copy of same in the United States mail on the 31st day of August, 2005: Mr. John W. Walker JOHNW. WALKER,P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Nations Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Judge t Thomas Ray U. S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr; Tim Gauger Mr. Mark A. Hagemeier Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr; Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Little Rock School District (LRSD) QUARTERL Y UPDATE to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) and Joshua September 1, 2005 RECEIVED AUG 2 9 2005 QfflCEOf IJESEBREGATION IIOE-LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, PLAINTIFF V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. I ET AL., DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. , INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL., INTERVENORS . Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) Instructional Resource Center (IRC) Little Rock School District 3001 South Pulaski Little Rock, AR 72206 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DNISION RECEIVED SEP - 6 2DD5 OFFICE OF DESEOREOATION MON!TORJHQ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for August 2005. Respectfully Submitted, j 04h smit~92251 General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 -I CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on August 31, 2005, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr;M. SamuelJones,III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 s'tttt Smith IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW RECEIVED SEP - 6 2005 OFFICE OF PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENOR$ KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL DESEOREOATION MONl10RINO INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of August 31, 2005 Based on the information available at June 30, 2005, the ADE calculated. the State Foundation Funding for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending: Date lastday,,of' each month', August- Jun\u0026amp;. RECEIVED OCT 3 2005 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DESEGREG=raHITORlHG EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DNISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MOTION TO EXTEND TIME For its Motion, Plaintiff Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. In accordance with the June 30, 2004 Compliance Remedy in this case, LRSD has engaged experts to prepare four Step 2 program evaluations for the 2004-05 school year. The progress of those evaluations has been reported to the Court and the parties in quarterly updates filed by LRSD, the most recent of which was filed on August 31, 2005. The evaluations are due to the Court on October 1, 2005. 2. The four Step 2 program evaluations cannot be completed without the results of the benchmark examinations administered by the State of Arkansas for the 2004-05 school year. The benchmark examination results are not yet available and will not be available until October 1 or later. Dr. Steve Ross and Dr. James Catterall, the experts hired by LRSD to conduct the four Step Y program evaluations, estimate that if they receive the benchmark exam results in early October that they would be able to deliver completed program evaluations by early January 2006. Letters from Dr. Ross and Dr. Catterall explaining the need for more time are attached to this Motion. 3. The requested extension of time is necessary to ensure the delivery ofuseful program evaluations which will fulfill the purposes of the compliance remedy. The requested extension of time will not delay any decisions about whether to continue, expand, modify or discontinue programs. Those decisions will be made in the Spring and will be effective for the 2006-07 school year. 4. LRSD has attempted to contact the Joshua Intervenors to secure their agreement to the requested extension of time, but has not yet received a response. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above and in the attached letters fromDr. Ross and Dr. Catterall, Plaintiff Little Rock School District requests an extension of the time within which it must file four Step 2 program evaluations for the 2004-05 school year to and including Monday, J an~ary 16, 2006. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 Regions Bank Bldg. 400 West Capitol A venue Little Rock, AR 72201 501/376-2011 /s/ Christopher Heller 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on September 29, 2005, I have electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such filing to the following: mark.hagemeier@ag.state.ar. us sjones/@mwsgw.com sjones@jlj.com johnwalkeratty@aol.com and I hereby certify that on September 29, 2005, I mailed the document and a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by United States Postal Service to the following non CM/ECF participants: Judge J. Thomas Ray U. S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Gene Jones Office of Desegregation Monitoring 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 /s/ Christopher Heller 3 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES UCLA BERKELEY  DAVIS  IRVINE  LOS ANCEL ES  RIVERSIDE  SAN DIECO  SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA  SANTA CRUZ Graduate School of Education \u0026amp; Information Studies P.O. Box 951521 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1521 September 26, 2005 Karen DeJarnette, Ph.D. Director, PRE Department Little Rock School District 3001 S. Pulaski Little Rock, AR 77206-2873 Dear Karen: According to Dr. Julian, Assistant Commissioner for the state Department of Education, her agency will receive results of the Benchmark test scores \"around the first of October\", and your experience with release of digitally formatted data indicates that you may not receive data to pass on to me and my research staff until several weeks after the state receives it. At any rate, we do not have data in hand necessary to complete our report on Year-Round Education, certainly not by the present due date of October 1, 2005. Assuming you can deliver correctly formatted data by early November, I can furnish a draft in early December and the final report by early January 2006. This schedule should permit analyzing the data, composing a complete draft, and producing the final report. Anything you can do to confirm the date of data delivery will help our team plan the balance of the work. Sincerely, (e-mailed September 26, 2005 - Signed original sent express) jsc James S. Catterall, Ph.D. Professor Voice: (310) 825-5572 Fax: (310) 206-6293 E-mail: jamesc@gseis.ucla.edu THE UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS September 23, 2005 Dr. Karen DeJarnette Director, PRE Department Little Rock School District 3001 S. Pulaski Little Rock, AR 77206-2873 Dear- Dr. DeJarnette: Center for Research in Educational Policy A Tennessee Center of Excellence 325 Browning Hall Memphis, TN 38152-3340 Office: 901 .678.231 o Toll Free: 866.670.6147 Fax: 901 .678.4257 www.memphis.edu/crep I have been informed that the State of Arkansas will receive student-level Benchmark test scores at the beginning of October this year and release them to the school districts some time after that. I further understand that the digital version, which we need for computer analysis, will be available after the State sends printed versions to the districts. Thus, the data may not be available to my research staff until perhaps late fall. Whatever the actual delivery date, it typically takes us about six to eight weeks to run, verify, and interpret the analyses and then produce the draft report. I am asking you to take this time requirement into account in projecting when our final report could be ready following the release to us of Benchmark data. Given the dates above, we believe a reasonable date for delivery of the final report is early January 2006. Sincerely, Steven M. Ross, Ph.D. Fadree Professor and Director Center for Research in Educational Policy A Tennessee Board of Regents Institution An Equal Opportunity  Affirmative Action Univer~ty UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. No. 4:82CV00866-WRW/JTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al. KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al. ORDER RECEIVED OCT 3 2005 OFACEOF DESEGREGATION MONf-TORJNG PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS Pending is Little Rock School District's Motion to Extend Time (Doc. No. 3938), the first paragraph of which, reads as follows: In accordance with the June30, 2004 Compliance Remedy in this case, LRSD has engaged experts to prepare four Step 2 program evaluations for the 2004-05 school year. The progress of those evaluations has been reported to the Court and the parties in quarterly updates filed by LRSD, the most recent of which was filed on August 31, 2005. The evaluations are due to the Court on October 1, 2005. For emphasis I note that the above quoted paragraph correctly reflects that the June 30, 2004 order directed (not \"suggested\") that the subject evaluations were to be filed on October 1, 2005 ( actually, the Order directed that the evaluations were to be filed \"no later than October 1, 2005,\" but this is a small point). Late yesterday (at 4:34 p.m., to be specific), September 29, 2005, with one working day left before the October 1 deadline, LRSD filed this Motion to Extend Time. It appears from the other matters set forth in the motion, that LRSD cannot meet the October 1 deadline because of uncompleted tasks. 2004: Before writing anything else I feel compelled to quote my complete order of July 26, Regardless of an appeal, LRSD is required to continue full speed ahead, on all points, with respect to the compliance remedy set forth in the Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004 (Doc. No. 3875). As was noted in the June 30 Memo, LRSD is required to do only what it volunteered to do. I assume that I am stating the obvious, but, as folks are wont to say nowadays, I wanted to make sure that we are \"all on the same page.\"1 LRSD's Motion to Extend Time also contains this paragraph: LRSD has attempted to contact the Joshua Intervenors to secure their agreement to the requested extension of time, but has not yet received a response. Since the current motion by LRSD presents a weighty matter (at least my view), it seems that it would be important to have a response from Joshua's lawyers before the deadline passes. - Is it possible that both lawyers ofrecord for Joshua are traveling out of the country sans omnipresent cell phones? If what I have said above has not made it clear, I will now state it plainly-- I am not happy with the Johnny-come-lately motion. These things, among others, are on my mind: 1. How long has LRSD lrnown that they were not going to comply with the Court's direct, specific order? 2. Why was the motion not filed until the 11th hour? 3. Does this last minute filing demonstrate that LRSD is treating the Court's directives with studied neglect? 'Doc. No. 3890 (emphasis in original). 2 4. Is LRSD playing for time in the hope that the Circuit Court of Appeals will reverse, thereby relieving LRSD of what it was plainly obliged to do, regardless of the appeal? 5. Why should a last minute motion like this be granted? LRSD is directed to file a plenary response to each of the above questions by 5 p.m. next Tuesday, October 4, 2005. I note that sixty-nine page Order entered on June 30, 2004 was so long and detailed because LRSD pled that it did not understand exactly what its obligations were under earlier orders. It seems that this detailed order of June 30, 2004 did head off pleas of misunderstanding, but not a last minute motion to avoid its plain obligations, at least until a much later date. A hearing on LRSD's Motion to Extend Time will be set forthwith. The exact nature of that hearing will be determined after I receive LRSD's document in response to this Order (due next Tuesday, October 4, 2005, by 5 p.m.). IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of September, 2005. /s/ Wm. R.Wilson,Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3 -~~~ Arkansas ~~ DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ---==---~ HTATCAPITOLMAU.  IJTll.El0CX,;AIJCANSAS 72201-1071  (501)612-4475  bltp://arkcdiutate.ar.aa Dr. Kenneth James, Commissioner or Education September 30, 2005 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 I Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones III 9NfHOl1NOW N0l!V93H93S3O ~o 331JO gooz t: 1:m C3Al303H Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. US. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 WRW Dear Gentlemen: Per an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of September 2005 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, r , \\JtLIV\\ ~Smith General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: MarkHagemeier RECE-IVE-D OCT 3 2005\" OFFICcOFDESEGREGATION MONlTORING~ STATE.BOARD OffEDUCATION: Chair-Dr: JcaruwWestmoreland: Arkadelphia, Vicc-ChaiL-Dianc:Tatum,.PintBuff. Members: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro. Shelby Hillmair,,CarlisleCalvinKing; Marianna Randy,Eawson;.Bcntonvill~ *Mary Jane-Rebick, Little:Roclc *Naccaman: Williams, Johnson An Equal Opponunity Em lo er UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RECEIVED LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ,otf ,3 :z1aus ~ - ,.,;)i;,r , rJfFF!ffl:(ffl: 11E~~HiAiTIO;{,'Afu!ffm?lflG PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for September 2005. Respectfully Submitted, o C ~o-:lt,~ Scott Smith, Bar# 92251 General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 ' . CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on September 30, 2005, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr.M. SamuelJones,III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201    This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e\n   \n\n\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/items\u003e"},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1093","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2005-07"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Curricula","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1093"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nRECEIVED JUL 2 8 2005 OFFICE OF Agenda DESEGREGATION MONITORING Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting JULY2005 OFFICE OF DESEG. MONITORING n\u0026gt; .,, i==~ -\u0026lt; C 03: oz :o\u0026gt; O:tl m-\u0026lt; :ti-., :- oCz: on r--\u0026lt; r- 0 nz \u0026gt;r- \"' r- ==.,, m:O r- 0 on om 3: 0 m c: .... ~ 0 rC) 3: C: \u0026gt; ~~ -\u0026lt;m cn\no \"' :ti \u0026gt;. m.,, \"'O .C,,: :-t\u0026lt;i\n-t~ n:o =i~ ~o -c, Oz Zen-\u0026lt; 0 z \"' !D ~ ::!l z m :ti \"z' m 0 C: n \u0026gt; -\u0026lt; 0 z f) :ti m 3: \u0026gt; !:J ~ r-\"' ~~ -\u0026lt; 0 \u0026gt; 3: n :::\nF:. m z \"' I. 11. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Welcome to Guests REGULAR MEETING JULY 28, 2005 5:30 P.M. 111. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Partners in Education - New Partnerships C. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) D. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A. Remarks from Board Members B. CARE Program Update C. Student Assignment Report D. Budget Update E. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects F. Internal Auditors Report G. Technology Update V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A Minutes: Regular Meeting - 06-23-05 Special Meeting - 06-29-05 (,\".). ., i- :,0 rm --\u0026lt; C 03: oz :,a\u0026gt; O::ID m-\u0026lt; :,a.., :- ,oCz: on r- ... ~o \u0026gt;~ rr- ::i\n-,:, m::ID r- 0 (\")(\") om 3: 0 .m.. c: ~ 0 re, 3: c:,. ~::l --\u0026lt;m \"':,0 \"' :,0 .\u0026gt; m.., \u0026lt;no .C...,.: .:\",.0.' ('\")\nij :::\nm -\u0026gt;-'.\"o' - C, Oz_z \"' ... 0 z \"' !JI ~ z~ m :,0 \"z' m 0 C: (\") .\u0026gt;.. 0 z fl :,0 m 3: \u0026gt; ~~ r- \"' .~.. o~ \u0026gt; 3: (\") :::\nN zm \"' Regular Board Meeting July 28, 2005 Page 2 VI. EDUCATIONAL SERVICES A. Handbook for Pre-K / Early Childhood Program VII. SCHOOL SERVICES A. Revision of Policy IJOA Field Trips with Regulations IJOA-R VIII. HUMAN RESOURCES A. Personnel Changes IX. FINANCE \u0026amp; SUPPORT SERVICES A. Second Reading: Policy FA - New Facilities Development Goal B. Consulting Contract Tech Services C. Property Donation - Mabelvale D. Request for Grant Proposal Authority E. Donations of Property F. Financial Report X. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions XI. ADJOURNMENT n )\u0026gt;-., ~~ --\u0026lt; C 03: oz ::a\u0026gt; o::a ,m.,-..\u0026lt;, -c: :o:onz r--\u0026lt; ~~ )\u0026gt;u, r r ~.., rm-0\"' nn om\ni:o m c: .... ~ 0,- C)\ni: C:)\u0026gt; ~ =l --\u0026lt;m U\u0026gt; \"U\u0026gt;' \u0026gt;. m\"..', U\u0026gt;o .C., :.\"..'. ~ U\u0026gt; n:i3 =i m )\u0026gt;O --\u0026lt;0 ofi ZU\u0026gt; .... 0 z U\u0026gt; !\" ~ .\"..'. z m \"U\u0026gt;' z m 0 C: n ~ 0 z PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS / WELCOME TO GUESTS Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. PARTNERS IN EDUCATION C. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS 0. LRCTA DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 July 28, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Partners in Education BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District Partners in Education program is designed to develop strong relationships between the community and our schools. The partnership process encourages businesses, community agencies and private organizations to join with individual schools to enhance and support educational programs. Each partnership utilizes the resources of both the school and the business for their mutual benefit. RATIONALE: The following schools and businesses have completed the requirements necessary to establish a partnership and are actively working together to accomplish their objectives. FUNDING: Not applicable. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the board approve the following partnerships: Woodruff Elementary School and EDS Metropolitan Career and Technical Center and Arkansas Baptist Church PREPARED BY: Debbie Milam, ViPS Coordinator \"m'\"m' \"D \"D 00 .\"..'.\"...'. U) U) -n)\u0026gt; ::Oz Oo\nc n CD 0 o\nc \u0026gt; 3: \"'c Oz 3: 0 m\u0026gt; 3: --\u0026lt; ~o :,:,Z U) U) !\" n \u0026gt; \"m' \"D 0 ' C) ~ 3: C \"D 0 \u0026gt; m--\u0026lt; r\u0026gt; U) --\u0026lt; cc  o ccm cZ o--\u0026lt; C) \u0026gt; mu, --\u0026lt; U) cc5 \"DZ 0 3: \u0026gt;m --\u0026lt;z m--\u0026lt; \"m' \"D 0 ::!I rn n 0 z ~ \"' C n --\u0026lt; 0 z \"m' \"D :-\u0026lt; r\u0026gt; \"m' 3: \u0026gt; ~~ ,.... U) \"' -n ~~ \u0026gt;3: n :::\nN m z U) Partners in Education Proposal Woodruff Elementary School and EDS EDS commits to the following partnership activities:  Mentoring  Reading for ViPS Reading Day  A birthday table of treats each month  Student recognition certificates for assemblies  Thanksgiving turkeys for selected families in need  Christmas gifts and food for selected families in need  Career day speakers  Other activities as requested Woodruff Elementary School commits to the following partnership activities:  Student artwork  Acknowledgement of EDS as a Partner in Education  Student performances when feasible  Opportunities for EDS employees to become involved in public education Partnership Between Arkansas Baptist College and Metropolitan Career and Technical Center The Metropolitan Career and Technical Center will: 1. Recognize Arkansas Baptist College as a partner in education on the school's website under the Metropolitan sub link and in the monthly newsletter distributed to parents and students throughout the LRSD district. 2. Recognize Arkansas Baptist College as a partner in education at the next Little Rock School Board Meeting. 3. Display plaque received at Little Rock School Board meeting recognizing the Partnership with Arkansas Baptist College in the central office at Metropolitan Career and Technical Center. 4. Metropolitan Career and Technical Center will identify qualified students who meet the requirements under the articulation agreement and refer them to Arkansas Baptist College and the Criminal Justice Program. 5. Arrange field trips for students and/or parents to tour Arkansas Baptist College. 6. Provide opportunities for Arkansas Baptist College representatives to demonstrate the degree programs relative to Criminal Justice. 7. Provide a display for Arkansas Baptist College to recruit potential student trainees and parents to review during \"Open House\", Parent and Advisory Board Day and Job Fair/College day activities. Arkansas Baptist College will: 1. Provide a representative to serve on the Advisory Council to Metropolitan Career and Technical Center's various articulated programs in order to provide guidance and strategic planning support regarding the enhancement of the school's curriculum, recruitment policies and marketing of programs. 2. Provide technical assistance in the classroom by providing speakers to come to come out and speak on various topics relative to the Criminal Justice field. 3. Provide and opportunity for field trips and visiting the campus. 4. Provide assistance with annual Skills USA Competition in Hot Springs. .:m,:,O m.\n,o, co .::.O..\n.o. enen 'Tl\u0026gt; ::Oz Co 3:n a, 0 o\nr: \u0026gt;\nr: ::0 C: Oz\nr: n m\u0026gt; 3: ... ~6\noZ en en !II (\") \u0026gt; ::0 .m,, ::0 0 c\n) ~ 3: .C,,: 0 .\u0026gt;.. m 0 .e.n. 0 C:  0 ~~ o--\u0026lt; C\u0026gt;\u0026gt; men ... en -C,: ,cz'i 0 3: \u0026gt;m --\u0026lt;z m--\u0026lt; ::0 .m,, 0 ::!l rn (\") 0 z .e.n. ::0 C: .(.\".) 5 z ::0 m ~ 0 ::0 m 3: \u0026gt; ~~ ,-en ~ ~ ...a \u0026gt; 3: (\") :::\nmN z en DATE: July 28, 2005 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: CARE Program Final Report- June 2005 BACKGROUND: The CARE Program began on August 25, 1980 with service to 13 schools. The current program serves 1500 of LRSD students in 21 elementary schools. The CARE Program is a non-profit, self-supporting program of child care provided for elementary students and parents of the Little Rock School District. The program operates before and after school and all day on most school holidays. The CARE Program provides a structured program of creative activities and recreation in a nurturing environment. Varied group and independent activities are planned according to the students' ages and interests. BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REQUEST: The LRSD Board of Directors requested information regarding the CARE Program through June 2005. A more detailed report is attached for your review. 2004-05 School Year TOTAL INCOME EXPENDITURES Personnel \u0026amp; Indirect Costs Supplies END OF YEAR BALANCE PREPARED BY: $1 ,513,922.68 1,067,944.35 21 ,561 ,41 424,416.92 Dr. Linda Watson, Senior Director of Student Services Martha Rogers, Coordinator, CARE Program r\u0026gt; en --\u0026lt; C C:  C ~~ c--\u0026lt; c,\u0026gt; men --\u0026lt; en C:Q -oz c\ni: \u0026gt;m --\u0026lt;z m--\u0026lt;\n:o .m.,, 0 ~ !\" C') 0 z en --\u0026lt;\n:o C: C') --\u0026lt; 0z\n:o .m,..,., :n \u0026gt; C: C ::\n0\n:o en\n:o m..,, 0\n:o --\u0026lt; CARE Program End of Year 2004/05 School Year (As of 7-1-05) INCOME: Beginning Balance 2004/05 Registration Fees Monthly/Part-time/Drop In Fees Late Payment Fees $ Holiday/Long Day Fees/Extra Day Fees TOTAL INCOME EXPENDITURES: Personnel: (Payroll through July Summer Payroll) Indirect Costs: (ONCE YEARLY CHARGE) Food Service-Projected Equipment \u0026amp; Repairs Refunds Training Advertising endofyearbudget 2004-05.doc 349,139.71 35,650.00 1,067,442.93 28,875.00 32,815.04 1,513,922.68 920,673.75 9,082.74 120,890.00 6,692.57 5,033.15 964.54 1,666.60 Motion Picture Licensing 1,248.50 OHS Licensing 1,550.00 Miscellaneous: 142.70 SUBTOTAL OF EXPENDITURES 1,067,944.35 Supplies: Consumable: 14,385.75 Postage: 3,637.78 Printing: 3,087.78 SUBTOTAL OF SUPPLIES 21,561.41 TOTAL EXPENDITURES: 1,089,505.76 END OF YEAR BALANCE: 424,416.92 endofyearbudget 2004-05.doc p m--\u0026lt; (\") :,: z ,0- 0 C) -\u0026lt; C: \"C' \u0026gt; m--\u0026lt; ~ \u0026gt;::o . 0\ni:: C: -Z-Z-\u0026lt; c.... :z-mm U\u0026gt;\ni:: \u0026gt; =1 m ::0 u, fl u, cc--\u0026lt;:  C a, m C: z c--\u0026lt; c,\u0026gt; mU\u0026gt; --\u0026lt; u, C: c'i -.,z c\ni:: \u0026gt;m m--\u0026lt;-z\n::0 m \"0 ' ::0 --\u0026lt; rn (\") 0 z u, --\u0026lt; ::0 C: (\") --\u0026lt; 5 z ::0 m ~ :\" \u0026gt; C: C ::. 0 ::0 u, ::0 m \"0 ' ::0 --\u0026lt; PAYROLL TOTALS 2004-2005 I I - -- I MONTH TOTAL SALARY SALARY TEACHER INS PUBLIC FICA FICA BALANCE ADM ' STAFF RETIRE ADM RETIRE ADM STAFF 1 I I - AUGUST $ 11 ,~~.06 $ 9,!0989 $ 1.275.40 I $ 861.03 I $ 673.74 $ 11 ,920.06 SEPT $ 63,146.61 $ 19,406.35 $ 31 ,307 .75 $ 6,731 .63 $ 1,811 .36 $ 85.15 I $ 1,440.94 $ 2,363.43 $ 63,146.61 OCT $ 92,175.:!_? . $ 19,236.91 $ 55,446.90 $ 9,936.13 $ ! ,798.58 $ 124 98 $ 1,519.50 $ 4,112.12 $ 92,175.12 -- NOV 1$ 8I,986.26 $ 17,880.91 $ 53 ,319.79 $ 9,497.80 $ 1,798.58 $ 122.51 $ 1,522.28 $ 3,844 39 $ 87,986 .26 DEC $ 96,158.40 $ 21 ,492.99 $ 56,489.06 $ 10,336.41 $ 1,798.58 $ 161 .97 $ 1,319 07 $ 4,560.32 $ 96,158.40 JAN ,~ 55,513 .96 $ 10,296.47 $ 34,835.48 $ 5,993.49 $ 902.58 $ 83.15 $ 753.24 $ 2,649.55 $ 55,513.96 FEB $ 90,063 .67 $ 17,862.81 , $ 55 ,121 .87 $ 9,653.82 $ 1,805.16 $ 138.04 $ 1,428 09 $ 4,053.88 $ 90,063.67 MAR $ 92,584.82 $ 19,950.92 $ 55,181.03 $ 9,859.I9 $ 1,805 .16 $ 143.56 $ 1,470.98 $ 4,173.38 $ 92,584.82 APRIL $ 9~~?_7 33 $ 20 ,_592.97 $ 60,371 .72 $ 10,596 34 $ 1,805.16 $ 169.17 $ 1,518.50 $ 4,573 47 $ 99,627 33 MAY $ 96,408.14 $ 19,629.88 $ 58,732 .27 $ 10,167.72 $ 1,805.16 $ 182.23 $ 1,445 .01 $ 4,445.87 $ 96,408.14 JUNE $ 108,289.69 $ 20 ,592.81 $ 67 ,563 .70 $ 11 ,521.49 $ 1,805 .16 $ 167.38 $ 1,618.72 $ 5,020.43 $ 108,289.69 JULY $ 26,799.69 $ 20 ,592.99 $ 2,883 04 $ 1,805.16 $ 1,518.50 $ 26,799 69 I TOTAL $ 920,673 .75 $ 216,645 .90 $ 528 ,369 .57 $ 98,453.06 $ 19,801 67 $ 2.896 64 $ 14,710.07 $39,796.84 $ 920,673 Yo Approximate CARE Sito Staff Payroll Projection per School as of May 5, 2005 Totals through July, 2005 Number of Lead Aldeo Lead Aides Number of Aldeo Aldeo Total Staff CARE Sito Per School lveariv salarvl Per School (total veariv salaries\\ Per School Bale 1 $7 837.34 4 $15,795.72 5 Booker 1 $7,572.12 5 $24,067.38 6 Bradv 1 $5,299.06 3 $16 794.30 4 Carver 1 $6,694.58 2 $9930.62 3 Dodd 1 $5 263.46 2 $6 430.64 3 FalrPar1\u0026lt; 1 $5482.40 2 $11612.00 3 Forest Par1\u0026lt; 1 $5,456.00 6 $28,489.80 7 Franklin 1 $5,482.40 1 $5021.38 2 Full\u0026gt;riaht 1 $7,572.12 6 $30,137.06 7 Jefferson 1 $7 837.34 4 $18,048.72 5 Kina 1 $5,206.50 9 $41 ,548.76 10 McOenmott 1 $6,808.50 4 $21 271 .00 5 Meadowdlff 1 $5,790.34 2 $6139.22 3 Otter Creek 1 $7,837.34 2 $7,230.36 3 Pulaski Heklhts 1 $4 288.24 3 $16,851 .26 4 Rocketener 1 $5,206.50 7 $28,688.26 8 Romine 1 $7,572.12 2 $10,822.40 3 Terrv 1 $7,837.34 3 $14,895.00 4 Washlnaton 1 $5,530.46 4 $20 851 .08 5 WestemHlns 1 $5993.26 3 $11 ,920.66 4 Williams 1 $7 837.34 6 $26,821 .38 7 TOTALS 21 $134 402.76 80 $375 367.00 101 Actual AdministraH\"\" -~lrl- 04-05 -~~hnn/ Y-r Administration Suoervisor Coordinator Field Assistant Field Assistant Clerical Bookkeeper Bookkeeoer P\"\"\"\"' Bookk\"\"\"\"r TOTALS CARE Projected Salaries 05-06.xls UIOd3ll SllOllOOI/ -~ 'ld3ll NOll:lOlllSNO:l 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 TOTAL CARE PAYROLL 311/0dn 13oona o lllOd3ll lN31'1NVISSl/ lN3001S :i Total Salariea Total Salarieo for Per School June and Julv $23 633.06 $31 639.50 $22,093.36 $16 625.20 $13 694.10 $17 094.40 $33 945.80 $10 503.78 $37709.18 $25,888.06 $46,755.26 $28 079.50 $11 929.56 $15 067.70 $21 137.50 $33,894.78 $18,394.52 $22,732.34 $26,381.54 $17 913.92 $34 658.72 $509 789.78 $65,166.00 $41 828.00 26106.78 30260.00 26 412.00 32,544.00 22 452.60 $244 771 .39 186132.81 $920,673.75 - S3lnNll'l 'I/ Sll3lll/l'l 3NllNOOll 11 - - - 311/0dn AD010NH:l31 o Last Name First Name dministrative Office Staff Allen She'Ron Conrad Wendy Houchin Veda Moore Cathine Odle Vicki Rogers Martha Westbrook-Walton Annette CARE Staff Class 04-05 CARE Pay 04-05 $26, 106.78 $26,412.00 $22,452.60 $41,828.00 $32,544.00 $65, 168.00 $30,260.00 Bale Pager: 607-7522 CARE Phone: 447-3652 Office Phone: 447-3600 Davis Linda 1-7 $7.89 Henderson Keily 1-2 $7.13 Hollis Vera Lead 3-17 $10.36 Roland Rosemary 2-17 $10.01 Williams Marcey 1-6 $7.74 Booker Pager: 607-7521 CARE P110ne: 448-3878 Office Phone: 447-3800 Arnold Carolyn Lead 2-17 $10.01 Bush Shi-rley 1-8 $8.05 Dickerson Bobbie 1-7 $7.89 Fletcher Ruby 1-6 $7.74 Harris Vivian 1-7 $7.89 Brady Pager: 607-7520 CARE Phone: 447-3939 Office Phone: 447-3900 Enlow Karron 1-6 $7.74 Fields Alice Lead 3-10 $9.16 Howard Kathy 1-10 $8.36 Milam Lisa 1-4 $7.41 Woodley Linda 3-17 $10.36 7/26/2005 Hours Worked (before \u0026amp; after school - Individual hours may vary) 7.5 hrs/day 7.5 hrs/day 7.5 hrs/day 7.5 hrs/day 7.5 hrs/day 7.5 hrs/day 7.5 hrs/day .5 hrs/day - a.m. only 4.25 hrs/day - a.m. \u0026amp; p.m. 4.25 hrs/day - a.m. \u0026amp; p.m. 2.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.75 hrs/day - a.m. \u0026amp; p.m. 3 hrs/day - p.m. only 2 hrs/day - p.m. only 3 hrs/day - p.m. only 3 hrs/day p.m. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 2.5 hrs/day - p.m. only I hr/day - a.m. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only Page 1 CARE Staff Last Name First Name Class 04-05 CARE Pay 04-05 Carver Pager: 607-7516 CARE Phone: 447-4073 Office Phone: 447-4000 Gibson Sanders Susan Patricia Lead 1-6 3-8 $7.74 $8.85 Winfrey Vearlean 1-17 $9.43 Dodd Pager: 607-7515 CARE Phone: 447-4345 Office Phone: 447-4300 Geeter Surratt Vanderpool Lula Barbara Milagros Lead Fair Park Pager: 607-7513 CARE Phone: 447-4435 Finley Montgomery Parent Felita Lucille Josephine Lead 4-1 $6.25 2-11 $9.10 1-6 $8.33 Office Phone: 447-4400 2-12 $9.26 1-17 $9.43 1-6 $7.74 Forest Park Pager: 607-7360 CARE Phone: 447-4540 Office Phone: 447-4500 Berry Gary Haggans McDonald Seawood Nancy Angela Monica James Ruthe 3-12 2-3 1-2 3-5 $9.43 $7.85 $7.13 $8.38 1-5 $7.56 Franklin Pager: CARE Phone: 447-4627 Office Phone: 447-4600 Hampton Henry Valda Sadie Lead Fulbright Pager: 607-7542 CARE Phone: 447-4762 Dixon Fritz Kenneth Terry Lead Jefferson Pager: 607-7538 CARE Phone: 447-5009 Humphrey Loistine Jones Valerie Pool Theresa Lead While Crystal 7/26/2005 H!Od3!l SMOllOOV -~ \"ld3!l NOll:lO!llSNO:\u0026gt; 3 2-12 $9.26 1-12 $8.68 Office Phone: 447-4700 3-9 $9.00 2-17 $10.01 Office Phone: 447-5000 1-8 1-6 3-17 1-5 $8.05 $7.74 $10.36 $7.56 31VOdn 13!\u0026gt;008 a l!l0d3!l 1N3WNDISSV 1N3001S :, Hours Worked (before \u0026amp; after school - individual hours may vary) S310NIW y S!l311VW 3NllNOO!l 'II 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 4 hrs/day - a.m. \u0026amp; p.m. 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 4.25 hrs/day - a.m. \u0026amp; p.m. 3.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 3 hrs/day - a.m. \u0026amp; p.m. 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 4 hrs/day - a.m. \u0026amp; p.m. 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 2.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 2.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 3 hrs/day - a.m. \u0026amp; p.m. 2.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3 hrs/day - p.m. only 3 hrs/day - a.m. \u0026amp; p.m. 3.25/hrs day - p.111. only Page 2 31VOdO AD010NH:\u0026gt;31 'D I . CARE Staff Last Name First Name Class 04-05 CARE Pay 04-05 King Pager: 607-7536 CARE Phone: 447-5185 Office Phone: 447-5100 Alford Anderson Carter Cartznes Davis Dilworth Jones Phillips Rhonda Diane John Jerome Arrysen Floyce William Frank Jeremiah Lead 3.9 1-3 3-17 2-2 2-1 3-11 3-6 1-4 $9.00 $7.28 $ I 0.36 $7.70 $7.55 $9.34 $8.54 $7.41 Sterley Pamela 1-2 $7. 13 McDermott Pager: 607-7534 CARE Phone: 447-5553 Office Phone: 447-5500 Alexander Jenkins McFee Mitchell Madie Christy Sarah Delisa Robinson Dorothy Lead -r,ieadowcliff Pager: CARE Phone: 447-5635 Bonds Dorothy 3-17 3-9 2-7 2-17 $10.36 $9.00 $8.48 $10.01 1-7 $7.89 Office Phone: 447-5600 1-7 $7.89 Conley Barnell Lead 2-17 $ I 0.0 I Otter Creek Pager: 607-7532 CARE Phone: 447-5837 Office Plwne: 447-5800 Aushn Dawson Walker Pulaski Heights Gordon Kendall Miller Tappin 7/26/2005 Shirley Bruce Whitney Lead 3-17 4-1 4-1 Pager: 607-7533 CARE Phone: 447-3285 Mary Evelyn Vanessa Ranita 3-9 1-6 2-17 1-4 $10.36 $6.25 $6.25 Office Phone: 447-5900 $9.00 $7.74 $10.01 $7.41 Hours Worked (before \u0026amp; after school  individual hours may vary) 3.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.25 hrs/day p.m. only I hr/day - a.m. only 3.5 hrs/day p.m. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 4.25 hrs/day - a.111. \u0026amp; p.rn. 3.5 hrs/day  p.m. only 4.25 hrs/day a.m. \u0026amp; p.m. 3.5 hrs/day p.m. only 2.5 hrs/day  p.m. day 4.25 hrs/day - a.m. \u0026amp; p.m. 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 2.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.25 hrs/day p.m. only 3.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3 hrs/day  a.m. \u0026amp; p.m. 4.25 hrs/day a.m. \u0026amp; p.m. 3.25 hrs/day - p.rn. only 3.25 hrs/day p.m. only 2.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 4.25 hrs/day - a.m. \u0026amp; p.m. 2.25 hrs/day p.m. only 3 hrs/day - p.m. only Page 3 CARE Staff Last Name First Name Class 04-05 CARE Pav 04-05 Rockefeller Pager: 607-7523 CARE Phone: 447-6290 Office Phone: 447-6200 Alexander Elizabeth 1-6 $7.74 Clark Shirley 1-6 $7.74 Dobbins Marie 1-6 $7.74 Gant-Watson Wonda 3-5 $8.38 Porter Hazel 1-5 $7.56 Robinson Onetha 2-4 $8.01 Sten house Brenda Lead 3-9 $9.00 Romine Pager: 607-7580 CARE Phone: 447-6358 Office Phone: 447-6300 Terry Bibbs Wilbon Williams Cynthia Cora Ardelia Lead Pager: 607-7559 CARE Phone: 447-6553 Miller Robinson Thompson Joyce Barbara Darkeita 2-17 $10.01 1-16 $9.28 1-17 $9.43 Office Phone: 447-6500 1-6 1-7 1-6 $7.74 $7.89 $7.74 Thompson Linda Lead 3-17 $ I 0.36 Washington Pager: 607-7557 CARE Phone: 447-6787 Office Phone: 447-6700 Croon Shelia 1-6 $7.74 Eskew Annette 2-6 $8.33 Gue Sammie 1-17 $9.43 Nellums Mary Lead 2-14 $9.56 Shavers Patricia 1-5 $7 .56 Westem Hills Pager: 607-7553 CARE Phone: 447-6912 Office Phone: 447-6900 Douglass Jones Madison Workman 7/26/2005 Sandra Mary R. Zora Helen HIOd3H SHOllanv -~ Lead 3-17 1-4 3-17 2-17 \"ld3H NOll:JOHlSNO:\u0026gt; 3 $10.36 $7.41 $10.36 $10.01 31VOdn 130008 a HIOd3H lN3WNDISSV 1N3001S :i Hours Worked (before \u0026amp; after school - Individual hours may vary) S3.LnNIW v SH3llVW 3NllNOOH r. 3.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 4.25 hrs/day - a.m. \u0026amp; p.m. 3 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 4.25 hrs/day - a.m. \u0026amp; p.111. 4.25 hrs/day - a.111. \u0026amp; p.111. 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 4.25 hrs/day - a.m. \u0026amp; p.111. 3.25 hrs/day - p.111. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 2.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.111. only I hr/day - a.111. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only Page 4 31VOdn AD010NH:l31 o CARE Staff Last Name First Name Class 04-05 CARE Pav 04-05 Williams Pager: 607-7543 CARE Pirone: 447-7163 Office Phone: 447-7100 Akins Kharisty 2-1 $7.55 Kelley brew Carol 1-6 $7.74 Lynch Mary Ellen 1-7 $7.89 Ollison Yolanda 1-4 $7.41 Smith Sarah L. Lead 3-17 $10.36 7/26/2005 Hours Worked (before \u0026amp; after school - Individual hours may vary) 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 3 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.25 hrs/day - p.m. only 32.5 hrs/day - p.m. only 3.75 hrs/day - a.m. \u0026amp; p.m. Pages CARE PROGRAM ENROLLMENT/STAFF DATA 2000-2005 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 CARE Enrollment Number of Sites Number of Staff 1099 22 95 1100 21 100 1342 19 103 1460 22 103 CARE enrollment is the total number of students who were enrolled throughout the school year. C:\\Documents and Settings\\veda.houchin\\My Documents\\Marthas\\chart 04-05.doc 1507 21 100 !-'\u0026gt; .... m n :c z ,0- 0 C) -\u0026lt; C: \"'D 0 ~ m p .C..l.) 0 C:  o D\u0026gt; m C: z o-\u0026lt; C)  men -\u0026lt;\"' C: c'i \"'DZ o\nc  m -m\u0026lt;_z.\na m \"'D 0 .\n.a.. rn n 0 z !!l\na C: n... . 0 z\na m \"'D :-\u0026lt; '.Tl  C: 0 ~\na Cl)\na m \"'D 0 .\n.a.. June 2005 Enrollment by Sites CARE Program School List SCHOOL 4 YR KIND FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH FIFTH Totals 1 BALE 7 12 0 7 4 7 2 39 2 BOOKER 15 6 9 9 3 5 48 3 BRADY 6 7 3 2 5 2 4 29 4 CARVER 3 15 11 10 4 10 7 60 5 DODD 15 9 4 5 4 3 4 44 6 FAIR PARK 8 8 5 3 0 2 27 7 FOREST PARK 12 10 16 20 14 9 3 84 8 FRANKLIN 4 4 5 2 2 0 2 19 9 FULBRIGHT 11 11 15 10 16 9 10 82 10 JEFFERSON 12 11 13 12 12 7 8 75 11 KING 21 21 26 18 11 10 3 110 12 MCDERMOTT 8 15 4 9 6 9 5 56 13 MEADOWCLIFF 4 9 5 7 3 3 2 33 14 OTTER CREEK 6 12 9 13 4 7 7 58 15 PULASKI HEIGHTS 6 8 7 5 7 10 7 50 16 ROCKFELLER 18 10 10 9 2 4 8 61 17 ROMINE 8 8 8 3 4 2 34 18 TERRY 6 15 17 14 10 7 70 19 WASHINGTON 18 9 14 10 5 5 2 63 20 WESTERN HILLS 6 6 9 6 5 2 35 21 WILLIAMS 0 16 16 9 21 14 13 89 TOTAL 180 231 203 183 148 124 97 1166 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: July 28, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: July 2005 Construction Report - Bond Projects BACKGROUND: The bids for Rightsell were received by LRSD on May 25, 2005. The low bidders for the remodeling and the abatement of Rightsell had given LRSD until July 25, 2005 to award the contracts without any changes to their bid prices. LRSD has made another request to the contractors to extend their bid prices through August 31 . The remediation contractor agreed with this date. The building contractor for the remodeling agreed to September 30. The remodeling of Fair Park has been ongoing since the last day of school. The remodeling consists of necessary interior changes to fit the new Pre-Kindergarten program. The schedule is very ambitious and the contractor is working almost non-stop toward a completion date of August 1. Changes are being made to the driveway and drop off areas. These changes are on schedule and should be completed by August 1. The remodeling of student restrooms at Forest Park is being done this summer. The contractor is working toward completion by August 1. The demolition of Cloverdale Elementary School will be completed in October 2005. RATIONALE: Monthly reports are submitted to the Board to keep members up-to-date on construction projects in the District. FUNDING: Bond Funds RECOMMENDATION: Report item\nno action necessary. PREPARED BY: Bill Goodman, District Engineer ,.,.\u0026lt;..  m ,:c. c0 z\u0026lt;\"\u0026gt; o\u0026gt; D\u0026gt; :::! 00 oz ~\u0026gt; \"0 r- \"m.'e \u0026lt;n (\") :\u0026gt;\u0026lt;  \u0026gt;\u0026lt; ~~ m en (\") (\") 0 :c Zo Co \"m' ren \u0026gt;m C\nc ~~ .. m .:::: en 0 \u0026gt; :-,, \u0026gt; C 0 =l 0 \"\"'' \"m' \"0 0 ~ CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JULY 28, 2005 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION I t:st. c.\nompIetIon Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Carver Media Center Expansion $167,490 Dec-05 Central Renovation - Interior - - ~ $10,200,26!3 -- Oct-05 -- -- ---- - Fair Park Remodel $799,000 Aug-0~ Fair Park Parking Lot - - - -- - - $185,00~ Aug-05 -- Forest Park Restrooms $152,881 Aug-05 Gibbs Addition - - $705,67_0_ _ Dec-05 - - Henderson -- Skylight Replacement - $319,000 Nov-05 Meadowcliff Remodel - $365,600 Sep-05 - - Oakhurst (Adult Education) New Windows $215,000 Aug-05 Pulaski Heights Elementary Clean Exterior Walls --1 $98,660 Aug-05 ---- Southwest New Corridor Ceiling I $300,000 Aug-05 Western Hills Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC I $622,160 Aug-05 Woodruff Parking addition $175,000 AuQ-05 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - SUMMER/ FALL 2005 I Est. CompletIon Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Cloverdale Elementary Demolition $520,750 Oct-05 -- Rightsell Renovation $2,494,000 Sep-06 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED I csr. t-ompIeuon Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Booker Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown Chicot Electrical Upgrade I Unknown Unknown J. A. Fair Sewer Line ! $50,000 Unknown $1 ,547,000 -- - Forest Heights Remodel Unknown -- -- Mitchell Renovation $2,212,493 Unknown Pulaski Hgts. MS Energy monitoring system installation I Unknown Unknown Williams Drainage Repair $29,200 Unknown BOND PROJECTS NOT YET STARTED I est. t-ompIeuon Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Administration Annex ADA Adaptations $32,351 , Unknown Electrical Upgrade $9,166 I Unknown Adult Education ADA Adaptations $248,020 I Unknown Structural Repairs $53,918 I Unknown Alternative Learning Center ADA Adaptations $43,134 I Unknown Electrical Upgra~ $2,696 I Unkno-wn Roof Repairs $26,959 . Unknown I Restroom Renovation I ~ 7,742 Unknown - Booker ADA Adaptations I $107,835 I Spring 2006 Cashion Building IADA Adaptations $21,567 Unknown Dodd Restroom Renovation $26,959 Unknown -- -- - -- Facility Services ~ 2,351 1 ADA Adaptations Unknown -- -- Install Water Meters at Cooling Towers $4,313 Unknown I Emergency Lighting Replacement $ao,a76 1 Unknown 1 Land Purchase - Booker --!...- $100,000 Unknown - Fulbright --1R enovate Restrooms $10,784 Unknown ADA Adaptations $21-\n\"s67-r--- - Unknown - Garland Renovation $900,000 Partially Complete - ADA Adaptations $188,711 Unknown Electrical Upgrade $6,988 I Unknown Geyer Springs Replace Restroom Stalls $4,313 Unknown ADA Adaptations $21,567 Unknown CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JULY 28, 2005 BOND PROJECTS NOT YET STARTED Facility Name I I Est. Completion Project Description Cost Date Henderson Renovate Office $10,784 Summer 2006 ---- --~A_D_A Adaptations - $70,0~ 1-IR_C _____ ADA Adaptations - -- --- - ~.5ITT Restroom Renovation ______ ==--- $21,567 - 1-M- a_b_e-lv-a-le_Ele_m_e_n-ta_ry ___E_ le-c-tr-ic_a_l -U-pgr_a_de__ $6,21 1 - - ~mott Restroom Renovation -----~- $32,350 - Quigley Restroom Upgrades______ -- $5f918 - ,- ~ -~-------~-D-re_s_s-in-g Room Renovation -- $37,742 __ _ Unknown Unknown Unknown Fall 2005 Unknown Unknown Unknown Rockefeller ADA Adaptati~ $26,~ - - -- Unknown Electrical Upgrade - ,. $1,618 1-------------------=,-------'- - --'- -- --- 1-------- -----~l_nte_rior Renovation ___ _ - _ $16, 17_5 ___ Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Transportation - Laidlaw ADA Adaptations --------,,-- $32,3_5_1 _ Transportation - LRSD Electrical Upgrade $1,294 West Little Rock School New School ---- --- $11,782,638 ,-- BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Project Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Administration Asbestos abatement Administration I Fresh air system - Administration Fire alarm -- ---- - -- --+- Administration HVAC $380,495 $55,000 $32,350 - $70,000~ - Administration Annex ----1-En-e-rg_y_m_on-itoring system installation - - Alternative Learning Ctr. I Energy monitoring system instattaiion $15,16oT Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy efficien_t_li=gh_t_in~g'------ __- _--=_-_- $82,000 - Badgett ___ !Partial asbestos abateme_n_t _________ $237,237 Badgett ___ I Fire alarm ---1-- _ $18,250 -- Bale Classroom addition/renovation $2,244,524 Mar-03 __ Aug-03 _ AUJJ-03 Nov-04 ~ay-02 Oct-01 Dec-01 Jul-01 __ Aug-02 Dec-02 Bale _______ Energy monitoring sy_st_e_m_ _____ Mar-02 --+---- -- --- Bale Partial roof replacement $269,587 I Dec-01 ,_B_a_le_ ________H_ V_A_C_ ___________ __, ___$6 6_4~,5_8_7-+- ___ Aug-01 Baseline Renovation $953,520 __ Aug-04 --r-----=--~ 1-B_o_oke_r_ ______- +G-__y,__m_Ro_o_f ________________$4_ 8,525 j Oct-04 Booker ADA Rest rooms $25,000 Aug-04 Booker Energy efficient lighting I $170,295 I Apr-01 1--------------t-~ ~---,--=-~'--------'------ B o o k er Energy monitoring system installation $23,710 Oct-01 Booker Asbestos abatement _ $10,900 Feb-02 Booker Fire alarm $34,501 Mar-02 Brady ________ _,_A_dd_itio_n_/re_n_o_va_t_io_n ________ ~ ___ $_9_73,621 Nov-04 Brady Energy efficient lighting $80,593 Sep-02 Brady Asbestos abatement $345,0n -- Aug-_92 Carver Energy monitoring system installation ~4,480 I May-01 Carver Parking lot -- $111,742 _ Aug-03 Central HVAC Renovation - Band Area $225,000 __ Dec-04 Central Reflecting Pond $57,561 Sep-04 Central Parking Student parking $174,000 1 Aug-03 Central/Quigley I Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair $265,000 I Aug-03 Central/Quigley I Athletic Field lmprov_em_e_n_t --~-------$-3-8-,0-0-0-+-- Aug-03 Central/Quigley irrigation System $14,~-- Aug-03 Central I Purchase land for school\nUnknown Dec-02 Central I Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations $2,000,000 ' Dec-02 2 !a' .... m n ::c z ,0- 0 C, -\u0026lt; .c.:,: C ~ m \u0026lt; ~\n:cc :,,,c:: zn c\u0026gt; a, :::! 00 oz ~.., ,)\u0026gt;- :x, en m,n\u0026lt; :,,: . \u0026gt;\u0026lt; en == men nn O::c Zo Co :x, rmen \u0026gt;m ~~ c, n .. m c\"' 0 )\u0026gt; '.\" )\u0026gt; c:: C ~ :x, en :x, .m., 0 :..x.,. Facility Name Central Central Central Chicot Chicot Cloverdale Elem. -- Cloverdale MS -- Cloverdale MS Dodd Dodd Dodd Dodd Dunbar Facilities Service Facility Services Fair Park --- Fair Park Fair Park Fair Park J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair -- J. A. Fair --- J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair Forest Park Forest Park Forest Park Fulbright Fulbright Fulbright Fulbright Fulbright Fr-anklin Geyer Springs Gibbs Gibbs Hall Hall Hall Hall Hall -- Hall Hall --- Henderson Henderson Henderson Henderson Henderson CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JULY 28, 2005 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED I I Est. Completion Project Description Cost Date Ceiling and wall repair $24,000 Oct-01 Fire Alarm System Design/Installation $80,~ - ---+- T Aug-Ql_ Front landing tile repair - $22,470 Aug__:Q_!_ Drainage $64,700 Aug-04 -- ~- -- Sound Attenuation $43,134 Jul-04 Energy efficient lighting ~ ----- $132,678 Jul-01 -- - Energy efficient lighting $189,743 Jul-01 -- $1,393,822 -- Major renovation \u0026amp; addition Nov-02 __Fire Alarm Upgrade --- r $9,200 Oct-04 - - Energy efficient lighting - $90,665 Aug-01 Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile $156,299 Jul-01 Replace roof top HVAC r $215,570 _ Aug-lg -+ Renovation/addition $6,149,023 Nov-04 Interior renovation - - -- $84,6~-- -- Mar-01 Fire alarm $12,000 Aug-03 -- - Roof $245,784 May-05 HVAC renovation/fire alarm $315,956 Apr-02 j Energy efficient lighting $90,162-- - Aug.:Q!_ - ~ Asbestos abatement-ceiling I --$59,310 Aug-01 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music room addition $3,155,640 Aug-04 -- -- - Energy efficient lighting $277,594 Apr-01 -- - Press box -- $10,784 Nov-00 --- Security earner~ __ $12,500 Jun-01 - IA thletic Field Improvement - ---$38,000 Jul-03 - Irrigation System $14,000 Jul-03 Roof repairs --- -- --$391,871 - - Aug-03 Replace window units w/central HVAC -- $485,258 Nov-03 Diagonal parking $111,742 I Aug-03 Energy efficient lighting $119,788 I May-01 Energy efficient lighting $134,463 Jun-01 Energy monitoring system installation $11,950 Aug-01 Replace roof top HVAC units $107,835 Aug-02 Parking lot $140,000 Sep-02 Roof repairs $200,000 Oct-02 Renovation $2,511,736 Mar-03 Roof Repair $161,752 I Jun-04 Energy efficient lighting I I $76,447 I Apr-01 1 Energy monitoring system installation I $11,770 Jul-01 $8,637,709 1 -- Major renovation \u0026amp; addition I Sep-03 1Asbestos abatement I $168,222 Aug-01 Energy efficient lighting I $42,931 I Jul-01 -- Infrastructure improvements I $93,657 I Aug-01 Energy efficient lighting I $296,707 Apr-01 1Intercom I Feb-01 'Security cameras_ _ : $10,600 . J-un-0-1 Lockers ! $43,854 Dec-04 Energy efficient lighting I $193,679 . Jul-01 I Roof replacement gym I $107,835 May-01 Asbestos abatement Phase I I $500,000 1 Aug-01 Asbestos abatement Phase 2 I $250,000 Aug-02 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JULY 28, 2005 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Est. Completion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date -IRC- Energy efficient lighting $109,136 Jul-02 --- Jefferson Asbestos abatement $43,~ Oct-01 Jefferson -- R enovation \u0026amp; fire alarm $1,630,000 Nov-02 -- --- Laidlaw Parking lot $269,588 Jul-01 Mablevale Elem Fire Alarm Upgrade -m:ooo Oct-04 Energy monitoring system installation ~-- Mabelvale Elem. ~.150 Aug-Ql Mabelvale Elem. Replace HVAC units $300,000 Aug-02 -- Mabelvale Elem. Asbestos Abatement $107,000 Aug-02 r-- Mabelvale Elem. Energy efficient lighting - $106,598 Dec-02 Mabelvale MS Renovate bleachers $134,793 Aug-01 Mabelvale MS - IR enovation $6,851,621 Mar-04 Mann Partial Replacement $11,500,000 Apr-04 -- Mann 'Asphalt w.alks ,T he total $1.8 million Dec-01 Mann I walkway canopies Dec-01 -- __ --is what has been Mann Boiler replacement __, used so far on the I Oct-01 -- Mann Fencing projects listed Sep-01_ -- -- Mann Partial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. Aug-Q.!_ - McClellan I Parking Lot Overlay I $65,000 Apr-05 - --- McClellan -- Athletic Field Improvement - $38,000 Jul-03 McClellan Irrigation System . $14,750 Jul-03 --- McClellan 1 Security cameras __ I $36,300 1 Jun-01 ---- McClellan _ ~rgy efficient lighting $303,614 May-01 -- -- - - McClellan Stadium stands repair $235,000 ~g-01 -- McClellan !Intercom $46,000 Feb-02 McClellan $2,155,622 -- Classroom Addition Jul-04 I-Fire Alarm Upgrade -- McDermott $7,700 Sep-04 I McDermott 1 Energy efficient lighting I $79,411 Feb-01 McDermott Replace roof top HVAC units $476,000 I Aug-0_ Meadowcliff Fire alarm $16,175 Jul-01 -- - Meadowcliff Asbestos abatement $253,412 1 Aug-02 Meadowcliff Engergy efficient lighting $88,297 Dec-02 Metropolitan Replace cooling tower $37,203 Dec-00 Metropolitan Replace shop vent system $20,000 May-01 Metropolitan Energy monitoring system installation $17,145 Aug-01 Mitchell I Building Remediation $165,000 I Jul-04 Mitchell Energy efficient lighting $103,642 Apr-01 Mitchell I Energy monitoring system installation I $16,695 Jul-01 I--- Mitchell 'Asbestos abatement I $13,000 Jul-01 Oakhurst HVAC renovation I $237,237 Aug-01 Otter Creek Energy monitoring system installation $10,695 May-01 Otter Creek Energy efficient lighting $81,828 Apr-01 --- Otter Creek )Asbestos abatement I $10,000 ~g~2 Otter Creek Parking lot I $138,029 j __ Aug~ Otter Creek 6 classroom addition $888,778 I Oct-02 Otter Creek Parking Improvements I $142,541 Aug-03 Parkview Addition $2,121,226 Dec-04 - Parkview HVAC controls I $210,000 Jun-02 Parkview I Roof replacement $273,877 -- Sep-01 -- Parkview I Exterior lights $10,784 I Nov-00 Parkview HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls $301,938 Aug-01 Parkview , Locker replacement $120,000 Aug-01 Parkview I Enerqy efficient liqhtinq $315,000 I Jun-01 4 p -m\u0026lt; (\") :,: z 0 r- 0 G') -\u0026lt; .c.:.:, CJ ~ m \u0026gt;\u0026lt; \"':= mu, nn 0:,: Zo Co ::0 rffl r,, \u0026gt; m ~~ G'\u0026gt;(\") .. m C en ,0. ',.T.l c:: CJ =l 0 ::0 \"' ::0 .m.., 0 ::0 -\u0026lt; CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JULY 28, 2005 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Est. Completion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Procurement Energy monitoring system installation $5,290 Jun-02 -- ~ Procurement Fire alarm $25,000 Aug-03 --- Pulaski Heights Elem/Middle_ Cafeteria Ceiling - - - $33,378 Aug-05 Pulaski Heights~m/Middle Replace Entry Doors T $13,990 ~- -- t Aug-05 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Renovation - $1,193,259 Nov-04 - - Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground _J__ $17,000 Dec-02 Pulaski Hgts. MS Renovation-- -- $3,755,041 - -- --- Nov-04 Rightsell Energy efficient lighting-- T $84,898 Apr-01 -- - - Rockefeller Energy efficient lighting-- $137,004 Mar-01 -- -- Rockefeller Replace roof top HVAC $539,175 Aug-01 Rockefeller I Parking addition -- ~742 Aug-02 Romine $10,000 --- 'Asbestos abatement I ~r-02 --- Romine Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $3,534,675-,----- Mar-03 Scott Field Track Renovations I $289,056 I May-05 Security/Transportation IB us cameras - $22,500 Jun-01 -- Southwest Addition $2,000,000 Nov-04 -- Southwest Asbestos abatement $28,138 I Aug-00 Southwest New roof --- $690,000 . Oct-03 -- Southwest Energy efficient lighting $168,719 Jan-02 Southwest Drainage / street widening $250,000  Aug-03 Student Assignment I Energy monitoring system installation I $4,830 Aug-02 Student Assignment Fire alarm $9,000 Aug-03 -Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation $275,000 -D-ec--01 Tech Ctr/ Metro Renovation Addition/Renovation - Phase II $3,679,000 Jun-04 ------ Technology Upgrade I Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data Nov-02 --- Terry  Energy efficient lighting I $73,850 Feb-01 ------- Terry 1 Driveway \u0026amp; Parking $83,484 - Aug-02 +----- - Terry Media Center addition I $704,932 Sep-02 Wakefield Rebuild I $5,300,000 Dec-04 Wakefield Security cameras $8,000 Jun-01 Wakefield Energy efficient lighting $74,776 Feb-01 Wakefield Demolition/ Asbestos Abatement I $200,000 Nov-02 Washington Fire Alarm Upgrade $11,600 Oct-04 Washington Security cameras $7,900 Jun-01 Washington Energy efficient lighting $165,281 Apr-01 Watson Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 Jul-01 Watson Asbestos abatement $182,241 Aug-01 Watson 'Energy efficient lighting $106,868 Aug-01 Watson Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 Watson Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $800,000 Aug-02 Western Hills  Fire Alarm Upgrade $8,400 _1 _ Oct-04 Western Hills ADA Rest rooms $25,000 - ~g-04 Western Hills Asbestos abatement $191,946 Aug-02 Western Hills Intercom $7,100 Dec-01 Western Hills 'Energy efficient lighting $106,000 Jul-01 -- Williams Renovation $2,106,492 . Mar-04 Williams Parking expansions I $183,717 j Dec-03 -- Williams __ ~gy effici~nt lighting I $122,719 Jun-01 -- Wilson HVAC for Cafeteria $56,000 Mar-05 Wilson Renovation/expansion $1,263,876 Feb-04 Wilson Parking Expansion $110,000 Aug-03 Woodruff I Renovation $246,419 AuQ-02 5 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: July 28, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Board Auditor Report BACKGROUND: Monthly report to School Board. RATIONALE: Summary report of activities. FUNDING: No changes. RECOMMENDATION: None. PREPARED BY: Sandy Becker p m--\u0026lt; (\") :,: z 0,.. . 8 -\u0026lt; C \"D ~ m \u0026lt; :. m :,:0  c zO o  a,::! 00 oz 2!\n\u0026gt; \"D ,... :,:, en m\u0026lt; :',\n(\" )  \u0026lt; (I)\n= men (\") (\") 0:,: Zo Oo :,:, ,... men  m ~~ C) (\") .. m .::en 0  ~~ \"D m:i: :,:,c en 3: 0  zz ~~ ,- en oo :i:c :,:, Z(\") c, m men en Date: To: From: Re: July 28, 2005 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Board of Directors Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Audit Report - July This is the sixty-ninth communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with one high school, one middle school and two elementary schools to resolve financial issues in their activity and related funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. b) The AAB has forwarded a Booster Club Guidelines Package to be included in official publications of the District after review. Board Policy and Regulation a) The amended Out of District Travel regulation is being implemented. Technology Training a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and Newspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff. a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of Nuts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. Audit Report - July 2005 Page 2 of2 b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) c) d) e) f) g) h) a) b) c) d) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. Reviewing leave accountability system. Reviewing Teacher School Supply Fund Records for recommendations. Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2005. Eleven schools participated. Assisting LRSD PT A's in financial process training. Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. C: -0 0 \u0026gt;\n1 ~ .\u0026gt; m\" :i\nO \u0026gt; C: zn o\u0026gt; a,:::! oooz ~\u0026gt; -0 r\no U) m. \u0026lt; (\") :\u0026gt;\u0026lt;  e\u0026gt;n\u0026lt;~ m \"' (\")(\") 0:i: Zo Oo\no rm u, \u0026gt;m O\no z\u0026lt; c, n .. m Cu, g\ni-~ -0 m:i:\no C: U) !!: 0\u0026gt; zz ~~ r- U) no :i: C: \u0026gt;\no zo C) m m u, U) DATE: TO: FROM: July 28, 2005 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Technology Report BACKGROUND: Since the last Board meeting the following technology activities took place:  Training for Teachers has been on-going all summer at the Technology Center and other district sites. Teachers have received training on software programs such as - Project SOAR, Curriculum Mapper, Compass Odyssey, and more ...  The computer refresh program has continued at designated district sites.  Plans are in place to continue implementation of Edline - web-based Grade reporting to parents at the Middle School Level.  Computer Information Services has implemented a new web-based workorder/ project management tracking system called RADAR - RequestAssign- Develop-Apply-Review. RADAR will be used by the Dis::icts' Applications Group to track and manage data/report requests throughout the district. District staff will have the capability of entering their data requests via the web and automatically receive updates on the status of their requests via email.  Ten elementary schools are piloting software to assign students to classes electronically using an electronic scheduler for elementary schools. RATIONALE: To implement the LRSD Technology Plan 2003 - 2006 ,..,.\u0026lt;... . m ::z:C ,..c zn c\u0026gt; CD:::! 00 oz 2S )\u0026gt; 'ti,...\nJJU\u0026gt; m. \u0026lt;n :\u0026gt;\u0026lt;  \u0026gt;\u0026lt; CJ)?= mu, On O::z: Zo Co\nJJ,... mu, \u0026gt;m ~~ e\u0026gt;n .. m ctn 0 )\u0026gt;\n,\u0026gt;~ 'ti m:x:\nJJ C: tJ\u0026gt; 3: 0\u0026gt; zz ~~ ,... tJ\u0026gt; no ::z:c \u0026gt;\nJJ zo C\u0026gt; m men tJ\u0026gt; FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept this report. PREPARED BY: John Ruffins, Director, Computer Information Services Lucy Neal, Coordinator, Technology and Media Services LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: July 28, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Handbook for Parents of Pre-K Children Participating in the LRSD Early Childhood Program BACKGROUND: The Department of Early Childhood and Elementary Literacy convened a committee of early childhood teachers, principals, parents, and specialists to develop a Pre-K Parent Handbook. Several meetings were held to develop the content of the Handbook, and a draft version of the Handbook was sent to all LRSD Elementary Principals and Pre-K Teachers for their review. The attached handbook is the result of those efforts. RATIONALE: Currently the District does not have a formal district handbook regarding the preschool program. The purpose of the handbook will be to provide parents, teachers, and principals with clearly defined expectations regarding participation in the preschool (fouryear- old) program and policies and procedures for dealing with preschool issues. FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board adopt the Pre-K Parent Handbook as submitted. PREPARED BY: Krista Underwood, Director, Early Childhood !\" n 0 ~ ~ n =l m n :c (/) m \"\u0026lt;'\n::: f.,l, .\"0, ', m ~ C 0 z ~ i5 z \u0026gt;\u0026lt; ~~ nmn\"' 0 :c zo Co \"',... m\u0026gt;m\"' l ~ C)n .. m c\"' 0 \u0026gt; .~,, ~ m :c\n,:,c (/) 3:: 0\u0026gt; zz Z:,c ! rn no :C C \u0026gt;:,c Zn C) m mCJ\u0026gt; (/) Little Rock School District Pre-Kindergarten (4-Year-Old) Parent Handbook 2005-06 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Letter to Families .................................................................................... 3 Goals of the Program ............................................................................... 3 List of Pre-Kindergarten Schools .. .. .. .. . .. ................................................. .4 Enrollment Requirements .......................................................................... 5 Physical Examination and Immunization Requirements ..................................... 5 The Pre-Kindergarten Instructional Program ................................................. 6 Attendance .............................................................................................................. 7 Little Rock School District Discipline Policy .................................................... 7 Authorized Persons/Sign In and Sign Out. .................................................... 8 Illness of Children .................................................................................... 9 Medication at School. ............................................................................. 10 Appropriate Dress for School. .................................................................. 10 Outdoor Play ........................................................................................ 10 Emergency Drills ................................................................................... 10 Nap Time ............................................................................................ 10 School Breakfast and Lunch Program ....................................................... 10 Toileting .............................................................................................. 11 Parent Involvement. ............................................................................... 11 Parent/Teacher Conferences .................................................................... 11 Money Sent to School.............. .. . . . . .. . .. . .. . . .. . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . .. ................... 11 Signature Page.............................. . ...................................................... 12 2 !l' n 0 .z... . ~ n ::l m n ::r:: en m ~\na\np ,,\no ,0, m\no ::\n! 0 0 z :!. 0 z !I: \u0026gt; ti! m ~ !:\n\u0026gt;\u0026lt; ~:== m en nn O::r:: zo Oo\norm en \u0026gt;m ~~ c, n .. m C en 0 \u0026gt; ,\n,,\u0026gt; ~ m::r::\no C: en !I: 0\u0026gt; zz ~~ r- en no ::r:: C: \u0026gt;\no Zn Cl m men en LETTER TO THE FAMILIES: WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION Welcome to the Little Rock School District (LRSD) Pre-Kindergarten (Pre-K) Program! We understand the tremendous trust you are placing in us to educate your children. Our well-trained staff is committed to ensuring that your children receive the best early learning experiences in the safest, most caring environment possible. The philosophy of the Little Rock School District Pre-Kindergarten Program is the following:  Every child deserves a safe, healthy, and secure environment.  All children can be successful learners.  The children, families, and school community should be treated with respect and honesty.  Learning should be relevant, meaningful, and developmentally appropriate.  Parents are a child's first and most important teacher.  Cooperation, collaboration, and teamwork are essential to meeting the District's Pre-K goals. The Little Rock School District offers the highest quality pre-school education available. It is the goal of the district's early childhood program to help each child achieve his/her maximum potential through a variety of experiences designed to promote a positive self-concept. A qualified and experienced staff provides a warm and supportive atmosphere which assures each child that he or she is secure and accepted. Classrooms are designed to provide a cheerful, healthy learning environment for growing, active children. PROGRAM GOALS The Little Rock School District Pre-Kindergarten Program is not a child care program, but a program designed to increase the readiness of the children for kindergarten with the ultimate goal of ensuring children's success in school. The goal will be accomplished through the following activities: 1. Provide preschool students with high quality, developmentally appropriate learning experiences designed to enhance kindergarten readiness. 2. Support parents in their role as a child's first and most important teacher by providing access to educational resources and information. 3. Ensure continuity and smooth transitions from home to early education and primary school. The learning environment of the Pre-Kindergarten Program is designed to provide students with a challenging, yet developmentally appropriate curriculum. The program components are aligned with the state standards adopted in the Arkansas Early Childhood Framework. Through the active learning process, children will construct their own knowledge\nlearn how to make decisions and plans\nseek and organize information. The role of the teacher is to guide students in their construction of knowledge - challenging them to make predictions, try new approaches, and solve their own problems. Please help us achieve these goals by getting your child to school on time everyday!! 3 School Bale Baseline Brady Carver Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Forest Park Franklin Fulbriqht Geyer Sorinas Jefferson King Mabelvale McDermott Meadowcliff Otter Creek Pulaski Heights Rightsell Rockefeller Romine Stephens Terrv Wakefield Washinaton Watson Western Hills Wilson Woodruff LIST OF PRE-KINDERGARTEN SCHOOLS Address Principal 6501 32na St. Barbara Anderson 3623 Baseline Rd. Eleanor Cox 7915 W. Markham Ada Keown 2100 East 6m Dianne Barksdale 11100 Chicot Jane Harkey 6500 Hinkson Rd. Frederick Fields 6423 Staoecoach Faith McLauahlin 616 N. Harrison TBA 1600 N. Tyler Theresa Ketcher 1701 S. Harrison Ethel Dunbar 300 Pleasant Valley Deborah Mitchell 5240 Mabelvale Pike Donna Hall 2600 N. McKinley Roberta Mannon 905 MLK Blvd. Tyrone Harris 9401 Mabelvale C/O TBA 1200 Reservoir Rd. Virainia Ashley 25 Sheraton Dr. Karen Carter 16000 Otter Creek Pkwy. Janis Tucker 319 N. Pine Lillie Carter 911 West 19m Eunice Thrasher 700 East 17\"' Anne Manaan 3400 Romine Rd. Lillie Scull 3700 West 18m Sharon Brooks 10800 Mara Lynn Becky Ramsey 75 Westminister Les Taylor 2700 Main Gwen Zeiqler 7000 Valley Dr. Mike Oliver 4901 Western Hills Scott Moraan 4015 Stannus Beverly Jones 3010 West 7m Janice Wilson Telephone 447-3600 447-3700 447-3900 447-4000 447-7000 447-4200 447-4300 447-4400 447-4500 447-4600 447-4700 447-4800 447-5000 447-5100 447-5400 447-5500 447-5600 447-5800 447-5900 447-6100 447-6200 447-6300 447-6400 447-6500 447-6600 447-6700 447-6800 447-6900 447-7200 447-7300 4 !\" n .0z.. . ~ n =l m n ::c (J) m :a \u0026lt;\n:=: p ..,, :a .0., , m ~ C 0 z ~ 0 z \u0026gt;\u0026lt; (/J ?= m\u0026lt;n nn O::c Zo Co :a ,... m\u0026lt;n \u0026gt;m ~~ C'ln .. m i= (J) g\n..,,,\u0026gt; ~ m::c :a C en 3: 0\u0026gt; zz ~~ ,....(J) no :cc \u0026gt; :a Zn C'lm m\u0026lt;n (J) ENROLLMENT REQUIREMENTS Applications for enrollment are accepted without regard to race, religion, color, sex or national origin. To apply for admission in a Pre-Kindergarten program, parents must contact the Little Rock School District Student Registration Office at 5th and Sherman (447-2950). If there is not an opening at the requested school, the child's name will be put on a waiting list. After receiving a notification letter of an opening, parents will need to follow the directives in the letter which will usually require notifying the Student Registration Office of acceptance or refusal of that PreKindergarten slot by an established deadline date. Upon acceptance, parents will visit the assigned school during student check-in and complete the necessary forms. The following is a list of the enrollment requirements: 1. A child must be 4 years of age on or before September 15th before entering the PreKindergarten Program. 2. In order for a child to attend class on the first day of Pre-Kindergarten, the school must have the following documents: a. Pupil Information Form b. Original Birth Certificate c. Social Security Number d. Health Screening Form (See explanation below.) e. Complete all required immunizations and provide records to the school nurse or school office. (See explanation below.) f. Permission for the child to receive emergency medical care at Arkansas Children's Hospital or a designated physician in case of an extreme medical emergency g. Information form designating persons who are allowed to pick up child from school h. Notarized custody declaration if applicable i. Updated physical or current physical The date used by the Little Rock School District for admittance to the Pre-Kindergarten Early Childhood Program is the same as that established by the State Department of Education for kindergarten eligibility. PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS AND IMMUNIZATIONS Little Rock School District Health Services require immunizations and physicals for students in the Pre-Kindergarten Program. It is mandatory that all students in the Pre-Kindergarten Program have a physical examination by their doctor or primary health care provider and submit the required Health Screening Form to the school office. In addition, Pre-K children must receive the required age-appropriate immunizations. Written proof of these immunizations must be presented before the child is admitted to school and each time the child receives additional immunizations. Children who have not met these requirements will not be allowed to attend school. Changes in immunizations must be reported to the office or school nurse. 5 THE PRE-K INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM Staffing. Every Pre-Kindergarten classroom is staffed with a certified early childhood education teacher and instructional assistant with Child Development Associate (CDA) Training. Classroom Size. Every Pre-Kindergarten classroom is limited to an enrollment of 20 children with a ratio of one adult to every ten children throughout the day with the exception of naptime. Before and After School Child Care. Child care is available at most schools before and after school from 7:00 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. Please check with your assigned school to see if this service is provided. Instruction. The Little Rock School District uses a learning center approach to help children become independent thinkers, self-confident eager learners and highly skilled individuals. This approach provides opportunity for children to engage in respectful interactions in a richly prepared environment with professionals available to help them develop socially, emotionally, academically, and physically. Some of the centers that are implemented in the classrooms are the following: Block Center - Blocks provide the basic muscle development skills and creativity necessary to solve problems. This center will give children the opportunity to explore, sort, make comparisons, and build structures. Dramatic Play Center - Dramatic play is used to help children develop social interaction as they explore new and different ways to play. A variety of props will be available for children to role play. Art/Music Centers - In these centers children's self-esteem is developed. When their forms of self-expression are accepted and appreciated, children feel good about themselves. Small muscle skills and eye-hand coordination are developed in these centers. Creativity is encouraged. Language Arts Center - In this center, children begin to understand that books are exciting \"friends\" that can be enjoyed. They begin to notice that letters are symbols for the words they say. They learn to tell stories and events in sequence. They learn to \"read\" pictures. The children are developing their listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills in this center. Manipulative Center - This center is one in which children work with activities that develop small muscle and eye-hand coordination. Putting a puzzle together involves problem solving and configuration (seeing the shape of things and how they fit together). In this center children learn how to work independently, classify objects, put materials together, and how to take them apart. Nature/Science/Math Center - This center is a DOING center rather than a \"look but don't touch\" center. The children develop the thinking process and sensory experiences. They develop concepts of shape, color, size, number, classifying, and sequencing. 6 !J' (\") .0z.. . ~ (\") =1 m (\") ::c u, m :,c\n\u0026lt;:: .f,l, :,c .0, , m ~ C 0 z .\u0026gt;... 5 z \u0026gt;\u0026lt; en := mu, (\") (\") O::c zo Co :,c ,mu, \u0026gt;m ~~ C) (\") .. m C \u0026lt;n 0 \u0026gt; .\n,s, -~ m::c :,c C: \u0026lt;n 3: 0\u0026gt; zz ~~ ,- u, no ::c C: \u0026gt;:,c Zc-, c, m m \u0026lt;n u, ATTENDANCE Teachers begin instruction at the beginning of the school day so it is imperative that students arrive on time. When students are tardy, they miss a portion of the instruction provided to the rest of the class. Students will be considered tardy ten minutes after the first bell rings. If a child must be absent, the following procedures will be used to report and monitor absences. 1. The parenUguardian is to notify the school attendance office by noon on the date when a student is absent. Failure to do so will result in the absence being recorded as unexcused unless the principal extends the verification period. 2. Full day or part day absences will be excused for personal illness, family emergency or an unusual cause acceptable to the principal of the school in which the student is enrolled. 3. When a student has three or more unexcused absences in any class during one semester, the school attendance secretary will notify the student's parenUguardian, or persons in loco parentis. Notice will be via telephone contact by the end of the school day in which the absence occurred or sent via regular mail no later than the following school day. Data from the student's Pupil Information Form will be used in the procedure. 4. When a student has six unexcused absences in any class during one semester, the school attendance secretary will again notify the student's parenUguardian of the number of absences. Also, the student's building-level administrator will schedule a conference with the student and his or her parenUguardian to discuss the student's absence pattern and its effects, together with appropriate interventions. The administrator will explain during the conference that dismissal will occur if the student receives 12 unexcused absences a semester. LRSD DISCIPLINE POLICY FOR CHILDREN IN THE PRE-K (FOUR-YEAR-OLD) PROGRAM Discipline in the Pre-Kindergarten Program will be appropriate to the child's level of understanding and be directed toward teaching the child acceptable behavior and self-control. Staff will offer guidance to a child needing redirection. With the help of a staff member, children will be offered appropriate choices so that in their developmental years they may determine what is right and wrong. If a child continues to have behavior problems, separating the child for \"time out\" may be necessary to resolve the difficulty. Time out is appropriate for children over 2 years of age. The period of time should equal the child's age\n(for example, 4 years of age should be 4 minutes). ParenUteacher conferences may be needed to determine if other circumstances are contributing to the situation and to develop a plan of action. Behavior management used by the Little Rock School District focuses on creative conflict resolution. This technique emphasizes children learning to resolve their own conflicts with each other and with adults in a positive manner. It is designed to increase the self-esteem of the children. 7 Disciplinary Steps: (Taken from The Student Conduct Code Section of the Little Rock School District Student Handbook) 1. Prevention - trying to keep the inappropriate behavior from happening 2. Redirection - encouraging another activity, role-play appropriate behavior 3. Conference with child 4. Time out in the classroom (age appropriate amount of time and supervised) 5. Contact a parent for a conference 6. Refer to the Pupil Services Team and/or Tri-District Early Intervention Team to develop a behavior management plan 7. Up to five (5) days removal from the program 8. If a behavior is dangerous and/or unhealthy for the child, another child and/or staff members, and after all efforts have been exhausted, the child will be dismissed from the program Parents will be kept fully informed as a child progresses through the disciplinary steps. They will be called immediately when a child exhibits dangerous or uncontrollable behavior, and disciplinary action will be taken to ensure the safety for all, which, as noted above, could be dismissal from the program. The administrator may choose a more severe penalty, at any time, based on the child's past behavior record and may reduce disciplinary actions when warranted. When disciplinary actions are imposed on a child, the parent/guardian will be notified. The District's discipline procedures meet the licensing requirements as set forth by Arkansas Department of Human Services, Division of Child Care and Early Childhood Education Licensing requirements. CORPORAL PUNISHMENT DISTRICT POLICY STATES THAT CORPORAL PUNISHMENT MAY NOT BE USED AS A DISCIPLINARY MEASURE IN THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS BY ANY TEACHER, ADMINISTRATOR, OR OTHER SCHOOL PERSONNEL. PARENTS/GUARDIANS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO ADMINISTER ANY FORM OF CORPORAL PUNISHMENT ON SCHOOL GROUNDS. AUTHORIZED PERSONS/SIGN IN AND SIGN OUT 1. It is District and State policy that, upon arrival to school, the parent or guardian (or any designated adult or caregiver) must bring the children inside the school building to sign them in and make their presence known to the appropriate staff member. Parents must also come inside to sign their children out at the end of the school day, 2. The sign-in sheet is used to verify attendance and to ensure the child's safety. To remain in the program, a parent or designee must sign the child in and out. 3. It is important that the registering parent notify the school office in writing of persons authorized to pick up the child. A CHILD WILL BE ALLOWED TO LEAVE SCHOOL ONLY WITH AUTHORIZED PERSONS. Anyone picking up a child should be prepared to show proper identification before the child will be released. In the case of divorced parents, it is important that the registering parent indicate on the enrollment application 8 !X' (\"') 0.z. . ~ =1 m (\"') :c en m :c \u0026lt; ?- .~., :c 0.. , m :c ::\nl C 0 z ~ 0z\ni:: \u0026gt; CD m ~ !:\n\u0026gt;en\u0026lt;~ men (\"')(\"') O\n:c Zo Co :c rmen \u0026gt;m ~~ C) (\"') .. m i:: en g .~., ~ m :c :C C en\n: 0\u0026gt; zz ,~-~en no :C C \u0026gt; :c Z(\"') c, m men en who has legal custody and who may pick the child up from school. Legal documentation will be required as proof of custody. 4. Elementary-age siblings 4th grade and older may sign a Pre-Kindergarten student in/out only if a permission letter is signed by the parent/guardian and given to the school office by the parent/guardian. 5. Children should be picked up on time after school. If parents cannot pick up their children at the appropriate time, arrangements should be made for other transportation or after school care. No child will be released from the playground. Parents should accompany their children out of the building. Children should not be allowed to leave the building unattended. Children will need to be signed in/out for the CARE program, daycare pick-ups, car pools, and/or any method of transportation. Parent cooperation will help ensure the safety of all of the Pre-Kindergartne children. ILLNESS OF CHILDREN Children with these symptoms must be kept at home:  Temperature of 100.4 or over (for the safety of the child and others, it is required that the child be kept home until 24 hours after he/she is fever-free without the aide of fever-reducing medication).  Vomiting  Diarrhea  Symptoms of communicable disease If any of these occur, parents will be contacted to pick up their children immediately. MEDICATION AT SCHOOL Transporting Medication Between Home and School: Parents are responsible for getting medicine to and from school. Children will not be allowed to transport medicine at any time. Medication Permission: Parents must complete all required information on the LRSD permission form in order for the child to receive medicine at school. Medication Storage: Parents must take student medications to the nurse or office. Students are not allowed to keep medicine in the classroom, therefore, parents should never leave medications in backpacks. All medications will be locked in the office. The school nurse or office personnel will administer all medications. Teachers are not permitted to give medications. Over the counter medication will not be given longer than five days. Once-a-day medication and twice-a-day medications should be given at home. Please notify the office if medication requires refrigeration. Medication Time: It is important that each school establish routine times for medication administration. It is not possible to have a specific time for each child. Medication Containers: Medication must be in the prescription bottle or non-prescription original container with the original label. Medication is not to be sent in any other container or wrapper (e.g., Saran Wrap, aluminum foil, lunch box, etc.). 9 APPROPRIATE DRESS FOR SCHOOL Preschool is a very active place to learn. Children paint, glue, play in sand and water, and play outdoors daily weather permitting\ntherefore, sturdy, comfortable, washable clothes are necessary. This allows the children to become actively involved in all activities. Parents should make sure their children's clothes are easy to pull up and down for bathroom needs. Tennis shoes seem to work best for all activities. Flip-flops and clogs are not safe footwear for school. Children should always have a sweater or jacket available for cool days. Light clothing is necessary when it gets hot. The child 's name must be written on all clothes that the child can take off at school. (e.g., jackets, sweaters). In case of accidents, each child will need a complete change of clothing at school. OUTDOOR PLAY Outdoor play is required for one hour each day. Weather permitting, children will play outside every day with 32 being th~ temperature guideline. The wind chill factor is taken into consideration in the winter\nheat index for the summer. Please do not ask for exceptions. If a student is too sick to go outside, parents need to keep the child home. The schools do not have enough assistants to provide one-on-one supervision and the State has strict guidelines for the ratio of adults to children. No toys will be allowed at school, and bringing toy guns to school will result in dismissal. EMERGENCY DRILLS Emergency drills are held monthly to acquaint the children with evacuation procedures. This makes quite an impression on a few children the first time a drill is held, but children soon become accustomed to the sound and know just what to do. The Pre-Kindergarten Program is equipped with a fire alarm system and smoke detectors. Fire extinguishers are placed throughout the building. NAP TIME After lunch, a nap period is scheduled for all Pre-Kindergarten children. Parents should send one small stuffed animal for the child to cuddle during naptime, one crib sheet, and a large bath towel for the mat. To protect the child's health, the District provides a sanitized mat or cot. Towels and sheets for Pre-Kindergarten are sent home on Friday to be laundered and must be returned on Monday. SCHOOL BREAKFAST/LUNCH PROGRAM A breakfast and lunch for the Pre-Kindergarten students will be available at each school. Both meals will be served in the cafeteria. Breakfast and/or lunch must be paid in advance weekly or daily. Free and reduced lunch application forms may be obtained in the school office. Food will not be heated, so parents must pack food that is prepared to be eaten as is. If a hot lunch is desired, it is suggested that the child purchase a lunch prepared by food service. If the child brings his/her lunch to school, it is recommend that a nutritious lunch be sent. Please do not send candy, gum, or soft drinks. !\"' (\"') z.0.. . ~ (\"') ::1 m (\"') :I: en m ~\n:\n~ ..,,\n,::, .0., , m\n,::, ::\n! 0 0 z :. 0 z \u0026gt;\u0026lt; (I):= men \u0026lt;\"\u0026gt;n 0:I\nzo Co\n,::,r men \u0026gt;m ~~ c, n .. m c::::en 0 \u0026gt;\n..t,,\u0026gt; ~ m:I:\n,::,c en 3: 0\u0026gt; zz ~~ r en no :I:c \u0026gt;\n,::, Z(\"') Cl m men en TOILETING Students must be completely potty trained to participate in the Pre-Kindergarten Program. No diapering will be done by the staff. If a child has an accident, the parent will be notified. Pull-ups will only be accepted due to a medical condition accompanied by a doctor's statement. PARENT INVOLVEMENT Please read carefully any notes or letters that the child brings home from school. This keeps the lines of communication open so that parents know what is happening at school. Lunch is a great time to volunteer! The school encourages all parents to become involved in their children's early education environment by volunteering or visiting in the classroom. This time can be at the parent's convenience and should be arranged with the classroom teacher. Volunteering will enhance the parent-teacher relationship and familiarize parents with the program and the many rewards of working with young children. Parents must remember, however, that is it never appropriate for a parent to discipline other children in the program. Little Rock School District has very specific disciplinary guidelines that must be followed. PARENTffEACHERCONFERENCES Two conferences will be scheduled during the school year\nhowever, conferences between parents and teachers can be arranged at the request of either party whenever the need arises. Every effort will be made to schedule a time convenient for parents\nhowever, every effort will be made not to schedule conferences during instructional time. If parents have a concern about either the program or policies regarding the Pre-Kindergarten Program, they should use the following procedure to express their concern: 1. Contact the classroom teacher and ask that a conference be arranged. Discuss the problem or concern with the child 's classroom teacher. In most cases, the teacher will be able to either explain the situation to the satisfaction of the parent or will make the necessary changes to remedy the situation. 2. If parents still have concerns, they should contact the building principal. MONEY SENT TO SCHOOL Parents should send all money in a sealed envelope with your child's name, teacher's name, and purpose of the money listed on the outside of the envelope. 11 Dear Parent or Guardian: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 Please sign and return this form to your child's teacher indicating that you have received and read this Handbook. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. I have received and read the Little Rock School District Pre-K Parent Handbook. Parent Signature Date 12 !JI n 0 .z.. . ~ =1 mn ::c en m\no\n\u0026lt;:: fl -,:,\no 0 -,:, m ~ C 0 z ~ 0z 3C \u0026gt; CD m .,~..... \u0026gt;\u0026lt; (I):= men nn O::c zo Co\no,... men \u0026gt;m ~~ C)n . . m C en 0 \u0026gt;\nso~ -,:, m::c\no c:: en 3C 0\u0026gt; zz ~~ ,... en no ::cc:: \u0026gt;\no Zn C) m men en DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 July 28, 2005 LRSD Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools Revision of Policy IJOA and IJOA-R - Field Trips BACKGROUND: The LRSD Board of Directors endorses the use of field trips. A field trip can best be described as a living laboratory in which learning is acquired through active hands-on experience with the rich resources of the local community. Each school will be responsible for using the grade level curriculum map to identify and explain the content area that each field trip will support and how student learning will be assessed. Fields trips are to be exciting and offer a learning experience for children beyond the walls of the classroom into the vast community outside. They provide children with experiences that cannot be duplicated in the school but are nonetheless an integral part of school instruction. RATIONALE: Policy IJOA and IJOA-R have been revised to provide direction to building principals and classroom teachers when planning field trips for the 2005-2006 school year. Procedures for field trips are outlined in an effort to ensure that students are spending quality instructional time with the teacher in the classroom and on field trips. Principals and teachers will be accountable for organizing field trips in an effort to ensure that each opportunity is related to the district's curriculum and to ensure that the district policy and regulations are being adhered to. FUNDING: Individual School's Operating Budget RECOMMENDATION: The Board approved IJOA on first reading at their agenda meeting on July 14. The administration requests second reading and approval of Policy IJOA for implementation during the 2005-2006 school year. PREPARED BY: Dr. Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent for Elementary Schools ?\" n .0z. . ~ n ~ m n :J: en m ~\n::\n~ \"0 \"0 ' \"0 m ~ C 0 z ~ 0 z !I: \u0026gt; \"m\" ~ rm !=' C) ~ ~ \"0 0 ' \"0 0 en \u0026gt;,.... ?\"~ \"0 m:J: ::oc en !I: 0\u0026gt; zz ~~ ,- en no :Cc \u0026gt;::o Zn c, m men en LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: IJOA FIELD TRIPS The Little Rock School District Board of Education endorses the use of field trips for students. In light of the valuable contribution to a child's education, field trips should be preceded by good planning. Careful attention should be given to trip selection, pre-visit, preparation, appropriate follow up, and evaluation. Such efforts should ensure that students will have a successful educational experience. When considering a field trip, teachers are advised to first consult with their administrator regarding existing school board policies and follow the recommended procedures outlined in the regulation - lJOA -R: Field Trips. Adopted: July 22, 1999 Revised: 2 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: IJOA-R FIELD TRIPS Responsibilities of Principals in the Field Trip Process It is the responsibility of the principal to ensure the planning, execution, and fulfillment of all financial obligations. By signing the required Request for Educational Field Trip form (Form 221 , revised 7/05), the principal is:  stating that the field trip is related to the curriculum standards and benchmarks appropriate for the grade level or course\n indicating that the teacher will make the actual arrangements at the site and describing the kind of transportation to be used\n stating that student safety and accessibility to the trip has been considered\nand  agreeing that a requisition form to pay for entrance fees, tickets, etc. will be submitted General Procedures All activities that involve any student leaving the campus for school-sanctioned activities are construed to be field trips and will fall within these guidelines whether or not district transportation or other transportation is used. 1. The Educational Services Division will support the schools in identifying and aligning the field trip to the curriculum. Using the grade level curriculum map, the teacher will identify and explain the content area that the field trip will support and how student learning will be assessed. 2. All field trips must be curriculum-related and must be accessible to all students. All students must be afforded the opportunity to go on the field trip(s). Hence, student participation in field trips must not be used for disciplinary purposes or sanctions. All regulations in the Little Rock School District Elementary and Secondary Handbook will be followed while on the field trip and in determining eligibility to participate. 3. Field trip requests must be made at least three (3) weeks prior to the date of the field trip. If this timeline is not adhered to, the request may be denied. Schools must cancel trips at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled pick-up time. Failure to do so will result in a one (1) hour regular rate penalty charge to be billed to the school. 3 !X' n .0z.. .\n:\n! n =1 m n :I: en m\na:, \u0026lt;\n=:\nf) .,,\na:, .0, , m ~ C 0 z ~ 0z\ni: \u0026gt; a, m ,~... m !=\" C)\n:\n! ..z.,. ,.\na:, .0, , 0 en \u0026gt;,... .\n,,,, ,~ m::I:\na:,c: en\nc 0\u0026gt; zz ~~ ,... en no :I: C: \u0026gt;\na:, Zn c, m men en LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: IJOA-R (continued) 4. Because of the district's commitment to comply with the No Child Left Behind Act and remove schools from school improvement, it is critical for instructional time to be used wisely. Therefore, field trips will be limited to two (2) field trips per classroom on the elementary schools. Both elementary and secondary principals will submit a quarterly field trip report that will be monitored by the Associate Superintendents. No field trips should be approved during the week of any testing and after May 15th of each year unless approved by the Associate Superintendent for Elementary or Secondary Schools. 5. Since no funds have been centrally budgeted for field trips, each school is responsible for the funding of field trips, with the exception of those field trips, which are financed through special programs or curricular departments. 6. A supply of the Request for Educational Field Trip and the Field Trip Permission forms is available from the Supply Center by requisition . 7. Principals are to thoroughly check all field-trip requests forms to ensure that the required information is complete and correct prior to signing. Principals will be accountable for ensuring that all submitted field trip forms are complete and accurate and that all directives pertaining to field trips are followed. Prior to the field trip, the principal should submit a copy of each field trip form to the appropriate Associate Superintendent. 8. Written parental approval must be given in order for a student to be allowed to participate in a field trip. All documents involving parental approval must be kept on file at the school until the end of the academic year. 9. The Procurement Department will publish a list of approved charter bus companies and reminders of the timeline for requisitions. A purchase requisition must be completed if a charter bus will be the mode of transportation employed. 4 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: IJOA-R (continued) 10. For trips out of the city, a seat assignment list is required. Students should be in their assigned seats during all travel time. 11. An employee of the District must be designated as the emergency contact person for any field trip, which is in progress before or after school hours. The teacher/ administrator conducting the field trip must have the phone number of this emergency contact person. The emergency contact person must have a copy of the field trip list and remain available until all students are returned to the school or their home. The teacher/administrator conducting the field trip and the principal must also have a copy of the list during the field trip. The teacher/administrator who is conducting the field trip will notify the emergency contact person when all students have been returned safely to school or to their homes. 12. If a charter bus is used for transporting students:  The vendor must be on the approved Procurement list.  Insurance certificates for approved charter bus companies are kept on file at Procurement.  Schools are to prepare a requisition, attach a copy of the Request for Educational Field Trip form, and forward to Procurement for purchase order processing.  All payments for charter buses will be via purchase orders. 13. If a private vehicle is used for the transportation of students:  Parents must give permission for their child to ride in a private vehicle.  Proof of insurance must be obtained. Such verification will be kept on file for the duration of the academic year. (A photocopy of the vehicle operator's insurance card showing current coverage will suffice.) The vehicle used for the trip and its driver must have the State's required Arkansas minimum automobile liability insurance coverage.  A seat belt must be available for every passenger and the driver.  The driver must be at least 21 years of age. 14.An appropriate number of chaperones will be secured to ensure student safety and to maintain proper discipline of the students. This ratio will vary by grade level and by the nature of the field trip. 5 !X' (\") 0 z -i ~ (\") ~ m (\") ::r: en m ~\n:\n.f.l,\no 0.. , m ~ 0 0 z ~ 0 z \u0026lt;:I C\u0026gt; ~ z .-.i,\no .0. , 0 en )\u0026gt; r- .\n.i,- ~ m::r:\noc en\n: 0 )\u0026gt; zz ~~ r- en no :cc )\u0026gt;\no Z(\") c, m men en LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: IJOA-R (continued) Additional Considerations State law and issues of liability will be considered in planning and implementing field trips, whether curricular or for athletic events in which private vehicles are utilized. Conditions for the Use of District Vehicles 1. The District can provide transportation for field trips and activities if such field trips or activities are between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 1 :30 p.m. during the school day. Saturday and after-school-hour activities must be arranged via the Educational Field Trip Request form. LRSD buses will normally not be available for field trips on Sunday. 2. Arrangements for transportation for regularly-scheduled athletic events will be made with Laidlaw Transportation regarding the number of buses needed and the time when they are needed. 3. No stops will be made for the purpose of feeding students lunch unless previously requested on the Request for Educational Field Trip form. Financial Procedures for Field Trips When Using a LRSD (Laidlaw) Bus 1. Schools must identify the budget account(s) to charge for buses on the Request for Educational Field Trip form when LRSD bus or Laidlaw Transportation is used. If the cost is being split between several schools, all codes must be listed along with the percent allocation to each school. If no account(s) is provided, the request will not be approved and the form will be returned to the school. 2. Once the trip occurs, Laidlaw will bill the LRSD, and the Business Office will subsequently charge the cost of expenses to the budget code(s) provided on the Request for Educational Field Trip form. The Business Office will pay Laidlaw directly for the trip. 3. A copy of the paid invoice will be sent to the principal/department head that has control over the budget code(s) listed. This copy will be the notification of the amount(s) charged to the budget. 6 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: IJOA-R (continued) Third-Party Funders of Field Trips 1. If a third party is paying for the field trip (PTA, etc.), schools must still provide the school budget code on the form. The school budget will be charged, and the school will then be responsible for collecting the amount due from the third party. When this amount is collected, the school must forward the check to the Business Office with instructions on which account(s) to credit. 2. The contract rate with Laidlaw for the year will apply. The time for rate calculations will be from the time the bus arrives at the school until the time the bus returns to be billed in 15-minute intervals. 3. If after a trip the principal/teacher has concerns about the service provided, the principal should call the LRSD liaison with Laidlaw who will then work with Laidlaw to resolve the issues and make necessary adjustments to the invoice. Once the school receives the copy of the Laidlaw invoice, the amount will have already been deducted from the budget code provided on the Request for Educational Field Trip form. Activity Fund When paying for buses using activity accounts, all of the regulations above apply, with the following exceptions: 1. The school should use the activity account code. 2. If a LRSD department is responsible (i.e ., Staff Development, Superintendent's Office), the form must be coded by the responsible department. 3. The school will receive a copy of the paid invoice showing the account code to be charged. 4. An Activity Fund Requisition must be completed and forwarded, along with a copy of the invoice to the Business Office. Date: October 21, 1999 Revised: 7 !l' n 0 .z.. . ~ n =l m n ::c Cl\u0026gt; m ::a \u0026lt;\n::: .f.l, ::a 0.. , m ~ C 0 z ~ 0z\nr: \u0026gt; a, m ,~... m !'=' C) ~ z..... ,. ::a .0. , 0 Cl\u0026gt; ,\u0026gt;...\n..s,o ~ m::c ::a \u0026lt;= Cl\u0026gt;\nr: 0\u0026gt; zz ~~ ,-Cl\u0026gt; no ::c \u0026lt;= \u0026gt;::ti Zn c, m men Cl\u0026gt; REQUEST FOR EDUCATIONAL FIELD TRIP Required for all students leaving campus for school activities Request must be made at least three (3) weeks before date of field trip. Date: _____ School: _________ Grade Level: _______ _ Teacher/Teachers making arrangements for the field trip Emergency Contact Person: _____________ Phone#: __________ _ Using the grade level curriculum map, identify and explain the content area that this field trip supports and how you will assess student learning. Date of Field Trip: ______ _ Destination(s) ______________ _ (including stops for lunch) Address(s): _______________ _ Means of Transportation: D LRSD Bus D Approved Charter Bus D Insured Private Car Time LEAVING School: _______ _ Time LOADING to Return: ___________ _ (9:00 a.m. earliest for LRSD Buses) (1 :30 p.m. latest for LRSD Buses) Number of students going on the field trip: ____ _ Number of Buses needed: _____ _ (Maximum capacity LRSD bus: 65) Request for sack lunches must be made to the Child Nutrition Manager two (2) weeks prior to the field trip. BUDGET CODE: ____________________________ _ Checklists (To be completed by the principal): Insurance verification obtained \u0026amp; on file Does this trip conflict with other scheduled events? Are any children being deprived of the trip because of economic issues? Requisition is attached (if applicable) YES NO 8 YES Field trip permission slips on file? __ Has student safety been considered and the school nurse notified? List of Participants to: Teacher/Administrator Emergency Contact Person (ECP) NO Professional leave requested (if applicable) __ _ Principal Date Copies should be distributed to the following: White Copy - Laidlaw Yellow Copy - Laidlaw Teacher/Administrator has ECP's Phone# Contact Teacher Pink Copy - Associate Superintendent Elementary/Secondary Schools Gold Copy - School 9 Date !\" n .0z.. . ~ n =l m n ::c V, m :,:, \u0026lt;\n::\nfl \"II :,:, 0 \"II m ~ 0 0 z ~ 0z !I:  a, m ,~... m ~ C) ~ .z.. . \"II :,:, 0 \"II 0 V, ,... ?\"~ \"II m::c :,:, C: V, !I: 0  zz ~~ ,... V, no ::c C: :,:, Zn c, m m v, V, Name of School Field Trip Permission Form LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ---------------- Contact Teacher ---------------- An educational field trip is planned for your child's class or group to visit ________ _ ______________ on ________________ _ (MONTH) (DAY) (YEAR) The pupils will be transported by: LRSD Bus D Insured Private Car D Approved Charter Bus D I, as parent or legal guardian, give permission for _________________ _ to go on this educational field trip. (SIGNATURE) (DATE) (PUPIL'S NAME) 10 Form #113 Reviewed 7 /05 DATE: TO: July 28, 2005 Board of Directors LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Personnel Changes BACKGROUND: None RATIONALE: To staff allocated positions within the District FUNDING: Operating Fund RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.C.A. 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) consecutive years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 19, 2005 for regular schools are considered intern teachers. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 8, 2005 for EYE are considered intern teachers. PREPARED BY: David E. HartPs~~r Director of Human Resources !II n .0z.. . $! n ::1 m n :c en m :\u0026gt;:\u0026gt;\n\u0026lt;:\n,, \"D :\u0026gt;:\u0026gt; 0 \"D m ~ C 0 z ~ 0z\ni::  m m ,~.. m !'=I C) $! z... . \"D :\u0026gt;:\u0026gt; 0 \"D 0 en ,.. Personnel Changes Page 2 July 28, 2005 NAME START DATE/ POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE Resignations/Terminations Certified Emelolees Darr, Kimberly Elementary II/ 8-07-02 Reason : Accepted another OTTER CREEK 7-18-05 position Kennedy, Barbara Library Media 8-20-90 Reason: Leaving the city Specialist/ 8-01-05 DODD Scott, Glenda Elementary IV/ 8-11-04 Reason: Accepted another WILSON 7-11-05 position Skarda, Natalie Special Education/ 8-1-01 Reason: Accepted another CHICOT 7-1-05 position Tidball, Holly Music/ 8-11-04 Reason: Leaving the city RIGHTSELL 7-14-05 New Certified Emelolees Broadnax, Amy Elementary Ill/ 8-11-05 KING Grisham, Laura Art/ 8-11-05 OTTER CREEK Hill, Dorothy Elementary II/ 8-11-05 MEADOWCLIFF Kelley, Karen Elementary II/ 8-11-05 FRANKLIN Lewis, Casey 4 Yr Old/ 8-11-05 FRANKLIN Nickerson, Vickie Elementary I/ 8-11-05 MCDERMOTT SALARY ANNUAL CLASS SALARY 1-04 32350.00 TCH925 6-19 57364.00 LIB950 2-17 49217.00 TCH925 4-05 38041.00 SPE925 1-01 30040.00 TCH925 1-01 30040.00 TCH925 1-12 41593.00 TCH925 4-19 54561.00 TCH925 1-08 36972.00 TCH925 1-02 30617.00 4YR925 4-18 53061 .00 TCH925 Personnel Changes Page 3 July 28, 2005 NAME Romain, Kim Swann, Julie Van Alstyne, Vicki Wilson, Celeste POSITION / SCHOOL Elementary IV/ WAKEFIELD Elementary Ill/ WAKEFIELD Special Education/ CHICOT Elementary I/ FULBRIGHT Certified Promotions NONE Certified Transfers NONE START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL END DATE CLASS SALARY 8-11-05 1-01 30040.00 TCH925 8-11-05 1-03 31195.00 TCH925 8-11-05 1-10 39283.00 SPE925 8-11-05 1-01 30040.00 TCH925 Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Webb, Brenda Reason: Personal Young, Ossie Reason: Retired Hart-Grayson, Mary Nurse/ 9-28-04 52-8 33528.00 WILSON 6-06-05 NURSES Child Nutrition/ 8-15-90 3-14 9933.00 MABELVALE MIDDLE 6-06-05 FSH550 New Non-Certified Employees NONE Non-Certified Transfers Transferred from CLK 11 - Child Nutrition to CLK 10 - Child Nutrition !I' (\") 0 .z... . ~ (\") =l m (\") ::c U\u0026gt; m ~\n=\n.~., ::a .0. , m ~ 0 0 z ~ 0z 31:  ID m i m !=' C) ~ ..z.... ,. ::a .0. , 0 U\u0026gt; .... LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: July 28, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Second Reading - Board Policy FA: New Facilities Development Goal BACKGROUND: The promotion of buildings that are environmentally responsible is at the forefront of planning for energy and resource conservation at the local, state and national levels. The District is committed to contributing to the environmental and economic sustainability of our City and State. RATIONALE: In an effort to promote a positive effect on the City's environment and healthy places for students to learn and employees to work, the attached policy is presented for the Board's approval. New construction of District buildings will utilize sustainable design practices that will decrease the negative impact of buildings on the environment and occupant health while reducing operating and maintenance costs. FUNDING: Bond Account RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the Board approve Policy FA as attached. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen Chief Financial Officer f\u0026gt; 1 0 \"ti m ::0 :.1 0 0 ~ ::i 0 z 31: \u0026gt; CD m ,~.... m !'=I C) ~ .z.. . \"ti ::0 0 \"ti 0 U) ,\u0026gt;.... LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: FA New Facilities Development Goal The Board of Education is committed to promoting the conservation of energy and natural resources for new construction of District facilities. This approach will provide a positive effect on the City's environment and ensure healthy places for students to learn and employees to work. The promotion of buildings that are environmentally responsible is at the forefront of planning for energy and resource conservation at the local, state and national levels. The District will join in this effort through planning, designing, constructing and operating District-owned buildings and facilities by utilizing sustainable design practices that will decrease the negative impact of building on the environment and occupant health while reducing operating and maintenance costs. The District will adopt the U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED-NC) rating system for new construction of District-owned facilities (or other nationally recognized rating system). Adopted: References: U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design system LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: FROM: July 28, 2005 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Contract Extension for Technology Services BACKGROUND: After the successful millage election in May 2000, the District began contracting for technology services for the development and implementation of the LRSD Technology Plan. In the beginning two consulting firms were under contract: ATS\u0026amp;R to address the physical infrastructure and EDS to work with District staff to create and implement a new technology plan. As technology projects have been completed, contracts for technology services have been reduced as shown in the chart below. The current District contract with Education Innovations - Sharon Dowdy which began in 2004 expired on June 30, 2005. Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 Total EDS 349,849 840,000 840,000 203,419 2,233,268 ATS\u0026amp;R 255,619 255,619 Education Innovations 77,937 79,500 157,437 605,468 840,000 840,000 203,419 77,937 79,500 2,646,324 RATIONALE: Discussions during last year's contract presentation process indicated that 2004-2005 could be the last year this service would be needed by the District. Several major events have caused a re-evaluation of our previous position. 1. Three of our most critical technology related contracts end either at 6/30/06 or 6/30/07 at which time new RFPs will have to be developed and responses evaluated. :.n., z )\u0026gt; z n \u0026gt;,... ::0 .m., 0 ~ ?\u0026lt; n 5 en z C'l ::0 m 3: )\u0026gt; ::0 .f.l, ::0 0.. , m ~ C 0 z ~ 0z 3: )\u0026gt; m m ,~... m !::I C'l ~ ..z.. ., ::0 0.. , 0 ,~... Those contracts include our wide area network lease\nlocal, long distance, and cellular phone service\nand telephone system maintenance. 2. Federal E-Rate processes and procedures are continually becoming more complex, making the securing of funds a much more technical and time consuming process. 3. The evaluation and implementation of an automated agenda management system is scheduled to begin in August 2005. Other factors that also should be considered: 1. Cost/Benefit The cost of entering into this contract is far outweighed by the amount of revenue received from E-Rate funds each year. Since the District began using a consultant to assist with E-Rate filings for 2001-2002, the amount of revenue funded for E-Rate projects has been over $ 1 million annually. The chart below shows the District's funding received since the inception of the program in 1998: E-Rate Funds Received Total E-Rate Funded 1998-2001 627,120 2001-2002 2,777,603 2002-2003 1,264,968 2003-2004 3,075,463 2004-2005 1,385,105 Total E-Rate Funded 2001 - 2005 8,503,139 2. Requests for Proposal (RFP) Writing technology-related RFPs requires a level of technical sophistication not currently required for routine operation of the District. A multi-million dollar telecommunications RFP must be developed and evaluated and contracts signed before E-Rate applications can be filed in January 2006. The current value of that contract is approximately $ 1.8 million annually. Other technology-related projects arise each year that are one-time projects requiring technical assistance. For example, during 2004-05 Ms. Dowdy helped write and evaluate the RFP for webbased access to student grades (Edline) and assisted in writing the RFP for online Board agenda software as well as conducting reference checks on potential vendors. The evaluation phase of the online agenda RFP is scheduled for August.  Future projects under consideration that will require outside technical assistance are:  District-wide document management system  Textbook inventory software  Applicant tracking  Centralized library management system  Expansion of media retrieval systems These potential projects, if funded, will require assistance in research and writing of technical specifications, conducting technical pre-bid conferences, coordinating vendor presentations, conducting reference checks, and conducting project coordination meetings. 3. Project Management For the most part, implementation of E-Rate projects is handled by LRSD staff. However, in some cases where a different level of technical expertise is required, the services of an independent project manager are needed. A current example would be the remaining two (2) complete Safari installations and final review and sign-off for six (6) more. To meet E-rate requirements those installations must be complete by September 30. We have also been funded for smaller video systems at four elementary schools that will be installed this year. 4. Current Staff Impact A portion of the work done by Education Innovations is of a technical nature requiring expertise that is not available in the District, while some components of the work could be done by District staff in Computer Information Services and Instructional Technology. However, a change of this magnitude will negatively impact the District's resources that are currently being focused on the support of our technology needs. The current staffing levels and responsibilities of the two departments impacted by this contract are outlined below. Computer Information Services Current staff: Director, 1 Operations Manager, 3 Operations Specialists (AS/400), 5 Applications Specialists, 1 Help Desk Specialist, 1 Systems Engineer (servers), 1 System Engineer (desktop), 1 Training Coordinator, 9 Computer Technicians, 1 Telephone Technician and .5 Secretary. This staff is responsible for:  Coordination and support of CIMS software running on IBM AS/400 system. All major hardware and software issues are escalated to the IT Director.  Coordination and support of data interface integration of electronic gradebook and web-based grade access for parents.  Coordination and support of all software initiatives including participation in the evaluation and approval process.  Implementation and support of District's server farm, including maintaining all user accounts and email in an active directory environment.  Coordinate all technology related software/hardware products used throughout the District.  Responsible for training all users on the District's Student Management system, including attendance, grading, transcripts, scheduling, and maintaining demographic data.  Support approximately 8,000 desktop computers District-wide, including overall approval and use of all desktop software.  Responsible for automation of all District cafeterias using BonAppetit software application. .:-,.n, z \u0026gt;z (\") ,\u0026gt;-\n,:, .m.,, 0 ~ ?\u0026lt; (\") ,- 0 en z C,\n,:, m\nc \u0026gt;\n,:, fl ..,,\n,:, .0., , m\n,:, ::\n1 0 0 z ~ 0z\nc \u0026gt; tD m ~ rm !=' C, .z~.. ..,,\n,:, .0., , 0 en ,\u0026gt;-  Support and maintain PBX phone system District-wide including, approximately 4,000 phone sets and voicemail for all employees. Instructional Technology Current staff: Coordinator, 3 instructional technology specialists, and .5 secretary. This staff is responsible for:  Coordination and support of library media program, including professional development of library staff, support of library automation system, development of library protocols, and monitoring of library resources  Implementation, training and support for the District's electronic gradebook and parent web access to student grades. There will be an expansion of 4 schools on the gradebook and 8 schools on parent web access in the 2005-2006 school year.  Development and implementation of technology training classes for teachers, including basic productivity tools and instructional software tools that are integrated into the curriculum  Coordination of training and monitoring of 25 sites that have Compass Learning software, working to ensure that the software is fully integrated with LRSD curriculum goals  Implementation, training and support for Safari video networks in 13 District sites.  Oversight of all E-rate applications, keeping current on program rule changes, preparing for audits and site visits, submitting documentation on review processes and appeals, and maintaining E-rate records  Coordination of the LRSD Technology Committee  Leadership of LRSD Technology Planning efforts 5. E-rate Comparison with Other Districts Arkansas districts were surveyed about their E-Rate application process, funding and use of consultants. The table below shows the result of that research. Arkansas Districts 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 Comments Fayetteville $137,700 $105,461 $143,742 $159,087 Do not use consultant. Apply only for telco services. Fort Smith $427,362 $178,933 $168,981 $146,265 Do not use consultant. Apply only for telco services. LRSD $2,777,603 $1,564,968 $3,075,463 $1 ,385,105 Apply for telco, internal connections, system maintenance. NLRSD $0 $0 $80,255 $66,825 Began using paid consultant in 2003-2004. PCSSD $0 $81 ,288 $88,422 $85,583 Do not use consultant. Do not apply for more because they don't have enough helo. Rogers $0 $0 $0 $0 Do not apply for e-rate funding. Springdale $47,017 $51,724 $68,068 $355,011 Do not use consultant. Texarkana, AR $0 $51 ,070 $75,370 $51 ,753 Apply only for telco. For 05-06 added staff so they could apply for more. FUNDING: The one (1) year request of $78,000 plus travel expenses will be funded by the Dedicated Maintenance and Operations fund. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board approve the attached Agreement for the 2005-2006 school year. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen Chief Financial Officer '...\",' z z\u0026gt; n ,\u0026gt;-\n,o m \"D 0 ~ ?\u0026lt; ,n- 0 u, z C'l\n,o m 3: \u0026gt;\n,o fl \"D\n,o 0 \"D m\n,o ~ 0 0 z ~ 0 z 3: \u0026gt; ID m ~ rm !=' C'l ~ .z.. . \"D\n,o 0 \"D 0 u, \u0026gt;,- National Districts 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 Comments Indianapolis, IN $1,413,319 $993,123 $1,400,522 $1,494,124 Do not use consultant. Apply only for telco because process takes too much lime. Caddo Parish, $153,204 $2,056,389 $933,605 $539,599 Do not use consultant. LA Apply only for telco because process takes too much lime. Norfolk, VA $902,703 $682,786 $812,456 $979,572 Do not use consultant. Hired extra staff fore-rate. Chatham County, $48,821 $2,009,982 $1,794,221 $2,981 ,315 Do not use consultant. GA Muscogee County, $609,527 $747,105 $895,556 $393,059 Use a paid consultant for GA very larae contracts. 2. ASSUMED NAME CERTIFICATE FOR UNINCORPORATED BUSINESS OR PROFESSION The aasumed name under which the bu1i.aeaa or profeuional service i or i, to be conducted or rendered i t~i(.fA \u0026gt;..\n.:: \"- \"I:..\"'\"'-k~\\ \\.\\ \\, - '\n, BUSINESSADDRESS:.:,ty Culf11' = Wy1,,,, fa: 7':)t l \u0026lt;\"t~ The regislr\u0026amp;DI is: (Check oae 1111d fill iD appropriate blank,. Attach aclditiooal sbcell if 00\u0026lt;e111ary.)  A. An INDIVIDUAL: The full name and re,ideoce addreui, S Y',C... ,-c} :,, }) 0 rY J. i j C...c. //,' ('., C...-t. Nune .v lit. T.x  B. A PARTNERSHIP: The veatwc or partnenhip name is: ____________________ _ Tbe venture or partnership office add..ff:11 i1: ________________________ _ 1be full came of eachjoim venturer or general partner and hit residellcc addrcn ifhc ia an individual or ill office \u0026amp;ddrc11 if not an individual it: --------------------------------  C. An ESTA'Ir:: Thenamo of lheestate is: __________________________ _ The e1tate1' office, if any, it: The full name of each n:prc1catativc of the estate and bis rcaidcncc addre11 if be is an individual or ill office ~en if not an individual ia:  0 . A REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST: 'The name of the lnllt is: _______________ _ The addreH of the llult it: The full name of each tnistee manager and hi resideoce addreu if bo is an individual and it office addreu if not 11D indivi-dual is: ------------------------------------- Fi  E. A COMPANY OTiiER THAN A REAL ESTA'lr: INVESTMENI' TRUST, OR A CORPORAT IO~ The\"'~ ..\\...D, the com-pmy or corporati011 ii: g ~ \u0026lt;- The lt\u0026amp;te, country, or other jurisdictioa under tho law, of which it wu organiz.cd, iocmporatcd, or i SIIOC~ ~ office addrc11 U: ~ n~ ~ ~ ..,_ f..:\n.... ,I  C 4. The'burinc11 or profe11io.aal aervico that is or i.a to be CODducted or rendered in the county under 1lua usu.med name ii~ing or will be cooducte4\u0026lt;\u0026gt;r rendered u a: (Chock applicable ooo) CiY Proprictonbip  Limic,,d Partnership  Sole lnctitioaor  Real Estate InvestmeDI Trust  JoiDIVe\u0026lt;IIW-o  IoiDIStookComp1111y  General ParlDulbip 0 Some other !onn of unincorporated bu1ine11 orprofeuional usociation or entity: __________ _ To certify which, witoeu __ vY\\~-'-IY~------baod the ..:Jii_r~y ot __ L~Y~\"~e. ______ , 19 ::l.l SlGNATIJIU! (S) - Ji\n\\\u0026amp; CMd:::::t-- ~\u0026lt;-, w, ov /OlUOB'.23T{ n!ESTATEOPTEXAS } COUNI'YOP COLLIN BEFORBME, HELEN STARNES, _____-_ -_-_-_-_-_-:_~_-_-_-.,.-:_-_-_-_-.,.-------...,-=-..,.-_-_~c:o:U~N_T_Y-.-C_L_E_RK__,,.....----=--=--=--=--=----,-in-aod--fo_r_1\u0026amp;1.\n.._d_C_O_UD_l y_ a_od_ S_ ta_le-,-o-o-lbi-.-, \"Y personally appeared _.P=c.. ..6.. .o u r:.:..ia.,,_,,h _.s-='--.,. . ..c C.J\"\"\"\":..c...._....\u0026amp;... .....- e..1\u0026lt;Ju14-14-_________________ ----------------- biownto me to be i:e pcnao.___ wboae name~~--- subscribed . ., J,o..tho foregoing instrument. and acknowledged to mo that ~he __ executed the same for the putposcs therein expreued. Given under my hand and seal of office, Ibis !)_4't/... dsy of ~.,,., L 19 CJ\"/ ~N SIARNES, CUUNtY cr\ntmc- DEPUTY ,,,,,,u,u,,,,,,, NOTE: A ccrti!~~~~ and aolmowlcdged by eaob individual whosc name i.o re  to be 1tatcd therein or by hi repre, ,, ~l\"',\n,.'\"-,~)'l!i.4,and iD the cue of 1111y penooool 1111 individual the name of which is required to be staled therein. the~   exe~~ acknowledged under oath on behalf of such penon by its rcpreacmative or anomey in fact or by ij\"J!t\nq,j,, trustee manager, officer, or anyone bavina comparable authority, u the cue may be, of JU\u0026lt;:b pe~\\y  execii='tl ind acknowledged by an anomey iD fact aball include a ,tatemCDI that 111Cb allom\u0026lt;y iD fact ~ be~~   ~y his principal to eucute and acknowledge the same. :, H161Assumed ,e~~fr\"=~~ . ,,,,, ,,,,... ClklRev 3/11.8 7 :.n., z z\u0026gt; (\") \u0026gt;,.. ::0 m \"D 0 ~ ?'\u0026lt; ,(.\".) 0 en z C) ::0 m\nc \u0026gt; ::0 f\u0026gt; \"D ::0 0 \"D m ~ C 0 z ~ 0 z\nc \u0026gt; ID m ~ ,\u0026gt;.. m !=' C) ~ z --\u0026lt; \"D ~ \"D 0 en \u0026gt;,.. rn C 0 z ~ 0 z en 0.. , \"D ::0 0 \"D m ::0 AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTED SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTED SERVICES (this \"Agreement\") is made and entered into as of the 1st day of July, 2005, by and between the LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT (the \"District\") and Education Innovations -Sharon Dowdy (\"Contractor\"). A. The District desires for Contractor to provide the services described in the Statement of Work to be Performed section of this Agreement for the cost set forth in this Agreement and subject to the other terms and provisions of this Agreement. B. Contractor has represented to the District that it has the knowledge and expertise to perform the Services for the price specified in this Agreement. C. The District and Contractor desire to enter into this Agreement to set forth their agreements with respect to the services to be provided by Contractor as well as the compensation to be paid Contractor by the District. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the District and Contractor hereby agree as follows: 1. Statement of Work to be Performed - Contractor agrees to provide, in accordance with the highest professional standards of care, the services (the \"Services\"): Technology Related Request for Proposal Development  Develop Telecommunications RFP (WAN and phone service) in conjunction with LRSD Procurement staff  Develop additional technology related RFPs, including, but not limited to, PC specifications, network electronics, video PBX systems, cabling, etc.  Assist in evaluation of technology-related RFP's  Participate in Technology Committee meetings  Update LRSD Technology Plan as needed Online Automated Agenda Management System Project  Act as project manager for implementation of online automated agenda management system  Plan and facilitate regular meetings with project personnel including both LRSD staff and vendor team  Create implementation timelines with vendor and LRSD staff  Assist in preparation of materials lists and purchase orders for the system  Communicate with LRSD staff on all aspects of project implementation  Coordinate implementation schedule with vendor and LRSD staff  Monitor progress of implementation schedule and notify LRSD of any problems  Manage budget for project  Work with vendor on content of training sessions  Coordinate training schedule with LRSD staff  Monitor training sessions E-rate  Advise on types of E-rate filings that would benefit LRSD  Prepare all E-rate applications and submit to LRSD for review  Research and prepare documentation related to E-rate applications  Organize documentation for all E-rate related applications  Research and prepare correspondence related to E-rate Program Integrity and Selective Review requests  Research and prepare appeal documents  Do background research on FCC rules and orders related to E-rate  Assist LRSD vendors in all types of E-rate filings Media Retrieval Projects  Act as project manager for implementation of Safari system at 8 new sites  Plan and facilitate regular meetings with project personnel including both LRSD staff and vendor team  Create implementation timelines for each site working with vendor and LRSD construction managers  Assist in preparation of materials lists and purchase orders for the systems  Walk schools with vendor and LRSD construction managers to determine locations and technical needs of head end rooms  Communicate with principals on all aspects of project implementation  Coordinate implementation schedule with vendor and LRSD construction managers  Monitor progress of implementation schedule and notify LRSD of any problems  Manage budget for project  Work with vendor on content of training sessions  Coordinate training schedule with principals and staff  Monitor training sessions  Oversee maintenance service at 11 existing Safari sites 2 fl 0\"\"\"\" \"m\" \"..\".. -\u0026lt; C 0 z .).\u0026gt;.. 0 z 3: )\u0026gt; tD m r- \u0026lt; )\u0026gt; mr- :..n., z )\u0026gt; z n .\u0026gt;... \"m\" \"0\" ~ ?\u0026lt; n r- 0 (J) z C) \"m\" 3: )\u0026gt; \"\" !=' C) ~ .z.. . \"\"\"\" 0 \"0\" (J) )\u0026gt; r- !T1 C 0 z ~ 0z (J) .0.. , \"\"\"\" 0 \"m\" \"\" Other Possible RFP Development:  Human Resources Applicant Tracking System  District Wide Document Management System  Textbook Inventory System  Student ID System 2. Nature and Scope of Engagement - The District hereby retains Contractor to perform the Services and the District agrees to pay for the Services as provided in Section 4. The Contractor accepts the engagement to perform the Services and agrees to provide such services to the District, all as set forth herein. Contractor will not subcontract or otherwise engage subcontractors to perform the Services without prior written approval from the District. 3. Term -The term of this Agreement shall be July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006. 4. Compensation. Contractor will be paid a total of $78,000 for the Services payable in twelve installments of $6,500 in monthly arrears plus reimbursement of travel expenses directly attributable to perform LRSD work also billed monthly in arrears. When travel expenses are paid by Little Rock School District, the consultant will work exclusively on LRSD projects. 5. Independent Contractor - Contractor agrees that it is an independent contractor in performing the Services. As an independent contractor, Contractor's duties are limited as provided in this Agreement, and it does not have, and agrees it will not hold itself out as having, any authority to represent or obligate the District as an officer, employee or agent. 6. Indemnification and Legal Compliance - The Contractor shall at all times observe and fully comply with any and all Federal, State and local laws, statutes, orders, ordinances and regulations. Contractor agrees to save, hold harmless and to indemnify the District, its agents, employees, officers and board members against any and all liability, losses, claims or costs of whatsoever kind or nature relative to the performance of this Agreement or any occurrence or accident in connection with inadequate design, breach of contract, material failure, default or the performance of any work, services or products supplied pursuant to this Agreement. Further, Contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the District, its agents, employees, officers and board members from any lawsuits, causes of action, claims, liabilities and damages, of any kind and nature, including but not limited to, attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of the performance of this Agreement whether attributable in whole or in part to any act, omission or negligence of the District, its agents or employees, including, but not limited to, any and all lawsuits, causes of action, claims, liabilities, and damages which the District, its agents or employees may sustain by reason of any failure of Contractor to indemnify as provided herein\nor any failure by Contractor to otherwise perform its obligations pursuant to this Agreement, or by reason of the injury to or death of any person or persons or the damage to, loss of use of or destruction of any property resulting from the work undertaken herein. 3 7. Conflict of Interest - Contractor represents and warrants that no director or employee of the District is in any manner interested directly or indirectly in this Agreement or in any of the expected profits which might arise from this Agreement. Contractor further represents and warrants that no attempt has been made to influence or gain favorable advantage by communicating directly or indirectly with any official of the District. 8. Civil Rights Act Compliance\nNo Discrimination- Contractor agrees that it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to the regulations of the Department of Education (34 C.F.R. Part 100) issued pursuant to that title. Contractor further agrees that it shall not discriminate against, or segregate, a person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, familial status, natioal origin, ancestry, disability or condition of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) or AIDS-related complex in carrying out its duties and obligations pursuant to this Agreement nor shall Contractor or any person claiming under or through Contractor establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation. In the event the District permits subcontracting under this Agreement, Contractor agrees to include provisions similar to the foregoing in any subcontracts entered into between Contractor and any Subcontractor. Contractor assures the District that it will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate the foregoing provisions of this Agreement. Contractor further agrees to comply with all other applicable requirements of federal, state and local laws, ordinances or regulations regarding nondiscrimination in employment. 9. Termination - This Agreement may be terminated for cause by either party in the event a representation or warranty set forth herein is untrue in any material respect. This Agreement may also be terminated in the event there is any breach of a material provision of this Agreement which is not cured within ten ( 10) days following written notice to the defaulting party. Contractor's representations and warranties shall survive any termination of this Agreement. In the event of termination for cause, either party shall have all rights and remedies available under Arkansas law or applicable federal law. The District may also terminate without cause with 30 days written notice to the Contractor. In this case, the District will only be liable for pro-rata amounts and incurred travel due the Contractor through the date of termination. 10. Examination of Contractor Records - The District shall have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of Contractor involving transactions relating to this Agreement at any reasonable time during the term of this Agreement as well as for a period of three (3) years following the termination of this Agreement. 4 !=' G') z~ -\u0026lt; \"D\n,o 0 \"D 0 V, ,\u0026gt;- ~ .., z z\u0026gt; (\") ,\u0026gt;-\n,o m \"D 0\n,o -\u0026lt; 11. Miscellaneous - 11.1 Severability - If a court holds any part, term or provision of this Agreement to be unenforceable, the validity of the remaining portions shall not be affected, and the rights and obligations of the parties shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreement did not contain the objectionable part, term or prov1s1on. 11.2 Headings - The headings which appear in this Agreement have been inserted for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. They are not intended to, and shall not be deemed to define, limit or extend the scope or intent of any provision hereof. 11.3 Entire Agreement - This Agreement has been negotiated and prepared by the parties equally and shall not be construed as having been drafted by one party. When fully executed, it shall supercede any and all prior and existing Agreements, either oral or in writing. This Agreement (including any exhibits) contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. 11.4 Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposals - In the event there is a Request for Qualifications or Request for Proposals attached to this Agreement, such document shall be incorporated into this Agreement by reference. 11 .5 Amendments - Any amendment or modification of this Agreement must be made in writing and signed by the parties to this Agreement. 11 .6 Assignment - This Agreement is not assignable by either party without the prior consent of the other party. 11.7 Governing Law and Jurisdiction - The laws of the State of Arkansas shall govern the parties' rights and obligations under this Agreement. The parties agree that this Agreement was negotiated in the State of Arkansas and agree that any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in the State of Arkansas. 11.8 Attorneys' Fees and Costs - If any suit or other proceeding is instituted by either party pertaining to this Agreement or the obligations hereunder, the prevailing party, in addition to any other relief the court may award, shall be entitled to its costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees. 11.9 Notice - Any notice, consent, request or other communication required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given when either (i) 5 personally delivered to the intended recipient, or (ii) sent, by certified or registered mail, return-receipt requested, addressed to the intended recipient at the address specified below its signature on the signature page of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective as of the date set forth above. THE DISTRICT: Little Rock School District By: (print) Name: Title: Director of Procurement Signature: Address for Notice: 1800 East Sixth Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 6 CONTRACTOR: Education Innovations By: (print) Name: __________ _ Title: _________ _ Signature: Address for Notice: !\"\" \"C\n:c 0 \"C m .\n.:.c. -\u0026lt; C 0 z .\u0026gt;... 0z 3:: \u0026gt; 0, m,.... \u0026lt;\u0026gt; ,.... m :..n., z z\u0026gt; n ,\u0026gt;....\n:c m \"C 0 ~ ?\u0026lt; ,n... . 0 u, z c\n,\n:c m 3:: \u0026gt; ~ c\n, ~ .z.. . \"C\n:c 0 \"C 0 u, ,\u0026gt;.... DATE: TO: FROM: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 July 28, 2005 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Property Donation BACKGROUND: The Ashley Company, a commercial real estate development corporation of North Little Rock, has made an offer to the Little School District in the form of a donation of 22.62 acres of vacant land valued at $305,000. This property is located at the Mabelvale Cut-off at Heinke Road immediately adjacent and adjoining properties owned by the Little Rock School District that house Mabelvale Elementary School. The property is presently owned by Conservative Development Company (CDC) whose representative is the Ashley Company of North Little Rock. RATIONALE: While in the process of securing permission to locate portable buildings at Mabelvale Elementary School, the Ashley Company was contacted\nand, as a result, offered the Little Rock School District approximately 23 acres of undeveloped property immediately to the north and east and adjoining Mabelvale Elementary School. The property is partially cleared but most is heavily wooded. The Ashley Company is making the donation on the part of the Conservative Development Company who desires to make this donation to the Little Rock School District. An appraisal of the property has been completed, and the value is shown to be $305,000. A title commitment has been secured from Beech Abstract, and additional transactions will take place to secure the title to this property once\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":24,"next_page":25,"prev_page":23,"total_pages":155,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":276,"total_count":1850,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":1843},{"value":"Sound","hits":4},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":3}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":289},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":220},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":179},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","hits":69},{"value":"United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit","hits":30},{"value":"North Little Rock School District","hits":12},{"value":"Bushman Court Reporting","hits":11},{"value":"Walker, John W.","hits":6},{"value":"Joshua Intervenors","hits":5},{"value":"Arkanasas State University. Office of Educational Research and Services","hits":4},{"value":"Arkansas Association of Educational Administrators","hits":4}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":1745},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":1244},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":1207},{"value":"Education--Evaluation","hits":886},{"value":"Educational law and legislation","hits":721},{"value":"Educational planning","hits":690},{"value":"School integration","hits":604},{"value":"School management and organization","hits":601},{"value":"Educational statistics","hits":560},{"value":"Education--Finance","hits":474},{"value":"School improvement programs","hits":417}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Springer, Joy C.","hits":6},{"value":"Walker, John W.","hits":3},{"value":"Heller, Christopher","hits":2},{"value":"Wright, Susan Webber, 1948-","hits":2},{"value":"Armor, David","hits":1},{"value":"Eddington, Ramsey","hits":1},{"value":"Intervenors, Joshua","hits":1},{"value":"Intervenors, Knight","hits":1},{"value":"Jones, Sam","hits":1},{"value":"Jones, Stephen W.","hits":1},{"value":"Joshua, Lorene","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":6},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":1849},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":1836},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":1799},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":1539},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, North Little Rock, 34.76954, -92.26709","hits":10},{"value":"United States, Missouri, 38.25031, -92.50046","hits":5},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Maumelle, 34.86676, -92.40432","hits":4},{"value":"United States, Missouri, Saint Louis City County, Saint Louis, 38.65588, -90.30928","hits":3},{"value":"United States, Kansas, 38.50029, -98.50063","hits":2},{"value":"United States, New York, 43.00035, -75.4999","hits":2},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Chicot County, 33.26725, -91.29397","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":1836},{"value":"Missouri","hits":5},{"value":"Kansas","hits":2},{"value":"Massachusetts","hits":2},{"value":"New York","hits":2},{"value":"Connecticut","hits":1},{"value":"Illinois","hits":1},{"value":"Maryland","hits":1},{"value":"Michigan","hits":1},{"value":"Ohio","hits":1},{"value":"Oklahoma","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1994","hits":385},{"value":"1995","hits":376},{"value":"1996","hits":334},{"value":"1993","hits":312},{"value":"1992","hits":292},{"value":"1999","hits":273},{"value":"1997","hits":268},{"value":"1991","hits":255},{"value":"2001","hits":252},{"value":"2000","hits":251},{"value":"1998","hits":245},{"value":"2002","hits":182},{"value":"1990","hits":173},{"value":"2003","hits":164},{"value":"2004","hits":148},{"value":"1989","hits":134},{"value":"2005","hits":119},{"value":"2006","hits":86},{"value":"2011","hits":62},{"value":"2010","hits":60},{"value":"2007","hits":57},{"value":"1988","hits":51},{"value":"2008","hits":47},{"value":"2009","hits":47},{"value":"1987","hits":35},{"value":"1986","hits":30},{"value":"2012","hits":30},{"value":"1984","hits":27},{"value":"1985","hits":23},{"value":"2013","hits":19},{"value":"1983","hits":16},{"value":"1982","hits":15},{"value":"1980","hits":13},{"value":"1981","hits":13},{"value":"1974","hits":12},{"value":"1975","hits":12},{"value":"1976","hits":12},{"value":"1977","hits":12},{"value":"1978","hits":12},{"value":"1979","hits":12},{"value":"1973","hits":11},{"value":"2014","hits":11},{"value":"1967","hits":9},{"value":"1968","hits":9},{"value":"1969","hits":9},{"value":"1970","hits":9},{"value":"1971","hits":9},{"value":"1972","hits":9},{"value":"1954","hits":8},{"value":"1966","hits":8},{"value":"1950","hits":7},{"value":"1951","hits":7},{"value":"1952","hits":7},{"value":"1953","hits":7},{"value":"1955","hits":7},{"value":"1956","hits":7},{"value":"1957","hits":7},{"value":"1958","hits":7},{"value":"1959","hits":7},{"value":"1960","hits":7},{"value":"1961","hits":7},{"value":"1962","hits":7},{"value":"1963","hits":7},{"value":"1964","hits":7},{"value":"1965","hits":7},{"value":"2017","hits":6},{"value":"2015","hits":5},{"value":"2016","hits":5},{"value":"2018","hits":5},{"value":"2019","hits":5},{"value":"2020","hits":5},{"value":"2021","hits":5},{"value":"2022","hits":5},{"value":"2023","hits":5},{"value":"2024","hits":5}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1950","max":"2024","count":5114,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":904},{"value":"reports","hits":255},{"value":"judicial records","hits":232},{"value":"legal documents","hits":207},{"value":"exhibition (associated concept)","hits":67},{"value":"project management","hits":62},{"value":"budgets","hits":38},{"value":"correspondence","hits":23},{"value":"handbooks","hits":20},{"value":"agendas (administrative records)","hits":17},{"value":"handbills","hits":16}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}