{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1303","title":"Parent Committee: Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1988/1989"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School improvement programs","Parents"],"dcterms_title":["Parent Committee: Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1303"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["200 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_966","title":"Reports: Enrollment, North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1988/1999"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School enrollment"],"dcterms_title":["Reports: Enrollment, North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/966"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_765","title":"Test data, standardized results","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1988/1995"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Standards","Educational statistics"],"dcterms_title":["Test data, standardized results"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/765"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nSCHOOL: Cloverdale Junior High Iges 1989 READING 2.90. 1991 1992 1990 MATHEMATICS 1969 1990 1991 REVISED AUGUST 1992 I Number Tested Number Passed 202 183 201 181 212 182 222 186 218 186 202 168 201 177 212 181 Percent Passed 91 90 86 84 85 83 88 85 BLACK MALES Number Passed ,44 44 54 51 58 43 43 51 Percent Passed 81 81 81 77 83 80 80 76 Number Passed 56 61 59 70 78 48 60 61 Percent Passed Number Passed rcent Passed WHITE FEMALES Number Passed Percent Passed Number Passed Percent Passed 89 87 81 8C 81 76 86 84 32 35 31 15 21 30 34 31 97 49 98 2 IOC 97 36 100 5 100 94 35 100 3 75 95 40 93 6 100 100 26 93 3 100 91 45 90 2 100 94 94 35 35 97 5 100 100 3 75 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICr ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FIVE YEAR SUm4ARY 1988-1992 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 8 1992 222 180 218 188 1988 202 166 languz^ge arts 1989 1990 1991 1992 SCIENCE .1920 91 1992 1986 SOCIAL STUDIES 1989 4990 19 91 .112. ** PASSING 8CORE=4204 88 90 199011991 1992, 81 52 79 69 79 19 95 34 79 6 100 Total for all students in the Other' race category, were not reported by gender. 86 58 83 82 85 20 95 25 89 3 100 82 40 74 50 79 29 88 45 90 2 100 201 164 212 156 222 218 172 192 202 121 201 135 212 150 222 135 218 139 202 127 201 124 212 135 222 118 218 156 206 178 207 181 213 191 219 193 219 198 82 36 67 57 81 32 89 35 97 4 80 These scores 74 38 57 57 78 26 79 33 94 2 50 77 44 67 69 79 16 80 39 91 4 67 88 56 80 84 88 21 100 28 100 3 100 60 27 50 31 49 25 76 37 74 1 .50 67 71 61 64 63 62 64 53 72 86 87 90 88 90 33 43 38 49 31 24 36 31 50 61 38 54 32 89 27 75 5 100 64 58 70 57 44 54 47 71 46 63 29 88 30 86 2 50 42 48 18 90 34 79 3 50 46 48 20: 95 22 79 2 67 32 37 43 42 62 51 53 59 48 65 26 33 28 16 19 79 92 85 80 90 36 72 2 100 25 69 5 100 26 74 2 50 25 58 4 67 23 82 2 67 The PASSING SCORE information for 1980-1992 is based on three administrations of the HPT. ' A '1SCHOOL: Dunbar Junior High 1986 1969 READING 1-9 9 0 1991 1992 1988 MATHEMATICS 1989 1990 1991 REVISED AUGUST 1992 ALL STUDENTS Number Tested Number Passed 202 167 219 174 169 124 152 126 242 216 202 169 219 175 169 116 152 114 Percent Passed Number Passed BLACK rgMALE? Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE MALES Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE FEMALES Number Passed Percent Passed Number Passed Percent Passed as 71 S3 89 84 80 69 75 51 laa 59 80 28 88 26 93 3 75 63 72 75 80 13 100 22 100 1 50 40 63 57 76 12 92 15 94 0 41 79 42 82 21 84 22 92 0 49 75 65 90 55 98 42 95 5 100 52 81 63 85 26 81 25 89 3 75 66 75 76 81 13 100 20 91 0 42 33 66 63 50 38 67 10 77 13 81 1 100 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 1988-1992 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 8 J 992. 242 215 89 54 83 59 1988 202 142 70 36 56 LANGUAGE ARTS 1989 1990 1991 1992 1989 SCIENCE 1990 1991 1992 1980 SOCIAL STUDIES 1989 1990 1991 1992  PASSING BCORE=4204 75 82 19 76 24 100 0 * Total for all students in the Other\" race category, were not reported by gender. 55 98 42 95 5 100 60 81 22 69 23 82 1 25 219 148 169 120 152 117 242 210 202 106 219 105 169 94 152 76 242 160 202 116 219 128 169 101 152 85 242 168 1 1988 195 170 lie? 1990 Alli 1992 68 49 56 65 69 13 100 20 91 1 50 These scores 71 77 87 52 48 56 50 66 57 58 60 56 69 87 37 58 58 77 10 77 14 88 1 100 34 65 41 80 18 72 24 100 0 51 78 64 89 49 88 42 95 4 80 27 42 33 45 23 72 22 79 1 25 41 47 35 37 11 85 17 77 1 50 36 56 34 45 11 85 12 75 1 100 18 35 23 45 21 84 14 58 0 32 49 35 49 50 89 39 89 4 80 34 53 39 53 23 72 19 68 1 25 45 31 28 38 51 54 57 12 92 16 73 1 50 48 42 56 11 85 16 100 1 100 54 26 51 18 72 13 54 0 58 38 53 48 86 40 91 4 80 222 175 170 126 152 136 242 222 79 74 89 92 The PASSING SCORE information for 1988-1992 is based on tlirea administrations of the MPT.SCHOOL: Forest Heights Junior High 1968 1989 READING 1990 1112, 1966 MATHEMATICS 1989 1990 AUX REVISED AUGUST 1992 ftlL STVPEHT? Number Tested Number Passed Percent Passed 259 244 94 222 204 92 258 239 93 218 188 86 225 169 75 259 242 93 222 206 93 258 237 92 218 193 _5a BLACK MALES Number Passed 61 59 68 55 49 58 60 67 54 Percent passed 86 82 53. M 56. 55. 51 BIAgK FEHAI.S? Number Passed 81 58 78 65 57 82 58 79 71 Percent Passed 55 55 51 25 76 96 55 55 52 WHITE MALES, Number Passed 42 49 43 35 27 42 49 43 35 Percent Passed 55 100 100 52 90 58. 105 105 52 WHITE FEMALES Number Passed 57 31 42 29 28 56 38 40 29 Percent Passed 98 97 100 100 100 97 100 95 100 OTHER STUDENTS Number Passed 3 1 8 4 8 4 1 8 4 Percent passed 75 50 100 100 89 100 50 100 100 Total for all students in the \"Other\" race category, were not reported by gender. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 1988-1992 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 8 1992 225 179 80 58 in 61 81 26 52 26 93 8 89 1986 259 234 90 55 50. 75 55 42 58 58 100 4 100 lANGUAGB ARTS 1969 222 192 86 49 _2Q 57 __2Q 46 51 38 100 2 100 These scores 1990 258 229 89 218 177 _1L. 1992 225 152 68 1988 259 207 _S0 1989 SCIENCE 1990 1991 .1952 1908 SOCIAL STUDIES 1969 1990 1991 1992 Igas PASSING 8COnE=4204 Am. 90 im .19 9 2 60 45 44 51 If, 79 55 41 55 41 98 8 100 66 50 33 55 29 100 4 100 5 8 50 52 22 21 28 100 8 89 60 21 42 58 52 90 2 50 222 184 -51 258 213 _5i 218 154 -Zl 225 140 62 259 204 _2S 222 191 -55 258 208 218 172 225 134 -60 262 254 _95 226 214 _as. 261 244 93 219 197 _9Q_ 218 181 83 53 If, 46 .25 49 100 35 92 1 50 55 in 68 25 42 58 40 95 8 100 42 88 47 52 34 51 27 93 4 100 4 1 55 40 51 25 83 27 96 7 78 47 55 55 50 40 5 25 25 15 58 5 42 58 55 95 2 50 48 66 56 38 2__Z2 58. 51 49 40 34 100 55 54 26 87 37 97 2 100 39 28 23 93 8 100 97 4 100 55 7 78 u The PASSING SCORE infoniiation for 1980-1992 is based on three administrations of the MPT.SCHOOL: HENDERSON JUNIOR HIGH 19 89 READING 1990 1992 1988 MATHEMATICS 1989\n??o 199 1 REVISED AUGUST 1992 Number Tested Number Passed 297 282 285 265 290 261 288 242 Percent Passed Number Passed Ptrcent Paaaea BIJVCK FEMALES Humber Passed Percent Passed WUTE MALE? Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE FEMALES Humber Passed percent Passed Humber Passed tatssBt 95 83 94 79 92 54 98 63 98 3 75 93 68 94 98 90 43 91 42 100 14 93 90 66 80 103 91 47 96 34 100 11 100 84 70 74 101 85 27 96 30 17 14 88 212 174 82 74 79 61 77 12 100 21 100 6 100 297 266 285 266 290 270 288 254 90 75 85 75 87 52 95 61 11 3 75 93 68 94 96 88 46 12 42 111 14 93 93 73 88 104 12 49 111 34 111 10 91 88 79 84 103 87 27 11 31 100 14 88 Total for all students in the \"Other\" race category, were not reported by gender. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 1988-1992 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 8 1992 212 183 86 76 81 69 87 11 92 21 111 6 100 1988 297 267 90 71 81 79 92 51 93 62 12 4 100 LANGUAGE ARTS 1989 285 259 91 64 89 98 90 45 11 42 111 10 67 These scores 1990 290 240 83 59 71 95 84 42 11 33 12 11 100 288 231 80 63 67 98 82 26 12 31 111 13 81 92 212 160 75 57 61 66 84 11 92 21 100 5 83 1980 297 218 73 58 66 50 58 51 93 57 11 2 50 1989 SCIENCE 1990 1991 19 9 2 1908 SOCIAL STUDIES 1989 1991 1992 ** PASSING 6CORE=4204 8 1989 1990 9 . JUi. 285 210 290 205 288 166 74 45 63 73 67 42 89 38 11 12 80 71 52 63 64 57 45 12 33 12 11 100 58 53 56 51 43 24 11 26 14. 12 75 The PASSING SCOPE 212 120 57 54 5.7_ 32 4 1 11 18 _ai 5 83 297 225 285 240 290 245 288 162 76 63 72 55 64 48 12 57 11 2 50 84 62 86 83 76 43 11 40 11 12 80 84 68 82 8 7 77 46 11 34 111 10 91 56 50 53 59 50 19 11. 24 22 10 63 212 141 67 56 60 48 11 92 20 11 6 100 306 290 288 280 303 282 295 263 211 179 95 97 93 89 85 information for 1908-1992 administrations of the MPT. 1 is based on throeSCHOOL: MABRLVALE JUNIOR HIGH 1988 1969 READING 1990 1991 1992 1988 MATHEMATICS 1989 1990 1991 REVISED AUGUST 1992 ALL STUDENTS Number Tested Number Passed Percent Passed BIACK MALES Number Passed Percent Passed BIACK FEMALES Number Passed Percent Passed WIITE MALES Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE FEMALES Number Passed Percent Passed OTHER STUDENTS Number Passed Percent Passed 203 196 174 158 162 153 191 163 97 40 87 54 98 57 100 44 100 1 100 91 38 79 39 87 39 100 41 100 1 100 94 48 91 38 90 39 100 24 100 4 100 85 42 lA 49 82 30 94 36 100 6 100 175 146 83 37 70 51 84 23 92 33 97 2 100 203 177 174 160 162 154 191 163 87 35 76 45 82 54 95 42 95 1 100 92 41 85 40 89 38 97 40 98 1 100 95 50 39 93 37 95 24 100 4 100 85 44 21 47 78 30 94 36 100 6 100 Total for all students in the \"Other\" race category, were not reported by gender. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 1988-1992 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 8 1992 175 154 88 41 77 55 90 24 96 33 97 1 50 LANGUAGE ARTS 1988 203 179 88 35 76 46 84 53 93 44 100 1 100 1989 1990 1991 1992 1980 1989 SCIENCE 1990 1991 1992 1988 SOCIAL STUDIES -1909 991 1992 r * PASSING BCORE=\u0026lt;204 AWL 199? 1990 1111 1-992 174 150 86 34 7 1 36 80 39 100 40 98 1 100 These scores 162 135 83 39 74 36 86 34 87 23 96 3 75 191 160 84 41 21 48 80 30 94 36 100 5 83 175 128 73 32 60 42 69 22 88 31 21 1 50 203 149 73 27 30 55 51 89 40 91 1 122 174 111 162 119 191 111 64 26 51 18 40 37 95 29 71 1 122 73 35 56. 23 55 36 92 21 88 4 122 58 26 16. 21 35 26 81 34 94 4 The PASSING SCOPE 175 86 49 19 36 25 41 17 68 24 71, 1 50 203 146 72 28 61 30 55 51 2. 36 82 1 122 174 128 74 31 65 23 51 38 27 35 85 1 122 162 126 78 37 70 31 74 33 85 22 92 3 75 191 125 65 31 54 31 52 27 84 32 82 4 67 175 85 49 18 34 25 41 15 60 26 76 1 50ji 207 195 171 160 166 159 193 178 94 91 96 92 175 153 87 information for 1900-1992 administrations of the MPT. is based on threeSCHOOL: MANN MAGNET JUNIOR HIGH l?88 1969 READING 1990 199 986 MATHEMATICS 98 REVISED AUGUST 1992 ALL STUDENTS Number Tested Number Passed Percent Passed 232 227 98 269 258 96 278 271 97 282 268 95 272 248 91 232 219 94 269 257 96 278 255 92 282 246 87 BLACK HALES Number Passed Fercent Pnased BLACK FEMALES Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE MALES  Number Passed Percent Passe i Number Passed Percent Passed OTHER STUDENTS Number Passed Percent Passed Total for a. 6'9 99 62 95 39 98 49 100 8 100 65 89 80 98 48 98 57 100 8 100 64 98 85 96 59 98 60 100 3 75 61 91 81 94 57 95 63 100 6 100 were not reported by gender. 58 83 94 90 37 100 52 100 7 100 64 91 61 94 40 100 46 94 8 100 66 90 79 96 48 98 56 98 8 100 59 55 91 75 84 58 97 59 98 4 100 82 69 80 56 93 61 97 5 83 students in the \"other\" race category. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 1988-1992 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 8 1906 1969 lAHGUAGE ARTS 1990 1991 1908 1989 SCIENCE 1990 199 1 19 92. 1908 SOCIAL STUDIES 1989 1990 1991 1992 - ** PASSING 6CORE=:4204 69 90 1991 1922 . 272 247 91 61 87 92 88 36 97 52 100 6 86 232 211 91 60 86 58 89 37 93 48 98 8 100 269 248 92 59 81 76 93 48 98 57 100 8 100 These scores 278 267 96. 58 89 85 96 60 100 60 100 4 100 282 261 93 55 82 81 94 56 93 63 100 6 100 272 252 93 58 83 101 96 36 97 51 98 6 86 232 196 84 58 83 50 77 37 93 43 88 8 100 269 210 78 48 66 55 67 48 98 53 93 6 75 278 235 85 53 82 64 72 59 98 56 93 3 75 282 201 71 272 202 74 232 184 79 269 217 81 278 237 85 282 225 80 272 216 79 233 224 96 270 263 97 282 272 96 284 276 97 27 3 257 94 41 61 43 50 53 88 60 95 4 67 49 70 65 62 35 95 46 88 7 100 50 71 48 74 37 93 41 84 8 100 50 55 49 51 68 62 76 48 98 51 89 6 75 85 66 74 58 97 55 92 3 75 73 60 70 52 87 53 92 6 100 73 75 71 35 95 49 94 6 86 1 i The PASSING SCORE information for 1988-1992 administrations of the MPT. is based on tlireeSCHOOL: PULASKI HEIGHTS JUNIOR HIGH 986 1989 READING 90 1988 MATHEMATICS 989 1990 9 REVISED AUGUST 1992 ALL STUDENTS Number Tested Number Passed Percent Passed BLACK MALES Number Passed Percent Eaased BLACK FEMALES Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE MALES Number Passed Number Passed Percent Passed OTHER STUDENTS Number Passed Percent passed 194 177 91 49 36 44 83 45 100 37 100 2 100 220 198 90 45 80 53 87 48 100 48 96 4 80 217 189 87 223 198 89 223 195 87 194 169 87 220 191 87 217 189 87 223 193 87 49 79 65 83 34 97 35 97 6 100 38 73 56 85 44 98 57 100 3 100 57 86 51 74 33 97 54 100 0 46 81 43 81 45 100 35 92 1 50 41 73 53 87 46 96, 47 94 4 80 49 36 79 65 83 35 100 35 97 5 83 69 53 80 44 5a 57 100 3 100 Total for all students in the \"Other\" race category, were not reported by gender. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 1988-1992 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 8 1992 223 196 88 52 79 58 84 32 94 54 100 0 1986 194 163 84 42 74 42 79 43 96 34 92 2 100 LANGUAGE ARTS 1989 1990 199 1 1992 im 1969 SCIENCE 19 9 0 1991 1992 1988 SOCIAL STUDIES im 19JA 1991 1992 * PASSING 6CORE=\u0026lt;20X 19 68 I 19_.e 990 1991 1992 220 196 89 43 77 53 87 47 98 49 98 4 80 These scores 217 190 88 48 77 69 88 32 91 36 100 5 83 223 187 84 223 174 78 194 116 60 220 144 65 217 167 77 223 158 223 163 34 65 51 77 43 96 56 98 3 100 44 67 46 67 30 88 54 100 0 26 46 20 38 42 93 28 76 0 J 30 41 71 73 194 101 52 220 163 74 217 183 84 223 148 66 223 162 73 196 175 89 223 202 91 219 204 93 223 207 93 228 202 89 29 47 20 35 48 23 4 1 54 21 34 45 54. 44 88 4 80 66 54 69 33 54 35 97 4 67 56 71 35 63 77 44 62 28 42 44 5S 54 95 31 4 5 32 94 53 _98 3 0 15 28 41 51 25 68 0 35 57 46 .36. 43 86 4 61 78 34 .97 35 97 5 32 48 40 55 50 88 3 38 55 32 94 51 94 0 100 The PASSING SCORE administrations of 80 85 100 i information for 1988-1992 the MPT. is based on threeSCHOOL\nSOUn-KJEST JUNIOR HIGH READING 98 8 9 92 8 198 MATHEMATICS 90 19 REVISED AUGUST 1992 ALL STUDENTS Number Tested Number Passed 222 203 209 185 170 143 209 186 205 163 222 199 209 176 170 134 209 161 Percent Passed 91 89 84 89 80 54 21 22 BUCK HALES Number Passed Percent Passed BUCK FEHALES Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE MALES Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE FEMALES Number Passed Percent Passed OTHER STUDENTS 68 86 65 90 22 96 47 100 Number Passed 1 Percent Passed 100 63 81 70 91 28 93 22 100 2 100 60 85 52 81 16 94 13 93 2 50 67 86 73 90 18 95 22 100 6 67 51 72 59 77 28 90 20 95 5 100 66 84 65 90 22 96 45 55 1 100 62 79 65 27 90 20 51 2 100 51 72 50 78 15 88 14 100 4 ,100 57 73 61 75. 16 84 20 51 1 78  Total for all students in the \"Other\" race category, were not reported by gender. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 1988-1992 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 8 1992 205 153 75 49 69 56 73 27 87 16 76 5 l^NGUAGE ARTS 1988 222 198 89 66 84 63 5S. 22 96 46 aa. 1 100 1100 1989 1990 1991 1992 1980 1989 SCIENCE 1990 1991 1992 SOCIAL STUDIES 1989 1990 1991 1112. , * PASSING GCORE=42O\u0026lt; 88 1992 209 180 86 60 77 69 90 29 97 21 55. 1 50 These scores 170 141 51 55 77 53 55 16 14 IQQ. 3 75 209 160 22 55 71 60 TA 18 E5. 21 55 6 67 205 160 222 159 209 108 170 115 209 118 205 95 222 172 209 146 170 89 209 98 205 107 235 220 78 50 70 64 83 26 84 15 71 5 100 72 48 61 44 1 21 51 45 95 1 100 52 33 42 30 32 26 Ei 18 Ei 1 50 43 61 39 it 17 IQQ. 14 inn 2 50 56, 43 52 37 17 16 iE 5 56 46 33 46 27 35 24 n 7 33 4 80 IL. 70 52 47 52 q.'i 55 TH 53 74 21 ai 42 EA 1 100 49 50 E5. 26 Ei 19 2 IQO 32 A5 29 45 14 Ei 12 E6- 2 50 30 5S 36 16 84 12 E5- 44 33 46 39 51 21 68 10 48 4 soil 212 184 171 152 sq 206 191 53 199 16 2 81 The PASSING SCORE information for '19U8-1992 is based on three administrations of the MPT.COMPARISON OF PASSING RATES ON THE MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST 1989-92 LITTLE ROCK 3 3 6 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 YEAR 1989 1990 1991 1992 A B W 0 A B W 0 A B W O A B W 0 Reading 86 82 96 78 87 83 95 95 87 82 95 96 88 82 98 96 Mathematics 89 85 96 83 87 82 95 90 87 83 94 91 81 87 97 96 Reading 88 84 96 96 90 87 97 95 94 92 97 100 92 89 98 94 Mathematics 89 86 95 96 90 88 96 95 90 88 95 97 89 86 95 91 Language Arts 75 68 89 88 77 70 92 86 78 72 89 90 77 70 90 85 Science 66 56 86 85 72 62 92 82 73 64 90 87 75 67 90 88 Social Studies 70 60 89 88 77 69 94 95 74 66 89 90 74 66 89 85 Reading 94 91 99 93 93 90 99 93 92 90 98 92 92 89 98 97 Mathematics 92 90 96 93 90 86 97 93 91 88 96 90 90 87 96 94 Language Arts 89 84 97 83 86 82 94 88 89 85 95 88 86 82 94 89 Science 70 59 89 78 75 65 94 86 67 55 90 72 68 58 88 86 Social Studies 78 71 90 88 78 72 92 81 73 68 84 74 69 61 84 86 A All students % B Black students % W White students % 0 Other students % A-1COMPARISON OF PASSING RATES ON THE MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST 1989-92 LITTLE ROCK YEAR 1989 A B 0 A 1990 B W 0 A 1991 B W 0 A 1992 B W 0 3 Reading 3 Mathematics 6 Reading 6 Mathematics 6 Language Arts 6 Science 6 Social Studies 8 Reading B Mathematics 8 Language Arts 8 Science 8 Social Studies A - All students I W White students % 86 89 88 89 75 66 70 8' 96 92 -I 94 5195 3O8B \n?|85 3 88 92 91 89 67 73 B 0 89 91 90 98 8 8: 5 6 Black students I Other students t 96 9' 4 82 762 * 74 Looking at the reading test results in the 3rd grade in 1989, we note that black students have a passage rate of 82% while white students have a 96% passing rate, a difference of 14 percentage points. Following this group to the 6th grade (the grade they should be in 1992) we see that the rate of passage for black students has improved to 89% while the white student rate of passage improved to 98%, a difference of only 9% points. Thus the disparity between the rates has diminished by 5% points, but this data shows science as an area of concern in this district. We do understand that the students in the 1989 group are not exactly the same students in the 1992, but we feel that looking at these two groups is more accurate than looking at 1989 and 1990 or 1989 and 1991 of the same grade level. A-2COMPARISON OF PASSING RATES MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST LITTLE ROCK 82% 3rd 6th 85% 3rd ?  95% 6th Reading 1989/1992 Math 1989/1992 BLACK STUDENTS 1989 BLACK STUDENTS 1992 WHITE STUDENTS 1989 WHITE STUDENTS 1992 A-3 COMPARISON OF PASSING RATES ON THE MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST 1989-92 3 3 6 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 LITTLE ROCK RACE BY SEX YEAR 1989 1990 1991 1992 BF BM WF WM BF BM WF WM BF BM WF WM BF BM WF WM Reading 86 87 96 95 88 79 98 93 85 79 97 94 89 75 98 97 Mathematics 88 83 96 97 84 80 98 93 84 82 96 92 90 84 97 97 Reading 89 79 98 94 90 84 98 96 95 88 98 97 91 86 99 98 Mathematics 89 82 96 94 89 86 97 95 92 84 96 94 89 83 96 94 Language Arts 74 61 92 85 74 66 96 88 78 64 93 86 76 64 94 86 Science 53 59 85 87 58 66 91 92 63 66 88 92 66 68 91 90 Social Studies 62 58 89 89 69 69 95 93 69 62 89 90 66 66 89 89 Reading 93 89 99 98 91 89 99 98 91 88 99 98 91 86 98 98 Mathematics 91 88 96 97 88 84 98 97 90 86 97 96 90 85 97 94 Language Arts 90 77 99 96 89 75 98 91 91 79 99 91 89 75 97 90 Science 56 61 85 93 64 67 93 95 50 61 88 92 54 64 86 90 BF WF Social Studies 71 72 86 95 74 71 92 91 68 68 81 86 62 61 85 84 Black female students % White female students % BM WM Black male students % White male students % A-4 8COMPARISON OF PASSING RATES ON THE MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST YEAR 1989 LITTLE ROCK 1989-92 RACE BY SEX ..1990 1991 1992 BF BM WF WM BF BM WF WM BF BM WF WM BF BM WF WM 3 Reading 96 87 96 95 BF WF Mathematics Reading Mathematics Language Arts Science Social Studies Reading Mathematics Language Arts Science Social Studies 88 83 96 - 97 89 89 74 53 62 79 98 94 '5 91 86 * i\\ 82 61 59 58 Black female students t White female students t 96 92 85 89 94 85 87 89 BM WM 7\n91 90 91 50 68 Black male students t White male students X 89 83 96 94 88 99 98 71 86 97 96 79 61 68 99 68 61 91 92 66 Female Disparity / \\ - Male Disparity 3 6 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 1 Looking at the reading test results in the 3rd grade in 1989, we note that black males have a passage rate of 87% where white males have a 95% passing rate, a difference of 8 percentage points. We also noted the passage rate to be 86% of black females and 96% of white females 96%, a difference of 10 percentage points. Following this group to the 6th grade (the grade they should be in 1992) we see that the rate of passage for black males has decreased to 86% and white males increased to 98%, a difference of 12 percentage points and black females rate of passage increased to 91% while white females increased to 99%, a difference of 8 percentage points. Thus the disparity between race by sex is diminishing, but this data also shows science as an area of concern in this district. We do understand that the students in 1989 group are not exactly the same students in 1992, but we feel that looking at these two groups is more accurate than looking at 1989 and 1990 or 1989 and 1991 of the same grade level. A-5COMPARISON OF PASSING RATES MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST LITTLE ROCK ! RACE BY SEX 10 86% 3rd 99% 6th It FEMALE 87% 3rd Reading 1 989/1 992 MALE 98% 6th BLACK 1989 WHITE 1989 BLACK 1992 WHITE 1992 A-6 COMPARISON OF PASSING RATES MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST LITTLE ROCK ! RACE BY SEX 88% 3rd^ 7 96% 6th / , 83% 3rd 94% 6th FEMALE Math 1989/1992 MALE BLACK 1989 WHITE 1989 BLACK 1992 WHITE 1992 A-7 COMPARISON OF PASSING RATES MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST LITTLE ROCK ! RACE BY SEX z 8^ 6th 99% 8th 79% 6th 10 98% 8tha FEMALE Reading 1989/1991 MALE BLACK 1989 WHITE 1989 BLACK 1991 j WHITE 1991 A-8 COMPARISON OF PASSING RATES MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST LITTLE ROCK / RACE BY SEX 7 7 89% 6th 97% 8th IK 82% 6th 71 / 96% 8th FEMALE Math 1989/1991 MALE BLACK 1989 WHITE 1989 BLACK 1991 IfiJ WHITE 1991 A-9 5 COMPARISON OF PASSING RATES MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST LITTLE ROCK ! RACE BY SEX 3 71 z 'o- 99% 8th 91% 74% 6th tj 8th 61% 6th n B FEMALE Lang. Arts 1989/1991 MALE BLACK 1989 WHITE 1989 BLACK 1991 WHITE 1991 A-IOCOMPARISON OF PASSING RATES MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST LITTLE ROCK ! RACE BY SEX z 3^ z 5^ 88% 8th 92% 8th z 53% 6th 59% 6th FEMALE Science 1989/1991 MALE BLACK 1989 WHITE 1989 BLACK 1991 Ui WHITE 1991 A-llCOMPARISON OF PASSING RATES MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST LITTLE ROCK ! RACE BY SEX 7\\ Z 71 Z /3 81% Sth /2 86% 8th ^2% 6th 58% 6th FEMALE Social 1989/1991 MALE BLACK 1989 WHITE 1989 BLACK 1991 WHITE 1991 A-12LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND EVALUATION ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST GRADE EIGHT SUMMTkRY THIRD ADMINISTRATION 19 9 2 TOTAL TEST PASSING SCORE = STUDENTS FAILING 4204 SCHOOL/NO, TESTED* STUDENTS PASSING BLACK WHITE OTHER TOTAL CLOVERDALE/219 Number Percent DUNBAR/242 Number Percent FOREST HEIGHTS/218 Number Percent HENDERSON/211 Number Percent MABELVALE/175 Number Percent MANN/273 Number Percent PULASKI HEIGHTS/228 Number Percent SOUTHWEST/199 Number Percent ELIZ. MITCHELL/9 Number Percent PINNACLE POINT/5 Number Percent DISTRICT/1779 Number Percent 198 90 222 92 181 83 179 85 153 87 257 94 202 89 162 81 5 56 1559 88 10 48 10 50 24 65 21 66 12 55 7 44 10 38 15 41 109 50 10 48 6 30 13 35 11 34 6 27 9 56 16 62 15 41 1 25 1 20 88 40 21 10 2 10 2 10 20 8 17 32 15 3 14 2 50 I 40 11 5 5 14 1 25 2 40 12 5 22 13 16 6 26 11 37 19 4 44 ___5 lOQ! 220 12 0 M F M 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 F 1 5 0 0 1 5 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o. * The number of students tested has been revised to reflect students moving into and out of the district since the second administration and to exclude special education students who may have been included in the second administration summary.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND EVALUATION ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST GRADE EIGHT SUMMARY THIRD ADMINISTRATION 19 9 2 SCHOOL/NO. TESTED* STUDENTS PASSING TOTAL TEST PASSING SCORE = ____________STUDENTS FAILING BLACK WHITE 4204 OTHER TOTAL CLOVERDALE/219 Number Percent DUNBAR/242 Number Percent FOREST HEIGHTS/218 Number Percent HENDERSON/211 Number Percent MABELVALE/175 Number Percent MANN/273 Number Percent PULASKI HEIGHTS/228 Number Percent SOUTHWEST/199 Number Percent ELIZ. MITCHELL/9 Number Percent PINNACLE POINT/5 Number Percent DISTRICT/1779 Number Percent 198 90 222 92 181 83 179 85 153 87 257 94 202 89 162 81 5 56 1559 88 10 48 10 50 24 65 21 66 12 55 1 44 10 38 15 41 109 50 10 48 6 30 13 35 11 34 6 27 9 56 16 62 15 41 1 25 1 20 88 40 21 10 2 10 2 10 20 8 37 32 15 3 14 2 50 2 40 11 5 5 14 1 25 3 40 12 5 22 13 16 6 26 11 31 19 4 44 ___5 lOQ! 220 12 0 M F M 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 F 1 5 0 0 1 5 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o. 0 * The number of students tested has been revised to reflect students moving into and out of the district since the second administration and to exclude special education students who may have been included in the second administration summary.4 T-n n -f J Hl-fo A.,. .3,. Ck.c,f-_ Aft^u:^ C,. Apmktt^ At 5 - 7^ \"-1^ - H . ?!- ki 76-Pk X '^-iO iO'kt ?!. __ /r-^3 '^'7-f'l^ y/~ in rp-sr _____ vZrijL._ ___^jJ2Z 'I'i-Vf Hy-6j- 7i f 'J . ^r'/X i 7-Co 7'S^it ^k- -?! 'J H- fj-r? 6.0- 5\u0026lt; r6- (.(. t,S~77 71 Ci\u0026gt;J\u0026gt;\u0026lt;^^ /11. i^. '2k. it- ~73 ^y- 7? J - o /7- 0 tJ ,. kp.'kA_. l/Aa 2 ^1, 5^ - H'i-'ii v/y/tXzMXl 7 MoLiijaJix I)!'., k'i MxA^oM- z*-L ^\u0026lt;4!? 7^-71 \\CJ. VS-J 5 Ai\"- _fe!v_Ci4iX.^ -2\u0026gt;-tJLi. i^hi- .jL|\u0026gt;. 7g-yy vr-7y 33-0 a. T - \u0026lt;9 IVJ '7. __'^. W3- 71\" _ ^^klAVj 3 7 3T-0 -ff- o iz 2i ir- \u0026lt;^5-- A-/3 L. }?.. hl- - o lx_ 3i - Hl Z\u0026lt;j|- z? VV- 7! Ll-. Ht- a Hi-7c3 ir- fj 7i-'4\u0026lt;i S't'JJ' ^7'7i- S'l-ti .73-4J- r3.:L0 fl~kr il-HI '-/i. -vj y'f- 71- H\u0026lt;)\u0026lt;3 Hi-ir 3V-1Z St-- O S^f fz- HI 3\u0026lt;l- \u0026lt;3 7^-3^ Ikl)^ 'A. _ 'i' -J ___Ji 2^~ki Ijito.uI'^ rr\u0026gt;'\u0026lt;t-i. ^:i-7-i. ir-ct yy-rz Aj2 y/k-iz^ /I IL - 6 'I. 06/26/92 15:37 301 324 2032 L R School Dlst ODM @001/003 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 W. MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 FAX (501) 324 - 2032 DATE TO FROM SENDER'S PHONE SUBJECT f^umber' of Pagtt (include cover pc^e) Fax Phon Speed Dial FOR DATA. PROCESSING OFFICE USE ONLY Transmiaei By Date Time R 03/91 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION The Stanford Achievement Test, Eighth Edition was adm-inisrAred in April 1992 to 19,287 students in grades one through eleven. Since this is the first year for administering the Stanford, concrete match between the Stanford-8 and the Metropolitan Achievement Test (MAT-6) is difficult. \" several areas that were not tested by the MAT-6, purposes this is a new beginning. 7 ' ' ~ districtwide data follows. The Stanford includes For practical A very brief summary of I. When all student scores are reported as district totals, students scored at/above the 50th percentile in the following areas\nReading Mathematics Language Arts Science Social Studies Basic Battery Complete Battery - Grade 6 - Grades 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 - Grades 3, 6, and 9 - Grades 6 and 9 - Grades 6 and 11 - Grades 6 and 11 - Grades 6 and 11 II. White students scored at or above the 50th percentile in all subjects and at all grade levels reporting. Highest, 77th percentile Lowest, 57th percentile - Grade 2 mathematics - Grade 9 mathematics. a III. Other students scored at or above the 50th percentile in all subjects and grades except grade one science which was at the 49th percentile. Highest, 87th percentile - Grade 2 mathematics - Grade 8 mathematics IV. Black students scored below the 50th percentile in all subjects and at all grade levels reporting. Highest, 48th percentile Lowest, 26th percentile - Grade 6 mathematics - Grade 6 social science. - Grade 5 reading. More detailed information relative to individual school results and longitudinal data will be provided later. bjgLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAMHIHG, RESEARCH AHU EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORHAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/MCE) DISTRICTWIDE SUMMARY 1992 s t'O oa co ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE HUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SC IKMCE BASIC BATTERY .COMPLETE BATTERY VI 1 TOTAL D W 0 2094 1330 697 24 42/45.8 35/41.9 63/57.0 66/58.8 40/49.0 40/44.6 70/61.1 74/63.3 41/45.1 32/40.2 63/57.2 68/60.1 37/42,9 27/37.3 59/55.0 49/49.5 45/47.5 36/42.4 67/59.5 74/63.5 39/44.0 31/39.5 64/57.0 67/59.1 VI 2 TOTAL B W O 1803 1173 672 28 39/44.1 29/38.1 62/56,2 63/56,9 57/53.0 46/47.7 77/65.6 07/73.6 49/49,7 39/43.9 70/60,9 64/57,4 43/46.3 32/40.0 65/50.0 67/59,3 k-fi 45/47.4 34/41.3 69/60.3 73/62.6 45/47.3 33/40.0 70/61.2 74/63.5 t-O 3 TOTAL B W O 1783 1131 632 18 39/44.2 27/36.9 63/57.0 57/53.8 58/54.1 46/47.8 76/65.1 80/68.0 50/50.0 38/43.0 70/60.9 68/59.6 43/46,1 30/38.8 67/59,1 63/57.1 46/48.0 35/41.6 67/59.2 61/55.9 49/49.2 36/42.4 70/61.1 69/60.4 47/40.2 34/41.0 70/61.0 68/59.7 to *4 TOTAL 1067 44/47.0 50/53,9 46/47.6 46/47,6 48/49.0 40/49.0 47/48.2 5 TOTAL I) H 0 1922 1288 612 22 38/43.3 26/35.6 63/55.8 58/54.1 53/51.7 43/46.5 71/61.9 83/69.9 40/48.7 30/43.7 67/59.1 66/58.7 45/47.4 33/40.6 70/61.2 74/63.6 46/48.1 37/43,1 65/58,2 70/60.8 44/46,8 34/41,1 65/58.3 71/61.5 44/46.7 32/40.4 67/59.2 72/62,4 6 TOTAL 8 W O 1043 1209 609 25 50/49.9 37/42.8 74/63.6 67/59.2 57/53.8 48/40.7 74/63.3 75/64.3 51/50,3 41/45.4 60/59.9 64/57.7 54/52.0 43/46.0 74/63.5 75/64.0 59/54.5 48/49.0 76/65.0 72/62,0 54/52.1 43/46.4 73/63.1 72/62.2 54/52.1 43/46.0 75/64,0 73/62,6 t- W o Cr o o e 0) *7 TOTAL 1694 42/45.5 45/47.4 43/46.1 42/45.6 47/40.6 46/47.9 46/47.7 8 TOTAL D W O 1573 1060 493 19 41/45.2 29/30.5 67/59.4 73/62.6 39/44.0 30/38,8 59/54.7 87/73.6 40/49.1 30/43.6 69/60.7 81/60.5 45/47.4 34/41.3 68/60.1 77/65.7 46/40.0 34/41.3 72/62.1 03/70.0 43/46.2 32/40.0 66/50.6 84/71.2 43/46.1 30/39.2 60/59.0 86/72i6 1 1 O a K 9 TOTAL 8 H O 1554 995 536 23 44/46.6 30/39.2 68/60.1 63/57.2 34/41.2 23/34.1 57/53.9 68/59.6 54/51,9 42/45,9 73/63,0 69/60,6 50/50,2 38/43,4 72/62.5 69/60.7 49/49.6 36/42.5 73/62.6 71/61.4 47/48,2 34/41,1 70/61,0 71/61,7 48/48.0 . 34/41.1 73/62.6 73/62.9 *10 TOTAL 1602 49/49.2 37/43.2 40/48,6 45/47.3 43/46.2 47/40.4 47/40.5 11 TOTAL B W 0 1472 825 612 35 50/49.8 34/41.4 69/60,7 66/58,4 43/46.5 32/40.1 59/54.6 62/56.4 40/49.1 35/41.9 66/58,5 61/55.1 47/40.6 32/40.2 68/59.7 58/54.4 51/50.6 36/42.7 69/60.7 72/62.3 51/50.4 36/42.3 70/60.8 69/60.5 51/50.4 34/41.3 72/62.1 70/61.0 o * Data by raoa Cor grades 4, T, and 10 is unavailable at this time. Thia Intormatlon will be provided at a later date. **At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objdotlves are combined and reflected as one score under EHVinONKSHT. 1 1LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 1989-1993 Revised August 1993 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 8 SCHOOL: Mabelvale Junior High READING MATHEMATICS 9 0 9 99 ,989 LANGUAGE ARTS 90 991 1992 199 1990 SCIENCE 19 992 I 1993 SOCIAL STUDIES 1969 I 1990 I 1991 ** PASSING SCORE=42O4 . 1989 11990l19911199 99 ALL STUDENTS Number Tested Number Passed Parcent Passed 174 158 91 162 153 94 191 163 85 175 146 83 179 157 88 174 160 92 162 154 95 191 163 85 175 154 88 179 157 88 174 150 86 162 135 83 191 160 84 175 128 73 179 132 74 174 111 64 162 119 73 191 111 58 175 86 49 179 105 59 174 128 74 162 126 78 191 125 65 175 85 49 179 116 65 171 160 91 166 159 96 193 178 92 175 153 87 179 151. 84 BLACK HALES Number Passed 38 48 42 37 49 41 50 44 41 52 34 39 41 32 38 26 35 26 19 33 31 37 31 18 33 Percent Pjsed 79 91 74 70 80 85 94 77 77 85 71 74 72 60 62 54 66 46 36 54 65 70 54 34 54 4 BMCK FEMALES Number Passed 39 38 49 51 48 40 39 47 55 46 36 36 48 42 39 18 23 21 25 22 23 31 31 25 29 Percent Passed 87 90 82 84 87 89 93 78 90 84 80 86 80 69 71 40 55 35 41 40 51 74 52 41 53 WHITE MALES Number Passed 39 39 30 23 25 38 37 30 24 25 39 34 30 22 22 37 36 26 17 20 38 33 27 15 25 Percent Passed 100 100 94 92 93 97 95 -94 96 93 100 87 94 88 81 95 92 81 68 74 97 85 84 60 93 Number Passed 41 24 36 33 34 40 24 36 33 33 40 23 36 31 32 29 21 34 24 29 35 22 32 26 28 Percent Passed 100 100 100 97 100 98 100 100 97 97 98 96 IQQ. 11 54. 71 85 55. 57 82 76 52. Number Passed Percent Passed 100 100 100 too 50 100 100 100 50 50 100 3 75 83 50 50 100 100 67 50 50 1 100 75 4 67 50 50 51 3k 58. 1 4 6 2 1 1 4 6 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 3 1 1 I I * Total for all students in the \"other race category, were not reported by gender. These scores The PASSING SCORE information is based on three administrations of the MPT.SCHOOL: Mann Magnet Junior High READING 8 MATHEMATICS 90 ALL STUDENTS Number Tested Number Passed Percent Paased_ 269 258 96 278 271 97 282 268 95 272 248 91 256 234 91 269 257 96 278 255 92 282 246 87 BLACK MALES Number Passed 65 64 61 58 52 66 59 55 Percent Passed BLACK FEMALES Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE MALES Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE FEMALES Number Passed Percent Passed OTHER STUDENTS Number Passed Percent Passed 89 80 98 48 9a 57 100 8 100 98 85 96 59 aa 60 100 3 75 91 81 94 57 95 63 100 6 100 83 94 90 37 100. 52 100 7 100 87 68 87 49 aa 58 97 1 88 90 79 96 48 28 56 98 8 100 91 75 84 58 az 59 98 4 100 82 69 80 56 az 61 97 5 83 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 1989-1993 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 8 LAUGUAGE ARTS 1589 1550 1551 1552 1593 1989 1990 SCIENCE 1591 1592 1993 1589 SOCIAL STUDIES 1590 1591 195? Revised August 1993 ** PASSING SCORE=4204 1589 1990 1991 272 256 247 221 91 61 87 92 88 36 az 52 100 6 86 86 49 82 61 78 48 a6. 56 93 7 88 Total for al1 students in the \"Other race category, were not reported by gender. 269 248 92 278 267 96 282 261 93 272 252 93 256 231 90 269 210 78 278 235 85 282 201 71 272 202 74 256 173 68 269 217 81 278 237 85 282 225 80 272 216 79 256 187 73 270 263 97 282 272 96 284 276 97 273 257 94 256 234 91 59 ai 76 93 48 aa 57 100 8 100 58 85 96 60 loa 60 100 4 100 55 az 81 94 56 az. 63 100 6 100 These scores 58 aa 101 96 36 az 51 98 6 86 47 7a 73 94 46 az 58 97 7 88 48 aa 55 67 48 98 53 93 6 75 53 41 49 31 50 55 49 51 36 az 64 72 59 98 56 aa 3 75 61 43 50 53 88 60 95 4 67 7a 65 62 35 95 46 aa 7 100 az 36 46 47 94 52 az 7 88 as 62 76 48 98 51 89 6 75 13 60 The PASSING SCORE information is based on three administrations of the MPT. 66 74 58 97 55 92 3 75 60 70 75 71 44 56 52 87 58 92 6 100 35 46 95 49 94 6 86 92 54 90 7 88LITT'LE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 1989-1993 Revised August 1993 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE a SCHOOL: Pulaski Heights Junior High 1989 1990 READING Alli. 1992 1993 1969 MATHEMATICS 19^ Alii. ,969 LANGUAGE ARTS 1990 9 9 9 1990 SCIENCE 1991 1969 199 SOCIAL STUDIES ** PASSING SCORE=4204 1990 1992 ALL STUDENTS Number Tested Number Passed Percent Paaaed 220 198 90 217 189 87 223 198 89 223 195 87 234 210 90 220 191 87 217 189 87 223 193 87 223 196 88 234 202 86 220 196 89 217 190 88 223 187 84 223 174 78 234 196 84 220 144 65 217 167 77 223 158 71 223 163 73 234 168 72 220 163 74 217 183 84 223 148 66 223 162 73 234 178 76 223 202 91 219 204 93 223 207 93 228 202 89 234 210 90 1 BIACK MALES Number Passed Percent Passed BLACK FEMALES Number Passed Percent Passed Number Passed Percent Passed 45 80 53 87 48 100 49 79 65 83 34 SI 38 13 56 85 44 98 57 86 51 Ik 33 SI 49 IS 66 86 35 100 41 13 53 hl 46 96 49 IS 65 83 35 100 36 hS 53 80 44 98 52 79 58 84 32 94 44 43 48 34 44 44 30 41 29 47 35 35 48 23 41 35 71 (A 83 34 SI 77 53 87 47 98 77 69 88 32 91 65 51 77 43 96 hl 46 67 30 5a ir 60 78 32 51 54 21 34 45 54. 66 54 69 33 ,56 28 44 58 71 31 Ai 32 56 41 ii 35 IQQ 63 35 iZ 46 5t 77 44 62 56 61 32 38 53 78 34 SL 48 40 89 55 32 54, 69 34 52 WHITE FEMALES Number Passed 48 35 57 54 58 47 35 57 54 58 49 36 56 54 58 44 35 54 53 56 43 35 50 51 54 Percent Paaaed 96 97 100 100 too 94 97 100 100 too 98 1130. 98 100, 100. 58. 52 55. 55 51 .86 52 54, 53 38 OTHER STUDENTS 6 3 0 2 5 3 0 2 5 3 0 2 3 0 1 4 5 3 0 2 Number Passed li It Percent Passed 80 100 100 too 80 83 100 - 100 50. 51 100. lOO 50 521 lOO 50 50. 531 ino mol Total for all students in the Other\" race category, were not reported by gender. These scores The PASSING SCORE information is based on three administrations of the MPT.SCHOOL: Southwest Junior High iW. READING -1392 -1393 1989 MATHEMATICS -1390 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 1989-1993 TEST RESULTS INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 8 Revised August 1993 ALL STUDENTS Number Tested Number Passed Percent PasaeJ BLACK MALES Number Passed Percent Peened BLACK FEMAl.E.S Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE MALES Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE FEMALES Number Passed Percent Passed OTHER STUDENTS Number Passed Percent Passed J991 -1391 language arts - Jlii  1989 I 1990 i 199 11 199 1993 . 1989 SCIENCE 209 185 89 170 143 84 209 186 89 205 163 80 196 159 81 209 176 84 170 134 79 209 161 11 205 153 196 156 209 180 170 209 1990 I 1991 9: SOCIAL STUDIES .990 199 992 19 PASSING SCORE=42o'T 989 199011991 1992 63 60 67 51 61 81 70 91 28 93 22 100 2 100 85 52 81 16 94 13 93 2 50 86 72 76 62 79 51 72 57 73 7^_80_ 86 141 83 160 77 205 160 78 196 138 70 209 108 52 170 115 68 209 118 56 205 95 46 196 117 60 209 146 70 170 89 52 209 98 47 205 196 107 52 120 61 212 184 86 171 152 89 206 191 93 199 162 81 1993 194 160 82 49 69 61 76 60 55 55 50 46 33 21 21 21 10 58 43 43 33 44 49 61 JI 46 73 90 59 77 58 85 65 84 50 78 61 75 56 73 57 84 69 90 53 83 60 74 64 83 55 81 30 39 39 61 37 46 18 95 22 100 28 90 20 95 17 85 19 83 6 5 4 61[100 80 * Total for all students in the were not reported by gender. 27 90 20 91 2 100 \"Other\" 15 88 14 100 4 100 race 16 84 20 21 7 78 n 87 16 21. 5 16 80 18 21 100 I 80 category. 29 97 21 1 50 16 18 26 15 26 94 14 IQQ, 3 15 These scores 95 84 75 87 17 100 17 89 21 6 15 n 5 19 3 67 100 60, 18 .82 1 50 14 16 100. 73. passing score infonnation is based on three administrati. ons of the 2 50 5 56 n 27 35 24 77 7 33 4 32 30 33 49 63 45 38 46 61 41 60 14 70 14 1 4 80 I 80 50 65 29 45 36 44 39 51 39 57 26 87 19 38. 2 100 14 82 12 38 2 50 16 21 16 84 68 80 12 10 13 55. 3. 52 4 4 3 44 80 60 1RECEIVED TO: FROM:' DATE: Mrs. Janet Bernard, Associate Superintendent Mr. Robert L. Brown, Jr.  V -IO -1 nno May 16, 1993 SUBJ: AMPT Test Summary/Six Years MAY 1 8 1995 Office of Desegregation Monitoring I am providing you with the results of Garland's sixth grade (Black male)student performance over a six year period. The results from 1988 -1991 reflect the progress of Black male students under the instructional leadership of another principal. Particular focus on Black males is being used because of the enormous gender disparity in performance between black students. Detailed results of the performance of Black male students from 1988 to 1993 can be obtained from the office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation. The results in reading are being provided for you because they are the single most important predictor of future success in educational attainment. The District Summary results are being used as a standard to normalize the results at Garland. READING 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 District Summary Percent Passed Garland School Percent Passed Difference 78 79 84 88 86 84 73 -5 47 -32 80 -4 77 -11 91 +5 95 +11 The major difference in the variables impacting the results for the last two year has been the emphasis placed on culturally specific content in the school's curriculum. The students at Garland School, in grades 4 through 6, responded to this statement \"African-African American History is taught in this school\", on the Incentive School Student Survey with 80% favorable response as \"ALWAYS\". When the outcomes of the MPT performance in Reading and Math were shared with the sixth grade students, they were asked to explain the cause of the difference. They responded by saying that school was about them. They learned a lot about Africa and African Americans. When you compare the District Summary with Garland's progress for the same period. you find a significant difference in gains for Black males, uncharacteristic of the performance level during the tenure of another principal. I would like to get on the agenda to share this with the Board of Directors. I am asking your assistance in making this happen. We can close the gap before the year 2000. cc Monitoring Teams.-JR-p 6\u0026lt;7n\u0026lt;JlA\u0026gt;n^ Xx/ziiv O^C^yilAnt^ c^/jopcvxCt^ lU^4\u0026gt;i-^. h LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) DISTRICTWIDE SUMMARY 1993 ENVIRONMENT* GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B W O 1941 1232 682 26 46/47.7 34/41.3 67/59.0 61/55.8 48/48.8 35/41.8 70/61.2 65/57.9 45/47.5 33/40,6 68/59.8 61/55.6 43/46.3 31/39.4 66/58.7 55/52.5 48/48.9 35/41.8 70/61.3 62/56.6 42/45.8 28/38.0 67/59.5 58/54.3 2 TOTAL B W O 1913 1214 668 30 41/45.0 29/38.1 63/57.1 64/57.5 61/55.8 49/49.2 79/67.2 84/71.1 50/50.1 38/43.8 70/61.2 67/59.5 48/48.9 35/42.1 70/61.0 61/56.1 47/48.5 34/41.2 70/61.0 72/62.4 47/48.6 33/40.8 72/62.1 73/62.7 3 TOTAL B H O 1770 1099 641 26 43/46.3 29/38.6 67/59.0 61/56.1 54/52.3 42/45.6 73/62.8 84/70.7 48/48.7 35/42.0 68/59.9 63/57.2 46/48.0 32/40.0 70/61.1 66/58.9 46/47.9 33/40.6 68/59,7 68/60.0 47/48.5 34/41.2 69/60.4 71/61.7 46/47.8 32/40.0 69/60.6 70/61.2 4 TOTAL B W 0 1716 1094 598 23 45/47.5 33/40.7 68/59.9 60/55.4 61/55.9 52/50.8 76/65.1 79/67.0 53/51.5 41/45.0 73/63.1 68/59.8 53/51.5 40/44.7 74/63.5 74/63.2 59/54.5 46/48.0 78/66.2 73/62.6 53/51.6 41/45.2 73/63.1 71/61.6 53/51.8 40/44.9 75/64.2 72/62.2 5 TOTAL B W O 1821 1189 606 23 39/44.1 27/37.0 64/57.7 51/50.3 57/53.5 46/48.1 74/63.7 71/61.6 49/49.6 39/44.1 68/60.1 60/55.5 48/49.0 35/41.7 73/62.9 59/55.0 52/51.2 42/45.6 72/62.0 60/55.2 46/48.0 35/41.9 68/59.8 61/56.0 47/48.3 34/41.5 70/61.1 61/56.1 6 TOTAL B W 0 1855 1227 603 24 52/50.9 39/44.0 75/64.5 74/63.2 58/54.4 49/49.6 74/63.8 81/68.2 53/51.8 44/46.8 71/61.6 67/59.2 55/52.6 44/46.7 75/64.0 78/66.4 59/54.5 48/48.9 77/65.4 77/65.5 56/53.2 46/47.7 75/64.0 75/64.5 56/53.1 45/47.1 76/64.8 77/65.6 7 TOTAL B W 0 1718 1120 575 21 42/45.5 29/38.4 67/59.4 58/54.0 45/47.1 35/41.9 63/57.2 63/57.2 46/47.6 34/41.3 68/59.8 63/57.1 46/47.8 31/39.8 74/63.4 70/60.9 49/49.7 39/44.0 70/60.9 64/57.4 44/46.9 32/40.4 67/59.4 65/58.0 44/47.0 31/39.8 69/60.5 66/58.4 8 TOTAL B W 0 1571 1046 503 20 43/46.5 30/39.2 71/61.5 73/62.6 43/46.2 32/40.3 65/57.9 72/62.5 49/49.6 38/43.6 71/61.9 78/66.3 47/48.3 34/41.5 72/62.4 74/63.7 48/48.8 34/41.5 74/63.6 85/71.6 46/47.9 33/40.8 72/62.0 75/64.4 46/47.7 32/39.9 74/63.3 78/66.1 9 TOTAL B W 0 1506 994 496 15 44/46.6 33/40.5 65/58.3 72/62.5 34/41.4 25/35.6 54/52.0 89/75.6 51/50.5 40/44.9 70/61.2 88/74.3 48/48.9 38/43.7 66/58.8 79/67.3 47/48.5 36/42.4 68/60.1 87/73.4 46/47.7 35/41.7  66/58.9 88/74.7 46/48.0 35/41.6 68/60.0 89/75.5 10 TOTAL B W O 1587 985 572 29 51/50.3 35/41.9 75/64.3 74/63.6 42/45.8 31/39.7 61/55.8 73/62.6 50/50.2 37/43,2 71/61,8 73/62.7 47/48.4 31/39.6 74/63.2 75/64.5 46/48.0 34/41.5 67/59.0 69/60.7 50/50.1 36/42.2 73/62.9 79/66.6 49/49.7 34/41.1 74/63.6 00/67.9 11 TOTAL B W O 1383 791 562 29 47/48.5 32/40.4 68/60.0 66/58.9 40/44.7 28/37.9 58/54.0 65/57.9 46/47.9 32/40.3 66/58.4 66/58.8 46/47.9 31/39.7 67/59.3 59/54.7 48/49.0 34/41.3 68/59.7 67/59.1 48/48.9 33/40.7 68/59.9 71/61.4 48/49.0 32/40.1 70/61.0 69/60.7 * At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 1989-1993 Resvised August 1993 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 8 SCHOOL: Henderson Junior High 19SP READING 19-91 1^92 1^93 -11S9 MATHEMATICS 1990 1991 1989 1990 LAUGUAGE ARTS 9 1989 1990 SCIENCE 1991 1992 1993 1989 SOCIAL STUDIES 1990 1991 Alii 1993 ** PASSING SCORE=4204 A989 1990 -1191 1992 199? ALL STUDENTS Number Tested Number Passed Percent Passed 285 265 93 290 261 90 288 242 84 212 174 82 242 206 85 285 266 93 290 270 93 288 254 88 212 183 86 242 197 81 285 259 91 290 240 83 288 231 80 212 160 75 242 181 75 285 210 74 290 205 71 288 166 58 212 120 57 242 136 56 285 240 84 290 245 84 288 162 56 212 141 67 242 180 74 288 280 97 303 282 93 295 263 89 211 179 85 243 214 88 BLACK MALES Number Passed 68 66 70 74 74 68 73 79 76 77 64 59 63 57 60 45 52 53 54 48 62 68 50 56 65 Percent Passed 94 80 74 79 80 94 88 84 81 84 89 71 67 61 65 63 63 2L 60 71 2L BLACK FEMALES Number Passed 98 103 101 61 97 96 104 103 69 89 98 95 98 66 89 73 64 51 32 55 83 87 59 48 81 Percent Passed 90 91 85 77 86 88 52 SL 2a 50. 52. 54 2a 52 52 43. 41 4a 2ii. 11 51 22 52 WHITE MALES Number Passed 43 47 27 12 18 46 49 27 11 16 45 42 26 11 15 42 45 24 11 17 43 46 Percent Passed 91 19 11 18 96 100 100 98 100 55 52 5a 55 55 53 921 53 5a 52 86 52 54 51 54 68 52 -100 % WHITE FEMALES Number Passed 42 34 30 21 14 42 34 31 21 13 42 33 31 21 14 38 33 26 Percent Passed 100 100 97 100 93 100 100 100 100 87 IQQ. 52 IQQ, IQQ 53 90 52 54 18 14 40 34 24 20 12 55 53 93 IQQ 22 55 50 OTHER STUDENTS Number Passed 14 11 14 14 10 14 10 11 13 12 11 12 12 10 10 Percent Passed 93 100 88 100 75 93 91 88 100, 50 67 IQQ. 51 53J 25 55 IQQ 25 53 50 5Q 51 53 IIQQ 100 6 3 6 2 5 3 5 2 6 4 1 * Total for all students in the \"Other\" race category, were not reported by gender. These scores The PASSING SCORE information is based on three administrations of the MPT.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 1989-1993 I Revised August 1993 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 8 SCHOOL: Forest Heights Junior High 1989 1990 READING 1991 1122 1993 1989- MATHEMATICS -19 98. 1991 1989 LANGUAGE ARTS 1990 1991 1992 1993 1989 1990 SCIENCE 1991 1992 1993 1989 SOCIAL STUDIES 1991 ** PASSING SCORE=42O4 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 ALL STUDENTS Number Tested Number Passed 222 204 Percent Passed 92 258 239 93 218 188 86 225 169 75 228 192 84 222 206 93 258 237 92 218 193 89 225 179 80 228 191 84 222 192 86 258 218 229 177 89 81 225 152 68 228 184 81 222 184 258 213 83 83 218 154 71 225 140 62 228 154 68 222 191 86 258 208 81 218 172 79 225 134 60 228 155 68 226 214 95 261 244 93 219 197 90 218 181 83 227 195 86 195^ 1?^ 19?? 1231 BIACK MALES Humber Passed 59 68 55 49 44 60 67 54 58 Percent BIACK FEMALES Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE MALES Number Passed Percent Passed 84 58 92 49 100 86 78 91 43 100 82 65 79 35 97 59 57 76 27 90 62 82 27 100 86 58 92 49 100 85 79 92 43 100 81 71 87 35 97 70 61 81 26 87 48 68 78 88 26 96 49 70 57 90 46 94 60 76 79 92 41 95 45 67 66 80 33 92 44 53 50 67 22 73 40 53 55 42 41 36 55 55 50 40 37 56 79 89 26 96 76 46 73 49 100 70 68 79 42 98 63 47 57 34 94 49 40 53 25 83 51 53 60 27 100 79 70 75 48 52 48 76 49 100 66 77 40 93 56 38 58 68 34 94 51 26 87 65 24 89 WHITE FEMALES Number Passed Percent Passed 37 97 42 100 29 100 28 100 34 97 38 100 40 95 29 100 26 93 34 97 38 100 41 98 29 100 28 100 34 97 35 92 40 95 27 93 27 96 33 94 37 97 39 93 28 97 23 82 32 91 OTHER STUDENTS 1 8 4 8 5 1 8 4 8 5 2 8 4 8 5 1 8 4 7 5 2 8 4 7 4 Number Passed percent Fused 50 100 100 89 83 50 100 100 89 83 100 100 100 89 83 50 100 100 78 83 100 100 100 78 67 Total for ill students in the 'Other*' race category, were not reported by gender. These scores The PASSING SCORE information is based on three administrations of the MPT. ISCHOOL: Dunbar Magnet Jr. High ma. 1990 READING 1991 1993 19 99 MATHEMATICS 1990 AW. Aaai I ALL ETVPEHT? Number Tested Number Passed Percent Passed BLACK MALES Number Passed Percent Passed BLACK FEMALES Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE MALES Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE FEMAUS Number Passed Percent Passed OTHER STUDENTS Number Passed Percent Passed w * 219 174 79 63 11. 75 80 13 100 22 100 1 50 169 124 73 152 126 83 242 216 89 230 202 88 219 175 80 169 116 69 152 114 75 242 215 89 40 63 57 16 12 92 15 55 0 0 41 79 42 21 84 22 21 0 0 49 52 66 42 33 54 75 65 90 55 98 42 95 5 100 75 59 46 96 39 5a 6 86 75 76 81 13 100 20 91 0 66 50 67 10 77 13 81 1 100 63 83 38 75 59 82 19 76 24 100 0 55 98 42 95 5 100 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 1989-1993 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 8 A Ui 230 195 _ai 51 74 54 2. 47 5S. 37 93 6 86 Total for all students in the Other race category, were not reported by gender. 1989 219 148 68 49 56 65 69 13 100 20 91 1 50 LANGUAGE ARTS A990 1991 1992 A993 . 1999 SCIENCE 0 9 9 19 199 SOCIAL STUDIES 0 Aiai Revised August 1993 ** PASSING SCORE=4204 Aa89 -19 90 1991 1992 -1993 169 120 71 37 58 58 77 10 77 14 88 1 100 152 117 77 242 210 87 230 194 84 219 105 48 169 94 56 152 76 50 242 160 66 230 155 67 219 128 58 169 101 60 152 85 56 242 168 69 230 154 67 222 175 79 170 126 74 152 136 89 242 222 92 229 203 89 34 65 41 80 18 72 24 100 0 These scores 3 passing score information is based on three administrations MPT. of the 51 78 64 89 49 88 42 95 4 80 47 41 36 18 32 32 45 31 28 38 29 68 60 51 44 9? 37 93 6 86 47 35 37 11 85 17 77 1 50 56 35 49 liiL 51 48 54 58 A2 34 45 23 45 35 49 35 53. 54 57 42 56 26 51 38 53 42 64 11 21 50 46 12 11 18 48 44 12 75 1 100 .24 14 58 0 52. 56. 21 52 11 86 52 39 89 4 80 36 90 6 86 16 73 1 50 16 100 1 100 13 54 40 91 33 83 0 4 80 6 86SCHOOL: Cloverdale Jr, High 1969 1990 READING 1991 1311 1993 J 35 9. MATHEMATICS 0 ALL STUDENTS Number Tested Number Passed Percent Passed BIACK MALES Number Passed Percent Passed BLACK FEMALES Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE MALES Number Passed Percent Passed WHITE FEMALES Number Passed Number Passed Percent Passed 201 181 90 212 182 _a5 222 186 .84 218 186 85 185 146 -79 201 \\n _aa 212 181 88 44 81 54 81 51 77 58 83 44 76 43 80 51 76 61 59 70 78 57 60 61 87 35 31 36 100 5 100 81 31 94 35 100 3 75 5Q 51 76 55 M 19 21 16 34 31 95 40 93 6 100 100 26 93 3 100 25 93 4 100 94 94 35 97 35 100 5 100 3 75 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 1989-1993 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 8 LANGUAGE ARTS 199211993 222 180 JU. 218 188 86 185 135 73 1989 1990 199 1 1992 1993 1969 1990 SCIENCE 1991 1992 1993 1989 SOCIAL STUDIES 1290 1992 1322 Revised August 1993 ** PASSING SCORE=4204 1989 1990 1991 199? 1993 52 79 58 83 39 67 69 82 53 7^ 19 95 34 79 6 100 5. 21 20 95 25 89 3 100 Total for all students in the Other\" race category. 16 1() 24 89 3 75 201 164 8? 212 156 74 222 \\12 218 192 .88 185 154 _a3 201 135 _a7 212 150 _?1 222 135 61 218 139 64 185 94 51 201 124 _6Z 212 135 -64 222 118 6.8 218 156 -72 185 87 _42. 207 181 SJ- 213 219 191 -91. 193 _aa 219 198 -99 185 154 _8J 36 67 38 44 57 67 56 50 45 78 33 51. 43 54 38 55 49 15 30 52 24 44 36 54 31 41 50 21 28 48 57 57 69 84 51 32 59 35 97 4 80 la 19. 58 62 83 38 46 42 46 26 16 21 18 19 55. 100. 86. .54. 1 48 28 37 37 5i 43 59 42 62 28 32 29 18 20 13 33 28 59. aa 90. 95. 62 95 5S 4a 55 21 16 19 11 5Q 95 52 33 94 39 91 28 100 25 93 27 75 30 86 34 79 22 79 22 81 25 69 26 74 25 58 23 82 18 67 2 50 4 bl These scores were not reported by gender. The PASSING SCORE information is based on three administrations of the MPT. 3 100 4 100 5 100 2 50 3 50 2 67 1 25 5 100 2 50 4 bl 2 67 2 50 f 1received AUG 6 1992 Oitice oi Desssregation Monitoring LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Date\nAugust 5, 1992 To\nFrom\nMargie Powell, Associate Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring Sterling Ingram^Director Planning, Research and Evaluation Re\nStanford Achievement Test Results, 1992 I am attaching Stanford-8 results by school at this time. I believe the report is self-explanatory\nhowever, if you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. bjgSCHOOL: GRADE/RACE 1 TOTAL B W 0 2 TOTAL B W 0 3 TOTAL B W O 4 TOTAL * B W 0 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W 0 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 BADGETT ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 23 10 13 21 16 5 22 17 5 37 36 28 8 26 18 8 21/32.7 24/35.2 18/30.7 41/45.2 48/48.9 36/42.4 16/28.7 17/29.9 15/27.8 27/37.1 23/34.5 30/39.2 25/35.5 28/37.4 22/34.0 19/31.1 20/32.5 17/30.0 31/39.7 24/34.9 59/54.9 44/46.6 35/41.8 71/61.8 36/42.3 23/34.4 80/67.6 33/40.9 28/37.9 51/50.7 30/39.1 21/33.1 66/58.4 39/44.3  31/39.6 67/59.3 27/37.2 23/34.6 43/46.3 52/50.8 50/49.9 58/54.1 35/41.9 33/40.5 44/46.7 20/32.2 16/28.8 40/44.6 28/37.6 27/37.3 30/38.8 38/43.4 35/41.6 49/49.6 33/40.6 30/38.7 45/47.1 31/39.4 46/47.8 32/40.0 29/38.6 35/42.7 35/41.9 32/40.4 16/29.1 14/27.6 23/34.5 32/40.0 33/40.9 27/36.8 23/34.6 23/34.5 24/35.0 20/32.6 21/32.8 20/32.3 29/38.1 27/37.3 34/41.0 22/34.0 22/33.4 26/36.1 21/32.9 20/32.3 24/35.1 34/41.2 29/38.4 46/47.6 45/47.2 43/46.0 50/49.9 41/45.4 41/45.3 42/45.6 41/45.0 38/43.8 49/49.7 46/48.1 56/53. 1 41/45.4 39/44.2 47/48.3 41/45.0 38/43.8 46/47.9 * Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at time. This information will be provided at a later date. **At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: BALE GRADE/RACE 1 TOTAL B W O 2 TOTAL B W 0 3 TOTAL B W o 4 TOTAL * B W O 5 TOTAL B W 0 6 TOTAL B W 0 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS language SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 40 35 4 1 39 33 5 34/41.3 30/39.1 66/58.4 58/54.2 31/39.4 25/35.7 73/62.9 90/77.0 25/35.6 22/33.4 58/54.0 32/40.1 29/38.4 25/35.9 69/60.4 30/39.0 29/38.3 24/35.2 69/60.7 62/56.4 27/37.3 23/34.5 65/58.0 56/53.2 23/34.4 21/32.8 42/45.9 35/42.1 32/40.0 63/56.9 32/40.3 30/38.9 55/52.6 32/40.3 28/37.4 72/62.5 30/39.2 28/37.5 52/50.9 29/38.4 26/36.4 54/52.3 41  21/32.7 33 7 1 53 51 39 9 3 38 30 8 19/31.4 30/39.1 17/29.9 27/36.8 27/37.0 22/33.8 53/51.3 26/36.6 28/37.7 22/33.7 52/51.0 42/45.8 42/45.7 42/45.9 44/46.8 40/44.4 36/42.7 51/50.7 61/55.9 26/36.7 27/36.9 26/36.1 20/32.3 27/37.3 27/36.9 30/39.1 27/37.1 34/41.4 33/40.7 40/44.7 34/41.3 31/39.3 30/38.7 35/41.9 30/39.0 31/39.4 26/36.7 27/36.8 32/40.4 27/36.8 25/35.5 41/45.1 40/44.5 40/44.6 59/54.5 35/41.9 33/40.5 43/46.4 7/42.8 4/41.1 t 8/49.0 1/45.2 35/41.7 32/40.0 4?/47.2 * Data by race for grade 4 is unava'able at this ti This information will be provided at a later date. .,e. 33/40.5 26/36.6 59/55.0 45/47.3 36/42.7 28/38.0 66/58.4 34/41. 31/39. .8 44/46.7 42/45.6 40/44.3 37/42.3 55/52.5 33/40.7 29/38.6 47/48.4 40/44.5 31/39.4 28/37.5 43/46.3 31/39.8 28/37.4 47/48.3 39/44.3 30/39.2 27/36.8 46/47.9 **At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIEN.E and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combine and reflected one score under ENVIRONMENT.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 SCHOOL: BASELINE F.T.EMFNTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 1 TOTAL B W O 61 38 21 2 34/41.3 32/40.0 42/45.6 11/23.8 31/39.4 27/37.2 41/45.3 9/21.5 28/37.5 25/35.8 30/39.0 61/55.6 30/38.7 26/36.3 39/44.1 16/29.0 33/40.8 29/38.5 39/44.0 52/51.0 27/37.0 25/35.5 34/41.2 9/21.2 2 TOTAL B W o 39 27 10 1 28/37.4 24/34.9 38/2,3.5 34/41.3 37/42.8 28/37.8 61/55.7 59/54.8 43/46.1 33/40.7 68/60.1 43/46.3 25/35.7 19/31.4 47/48.4 9/21.8 30/38.9 24/35.1 47/48.2 39/44.1 28/37.9 22/33.6 47/48.4 35/41.9 3 TOTAL B W O * '53 42 11 30/38.8 25/36.0 49/49.3 54/52.0 47/48.2 78/66.5 41/45.4 36/42.2 64/57.6 34/41.5 28/37.6 62/56.5 40/44.4 35/41.6 59/54.9 40/44.5 34/41.4 62/56.6 38/43.3 31/39.8 63/56.7 4 TOTAL t B W O 42 .38/43.8 60/55.3 41/45.3 43/46.2 54/52.2 44/46.8 46.6 5 TOTAL B W O 38 30 8 30/38.8 32/39.9 23/34.7 50/49.9 49/49.6 52/51.-1 41/45.2 39/44.3 47/48.3 37/43.0 37/42.8 39/43.9 35/41.9 35/A2.0 34/41.2 37/43.2 38/43.8 34/41.1 35/42.1 36/42.6 32/40.2 6 TOTAL B W O 32 28 4 40/44.6 38/43.8 50/50.2 39/44.3 39/43.9 44/46.6 38/43.5 38/43.7 36/42.4 42/45.5 39/44.2 59/54.8 45/47.1 43/46.2 57/53.7 37/43.2 37/42.8 43/46.1 37/42.9 36/42.2 46/47.7 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information ill be provided at a later date. At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 BOOKER MAGNET ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY  1 TOTAL B W o 2 TOTAL B W 0 3 TOTAL B W o 4 TOTAL * B W O 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W 0 89 49 39 1 82 48 32 2 - 92 50 39 3 89 87 50 35 2 87 46 38 3 39/44.1 27/37.2 55/52.7 46/47.9 42/45.7 30/39.2 56/53.3 73/62.9 38/43.8 26/36.6 55/52.6 62/56.4 36/42.6 20/32.5 60/55.5 35/41.9 41/45.4 29/38.4 57/53.8 60/55.3 35/41.7 21/33.2 54/52.2 55/52.6 46/48.0 32/40.1 68/59.7 61/55.8 63/56.8 49/49.4 78/66.2 91/78.5 51/50.7 39/44.3 68/59.7 63/56.7 46/48.1 32/40.1 67/59.3 69/60.3 51/50.7 36/42.2 73/62.8 71/61.5 52/50.8 35/41.6 74/63.7 74/63.5 40/44.9 25/35.9 59/55.0 74/63.8 52/51.1 39/44.0 64/57.6 94/82.5 47/48.2 35/42.0 58/54.2 89/75.9 43/46.1 27/36.9 63/56.8 71/61.5 40/44.6 27/36.9 55/52.4 85/71.8 46/47.7 32/40.2 60/55.4 86/73.1 44/46.6 29/38.3 60/55.3 87/73.2 61/55.9 47/48.5 34/41.2 64/57.7 73/62.6 59/54.6 40/44.5 78/66.1 74/63.8 67/59.5 56/53.3 60/55.2 59/54.9 61/55.9 60/55.5 63/57.2 55/52.8 72/62.1 87/74.0 55/52.6 44/46.7 69/60.2 50/49.9 53/51.8 43/46.4 65/58.3 77/65.4 52/50.9 39/44.3 67/59.1 82/69.4 53/51.8 46/47.6 63/57.1 72/62.4 52/50.8 41/45.4 64/57.4 81/68.7 51/50.7 41/45.0 65/57.9 83/69.8 60/55.4 46/48.1 75/64.1 66/58.7 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. 53/51.7 40/4.9 68/60.0 54/52.1 65/57.9 53/51.7 77/65.2 72/62.1 59/54.9 44/47.0 75/64.3 63/57.1 59/54.9 44/46.6 76/64.9 65/57.9 At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflcctad as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTl : ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 BRADY ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY * 1 TOTAL B W 0 2 TOTAL B W o 3 TOTAL B W O 4 TOTAL * B W O 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W O 64 40 23 59 41 16 2 - '43 32 11 57 60 48 10 2 60 38 22 48/48.7 39/44.1 62/56.5 57/53.7 45/47.3 74/63.5 46/48.1 34/41.0 69/60.3 36/42.7 27/37.1 55/52.4 53/51.3 41/45.4 71/61.5 47/48.6 36/42.7 66/58.8 38/43.6 33/40.8 51/50.3 42/45.8 26/36.5 18/31.0 54/52.2 35/42.0 27/37.2 24/35.4 32/40.4 77/65.5 42/45.6 29/38.1 66/58.9 53/51.7 48/48.9 62/56.5 82/69.6 44/46.7 31/39.5 80/67.5 50/50.2 45/47.5 41/45.2 57/53.6 87/73.3 41/45.3 30/39.2 62/56.2 51/50.7 50/50.0 57/53.8 35/41.7 33/40.7 22/34.0 69/60.5 39/44.0 35/41.8 33/40.7 39/44.3 61/56.1 45/47.1 36/42.5 60/55.5 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. 46/47.9 41/45.1 59/54.9 47/48.6 44/46.9 39/44.2 56/53.0 54/52.2 44/47.0 39/44.0 58/54.0 55/52.6 27/37.3 19/31.6 57/53.8 31/39.8 24/35.0 57/53.8 33/40.8 23/34.6 66/58.9 30/39.1 20/32.6 64/57.8 40/44.4 33/40.9 29/38.6 42/45.8 84/70.6 48/48.9 37/42.8 67/59.5 43/46.4 32/-. 0.4 31/39.4 35/41.9 66/58.4 51/\"'O. 6 41 Al 5.2 68/79.9 40/44.6 38/43.7 35/41.7 31/39.6 43/46.4 82/69.0 33/40.5 29/38.3 41/45.3 82/69.3 44/46.8 32/40.3 65/58.0 44/46.8 32/39.9 66/58.7 **At Grades 1 and 2 the .SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: GRADE/RACE I TOTAL B W O 2 TOTAL B W 0 3 TOTAL B W o 4 TOTAL B W 0 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W 0 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 CARVER MAGNET ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 67 38 26 3 87 49 38 -90 49 40 1 94 93 48 43 2 96 53 41 2 78/66.0 70/61.3 85/71.8 89/75.7 84/70.8 78/65.9 90/76.5 94/83.4 71/61.6 62/56.5 81/68.8 75/64.3 58/54.2 46/47.8 71/61.8 82/69.5 80/67.5 73/62.7 87/73.6 90/76.7 76/65.1 68/59.7 85/71.6 90/76.9 64/57.7 48/48.9 82/63.0 81/68.3 64/57.8 86/72.3 72/62.1 58/54.3 85/72.2 60/55.2 44/46.7 78/66.1 72/62.1 54/52.2 88/74.9 73/62.6 54/52.1 89/76.1 63/56.9 38/43.7 86/72.5 95/84.6 79/66.6 61/55.6 92/79.3 99/99.0 75/64.3 55/52.5 91/78.4 93/81.1 70/61.0 48/49.0 89/75.4 81/68.5 69/60.2 47/48.2 88/74.4 92/79.6 72/62.3 51/50.3 89/76.2 98/93.3 72/62.2 49/49.4 90/77.2 97/89.6 67/59.1 84/70.9 71/61.6 73/62.9 70/61.3 74/63.5 74/63.7 56/53.1 34/41.2 77/65.7 82/69.0 70/60.8 51/50.3 85/71.4 95/85,2 62/56.6 46/47.9 77/65.6 84/71.0 73/62.6 47/48.6 91/77.6 90/77.2 63/5U.8 46/47.8 77/65.8 91/78.1 61/56.0 41/45.4 79/67.0 88/74.4 63/57.2 42/45.7 82/69.2 91/77.7 76/64.7 63/57.2 88/74.6 73/63.0 79/66.7 68/60.1 89/75.7 67/59.0 71/61.4 61/55.7 82/69.4 45/47.4 79/67.3 69/60.5 90/76.4 63/56.9 79/66.9 70/61.2 88/74.3 78/66.4 78/66.2 68/59.7 88/74.8 68/59.6 79/67.2 69/60.2 90/76.5 68/60.0 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. **At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are com! ined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTLL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 CHICOT ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY A 1 TOTAL B W O 2 TOTAL B W 0 3 TOTAL B W O 4 TOTAL * B W 0 5 TOTAL B W o 6 TOTAL B W 0 85 52 32 72 48 23 1 62 39 22 59 59 35 24 53 33 18 2 34/41.3 25/35.6 52/51.2 46/47.7 38/43.6 59/54.7 33/40.8 24/34.8 53/51.7 32/39.9 22/33.6 50/50.1 35/41.8 24/35.3 55/52.6 35/41.6 26/36.7 50/50.0 32/39.9 25/35.8 44/46.8 92/79.6 47/48.6 40/44.5 61/56.0 92/79.6 43/46.2 34/41.1 60/55.3 92/79.6 31/39.4 23/34.3 48/48.8 83/68.5 37/43.0 28/37.6 55/52.4 96/86.9 36/42.4 26/36.4 56/52.9 97/89.6 32/40.1 31/39.3 35/41.9 52/50.9 48/48.9 50/55.3 45/47.4 42/45.5 52/51.0 34/41.3 32/40.3 39/44.0 41/45.1 38/43.6 46/48.1 41/45.0 38/43.3 47/48.5 39/44.1 36/42.2 46/48.1 -38/43.4 38/43.4 29/38.3 51/50.6 47/48.2 34/41.4 62/56.3 92/78.9 51/50.5 32/40.2 38/43.7 40/44.5 39/44.1 37/43.1 48/48.9 40/44.9 58/54.4 44/46.8 38/43.4 50/50.0 89/75.4 47/48.3 41/45.0 56/53.0 46/47.8 38/43.6 54/52.3 88/74.5 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at thi^ time. This information will be provided at a later dace. 41/45.1 31/39.4 56/53.4 46/^17.8 38/43.7 57/53.9 40/44.8 33/40.5 52/51.2 40/44.8 32/39.9 54/52.0 50/50.2 39/44.0 65/58.3 90/76.9 52/a.0 44/4 6.6 61/56.1 90/\n6.9 47/48.4 37/42.9 59/54.5 94/83.4 47/48.2 36/42.4 59/55.0 94/82.3 At Grades 1 and 2 the SC.EHCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combned and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: GRADE/RACE 1 TOTAL B W 0 2 TOTAL B W o 3 TOTAL B W 0 4 TOTAL it B W O 5 TOTAL B W 0 6 TOTAL B W O LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUtlMARY 1992 r.I.EMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 37 30 6 1 45 33 12 -47 36 10 1 47 49 35 14 62 51 10 1 51/50.4 50/50.1 56/53.0 40/44.7 73/62.8 71/61.8 84/71.2 36/42.5 51/50.6 49/49.7 62/56.2 43/46.3 47/48.5 40/44.9 83/70.0 14/27.2 61/55.8 59/54.9 72/62.4 37/43.0 56/53.2 54/52.0 71/61.4 28/37.7 42/45.9 34/41.1 67/19.4 40/44.7 38/43.3 46/47.9 77/65.6 42/45.9 43/46.3 37/43.1 57/53.8 43/46.2 43/46.3 47/48.2 10/23.0 60/55.5 49/49.7 85/72.0 63/57.0 60/55.4 68/60.0 97/89.6 67/59.0 59/54.6 53/51.5 71/61.8 64/57.8 63/57.1 71/61.9 57/53.7 46/47.7 38/43.6 68/59.6 58/54.2 54/51.9 70/61.2 84/70.9 48/48.9 54/52.3 47/48.5 71/61.4 47/48.6 49/49.3 44/46.9 12/25.3 * Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. 65/58.2 60/55.2 79/66.7 48/48.7 37/43.2 74/63.7 49/49.7 39/44.0 77/65.5 57/53.7 53/51.6 68/60.0 85/71.8 59/54.5 56/53.0 65/58.3 87/73.7 53/51.7 50/50.1 60/55.1 89/75.8 54/52.0 50/50.2 61.55.7 90/77.0 56/53.3 57/53.8 57/53.9 57/53.8 46/48.1 39/44.0 64/57.7 44/46.7 43/46.1 54/52.3 8/20.4 51/50.6 49/49.2 58/54.2 51/50.3 5 0 / 5 0.2 54/52.2 28/37.7 50/50.1 45/47.1 63/57.1 49/49.6 43/46.5 63/57.1 53/51.5 53/51.4 57/53.8 28/37.7 51/50.4 50/50.2 56/53.1 23/34.4 **At Grade? 1 and 2 the SCiZNCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are coml ned and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION I STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 DODD ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B H O 41 27 13 1 22/33.9 22/33.8 23/34.1 23/34.4 30/38.8 31/39.7 28/37.9 11/24.2 19/31.2 21/33.2 13/26.5 18/30.7 22/34.0 23/34.3 20/32.6 42/45.8 25/35.5 28/37.6 19/31.8 13/26.3 21/32.7 22/33.5 20/31.9 10/23.0 2 TOTAL B W 0 42 17 24 30/39.0 26/36.1 34/41.5 37/43.0 28/37.6 45/47.2 43/46.4 26/36.6 59/54.6 35/42.0 22/33.4 47/48.6 32/39.9 19/31.3 43/46.5 36/42.3 27/37.0 44/46.7 3 TOTAL B W O 32 18 13 1 26/36.5 21/32.8 34/41.1 38/43.6 45/47.4 45/47.4 45/47.4 45/47.4 39/44.3 36/42.6 43/46.5 45/47.4 32/39.9 26/36.5 38/43.5 56/53.2 27/37.2 25/35.7 30/38.7 38/43.6 34/41.5 32/39.9 38/43.4 42/45.8 31/39.8 28/38.0 35/41.8 41/45.2 4 TOTAL * B W O 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W 0 30 41 24 17 52 27 25 44/46.8 43/46.5 46/47.9 40/44.7 59/54.5 43/46.4 74/63.3 54/52.0 42/45.6 38/43.5 37/43.1 45/47.4 42/45.5 58/54.3 60/55.5 55/52.5 52/51.1 54/52.0 50/49.9 44/46.8 46/47.6 42/45.7 45/48.1 49/49.4 43/46.2 49/49.7 53/51.4 45/47.1 48/49.1 52/50.9 44/46.7 52/51.2 49/49.7 56/52.9 58/54.4 49/49.7 67/59.5 59/54.6 49/49.7 68/60.0 60/55.3 51/50.5 69/60.4 56/53.2 49/49.2 64/57.6 56/53.4 48/48.9 65/58.3 * Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will ba .rovided at a later date. *At Gr-des 1 and 2 the SCIENCE are . rabined and reflected and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: GRADE/RACE 1 TOTAL B W O 2 TOTAL B W 0 3 TOTAL B W O 4 TOTAL * B W 0 5 TOTAL B W 0 6 TOTAL B W 0 * LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT*\" NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 46 38 7 32 26 5 1 37 29 8 35 36 32 3 1 36 29 6 1 35/42.1 29/38.1 70/61.0 42/45.8 36/42.3 74/63.4 22/34.0 16/29.1 67/59.4 30/38.9 23/34.4 72/62.1 30/39.0 23/34.2 73/62.6 33/40.5 26/36.3 70/61.3 27/36.9 19/31.6 65/57.9 82/6-9.3 51/50.4 43/46.1 74/63.2 99/99.0 36/42.5 28/38.0 63/60.1 86/72.8 35/42.0 29/38.3 58/54.1 91/78.2 32/40.3 23/34.7 69/60.6 94/82.7 31/39.8 22/33.9 71/61.7 95/84.6 29/38.6 21/32.8 68/59.6 50/50.1 42/45.5 79/67.0 45/47.1 35/41.6 79/67.1 29/38.1 21/32.9 63/56.8 41/45.3 31/39.5 78/66.3 38/43.7 30/38.7 72/62.0 36/42.4 27/36.8 72/62.4 39/44.2 54/52.1 43/46.5 40/44.6 42/45.5 43/46.2 41/45.0 24/34.9 21/33.0 61/55.8 3/10.4 40/44.5 31/39.8 77/65.4 57/53.7 40/44.8 39/44.0 52/50.8 39/44.1 50/49.9 45/47.5 68/60.0 62/56.4 39/44.0 35/41.8 77/65.4 16/29.1 30/38.7 27/36.9 61/55.7 16/29.1 38/^3.3 36/42.3 70/61.1 10/23.0 31/39.6 29/38.1 67/59.0 18/30.7 30/39.1 27/37.3 71/61.8 15/28.2 46/47.7 41/45.0 68/59.6 60/55.3 50/49.9 43/46.3 80/67.7 46/47.9 59/54.6 53/51.4 81/68.2 76/34.9 47/48.4 41/45.0 73/63.0 62/56.4 47/48.5 41/45.1 75/64.1 61/55.9 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be prov ed at a later date. **At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are comb-'ned and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B W o 2 TOTAL B W 0 3 TOTAL B W O 4 TOTAL * B W 0 5 TOTAL B W 0 6 TOTAL B W 0 72 34 37 1 45 12 32 1 48 21 27 69 48 28 20 45 24 20 1 63/56.9 36/42.3 84/70.7 68/59.9 71/61.4 42/45.6 89/76.0 68/59.9 55/52.6 28/37.6 79/66.8 53/51.6 50/50.0 30/38.7 70/51.1 30/39.0 67/59.3 39/44.0 87/73.3 67/59.3 61/55.6 29/38.4 84/71.3 62/56.4 62/56.5 37/42.8 70/61.0 92/7-9.6 68/59.9 33/40.7 77/65.7 99/99.0 54/52.0 26/36.2 63/57.1 86/72.8 55/52.7 21/33.1 67/59.4 81/68.5 63/57.1 32/40.1 72/62.5 97/89.6 64/57.5 30/38.9 74/63.5 97/89.6 58/54.1 26/36.1 31/68.1 52/51.1 49/49.7 23/34.2 83/70.4 62/56.2 40/44.4 81/68.7 97/89.6 77/65.8 49/49.3 91/78.7 59/54.5 35/41.6 75/64.5 61/55.6 29/38.3 82/69.0 63/57.0 30/38.9 84/71.0 67/59.2 36/42.2 86/72.4 66/58.5 32/40.2 86/72.6 64/57.5 54/51.9 51/50.3 53/:\u0026gt;l. 5 57/53.7 56/52.9 68/59.9 45/47.1 90/76.9 56/52.9 38/43.8 77/65.7 54/51.9 27/37.0 85/71.8 53/51.6 34/41.5 77/65.2 57/53.8 33/40.7 85/72.2 57/53.6 31/39.4 87/73.4 65/58.2 47/48.2 81/68.1 99/99.0 54/51.9 37/42.8 71/61.6 88/74.7 63/57.2 46/47.8 78 '66.5 99/99.0 65/58.2 46/4 3.0 82/69.4 91/78.2 64/57.3 44/46.7 80/67.8 99/99.0 54/57.5 43/46.1 82/69.0 99/99.0 I Data by race for grade 4 is u.'.available at this time. This information will be prov- ied at a later date. **At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are cowl ined and reflect.ad as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL\nLITTL, ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL P \"ICENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 1 TOTAL B W O 70 64 6 25/35.5 25/35.5 25/36.2 26/36.3 25/35.8 35/41.6 19/31.5 18/30.8 30/38.8 28/37.9 26/36.4 58/54.0 25/36.0 25/35.5 33/40.8 21/32.8 19/31.3 48/48.8 2 TOTAL B W O 63 60 3 19/31.5 18/30.4 59/54.5 35/41.9 35/41.6 47/48.4 27/36.9 26/36.2 51/50.7 25/36.0 23/34.5 79/66.9 25/35.6 24/34.8 56/52.9 23/34.1 21/33.1 59/54.9 3 TOTAL B W O 60 55 5 17/29.5 16/28.6 31/39.3 29/38.3 27/37.0 56/53.0 27/37.0 26/36.1 46/48.0 18/30.8 16/29.0 50/50.1 23/34.2 21/33.0 45/47.3 23/34.1 21/33.0 43/46.2 20/32.1 18/30.9 42/45.9 4 TOTAL * B W O 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W 0 39 56 50 4 2 55 51 4 25/35.6 31/39.4 24/34.9 18/30.9 28/37.8 26/36.1 23/34.1 15/28.5 14/27.1 18/30.9 66/58.6 28/37.6 26/36.7 24/35.4 74/63.8 28/37.5 25/35.9 34/41.0 86/72.7 23/34.2 22/33.5 13/26.6 77/65.8 26/36.2 24/35.3 19/31.2 81/68.2 21/33.0 19/31.7 21/32.8 77/65.2 20/32.3 19/31.1 18/30.4 78/66.3 30/38.8 28/37.5 62/56.2 36/42.7 34/41.3 69/60.6 38/43.3 36/42.5 57/53.8 39/43.9 37/43.1 59/54.8 43/46.0 41/45.0 66/58.9 36/42.7 34/41.4 66/58.4 36/42.3 34/41.0 67/59.2 Data by race for grade 4 is uiavailable at this time. At Grad 3 1 and 2 the S,.^Et\nCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives This information will be provi '.ed at a later te. are con ned and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTLl rock SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B W O 71 34 36 45/47.5 27/37.1 64/57.8 45/47.2 25/35.7 66/58.8 47/48.4 24/35.0 71/61.7 37/43.2 19/31. 8 58/54.2 46/48.1 25/35.5 69/50.6 40/44.8 18/31.0 65/58.6 2 TOTAL B W 0 80 35 40 4 56/53.0 37/43.2 72/62.2 43/46.0 64/57.5 49/49.2 74/63.7 71/61.4 58/54.4 44/46.6 71/61.7 41/45.1 49/49.7 37/42.8 61/56.1 58/54.4 59/54.7 42/45.5 72/62.3 51/50.3 60/55.5 41/45.1 75/64.4 52/51.1 3 TOTAL B W O 68 25 42 1 56/53.0 28/38.0 72/62.0 47/48.4 73/63.1 48/48.8 85/71.5 85/71.8 61/56.1 40/44.8 73/63.1 36/42.5 60/55.1 27/37.3 77/65.3 85/71.8 59/54.9 33/40.9 74/63.4 43/46.3 65/57.9 39/43.9 78/66.2 60/55.3 63/57.2 35/41.8 78/66.4 60/55.3 4 TOTAL * B W 0 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W 0 63 73 37 35 1 72 26 45 1 57/53.7 61/55.9 51/50.5 55/52.6 55/52.5 56/53.4 56/53.0 39/44.0 23/34.1 59/54.8 77/65.6 64/57.6 35/41.7 78/66.0 98/93.3 52/51.2 41/45.1 62/56.6 99/99.0 65/58.0 42/45.9 75/64.0 99/99.0 48/48.9 34/41.0 63/56.8 98/93.3 49/49.3 27/37.3 70/60.9 99/99.0 47/48.2 33/40.7 60/55.4 93/81.1 46/47.6 31/39.4 60/55.3 93/81.1 46/47.6 29/38.5 61/56.1 96/86.9 1 1 I 62/56.4 38/43.3 73/63.1 97/89.6 67/59.2 44/46.7 77/65.6 99/99.0 71/61.9 53/51.4 80/67.4 96/86.9 64/57.7 39/44.3 76/64.6 98/93.3 66/58.5 40/44.5 78/65.9 98/93.3 * Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are com ned and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STAl^FORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 SCHOOL: GARLAND ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B W 0 32 32 42/45.5 42/45.5 31/39.7 31/39.7 29/38.5 29/38.5 20/32.1 20/32.1 35/41.9 35/41.9 26/36.1 26/36.1 2 TOTAL B W O 29 26' 3 19/31.8 17/29.7 51/50.7 32/40.3 29/38.4 65/58.3 25/35.9 23/34.5 48/48.7 25/35.7 21/33.3 65/58.3 21/33.1 18/30.8 55/52.8 26/36.2 23/34.1 58/54.2 3 TOTAL B W O 28 '28 12/25.6 12/25.6 29/38.5 29/38.5 24/35.0 24/35.0 20/32.0 20/32.0 22/33.9 22/33.9 19/31.2 19/31.2 17/30.0 17/30.0 4 TOTAL * B W O 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W 0 31 35 35 42 42 23/34.1 23/34.3 23/34.3 27/37.2 27/37..? 39/44.3 38/43.8 38/43.8 43/46.4 43/46.4 29/38.1 26/36.7 34/41.5 28/37.7 26/36.4 32/40.0 32/40.0 39/44.3 39/44.3 3C/38.7 39/38.7 31/39.5 31/39.5 29/38.3 29/38.3 28/37.6 28/37.6 39/43.9 39/43.9 47/48.5 47/48.5 39/43.9 39/43.9 38/43.5 38/43.5  Data by race for grade 4 is v. vailable at tfiis time. This information will be profiled at a.later Jate. **At Grac\n1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are cor Ined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: GRADE/RACE 1 TOTAL B W O 2 TOTAL B W 0 3 TOTAL B W 0 4 TOTAL * B W O 5 TOTAL B W o 6 TOTAL B W 0 * LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 43 22 21 26 18 8 25 19 6 24 42 29 13 31 26 5 32/40.1 30/38.7 35/41.8 35/42.1 31/39.5 46/47.8 25/35.5 27/37.3 17/29.8 31/39.6 30/39.2 22/33.4 54/52.0 33/40.6 31/39.6 42/45.5 55/52.6 49/49.4 62/56.2 64/57.6 57/53.6 79/66.8 54/52.0 53/51.5 57/53.8 44/46.9 41/45.0 34/41.4 55/52.8 57/53.7 56/53.2 63/56.7 41/45.3 39/44.1 44/46.6 46/47.7 39/44.1 61/55.9 36/42.6 36/42.5 37/42.8 41/45.2 38/43.6 32/39.9 54/51.9 40/44.7 40/44.5 42/45.6 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. 28/37.7 27/37.2 29/38.2 56/53.4 44/47.0 80/67.9 32/40.4 31/39.4 38/43.4 31/39.3 30/39.1 32/40.0 29/38.5 35/41.6 30/39.0 24/35.4 45/47.1 35/41.6 32/40.1 40/44.8 43/46.2 37/42.9 49/49.6 32/39.9 26/36.6 38/43.4 45/47.5 45/47.2 48/49.0 4 3/46.4 43/46.0 47/48.4 46/47.9 39/44.3 61/56.0 47/48.6 40/44.6 64/57.7 36/42.3 36/42.6 34/41.4 36/42.5 34/41.0 26/36.4 52/51.0 46/47.8 45/47.5 49/49.4 33/40.5 33/40.7 32/39.9 33/40.6 32/40.0 25/35.7 49/49.7 44/46.9 43/46.5 48/48.7 **At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: GRADE/RACE 1 TOTAL B W O 2 TOTAL B W 0 3 TOTAL B W O 4 TOTAL * B W 0 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W 0 * LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH ANd' EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 GIBBS MAGNET ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 45 27 18 43 20 22 1 38, 22 16 46 69 37 31 1 44 20 24 52/51.1 41/45.3 68/59.8 52/51.0 42/45.6 67/59.2 45/47.2 31/39.6 66/58.5 45/47.2 27/37.2 72/62.1 52/51.0 39/44.2 70/61.3 49/49.4 36/42.5 68/59.8 64/57.5 45/47.5 79/66.8 55/52.6 79/66.9 62/56.6 90/76.6 72/62.3 67/59.0 47/48.3 83/70.3 11/24.2 63/57.2 48/48.7 75/64.2 87/73.7 70/61.0 52/51.1 83/70.4 58/54.2 71/61.6 53/51.3 84/71.3 63/57.0 59/54.9 46/47.7 77/65.4 82/69.2 69/60.4 94/81.8 68/60.0 55/52.7 84/70.5 68/59.8 50/50.0 87/73.3 74/63.2 59/55.0 88/74.5 72/62.2 58/54.3 86/73.0 72/62.4 57/53.9 88/74.2 63/56.7 80/67.5 57/53.8 63/56.9 70/61.1 67/59.0 67/59.2 62/56.4 39/43.9 84/70.5 89/75.8 72/62.5 48/48.8 91/77.9 97/89.6 62/56.5 47/48.5 77/65.8 82/69.3 65/58.1 33/40.6 91/78.1 93/81.1 69, ,0.3 46/47.8 87/74.0 99/99.0 66/58.5 42/45.8 86/72.8 94/82.7 67/59.0 40/44.9 88/75.0 96/86.9 72/62.0 41/45.0 89/76.1 72/62.4 53/51.6 85/71.4 61/55.8 43/46.2 74/63.8 68/60.0 46/48.1 83/70.0 76/64.9 55/52.6 88/75.1 72/62.1 49/49.4 86/72.7 72/62.4 48/49.0 87/73.5 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are contb.Mied and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRCT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVAIl'ATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGIKH EDITION NATIONAL PMCENTILE RANK,/NORMAL CURVE EQUI'CALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 ISH ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B W O 37 37 29/38.6 29/38.6 28/37.8 28/37.8 31/39.6 31/39.6 33/40.5 33/40.5 28/37.6 28/37.6 25/35.6 25/35.6 2 TOTAL B W 0 28 26 2 33/40.5 34/41.0 21/33.1 49/49.5 46/48.0 81/68.8 56/53.0 55/52.8 61/55.7 61/56.1 59/55.0 83/70.4 45/47.3 45/47.3 46/47.8 43/46.2 43/46.0 49/49.3 3 TOTAL B W O 16 16 17/29.9 17/29.9 37/43.0 37/43.0 40/44.7 40/44.7 26/36.3 26/36.3 33/40.5 33/40.5 33/40.7 33/40.7 31/39.4 31/39.4 4 TOTAL * B W 0 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W O 20 29 28 1 14 14 32/40.2 57/53.5 35/41.9 29/38.1 43/46.3 41/45.0 38/43.5 24/35.3 25/35.5 14/27.2 31/39.4 31/39.4 * Data by race for grade 4 is r This information will be prov 42/45.8 43/46.2 23/34.4 41/45.3 42/45.5 32/40.1 32/40.1 32/40.4 16/29.1 36/42.4 36/42.5 32/40.1 33/40.6 33/40.9 21/33.0 31/39.8 32/40.1 20/32.3 - 62/56.3 62/56.3 36/42.5 36/42.5 vailable at th..\ntime, 'ed at a later date. 42/45.7 42/45.7 49/+9.3 49/49.3 46/47.7 46/47.7 44/46.8 44/46.8 At Grad are coir.  1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives ned and reflect.d as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTL: ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES 'PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B W 0 67 26 40 53/51.5 25/35.9 71/61.5 64/57.6 34/41.1 81/68.4 53/51.6 27/37.0 71/61.7 55/52.6 21/33.0 76/65.0 58/54.3 28/37.7 76/65.0 54/52.0 21/33.3 75/64.0 2 TOTAL B W 0 64 26 35 3 48/49.0 23/34.1 57/59.4 63/56.9 69/60.5 38/43.8 85/71.9 91/77.9 53/51.8 29/38.2 72/62.2 56/53.0 57/53.9 28/38.0 76/64.8 82/69.3 57/53.5 28/37.9 75/64.5 69/60.6 58/54.1 28/37.4 77/65.7 72/62.5 3 TOTAL B W O 70 30 39 1 56/53.1 40/44.5 69/60.5 12/25.3 70/61.3 56/53.3 81/68.2 14/27.2 59/54.9 51/50.4 67/59.3 5/15.4 67/59.5 42/45.9 84/70.7 18/30.7 69/60.4 51/50.4 81/68.8 22/33.7 62/56.2 47/48.3 73/63.1 10/23.0 63/56.8 46/47.7 76/64.7 9/21.8 4 TOTAL * B W 0 5 TOTAL B W 0 6 TOTAL B W 0 70 63 26 37 53 22 31 59/54.7 64/57.8 59/54.7 57/53.7 59/54.6 59/54.6 58/54.3 60/55.4 26/36.1 82/69.4 71/61.9 42/45.7 87/73.4 70/60.8 51/50.3 81/68.4 82/69.5 65/58.0 91/77.7 69/60.4 45/47.5 83/69.7 70/61.0 54/52.3 79/67.1 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. 69/60.2 33/40.7 88/74.4 74/63.5 48/49.1 87/73.8 82/69.6 55/52.6 94/82.0 64/57.4 36/42.5 80/67.9 68/60.1 37/43.0 85/72.1 82/69.3 62/56.3 91/78.5 78/66.0 56/53.1 88/75.2 79/67.1 56/52.9 90/77.2 At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are coral Hied and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTLL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 MABELVALE ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 I 1 TOTAL B W 0 71 35 34 1 36/42.4 26/36.5 47/48.3 80/67.7 34/41.5 26/36.3 44/46.7 44/46.8 43/46.3 36/42.5 50/49.9 74/63.5 37/42.8 27/37.3 48/49.1 54/52.1 33/43.7 32/40.0 45/47.2 76/64 .9 31/39.8 24/34.8 40/44.6 74/63.5 2 TOTAL B W O 75 43 32 37/42.8 26/36.5 53/51.4 49/49.6 39/44.2 63/56.8 42/45.5 33/40.7 54/51.9 34/41.3 23/34.5 51/50.4 39/44.1 30/39.2 51/50.7 37/42.8 27/36.8 52/50.9 3 TOTAL B W O 60 34 25 1 32/39.9 21/33.2 48/48.7 72/62.3 48/48.9 38/43.3 60/55.5 95/84.6 42/45.9 32/39.9 57/53.9 80/67.7 33/40.7 25/35.9 45/47.1 56/53.2 38/43.3 30/38.9 48/49.1 62/56.4 39/44.3 28/37.9 55/52.4 85/71.8 38/43.8 28/37.6 52/51.0 83/70.1 4 TOTAL * B W 0 5 TOTAL B W 0 6 TOTAL B W 0 66 62 36 26 69 44 23 2 35/42.1 48/48.7 36/42.6 37/42.8 39/44.3 38/43.4 36/42.3 35/41.7 27/37.0 46/48.1 41/45.2 37/42.9 47/48.5 52/51.2 47/48.3 60/55.3 42/45.7 31/39.4 59/54.5 41/45.3 34/41.3 51/50.7 38/43.6 31/39.7 48/48.9 38/43.3 30/38.8 49/49.5 36/42.3 29/38.5 49/49.6 45/47.4 45/47.1 38/43.3 56/53.3 66/58.4 41/45.3 34/41.1 56/53.3 47/48.2 50/50.2 45/47.3 59/54.6 73/63.0 45/47.1 42/45.9 47/48.4 64/57.4 41/45.4 35/41.8 53/51.5 58/54.0 41/45.2 35/41.8 52/51.0 60/55.2 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. **At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTLL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AiD EVALUATION STAMFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 MCDERMOTT ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B W 0 72 41 28 3 57/53.8 36/42.7 80/68.0 90/76.7 64/57.5 48/49.0 80/67.9 93/81.7 56/53.3 37/42.8 79/66.8 91/78.5 53/51.4 33/40.8 76/64.6 90/77.3 61/56.1 41/45.0 83/70.0 92/79.0 59/54.6 35/41.9 84/70.5 91/78.7 2 TOTAL B W O 68 36 32 52/50.9 35/42.0 70/60.9 75/64.2 56/53.1 90/77.1 64/57.3 46/47.9 81/68.1 55/52.4 37/43.1 73/62.8 61/55.9 41/45.1 80/68.0 61/56.1 40/44.7 82/69.1 3 TOTAL B W O 60 28 31 1 60/55.2 46/48.0 71/61.9 58/54.2 74/63.6 64/57.4 83/69.8 56/53.2 66/58.7 53/51.3 78/65.9 43/46.3 60/55.5 42/45.9 75/64.1 81/68.5 65/58.3 49/49.6 79/66.8 66/58.7 69/60.5 56/53.1 80/67.4 58/54.2 69/60.5 54/52.2 81/68.2 62/56.4 4 TOTAL * B W 0 66 57/53.5 66/58.9 52/50.8 52/51.1 51/50.6 58/54.2 56/53.1 5 TOTAL B W O 74 40 34 49/49.5 32/39.9 71/61.5 56/53.4 46/47.9 69/60.2 56/52.9 45/47.2 68/59.9 52/51.2 39/44.0 58/59.8 51/50.6 41/45.3 63/57.0 53/51.5 40/44.6 67/59.5 53/51.4 40/44.4 68/59.7 6 TOTAL B W 0 63 44 16 3 47/48.2 39/43.9 71/61.8 32/40.1 I 56/53.4 51/50.3 68/60.0 74/63.7 45/47.1 39/44.2 58/54.4 54/52.3 48/49.1 39/44.2 66/58.7 84/70.5 52/50.8 46/48.0 64/57.5 64/57.3 51/50.7 45/47.3 67/59.5 60/55.2 50/50.1 43/46.4 67/59.4 63/56.7 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at thi2 time. This information will be provided at a later date. **At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: GRADE/RACE 1 TOTAL B W 0 2 TOTAL B W O 3 TOTAL B W O 4 TOTAL * B W O 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W O * LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 71 45 25 62 40 22 55 37 18 58 47 27 20 46 34 12 35/42.1 28/37.5 51/50.6 39/44.2 34/41.5 50/50.0 27/37.3 23/34.4 38/43.6 25/35.9 19/31.2 41/45.2 35/41.8 28/37.7 49/49.5 31/39.8 26/36.3 44/46.7 32/40.0 25/35.7 46/48.1 28/38.0 25/35.8 36/42.6 34/41.1 32/40.2 18/30.6 56/53.2 49/49.5 41/45.3 71/61.4 49/49.4 47/48.5 52/50.9 37/43.2 32/40.2 48/48.7 27/36.8 23/34.3 34/41.3 37/43.1 31/39.7 49/49.3 34/41.4 28/37.4 47/48.6 40/44.6 37/43.1 46/48.0 38/43.5 37/43.2 39/44.1 28/37.8 25/35.6 36/42.5 30/39.0 28/38.0 34/41.2 34/41.2 31/39.8 39/44.1 31/39.7 29/38.1 37/42.8 43/46.3 34/41.1 21/32.7 54/52.3 52/51.0 49/49.6 60/55.1 36/42.7 46/47.6 44/4b.7 37/43.2 37/43.1 43/46.5 28/37.6 66/58.5 46/47.6 41/45.1 59/54.8 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. 36/42.6 18/30.6 66/58.8 50/49.9 43/46.4 68/60.0 35/42.0 24/34.9 53/51.6 34/41.3 20/32.6 56/53.1 33/40.6 19/31.3 56/53.3 63/56.8 54/52.2 83/70.0 51/50.3 46/47.8 64/57.4 51/50.7 46/47.7 67/59.2 **At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: GRADE/RACE 1 TOTAL B W 0 2 TOTAL B W O 3 TOTAL B W O 4 TOTAL * B W O 5 TOTAL B W o 6 TOTAL B W 0 * LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVAIVATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 MITCHELL ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 40 38 2 43 41 2 39, 35 3 1 41 24 23 1 38 38 32/40.1 31/39.6 49/49.6 20/32.0 21/32.9 4/13.8 25/35.9 23/34.1 58/54.4 42/45.8 26/36.3 27/37.1 25/36.4 55/52.6 29/38.3 29/38.3 30/39.1 30/38.7 43/46.3 48/49.0 49/49.5 31/39.6 46/40.1 44/47.0 73/62.9 43/46.3 37/42.8 56/53.1 56.53.4 44/46.8 42/45.9 42/45.9 30.38.8 29/38.4 44/47.0 31/39.7 32/40.0 21/33.0 34/41.3 31/39.5 75/64.2 26/36.5 25/35.9 43/46.3 40/44.7 94/82.7 33/40.9 33/40.9 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at th..s time. This information will be provided at a later date. 2 i/32.9 20/31.9 55/52.6 31/39.5 30/38.8 54/52.1 26/36.3 25/35.6 49/49.4 26/36.3 25/35.6 52/50.9 29/38.2 25/35.7 71/61.5 65/58.1 42/45.9 39/44.1 78/65.9 49/49.5 26/36.7 29/38.2 35/41.6 -) 4/41.0 66/58.7 50/-.9.8 49/49.6 59/54.8 43/46.2 43/46.2 39/44.2 39/44.2 29/38.6 30/39.2 12/25.3 32/40.0 28/37.9 73/62.6 40/44.7 29/38.2 42/45.6 41/45.0 67/59.3 36/42.6 36/42.6 26/36.2 26/36.7 12/25.2 30/39.2 27/37.1 71/61.8 42/45.8 26/36.7 42/45.5 40/44.9 67/59.3 36/42.2 36/42.2 J At Grad 1 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are com'Aned and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTLL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 OTTER CREEK ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY * 1 TOTAL B W 0 2 TOTAL B W 0 3 TOTAL B W O 4 TOTAL * B W O 5 TOTAL B W 0 6 TOTAL B W 0 65 34 31 46 15 31 48. 2'1 26 1 49 46 25 21 52 23 28 1 56/52.9 44/46.7 67/59.4 56/53.2 34/41.2 78/65.9 47/48.6 29/38.5 67/59.4 38/43.5 22/33.7 58/54.2 59/54.6 42/45.7 75/64.0 54/51.9 38/43.3 70/61.3 49/49.3 31/39.8 58/54.3 72/62.3 44/47.0 83/70.0 57/53.6 39/44.0 66/58.4 53/51.5 25/35.9 66/58.8 56/53.2 32/40.4 67/59.5 57/53.6 30/39.2 69/60.6 54/52.0 35/41.7 69/60.7 40/44.7 71/61.9 51/50.3 85/71.4 68/59.9 65/57.9 44/47.0 79/66.9 51/50.5 48/48.8 32/40.4 61/55.9 31/39.6 54/52.2 37/43.1 68/59.9 40/44.7 64/57.3 43/46.2 78/66.4 58/54.2 60/55.5 39/44.3 76/64.8 52/51.1 55/52.4 63/57.0 60/55.2 53/51.6 57/53.8 57/53.6 56/53.2 38/43.4 24/34.9 57/53.5 67/59.2 53/51.5 81/68.5 61/55.9 44/46.7 79/67.0 49/49.4 36/42.3 64/57.7 52/70.9 41/45.0 65/58.0 53/51.5 38/43.8 69/60.6 52/51.2 37/43.1 69/60.7 63/57.0 35/42.0 82/69.5 48/48.9 72/62.2 49/49.2 86/73.1 62/56.4 58/54.1 32/40.4 77/65.3 56/53.2 64/57.8 41/45.0 81/68.5 54/52.1 I 66/58.9 41/45.0 84/70.6 49/49.5 66/58.4 40/44.5 83/70.2 48/48.9 66 /58.7 39/44.1 84/71.1 48/48.9 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflec i as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTLL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHxEVEHENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE S^'LENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B W O 71 37 32 2 32/40.1 16/29.1 58/54.0 20/32.0 49/49.5 26/36.5 74/63.8 80/67.8 49/49.6 26/36.7 74/63.7 80/67.4 45/47.2 20/32.4 76/65.0 39/44.3 41/45.0 20/31.9 68/59.8 48/48.9 42/45.5 18/30.5 73/62.8 42/45.6 2 TOTAL B W O 46 20 25 1 46/47.9 20/32.5 68/59.9 58/54.2 70/60.8 46/47.7 83/69.7 99/99.0 53/51.7 33/40.9 69/60.3 52/51.1 52/50.8 29/38.1 71/61.6 28/37.7 54/52.1 28/37.7 74/63.2 72/62.3 55/52.8 27/36.9 76/65.1 70/61.0 3 TOTAL B W O 41, 19 21 1 50/49.9 28/37.8 68/59.6 88/74.7 71/61.8 49/49.5 85/72.0 92/79.6 64/57.6 45/47.3 78/65.9 93/81.1 60/55.3 39/44.0 77/65.4 69/60.4 57/53.5 40/44.7 70/61.0 72/62.3 63/56.8 41/45.1 78/66.5 90/77.0 62/56.3 39/44.0 78/66.4 38/74.7 4 TOTAL * B W O 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W O 47 41 22 18 1 33 21 12 48/49.1 57/53.8 42/45.5 46/47.8 49/49.5 49/49.2 47/48.5 37/43.2 21/33.1 59/54.7 66/58.7 37/42.8 28/37.5 54/52.1 55/52.4 42/45.5 65/58.2 99/99.0 49/49.4 38/43.5 62/56.2 65/58.1 44/46.6 25/35.7 65/58.2 90/77.0 47/48.5 34/''.0 62/j6.4 83/70.1 44/47.0 31/39.3 59/55.0 84/70.9 44/46.9 28/38.0 62/56.2 88/74.7 35/41.6 26/36.6 51/50.5 40/44.9 30/38.7 61/55.8 38/43.8 30/39.0 54/52.1 47/48.6 41/45.3 59/54.5 37/43.0 28/37.7 54/52.1 36/42.7 28/37.5 54/51.9 Data by race for grade 4 is vailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PEt'CENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 SCHOOL: RIGHTSELL ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B W 0 39 38 43/46.2 43/46.5 46/47.9 46/48.0 32/40.4 33/40.8 25/35.9 26/36.2 40/44.7 41/45.0 39/44.0 40/44.4 2 TOTAL B W 0 33 32 45/47.1 45/47.2 71/61.5 70/61.0 66/58.7 66/58.7 44/46.9 45/47.2 57/53.8 57/53.8 58/54.1 58/54.1 3 TOTAL B W O 3,8 37 1 4 TOTAL * B W 0 33 32/40.2 32/39.9 53/51.6 26/36.2 45/48.1 45/47.1 95/84.6 53/51.6 42/45.7 41/45.0 84/70.9 37/42.8 24/35.2 23/34.7 56/53.2 2//35.1 30/38.8 29/38.4 55/52.6 31/39.4 38/43.8 38/43.3 75/64.2 36/42.4 34/41.5 34/41.0 73/62.9 32/40.1 5 TOTAL B W 0 42 42 21/33.1 21/33.1 40/44.7 40/44.7 37/43.1 37/43.1 26/37.9 z 7737.9 37/43.2 37/43.2 30/38.8 30/38.8 29/38.4 29/38.4 6 TOTAL B W 0 1 33 33 34/41.0 34/41.0 49/49.5 49/49.5 42/45.6 42/45.6 26/42.3 -3/42.3 41/45.2 41/45.2 43/46.0 43/46.0 40/44.6 40/44.6 * Data by race for grade 4 is ur',vailable at thij time. This information will be provided at a later date. At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are com)' led and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 ROCKEFELLER ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B W O 62 41 20 1 42/45.8 37/43.0 52/51.0 64/57.5 50/50.1 45/47.1 61/56.0 59/54.8 51/50.3 46/47.8 59/54.8 70/61.0 33/40.8 26/36.7 49/49.3 35/41.9 46/48.1 41/45.1 57/53.6 68/59.9 42/45.5 37/42.8 51/50.7 63/57.0 2 TOTAL B W 0 41 29 10 2 28/37.8 23/34.6 43/46.3 34/41.0 42/45.9 38/43.5 56/52.9 40/44.6 44/46.9 38/43.5 58/54.0 68/59.6 30/38.9 23/34.2 54/52.2 26/36.7 31/39.8 25/36.0 51/50.3 36/42.4 30/39.2 24/34.8 53/51.3 35/41.8 3 TOTAL B W O 39 2'6 12 1 20/32.2 13/26.0 38/43.8 69/60.4 36/42.7 33/40.5 43/46.4 67/59.3 35/41.6 26/36.4 54/52.1 63/57.0 20/31.9 16/29.4 24/34.9 61/55.9 27/37.2 22/33.9 38/43.3 38/43.6 28/37.6 21/33.2 41/45.2 66/58.7 25/35.7 18/31.0 39/44.0 63/57.0 4 TOTAL * B W O 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W 0 38 38 32 5 1 36 27 9 29/38.4 38/43.4 25/35.6 26/36.7 31/39.3 28/37.8 26/36.3 30/39.2 28/38.0 39/44.0 55/52.6 37/42.9 32/40.3 53/51.6 49/49.7 46/47.7 71/61.4 63/57.0 41/45.1 36/42.6 63/56.9 75/64.2 43/46.2 38/43.8 66/58.8 66/58.7 34/41.0 32/40.0 40/44.6 59/54.8 36/42.4 33/40.7 52/50.9 62/56.4 35/41.8 32/40.0 52/51.0 62/56.4 48/48.7 43/46.1 64/57.3 38/43.8 34/41.1 55/52.7 48/49.0 45/47.3 58/54.2 56/53.4 50/49.9 75/64.1 45/47.4 40/44.9 59/54.9 45/47.5 40/44.8 61/55.7 * Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL\nGRADE/RACE 1 TOTAL B W 0 2 TOTAL B W O 3 TOTAL B W O 4 TOTAL * B W O 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W O LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVAI.OATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 ROMINE ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 46 40 6 49 47 2 44 38 6 45 36 32 4 40 35 4 1 39/44.3 37/43.0 55/52.8 63/57.1 62/56.2 73/62.7 47/48.3 45/47.5 58/54.3 44/46.7 41/45.3 61/56.0 49/49.4 46/48.1 66/58.6 49/49.3 47/48.2 63/56.8 19/31.3 19/31.2 22/33.4 32/40.0 29/38.6 49/49.4 39/44.1 41/45.2 40/44.9 45/47.2 40/44.4 36/42.5 73/62.8 23/34.4 33/40.8 34/41.5 11/24.0 34/41.3 34/41.4 30/39.2 29/38.2 28/37.4 62/56.4 27/36.8 27/37.1 16/29.4 25/36.0 26/36.3 16/29.4 49/49.3 50/50.1 39/44.3 47/48.4 47/48.5 46/47.7 40/44.7 39/44.0 48/49.0 42/45.8 42/45.9 40/44.7 42/45.5 41/45.4 43/46.1 40/44.6 40/44.4 42/45.7 53/51.8 43/46.0 42/45.7 48/48.8 47/48.6 45/47.1 78/66.5 17/29.9 46/47.7 45/47.3 45/47.2 48/48.7 40/44.6 40/44.6 52/51.0 3/20.4 * Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. 38/43.7 37/42.9 45/47.2 41/45.4 I 40/44.9 41/45.0 39/44.1 38/43.5 36/42.7 50/50.0 40/44.7 40/44.5 42/45.7 39/43.9 38/43.7 42/45.6 43/46.2 40/44.5 74/63.3 32/40.1 59/54.9 55/52.7 90/77.0 35/41.9 43/46.4 40/44.9 72/62.5 19/31.5 44/46.8 41/45.2 76/64.7 20/32.3 At Grades 1 and 2 the SC EHCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are conC'ned and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 SCHOOL: STEPHENS ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B W O 38 37 1 22/33.8 22/33.8 23/34.4 42/45.5 41/45.4 52/51.1 35/41.8 35/41.6 53/51.6 23/34.5 23/34.7 14/27.2 31/39.6 31/39.6 35/41.9 24/35.3 24/35.2 25/35.8 2 TOTAL B W O 32 32 27/37.3 27/37.3 26/36.2 26/36.2 33/40.5 33/40.5 24/35.2 24/35.2 21/33.3 21/33.3 22/34.0 22/34.0 3 TOTAL B W O V 21 20/32.6 20/32.6 43/46.1 43/46.1 35/42.0 35/42.0 29/38.5 29/38.5 36/42.3 36/42.3 33/40.5 33/40.5 31/39.7 31/39.7 4 TOTAL 2 24/35.4 34/41.4 38/43.6 27/36.8 35/41.9 49/49.7 47/48.3 * B W O 5 TOTAL B W O 39 39 17/30.2 17/30.2 35/42.0 35/42.0 34/41.3 34/41.3 32/40.4 32/40.4 32/40.2 32/40.2 26/36.2 26/36.2 26/36.2 26/36.2 6 TOTAL B W 0 30 28 1 1 33/40.9 29/38.2 73/62.9 98/93.3 40/44.9 35/41.6 94/82.7 99/99.0 37/42.9 35/42.0 33/40.7 84/70.9 38/43.3 34/41.4 54/52.1 97/89.6 42/45.5 37/42.9 89/75.8 96/36.9 36/42.3 31/39.7 76/64.9 98/93.3 35/41.8 30/39.2 76/64.9 98/93.3 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTL\n. ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 TERRY ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B W O 67 26 37 4 63/57.1 51/50.6 69/60.7 79/67.2 68/60.1 48/48.8 81/68.6 75/64.0 51/50.7 36/42.7 62/56.6 61/56.0 50/50.2 3 '43.3 62/56.6 34/41.3 65/58.1 49/49.3 74/63.6 75/64.0 61/55.6 43/46.2 71/61.6 69/60.7 2 TOTAL B W 0 68 28 39 1 47/48.3 27/37.3 59/54.9 97/89.6 67/59.2 49/49.7 76/64.9 99/99.0 59/55.0 40/44.8 70/61.2 99/99.0 46/48.0 33/40.8 54/52.2 95/84.6 55/52.6 35/41.7 67/59.2 99/99.0 54/52.2 33/40.8 67/59.3 99/99.0 3 TOTAL B W 0 73 33 39 63/56.8 44/46.8 78/65.9 70/61.3 56/53.2 81/68.7 70/61.1 56/53.1 81/68.2 62/56.6 46/47.9 75/64.5 66/58.9 49/49.3 80/67.6 68/60.0 52/50.8 81/68.3 68/59.9 50/50.0 82/69.0 4 TOTAL * B W 0 5 TOTAL B W 0 6 TOTAL B W 0 79 78 45 32 1 74 34 37 3 53/51.8 66/58.4 54/51.9 47/48.5 54/52.2 56/53.2 54/52.1 45/47.3 30/38.8 68/59.9 11/24.2 47/48.3 36/42.7 63/56.9 12/25.3 47/48.2 34/41.4 65/58.2 24/35.1 47/48.5 32/40.4 69/60.6 15/28.2 48/n9.0 38/43.7 63/57.2 18/30.7 46/47.7 32/40.4 66/58.6 11/24.2 46/47.6 31/39.8 67/59.3 9/21.8 67/59.0 50/50.0 79/67.3 67/59.2 74/63.7 65/58.0 82/69.1 70/60.8 63/57.2 51/50.7 73/62.8 71/61.4 73/61.4 54/52.0 84/70.6 61/55.8 70/60.8 52/50.9 84/70.5 56/53.4 i 71/61.4 59/54.6 80/68.0 64/57.7 71/61.7 57/53.9 82/69.3 63/57.2 * Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. **At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 WAKEFIELD ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B W o 71 55 16 1 31/39.5 31/39.3 32/40.3 29/38.3 29/38.6 27/36.8 41/45.0 -0- 24 /34 .8 23/34 .3 28/37.5 8/20.4 17/30.0 16/28.8 23/34 .7 7/18.9 28/37.6 26/36.5 34/41.4 -0- 21/32.9 18/30.5 33/40.8 -0- 2 TOTAL B W O 58 33 23 2 34/41.0 23/34 .4 46/48.1 80/-67.9 48/48.9 38/43.3 57/53.8 94/82.6 38/43.8 31/39.7 46/47.9 72/62.0 32/40.0 23/34.6 43/46.4 52/51 . 0 37/43.0 27/37.3 47/48.4 89/75.3 36/42.6 26/36.4 48/48.7 88/74 .5 3 TOTAL B W O 64 39 25 34/41.1 28/37.6 44/46.7 46/47.7 40/44 .4 56/53.0 41/45.4 32/40.0 57/53.7 34/41.0 27/37.3 44/46.8 38/43.3 31/39.4 49/49.3 39/44.3 33/40.5 50/50.2 37/43.0 30/38.9 49/49.3 4 TOTAL * B W 0 63 39/44 .3 50/50.0 46/47.8 42/45.6 46/47.7 43/46.3 42/45.7 5 TOTAL B W O 66 52 13 1 25/35.9 1''/31.7 53/51.7 45/47.4 34/41.2 27/37.2 60/55.1 83/70.1 35/41.6 28/37.9 61/55.6 57/53.7 32/40.3 26/36.1 60/55.3 70/61.0 33/40.9 30/38.7 48/48.9 49/49.5 29/38.3 23/34 . 1 56/53.2 70/61.0 28/37.8 22/33.5 56/53.2 68/59.9 6 TOTAL B W O 78 56 20 2 37/42.9 32/40.2 49/49.3 54/52.0 49/49.3 44/46.6 60/55.2 74/63.6 46/47.7 37/42.8 68/59.6 66/58.7 45/47.4 37/43.2 64/57.6 71/61.8 49/49.5 43/46.0 66/58.8 58/54.2 43/46.4 38/43.3 58/54.0 64/57.6 43/46.2 36/42.7 59/55.0 63/57.2 * Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTLL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANF/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 WASHINGTON MAGNET ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY * 1 TOTAL B W 0 ? TOTAL B W 0 3 TOTAL B W O 4 TOTAL * B W 0 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W O 152 98 53 1 124 71 49 4 10 2 5'6 46 111 95 53 4 1 1 89 51 37 1 49/49.7 35/41.8 75/64 . 2 80/67.7 65/58.0 52/50.9 84/71.2 94/82.7 61/55.7 43/46.3 86/73.0 99/99.0 57/53.5 45/47.4 76/65.1 83/70.1 * X 59/54.9 43/46.2 84/70.5 91/78.2 55/52.8 38/43.6 82/69 . 3 91/78.2 41/45.3 25/35.7 65/58.3 6 1 /-5 5 . 8 70/60.8 48/48.8 90/77.4 85/71.8 60/55.4 38/43.3 86/72.6 66/58.7 52/51.1 29/38.4 80/67.6 87/73.3 51/50.6 29/38.6 79/67.0 72/62.0 52/51.2 29/38.5 81/68.6 75/64 .5 38/43.7 17/30.1 68/59.8 50/49.9 35/41.8 17/30. 1 63/57.0 51/50.5 51/50.6 30/39.0 78/65.9 86/72.8 55/52.8 36/42.5 77/65.3 63/56.7 63/57 . 1 48/49.0 80/67.4 86/72.8 63/57.1 50/49.8 79/66.7 90/77.0 47/48.5 27/36.8 73/62.8 47/48.6 46/48.1 31/39.8 66/58.5 72/62.3 53/51.6 39/44 .3 70/61.0 91/78.2 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. 44/46.8 23/34 .7 71/61.5 45/47.2 24/35.0 72/62.0 46/47.7 25/35.6 72/62.5 44/46.7 22/34.0 72/62.0 52/50.8 50/50.0 30/39.1 74 '63.5 95/84 .6 60/55.3 40/44.4 82/69.2 99/99.0 55/52.4 52/51.0 51/50.5 46/47.7 31/39.6 65/58.0 66/58.7 59/54 . 5 43/46.4 76/64.9 89/75.8 46/47.9 29/38.4 68/59.9 65/58.1 56/53.0 39/44 . 1 76/64 .7 90/77.0 46/47.9 28/37.6 70/60.9 71/61.7 56/53.4 38/43.5 78/66.2 94/82.7 At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 WATSON ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B W O 64 47 17 27/37.0 24/34.9 37/42.8 33/40.5 30/38.9 41/45.2 23/34.1 20/32.4 30/38.8 23/34.4 20/32.5 32/40.1 27/36.9 23/34.3 39/44.0 24/35.4 22/33.7 32/40.3 2 TOTAL B W O 48 37 9 34/41.4 30/38.8 55/52.4 46/47.6 43/46.1 59/54.5 44/4' . 6 38/43.5 66/58.7 31/39.5 24/35.1 61/56.0 40/44.6 36/42. 62/56.2 39/44.0 34/41.3 64/57.3 3 TOTAL B N O 44 29 15 24/35.2 15/27.7 48/48.8 47/48.2 35/41.7 69/60.4 31/39.4 21/32.7 54/52.0 33/40.7 20/32.6 61/55.0 33/40.5 25/35.9 49/49.2 33/40.9 22/33.8 59/54.5 31/39.7 20/32.2 58/54.3 4 TOTAL * B W 0 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W 0 65 55 42 12 1 69 43 25 38/43.3 46/48.1 40/44.6 48/49.0 44/47.0 40/44.6 40/44.4 I 39/43.9 40/44.4 37/43.1 18/30.7 52/51.1 38/43.8 73/62.8 58/54.1 57/53.6 62/56.6 39/44.1 58/54.3 47/48.5 74/63.4 48/49.1 47/48.6 53/51.8 26/36.5 50/49.8 41/45.2 64/57.3 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. 45/47.3 46/47.9 44/46.8 16/29.1 47/48.6 36/42.3 67/59.2 44/4 6.9 4 7.0 44/47.0 35/41.9 46/47.7 46/48.0 46/47.8 24/35.1 45/47.2 46/47.6 44/46.9 23/34.4 53/51.6 43/46.0 70/61-.0 54/51.9 43/46.1 71/61.5 53/51.3 40/44.9 71/61.9 **At Grades 1 and 2 the SCI2NCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 WESTERN HILLS ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** I GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY A 1 TOTAL B W O 2 TOTAL B W 0 3 TOTAL B W 0 4 TOTAL \u0026gt;( B W 0 5 TOTAL B W o 6 TOTAL B W 0 44 24 20 44 25 17 1 45 '27 18 51 51 34 17 50 28 22 46/48.1 35/41.8 61/55.8 41/45.3 29/38.1 57/53.9 43/46.0 29/38.4 60/55.1 29/38.4 20/32.6 41/45.4 50/50.1 41/45.0 62/56.2 43/46.3 29/38.5 61/55.7 45/47.1 34/41.5 57/53.9 54/5-2.1 46/47.6 33/40.7 64/57.8 35/41.9 35/41.8 26/36.2 56/52.9 60/55.1 46/47.8 75/64.4 65/58.1 56/53.0 81/68.4 63/57.0 63/56.7 50/50.1 81/68.1 81/68.5 47/48.2 34/41.0 67/59.3 68/59.9 52/51.1 41/45.4 71/61.7 60/55.3 52/51.0 40/44.8 72/62.2 63/57.0 69/60.6 59/54.9 82/69.2 53/51.6 39/44.3 73/62.7 44/46.7 33/40.7 61/55.6 42/45.6 34/41.2 54/52.3 57/53.6 44/47.0 74/63.5 53/51.5 40/44.7 71/61.8 54/52.0 37/42.9 38/43.5 39/44.1 41/45.0 39/43.9 53/51.8 45/47.3 69/60.7 45/47.2 36/42.6 62/56.4 41/45.0 30/38.9 63/57.2 45/47.4 36/42.6 63/56.9 41/45.1 32/40.2 59/54.9 40/44.7 31/39.4 60/55.4 60/55.2 55/52.5 65/58.6 56/53.0 49/49.4 64/57.6 61/55.9 52/50.9 72/52.4 64/57.8 53/51.6 77/65.7 60/55.4 52/50.9 70/61.0 60/55.5 51/50.4 72/62.0 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 WILLIAMS MAGNET ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY  1 TOTAL B W O 2 TOTAL B W 0 3 TOTAL B W o 4 TOTAL * B W 0 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W O 65 38 25 2 65 35 29 1 60 33 27 68 89 47 4 1 1 69 40 29 82/69.5 74/63.5 91/77.8 92/79.4 69/60.3 54/52.1 82/69.6 9 0 /-7 7.0 68/60.0 56/53.2 81/68.3 70/60.8 63/56.9 46/48.1 78/66.1 98/93.3 81/68.2 76/64.7 86/73 . 1 82/69.0 76/64.8 89/75.5 82/69.0 76/64 .7 68/59.7 85/71.4 88/75.2 62/56.4 48/48.7 81/68.3 61/55.9 83/69.9 75/64.5 90/77.3 91/78.8 80/67.8 72/62.1 89/75.9 90/76.6 82/69.6 76/64 . 6 88/74 .8 98/93.3 83/69.8 77/65.2 89/75.3 81/68.7 81/68.6 69/60.3 90/77.3 99/99.0 81/68.4 72/62.2 90/76.9 81/68.2 71/61.5 89/76.0 92/79.6 78/65.9 74/63.4 82/69.1 72/62.0 70/61.3 59/54.6 81/68.5 92/79.6 75/63.9 70/61.1 80/67.8 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. 81/68.6 72/62.3 90/76.6 62/56.4 67/59.3 54/52.2 80/67.9 74/63.8 77/65.3 62/56.6 88/74.4 99/99.0 73/62.9 67/59.0 81/68.4 * * 74/63.7 64/57.7 84/71.0 69/60.6 71/61.9 59/54.6 82/69.3 99/99.0 80/68.0 76/64 .9 86/72.4 78/65.9 66/58.5 87/74.1 95/84.6 79/67.3 68/59.7 89/75.8 95/84.6 77/65.8 69/60.3 86/72.6 77/65.6 67/59.5 86/73.0 73/62.9 74/63.3 72/62.3 57/53.8 84/71.2 99/99.0 81/68.7 76/64.7 88/74.2 74/63.5 59/54 .5 86/72.9 99/99.0 82/69.0 76/64.9 88/74.6 **At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIEHCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.SCHOOL: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 WILSON ELEMENTARY ENVIRONMENT** GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B W 0 44 33 11 84/70.7 84/71.1 83/69.7 71/61.8 69/60.7 76/64.9 67/59.2 66/58.8 69/60.5 41/45.2 38/43.8 49/49.4 75/64.2 75/64.2 75/64.5 68/59.9 67/59.4 71/61.6 2 TOTAL B W O 63 36 27 52/50.9 47/48.4 58/54.2 69/60.2 67/59.2 71/61.5 56/52.9 51/50.3 62/56.5 41/45.2 39/43.9 44/46.9 58/54 .3 54/52.1 63/57.2 58/54.1 54/52.0 63/57.0 3 TOTAL B W O . 55 '4 0 13 2 37/43.2 35/41.7 46/47.8 36/42.6 55/52.5 51/50.7 61/56.0 74/63.4 49/49.3 45/47.5 56/53.2 71/61.4 40/44 .5 34/41.2 54/52.2 73/62.9 45/47.1 41/45.3 54/51.9 59/54.5 46/48.1 43/46.5 53/51.7 58/54.0 45/47.3 41/45.1 56/53.0 59/54 .8 4 TOTAL * B W 0 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W 0 45 48 42 6 42 32 10 35/42. 1 27/37.0 25/35.8 42/45.6 40/44.5 32/40.1 64/57.6 48/49.1 45/47.1 40/44 .8 36/42.2 41/45.1 38/43.7 39/44.2 38/43.4 49/49.7 55/52.8 54/52.3 58/54 . 3 34/41.0 32/40 . 1 44/47.0 42/45.6 39/44.0 51/50.5 Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be prov'ded at a later date. 31/39.6 31/39.5 33/40.7 37/43.1 33/40.9 51/50.4 32 /'iO . 1 32/ 10.1 31/39.8 49/49.4 45/47 . 1 63/57,1 32/40.1 30/39.2 43/46.4 46/48.0 43/46.4 55/52.8 30/39.1 29/38.4 39/44.1 44/47.0 41/45.1 56/53.3 *At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.LITTLr\nROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION SCHOOL: STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 LANGUAGE ENVIRONMENT** SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 1 TOTAL B W O 22 13 9 35/41.6 22/33.5 56/53.4 37/43.2 24/34 .9 60/55.1 31/39.8 16/29.4 59/54.9 27/37.0 17/30.1 45/47.1 30/39.2 14/27.6 61/55.9 28/37.9 14/27.3 56/53.3 2 TOTAL B W 0 20 12 8 24/35.3 19/31.6 33/40.9 39/44 . 1 30/39 . 1 53/51.7 28/37.4 17/29.5 49/49.3 30/38.7 22/33.4 44/46.8 fr -k 31/39.7 26/36.6 40/44 .4 26/36.5 18/31.0 40/44.6 3 TOTAL B W 0 23 17 6 32/40 ..3 24/35.2 59/54.8 4 3/46.0 36/42.6 61/55.6 45/47.5 34/41.5 75/64.2 30/38.9 22/33.8 56/53.4 37/43.0 32/39.9 53/51.6 38/43.7 31/39.3 61/56.1 35/42.1 28/37.4 60/55.4 4 TOTAL * B W 0 5 TOTAL B W O 6 TOTAL B W O 35 26 16 9 1 34 20 14 30/38.7 31/39.7 25/35.7 40/44.7 66/58.7 31/39.6 21/32.7 49/49.4 47/48.5 67/59.2 60/55.5 74/63.3 93/81.1 46/48 . 1 41/45.4 54/51.9 34/41.2 33/40.7 39/44.1 35/41.8 33/40.7 48/49.1 44/46.8 57/53.7 38/43.6 39/44.3 36/42.4 45/47.4 42/45.8 48/48.8 42/45.9 55/52.7 66/58.7 46/47.7 39/44.1 54/52.1 76/64 .9 45/47.2 38/43.6 54/52.0 73/62.9 40/44.4 29/38.6 55/52.8 40/44.7 33/40.5 51/50.7 49/49.5 42/45.5 60/55.3 39/44.0 31/39.7 50/50.0 38/43.7 30/39.2 50/50.2 * Data by race for grade 4 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date. **At Grades 1 and 2 the SCIENCE and SOCIAL SCIENCE objectives are combined and reflected as one score under ENVIRONMENT.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION GRADE/RACE * 7 TOTAL B W 0 8 TOTAL B W 0 9 TOTAL B W 0 STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, NATIONAl PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE SCHOOL: CLOVERDALE JR. HIGH SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE 181 205 156 48 1 19 4 129 62 3 32/40.3 34/41.3 35/41.9 EIGHTH EDITION EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCIENCE 34/11.0 SOCIAL SCIENCE 36/42.3 BASIC BATTERY 35/42.1 COMPLETE BATTERY 35/41.6 34/41.4 28/37.9 55/52.7 84/70.9 30/38.7 25/35.9 45/47.1 99/99.0 40/44. 8 35/41.6 58/54.2 99/99.0 38/43.5 32/40.3 57/53.6 67/59.3 38/43.5 33/40.5 56/53.2 78/66.3 33/40.5 28/37.5 49/49.2 97/89.6 32/40. 1 27/36.8 49/49.7 97/89,6 36/42.6 30/38.8 52/51.1 23/34 . .3 27/37.0 22/33.5 39/43.9 35/4 2.1 47/48.3 40/44.8 61/55.9 37/42.8 41/45.2 36/42.6 52/50.8 31/39.4 41/45.3 35/42.1 54/52.0 38/43.8 39/44.0 33/40.6 53/51.3 36/42.4 39/44 . 1 33/40.7 53/51.4 35/41.6 * Data by race for grade 7 Is unavailable at this time. This information will be j covided at a later date.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EV.'-LUATION GRADE/RACE * 7 TOTAL B W O 8 TOTAL B W o 9 TOTAL B W 0 STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE SCHOOL: NUMBER TESTED 239 229 126 101 2 121 84 37 SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH TOTAL READING 55/52.8 53/51.8 38/43.3 72/62.1 86/72.6 34/41.1 24/34.8 61/56.1 TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE 59/54.9 54/52.2 EIGHTH EDITION EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 56/53.2 59/54.6 59/54.5 59/54.6 46/47.7 34/41.4 59/54.9 97/90.0 59/54.6 45/47.2 74/63.4 94/83.2 55/52.7 39/44.2 73/62.6 96/85.8 57/53.7 37/43.1 78/66.2 97/90.1 52/51.0 37/43.1 69/60.2 97/90.1 53/51.5 36/42.2 72/62.3 99/96.2 28/37.6 18/31.0 55/52.8 43/46.3 33/40.7 67/59.5 44/46.9 32/40.2 72/62.3 39/44.2 27/37.0 70/60.9 36/42.6 25/35.8 66/58.6 38/43.3 25/35.8 69/60.4 * Data by race for grade 7 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVAI,UATION GRADE/RACE * 7 TOTAL B W O 8 TOTAL B W O STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL: NUMBER TESTED 205 181 120 54 7 SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH TOTAL READING 46/48.1 32/39.9 21/32.8 63/56.8 66/58.7 TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY 47/48.4 47/48.3 42/45.9 51/50.4 50/50.2 50/49.9 9 TOTAL B W O 188 124 61 3 46/48.0 35/41.9 69/60.3 50/49.8 * 38/43.3 27/37.0 62/56.2 81/68.2 37/43.0 26/36.1 61/55.7 72/62.5 42/45.7 32/39.9 65/58.0 81/68.1 43/46.4 32/40.4 69/60.2 72/62.0 41/45.1 29/38.2 69/60.2 73/63.1 39/44.1 27/36.9 63/57.2 76/65.1 39/43.9 26/36.2 65/58.1 78/66.0 56/53.1 47/48.4 72/62.3 70/61.1 57/53.7 44/47.0 78/66.0 79/66.7 49/49.7 40/44.6 66/58.6 83/70.0 50/50.0 39/43.9 72/62.2 64/57.4 50/50.2 38/43.5 74/63.4 70/61.1 Data by race for grade 7 is unavailable at this time. This information will be provided at a later date.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST, EIGHTH EDITION NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK/NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENT SCORES (PR/NCE) SCHOOL SUMMARY 1992 SCHOOL: HENPFRSON JR HIGH GRADE/RACE NUMBER TESTED TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE BASIC BATTERY COMPLETE BATTERY * 7 TOTAL B W 0 216 31/39.3 40/44.9 34/41.0 33/40.9 36/42.5 38/43.7 37/43.0 8 TOTAL B W 0 199 162 33 4 34/41.3 27/37.0 67/59.3 90/76.6 39/44.2 34/41.3 58/54.1 95/83.9 42/45.8 35/41.7 72/62.0 94/82.8 39/44.0 32/40.4 65/58.1 92/79.1 42/45.8 35/41.7 70/61.3\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1510","title":"Testing: Metropolitan Achievement Tests (MAT-6), comparative data, Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1988/1991"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Standards","Educational statistics","School integration","School management and organization","Students"],"dcterms_title":["Testing: Metropolitan Achievement Tests (MAT-6), comparative data, Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1510"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["118 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_799","title":"Court filings: Court of Appeals, ruling, 833 F.2d 112","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1987-11-05"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Court records","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","School board members","Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: Court of Appeals, ruling, 833 F.2d 112"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/799"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_814","title":"Court filings: District Court, order","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1987-10-15"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Court records","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School integration","Magnet schools","Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, order"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/814"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_208","title":"Enrollment, Little Rock School District (LRSD) and North Little Rock School District (NLRSD), racial count","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1987-10-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Enrollment, Little Rock School District (LRSD) and North Little Rock School District (NLRSD), racial count"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/208"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nOctober 15, 1987 TO: Board of Directors FROM: James Jennings, Associate Superintendent - Desegregation '5\"\"$ THROUGHD:r . George Cannon, Interim Superintenden~ SUBJECT: Enrollment Report - October 1, 1987 cc: Executive Staff TEL: TOTALE NROLLMENT Senior High School!! Central F-,ir H.!!ll McClel hn P~rkview Metropolit-,n TOTALH !GHS CHOOLS Junior High School, Clovcrdsle Ounbor Forest Heiohh Henderson Mabelvele Monn Pula~ki Heiahh Southwest TOTAL JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS HIGH SCHOOLK IND~RGARTEN: CP-ntral Fair '50  Hall McClellan 1\u0026lt;2''\u0026gt; l/f Parkview /' I 1{oe3.2)e ~i~ TOTAL ~ ENROLLMERNETP ORT October\" 1, 1987 ~WiE.!'il 26,853 2108 882 1449 1279 833 15 6566 678 682 862 1033 672 653 754 804 6138 White 2 :1 8 12 9. 32 Jan 14,94 , Black Otht'r 57 q 7 7 110 90 10:32 No.001 P.02 X BLACK 61 57 48 50 39 55 80 Sl 63 68 62 60 50 53 63 66 61 Total 59 10 15 19 19 :122 I f I \\ ..\\ i ! I j i y:,?: fF piO N f1.1 I ,\n::J It-/ ,(1-1 \n,i,3/51e .- f 21 fi)ull\\(3/ Eler,entary Schools Badgett 290 72 Bale 397 70 Baseline 448 71 Brady 423 65 Chicot 642 57 Cloverdale 408 64 Dodd 398 61 Fair Park 315 69 Fore::it Park 426 59 Franklin 403 72 Fulbright 503 57 Garland 329 85 Geyer Springs 235 66 Ish 214 81 Jefferson 462 56 King 269 81 Mabel vale 546 59 McDerr,ott 471 56 Meadowcli ff 449 65 Mitchell 256 86 Otter Creek 325 60 Pulaski Heights 340 75 Rioht sell 246 77 Rockefeller 289 87 Ror,ine 484 71 Stephens 218 90 Terry 481 57 Wakefield 467 62 Washington 214 93 Watson 491 63 Western Hills 314 61 Wilson 407 71 Woodruff 229 76 Total 12,389 67 EleMentary Magnet Schools Booker 636 51 Carver 362 49 Gibbs 265 49 Williar,s 496 50 Total 1,759 50 TOTAL ELEMENTARY 14,148 65 Special Schools 0 SCHOOLS Amboy Argenta . Baring Cross Belwood Boone Park Crestwood Glenview -Indian Hills Lakewood Lynch Drive Meadow Park North Heights Park Hill Pike View Pine Redwood Rose City Seventh Street TOTALS NORTHL ITTLE ROCKP UBLIC SCHOOLS RACIAL COUNT ~{ OF OCTOBER1 , 1987 ELEMENTARSYC HOOLSE XCLUDINGK INDERGARTEN NONBLACK 203 86 6 70 219 121 99 256 128 124 124 223 120 215 93 109 98 177 2,471 BLACK 137 92 7 54 265 89 . 93 133,_. 94 132 137 126 67 188 91 115 74 127 2,021 TOTALS 340 178 13 124 484 210 192 389 222 256 261 349 187 403 184 224 172 304 4,492 BLACK PERCENTAGE 40.3% 51. 7% 53.8% 43.5% 54.87. 42.4% 48.47. 34.27. 42.3% 51.6% 52.5% 36 .1% 35.8% 46.7% 49.5% 51.3% 43.0% 41. 8% 45.0% # ~A -NORTHL ITTLE ROCKP UBLIC SCHOOLS . RACIAL COUNT ,,._ AS OF OCTOBER1 , 1987 BLACK SCHOOLS NONBLACK BLACK TOTALS PERCENTAGE Baring Cross (secondary students) __ 9 18 27 66.77. SUBTOTALS 9 18 27 66.77. SECONDARSYC HOOLS Central 433 258 691 37.37. -- Lakewood 350 132 482 27.47. Ridgeroad 340 279 619 45.17. Rose City 258 --- 175 433 40.47. SUBTOTALS 1,381 844 2,225 37.97. Northeast 862 329 1,191 27.67. Ole Main 606 424 1,030 41. 27. SUBTOTALS 1,468 753 2,221 33.97. SECONDARTYO TALS 2,858 1,615 4,473 36. li. ELEMENTARTYO TALS (excluding kindergarten) 2,471 2,021 4,492 45.0% DISTRICT TOTALS (excluding kindergarten) 5,329 3,636 8965 40.67.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1105","title":"Magnet Review Committee: Status report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1987-09-03"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational statistics","School employees","School management and organization","School enrollment","Magnet schools"],"dcterms_title":["Magnet Review Committee: Status report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1105"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nM 'Kc S-l-a.J.,,,5 1'e rr+ on Ma,ncd scioo/ Devel~'\"'\". Serl 31 /9'l7 September 3, 1987 The Honorable Henry Woods U.S. District Court Judge P. o. Box 3683 Little Rock, AR 72203 Dear Judge Woods: OCT 2 0 i9i\n2 Olfice of Desegrega.1on orntor,ng Please find attached the fourth Magnet Review Committee status report on magnet school development and progress. The content of the report is limited to the topics listed in the Table of Contents. The Committee is prepared to elaborate on the areas described in the report and/or provide additional information as you may direct. The MRC has worked closely with the three districts and the State to ready the six magnet schools for the 1987-88 school year. We are pleased to report that the six anticipated magnet school programs are in place and operational. The MRC will continue to work cooperatively in fulfilling its oversight responsibility and will make findings and recommendations as may be necessary to effect the efficient operation and administration of interdistrict magnet school programs. Sincerely, ~~k-chairman Pulaski Couny S~al School District R~rp~ Arkansas Department of Education ~ Arma Hart Little Rock School District !f,,~8f::::'#~ JoshuaYr~~:~!enors :sl Attachment -i- ~~ Marcia H\nrding (/ Arkansas Department of Education ~ ~ James Smith North Little Rock School Executive Direct , MRC MAGNET REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT TO THE COURT September 3, 1987 -ii- TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Report Introduction................................. i Student Recruitment And Assignment.................. 1 Teacher Recruitment and Staffing.................... 4 Staff Training and Development...................... 6 Curricula Development............................... 12 Community Involvement............................... 13 Transportation... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Construction and Renovation Update.................. 16 Research and Evaluation............................. 18 Policy.............................................. 21 Magnet Review Committee Operation................... 23 Recommendations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4 -iii- STUDENT RECRUITMENT AND ASSIGNMENT RECRUITMENT ACTIVITIES Since July 1987, the Magnet Educational Team (MET) has undertaken the following recruitment activities: A. Conducted open houses for all magnet schools. Approximately 800 people attended these and ninety-two (92) magnet school applications were received subsequent to this action. Names of those attending were kept for future recruitment. B. Mailed 30,000 flyers to parents in the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special School Districts to inform them of the availability of magnet school seats and the open houses. C. Conducted a phone-a-then of 3,000 calls placed to parents in the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special School Districts. Approximately 1,300 actual contacts with parents resulted. The calls in Pulaski County Special School District were targeted to parents of white students. D. Purchased newspaper advertisements in both major papers serving Pulaski County. E. Prepared public service announcements which were run on nine radio stations in the area. F. Printed information concerning magnet schools on utility bills distributed by utility companies to patrons in the Pulaski County area. Additional recruitment efforts included: 1. Mailouts of letters to parents of magnet school students enrolled in Mann and Parkview Magnet Schools. This communique encouraged them to recruit among their friends for the possibility of magnet school enrollments. 2. Placing advertisements in the Arkansas Democrat and Arkansas Gazette August 19, 1987 and August 20, 1987 respectively. 3. Donna Grady, MRC Executive Director, and Ruth Simmons Herts, Chairperson, MET, appearing on the KOKY talk show \"Horizons\" to inform the public of and recruit for magnet schools. In compliance with the Court's Stipulation and Order establishing the composition of the MET, Litttle Rock School District has appointed to the MET James Jennings as its desegregation officer. -1- MAGNET SCHOOL ENROLLMENT DATA The following two pages of charts delineate magnet school enrollment data. MAGNET SCHOOL SEATS ASSIGNED AS OF AUGUST -- 24, 1987 School CaEacity Assigned % White % Black Booker 710 677 52% (352) 48% (325) LRSD 428 46% (198) 54% ( 23 0) NLRSD 75 75% ( 5 6) 25% (19) PCSSD 174 56% ( 9 8) 44% ( 7 6) Carver 472 385 51% (195) 49% (190) LRSD 231 37% ( 8 5) 63% (146) NLRSD 53 68% (36) 32% (17) PCSSD 101 73% (7 4) 27% ( 2 7) Gibbs 326 280 55% (154) 45% (126) LRSD 220 46% ( 10 2) 54% (ll8) NLRSD 23 70% (16) 30% ( 7) PCSSD 37 54% ( 2 0) 46% (17) Williams 530 508 52% (263) 48% (245) LRSD 392 49% (194) 51% ( 19 8) NLRSD 31 39% (12) 61% (19) PCSSD 85 67% ( 5 7) 33% ( 2 8) Mann 975 708 48% ( 339) 52% (369) LRSD 532 46% ( 24 3) 54% (289) NLRSD 23 57% ( 13) 43% ( 10) PCSSD 153 54% ( 8 3) 46% ( 7 0) Parkview 1,150 795 47% ( 371) 53% (424) LRSD 659 43% ( 28 5) 57% ( 3 7 4) NLRSD 23 57% ( 13) 43% (10) PCSSD ll3 65% ( 7 3) 35% (40) TOTALS 4,155 3,353 50% (1,674) 50% (1679) LRSD 2,462 45% (1,107) 55% (1355) NLRSD 228 64% ( 146) 36% (82) PCSSD 663 61% ( 40 5) 39% (258) SOURCE: James Jennings, Little Rock School District's Student Assignment Office -2- MAGNET SCHOOL ENROLLMENT: RACIAL RATIO SUMMARY TOTAL ELEMENTARY: BLACK: 886 (47.90%) WHITE: 964 (52.10%) TOTAL: 1,850 (100%) TOTAL SECONDARY: BLACK: WHITE: TOTAL: 793 (52. 77%) 710 (47 .23%) 1,503 (100%) TOTAL ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY: BLACK: WHITE: TOTAL: 1,679 (50%) 1,674 (50%) 3,353 (100%) Although the current (by school) enrollment does not comply with the Court's order to balance magnet school enrollment 50% white/SO% black, the Magnet Review Committee assures the Court that extraordinary effort has gone into student recruitment in an effort to comply with the spirit of the Order. A major factor in racial imbalance on the elementary school level is the under-enrollment of black students at Gibbs. The districts are currently notifying waiting list students as to the availability of seats. Assignment of black students from the waiting lists will balance the ratio. The action taken by the MRC to freeze enrollment of blacks and further recruit whites on the secondary school level will positively affect racial distribution. -3- TEACHER RECRUITMENT AND STAFFING The Little Rock School District actively recruited certified individuals for positions in magnet schools. Job announcements were distributed by the Little Rock School District's Personnel Office. North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special School Districts' Personnel Offices received and distributed copies of these job announcements. State and out-of-state colleges, universities and newspapers were contacted. The Arkansas Arts Center, Arkansas Repertory Theatre, and the International Heifer Project were notified as to vacant positions. The current staffing status is reported on the following page. -4- MAGNET SCHOOL STAFF EMPLOYED as of August 28, 1987 CERTIFIED STAFF School Total Staff # Black % Black # White % White Booker 43 14 33% Vacancies: 2 (reserved for blacks) Carver 34 Vacancies: None Gibbs 27 Vacancies: 2 Williams 33 Vacancies: None Mann 60 Vacancies: None Parkview 74 Vacancies: None Booker 14 Vacancies: 4 Carver 11 Vacancies: 2 Gibbs Vacancies: 3 Williams Vacancies: 2 Mann Vacancies: 6 Parkview 8 13 7 13 Vacancies: None 14 41% 9 33% 8 24% 25 42% 24 32% NON-CERTIFIED STAFF 13 93% 9 82% 8 100% 5 38% 4 57% 6 46% 29 67% 20 59% 18 67% 25 76% 35 58% 50 68% 1 7% 2 18% 0 0% 8 62% 3 43% 7 54% SOURCE: Magnet School Principals, Assistant Principals, and Staff Richard Maple, Director of Personnel, Little Rock School District -5- STAFF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT Each magnet school faculty and staff participated in special magnet school staff development meetings/conferences/ workshops prior to the regularly scheduled Little Rock School District teacher inservice. Magnet sc.hool employees, many of whom were new to the magnet school setting, had the opportunity to familiarize themselves with school themes, goals and objectives, and curricula. Arkansas and out-ofstate consultants planned and provided the inservice training. Agendas from some of the staff development sessions are included in this section of the report. -6- WEEK l August 10 August 11 August 12 August 13 August 14 WEEK 2 August 17 August 18 August 19 August 20 August 21 WEEK 3 August 24 August 25 August 26 August 27, 28, 29 CARVER MAGNET SCHOOL IN-SERVICE SCHEDULE Staff Cohesiveness and Race Relations Donita Hudspeth Orientation and Management System Dress Code Mary E. Guinn Young Astronaut Program Lawanna White Science Program and Process Skills Rene' Carson, Lola Perritt Invention Convention Dr. Cathy Valentino Scheduling Anne Mangan, Trish Killingsworth Special Education Barbara Graves, Shirley Walker TESA Diane Wood, Rene' Carson PET Maintenance Mary E. Guinn Computer Inservice Computer Inservice Assertive Discipline Jo Evelyn Elston or Mary Classroom Management Mary Guinn Cooperative Learning/Mastery Learning Diane Wood, Judy Trowell IRC VIPS Mary Mosley LeeAnn Matson Writing Across the Curriculum Marvin Zimmerman Guinn Correlate text with Basic Skills, Mat 6, Minimum Performance, etc. State Department of Education Inservice on Jeacher Evaluation Mary Guinn Explanation of Specialists' Program Educational Specialists 9:00 - 11:00 Robinson Auditorium County Wide Meeting 11:00 - 2:30 On Your Own 2:30 - 4:00 Cluster Meeting (07) Hall High Media Center Work in Classrooms -7- II i I I I I I i II ..__ :JIM ATTRACTED TO PARKVlEW FINE ARTS MAGNET PARKVIEW FINE ARTS MAGNET Inservice/Staff Development August 20, 1987 8:30 a.m. / Library Welcome and Introduction Overview \"Academics\" Teacher Views Student Views - Questions/Answers Lunch 11:30 - 12:30 \"The Arts\" Mr. Junious Babbs Principal/Parkview Mr~ Robert Watkins Principal/Arts Magnet Mrs. Carol Francois English Chairperson Ms. Rose Parker Social Studies Chairperson Video Presentation Parkview/AMHS Staff Dance Dr. Rosann Cox Visual Arts Theatre Music - Questions/Answers - Wrap up -8- Coordinator Ms. Josephine Jones Coordinator Mrs. Louise Smith Coordinator Dr. Douglas Cornell Coordinator Parkview/AMHS Staff Mr. Junious Babbs Principal/Parkview I I I ' , i I I I'M ATTRACTED TO PARK VIEW Fl Nl:: ARTS MAGNET PA!{K\\'IE\\,' FIKE ARTS MAGNET ln se r v i ce/S taff Development Au ~us t 19, 1987 8:30 a .m./Li br a~v I. Introducti on of ~ew Faculty and Staff Freddie Baer Gladys Bradford Anthony Bruce Joe Cripps Terry Daniel Millie Farlow Corky Haygood German/Dance Specialist Kindergarten - long term Art/Dance Specialist Music Specialist Health/Coach Music Specialist Assistant Principal Katherine Wright-Knight English Instructor Jane Morgan Gertrude Munns Teresa Seals Jerome Sims II. Welcome Ill. An Update Status of Renovation Communications Specialist Library Clerk Office Secretary Campus Supervisor Student Numbers/Master Schedule Teacher/Student Handbook Schedule - Wednesday and Thursday Preparing For the Magnet School Experience Mrs. Ella Washington, Music Supervisor Milwaukee Public Schools -9- I I I I I I I I I I - \\ \\ I ,.....::,-......__ Williams LI I 1 Lt: ~CC( SCHOOL DISTRICT Williams Magnet Scho,,I Pre-School Staff ~evelopmen~ :nseruic~ s~.1cd~le (Tentative} August 17 (Monday) 7:40 - 8:15 8:15 - 9:00 Coffee/donuts and get acquainted Introductions/welcome Williams Staff Supervisory Personnel Administrative Personnel Magnet Review Personnel 9~00 - -10:00--- Magnet school definition/history/overview 10:00 - 10:15 Break 10.15 - 11:30 Changes in Williams Magnet School curriculum Job Descriptions Vice Principal Magnet Specialists Accelerated Learning Specialists 11:30 - Lunch 12:30 - 2:55 ---Organization of classroom for instruction ------------------------------------------------------------------------ August 18 (Tuesday) 7:40 - 8:00 --- Coffee 8:00 - 10:00 --- Overview of School's: 10:00 - Break Philosophy Expectations Goals 10:00 - 11:30 --- Continue above 11:30 - Lunch 12:30 - 2:55 --- PET review -10- Objectives Guidelines (Handbook/District Mission Statement/NC Goals and Objective~ Williams Magnet Goal Individual Teacher Goals) I I August 19 (Wednesday) 7:40 - 8:00 --- Coffee 8:00 - 10:00 --- Instructional Activities/Strategies Reading 10:00 - 10:15 - Break Assessment for grouping Grouping stratagies Appropriate materials Managing multiple reading groups Managing non-directed activities Learning center strategies Shifting gears for various reading groups Assistance from ALPS and Magnet Specialists Instructional techniques Evaluation Effective/efficient record keeping Other 10:15 - 11:00 - English Handwriting Writing Across Curriculum (WAC) Spelling 11.00 - 11:30 - Social Studies 11:30 - 12:30 - Lunch 12:30 - 1:00 - Science 1:00 - 1:30 - Health 1:30 - 2:55 - Math ---------------------------------------------------------------------- August 20 - 21 (Thursday) and (Friday until noon) 7:40 - 8:00 --- Coffee 8:00 - 2:55 - Classroom Management (15 minute break at lunch trom 11:30 - 12:00 Friday A:ternoon 12:30 - Corre~ating speciclist conten~ with basic skills (15 min .. each) Art I.E. Speech !-,usic ~urse hesource -11- Library Counselor ALPS CURRICULA DEVELOPMENT In accordance with recommendations in the May 23, 1987 MRC report to the Court, principals and other staff members of magnet schools participated in the development of the magnet schools' curricula. Dr. Beverly White, Associate Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction, Little Rock School District, presented the curriculum guides for the six magnet schools to the Little Rock School District Board of Directors on Thursday, August 27, 1987. The MRC reviewed the plans for curricula development of the Little Rock School District and will continue to stay involved in the process. -12- I I I I I I I I I I I COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT The Magnet Review Committee is aware of the need to involve the community in an effort to develop magnet schools that will attract students. Examples of activities involving the community are the following: 1. April-May, 1987: Gene Jones, Chairman, Magnet Review Committee, and Ruth Shepherd, Member, Magnet Education Team, were interviewed on KARN, providing information on magnet schools to listeners. 2. April-May, 1987: A MET subcommittee prepared magnet school Public Service announcements. Committee members were Janet Coburn, William Robinson, Alfreda Marshall, and Ruth Shepherd. Through these announcements, information on magnet schools was provided throughout the community. 3. April-May, 1987: Brochures describing elementary, junior high, and senior high magnet school programs were prepared and distributed in high visibility areas (e.g., hospitals, grocery stores, discount stores, etc.) 4. July, 1987: The MET conducted a phone-a-than calling approximately 3,000 parents in the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special School Districts. Approximately 45 people volunteered their time and energy to ensure the phone-a-thon's success. These volunteers were parents, teachers, MET members, MRC members, CTA members, principals, student council members, PTA members, and school district personnel. During the phone-a-thon, parents and students received answers to questions about magnet schools and magnet school enrollment. Three businesses opened their doors to the MET to conduct the phone-a-than, which further involved the community. Worthen Bank, KARK-TV Channel 4, and the Arkansas Education Association provided facilities and phones. 5. July, 1987: The Magnet Educational Team, MRC, and the magnet school principals planned and conducted open houses which targeted parents in the North Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County School District. Over 800 parents attended the open houses which -13- provided for dialogue and information on enrollment, curricula, course offerings, staffing, counseling, extracurricular activities, and other magnet issues. 6. July, 1987: The MRC established a full-time office and staff. The office provides, in addition to other functions, a one-to-one contact with magnet school patrons, students, staff, administrators, and interested parties. 7. August, 1987: Donna Grady, MRC Executive Director, and Ruth Simmons Herts, MET Chairperson, and Director of Desegregation for Pulaski County Special School District, appeared as guests on the KOKY talk show \"Horizons.\" This format provided parents, students, and community and business members an opportunity to ask questions and receive answers about magnet schools. 8. August-September 1987: All schools have planned open houses to allow parents and community members an opportunity to receive information on the schools' total programs. -14- TRANSPORTATION The Interdistrict Transportation Authority (ITA) meets or confers semi-weekly, according to Jim Bohannon, ITA Chairperson. The school districts have been cooperative in working to devise a system for transportation. This cooperation extends to the Little Rock School District transporting some Pulaski County Special School District students to magnet schools. The ITA is working with the Magnet Review Committee and the secondary school principals to design an extracurricular activity transportation schedule. This schedule will be available in the latter part of September. Magnet school bus routes for all three districts are still being finalized. The MRC will review the transportation system as it operates through this current school year with an eye toward efficiency and economy, and make suggested changes as deemed necessary in the future. -15- CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION UPDATE A brief description of the status of renovation at each magnet school follows. BOOKER Booker Arts Magnet School is scheduled to receive asbestos removal, interior cosmetic renovation, and roof repair. At this time, asbestos removal has been completed. Interior renovation is partially complete with portable buildings being used to replace unfinished rooms. Roof repair will begin September 24, 1987. In summary, the building is usable and school should proceed with minimal interruption. OLD CARVER The original Carver building is to be replaced with a new structure, but some work has been required to make the original building usable. Accordingly, a science laboratory and a computer laboratory have been installed and are presently in use. In summary, the building is functional, and school is proceeding successfully. GIBBS Gibbs International Studies Magnet School is receiving major renovation. The work on the media center, administrative offices, language laboratory, hallways, and some classrooms is completed. The remaining work, including heat and air, carpeting, and classroom refinishing work will be completed in the summer of 1988. The condition of the building should promote a successful school year. MANN Some essential elements of the major renovation of Mann have been completed, but most of the work will be done in the summer of 1988. The piano laboratory and computer laboratory work has been completed. The re-roofing of the building began August 31, 1987. PARKVIEW The piano laboratory and dance studio will be completed by September 8, 1987. Equipment installation will follow immediately. No other major work is planned for Parkview. -16- NEW CARVER Plans for the new Carver building are complete and being prepared for bids. The Committee has studied the plans and finds them to be suitable for effective magnet school instruction. The question of costs is, of course, a concern\ntherefore, the architect is preparing alternatives for purposes of negotiating costs if necessary. The present plans allow for 600 students\nhowever, the Committee believes the size of the building can be reduced if necessary to bring construction costs within budget. A copy of the building program manual is being sent under separate cover. In summary, the condition of the magnet school buildings is not ideal\nhowever, school can proceed as planned with slight adjustments in operations. -17- RESEARCH AND EVALUATION The MRC Chair, Gene Jones, appointed a subcommittee for Magnet School Research and Evaluation. The subcommittee is charged with the responsibility of devising a plan for evaluating magnet schools. Such evaluation shall encompass determining the desegregative effects of the magnet school programs, as well as the educational quality of these programs. The subcommittee will collect information on similar studies conducted in the United States, and identify consultants who can assist with planning and implementing the research and evaluation. -18- RESEARCH/EVALUATION SUBCOMMITTEE MAGNET SCHOOLS MEETING DATE August 4, 1987 MEMBERSHIP Marcia Harding, Donna Grady, Herb Williams FOCUS Research and evaluation considerations regarding impact of magnet schools as interdistrict remedy (the Little Rock metro area). KEY VARIABLES 1. Philosophy, Policy, Practices Students Parents Program Personnel 2. Parent and Community Involvement 3. Resource Allocation Funding Staff Physical Facilities 4. Staffing and Leadership Attitudes Relationships Staff Development 5. Instruction Planning Curriculum Evaluation -19- 6. Program and Student Outcomes PHASES Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV Student Performance Data Attitudes Satisfaction Determine the extent to which key variables exist in magnet school sites. Develop research/evaluation paradigm or model able to generate data from school sites. Initiate data collection, analysis, interpretations. Continuation of Phase III, plus discerning impact and implications. RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP FOR SUBCOMMITTEE 1. Review related literature in search of existing model. 2. Identify personnel available for consultation. -20- POLICY The MRC is cognizant of the Court's June 30, 1987 Order clarifying the role of the MRC in policy development for the operation of the interdistrict magnet school programs and setting forth guidelines for presentation of MRC policy decisions to the Court for adoption subsequent to the Order. The \"Policy on Interdistrict Magnet School Student Transfers\" included in this report was developed and adopted by the MRC prior to the Court's Order. It has been disseminated to the districts for implementation. As policies governing the interdistrict magnet schools are developed in the future, they will be submitted to the Court in accordance with the Court's Order. -21- POLICY ON INTERDISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOL STUDENT TRANSFERS Students enrolled in an Interdistrict Magnet School will be required to remain in the magnet school for a minimum of one semester. Students who develop extenuating circumstances which might warrant a change in assignment prior to completion of one semester may petition to obtain a change of assignment. Petitions will be received by the host district. Petitions will be reviewed by a three (3) member committee comprised of student assignment officers or designates for the three (3) Pulaski County, Arkansas, districts. A majority of these officers will determine whether a student is allowed to change assignment.* Specific student assignment will be made according to policies of the home district. *Identified handicapped students are excluded from the review process as described herein. Decisions pertaining to the appropriateness of their educational programming and placement shall be made in accordance with Public Law 94-142 and Arkansas Act 102 regulatory procedures. -22- MAGNET REVIEW COMMITTEE OPERATION The Magnet Review Committee Office is located at 22nd and Poplar Streets, North Little Rock, and is housed in the North Little Rock School District Administration Annex, Room 105. The office is staffed by Donna L. Grady, Executive Director, and Sandra Luehrs, Secretary. The Pulaski County Educational Cooperative (Martha Nelsen, Director) is the fiscal agent for the MRC Office. The Magnet Review Committee has held eight scheduled meetings and four called meetings since the last report. Copies of the minutes of these meetings are available upon request. The MRC held election of officers September 1, 1987. The election results are as follows: Marcia Harding (ADE) - Chairperson Herb Williams (Joshua Intervenors) - Vice-Chair Outgoing Chairman, Gene Jones, will no longer represent Pulaski County Special School District. He will be employed as Associate Director for Instruction for the Arkansas Department of Education. The Committee acknowledges his fine year of dedication, service, and leadership. -23- - RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Magnet Review Committee recommends that magnet school enrollment of the majority race (at that school) be frozen. Schools should be allowed to accept other race applicants until the 50% Black/50% White ratio required by the Court is reached. 2. The MRC recommends that the Little Rock School District Personnel Department and principals continue to strive toward their stated goal of 50% Black/50% White staffing within a five-year period. The MRC will stay informed of future plans for staffing and will see that magnet school staffing guidelines are being followed. 3. The MRC recommends that future inservice training content include desegregation training for magnet school staff members. -24-\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_866","title":"Court filings: District Court, order","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1987-07-02"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Court records","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School integration","School districts","Magnet schools","Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, order"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/866"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_852","title":"Court filings: District Court, orders","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1987-05-13","1987-05-26"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Court records","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School employees","School integration","Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, orders"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/852"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1211","title":"Magnet Review Committee: Report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1987-05-05/1987-05-06"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Magnet schools","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Magnet Review Committee: Report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1211"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nReport from Magnet Review Committee to Honorable Henry Woods, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\n' The Honorable Henry Woods U. 5. District Court Judge P.O. Box 3683 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 Dear Judge Woods: OCT 2 0 '9'12 Olfice of Oessgrega\\1011 Won1tonng May 5, 1987 Please find attached the second Magnet Review Committee report on the magnet school development in the Pulaski County School Desegregation case. The committee is prepared to elaborate on the issues described in the report as you may direct. jr Attachment Sincerely, !:::khairman Pulaski County Special School District R~te~ Arkansas Department of Education ~~~ Marcia Hardina - - -  - 0 _,, Arkansas Department of Education Jesse Rancifer Little Rock School District James Smith North Little Rock School District MAGNET REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT TO THE COURT MAY 6, 1987 - - MAGNET REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT TO THE COURT MAY 6, 1987 INTRODUCTION In comp 1 i an c e w i th the Inter i m Order of the Un i t e d States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas, issued February 27, 1987 the Magnet Review Committee (MRC) hereby submits a report on the progress made in imp 1 emen ting the magnet schools. The report is organized into three maJor divisions: a summary. the introduction\neach critical issue area\nand Critical aspects of implementation as stated in the Order will be addressed, as wel 1 as additional areas contained in the January 22, 1987 MRC Report and the , Stipulation approved by the court in the Order of February 27 (referred to by the court as Exhibits A-C). The MRC was instructed in the Order to \"work closely with the three districts and the State in order to have the six magnet schools ready for the 1987-88 school year.\" The MRC has attempted to do so. In keep i n g w i th i ts def i n e d responsi bi 1 it i es the MRC wi 11 al so make findings and recommendations in this report as may be necessary to the efficient operation and administration of magnet schools. II I ' INTERDISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOL PROGRAMS: AREAS OF REVIEW STAFF SELECTION/TEACHER RECRUITMENT BACKGROUND In its report of January 22, 1987 to the court the Magnet Review Committee CMRC) addressed interdistrict magnet school programs staffing in terms of both staff composition and selection. The MRC recommended that the staff: 1) be comprised of highly qualified educators.\n2) ultimately represent a fifty-fifty black to non-black ratio of administrators and teachers\n3) include among its make up persons from the three districts CLRSD, NLRSD, PCSSD)\nand 4) be selected utilizing criteria developed cooperatively by the LRSD and MRC. It is the belief of the MRC that careful selection of principals and teachers to staff the interdistrict magnet school programs is essential to their ultimate success. Staffing of the magnet programs has fol lowed e s s e n t i a l 1 y t h e same p r o c e s s as a l 1 o t h e r LR SD s c h o o 1 s  Th e equ I ty and ba 1 ance er i ter i a established in the terms of the LRSD and CTA staff reassignment agreement served to orchestrate the staffing of the interdistrict magnet schools. Initially twenty percent (201/.) of the teachers in a school building were proposed to be retained as a \"core\" staff\nthis was later increased to an eighty percent (80%) retention level. It was reported to the MRC that ten 2 I I percent (10%) of the positions were to be reserved for faculty desiring to transfer interdistrict. Again, magnet programs were affected in the same manner as al 1 non-magnet schools with regard to staff reassignment. As a result, principals and teachers to date have been assigned to the magnet schools in the absence of an open recruitment process. FINDINGS OF FACT 1 . February 3, 1987 At its regular meeting, the MRC requested that the LRSD provide it with any written criteria pertaining to magnet school staff selection for review. 2. February 18, The principals assigned to the six magnet 1987 3. March 13, 1987 schools were publicly announced. The MRC had not been consulted as to selection criteria or a timetable for selection prior to their assignment. At an MRC meeting, Vance Jones and Beverly White of the LRSD presented information on the LRSD general process of teacher reassignment. They received copies of selection criteria developed by the MRC for consideration and inclusion in materlals for dissemination to teachers. The timel ine for the teachers to notify the district 3 II 4. Apr i 1 1 0 , 1987 of their preferred assignments was to be the Monday fol lowing this Friday meeting. The MET began mass distribution of MRCapproved recruitment brochures assuring that teachers for magnet schools were carefully selected. 5. Apr i 1 1987 21, The MRC interviewed the six principals assigned to the magnet programs. Three of the six stated that they had appealed their reassignments to magnet programs. The reassignments held, No application process or special er i ter i a were used RECOMMENDATIONS in placing these principals at the magnet schools. They also had not been given the opportunity to that point to have any direct involvement in staff selection for their programs. 1. Teaching staff wishing to remain in existing magnet schools which wi 11 not undergo major curricular or thematic change should be retained to provide continu1 ty and stability to the overall (d1strictwide) magnet programs. Vacant positions should be declared open and fi 1 led initially with qualified faculty desiring to transfer interdistrict, consistent with the goal of ten percent (101/.) 4 ,= ii ,! I of a magnet school ' s faculty being selected from NLRSD and PCSSD. 2. Teaching positions for all new magnet schools should be declared open and advertised. Information on the magnet programs and criteria for teacher selection should be made available to encourage applicants. The principals should be al lowed to interview and recommend the teaching staff to be hired under the school-based management concept. 3. In staffing the magnet schools a variety of criteria should be used. While this should include the LRSD balance and equity considerations - it must not be solely limited to them, as they will not assure selection of a staff interested in or committed to participation in magnet programs as an educational alternative aiding desegregation. The MRC is committed to working with the LRSD to further define criteria for magnet school staff selection. 4. The goals discussed so extensively by the LRSD of c r e a t i n g b a l an c e an d e q u i t y am on g a l l s c h o o l s t a f f s a r e important in the overall desegregation process. The MRC is cognizant, however, of the need for flexibility in the time-frame for accomplishing this. For this reason, the MRC supports a \"phase in\" process such as that proposed in the LRSD March 1986 Desegregation Plan. 5 . CU~RICULUM DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUND Curriculum development activities for magnet schools 1n the Little Rock School District (LRSD) have been on-going and continuous. Curriculum supervisors for magnet schools have developed and shared a broad description for each new and old magnet school theme with the Magnet Review Committee. The LRSD has informed the MRC that the actual curriculum development and selection of materials for new magnet school themes ( i . e., Carver Basic Skills/ Math-Science, Horace Mann Science/Fine Arts, Gibbs Foreign Language/International Studies and Parkv1ew Arts/Performing Arts) wi 11 be done at the end of the current school year with the assistance of teachers, curriculum supervisors, principals, and consul tan ts. The MRC be 1 i eves that the curriculum and staff development activities for each magnet school are critical for the successful implementation of magnet schools. FINDING OF FACT 1 . Spring 1986 The LRSD Associate Superintendent Curriculum and Instruction\nSupervision and the Special Assistant, Desegregation developed a cri t1cal task calendar for the development 6 ., ,_. 3. 4. September October, 1986 October, 1986 March, 1987 of magnet schools for the LRSD . Draft proposals were developed for three (3) additional magnet schools in the LRSD -- Carver Basic Ski 1 ls Magnet, Dunbar Arts Magnet Junior High School and ParKview Arts Magnet. These proposals included program descript ions , staffing requirements, curriculum design and budgets. These three (3) magnets were to be in addition to the three ( 3) magnet components operative 1n the district -- Booker Arts Magnet, Mann Sc i enc e Mag n e t and W i 1 1 i ams Bas i c SK i 1 1 s Magnet. These draft proposals were presented to the Magnet Review Committee for review/ support as a part of the plan for Pulaski County Schools and for submission for a federal grant under the Magnet Schools Assistance Program. Due to miscommunication among the parties, a formal review by the Magnet Review Cammi ttee did not occur, resulting in no recorpmendation. The Curriculum and Instruction staff of LRSD presented an inst rue ti ona 1 pr ogr am 7 .. . ... 5. 6. March 1987 April 1987 RECOMMENDATIONS overview for each magnet program to the MRC. The Curriculum and Instruction staff of LRSD provided a budget Justification review for the MRC. The principals of the Magnet Schools met in session with the MRC to discuss magnet school programs. The Curr i cul 1Jm and Instruction staff and magnet school principals provided additional programming and program budget just~fication :~formation in a session with the MRC. 1. The Principals and other staff members of magnet schools should become intimately involved in developing the curriculum. 2. The Accelerated Learning Program should undergo further study in 1 ight of the Court Order on the provision \u0026lt; inclusive of cost) of compensatory programs. 3. Remedial assistance should be offered to those students in magnet schools performing below grade level. 8 . . STAFF TRAINING BACKGROUND The MRC has had several opportunities to discuss the staff training and development that are scheduled for personnel that will be employed in the magnet schools, Al though no activities have been implemented as of this report, topics have been selected, consultants are being identified and budget requests have been made, Th e s u mm e r , a f t e r t h i s c u r r e n t s c h o o l ye a r h as be e n c om p l e t e d , h as be e n i de n t i f i e d as t h e t i me f r am e i n w h i c h staff training and development will begin. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. No staff training and development activities for magnet school personnel have been initiated, 2, No operational plan has been reviewed by the MRC. 3. Topics for staff training and development have been identified . 4. Foci of staff training and development are improJement of instruction and curricular development and implementation. 5. Budget requests have been presented to the MRC. RECOMMENDATIONS 1, An operational plan should be developed for staff training and development. 9 Li ' I I: 2. Consultants emplo\u0026gt;'ed to deliver services and employees of the district should be desegregated. 3. Budget requests should be approved contingent upon approval of the operational plan. 10 - MAGNET SCHOOL BUDGETS BACKGROUND The Magnet Review Committee has informed the Little Rock School Di str ict that i ts proposed budgets for magnet schools subs tan ti a 1 1 y e xceed the guide l i nes offered by the c omm i t t e e i n i t s Jan u a r y 2 2 r e p or t as ado p t e d by t h e c o u r t  It i s also the view of the major i ty mambership of the MRC that magnet school budgets should not exceed the general operating cost by more than twelve percent ( 12% ) . It 1s the Little Rock School district ' s position that a trul y extraordinary curriculum experience cannot be prov i ded for students in each magnet school with such a cei 1 ing. The Little Rock School District also contends the twelve percent (12%) figure above regular operating cost was presented in the MRC Report to the court before startup cost was discussed (teacher inservice, curriculum development, etc. ) . FINDINGS OF FACT 1 . March 31, 1987 2. Apr i 1 7, 1 987 Draft copies of proposed magnet school budgets were provided to each member from John Bilheimer Attorney. Revised magnet school budgets for each school were presented to the MRC with justification attached. 11 ( 3. Apr i l 21 , 1 987 4. Apr i l 28, 1 987 5. Apr i l 28, 1 987 RECOMMENDATIONS The principals ind curriculum supervisors for the magnet schools made formal presentations and answered questions on the MRC ' s concerns. Magnet school revised budgets were presented to the MRC and concerns answered. Magnet school principals and program supervisors were scheduled with the MRC in a specific time block to address budget concerns. The MRC voted to disapprove the proposed magnet school budgets. 1. The Little Rock School District should be directed to revise the proposed magnet school qudgets to a level cons i st en t w i th the twe 1 v e percent ( 1 21/.) i n crease-d opera t I n g cost figures used in the original funding formula. 12 RENOVATION/CONSTRUCTION BACKGROUND The terms of financing renovation and construction are clearly stated in the Magnet Review Committee Report of January 22 and Stipulation Agreement approved by the Dist r i ct Court i n Fe br u ar y, 1 987. It is agreed that the State will be a full partner in all phases of construction and renovation from selection of the architect to final approval. At the current time, the Little Rock School District has projected completion of magnet school renovations by fall of 1987 and construction of a new Carver Elementary School by fall of 1988. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The LRSD and representatives of the State have worked collaboratively to select architects. 2. Architects have been agreed upon by the State and LRSD and approved by the LRSD School Board. RECOMMEl'lDAT IONS 1. The LRSD and the State should continue to work cooperatively in Joint planning with regard to renovation/construction. 2. The parties responsible for the costs of renovation/construction should agree on the nature of the work to be completed prior to soliciting bids. 13 3. An y changes or variances proposed by the LRSD from the renovation/ construction approved for each magnet school by the court in its February 1987 Order shou 1 d be approved by the MRC. 4. The LRSD and State should agree as quickly as possible on renovation p 1 ans to permit the magnet school programs to be operative by September, 1987. 14 GQl..,'ERNANCE BACKGROUND The MRC recommendation on governance of the si x magnet school programs was adopted by the court on Februar y 27, 1987. It provided that the day-to-day operations be the responsiblility of the host district. However, during the course of the Magnet Review Cammi ttee ' s attempts to work closely with the parties, as directed by the court, differing interpretations on the meaning of the governance function has occurred. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. As the host district the LRSD is responsible for the da y-to-day operation of magnet schools. 2. The MRC be 1 i eves the LRSD has app 1 i ed a narrow interpretation of governance in matters of responsibl i 1 i ty assigned to the MRC. 3. The MRC ' s progress has been impeded by the difference of interpretation in the matter of governance. RECOMMENDATIONS 1, The court should reaffirm the authority vested in the Magnet Review Committee. 2, The court should direct the LRSD to tAJorK in concer t withtheMRC . 15 r, STUDENT ENROLLMENT AND RECRUITMENT BACKGROUND The MRC embraces the language regarding student enrollment and recruitment as found in the Stipulation approved by the court on February 27, 1987, It is understood that seat allocations wi 1 l not be made by district to a particular school, but only by elementary, jun i or hi gh and sen i or h i gh level . Therefore, a particular district will be permitted to use its al located seats in accordance with the desires of its students subject to space l i mi tat ions in particular magnet schools and the maintenance of a 50-50 racial balance. If there is oversubscription among the districts by race, grade or school each district may make a recommendation to the MRC for its approval regarding actual distribution of seats. The three districts agree that each district wi I 1 establish an open enrol 1 men t policy for magnet schools and wi I 1 be permitted to de t e rm i n e h ow c h i I d r e n w i I I be s e I e c t e d for the magnet seats al located to each district pursuant to that policy. The MRC has pursued activities consistent with the order in recruiting students for magnet schools. actvi ties are explained in the fol lowing section, FINDINGS OF FACT These 1. The Little Rock School District (LRSD) interpreted the Stipulation to mean that each school district should be allocated seats by school and grade levels. 16 I f : i I I 2. On April 21, 1987 the Magnet Rev i etA.J Commit tee went on record as reaffirming support for the court-approved Stipulation Agreement regarding the al location of seats to the magnet schools. 3. The Pulaski County Special School District has been al located approximately 1257 magnet seats, North Little Rock School District 475 and Little Rock School District 246'?. 4. A great deal of effort has been put forth by the three school districts and the Magnet Educational Team (MET) to recruit students to the magnet schools. 5. Each school district has developed a brochure and is actively recruiting. The MET has been active in developing brochures and posters for dissemination, developing public service announcements for radio and television, and having MRC and MET members speak on a KARN radio talk show. 6. The MET has disseminated to the three school districts more than 66,000 brochures\ntaped the three superintendents for later broadcast on television\nas wel 1 as contacting AP\u0026amp;L, Southwestern Bell, and ARKLA Gas to provide short messages in their bi 11 ings regarding magnet schools. 7. The MET also plans to place advertisements in school newspapers and religious publications, attend PTA meetings, encourage open house 1Jisitations and establish a student buddy system. Long range plans include developing a slide/tape show, highlighting of a magnet school each month, 17 .. using magnet students in recruiting and forming a newcomers' c ornm i t t e e . 8. There is no LRSD employee responsible for desegregation planning on the MET as per the requirement of the Stipulation. 9. To date the fol lowing number of students ' applications for magnet schools have been received. *** LRSD NLRSD PCSSD 2636 Blacks 1444 Whites 63 Blacks 173 Blacks 87 Whites 21 7 Wh i te s *** These are duplicated counts by -virtue of students being permitted to make 1st, 2nd, and 3rd choices. 10. The MRC wi 11 review on May 19 student requests to magnet schools to expedite the student assignment process. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The MRC recommends that the LRSD advertise extensively in the community the twenty-five percent (25%) shadow provision for each magnet school  2. The MRC recommends that al 1 the par t i es i n v o 1 v e d adhere to the original court-approved Stipulation Agreement regarding the al location of seats to the magnet schools by levels and not by specific schools and grade levels, ie, elementary, junior high and senior high. Si nee there , s _only one junior high and one senior high affected it is ob v i o u s t h a t s u c h a r e c omm e n d a t i on w i 1 1 a f f e c t on 1 y t h e elementary schools. 18 . . 3. The MRC recommends that the LRSD appoint a district representative to the MET consistent with the Stipulation  19 TRANSPORTATI 01'-l BACKGROUND The Stipulation approved by the District Court on February 27, 1987 1 contains the plan of agreement reached by the parties on interdistrict transportation. It provides that an Interdistrict Transportation Authority \u0026lt;ITA) will be formed to administer the Interdistrict Transportation Plan. The ITA shal 1 be composed of an appropriate representative from each district and the State. The parties agreed that: (1) transportation of magnet/ M-to-M students should be done in a cost efficient manner\n(2) each district will accc,unt separately for the costs of transporting these students\nand (3) conflicts wi 11 be resolved through a District Court Special Master. , FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Interdistrict Transportation Auti-1ority ( !TA) t-1as not been formed. 2. The transportation needs of magnet/M-to-M transfer students cannot be fully determined unti 1 the completion of student enrollment/assignment. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Parties should be directed to appoint immediately their representative to the ITA. 2. The ITA should conduct an organizational meeting for planning purposes by June 1, 1987. 20 I ! .. 3. Each district should proJide immediately to the ITA a status report on its student assignment and a tentative date by which student assignments wi 11 be finalized to the degree that transportation methods/ routes may be planned . 4. The ITA should submit a status report on transportation to the MRC by June 15, 1987, 21  .. EXTENDED DAY CARE BACKGROIJ~,JD Extended Day Care is a self-supporting program in the Little Rock School District. It is made available in an y elementary school based on demand. At least tv-1elve students. are required to operate the program in any elementar y school. The program cost is $6,00 registration and $3.00 per day per student which includes breakfast and an afternoon snack. The hours of operation are from 7 a.m. u n t i l s c h o o l be g i n s an d i n t h e a f t e r n o on f r om t h e t i me school closes unti 1 5:30 p.m. FI !'JD I NGS OF FACT 1. The unresolved student assignments make It difficult to determine the need for Ex tended Day Programs in magnet schools. 2. Ex tended Day Care programs described above will be useful i n attracting students to magnet schools. RECOMMENDATIONS 1 . Fol lowing assignment of students to magnet school programs, the LRSD should provide the CARE Program with the names and addresses of parents to be contacted regarding the ava i 1 ab i 1 i ty of ex tended day care. 22 ..  ..... ... .  COMMUNITY INPUT/INVOLVEMENT BACKGROUND In the January 22, 1987, report to the court, the MRC r e c omm e n de d a mode l f or c omm u n i t y p a r t i c i p a t i on . Th e components of the model are: (1) an awareness campaign\n( 2 ) a p u b l i c e du c a t i on c amp a i g n\n\u0026lt; 3 ) a n e e d s ass e s sm e n t p r o c e s s\nand (4) a system for processing input. There is no evidence that the model , as such, has been adopted and/ or implemented. However , the Magnet Educ at i on al Team has defined within its scope of activities a public information campaign that attempts to provide to parents a comprehensive perspective of magnet schools that are scheduled to be available during the 87-88 school year. It is also noteworthy to mention that the LRSD has formed a citizen ' s committee to examine the student assignment plan. The committee's scope exceeds the six magnet schools. In addition, the March, 1986 LRSD desegregation plan sets forth a me c h an i sm f or p a r e n t i n v o 1 v em e n t v i a s c h o o 1 i mp r o v em e n t teams. The superintendent of the LRSD has appeared several times on local electronic media and on those occasions, patrons have opportunities to question and advise him regarding the desegregation plan . FINDINGS OF FACT 23     I    t 1 . The model for community participation has not been adopted and/or implemented by the host district for magnet schools. ,,-.:,_ . Provisions for parent involvement through school improvement teams at the building level have been made. 3 . Magnet schools have been inc 1 uded in the genera 1 strategy to involve the community at large in an interdistrict remedy to effect desegregation in the school districts in Pulaski County. 4. The MET has taken on some respons i bi 1 i ty to i nform the patrons and students. 5 . A c i t i z e n ' s adv i so r y c omm i t t e e h as t, e e n c on s t i t u t e d t o review student assignments, including magnet schools . RECOMMENDAT I Of\\lS 1. The LRSD and the MRC should work cooperatively to implement the model approved by the court. 24 \" ' -  1 MAGNET REVIEW COMMITTEE ORGANIZATION BACKGROUND The Magnet Review Cammi ttee has met weekl y to cont i nue the planning reported to the court in January. During this time the committee has: ( 1) heard reports from Little Rock School District personnel regarding curriculum, budgets and personnel\n( 2) established the Magnet/ M-to-M Educational Team\nand ( 3 ) worked to create a collaborati ve atmosphere around the i ssue of magnet schools. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The MRC advertised for applicants for an executive director. Twenty-five people have applied for the job. 2. The MRC initiated steps to house the MRC office with that of the Pulaski Count y Educational Services Cooperative (Co-op). 3. The MRC has arranged to deposit funds with the North Little Rock School District pending arrangements with the Co-op . 4. The MRC endorsed and paid for activities of the MET. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The MRC organization, consistent with its charge, should remain intact\". 25\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_816","title":"Court filings: District Court, orders","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1987-04-15","1987-04-29"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Court records","School districts","School employees","School integration","School management and organization","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, orders"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/816"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":150,"next_page":151,"prev_page":149,"total_pages":155,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":1788,"total_count":1850,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":1843},{"value":"Sound","hits":4},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":3}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":289},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":220},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":179},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","hits":69},{"value":"United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit","hits":30},{"value":"North Little Rock School District","hits":12},{"value":"Bushman Court Reporting","hits":11},{"value":"Walker, John W.","hits":6},{"value":"Joshua Intervenors","hits":5},{"value":"Arkanasas State University. Office of Educational Research and Services","hits":4},{"value":"Arkansas Association of Educational Administrators","hits":4}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":1745},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":1244},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":1207},{"value":"Education--Evaluation","hits":886},{"value":"Educational law and legislation","hits":721},{"value":"Educational planning","hits":690},{"value":"School integration","hits":604},{"value":"School management and organization","hits":601},{"value":"Educational statistics","hits":560},{"value":"Education--Finance","hits":474},{"value":"School improvement programs","hits":417}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Springer, Joy C.","hits":6},{"value":"Walker, John W.","hits":3},{"value":"Heller, Christopher","hits":2},{"value":"Wright, Susan Webber, 1948-","hits":2},{"value":"Armor, David","hits":1},{"value":"Eddington, Ramsey","hits":1},{"value":"Intervenors, Joshua","hits":1},{"value":"Intervenors, Knight","hits":1},{"value":"Jones, Sam","hits":1},{"value":"Jones, Stephen W.","hits":1},{"value":"Joshua, Lorene","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":6},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":1849},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":1836},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":1799},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":1539},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, North Little Rock, 34.76954, -92.26709","hits":10},{"value":"United States, Missouri, 38.25031, -92.50046","hits":5},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Maumelle, 34.86676, -92.40432","hits":4},{"value":"United States, Missouri, Saint Louis City County, Saint Louis, 38.65588, -90.30928","hits":3},{"value":"United States, Kansas, 38.50029, -98.50063","hits":2},{"value":"United States, New York, 43.00035, -75.4999","hits":2},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Chicot County, 33.26725, -91.29397","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":1836},{"value":"Missouri","hits":5},{"value":"Kansas","hits":2},{"value":"Massachusetts","hits":2},{"value":"New York","hits":2},{"value":"Connecticut","hits":1},{"value":"Illinois","hits":1},{"value":"Maryland","hits":1},{"value":"Michigan","hits":1},{"value":"Ohio","hits":1},{"value":"Oklahoma","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1994","hits":385},{"value":"1995","hits":376},{"value":"1996","hits":334},{"value":"1993","hits":312},{"value":"1992","hits":292},{"value":"1999","hits":273},{"value":"1997","hits":268},{"value":"1991","hits":255},{"value":"2001","hits":252},{"value":"2000","hits":251},{"value":"1998","hits":245},{"value":"2002","hits":182},{"value":"1990","hits":173},{"value":"2003","hits":164},{"value":"2004","hits":148},{"value":"1989","hits":134},{"value":"2005","hits":119},{"value":"2006","hits":86},{"value":"2011","hits":62},{"value":"2010","hits":60},{"value":"2007","hits":57},{"value":"1988","hits":51},{"value":"2008","hits":47},{"value":"2009","hits":47},{"value":"1987","hits":35},{"value":"1986","hits":30},{"value":"2012","hits":30},{"value":"1984","hits":27},{"value":"1985","hits":23},{"value":"2013","hits":19},{"value":"1983","hits":16},{"value":"1982","hits":15},{"value":"1980","hits":13},{"value":"1981","hits":13},{"value":"1974","hits":12},{"value":"1975","hits":12},{"value":"1976","hits":12},{"value":"1977","hits":12},{"value":"1978","hits":12},{"value":"1979","hits":12},{"value":"1973","hits":11},{"value":"2014","hits":11},{"value":"1967","hits":9},{"value":"1968","hits":9},{"value":"1969","hits":9},{"value":"1970","hits":9},{"value":"1971","hits":9},{"value":"1972","hits":9},{"value":"1954","hits":8},{"value":"1966","hits":8},{"value":"1950","hits":7},{"value":"1951","hits":7},{"value":"1952","hits":7},{"value":"1953","hits":7},{"value":"1955","hits":7},{"value":"1956","hits":7},{"value":"1957","hits":7},{"value":"1958","hits":7},{"value":"1959","hits":7},{"value":"1960","hits":7},{"value":"1961","hits":7},{"value":"1962","hits":7},{"value":"1963","hits":7},{"value":"1964","hits":7},{"value":"1965","hits":7},{"value":"2017","hits":6},{"value":"2015","hits":5},{"value":"2016","hits":5},{"value":"2018","hits":5},{"value":"2019","hits":5},{"value":"2020","hits":5},{"value":"2021","hits":5},{"value":"2022","hits":5},{"value":"2023","hits":5},{"value":"2024","hits":5}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1950","max":"2024","count":5114,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":904},{"value":"reports","hits":255},{"value":"judicial records","hits":232},{"value":"legal documents","hits":207},{"value":"exhibition (associated concept)","hits":67},{"value":"project management","hits":62},{"value":"budgets","hits":38},{"value":"correspondence","hits":23},{"value":"handbooks","hits":20},{"value":"agendas (administrative records)","hits":17},{"value":"handbills","hits":16}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}