{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1126","title":"Little Rock School District Court Submission","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1993-08-02"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District Court Submission"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1126"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nLITTLE RCDCK SCHCDCDL 191STFUCT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 COURT SUBMISSION AUGUST 2, 1993 Little Rock School District Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge and Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Chris: August 2, 1993 REC IVE AUG 3 1993 Office of Desegregation Mon!tor,ng In preparation for the August 2, 1993, court submission of the revised budget, tll.e Board held a work session on Wednesday, July 28, 1993. At that meeting a list of \"selected items for budget review\" was presented to the Board for discussion and approval. After discussion and input, the Board adopted the revision that is summarized as Draft 7. For ease of submission, this revision includes only a line-item object summary and a function summary detailing the revision. Once the budget has been approved by the court, a final budget document will be issued which incorporates all the exhibits and schedules previously discussed with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. f!J'{I//( MarkD~len Controller MDM/cfh 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)374-3361 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1992-94 Revenue and Expenditure Projection (Draft 7) Selected Items For Budget Review Selected Items For Budget Review - Narrative Line Item (Object) Summary Function Summary 1993-97 Revenue and Expenditure Projection (Draft 3) Business Case - ABACUS Business Case - McClellan Community School Business Case - Recruitment Proposal - Mabelvale Junior High School Proposal - Grant Writer Business Case - Office of Desegregation Secretary Page No. 1 3 4 8 11 14 22 32 37 40 42 43 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1992-94 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PROJECTION (DRAFT 7) 06-30-93 ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL REVISED BUDGET REVISED#3 1991-92 1992-93 1992-93 1993-94 REVISIONS 1993-94 REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 38,196,979 39,088,120 39,701,855 41,027,982 41,027,982 40% PULLBACK 21,081,833 21,694,576 22,220,949 21,420,949 21,420,949 DELINQUENT TAXES 4,250,186 4,250,186 4,293,380 4,502,692 4,502,692 EXCESS TREASURERS FEES 140,858 140,000 145,690 145,690 145,690 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 241,476 300,000 360,734 303,000 303,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 224,667 224,667 245,162 245,162 245,162 MISC. AND RENTS 406,878 461,000 574,918 484,050 484,050 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 354,446 300,000 208,519 350,000 350,000 ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 100,857 100,857 87,005 102,874 102,874 TOTAL 64,998,180 66,559,406 67,838,212 68,582,399 ' 68,582,399 REVENUE-COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 73,419 73,419 73,428 73,419 73,419 SEVERANCE TAX 15,350 11,000 18,031 18,000 18,000 TOTAL 88,769 84,419 91,459 91,419 91,419 REVENUE - STATE SOURCES MFPA 27,264,460 27,042,713 25,275,221 27,142,713 (1,792,575) 25,350,138 SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS 8,637,482 8,926,606 8,926,606 8,094,112 8,094,112 SETTLEMENT LOAN 4,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 (3,000,000) 0 APPORTIONMENT 73,426 73,419 72,694 0 0 VOCATIONAL 1,513,699 1,341 ,887 1,261 ,451 1,341,887 1,341 ,887 HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 824,870 821,449 1,139,235 1,210,000 1,210,000 EARLY CHILDHOOD 147,050 229,403 234,403 240,873 240,873 ORPHAN CHILDREN 3,000 3,000 3,540 3,540 3,540 TRANSPORTATION 2,379,879 2,692,563 2,969,244 2,700,000 2,700,000 COMPENSATORY EDUCATION 858,743 548,034 563,602 575,435 575,435 M TOM TRANSFERS 1,770,486 2,490,900 2,356,224 2,883,425 2,883,425 ADULT EDUCATION 697,589 697,589 799,544 768,715 768,715 TOTAL 48,670,684 46,367,563 45,101 ,764 47,960,700 (4,792,575) 43,168,125 REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES PUBLIC LAW 874 9,385 40,000 40,866 40,000 40,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 129,428 262,000 171,006 1,250,000 1,250,000 TRANSFER FROM BOND ACCT 394,675 600,000 500,000 500,000 TOTAL 533,488 902,000 211,872 1,790,000 1,790,000 TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 114,291 , 121 113,913,388 113,243,307 118,424,518 (4,792,575) 113,631,943 -1- .. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1992-94 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PROJECTION (DRAFT 7) 06-30-93 ., ::- ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL REVISED BUDGET REVISED#3 1991-92 1992-93 1992-93 1993-94 REVISIONS 1993-94 REVENUE-FEDERAL GRANTS CHAPTER I 3,275,099 4,288,755 4,288,755 4,288,755 4,288,755 CHAPTER II 224,423 215,020 215,020 215,020 215,020 TITLE VI B 558,810 589,011 589,011 589,011 589,011 OTHER 1,164,511 1,186,464 1,221,200 1,186,464 1,186,464 .. .. TOTAL 5,222,843 6,279,250 6,313,986 6,279,250 6,279,250 REVENUE-MAGNET SCHOOLS STATE/LOCAL 13,887,841 14,278,796 13,548,434 14,707,160 14,707,160 TOTAL 13,887,841 14,278,796 13,548,434 14,707,160 ' 14,707,160 TOTAL REVENUE 133,401,805 134,471,434 133,105,727 139,410,928 (4,792,575) 134,618,353 EXPENSES SALARIES 73,191,213 73,581,345 71,912,128 77,407,917 (1,453,394) 75,954,523 BENEFITS 8,992,742 9,941,433 9,908,175 10,251,363 (944,807) 9,306,556 SERVICES,SUPP,EQUIP 22,470,043 21,652,668 20,080,366 21,618,532 (484,260) 21,134,272 DEBT SERVICE 7,950,100 9,597,115 9,554,535 8,870,123 8,870,123 CONTINGENCY 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 RESERVE FOR ENCUMBR 714,896 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 112,604,098 115,272,561 112,170,100 119,147,935 (2,882,461) 116,265,474 EXPENSES-FEDERAL GRANTS 5,111,131 6,764,930 5,741,806 6,279,250 6,279,250 EXPENSES-MAGNET SCHOOLS 13,887,841 14,278,796 13,548,434 14,707,160 14,707,160 TOTAL EXPENSES 131,603,070 136,316,287 131,460,340 140,134,345 (2,882,461) 137,251,884 INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE 1,798,735 (1,844,853) 1,645,387 (723,418) (1,910,114) (2,633,532) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL 373,968 485,680 (0) (0) 572,180 572,180 OPERATING 634,844 2,321,867 2,321,867 962,694 2,432,380 3,395,074 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL 485,680 (0) 572,180 (0) 572,180 572,180 OPERATING 2,321,867 962,694 3,395,074 239,276 522,266 761,542 TOTAL 2,807,547 962,694 3,967,254 239,276 1,094,446 1,333,722 -2- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SELECTED ITEMS FOR BUDGET REVIEW 06-30-93 PROPOSED REVISION FTE REVENUE SALARIES FRINGES SER/SUPP TOTAL REVENUE 01. MFPA (1,792,575) (1,792,575) 02. SETTLEMENT LOAN (3,000,000) (3,000,000) TOTAL REVENUE (4,792,575) (4,792,575) EXPENSE 03. SABBATICAL LV DODD/BASELINE -1.00 (58,677) (6,189) (64,866) 04. ATHLETIC DIR POSITION -1.00 (43,521) (5,097) (48,618) 05. 4-YEAR OLD AIDES 10.00 104,110 19,060 123,170 06. ABACUS (73,095) 1,095 (100,000) (172,000) 07. FIGHT BACK PROGRAM -3.00 (88,000) (11,871} ' (99,871) 08. TRANSFER OF POSITION -1.00 (57,513) (6,167} (63,680) 09. COMMUNITY SCH PROG (50,000) (50,000) 10. PARENT RECRUITMENT (40,000) (40,000) 11 . 7TH PERIOD MABEL VALE 100,000 7,650 42,350 150,000 12. PROPOSED ISH CLOSING (920,808) (70,442) (8,750) (1,000,000) 13. STAFFING EFFICIENCY -16.6 (485,787) (54,434} (540,221} 14. SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 300,000 22,950 322,950 15. DISTRICT PAID HEALTH INS (825,000) (825,000) 16. TUITION- EXCEPTIONAL CHILD 250,000 250,000 17. STATE TEXTBOOKS (118,958) (118,958) 18. STIPENDS/INSERVICE (130,051) (9,949) (140,000) 19. PROCUREMENT TRAVEL (13,500) (13,500) 20. EXTENDED YEAR (130,051) (9,949) (140,000) 21 . GRANT WRITER 1.00 30,000 3,536 33,536 22. MATERIALS/SUPP CUT 2% (445,402) (445,402) TOTAL EXPENSE (1,453,394) (944,807) (484,260) (2,882,461) -3- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Selected Items For Budget Review June 30, 1993 As a result of the additional budget review process that began July 9, 1993, a list of targeted areas was developed for further analysis and consideration. An explanation follows for each numbered item listed on the document entitled \"Selected Items for Budget Review\": 1. MFPA 2. 3. 4. The District was notified July 13, 1993, that the level of state aid for the 1993-94 school year had been cut by $870,472.00 due to a formula increase in the charge on real property assessments. This reduction combined with an overestimated projection resulted in the total reduction to this line item in the amount of ($1,792,575). Settlement Loan One provision of the March, 1989, Settlement Agreement established a $20 million loan fund. Proceeds from the fund shall be used for desegregation purposes. Further review of the District's financial situation as of June 30, 1993, yielded the reduction of this non-recurring revenue line item of $3 million from the budget. Sabbatical Leave - Dodd/Baseline Previous versions of the budget document included two principal positions at Dodd Elementary - one due to a requirement to hold a position while an employee was on sabbatical leave. Because of the untimely death of the Baseline Elementary principal on June 21, 1993, and the return of one person on sabbatical leave as of July 14, 1993, one principal position can now be removed from the budget. Athletic Director Position Funding for this position remained in the budget even though the job had been eliminated in the 1992-93 budget cutting process. This reduction removes the position that was inadvertently restored. 5. 4-Year Old Aides The additional ten (10) new 4-Year Old programs for 1993-94 will require ten ( 10) certified teachers. There must also be ten (10) aides to support those teachers. Budget review revealed that the funds for the ten (10) aides were mistakenly omitted from the document. This revision adds the funds for the aides to the budget to satisfy the commitment previously made. -4- Selected Items For Budget Review 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. ABACUS Additional analysis of this program yielded that services could be modified and delivered by using fewer dollars. More details are provided in a separate business case appearing elsewhere in this court submission. Fight Back Program The District received notice from the City of Little Rock that it was terminating funding for this program as of August 31, 1993. Therefore, the three positions budgeted had to be removed. Transfer of Position A vacancy exists in the federally funded Chapter I program due to a recent retirement. An employee currently charged to the operating budget will be transferred to the federal vacant position. Planned restructuring of duties will then allow the elimination of the operating budget position. Community School Program In the earlier budget preparation process, funding for this program was mistakenly doubled over the original additional request. That error is now being corrected. Parent Recruitment A review of budget-to-actual expenditures for this line item revealed that an overestimate of resources for 1993-94 was erroneously included. After this cut of $40,000, the 1993-94 allocation is still increased by almost 26% over the 1992-93 budget. 7th Period - Mabelvale Junior High A proposal supporting this addition to the budget appears elsewhere in this court submission. Proposed Ish Closing If permission has been obtained from the court to close this school, the majority of the dollars allocated for this location may be eliminated from the budget. A small contingency fund remains to offset any remaining expenditures necessary for this site (i.e., utilities, etc.). -5- Selected Items For Budget Review 13. 14. Staffing Efficiency A detailed review of current enrollments by site was compared to budgeted staffing by site as directed by the District's Board of Directors. Based on this process, 16.6 FfE's can be removed from the budget. As we move closer to the opening of school, this area will be very closely monitored so that we can maximize both our secondary and elementary school staffing/assignment processes. No staff will be eliminated and the personnel in those positions will be assigned to existing vacancies. Substitute Teachers Additional dollars are being added to this component of the budget to bring the 1993-94 allocation in line with the 1992-93 actual expenditures. This area continues to be a major source of concern to the District's Board of Directors, the administration, and the teachers' union. Strategies and reports are currently being discussed to deal with this issue. Our current technology should enable the District to produce reports to allow building administrators to compare performance from school-to-school. 15. District Paid Health Insurance 16. Notification was received on or about July 13, 1993, by the District that costs for the statewide health insurance program administered by Blue Cross are decreasing effective October 1, 1993. This adjustment reflects the premium reductions as outlined to us by the carrier. Tuition - Exceptional Children The increase in this expense item is offset by a corresponding increase in the handicapped children state revenue line item. The dollars spent and received in this area represent a \"pass through\" for handicapped and non-handicapped expenditures in approved residential treatment centers. 17. State Textbooks This represents an adjustment to the allocation for state adopted textbook purchases funded by the state. This reduction in expense corresponds with an identical reduction included in the MFPA adjustment. Neither revenue nor expense for this item runs through the District's books. -6- Selected Items For Budget Review 18. Stipends/Inservice The budget-to-actual review process indicates that this line item was overfunded for 1992-93. This reduction brings the 1993-94 proposed allocation in line with 1992-93 actual expense plus a 50% increase. 19. Procurement Travel A data entry error was made when data was loaded for the Procurement and Materials Management Department budget. A $1,500 line item for travel was keyed as $15,000. This adjustment corrects the travel line. 20. Extended Year 21. 22. A reduction in the amount which had been estimated for this program is being proposed due to a review of the actual costs of operating the program in 1992-93. By funding at the level now proposed, the 1993-94 funding level will be 20% greater than 1992-93 actual expenditures. Grant Writer This addition of one (1) FTE for this purpose should afford the District the opportunity to be more competitive in the area of grant acquisition, especially since funding shortfalls appear to be an issue for future years. Materials/Supplies Cut 2% The Board directed the Administration to reduce Districtwide material and supply allocations by 2%. A comparison of budget-to-actual indicates that this reduction should be able to be absorbed. The Board further added that if programs were adversely effected, some restoration would be discussed. -7- I ex, I Date: 07/30/93 Time: 14:17 SALRIES 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0115 CERTIFIED INSTRUCT. ASST. 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NONCERTIFICATEO 0121 MAINTENANCE D124 CLERICAL OVERTIME 0130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS-SHORT 0135 SUBST. CERTIFIED LONG TER 0140 SUBST NON-CERTIFIED-SHORT 0145 SUBST. NON-CERTIFIED LONG SALRIES BENEFITS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0290 OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS BENEFITS PURCHASED SERVICES U510 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0311 INSTRUCTION SERVICES 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0313 PUPIL SERVICES 0314 STAFF SERVICES 0316 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 0318 BOARD OF ED SERVICES 0319 OTHER PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH 0321 UTILITY SERVICES-NATURAL 0322 UTILITY SERVICES -ELECTRIC 0323 UTILITY SER-WATER/SEWAGE/ 0324 CLEANING SERVICES 0325 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0327 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 03211 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0329 OTHER PROPERTY SERVICES 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 03Il TRAVEL 0334 OFFICE EXPENSES 0339 OTHER TRANSPORTATION SERV 0341 TELEPHONE 0342 POSTAGE TOTAL ' TOTAL Little Rock School District Line Item (Object) Surmary Actual 1991/92 $:\u0026gt;5,ooY ,bt.b. r:. $8,212.70 $1,229,076.61 $15,076,554.61 $1,129,828.37 $91,812.91 $871,099.40 $326,189.12 $540,253.81 $28,557.67 $73,191,211.95 $5,570,905.78 $0.00 $171,904.40 $3,036,037.39 $153,797.29 $60,097.43 $8,992,742.29 Ut.f,Ult:,.U:, $13,309.42 $1,052,785.32 $44,070.20 $40.00 $7,529.35 $57,237.67 $91,162.34 $563,340.02 $2,651,690.07 $173,066.98 $0.00 $519,413.12 $470,552.36 $50,770.81 $23,214.29 $126,364.09 $710,448.27 $2,555.64 $92,165.12 ($80.00) $1,430.88 $336,319.73 $91,358.85 Budget 1992/93 :0).\u0026gt;,0Y, ,oYo.Uti $0.00 $1,740,785.54 $16,821,567.84 $0.00 $0.00 $900,000.00 $0.00 $350,DDO.OO SO.OD $73,504,049.46 $9,728,728.24 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $160,000.00 $73,462.00 $9,962,190.24 :\u0026gt;JOO,.\u0026gt;YU.UU $1,000.00 $691,900.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $366,862.00 $70,000.00 $28,000.00 $3,531,500.00 $5,500.00 $15,000.00 $501,.558.00 $596,964.28 $42,000.00 $18,464.00 $275,500.00 $562,036.00 $21,120.00 $73,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $311,000.00 $96,893.00 Actual 1992/93 :oJ.:,o.,..,.,:\u0026gt;ti:\u0026gt;.t.5 $5,386.52 $326,649.66 $15,668,717.99 $1,167,691.67 $69,487.74 $1,363,632.01 $0.00 $410,977.09 $0.00 $71,912,127.91 $5,497,924.6:, $7,755.35 $166,240.10 $3,985,992.66 $192,426.52 $57,835.84 $9,908,175.12 $t.'l:,,ooJ.5f $18,610.84 $768,382.37 $279,291.40 $61.60 $0.00 $595,179.47 $64,266.08 $581,209.77 $2,232,084.12 $149,273.82 $207,407.65 $259,257.67 $531 ,707. 94 $135,447.85 $12,944.93 $18,924.55 $645,404.74 $1,286.44 $112,709.23 $0.00 $1,258.82 $338,295.60 $91,277.58 Budget 1993/94 :O)f ,YU), f'+).16 $0.00 $305,885.31 $14,962,781.62 $1,136,945.28 $0.00 $1,226,321.00 $0.00 $416,844.45 $0.00 $75,954,522.84 $5,42'1,063.93 $6,882.48 $147,104.28 $3,468,506.01 $195,000.00 $60,000.00 $9,306,556.70 $1:\u0026gt;t.1,ouu.UU $21,015.00 $711,357.00 $53,440.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $752,500.00 $72,100.00 $826,700.00 $2,879,165.00 $209,950.00 $400,000.00 $200,300.00 $505,785.09 $135,700.00 $15,050.00 $128,650.00 $628,067.30 $24,160.00 $57,843.63 $0.00 $0.00 $386,500.00 $99,016.20 FTE 1993/94 1()0 0 0 1253 50 0 0 0 0 0 3D59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I.O I Date: 07/30/93 Time: 14:17 0350 ADVERT! SI NG 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDINGEXTE 0362 FREE PRINTED ITEMS 0365 COPIER LEASE 0370 TUITION 0380 FOOD SERVICES 0390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES PURCHASED SERVICES MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 0409 SUPPLIES 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES  SP TRACKING 0412 LOCAL SUPPLIES SP TRACKIN 0413 SOFTWARE 0414 SUPPLIES 0415 TEST MATERIALS 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0417 SUPPLIES -SUPPLY CENTER 0420 TEXTBOOKS 0421 TEXTBOOKS LOCAL SOORCES 0430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0431 LIBRARY REFERENCE MATERIA 0435 0440 PERIODICALS 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0451 AUDIO-VISUAL MATERIALS 0481 PLUMBING 0482 CARPENTRY 0483 ELECTRIC 0485 AIR COND/HEAT 0486 BOILERS/SM ENGINES 0488 PAINTING 0489 ROOFING 0490 OTHER SUPPLIES 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 0494 GAME RELATED EXPENSES 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES CAPTIAL OOTLAY 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0541 EQUIPMENT PER PROP SP TRA 0542 EQUIPMENT (NOT INVENTORIE 0543 EQUIPMENT (REAL PROPERTY) TOTAL TOTAL Little Rock School District Line Item (Object) Surrnary Actual 1991/92 $31,382.16 S109,846.69 S120,347.36 SO.DO $419,811.22 S719,470.11 S138,895.91 S90,673.50 S9,036, 187.53 SO.OD Sl,929,459.75 Sl,083,539.56 $46,338.38 S253,368.81 $8,107.60 S112,075.84 SO.DO SO.OD (S10.95) S305,577.99 S786.12 S15,527.70 SO.OD Sl 1,275.65 S3,675.18 $6,788.91 S3,326.06 S1 ,649.24 $8,319.48 $6,972.10 S17,583.01 S3,637.83 S1,350.78 S10,468.47 S110, 144.08 $68,869.93 Sl,928.82 SO.DO $4,010,760.34 $1,422,531.06 S35,417.01 $836.27 S91,527.78 Budget 1992/93 S24,950.00 S188,419.20 S169,954.00 S500.00 $470,000.00 $476,187.20 S168,923.00 S32,000.00 S9,328,220.68 SO.OD S1 ,217,253.12 S798,339.00 S22, 168.00 S54,500.00 SO.OD S53,950.00 S391,889.00 S1,985.00 S955,000.00 S166,200.00 Sl,060.00 SO.DO S3,000.00 $45,081.00 S6,830.00 S50,000.00 SO.OD SO.OD SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD Sl,000.00 $88,130.00 S71,820.00 S2, 160.00 SO.DO S3,930,365.12 $492,724.84 SO.OD SO.OD S92,000.00 Actual 1992/93 S21,046.31 S91, 146.74 S116,235.20 $404.24 S362,507.86 S1 ,292,991.82 S144,413.73 S165,837.05 S9,534,750.79 c-,411.96\u0026gt; S1, 180,159.22 $870,780.43 S17,966.31 S31,128.18 S1 ,098.52 S39,900.00 $479,578.46 S1,075.62 SO.DO S167,488.65 SO.OD SO.OD SO.OD S22,988.87 SJ,898.09 S24,869.01 S18.54 $486.02 S708.32 S172.70 S15,453.14 S282.25 SO.DO S17,943.27 S79,376.33 $82,828.00 SO.OD S320.00 S2,974, 107.97 $654,966.90 $6,461.34 SO.OD S67,025.70 Budget 1993/94 S18,006.00 S151, 142.39 S153,645.50 S515.00 S503,000.00 S1,195,000.00 S178,062.69 S59,380.00 S10,988,850.80 SO.DO S976,618.83 S784,000.00 S30,157.04 S33,405.00 S2,000.00 S53,000.00 $466,941.10 S2,044.55 $862,542.00 S362,420.00 Sl,120.80 SO.OD S2,000.00 S26,498.35 S2, 150.40 S30,000.00 SO.OD SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD S15,000.00 SO.OD SO.DO Sl0,300.00 S80,974.40 S71,275.80 S2,224.80 Sl,200.00 S3 815,873.07 S598,309.00 S10,000.00 SO.DO $60,000.00 FTE 1993/94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I ~ 0 I Date: 07/30/93 Time: 14:17 0545 EQUIPMENT LEASE PURCHASE 0548 EQUIPMENT  SUPPLY CENTER 0550 VEHICLES 0551 VEHICLES LEASE PURCHASE CAPTIAL OUTLAY OTHER OBJECTS 0610 REDEMPTION OF PRINCIPAL 0620 INTEREST 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 0635 DUES \u0026amp; FEES  NCA 0640 INSURANCE 0641 PROPERTY INSURANCE 0642 LIABILITY INSURANCE 0649 OTHER INSURANCE 0660 IMPROVEMENT TAX 0690 OTHER EXPENSES OTHER OBJECTS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL Little Rock School District Line Item (Object) Surmary Actual 1991/92 S1 ,350,643.15 SO.OD S152,106.60 S906,669.49 S3 959 731.36 S3,393,324.59 S4,904,977.12 S54,716.42 S12,950.00 Sl,196,236.20 S50,000.00 S1 ,817 .08 S51,804.85 SB,971.34 S3,738,667.07 SB,413,464.67 S112,604,098.14 Budget 1992/93 Sl,489,020.00 S136,302.00 S0.00 S910,000.00 S3 120,046.84 $4,597,115.00 s5,ooo,ooo.oo $40,645.00 S26,000.00 Sl,018,440.00 S0.00 S0.00 S54, 775 .00 SO.DO $4,690,713.00 SlS,427,688.00 S115,272,560.34 Actual 1992/93 Sl,546,013.55 $61,031.26 S0.00 $618,895.35 S2 954,394.10 $4,951,180.35 $4,597,390.58 S52,497.64 S15,023.01 S920,983.15 SO.OD SO.OD S52, 791.12 S14,769.85 S3,567,012.06 S14, 171,647.76 S111,455,203.65 S1 Budget 1993/94 S926,742.00 S52,093.00 S0.00 S0.00 647 144.00 S4,074,616.00 S4,785,507.40 S57,339.50 S17,000.00 S400,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S54,775.00 S15,000.00 S5,148,290.00 S14,552,527.90 S116,265,475.31 FTE 1993/94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3059 I f-' f-' I Date: 08/02/93 Time: 11 :04 Function Description 1105 FOUR YEAR OLD PROGRAM 1110 KINDERGARTEN 1120 ELEMENTARY 1124 ELEMENTARY MUSIC 1125 ELEMENTARY MAGNET 1127 SPECIALTY PROGRAMS 1129 SPECIALTY PROGRAM 1130 MIDDLE\\JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1132 JUNIOR HIGH 1135 JUNIOR HIGH MAGNET 1137 JUNIOR HIGH RESTRUCTURE 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 1145 HIGH SCHOOL MAGNET 1146 HIGH SCHOOL STANDARDS 1151 BOYS ATHLETICS 1152 GIRLS ATHLETICS 1154 FOOTBALL/MINOR SPORTS 1155 VOLLEYBALL 1156 BASKETBALL 1157 TRACK,TENNIS,GOLF \u0026amp; SWIMM 1158 BASEBALL 1190 OTHER REGULAR 1191 MULTI-ETHNIC PROGRAM 1193 TRAVELING TEACHERS 1195 ACCELERATED LEARNING 1196 ACCELERATED LEARNING 1199 SUBSTITUTESINSTRUCTION 1210 ITINERANT INSTRUCTION 1220 RESOURCE ROOM 1230 SPECIAL CLASS 1240 HOMEBOUND AND HOSPITAL 1290 OTHER 1292 EXTENDED YEAR HANO. SERVI 1321 MARKETING/DIST ED-COOP 1322 MARKETING/DIST EDEXPL 1331 BUSINESS ED COOP 1332 BUSINESS ED EXPL 1333 BUSINESS EOSKILL TR 1341 HEALTH COOP 1351 TRADE \u0026amp; INOCOOP 1352 TRADE \u0026amp; INOEXPL 1353 TRADE \u0026amp; IND-SKILL TR 1354 YOUTH APPRENTICESHIP 1360 HOME ECONOMICS 136Z CONS/HMKG Little Rock School District Function SLl11118ry Actual 1991/92 $312,429.70 $3,107,993.07 $18,957,936.89 $0.00 $24,950.47 $0.00 $978,337.42 SB, 134,324.61 S0.00 $71,943.05 S429,684.81 S7,856,636.53 $42,226.16 $2,300.61 S42,098.02 $43,559.23 $47,638.98 $6,490.16 $42,794.32 $9,066.81 $8,946.68 $63,857.99 $690.88 $21,042.56 $2,283,175.79 S17,394.73 $1,393,301.78 S943, 193.30 $2,065,293.61 $1,253,039.78 $255,077.13 $823, 730. 20 $14,151.72 $197,722.24 S2,869.04 S191,121.48 $853,847.88 S970, 157.41 $58,755.33 S193,754.91 $619,807.20 $1,016,956.63 $41,764.48 $38,946.63 $670,989.72 Budget 1992/93 $1,479,804.31 $3,253,398.91 $21,904,944.99 $0.00 $265,892.02 $0.00 $0.00 $8,635,782.29 $0.00 $212,863.97 $492,021.18 SB, 264,041.10 $273,095.96 $0.00 $44,620.00 $13,230.00 $49,680.00 $7,200.00 $45,540.00 $11,160.00 S10,800.00 $37,696.84 $0.00 $12,000.00 $2,275,181.26 S0.00 $1,096,370.00 $901,880.14 S2, 189,284.37 S1,296,582.62 $240,565.63 $435,287.20 $0.00 $194,886.18 $0.00 $190,480.17 S575,813.91 S965,541.57 S50,996.02 S189,221.26 $537,358.99 $852,818.65 $46,025.56 S36,683.42 $664,130.37 Actual 1992/93 $1,195,358.85 $3,121,214.45 $19,905,274.36 $0.00 $146,003.86 $24,406.82 $0.00 $8,267,275.44 $5,540.42 $132,143.30 $535,179.49 S7, 823,764.65 $265,987.68 $0.00 $39,661.58 $25,254.43 $48,990.82 $6,393.73 $42,832.09 $13,487.01 $7,440.07 $20,238.80 $0.00 $19,897.81 S2, 121,435.04 $0.00 $1,438,180.85 S1 ,004,570.16 $2,088,460.12 $1,321,771.13 $215,503.17 $1,308,911.09 $4, 123.47 $228,230.75 $0.00 $195,778.88 ,$567,909.51 $1,029,262.40 $71,936.86 S195,305.05 $582,238.42 $992,355.65 $23,257.92 $3,035.70 $614,847.68 Budget 1993/94 $1,707,083.90 $3,261,957.67 $20,225,568.03 $986,897.00 S164,924.23 $0.00 $86,475.45 SB,827,509.50 $26,480.41 $443,104.64 $539,265.87 $8,627,637.52 $79,954.07 $0.00 $44,506.65 $4,798.20 $49,680.00 $7,416.00 $45,880.20 $11,354.40 Sl0,800.00 $17,936.19 $0.00 $15,000.00 $1,298,674.71 $0.00 $1,434,535.20 $1,123,449.98 $2,229,816.67 $1,321,770.46 S319,407.51 $1,246,285.43 $5,705.28 $206,250.75 $0.00 S201,039.34 $647,155.07 $1,001,393.89 $30,058.48 $202,903.96 $552,265.88 $919,838.00 $115,764.01 $0.00 $727,503.40 FTE 1993/94 68 92 711 28 4 0 0 255 1 1 18 232 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 46 77 37 11 5 0 4 0 4 16 22 1 4 14 20 2 0 19 I I-' N I Date: 08/02/93 Time: 11:04 Function Description 1371 CAREER ORIENTATION 1392 COORD CAREERCOOP 1393 LOORD CAREEREXPL 1410 ADULT BASIC EDUCATION 1420 ADULT GENERAL EDUCATION 1430 ADULT VOCATIONAL PROGRAM 1440 SPECIAL PROJECTS 1445 IIORKPLACE LITERACY 1490 OTHER ADULT EDUCATION 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION 1560 READING 1570 MATHEMATICS 1580 ACADEMIC PROGRESS GRANTS 1595 COMPENSATORY EDUCATION 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 2111 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2113 SOCIAL IIORK SERVICES 2114 PUPIL ACCOUNTING SERVICES 2120 GUIDANCE SERVICES 2121 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2122 COUNSELING SERVICES 2129 OTHER GUIDANCE SERVICES 2134 NURSING SERVICES 2142 PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING SER 2211 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2212 INSTRUCTION AND CURR DEV 2213 INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF TRAIN 2215 INST STAFF TRAINING TES 2216 INST STAFF TRAINING PET 2217 CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT 2218 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION 2219 OTHER IMPROVEMENT OF INST 2222 SCHOOL LIBRARY SERVICES 2223 AUDIOVISUAL SERVICES 2229 OTHER EDUCATIONAL MEDIAS 2310 BOARD OF EDUCATION SERVIC 2314 ELECTION SERVICES 2315 LEGAL SERVICES 2317 AUD IT SERVICES 2319 OTHER BOARD OF EDUCATION 2321 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTEND 2326 DESEGREGATION 2410 OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL 2490 OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES - 2510 DIRECTION OF BUSINESS SUP Little Rock School District Function Surmary Actual 1991/92 S230,724.89 $201,795.03 SO.OD $437,414.74 $186,704.13 $18,949.50 $28,974.75 S25,545.75 S35,631.06 S930,948.93 S11,216.41 S288,660.42 $658,575.23 $967,023.83 S1,327,011.59 $11,321.52 SO.OD $145,479.23 $1,561,832.32 $8,639.40 Sl,261,361.90 $97,434.27 S791,264.86 S176,515.50 S719, 148. 16 S2, 142,689.55 S2,238.82 SO.DO S5, 110.19 $14,030.26 S19,373.77 S160,312.59 S2,603,586.90 $36,805.75 S76,000.00 $7,335.80 SO.OD $17,092.67 $40,145.00 S288,020.95 S299,408.55 $433,908.55 S5,965,386.34 $20,954.46 $68,273.22 Budget 1992/93 $224,651.50 $203,203.43 $21,518.34 $404,251.48 $180,760.35 S39,221.06 S10,001.85 SO.DO SO.OD SO.DO $280,068.49 S21,519.20 S320,000.00 $862,437.52 $646,481.75 $5,150.00 SO.OD S14,700.00 S2,475,037.42 S12,850.00 SO.DO SO.OD $812,854.26 SO.OD $730,230.41 S2,505,932.99 S14,000.00 S25,000.00 S40,000.00 S13,000.00 SO.DO $182,022.60 S2,459,369.06 SO.OD S86,000.00 SO.DO S16,500.00 S75,000.00 S31,500.00 $281,462.00 $207,342.23 $424,832.88 S5 ,746, 732. 23 S28,000.00 $81,630.00 Actual 1992/93 $256,111.14 $205,769.71 SO.OD $437,414.74 $331,299.86 SO.OD S0.00 S16,895.83 S13, 933. 79 S220,694.23 S27,887.91 S8,814.04 $233,266.90 S869,433.11 S813,857.18 ($16.00) SO.DO S16,809.66 S2,542,749.16 S2,684.06 $66,678.53 SO.DO S811,380.61 $181,256.55 S808,955.03 S2,579,824.46 SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD $756.00 SO.DO S183,997.25 S2,615,589.49 S34,043.16 S76,000.00 SO.OD $38.25 $467,398.72 S38,242.50 S279 ,740. 50 S232, 171 . 98 $429,738.70 $6,093,823.40 S21,541. 79 $63,697.30 Budget 1993/94 S247,878.64 S213, 754. 13 SO.DO $424, 133.49 S326,524.45 $1,888.48 $953.04 SO.DO SO.DO S241,150.73 S16, 135.65 $9,807.48 S320,000.00 Sl ,093,317.00 S1, 107,246.28 S4,758.48 S121,287.10 S116, 044. 71 S2,798,345.63 S8,563.51 S38,551.19 SO.DO S763,214.52 S195,928.86 $828,827.74 S1, 947,746.50 S10,713.11 $16,070.13 S32,139.33 S10, 713.11 SO.OD S117,058.34 S2, 348,444 .72 S31,927.05 S86,000.00 SO.OD S20,000.00 S350,000.00 S35,000.00 $304,912.07 S200,221.49 $422,648.59 $6,176,083.63 S9,120.69 S87,000.00 FTE 1993/94 6 4 0 15 10 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 37 42 0 10 3 78 0 1 0 41 5 10 44 0 0 0 0 0 6 88 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 10 171 0 0 I ...... w I Date: 08/02/93 Time: 11 :04 Function Description 2525 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING SERV 2529 OTHER FISCAL ACCCXJNTING S 2539 OTHER FACILITIES ACQ \u0026amp; CO 2541 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2542 UPKEEP OF BUILDINGS 2543 UPKEEP OF GROUNDS 2544 UPKEEP OF EQUIPMENT 2545 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 2546 SECURITY SERVICES 2548 ASBESTOS PROGRAM 2549 OTHER OPER \u0026amp; MAINT 2551 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2552 VEHICLE OPERATION 2553 MONITORING 2554 VEHICLE SERVICING 2572 PURCHASING SERVICES 2573 ~AREHOUSING \u0026amp; DISTRIBUTIN 2574 PRINTING, PUB, \u0026amp; DUPLICAT 2585 SAFETY-DRUG TESTING 2587 SAFETY \u0026amp; SECURITY 2589 RISK MANAGEMENT 2590 OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES-BU 2610 DIR OF CENTRAL SUPPORT SE 2623 EVALUATION SERVICES 2632 INTERNAL INFORMATION SERV 2642 RECRUITMENT \u0026amp; PLACEMENTS 2649 OTHER STAFF SERVICES 2664 OPERATIONS 3100 DIRECTION OF COMMUNITY SE 3500 CUSTOOY \u0026amp; CARE OF CHILD 3800 INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS 3820 SUMMER SCHOOL 3900 OTHER COMMUNITY SERVICES 3909 DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION 3911 FAMILY LIFE EDUCATION NF 3916 IN-SCHOOL SUSPENSION 4900 OTHER NON -PROGRAMMED CHAR 5100 BONDED INDEBTEDNESS 6000 PROVISION FOR CONTINGENCI LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Little Rock School District Function SlfflllSry Actual 1991/92 $384,333.68 $39,078.26 $282,107.60 $141,000.45 $9,226,708. 98 $33,083.92 $21,096.97 $72,039.62 $41,627.16 $77,068.61 $49,948.00 $85,779.28 $3,161,263.57 $321,718.14 $3,199,247.83 $927,587.06 $28,662.15 $98,917.79 $14,588.24 $760,378.15 $1,325,111.52 S0.00 $497,991 . 88 $571,953.63 $182,505.89 $345,105.31 $92,350.86 $1,223,976.26 ($4.59) $117,854.64 $213,563.35 $28,277.44 $10,000.00 $73,488.04 $613,400.00 $188,224.19 $3,771,117.52 $7,950,100.01 S0.00 $112,604,098.14 Budget 1992/93 $400,971.31 $0.00 $171,900.00 $0.00 $9,927,586.43 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $18,160.00 $3,500,688.20 $0.00 $3,227,601.09 $1,062,193.80 $11,500.00 $115,000.00 $16,000.00 $754,228.30 $1,137,255.98 $0.00 $220,363.00 $524,133.87 $217,071.80 $426,439.22 $0.00 $1,295,812.40 $115,000.00 $71,000.00 $196,000 . 00 $0.00 S0.00 so.oo $530,400.00 $0.00 $3,800,000.00 $9,597,115.00 $700,000.00 $115,272,560.34 Actual 1992/93 $398,488.44 $3,360.50 $208,269.23 $275,776.67 $8,176,780.17 $11,749.67 $16,043.09 $56,031.80 $2,957.29 $79,391.19 $0.00 $7,031.70 $3,443,249.84 $327,629.42 $2,731,640.87 $897,242.75 $47,038.80 $106,264.92 $11,897.80 $804,094.93 $1,063,284.28 $89,803.91 $149,406.41 $437,888.51 $154,437.80 $305,827.59 $88,999.58 $1,359,339.16 $95,000.00 $0.00 $229,653.19 $0.00 $0.00 $100,046.80 $0.00 S0.00 $3,586,103.53 $9,554,534.76 $0.00 $111,455,203.65 Budget 1993/94 $370,521.82 $0.00 $239,986.48 $222,728.53 $9,317,067.31 $12,831.91 $17,500.00 $57,206.94 $0.00 $68,903.30 $0.00 $19,790.05 $3,445,367.55 $319,159.16 $1,913, 122.85 $1,000,748.09 $54,936.16 $125,403.74 $14,937.36 $852,427.34 $450,000.00 $169,500.00 $141,848.03 $548,186.45 $208,860.21 $408,766.49 $0.00 $1,610,172.13 $170,112.24 $87,770.00 $249,440.00 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $530,400.00 S0.00 $3,915,500.00 $8,870,123.40 $1,000,000.00 $116,265,475.31 FTE 1993/94 12 0 5 9 237 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 324 12 10 15 1 0 0 40 0 0 3 9 4 9 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3059 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1993-97 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PROJECTION (DRAFT 3) 06-30-93 NO MILLAGE NO CUTS 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 REVENUE - LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 39,701,855 41,027,982 41,848,542 42,685,512 43,539,223 44,410,007 45,298,207 40% PULLBACK 22,220,949 21,420,949 21,720,949 22,020,949 22,360,949 22,708,949 23,063,949 DELINQUENT TAXES 4,293,380 4,502,692 4,502,692 4,502,692 4,502,692 4,502,692 4,502,692 EXCESS TREASURERS FEES 145,690 145,690 145,690 145,690 145,690 145,690 145,690 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 360,734 303,000 310,000 320,000 330,000 340,000 350,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 245,162 245,162 250,065 255,067 260,168 265,371 270,679 MISC. AND RENTS 574,918 484,050 493,731 503,606 513,678 523,951 534,430 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 208,519 350,000 357,000 364,140 371,423 378,851 386,428 ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 87,005 102,874 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 ' TOTAL 67,838,212 68,582,399 69,728,669 70,897,656 72,123,822 73,375,512 74,652,076 REVENUE-COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 73,428 73,419 73,419 73,419 73,419 73,419 73,419 SEVERANCE TAX 18,031 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 TOTAL 91,459 91,419 91,419 91,419 91,419 91,419 91,419 REVENUE - STATE SOURCES MFPA 25,275,221 25,350,138 25,857,141 26,244,398 24,899,172 25,397,155 25,905,098 SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS 8,926,606 8,094,112 6,042,591 3,829,942 683,125 0 0 SETTLEMENT LOAN 1,500,000 0 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 0 0 APPORTIONMENT 72,694 0 0 0 0 0 0 VOCATIONAL 1,261,451 1,341,887 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,139,235 1,210,000 1,510,000 1,710,000 1,910,000 2,110,000 2,310,000 EARLY CHILDHOOD 234,403 240,873 250,000 260,000 270,000 280,000 290,000 ORPHAN CHILDREN 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540 TRANSPORTATION 2,969,244 2,700,000 2,900,000 3,100,000 3,300,000 3,500,000 3,700,000 COMPENSATORY EDUCATION 563,602 575,435 586,944 598,683 610,656 622,869 635,327 M TOM TRANSFERS 2,356,224 2,883,425 2,941,094 2,999,915 3,059,914 3,121,112 3,183,534 ADULT EDUCATION 799,544 768,715 784,089 799,771 815,766 832,081 848,723 TOTAL 45,101 ,764 43,168,125 45,075,398 43,746,248 38,752,173 37,066,758 38,076,222 REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES PUBLIC LAW 874 40,866 40,000 35,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 .I_RANSFER FROM OTHER FUN 171 ,006 1,250,000 525,000 535,000 545,000 555,000 560,000 _!RANSFER FROM BOND ACCT 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 TOTAL 211,872 1,790,000 960,000 870,000 775,000 680,000 680,000 _!OTAL REVENUE OPERATING 113,243,307 113,631,943 115,855,486 115,605,323 111,742,414 111 ,213,689 113,499,717 -14- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1993-97 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PROJECTION (DRAFT 3) 06-30-93 NO MILLAGE NO CUTS 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 REVENUE-FEDERAL GRANTS CHAPTER I 4,288,755 4,288,755 4,331 ,643 4,374,959 4,418,709 4,462,896 4,507,525 CHAPTER II 215,020 215,020 217,170 219,342 221,535 223,751 225,988 TITLE VI B 589,011 589,011 594,901 600,850 606,859 612,927 619,056 OTHER 1,221,200 1,186,464 1,198,329 1,210,312 1,222,415 1,234,639 1,246,986 TOTAL 6,313,986 6,279,250 6,342,043 6,405,463 6,469,518 6,534,213 6,599,555 REVENUE-MAGNET SCHOOLS STATE/LOCAL 13,548,434 14,707,160 15,001,303 15,301,329 15,607,356 15,919,503 16,237,893 TOTAL 13,548,434 14,707,160 15,001,303 15,301,329 15,607,356 15,919,503 16,237,893 ' TOTAL REVENUE 133,105,727 134,618,353 137,198,831 137,312,115 133,819,287 133,667,404 136,337, 164 EXPENSES SALARIES 71,912,128 75,954,523 79,838,417 83,065,810 85,454,348 87,901,689 90,420,127 BENEFITS 9,908,175 9,306,556 10,613,054 10,944,072 11,164,449 11,387,737 11,615,492 SERVICES,SUPP,EOUIP 20,795,262 21,134,272 24,327,313 25,027,302 25,463,254 25,897,414 26,339,131 DEBT SERVICE 9,554,535 8,870,123 8,745,248 8,158,921 7,941,468 7,100,036 7,120,109 CONTINGENCY 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 112,170,100 116,265,474 124,524,032 128,196,105 131,023,519 133,286,876 136,494,859 EXPENSES-FEDERAL GRANTS 5,741,806 6,279,250 6,914,223 6,405,463 6,469,518 6,534,213 6,599,555 EXPENSES-MAGNET SCHOOL 13,548,434 14,707,160 15,001,303 15,301,329 15,607,356 15,919,503 16,237,893 TOTAL EXPENSES 131,460,340 137,251,884 146,439,558 149,902,897 153,100,392 155,740,592 159,332,307 INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE 1,645,387 (2,633,532) (9,240,726) (12,590,782) (19,281,105) (22,073,187) (22,995,142) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL 0 572,180 572,180 0 0 0 0 OPERATING 2,321 ,867 3,395,074 761,542 (7,907,004) (20,497,786) (39,778,892) (61,852,079) ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL 572,180 572,180 0 0 0 0 0 OPERATING 3,395,074 761,542 (7,907,004) (20,497,786) (39,778,892) (61,852,079) (84,847,221) _ TOTAL 3,967,254 1,333,722 (7,907,004) (20,497,786) (39,778,892) (61,852,079) (84,847,221) -15- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1993-97 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PROJECTION (DRAFT 3) 06-30-93 5 MILLS NO CUTS 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 39,701,855 41,027,982 41,848,542 50,185,512 51,189,223 52,213,007 53,257,267 40% PULLBACK 22,220,949 21,420,949 24,720,949 25,020,949 25,360,949 25,708,949 26,063,949 DELINQUENT TAXES 4,293,380 4,502,692 4,502,692 4,502,692 4,502,692 4,502,692 4,502,692 EXCESS TREASURERS FEES 145,690 145,690 145,690 145,690 145,690 145,690 145,690 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 360,734 303,000 310,000 320,000 330,000 340,000 350,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 245,162 245,162 250,065 255,067 260,168 265,371 270,679 MISC. AND RENTS 574,918 484,050 493,731 503,606 513,678 523,951 534,430 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 208,519 350,000 357,000 364,140 371,423 378,851 386,428 ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 87,005 102,874 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 TOTAL 67,838,212 68,582,399 72,728,669 81,397,656 82,773,822 8' 4,178,512 85,611,136 REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 73,428 73,419 73,419 73,419 73,419 73,419 73,419 SEVERANCE TAX 18,031 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 TOTAL 91,459 91,419 91,419 91,419 91,419 91,419 91,419 REVENUE - STATE SOURCES MFPA 25,275,221 25,350,138 25,857,141 26,244,398 24,899,172 25,397,155 25,905,098 SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS 8,926,606 8,094,112 6,042,591 3,829,942 683,125 0 0 SETTLEMENT LOAN 1,500,000 0 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 0 0 APPORTIONMENT 72,694 0 0 0 0 0 0 VOCATIONAL 1,261,451 1,341,887 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,139,235 1,210,000 1,510,000 1,710,000 1,910,000 2,110,000 2,310,000 EARLY CHILDHOOD 234,403 240,873 250,000 260,000 270,000 280,000 290,000 ORPHAN CHILDREN 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540 TRANSPORTATION 2,969,244 2,700,000 2,900,000 3,100,000 3,300,000 3,500,000 3,700,000 COMPENSATORY EDUCATION 563,602 575,435 586,944 598,683 610,656 622,869 635,327 M TOM TRANSFERS 2,356,224 2,883,425 2,941,094 2,999,915 3,059,914 3,121 ,112 3,183,534 ADULT EDUCATION 799,544 768,715 784,089 799,771 815,766 832,081 848,723 TOTAL 45,101,764 43,168,125 45,075,398 43,746,248 38,752,173 37,066,758 38,076,222 REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES PUBLIC LAW 874 40,866 40,000 35,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUN 171,006 1,250,000 525,000 535,000 545,000 555,000 560,000 TRANSFER FROM BOND ACCT 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 TOTAL 211,872 1,790,000 960,000 870,000 775,000 680,000 680,000 TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 113,243,307 113,631,943 118,855,486 126,105,323 122,392,414 122,016,689 124,458,777 -16- I - I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1993-97 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PROJECTION (DRAFT 3) 06-30-93 5 MILLS NO CUTS 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 REVENUE-FEDERAL GRANTS CHAPTER I 4,288,755 4,288,755 4,331,643 4,374,959 4,418,709 4,462,896 4,507,525 CHAPTER II 215,020 215,020 217,170 219,342 221,535 223,751 225,988 TITLE VI B 589,011 589,011 594,901 600,850 606,859 612,927 619,056 OTHER 1,221,200 1,186,464 1,198,329 1,210,312 1,222,415 1,234,639 1,246,986 TOTAL 6,313,986 6,279,250 6,342,043 6,405,463 6,469,518 6,534,213 6,599,555 REVENUE-MAGNET SCHOOLS STATE/LOCAL 13,548,434 14,707,160 15,001,303 15,301 ,329 15,607,356 15,919,503 16,237,893 TOTAL 13,548,434 14,707,160 15,001,303 15,301,329 15,607,356 15,919,503 16,237,893 TOTAL REVENUE 133,105,727 134,618,353 140,198,831 147,812,115 144,469,287 144,470,404 147,296,224 EXPENSES SALARIES 71,912,128 75,954,523 79,838,417 83,065,810 85,454,348 87,901,689 90,420,127 BENEFITS 9,908,175 9,306,556 10,613,054 10,944,072 11,164,449 11,387,737 11,615,492 SERVICES,SUPP,EQUIP 20,795,262 21,134,272 24,327,313 25,027,302 25,463,254 25,897,414 26,339,131 DEBT SERVICE 9,554,535 8,870,123 8,745,248 8,158,921 7,941 ,468 7,100,036 7,120,109 CONTINGENCY 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 112,170,100 116,265,474 124,524,032 128,196,105 131,023,519 133,286,876 136,494,859 EXPENSES-FEDERAL GRANTS 5,741,806 6,279,250 6,914,223 6,405,463 6,469,518 6,534,213 6,599,555 EXPENSES-MAGNET SCHOOL 13,548,434 14,707,160 15,001,303 15,301 ,329 15,607,356 15,919,503 16,237,893 TOTAL EXPENSES 131,460,340 137,251,884 146,439,558 149,902,897 153,100,392 155,740,592 159,332,307 INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE 1,645,387 (2,633,532) (6,240,726) (2,090,782) (8,631,105) (11,270,187) (12,036,082) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL 0 572,180 572,180 0 0 0 0 OPERATING 2,321,867 3,395,074 761 ,542 (4,907,004) (6,997,786) (15,628,892) (26,899,079) ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL 572,180 572,180 0 0 0 0 0 OPERATING 3,395,074 761 ,542 (4,907,004) (6,997,786) (15,628,892) (26,899,079) (38,935,161) TOTAL 3,967,254 1,333,722 (4,907,004) (6,997,786) (15,628,892) (26,899,079) (38,935,161) -17- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1993-97 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PROJECTION (DRAFT 3) 06-30-93 5 MILLS WITH CUTS 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 REVENUE - LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 39,701,855 41,027,982 41,848,542 50,185,512 51,189,223 52,213,007 53,257,267 40% PULLBACK 22,220,949 21,420,949 24,720,949 25,020,949 25,360,949 25,708,949 26,063,949 DELINQUENT TAXES 4,293,380 4,502,692 4,502,692 4,502,692 4,502,692 4,502,692 4,502,692 EXCESS TREASURERS FEES 145,690 145,690 145,690 145,690 145,690 145,690 145,690 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 360,734 303,000 310,000 320,000 330,000 340,000 350,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 245,162 245,162 250,065 255,067 260,168 265,371 270,679 MISC. AND RENTS 574,918 484,050 493,731 503,606 513,678 523,951 534,430 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 208,519 350,000 357,000 364,140 371,423 378,851 386,428 ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 87,005 102,874 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 TOTAL 67,838,212 68,582,399 72,728,669 81,397,656 82,773,822 84,178,512 85,611,136 REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 73,428 73,419 73,419 73,419 73,419 73,419 73,419 SEVERANCE TAX 18,031 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 TOTAL 91,459 91,419 91,419 91,419 91,419 91,419 91,419 REVENUE - STATE SOURCES MFPA 25,275,221 25,350,138 25,857,141 26,244,398 24,899,172 25,397,155 25,905,098 SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS 8,926,606 8,094,112 6,042,591 3,829,942 683,125 0 0 SETTLEMENT LOAN 1,500,000 0 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 0 0 APPORTIONMENT 72,694 0 0 0 0 0 0 VOCATIONAL 1,261,451 1,341,887 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,139,235 1,210,000 1,510,000 1,710,000 1,910,000 2,110,000 2,310,000 EARLY CHILDHOOD 234,403 240,873 250,000 260,000 270,000 280,000 290,000 ORPHAN CHILDREN 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540 TRANSPORTATION 2,969,244 2,700,000 2,900,000 3,100,000 3,300,000 3,500,000 3,700,000 COMPENSATORY EDUCATION 563,602 575,435 586,944 598,683 610,656 622,869 635,327 M TOM TRANSFERS 2,356,224 2,883,425 2,941,094 2,999,915 3,059,914 3,121,112 3,183,534 ADULT EDUCATION 799,544 768,715 784,089 799,771 815,766 832,081 848,723 TOTAL 45,101,764 43,168,125 45,075,398 43,746,248 38,752,173 37,066,758 38,076,222 REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES PUBLIC LAW 874 40,866 40,000 35,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUN 171,006 1,250,000 525,000 535,000 545,000 555,000 560,000 TRANSFER FROM BOND ACCT 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 TOTAL 211,872 1,790,000 960,000 870,000 775,000 680,000 680,000 TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 113,243,307 113,631,943 118,855,486 126,105,323 122,392,414 122,016,689 124,458,777 -18- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1993-97 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PROJECTION (DRAFT 3) 06-30-93 5 MILLS WITH CUTS 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 REVENUE-FEDERAL GRANTS CHAPTER I 4,288,755 4,288,755 4,331,643 4,374,959 4,418,709 4,462,896 4,507,525 CHAPTER II 215,020 215,020 217,170 219,342 221,535 223,751 225,988 TITLE VI B 589,011 589,011 594,901 600,850 606,859 612,927 619,056 OTHER 1,221,200 1,186,464 1,198,329 1,210,312 1,222,415 1,234,639 1,246,986 TOTAL 6,313,986 6,279,250 6,342,043 6,405,463 6,469,518 6,534,213 6,599,555 REVENUE-MAGNET SCHOOLS STATE/LOCAL 13,548,434 14,707,160 15,001,303 15,301,329 15,607,356 15,919,503 16,237,893 TOTAL 13,548,434 14,707,160 15,001,303 15,301,329 15,607,356 15,919,503 16,237,893 TOTAL REVENUE 133,105,727 134,618,353 140,198,831 147,812,115 144,469,287 144,470,404 147,296,224 EXPENSES SALARIES 71,912,128 75,954,523 79,838,417 83,065,810 85,454,348 87,901,689 90,420,127 BENEFITS 9,908,175 9,306,556 10,613,054 10,944,072 11,164,449 11,387,737 11,615,492 SERVICES,SUPP,EQUIP 20,795,262 21,134,272 24,327,313 25,027,302 25,463,254 25,897,414 26,339,131 DEBT SERVICE 9,554,535 8,870,123 8,745,248 8,158,921 7,941,468 7,100,036 7,120,109 POSITION/PROGRAM CUTS (4,950,000) (4,000,000) (6,700,000) (11,300,000) (12,000,000) CONTINGENCY 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 112,170,100 116,265,474 119,574,032 124,196,105 124,323,519 121,986,876 124,494,859 EXPENSES-FEDERAL GRANTS 5,741,806 6,279,250 6,914,223 6,405,463 6,469,518 6,534,213 6,599,555 EXPENSES-MAGNET SCHOOL 13,548,434 14,707,160 15,001 ,303 15,301,329 15,607,356 15,919,503 16,237,893 TOTAL EXPENSES 131,460,340 137,251,884 141,489,558 145,902,897 146,400,392 144,440,592 147,332,307 INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE 1,645,387 (2,633 ,532) (1,290,726) 1,909,218 (1 ,931 ,105) 29,813 (36,082) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL 0 572,180 572,180 0 0 0 0 OPERATING 2,321,867 3,395,074 761,542 42,996 1,952,214 21,108 50,921 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL 572,180 572,180 0 0 0 0 0 OPERATING 3,395,074 761,542 42,996 1,952,214 21,108 50,921 14,839 TOTAL 3,967,254 1,333,722 42,996 1,952,214 21,108 50,921 14,839 -19- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1993-97 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PROJECTION (DRAFT 3) 06-30-93 NO MILLAGE WITH CUTS 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1992- 93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 REVENUE - LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 39,701,855 41,027,982 41,848,542 42,685,512 43,539,223 44,410,007 45,298,207 40% PULLBACK 22,220,949 21,420,949 21,720,949 22,020,949 22,360,949 22,708,949 23,063,949 DELINQUENT TAXES 4,293,380 4,502,692 4,502,692 4,502,692 4,502,692 4,502,692 4,502,692 EXCESS TREASURERS FEES 145,690 145,690 145,690 145,690 145,690 145,690 145,690 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 360,734 303,000 310,000 320,000 330,000 340,000 350,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 245,162 245,162 250,065 255,067 260,168 265,371 270,679 MISC. AND RENTS 574,918 484,050 493,731 503,606 513,678 523,951 534,430 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 208,519 350,000 357,000 364,140 371,423 378,851 386,428 ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 87,005 102,874 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 TOTAL 67,838,212 68,582,399 69,728,669 70,897,656 72,123,822 73,375,512 74,652,076 REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 73,428 73,419 73,419 73,419 73,419 73,419 73,419 SEVERANCE TAX 18,031 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 TOTAL 91,459 91,419 91,419 91,419 91,419 91,419 91 ,419 REVENUE - STATE SOURCES MFPA 25,275,221 25,350,138 25,857,141 26,244,398 24,899,172 25,397,155 25,905,098 SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS 8,926,606 8,094,112 6,042,591 3,829,942 683,125 0 0 SETTLEMENT LOAN 1,500,000 0 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 0 0 APPORTIONMENT 72,694 0 0 0 0 0 0 VOCATIONAL 1,261,451 1,341 ,887 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,139,235 1,210,000 1,510,000 1,710,000 1,910,000 2,110,000 2,310,000 EARLY CHILDHOOD 234,403 240,873 250,000 260,000 270,000 280,000 290,000 ORPHAN CHILDREN 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540 TRANSPORTATION 2,969,244 2,700,000 2,900,000 3,100,000 3,300,000 3,500,000 3,700,000 COMPENSATORY EDUCATION 563,602 575,435 586,944 598,683 610,656 622,869 635,327 M TO M TRANSFERS 2,356,224 2,883,425 2,941,094 2,999,915 3,059,914 3,121,112 3,183,534 ADULT EDUCATION 799,544 768,715 784,089 799,771 815,766 832,081 848,723 TOTAL 45,101 ,764 43,168,125 45,075,398 43,746,248 38,752,173 37,066,758 38,076,222 REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES PUBLIC LAW 874 40,866 40,000 35,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUN 171,006 1,250,000 525,000 535,000 545,000 555,000 560,000 TRANSFER FROM BOND ACCT 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 TOTAL 211,872 1,790,000 960,000 870,000 775,000 680,000 680,000 TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 113,243,307 113,631 ,943 115,855,486 115,605,323 111,742,414 111,213,689 113,499,717 -20- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1993-97 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PROJECTION (DRAFT 3) 06-30-93 NO MILLAGE WITH CUTS 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 REVENUE-FEDERAL GRANTS CHAPTER I 4,288,755 4,288,755 4,331,643 4,374,959 4,418,709 4,462,896 4,507,525 CHAPTER II 215,020 215,020 217,170 219,342 221,535 223,751 225,988 TITLE VI 8 589,011 589,011 594,901 600,850 606,859 612,927 619,056 OTHER 1,221,200 1,186,464 1,198,329 1,210,312 1,222,415 1,234,639 1,246,986 TOTAL 6,313,986 6,279,250 6,342,043 6,405,463 6,469,518 6,534,213 6,599,555 REVENUE-MAGNET SCHOOLS STATE/LOCAL 13,548,434 14,707,160 15,001 ,303 15,301,329 15,607,356 15,919,503 16,237,893 TOTAL 13,548,434 14,707,160 15,001,303 15,301 ,329 15,607,356 15,919,503 16,237,893 TOTAL REVENUE 133,105,727 134,618,353 137,198,831 137,312,115 133,819,287 133,667,404 136,337, 164 EXPENSES SALARIES 71,912,128 75,954,523 79,838,417 83,065,810 85,454,348 87,901,689 90,420,127 BENEFITS 9,908,175 9,306,556 10,613,054 10,944,072 11,164,449 11,387,737 11,615,492 SERVICES.SUPP ,EQUIP 20,080,366 21,134,272 24,327,313 25,027,302 25,463,254 25,897,414 26,339,131 DEBT SERVICE 9,554,535 8,870,123 8,745,248 8,158,921 7,941,468 7,100,036 7,120,109 POSITION/PROGRAM CUTS (7,900,000) (12,050,000) (19,400,000) (22,000,000) (23,000,000) CONTINGENCY 714,896 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 112,170,100 116,265,474 116,624,032 116,146,105 111 ,623,519 111,286,876 113,494,859 EXPENSES-FEDERAL GRANTS 5,741,806 6,279,250 6,914,223 6,405,463 6,469,518 6,534,213 6,599,555 EXPENSES-MAGNET SCHOOL 13,548,434 14,707,160 15,001 ,303 15,301,329 15,607,356 15,919,503 16,237,893 TOTAL EXPENSES 131,460,340 137,251,884 138,539,558 137,852,897 133,700,392 133,740,592 136,332,307 INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE 1,645,387 (2,633,532) (1 ,340,727) (540,782) 118,895 (73,187) 4,858 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL 0 572,180 572,180 0 0 0 0 OPERATING 2,321 ,867 3,395,074 1,333,722 565,175 24,393 143,288 70,101 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL 572,180 572,180 0 0 0 0 0 OPERATING 3,395,074 761 ,542 565,176 24,393 143,288 70,101 74,958 TOTAL 3,967,254 1,333,722 565,175 24,393 143,288 70,101 74,958 -21- ADDITIONAL BUDGET EXPENDITURES ABACUS - INSTRUCTIONAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (REVISED - 7 /28/93) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Little Rock School District is committed to a comprehensive desegregation plan which focuses on the total learning environment for all students. The method of assigning these students is the first step in creating school and classroom environments that foster academic achievement and improve race relations between students and staff members. The next step involves a commitment to quality desegregated education by the District, the parents, and the community. The commitment requires a plan of action predicated upon the District's commitment to remaining solvent, while providing quality desegregated education for its students. The Educational Audit pointed out the curriculum must be reviewed, revised as necessary, developed in an appropriate scope and sequence, and capable of supporting carefully-written objectives. Not until this was done could we move forward to address in a meaningful way the evaluation of effective teaching and the assessment of student learning. Instructional management systems are very effective and helpful in tracking the progress of individual students and providing corrective prescriptions to improve learning. A. BACKGROUND The Little Rock School District remains committed to providing teachers and principals with the training and technical support necessary to ensure that the Abacus system is used by teachers as a viable instructional management tool. In order to fulfill this commitment using District resources currently available, all principals were trained during the first semester, but the original plan for training all K-12 core-area teachers during the 1992-93 school year was modified and, thus, the initial schedule for training was revised. During the 1992-93 school year, the Abacus system was implemented in a limited number of schools. All K-9 core-area teachers, specialists, and administrators in these schools were trained to use the system for management instruction in core content areas of the revised curriculum. Because of the large number of schools applying for the limited spaced available in the pilot project, the District decided to conduct two (2) cycles of the pilot training in order to include more schools in the project. The schools chosen to participate in each cycle were as follows: -22- Cycle I Mabelvale Jr. High Southwest Jr. High Baseline Carver Cycle II Badgett Booker Chicot Forest Park Dodd Geyer Springs Gibbs Mitchell lsh Jefferson Meadowcliff Otter Creek Rightsell Romine Terry Pulaski Heights El. Watson Woodruff Each cycle was divided into two phases of training: the first phase consisted of K-9 core-area teachers in each pilot school attending two half-day training sessions\nthe second phase consi$ted of individual technical assistance conducted by the Staff Development Specialists at the local pilot schools. Additional training for the teachers trained this past summer was also provided. After teachers had completed two training sessions, the Staff Development Specialists spent four to six (4-6) days in each school providing Phase II training, which consisted of individual technical assistance to the teachers as they used the Abacus system. This assistance was provided according to a schedule developed cooperatively by each teacher and the Staff Development Specialists. Following completion of the inschool technical assistance, additional class sessions and/or further in-school training will be scheduled and conducted according to the needs of the participants. Several optional Abacus review /refresher workshops were scheduled for those teachers who were originally trained this past summer at the IBM center. These workshops were conducted at Metropolitan during the AEA Convention. Session 1 - November 5, 1992 -- 8:30 - 11 :30 a.m. Session 2 - November 5, 1992 -- 12:30 - 3:30 p.m. Session 3 - November 6, 1992 -- 8:30 - 11 :30 a.m. Each session was limited to 20 participants per session. The remaining schools are targeted for initial training this summer and during the 1993-94 school year. -2 3 - B. PROBLEM DEFINITION The District must determine the most appropriate way to complete the training for the remaining schools and how to provide additional technical assistance and support to all schools. The new curriculum offers core content area teachers flexibility in making the best uses of an almost infinite number of assessment possibilities. Teachers realize that assessing student progress is an ongoing part of the instructional process, and most teachers incorporate a variety of assessment strategies into the daily teaching/learning routine. With the new core curriculum, teachers can ensure that students are mastering the grade level objectives by correlating their assessment methods, along with their instructional strategies, to the identified objectives. Since teachers have the freedom to arrange the objectives so that they fit the learner's needs and the teacher's style, they must also choose how to assess. Teachers will continue to use standardized chapter tests and other similar mass-produced assessment with caution. The new curriculum has been designed by LRSD teachers for LRSD teachers. The objectives in all core areas are linked to specific learner outcomes, and any assessment must reflect individual student progress consistent with the aims of those outcomes. To assist teachers in the assessment process, a test item bank that is aligned with the District's curriculum is available through the Instructional Management System. The test item bank will be expanded to include more test items by the beginning of the 1993-94 school year. Remaining teachers need to be trained in order to access the test items. C. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES The District needs to determine the most efficient and user-friendly method of completing this needed training. We have given a great deal of thought and discussion as to the most cost-effective means of providing this training. Feedback from staff in pilot schools was secured in determining what worked and what did not work in Cycle I and II training sessions this school year. A District-wide instructional management system is needed to help us track the progress of individual students and to provide corrective prescriptions to improve teaching and learning. We can no longer wait until spring each year to know whether or not our students have mastered the objectives in our curriculum. D. RECOMMENDATION The District reviewed Recommendation Number 2 in which it planned to implement the instructional management system District-wide. There are a number of critical issues facing the District, and it is extremely important that all initiatives be provided the necessary time and resources that will facilitate successful implementation. Recommendation Number 3 will allow the District to concentrate its efforts in the -24- elementary schools, so that successful implementation will be more assured and delay the secondary school implementation which is less critical for 1994-95. Intervention and tracking of students' progress can be most effective if started in the early years of our students' education. With the elimination of reading cards and math bifolds, it is necessary to establish a uniform system for recording students' mastery of the curriculum. It is recommended that the District modify its original plans and fully implement the Abacus Instructional Management System at all elementary schools during the 1993- 94 school year. During the 1992-93 school year, 22 schools participated in the piloting of the Instructional Management System. The pilot schools assisted us in learning to effectively train staff and to work out expected \"glitches\" in the System. The rationale for this recommendation is that the management system, fully operational, can provide:  Continuous monitoring of individual student progress. Detailed reports for conferences, Board of Directors, and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. Immediate feedback on test results with diagnostic information. Comprehensive library of learning resources.  Capability to create, store, and print tests. It is further recommended that the remaining secondary schools implement the instructional management system as of the 1994-95 school year. Secondary teachers will be encouraged to take advantage of training courses that will be offered at the Instructional Resource Center during designated evenings beginning with the 1993-94 school year. Training will also be made available during the summer of 1994. Parents The Abacus Instructional Management System provides ways to help make the parent an integral part of their student's learning process. It will: Provide reports showing the learning objectives and instructional goals to be mastered. Provide regular and timely update reports showing current progress toward those instructional goals. Clearly show parents which learning objectives have not been mastered or not attempted. -25- Provide suggested instructional resource listings which the parent can use to supplement classroom instruction in areas where the student needs help. Enhance parent/teacher cooperation. E. OBJECTIVE The objective of this recommendation is to fully utilize technology to uniformly manage and monitor instruction as indicated in the desegregation plan. The District needs this technology to help it evaluate programs that are working and to secure the necessary data to assist us in eliminating programs that are not working. Technology, used appropriately, can save staff many hours of manual labor and can provide uniform and consistent reporting of student learning and student mastery of the curriculum. Evaluation Criteria Continuous monitoring of student progress. Timely, detailed reports for conferences, administration, Board of Directors, and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. Increased teacher use of test item bank. Increased use of mastery reports by teachers and principals to intervene in student learning. Increased use of the System by reluctant users. Increased use of mastery reports to parents regarding student learning. F. IMPACT ANALYSIS The Instructional Management System has the potential for assisting the District in gathering data for reports, monitoring and evaluating teaching and learning, and tracking student progress. Reliable data are needed to make professional judgements regarding the effectiveness of District programs. It is important to provide student, class, school, and District Objective Mastery Analysis and Summary. The System can provide a rich and stimulating instructional resource bank that will assist teachers, librarians, media clerks, and parents. -26- Desegregation Plan Full implementation of the Instructional Management System at the elementary level will allow us to achieve a component in our desegregation plan: the use of an instructional management system that will track student progress. Court Orders The District has committed to the utilization of an instructional management system, and this commitment has been noted by the Court. Political Factors The District can receive favorable responses from the community and schools if it commits the necessary resources to correctly implement the System. Risks The quality of support and services provided by the schools and patrons can be positive, if implemented correctly. The additional funds requested will be viewed as a wise investment. Should the District decide not to support this system, the results can be very negative and regarded as \"just another gimmick.\" Timing Decisions regarding modified implementation should be made prior to the beginning of the 1993-94 school year. It will be necessary to begin training the remaining elementary teachers prior to the beginning of school. G. RESOURCES ANALYSIS Provided is a listing of personnel that must be trained to use the Instructional Management System. Included is the projected budget for staff development of teachers. The Administration recommends the Board of Directors approve Plan 3 for implementation for the 1993-94 school year. -27- ABACUS TRAINING FOR 1993-94 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 3 1. Train only the remainder of the elementary schools and provide maintenance for the original pilot schools. 2. Add five (5) technicians in Data Processing to provide district-wide technical assistance. 3. Designate one (1) staff member in each elementary school to provide technical assistance. within the school\neach person will receive a $500 stipend. (Computer lab attendant, media clerk, etc. may be selected for this position.) Training Costs for Plan 3 a. Training July 26 - August 13 Participants: Four (4) remaining incentive schools and King Review Session 3 pilot incentive schools Training for in-school technical person If the above staff members are not on contract, stipends of approximately $50 per day per teacher for approximately 240 teachers $12,000.00 b. Training August 30 - October 4 Participants: C. Total Twelve (12) remaining elementary schools Training for in-school technical person One (1) day substitute for approximately 340 teachers @ approximately $30 per day per substitute $10,200.00 Stipends (approx. $500 per school) $19,000.00 -28- $41,200.00 Training Schedule for Plan 3 Note: the following schedule is based on a 15 station Abacus lab. July 26 - August 13: Remaining incentive schools, King, and Review Sessions for all pilot incentive schools (240 teachers\none (1) full day per teacher and one additional full day for technical persons\nif not on contract, a stipend of approximately $50 per day) July 26 - Franklin July 27 - Franklin July 28 - Garland July 29 - Garland and Rockefeller July 30 - Rockefeller August 2 - Stephens August 3 - King August 4 - King August 5 - Review for lsh August 6 - Review for Mitchell August 9 - Review for Mitchell and Rightsell August 1 O - Review for Rightsell September 30 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) October 1 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) October 4 - In-school Technical Person (13 schools) Remaining one-half day of training for in-school technical person will be scheduled for one evening after the initial training. August 30 - October 4: Twelve (12) remaining elementary schools and 37 technical persons (340 staff members - two (2) half-day sessions per staff member\none full day for technical person\nuse substitutes) August 30 and September 15 August 31 and September 16 -29- Bale (8) Brady (8) Cloverdale El. (6) Fair Park (4) Fulbright (4) Bale (8) Brady (8) Cloverdale El. (6) Fair Park (4) Fulbright (4) l September 1 and September 17 Bale (4) Brady (6) I Fair Park (4) ' I Fulbright (8) I Mabelvale El. (6) September 2 and September 20 Fair Park (8) Fulbright (8) Mabelvale El. (8) I McDermott (6) I, I I September 3 and September 21 Fulbright (2) Mabelvale El. (6) McDermott (8) Wakefield (8) I Washington (6) I I September 8 and September 23 Mabelvale El. (6) McDermott (8) Wakefield (8) Washington (10) September 9 and September 24 McDermott (6) j' Wakefield (8) I Washington (10) Western Hills (6) September 1 O and September 27 Wakefield (2) Washington (10) I Western Hills (8) I Williams (10) I September 13 and September 28 Washington (4) Western Hills (6) Williams (10) Wilson (10) September 14 and September 29 Washington (8) Williams (8) Wilson (10) I September 30 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) October 1 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) October 4 In-school Technical Person (13 schools) I -30- BUDGET - ABACUS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 3 The following budget assumes full implementation of all elementary schools during the 1993-94 school year. It uses current enrollment numbers with the addition of King School's projected enrollment. Additional equipment numbers are based on having four stations at school with enrollment \u0026gt; 1000 students, three stations at schools with \u0026gt; 800 students, and two stations at schools with enrollments \u0026gt; 600 students. Those schools with less than 600 students would have only one (1) work station. We would have two printers and two scanners only at those locations with four PC's. All other locations would share one printer and one scanner. 21 IBM PC's $1,676.00 Forms Printer Cartridges (45) In-district Printing TOTAL $35,196.00 $12,474.00 $7,650.00 $3,520.00 $ 2,169.00 $61 ,007.00 This represents a total savings from the previous Plan 3 budget of $100,000. This was accomplished by taking a closer look at the hardware and forms needs for the schools. We were also able to identify an in-house inventory of scanners and printers. Implementation of Plan 3 instead of Plan 2 represents a savings in staff development of $72,650, resulting in an overall savings of $172,650. Equipment/Supplies/Mileage Stipends for 580 Elementary Teachers Stipends for one (1) technical asst. per school (38) Stipends for five (5) computer technicians TOTAL $ 61,007.00 22,200.00 19,000.00 65,000.00 - 31- $167,207.00 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BUSINESS CASE MCCLELLAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL (Revised July, 1993) The Little Rock School District is committed to a comprehensive desegregation plan which focuses on the total learning environment for all students. It is further committed to ensuring that all students in our district receive a quality desegregated education. The District recognized its responsibility in ensuring that the annexed schools would feel that they were an integral part of our school community. Therefore, support for the community school was secured and the community concept has been successfully implemented at McClellan Community High School. A. BACKGROUND The McClellan Community School Program was started during the 1990-91 academic year. The implementation of the program was directed by a group which was representative of the school and the surrounding community. Administrators, teachers, students, parents, members of school groups, and community leaders formed a biracial planning committee. The committee worked with local consultants who had experience in community schools. The District supported the development and implementation of a program to provide quality services to the students the community. This support reassured the McClellan community that the District was committed to the restoration of McClellan's long tradition of community involvement and support. Measures taken to resolve the District's financial bind have forced Community Education to become more creative. Although the reduction was large, Community Education has been able to scrutinize the budget and re-design some operations to function at lower costs without risking the quality of the program. Examples of this include FUNFEST and the evening and weekend classes. Staff stretched their minds, energies, resources, and revenue-operating power. B. PROBLEM DEFINITION The LRSD reduced its contribution to the McClellan Community Education budget from $227,000 in 1991-92 to $115,000 in 1992-93--close to 50%. However, given that personnel and fringe benefit costs total near $95,000, monies set aside for Community Education program operations were reduced by 60%. -32- C. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES The impact of the budget reductions has hit hard as it has in every part of the District. The Community Education points of stress can be categorized as follows: Classes As a result of the latest budget reductions, McClellan Community Education developed a new method of structuring classes offered in the evenings and on weekends. Class fees were raised by $5 - $15, and minimum numbers of enrollees were required to insure that each class would pay for itself ... be self-supporting. Community Education required that each class at least break even. The fee structure and rigid guidelines for enrollment inhibit establishing new classes. Summer Classes The summer session differs from the spring and fall sessions in that the major target population is \"youth.\" The day extends from 7:30 a.m. to 6 p.m. for the McClellan Too Cool for School Summer Camp for 6-18 year-olds and from 5:30 to 9 p.m. for classes geared to adults. In spite of need and large target populations, the summer youth camp brings in little revenue for two reasons: the target families typically cannot afford to pay fees to cover the true cost of the program and the program cost is extensive due to the high staff ratio required for youth activities. In essence, the previously described fee structure to create a selfsupporting program is inappropriate for the summer youth session. Community Education staff has turned to fund-raising to support the program. However, the youth camp is at risk of involving only a minimal number of children or of cancellation altogether. Scholarships The McClellan High School Advisory Council Scholarship Committee has previously awarded up to two scholarships per class to community applicants. Due to budget concerns, the number of scholarships shrank to one per class. Community Education's collaborative agreement with the Step Up Center, a neighborhood drug relapse prevention program, now allots only one scholarship to Step Up clientele for job skills and health-related classes. In the past, Community Education appropriated two scholarships for job skills and health-related classes and one scholarship for all other classes. The support through provision of class scholarships for the Step Up Center has declined somewhat. -33- FUNFEST FUNFEST, a school-community festival, has suffered little from the budget cutbacks due to the earnest work of the Advisory Council and its FUNFEST committee. The committee's original plan allowed for the festival to become self-supporting in three-four years. The budget cuts have simply pushed that goal forward more rapidly than anticipated. The challenge has been met through fund-raising in our community. Equipment, Supplies, and Support Personnel In the past, Community Education has contributed greatly to the school's inventory of equipment and supplies which serve both the McClellan and Community Education student populations. With recent cutbacks, we have not been able to contribute our fair share. Due to great support from Vocational Education to Community Education and the McClellan Business Department, this has not become a severe problem. However, equipment can go only so long without proper repair. The lack of funds to properly maintain the equipment Community Education utilizes could escalate into a serious problem over an extended period of time. Community Education programs draw an estimated 1,800 people into McClellan throughout the year. The use of this high school, in all probability, exceeds that of any school in the District. Yet, the budget limitations and the formula utilized to determine janitorial personnel do not take into consideration the added traffic of 1,800 children and adults. As a result of lack of adequate janitorial support, the physical plant has declined considerably. The ultimate impact is a negative public perception of the school surmised solely on the basis of physical environment. D. RECOMMENDATIONS Community Education at McClellan has been nothing but positive. The existing programming is of high quality and satisfies many current community needs. Community Education staff and the Advisory Council will continue to pursue community resources as well as private and public donations to insure ongoing quality. However, we also need District support for quality maintenance and expansion. Although the expectation of the District carrying full financial load for all planned programming seems unrealistic, added revenue of about $50,000 would insure a summer youth program and allow some staff relief to do grant writing. Without some reprieve from the present stress, we do not foresee growth for McClellan Community Education. - 34 - E. OBJECTIVE The objective of the recommendation is to allow Community Education to restore some existing programs and expand programming to meet changing and ongoing community needs. F. IMPACT ANALYSIS Program It is expected that restoration of these funds will have a positive effect on both the school and the community. The McClellan community would be reassured of the District's commitment. Desegregation Plan There will be positive impact on the Plan. The District will be in compliance with the Desegregation Plan. Court Orders No negative impact is noted. Political Factors Failure to provide this funding would be viewed negatively by the community. The quality of support provided by the District can have a positive effect. Failure to restore funding will reduce support from the community. Timing The summer program is currently being implemented. Failure to restore the program would have eliminated needed services for our youth this summer. G. RESOURCE ANALYSIS The cost for restoring and expanding some community programs has been revised and is projected to be $55,000. The staff has committed to securing additional funds through grant writing and fund raising. The District has committed to assisting the Community School financially if any difficulty is noted in implementing the program. -35- H. FORCE FIELD ANALYSIS The primary supporters of this recommendation will be the McClellan community and the Administration. These persons recognize the need to keep our commitment to the community and to the Desegregation Plan. The primary detractors could be other areas within our school district who have similar needs. I. GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN The staff will continue to monitor all activities in order to ensure the objectives of the program are accomplished as designed in the Plan. -36- BUSINESS CASE LRSD OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION - RECRUITMENT REVISED (JULY 1993) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Little Rock School District (LRSD) is required to engage in timely, vigorous and sustained recruitment in order to meet its desegregation obligations. A recruitment budget was established this spring to assist the district with the efforts. The proposed budget allocation of $74,000 was filed with the Court. The District has reviewed the recruitment activities revised the proposed 1993-94 budget and recommends a expenditure of $34,000. Backiuound The LRSD and the Interdistrict Plans require the LRSD in collaboration with the PCSSD to engage in timely, vigorous and sustained recruitment in order to meet its desegregation obligations. Specific recruitment strategies and activities designed to attract students to the LRSD are described in the plans. The 1991-92 recruitment budget was $51,600, of which $22,288.40 was spent. The LRSD 1992-93 budget allocation for recruitment was $27,000 and only $8,133.84 was spent. Problem Definition The LRSD can implement the recruitment activities in the Desegregation and Interdistrict Plans in a more effective manner than in the past and absorb a reduction in the budget. The real issue for the district is how to effectively recruit students and use its resources. Analysis and Alternatives The LRSD Communications, the Office of Desegregation staff, and selected district personnel reviewed the LRSD and the Interdistrict recruitment strategies and activities to be implemented. The first consideration was to continue to do business in the same way. The district's recruitment efforts must follow carefully developed strategies that 1) embrace all who have a role in promoting the district\n2) select activities that ensure a match between effort and resources\nand 3) decentralize the recruitment efforts among various school employees and community resources. -37- Recommendation Given the goals and objectives for recruitment described in the LRSD and Interdistrict plans, subsequent Court orders, and the priority set by the district for recruitment, the district is recommending that a total of $34,000 be allocated for recruitment for the 1993-94 school year. All strategies must be carefully monitored and evaluated. Should any major concerns be detected, the level of funding for recruitment will be increased to a level that ensures on-going, successful recruitment activities. Objective The objective for this recommendation is to provide the means to involve everyone who has a role in promoting the district and to engage in extensive recruitment activities that will result in racially balanced schools. This recommendation will 1) support the district's commitment to recruitment\n2) embrace all persons who have a role in promoting the district\n3) create a match between effort and resource\nand 4) reduce the district's proposed budget by $40,000 for the 1993-94 school year. The program activities can be implemented with the proposed allocation of $34,000. Impact Analysis When executed, this recommendation will ensure program coordination and the involvement of key district and community persons. Utilization of district and relevant community members will assist the district in meeting its desegregation obligations. Resource Analysis This recommendation will not negatively impact recruitment activities. Utilization of additional LRSD staff and community resources will enhance recruitment. -38- Force Field Analysis The primary supporters of the recommendation will be the LRSD administration. This support can be maximized by program managers utilizing creative and innovative techniques in its recruitment initiatives. The detractors of the recommendation could be those individuals who have concerns regarding the district keeping its commitment to engage in timely, rigorous, and sustained recruitment activities. We can minimize their concerns by providing feedback regarding the results of our recruitment efforts. -39- PROPOSAL FOR A \"SIX-PLUS\" INSTRUCTION DAY FOR MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. The teachers and administration of Mabel vale Junior High School have developed a proposal to improve student achievement in all academic areas. We understand the need for each child to be provided with a unique opportunity to succeed. Therefore, we proposed a unique seven period day to provide: Academic Support: Reading Assistance Mathematics Assistance Language Arts Plus English, Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies Plus. Enrichment: Library Research Special Projects Advanced Curriculum studies Global Studies. Ninth Grade Extra Electives: Choir, Art, Home Economics, Technology, Physical Education, Orientation to the Teaching Profession, Computer Programming, or Foreign Language. This unique \"Six-plus\" program will provide an opportunity for all students in grades 7-9 to participate in these activities. Selected ninth grade students will be able to complete an extra elective. This will ensure that our ninth grade students are fully prepared to compete when starting senior high school. All other junior high schools in the district are offering a seven period day. This \"Six-plus\" instructional day will provide an extra classroom period to address the unique requirements of our students at risk. These students will be attending all the classes normally scheduled and an extra class especially designed to assist them to succeed. Students who are not taking an extra elective or not needing special remediation classes will be offered a unique opportunity to explore and develop extended skills. -40- Proposal for a \"Six-Plus Instructional Day for Mabelvale Junior High School Page 2 Students will be assigned to a classroom setting 363 minutes per day. This is 30 additional minutes compared to last years' schedule. Teachers will have the opportunity to participate in group planning through interdisciplinary committees. The seventh period will be used to provide enrichment, remediation and additional electives. Overall, due to the increased time in the classroom, unique remediation strategies, higher order thinking skills, and ninth grade extra electives, we are excited about progress toward a large improvement in academic achievement. This puts Mabelvale Junior High on a par with the other junior high schools in the District, all of which already have a seven period day. It provides equity to the Mabel vale Junior High student body. -41- GRANT WRITER A strategy to Address Shortfall of Funding The district identified in its Program Planning and Budgeting Document (July 30, 1993 Court submission) a strategy that will address the shortfall of funding. The district is committed to implementing its Court-approved Desegregation Plan. With the commitment comes the responsibility of providing funds and ensuring that the funding levels are sufficient to support those programs that are determined by the planning and evaluation process. The Board of Directors and other staff believe that the district is not taking advantage of federal funds that are available to support and expand our existing programs.  During the budget review process, funds to pay for a grant writer were included in the revised 1993- 94 budget. Funding of this grant writer's position is an initial investment that will pay off during the next few years when existing, non-recurring funds will disappear. Funding for this position after the first year of implementation will be secured through the initiatives of the grant writer. Should the grant writer fail to secure additional funding, this position will be eliminated and/or a new grant writer will be selected. Util i zation of a successful grant writer can be an effective strategy to assist the district in addressing a shortfall of future funding. -42- BUSINESS CASE LRSD OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION REVISED (JULY 1993) SECRETARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Office of Desegregation (the \"Department\"), provides services in six areas. Most of these areas are not staffed by a secretary. The lack of clerical assistance will inhibit the Department's ability to provide reports in a timely manner. The employment of a secretary will enable the Department to provide appropriate technical assistance and support to all schools and ensure requests for progress reports are made and received in a timely manner. Backuound The Office of Desegregation provides services in the following areas: 1. Student Assignment Office (SAO) 2. Desegregation Facilitator 3. Parent Recruitment 4. Parent Involvement 5. Volunteers In Public Schools (VIPS) 6. CARE The primary role of the associate superintendent is to: 1) supervise all activities of the SAO\n2) monitor the overall implementation of the desegregation plan and prepare status reports for the Board, the Court and other parties\n2) provide overviews and in-service sessions on the desegregation plan, when necessary\n3) provide technical assistance, monitor activities and evaluate staff of each area within the Department\n4) provide technical assistance, and monitor the District Biracial Committee and the Incentive School Parent Council, and\n5) serve on the superintendent's cabinet. It is vital that all status reports and other desegregation activities be completed and documented in an efficient, effective and timely manner. This is not possible with the current level of secretarial support. This position was funded previously as a secretary to the Desegregation Facilitator. This action moves the position to the Office of Desegregation and increases the number of personnel served. -43- Business Case Office of Desegregation Page 2 Problem Definition Due to the heavy demands of the SAO staff, only limited time can be spent typing reports. Sometimes due to the heavy load of SAO the associate superintendent must either type the reports or seek assistance from other clerical staff within the district. This is inconvenient and time consuming. Analysis of Alternatives For the past year, the associate superintendent has accessed the services of the clerical staff in the SAO. Consideration was given to continuing this arrangement for the 1993-94 school year. However, the past year's performance has proved this not to be a workable solution. We considered moving one of the data entry staff. But, we are currently in the process of restructuring the data entry staff in order to meet our obligations spelled out in the desegregation plan. Discussions were held with the staff and with the superintendent. The need for a skilled secretary was emphasized. The entire district is affected if the duties of this office are not performed in an effective, efficient and timely manner. To do nothing about this situation is not an alternative if we are to meet the obligations of the desegregation plan. Recommendation The Office of Desegregation needs a secretary who is computer literate and capable of planning, organizing, processing and managing the volume of work that is generated by the Department on a daily basis. This cannot be done by the current staff whose time is already fully committed to the activities of the SAO. Objective The objective of this recommendation is to enable the Department to respond to the range of needs of all of its constituents in a timely manner and to complete status reports to the courts and other parties in a timely manner. Having a full-time secretary will support the desegregation plan and the district's goals of: (a) establishing climates of educational excellence and equity in all schools, and, (b) enhancing human relation skills for principals, teachers, and central office administration. -44- Business Case Office of Desegregation Page 3 The effectiveness of this position can be measured by product outcomes, efficiency of service, comments from principals, parents, district personnel, and visitors to the Department. Typing, filing, reports, etc. are expected to be completed in a timely manner. A wellrun office will allow information related to the desegregation plan to flow to the parents, students, and district administrators from the Office of Desegregation in a timely and efficient manner. This positive impact will enhance the district as an organization and the community it serves. Evaluation Criteria SAO will evaluate the following areas to determine the effectiveness of this position.  monitoring and status reports will be completed and filed in a timely manner  needed materials will be prepared and available to support staff development activities  improved office efficiency will be noted Impact Analysis The employment of a secretary will enable the Department to provide appropriate technical assistance and support to all schools and ensure that requests for progress reports are made and received in a timely manner. This recommendation can only enhance the service to the schools and allow the staff to develop and file status reports in a timely manner. Failure to increase secretarial help could prevent SAO from providing timely and adequate support. Resource Analysis The projected salary cost of this position is $21,500. Resources needed to address this secretarial position are not available within the district on a full time basis. Force Field Analysis The primary supporters of the recommendation will be the Office of Desegregation staff. Other district administrators will strongly support the position once they understand the difference in delivery of service this position makes. -45- The forces against the recommendation would be those concerned with the budget constraints. However, we feel that once the need is understood, they will support the recommendation. -46-\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_547","title":"Program planning and budgeting","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1993-08/1993-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Program planning and budgeting"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/547"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["budgets"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nPROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Ingram MONTH July 1993 August 1993 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) DATE: August 31, 1993 ACTIVITIES 1.1 Designate lead planning person 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 BEGINNING DATE July 1993 COMPLETION DATE July 27, 1993 RESPONSIBILITY Superintendent EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT Develop proposed budget calendar for budget year 1994-95 Begin Desegregation Program Inventory using desegregation audit as baseline Identify tentative list of various types of districtwide objective and perceptual data to be collected for the needs assessment Establish final budget calendar for 1994-95 that will allow the Board to monitor progress of the planning and budgeting process Begin to develop monitoring and reporting procedures and issue instructions, as needed Begin development of proportional allocation formulas Begin data collection July 21, 1993 July 26, 1993 Superintendent and Cabinet May 31, 1993 July 9, 1993 Superintendent and Cabinet July 21, 1993 July 21, 1993 April 26, 1993 August 17, 1993 May 1993 Program Planning and Budgeting Document (PPBD) dated July 30, 1993 July 26, 1993 July 27, 1993 August 27, 1993 November 30, 1993 November 30, 1993 Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Lead planning person Sterling Ingram, Director of Planning, Research arid Evaluation designated - PPBD,* p.2 PPBD, Attachment 4 Final version (7-9-93) of Program Identification worksheet (See attached) Tentative list located in PPBD, page 4 and 5 Acceptance of Budget calendar by Board of Directors at July 27, 1993 work session\nPPBD, Attachment 4 Meeting with Bill Mooney on August 27, 1993. Final version of data disk to follow. Topic covered during school start-up meeting MPT and Stanford-8 test resultsLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) PROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Ingram DATE: August 31, 1993 MONTH ACTIVITIES BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT August 1993 (cont.) 2.5 Begin to identify programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation July 14. 1993 January 31, 1993 Superintendent and Cabinet Academic Progress Grant - memo to Assistant Superintendents Student Assignment - August 18, 1993, 1:30 p.m. meeting conducted by Dr. H. Williams. Academic Support, Special Education, Vocational Education, Library Media August 30, 1993 meeting Substitute - August 26, 1993 meeting with LRCTA Out-sourcing - August 9, 1993 meeting with Coopers and Lybrand Stephens construciion 2.6 Complete Desegregation Program Inventory May 31, 1993 July 19, 1993 Superintendent and Cabinet Final version of Program Identification worksheet (see attached) September 1993 3.1 Conduct worksession for analysis of collected data August 20, 1993 August 31, 1993 Superintendent and Cabinet Meeting agenda 3.2 Conduct Board work session September 9, 1993 September 30, 1993 Board and Superintendent TBAProject Management Tool filed in library: LRSD Reports/AW , FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK HERSCHEL H. PHIOAY. P.A. ROBERT V. UIGMT. P.A. W1UUIAM H. SUTTON. P.A. JAMES W. MOORE BYRON M. EISEMAN. JR.. P.A. A PARTNERSHIP OF INDIVIDUALS ANO PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS ATTORNEYS AT LAW A JO' SLt, P.A. H.T. ECHOUS. P.A. 8UTTRY. P.A. { S. URSERY. P.A, ZEUERE. P.A. 2000 FIRST COMMERCIAL BUILDING 400 WEST CAPITOL OSCAR e. OAVIS. JR.. P.A. JAMES C. CLARK. JR.. P.A. THOMAS P. LEGGETT. P.A. JOHN DEWEY WATSON. P.A. PAUL B. BENHAM HI. P.A. LARRY W. BURKS. P.A. A. WYCKLIFF NISBET. JR.. P.A. JAMES EOWARO HARRIS. P.A. J. PHILLIP MALCOM. P.A. JAMES M. SIMPSON. P.A. MEREDITH P. CATLETT, P.A. JAMES M. SAXTON. P.A. J. SHEPHERD RUSSELL HI, P.A. DONALD H. BACON. P.A. WILLIAM THOMAS BAXTER, P.A. WALTER A. PAULSON 11, P.A. BARRY E. COPLIN. P.A. RICHARD . TAYLOR, P.A. JOSEPH 3. HURST. JR., P.A. ELIZABETH J. ROBBEN, P.A. CHRISTOPHER HELLER. P.A. LAURA HENSLEY SMITH. P.A. ROBERT S. SHAFER. P.A. WILLIAM M. GRIFFIN ill, P.A. THOMAS N. ROSE. P.A. MICHAEL S. MOORE. P.A. DIANE S. MACKEY, P.A. WALTER M. EBEL III. P.A. LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72201-3493 TELEPHONE 501-376-201 1 fax no. 501-376-2147 September 30, 1993 KEVIN A. CRASS. P.A. WILLIAM A. WAOOELL. JR.. P.A. CLYDE Tab* TURNER. P.A. CALVIN J. HALL. P.A. SCOTT J. LANCASTER. P.A. JERRY L. MALONE. P.A. M. GAYLE CORLEY. P.A. ROBERT B. BEACH. JR., P.A. J. LEE BROWN. P.A. JAMES C. BAKER, JR., P A H. CHARLES GSCKWENO, JR., P A HARRY A. LIGHT, P.A. SCOTT H. TUCKER. P.A. JOHN CLAYTON RANDOLPH. P A GUY ALTON WAOE PRICE C. GARDNER J. MICHAEL PICKENS TONIA P. JONES DAVID 0. WILSON JEFFREY H. MOORE ANDREW T. TURNER JOHN RAY WHITE DAVID M.GRAF PAMELA 0. PERCEFULL CARLA G. SPAINHOUR JOHN C. FENOLEY.JR. COUNSIL WILLIAM J. SMITH WILLIAM A. ELDREDGE. JR.. P.A. B.S. CLARK WILLIAM L. TERRY WILLIAM L. PATTON. JR.. P.A. WRITSR'S OIRECT NO. (50H 370-1553 Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 RECEIVED Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Building SEP 3 0 1993 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitcring Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachelle First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol Avenue Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Heritage West Building, Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: LRSD vs. PCSSD, et al Gentlemen and Mrs. Brown: Enclosed for each of you please find a copy of the Notice of Filing and attached documents submitted to the Court herein.Gentlemen and Mrs. Brown August 31, 1993 Page 2 Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Jerry L. Malone LRSD Attorney JLM:nr cc: Estelle Matthis Sterling Ingram Mark MilhollenRECSIVSD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION SEP 3 0 1953 Office of Dessgregaiion Ivoriii LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS vs. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS Mrs. Lorene Joshua, Et Al Intervenors Katherine Knight, Et Al Intervenors NOTICE OF FILING The plaintiff. Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\"), for its Notice of Filing, states: 1. By order dated August 26, 1993, the Court directed the LRSD to submit to the Court, not later than 5:00 p.m. on the last day of each month, the most recent copy of any project management tool the district is using to guide, monitor, and control the development and implementation of its program planning and budgeting processes. 2 The LRSD has attached hereto as an exhibit a true and accurate copy of its project management tool reflecting 1994-95 program planning and budgeting activities to date.FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR (501) 376-2011 72201 Attorneys for Little Rock School District By: Je^rrryy LL.. MMaalloonnee '  Bar I.D. No. 85096 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Jerry L. Malone, do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing notice of filing has been seirved upon the following persons by First Class Mail, postage pre-paid on this 30th day of September, 1993. Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Building 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON 7 JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 7201 Mr. Richard Roachelle First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol Avenue Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Heritage West Building, Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Jerry L. Malone LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOLi IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION SEP 3 0 1993 Office of Desegreoation LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS vs. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS Mrs. Lorene Joshua, Et Al Intervenors Katherine Knight, Et Al Intervenors NOTICE OF FILING The plaintiff. Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\"), for its Notice of Filing, states\n1. By order dated August 26, 1993, the Court directed the LRSD to submit to the Court, not later than 5:00 p.m. on the last day of each month, the most recent copy of any project management tool the district is using to guide, monitor. and control the development and implementation of its program planning and budgeting processes. 2 The LRSD has attached hereto as an exhibit a true and accurate copy of its project management tool reflecting 1994-95 program planning and budgeting activities to date.FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR (501) 376-2011 72201 Attorneys for Little Rock School District By: j^errryy L. Marone Bar I.D. No. 85096 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Jerry L. Malone, do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing notice of filing has been served upon the following persons by First Class Mail, postage pre-paid on this 30th day of September, 1993. Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Building 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON 7 JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 7201 Mr. Richard Roachelle First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol Avenue Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Heritage West Building, Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Jerry L. Malone PROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Ingram MONTH ACTIVITIES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) DATE: September 30, 1993 BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT Sept. 1993 3.1 Conduct worksession for analysis of collected data 3.1.1 Develop preliminary list of issues for needs assessment 3.1.2 Identify the need for program modification or development Aug. 20, 1993 Aug. 31, 1993 Aug. 30, 1993 Aug. 20, 1993 Aug. 31, 1993 Jan. 31, 1994 Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Meeting agenda Memorandum to attendees from Estelle Matthis Roster of attendees Memorandum to attendees from Dennis Glasgow, session facilitator Outline of process used in preliminary goal setting meeting Program modifications will be recommended after \"fast-track\" evaluation is completed. At this time we do not anticipate the development of any new programs.PROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Ingram MONTH ACTIVITIES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) DATE: September 30, 1993 BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT Sept. 1993 (cont.) 3.2 Conduct Board Work Session 3.2.1 Review preliminary list of issues for needs assessment 3.2.2 Review Desegregation Program Inventory Report 3.2.3 Review and revise, if necessary, the mission statement 3.2.4 Establish tentative written goals and objectives 3.2.5 Establish written priorities Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Nov. 30, 1993 Board and Superintendent Board and Superintendent Board and Superintendent Board and Superintendent Board and Superintendent Board and Superintendent Agenda of Board work session Copy of issues related to the goal s Copy of Program Inventory that was distributed to the Board Copy of revised mission statement Copy of tentative goals The Desegregation Plan is the priority. As we complete the needs assessment process including the broad-based input sessions and the monitoring of expenditures, the Superintendent will identify priorities for funding and will make recommendations to the Board as we move toward budget development.PROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Ingram MONTH ACTIVITIES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) DATE: September 30, 1993 BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT Sept. 1993 (cont.) 3.2.6 Review and provide guidance related to proportional allocation formulas Sept. 9, 1993 Nov. 30, 1993 Board and Superintendent Staff identified the following formulas: School Budget (per pupil allocation) Supervision Aide formula - , 4-Year-Old Budget allocations Library books and materials Omaha formula Custodial Services Security/Campus Supervisors Food Service School/Department Copier Allocations State and North Central Association standards for staffing The Superintendent will make recommendations relative to the proportional allocation formulas 3.2.7 Consider strategies for funding shortfall Sept, 9, 1993 Nov. 30, 1993 Board and Superintendent At the Sept. 9, 1993 Board work session the following strategies were identified for the Board: 1. Effectively implement the program planning and budgeting process.PROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Ingram MONTH ACTIVITIES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) DATE: September 30, 1993 BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT Sept. 1993 (cont.) 3.2.7 (continued) 2. Pursue receipt of additional local dollars through lobbying techniques and/or grant writing. 3. Vigorously pursue federal. dollars, especially through a team approach composed of the new grant writer and/or other selected individuals. 4. Examine thoroughly millage question and make appropriate decisions. 5. Explore possibility of program consolidation and different delivery of current programs and systems. 6. . Consider options on efficient use of all our physical plants - expansion/ closure/modification. 7. Conduct energy audits and evaluate data generated from that process.PROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Ingram MONTH ACTIVITIES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) DATE: September 30, 1993 BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT Sept. 1993 (cont.) 3.2.7 (continued) 3.2.8 Identify any additional programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation. Sept. 9, 1993 Nov. 30, 1993 Board and Superintendent 8. Conduct transportation study to achieve effective utilization of transportation system. Copy of memorandum from E. Matthis to program managers establishing \"fast-track\" evaluation guidelines. Ho additional programs were added during the Sept. 9, 1993 work session.PROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Ingram MONTH ACTIVITIES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) DATE: September 30, 1993 BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT Sept. 1993 (cont.) 3.3 Define procedures for broad-based input sessions Aug. 5, 1993 Sept. 21, 1993 Director-Communications Superintendent and Lead Planning Person Sept. 21, 1993 memorandum from J. Wagner to M. Bassa 3.4 Planning and Budgeting support activities 3.4.1 Little Rock School Dist./ City of Little Rock collaborative efforts 3.4.2 Principals meeting to review: * mission statement * goals * Program Planning and Budget Document (PBD) * Program Budget Document terms and data element definitions * Desegregation Plan/School Operations * 1993-94 Budget Allocation 3.4.3 Inservice for inputing achievements on the PBD Sept. 15, 1993 Sept. 15, 1993 Sept. 23, 1993 Sept. 15, 1993 Sept. 17, 1993 Sept. 23, 1993 Legal Advisor Interim Superintendent Director-Planning, Research, Evaluation Controller Interim Superintendent Assistant Supt's. Lead Planning Person Controller ODH - Budget specialist Lead planning person Copy of agenda and hand-out materials Memorandum to principals announcing cluster meeting dates Agenda of cluster meetings Copy of PBD Terms and Data Element definitions Memorandum announcing inservice datePROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Ingram MONTH ACTIVITIES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) DATE: September 30, 1993 BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT Sept. 1993 (cont.) 3.5 Desegregation update to LRSD Board of Directors 3.6 Conduct follow-up training for using the WordPerfect file Sept. 23, 1993 Oct. 5, 1993 Sept. 23, 1993 Oct. 8, 1993 Superintendent Interim Associate Superintendent for Curriculum and IRC staff Memorandum and attachments to the Board Memorandum to principals from Dennis Glasgow3.1 PRE-PLANNING GOAL SETTING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT August 20, 1993 9 a.m. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1. Opening/Purpose Remarks Estelle Matthis Issues - Direction 2. ^'^^^s'tegic Planning Dr. Henry Williams 3. Discussion . Desegregation Plan . Existing District Mission  Proportional Allocations - . Achievement Data . Attendance/Discipline  Parent Involvement 4. and Goals Next Step . Cabinet Work Sessions  Fonnulate Procedures for . Goal Setting Session Board of DirectorsTo: From: {IV. Subject: 3.1.1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS August 25, 1993 Little Rock School District Goal Setting Committee 72201 stelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent Pre-Goal Setting Meeting I wish to express my appreciation to each of you for agreeing to serve on this very special committee. The district is in the process of goal setting that will culminate with our long-range strategic planning. We will provide the leadership for the Board and Superintendent by identifying a tentative mission statement and goals for the district. In order to accomplish this objective, we have scheduled a work session for August 31, 1993 beginning at 8:30 a.m. and ending at approximately 8:30 p.m. be provided for participants. Lunch and dinner will We will convene the meeting at Calvary Baptist Church, 1901 N. Pierce Street in the Family Life Center. Enclosed are copies of some documents that you will need to review prior to August 31, 1993. a contact person for certain documents. For your convenience, we have identified These persons will assist you in the summarization of the content of these documents. We look forward to a very productive session on August 31, 199 3. If there are any questions, please contact me at 324-2012.1. 2 . 3. 4 . 5. 6. 7. 8. 3.1.1 Agenda Preliminary Goal Setting Meeting Tuesday, August 31, Welcome and Statement of Purpose Clarification or Questions Regarding Resource Documents: Achievement Test Results Desegregation Plan Program Planning and Budgeting Document Goals Adopted by Board of Directors, September, 1989 LRSD Student Learning Outcomes Arkansas Board of Education Learner Outcomes Developing a Mission Statement for LRSD Process for Developing Preliminary Goals -Break- Preliminary Goal Setting Small Groups (Using Nominal Group Technique) -Lunch- Preliminary Goal Setting Large Group (Using Nominal Group Technique) -Break- Develop Preliminary List of Issues Related to GoalsSmall Groups (Using Nominal Group Technique) 1993 Estelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent LRSD Staff Dennis Glasgow, Facilitator Dennis Glasgow, Facilitator Facilitators: Sterling Ingram Donita Hudspeth Dennis Glasgow Dennis Glasgow, Facilitator Facilitators: Sterling Ingram Donita Hudspeth Dennis Glasgow -Break- (Between Goals) Reporting Session on Issues Large Groups Dennis Glasgow, Facilitator 9. Processing and Closure Estelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent3.1.1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Preliminary Goal Setting Meeting Tuesday, August 31, 1993 Committee Members Anne Hansen - Principals Roundtable Lonnie Dean - Principals Rountable Lou Ethel Nauden - Classroom Teachers Association Eleanor Coleman - Classroom Teachers Association John Walker - Joshua Intervenors Joy Springer - Joshua Intervenors Katherine Mitchell - LRSD Board of Education Dorsey Jackson - LRSD Board of Education Carla Bobo - Parents Teachers Association Bettye Caldwell - Future LR Estelle Matthis - Cabinet Margaret Gremillion - Cabinet Bill Mooney - Cabinet Larry Robertson - Cabinet Brady Gadberry - Cabinet Mark Milhollen - Cabinet Jeanette Wagner - Cabinet Arma Hart - Cabinet Sterling Ingram - Facilitator Danita Hudspeth - Facilitator Dennis Glasgow - Facilitator Rene Carson - Recorder Marjorie Bassa - Recorder Kathy Penn-Norman - Recorder3.1.1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 September 2, 1993 Dear Committee Member, Thank you for your valuable assistance in providing input to the Little Rock School District Board of Directors about the District's mission statement and goals and also about issues related to attainment of the goals. productive in terms of the task it was given. The group, worked very hard and was quite Enclosed are the results of the meeting. This information is being shared with the School Board for consideration at a goal setting meeting starting at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 9, 1993. Sincerely, Dennis Glasgow Pi. 'S'fp 08 ... LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Little Rock School District is to provide a quality, integrated educational program which encourages all children to achieve their optimum academic, social, and emotional development. To that end, the students in the Little Rock School District will develop an appreciation for racial and cultural diversity. develop skills in problem solving and conflict resolution, and demonstrate mastery of specific skills. This will be achieved through the collciborative efforts of a Board, a dedicated and competent staff. and of parents and citizens committed to fairness, racial equity and adequate support for education.1. 2. 3. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT GOALS Implement integrated educational programs that will ensure that all students grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academic enrichment while closing disparities in achievement. Developing and maintaining staff that is well-trained and motivated. (Communicating with colleges and universities about teacher training will be a strategy for this goal). The Little Rock School Board, administration, staff, and students will demonstrate behavior and human relations skills that value people as human beings and that are consistent with an appreciation and understanding of multicultural diversity. 4. Solicit and secure financial and other resources that are necessary to fully support our schools, including our desegregation plan. 5. 6. Provide a safe and orderly climate that is conducive to learning for all students. Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operations.These were goals that were considered but were not chosen as being the most important.  Help students be productive in the 21st century by developing a capacity for life-long learning, problem solving skills, positive self-concept and a responsibility for learning. Provide a disciplined environment that promotes responsible citizenship. * By the year 1996: (1) reduce by 50% the number of students at grades 3 and 6 below the 50th percentile\nand (2) increase by 50% the students scoring at the 90% percentile (on standardized tests)  strongly promote parental involvement in the education of their children through home and school activities and encourage community involvement through partnerships and volunteerism. * Development and infusion of multicultural education in all areas of the curriculum. * Develop and maintain a system of accountability to the public of the District (achievement and resources).Note - The issues related to each goal which are listed on the following pages are stated subcommittees. problems (e.g., exactly as They are not in parallel form. reported by the Some are stated as behavior.), others Adults not modeling appropriate interpersonal are stated as overcome problems (e.g., strategies or activities Encourage student participation in to a cross-section of extracurricular activities.), while others are stated as programs) . needs All, (e.g., however, parental involvement involve areas in all school which were viewed as impediments to achieving the goals of the District.Issues related to Goal #1 Goal #1 ensure that Implement integrated educational programs that will all students grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academic enrichment while closing disparities in achievement. 1) Program development in areas where needs of all children are not met 2) Accountability (Staff,student, parents, and programs) 3) Objective criteria for determining program effectiveness 4) growth Measurement system to measure academic, social, and emotional 5) Needs assessment (local and District) 6) Adequate resources (human and financial) 7) Environment conducive to learningIssues related to Goal #2 Goal #2 - Developing and maintaining staff that is well-trained and motivated. (Communication with colleges and universities about teacher training will be a strategy for this goal.) 1) Accountability/change how do we deal with staff, i. e. teachers, principals, etc. who have not been held accountable in past (i.e. principal, etc.) 2) Monitor, evaluate, reinforce, and replicate 3) Recruitment and retention of quality staff and issuance of contracts in a timely manner 4) Quality inservice learning and.trainers 5) Needs assessment, i.e., building level and district-wide 6) Adequate resources (financial and human)Issues related to Goal #3 Goal #3 - The Little Rock School Board, administration, staff and students will demonstrate behavior and human relations skills that value people as human beings and that are consistent with an appreciation and understanding of multicultural diversity. 1) Provide financial resources 2) Practices and procedures which will be used in teaching strategies relating to positive interpersonal relationships 3) Training in human relations (job performance related) 4) Lack of understanding of cultural differences 5) promote Communications to parents concerning teaching strategies that relationships enhanced achievement and positive interpersonal 6) Parental involvement in all school programs 7) Provide adequate time for staff development 8) The biases and practices that all of the players bring to the setting (i.e., segregated lounges, cafeteria) 9) Racial sensitivity programs for students, staff, and parents 10) Adults not modeling appropriate interpersonal behavior 11) Encourage student participation in a cross-section of extra curriculum activities 12) Lack of understanding of the desegregation plan 13) Need for a different type of staff development delivery system, other that the current five member staff 14) Employment practices at all levels 15) Effective monitoring of diversity in all programsIssues related to Goal #4 Goal H - Solicit and secure financial and other resources that are necessary to fully support our schools, including our desegregation plan. 1) Lack of knowledge and commitment by public and District personnel to desegregation plan commitments. 2) Need hard data to evaluate programs in desegregation plan - - remove those that don't work. District and 3) More focused effort by all District personnel to promote school District. 4) Change in attitude in marketing (We have a lot to sell) progress in meeting LRSD goals. 5) Lack of knowledge of funding sources private) - such as Wal-Mart, Tyson (federal, state, 6) News coverage of schools needs to be more positive 7) Review and audit of personnel needs 8) Level of confidence of public in system 9) Instability in staff and staff changes promotes confusion. distrust, and lack of support to pass a school millage 10) Securing partners for all schools 11) State funding processesIssues related to Goal /5 Goal #5 - Provide a safe and orderly climate that is conducive to learning for all students. 1) Promote parent participation that includes parents and students helping to establish and support classroom/school rules 2) Identify community problems/conflicts that spill over into the school setting 3) Lack of commitment of staff for inservice training 1 4) Cost of purchasing materials/equipment to maintain attractiJ^ facilities and grounds 5) Cost of adding custodial staff and security personnel to maintain clean, attractive, and safe buildings 6) Teachers need to be trained to be effective in controlling student behavior 7) Role models (especially male) are needed for students at the elementary and secondary level 8) A planned program for citizenship, personal responsibility, and moral/ethical behavior is needed. 9) Expense and space for In-School Suspension Program Kids don't need to be on the street 10) Difficulty in getting parents to come to school for conferences and training 11) Physical structure of some buildings create safety problems (Too many doors, etc.) 12) Changing staff expectations about student behavior 13) Training of students/staff on the Rights and Responsibility handbooks to ensure consistent enforcement.Goal #6 Issues related to Goal #6 Ensure that equity occurs in activities and operations. all phases of school 1) What is equity? 2) The lack of a definition of site-based management in the LRSD 3) Provide financial resources 4) Practices and procedures which will be used in teaching strategies relating to positive interpersonal relationships 5) setting The biases and practices that all of the players bring to the 6) Racial sensitivity programs for students, staff and parents 7) Encourage student participation in a cross-section of extra curriculum activities 8) 9) Lack of understanding of the desegregation plan Employment practices at all levels 10) Effective monitoring of diversity in all programsThese were goals that were considered but were not chosen as being the most important.  Help students be productive in the 21st century by developing a capacity for life-long learning, problem solving skills, positive self-concept and a responsibility for learning. * Provide a disciplined environment that promotes responsible citizenship.  By the year 1996: (1) reduce by 50% the number of students at grades 3 and 6 below the 50th percentile\nand (2) increase by 50% the students scoring at the 90% percentile (on standardized tests)  strongly promote parental involvement in the education of their children through home and school activities and encourage community involvement through partnerships and volunteerism.  Development and infusion of multicultural education in all areas of the curriculum.  Develop and maintain a system of accountability to the public of the District (achievement and resources).Note - The issues related to each goal which are listed on the following pages are stated subcommittees. problems (e.g., exactly as They are not in parallel form. reported by the Some are stated as behavior.), Adults not modeling appropriate interpersonal others are stated overcome problems (e.g., as strategies or activities Encourage student participation in to a cross-section of extracurricular activities.), while others are stated as programs). needs All, (e.g., however, parental involvement in all school involve areas which were viewed impediments to achieving the goals of the District. as1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. PROCESS USED IN PRELIMINARY GOAL SETTING MEETING MISSION STATEMENT Facilitator defined \"mission statement\" and shared current LRSD Mission Statement with participants Participants worked In three small groups to identify components needed In a revised LRSD Mission Statement Small groups shared ideas for a revised mission statement which were recorded on a chart tablet Ideas generated from small groups were discussed/debated by large group Each small group developed its \"ideal\" mission statement using its own ideas and those that were shared by the other groups A representative from each small group met to reconcile the three mission statements to produce a single mission statement The revised mission statement was shared with the large group and received approvalGOALS/ISSUES The Nominal Group Technique was used to establish preliminary goals. Participants were divided Into three small groups, each representative of the larger group. The Nominal Group Technique consists of the following steps: SMALL GROUP PROCEDURES Step 1 Silent Generation of Ideas Step 2 Round Robin Recording Step 3 Serial Discussion for Clarification Step 4 Clustering of Ideas Step 5 Preliminary Vote Step 6 Discusslon/Debate on Results of Preliminary Vote Step 7 Final VoteLARGE GROUP PROCEDURES Step 1 Summary and Clustering of Small Group Ideas Step 2 Large Group Discussion/Debate Session Using \"Hot Seat\" Approach Step 3 Large Group Vote3.1.2 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS August 30, 1993 MEMORANDUM TO: Program Managers, Directors, and Supervisors FROM: Jie Matthis, Interim Superintendent SUBJECT: Procedures to be Used for Fast Track Evaluation of Desegregation Plan The districts Program Planning and Budgeting document identified a number of activities that are to be implemented during the 1993-94 school year. An activity for August 1993 is for the Superintendent and the Cabinet to begin to identify programs for \"fast track\" evaluation. A fast track evaluation will not have as many dimensions or details as a regular evaluation, since the evaluative process is conducted in a reduced time frame. Evaluation of the districts program will provide the information that is needed for us to determine if programs are effective and that such implementation will assist us in meeting our commitment to our Court-approved Desegregation Plan. The following guidelines are to be used to conduct fast track evaluations of targeted programs. 1. Prepare a comprehensive program description for each area or component that is targeted for evaluation. 2. Identify program goals for each area or component of the program that is being evaluated. 3. Identify the evaluation criteria that is to be used to fast track evaluate each goal. Include all evaluative measures and instruments that will be used in this process. 4. Identify any obstacles or problems that were encountered that hindered or impacted the obtainment of program goals. 5. Given the results of your fast track evaluation, recommendations for program additions, deletions, and/or changes are deemed appropriate. This data can be extremely helpful as you develop a strong business case for making a major decision(s) regarding continued implementation of various programs in the Desegregation Plan. The format for a business2 case is enclosed for your review. You will receive copies of the standard format that is to be used to fast track evaluate targeted programs. The following programs have been targeted for fast track evaluation: Targeted Program Personfs) Responsible 1. 2. 3. 4. All Employment Contracts Student Assignment Process Construction of Stephens Outsourcing Support Services 5. 6. 1. 8. 9. 10. 11. Special Education Vocational Education Academic Progress Incentive Grant Academic Support Program Library Media Services Resurvey Requirement Lucy Lyon Early Retirement Incentive Program Substitute Teachers Brady Gadberry Estelle Matthis Doug Eaton/John Riggs Doug Eaton/Charlie Neal Coopers and Lybrand Patty Kohler Carol Green Margaret Gremillion/Larry Robertson Leon Adams Mark Milhollen/Brady Gadberry LRSD/LRCTA We need each program manager to submit your preliminary evaluation report to my office by November 15, 1993. The final report is due by December 15, 1993. All evaluation reports will be submitted to the Board of Directors during January, 1994. /IksLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 3.2 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING September 9, 1993 - 5 p.m. Overview . . Dr. Henry P. Williams Superintendent of Schools Observations: Pre-Goal Setting Work Session (August 31, 1993) Dr. Katherine Mitchell Dorsey Jackson Dennis Glasgow - Facilitator DISCUSSION-.  Review and Revise the Mission Statement Board of Directors  Establish Tentative Written Goals Board of Directors  Review Preliminary List of Issues for Needs Assessment ....................... Board of Directors Sterling Ingram - Facilitator DISCUSSION.  Review Desegregation Program Inventory Report................. Board of Directors  Identify the Need for Program Modification or Development Board of Directors  Review and Provide Guidance Related to Proportional Allocations Formulas..... Board of Directors  Establish Written Priorities Board of Directors  Identify Any Additional Programs for \"Fast Track\" Evaluation................ Board of Directors Mark Milhollen - Facilitator DISCUSSION.  Consider Strategies for Funding Shortfall Board of Directors \"Next Step\"/Summary Estelle Matthis3.2.1 Issues related to Goal #1 Goal #1 Implement integrated educational programs that will ensure that all students grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academic enrichment while closing disparities in achievement. 1) Program development in areas where needs of all children are not met 2) Accountability {Staff, student, parents, and programs) 3) Objective criteria for determining program effectiveness 4) Measurement system to measure academic, social, and emotional growth 5) Needs assessment (local and District) 6) Adequate resources (human and financial) 7) Environment conducive to learning8) Lack of understanding of the desegregation plan 9) Employment practices at all levels 10) Effective monitoring of diversity in all programsIssues related to Goal #2 Goal #2 Develop and maintain a staff that is well-trained and motivated. 1) Accountability/change - - how do we deal with staff, i.e. teachers, principals, etc. who have not been held accountable in past (i.e. principal, etc.) 2) Monitor, evaluate, reinforce, and replicate 3) Recruitment and retention of quality staff and issuance of contracts in a timely manner 4) Quality inservice learning and trainers 5) Needs assessment, i.e., building level and di strict-wide 6) Adequate resources (financial and human)7) Provide adequate time for staff development 8) The biases and practices that all of the players bring to the setting (I.e., segregated lounges, cafeteria) 9) Racial sensitivity programs for students, staff, and parents 10) Adults not modeling appropriate Interpersonal behavior 11) Encourage student participation in a cross-section of extra curriculum activities 12) Lack of understanding of the desegregation plan 13) Need for a different type of staff development delivery system, other that the current five member staff 14) Employment practices at all levels 15) Effective monitoring of diversity in all programsIssues related to Goal #3 Goal #3 The Little Rock School Board, administration, staff and students will demonstrate behavior and human rela- tions skills that value people as human beings and that are consistent with an appreciation and understanding of multicultural diversity. 1) Provide financial resources 2) Practices and procedures which will be used in teaching strategies relating to positive Interpersonal relationships 3) Training in human relations (job performance related) 4) Lack of understanding of cultural differences 5) Communications to parents concerning teaching strategies that promote enhanced achievement and positive interpersonal relationships 6) Parental involvement in all school programsIssues related to Goal #4 Goal #4 Solicit and secure financial and other resources that are necessary to fully support our schools, including our desegregation plan. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Lack of knowledge and commitment by public and District personnel to desegregation plan commitments. Need hard data to evaluate programs in District and desegregation plan - - remove those that don't work. More focused effort by all District personnel to promote school District. Change in attitude in marketing (We have a lot to sell) - progress in meeting LRSD goals. Lack of knowledge of funding sources - (federal, state, private) - such as Wal-Mart, Tyson News coverage of schools needs to be more positive7) Review and audit of personnel needs 8) Level of confidence of public in system 9) Instability in staff and staff changes promotes confusion, distrust, and lack of support to pass a school millage 10) Securing partners for all schools 11) State funding processesIssues related to Goal #5 Goal #5 Provide a safe and orderly climate that Is conducive to learning for all students. 1) Promote parent participation that Includes parents and students helping to establish and support classroom/school rules 2) Identify community problems/conflicts that spill over into the school setting 3) Lack of commitment of staff for inservice training 4) Cost of purchasing materlals/equipment to maintain attraction facilities and grounds 5) Cost of adding custodial staff and security personnel to maintain clean, attractive, and safe buildings 6) Teachers need to be trained to be effective in controlling student behavior7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) Role models (especially male) are needed for students at the elementary and secondary level A planned program for citizenship, personal responsibility, and moral/ethical behavior Is needed. Expense and space for In-School Suspension Program Kids don't need to be on the street Difficulty in getting parents to come to school for conferences and training Physical structure of some buildings create safety problems (Too many doors, etc.) Changing staff expectations about student behavior Training of students/staff on the Rights and Responsibility handbooks to ensure consistent enforcement.Issues related to Goal #6 Goal #6 Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operations. 1) What is equity? 2) The lack of a definition of site-based management in the LRSD 3) Provide financial resources 4) Practices and procedures which will be used in teaching strategies relating to positive interpersonal relationships 5) The biases and practices that all of the players bring to the setting 6) Racial sensitivity programs for students, staff and parents 7) Encourage student participation in a cross-section of extra curriculum activities8) Lack of understanding of the desegregation plan 9) Employment practices at all levels 10) Effective monitoring of diversity In all programsSTPROG08 REVISED 09 SEPT 93 3.2.2 1 2 3 29 5 6 27 28 7 SOURCE SPl SP2 BP6 BP7 PP9 OP12 SP20 BP21 BP24 BP28 SP BP28 OP28 OP28 BP34 BP35 OP39 PROGRAM IDENTIFICATION WORKSHEET IN PLAN SEQUENCE ORDER FINAL VERSION PROGRAM NAME PRIMARY SECONDARY Commitment to Desegregation Leadership HIPPY 4-year old program City-wide Early Childhood Education Program Rockefeller Early Childhood Magnet Special Programs Summer Learning Program JTPA ASSET Program School Operations Alternative Learning Center Testing Assistance - Disadvantaged Student Hearing Officer Office of Desegregation and Student Assignment In-School Suspension Job Fair Extra-Curricular participation Board Board Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Mayo Williams Mayo Matthis Matthis Matthis Williams Williams Shead Price Shead Price Price Glasgow Adams Young Anderson Anderson Robertson Anderson Gremillion Anderson Ingram Watson Matthis Anderson Elston Anderson Gremillion Robertson8 9 10 12 13 14 26 32 15 35 16 17 SOURCE BP44 BP46 BP48 SP58 BP63 SP81 OPS 2 BPS 6 PP86 BP93 PP95 SP96 SP98 BP106 BP114 PP124 BP125 BP129 BP129 SP129 PP130 PROGRAM NAME Teacher Recruiter Staff Development Academic Support Program Gifted Education Multicultural Programs Focused Activities Academic Incentive Grants Original Magnets Parkview Science Magnet McClellan Community School Recruitment of Private School Students Federal Programs Vocational Education Library Services Special Education Staff Development Prejudice Reduction Security required for safe Schools Data Processing System for Student Information (including CIMS and ABACUS) Facilities Employment Practices PRIMARY Gadberry Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Mayo Glasgow Glasgow Glasgow Glasgow Glasgow Board TBA TBA TBA Gadberry SECONDARY Robinson Hudspeth Adams Woods Stovall Donaldson Various Robertson Anderson Gremillion Robertson Anderson Gremillion Anderson TBA Cole Rather Adams Green Lyons Kohler Hudspeth Williams Barnhouse Matthis Kingsella Eaton34 18 19 21 51 52 53 54 55 56 75 SOURCE PP130 PP131 BP131 PP139 BP143 SP145 PP146 OP148 OP148 OP149 BP152 BP153 BP153 OP153 BP153 OP153 PROGRAM NAME Bidding Practices PRIMARY TBA Parent Involvement/Community Mayo Linkages VIPS - Recruiting Student Assignments M-to-M Magnet Schools (Central, Dunbar, Washington, Henderson, McClellan) New Futures Facilities King Interdistrict School Mayo Mayo Mayo Matthis TBA Matthis Stephens Interdistrict School Matthis Office of Incentive Schools IS Writing to Read IS Science Labs IS Computer Labs IS Foreign Language Labs IS Computer Loan Program IS Other Incentive School Academic Programs - Kindergarten - Reading across the curriculum - Oral Expression across curriculum SECONDARY Neal Gill Milam TBA Young Matthis Mayo Mayo Gremillion Mayo Robertson Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Mayo Robertson Gremillion Robertson Gremillion Robertson Gremillion Robertson Gremillion Robertson Gremillion Robertson GremillionSOURCE PROGRAM NAME PRIMARY SECONDARY - Learning Styles Inventory - School Themes - Semi-Departmental - Instructional Tech. - Study/Test-taking - Parent Home Study - Computer Managed Inst. - Student Educ. Plans - Specialized Programs - Incentive Programs - Homework - Criterion-Referenced Test - Heterogeneous grouping - Effective Schools - African/Amer. History 57 BP154 IS Extended Day Matthis Glasgow Mayo 59 60 61 62 63 PP156 PP157 BP158 PP159 OP171 BP171 OP171 OP171 IS Social Skills - Family Folklore - Positive Imaging - Interpersonal skills - Rites of Passage - Role Model Program - Mentoring Program IS Special Activities - Peer Tutoring Program - Academic Reinforcement Clubs - Special Interest Clubs IS Field Trips IS Latin Enrichment Program IS Homework Centers IS Transportation (Add) IS Homework Hotline IS Mentors/Tutors Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo64 65 66 67 68 69 70 SOURCE BP172 PP172 PP172 BP172 PP173 PP175 BP176 OP176 OP176 OP178 OP178 PROGRAM NAME IS Instructional Aides (add) IS Supervision Aides IS Career Skills Development IS Extended Year IS Support Services - Other - Community Access/Field Trips - Community Involvement - Special Skills Prog. - Special Training - Parental Involvement - Learning Time Sched - Home/School Comm. - Extracurricular Prog. - Attendance and Behav. - Subj. Related Extracurr IS Counseling/Social Work - Community Services Access - College/Post Grad Aware - Study Skills - Home/Neighborhood Meet - Individual and Group Counseling - Wellness Program IS Incentive/Recognition IS Resident Counseling Service Camp Pfeifer IS Monitoring IS Permanent Substitute IS Additional Compensation PRIMARY Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis SECONDARY Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo71 72 73 74 22 24 SOURCE PP178 OP179 OP190 PP190 SP190 BP193 BP194 SP205 PP215 SP224 BP227 PROGRAM NAME IS School Policies and Procedures Others IS Extended Week IS Staffing - Recommended Full-time positions IS Staffing - Other - Staffing Committee - Staffing Needs Assessment - Staff Recruitment - Staff Selection - Staff Commit/Effect Monitor - Teacher Demonstration Program - Master Teacher Program - New Teacher Assist IS Alternative Classroom IS Required Staff Development IS Teacher Stipends for Inservice and Extra 5 days IS Parent Involvement IS Parent Recruitment Monitoring activities (Eval Dept) Computerized Transportation System PRIMARY Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Mayo Ingram TBA SECONDARY Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Matthis Mayo Montgomery ***************************************************************** SIS Student Choices/Options Mayo Pederson Wi edower 25 019 Romine Interdistrict Theme Matthis Mayo33 SOURCE SI13 SI21 SI23 SI33 SI35 SI53 SI54 BI56 SI59 PROGRAM NAME Summer School Staff Development School Operations Library Media Special Education Vocational Education Guidance/Counseling Program PRIMARY Matthis Glasgow Matthis Glasgow Glasgow Glasgow Glasgow Parent Involvement/Community Matthis Linkages Public Relations Wagner SECONDARY Robertson Gremillion Anderson Hudspeth Robertson Gremillion Anderson Lyons Kohler Green Elston Mayo Mayo3.2.3 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Little Rock School District is to provide a quality, integrated educational program which encourages ail children to achieve their optimum academic, social, and emotional development. To that end, the students in the Little Rock School District will develop an appreciation for ethnic and cultural diversity, develop skills in problem solving and conflict resolution, and demonstrate mastery of the District's curriculum. This will be achieved through the collaborative efforts of a Board, a dedicated and competent staff, and of parents and citizens committed to fairness, racial equity and adequate support for education.3.2.4 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT GOALS Implement integrated educational programs that will ensure that all students grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academic enrichment while closing disparities in achievement. Develop and maintain a staff that is well-trained and motivated. The Little Rock School Board, administration, staff, and students will demonstrate in their day to day behavior that they accept each individual as a valued contributor to society and view cultural diversity among students, staff and the community as a valued resource upon which our community and nation can draw as we prepare for the 21st Century. Solicit and secure financial and other resources that are necessary to fully support our schools, including our desegregation plan. Provide a safe and orderly climate that is conducive to learning for all students. Ensure that equity occurs in ail phases of school activities and operations.3.2.7 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 Board of Directors Special Meeting September 9, 1993 The Board of Directors of the Little in , or Directors of the Little Rock School District met too? special meeting at 5:20 p.m. on September 9, Board Room of the Administration Building, 810 West 1993, on September 9, Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. Board Secretary, presided. Dr. Katherine Mitchell, MEMBERS PRESENT: Dr. Katherine Mitchell Ms. Pat Gee Mr. Willie D. (Bill) Hamilton Mr. John Riggs Mr. Dorsey Jackson (NOTE: ARRIVED AT 5:40 p.m.) MEMBERS ABSENT: Mrs. 0. G. Jacovelli Mr. John Moore OTHERS PRESENT: Dr. Henry P. Williams, Superintendent Elect Mrs.   ' -- - - Estelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent Norma Rodgers, Acting Recorder of Minutes Ms. Betty Forbes, Staff Assistant Mrs. Ms. Karen Carter, Franklin Incentive Teacher Representative Miss Tameka Dillard, Parkview Magnet, Mr. Don Umfleet, Audio Specialist School, Student Representative PURPOSE OF SPECIAL MEETING\nDr. Katherine Mitchell, Board Secretary, called the meeting to order and announced that the special meeting purpose of considering the following issues: was called for the 1. 2. 3 . 4. Bond Refunding Stephens Site Selection Committee Personnel Long Range Goals/Mission StatementBoard of Directors Special Meeting September 9, 1993 BOND REFUNDING: Mr. Mark McBryde, Bond Consultant, explained to the Board the process for authorizing the Refunding Bonds in the converted principal amount of $5,385,000 for the purpose of refunding outstanding indebtedness. for the purpose The interest rate on these bonds would reduce from 7.06 percent to an average of 4.5 percent - a reduction of approximately 2.5 percent in debt service. The payments will remain on the same frequency. A Resolution Authorizing the Issuance and Delivery of Bonds\nand Prescribing Other Matters Pertaining Thereto was presented to the Board for approval. (Copy Attached). Mr. John Riggs moved approval of the recommendation as discussed by Mr. McBryde, seconded by Mr. Willie D. (Bill) Hamilton, and it carried unanimously. PERSONNEL It was recommended that Dr. Marjorie Bassa be hired as the 12 month Planning, Research and Evaluation specialist. Dr. If approved. Bassa would assist with the coordination of the Program Planning and Budgeting process. Mr. John Riggs moved acceptance of the Interim Superintendent's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Willie D. (Bill) Hamilton, and it carried 3-1 with Ms. Pat Gee voting \"nay.\" NOTE: Mr. Dorsey Jackson arrived at 5:40 p.m. STEPHENS SITE SELECTION COMMITTEE: Mr. Jerry Malone, LRSD Attorney, explained the process that was used in making a recommendation for the location of the new Stephens Interdistrict School. Mr. Malone explained that Judge Susan Webber Wright had ordered a decision from a second committee to be made up of patrons from all three schools districts (Little Rock, North Little and Pulaski County Special School District). Mr. John Riggs, Board Member, chaired the committee and Rock served as a non-voting member. (2) bus tours. Five meetings were held with two District Administration Building. Each meeting was held at the Little Rock School The committee was instructed to consider busing burden on students, recruitment and safety in the selection process. Judge Wright and her law clerk, together with Mrs. Ann Brown, Desegregation Monitor, were present for one of the bus tours. At the final meeting, all members were present and turned in their tally sheets except one person and that person brought the tally sheet the next day. the tally sheets as follows: The sites were ranked fromBoard of Directors Special Meeting September 9, 1993 Stephens Incentive School site - 309 points UAMS/DHS - 264 points 7th and Jones (Lumber Yard) - 211 points Discussion was held on the possibility for the use of the Stephens Building if the recommendation of the committee was not approved. Mr. The motion was seconded by Mr. Jackson moved that the Board approve the recommendation from the Site Selection Committee by locating the new school at the Stephens School's present location. The motion was seconded by Mr. Willie D. Hamilton, and it carried unanimously. The Board called for a break at 6:40 p.m. and resumed at 7:10 p.m. LONG-RANGE GOALS/MISSION STATEMENT Dr. Henry Williams strategic planning. gave an overview of his concern for He stated he had requested that a committee be put together to review and revise the goals and mission statement for the District. '  This committee was made up of community people, staff, and Board members. Dr. Katherine Mitchell reported on the pre-goal setting She stated the groups began their meeting in open session and were placed in small groups. session. group were chosen to work with. The six highest goals from each The groups were facilitated by Donita Hudspeth, Sterling Ingram and Dennis Glasgow. Mr. Dorsey Jackson expressed his thanks to the administrative staff, community people, classroom teachers, Joshua Intervenors, PTA and Mr. Bill Mooney of ODM Office for their work on the goals and mission statement. Mr. Dennis Glasgow expressed his thanks to the group and served as a facilitator. He explained that the group had used the nominal group technique in establishing a mission statement and the goals. Mr. Glasgow reviewed the proposed mission statement and goals with the audience. After questions were answered, Mr. After questions were answered, Hamilton moved that the Board accept the preliminary statement and goals as presented by the committee. mission accepted by Ms. Pat Gee and it carried unanimously, preliminary Mission Statement and Goals is attached. The motion was A copy of the Mr. Sterling Ingram a facilitator on the discussion of the Desegregation Program gave a report. identify program modification or development\nreview and provide guidance related to proportional allocations formulas\nestablishment of written priorities\nand identify any additional programs for \"Fast Track\" evaluation. He discussed a need to allocations Mr. Ingram distributedBoard of Directors Special Meeting September 9, 1993 guidelines to be used to conduct fast tract evaluations of targeted programs and format for program evaluation. Mr. and a facilitator for the _Mark Milhollen. . Controller, budgeting process, gave a short recap of eight strategies for funding shortfall, (copy attached) Estelle Matthis gave a summary of the goals and mission statement together with a wrap-up on the program planning and budgeting. ADJOURNMENT\nMr. seconded by Mr. unanimously. John Riggs moved that the meeting adjourn at 8:15, - (Bill) Hamilton, and it carried Willie D. John lore, President Approved: Dr. Katherine Mitchell, SecretaryLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Little Rock School District is to provide a quality, Integrated educational program which encourages all children to achieve their optimum academic, social, and emotional development. To that end, the students in the Little Rock School District will develop an appreciation for ethnic and cultural diversity, develop skills in problem solving and conflict resolution, and demonstrate mastery of the District's curriculum. This will be achieved through the collaborative efforts of a Board, a dedicated and competent staff, and of parents and citizens committed to fairness, racial equity and adequate support for education.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT GOALS 1. Implement Integrated educational programs that will ensure that all students grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academic enrichment while closing disparities in achievement. 2. Develop and maintain a staff that is well-trained and motivated. 3. The Little Rock School Board, administration, staff, and students will demonstrate In their day to day behavior that they accept each individual as a valued contributor to society and view cultural diversity among students, staff and the community as a valued resource upon which our community and nation can draw as we prepare for the 21st Century. 4. Solicit and secure financial and other resources that are necessary to fully support our schools, including our desegregation plan. 5. Provide a safe and orderly climate that is conducive to learning for all students. 6. Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities ^nd operations.1. 2. 3 . 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. STRATEGIES FOR FUNDING SHORTFALLS Effectively implement the program planning and budgeting process. Pursue receipt of additional local dollars through lobbying techniques and/or grant writing. Vigorously pursue federal dollars, especially through a team approach composed of the new grant writer and/or other selected individuals. Examine thoroughly millage question and make appropriate decisions. Explore possibility of program consolidation and different delivery of current programs and systems. Consider options on efficient use of all our physical plants - expansion/closure/modification. Conduct energy audits and evaluate data generated from that process. Conduct transportation study to utilization of transportation system. achieve effective3.2.8 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS August 30, 1993 MEMORANDUM TO: Program Managers, Directors, and Supervisors FROM: Jie Matthis, Interim Superintendent SUBJECT: Procedures to be Used for Fast Track Evaluation of Desegregation Plan The districts Program Planning and Budgeting document identified a number of activities that are to be implemented during the 1993-94 school year. An activity for August 1993 is for the Superintendent nd the Cabinet to begin to identify programs for \"fast track\" evaluation. A fast track evaluation will ot have as many dimensions or details as a regular evaluation, since the evaluative process is conducted in a reduced time frame. Evaluation of the districts program will provide the information that is needed for us to determine if programs are effective and that such implementation will assist us in meeting our commitment to our Court-approved Desegregation Plan. The following guidelines are to be used to conduct fast track evaluations of targeted programs. 1. Prepare a comprehensive program description for each area or component that is targeted for evaluation. 2. Identify program goals for each area or component of the program that is being evaluated. 3. Identify the evaluation criteria that is to be used to fast track evaluate each goal. Include all evaluative measures and instruments that will be used in this process. 4. Identify any obstacles or problems that were encountered that hindered or impacted the obtainment of program goals. 5. Given the results of your fast track evaluation, recommendations for program additions, deletions, and/or changes are deemed appropriate. This data can be extremely helpful as you develop a strong business case for making a major decision(s) regarding continued implementation of various programs in the Desegregation Plan. The format for a business2 case is enclosed for your review. You will receive copies of the standard format that is to be used to fast track evaluate targeted programs. The following programs have been targeted for fast track evaluation: Targeted Program Person(s) Responsible 1. 2. 3. 4. All Employment Contracts Student Assignment Process Construction of Stephens Outsourcing Support Services 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. (10. 11. Special Education Vocational Education Academic Progress Incentive Grant Academic Support Program Library Media Services Resurvey Requirement Lucy Lyon Early Retirement Incentive Program Substitute Teachers Brady Gadberry Estelle Matthis Doug Eaton/John Riggs Doug Eaton/Charlie Neal Coopers and Lybrand Patty Kohler Carol Green Margaret Gremillion/Larry Robertson Leon Adams Mark Milhollen/Brady Gadberry LRSD/LRCTA We need each program manager to submit your preliminary evaluation report to my office by November 15, 1993. The final report is due by December 15, 1993. All evaluation reports will be submitted to the Board of Directors during January, 1994. /Iks3.3 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas September 21, 1993 To: From: Re: Marjorie Bassa, Planning, Research \u0026amp; Evaluation Jeanette Wagner^^irector of Communications 1993/94 Community Forums The Community Forums have been set for the following dates at the following locations: Monday, October 11 - Cloverdale Elementary Tuesday, October 26 - Parkview Arts and Sciences Magnet High Wednesday, November 10 - Bale Elementary Tuesdav, November 16 - Forest Heights Jumor High Tuesday, November 30 - Rockefeller Incentive School After reading the document you prepared on the \"Steps to Planning Forums Meetings,\" I began to separate out the actions and tried to list those who might be responsible for them. Let me know if you have any problems with the division of labor, so to speak. Dept, of Communications: 1. Acquire school locations for forums (seating for 90-100). 2. Prepare postcards announcing the forum dates and times 3. Prepare news release for Central Arkansas media 4. Write and send 30 second PSA to TV/radio stations 5. Arrange for any sound equipment needed for forums 6. Prepare sign-in sheets for forums 7. Arrange for Security personnel for forums Dept, of Planning, Research and Evaluation 1. Prepare minutes of planning meeting 2. Prepare agenda for forums 2. Prepare survey or method of written input from community 3. Prepare matrix or report of written input for superintendent41 Ih 0 3.4 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Date: August 5, 1993 To: Jeanette Wagner, Director of Communications From: Sterling Ingram/ irector Planning, Research and Evaluation Re: Program Planning and Budgeting Tasks Attached is a copy of the Planning and Budgeting document which was submitted to the court on July 29, 1993. Although the document has not been approved, I expect the basic framework will not be changed. On page 3 of Attachment 4, you will find that Community Forums and District Dialogue sessions will be conducted as part of the needs assessment process. You have been identified as one of the persons responsible for this task. Please plan for three area school forums instead of one for a total of five community forums, an addition that the Board wanted. This was As the lead planning person for the planning and budgeting process, I am requesting that as you make plans for the 1993-94 school year, please include the necessary strategies, timelines, etc. in your management plan which will be included in the budget document. bjg cc: Estelle Matthis Jerry Malone 3.4.1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT/CITY OF LITTLE ROCK COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS AGENDA September 15, 1993 - 1:30 p.m. Overview of Desegregation Plan Jerry Malone Legal Adviser Linkages - LRSD Desegregation Plan and Future Little Rock Plans............... .............................................Sterling Ingram Director of Planning/Research/Evaluation Financial Implications ....................Mark Milhollen Director of Financial Services Remarks LRSD Board of Directors LR City Board of DirectorsGOALS FOR LITTLE ROCK A NEW FOCUS FOR CHANGE COMMUNITY AND RACIAL DIVERSITY * L.R. Race Relations Committee  Annual Race Relations Summit * Multicultural Events \u0026amp; Festivals COMMUNITY IMAGE ENHANCEMENT  Central High Museum CRIME PREVENTION AND PUBLIC SAFETY * Early Childhood Education  After School Programs * Mentoring * Fighting Back * New Futures  Insure the Children INTERVENTION  Neighborhood Drop-Off Center  Hearing Officer - Alternatives to Suspension TREATMENT  Treatment Program EDUCATION NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION  Early childhood education, mentoring, tutoring and intervention will be provided through neighborhood centers.CITY OF LITTLE ROCK-LRSD LINKAGE FUTURE LITTLE ROCK EDUCATIONAL TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS The City of Little Rock will: #1 - create and coordinate network of early childhood services. #2 - develop a strategic plan for determining the resources needed to develop a World Class Work force in the city. LRSD DESEGREGATION COMPONENTS # 1 - Early Childhood Education - HIPPY (Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters) - Four-Year-Old Program - CARE - Breakfast Program #2 - Vocational Education - JTPA (Job Training Partnership Act)CITY OF LITTLE ROCK-LRSD LINKAGE FUTURE LITTLE ROCK EDUCATIONAL TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS The City of Little Rock will: #3 - develop a human relations program with the objective of teaching children to function successfully in a safe learning environment. #4 - designate a LRSD administrator as Assistant Superintendent for Parent Activities. LRSD DESEGREGATION COMPONENTS # 3 - Safety and Security: The District Hearing Officer will develop plans to reduce the disparity of disciplinary actions. #4 - Associate Superintendent for Desegregation - VIPS (Volunteers in Public Schools) - Parent Involvement - Incentive School Mentor ProgramCITY OF LITTLE ROCK-LRSD LINKAGE FUTURE LITTLE ROCK EDUCATIONAL TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS The City of Little Rock will: #5 - work with the LRSD to review the school calendar to accommodate care and academic needs of children and their parents. #6 - establish an Educational Commission to carry out recommendations of Future Little Rock Education Task Force. LRSD DESEGREGATION COMPONENTS # 5 - Summer Learning Program - MPT Summer School - Incentive School Extended Year #6 - Joint Board Meetings of the Little Rock School District and the City of Little Rock3.4.2 Little Rock School District Office of the Assistant Superintendents 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 September 13, 1993 TO: .411 Principals FROM: Margaret Gremillion, .Assistant Superintendent Larry S. Robertson, Assistant Superintendent SUBJECT: Cluster xMeeting Dates Please mark your calendar for the following meeting dates: 1. Wednesday, September 15 - 3:00 p.m. Elementary principals and assistants - Gremillions Cluster *2. Thursday, September 16 - 1:30 p.m. Junior high principals 3. Thursday, September 16 - 3:00 p.m. Elementary principals and assistants - Robertsons Cluster *il . Friday, September 17 - 9:30 a.m. Senior high principals Secondary^ assistants will be scheduled at a later date. All meetings will be held in the Board Room. Mrs. Matthis will make a presentation to all clusters starting at the designated time on the School Operations Section of the Desegregation Plan. Elementary' principals will receive a sample of the report card and fact sheet to disseminate to their staffs. Tliank you for giving this your attention. /laj cc: Estelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent - CurriculumINSERVICE IMPLEMENTATION: DESEGREGATION PLAN PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGET DOCUMENT September 15, 1993 - 3 p.m. Opening Remarks . .. Margaret Gremillion Assistant Superintendent Budget Document .............................................Sterling Ingram Director of Planning/Research/Evaluation Mission Statement/Tentative Goals ......... Estelle Matthis Interim Superintendent Desegregation Plan/School Operations Estelle Matthis 1993-94 Budget Allocations ....................Mark Milhollen Director of Financial Services Report Card Inservice Margaret Gremillion OtherINSERVICE IMPLEMENTATION: DESEGREGATION PLAN PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGET DOCUMENT September 16, 1993 - 3 p.m. Opening Remarks ........... Larry Robertson Assistant Superintendent Budget Document .............................................Sterling Ingram Director of Planning/Research/Evaluation Mission Statement/Tentative Goals Estelle Matthis Desegregation Plan/School Operations Estelle Matthis 1993-94 Budget Allocations .....................Mark Milhollen Director of Financial Services Report Card Inservice ......... Alice Stovall Director of Reading Judy Teeter Reading Specialist Other Larry RobertsonINSERVICE IMPLEMENTATION: DESEGREGATION PLAN PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGET DOCUMENT Junior High Principals - September 16, 1993 - 1:30 p.m. Senior High Principals - September 17, 1993 - 9:30 a.m. Opening Remarks ......... Estelle Matthis Interim Superintendent Budget Document .............................................Sterling Ingram Director of Planning/Research/Evaluation Mission Statement/Tentative Goals Estelle Matthis Desegregation Plan/School Operations Estelle Matthis 1993-94 Budget Allocations .....................Mark Milhollen Director of Financial Services OtherDEFINITIONS A 3.4.2 CONCPT04 REVISED 02 SEP 93 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT TERM AND DATA ELEMENT DEFINITIONS TERM DEFINITIONS. __ The following definitions are provided for general guidance, and will be used throughout the Program Planning and Budgeting Process. Program. composed of a group A program is an or series of established plan of operation, related activities which carried out to serve a specific area of identified need. are - -__________ A program is a major undertaking by the district to fulfill statutory, executive, and/or legal requirements. Programs are the district's methods of implementing goals and objectives. Programs will be a basis for work progress and fiscal reporting and monitoring. a Programs will be a Program Description. Generally, program descriptions do not currently exist on most programs, and will have to be written. program description should include at least three parts: A - Purpose. A one or two sentence statement of what the program is designed to accomplish. Scope and Content. activities that A general description of the purpose. description program. This of are to be undertaken to achieve the section might also the administrative include structure a J of brief the Participants/Beneficiaries. A specific statement of how many and what kind of persons will be affected by the program during one fiscal year. Program Goal. A program goal is a broad guiding statement and should describe the overall aim(s), purposefs), or ambition(s) of 7 . _  It is ageneral and enduring statement of purpose that expresses the district's fundamental intentions and the specific program. provides guidelines for planning the future development of the program. What is the program trying to accomplish? must have at least one goal, but may have several. Each program Objectives. Program objectives present explicitly the desired impact the program should have on a problem. detail to the goals. They should provide They tell in specific, measurable terms what is to be accomplished to implement adopted goals. The objective statement should: (A) tell what is to be achieved\n(B) tell when the achievement is to be realized\n(C) tell how the achievement of the objective will be measured. Each program goal must have at least one objective, but may have several. Strategies. Strategies are the jobs. tasks, efforts, oractions undertaken in a program accomplishment of the objective. which contributes to the A strategy is a combination of intermediate steps, and produces a distinct end product intermediate processes which only support other strategies. end products should be measurable or quantifiable where possible, showing how the objective is to be achieved. - not These Each objective must have at least one strategy, but may have several. Evaluation Criteria. Evaluation criteria are statements which specify the end product of an objective or strategy and establish measurable levels of performance for the oroduct. These end product, products should be measurable or quantifiable where possible, showing how the objective or strategy is to be achieved. The criteria should measure, if possible, the relative impact of the results on the problem which the objective or strategy is designed to solve. If a strategy or objective cannot be measured in terms of impact, the measurement can be stated in terms of the level (or volume) of strategy provided and/or the number of persons served. Each strategy must have at least one evaluation criteria, but may have several. to solve. DEFINITIONS B PROGRAM PAGE DATA ELEMENTS DATA ELEMENT DEFINITIONS. Each program will have Page. one of these cover pages. Extensive program narrative will carry-over onto a second page. The form is set up on diskette to allow for this carry-over. do not have to get everything on one page. so you Program Seq #. Each program will sequence number by the district planner. be assigned a unique The purpose of this sequence number is to establish a reference for placing programs in order the planning document. When the document is within assembled, programs are arranged in this sequence. The program sequence number will help facilitate look-up since there is front-to-back page numbering. no field\nit should not change during the year. This element should be a static Revision Date. This date is the actual date this program document was last changed. This date will be entered by the person making the change each time the document is changed, this will change at least quarterly with date performance reporting. As a minimum, the regular Program Name. The district planner established name of the program in this field. will place the Name consistency will eliminate confusion, so try to use the designated name on all documents. change during the year. This elem.ent should be a static field\nit should not Program Code. link budget and expenditure This is a unique accounting code which will to the associated program. The code will be assigned by Financial Services prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, and all expenditures during the year should use this program code. should not change during the year. This element should be a static field\nit Primary Leader. The Primary Leader is the cabinet-level associate responsible for the management and operation of this program. This person should have the authority to ensure all necessary actions are taken to make the program successful. This person is responsible for the correctness and timeliness of the planning document and all subsequent reporting. Secondary Leader. The Secondary Leader is the associate who is back-up to the Primary, and will function in that capacity in the absence of the Primary. Program Description. above, must be placed in this field. The program description. as defined static field\nit should not change during the year. This element should be a District Goal Support. Each program must directly support onemore district goals. or If more than one district goal, the appropriate district goals should be listed in descending priority order. District goals will be established by the Board. order. This element should be a static field\nit should not change during the year. Program Goal. The program goal, as defined above, must be placed in this field. but may have several. sequentially. Each program must have at least one goal. Each goal should be numbered and listed not change during the year. This element should be a static field\nit should Plan Reference. Specific plan and page references will be listed in this section for those programs directly cited in one of the desegregation plans. L= LRSD Desegregation Plan. 1= InterDistrict Plan. The format should be L23 or 113-20. This element will be left blank if the program is not directly cited in one of the desegregation plans. This element should be a static field\nit should not change during the year, unless by Court Order. FY Program Budget. The total budgeted dollars appropriate fiscal year will be shown in this element. for the The number will be the total for the program code, and will be supplied by Financial Services at the beginning of the fiscal year, element will change only if the budget changes. This FTE. This element reflects the Full Time Equivalents (FTE) budgeted for this program (at the program code level). The number will be the total for the program code, and will be supplied by Financial Services at the beoinnino of the fiscal vear. This beginning year. element will change only if the budget changes. lst/2nd/3rd/4th Qtr Expend. The actual expenditures for each quarter will be entered into the appropriate field during the quarterly reporting process. Financial Services will provide the information, but the Primary Leader is responsible for entering the information onto the form. Once entered, these fields should remain static unless an error is detected. YTD Expenditures. actual expenditures at the program level. This field is the year-to-date total of departments with expenditures against this program. This will include all Financial Services will provide the information once each quarter is closed, but the Primary Leader is responsible for entering the information onto the form. unless an error is detected. Once entered, these fields should remain static Related Function Codes. This field identifies all function- level accounting codes which combine to make the complete program budget. Each program will have at least one function code, but may have several. with one space between them. Each four digit code should be listed sequentiallyDEFINITIONS C OBJECTIVE PAGE DATA ELEMENTS DATA ELEMENT DEFINITIONS. Page. This is relating to the \"program\". the field. the sequential page number for all pages This number is automatically placed in Program Seq #. This should be the same number as program page. This number will objectives back to the major program. link all separate on the program Revision Date. This date is the actual date this program document was last changed. This date will be entered by the person making the change each time the document is changed, this date will change at least auarterlv with performance reporting. quarterly As a minimum, the regular The date on this page may be different from that on the program page since this objective page should change more frequently. Program Name. page. This name IS This should be the same name as on the program a further link back to the major program. Including the name on this page prevents the need to refer back for the program name. Program Code. This program page. should be the same code(s) as on the This code(s) is a link back to the major program. Including the code(s) on this page prevents the need to refer back for the program code. Primary Leader. program page. This should be the same person as on the Including this name on this page prevents the need to refer back for the leader 's name. Secondary Leader. that name on the program page. This name will generally be the same as objectives, However, if a program has several supporting objectives. the Secondary Leader may be different for those Program Goal. program page in this field. Include only one of the program goals from the For each program goal listed on the program page, there will be at least one objective page. Plan Reference Page Number. listed for each objective and strategy. Source references should be If the objective or strategy is desegregation plan related, list the specific plan and page upon which this objective or strategy is found. If the objective or strategy is not related to a desegregation plan Court Order, list whatever source was used. or be numbered to correspond to the appropriate strategy. Each reference should Objectives. the program goal. List all of the objectives required to satisfy Objectives should be listed in bold face.K n f^om a desegregation plan or court order should within parentheses. Each program goal must have at least one objective, but may have several. Spacing between supporting strategies. Objectives should be numbered sequentially under each goal. Strategies. the related objective. Wording not taken from List all be in bold face of the strategies required to satisfy Strategies should be listed in bold face, a desegregation plan or court order should within parentheses. Each objective must have at r but may have several. least one strategy, __ __ ___ numbered sequentially under each object! ve. Strategies should be Beginning Date. This is the actual date this particular thp ' f consistency, all dates should be entered in the following format\nMM/DD/YY, 07/22/93. stated yet, leave this field blank. activity began. This If an activity has not Completion Date, activity was completed. This IS the actual date this particular - For consistency, entered the following format\nactivity has been in MM/DD/YY, all dates should be 07/22/93. started but not completed, give your best oues\u0026lt;5 on the percent of completion f75%l. Tf th. . completion (75%). started, leave this field blank. If the activity has Responsibility. This with ensuring this activity is accomplished. is the name of the individual tasked Evaluation Criteria. List at least one evaluation criteria p 1 . Include the specific measure of success Evaluation criteria should be listed in bold face. for each strategy. measure of tekZn snouiu oe listed in bold face. Wording not JS\n^gfg^tion plan or court order should be in bold face within parentheses. Each evaluation correspond to the appropriate strategy, and should be numbered sequentially under each strategy. criteria should beLRSD PV 93 91 PROGRAM PUhOET DOCUMEN f f.n\u0026gt;n Scq tz Pace\nRevisKm Hale: ('.Clin Name: l\u0026gt;mn Code: rrimary Leaden Secondary fxadcr. p.ram l\u0026gt;ewrip(ton: hict Goal Support: \".rain Goal: n Rcrcrcnccs:  Program Rudget: I DPipcndilures: Lilcd Eunciton Codes: 1st Qtr Expend: 2imJ Qtr Expend: 3rd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expenrl: I September 14, 1993 PTE LRSD lY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGlVr 1 liNT Page: 2 ISogiaitt $\u0026lt;x| /: Keviston Date: Suptvnilier 14, 1993 Ir Piogiaiu Name: I'lugram Cude: Pittgiain (kal: Plan Refeieiicc Page Number Oiijcetivcs Primaiy Ixader Sccotulary Ixadcr: Strategies Ucginuiiig Date Completion Dale Responsibility Evaluation CriteriaI I I'rogcMi S(X| Pi oginm Home: Pi ogr.-vR CtKic: Pt oqi :im Goal: Plan Reference Page Mtirbcr 1. Pngc 30 1.1 Pane 30 1.2 loie 30 1.3 Page 30 2. Page 30 2.1 Page 30 LRSD FT 93-9\u0026lt; PROCBAH DUOCET DOCUHrUI Primary Lcodcr: Secondary leader: Ihc inlet of the school opcroties goni is to provide cquitoblc cducotiooal opportunities (or all sturJents in the LRSO. Objectives Strategies Begiming Date Conpletion Date Page: 2 Revision Date: ResponsibiIity Septcmi^cr 2, WW Evaluation Criteria 1. To ensure on orgonizational structure wliich provides equal opportunity ond occess for parents, students and staff. 1. To review organixotional structure in .schools ond control office to ensure sufficient support for students orxJ stoff success and for the iffplementotion of the desegregation pion. 1.1 Appoint school-based biracial comiittees to monitor inplcmentation ond data. (Report to faculty) 1.2 A district-wide biracial cofnnittee will monitor district-wide desegregation efforts ond data and (report to Board) 1.3 Establish  reporting system. 2. To provide inservice to raise staff awarencss/oxpectations of equity for stixtents. concerns 2.1 Inservice cycles for existing ofxl ru'u staff inchxJing: a. teacher expectations b. working with parents c. at-risk youth d. Icarnir\u0026gt;g styles (July 1, 1993) July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 (June 30, 1996) Jirx: 30, 1996 Jir 30, 1996 Jixxj 30, 1996 Jire 30, 1996 (Prine ipals,, Assistant Supts., Assoc. Si45t. Principals, Assistant Sijpts. Assoc. Stpt. of Educat ional Programs, Assoc. Sipt. for Dcsegregalion Associotc Si^ts., Assistant Sipts. Local schools, Staff Oevelopntent, Conmunicat ions Oepl., Staff Development, Academic Support) Appropriate Associate Sipts., Qtvi Staff Development 1. Sufficient program personnel ore in place to meet the rceds of all students in the program os measured by the monitoring instruBctit.. 1. (Satisfactory corrplianci with the E\u0026lt;kjc8tion Equity Monitoring Oocunont) 1. School-level docunentot ion of cymrterly meetings (minutes, rosters: 1.2 Report from the monitoring of the biracial conmittcc to (he Board 1.3 Monitoring reports district-wide birnciol cenmi t tees 2. Results of school climate survey 2. (Random survey results from Staff Oevelopnent) 2.1 Roster of tcnchers/pnrt icipating slnf f 2.1 Evaluation of irwcrvic- seopents by participants3.4.3 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Date: September 20, 1993 To: Principals and Selected Central Office Administrators From: Sterling Ingram, Director' Subject: Program Budget Document Inservice As discussed in the Implementation Desegregation Plan- Program Planning and Budget Document sessions, a training session for completing the Program Budget Document (PBD) is scheduled for Thursday, September 23, 1993, in the Board Room at 1:30 p.m. You should designate the person to attend this session who will input evidence into the computer for your school. If you have questions, contact Dr. Marjorie Bassa at 324-2120. drg3.5 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT 810 WEST MARKHAM Date: To: From: Through: Re: LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 September 23, 1993 Board of Directors Sterling Ingra^^Director Planning, Research and Evaluation VesI Estelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent Program Planning and Budgeting Process Attached is a preliminary copy of the Program Budget Document for the School Operations section. language is identified in bold type. language is displayed parenthetically. Original Clarifying Schools were requested to provide evidence of completion or status after the end of each quarter as indicated in the Program Planning and Budgeting document. I am available for questions. bjgLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MONITORING AND REPORTING OPERATIONS FLOW AsdXant SuperIntandanta Maatar Dlakatta Planning, Raaaarch and Evaluation Financial Sarvloaa School Oparatlona Program Dlakattaa A V Schools Utater Dlakatta A Other Program Managers Flnanolal Information V Quarterly ReportProgroB Seq *: PrograM Naae: School Operations Progreai Code: Priaary Leader: Prograa Description: IRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader: Page: Revision Date: September 23, 1993 1 District Goal S^Dport: Prograa Goal: Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operations. The intent of the school operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportisiities for all students in the LRSD. Plan References: FT Prograa Budget: TTD Expenditures: Related Function Codes: 1st Qtr Expend\n2nd Qtr Expend: 3fd Qtr Espend\n4th Qtr Expend: FTE Progran Seq *: Progm Mane: School Operations Progrsa Code: Progras Goal\nPlan Reference Page Nudser 1. Psge 30 1.1 Page 30 1.2 Page 30 1.3 Page 30 2. Page 30 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUHgMT Priaary Leader: Secondary Leader: The intent of the school operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportwitiea for ell students in the LRSD. Objectives Strategies Begiming Date Coapletion Date Page: 2 Revision Date: Responsibility SeptMfeer 23, 1993 Evaluation Criteria 1. To ensure an organizational structure lAich provides equal opporttaiity and access for parents, stulents and staff. 1. To review organizational structure in schools and central office to enaure sufficient support for students and staff success and for the iapleaentation of the desegregation plan. 1.1 Appoint school-based biracial coanittees to aonitor iapleaentation and data. (Report to faculty) 1.2 A district-wide birecial coaaittee will aonitor district-wide desegregation efforts and data and (report to Board) 1.3 Establish a reporting systea. 2. To provide inservice to raise staff awareness/expectations of equity concerns for students. (July 1, 1993) (June 30, 1994) (Principals,, Assistant Supts., Assoc. Supt.) 1. (Sufficient program personnel are in place to meet the needs of all students in the program as measured by the monitoring instrument) 1. (Satisfactory compliance with the Education Equity Monitoring Document) 1.1 Survey of staff - patrons July b 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 Jwe 30, 1994 Juw 30, 1994 Jme 30, 1994 Jine 30, 1994 Principals, Assistant Si4\u0026gt;ts. Assoc. of Educational Prograas, Assoc. Sipt. for Desegregation Associate Sipts., Assistant Si4\u0026gt;ts. (Local schools. Staff Development, Communications Dept., Staff Development, Academic Support) 1.1 School-level docmentation of quarterly eatings (ainutes, rosters) 1.2 Report of the biracial coMiittee 1.2 (Report from the monitoring of the biracial conmittee to the Board) 1.3 Monitoring reports district-wide biracial coaaittees 2. Results of school cliaate survey 2. (Random survey results from Staff Development)ProgrM Seq *: Progran Maae: School Operations Prograai Code: Prieary Leader: Secondary Leader: Page: 3 Revision Date: Septewber 23, 1993 Prograa Goal: The intent of the school operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportuiities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Nudser 2.1 Page 30 1. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. Page 30 3.1 Page 30 4. Page 30 2.1 Inservice cycles for existing end new staff including: a. teacher expectations b. working with parents c. at-risk youth d. learning styles 3. To provide programa bhich raise parental awareness of district structure, policy, and programs and ways to access them. 3. (Program which demonstrate high quality of parent Involvement) 3.1 Mini'seoiinars at PTA meetings and in the coomunity. 3.1 (Evidence of quality programs presented to parents.) 4. To Bionitor school standards to ensure high quality education for all students. July b 1993 July 1, 1993 (July 1, 1993) July 1. 1993 July 1, 1993 Jme 30, 1994 June 30, 1994 (June 30, 1994) Jme 30, 1994 Jine 30, 1994 Appropriate Associate Supts., and Staff DevelofHent (Connunications Dept., Staff Development, and Academic Support) District staff PTA Cornell (local and ares) 2.1 Roster of t eochers/part i c i pa t i ng staff Data-based iaprovesant in targeted stuctent schools 2.1 (Evaluation of inservice segments by participants) 3. Raster of attendance 3.1 Calendar showing programs held 3.1 (Calendar showing roster of participants and evaluation form) 3.1 (Evidence of parent participation\nincrease in nuiber of parents involved in school activities including VIPS, PTA, Parent Forims\nand increase in student achievement data\nand increase in ninber of students above the NCE on Stanford 8 and Abacus)Prograi Seq f: Prograa Maae: School Operations Rrograa Code: Priaary Leader: Secondary Leader: P9c: 4 Revision Dote: Septenber 23, 1993 Prograa Goal: The intent of the school operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Niaber 4.1 Page 30 4.2 Page 30 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Ccapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1. (cont'd) 4.1 Review data 4.1 (List data, achievement, discipline, promotion, retention, increase or decrease of white students, niaber above and below state reference point to assess strengths, needs, and strategies.) 4.2. School aonitoring visits July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 Jme 30, 1994 Jme 30, 1994 Associate Supt., Principals, Assistant Sigits. Planning, Research, and Evaluation 4.1 Calendars of visits 4.1 (Staff, facilities, climate, a^inistration, organization, and achievement levels) 4.2 Monitoring reports 4.2 (Staff Climate Survey)Progri Seq f: Prograa Hoae: School Operations Progri Code: Prograa Goal: Plan Reference Page Nudier 2. Page 31 1.1 Page 31 1.2 Page 31 2. Page 31 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primry Leader: Secondary Leader: The intent of the School Operations goal Is to provide equitable educational opportwities for all students 1n the LRSD. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date (kapletion Date Page: 5 Revision Date: Responsibility Septenter 23, 1993 Evaluation Criteria 2. To provide a climate in each school which is based on the belief and expectation that all children can lesm and to provide resources necessary to support that belief. 2. (To work with teachers and principals to develop a positive school climate) 1. Provide education to staff and patrons regording school culture and positive school climate. 1.1 PTA Board and general meetings to have educational coaponents regarding climate and expectations. 1.1 (LRSD expectations, teacher-designed instrunent, clarify what kind of expectations-'schievement, behavior, attendance) 1.2 Use of cable Charnel 4 to carry brief messages to staff regarding expectations, working with at-risk and disadvantaged students, and creating positive climate. 1.2 (Clarify performance expectations, such as behavior eephasis on students falling below) 2. Monitor school climate and resource allocation. 2. (Review of annual school plan) July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1. 1993 July 1, 1993 Jine 30, Jm 30, Jisw 30, Jm 30, 1994 1994 1994 1994 (Principals, Teachers, Assistant Sipts.) District personnel as desi^iated by the Associate Supt. (Principals, Teachers, Staff Oevelopnent, Conwuni cat ions Office) 1. Utilization of the school climate survey 1. (Results of school climate survey report) 1.1 Agendas of oeetings Neoaurable iaproveaants in individual school cliaates (1.1 Agendas of meetings and evidence of results of school climate survey report) 1.2 (Assessing performance of the school principal)Progri Sq: Prograa Maae: School Operations Prograa Code: Primary Leader: Secondary Leader: Page: 6 Revision Date: September a, 1993 Prograa Goal: The intent of the School Operations goel is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LtSO. Plan Reference Page Ruter 2.1 Page 31 2.2 Page 31 2.3 Page 31 3. Psge 31 3.1 Page 31 Objectives Strategies Begiming Date Co^\u0026gt;(etion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2. (cont'd) 2.1 Monitor facility, staff morale, student achievement, status of media center books, and smterials. 2.1 (Assess staff morale, student achievement, etc.) 2.2 Erhance equipment, supplies, and materials in buildings. 2.2 (Provide resources) 2.3 Provide staff development and intervention plana as needed. 2.3 (To provide staff development to meet the instructional needs of principals, teachers, and all levels of staff) 3. To work with schools to help them desiffi prograam Uli ch meet the specific needs of their students. 3. (Assist teachers and principals in the development of individual programs which address learning needs of students) 3,1 Provide resource assistance to school staffs. 3.1 (Provide resources, both hunan and financial, to teachers and principals in the development of educational programs) July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 (July 1, 1993) July 1, 1993 Jm 30, 1994 Jm 30, 1994 June 30, 1994 (June 30, 1994) June 30, 1994 Assistant Si\u0026lt;its., Prirvipmls, Media Sujervisor Assistant S^Ts., Principals, Media Si\u0026lt;)ervisor (Curriculun Supervisors) Assistant Si^ns., Principals, Media Si^jervisor, Idmtified District Staff (Staff Development) (Associate Supt., Assistant Supts., Curriculun Supvs., Staff Development) Educational Programs (Associate Supt., Principals) 2.1 Reports of Sipervisors, Assistant Sipta. 2.2 (Inprovement in the climate and environment and kinds of materials that are available) 2.3 Staff Development roaters 2.3 (Kinds of staff development programs developed for needs) 2.3 Quality of education survey results 3. (Evidence of inpiementation of Desegregation Plan and School Inprovement Plan) 3.1 Completion of program designProgroi Seq *: ProgrsB Maae: School Operations Prograe Code: Prieary Leader: Secondary Leader: Page: 7 Revision Date: Septenter 23, 1993 Prograe Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational ofiportmitiea for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Huiber 3.2 Page 31 3.3 Rage 31 4. Page 32 4.1 Page 32 4.2 Page 32 Objectives Strstegies Begiming Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2. (cont'd) 3.2 Provide planning tiae and fonaats to school staffs) 3.3 Develop school profiles tJiich show complete data pictures. Set goals for iiyroveaant. 4. Establish a prograa to faailiarite parents with school expectations and to build a partnership aith thea. 4.1 Share schools' objectives, discipline policy, standards for testing, placing, and proaoting students. 4.1 (At the beginning of school, do an annual school letter that shares policies and objectives) 4.2 Involve parents as full partners in planning at schools for stud^s' growth and success. July 1, 1993 July 1, July 1, July 1, July 1, 1993 1993 1993 1993 Jue 30, Jue 30, Jme 30, Jme 30, Jme 30, 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 Associate Si^it. for Educational Prograaa, Principals, School Principals and Staffs (Planning, Research, and Evaluation\nData Processing) (Asst. Supts., Principals, Media Supv.) Principals, Staffs Principals, Staff, PTA Board, Patrons 3.2 School profiles and Bonitored building plana 3.3 (Completed document) 4.1 Developaant of and sharing of school-based objectives, discipline policies, etc. 4.2 Statistical iaproveaent in student behavior and achieveaentPrograa Seq *: Progros Hose: School Operations Progrsa Code: Progri Goal: Plan Reference Page Ktaber 3. Page 33 1.1 Page 33 1.2 Page 33 2. Page 33 IRSO FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUHEHT Priaary Leader: Secondsry Leader: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all stulenta in the LRSO. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Page: 8 Revision Date: SepteiFber 23, 1993 Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. To develop and i^lement policies which influence school climate and isprove discipline and student attendance while also meeting individual student needs and lemming styles. 3. (Design and put into place programs which improve school climate and improve discipline and student attendance while also meeting individual student needs and learning styles) 1. Provide inservice training to district personnel on discipline in a desegregated setting. 1. (Focus on how to use techniques that foster positive student behavior in a desegregated setting) 1.1 Conduct inservice training on discipline management in all local schools. 1.1 (Conduct inservice on an ongoing basis on positive discipline management In all local schools) 1.2 Provide follow-tp training for new staff on a regular basis. 1.2 (Provide ongoing training for all stafO 2. Provide inservice to district personnel on behavioral styles and learning styles of students with divergent backgrounds. 2. (Conduct inservice on an ongoing basis on positive discipline management in all local schools) (July 1, 1993) As needed (July 1, 1993) July 1. 1993 (July 1, 1993) (June 30, 1994) (June 30, 1994) Jwe 30, 1994 (June 30, 1994) (Principals, Parents, Staff Development, Student Hearing Officer) Director of Pv\u0026lt;\u0026gt;il Services, BuiIding Principals, Assistant Sqots. (Student Hearing Officer) Building Principals, Director of Pi\u0026lt;\u0026gt;il Services (Student Hearing Officer) (Director of Pupil Services, Building Principals, Asst. Supts., Student Hearing Officer) 1. (Comparative data annual school report for student attendance and student management quarterly reports) 1. (Quarterly discipline management reports that will reflect a decrease in behavior referrals and suspensions) 1.1 (Rosters of meetings) 1.1 (Quarterly discipline management reports that Mill reflect a decrease in behavior referrals and suspensions) 1.2 (Quarterly discipline management reports that Mill reflect a decrease in* behavior referrals and suspensions) 1.1 (Quarterly discipline management reports that wilt reflect a decrease in behavior referrals and suspensions)Progm Seq *: Prograa Raae: School Operations Prograa Code: Priaary Leader: Secondary Leader: Page: 9 Revision Date: SeptefTber 23, 1993 Prograa Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Nuidier 2.1 Page 33 3. Page 33 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date CoiR\u0026gt;letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) 2.1 Provide training for school-based iiqiroveaent teems (to involve staff and parents who will train staff at the school site with amual aaintenance). 2.1 (Provide ongoing training for staff to foster positive student behavior) 3. Provide a coaaittae to review attendance and discipline policies and data on an ongoing bMis to eneure equity of policy and policy adainistration. 3. (Each school is to establish a committee to conduct quarterly reviews of attendance and discipline data to assess conpliance with the goal of equitable policy and policy adninistration. Conduct and report results of quarterly reviews.) July 1, 1993 (July 1, 1993) June 30, 1994 (June 30, 1994) Associate S(\u0026lt;)ts., Staff Develofwnt, Identified Staff (Principals, Teachers, Hearing Officer, Data Processing)) (Principals, Teachers, Student Hearing Officer) 2.1 (Quarterly reports should include positive as well as negative reports which show an increase in the citizenship honor roll in elementary schools. Should show an increase in the nunber of students that acquire \"Vs\" and \"2*8\" in citizenship at the secondary level) 3. (Final report of the quarterly reviews)Progras Seq f: Progras Mase: School Operations Progras Code: Priaary Leader: Secondsry Leader: Page: Revision Date: 10 Septenber 23, 1993 Progrw Goal: intent of the School Operetione goel is to provide equitable educational opportiaiitiea for all atiaientt in the USB. Plan Reference Page Mmdier 3.1 Page 33 3.2 Page 33 3.3 Page 33 4. Page 33 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) 3.1 Coasiittee and aibcomittee to include principals, staff, patrorw, students (on the secondary level) and at least one (1) Board aeaber to review dots and recoHKnd asxiifi cat ions to meet students* needs and district needs. 3.1 (Establish a district-wide coamittee to review the local school committee reports which should Include attendance, discipline data Interventions by race and gender. The district-wide coamittee will report the results of the review to the Associate Supt. of Desegregation.) 3.2 Revise student hanAooki n needed 3.2 (Update student handbooks annually to ensure continued conpUance with district attendance and discipline policies) 3.3 The student hearing officer will be responsible for developing and annitoring pin to reduce the disparity of disciplinary actions. 3.3 (Use evidence of district-wide reports to provide guidance to local schools in formatting plans to reduce disparity of disciplinary actions) 4. Appoint Joint coamittee with PCSSD and NLRSO. 4. (. . .to establish a uniform attendance and discipline policy.) July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 Jme 30, 1994 Jme 30, 1994 Jme 30, 1994 Jme 30, 1994 Associate Sipts., Principals, Teachers, Director of Pi4\u0026gt;il Services (Hearing Officer, Desegregation Facilitator) (Principals, Teachers) (Asst. Supts., Teachers, Parents, Principals, Student Hearing Officer) (Associate Supt. for Desegregation) 3.1 (Formal report Identifying results of analysis of data received from local school conmittees about level of compliance with district attendance and discipline policies) 3.2 (Student handbooks reflect compliance with current district attendance and discipline policies) 3.3 (Analysis of quarterly reports in chart form to determine decrease in reported discipline sanctions) 4. (Evidence of a mi form discipline policy)Prograa Seq f: Prograa Maae: School Operations Prograa Code: Priaary Leader: Secondary Leader: Pege: Revision Dote: 11 Progri Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportuiities for all students in the LRSD. PlPaang eR eMfueirRe)nerce 4.1 Page 33 5. Page 34 5.1 Page 34 5.2 Page 34 6. Page 34 Objectives Strategies BeDgiantneing Co^D)aletetion Responsibility 3. (cont'd) 4p.o1 licRieevsie wa nad ttceonndsaenqcuee nacneds .disciplinary 5a.c roPsust tihne p dlaicset raicltte rwniathti vaets letoa sst uosnpee nssuiochn intervention to be pieced at each school. 5to.1 bDe erveevlioepw esdch aoto ld-biassterdic dt islecvipelli naend p tlaon a include suspension alternatives. b5e.2 reEgffuelcatirvlye naesssse sosef dt.hese alternatives to 6d.i sEcisptalinbleis ha nad sacttheonodla-bnacsee din csetundteivnet system at ea^ school. 6w.h ic(h. s. ho.ausld praerst uoltf tihne imanpnrouvael ds cahttoeonld apnlacne and a decrease in disciplinary sanctions.) July 1, July 1, July 1, July 1, 1993 1993 1993 1993 July 1, 1993 Jme 30, 199L Jine 30, 1994 Jm 30, 1994 Jine 30, 1994 Jine 30, 1994 Septenber 23, 1993 Evaluation Criteria ASis\u0026lt;s\u0026gt;otsc.ia, te athprpeoein stecdho solt aff dTirsi-tDricisttsr ic(ut se Coaponent) s(Ptarifnf,c ipAaslsst,. Supts.) ASissstiss.ta, nt SPcrihnocoipl-ablass, ^ staffs S(Ptarifnfsc,i paSlcsh,o olbCaosnemd ittees, ASsuspitsst.a, nHt earing Officer) S(Ptarifnfsc,ip aSlcsh,o olbCaosnend ittees 4T.r1i -DReivsietrwic at nad ttreenvdiasniocne oanf d disciplinary policies 5re. p(oRret vtieow doetfe rsmusinpee nsions dseucsrpeeansseio nins oaut t-inodf-isvcidhuoaoll schools) 5S.u1p t(sS. uobmf isscshioono l top laAnsss tt. hat oiduet-notfi*fsyc haoltoel rnsaustipveenss ioton s) 5a.l2te rEnxaisttievnec ep laonf in each building 5S.u2p.t s(. Soubf msicshsoioonl ptola nAss stth. at oiduet-notfi-fsyc haoltoelr nsautsipveenss ioton s\neovuitd*eonf-csec hoof odl escuresapseen siino ns) 6sc. h(oSoul brmeipsosirotsn otof athnen uAals st. oSfu pitms.p rowveilml egnitv ea nde vaid ence daendc redaissec ipinli ntahery asttaenndctaioncnes ) Psge: 12 Progrsa Seq *: Revision Date: Septetrber 23, 1993 Progrsa Isae: School Operations Progrsa Code: Prioary Leader: Secondary Leader: Progrsa Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the UISD. PlPaang eR eNfteardeienrce 6.1 Page 34 7. Page 34 7.1 Page 34 7.2 Page 34 Objectives Strategies BeDgiantneing CoaDpalteetion Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) 6pr.1og rRaemv ieswo trhesaet arrechc oagnndi tdioenv emlodp rinewceanrdtsiv es will be individual to the school. 6a.n1n u(Tahlley troes edaertechrm wineil l rebev isreiovnie wneede ds of school incentive systems) s7t.u dPeronvtsid ew ictho mchsreolinnigc dinistecripvelinnMtio*ny afonrd /or attendance probleas. 7in.1te rAvcetnivtaioten dteiasmciap lainte s/acthteonodl. anMcaen date the pinsv^oillv ese trhveic ecso mteseealio tro w dioth asotnuidtoernintsB wahnod have discipline/attendance probleas. 7re.2g aIrndvinoglv eth peairre cnhtsi ldinre nth eth rtoeuemgh process meet ings/conf erences. 7a.n2d /o(.r d. is.acbipoulint aidrye nptriofibeledm as)ttendance July 1, 1993 July 1. 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1. 1993 Jm 30. 1994 Jm 30, 1994 June 30, 1994 June 30, 1994 PSrtainfcf,i pals/ ASsipstisst.a, nVt IPS, Patrons T(Peaump, il Services PCaoruennstesl)ors, PGruiindcanipraa ls, DBcupiladritnage nts, SHetaaflfths , SSecrvhiocoel s Coordinator PParirnecnitpsa, lsPT, A OCfofiocveirls, , PTA CPoipmils eSloerrsv,i ces THeeaasleth, SScehrovoicl es 6su.1p pSotrat tvisatliicdaitly d oatfa ptlaon danisd cii^prloinveo aaennd tb einh avior 6sc.1h o(oSl urbempiossrtiosn too f thaen nAuasls t. Simupprtosv.e mweinllt sinho wd isanc ipline and behavior) 7an. d (Raettveinedwa nocfe driesccoiprdlisn ew ill dshioswc ipa lidneacrreya saen di/no r chronic atten^nce problems) 7in.1te rRveecnotridosn of cotnseling a7n.1d a(Rtteevnideawn coef dreiscocripdsli nwe ill cshhorwo naic ddecisrecaipseli nien athned /or attendance problems) 7im.2o lRveecaoerdnst of parents/tesa 7in.2cr e(a. se. .i nw thilel snhuonwb ear n of pthaere ntetasm p parrotciceispsa)ting in Prograa Seq f: Prograa Naae: School Operations Prograa Code: Prograa Goal: Plan Reference Page Muder 4. Page 35 1.1 Page 35 1.2 Page 35 (1.4 Page 35) 2. Page 35 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Priaary Leader: Secondary Leader: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable edicationnl opportmitiea for all students in the LRSD. Objectives Strategies Begimino Date Caq\u0026gt;letian Date Page: 13 Revision Date: Responsibility Septeirter 23, 1993 Evaluation Criteria 4. To provide guidance and comaeling service which address students* needs, are S(\u0026lt;]portive of strategies and interventions to eriiance student success and expectations, and provide coowni cat ions to families of students. 1. Infora students of all opportunities available to thea and encourage thea to take advantage of these opportinities. 1. (Identify academic, emotional, social, arxl physical needs of students.) 1. (Identify needs of students (elementary) 1. (Secure the needed services utilizing district and connun1ty*basad resources) 1.1 PiA\u0026gt;lish a docuaent annually idiich lists finmcial aid, vocational and hitter education opportmitiea for all students. 1.1 (Make available) docuantCs). . .) 1.2 Encourage students to take advantage of opportunities open to them. 1.3 (Follow up to ensure that referral was appropriate intervention to enhance student success and expectations) 2. Make parents partners in education of their children by amking information accessible to them and keeping them informed. July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 June 30, 199* Jm 30, 1994 Jine 30, 1994 Jine 30, 1994 Jine 30, 1994 Counselors, Principals (Pupil Services Teachers, Parents, Teachers) Principals, Counselors, Vocational Director (Teachers, Parents) (Principals, Teachers, Parents, Students) (Principals, Teachers, Parents (Principals, Teachers, Parents) 1. Guidance services. Annual Report, and Report Coaparison 1. (Reports will show all students needing services will receive them) 1.1 Pti\u0026gt;l1cat1onB of document 1.1 (Disseminate document to students and parents) 1.2 Statistical increase in nurtier of students, particularly minority students, receiving firwicial aid and proceeding into post secondary education (1.3 Documentation will show referrals were appropriate) 2. (Reports will reflect an increase in the nunber of parents involved as partners in the education of their children)Progrsa Seq f: ProgrM Hsaa: School Operations Progrsa Code: Priaary Leader: Secondary Leader: Progrsa Goel: The intent of the School Operations goal Is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Ihsber 2.1 Page 35 2.2 Page 35 3. Page 35 3.1 Page 35 4. (cont'd) Page: Revision Date: 14 SeptCTber 23, 1993 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Cospletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2.1 Hold a coKSiity educational Meeting each year during the spring to infora parents of curriculua and student opportunities (to Include co-curriculer activities) 2.1 (Identify courses and activities available which will help prepare students for post secondary education and career preparation) 2.2 Provide written infonaition to parents regarding curriculua and student stills. 3. To Make students aware of educational and post educational opportuiitles 3.1 Skills and eaploynent fair to be held annually in conjunction with business ccaauiity. 3.1 (. . .and College Night) July 1, 1995 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 Jme 30, 1994 Jme 30, 1994 Jme 30, 1994 Principals, Couwelors, Director of Guidance, Associate and Assistant Si\u0026lt;]ts. Educational PrograsB, BuiIding Principals, Cosaaailcatlons Dept. (Counselors, Principals, Teachers, Vocational Director, Parents) Vocational Teachers, Comselors, Voltnteers in Schools, PTA (Director of Pupil Services) 2.1 Roster of aeetings (2.1 Nurber of students who graduate and elect advanced tralningZeducatlon by race and gender) (2.1 Report will show the targeted nurber of students who will enroll in upperlevel classes and elect to attend post secondary education) (2.2 Brochures and Parent Home Study Guide will be given to targeted parents. Videos will be available for check-out) (3. Disseminate docunents to students and parents) 3.1 Eaployaant Fair Student Attendance 3.1 (Participation rates of parents and students in the LRSD attending the employment fair and College Night will be conpiled and compared with previous attendance rates)Prograi Seq *: Progm Maae: School Operations Prograi Code: Priaary Leader: Secondary Leader: Page: 15 Kevition Date: Septenfcer 23, 1993 Prograa Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Ihaber 4. Page 35 4.1 Page 35 5. Page 35 Objectives Strategies Begiming Date Caa|)letlon Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 4. (cont'd) 4. Create coaamity linkages to assist students in need of special servicea. 4.1 Through Ford Collaborative, Neu Futures Initiation, city, courts, p(i\u0026gt;llc, and private service providers, provide school linkages with guidance staff for student special needs Interventions. 5. Create acadeaic Intervention strategies on a school basis. 5. (Include acadeaic.  .In the annual school plan) 5.1 Each school to put into its annual plan a designed set of Interventions to help increase student acadenlc success\ni.e, Peer Tutoring, Volmteer Tutors. July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 JULY 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 Ji 30, Juw 30, Jire 30, Jme 30, 1994 1994 1994 1994 (Ctxnselora, Principals, PcqaiI Services Team (Elen), Parents) Comaelors, LRSD New Futures Liaison, Associate and Assist. Siqits., Deputy Stjpt. (Principals, Staff, Asst. Si^ts.) Principals, Staffs of BuiIdings, Assistance froa Educational Prograas, Associate and Asst. Si^s. (4. Report will reflect the nuiber of conrunlty linkages and their ability to meet the needs of targeted students) 4.1 Established coasanity linkages 4.1 (Report will reflect the nmber of connunity linkages and their ability to meet the needs of targeted students) 5. (Annual School Report to include level of successful academic Intervention as identified in the annual school Improvement plan) 5.1 Amual plan and annual evaluation report coiqarlson 5.1 (Annual School Report to include level of successful academic Intervention as identified In the annual school ifiprovement plan)Progna Seq *: Progroi Mase: School Operations Progrsa Code: Progrsa Goal: c Plan Reference Page Nudaer 5. Psge 17 1.1 Page 37 LRSO FT 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOOJHEMT Priasry Leader: Seccnctary leader! The Intent of the School Operations goal Is to provide equitable educational opportwitiea for all students in the USD. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Conation Date Page: 16 Kevition Oete: tespcnsIblUty SeptentMr 23, 1993 Evaluation Criteria 5. To provide guidance and cowseling ihich Bakes students ausre of their options and to assist students In acquiring habits snd attitudes necessary for success in school and In later life. 1. Provide Binicourses for students in study halls, testing skills, and pre- career skills in a sequenced program begiming in grade four and through high school. 1. (Offer test-taking, study skills, and pre-career skills through the elementary and secondary instructional and guidance programs) 1.1 Ninicourses to be developed in sequence begiming with grade four. (July 1, 1993) July 1, 1993 (June 30, 1994) Jwe 30, 1994 (Principals, Cowselore, Teachers, Staff Development) Principals, Classroom Teachers, VIPS, Guidance Cowselors, Staff Dvlp. 1. Data gathered frta ps^i I services tema 1. (Data gathered by the Pupil Services Team will reflect an increase In the nunber of students passing courses, nuiber of students who elect post high school career/educat i onaI opportunities, and a decrease in the drop-out rate) 1.1 Development of Binicourses 1.1 (Data gathered from grade distribution sheet will reflect an increase in nunber of students who passed the courses and elect post high school career/educational opportunities and a decrease in the drop-out rate) ' 1.1 (Scope and sequence chart grades 4-12 that includes skills targeted for each level)Prograa Seq f: Proora NaaK: School Operations Prograa Code: Priaary Leader: Secondary Leader: Page: 17 Revision Date: Prograa Goal: The Intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LKSD. PlPaang eR eNfueRrejenrce 1.2 Page 37 2. Page 37 2.1 Page 37 Objectives Strategies BeDgiantneing CoDqialetetion Responsibility 5. (cont'd) t1h.2e uPsreo voidf ec tuerarcichuelru as toaff f thdeesvee loapreaaesn.t in t1o.2 te(aOcfhfeerrs atpop rsoupprpiaotret tsetaacfhf indge voelfo pthmee nt curriculua) 2fu. tuRraeis ec aarewearr eonepstsio nosf .student of (about) c2a. re(Ienrc roepatsioen sst.u)dent knowledge of future a2n.1d Uasses coafb lrieesso buercgein vnoinlgm tiene ersle aine nctlaarsys es schools to address career options. July 1, July 1 July 1, 1993 1993 1993 Jme 30, JUK 30, Jts 30, 1994 1994 1994 September 23, 1993 Evaluation Criteria Cstuarrfif c, uSiutsa ff DDeirveeclotoparent s(Ctaufrfr,ic uSlutanf f DDeirveeclotpomr,e nPt ipil Services) gTreaadcehse r4s--1- 2 (inVI PESd,u cPaatirotnne, rs CPouupnils eSloerrsv)ices, t1h.e2s eS t(acfof Bppaarrtaictivipea rtaioanb eirns ) s1.k2i ll(sS twafifl l ubsee oref flaeccqtueidre dIn dthaei lys tuindsetnrtusc* tiaocna daenmdic 1n achievement) 2ra. te(D, encurenabseer d odf rosptu-doeunt ts cwahore eerle/ecdt upcoast1t ohnaigI h school oinpcpreoartsuen)ities will 2w. il(lA nrenuflael cdt ias tpriecrct ensutargvee y sintucdreeanstse wInh o thpea ssn ucnobuerr seosf , cwahore eerle/ecdt upcoastito nh igh school doepcproeartsuen iItnie sth, ea nddro ap -out rate) d2a.1te sRoster of volisrteers, 2ra.1t e,(D necurrebaesre do f dsrotupd-oeuntt s cwahore eerle acnt d peodsut chaigtiho nsacl hool oinpcpreoartsuen)ities will Progras Seq f: Progrsa Nsae: School Operations Progrsa Code: Progrsa Goal: Plan Reference Page Rudar 6. Page 38 1.1 Page 38 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET POCUHEHT Priaary Leader: Secondary Leader: The Intent of the School Operations goal Is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students In the LRSD. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coagdetlon Date Page\n18 Revision Date: Responsibility Septetrber 23, 1993 Evaluation Criteria 6. To monitor student class ratios and Instructional practices to ensure equal opportmities for all students. 1. Achieve equity in class structure by grade and by subject area. 1.1 Review class ratios by sd\u0026gt;ject, by class, (and) by teacher on a semester basis. July 1. 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 Jme 30, 1994 Jme 30, 1994 Jme 30, 1994 Principals, Assistant Sigds., Associate Sipts. Principals, Assistant Sigits., Associate Sl\u0026lt;)tS. 6. Sufficient program persomel are In place to amet the needs of all students In the program as measmed by the monitoring Irmtnaent. 1. (Principals will be responsible for assigning students to grades and to subject areas in an equitable ratio as defined by the LRSD desegregation plan) (Principals are responsible for making sure that their school's profile reflects equitable educational practices) 1.1 Nonitoring of ratios* and student outcomes 1.1 (The school profile should reflect equity by grade structure and by subject area) *Ratios are not to be construed as quotas. The intent is for all barriers preventing full participation in classes and programs to be reanved.Progran Seq f: Prograa Naae: School Operations Prograa Code: Priaary Leader: Secondary Leader: Page: 19 Revision Date: Prograa Goel: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSD. PlPasng eR eHfiearbeenrce Y.2 Page 38 1.3 Page 38 2. Page 38 2.1 Psge 38 Objectives Strategies BeDgaimteing CoD^loetetion Responsibility 6. (cant'd) a1.c2t iAvditdieresss. disparities with intervention p1.a3r tRiceispnoveti o(and odrfe ssstu) dbeantrsri.ers to equitable 2p.r aAcctihcieevse. equity in student instructional 2b.y1 cRlaesvsie,w b gyr atedaec dheisr troinb uat isoenm ebsyt esr ubbajescist,. 2w.e1e ks(P irnin coirpdaelrs tow ialdl drreevsise wft nenaecdhl sntein e problems) July 1. 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 Jm 30, 1994 Jm 30, 1994 Jm 30, 1994 Jm 30, 1994 Septernber 23, 1993 Evaluation Criteria C(Toeuancsheelorsr,s , APsrisntc. ipSaulpst,s ., ASsuspotsc.i)ate C(Toeuancsheelorsr,s , APsrisntc. ipSaulpst,s ., Associate Supts T(Pearicnhceirpsa, lsS,t aff Development) APsrisnicsitp. oSlst,^ s., Assoc. S^)ts. d1e.2c re(aDsies pianr ietideusc awtioilnl al programs) w(Eailcl h inscclhuodoel 'sin taenrnvueanl tipolann daicstpivairtiiteiess )to address d1e.3c re(aDsies pianr ietideusc awtioilnl al programs) m(Peeritn ctoip aidlse natnidfy satnadf f wilt taod dereqsusi tabbalrer ieprasr teicxipisatitniogn panrdo fwileil)l docunent in school 2p.la n(E awchil l scidheonolt'isfy a annn ual eprfofegrcatmiv ew hsictha fwf dilel vealsospmiset nt tienasctrhuecrsti oinna al ppprraocptriciaetes that will ensure equity) 2sc.1h eMduolensitoring of master 2p.r1in c(Eipaachl bwuiillld irnegq uire a gsruabdjee cdt,i sbtryi bculatisosn, sahnde ebt yb y oteradcehr etro emacohn nitoinre ewqeueiktys . inA cthoep y Atsos isista bnet forwarded to Superintendent) Prograi Seq *: Progm Naae: School Gpersticns Progrsa Code: Priaary Leedrr: Secondary Leader: Page: 20 Revision Date: Progri Coal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all studaits In the LRSD. PlPaang eR eMfeiarbeenrce 2.2 Page 38 3. Page 38 3.1 Page 38 Objectives Strategies BeDgaimteing CooDfailetetion Responsibility 6. (cant'd) 2p.r2a ctices) wditihs pisnrtietirevse n(tIionn e aducctiavtiiotineasl . 3. Achieve equity in teaching aethods. 3p.r1in Pcirpoovildse a ninds eterevcichee rsa sIsnis traenfecree ntoce to vmaerthiaondst .learning styles and effective July 1. 1993 July 1, 1993 Jine 30, 199A Jme 30, 199A Septentwr 23, 1993 Evaluation Criteria T(Pearicnhceirpsa, lsS,t aff Development) T(Pearicnhceirpsa, lsS,t aff Development) DSetsvefflo pment, PHurainanc ipRoelsso,u rce, AAssssot.c . Ssigi\u0026lt;r\u0026gt;tsts.,\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_565","title":"Project Management tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1993-08/1993-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Project Management tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/565"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["budgets"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nIncludes court filings\nFRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR (501) 376-2011 72201 Attorneys for Little Rock School District  J^fy^L. MaTc^e^ ' Bar I.D. No. 85096 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Jerry L. Malone, do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing notice of filing has been served upon the following persons by First Class Mail, postage pre-paid: Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Building 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON 7 JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 7201 Mr. Richard Roachelle First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol Avenue Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Heritage West Building, Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Jerry L. MaloneIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION rtT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL Mrs. Lorene Joshua, Et Al Katherine Knight, Et Al Gy. PLAINTIFFS LR-C-82-866 DEFENDANTS Intervenors Intervenors aJ -f-i.'i 'fAti 5 f -3 NOTICE OF FILING The plaintiff, Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\"), for its Notice of Filing, states: 1. By order dated August 26, 1993, the Court directed the LRSD to submit to the Court, not later than 5:00 p.m. on the last day of each month, the most recent copy of any project management tool the district is using to guide. monitor. and control the development and implementation of its program planning and budgeting processes. 2. The LRSD has attached hereto as an exhibit a true and accurate copy of its project management tool reflecting 1994-95 program planning and budgeting activities to date. PROGRAM MANAGER Sterlinq Inqram MONTH ACTIVITIES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) DATE: August 31, 1993 BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT August 1993 (cont.) 2.5 Begin to identify programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation July 14, 1993 January 31, 1993 Superintendent and Cabinet Academic Progress Grant - memo to Assistant Superintendents Student Assignment - August 18, 1993, 1:30 p.m. meeting conducted by Dr. H. Williams. Academic Support, Special Education, Vocational Education, Library Media August 30, 1993 meeting Substitute - August 26, 1993 meeting with LRCTA Out-sourcing - August 9, 1993 meeting with Coopers and Lybrand Stephens construction 2.6 Complete Desegregation Program Inventory May 31, 1993 July 19, 1993 Superintendent and Cabinet Final version of Program Identification worksheet (see attached) September 1993 3.1 Conduct worksession for analysis of collected data August 20, 1993 August 31, 1993 Superintendent and Cabinet Meeting agenda 3.2 Conduct Board work session September 9, 1993 September 30, 1993 Board and Superintendent TBALITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) PROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Ingram DATE\nAugust 31, 1993 MONTH ACTIVITIES BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT July 1993 August 1993 1.1 Designate lead planning person 1.2 Develop proposed budget calendar for budget year 1994-95 1.3 Begin Desegregation Program Inventory using desegregation audit as baseline 1.4 Identify tentative list of various types of districtwide objective and perceptual data to be collected for the needs assessment 2.1 Establish final budget calendar for 1994-95 that will allow the Board to monitor progress of the planning and budgeting process 2.2 Begin to develop monitoring and reporting procedures and issue instructions, as needed 2.3 Begin development of proportional allocation formulas 2.4 Begin data collection July 1993 July 27, 1993 Superintendent Sterling Ingram, Director of Planning, Research arid Evaluation designated - PPBD,* p.2 July 21, 1993 May 31, 1993 July 21, 1993 July 21, 1993 April 26, 1993 August 17, 1993 May 1993 Program Planning and Budgeting Document (PPBD) dated July 30, 1993 July 26, 1993 July 9, 1993 July 26, 1993 July 27, 1993 August 27, 1993 November 30, 1993 November 30, 1993 Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Lead planning person PPBD, Attachment 4 Final version (7-9-93) of Program Identification worksheet (See attached) Tentative list located in PPBD, page 4 and 5 Acceptance of Budget calendar by Board of Directors at July 27, 1993 work session\nPPBD, Attachment 4 Meeting with Bill Mooney on August 27, 1993. Final version of data disk to follow. Topic covered during school start-up meeting MPT and Stanford-8 test resultsLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DESEGREGATION PLAN ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION ACTIVITIES INCLUDED PROGRAM RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Early Childhood Education (6) HIPPY/JTPA (6) 4-year-old program (7) Citywide (9) Rockefeller Early Childhood Magnet (12) E. Matthis (M. Shead, P, Price) Summer Learning Program (21) J. Bernard (S. Stueart) Asset Program (24) J. Bernard (S. Stueart) School Operations (28) Teacher Recruiter (44) In-School Suspension (34) Alternative Learning Center Job Fair (Guidance) (35) Student Hearing Officier (28) J. Bernard (L. Robertson, M. Gremillion, S. Stueart) Academic Support Program (48) E. Matthis (L. Adams, D. Wood, A. Stovall) Multicultural Curriculum (63) E. Matthis (Curriculum Supervisors) Focused Activities (81) Academic Incentive Grants (82) J. Bernard (L. Robertson, M. Gremillion S. Stueart) Magnet Schools (86) E. Matthis (J. Bernard) Booker, Carver, Gibbs, Williams, Mann, and Parkview (86) Library Media Services (106) E. Matthis (L. Lyons) Special Education (114) E. Matthis (P. Kohler) Parent Involvement (131) M. Parker (D. Milam) Educational Equity Monitoring (224) Planning, Research and Evaluation Testing Assistance (28) M. Parker (S. Ingram) (A1.3 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Date: May 21, 1993 To: Mac Bernd, Superintendent From: Sterling Ingram, Director Planning, Research and Evaluation Re: Desegregation Programs Attached is a listing of desegregation programs that have been sorted according to whether assessment/ evaluation activities are included or not included as part of the program descriptions. No quality judgement was made relative to the activities. The Incentive  some School section included activities for sub-sections but not an overall assessment/evaluation component. This list will serve as a guide for reviewing and/or developing assessment/evaluation activities for desegregation programs. I will determine the status of assessment components during the follow-up meeting with the program managers. beginning of the 1993-94 school year. I expect this to start at the If you need additional information at this time, please contact me. bjgLRSD DESEGREGATION PLAN NO ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION ACTIVITIES INCLUDED Page 2 PROGRAM RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Incentive Schools (149) (Partial) Writing to Read (152) Science Lab (153) Computer Lab (153) Computer Loan Program (153) Extended Day (154) Field Trips (158) Transportation (additional) (171) Instructional Aides (172) Extended Year (172) Incentive/Recognition (176) Recommended Staffing (190) Required Staff Development (193) Teacher Stipend Inservice (194) Incentive School Alternative Classroom (190) J. Bernard (A. Hart)LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DESEGREGATION PLAN NO ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION ACTIVITIES INCLUDED PROGRAM RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Commitment to Desegregation (1) Board (M. Bernd) Leadership (2) Board of Education ODM Board (M. Bernd) Board of Education - Prejudice Reduction (125) Special Programs (20) E. Matthis Gifted Education (58) E. Matthis (M. Donaldson) McClellan Community School (93) J. Bernard (M. Daggett) Recruitment of Private School Students (95) Parent Recruiting (215) VIPS Recruiting (131) M. Parker (B. Rather, D. Milam) Federal Programs (96) E. Matthis (L. Adams) Vocational Education (98) E. Matthis (D. Dillahunty) Staff Development (46) (124) E. Matthis (M. Zimmerman) Support Services Safety and Security (129) Data Processing (129) ' ii/' ' G. Jones (B. Barnhouse, D. Kingsella) Student Assignment/OLE (28) (139) M-M, Magnets Interdistrict (Central, Washington, Romine (119) Dunbar, McClellan, Henderson, King, and Stephens) (143) M. Parker (S. Pederson, J. Wiedower) (14 8) (148) Facilities (129) (146) G. Jones (D. Eaton) Computerized Transportation (227) New Furtures (145) G. Jones (B. Montgomery) J. Bernard (L. Young)To: Ms. Mr. From: Subject: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS July 14, 1993 72201 Margaret Gremillion, Assistant Superintendent Larry Robertson, Assistant Superintendent '^^telle Matthis, Interim Superintendent Academic Progress Incentive Grants L approved Desegregation Plan describes the Academic Incentive Grants and the process for implementation. ,4 it states that the continuation_of the Academic Incentive Grant Program will be reviewed at the end of the It is necessary for us to proceed with the final evaluation of this program in order to make a decision You may wish to consult with Sterling The court Progress On Page 84 Progress 1992-93 school year. regarding future funding. Ingram regarding this matter. 2.5 S'INTERDISTRICT PLAN NO ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION ACTIVITIES INCLUDED PROGRAM RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Student Choices/Options (8) M. Parker (S. Pederson, J. Wiedower) Summer School (13) J. Bernard (L. Robertson, M. Gremillion S. Stueart) Staff Development (21) E. Matthis (M. Zimmerman) School Operations (23) J. Bernard (L. Robertson, M. Gremillion S. Stueart) Library Media (33) E. Matthis (L. Lyons) Vocational Education (53) E. Matthis (D. Dillahunty) Guidance/Counseling Program (54) E. Matthis (J. E. Elston) Parent Involvement/Community Linkages (56) M. Parker (D. Milam) Public Relations (57) J. Wagner INTERDISTRICT PLAN ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION ACTIVITIES INCLUDED PROGRAM RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Special Education (35) E. Matthis (P. Kohler)2.5 AGENDA CURRICULUM AND LEARNING IMPROVEMENT MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS CONFERENCE ROOM August 30, 1993 - 1:15 p.m. 1. Opening Remarks Estelle Matthis 2. Fast Track Evaluations Discussion Area Personfs) Responsible Academic Support Special Education Vocational Education Library Media Resurvey Leon Adams Patty Kohler Carol Green Lucy Lyon  Planning Process/Procedures to be Used (Matthis)  Development of Uniform Format  Established Timeline for Completion of Evaluation Preliminary Report Due - November 15, 1993 Final Report Due - December 15, 1993 Report to Board of Directors - January, 1994 3. Next Meeting - August 31, 1993LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 July 27, 1993 TO: Ms. Margaret Gremillion Mr. Larry Robertson FROM: SUBJECT: 'Estelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent ACADEMIC PROGRESS INCENTIVE GRANTS Please review my requests dated July 14, 1993 and apprise me of the process as well as the date that I can expect to receive the evaluation report as stated in the Desegregation Plan, page 84. Your urgent attention to this matter is appreciated.# 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 26 STPROGll REVISED 09 JUL 93 SOURCE BP 6 BP7 OP12 OP2 8 OP28 OP39 BP44 BP46 BP48 BP63 OP82 BP86 BP114 BP129 BP129 PROGRAM IDENTIFICATION WORKSHEET IN PROGRAM CODE SEQUENCE final version PROGRAM NAME PRIMARY SECONDARY hippy Matthis Shead 4 year old program' Rockefeller Early Childhood Magnet Student Hearing Officer Office of Desegregation and Student Assignment Extra-Curricular Participation Teacher Recruiter Staff Development Academic Support Program Multicultural Programs Academic Incentive Grants Original Magnets Special Education Security required for Schools safe Data Processing System for Matthis Matthis Bernd Parker Bernard Gadberry Matthis Matthis Matthis Bernard Matthis Matthis Jones Jones Price Price Howard Bernard Matthis Stueart Gremillion Robertson Robinson Zimmerman Adams Woods Stovall Various Robertson Stueart Gremillion Bernard Kohler Barnhouse Bernard Kingsella2.5 Little Rock School District August 31, 1993 Mrs. Eleanor Coleman, President Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association 1500 West 4th Street, Suite 305 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mrs. Coleman: This communication is a follow-up of our meeting held August 26, 1993, in which we addressed several issues including substitute teachers. For some time the LRSD and the CTA have worked together to identify strategies and approaches that could lead to an increase in the number of days teachers are present in the schools to interact with our students for quality instruction. The budget allocation to cover substitute teacher pay increases every year. It appears as if some of these funds could be used in a more productive manner, such as purchasing materials, supplies, or quality staff development. I am requesting the assistance of the (3TA in reestablishing a review committee with the LRSD to study the issue of increasing teacher attendance, which may result in a reduction in the use of substitute teachers. Please contact me regarding the composition of this committee and a date for us to begin to \"fast track evaluate\" the effectiveness of the existing guidelines for use of substitute teachers. The CTAs assistance in this matter will be of great value to the district and our students. I will provide you with the format that will be used to document our fast track evaluation. Sincerely, Estelle Matthis Interim Superintendent EM/lks 810 West Markham street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)324-2000 54 BP153 IS. Computer Labs Bernard 55 OP153 IS. Foreign Language Labs Bernard 56 BP153 IS. Computer Loan Program Bernard 57 BP154 IS. Extended Day Bernard 59 BP158 IS. Field Trips Bernard 60 OP171 IS. Homework Centers Bernard 61 BP171 IS. Transportation (Add) Bernard 62 OP171 IS. Homework Hotline Bernard 63 OP171 IS. Mentors/Tutors Bernard 64 BP172 IS. Instructional Aides (add) Bernard 65 BP172 IS. Extended Year Bernard 66 BP176 IS. Incentive/Recognition Bernard 67 OP176 IS. Resident Counseling Service Camp Pfeiffer Bernard 68 OP176 IS. Monitoring Ingram 69 OP178 IS. Permanent Substitute Bernard Parker Matthis Parker Matthis Parker Matthis Parker Matthis Parker Matthis Parker Matthis Parker Matthis Parker Matthis Parker Matthis Parker Matthis Parker Matthis Parker Matthis Parker Matthis Parker Bernard Parker Gadberry 70 OP178 IS. Additional Compensation Bernard Gadberry 71 OP179 IS. Extended Week Bernard Matthis18 BP143 19 OP148 21 OP148 22 BP224 24 BP227 25 019 26 BP93 27 BP34 28 BP35 29 BP28 32 BP106 33 BI56 34 BP131 35 BP125 51 OP149 52 BP152 53 BP153 Student Information (including CIMS and ABACUS) M-to-M Magnet Schools (Central,Dunbar, Washington, Henderson, McClellan) King Interdistrict School Stephens Intedistrict School Monitoring activities fEval Dept) Computerized Transportation System Romine Interdistrict Theme McClellan Community School In School Suspension Job Fair Testing Assistance - Disadvantaged Library Services Parent Parker Bernard Bernard Ingram Jones Bernard Bernard Bernard Matthis Parker Matthis Linkages^^^^^\"'^^^'^ Bernard VIPS - Recruiting Parker Prejudice Reduction Board IS. Office of Incentive Schools IS. Writing To Read IS. Science Labs Bernard Bernard Bernard Parker Matthis Parker Matthis Parker Montgomery Matthis Parker Daggett Stueart Elston Ingram Lyons Parker Milam Bernd Parker Matthis Parker MatthisBP28 School Operations Bernard Robertson Stueart Gremillion SP Alternative Learning Center Bernard Stueart SPSS Gifted Education Matthis Donaldson SP81 Focused Activities Bernard Robertson Stueart Gremillion PP86 Parkview Science Magnet Matthis Bernard PP95 Recruitment of Private School Students Parker Cole Rather SP96 Federal Programs Matthis Adams SP98 Vocational Education Matthis Green PP124 Staff Development Matthis Zimmerman SP129 Facilities Jones Eaton PP130 Employment Practices Gadberry PP130 Bidding Practices Jones Neal PP131 Parent Involvement/Community Linkages Parker Gill PP139 Student Assignments Parker Weidower SP145 New Futures Bernard Young PP146 Facilities Jones Bernard Parker PP156 IS. Social Skills - Family Forklore - Positive Imaging - Interpersonal skills - Rites of Passage ~ Role Model Program - Mentoring Program Bernard Matthis Parker72 0P19O IS. Staffing - Recommended Full-time positions Bernard 73 BP193 IS. Required Staff Development Bernard 74 BP194 IS. Teacher Stipends for Inservice and Extra 5 days Bernard 75 OP153 IS. Other Incentive School Academic Programs - Kindergarten - Reading across the Curriculum - Oral Expression  across Curriculum - Learning Styles Inventory - School Themes - Semi-departmental - Instructional Tech - Study/Test-taking - Parent Home Study - Computer Managed Inst - Student Educ Plans Specialized Programs Incentive Programs - Homework - Criterion-Refer Test - Heterogeneous grouping - Effective Schools - African/Amer History Bernard SPl Commitment to Desegregation Board SP2 Leadership Board PP9 City-wide Early Childhood Education Program Matthis SP20 Special Programs Matthis BP21 Summer Learning Proqram JTPA Bernard BP24 ASSET Program Bernard Parker Matthis Parker Matthis Parker Gadberry Matthis Parker Bernd Bernd Shead Price Bernard Glasgow Adams Young Stueart StueartSP190 SP205 PP215 SIS SI13 SI21 SI23 SI33 SI35 SI53 SI54 SI59 Monitor - Teacher Demonstration Program - Master Teacher Prog - New Teacher Assist IS. Alternative Classroom IS. Parent Involvement IS. Parent Recruitment Student Choices/Options Summer School Staff Development School Operations Library Media Special Education Vocational Education Guidance/Counseling Program Public Relations Bernard Bernard Parker Parker Bernard Matthis Bernard Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Wagner Matthis Parker Parker Bernard Pederson Wiedower Robertson Gremillion Stueart Zimmerman Robertson Gremillion Stueart Lyons Kohler Green Elston ParkerPP157 IS. Special Activites - Peer Tutoring Program - Academic Reinforcement Clubs - Special Interest Clubs Bernard Matthis Parker PP159 IS. Latin Enrichment Program Bernard Matthis Parker PP172 IS. Supervision Aides Bernard Matthis Parker PP172 IS. Career Skills Development PP173 IS. Support Services - Other - Community Access/Field Trip - Community Involve - Special Skills Prog - Special Training - Parental Involvement - Learning Time Sched - Home/School Comm - Extracurricular Prog - Attendance and Behav - Subj Related Extracurr Bernard Matthis Parker PP175 IS. Counseling/Social Work - Community Services Access - College/Post Grad Aware - Study Skills - Home/Neighborhood Meet - Individual and Group Counselling - Wellness Program Bernard Matthis Parker PP178 IS. School Policies and Procedures Others Bernard Matthis Parker PP190 IS. Staffing - Other - Staffing Committee - Staffing Needs Assessment - Staff Recruitment - Staff Selection - Staff Commit/Effect Bernard Matthis Parker1. 2. 3. GOALS ADOPTED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS SEPTEMBER, 1989 To increase educational achievement for all specific emphasis on closing disparities \"in^achiiiJXneit^ To establish climates of educational school through: excellence in all a) b) c) d) To providing equitable educational all students in a environment\nopportunities for desegregated learning enabling all students to develop capacity and love for learning\nstudents to a lifelong to be productive contributors the schoq^ the community and the workplace\nproviding a disciplined, environment for all students. structured learning enhance human relations .  , --- --------- skills for teachers, and central office administrators. principals,3.1 PRE-PLANNING GOAL SETTING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT August 20, 1993 9 a.m. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1. Opening/Purpose Remarks Estelle Matthis Issues - Direction 2. Strategic Planning Dr. Henry Williams 3. Discussion . Desegregation Plan . Existing District Mission and . Proportional Allocations - . Achievement Data . Attendance/Discipline . Parent Involvement 4 . Goals Next Step . Cabinet Work Sessions . Formulate Procedures for Board . Goal Setting Session of Directors 3- /Little Rock School District STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Sve^uccesstTSnPriPn^P^ possessing the skills and knowledge they need to curricular program, level/course, unit, and The District has the following outcomes for all students by the time they graduate from the 12th grade: Students will\n1. Adequately master reading, writing, speaking, listening (communication and creative thinking), and mathematics skills sufficient functioning. I, critical for effective, efficient 2. Locate and use needed information from resources. printed materials and/or other 3. Identify problems and needs, apply problem solving information ____ .. *  information for meaning and/or action. strategies, and analyze 4. 5. 6. Use tools of technology at an effective, efficient, flexible, and adaptable level. historical, geographic, political, literary, and scientific information and use such knowledge in day-to-day decisions. Appreciate and understand cultural differences, the arts and humanities current happenings, and ways to predict or influence future events. 7. Establish and maintain effective and supportive intrapersonal interoersonal and cooperative relationships, and civic and social  interpersonal, and responsibility. 8. Demonstrate self-direction as an active life-long learner and demonstrate self- Sy and a physically and =ly SnSd ! ILITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Little Rock School District is to provide an educational program that enables each child to achieve his/her highest potential. To that end, the Little Rock School District will provide (1) a program of basic education for all students\n(2) programs that address the special needs of students (emotional, physical, and mental)\nand (3) enrichment opportunities such as art, music, and athletics. Through an organized program of studies, each student will experience academic success and will learn and appreciate responsibility and productive citizenship.FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR (501) 376-2011 72201 Attorneys for Little Rock School District By: J^rry L. Malone Bar I.D. No. 85096 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Jerry L. Malone, do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing notice of filing has been served upon the following persons by First Class Mail, postage pre-paid on this 30th day of September, 1993. Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Building 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON 7 JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 7201 Mr. Richard Roachelle First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol Avenue Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Heritage West Building, Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Jerry L. Malone IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ^3 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTiFFS? g vs. LR-C-82-866 CASL By\nPULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS Mrs. Lorene Joshua, Et Al Intervenors Ccr*. c._ Katherine Knight, Et Al Intervenors NOTICE OF FILING The plaintiff. Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\"), for its Notice of Filing, states: 1. By order dated August 26, 1993, the Court directed the LRSD to submit to the Court, not later than 5:00 p.m. on the last day of each month, the most recent copy of any project management tool the district is using to guide, monitor. and control the development and implementation of its program planning and budgeting processes. 2 The LRSD has attached hereto as an exhibit a true and accurate copy of its project management tool reflecting 1994-95 program planning and budgeting activities to date. PROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Ingram MONTH ACTIVITIES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT HANAGEHENT TOOL) DATE: September 30, 1993 BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT Sept. 1993 (cont.) 3.2 Conduct Board Work Session 3.2.1 Review preliminary list of issues for needs assessment 3.2.2 Review Desegregation Program Inventory Report 3.2.3 Review and revise, if necessary, the mission statement 3.2.4 Establish tentative written goals and objectives 3.2.5 Establish written priorities Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Sept. 9, 1993 Nov. 30, 1993 Board and Superintendent Board and Superintendent Board and Superintendent Board and Superintendent Board and Superintendent Board and Superintendent Agenda of Board work session Copy of issues related to the goals Copy of Program Inventory that was distributed to the Board Copy of revised mission statement Copy of tentative goals The Desegregation Plan is the priority. As we complete the needs assessment process including the broad-based input sessions and the monitoring of expenditures, the Superintendent will identify priorities for funding and will make recommendations to the Board as we move toward budget development.PROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Ingram MONTH Sept. 1993 ACTIVITIES 3.1 Conduct worksession for analysis of collected data 3.1.1 Develop preliminary list of issues for needs assessment 3.1.2 Identify the need for program modification or development LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) DATE: September 30, 1993 BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT Aug. 20, 1993 Aug. 31, 1993 Aug. 30, 1993 Aug. 20, 1993 Aug. 31, 1993 Jan. 31, 1994 Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Meeting agenda Memorandum to attendees from Estelle Matthis Roster of attendees Memorandum to attendees from Dennis Glasgow, session facilitator Outline of process used in preliminary goal setting meeting Program modifications will be recommended after \"fast-track\" evaluation is completed. At this time we do not anticipate the development of any new programs.PROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Ingram MONTH ACTIVITIES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) DATE: September 30, 1993 BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT Sept. 1993 (cont.) 3.2.7 (continued) 2. Pursue receipt of additional local dollars through lobbying techniques and/or grant writing. 3. Vigorously pursue federal dollars, especially through a team approach composed of the new grant writer and/or other selected individuals. 4. Examine thoroughly millage question and make appropriate decisions. 5. Explore possibility of program consolidation and different delivery of current programs and systems. 6. Consider options on efficient use of all our physical plants - expansion/ closure/modification. 7. Conduct energy audits and evaluate data generated from that process.PROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Ingram MONTH ACTIVITIES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) DATE: September 30, 1993 BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT Sept. 1993 (cont.) 3.2.6 Review and provide guidance related to proportional allocation formulas Sept . 9, 1993 Nov. 30, 1993 Board and Superintendent Staff identified the following formulas: School Budget (per pupil al location) Supervision Aide formula 4-Year-Old Budget allocations Library books and materials Omaha formula Custodial Services Security/Campus Supervisors Food Service School/Department Copier Allocations State and North Central Association standards for staffing The Superintendent will make recommendations relative to the proportional allocation formulas 3.2.7 Consider strategies for funding shortfall Sept. 9, 1993 Nov. 30, 1993 Board and Superintendent At the Sept. 9, 1993 Board work session the following strategies were identified for the Board: 1. Effectively Implement the program planning and budgeting process.PROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Ingram MONTH ACTIVITIES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) DATE: September 30, 1993 BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT Sept. 1993 (cont.) 3.3 Define procedures for broad-based input sessions Aug. 5, 1993 Sept. 21, 1993 Director-Communications Superintendent and Lead Planning Person Sept. 21, 1993 memorandum from J. Wagner to M. Bassa 3.4 Planning and Budgeting support activities 3.4.1 Little Rock School Dist./ City of Little Rock collaborative efforts 3.4.2 Principals meeting to review: * mission statement * goals * Program Planning and Budget Document (PBD) * Program Budget Document terms and data element definitions * Desegregation Plan/School Operations 1993-94 Budget Allocation 3.4.3 Inservice for inputing achievements on the PBD Sept. 15, 1993 Sept. 15, 1993 Sept. 23, 1993 Sept. 15, 1993 Sept. 17, 1993 Sept. 23, 1993 Legal Advisor Interim Superintendent Director-Planning, Research, Evaluation Controller Interim Superintendent Assistant Supt's. Lead Planning Person Controller ODM - Budget specialist Lead planning person I Copy of agenda and hand-out materials Memorandum to principals announcing cluster meeting dates Agenda of cluster meetings Copy of PBD Terms and Data Element definitions Memorandum announcing inservice datePROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Inqram MONTH Sept. 1993 (cont.) ACTIVITIES 3.2.7 (continued) 3.2.8 Identify any additional programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) DATE: September 30, 1993 BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY 8. EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT Conduct transportation study to achieve effective utilization of transportation system. Sept. 9, 1993 Nov. 30, 1993 Board and Superintendent Copy of memorandum from E. Matthis to program managers establishing \"fast-track\" evaluation guidelines. No additional programs were added during the Sept. 9, 1993 work session.3.1 PRE-PLANNING GOAL SETTING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT August 20, 1993 9 a.m. administration building 1. Opening/Purpose Remarks Estelle Matthis Issues - Direction 2. Strategic Planning Dr. Henry Williams 3. Discussion . Desegregation Plan . Existing District Mission . Proportional Allocations . Achievement Data . Attendance/Discipline . Parent Involvement 4 . and Goals Next Step . Cabinet Work Sessions . Formulate Procedures for . Goal Setting Session Board of DirectorsPROGRAM MANAGER Sterling Ingram MONTH ACTIVITIES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING MANAGEMENT TIMELINE (PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL) DATE: September 30, 1993 BEGINNING DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBILITY EVIDENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT Sept. 1993 (cont.) 3.5 Desegregation update to LRSD Board of Directors 3.6 Conduct follow-up training for using the WordPerfect file Sept. 23. 1993 Oct. 5, 1993 Sept. 23, 1993 Oct. 8, 1993 Superintendent Interim Associate Superintendent for Curriculum and IRC staff Memorandum and attachments to the Board Memorandum to principals from Dennis Glasgow1. 2. 3. 4 . 5. 6. 7. 8. 3.1.1 Agenda Preliminary Goal Setting Meeting Tuesday, August 31, Welcome and Statement of Purpose Clarification or Questions Regarding Resource Documents: Achievement Test Results Desegregation Plan Program Planning and Budgeting Document Goals Adopted by Board of Directors, September, 1989 LRSD Student Learning Outcomes Arkansas Board of Education Learner Outcomes Developing a Mission Statement for LRSD Process for Developing Preliminary Goals -Break- Preliminary Goal Setting Small Groups (Using Nominal Group Technique) -Lunch- Preliminary Goal Setting Large Group (Using Nominal Group Technique) -Break- Develop Preliminary List of Issues Related to GoalsSmall Groups (Using Nominal Group Technique) 1993 Estelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent LRSD Staff Dennis Glasgow, Facilitator Dennis Glasgow, Facilitator Facilitators: Sterling Ingram Donita Hudspeth Dennis Glasgow Dennis Glasgow, Facilitator Facilitators: Sterling Ingram Donita Hudspeth Dennis Glasgow -Break- (Between Goals) Reporting Session on Issues Large Groups Dennis Glasgow, Facilitator 9. Processing and Closure Estelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent3.1.1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 August 25, 1993 To: Little Rock School District Goal Setting Committee From: stelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent Subject: Pre-Goal Setting Meeting I wish to express my appreciation to each of you for agreeing to serve on this very special committee. The district is in the process of goal setting that will culminate with our long-range strategic planning. We will provide the leadership for the Board and Superintendent by identifying a tentative mission statement and goals for the district. In order to accomplish this objective, we have scheduled a work session for August 31, 1993 beginning at 8:30 a.m. and ending at approximately 8:30 p.m. Lunch and dinner will be provided for participants. We will convene the meeting at Calvary Baptist Church, 1901 N. Pierce Street in the Family Life Center. Enclosed are copies of some documents that you will need to review prior to August 31, 1993. For your convenience, we have identified a contact person for certain documents. These persons will assist you in the summarization of the content of these documents. We look forward to a very productive session on August 31, 1993. If there are any questions, please contact me at 324-2012.3.1.1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 September 2, 1993 Dear Committee Member, Thank you for your valuable assistance in providing input to the Little Rock School District Board of Directors about the District's mission statement and goals and also about issues related to attainment of the goals. productive in terms of the task it was given. The group worked very hard and was quite Enclosed are the results of the meeting. This information is being shared with the School Board for consideration at a goal setting meeting starting at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 9, 1993. Sincerely, Dennis Glasgow \u0026lt;i * V 3.1.1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Preliminary Goal Setting Meeting Tuesday, August 31, 1993 Committee Members Anne Hansen - Principals Roundtable Lonnie Dean - Principals Rountable Lou Ethel Nauden - Classroom Teachers Association Eleanor Coleman - Classroom Teachers Association John Walker - Joshua Intervenors Joy Springer - Joshua Intervenors Katherine Mitchell - LRSD Board of Education Dorsey Jackson - LRSD Board of Education Carla Bobo - Parents Teachers Association Bettye Caldwell - Future LR Estelle Matthis - Cabinet Margaret Gremillion - Cabinet Bill Mooney - Cabinet Larry Robertson - Cabinet Brady Gadberry - Cabinet Mark Milhollen - Cabinet Jeanette Wagner - Cabinet Arma Hart - Cabinet Sterling Ingram - Facilitator Donita Hudspeth - Facilitator Dennis Glasgow - Facilitator Rene Carson - Recorder Marjorie Bassa - Recorder Kathy Penn-Norman - Recorder1. 2. 3. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT GOALS Implement integrated educational programs that will ensure that all students grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academic enrichment while closing disparities in achievement. Developing and maintaining staff that is well-trained and motivated. (Communicating with colleges and universities about teacher training will be a strategy for this goal). The Little Rock School Board, administration, staff, and students will demonstrate behavior and human relations skills that value people as human beings and that are consistent with an appreciation and understanding of multicultural diversity. 4. Solicit and secure financial and other resources that are necessary to fully support our schools, including our desegregation plan. 5. Provide a safe and orderly climate that is conducive to learning for all students. 6. Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operations.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Little Rock School District is to provide a quality, integrated educational program which encourages all children to achieve their optimum academic, social, and emotional development. To that end, the students in the Little Rock School District will develop an appreciation for racial and cultural diversity. develop skills in problem solving and conflict resolution, and demonstrate mastery of specific skills. This will be achieved through the collaborative efforts of a Board, a dedicated and competent staff. and of parents and citizens committed to fairness, racial equity and adequate support for education.Note - The issues related to each goal which are listed on the following pages are stated subcommittees. problems (e.g., exactly as They are not in parallel form. reported by the Some are stated as behavior.), others Adults not modeling appropriate interpersonal are stated as overcome problems (e.g., strategies or activities to Encourage student participation in a cross-section of extracurricular activities.), while others are stated as programs). needs All, (e.g., however, parental involvement involve areas in all school which were viewed as impediments to achieving the goals of the District.These were goals that were considered but were not chosen as being the most important. * Help students be productive in the 21st century by developing a capacity for life-long learning, problem solving skills, positive self-concept and a responsibility for learning. Provide a disciplined environment that promotes responsible citizenship. * By the year 1996: (1) reduce by 50% the number of students at grades 3 and 6 below the 50th percentile\nand (2) increase by 50% the students scoring at the 90% percentile (on standardized tests)  strongly promote parental involvement in the education of their children through home and school activities and encourage community involvement through partnerships and volunteerism. * Development and infusion of multicultural education in all areas of the curriculum. * Develop and maintain a system of accountability to the public of the District (achievement and resources).Issues related to Goal #2 Goal #2 - Developing and maintaining staff that is well-trained and motivated. (Communication with colleges and universities about teacher training will be a strategy for this goal.) 1) Accountability/change how do we deal with staff, i. e. teachers, principals, etc. who have not been held accountable in past (i.e. principal, etc.) 2) Monitor, evaluate, reinforce, and replicate 3) Recruitment and retention of quality staff and issuance of contracts in a timely manner 4) Quality inservice learning and trainers 5) Needs assessment, i.e., building level and district-wide 6) Adequate resources (financial and human)Issues related to Goal fl Goal fl ensure that Implenient integrated educational programs that will all students grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academic enrichment while closing disparities in achievement. 1) Program development in areas where needs of all children are not met 2) Accountability (Staff,student, parents, and programs) 3) Objective criteria for determining program effectiveness 4) growth Measurement system to measure academic, social, and emotional 5) Needs assessment (local and District) 6) Adequate resources (human and financial) 7) Environment conducive to learningIssues related to Goal #4 Goal #4 - Solicit and secure financial and other resources that are necessary to fully support our schools, including our desegregation plan. 1) Lack of knowledge and commitment by public and District personnel to desegregation plan commitments. 2) Need hard data to evaluate programs in desegregation plan - - remove those that don't work. District and 3) More focused effort by all District personnel to promote school District. 4) Change in attitude in marketing (We have a lot to sell) progress in meeting LRSD goals. 5) Lack of knowledge of funding sources private) - such as Wal-Mart, Tyson (federal, state, 6) News coverage of schools needs to be more positive 7) Review and audit of personnel needs 8) Level of confidence of public in system 9) Instability in staff and staff changes promotes confusion. distrust, and lack of support to pass a school millage 10) Securing partners for all schools 11) State funding processesIssues related to Goal #3 Goal #3 - The Little Rock School Board, administration, staff and students will demonstrate behavior and human relations skills that value people as human beings and that are consistent with an appreciation and understanding of multicultural diversity. 1) Provide financial resources 2) Practices and procedures which will be used in teaching strategies relating to positive interpersonal relationships 3) Training in human relations (job performance related) 4) Lack of understanding of cultural differences 5) promote Communications to parents concerning teaching strategies that enhanced relationships achievement and positive interpersonal 6) Parental involvement in all school programs 7) Provide adequate time for staff development 8) The biases and practices that all of the players bring to the setting (i.e., segregated lounges, cafeteria) 9) Racial sensitivity programs for students, staff, and parents 10) Adults not modeling appropriate interpersonal behavior 11) Encourage student participation in a cross-section of extra curriculum activities 12) Lack of understanding of the desegregation plan 13) Need for a different type of staff development delivery system, other that the current five member staff 14) Employment practices at all levels 15) Effective monitoring of diversity in all programsIssues related to Goal #6 Goal #6 Ensure that equity occurs in activities and operations. all phases of school 1) What is equity? 2) The lack of a definition of site-based management in the LRSD 3) Provide financial resources 4) Practices and procedures which will be used strategies relating to positive interpersonal relationships in teaching 5) setting The biases and practices that all of the players bring to the 6) Racial sensitivity programs for students, staff and parents 7) Encourage student participation in a cross-section of extra curriculum activities 8) Lack of understanding of the desegregation plan 9) Employment practices at all levels 10) Effective monitoring of diversity in all programsIssues related to Goal #5 Goal #5 - Provide a safe and orderly climate that is conducive to learning for all students. 1) Promote parent participation that includes parents and students helping to establish and support classroom/school rules 2) Identify community problems/conflicts that spill over into the school setting 3) Lack of commitment of staff for inservice training 4) Cost of purchasing materials/equipment to maintain attraction facilities and grounds 5) Cost of adding custodial staff and security personnel to maintain clean, attractive, and safe buildings 6) Teachers need to be trained to be effective in controlling student behavior 7) Role models (especially male) are needed for students at the elementary and secondary level 8) A planned program for citizenship, personal responsibility, and moral/ethical behavior is needed. 9) Expense and space for In-School Suspension Program Kids don't need to be on the street 10) Difficulty in getting parents to come to school for conferences and training 11) Physical structure of some buildings create safety problems (Too many doors, etc.) 12) Changing staff expectations about student behavior 13) Training of students/staff on the Rights and Responsibility handbooks to ensure consistent enforcement.Note - The issues related to each goal which are listed on the following pages are stated subcommittees. problems (e.g., exactly as They are not in parallel form. reported by the Some are stated as behavior.), others Adults not modeling appropriate interpersonal are stated as overcome problems (e.g., strategies or activities to Encourage student participation in a cross-section of extracurricular activities.), while others are stated as programs). needs All, (e.g., however. parental involvement involve areas in all school which were viewed as impediments to achieving the goals of the District.These were goals that were considered but were not chosen as being the most important.  Help students be productive in the 21st century by developing a capacity for life-long learning, problem solving skills, positive self-concept and a responsibility for learning. * Provide a disciplined environment that promotes responsible citizenship. * By the year 1996: (1) reduce by 50% the number of students at grades 3 and 6 below the 50th percentile\nand (2) increase by 50% the students scoring at the 90% percentile (on standardized tests)  strongly promote parental involvement in the education of their children through home and school activities and encourage community involvement through partnerships and volunteerism.  Development and infusion of multicultural education in all areas of the curriculum. * Develop and maintain a system of accountability to the public of the District (achievement and resources). *GOALS/ISSUES The Nominal Group Technique was used to establish preliminary goals. Participants were divided into three small groups, each representative of the larger group. The Nominal Group Technique consists of the following steps: SMALL GROUP PROCEDURES Step 1 Silent Generation of Ideas Step 2 Round Robin Recording Step 3 Serial Discussion for Clarification Step 4 Clustering of Ideas Step 5 Preliminary Vote Step 6 Discusslon/Debate on Results of Preliminary Vote Step 7 Final VotePROCESS USED IN PRELIMINARY GOAL SETTING MEETING MISSION STATEMENT 1. Facilitator defined \"mission statement and shared current LRSD Mission Statement with participants 2. Participants worked in three small groups to identify components needed in a revised LRSD Mission Statement 3. Small groups shared ideas for a revised mission statement which were recorded on a chart tablet 4. Ideas generated from small groups were discussed/debated by large group 5. Each small group developed its \"ideal\" mission statement using Its own ideas and those that were shared by the other groups 6. A representative from each small group met to reconcile the three mission statements to produce a single mission statement 7. The revised mission statement was shared with the large group and received approval3.1.2 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS August 30, 1993 MEMORANDUM TO: Program Managers, Directors, and Supervisors FROM: Jie Matthis, Interim Superintendent SUBJECT: Procedures to be Used for Fast Track Evaluation of Desegregation Plan The districts Program Planning and Budgeting document identified a number of activities that are to be implemented during the 1993-94 school year. An activity for August 1993 is for the Superintendent and the Cabinet to begin to identify programs for \"fast track\" evaluation. A fast track evaluation will not have as many dimensions or details as a regular evaluation, since the evaluative process is conducted in a reduced time frame. Evaluation of the districts program will provide the information that is needed for us to determine if programs are effective and that such implementation will assist us in meeting our commitment to our Court-approved Desegregation Plan. The following guidelines are to be used to conduct fast track evaluations of targeted programs. 1. Prepare a comprehensive program description for each area or component that is targeted for evaluation. 2. Identify program goals for each area or component of the program that is being evaluated. 3. Identify the evaluation criteria that is to be used to fast track evaluate each goal. Include all evaluative measures and instruments that will be used in this process. 4. Identify any obstacles or problems that were encountered that hindered or impacted the obtainment of program goals. 5. Given the results of your fast track evaluation, reconunendations for program additions, deletions, and/or changes are deemed appropriate. This data can be extremely helpful as you develop a strong business case for making a major decision(s) regarding continued implementation of various programs in the Desegregation Plan. The format for a businessLARGE GROUP PROCEDURES Step 1 Step 2 Summary and Clustering of Small Group Ideas Large Group Discussion/Debate Session Using \"Hot Seat\" Approach Step 3 Large Group VoteLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 3.2 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING September 9, 1993 - 5 p.m. Overview . . Dr. Henry P. Williams Superintendent of Schools Observations: Pre-Goal Setting Work Session (August 31, 1993) Dr. Katherine Mitchell Dorsey Jackson Dennis Glasgow - Facilitator DISCUSSION-.  Review and Revise the Mission Statement Board of Directors  Establish Tentative Written Goals Board of Directors  Review Preliminary List of Issues for Needs Assessment ........................ Board of Directors Sterling Ingram - Facilitator DISCUSSION.  Review Desegregation Program Inventory Report................. Board of Directors  Identify the Need for Program Modification or Development Board of Directors  Review and Provide Guidance Related to Proportional Allocations Formulas..... Board of Directors  Establish Written Priorities Board of Directors  Identify Any Additional Programs for \"Fast Track\" Evaluation ................. Board of Directors Mark Milhollen - Facilitator DISCUSSION.  Consider Strategies for Funding Shortfall Board of Directors \"Next Step\"/Summary Estelle Matthis2 case is enclosed for your review. You will receive copies of the standard format that is to be used to fast track evaluate targeted programs. The following programs have been targeted for fast track evaluation: Targeted Program Person(s) Responsible 1. 2. 3. 4. All Employment Contracts Student Assignment Process Construction of Stephens Outsourcing Support Services 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Special Education Vocational Education Academic Progress Incentive Grant Academic Support Program Library Media Services Resurvey Requirement Lucy Lyon Brady Gadberry Estelle Matthis Doug Eaton/John Riggs Doug Eaton/Charlie Neal Coopers and Lybrand Patty Kohler Carol Green Margaret Gremillion/Larry Robertson Leon Adams Early Retirement Incentive Program Substitute Teachers Mark Milhollen/Brady Gadberry LRSD/LRCTA We need each program manager to submit your preliminary evaluation report to my office by November 15, 1993. The final report is due by December 15, 1993. All evaluation reports will be submitted to the Board of Directors during January, 1994. /Iks8) Lack of understanding of the desegregation plan 9) Employment practices at all levels 10) Effective monitoring of diversity in all programs3.2.1 Issues related to Goal #1 Goal #1 Implement integrated educational programs that will ensure that all students grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academic enrichment while closing disparities in achievement. 1) Program development in areas where needs of all children are not met 2) Accountability (Staff, student, parents, and programs) 3) Objective criteria for determining program effectiveness 4) Measurement system to measure academic, social, and emotional growth 5) Needs assessment (local and District) 6) Adequate resources (human and financial) 7) Environment conducive to learning7) Provide adequate time for staff development 8) The biases and practices that all of the players bring to the setting (i.e., segregated lounges, cafeteria) 9) Racial sensitivity programs for students, staff, and parents 10) Adults not modeling appropriate interpersonal behavior 11) Encourage student participation in a cross-section of extra curriculum activities 12) Lack of understanding of the desegregation plan 13) Need for a different type of staff development delivery system, other that the current five member staff 14) Employment practices at all levels 15) Effective monitoring of diversity in all programsIssues related to Goal #2 Goal #2 Develop and maintain a staff that is well-trained and motivated. 1) Accountability/change - - how do we deal with staff, I.e. teachers, principals, etc. who have not been held accountable in past (i.e. principal, etc.) 2) Monitor, evaluate, reinforce, and replicate 3) Recruitment and retention of quality staff and issuance of contracts in a timely manner 4) Quality inservice learning and trainers 5) Needs assessment, I.e., building level and district-wide 6) Adequate resources (financial and human)Issues related to Goal #4 Goal #4 Solicit and secure financial and other resources that are necessary to fully support our schools. Including our desegregation plan. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Lack of knowledge and commitment by public and District personnel to desegregation plan commitments. Need hard data to evaluate programs in District and desegregation plan - - remove those that don t work. More focused effort by all District personnel to promote school District. Change in attitude in marketing (We have a lot to sell) progress in meeting LRSD goals. Lack of knowledge of funding sources - (federal, state, private) - such as Wal-Mart, Tyson News coverage of schools needs to be more positiveIssues related to Goal #3 Goal #3 The Little Rock School Board, administration, staff and students will demonstrate behavior and human rela- tions skills that value people as human beings and that are consistent with an appreciation and understanding of multicultural diversity. 1) Provide financial resources 2) Practices and procedures which will be used in teaching strategies relating to positive Interpersonal relationships 3) Training in human relations (job performance related) 4) Lack of understanding of cultural differences 5) Communications to parents concerning teaching strategies that promote enhanced achievement and positive interpersonal relationships 6) Parental involvement in ail school programsIssues related to Goal #5 Goal #5 Provide a safe and orderly climate that is conducive to learning for all students. 1) Promote parent participation that includes parents and students helping to establish and support classroom/school rules 2) Identify community problems/conflicts that spill over into the school setting 3) Lack of commitment of staff for inservice training 4) Cost of purchasing materials/equipment to maintain attraction facilities and grounds 5) Cost of adding custodial staff and security personnel to maintain clean, attractive, and safe buildings 6) Teachers need to be trained to be effective in controlling student behavior7) Review and audit of personnel needs 8) Level of confidence of public In system 9) Instability in staff and staff changes promotes confusion, distrust, and lack of support to pass a school millage 10) Securing partners for all schools 11) State funding processesIssues related to Goal #6 Goal #6 Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operations. 1) What is equity? 2) The lack of a definition of site-based management in the LRSD 3) Provide financial resources 4) Practices and procedures which will be used in teaching strategies relating to positive interpersonal relationships 5) The biases and practices that ail of the players bring to the setting 6) Racial sensitivity programs for students, staff and parents 7) Encourage student participation in a cross-section of extra curriculum activities7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) Role models (especially male) are needed for students at the elementary and secondary level A planned program for citizenship, personal responsibility, and moral/ethical behavior Is needed. Expense and space for In-School Suspension Program Kids don't need to be on the street Difficulty In getting parents to come to school for conferences and training Physical structure of some buildings create safety problems (Too many doors, etc.) Changing staff expectations about student behavior Training of students/staff on the Rights and Responsibility handbooks to ensure consistent enforcement.STPROG08 REVISED 09 SEPT 93 3.2.2 1 2 3 29 5 6 27 28 7 SOURCE SPl SP2 BP6 BP7 PP9 OP12 SP20 BP21 BP24 BP28 SP BP28 OP28 OP28 BP34 BP35 OP39 PROGRAM IDENTIFICATION WORKSHEET IN PLAN SEQUENCE ORDER FINAL VERSION PROGRAM NAME PRIMARY SECONDARY Commitment to Desegregation Leadership HIPPY 4-year old program City-wide Early Childhood Education Program Rockefeller Early Childhood Magnet Special Programs Summer Learning Program JTPA ASSET Program School Operations Alternative Learning Center Testing Assistance - Disadvantaged Student Hearing Officer Office of Desegregation and Student Assignment In-School Suspension Job Fair Extra-Curricular participation Board Board Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Mayo Williams Mayo Matthis Matthis Matthis Williams Williams Shead Price Shead Price Price Glasgow Adams Young Anderson Anderson Robertson Anderson Gremillion Anderson Ingram Watson Matthis Anderson Elston Anderson Gremillion Robertson8) Lack of understanding of the desegregation plan 9) Employment practices at all levels 10) Effective monitoring of diversity in all programs34 18 19 21 51 52 53 54 55 56 75 SOURCE PP130 PP131 BP131 PP139 BP143 SP145 PP146 OP148 OP148 OP149 BP152 BP153 BP153 OP153 BP153 OP153 PROGRAM NAME Bidding Practices PRIMARY TBA Parent Involvement/Community Mayo Linkages VIPS - Recruiting Student Assignments M-to-M Magnet Schools (Central, Dunbar, Washington, Henderson, McClellan) New Futures Facilities King Interdistrict School Mayo Mayo Mayo Matthis TBA Matthis Stephens Interdistrict School Matthis Office of Incentive Schools IS Writing to Read IS Science Labs IS Computer Labs IS Foreign Language Labs IS Computer Loan Program IS Other Incentive School Academic Programs - Kindergarten - Reading across the curriculum - Oral Expression across curriculum SECONDARY Neal Gill Milam TBA Young Matthis Mayo Mayo Gremillion Mayo Robertson Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Mayo Robertson Gremillion Robertson Gremillion Robertson Gremillion Robertson Gremillion Robertson Gremillion Robertson Gremillion8 9 10 12 13 14 26 32 15 35 16 17 SOURCE BP44 BP46 BP48 SP58 BP63 SP81 OPS 2 BPS 6 PP86 BP93 PP95 SP96 SP98 BP106 BP114 PP124 BP125 BP129 BP129 SP129 PP130 PROGRAM NAME Teacher Recruiter Staff Development Academic Support Program Gifted Education Multicultural Programs Focused Activities Academic Incentive Grants Original Magnets Parkview Science Magnet McClellan Community School Recruitment of Private School Students Federal Programs Vocational Education Library Services Special Education Staff Development Prejudice Reduction Security required for safe Schools Data Processing System for Student Information (including CIMS and ABACUS) Facilities Employment Practices PRIMARY Gadberry Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Mayo Glasgow Glasgow Glasgow Glasgow Glasgow Board TBA TBA TBA Gadberry SECONDARY Robinson Hudspeth Adams Woods Stovall Donaldson Various Robertson Anderson Gremillion Robertson Anderson Gremillion Anderson TBA Cole Rather Adams Green Lyons Kohler Hudspeth Williams Barnhouse Matthis Kingsella Eaton64 65 66 67 68 69 70 SOURCE BP172 PP172 PP172 BP172 PP173 PP175 BP176 OP176 0P176 OP178 OP178 PROGRAM NAME IS Instructional Aides (add) IS Supervision Aides IS Career Skills Development IS Extended Year IS Support Services - Other - Community Access/Field Trips - Community Involvement - Special Skills Prog. - Special Training - Parental Involvement - Learning Time Sched - Home/School Comm. - Extracurricular Prog. - Attendance and Behav. - Subj. Related Extracurr IS Counseling/Social Work - Community Services Access - College/Post Grad Aware - Study Skills - Home/Neighborhood Meet - Individual and Group Counseling - Wellness Program IS Incentive/Recognition IS Resident Counseling Service Camp Pfeifer IS Monitoring IS Permanent Substitute IS Additional Compensation PRIMARY Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis SECONDARY Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow MayoSOURCE PROGRAM NAME PRIMARY SECONDARY - Learning Styles Inventory - School Themes - Semi-Departmental - Instructional Tech. - Study/Test-taking - Parent Home Study - Computer Managed Inst. - Student Educ. Plans - Specialized Programs - Incentive Programs - Homework - Criterion-Referenced Test - Heterogeneous grouping - Effective Schools - African/Amer. History 57 BP154 IS Extended Day Matthis Glasgow Mayo 59 60 61 62 63 PP156 PP157 BP158 PP159 OP171 BP171 OP171 OP171 IS Social Skills - Family Folklore - Positive Imaging - Interpersonal skills - Rites of Passage - Role Model Program - Mentoring Program IS Special Activities - Peer Tutoring Program - Academic Reinforcement Clubs - Special Interest Clubs IS Field Trips IS Latin Enrichment Program IS Homework Centers IS Transportation (Add) IS Homework Hotline IS Mentors/Tutors Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo33 SOURCE SI13 SI21 SI23 SI33 SI35 SI53 SI54 BI56 SI59 PROGRAM NAME Summer School Staff Development School Operations Library Media Special Education Vocational Education Guidance/Counseling Program PRIMARY Matthis Glasgow Matthis Glasgow Glasgow Glasgow Glasgow Parent Involvement/Community Matthis Linkages Public Relations Wagner SECONDARY Robertson Gremillion Anderson Hudspeth Robertson Gremillion Anderson Lyons Kohler Green Elston Mayo Mayo71 72 73 74 22 24 SOURCE PP178 OP179 OP190 PP190 SP190 BP193 BP194 SP205 PP215 SP224 BP227 PROGRAM NAME IS School Policies and Procedures Others IS Extended Week IS Staffing - Recommended Full-time positions IS Staffing - Other - Staffing Committee - Staffing Needs Assessment - Staff Recruitment - Staff Selection - Staff Commit/Effect Monitor - Teacher Demonstration Program - Master Teacher Program - New Teacher Assist IS Alternative Classroom IS Required Staff Development IS Teacher Stipends for Inservice and Extra 5 days IS Parent Involvement IS Parent Recruitment Monitoring activities (Eval Dept) Computerized Transportation System PRIMARY Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Matthis Mayo Ingram TBA SECONDARY Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Glasgow Mayo Matthis Mayo Montgomery SIS student Choices/Options Mayo Pederson Wiedower 25 019 Romine Interdistrict Theme Matthis Mayo3.2.4 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT GOALS Implement Integrated educational programs that will ensure that all students grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academic enrichment while closing disparities in achievement. Develop and maintain a staff that is well-trained and motivated. The Little Rock School Board, administration, staff, and students will demonstrate in their day to day behavior that they accept each individual as a valued contributor to society and view cultural diversity among students, staff and the community as a valued resource upon which our community and nation can draw as we prepare for the 21st Century. Solicit and secure financial and other resources that are necessary to fully support our schools, including our desegregation plan. Provide a safe and orderly climate that is conducive to learning for all students. Ensure that equity occurs in ail phases of school activities and operations.3.2.3 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Little Rock School District is to provide a quality, integrated educational program which encourages all children to achieve their optimum academic, social, and emotional development. To that end, the students in the Little Rock School District will develop an appreciation for ethnic and cultural diversity, develop skills in problem solving and conflict resolution, and demonstrate mastery of the District's curriculum. This will be achieved through the collaborative efforts of a Board, a dedicated and competent staff, and of parents and citizens committed to fairness, racial equity and adequate support for education.Board of Directors Special Meeting September 9, 1993 BOND REFUNDING\nMr. Mark McBryde, Bond Consultant, explained to the Board the process for authorizing the Refunding Bonds in the converted principal amount of $5,385,000 for the purpose of refunding outstanding indebtedness.   for the purpose The interest rate on these bonds would reduce from 7.06 percent to an average of 4.5 percent - a reduction of approximately 2.5 percent in debt service. remain on the same freouencv. A Resolution Authorizing the frequency. The payments will Issuance and Delivery of Bonds\nand Prescribing Other Matters Pertaining Thereto was presented to the Board for approval. (Copy Attached). Mr. John Riggs moved approval of the recommendation as discussed by Mr. McBryde, seconded by Mr. Willie C. (Bill) Hamilton, and it carried unanimously. D, PERSONNEL It was recommended that Dr. Marjorie Bassa be hired as the 12 month Planning, Research and Evaluation specialist. Dr. coordination of the Program Planning and Budgeting process. Mr. John Riggs moved acceptance of the Interim Superintendent's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Willie D. (Bill) Hamilton, and it carried 3-1 with Ms. Pat Gee voting \"nay.\" Bassa would assist with the If approved, NOTE: Mr. Dorsey Jackson arrived at 5:40 p.m. STEPHENS SITE SELECTION COMMITTEE\nMr. Jerry Malone, LRSD Attorney, explained the process that was used in making a recommendation for the location of the new Stephens Interdistrict School. Mr. Malone explained that Judge Susan Webber Wright had ordered a decision from a second committee to be made up of patrons from all three schools districts (Little Rock, North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special School District). Mr. John Riggs, Board Member, chaired the committee and served as a non-voting member. (2) bus tours. Five meetings were held with two District Administration Building. Each meeting was held at the Little Rock School The committee was instructed to consider busing burden on students, recruitment and safety in the selection process. ' - Judge Wright and her law clerk, together with Mrs. Ann Brown, Desegregation Monitor, were present for one of the bus tours. At the final meeting, all members were present and turned in their tally sheets except one person and that person brought the tally sheet the next day. the tally sheets as follows\nThe sites were ranked from3.2.7 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 Board of Directors Special Meeting September 9, 1993 The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District met in a lawfully-called special meeting at 5:20 p.m. on September 9, 1993, in the Board Room of the Administration Building, Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. 1993 , 810 West Board Secretary, presided. Dr. Katherine Mitchell, MEMBERS PRESENT: Dr. Katherine Mitchell Ms. Pat Gee Mr. Willie D. (Bill) Hamilton Mr. John Riggs Mr. Dorsey Jackson (NOTE: ARRIVED AT 5:40 p.m.) MEMBERS ABSENT: Mrs. O. G. Jacovelli Mr. John Moore OTHERS PRESENT: Dr. Henry P. Williams, Superintendent Elect Mrs. Estelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent Mrs. Norma Rodgers, Acting Recorder of Minutes Ms. Betty Forbes, Staff Assistant Ms. Karen Carter, Franklin Teacher Representative Incentive School, Miss Tameka Dillard, Parkview Magnet, Student Representative Mr. Don Umfleet, Audio Specialist PURPOSE OF SPECIAL MEETING: Dr. Katherine Mitchell, Board Secretary, called the meeting to order and announced that the special meeting was called for the purpose of considering the following issues: 1. 2. 3 . 4 . Bond Refunding Stephens Site Selection Committee Personnel Long Range Goals/Mission StatementBoard of Directors Special Meeting September 9, 1993 guidelines to be used to conduct fast tract evaluations of targeted programs and format for program evaluation. Mr. jjark_Milhpllen, Controller, and a facilitator for the budgeting process, gave a short recap of eight strategies for funding shortfall, (copy attached) Mrs, Estelle Matthis gave a summary of the goals and mission statement together with a budgeting. wrap-up on the program planning and ADJOURNMENT\nMr. seconded by Mr. unanimously. John Riggs moved that the meeting adjourn at T.-r.nj- - (Bill) Hamilton, and it carried Willie D. it 8:15, John lore, President Approved: Dr. Katherine Mitchell, SecretairyBoard of Directors Special Meeting September 9, 1993 Stephens Incentive School site - 309 points UAMS/DHS - 264 points 7th and Jones (Lumber Yard) - 211 points Discussion was held on the possibility for the use of the Stephens Building if the recommendation of the committee was not approved. Mr. Jackson moved that the Board approve the recommendation from the Site Selection Committee by locating the new school at the Stephens School's present location. The motion was seconded by Mr. Willie D. Hamilton, and it carried unanimously. The Board called for a break at 6:40 p.m. and resumed at 7:10 p.m. LONG-RANGE GOALS/MISSION STATEMENT Dr. Henry Williams gave an overview of his concern for strategic planning. He stated he had requested that a committee be put together to review and revise the goals and mission statement for the District. This committee was made up of community people, staff, and Board members. Dr. session. Katherine Mitchell reported on the pre-goal setting She stated the groups began their meeting in open session and were placed in small groups. The six highest goals from each group were chosen to work with. The groups were facilitated by Donita Hudspeth, Sterling Ingram and Dennis Glasgow. Mr. Dorsey Jackson expressed his thanks to the administrative staff, community people, classroom teachers, Joshua Intervenors, PTA and Mr. Bill Mooney of ODM Office for their work on the goals and mission statement. Mr. Dennis Glasgow expressed his thanks to the group and served as a facilitator. He explained that the group had used the nominal group technique in establishing a mission statement and the goals. Mr. Glasgow reviewed the proposed mission statement and goals with the audience. After questions were answered, Hamilton moved that the Board accept the preliminary mission Mr. statement and goals as presented by the committee. accepted by Ms. Pat Gee and it carried unanimously, preliminary Mission Statement and Goals is attached. The motion was A copy of the Mr. Sterling Ingram a facilitator on the discussion of the Desegregation Program gave a report. He discussed a need to identify program modification or development\nreview and provide guidance to proportional allocations formulas\nrelated establishment of written priorities\nand identify any additional programs for \"Fast Track\" evaluation. Mr. Ingram distributedLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT GOALS 1. Implement Integrated educational programs that will ensure that all students grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academic enrichment while closing disparities in achievement. 2. Develop and maintain a staff that is well-trained and motivated. 3. The Little Rock School Board, administration, staff, and students will demonstrate In their day to day behavior that they accept each individual as a valued contributor to society and view cultural diversity among students, staff and the community as a valued resource upon which our community and nation can draw as we prepare for the 21st Century. 4. Solicit and secure financial and other resources that are necessary to fully support our schools, including our desegregation plan. 5. Provide a safe and orderly climate that is conducive to learning for all students. 6. Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities ^nd operations.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Little Rock School District is to provide a quality, Integrated educational program which encourages all children to achieve their optimum academic, social, and emotional development. To that end, the students in the Little Rock School District will develop an appreciation for ethnic and cultural diversity, develop skills In problem solving and conflict resolution, and demonstrate mastery of the District's curriculum. This will be achieved through the collaborative efforts of a Board, a dedicated and competent staff, and of parents and citizens committed to fairness, racial equity and adequate support for education.3.2.8 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS August 30, 1993 MEMORANDUM TO: Program Managers, Directors, and Supervisors FROM: .style Matthis, Interim Superintendent SUBJECT: Procedures to be Used for Fast Track Evaluation of Desegregation Plan The districts Program Planning and Budgeting document identified a number of activities that are to be implemented during the 1993-94 school year. An activity for August 1993 is for the Superintendent and the Cabinet to begin to identify programs for \"fast track\" evaluation. A fast track evaluation will not have as many dimensions or details as a regular evaluation, since the evaluative process is conducted in a reduced time frame. Evaluation of the districts program will provide the information that is needed for us to determine if programs are effective and that such implementation will assist us in meeting our commitment to our Court-approved Desegregation Plan. The following guidelines are to be used to conduct fast track evaluations of targeted programs. 1. Prepare a comprehensive program description for each area or component that is targeted for evaluation. 2. Identify program goals for each area or component of the program that is being evaluated. 3. Identify the evaluation criteria that is to be used to fast track evaluate each goal. Include all evaluative measures and instruments that will be used in this process. 4. Identify any obstacles or problems that were encountered that hindered or impacted the obtainment of program goals. 5. Given the results of your fast track evaluation, recommendations for program additions, deletions, and/or changes are deemed appropriate. This data can be extremely helpful as you develop a strong business case for making a major decision(s) regarding continued implementation of various programs in the Desegregation Plan. The format for a business1. 2 . 3. 4. 5. 6, 7. 8. STRATEGIES FOR FUNDING SHORTFALLS Effectively implement the program planning and budgeting process. Pursue receipt of additional local dollars through lobbying techniques and/or grant writing. Vigorously pursue federal dollars, especially through a team approach composed of the new grant writer and/or other selected individuals. Examine thoroughly millage question and make appropriate decisions. Explore possibility of program consolidation and different delivery of current programs and systems. Consider options on efficient use of all our physical plants - expansion/closure/modification. Conduct energy audits and evaluate data generated from that process. Conduct transportation study to utilization of transportation system. achieve effective3.3 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas September 21, 1993 To: From: Re: Marjorie Bassa, Planning, Research \u0026amp; Evaluation Jeanette Wagner^irector of Communications 1993/94 Community Forums The Community' Forums have been set for the following dates at the foUowdng locations: Monday, October 11 - Cloverdale Elementary Tuesday, October 26 - Parkview Arts and Sciences Magnet High Wednesday, November 10 - Bale Elementary Tuesday, November 16 - Forest Heights Junior High Tuesday, November 30 - Rockefeller Incentive School After reading the document you prepared on the \"Steps to Planning Forums Meetings,\" I began to separate out the actions and tried to hst those who might be responsible for them. Let me know if you have any problems with the division of labor, so to speak. Dept, of Communications: 1. Acquire school locations for forums (seating for 90-100). 2. Prepare postcards announcing the forum dates and times 3. Prepare news release for Central Arkansas media 4. Write and send 30 second PSA to TV/radio stations 5. /urange for any sound equipment needed for forums 6. Prepare sign-in sheets for forums 7. Arrange for Security personnel for forums Dept, of Planning, Research and Evaluation 1. Prepare minutes of planning meeting 2. Prepare agenda for forums 2, Prepare survey or method of written input from community 3. Prepare matrix or report of written input for superintendent 2 case is enclosed for your review. You will receive copies of the standard format that is to be used to fast track evaluate targeted programs. The following programs have been targeted for fast track evaluation: Targeted Program Person(s) Responsible 1. 2. 3. 4. All Employment Contracts Student Assignment Process Construction of Stephens Outsourcing Support Services 5. 6. 1. 8. 9. 10. 11. Special Education Vocational Education Academic Progress Incentive Grant Academic Support Program Library Media Services Resurvey Requirement Lucy Lyon Brady Gadberry Estelle Matthis Doug Eaton/John Riggs Doug Eaton/Charlie Neal Coopers and Lybrand Patty Kohler Carol Green Margaret Gremillion/Larry Robertson Leon Adams Early Retirement Incentive Program Substitute Teachers Mark Milhollen/Brady Gadberry LRSD/LRCTA We need each program manager to submit your preliminary evaluation report to my office by November 15, 1993. The final report is due by December 15, 1993. All evaluation reports will be submitted to the Board of Directors during January, 1994. /Iks3,4.1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT/CITY OF LITTLE ROCK COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS AGENDA September 15, 1993 - 1:30 p.m. Overview of Desegregation Plan Jeriy Matone Legal Adviser Linkages - LRSD Desegregation Plan and Future Little Rock Plans................. ..................................................Sterling Ingram Director of Planning/Research/Evaluation Financial Implications .......................Mark Milhollen Director of Financial Services Remarks LRSD Board of Directors LR City Board of Directors(WEOEOIEJn 3.4 Alls 0 - 1993 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Date: August 5, 1993 To: Jeanette Wagner, Director of Communications From: Sterling Ingram/ irector Planning, Research and Evaluation Re: Program Planning and Budgeting Tasks Attached is a copy of the Planning and Budgeting document which was submitted to the court on July 29, 1993 . Although the document has not been approved, I expect the basic framework will not be changed. On page 3 of Attachment 4, you will find that Community Forums and District Dialogue sessions will be conducted as part of the needs assessment process. You have been identified as one of the persons responsible for this task. Please plan for three area school forums instead of one for a total of five community forums, an addition that the Board wanted. This was As the lead planning person for the planning and budgeting process, I am reguesting that as you make plans for the 1993-94 school year, please include the necessary strategies, timelines, etc. in your management plan which will be included in the budget document. bjg cc: Estelle Matthis Jerry MaloneCITY OF LITTLE ROCK-LRSD LINKAGE FUTURE LITTLE ROCK EDUCATIONAL TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS The City of Little Rock will: #1 - create and coordinate network of early childhood services. #2 - develop a strategic plan for determining the resources needed to develop a World Class Work force in the city. LRSD DESEGREGATION COMPONENTS # 1 - Early Childhood Education - HIPPY (Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters) - Four-Year-Old Program - CARE - Breakfast Program #2 - Vocational Education - JTPA (Job Training Partnership Act)GOALS FOR LITTLE ROCK A NEW FOCUS FOR CHANGE COMMUNITY AND RACIAL DIVERSITY * L.R. Race Relations Committee  Annual Race Relations Summit  Multicultural Events \u0026amp; Festivals COMMUNITY IMAGE ENHANCEMENT  Central High Museum CRIME PREVENTION AND PUBLIC SAFETY  Early Childhood Education * After School Programs * Mentoring  Fighting Back * New Futures * Insure the Children INTERVENTION * Neighborhood Drop-Off Center * Hearing Officer - Alternatives to Suspension TREATMENT * Treatment Program EDUCATION NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION * Early childhood education, mentoring, tutoring and intervention will be provided through neighborhood centers.CITY OF LITTLE ROCK-LRSD LINKAGE FUTURE LITTLE ROCK EDUCATIONAL TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS The City of Little Rock will: #5 - work with the LRSD to review the school calendar to accommodate care and academic needs of children and their parents. #6 - establish an Educational Commission to carry out recommendations of Future Little Rock Education Task Force. LRSD DESEGREGATION COMPONENTS # 5 - Summer Learning Program - MPT Summer School - Incentive School Extended Year #6 - Joint Board Meetings of the Little Rock School District and the City of Little RockCITY OF LITTLE ROCK-LRSD LINKAGE FUTURE LITTLE ROCK EDUCATIONAL TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS The City of Little Rock will: #3 - develop a human relations program with the objective of teaching children to function successfully in a safe learning environment. #4 - designate a LRSD administrator as Assistant Superintendent for Parent Activities. LRSD DESEGREGATION COMPONENTS # 3 - Safety and Security: The District Hearing Officer will develop plans to reduce the disparity of disciplinary actions. #4 - Associate Superintendent for Desegregation - VIPS (Volunteers in Public Schools) - Parent Involvement - Incentive School Mentor ProgramINSERVICE IMPLEMENTATION: DESEGREGATION PLAN PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGET DOCUMENT September 15, 1993 - 3 p.m. Opening Remarks . . . Margaret Gremillion Assistant Superintendent Budget Document ..................................................Sterling Ingram Director of Planning/Research/Evaluation Mission Statement/Tentative Goals .......... Estelle Matthis Interim Superintendent Desegregation Plan/School Operations Estelle Matthis 1993-94 Budget Allocations .......................Mark Milhollen Director of Financial Services Report Card Inservice Margaret Gremillion Other3.4.2 Little Rock School District Office of the Assistant Superintendents 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 September 13, 1993 TO\nAJl Principals FROM: Margaret Gremillion, Assistant Superintendent Larry S. Robertson, Assistant Superintendent SUBJECT: Cluster Meeting Dates Please mark your calendar for the following meeting dates: 1. Wednesday, September 15 - 3:00 p.m. Elementary principals and assistants - Gremillions Cluster *2. Thursday, September 16 - 1:30 p.m. Junior high principals 3. Thursday, September 16 - 3:00 p.m. Elementary' principals and assistants - Robertsons Cluster *4. Friday, September 17 - 9:30 a.m. Senior high principals ^Secondary assistants will be scheduled at a later date. All meetings will be held in the Board Room. Mrs. Matthis will make a presentation to all clusters starting at the designated time on the School Operations Section of the Desegregation Plan. Elementarj' principals will receive a sample of the report card and fact sheet to disseminate to their staffs. Thank you for giving this your attention. /laj cc: Estelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent - CurriculumINSERVICE IMPLEMENTATION: DESEGREGATION PLAN PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGET DOCUMENT Junior High Principals - September 16, 1993 - 1:30 p.m. Senior High Principals - September 17, 1993 - 9:30 a.m. Opening Remarks .......... Estelle Matthis Interim Superintendent Budget Document ..................................................Sterling Ingram Director of Planning/Research/Evaluation Mission Statement/Tentative Goals Estelle Matthis Desegregation Plan/School Operations Estelle Matthis 1993-94 Budget Allocations .......................Mark Milhollen Director of Financial Services OtherINSERVICE IMPLEMENTATION: DESEGREGATION PLAN PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGET DOCUMENT September 16, 1993 - 3 p.m. Opening Remarks ............. Larry Robertson Assistant Superintendent Budget Document ..................................................Sterling Ingram Director of Planning/Research/Evaluation Mission Statement/Tentative Goals Estelle Matthis Desegregation Plan/School Operations Estelle Matthis 1993-94 Budget Allocations .......................Mark Milhollen Director of Financial Services Report Card Inservice .......... Alice Stovall Director of Reading Judy Teeter Reading Specialist Other Larry Robertsonactions undertaken in a program which accomplishment of the objective. contributes to the intermediate steps, A strategy is a combination of and produces a distinct end product intermediate processes which only support other strategies. - not These end products should be measurable or quantifiable where possible, showing how the objective is to be achieved. have at least one strategy, but may have several. Each objective must Evaluation Criteria. Evaluation criteria are statements which specify the end product of an objective or strategy and establish measurable levels products should be measurable of performance for the product. These end showing how the objective or strategy is or quantifiable where possible. criteria should measure. to be achieved. The if possible. the relative impact of the results on the problem which the objective or strategy is designed to solve. If a strategy or objective cannot be measured in terms of impact, the measurement can be stated in terms of the level (or volume) of strategy provided and/or the number of persons served. Each strategy must have at least one evaluation criteria, but may have several.DEFINITIONS A 3.4.2 CONCPT04 REVISED 02 SEP 93 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT TERM AND DATA ELEMENT DEFINITIONS TERM DEFINITIONS. The following definitions are provided for general guidance, and will be used throughout the Program Planning and Budgeting Process. Program. A program is composed of a group or series an established plan of of operation, related activities which carried out to serve a specific area of identified need. are IS a major undertaking by the district executive, and/or legal requirements. to fulfill A program statutory. methods of implementing goals and objectives. Programs are the district's Programs will be a basis for work progress and fiscal reporting and monitoring. Program Description. Generally, program descriptions do not currently exist on most programs, and will have to be written, program description should include at least three parts: A - Purpose. A one or two sentence statement of what the program is designed to accomplish. Scope and Content. A general description of the activities that are to be undertaken to achieve the purpose. description program. This of section the might also administrative include structure a ] of brief the Participants/Beneficiaries. A specific statement of how many and what kind of persons will be affected by the program during one fiscal year. Program Goal. A program goal is a broad guiding statement and should describe the overall aim(s), purpose(s), or ambition{s) of the specific program. It is a'general and enduring statement of purpose that expresses the district's fundamental intentions and provides guidelines for planning the future development of the program. What is the program trying to accomplish? must have at least one goal, but may have several. Each program Objectives. Program objectives present explicitly the desired impact the program should have on a problem. detail to the goals. They should provide They tell in specific, measurable terms what is to be accomplished to implement adopted goals. statement should: The objective (A) tell what is to be achieved\n(B) tell when the achievement is to be realized\n(C) tell how the achievement of the objective will be measured. least one objective, but may have several. Each program goal must have at Strategies. Strategies are the jobs. tasks, efforts, oror more district goals. If more than one district goal, the appropriate district goals should be listed in descending priority order. District goals will be established by. the Board. element should be a static field\nyear. This it should not change during the Program Goal. placed in this field, but may have several. The program goal, as defined above, must be sequentially. Each program must have at least one goal. Each goal should be numbered and listed not change during the year. This element should be a static field\nit should Plan Reference. Specific plan and page references will be listed in this section for those programs directly cited in one of the desegregation plans. L= InterDistrict Plan. LRSD Desegregation Plan. The format should be L23 or 113-20. 1 = This element will be left blank if the program is not directly cited in one of the desegregation plans. This element should be a static field\nit should not change during the year, unless by Court Order. FY Program Budget. The total budgeted dollars appropriate fiscal year will be shown in this element. for the The number will be the total for the program code, and will be supplied by Financial Services at the beginning of the fiscal year, element will change only if the budget changes. This FTE. This element reflects the Full Time Equivalents (FTE) budgeted for this program (at the program code level). The number will be the total for the program code, and will be supplied by Financial Services at the beginning of the fiscal year. element will change only if the budget changes. This lst/2nd/3rd/4th Qtr Expend. quarter will be entered into the appropriate The actual expenditures for each quarterly reporting process. field during the Financial Services will provide the information, but the Primary Leader is responsible for entering the information onto the form. Once entered. remain static unless an error is detected. these fields should YTD Expenditures. actual expenditures at the program level. This field is the year-to-date total of departments with expenditures against this program. This will include all Financial Services will provide the information once each quarter is closed, but the Primary Leader is responsible for entering the information onto the form. unless an error is detected. Once entered, these fields should remain static Related Function Codes. This field identifies all function- level accounting codes which combine to make the complete program budget. Each program will have at least one function code, but may have several. with one space between them. Each four digit code should be listed sequentiallyDEFINITIONS B PROGRAM PAGE DATA ELEMENTS DATA ELEMENT DEFINITIONS. Page. Each program will have one of these cover pages. Extensive program narrative will carry-over onto a second page. The form is set up on diskette to allow for this carry-over, so you do not have to get everything on one page. Program Seq #. Each program will be sequence number by the district planner. assigned a unique The purpose of this sequence number is to establish a reference for placing programs in order within assembled, the planning document. When the document IS programs are arranged in this sequence. The program sequence number will help facilitate look-up since there is front-to-back page numbering. no field\nit should not change during the year. This element should be a static Revision Date. document was last changed. This date is the actual date this program This date will be entered by the person making the change each time the document is changed. this date will change at performance reporting. least quarterly with As a minimum, the regular Program Name. The district planner established name of the program in this field. will place the Name consistency will eliminate confusion, so try to use the designated name on all documents. change during the year. This element should be a static field\nit should not Program Code. link budget and expenditures This is a unique accounting code which will to the associated program. The code will be assigned by Financial Services prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, and all expenditures during the year should use this program code. should not change during the year. This element should be a static field\nit Primary Leader. The Primary Leader is the cabinet-level associate responsible for the management and operation of this program. This person should have the authority to ensure all necessary actions are taken to make the program successful. This person is responsible for the correctness and timeliness of the planning document and all subsequent reporting. Secondary Leader. The Secondary Leader is the associate who is back-up to the Primary, and will function in that capacity in the absence of the Primary. Program Description. above, must be placed in this field. The program description. as defined static field\nit should not change during the year. This element should be a District Goal Support. Each program must directly support oneWording not taken from a desegregation plan be in bold face within parentheses. or-court order should least one objective, but may have Each program goal must have at several. should allow for all supporting strategies, should be numbered sequential!v unrtpr Spacing between Strategies. sequentially under each goal. Objectives the related objective. Wording not taken from List all of the strategies required to Strategies should be listed in bold face, desegregation plan or court order should within parentheses.  satisfy a be in bold face witnin parentheses. Each objective must have at strategy, but may have several. least one numbered sequentially under each object! ve. Strategies should be Beginning Date. This is the actual date this p^..i^.lo_ the fniiA ' t consistency, all dates should be entered in format\nMM/DD/YY, 07/22/93. If an activity has no? activity began. This particular . ---- 07/22/93. stated yet, leave this field blank. Completion Date, activity was completed. This IS the actual date this particular . - For consistency, entered the following format\ni j activity has been started but not completed, on the percent of completion (75%). started, leave this field blank. in MM/DD/YY, all dates should be 07/22/93. If an give your best guess If the activity has not Responsibility. This is the name nponsioiuty. of the individual tasked with ensuring this activity is accomplished. Evaluation Criteria. for each strategy. List at least one evaluation criteria Include the specific measure of success. taken f-om a desegregation plan or court order should be in bold parentheses. Each evaluation criteria should be numbered to correspond to the appropriate strategy, and should be numbered sequentially under each strategy.DEFINITIONS C OBJECTIVE PAGE DATA ELEMENTS DATA ELEMENT DEFINITIONS. Page . This is the relating to the the field. program\". sequential page number for all pages This number is automatically placed in Program Seq #. This should be the same number as program page. This number will link all objectives back to the major program. separate on the program Revision Date. document was last changed. This date is the actual date this program This date will be entered by the person making the change each time the document is changed. this date will change at performance reporting. least quarterly with As a minimum, the regular The date on this page may be different from that on the program page since this objective page should change more frequently. Program Name. page. This name is This should be the same name as on the program a further link back to the major program. Including the name on this page prevents the need to refer back for the program name. Program Code. This should be the same code(s) as on the program page. This code(s) is a link back to the major program. Including the code(s) on this page prevents the need to refer back for the program code. Primary Leader. This should be the same person as on the program page. Including this name on this page prevents the need to refer back for the leader 's name. Secondary Leader. that name on the program page. This name will generally be the same as objectives, supporting objectives. the Secondary Leader may be However, if a program has several different for those Program Goal. program page in this field. Include only one of the program goals from the For each program goal listed on the program page, there will be at least one objective page. Plan Reference Page Number. Source references should be listed for each objective and strategy. If the objective or strategy is desegregation plan related, list the specific plan and page upon which this objective or strategy is found. If the objective or strategy is not related to a desegregation plan or Court Order, list whatever source was used. Each reference should be numbered to correspond to the appropriate strategy. Objectives. the program goal. List all of the objectives required to satisfy Objectives should be listed in bold face.LRSD HY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 2 I'logiaiii Seq Revistoo Dale: September 14, 1993 Ptogiain Name: i'lugrarn Cixlu: Primary Ixader Sccciutary Ixadcr: Pntgiajn (kal\nIr !i Plan Refeieiice Page Number Objectives Stralegies Begiiwing Dale Coniptelion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria-ram Scq i: i\u0026gt;ram Name: ..tain Code: Primary Leader -ram Description\nlicl Goal Support\nrain Oral: n References\nPnrgram Budget: Dl'xpcndiiurcs: t.ited Punction Codes: Ist Qir Expend: 2rxl Qtr Expend\nLRSD rv 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGHI DOCUMENT Sccotxlary Ixadcr 3rtl Qir Expcixi: 4th Qtr Expend: Page\n 1 Revision Date\nSeptcniler 14. 1993 PTE3.4.3 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Date: September 20, 1993 To: Principals and Selected Central Office Administrators From: Sterling Ingram, Director' Subject: Program Budget Document Inservice As discussed in the Implementation Desegregation Plan- Program Planning and Budget Document sessions, a training session for completing the Program Budget Document (PBD) is scheduled for Thursday, September 23, 1993, in the Board Room at 1:30 p.m. You should designate the person to attend this session who will input evidence into the computer for your school. If you have questions, contact Dr. Marjorie Bassa at 3242120. drgProgrnn Scq Hz Progf .Tfl* Nome: Il ogram Ctxte: Pl (\u0026gt;gi\nHn Goal: Plan Reference Page Nijrlxr LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUKCHT Primary Leader: Secondary leader: The intent of the school operations goal is to provide equitable educational opporti\u0026gt;iitics for all students in the LRSD. Objectives Strategics Beginning Date Couplet ion Date Page: 2 Revision Date: ResponsibiIity Scptrinbcr 1993 Evaluation Criteria I I. Page 30 1. To ensure an organizational structure wtn'ch provides equal opportunity and access for parents, students and staff. 1. To review organizatiorwl structure in schools and central office to ensure sufficient support for students and staff success and for the inplementation of the desegregation plan. (July 1. 1993) (June 30, 1994) (Principals,, Assistant Supts., Assoc. Supt. 1. Sufficient program personnel are in place to meet the needs of all students in the program os measured by the monitoring instrunent.. 1. (Satisfactory complianc* with the Education Equity Monitoring Document) 1.1 Page 30 1.1 Appoint school-based biracial comittees to monitor iirplemcntation and July 1, 1993 June 30, 1994 data. (Report to faculty) Principals, Assistant Stpts. I 1.2 Page 30 1.3 Page 30 2. Page 30 I : 2.1 Page 30 I 1.2 A district-wide biracial conmittee will monitor district-wide desegregation efforts and data and (report to Board) 1.3 Establish a reporting system. 2. To provide inservice to raise staff awarcness/cxpectations of equity corxrcrns for stixicnts. 2.1 Inservice cycles for existing arxi rx?w staff including: a. teacher expectations b. workirtg with parents c. at-risk youth d. learning styles July 1, 1993 July 1. 1993 July 1, 1993 Jtrx: 30. 1994 June 30, 1994 Ju-K? 30. 1994 1. School-level docunentation of qwrterly meetings (minutes, rosters: Assoc. Sipt. of Educational Programs, Assoc. Sept, for Desegregation Associate Supts., Assistant Supts. Local schools. Staff Development, Conmunicat ions Dept., Staff Development, Academic Support) Appropriate Associate Septs., arid Staff Developnent 1.2 Report from the monitoring of the biracial conmittee to the Board 1.3 Monitorir\u0026gt;g reports district-wide biracial ctwni t tees 2. Results of school climate survey 2. (Random survey results from Staff Oevelopncnt) 2.1 Roster of teachers/pnrt icipating staf f 2.1 Evaluation of insorvic- segments by participants3.5 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 Date: September 23, 1993 To: From: Through: Board of Directors Sterling Ingra^^Director Planning, Research and Evaluation\nV'Estelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent Re: Program Planning and Budgeting Process Attached is a preliminary copy of the Program Budget Document for the School Operations section. language is identified in bold type. language is displayed parenthetically. Original Clarifying Schools were requested to provide evidence of completion or status after the end of each quarter as indicated in the Program Planning and Budgeting document. I am available for questions. bjgLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MONITORING AND REPORTING OPERATIONS FLOW Aasistant Suparintandanta Maatar Diakatta Planning, Raaaarch and Evaluation FInancial Sarvloaa School Oparatlona Program Dlakattaa A A Master Dlakstts Financial Information Schools Other Program Managers V V Quarterly ReportProgran Seq *: ProgroM Maae: School Operations Prograa Code: Prieary Leader: Progran Description: LRSD FY 93*94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader: Page: 1 Revision Date: September 23, 1993 District Goal St^iport: Prograe Goal: Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operations. The intent of the school operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSD. Plan References\nFY Prograe Budget\nTTP Expenditures\nRelated Fuiction Codes\n1st Qtr Expend\n2nd Qtr Expend: 3rd Qtr Expend\n4th Qtr Expend\nPrograa Seq f: Prograa Naae: School Operations Progri Code: Prograa Goal: Plan Reference Page Mtaber 1. Page 30 1.1 Page 30 1.2 Page 30 1.3 Page 30 2. Page 30 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Priaary Leader: Secondary Leader: The intent of the school operatiora goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSD. Objectives Strategies Begiming Date Coapletion Date Page: 2 Revision Date: Responsibility Septentier 23, 1993 Evaluation Criteria 1. To ensure an organizational structure which provides equal opportunity and access for parents, students and staff. 1. To review organizational structure in schools and central office to ensure sufficient s(\u0026lt;]port for students and staff success and for the iapleaentation of the desegregation plan. 1.1 Appoint school-based biracial coHsittees to snnitor iaplcaentation and data. (Report to faculty) 1.2 A district-wide biracial coanittee will annitor district-wide desegregation efforts and data and (report to Board) 1.3 Establish a reporting systea. 2. To provide inservice to raise staff auareness/expectations of equity concerns for students. (July 1, 1993) (June 30, 1994) (Principals,, Assistant Supts., Assoc. Supt.) 1. (Sufficient program personnel are in place to meet the needs of all students in the program as measured by the monitoring instrunent) 1. (Satisfactory compliance with the Education Equity Monitoring Docunent) 1.1 Survey of staff  patrons July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 Jme 30, 1994 June 30, 1994 June 30, 1994 Jisie 30, 1994 Principals, Assistant Supts. Assoc. Si^xt. of Educational PrograsB, Assoc, sigyt. for Desegregation Associate S^\u0026gt;ts., Assistant Si\u0026lt;\u0026gt;ts. (Local schools, Staff Development, Communications Dept., Staff Development, Academic Support) 1.1 School-level docuaentation of quarterly meetings (minutes, rosters) 1.2 Report of the biracial coanittee 1.2 (Report from the monitoring of the biracial coninittee to the Board) 1.3 Honitoring reports district-wide biracial coanittees 2. Results of school climate survey 2. (Random survey results from Staff Development)Page: 3 ProgroB Seq f: Revision Date: September 23, 1993 Prograa NasK: School Operations Progri Code: Priaary Leader: Secondary Leader: Program Goal: The intent of the school operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Hiaber 2.1 Page 30 1. (cont'd) 3. Page 30 3.1 Page 30 4. Page 30 Objectives Strategies Begiming Date Coapletfon Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2.1 Inservice cycles for existing ard rww staff including: a. teacher expectatiorm b. working with parents c. at-risk youth d. learning styles 3. To provide programs which raise parental awareness of district structure, policy, and programs and ways to access them. 3. (Programs which demonstrate high quality of parent involvement) 3.1 Mini-seminars at PTA ametinga ard in the coamunity. 3.1 (Evidence of quality programs presented to parents.) 4. To Bionitor school standards to ensure high quality education for all students. July 1, 1993 July 1. 1993 (July 1. 1993) July 1. 1993 July 1. 1993 Jine 30. 1994 Jme 30. 1994 (June 30, 1994) Jme 30. 1994 Jine 30. 1994 Appropriate Associate Si^s.. and Staff Develofxaent (Comruni cat ions Dept.. Staff Development, and Academic Support) District staff PTA Council (local and area) 2.1 Roster of tcachers/participating staff Data-based iaproveamt in targeted stud^ schools 2.1 (Evaluation of inservice segments by participants) 3. Roster of attendance 3.1 Calendar showing prograam held 3.1 (Calendar showing roster of participants and evaluation form) 3.1 (Evidence of parent participation\nincrease in nurber of parents involved in school activities including VIPS, PTA, Parent Forums\nand increase in student achievement date\nand increase in nunber of students above the NCE on Stanford 6 and Abacus)Page: 4 Prograa Seq *: Revision Date: Septeflber 23, 1993 Progn Kaae: School Operations Prograa Code: Priaery Leader: Secondary Leader: Prograa Goal: The intent of the school operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page lhad\u0026gt;er 4.1 Page 30 4.2 Page 30 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1. (cont'd) 4.1 Review data July b 1993 Jme 30, 1994 4.1 (List data, achievement, discipline, promotion, retention, increase or decrease of white students, rxnber above and below state reference point to assess strengths, needs, and strategies.) 4.2. School aonitoring visits July 1, 1993 Jine 30, 1994 Associate Principals, Assistant Si\u0026lt;\u0026gt;ts. Plaming, Research, and Evaluation 4.1 Calenders of visits 4.1 (Staff, facilities, climate, adninistration, organization, and achievement levels) 4.2 Monitoring reports 4.2 (Staff Climate Survey)Prograa Seq *: Prograa Naae: School Operationa Progri Code: Prograa Goal: Plan Reference Page Rudier 2. Page 31 1.1 Page 31 1.2 Page 31 2. Page 31 LRSD FY 93*94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Priiary Leader: Secondary Leader: The Intent of the School Operationa goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Page: 5 Revision Date: Responsibility Septeffijer 23, 1993 Evaluation Criteria 2. To provide a climate in each school which is besed on the belief and expectation that all children can learn ar^ to provide resources necessary to stpport that belief. 2. (To work with teachers and principals to ^velop a positive school climate) 1. Provide education to staff and patrons regarding school culture and positive school climate. 1.1 PTA Board and general meetings to have educational coaponents regarding climate and expectations. 1.1 (LRSD expectations, teacher-designed instrunent, clarify what kind of expectations--achievement, behavior, attendance) 1.2 Use of cable Channel 4 to carry brief messages to staff regarding expectations, working with at-risk and disadvantaged students, and creating positive clisBte. 1.2 (Clarify performance expectations, such as behavior enphasis on students falling below) 2. Monitor school cliamte and resource allocation. 2. (Review of annual school plan) July 1. 1993 July 1. 1993 July 1. 1993 July 1. 1993 June 30. 1994 June 30. 1994 Jtne 30. 1994 Jisa 30. 1994 (Principals, Teachers, Assistant Supts.) District personnel as designated by the Associate Sipt. (Principals, Teachers, Staff Development, Conmunications Office) 1. Utilization of the school clisBte survey 1. (Results of school climate survey report) 1.1 J^endas of aeetings Measurable iaprovesKnts in individual sdKwl cliaates (1.1 Agendas of meetings and evidence of results of school climate survey report) 1.2 (Assessing performance of the school principal)Page: 6 Progri Seq #: Revision Date: September 23, 1993 Prograa Maae: School Operations Prograa Code: Priaary Leader: Secondary Leader: Prograa Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Miatoer 2.1 Page 31 2.2 Page 31 2.3 Page 31 3. Page 31 3.1 Page 31 Objectives Strategies Begiming Date Coagiletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2. (cont'd) 2.1 Monitor facility, staff anrale, student achieveamnt, status of media center books, and materials. 2.1 (Assess staff morale, student achievement, etc.) 2.2 Enhance equipment, stgjplies, and materials in buildings. 2.2 (Provide resources) 2.3 Provide staff developamnt and intervention plans m neiaded. 2.3 (To provide staff development to meet the instructional needs of principals, teachers, and all levels of staff) 3. To work with schools to help them desist programs which meet the specific needs of their students. 3. (Assist teachers and principals in the development of individual programs which address learning needs of students) 3.1 Provide resource assistance to school staffs. 3.1 (Provide resources, both human and financial, to teachers and principals in the development of educational programs) July 1. 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 (July 1, 1993) July 1, 1993 Jisa 30, Jine 30, Jue 30, 1994 1994 1994 (June 30, 1994) Jme 30, 1994 Assistant SlfltS., Principals, Media Si\u0026lt;iervisor Assistant St\u0026lt;its., Principals, Media SiRjervisor (Curriculun Supervisors) Assistant Starts., Principals, Media Supervisor, Identified District Staff (Staff Development) (Associate Supt., Assistant Supts., Curriculum Supvs., Staff Development) Educational Prograae (Associate Supt., Principals) 2.1 Reports of Supervisors, Assistant Supts. 2.2 (Improvement 1n the climate and environment and kinds of materials that are available) 2.3 Staff Development rosters 2.3 (Kinds of staff development programs developed for needs) 2.3 Quality of education survey results 3. (Evidence of implementation of Desegregation Plan and School Improvement Plan) 3.1 Caaf\u0026gt;letian of prograai designPage: 7 ProgrMi Seq f: Revision Date: September 23, 1993 Progroi Maae: School Operations Prograa Code: Prinary Leader: Secondary Leeder: Prograa Goal: The Intent of the School Operations goal 1s to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students 1n the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Riaber 3.2 Page 31 3.3 Page 31 4. Page 32 4.1 Page 32 4.2 Page 32 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coag\u0026gt;letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2. (cont'd) 3.2 Provide planning time and formats to school staffs) 3.3 Develop school profiles which show coa^lete data pictures. Set goals for iafx'ovement. 4. Establish a program to familiarize parents with school expectations and to build a partnership with them. 4.1 Share schools' objectives, discipline policy, standards for testing, placing, and proanting students. 4.1 (At the beginning of school, do an annual school letter that shares policies and objectives) 4.2 Involve parents as full partners In planning at schools for students' growth and success. July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 Jisie 30, 1994 Jine 30, 199( Jine 30, 1994 Jine 30, 1994 Jine 30, 1994 Associate S^\u0026gt;t. for Educational Programs, Principals, School Principals and Staffs (Planning, Research, and Evaluation\nData Processing) (Asst. Supts., Principals, Media Supv.) Principals, Staffs Principals, Staff, PTA Board, Patrons 3.2 School profiles and Bonltored building plans 3.3 (Completed document) 4.1 Development of and sharing of school-based objectives, discipline policies, etc. 4.2 Statistical improveaent In student behavior and achieveaient Prograa Seq f: ProgrsB Nssk: School Operations Prograa Code: Prograa Goal: Plan Reference Page Hiaber 3. Page 33 1.1 Page 33 1.2 Page 33 2. Page 33 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Priaary Leader: Secondary Leader\nThe intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSO. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coagiletion Date Page: 8 Revision Date: Responsibility Septenber 23, 1993 Evaluation Criteria 3. To develop and iapleaent policies Uiich influence school climate and iiqx'ove discipline and student attendant while also meeting individual student needs and learning styles. 3. (Design and put into place programs which improve school climate and improve discipline and student attendance while also meeting individual student needs and learning styles) 1. Provide inservice training to district personnet on discipline in a desegregated setting. 1. (Focus on how to use techniques that foster positive student behavior in a desegregated setting) 1.1 Conduct inservice training on discipline manageaRnt in all local schools. 1.1 (Conduct inservice on an ongoing basis on positive discipline management in all local schools) 1.2 Provide follow-(4\u0026gt; training for new staff on a regular bMis. 1.2 (Provide ongoing training for all staff) 2. Provide inservice to district personnel on behavioral styles and learning styles of students with divergent bactcgromds. 2. (Conduct inservice on an ongoing basis on positive discipline management in all local schools) (July 1, 1993) As needed (July 1, 1993) July 1, 1993 (July 1, 1993) (June 30, 1994) (June 30, 1994) June 30, 1994 (June 30, 1994) (Principals, Parents, Staff Development, Student Hearing Officer) Director of P(B\u0026gt;il Services, BuiIding Principals, Assistant Sipts. (Student Hearing Officer) Bui Iding Principals, Director of Pi\u0026lt;\u0026gt;il Services (Student Hearing Officer) (Director of Pupil Services, BuiIding Principals, Asst. Supts., Student Hearing Officer) 1. (Comparative data annual school report for student attendance and student martagement quarterly reports) 1. (Quarterly discipline management reports that will reflect a decrease in behavior referrals and suspensions) 1.1 (Rosters of meetings) 1.1 (Quarterly discipline management reports that will reflect a decrease in behavior referrals and suspensions) 1.2 (Quarterly discipline management reports that will reflect a decrease in behavior referrals and suspensions) 1.1 (Quarterly discipline management reports that will reflect a decrease in behavior referrals and suspensions)Page: 9 Prograa Seq *: Keviaion Date: Septefrtber 23, 1993 Prograa Maae: School Operationa Prograa Code: Prinry Leader: Secondary Leader: Prograa Goal: The Intent of the School Operationa goal ia to provide equitable educational opportmitiea for all atudenta in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Muad\u0026gt;er 2.1 Page 33 3. Page 33 Objectivea Strategiea Beginning Pate Coapletion Pate Reaponaibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) 2.1 Provide training for school-based iiq\u0026gt;roveaent teem (to involve staff and parents uho Mill train staff at the school site with annual Mintenance). 2.1 (Provide ongoing training for staff to foster positive student behavior) 3. Provide a coaaiittee to review attendance and discipline policies and data on an ongoing basis to ensure equity of policy and policy adainistration. 3. (Each school is to establish a conmittee to conduct quarterly reviews of attendance and discipline data to assess conpliance with the goat of equitable policy and policy adninistration. Condict and report results of quarterly reviews.) July 1, 1993 (July 1, 1993) Jme 30, 1994 (June 30, 1994) Associate Sipts., Staff Developaent, Identified Staff (Principals, Teachers, Hearing Officer, Data Processing)) (Principals, Teachers, Student Hearing Officer) 2.1 (Quarterly reports should include positive as well as negative reports which show an increase in the citizenship honor roll in elementary schools. Should show an increase in the nuiber of students that acquire \"Vs\" and \"2'8\" in citizenship at the secondary level) 3. (Final report of the quarterly reviews)Page: 10 Progn Seq f: Revision Date: Septenber 23, 1993 Prograa Naae: School Operatiom Program Code: Priaary Leader: Secondary Leader\nProgram Goal: The intent of the School Operationa goal is to provide equitable educational opportuiities for alt studaita tn the LRSD. E Plan Reference Page Rudier 3.1 Page 33 3.2 Page 33 3.3 Page 33 4. Page 33 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coag\u0026gt;letion Date Responaibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) 3.1 Coamittee and subcoamittee to include principals, staff, patrons, students (on the secondary level) and at Icmst one (1) Board mraber to review data and recoamend andifications to aeet students' needs and district needs. 3.1 (Establish a district-wide committee to review the local school committee reports which should include attendance, discipline data interventions by race and gender. The district-wide committee will report the results of the review to the Associate Supt. of Desegregation.) 3.2 Revise student handbooks as needed 3.2 (Update student handbooks annually to ensure continued compliance with district attendance and discipline policies) 3.3 The student hearing officer will be responsible for devaluing and monitoring plans to reduce the disparity of disciplinary actions. 3.3 (Use evidence of district-wide reports to provide guidance to local schools in formatting plans to reduce disparity of disciplinary actions) 4. Appoint Joint coamittee with PCSSO and NLRSO. 4. (. . .to establish a uniform attendance and discipline policy.) July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 Jine 30, 1994 Jme 30, 1994 Jine 30, 1994 Jim 30, 1994 Associate Si\u0026lt;its., Principals, Teachers, Director of Pupil Services (Hearing Officer, Desegregation Facilitator) (Principals, Teachers) (Asst. Supts., Teachers, Parents, Principals, Student Hearing Officer) (Associate Supt. for Desegregation) 3.1 (Formal report Identifying results of analysis of data received from local school conmittees about level of conpllance with district attendance and discipline policies) 3.2 (Student handbooks reflect conpliance with current district attendance and discipline policies) 3.3 (Analysis of quarterly reports in chart form to determine decrease in reported discipline sanctions) 4. (Evidence of a uniform discipline policy)Page: 11 Prograa Seq *: Revision Date: Septenber 23, 1993 Prograa Naae: School Operations Progri Code: Priaary Leader: Secondary Leader: Progri Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Mtadaer 4.1 Page 33 5. Page 34 5.1 Page 34 5.2 Page 34 6. Page 34 Objectives Strategies Beginning Pate Coag\u0026gt;letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) 4.1 Review attendance and disciplinary policies and consequences. 5. Put in place alternatives to suaperwion across the district with at least one such intervention to be placed at each school. 5.1 Develop school-based discipline plans to be reviewed at district level and to Include suspension alternatives. 5.2 Effectiveness of these alternatives to be regularly assessed. 6. Establish a school-based student discipline and attendance incentive systea at ea^ school. 6. (. . .as part of the annual school plan which should result in improved attendance and a decrease in disciplinary sanctions.) July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1. 1993 Jme 30, 1994 Jme 30, 1994 Jme 30, 1994 June 30, 1994 Jme 30, 1994 Associate Sights., appointed staff three school districts (use Tri-Pistrict Coaponent) (Principals, staff, Asst. Supts.) Assistant Su^s., Principals, School-based staffs (Principals, Staffs, Schoolbased Coiranittees, Assistant Supts., Hearing Officer) (Principals, Staffs, Schoolbased Committees 4.1 Review and revision of Tri-Pistrict attendance and disciplinary policies 5. (Review of suspensions report to determine decrease in out-of-school suspensions at individual schools) 5.1 (Submission to Asst. Supts. of school plans that identify alternatives to out-of-school suspensions) 5.2 Existence of alternative plan In each buiIding 5.2. (Submission to Asst. Supts. of school plans that identify alternatives to out-of-school suspensions\nevidence of decrease in out*of-school suspensions) 6. (Submission of annual school reports to the Asst. Supts. will give evidence of improvement and a decrease in the attendance and disciplinary sanctions)Pa9e: 12 Prograa Seq f: Revision Date: Septeniwr 23, 1993 Prograa Naae: School Operations Prograa Code: Primary Leader: Secondary Leader: Prograa Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educatioral opportmitiea for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Miafeer 6.1 Page 34 7. Page 34 7.1 Page 34 7.2 Page 34 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date_ Collation Date Responaibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) 6.1 Review research and develop rewards program so that recognition and incentives will be individual to the school. 6.1 (The research will be reviewed anrHjally to determine revision needs of school incentive systems) 7. Provide comseling intervention for students with chronic disciplinary and/or attendance problems. 7.1 Activate discipUne/attendance Intervention teams at school. Mandate the pi^l I services team to do monitoring and involve the comsalor with students who have discipline/attendanca problems. 7.2 Involve parents in the team process regarding their children through meat1ngs/conferences. 7.2 (. . .about identified attendance and/or disciplinary problems) July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 Jme 30, 1994 June 30, 1994 Jme 30. 1994 Jww 30, 1994 Principals/ Staff, Assistant Starts., VIPS, Patrons (Pipil Services Team, Counselors, Parents) Principals, GuidanM Departments, Bui Iding Staffs, School Health Services Coordinator Principals, Parents, PTA Officers, PTA Corneil, Counselors, P4\u0026gt;il Services Tease, School Health Services 6.1 Statistic\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1137","title":"Little Rock School District Court Submission","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1993-07-30"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School improvement programs","Student assistance programs","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District Court Submission"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1137"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 COURT SUBMISSION JULY 30, 1993 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING July 30, 1993 GENERAL CONCEPT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING A comprehensive program planning and budgeting process will improve the district's ability to allocate its revenue rationally and, therefore, have maximum impact on achieving the goals of the district. By linking program objectives and program expenditures we can see more clearly if our money is being spent appropriately. During the planning and budgeting process, we will do the following: 1. Determine the needs of the district, particularly legal obligations under the desegregation and settlement plans. 2. Define goals and objectives. 3. Define programs to achieve those objectives, particularly those required by the desegregation plans. 4. Measure performance and expenditures. 5. Prepare information for corrective decision-making. A. Organizational Structure for Planning and Budgeting Process 1. Key Players - The Superintendent shall lead the planning and budgeting process with direct support from his/her cabinet. The Board is the ultimate decisionmaker for the planning and budgeting process. 2. Description - The planning and budgeting process shall be under the leadership of the Superintendent with LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 2 direct support from the Superintendent's Cabinet. The planning and budgeting process will be coordinated by the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation (PRE) and the Manager of Resources and School Support who both serve on the superintendent's Cabinet. The Board will provide guidance for developing a planning and budgeting calendar. The calendar will allow the Board to continuously monitor progress of the planning and budgeting process. The Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation will be the lead planning person. He/She will ensure that the planning process is conducted according to established timeframes, provide technical assistance, coordinate the planning process, collect appropriate reports, coordinate the preparation of related documents and advise the Superintendent and Board relative to the planning process. In addition, the lead planning person will be responsible for ensuring all requirements from the desegregation plans and court orders are integrated into the planning process. The Director of PRE will be assisted by a Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist whose major responsibility will be district-wide planning. The PRE Specialist will be housed in the PRE office. The job description for the PRE Specialist details the necessary qualifications and job responsibilities (See Attachment 1). LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 3 3. Outcome - An organizational chart that displays the current lines of authority and responsibility is attached (Attachment 2), as well as the proposed Planning and Budget Development Calendar (Attachment 4). 4. Timeframe - The lead planning person will be named in July 1993. The Planning and Budget Development Calendar will be finalized in August 1993. The organizational structure will be reviewed in May 1994 to ensure that the July 1993 configuration is the most effective and efficient arrangement. Necessary revisions and adjustments will be made by the district at that time. B. Needs Assessment A needs assessment is a process of comparing the current situation with the desired conditions. 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide leadership and direction for the needs assessment process. The lead planning person will coordinate the process. The Superintendent's Cabinet will be responsible for directing the staff in the collection of assessment information. The Superintendent and the Cabinet will be the decision-makers for identifying the needs. 2. Description - Utilizing a combination of district-wide perceptual, empirical and objective instruments, data LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 4 will be collected and analyzed to determine the needs of the students, parents, teachers, and administrators. Perceptual information will be collected through broadbased input sessions such as community forums and district dialogue sessions. e community forums will be conducted. One forum each for area schools, magnet schools and incentive schools will be scheduled. Every effort will be made to strategically locate the sessions to accommodate maximum participation. Additional sessions may be scheduled with other focus groups, when necessary. One district dialogue will be conducted with principals, teachers, classified staff, and central office administrators. An administrative work session will be conducted to review and analyze various districtwide reports and objective data. The following data will be reviewed: Arkansas Minimum Performance Test Results Stanford Achievement Test Results Desegregation Monitoring Reports Desegregation Plan Audit LRSD Desegregation Plans and Court Orders Curriculum Audit School Climate/Human Relations Survey Results LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 5 Facilities study Proportional Allocation Formulas Program Inventory A comparison between identified needs and the program inventory will be conducted to determine if there are programmatic gaps and areas of need. 3. outcome - The outcome of the administrative work sessions, community forums and district dialogue sessions will be a list of needs in the curriculum, desegregation, and support areas that will be rank ordered based on supporting data. The Superintendent and Cabinet will begin to identify programs in need of \"fast-track\" evaluations. 4. Timeframe - The needs assessment for the 1994-95 budget process begins in August 1993 with data collection. An initial list will be developed in September 1993. The final list will be developed in November 1993 after the community forums and district dialogues are completed. c. Program Inventory During the needs assessment period which starts in August 1993 for the 1994-95 budget y~ar, current desegregation programs will be identified. 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide overall direction, and the Board will review the findings. The lead planning person will coordinate the collection of basic data and prepare the data into appropriate LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 6 documents for use in goal setting and program modification and/or development. The Cabinet and staff will collect the necessary data. 2. Description - All current programs and services will be identified. Using the desegregation Audit, desegregation programs will be identified and defined first. Non-desegregation programs will be identified, defined and merged with the list of desegregation programs to formulate a composite list of all programs. The desegregation plan and court orders will be reviewed to ensure all obligations related to compliance are operative. Primary and secondary responsible persons will be identified for each program or service. 3. outcome - A Program Inventory Report will be generated and used during the goals and objectives development process, program modification and/or development process, and the budgeting process. 4. Timeframe - The program inventory will be conducted during the needs assessment period. All desegregation programs will be identified in August 1993. The non-desegregation programs should be identified by the completion of the needs assessment period in November 1993. LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 7 D. Planning and Budget Goals The goal setting process helps guide all actions of the administration. The process defines the expected outcomes for a specified period of time. 1. Key Players - The Board and Superintendent will provide leadership for identifying the mission and goals of the district. 'The Cabinet will provide assistance and support by defining objectives for programs which will satisfy the accepted goals. The goal setting process will be coordinated by the lead planning person. 2. Description - The Board will conduct a work session. After reviewing the preliminary list of issues for the needs assessment and the Program Inventory Report, the Board will: * Review and revise, if necessary, the mission statement. * Establish tentative written goals/objectives. The goals and objectives will define what the district expects to realistically accomplish for the year. Goals and objectives that conflict with the desegregation plan will not be adopted. * Review and provide guidance related to proportional allocation formulas (materials and supplies, staffing, etc.). * Establish written priorities. These priorities will guide staff in program modification and program LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page a development, as well as to help allocate funding and resources during the budgeting process. * Identify any additional programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation. * Consider strategies for funding shortfalls. The Cabinet will work to ensure that program goals and evaluation criteria are linked to the established goals. 3. outcome - At the conclusion of the goal setting session(s), the Board will publish: * a written mission statement * written goals * a list of priorities The staff will revise program objectives and evaluation criteria as needed for each program, and these will be incorporated into the Program Budget Document. 4. Timeframe - Although the goal setting process is dependent on the needs assessment and program inventory, it will operate concurrently with them. The work session will be conducted in September 1993. Program objectives and evaluation criteria will be established by November 1993. A status report will also be provided to the Board in November 1993. E. Program Development If a service or program does not exist to support needs addressed by the defined goals, it may be necessary to develop a program or modify an existing program. LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 9 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide leadership and guidance to ensure that goals are achieved by offering the best possible programs. The Cabinet will provide direction to staff in developing, modifying, and implementing effective and efficient programs. The lead planning person will monitor and advise the Superintendent throughout the program modification and development phase. 2. Description - Programs may need to be developed to address newly identified needs or fill gaps. Current programs may have to be modified to successfully meet objectives. Some programs may have to be eliminated. The District will establish a framework for program development. The framework will include: * Overview/Program Description * Program Goals/Objectives * Identified Needs * Target Population * Organizational Management/Personnel * Staff Development * Parental Involvement, if any * Physical Facilities, if any * Identification of possible funding sources * Proposed Budget (start-up costs/recurring costs) * Impact on Desegregation Plan * Evaluation Criteria * Program Budget Document (See Attachment 5, p. 2) LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 10 Program development and modification will be conducted by staff with the appropriate cabinet level official providing oversight to ensure that all tasks are completed in a timely manner. The Superintendent and the Cabinet will review all program development and modification to ensure that commitments in the desegregation plan are not hindered by such program development or modification. 3. outcome - Existing programs and programs that are developed to satisfy a need will include all of the elements for budget development and can be directly placed into the Program Budget Document. 4. Timeframe - The program development process will begin in October 1993, if necessary, and conclude in January 1994. F. Budget Priorities - Budgeting 1. Key Players - The Board is the ultimate decision-making authority on the budget. However, the Superintendent will ensure that a balanced budget is developed that meets the needs and goals of the school district. The Manager for Resources and School Support will coordinate the budget preparation process and the lead planning person will ensure that the planning and budgeting components are linked appropriately. Budget managers will provide input relative to his/her area of LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 11 responsibility. The Controller will produce the budget information. 2. Description - Funds, personnel and facilities will be allocated based on the goals and objectives of the district. Directions for budget preparation will be issued by the Superintendent. These directions will include the identification of all proportional formulas and exceptions. 3. outcome - A budget document will be developed that satisfies traditional budgeting and accounting requirements with a program planning and budgeting component which links the program and budget allocations. Funding of desegregation requirements will be a priority. 4. Timeframe - December - Prepare initial financial forecast for next and out years. - Issue directions for budget preparation. - Budget managers submit requests for 1994-95 school year. - Begin developing program budget document. January - Begin budget development February - Continue budget development. - Continue developing program budget document March - Revise financial forecast. - Revise program budget document April - Complete program budget document LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 12 May-June - Revise budget as needed July - Adopt Budget August - Submit 1994-95 budget to Arkansas Department of Education G. Budget-Planning Document (Program Budget Document) The document will provide the means for monitoring program performance and expenditures throughout the fiscal year. 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide guidance for the development of the document. The Cabinet members will provide program information for their respective areas. The Controller will provide financial information for each program. The lead planning person will coordinate the document into the final product. 2. Description - The Desegregation Audit and Program Inventory will provide the information necessary to develop the initial budget document. Programs will be developed or modified in such a manner that the Program Budget Document (Attachment 5, p. 2) will be a necessary component of the submission. A Cabinet member will be assigned as the responsible primary leader for each identified program. A secondary leader will also be assigned. The primary leader is tasked with ensuring the program meets its objectives, coordinating the required activities or LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 13 strategies, and the preparation and submission of regular reports. 3. outcome - A program budget document will be developed that will become the basis for monitoring and reporting, and will become a guide for interim decision-making. (See Attachment 5) 4. Timeframe - Development of the document will begin in December and be completed in conjunction with the completion of the tentative budget in April. H. Monitoring and Reporting 1. Key Players - The Board and Superintendent will be the recipients of the reporting for oversight and decisionmaking. The lead planning person will coordinate the process and prepare a composite report. The Manager for Resources and School Support will provide matching financial information by program. The Cabinet and Staff will prepare all reporting documents falling within their area of responsibility. 2. Description - The program budget document will be the basis for monitoring and reporting, and will establish the format and design. The document would merge both program performance and expenditure reporting on a quarterly basis. Programs with poor performance or expenditure problems could be addressed with corrective action during the year rather than after the year is completed. LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 14 3. outcome - The result would be a quarterly composite progress report on identified programs within the district, supported with expenditure information. The quarterly report would be an extension of the program budget document. 4. Timeframe - The first report would be generated by the end of October for the period July, August, and September. Subsequent quarterly reports would be due by the end of January, April, and July. I. Program Evaluation Program evaluation will provide an assessment of performance for decision-making purposes. 1. Key Players - The Board and Superintendent are recipients of the evaluations, and will use the information to determine direction and resource allocation. The lead planning person will coordinate the program evaluation process. The Manager of Resources and School Support will provide supporting financial information. The Cabinet and staff will prepare all reporting documents falling within their area of responsibility. 2. Description - During the first year of the planning and budgeting process only, there will be two concurrent and parallel program evaluation components. A regular evaluation and a \"fast-track\" evaluation. A \"fasttrack\" evaluation does not have the details or LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 15 dimension of a regular evaluation, since the evaluative process is conducted in a reduced time frame. After the first year, \"fast-track\" evaluations will be utilized as necessary. Each program will be evaluated through the district's regular program evaluation component. As programs are developed and implemented, they will contain program objectives and evaluation criteria. Special evaluations might be directed by the Superintendent. Programs may be identified for \"fasttrack\" evaluation if they have high impact on the goals and direction of the district. 3. Outcome - Program evaluation information will enable the district to make programmatic decisions in the areas of program modification, program development, program elimination and resource allocation which are the result of careful planning and thoughtful analysis. 4. Timeframe - The initial evaluation period will begin in August 1993 and continue until the initial decision point in the budgeting phase in January 1994. J. Broad-Based Feedback Broad-based feedback is designed to provide feedback to the various groups who participated in the community forum and district dialogues. Every effort will be made to include other interested groups, if needed. 1. Key Players - The Board and the Superintendent will provide direction for the broad-based feedback. The I,RSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING page 16 Director of Communications, with the assistance from the lead planning person, will develop a plan for disseminating information. 2. Description - Seven broad-based feedback sessions will be conducted to provide information relative to the planning and budgeting process to the community and our employees. The target populations will be the same as the broad-based input sessions conducted in October 1993 and November 1993. 3. Outcome - Positive community support in recognition of the thoughtfully planned budgeting process may be generated. 4. Timeframe - Broad-based feedback sessions will be conducted in March 1994. K. summary - A strategy to Address Shortfall of Funding One of the primary goals of the long-range planning and budget process is to instill in the minds of the patrons and others interested in the affairs of the District a new sense of fiscal respo~sibility, accountability and internal program evaluation by the District. Such tools as the program inventory, needs assessment strategies and quarterly reporting will serve to not only strengthen the process, as outlined in the monthly calendar of critical events, but to increase the community's awareness of the Desegregation Plan, the commitments it contains and the District's carefully thought-out process designed to live up to those LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING page 17 commitments. With commitment comes the responsibility of providing funds and ensuring that the funding levels are sufficient to support those programs that are determined by the planning and evaluation process to be effective toward achieving the desired goals. Increased use and refinement of the District's new Position Control Inventory System software should yield valuable data for program evaluation and budget decision making. Internal monthly reporting will be structured to provide more historical data for additional analysis and on-going monitoring. Quarterly monitoring reports, by way of the Program Budget Document, will also be provided. This process, plus the program linkages will serve as the basis for future funding decisions by the Board and the administration. Once these steps and procedures become fully operational, the District will be able to identify those operations which can either be modified or eliminated, thereby serving to demonstrate the level of fiscal responsibility needed to garner community support for future requests for funding. Further, by achieving greater staffing efficiency, reducing over-use of materials and supplies (i.e., through proportional allocations, etc.) and by directing the District's resources toward those programs with demonstrated track records of success, the District will be able to reduce or, hopefully, eliminate its reliance on non-recurring revenue sources. Accordingly, the longrange planning and budget process will be the key component LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING page 18 of the District's strategy to address anticipated funding shortfalls. The continuing Process - Planning and budgeting is a continuing process. As such, the needs assessment and program inventory for FY 1994-95 will begin in May 1994. The lead planning person will review the process and make recommendations for changes to the Superintendent, if necessary. The lead planning person will ensure that the planning process is implemented as designed and coordinate the activities. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist Job Description Attachment 2 Organizational chart Attachment 3 Planning and Budget Cycle Attachment 4 Planning and Budget Calendar Attachment 5 Budget Format LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 July 14, 1993 Attachment 1 PLEASE POST The Little Rock School District is now accepting applications for the following position for the 1993-94 school year: FQSITION: Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist Q!JALIFICATIONS: 1. A master's degree or higher in psychology, counseling or education. 2. Eligibility for an Arkansas teacher or administrator certificate. 3. At least five (5) years of successful public school or higher education experience as a teacher, counselor, psychologist, or administrator. Additional related experience may be substituted for public school experience. 4. Evidence of strong organizational and interpersonal skills. 5. Knowledge of planning concepts and techniques. 6. Demonstrates the conviction that all children can learn and will learn in the Little Rock School District. 7. Evidence of a strong commitment to quality desegregated education. NOTE: APPLICANTS SHOULD BE PREPARED TO SHOW EVIDENCE OF THESE QUALIFICATIONS IN THE INITIAL SCREENING INTERVIEW. REPORTS TO: Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation JOB GOAL: To provide technical support in the area of strategic planning to the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation so that he/she is able to provide the Superintendent and Board of Directors with pertinent evaluative data on all programs and services (both educational and supportive) being provided by the school district. BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES: Provides technical support to the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation in the following ways: 1. Coordinates and provides assistance and technical support for the districtwide planning process. 1anning, Research and Evaluation Specialist Attachment 1 age 2 3. 6. 7. a. 9. 10. 11. Assists in preparing and implementing the planning document. Assists with the collection of reports and other documents related to the planning process. Ensures that all requirements from the desegregation plans and court orders are integrated into the planning process. Keeps continually informed regarding research in educational testing and the development of useful information and improved tests for use in educational and supportive programs. Develops system-wide evaluation designs and develops schedules for implementing the evaluation designs. Administers and/or supervises the administration of group tests. Monitors, on an ongoing basis, the programs being evaluated by the Planning, Research and Evaluation Department. Assists with the supervision and scoring of tests and conducts statistical analysis of test results for all schools and areas of group testing conducted. Prepares informative reports and instructional materials for the guidance of counselors, teachers, and other professionals who use evaluation results and/or test data in performing their own duties. Provides leadership in the development of improved instruments and procedures for evaluating programs and services. 12. Designs and/or administers studies to identify community, fiscal, staff, and other factors which can account for variations in quality within the school system, and suggests ways to improve level of student achievement. 13. Assists with the implementation of data processing programs in the area of student testing and evaluation. 14. Serves as a resource person in planning and conducting inservice educational activities for the improvement of teaching practices in the areas of test construction, test administration, and test results evaluation. 15. Prepares various reports as designated by the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation. 16. Assumes other duties as assigned by the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation. 'ERMS OF EMPLOYMENT: Twelve month annual contract plus Educational Stipend, Car Allowance and Benefits Package. planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist page 3 ~LINE FOR RECEIPT OF APPLICATION: ~ WRITTEN LETTERS OF INQUIRY TO: oirector of Human Resources Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 ~: Attachment 1 INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN THE ABOVE POSITION MUST COMPLETE A VERY RIGOROUS SELECTION PROCESS. THEREFORE, BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL APPLIES FOR A POSITION DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT AN INTERVIEW WILL BE CONDUCTED. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Parwnt Coordinator Comm,i,icationl Plannlna Researdl \u0026amp; Evaluation - . s...,r .. EJom. 18Schoolo _ _ S...,r.,Elem. 14Sc:molo _ _ s...,r .. s.c. 13Schooll Principu Teachera 1. *lncrtive Schoolo (7) Principalo Teachera Principu Teachera New FuturH 0 Alhletica Altemaliw l.esning Responsibilily of Appropriate Assocwe Superinlmdmt **Revisions will be made in accordance with district procedures. Readire Lang-- Foreignur,g\"- Scienc,- Malhemalica Social SludiN Labor Relalio,. ~ - F.,. Ma 0 1natrudional Tedmology phyaical Education Drug Education Ea,tyChildhood 1. Tentative placement in recognition of LRSD Curriculum Audit, 12/21/90, p.102. ATTACHMENT 2 Little Rock School District Organizational Structure JULY 1993 HumanResourooa Vocalional -ralP,ogni,nol  ~~:: Ad..Ed.-n l..ibniry S.rvicaa Controller Facil~ioa S.MON Tranoportation FoodS.rvioe Proc:ursnenl Security/Rial\u0026lt; ~enl lrlonnationSorti:ft Attachment 3 Pl.ANNING /\\ND BUDGETING CYCLE --------------------------,,------ ---------------- l 9 9 3 l 9 9 4 l 9 9 5 /\\CT IV lTI ES July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar . Apr. May June July Aug . Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. - -- ----- ---------+--+--+---l--+--+---1 ..... -~.--+---+---l--+--+---1 ..... --+--+--l fJc~ds Ass~ss1ncnt Regins l===t===l===+===l==\u0026gt; -----------------1---t--- ---t----+---+---1---1-------,---+------1--- - ---+--- PrcHJrc\\m Inventory Degins t12y=I===!===\u0026gt; p===l=-==t~~=et==\u0026gt; . -- - - -----------l---+--+---l ..... --+--+--+---l--+---+---l ..... --+----1---+---1--+--+---l---+--+--+---l--+--+---1 ..... --+---l c\no,, l s/Cbjectives Development l===I==\u0026gt; l===!=== l===l0=\u0026gt; -- - --.. -------- --t---~---t---t-----t---+--+---1---t ---+--+---\u0026gt;----1---t----+--- 1--- ---+----t---t----+---+---+------+---+--- l1roqram Development Mn11 it or i11g and Reportinq (('r i o r quarterly reports) l'royro1m 1::vdluation ==-=l===t===p==-~ =\u0026gt; ==-1=-===1==4==,,!===l=== l==f=\u0026gt;   J===t==,== l===!a==,,!======l===t,==p==I=\u0026gt;     ATTACHMENT 4 PROPOSED PLANNING BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 JULY 1993 ACTIVITY Designate lead planning person Develop proposed budget calendar for budget year 1994-95 Begin Desegregation Program Inventory using desegregation audit as baseline Identify tentative list of various types of districtwide objectives and perceptual data to be collected for the needs assessment AUGUST 1993 ACTIVITY Establish final Budget Calendar for 1994-95 that will allow the Board to monitor progress of the planning and budgeting process Begin to develop monitoring and reporting procedures and issue instructions, as needed. Begin development of proportional allocation formulas Begin data collection Begin to identify programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation Complete Desegregation Program Inventory RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Superintendent Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Superintendent Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Lead Planning Person Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 ATTACHMENT 4 - P. 2 SEPTEMBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) conduct work session for analysis of collected data * Develop preliminary list of issues for needs assessment * Identify the need for program modification or development conduct Board work session * Review preliminary list of issues for needs assessment * Review Desegregation Program Inventory Report * Review and revise, if necessary, the mission statement. * Establish tentative written goals/objectives. * Establish written priorities. * Review and provide guidance related to proportional allocation formulas * Consider strategies for funding shortfall * Identify any additional programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation (End of first quarter reporting period.) Superintendent and Cabinet Board and Superintendent ATTACHMENT 4 - P. 3 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 OCTOBER 1993 ACTIVITY Begin necessary program modification or development Begin to generate broad-based input for budget process Issue first quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report (Program Budget Document) NOVEMBER 1993 ACTIVITY complete the gathering of broad-based input for budget process complete identification of proportional allocation formulas and exceptions complete Needs Assessment listing using information gathered from broad-based input sessions. Finalize program objectives and evaluation criteria for each desegregation program. complete inventory list of non-desegregation programs Status report to Board on Budget Process RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Cabinet and Program Manager Superintendent and Director of Communications Controller Lead Planning Person RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Superintendent and Director of Communications Superintendent Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Lead Planning Person ATTACHMENT 4 - P. 4 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 DECEMBER 1993 ACTIVITY prepare initial financial forecast for next and out years rssue directions for budget preparation Budget managers submit request for 1994-95 school year Begin developing program budget document (End of second quarter reporting period.) JANUARY 1994 ACTIVITY Complete fast-track evaluations Begin Budget Development complete modifications or program development for submission to Superintendent and Cabinet Submit program modifications and development to Board Issue second quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report (Program Budget Document) RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Controller Superintendent Manager Resources and School Support Controller Manager Resources and School Support Controller Controller RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Lead Planning Person Cabinet Manager of Resources and School Support Controller Program Managers in Curriculum, Desegregation, and Resources and School Support Superintendent Controller and Lead Planning Person ATTACHMENT 4 - P. 5 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 FEBRUARY 1994 ACTIVITY continue Budget Development continue developing the program budget document MARCH 1994 ACTIVITY Revise financial forecast Revise the program budget document Provide feedback to input participants (End of third quarter reporting period.) RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Controller Controller RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Controller Controller Superintendent and Director of Communications APRIL 1994 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 ATTACHMENT 4 - P. 6 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) complete program budget document submit proposed budget to Board conduct Board work session on budget Revise budget as needed certified personnel reduction deadline Issue third quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report (Program Budget Document) MAY 1994 ACTIVITY Revise budget as needed Board work session on budget, if needed Approval of tentative budget Classified personnel reduction deadline Reassess planning organization for FY 1994-95 cycle Begin FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Begin program inventory for FY 1994-95 Controller Superintendent Superintendent and Board Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent Controller and Lead Planning Person RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Board and Superintendent Superintendent Superintendent and Cabinet Lead planning person Lead planning person ATTACHMENT 4 - P. 7 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 JUNE 1994 ACTIVITY Revise budget as needed continue FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment continue FY 1994-95 cycle program inventory (End fourth quarter reporting period.) JULY 1994 ACTIVITY Adopt Budget Conduct Board work session on planning and budgeting to include: * defining tentative goals * defining guidelines on broad-based input * designing tentative planning and budget development calendar * defining any \"fast-track\" evaluations Continue FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Continue FY 1994-95 cycle program inventory Issue fourth quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Superintendent and Cabinet Lead planning person Lead planning person RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Board Board and Superintendent Lead planning person Lead planning person Controller and Lead Planning Person AUGUST 1994 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 ATTACHMENT 4 - P. 8 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) submit 1994-95 budget to Arkansas Department of Education Establish final Budget Calendar for FY 1994-95 cycle continue FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment complete FY 1994-95 cycle program inventory (Program Budget Document) Superintendent Superintendent Lead planning person Lead planning person I\\TT I\\CI-IMHH 5 LRSD FY 93-94 TENTATIVE PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Program Seq II : Page: Revision Date: Program Name: Program Code: Primary Leader: Secondary Leader: Program Description: District Goal Support: Program Objective: II Pl\"n References: J FY Program Budget: 1 at Otr E\u0026gt;cpend: 3rd Qt, Expend: YTO Expenditures: 2nd Otr Expend: 4th Otr Expend: LRSD FY 93-94 TENTATIVE PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 2 Program Seq II : Revialo n Dale: Program Nome: Program Code: Primary leader: Secondary LI!  der: Program Objective: Plan Reference Ob)ectivea S!Tateglc  Beginning Completion Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Page Number Date Date -\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_346","title":"''Program Planning and Budgeting''","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1993-07-30"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["''Program Planning and Budgeting''"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/346"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 I COURT SUBMISSION JULY 30, 1993 RECEIVED JUL 3 0 1993 Office of Desegregation Monilonng LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING July 30, 1993 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING GENERAL CONCEPT A comprehensive program planning and budgeting process will improve the district's ability to allocate its revenue rationally and, therefore, have maximum impact on achieving the goals of the district. By linking program objectives and program expenditures we can see more clearly if our money is being spent appropriately. During the planning and budgeting process, we will do the following: 1. Determine the needs of the district, particularly legal obligations under the desegregation and settlement plans. 2. Define goals and objectives. 3. Define programs to achieve those objectives. particularly those reguired by the desegregation plans. 4. Measure performance and expenditures. 5. Prepare information for corrective decision-making. A. Organizational structure for Planning and Budgeting Process 1. Key Players - The Superintendent shall lead the planning and budgeting process with direct support from his/her cabinet. The Board is the ultimate decision- maker for the planning and budgeting process. 2. Description - The planning and budgeting process shall be under the leadership of the Superintendent withLRSD - Page 2 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING direct support from the Superintendent's Cabinet. The planning and budgeting process will be coordinated by the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation (PRE) and the Manager of Resources and School Support who both serve on the Superintendent's Cabinet. The Board will provide guidance for developing a planning and budgeting calendar. The calendar will allow the Board to continuously monitor progress of the planning and budgeting process. The Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation will be the lead planning person. He/She will ensure that the planning process is conducted according to established timeframes, provide technical assistance. coordinate the planning process, collect appropriate reports, coordinate the preparation of related documents and advise the Superintendent and Board relative to the planning process. In addition, the lead planning person will be responsible for ensuring all requirements from the desegregation plans and court orders are integrated into the planning process. The Director of PRE will be assisted by a Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist whose major responsibility will be district-wide planning. The PRE Specialist will be housed in the PRE office. The job description for the PRE Specialist details the necessary qualifications and job responsibilities (See Attachment 1).LRSD - Page 3 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING 3. Outcome - An organizational chart that displays the current lines of authority and responsibility is attached (Attachment 2), as well as the proposed Planning and Budget Development Calendar (Attachment 4). 4. Timeframe - The lead planning person will be named in July 1993. The Planning and Budget Development Calendar will be finalized in August 1993. The organizational structure will be reviewed in May 1994 to ensure that the July 1993 configuration is the most effective and efficient arrangement. Necessary revisions and adjustments will be made by the district at that time. B. Needs Assessment A needs assessment is a process of comparing the current situation with the desired conditions. 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide leadership and direction for the needs assessment process. The lead planning person will coordinate the process. The Superintendent's Cabinet will be responsible for directing the staff in the collection of assessment information. The Superintendent and the Cabinet will be the decision-makers for identifying the needs. 2. Description - Utilizing a combination of district-wide perceptual, empirical and objective instruments, dataLRSD - Page 4 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING will be collected and analyzed to determine the needs of the students, parents, teachers, and administrators. Perceptual information will be collected through broadbased input sessions such as community forums and district dialogue sessions. Three community forums will be conducted. One forum each for area schools, magnet schools and incentive schools will be scheduled. Every effort will be made to strategically locate the sessions to accommodate maximum participation. Additional sessions may be scheduled with other focus groups, when necessary. One district dialogue will be conducted with principals, teachers, classified staff, and central office administrators. An administrative work session will be conducted to review and analyze various districtwide reports and objective data. The following data will be reviewed: Arkansas Minimum Performance Test Results Stanford Achievement Test Results Desegregation Monitoring Reports Desegregation Plan Audit LRSD Desegregation Plans and Court Orders Curriculum Audit School Climate/Human Relations Survey ResultsLRSD - Page 5 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Facilities Study Proportional Allocation Formulas Program Inventory A comparison between identified needs and the program inventory will be conducted to determine if there are programmatic gaps and areas of need. 3. Outcome The outcome of the administrative work sessions, community forums and district dialogue sessions will be a list of needs in the curriculum, desegregation, and support areas that will be rank ordered based on supporting data. The Superintendent and Cabinet will begin to identify programs in need of \"fast-track\" evaluations. 4. Timeframe - The needs assessment for the 1994-95 budget process begins in August 1993 with data collection. An C. initial list will be developed in September 1993. The final list will be developed in November 1993 after the community forums and district dialogues are completed. Progreun Inventory During the needs assessment period which starts in August 1993 for the 1994-95 budget year, current desegregation programs will be identified. 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide overall direction, and the Board will review the findings. The lead planning person will coordinate the collection of basic data and prepare the data into appropriateLRSD - Page 6 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING documents for use in goal setting and program modification and/or development. The Cabinet and staff 2. 3. 4. will collect the necessary data. Description - All current programs and services will be identified. Using the desegregation Audit, desegregation programs will be identified and defined first. Non-desegregation programs will be identified, defined and merged with the list of desegregation programs to formulate a composite list of all programs. The desegregation plan and court orders will be reviewed to ensure all obligations related to compliance are operative. Primary and secondary responsible persons will be identified for each program or service. Outcome - A Program Inventory Report will be generated and used during the goals and objectives development process, program modification and/or development process, and the budgeting process. Timeframe - The program inventory will be conducted during the needs assessment period. All desegregation programs will be identified in August 1993. The non-desegregation programs should be identified by the completion of the needs assessment period in November 1993.LRSD - Page 7 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING D. Planning and Budget Goals The goal setting process helps guide all actions of the administration. The process defines the expected outcomes for a specified period of time. 1. Key Players - The Board and Superintendent will provide leadership for identifying the mission and goals of the district. 'The Cabinet will provide assistance and support by defining objectives for programs which will satisfy the accepted goals. The goal setting process 2. will be coordinated by the lead planning person. Description - The Board will conduct a work session. After reviewing the preliminary list of issues for the needs assessment and the Program Inventory Report, the Board will: * Review and revise, if necessary, the mission statement. * Establish tentative written goals/objectives. The goals and objectives will define what the district expects to realistically accomplish for the year. Goals and objectives that conflict with the desegregation plan will not be adopted. * Review and provide guidance related to proportional allocation formulas (materials and supplies. staffing, etc.). * Establish written priorities. These priorities will guide staff in program modification and programLRSD - Page 8 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING development, as well as to help allocate funding and resources during the budgeting process. * Identify any additional programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation. * Consider strategies for funding shortfalls. The Cabinet will work to ensure that program goals and evaluation criteria are linked to the established goals. 3. Outcome - At the conclusion of the goal setting session(s), the Board will publish: * a written mission statement * written goals * a list of priorities The staff will revise program objectives and evaluation criteria as needed for each program, and these will be incorporated into the Program Budget Document. 4. Timeframe - Although the goal setting process is dependent on the needs assessment and program inventory, it will operate concurrently with them. The E. work session will be conducted in September 1993. Program objectives and evaluation criteria will be established by November 1993. A status report will also be provided to the Board in November 1993. Prograun Development If a service or program does not exist to support needs addressed by the defined goals, it may be necessary to develop a program or modify an existing program.LRSD - Page 9 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide leadership and guidance to ensure that goals are achieved by offering the best possible programs. The Cabinet will provide direction to staff in developing, modifying, and implementing effective and efficient programs. The lead planning person will monitor and advise the Superintendent throughout the program modification and development phase. 2. Description - Programs may need to be developed to address newly identified needs or fill gaps. Current programs may have to be modified to successfully meet objectives. Some programs may have to be eliminated. The District will establish a framework for program development. The framework will include: * Overview/Program Description * Program Goals/Objectives * Identified Needs * Target Population * Organizational Management/Personnel * Staff Development * Parental Involvement, if any * Physical Facilities, if any * Identification of possible funding sources * Proposed Budget (start-up costs/recurring costs) Impact on Desegregation Plan * Evaluation Criteria * Program Budget Document (See Attachment 5, p. 2)LRSD - Page 10 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Program development and modification will be conducted by staff with the appropriate cabinet level official providing oversight to ensure that all tasks are completed in a timely manner. The Superintendent and the Cabinet will review all program development and modification to ensure that commitments in the desegregation plan are not hindered by such program development or modification. 3. Outcome - Existing programs and programs that are developed to satisfy a need will include all of the elements for budget development and can be directly placed into the Program Budget Document. 4. Timeframe - The program development process will begin in October 1993, if necessary, and conclude in January 1994. F. Budget Priorities - Budgeting 1. Key Players - The Board is the ultimate decision-making authority on the budget. However, the Superintendent will ensure that a balanced budget is developed that meets the needs and goals of the school district. The Manager for Resources and School Support will coordinate the budget preparation process and the lead planning person will ensure that the planning and budgeting components are linked appropriately. Budget managers will provide input relative to his/her area ofLRSD - Page 11 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING responsibility. The Controller will produce the budget 2. 3. 4. information. Description - Funds, personnel and facilities will be allocated based on the goals and objectives of the district. Directions for budget preparation will be issued by the Superintendent. These directions will include the identification of all proportional formulas and exceptions. Outcome - A budget document will be developed that satisfies traditional budgeting and accounting requirements with a program planning and budgeting component which links the program and budget allocations. Funding of desegregation requirements will be a priority. Timefreune December - Prepare initial financial forecast for next and out years. - Issue directions for budget preparation. - Budget managers submit requests for 1994-95 school year. - Begin developing program budget document. January - Begin budget development February - Continue budget development. - Continue developing program budget document March - Revise financial forecast. - Revise program budget document April - Complete program budget documentLRSD - Page 12 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING May-June - Revise budget as needed G. July August - Adopt Budget - Submit 1994-95 budget to Arkansas Department of Education Budget-Planning Document (Program Budget Document) The document will provide the means for monitoring program performance and expenditures throughout the fiscal year. 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide guidance for the development of the document. The Cabinet members will provide program information for their respective areas. The Controller will provide financial information for each program. The lead planning person will coordinate the document into the final product. 2. Description - The Desegregation Audit and Program Inventory will provide the information necessary to develop the initial budget document. Programs will be developed or modified in such a manner that the Program Budget Document (Attachment 5, p. 2) will be a necessary component of the submission. A Cabinet member will be assigned as the responsible primary leader for each identified program. A secondary leader will also be assigned. The primary leader is tasked with ensuring the program meets its objectives, coordinating the required activities or IPROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING LRSD - Page 13 strategies, and the preparation and submission of regular reports. 3. Outcome - A program budget document will be developed that will become the basis for monitoring and reporting, and will become a guide for interim decision-making. (See Attachment 5) 4. Timeframe - Development of the document will begin in December and be completed in conjunction with the completion of the tentative budget in April. H. Monitoring and Reporting 1. Key Players - The Board and Superintendent will be the recipients of the reporting for oversight and decision- making. The lead planning person will coordinate the process and prepare a composite report. The Manager for Resources and School Support will provide matching financial information by program. The Cabinet and Staff will prepare all reporting documents falling within their area of responsibility. 2. Description - The program budget document will be the basis for monitoring and reporting, and will establish the format and design. The document would merge both program performance and expenditure reporting on a quarterly basis. Programs with poor performance or expenditure problems could be addressed with corrective action during the year rather than after the year is completed.LRSD - Page 14 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING 3. Outcome - The result would be a quarterly composite progress report on identified programs within the district, supported with expenditure information. The quarterly report would be an extension of the program 4. budget document. Timeframe - The first report would be generated by the end of October for the period July, August, and September. Subsequent quarterly reports would be due by the end of January, April, and July. I. Program Evaluation Program evaluation will provide an assessment of performance for decision-making purposes. 1. Key Players - The Board and Superintendent are recipients of the evaluations, and will use the information to determine direction and resource allocation. The lead planning person will coordinate the program evaluation process. The Manager of Resources and School Support will provide supporting financial information. The Cabinet and staff will 2. prepare all reporting documents falling within their area of responsibility. Description - During the first year of the planning and budgeting process only, there will be two concurrent and parallel program evaluation components, evaluation and a \"fast-track\" evaluation. A regular II fast- A track\" evaluation does not have the details orLRSD - Page 15 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING dimension of a regular evaluation, since the evaluative process is conducted in a reduced time frame. After the first year, \"fast-track\" evaluations will be utilized as necessary. Each program will be evaluated through the district's regular program evaluation component. As 3. 4. J. programs are developed and implemented, they will contain program objectives and evaluation criteria. Special evaluations might be directed by the Superintendent. Programs may be identified for \"fast- track\" evaluation if they have high impact on the goals and direction of the district. Outcome - Program evaluation information will enable the district to make programmatic decisions in the areas of program modification, program development. program elimination and resource allocation which are the result of careful planning and thoughtful analysis. Timeframe - The initial evaluation period will begin in August 1993 and continue until the initial decision point in the budgeting phase in January 1994. Broad-Based Feedback Broad-based feedback is designed to provide feedback to the various groups who participated in the community forum and district dialogues. Every effort will be made to include other interested groups, if needed. 1. Key Players - The Board and the Superintendent will provide direction for the broad-based feedback. TheLRSD - Page 16 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Director of Communications, with the assistance from the lead planning person, will develop a plan for disseminating information. 2. Description - Seven broad-based feedback sessions will be conducted to provide information relative to the planning and budgeting process to the community and our employees. The target populations will be the same as the broad-based input sessions conducted in October 1993 and November 1993. 3. Outcome - Positive community support in recognition of the thoughtfully planned budgeting process may be generated. 4. Timeframe - Broad-based feedback sessions will be conducted in March 1994. K. Summary - A Strategy to Address shortfall of Funding One of the primary goals of the long-range planning and budget process is to instill in the minds of the patrons and others interested in the affairs of the District a new sense of fiscal responsibility, accountability and internal program evaluation by the District. Such tools as the program inventory, needs assessment strategies and quarterly reporting will serve to not only strengthen the process, as outlined in the monthly calendar of critical events, but to increase the community's awareness of the Desegregation Plan, the commitments it contains and the District's carefully thought-out process designed to live up to thoseLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 17 commitments. with commitment comes the responsibility of providing funds and ensuring that the funding levels are sufficient to support those programs that are determined by the planning and evaluation process to be effective toward achieving the desired goals. Increased use and refinement of the District's new Position Control Inventory System software should yield valuable data for program evaluation and budget decision making. Internal monthly reporting will be structured to provide more historical data for additional analysis and on-going monitoring. Quarterly monitoring reports, by way of the Program Budget Document, will also be provided. serve as This process, plus the program linkages will the basis for future funding decisions by the Board and the administration. Once these steps and procedures become fully operational, the District will be able to identify those operations which can either be modified or eliminated, thereby serving to demonstrate the level of fiscal responsibility needed to garner community support for future requests for funding. Further, by achieving greater staffing efficiency, reducing over-use of materials and supplies (i.e., through proportional allocations, etc.) and by directing the District's resources toward those programs with demonstrated track records of success, the District will be able to reduce or, hopefully, eliminate its reliance on non-recurring revenue sources. Accordingly, the long- range planning and budget process will be the key componentLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 18 of the District's strategy to address anticipated funding shortfalls. The Continuing Process - Planning and budgeting is a continuing process. As such, the needs assessment and program inventory for FY 1994-95 will begin in May 1994. The lead planning person will review the process and make recommendations for changes to the Superintendent, if necessary. The lead planning person will ensure that the planning process is implemented as designed and coordinate the activities.ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist Job Description Attachment 2 Organizational chart Attachment 3 Attachment 4 Planning and Budget Cycle Planning and Budget Calendar Attachment 5 Budget FoirmatAttachment 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 please post July 14, 1993 PLEASE POST The Little Rock School District is now accepting applications for the following position for the 1993-94 school year: POSITION: Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist qualifications\n1. A master's degree or higher in psychology, counseling education. or 2. Eligibility for an Arkansas teacher or administrator certificate. 3. At least five (5) years of successful public school or higher 4. 5. 6. 7. NOTE: counselor, psychologist. education experience as a teacher, psychologist, or Additional related experience may be substituted administrator. for public school experience. Evidence of strong organizational and interpersonal skills. Knowledge of planning concepts and techniques. Demonstrates the conviction that all children can learn and will learn in the Little Rock School District. Evidence of a strong commitment to quality desegregated education. APPLICANTS SHOULD BE PREPARED TO SHOW EVIDENCE OF THESE QUALIFICATIONS IN THE INITIAL SCREENING INTERVIEW. reports TO: Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation JOB GOAL: To provide technical support in the area of strategic planning to the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation so that he/she is able to provide the Superintendent and Board of Directors with pertinent evaluative data on all programs and services (both educational and supportive) being provided by the school district. BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES: Provides technical support to the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation in the following ways: 1. Coordinates and provides assistance and technical support for the districtwide planning process.planning. Research and Evaluation Specialist page 2 Attachment 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Assists in preparing and implementing the planning document. Assists with the collection of reports and other documents related to the planning process. Ensures that all requirements from the desegregation plans and court orders are integrated into the planning process. Keeps continually informed regarding research in educational testing and the development of useful information and improved tests for use in educational and supportive programs. Develops system-wide evaluation designs and develops schedules for implementing the evaluation designs. Administers and/or supervises the administration of group tests. Monitors, on an ongoing basis, the programs being evaluated by the Planning, Research and Evaluation Department. Assists with the supervision and scoring of tests and conducts statistical analysis of test results for all schools and areas of group testing conducted. Prepares informative reports and instructional materials for the guidance of counselors, teachers, and other professionals who use evaluation results and/or test data in performing their own duties. Provides leadership in the development of improved instruments and procedures for evaluating programs and services. Designs and/or administers studies to identify community, fiscal, staff, and other factors which can account for variations in quality within the school system, and suggests ways to improve level of student achievement. Assists with the implementation of data processing programs in the area of student testing and evaluation. Serves as a resource person in planning and conducting inservice educational activities for the improvement of teaching practices in the areas of test construction, test administration, and test results evaluation. Prepares various reports as designated by the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation. Assumes other duties as assigned by the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation. TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT: Twelve month annual contract plus Educational Stipend, Car Allowance and Benefits Package.planning. Research and Evaluation Specialist page 3 Attachment 1 gBADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF APPLICATION* pBNP WRITTEN LETTERS OF INQUIRY TO- Director of Human Resources Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 IIOTE: INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN THE ABOVE POSITION MUST COMPLETE A VERY RIGOROUS SELECTION PROCESS. ___ THEREFORE, BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL applies for a position does not NECESSARILY MEAN THAT AN INTERVIEW WILL BE CONDUCTED.ATTACHMENT 2 I I Communicationa Planning Rasaarchl i Equation | I Assoc. Sqpl. Desagretabon I Assoc. Stet. School OperaL I \"Student Aaaignment Hearing Officar I _ Daaegregtfion Fadlitalor Volunleera in Public Sd^b ] I 1 Before- A After- SchoofCARE - Parent RecruHment Crwrdinalor ] ) Parent Coordinator Aaai. Supt., Elem. 16 Schoola . Sipt., Elem. 14 Schoola PrindpEela Teaehera 1. *lncentive Schoola (7) Principe Teachera BOARD OF DIRECTORS Little Rock School District Organizational Structure JULY 1993 Interim Superintendent Reading Aaat. Supt., SSae c. 13Scho^ - Language ArW J Principato 1 Teadwra New Futurea *Athletica Alternative Leamirig 1 *RespoDsibiUty of Appropriate Associate Superinteadail Revisions will be made in accordance with district procedures. 1. I 1 Labor RaMiona Human Ftesoums Foreign Language Sdanoe Mathemalica Social Sludiea I 1 Assoc. SL0. CurricUum I Rne Aria Vocadiortal Manager Resourees and \u0026amp;hool Support ControNer I *lnatnxhor^ Technology *Phyaical Education Drug Education - Early Childhood  Staff Development Tentative placement in recognition of LRSD Curriculum Audit, 12/21/90, p.l02. - Federal Programed x!ti EaceptiorMrf Children Adu* Education 1 FadMiea Servioee 1 Procuramanl Library Servioea Tranaportalion FoodSarvioea 1 4 Security/Riok Manag^enl 1 Mormaiien Sarvicea1 PLANNING AND BUDGETING CYCLE Attachment 3 I -- I ACTIVITIES July Aug. 19 9 3 Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May 3 9 9 4 June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. 19 9 5 Apr. May June July Aug. I Needs Assessment Begins Program Inventory Degins May= Goa 1s/Object ives Development Program Development i Budgeting Budget Document Monitoring and Reporting '(prior qnaiterly reports) Progr-jm EvaluationATTACHMENT 4 PROPOSED PLANNING BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 JULY 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSONfS) Designate lead planning person Superintendent Develop proposed budget calendar for budget year 1994-95 Superintendent and Cabinet Begin Desegregation Program Inventory using desegregation audit as baseline Superintendent and Cabinet Identify tentative list of various types of districtwide objectives and perceptual data to be collected for the needs assessment Superintendent and Cabinet AUGUST 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Establish final Budget Calendar for 1994-95 that will allow the Board to monitor progress of the planning and budgeting process Superintendent Begin to develop monitoring and reporting procedures and issue instructions, as needed. Superintendent and Cabinet Begin development of proportional allocation formulas Superintendent and Cabinet Begin data collection Lead Planning Person Begin to identify programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation Complete Desegregation Program Inventory Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and CabinetATTACHMENT 4 P. 2 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 SEPTEMBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Conduct work session for analysis of collected data Superintendent and Cabinet * Develop preliminary list of issues for needs assessment * Identify the need for program modification or development Conduct Board work session Board and Superintendent * Review preliminary list of issues for needs assessment * Review Desegregation Program Inventory Report * Review and revise, if necessary, the mission statement. * Establish tentative written goals/obj ectives. * Establish written priorities. * Review and provide guidance related to proportional allocation formulas * Consider strategies for funding shortfall * Identify any additional programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation (End of first quarter reporting period.)ATTACHMENT 4 P. 3 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 OCTOBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Begin necessary program modification or development Cabinet and Program Manager Begin to generate broad-based input for budget process Superintendent and Director of Communications Issue first quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report (Program Budget Document) Controller Lead Planning Person NOVEMBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Complete the gathering of broad-based input for budget process Superintendent and Director of Communications Complete identification of proportional allocation formulas and exceptions Superintendent Complete Needs Assessment listing using infoirmation gathered from broad-based input sessions. Superintendent and Cabinet Finalize program objectives and evaluation criteria for each desegregation program. Superintendent and Cabinet Complete inventory list of non-desegregation programs Superintendent and Cabinet Status report to Board on Budget Process Superintendent and Lead Planning PersonATTACHMENT 4 P. 4 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 DECEMBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Prepare initial financial forecast for next and out years Controller Issue directions for budget preparation Superintendent Manager Resources and School Support Controller Budget managers submit request for 1994-95 school year Manager Resources and School Support Controller Begin developing program budget document Controller (End of second quarter reporting period.) JANUARY 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Complete fast-track evaluations Lead Planning Person Cabinet Begin Budget Development Manager of Resources and School Support Controller Complete modifications or program development for submission to Superintendent and Cabinet Program Managers in Curriculum, Desegregation, and Resources and School Support Submit program modifications and development to Board Superintendent Issue second quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report (Program Budget Document) Controller and Lead Planning PersonATTACHMENT 4 P. 5 FEBRUARY 1994 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Continue Budget Development Controller Continue developing the program budget document Controller MARCH 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Revise financial forecast Controller Revise the program budget document Controller Provide feedback to input participants Superintendent and Director of Communications (End of third quarter reporting period.)ATTACHMENT 4 P. 6 APRIL 1994 ACTIVITY PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Complete program budget document Controller Submit proposed budget to Board Superintendent Conduct Board work session on budget Superintendent and Board Revise budget as needed Superintendent and Cabinet Certified personnel reduction deadline Superintendent Issue third guarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report (Program Budget Document) Controller and Lead Planning Person MAY 1994 ACTIVITY Revise budget as needed RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Superintendent and Cabinet Board work session on budget, if needed Superintendent and Cabinet Approval of tentative budget Board and Superintendent Classified personnel reduction deadline Superintendent Reassess planning organization for FY 1994-95 cycle Superintendent and Cabinet Begin FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Lead planning person Begin program inventory for FY 1994-95 Lead planning personATTACHMENT 4 P. 7 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 JUNE 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Revise budget as needed Superintendent and Cabinet Continue FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Lead planning person Continue FY 1994-95 cycle program inventory Lead planning person (End fourth quarter reporting period.) JULY 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Adopt Budget Board Conduct Board work session on planning and budgeting to include: Board and Superintendent * defining tentative goals A A A defining guidelines on broad-based input designing tentative planning and budget development calendar defining any \"fast-track\" evaluations Continue FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Lead planning person Continue FY 1994-95 cycle program inventory Lead planning person Issue fourth quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report Controller and Lead Planning PersonATTACHMENT 4 P. 8 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 AUGUST 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Submit 1994-95 budget to Arkansas Department of Education Superintendent Establish final Budget Calendar for FY 1994-95 cycle Superintendent Continue FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Lead planning person Complete FY 1994-95 cycle program inventory (Program Budget Document) Lead planning personProgram Seq H: Program Name\nProgram Code\nProgram Description: District Goal Support: Program Ob|eclive\nPlfln References: FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: ATTACHMENT 5 LRSD FY 93-94 TENTATIVE PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader Secondary Leader Page: 1 Revision Data\n] l6t Qlr Expend: 2nd Qtr Expend: 3rd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend:ATTACHMENT 5 p.2 Program Seq H: Program Nome\nProgram Code\nProgram Ob|eclive\nPlan Reference Page Number Objectives LRSD FY 93-94 TENTATIVE PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leaden Secondary Leader\nPage\n2 Revision Date\nStrategics Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibi 1ity Evaluation Criteria 1J LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 HI r I\" COURT SUBMISSION JULY 30, 1993 I I I iLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING July 30, 1993 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING GENERAL CONCEPT A comprehensive program planning and budgeting process will improve the district's ability to allocate its revenue rationally and, therefore, have maximum impact on achieving the goals of the district. By linking program objectives and program expenditures we can see more clearly if our money is being spent appropriately During the planning and budgeting process, we will do the following: 1. Determine the needs of the district, particularly legal obligations under the desegregation and settlement plans. 2 . Define goals and objectives. 3. Define programs to achieve those objectives, particularly those required by the desegregation plans. 4. Measure performance and expenditures. 5. Prepare information for corrective decision-making. A. Organizational Structure for Planning and Budgeting Process 1. Key Players - The Superintendent shall lead the planning and budgeting process with direct support from his/her cabinet. The Board is the ultimate decision- maker for the planning and budgeting process. 2. Description - The planning and budgeting process shall be under the leadership of the Superintendent withLRSD - Page 2 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING direct support from the Superintendent's Cabinet. The planning and budgeting process will be coordinated by the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation (PRE) and the Manager of Resources and School Support who both serve on the Superintendent's Cabinet. The Board will provide guidance for developing a planning and budgeting calendar. The calendar will allow the Board to continuously monitor progress of the planning and budgeting process. The Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation will be the lead planning person. He/She will ensure that the planning process is conducted according to established timeframes, provide technical assistance. coordinate the planning process, collect appropriate reports, coordinate the preparation of related documents and advise the Superintendent and Board relative to the planning process. In addition, the lead planning person will be responsible for ensuring all requirements from the desegregation plans and court orders are integrated into the planning process. The Director of PRE will be assisted by a Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist whose major responsibility will be district-wide planning. The PRE Specialist will be housed in the PRE office. The job description for the PRE Specialist details the necessary qualifications and job responsibilities (See Attachment 1).LRSD - Page 3 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING 3. Outcome - An organizational chart that displays the current lines of authority and responsibility is attached (Attachment 2), as well as the proposed Planning and Budget Development Calendar (Attachment 4). 4. Timeframe - The lead planning person will be named in July 1993. The Planning and Budget Development Calendar will be finalized in August 1993. The organizational structure will be reviewed in May 1994 to ensure that the July 1993 configuration is the most effective and efficient arrangement. Necessary revisions and adjustments will be made by the district at that time. B. Needs Assessment A needs assessment is a process of comparing the current situation with the desired conditions. 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide leadership and direction for the needs assessment process. The lead planning person will coordinate the process. The Superintendent's Cabinet will be responsible for directing the staff in the collection of assessment information. The Superintendent and the Cabinet will be the decision-makers for identifying the needs. 2. Description - Utilizing a combination of district-wide perceptual, empirical and objective instruments, dataLRSD - Page 4 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING will be collected and analyzed to determine the needs of the students, parents, teachers, and administrators. Perceptual infoirmation will be collected through broadbased input sessions such as community forums and district dialogue sessions. Three community forums will be conducted. One forum each for area schools, magnet schools and incentive schools will be scheduled. Every effort will be made to strategically locate the sessions to accommodate maximum participation. Additional sessions may be scheduled with other focus groups, when necessary. One district dialogue will be conducted with principals, teachers, classified staff, and central office administrators. An administrative work session will be conducted to review and analyze various districtwide reports and objective data. The following data will be reviewed: Arkansas Minimum Performance Test Results Stanford Achievement Test Results Desegregation Monitoring Reports Desegregation Plan Audit LRSD Desegregation Plans and Court Orders Curriculum Audit School Climate/Human Relations Survey ResultsLRSD - Page 5 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Facilities Study Proportional Allocation Formulas Program Inventory A comparison between identified needs and the program inventory will be conducted to determine if there are programmatic gaps and areas of need. 3. Outcome - The outcome of the administrative work sessions, community forums and district dialogue sessions will be a list of needs in the curriculum, desegregation, and support areas that will be rank ordered based on supporting data. The Superintendent and Cabinet will begin to identify programs in need of \"fast-track\" evaluations. 4. Timeframe - The needs assessment for the 1994-95 budget process begins in August 1993 with data collection. An C. initial list will be developed in September 1993. The final list will be developed in November 1993 after the community forums and district dialogues are completed. Program Inventory During the needs assessment period which starts in August 19 for the 1994-95 budget year, current desegregation programs will be identified. 1. Key Players - The ferintendent will provide overall direction, and the Board will review the findings. The lead planning person will coordinate the collection of basic data and prepare the data into appropriateLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 6 documents for use in goal setting and program modification and/or development. The Cabinet and staff 2. 3. 4. will collect the necessary data. Description - All current programs and services will be identified. Using the desegregation Audit, desegregation programs will be identified and defined first. Non-desegregation programs will be identified. defined and merged with the list of desegregation programs to formulate a composite list of all programs. The desegregation plan and court orders will be reviewed to ensure all obligations related to compliance are operative. Primary and secondary responsible persons will be identified for each program or service. Outcome - A Program Inventory Report will be generated and used during the goals and objectives development process, program modification and/or development process, and the budgeting process. Timeframe - The program inventory will be conducted during the needs assessment period. All desegregation programs will be identified in August 1993. The non-desegregation programs should be identified by the completion of the needs assessment period in November 1993.LRSD - Page 7 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING D. Planning and Budget Goals The goal setting process helps guide all actions of the administration. The process defines the expected outcomes for a specified period of time. 1. Key Players - The Board and Superintendent will provide leadership for identifying the mission and goals of the district. 'The Cabinet will provide assistance and support by defining objectives for programs which will satisfy the accepted goals. The goal setting process will be coordinated by the lead planning person. Description - The Board will conduct a work session. After reviewing the preliminary list of issues for the needs assessment and the Program Inventory Report, the Board will: * Review and revise, if necessary, the mission statement. * Establish tentative written goals/objectives. The goals and objectives will define what the district expects to realistically accomplish for the year. Goals and objectives that conflict with the desegregation plan will not be adopted. * Review and provide guidance related to proportional allocation foirmulas (materials and supplies, staffing, etc.). * Establish written priorities. These priorities will guide staff in program modification and program LRSD - Page 8 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING development, as well as to help allocate funding and resources during the budgeting process. * Identify any additional programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation. * Consider strategies for funding shortfalls. The Cabinet will work to ensure that program goals and evaluation criteria are linked to the established goals. 3. Outcome - At the conclusion of the goal setting session(s), the Board will publish: * a written mission statement * written goals * a list of priorities The staff will revise program objectives and evaluation criteria as needed for each program, and these will be incorporated into the Program Budget Document. 4. Timeframe - Although the goal setting process is dependent on the needs assessment and program inventory, it will operate concurrently with them. The E. work session will be conducted in September 1993. Program objectives and evaluation criteria will be established by November 1993. A status report will also be provided to the Board in November 1993. Prograun Development 3 service or program does not exist to support needs addressed by the defined goals, it may be necessary to develop a program or modify an existing program.LRSD - Page 9 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide leadership and guidance to ensure that goals are I 2. achieved by offering the best possible programs. The Cabinet will provide direction to staff in developing, j modifying, and implementing effective and efficient programs. The lead planning person will monitor and^ advise the Superintendent throughout the program modification and development phase. Description - Programs may need to be developed to address newly identified needs or fill gaps. Current  programs may have to be modified to successfully meet objectives. Some programs may have to be eliminated. The District will establish a framework for program development. The framework will include: * Overview/Program Description * Program Goals/Objectives * Identified Needs A A Target Population Organizational Management/Personnel * Staff Development * Parental Involvement, if any A Physical Facilities, if any Identification of possible funding sources A  Proposed Budget (start-up costs/recurring costs) Impact on Desegregation Plan * Evaluation Criteria A Program Budget Document (See Attachment 5, p. 2)LRSD - Page 10 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Program development and modification will be conducted by staff with the appropriate cabinet level official providing oversight to ensure that all tasks are completed in a timely manner. The Superintendent and the Cabinet will review all program development and modification to ensure that commitments in the desegregation plan are not hindered by such program development or modification. 3. Outcome - Existing programs and programs that are developed to satisfy a need will include all of the elements for budget development and can be directly 4. placed into the Program Budget Document. Timeframe - The program development process will begin in October 1993, if necessary, and conclude in January 1994. F. Budget Priorities - Budgeting 1. Key Players - The Board is the ultimate decision-making authority on the budget. However, the Superintendent will ensure that a balanced budget is developed that meets the needs and goals of the school district. The Manager for Resources and School Support will coordinate the budget preparation process and the lead planning person will ensure that the planning and budgeting components are linked appropriately. Budget managers will provide input relative to his/her area ofLRSD - Page 11 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING responsibility. The Controller will produce the budget 2. 3. 4. information. Description - Funds, personnel and facilities will be allocated based on the goals and objectives of the district. Directions for budget preparation will be issued by the Superintendent. These directions will include the identification of all proportional formulas and exceptions. Outcome - A budget document will be developed that satisfies traditional budgeting and accounting requirements with a program planning and budgeting component which links the program and budget allocations. Funding of desegregation requirements will be a priority. Timeframe - December - Prepare initial financial forecast for next and out years. - Issue directions for budget preparation. - Budget managers submit requests for 1994-95 school year. - Begin developing program budget document. January - Begin budget development February - Continue budget development. - Continue developing program budget document March - Revise financial forecast. - Revise program budget document April - Complete program budget documentPROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING LRSD - Page 12 May-June - Revise budget as needed G. July August - Adopt Budget - Submit 1994-95 budget to Arkansas Department of Education Budget-Planning Document (Program Budget Document) The document will provide the means for monitoring program performance and expenditures throughout the fiscal year. 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide guidance for the development of the document. The Cabinet members will provide program information for their respective areas. The Controller will provide financial infonnation for each program. The lead planning person will coordinate the document into the final product. 2. Description - The Desegregation Audit and Program Inventory will provide the information necessary to develop the initial budget document. Programs will be developed or modified in such a manner that the Program Budget Document (Attachment 5, p. 2) will be a necessary component of the submission. A Cabinet member will be assigned as the responsible primary leader for each identified program. A secondary leader will also be assigned. The primary leader is tasked with ensuring the program meets its objectives, coordinating the required activities orPROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING LRSD - Page 13 strategies, and the preparation and submission of regular reports. 3. Outcome - A program budget document will be developed that will become the basis for monitoring and reporting, and will become a guide for interim decision-making. (See Attachment 5) 4. Timeframe - Development of the document will begin in December and be completed in conjunction with the completion of the tentative budget in April. H. Monitoring and Reporting 1. Key Players - The Board and Superintendent will be the recipients of the reporting for oversight and decision- making. The lead planning person will coordinate the process and prepare a composite report. The Manager for Resources and School Support will provide matching financial information by program. The Cabinet and Staff will prepare all reporting documents falling within their area of responsibility. 2. Description - The program budget document will be the basis for monitoring and reporting, and will establish the format and design. The document would merge both program performance and expenditure reporting on a quarterly basis. Programs with poor performance or expenditure problems could be addressed with corrective action during the year rather than after the year is completed.LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 14 3. Outcome - The result would be a quarterly composite progress report on identified programs within the district, supported with expenditure information. The quarterly report would be an extension of the program 4. budget document. Timeframe - The first report would be generated by the end of October for the period July, August, and September. Subsequent quarterly reports would be due by the end of January, April, and July. I. Program Evaluation Program evaluation will provide an assessment of performance for decision-making purposes. 1. Players  The Board and Superintendent are recipients of the evaluations, and will use the information to determine direction and resource allocation. The lead planning person will coordinate the program evaluation process. The Manager of Resources and School Support will provide supporting financial information. The Cabinet and staff will prepare all reporting documents falling within their area of responsibility. 2. Description - During the first year of the planning and budgeting process only, there will be two concurrent and parallel program evaluation components. A regular evaluation and a \"fast-track\" evaluation. A \"fast- track\" evaluation does not have the details orLRSD - Page 15 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING dimension of a regular evaluation, since the evaluative process is conducted in a reduced time frame. After the first year, \"fast-track\" evaluations will be utilized as necessary. Each program will be evaluated through the district's regular program evaluation component. As programs are developed and implemented, they will contain program objectives and evaluation criteria. Special evaluations might be directed by the Superintendent . Programs may be identified for \"fast- track\" evaluation if they have high impact on the goals and direction of the district. 3. Outcome - Program evaluation information will enable the district to make programmatic decisions in the areas of program modification, program development. program elimination and resource allocation which are the result of careful planning and thoughtful analysis. 4. Timeframe - The initial evaluation period will begin in August 1993 and continue until the initial decision point in the budgeting phase in January 1994. J. Broad-Based Feedback Broad-based feedback is designed to provide feedback to the various groups who participated in the community forum and district dialogues. Every effort will be made to include other interested groups, if needed. 1. Key Players - The Board and the Superintendent will provide direction for the broad-based feedback. TheLRSD - Page 16 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Director of Communications, with the assistance from the lead planning person, will develop a plan for 2. disseminating information. Description - Seven broad-based feedback sessions will be conducted to provide information relative to the planning and budgeting process to the community and our employees. The target populations will be the same as the broad-based input sessions conducted in October 1993 and November 1993. 3. Outcome - Positive community support in recognition of the thoughtfully planned budgeting process may be 4. generated. Timefrzune - Broad-based feedback sessions will be conducted in March 1994. K. Sxunmary - A Strategy to Address Shortfall of Funding One of the primary goals of the long-range planning and budget process is to instill in the minds of the patrons and others interested in the affairs of the District a new sense of fiscal responsibility, accountability and internal program evaluation by the District. Such tools as the program inventory, needs assessment strategies and quarterly reporting will serve to not only strengthen the process. as outlined in the monthly calendar of critical events, but to increase the community's awareness of the Desegregation Plan, the commitments it contains and the District's carefully thought-out process designed to live up to thoseLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 17 commitments. with commitment comes the responsibility of providing funds and ensuring that the funding levels are sufficient to support those programs the planning and evaluation process that are determined by to be effective toward achieving the desired goals. Increased use and refinement of the District's new Position Control Inventory System software should yield valuable data for program evaluation and budget decision making. Internal monthly reporting will be structured to provide more historical data for additional analysis and on-going monitoring. Quarterly monitoring reports, by way of the Program Budget Document, will also be provided. This process, plus the program linkages will serve as the basis for future funding decisions by the Board and the administration. Once these steps and procedures become fully operational, the District will be able to identify those operations which can either be modified or eliminated, thereby serving to demonstrate the level of fiscal responsibility needed to garner community support for future requests for funding. Further, by achieving greater staffing efficiency, reducing over-use of materials and supplies (i.e., through proportional allocations, etc.) and by directing the District's resources toward those programs with demonstrated track records of success, the District will be able to reduce or, hopefully, eliminate its reliance on non-recurring revenue sources. Accordingly, the long- range planning and budget process will be the key componentLRSD - Page 18 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING of the District's strategy to address anticipated funding shortfalls. The Continuing Process - Planning and budgeting is a continuing process. As such, the needs assessment and program inventory for FY 1994-95 will begin in May 1994. The lead planning person will review the process and make recommendations for changes to the Superintendent, if necessary. The lead planning person will ensure that the planning process is implemented as designed and coordinate the activities.ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist Job Description Attachment 2 Organizational chart Attachment 3 Planning and Budget Cycle Attachment 4 Planning and Budget Calendar Attachment 5 Budget FoirmatAttachment 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 PLEASE POST July 14, 1993 PLEASE POST The Little Rock School District is now accepting applications for the following position for the 1993-94 school year\nPOSITION\nPlanning, Research and Evaluation Specialist QOALIFICATIONS\n1. A master's degree or higher in psychology, counseling or education. 2. Eligibility for an Arkansas teacher or administrator certificate. 3. At least five (5) years of successful public school or higher education experience as a teacher, counselor, psychologist, or Additional related experience may be substituted or 4. 5. 6. 7. NOTE\nadministrator. for public school experience. Evidence of strong organizational and interpersonal skills. Knowledge of planning concepts and techniques the conviction that all children can learn and will Demonstrates -- learn in the Little Rock School District. Evidence of a strong commitment to quality desegregated education. SHOULD BE PREPARED TO SHOW EVIDENCE OF THESE QPALIFI- APPLICANTS _________________ CATIONS IN THE INITIAL SCREENING INTERVIEW,. REPORTS TO\nDirector of Planning, Research and Evaluation JOB GOAL\ntechnical support in the area of strategic planning to the To provide Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation so that he/she is able to provide the Superintendent and Board of Directors with pertinent evaluative data on all programs and services (both educational and supportive) being provided by the school district. basic performance RESPONSIBILITIES\ntechnical support to the Director of Planning, Research and Provides ----- Evaluation in the following ways\n1. Coordinates and provides assistance and technical support for the districtwide planning process.Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist Page 2 Attachment 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13 . 14. 15. 16. Assists in preparing and implementing the planning document. Assists with the collection of reports and other documents related to the planning process. Ensures that all requirements from the desegregation plans and court orders are integrated into the planning process. Keeps continually informed regarding research in educational testing and the development of useful information and improved tests for use in educational and supportive programs. Develops system-wide evaluation designs and develops schedules for implementing the evaluation designs. Administers and/or supervises the administration of group tests. Monitors, on an ongoing basis, the programs being evaluated by the Planning, Research and Evaluation Department. Assists with the supervision and scoring of tests and conducts statistical analysis of test results for all schools and areas of group testing conducted. Prepares informative reports and instructional materials for the guidance of counselors, teachers, and other professionals who use evaluation results and/or test data in performing their own duties. Provides leadership in the development of improved instruments and procedures for evaluating programs and services. Designs and/or administers studies to identify community, fiscal, staff, and other factors which can account for variations in quality within the school system, and suggests ways to improve level of student achievement. Assists with the implementation of data processing programs in the area of student testing and evaluation. Serves as a resource person in planning and conducting inservice educational activities for the improvement of teaching practices in the areas of test construction, test administration, and test results evaluation. Prepares various reports as designated by the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation. Assumes other duties as assigned by the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation. ?BRM5 of EMPLOYMENT\nTwelve month annual contract plus Educational Stipend, Car Allowance and Benefits Package.Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist Page 3 Attachment 1 DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF APPLICATION\nSEND WRITTEN LETTERS OF INQUIRY TO\nDirector of Human Resources Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 MOTE\nINDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN THE ABOVE POSITION MUST COMPLETE A VERY RIGOROUS SELECTION PROCESS. THEREFORE, BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL APPLIES FOR A POSITION DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT AN INTERVIEW WILL BE CONDUCTED. ATTACHMENT 2  CommuncatiorwIPIannbg Retearchl A Evaluation | I Aaaoc. Supt. Deeegretabon Assoc. Sum. Schod Opera*. *Studam Aaaignmam Hearing Officar } I Oaaagragmion FaoMator Aaat. SupI. Etom. leSchooto . S^)(., Etom. MSdwoto Volumaara in Public Schooli I Principato I Prwvipato Balora- A Aftar- SdwolCARE I - Param Racruttmant CMrdinator Param Coordinator Taactwra Taadwra 1. *lncemM Schools (7) BOARD OF DIRECTORS Little Rock School District Organizational Structure JULY 1993 Interim Superintendent AMt Suol .S*:. I Schoola I 13 T Prkcipada Taachara Naw RAuraa *Athlatics ANamativa Laammg *RespoosibiUty of Approprlale Attociate SuperatteodeDl Revisions will be made in accordance with district procedures. 1. Raading - Languaga ArW I 1 Labor Ralitior* HumanRMOurcas Foratgn Lartguaga Scianca Mathamalica Sedai Studiaa I 1 Assoc. Sqpl. Currtculum I Rna Arts Vocational Manager Rc avl^iool Resources SuRWt ControNar I Inatructional Technology *Physicat Edu^ion - Drug Education - Early Childhood -* Staff Davaloprrtam Tentative placement in recognition of LRSD Curriculum Audit, 12/21/90, p.l02. - Fadar,al aP2mxi,yvnaf Exceptional Chibran Achi Education * Library Sarvioaa F^diitiaa Sarvioaa \" Tranaportaiion Food Sarvioaa Procuramant Saily/Ri\u0026gt;k Managmarn - Mormation Sarvicaa I Attachment 3 ACTIVITIES July Aug. 19 9 3 Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. PIANNING AND BUDGETING CYCLE Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May 3 9 9 4 June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. 19 9 5 Apr. May June July Aug. Needs Assessment Begins Program Inventory Degins JJay- Goals/CbjectIves Development Program Development Budget i ng Budget Document Monitoring and Reporting i (prior quazterly reports) Program Evaluation ATTACHMENT 4 PROPOSED PLANNING BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 JULY 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Designate lead planning person Superintendent Develop proposed budget calendar for budget year 1994-95 Superintendent and Cabinet Begin Desegregation Program Inventory using desegregation audit as baseline Superintendent and Cabinet Identify tentative list of various types of districtwide objectives and perceptual data to be collected for the needs assessment Superintendent and Cabinet AUGUST 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Establish final Budget Calendar for 1994-95 that will allow the Board to monitor progress of the planning and budgeting process Superintendent Begin to develop monitoring and reporting procedures and issue instructions, as needed. Superintendent and Cabinet Begin development of proportional allocation fojrmulas Superintendent and Cabinet Begin data collection Lead Planning Person Begin to identify programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation Complete Desegregation Program Inventory Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet kATTACHMENT 4 P. 2 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 SEPTEMBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Conduct work session for analysis of collected data * Develop preliminary list of issues for needs assessment * Identify the need for program modification or development Conduct Board work session * Review preliminary list of issues for needs assessment * Review Desegregation Program Inventory Report * Review and revise, if necessary, the mission statement. * Establish tentative written goals/obj ectives. * Establish written priorities. * Review and provide guidance related to proportional allocation formulas * Consider strategies for funding shortfall * Identify any additional programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation (End of first quarter reporting period.) Superintendent and Cabinet Board and Superintendent ATTACHMENT 4 P. 3 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 OCTOBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSONfS) Begin necessary program modification or development Cabinet and Program Manager Begin to generate broad-based input for budget process Superintendent and Director of Communications Issue first quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report (Program Budget Document) Controller Lead Planning Person NOVEMBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Complete the gathering of broad-based input for budget process Complete identification of proportional allocation formulas and exceptions Complete Needs Assessment listing using information gathered from broad-based input sessions. Finalize program objectives and evaluation criteria for each desegregation program. Complete inventory list of non-desegregation programs Status report to Board on Budget Process Superintendent and Director of Communications Superintendent Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Lead Planning Person ATTACHMENT 4 P. 4 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 I DECEMBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Prepare initial financial forecast for next and out years Controller Issue directions for budget preparation Superintendent Manager Resources and School Support Controller Budget managers submit request for 1994-95 school year Manager Resources and School Support Controller Begin developing program budget document Controller (End of second quarter reporting period.) JANUARY 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Complete fast-track evaluations Lead Planning Person Cabinet Begin Budget Development Manager of Resources and School Support Controller Complete modifications or program development for submission to Superintendent and Cabinet Submit program modifications and development to Board Issue second quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report (Program Budget Document) Program Managers in Curriculum, Desegregation, and Resources and School Support Superintendent Controller and Lead Planning Person ATTACHMENT 4 P. 5 FEBRUARY 1994 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Continue Budget Development Controller Continue developing the program budget document Controller MARCH 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Revise financial forecast Controller Revise the program budget document Controller Provide feedback to input participants Superintendent and Director of Communications (End of third quarter reporting period.) ATTACHMENT 4 P. 6 APRIL 1994 ACTIVITY PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Complete program budget document Controller Submit proposed budget to Board Superintendent Conduct Board work session on budget Superintendent and Board Revise budget as needed Superintendent and Cabinet Certified personnel reduction deadline Superintendent Issue third quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report (Program Budget Document) Controller and Lead Planning Person MAY 1994 ACTIVITY Revise budget as needed RESPONSIBLE PERSONfS) Superintendent and Cabinet Board work session on budget, if needed Approval of tentative budget Classified personnel reduction deadline Reassess planning organization for FY 1994-95 cycle Begin FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Begin program inventory for FY 1994-95 Superintendent and Cabinet Board and Superintendent Superintendent Superintendent and Cabinet Lead planning person Lead planning person ATTACHMENT 4 P. 7 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 JUNE 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Revise budget as needed Superintendent and Cabinet Continue FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Lead planning person Continue FY 1994-95 cycle program inventory Lead planning person (End fourth quarter reporting period.) JULY 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Adopt Budget Board Conduct Board work session on planning and budgeting to include: Board and Superintendent A A A A defining tentative goals defining guidelines on broad-based input designing tentative planning and budget development calendar defining any \"fast-track\" evaluations Continue FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Lead planning person Continue FY 1994-95 cycle program inventory Lead planning person Issue fourth quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report Controller and Lead Planning Person ATTACHMENT 4 P. 8 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 AUGUST 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Submit 1994-95 budget to Arkansas Department of Education Superintendent Establish final Budget Calendar for FY 1994-95 cycle Superintendent Continue FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Lead planning person Complete FY 1994-95 cycle program inventory (Program Budget Document) Lead planning person Program Seq #: Program Name: Program Code\nProgram DeacrlpUon: District Goal Support: Program Ob(ecllve: Plan Relerencea: FY Program Budget: YTD Expcndlturea\nATTACHMENT 5 LRSD FY 93-94 TENTATIVE PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader\nSecondary Leader Page: 1 Revision Date:  tat Qtr Expend: 2nd Qtr Expend\n3rd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend\nProgram Seq #: Program Nome: Program Code: Program Ob)ecllve: Plan Reference Page Number Oblectives LRSD FY 93-94 TENTATIVE PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader: Secondary Leader: Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date ATTACHMENT 5 p.2 Page\n2 Revision Date: Responsibil ity Evaluation CriteriaI I\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1422","title":"Report: ''Monitoring Report: Pulaski County Special School District School Racial Balance,'' Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["1993-07-19"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School enrollment","School integration","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Monitoring Report: Pulaski County Special School District School Racial Balance,'' Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1422"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["192 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1275","title":"Proceedings: ''Budget Hearing,'' Little Rock School District budget","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1993-07-08"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Court records"],"dcterms_title":["Proceedings: ''Budget Hearing,'' Little Rock School District budget"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1275"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["legal documents"],"dcterms_extent":["45 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1253","title":"Proceedings: ''Budget Hearing,'' Pulaski County Special School District budget","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1993-07-07"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Court records"],"dcterms_title":["Proceedings: ''Budget Hearing,'' Pulaski County Special School District budget"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1253"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["legal documents"],"dcterms_extent":["12 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1553","title":"Court filings concerning legal fees, Ish Incentive School closure, North Little Rock School District planning and integration, and Little Rock School District planning","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1993-07"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Pulaski Association of Classroom Teachers (PACT)","Little Rock School District","Arkansas. Department of Education","North Little Rock High School (North Little Rock, Ark.)","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Education--Economic aspects","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School facilities","School integration","School improvement programs","School enrollment","Ish Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning legal fees, Ish Incentive School closure, North Little Rock School District planning and integration, and Little Rock School District planning"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1553"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["legal documents"],"dcterms_extent":["80 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_926","title":"''Status Report,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1993-07/1993-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School discipline","School employees","School enrollment","School facilities","School improvement programs","Student activities","Student assistance programs","Gifted persons"],"dcterms_title":["''Status Report,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/926"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1125","title":"Little Rock School District Court Submission","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1993-06-30"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","Educational statistics"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District Court Submission"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1125"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\n/ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 COURT SUBMISSION JUNE 30, 1993 \u0026lt;l Little Rock School District Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge and Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Chris: June 30, 1993 This document represents the updated 1993-94 tentative budget as requested in Judge Wright's order of June 15, 1993. Each section that has been revised since the April 26, 1993 document either by court order or by suggestions from the Office of Desegregation Monitoring is included in this submission. Columns for FTE's and 1992-93 unaudited actual expenses (through May 31 , 1993) have been added where ordered. A new section has been inserted to include revenue and expense projections for the next five years presented in a format to include three scenarios. A final budget document will be produced once the District's books have been closed for the 1992-93 fiscal year and Judge Wright has issued any orders that may generate changes. s~~\nrJ~ ~ / // f /~4d4 //M~o.~:~ Controller MDM/cfh 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501).374-3.361 .., 0. lj 1-. ~ 1-, Iii' (l LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1991-94 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PROJECTION (DRAFT 5) 06-30-93 ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROPOSED BUDGET REVISED 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 REVISIONS 1993-94 REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 31,899,357 38,196,979 39,088,120 41,027,982 41,027,982 40% PULLBACK 20,601,593 21,081,833 21,694,576 21,420,949 21,420,949 DELINQUENT TAXES 3,214,974 4,250,186 4,250,186 4,277,692 225,000 4,502,692 EXCESS TREASURERS FEES 118,998 140,858 140,000 145,690 145,690 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 317,646 241,476 300,000 303,000 303,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 120,412 224,667 224,667 245,162 245,162 MISC. AND RENTS 317,978 406,878 461,000 484,050 484,050 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 141,376 354,446 300,000 350,000 350,000 ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 91,322 100,857 100,857 102,874 102,874 TOTAL 56,823,656 64,998,180 66,559,406 68,357,399 225,000 68,582,399 REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 73,971 73,419 73,419 73,419 73,419 SEVERANCE TAX 16,232 15,350 11,000 18,000 18,000 TOTAL 90,203 88,769 84,419 91,419 91,419 REVENUE - STA TE SOURCES MFPA 22,037,764 27,264,460 27,042,713 27,142,713 27,142,713 SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS 10,356,778 8,637,482 8,926,606 8,094,112 8,094,112 SETTLEMENT LOAN 6,000,000 4,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 APPORTIONMENT 73,971 73,426 73,419 0 0 VOCATIONAL 1,265,710 1,513,699 1,341,887 1,341,887 1,341,887 HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 602,063 824,870 821,449 1,210,000 1,210,000 EARLY CHILDHOOD 0 147,050 229,403 240,873 240,873 ORPHAN CHILDREN 8,820 3,000 3,000 3,000 540 3,540 TRANSPORTATION 2,885,960 2,379,879 2,692,563 2,700,000 2,700,000 COMPENSATORY EDUCATION 609,943 858,743 548,034 575,435 575,435 M TO M TRANSFERS 1,007,481 1,770,486 2,490,900 2,883,425 2,883,425 ADULT EDUCATION 624,119 697,589 697,589 768,715 768,715 TOTAL 45,472,609 48,670,684 46,367,563 47,960,160 540 47,960,700 REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES PUBLIC LAW 874 28,585 9,385 40,000 30,000 10,000 40,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 95,588 129,428 262,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 TRANSFER FROM BOND ACCT 613,166 394,675 600,000 400,000 100,000 500,000 TOTAL 737,339 533,488 902,000 1,680,000 110,000 1,790,000 TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 103,123,807 114,291,121 113,913,388 118,088,978 335,540 118,424,518 r LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1991-94 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PROJECTION (DRAFT 5) 06-30-93 ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROPOSED 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 REVENUE-FEDERAL GRANTS CHAPTER I 2,886,618 3,275,099 4,288,755 4,288,755 CHAPTER II 227,900 224,423 215,020 215,020 TITLEVI B 468,964 558,810 589,011 589,011 OTHER 974,090 1,164,511 1,186,464 1,186,464 TOTAL 4,557,572 5,222,843 6,279,250 6,279,250 REVENUE-MAGNET SCHOOLS STATE/LOCAL 12,571,785 13,887,841 14,278,796 14,707,160 TOTAL 12,571,785 13,887,841 14,278,796 14,707,160 TOTAL REVENUE 120,253,164 133,401,805 134,471,434 139,075,388 EXPENSES SALARIES 56,996,869 65,368,035 65,063,011 67,397,356 BENEFITS 7,312,664 8,020,788 8,862,732 8,934,265 DESEGREGATION 14,598,558 15,997,240 17,012,939 18,207,812 SERVICES,SUPP ,EQUIP 17,053,677 15,267,935 14,236,764 14,638,463 DEBT SERVICE 6,646,769 7,950,100 9,597,115 8,870,123 CONTINGENCY 0 0 500,000 1,000,000 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 102,608,537 112,604,098 115,272,561 119,048,019 EXPENSES-FEDERAL GRANTS 4,369,442 5,111,131 6,764,930 6,279,250 EXPENSES-MAGNET SCHOOLS 12,571,785 13,887,841 14,278,796 14,707,160 TOTAL EXPENSES , 119,549,764 131,603,070 136,316,287 140,034,429 INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE 703,400 1,798,735 {1,844,853) (959,042) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL 185,838 373,968 485,680 0 OPERATING 119,574 634,844 2,321,867 962,694 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL 373,968 485,680 0 0 OPERATING 634,844 2,321,867 962,694 3,652 TOTAL 1,008,812 2,807,547 962,694 3,653 BUDGET REVISIONS 335,540 383,002 37,460 307,913 (628,459) 99,916 99,916 235,624 235,624 REVISED 1993-94 4,288,755 215,020 589,01  I 1,186,464 6,279,250 14,707,160 14,707,160 139,410,928 67,780,358 8,971,725 18,515,725 14,010,004 8,870,123 1,000,000 119,147,935 6,279,250 14,707,160 140,134,345 (723,417) 0 962,694 0 239,277 239,277 a I I I I I Date: 06/28/93 Time: 21:05 CERTIFIED UllU REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0115 CERTIFIED INSTRUCT. ASST. 0117 STIPENDS 0130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS-SHORT 0135 SUBST. CERTIFIED LONG TER CERTIFIED NON-CERT IF I ED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0121 MAINTENANCE 0124 CLERICAL OVERTIME 0140 SUBST NON-CERTIFIED-SHORT 0145 SUBST. NON-CERTIFIED LONG NON-CERTIFIED BENEFITS Ut.lU SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0290 OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS BENEFITS PURCHASED SERVICES 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0311 INSTRUCTION SERVICES 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0313 PUPIL SERVICES 0314 STAFF SERVICES 0316 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 0318 BOARD OF ED SERVICES 0319 OTHER PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH 0321 UTILITY SERVICES-NATURAL 0322 UTILITY SERVICES-ELECTRIC 0323 UTlllTY SER-~ATER/SE~AGE/ 0324 CLEANING SERVICES 0325 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0327 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0329 OTHER PROPERTY SERVICES 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 0334 OFF I CE EXPENSES Page 1 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL Little Rock School District Line I tern (Object) Sl.lTlll8ry Actual 1991/92 ,..,.\u0026gt;,ooY,6Z6. 75 $8,212.70 S1,229,076.61 S871,099.40 $326,189.12 S56,324,204.58 S15,076,554.61 S1,129,828.37 S91,812.91 S540,253.81 S28,557.67 S16,867,007.37 S5,570,','U~.fll SO.DO S171,904.40 $3,036,037.39 S153,797.29 S60,097 .43 S8,992,742.29 $327,016.05 SlJ,309.42 Sl,052,785.32 S44,070.20 S40.00 S7,529.35 S57,237.67 S91, 162.34 S563,340.02 S2,651,690.07 S173,066.98 SO.DO S519,413.12 S470,552.36 S50,770.81 S23,214.29 S126,364.09 S710,448.27 S2,555.64 S92, 165.12 ($80.00) Budget 1992/93 ,..\u0026gt;.\u0026gt;,O'J' I ,O'J'0.08 SO.DO S1 ,743,639.54 S900,000.00 SO.DO S56,335,335.62 S16,818, 713.84 SO.DO SO.DO S350,000.00 SO.DO S17, 168,713.84 S9, r t.ll, r t.ll.24 S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 S160,000.00 S73,462.00 S9,962, 190.24 S586,390.00 Sl,000.00 S691,900.00 SO.DO S2,000.00 S0.00 S366,862.00 S70,000.00 S28,000.00 S3,531,500.00 S5,500.00 S15,000.00 S501,558.00 S596,964.28 S42,000.00 S18,464.00 S275,500.00 S562,036.00 S21, 120.00 S73,600.00 SO.OD Budget 1993/94 ,..,.,.,341,853.0J SO.DO S453,431.31 S926,321.00 SO.DO S60,721,605.34 S15, 132,521.65 S1, 136,945.28 SO.DO S416,844.45 SO.DO S16,686,311.38 SS,498,155.35 S6,882.48 S148, 194. 77 S4,343, 130.04 S195,000.00 S60,000.00 Sl0,251,362.64 S621,800.00 S21,015.00 S761,357 .00 S53,440.00 Sl,000.00 SO.OD S752,500.00 S72,100.00 S826 ,700. 00 S2,879, 165.00 S209,950.00 S400,000.00 S200, 300. 00 S506,300.09 S135, 700.00 S15,050.00 S128,650.00 S633,067.30 $24,160.00 S71,343.63 SO.OD Date: 06/28/93 Time: 21 :05 0339 OTHER TRANSPORTATION SERV 0341 TELEPHONE 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING ANO BINOING-EXTE 0362 FREE PRINTED ITEMS 0365 COPIER LEASE 0370 lUIT JON 0380 FOCO SERVICES 0390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES PURCHASED SERVICES MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 0409 SUPPLIES 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES - SP TRACKING 0412 LOCAL SUPPLIES SP TRACKIN 0413 SOFT\\IARE 0414 SUPPLIES 0415 TEST MATERIALS 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0417 SUPPLIES-SUPPLY CENTER 0420 TEXTBOOKS 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0431 LIBRARY REFERENCE MATERIA 0435 0440 PERIOOICALS 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0451 AUDIO-VISUAL MATERIALS 0481 PLUMBING 0482 CARPENTRY 0483 ELECTRIC 0485 AIR CONO/HEAT 0486 BOILERS/SH ENGINES 0488 PAINTING 0489 ROOFING 0490 OTHER SUPPLIES 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 0494 GAME RELATED EXPENSES 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES CAPTI Al OUT LAY 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER Page 2 TOTAL TOTAL little Rock School District line Item (Object) SUllll8ry Actual 1991/92 Sl,430.88 $336,319.73 $91,358.85 $31,382.16 $109,846.69 $120,347.36 S0.00 $419,811.22 $719,470.11 $138,895.91 $90,673.50 S9, 036, 187. 53 S0.00 S1, 929,459.75 Sl,083,539.56 S46,338.38 $253,368.81 $8,107.60 S112,075.84 S0.00 S0.00 ($10.95) $305,577.99 $786.12 $15,527.70 S0.00 $11,275.65 $3,675.18 S6,788.91 S3,326.06 $1,649.24 S8,319.48 S6,972.10 $17,583.01 $3,637.83 S1 ,350. 78 $10,468.47 $110,144.08 $68,869.93 Sl,928.82 S0.00 S4,010 760.34 si ,422,531.06 Budget 1992/93 $0.00 S311,000.00 $96,893.00 $24,950.00 $188,419.20 $169,954.00 S500.00 $470,000.00 $476,187.20 $168,923.00 $32,000.00 S9,328,220.68 S0.00 $1,217,253.12 $798,339.00 S22, 168.00 S54,500.00 SO.OD S53,950.00 $391,889.00 S1,985.00 S955,000.00 $166,200.00 $1,060.00 S0.00 S3,000.00 $45,081.00 $6,830.00 S50,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $0.00 Sl,000.00 S88, 130.00 S71,820.00 S2, 160.00 SO.OD $3,930,365.12 $492,724.84 Budget 1993/94 $0.00 $386,500.00 S99, 273. 70 $18,006.00 $151,399.89 $153,645.50 $515.00 $5'03,000.00 $945,000.00 $190,062.69 S59,380.00 $10,820,380.80 $0.00 $1,415,208.71 $784,000.00 S30,672.04 $33,405.00 S2,000.00 S53,000.00 S470, 112.22 S2,044.55 S981,500.00 S362,677.50 $1,120.80 S0.00 S2,000.00 S26,498.35 S2,150.40 $30,000.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 S15,000.00 S0.00  S0.00 Sl0,300.00 $80,974.40 S71,275.80 S2,224.80 S1,200.00 $4,377,364.57 $689,547.50 Date: 06/28/93 Time: 21 :05 0541 EQUIPMENT PER PROP SP TRA 0542 EQUIPMENT (NOT INVENTORIE 0543 EQUIPMENT (REAL PROPERTY) 0545 EQUIPMENT LEASE PURCHASE 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 0550 VEHICLES 0551 VEHICLES LEASE PURCHASE CAPTIAL OUTLAY OTHER OBJECTS 0610 RED EMPT ION OF PRINCIPAL 0620 INTEREST 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 0635 DUES \u0026amp; FEES - NCA 0640 INSURANCE 0641 PROPERTY INSURANCE 0642 LIABILITY INSURANCE 0649 OTHER INSURANCE 0660 IMPROVEMENT TAX 0690 OTHER EXPENSES OTHER OBJECTS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Page 3 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL Little Rock School District Line Item (Object) SU11118ry Actual 1991/92 $35,417.01 $836.27 $91,527.78 $1,350,643.15 SO.DO $152,106.60 $906,669.49 $3 959 731. 36 $3,393,324.59 $4,904,977.12 $54,716.42 $12,950.00 $1,196,236.20 $50,000.00 $1,817.08 $51,804.85 $8,971.34 $3,738,667.07 $13,413,464.67 $112,604,098.14 Budget 1992/93 SO.DO $0.00 $92,000.00 $1,489,020.00 $136,302.00 $0.00 $910,000.00 $3 120 046.84 $4,597,115.00 $5,000,000.00 $40,645.00 $26,000.00 $1,018,440.00 $0.00 $0.00 $54,775.00 $0.00 $4,690,713.00 $15,427,688.00 $115,272,560.34 $1 Budget 1993/94 $10,000.00 SO.DO $60,000.00 $926,742.00 $52,093.00 $0.00 $0.00 738 382.50 $4,074,616.00 $4,785,507.40 $57,339.50 $17,000.00 $400,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $54,775.00 $15,000.00 $5,148,290.00 $14,552,527.90 $119,147,935.14 Date: 06/28/93 Time: 21:18 Little Rock School District Function Surmary Function Description 1105 FOUR YEAR OLD PROGRAM 1110 KINDERGARTEN 1120 ELEMENTARY 1125 ELEMENTARY MAGNET 1127 SPECIALTY PROGRAMS 1129 SPECIALTY PROGRAM 1130 MIDDLE\\JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1132 JUNIOR HIGH 1135 JUNIOR HIGH MAGNET 1137 JUNIOR HIGH RESTRUCTURE 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 1145 HIGH SCHOOL MAGNET 1146 HIGH SCHOOL STANDARDS 1151 BOYS ATHLETICS 1152 GIRLS ATHLETICS 1154 FOOTBALL/MINOR SPORTS 1155 VOLLEYBALL 1156 BASKETBALL 1157 TRACK,TENNIS,GOLF \u0026amp; S~IMM 1158 BASEBALL 1190 OTHER REGULAR 1191 MULTI-ETHNIC PROGRAM 1193 TRAVELING TEACHERS 1195 ACCELERATED LEARNING 1196 ACCELERATED LEARNING 1199 SUBSTITUTES-INSTRUCTION 1210 ITINERANT INSTRUCTION 1220 RESOURCE ROOM 1230 SPECIAL CLASS 1240 HOMEBOUND AND HOSPITAL 1290 OTHER 1292 EXTENDED YEAR HAND. SERVI 1321 MARKETING/DIST EDCOOP 1322 MARKETING/DIST EDEXPL 1331 BUSINESS ED COOP 1332 BUSINESS ED EXPL 1333 BUSINESS ED-SKILL TR 1341 HEALTH COOP 1351 TRADE \u0026amp; INDCOOP 1352 TRADE \u0026amp; INDEXPL 1353 TRADE \u0026amp; IND-SKILL TR 1354 YOUTH APPRENTICESHIP 1360 HOME ECONOMICS 1362 CONS/HMKG 1371 CAREER ORIENTATION 1392 COORD CAREER-COOP 1393 LOORD CAREEREXPL 1410 ADULT BASIC EDUCATION 1420 ADULT GENERAL EDUCATION 1430 ADULT VOCATIONAL PROGRAM 1440 SPECIAL PROJECTS 1445 IIORKPLACE LITERACY 1490 OTHER ADULT EDUCATION 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION 1560 READING 1570 MATHEMATICS 1580 ACADEMIC PROGRESS GRANTS 1595 COMPENSATORY EDUCATION 1910 GIFTED ANO TALENTED 2111 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2113 SOCIAL IIORK SERVICES 2114 PUPIL ACCOUNTING SERVICES 2120 GUIDANCE SERVICES Page 1 Actual 1991/92 $312,429.70 S3, 107,993.07 $18,957,936.89 $24,950.47 S0.00 $978,337.42 SB, 134,324.61 S0.00 $71,943.05 $429,684.81 S7,856,636.53 S42, 226.16 $2,300.61 $42,098.02 $43,559.23 $47,638.98 $6,490.16 $42,794.32 S9,066.81 $8,946.68 $63,857.99 $690.88 $21,042.56 $2,283,175.79 $17,394.73 S1 ,393,301. 78 S943, 193 .30 S2,065,293.61 S1 ,253,039.78 S255,077.13 $823,730.20 S14, 151. 72 $197,722.24 S2,869.04 $191,121.48 $853,847.88 $970,157.41 $58,755.33 $193,754.91 $619,807.20 S1,016,956.63 $41,764.48 $38,946.63 $670,989.72 S230,724.89 $201,795.03 S0.00 $437,414.74 S186,704.13 S18,949.50 S28, 974. 75 S25 ,545. 75 S35 ,631 .06 S930,948.93 $11,216.41 S288,660.42 $658,575.23 $967,023.83 S1 ,327,011.59 S11,321.52 S0.00 $145,479.23 $1,561,832.32 Budget 1992/93 S1 ,479 ,804 .31 $3,253,398.91 $21,904,944.99 $265,892 . 02 S0.00 S0.00 S8, 635,782.29 S0.00 S212,863.97 $492,021.18 $8,264,041.10 $273,095.96 S0.00 $44,620.00 $13,230.00 $49,680.00 $7,200.00 $45,540.00 $11, 160.00 S10,800.00 $37,696.84 S0.00 s12,ooo.oo $2,275,181.26 S0.00 S1,096,370.00 S901,880.14 S2, 189,284.37 S1,296,582.62 S240,565.63 $435,287.20 S0.00 S194,886.18 S0.00 S190,480.17 S575,813.91 $965,541.57 S50,996.02 S189,221.26 $537,358.99 $852,818.65 $46,025.56 $36,683.42 $664,130.37 S224,651.50 $203,203.43 S21,518.34 $404,251.48 $180,760.35 S39,221.06 S10,001.85 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S280,068.49 $21,519.20 S320,000.00 $862,437.52 $646,481.75 S5, 150.00 S0.00 $14,700.00 $2,475,037.42 Budget 1993/94 S1 ,681,072.65 $3,328,323.45 $23,073,155.13 $173,979.01 S0.00 $86,475.45 $8,790,806.29 $26,783.84 S452, 190.06 $545,069.54 $8,780,756.57 $100,000.00 S0.00 S44, 797 .oo $4,798.20 $49,680.00 $7,416.00 $45,880.20 S11,354.40 $10,800.00 $18,697.00 S0.00 $15,000.00 $1,332,756.42 S0.00 $1,111,585.20 $1,147,624.46 $2,268,606.18 S1 ,377,005.08 S324,980.11 S997,814.22 S5,705.28 S208, 184.71 S0.00 S202,595.86 $652,853.50 S1 ,021, 150.81 S31,974.81 S204, 169 .82 $558,050.96 S933,655.63 S119,623.23 S0.00 S734,449.69 S250,098.90 S215,630.04 S0.00 $427,317.98 S328,075.39 $2,280.00 $953.04 S0.00 so.oo $245,468.62 S22,400.00 s12,ooo.oo S320,000.00 S1, 102,804.02 11,125,514.75 S5,150.00 $122,361.80 S123,025.50 $2,863,409.70 Date: 06/28/93 Time: 21:18 Little Rock School District Function SU11T\\ary Function Description 2121 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2122 COUNSELING SERVICES 2129 OTHER GUIDANCE SERVICES 2134 NURSING SERVICES 2142 PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING SER 2211 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2212 INSTRUCTION AND CURR DEV 2213 INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF TRAIN 2215 INST STAFF TRAINING TES 2216 INST STAFF TRAINING PET 2217 CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT 2218 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION 2219 OTHER IMPROVEMENT OF INST 2222 SCHOOL LIBRARY SERVICES 2223 AUDIOVISUAL SERVICES 2229 OTHER EDUCATIONAL MEDIAS 2310 BOARD OF EDUCATION SERVIC 2314 ELECTION SERVICES 2315 LEGAL SERVICES 2317 AUDIT SERVICES 2319 OTHER BOARD OF EDUCATION 2321 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTEND 2326 DESEGREGATION 2410 OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL 2490 OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES 2510 DIRECTION OF BUSINESS SUP 2521 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2525 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING SERV 2529 OTHER FISCAL ACCOUNTINGS 2539 OTHER FACILITIES ACQ \u0026amp; CO 2541 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2542 UPKEEP OF BUILDINGS 2543 UPKEEP OF GROUNDS 2544 UPKEEP OF EQUIPMENT 2545 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 2546 SECURITY SERVICES 2548 ASBESTOS PROGRAM 2549 OTHER OPER \u0026amp; MAINT 2551 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2552 VEHICLE OPERATION 2553 MONITORING 2554 VEHICLE SERVICING 2572 PURCHASING SERVICES 2573 WAREHOUSING \u0026amp; DISTRIBUTIN 2574 PRINTING, PUB, \u0026amp; DUPLICAT 2585 SAFETY-DRUG TESTING 2587 SAFETY \u0026amp; SECURITY 2589 RISK MANAGEMENT 2590 OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES-BU 2610 DIR OF CENTRAL SUPPORT SE 2623 EVALUATION SERVICES 2632 INTERNAL INFORMATION SERV 2642 RECRUITMENT \u0026amp; PLACEMENTS 2649 OTHER STAFF SERVICES 2664 OPERATIONS 3100 DIRECTION OF COMMUNITY SE 3500 CUSTODY \u0026amp; CARE OF CHILD 3800 INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS 3820 SUMMER SCHOOL 3900 OTHER COMMUNITY SERVICES 3909 DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION 3911 FAMILY LIFE EDUCATION NF 3916 IN-SCHOOL SUSPENSION Page 2 Actual 1991/92 S8,639.40 S1 ,261,361.90 S97,434.27 $791,264.86 S176,515.50 S719, 148. 16 S2, 142,689.55 S2,238.82 SO.OD ss, 110.19 $14,030.26 S19,373.TT S160,312.59 $2,603,586.90 $36,805.75 S76,000.00 $7,335.80 S0.00 S17,092.67 $40,145.00 $288,020.95 $299,408.55 $433,908.55 S5,965,386.34 S20,954.46 $68,273.22 $61,590.54 $322,743.14 $39,078.26 S282, 107 .60 $141,000.45 S9, 226,708. 98 S33,083.92 S21, 096.97 S72,039.62 $41,627.16 STT,068.61 $49,948.00 sss, 779.28 S3, 161,263.57 S321, 718. 14 S3, 199,247.83 S927,587.06 S28,662.15 S98,917.79 S14,588.24 S760,378.15 S1,325,111.52 so.co S497, 991.88 $571,953.63 S182,505.89 S345, 105.31 $92,350.86 S1 ,223,976.26 ($4.59) $117,854.64 $213,563.35 S28,2TT.44 $10,000.00 S73,488.04 $613,400.00 S188,224.19 Budget 1992/93 S12,850.00 SO.DO SO.DO $812,854.26 SO.OD S730,230.41 S2,505,932.99 S14,000.00 S25,000.00 S40,000.00 S13,000.00 SO.OD S182,022.60 S2,459,369.06 S0.00 S86,000.00 SO.OD S16,500.00 $75,000.00 S31,500.00 $281,462.00 S207,342.23 $424,832.88 SS,746,732.23 S28,000.00 $81,630.00 S0.00 $400,971.31 S0.00 S171,900.00 S0.00 S9, 927,586.43 S0.00 so.co so.co so.oo so.co S0.00 S18, 160.00 S3,500,688.20 so.co S3,227,601.09 S1 ,062, 193.80 S11,500.00 S115,000.00 S16,000.00 $754,228.30 S1, 137,255.98 S0.00 S220,363.00 S524, 133 .87 S217,071.80 $426,439.22 S0.00 S1,295,812.40 S115,000.00 S71,000.00 S196,000.00 S0.00 so.oo so.co $530,400.00 so.co Budget 1993/94 S10,850.00 S38,866.41 SO.OD $808,174.81 S197,617.81 $835,518.00 S2,093,315.15 S10 ,713. 11 S16,070.13 S32, 139.33 S10,713.11 S0.00 S119, 112.97 S2,428,502.46 $32,509.56 S86,000.00 S0.00 s20,ooo.oo $350,000.00 S35,000.00 S305, 100.00 S201,3TT.31 $427,921.09 $6,374,937.44 S11,000.00 S87,000.00 S57,833.96 S318,204.67 so.co S250,598.87 $225, 795. 75 S9,414,554.14 S18,000.00 S17,500.00 S76,000.00 S0.00 $69,557.00 S0.00 S21,325.55 $3,534,753.67 S322,795.40 S1,962,888.40 S1,019,468.79 S59,855.60 S126,500.00 S15,000.00 $870,597.06 $450,000.00 S171,500.00 $84,580.22 S518,678.84 S253,828.22 $413,294.28 S0.00 S1,730, 147.47 S220, 112.24 S87,TTO.OO S249,440.00 so.co S0.00 S92,582.42 S530,400.00 so.co Date: 06/28/93 Time: 21:18 Little Rock School District Function SU1111ary Function Description 4900 I OTHER NON-PROGRAMMED CHAR 5100 I BONDED INDEBTEDNESS 6000 I PROVISION FOR CONTINGENCI LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Page 3 Actual 1991/92 s3, n1, 111 .52 $7,950,100.01 $0.00 $112,604,098.14 Budget 1992/93 $3,800,000.00 $9,597,115.00 $700,000.00 $115,272,560.34 Budget 1993/94 $3,915,500.00 $8,870,123.40 s1,ooo,ooo.oo $119,147,935.14 - Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code Description Code Description 1105 FOUR YEAR OLD PROGRAM 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS-SHORT 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0311 INSTRUCTION SERVICES 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0327 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINOINGINTERN 0380 FOOD SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CENTER 0630 OUES \u0026amp; FEES 1105 FOUR YEAR OLD PROGRAM TOTALS Page - Little Rock School District Program Budget  OOH Actual 1991/92 $160,0!!4.04 $133.50 $34,804.41 $417.58 $14,756.93 $9,407.17 $195.00 $650.00 $150.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $7,502.13 $75,122.58 S0.00 $8,516.36 S0.00 S90.00 $312,429.70 Budget 1992/93 $623,446.00 S0.00 $549,439.67 $0.00 $204,639.64 S0.00 S500.00 $0.00 S0.00 $1,000.00 Sl,000.00 Sl,500.00 S0.00 $2,123.00 $40,800.00 $5,200.00 $38,656.00 $11,500.00 S0.00 Sl ,479.804.31 Actual 1992/93 $545,954. 73 S0.00 $238,247.19 S0.00 $59,997.89 $56,027.05 $2,220.35 $4,365.37 S0.00 $509.04 $2,469.00 $532.16 $929.22 $22,195.51 $20,420.00 $3,364.59 $14,243.68 $4,871.27 S45.00 $976,392.05 Budget 1993/94 $974, {33.00 $21,770.40 $289,277.19 S0.00 $90,290.58 $89,110.48 $500.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $4,500.00 S0.00 S0.00 $37,186.69 $76,344.49 $2,709.82 $91,050.00 $3,600.00 S0.00 S1 ,681,072.65 - PROG: BU\u0026gt;004 FTE 1993/94 32.00 28.50 60.50 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code Description 1110 ICINDERGARTEII 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0410 SUPPLIES 0412 LOCAL SUPPLIES SP TRACKIN 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0417 SUPPLIES-SUPP~Y CENTER 1110 KINDERGARTEN TOTALS Page 2 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 Budget 1992/93 $2,rou,904,00 S2,848,548.00 $211,208.33 $370,123.91 $107,742.53 S0.00 S15 123.15 $10,182.00 $13,015.06 $12,968.00 S0.00 $9,592.00 S0.00 Sl,985.00 S3 107 993.07 $3,253,398.91 Actual 1992/93 S2,t.u.,u.r .26 $175,356.70 $117,799.64 $12,508.04 $4,826.62 $3,774.55 $1,075.62 S2 607 568.43 Budget 1993/94 $2,932,915.50 S209, 147.91 $150,491.23 $10,487.46 $13,357.04 $9,879.76 $2,044.55 $3,328,323.45 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 9j.OO . 93.00  Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1120 ELEMENTARY 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0115 CERTIFIED INSTRUCT . ASST. 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0124 CLERICAL OVERTIME 0140 SUBST NON-CERTIFIED-SHORT 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0290 OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0311 INSTRUCTION SERVICES 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0313 PUPIL SERVICES 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EKTE 0365 COPIER LEASE 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0420 TEXTBOOKS 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0542 EQUIPMENT (NOT INVENTORIE 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 1120 ELEMENTARY TOTALS Page 3 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S14,477,326.70 $8,212.70 S3,124.01 Sl,508, 152.07 SO.DO $44,534.64 Sl,227,137.90 SO.OD S437 .86 S767,930.87 S17.85 S0.00 Sl,486.50 SO.DO $6,809.32 $87,961.35 SO.OD $6,679.16 S5,574.58 S2,937.02 $809.23 S13,839.55 S26.35 Sl,402.00 S341,803. 14 S0.00 S0.00 S219,939.73 S231,063.45 S87.41 SO.OD $643.50 S18 957 936.89 Budget 1992/93 S16,554,844.80 SO.DO S422, 103.36 Sl,496,690.80 S0.00 SO.OD S2,295,506.03 SO.OD SO.OD S0.00 SO.DO SO.DO S400.00 SO.DO S16,050.00 S119,250.00 SO.DO S8,750.00 SO.OD S19,500.00 S750.00 SO.DO S42,000.00 S0.00 S185,300.00 S141,100.00 S475,000.00 S44,750.00 S78,950.00 SO.OD S4,000.00 SO.OD S21 904 944.99 Actual 1992/93 S12,002,277.00 S5,386.52 S514,218.60 Sl ,395, 651. 94 S27.98 S33,920.78 Sl,067,016.81 S4,515.59 S297.09 S837,051.68 SO.OD S372.33 SO.DO Sl,436.00 S3,968.46 S71,789.00 S21,542.38 S5,617.68 SO.DO S2,599. 77 Sl,436.98 SO.DO S73,727.09 $639.00 S119,528.29 S144, 754.19 SO.DO S20,962.41 $41,869.45 SO.OD S6,169.79 Sl,220. 00 S16,377,996.81 Budget 1993/94 S16, 958, 101.80 SO.DO S264,281.00 Sl, 791,271.76 SO.OD SO.OD Sl,413,049.48 S5,774.16 S534.92 Sl,225,085.68 SO.DO SO.DO $412.00 S0.00 S16,531.50 S104,802.50 SO.OD S9,012.50 SO.OD $8,725.00 S772.50 SO.OD S55,000.00 S0.00 S261,589.20 S126,961.14 $489,250.00 S246,162.50 S91,717.50 S0.00 S4, 120.00 SO.OD S23 073 155.13 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 536.00 247.00 783.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FIXlCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1125 ELEMENTARY MAGNET 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 1125 ELEMENTARY MAGNET TOTALS Page 4 Little Rock School District Program Budget - DOM Actual 1991/92 so.oo S10, 117.75 SO.DO S774.05 SO.OD $4,002.45 S315.00 SO.OD S9, 741.22 S0.00 S24 950.47 Budget 1992/93 S115,l70.00 SO.OD $43,019.00 S24,103.02 SO.OD s10,ooo.oo S40,000.00 SJ,500.00 S30,000.00 S0.00 S265,892.02 Actual 1992/93 Sr5,325.86 $450.00 S22,190.84 ST,494.43 S6,232.35 SO.OD S200.00 S1 ,472.04 SO.DO S794.61 Sl 14 160.13 Budget 1993/94 S94,710.00 SO.OD S13, 132.45 S7,764. 79 $6,371.77 S5,000.00 S25,000.00 S2,000.00 s20,ooo.oo SO.OD S173 979.01 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 3.00 1.00 4.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1127 SPECIALTY PROGRAMS 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 1127 SPECIALTY PROGRAMS TOTALS Page 5 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD S0.00 SO.OD SO.DO Budget 1992/93 SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD SO.OD SO.OD S0.00 SO.DO Actual 1992/93 S745.00 S56.99 S1, 129.99 S345.56 S179.63 S781.56 S3 238.73 Budget 1993/94 SO.DO SO.DO S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 SO.OD SO.OD PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: D6/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1129 SPECIALTY PROGRAM 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 1129 SPECIALTY PROGRAM TOTALS Page 6 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $908,803.26 $69,523.63 $10.53 S978 337.42 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Budget 1993/94 S75,000.00 $11,475.45 S0.00 $86,475.45 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1130 MIDDLE\\JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0240 INSURANCE 0313 PUPIL SERVICES 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0362 FREE PRINTED ITEMS 0365 COPIER LEASE 0380 FOOD SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0440 PERIOOICALS 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0541 EQUIPMENT PER PROP SP TRA 0542 EQUIPMENT (NOT INVENTORIE 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 1130 MIDDLE\\JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS Page 7 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $6,993,774.56 S9,871.65 S122,710.09 S545, 139. 94 S0.00 S280,979.39 SO.DO S5,084.57 S5,069.80 Sl0,595.02 S0.00 S5,332.50 S4, 799.94 S0.00 Sl0,268.89 Sl.45 Slll,654.96 S0.00 S5,993.57 S571.90 S161.30 S229.74 S21,586.24 S432.00 $67 .10 SO.DO S8 134.324.61 Budget 1992/93 $6,~.606.20 S504,885.62 S158,482.50 S912,355.97 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD S8, 178.00 S8,000.00 S8,090.00 S0.00 S16,500.00 S4,000.00 S500.00 SO.OD S0.00 S68,600.00 S47,000.00 S17,500.00 S900.00 S500.00 S500.00 S14, 184.00 SO .OD SO.OD S5,000.00 S8 635.782.29 Actual 1992/93 $6,006,367.84 S200.00 S95,561.34 $466,436.19 S229.45 S314,857.39 S104.00 S3,811.15 S3,150.20 S5,815.17 S681.60 S2,406.65 S4, 133.93 S102.41 SO.DO S0.00 S46,432 .11 S53,397.68 S2,437.67 S133.60 S0.00 S181.25 S22,916.13 S0.00 SO.DO S12,429.71 S7,041,785.47 Budget 1993/94 S7,540,908.27 SO.OD S104,817.29 S545,813.49 S0.00 $400,054.23 S0.00 $8,038.84 S8,210.00 $8,317.70 SO.OD S7,680.00 $6,620.00 S515.00 SO.DO S0.00 S73,946.46 $48,410.00 S15,860.00 S927.00 S515.00 S515.00 S14,508.00 SO.OD SO.OD S5,150.00 S8 790,806.29 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 l45.20 10.00 255.20 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1132 JUNIOR HIGH 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 1132 JUNIOR HIGH TOTALS Page 8 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 Actual 1992/93 $4,882.45 $373.53 $284.44 S5 540.42 Budget 1993/94 $23,527.00 Sl,677.73 Sl,579.11 $26 783.84 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 1.00 1.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1135 JUNIOR HIGH MAGNET 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0333 TRAVEL 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0362 FREE PRINTED ITEMS 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0420 TEXTBOOKS 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0483 ELECTRIC 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CENTER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 1135 JUNIOR HIGH MAGNET TOTALS Page 9 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 S0.00 $238.75 $18.27 S0.00 $450.00 $1,580.20 $3,938.96 $1,506.99 S0.00 S0.00 $26,272.33 S0.00 S0.00 S627.32 S0.00 S0.00 $34,683.80 S0.00 $2,626.43 S71 943.05 Budget 1992/93 $119,727.20 S0.00 S7,136.77 S0.00 S0.00 S5,000.00 $5,000.00 S5,000.00 S1,000.00 S0.00 $16,000.00 $14,000.00 S5,000.00 $16,000.00 $3,000.00 S0.00 S10,000.00 S5,000.00 S1,000.00 $212,863.97 Actual 1992/93 $33,002.54 SO.OD $2,524.70 $1,504.78 SO.DO $317.00 $1,334.70 S0.00 S610.00 S276.01 $23,890.05 S3, 121.19 S0.00 $4,321.95 so.oo $84.40 $39, 123.14 $3,764.33 S1 ,701.00 $115,575.79 Budget 1993/94 $349,064.10 S0.00 $2,484.93 $1,641.04 SO.OD S2,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,000.00 S1,000.00 S0.00 $28,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 so.oo S0.00 $49,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,000.00 S452, 190.06 PROO: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 1.00 1.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FLnCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1137 JUNIOR HIGH RESTRUCTURE 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0410 SUPPLIES 1137 JUNIOR HIGH RESTRUCTURE TOTALS Page 10 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 $360,111.03 $27,548.18 $16,405.96 $25,619.64 $429,684.81 Budget 1992/93 $431,477.00 $60,544.18 S0.00 S0.00 $492,021.18 Actual 1992/93 J3\\lj, rr2.93 $30,123.70 $24,263.31 $0.00 $448,159.94 Budget 1993/94 $480,373.84 $34,491.95 $30,203.75 $0.00 $545,069.54 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 18.00 18.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fl.a'letion Object Code Description Code Description 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0124 CLERICAL OVERTIME 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0322 UTILITY SERVICES-ELECTRIC 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDINGEXTE 0365 COPIER LEASE 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0412 LOCAL SUPPLIES SP TRACKIN 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0420 TEXTBOOKS 0421 TEXTBOOKS LOCAL SOURCES 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CENTER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 1140 HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS Page 11 Little Rock School District Program Budget ODM Actual 1991/92 $6,490,560.23 S0.00 S137,858.55 S0.00 $507,043.92 S0.00 so.oo $251,408.56 $14,209.44 S224,508.TT S0.00 SS,974.47 S2,486.20 S261.21 $9,661.83 SS,304.53 S2,500.00 $3,114.59 S2.50 $125,476.61 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $35,651.62 S567.89 $39,660.61 S0.00 S385.00 S7 856 636.53 Budget 1992/93 S6, 146,122.20 S457, 719.49 S152, 134.00 S0.00 $790,875.41 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $12,940.00 S0.00 S0.00 S8,000.00 SS,000.00 S250.00 $9,250.00 $11,500.00 S14,500.00 S0.00 S200.00 $69,600.00 SS00.00 $27,000.00 S475,000.00 $44,000.00 S0.00 S34,000.00 S3,800.00 $1,650.00 S8 264,041.10 Actual 1992/93 SS,492,666.20 S0.00 $156,320.95 SS,596.TT $432,579.04 S781.99 S278.44 S279, 774.84 SS,533.16 S0.00 S0.00 SS,080.34 $3,799.13 S0.00 $9,214.98 $2,825.29 $1,516.02 S0.00 S0.00 $52,594.65 S0.00 $42,251.73 S0.00 $92,553.66 S0.00 $25,052.50 S1, 728. 72 $611.00 S6 616,759.41 Budget 1993/94 S6,984,012.8Y S0.00 $179,658.36 S0.00 $511,280.08 S1, 108.32 S0.00 $356,989.06 SS,500.00 S0.00 S0.00 SS,240.00 SS,150.00 S257.50  SS,467.50 SS,635.00 SS,635.00 S0.00 S206.00 $79,958.35 S515.00 $27,810.00 S489,250.00 $69,570.00 S0.00 S32,900.00 $3,914.00 S1 ,699.50 $8,780,756.57 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 l17.00 15.00 232.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Descrlotion 1145 HIGH SCHOOL MAGNET 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0333 TRAVEL 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0380 FOOD SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOICS - LOCAL SClJRCES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 1145 HIGH SCHOOL MAGNET TOTALS . Page 12 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $24,976.12 $587.73 $1,955.62 Sl, 120.42 S0.00 $2,341.45 S0.00 $195.50 $54.00 $1,647.02 S0.00 $7,685.52 $1,662.78 S0.00 $42 226.16 Budget 1992/93 $176,625.00 S0.00 $6,470.96 S0.00 S0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 S0.00 $0.00 $15,000.00 $7,000.00 $20,000.00 $13,000.00 $15,000.00 $273,095.96 Actual 1992/93 $16,998.53 S0.00 $1,300.40 $702.03 $14.40 $8,054.26 $127.00 $0.00 S0.00 $40,224.23 $1,917.71 $27,289.23 $126,235.61 $1, 140.06 $224,003.46 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $8,000.00 $4,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 $64,000.00 $6,000.00 $13,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,000.00 $100,000.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code Descri tion Code - Descri tion 1146 HIGH SCHOOL STANDARDS 3 0 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 1146 HIGH SCHOOL STANDARDS TOTALS Page 13 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 Actual Budget 1993/94 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1151 BOYS ATHLETICS 0410 SUPPLIES 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 1151 BOYS ATHLETICS TOTALS Page 14 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $74.11 $16,944.55 $11,520.00 $13,559.36 $42 098.02 Budget 1992/93 $900.00 $17,200.00 $11,520.00 $15,000.00 $44,620.00 Actual 1992/93 $0.00 $11,030.23 $15,863.00 $12,768.35 $39,661.58 Budget 1993/94 $927.00 $17,350.00 $11,520.00 $15,000.00 $44,797.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 - Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 FlXlCtion Object Code Description Code Description 1152 GIRLS ATHLETICS 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1152 GIRLS ATHLETICS TOTALS Page 15 Little Rock School District Program Budget  OOH Actual 1991/92 $37,979.23 $5,580.00 S0.00 $43 559.23 Budget 1992/93 $7,650.00 $5,400.00 $180.00 $13 230.00 Actual 1992/93 $19,674.43 $5,580.00 S0.00 $25 254.43 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 $4,618.20 $180.00 S4 798.20 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Code - Description Code - Description 1154 FOOTBALL/MINOR SPORTS UJl1 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 1154 FOOTBALL/MINOR SPORTS TOTALS Page 16 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 $1 ~08. lU $24,596.97 $21,533.91 $47 638.98 Budget 1992/93 $1,980.00 $25,200.00 $22,500.00 $49 680.00 Actual 1992/93 $2,507.00 $21,108.82 $25,375.00 $48 990.82 Budget 1993/94 $1,980.00 $25,200.00 $22,500.00 $49 680.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1155 VOLLEYBALL 0130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS-SHORT 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 0494 GAME RELATED EXPENSES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1155 VOLLEYBALL TOTALS Page 17 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S135.00 Sl0.33 S1 ,373. 79 S2,936.04 Sl ,370.00 S665.00 S0.00 S6,490.16 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 Sl,440.00 S3,600.00 Sl,440.00 S720.00 S0.00 S7 200.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 Sl,358.09 S2,813.54 Sl,990.00 S0.00 S232. 10 S6,393.73 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 Sl,483.20 S3,708.00 Sl,483.20 S741.60 S0.00 S7 416.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fi.net ion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1156 BASKETBALL 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 0494 GAME RELATED EXPENSES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1156 BASKETBALL TOTALS Page 18 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 $2,485.02 $0.00 $13,633.08 $26,015.02 $661.20 $0.00 $42,794.32 Budget 1992/93 SJ,240.00 $0.00 $15,300.00 $26,280.00 $720.00 $0.00 $45,540.00 Actual 1992/93 $3,0~4.39 $160.50 $12,039.40 $26,700.00 $0.00 $877.80 $42 832.09 Budget 1993/94 $j,l83.20 $0.00 $15,435.00 $26,420.40 $741.60 $0.00 $45 880.20 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 FlllCtlon Object Code Description Code - Description 1157 TRACIC,TENNIS,GOLF \u0026amp; SIIIMH 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 0494 GAME RELATED EXPENSES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1157 TRACK TENNIS,GOLF \u0026amp; SIIIHH TOTALS Page 19 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 S1,303.29 $4,309.90 S2,851.00 $602.62 SO.OD $9,066.81 Budget 1992/93 S2,880.00 $4,680.00 S2,880.00 S720.00 SO.DO $11. 160.00 Actual 1992/93 S140.00 S2,702.39 SS,320.00 SO.DO S2,959.00 $11,121.39 Budget 1993/94 S2,YU.40 $4,766.40 S2,934.00 S741.60 SO.OD $11,354.40 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Fl.l'ICt ion Object Code Description Code Description 1158 BASEBALL 0491 UN I FORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1158 BASEBALL TOTALS Page 20 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOM Actual 1991/92 $8,946.68 $0.00 $0.00 S8 946.68 Budget 1992/93 $9,000.00 $1,800.00 $0.00 $10 800.00 Actual 1992/93 $4,982.87 $2,000.00 $287.70 $7 270.57 Budget 1993/94 $9,000.00 $1,800.00 $0.00 $10 800.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1190 OTHER REGULAR 01H STIPENDS 0130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS-SHORT 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROO IHPROV 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 1190 OTHER REGULAR TOTALS Page 21 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $27,218.98 S504.40 $2,120.95 $18,025.44 S9,635.92 S18.85 SO.OD $3,337.15 S182.30 S2,814.00 $63 857.99 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S20,000.00 S10,000.00 $48.00 S500.00 S2,429.00 S2,324.84 S2,395.00 S37,696.84 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S15,482.78 S0.00 SO.OD S1,731.18 SO.DO S2,936.00 $20,149.96 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S1,000.00 S10,000.00 $48.00 S500.00 S2,429.00 S2,325.00 S2,395.00 S18,697.00 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1191 MULTI -ETHNIC PROGRAM OlJD SUBSTITUTE TEACH~RS-SHORT 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IHPROV 1191 MULTI-ETHNIC PROGRAM TOTALS Page 22 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $171.12 S13.09 5506.67 $690.88 Budget 1992/93 SD.DD SO.OD SO.OD SO.OD Actual 1992/93 SD.DO SO.OD SO.OD SD.OD Budget 1993/94 SD.OD SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO PROG: BUDOD4 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code Description Code Description 1193 TRAVELING TEACHERS 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 1193 TRAVELING TEACHERS TOTALS Page 23 I I I Little Rock School District Program Budget OOM Actual 1991/92 SO.DOI $21,042.561 s21,042.56 I Budget 1992/93 s12,ooo.001 so.001 s12,ooo.oo I Actual 1992/93 S0.00 $16,011.32 $16,011.32 Budget 1993/94 $15,000.00 S0.00 S15,0DO.DD PROG: BUOD04 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FlllCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1195 ACCELERATED LEARNING 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0290 OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0333 TRAVEL 0380 FOOD SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0413 SOFTWARE 0416 SUPPLIES  SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOl(S - LOCAL SOJRCES 0483 ELECTRIC 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0545 EQUIPMENT LEASE PURCHASE 1195 ACCELERATED LEARNING TOTALS Page 24 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S447, 048. 20 S480.00 $508,728.05 $74,297.38 $69,334.95 $60.00 $1,000.00 $20,042.22 $12,765.00 S0.00 so.oo $58,667.45 S13, 297 .12 S0.00 S2, 727 .03 $4,428.43 $32,735.96 $1,037,564.00 $2 283 175 .79 Budget 1992/93 $358,860.00 S0.00 $601,845.00 $180,762.26 S0.00 S0.00 SS,000.00 SS0,000.00 $714.00 S10,000.00 $50,000.00 S10,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 $8,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S1,000,000.00 $2,275 181.26 Actual 1992/93 S.\u0026gt;vr, 11ll.86 S0.00 $415,952.48 $62,207.94 $77,754.28 S0.00 $925.00 $14,283.78 S0.00 $1,286.73 S0.00 $21,455.98 $736.64 $3,575.87 S196.41 S0.00 $7,009.54 $1,037,564.00 $2 040 131.51 Budget 1993/94 $491,815.94 S0.00 $292,702.65 $57,434.87 $68,302.97 S0.00 $3,000.00 $18,000.00 $300.00 S4,000.00 $5,000.00 $27,000.00 $1,200.00 S0.00 S2,000.00 $0.00 S12,000.00 $350,000.00 $1,332 756.42 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 15.00 39.00 54.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1196 ACCELERATED LEARNING 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0421 TEXTBOOICS - LOCAL SOORCES 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 1196 ACCELERATED LEARNING TOTALS Page 25 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S52.75 S10,553.14 $6,676.57 S112.27 S17,394.73 Budget 1992/93 SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO Actual 1992/93 SO.DO SO.OD SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO Budget 1993/94 SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fi.,ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 1199 SUBSTITUTES-INSTRUCTION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS-SHORT 0135 SUBST. CERTIFIED LONG TER 0140 SUBST NON-CERTIFIED-SHORT 0145 SUBST. NON-CERTIFIED LONG 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 1199 SUBSTITUTES-INSTRUCTION TOTALS Page 26 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 S33,360.18 $869,871.30 S326, 189.12 S33,985.53 S28,557.67 S101,337.98 S0.00 SO.OD Sl,393,301.78 Budget 1992/93 SO.OD S900,000.00 SO.DO s100,ooo.oo SO.OD S96,370.00 SO.DO SO.OD Sl.096,370.00 Actual 1992/93 S30,693.49 S1,285,230.67 SO.DO S115,688.90 SO.DO S109,653.58 S18.42 S30.83 Sl 541.315.89 Budget 1993/94 SO.OD S926,321.00 SO.DO S185,264.20 SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD Sl,111,585.20 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fl61Ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 1210 IT I NE RANT INSTRUCTION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1210 ITINERANT INSTRUCTION TOTALS Page 27 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 5842,551.43 $64,456.02 $33,503.54 $1,797.08 S0.00 $885.23 $943 193.30 Budget 1992/93 $793,737.00 $104,043.14 S0.00 Sl,600.00 S0.00 $500.00 $901 880.14 Actual 1992/93 $739,887.39 $56,601.38 $38,273.58 $1,531.80 $13.70 $126.60 $836 434.45 Budget 1993/94 $1,018,946.50 $72,661.61 $53,716.35 S2,000.00 S0.00 $300.00 $1 147 624.46 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 47.00 47.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 FlXlCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1220 RESOORCE ROC'f4 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES  SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1220 RESOORCE ROC'f4 TOTALS Page 28 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 S1 ,848,lZY.2.5 S0.00 $141,389.11 $70,776.20 $4,025.53 S0.00 $873.54 $2,065,293.61 Budget 1992/93 Sl,9.52,,u .. 54 $5,294.20 $244,297.63 S0.00 $6,700.00 S0.00 $200.00 $2,189,284.37 Actual 1992/93 Sl,554,460.39 SO.DO $118,917.31 $78,850.74 $998.21 $344.20 $0.00 $1,753,570.85 Budget 1993/94 $2,020,960.81 S0.00 $144,115.83 $101,329.54 S2,000.00 $0.00 $200.00 $2,268,606.18 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 78.00 78.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1230 SPECIAL CLASS 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0410 SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1230 SPECIAL CLASS TOTALS Page 29 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 s1. 111,088.:,1 $8,833.77 $85,674.58 $44,680.29 $2,762.63 S0.00 $1 253.039.78 Budget 1992/93 s1,120,622.oo $18,108.00 $152,152.62 S0.00 $2,700.00 $3,000.00 $1.296 582.62 Actual 1992/93 $969,932.60 $1,972.10 $74,351.53 $49,861.62 $455.23 S0.00 $1 096 573.08 Budget 1993/94 $1,224,YYY.00 S0.00 $87,355.36 S61, 150.71 $2,000.00 $1,500.00 $1 377 005.08 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 38.00 38.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code Description Code Description 1240 HOMEBOUND AND HOSPITAL 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCf 0410 SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1240 HOMEBOUND AND HOSPITAL TOTALS Page 30 little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 $187,392.42 S27, 128.44 $16,410.60 $9,873.13 $8,794.35 $5,478.19 S255 077 .13 Budget 1992/93 $194,977.00 $8,231.00 S25, 157.63 SO.DO S7,200.00 S5,000.00 $240,565.63 Actual 1992/93 $128,692.54 $22,963.99 $11,602.26 S9, 152.81 $6,973.12 $1,652.14 $181,036.86 Budget 1993/94 $250,543.00 $27,376.49 $19,973.89 $16,286.73 Sl,800.00 S3,000.00 S324 980.11 PROO: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 8.00 3.00 11.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Fl.l'lCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1290 OTHER 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0370 TUITION 1290 OTHER TOTALS Page 31 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 5131,rrY.18 $10,081.27 $5,414.12 $55,658.30 S0.00 $1,318.97 ' $619,478.36 $823 730.20 Budget 1992/93 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 $90,000.00 $2,100.00 $2,000.00 $341,187.20 $435,287.20 Actual 1992/93 $100,899:58 $7,718.81 $5,108.07 $36,041.12 $315.38 S0.00 $845,484.28 $995,567.24 Budget 1993/94 $127,075.40 $9,782.62 $7,956.20 $50,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $800,000.00 $997,814.22 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 5.00 5.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 fu,ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 1292 EXTENDED YEAR HAND. SERVI 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0410 SUPPLIES 1292 EXTENDED YEAR HAND. SERVI TOTALS Page 32 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 $8,351.70 $638.88 $1,926.00 $2,842.80 $392.34 $14,151.72 Budget 1992/93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Actual 1992/93 $2,692.50 $205.97 $1,049.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,947.47 Budget 1993/94 $3,705.28 $0.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,705.28 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 F1.r1ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 1321 MARKETING/DIST ED-COOP 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 1321 MARKETING/DIST EDCOOP TOTALS Page 33 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 $178,612.16 $13,663.95 $4,702.49 $0.00 $743.64 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $197 722.24 Budget 1992/93 $172,446.00 $19,870.18 $0.00 $500.00 $2,070.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $194.886.18 Actual 1992/93 $181,931.00 $13,917.34 $6,555.75 $0.00 $64.89 $140.14 $1,124.70 $2,410.68 $129.49 $206 273.99 Budget 1993/94 $185,705.47 $13,242.74 $6,589.40 $515.00 $2,132.10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $208 184.71 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 4.00 4.00 Date: D6/3D/93 Time: D9:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1322 MARKETING/DIST ED-EXPL DllD REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX D240 INSURANCE 1322 MARKETING/DIST ED-EXPL TOTALS Page 34 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S2,594.76 S196.50 S75.76 S2,669.04 Budget 1992/93 SD.DO S0.00 SO.OD SO.DD Actual 1992/93 SO.OD SO.DD SD.DD SD.DD Budget 1993/94 SD.00 SD.DD SD.DO SD.DD PROG: BUDDD4 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1331 BUSINESS ED COOP 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPL! ES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 1331 BUSINESS ED COOP TOTALS Page 35 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 $172,933.32 $13,229.16 $4,786.82 SO.DO $172.18 S0.00 $191,121.48 Budget 1992/93 $169,737.00 $19,643.17 S0.00 $200.00 $900.00 S0.00 $190 480.17 Actual 1992/93 $160,265.55 $12,260.19 $5,833.53 $173.76 S814.n $179.96 $179 527.76 Budget 1993/94 $181,901.88 $12,971.54 $6,589.44 $206.00 $927.00 S0.00 $202,595.86 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 4.00 4.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1332 BUSINESS ED EXPL 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0413 SOFTIIARE 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT -PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 1332 BUSINESS ED EXPL TOTALS Page 36 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $506,226.88 $38,726.16 $17,724.45 $2,396.10 $7,730.99 $152.16 $0.00 $280,891.14 S0.00 $853 847.88 Budget 1992/93 $476,049.00 $60,214.91 S0.00 $8,000.00 $3,150.00 $0.00 S0.00 $28,400.00 S0.00 $575 813.91 Actual 1992/93 $456,428.24 $34,916.74 $21,239.05 $3,157.50 $602.13 S0.00 $3,306.91 S2, 184.91 $300.48 $522,135.96 Budget 1993/94 $548,626.86 $39,122.83 $24,367.31 $8,240.00 $3,244.50 S0.00 S0.00 $29,252.00 S0.00 $652 853.50 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 16.00 16.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1333 BUSINESS ED-SKILL TR 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 0413 SOFTIJARE 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0420 TEXTBOOKS 0421 TEXTBOOKS LOCAL SOURCES 0440 PERIOOICALS 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1333 BUSINESS ED-SKILL TR TOTALS Page 37 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 Sff.\u0026gt;,JOO.Jf S59, 157.48 $23,214.52 $23,416.90 S0.00 $12,848.99 $13,608.14 S0.00 ($10.95) $10,714.68 $101. 92 S0.00 $53,805.36 S970 157.41 Budget 1992/93 $749,126.00 $90,956.57 S0.00 $23,000.00 S0.00 $47,279.00 $13,500.00 S0.00 S0.00 $4,500.00 S0.00 $180.00 $37,000.00 $965 541.57 Actual 1992/93 S739, 709. TB $56,587.95 $30,389.36 $19,445.31 $170.36 $4,108.72 S0.00 $5,862.74 S0.00 $206.17 $79.87 S0.00 $93,230.18 $949,790.44 $1 Budget 1993/94 S834, 157.76 $59,484.22 $35,692.57 $20,963.00 S0.00 $41,180.85 $13,905.00 S0.00 S0.00 $4,635.00 S0.00 S185.40 $10,947.00 021 150.81 PROG: BI.J0004 FTE 1993/94 22.00 22.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fi.net ion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1341 HEALTH COOP 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOtCS - LOCAL SOORCES 0440 PERIOOICALS 1341 HEALTH COOP TOTALS Page 38 little Rock School District Program Budget - COM Actual 1991/92 $51,573.76 $3,945.39 $1,215.22 S0.00 Sl,419.47 S0.00 $561.59 $39.90 $58,755.33 Budget 1992/93 $41,005.00 $4,791.02 S0.00 S200.00 S5,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 sso 996.02 Actual 1992/93 $58,359.84 $4,464.55 $2,335.28 S0.00 $207. 76 $207.09 $504.71 S0.00 $66,079.23 Budget 1993/94 $23,373.75 Sl,666.79 S1 ,578.27 S206.00 $5,150.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $31,974.81 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 1.00 1.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description u51 TRADE \u0026amp; IND-COOP 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SCXJRCES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1351 TRADE \u0026amp; IND-COOP TOTALS Page 39 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S175, 108.76 S13,395.97 $4,771.13 SO.DO S274.91 SO.OD S204.14 SO.DO S193 754.91 Budget 1992/93 S166,361.DO S19,360.26 S0 . 00 S500.00 SO.OD SO.DO S0.00 S3,000.00 S189,221.26 Actual 1992/93 S160,487.17 S12,277.36 S5,835.37 SO.DO SO.OD S28.05 SO.DO S143.69 S178, 771.64 Budget 1993/94 S181,065.18 S12,911.79 $6,587.85 S515.00 SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO S3,090.00 S204. 169 .82 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 4.00 4.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FLllCt ion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1352 TRADE \u0026amp; INDEXPL 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0413 SOFTIIARE 0416 SUPPLIES  SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS LOCAL SOURCES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0543 EQUIPMENT (REAL PROPERTY) 0548 EQUIPMENT  SUPPLY CENTER 1352 TRADE \u0026amp; INDEXPL TOTALS Page 40 little Rock School District Program Budget - COM Actual 1991/92 $483,823.44 $37,012.37 $15,121.90 $953.30 $15,983.65 $105.50 $0.00 $1,356.62 $65,450.42 SO.OD $0.00 $619.807.20 Budget 1992/93 $471,809.00 $57,149.99 $0.00 $4,000.00 $4,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S537 358.99 Actual 1992/93 $403,580.97 $30,874.10 $16,510.92 $667.64 $15,065.73 $0.00 $228.78 $0.00 $40,641.04 $22,240.00 $768.25 $530,577.43 Budget 1993/94 $491,621.64 $35,057.75 $22,719.57 $4,120.00 $4,532.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $558,050.96 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 14.00 14.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1353 TRADE \u0026amp; IND-SKILL TR 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0311 INSTRUCTION SERVICES 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0333 TRAVEL 0350 ADVERTISING 0361 PRINTING AND BINDINGEXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS LOCAL SOJRCES 0440 PERIODICALS 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0542 EQUIPMENT (NOT INVENTORIE 1353 TRADE \u0026amp; IND-SKILL TR TOTALS Page 41 S1 Little Rock School District Progr11111 Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $769,051.89 $58,832.56 $21,889.44 S0.00 $69,531.00 $3,807.37 $210.59 $192.80 S0.00 $39,021.10 S0.00 S4, 979.14 $932.59 $2,583.40 $45,242.99 $681. 76 016,956.63 Budget 1992/93 lf02,046.00 S84,5n.65 S0.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 $1,600.00 s290.oo $600.00 $10,500.00 SD.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $42,300.00 S0.00 $852,818.65 Actual 1992/93 $676,224.45 S51, 913. 72 S26,7n.88 S0.00 $66,078.00 $2,359.55 $2,951.06 $3,316.12 S0.00 $29,363.31 $1,696.12 $1,867.92 $649.96 $932.29 $13,167.82 S0.00 $877,293.20 Budget 1993/94 STT4,390.61 $55,222.18 $31,158.83 $515.00 $1,545.00 $3,000.00 S2,000.00 $206.00 $618.00 $25,000.00 SO.OD S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $40,000.00 S0.00 $933 655.63 PROG: BUIJ004 FTE 1993/94 19.88 19.88 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1354 Ya.JTH APPRENTICESHIP 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON -CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT -PERSONAL PROPER 1354 YOUTH APPRENTICESHIP TOTALS Page 42 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 sa,oou.oo $4,725.00 $400.00 Sl,000.23 S0.00 S0.00 $5,630.44 $137.47 $9,957.90 $11,544.19 so.oo S369.25 S41 764.48 Budget 1992/93 $jl ,990.00 S0.00 S0.00 $4,035.56 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $10,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 $46.025.56 Actual 1992/93 $45.00 S0.00 $1,200.00 $95.24 S0.00 $517.20 $3,548.41 S0.00 S0.00 $3,842.69 $854.36 S0.00 $10 102.90 Budget 1993/94 $98,970.88 S0.00 S0.00 S7,057.64 $3,294.71 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $10,300.00 S0.00 S0.00 $119 .623. 23 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 2.00 2.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Descriotion 1360 HOME ECONOMICS 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 1360 HOHE ECONOMICS TOTALS Page 43 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $35,073.54 $2,683.04 $1,190.05 $38 946.63 Budget 1992/93 $32,597.00 $4,086.42 S0.00 $36.683.42 Actual 1992/93 S2, 726.22 $208.56 $100.92 S3 035.70 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $0.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1362 CONS/HMKG 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1362 CONS/HMKG TOTALS Page 44 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 S:\u0026gt;t.\u0026gt;,.508.3.5 S43 857.91 $19,039.50 S6,642.13 S17,128.14 $0.00 S11,013.71 S670, 989 .72 Budget 1992/93 S::,o::,,0.5.5.00 S72,057.37 S0.00 S2,000.00 S4,040.00 S0.00 Sl,000.00 S664, 130.37 Actual 1992/93 5484, 624. 72 S37,033.81 S21,420.21 S3,506.19 SS,984.26 S699.19 S9,967.14 $566,235.52 Budget 1993/94 S651,380.92 S46,450.37 S29,367.20 S2,060.00 S4, 161.20 S0.00 S1,030.00 S734,449.69 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 19.00 19.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1371 CAREER ORIENTATION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS LOCAL SOURCES 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 1371 CAREER ORIENTATION TOTALS Page 45 little Rock School District Program Budget OOM Actual 1991/92 S204,950.42 S15,678.85 S7,038.79 S407. 71 S2,141.00 SO.DO S508.12 SO.OD S230 724.89 Budget 1992/93 S197,908.00 S24,713.50 SO.DO S1,000.00 S1,030.00 SO.DO SO.OD SO.DO S224 651.50 Actual 1992/93 S202,411.27 S15,484.34 SS,695.17 S664.89 S1,184.17 S506.16 S3,289.37 S1,424.10 S233,659.47 Budget 1993/94 S222,328.21 S15,854.33 S9,825.46 S1,030.00 S1,D60.90 SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO S250.098.90 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 6.00 6.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1392 COORD CAREER-COOP 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1392 COORD CAREER-COOP TOTALS Page 46 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 S180,436.35 S13,803.24 S4, 782.23 SO.OD S559.02 S0.00 S154.78 S2,059.41 $201,795.03 Budget 1992/93 S177,795.00 S20,318.43 SO.DO S500.00 Sl ,890.00 S0.00 $0.00 $2,700.00 $203,203.43 Actual 1992/93 S167,486.23 S12,812.40 S5,877.92 S174.07 S134.87 $112.32 $560.73 $1,301.56 $188 460.10 Budget 1993/94 S190,232.30 SlJ,565.60 $6,589.44 S515.00 Sl, 946.70 S0.00 S0.00 S2,781.00 S215,630.04 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 4.00 4.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code Description Code Description 1393 LOORD CAREEREXPL 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 1393 LOORD CAREEREXPL TOTALS Page 47 Little Rock School District Program Budget  COM Actual 1991/92 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 Budget 1992/93 $19,229.50 $2,288.84 S0.00 $21.518.34 Actual 1992/93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Budget 1993/94 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fl.net ion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1410 ADULT BASIC EDUCATION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0327 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0333 TRAVEL 0341 TELEPHONE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES - SP TRACKING 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0490 OTHER SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1410 ADULT BASIC EDUCATION TOTALS Page 48 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S276,425.88 S103,570.81 S29,069.87 S16,081.90 SO.DO S3,927.45 SO.OD S63.98 S149.55 S2,963.99 S356.65 S0.00 S3,395 .71 S0.00 Sl,408.95 $437 414.74 Budget 1992/93 S260,947.65 S111,820.00 S29,483.83 SO.OD S1,000.00 SO.DO SO.OD SO.DO SO.DO Sl,000.00 SO.OD S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD SO.OD $404 251.48 Actual 1992/93 S224,622.66 S97,547.06 S24,646. 15 S18,289. 15 S2,412.79 SO.OD S261.36 SO.OD SO.DO S258.76 SO.OD S71.88 S2,830.76 SO.DO SO.OD S370 940.57 Budget 1993/94 S274,981.58 S103,581.21 S27,590.37 S14,518.97 Sl ,849. 71 SO.OD S1,036.13 S500.00 SO.DO Sl,260.00 SO.DO SO.OD $2,000.00 SO.DO SO.OD S427 317.98 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 9.00 6.00 15.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fll1Ction Object Code - Description Code  Description 1420 ADULT GENERAL EDUCATION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0327 RENTAL OF LANO \u0026amp; BUILDING 0333 TRAVEL 0341 TELEPHONE 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERT! SI NG 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0490 OTHER SUPPLIES 1420 ADULT GENERAL EDUCATION TOTALS Page 49 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOM Actual 1991/92 $157,824.94 $9,610.67 $12,809.05 $6,227.55 S0.00 $211.82 S0.00 S0.00 $20.10 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $186 704.13 Budget 1992/93 $166,056.99 S0.00 $12,703.36 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $1,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 so.co S1,000.00 $180.760.35 Actual 1992/93 $206,356.51 s9,8n.5o $16,541.44 $9,245.76 $326.00 S0.00 $317.28 S0.00 S0.00 $417.00 S1 ,330.84 $594.36 $1,731.32 $775.15 $247,508.16 Budget 1993/94 S273, 798.22 $18,836.45 $19,744.36 $8,071.47 S0.00 $1,400.00 S0.00 $2,000.00 $300.00 S0.00 $3,624.89 S0.00 S0.00 $300.00 $328 075.39 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 9.00 1.00 10.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code Description Code Descrlotlon 1430 ADULT VOCATIONAL PROGRAM 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX \" 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRSEOUIPHENT 0332 TRAVELPAYROLL 0341 TELEPHONE 0342 POSTAGE 0410 SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPHENTPERSONAL PROPER 1430 ADULT VOCA Tl ONAL PROGRAM TOTALI Page 50 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 $11,341.00 S867.62 S473. 70 $0.00 $285 .10 $0.00 $0.00 Sl,259.41 S4,722.67 $18 949.50 Budget 1992/93 $34,576.00 $2,645.06 $0.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S1,000.00 $0.00 $39 221.06 Actual 1992/93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Budget 1993/94 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,030.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S1,250.00 S0.00 $2 280.00 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 fu,ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 1440 SPECIAL PROJECTS 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRSEQUIPHENT 0327 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 0341 TELEPHONE 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES - SP TRACKING 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0490 OTHER SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1440 SPECIAL PROJECTS TOTALS Page 51 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $8,520.00 S2,700.00 $858.35 S0.00 S263.75 S2,249.29 $0.00 S997.05 S2, 781.60 S750.00 S0.00 S36.50 S235.74 S1 ,353.18 S2,870.04 S1,000.00 S4,359.25 S28 974.75 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 SO.DO $8,576.57 SO.DO S925.28 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 so.oo S0.00 $500.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S10,001.85 Actual 1992/93 $0.00 SO.DO SO.OD $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Budget 1993/94 SO.OD S0.00 $0.00 SO.DO $953.04 S0.00 so.oo S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S953.04 PROO: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FIilet ion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1445 WORKPLACE LITERACY 0451 AUDIO-VISUAL MATERIALS I 0540 EQUIPMENTPERSONAL PROPER! 1445 WORKPLACE LITERACY TOTALS I Page 52 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S1 ,471.55 I $24,074.201 S25,545.75 I Budget 1992/93 so.001 so.001 S0.00 I Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Descri tion Code - Descri tion 1490 OTHER ADULT EDUCATION 0 10 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 1490 OTHER ADULT EDUCATION TOTALS Page 53 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual Budget 1991/92 1992/93 S32,008.80 SO.OD S2,448.72 SO.OD S1, 173.54 SO.OD SO.DO SO.DO $35,631.06 SO.DO PROG: BUD004 Actual Budget FTE 1992/93 1993/94 1993/94 S10,530.00 SO.DO S805.62 SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO S732.02 SO.DO S12,067.64 SO.DO Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0140 SUBST NON-CERTIFIED-SHORT 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0380 FOOD SERVICES 0410 SUPPL! ES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT -PERSONAL PROPER 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION TOTALS Page 54 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 SJ48,239.02 $449,900.27 S6,847 .68 $61,571.66 S59,049.99 S4,m.6o Sl ,074.23 SO.OD (S351.89) (S131.87) S0.00 (S23.76) S930,948.93 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD SO.OD S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO S0.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S187, 739.10 Sl,076.76 S14,444.24 S17,853.38 $4,740.88 S357.22 S39.60 S0.00 S21,059.31 S459.12 SO.DO S247 769.61 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S206,593.30 so.oo S15,903.91 S22,471.41 S0.00 S500.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD so.oo S245 468.62 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 21.00 21.00 Date: 06/3D/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Descr i pt I on Code - Oescr i Pt ion 156D READING 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED D210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING ANO BINOING-EXTE 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0440 PERIODICALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 156D READING TOTALS 55 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO SD.00 S217.87 SO.DO S991. 70 S203.13 $31.00 S11.81 $89.25 S7, 167.83 S0.00 S292.39 S2,211.43 S11 216.41 Budget 1992/93 S202,028.00 S2,900.00 S22,774.00 S14,016.49 S0.00 $3,200.00 S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 SO.OD SO.OD $35,150.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S280 068.49 Actual 1992/93 SO.OD SO.DO S0.00 SO.OD S94.95 SO.DO Sl,764.60 S130.09 S95.98 SO.DO SD.OD $12,805.73 S818.35 S189.89 Sl,048.63 $16.948.22 Budget 1993/94 SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO S0.00 S200.00 Sl,800.00 S0.00 S200.00 S200.00 SO.DO SO.DO S20,000.00 S0.00 SO.OD S0.00 S22 400.00 PROG: BUDDD4 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FIM'let I on Object Code  Description Code  Description 1570 MATHEMATICS 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING ANO BINDINGEXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0440 PERIOOICALS 0540 EOUIPMENTPERSONAL PROPER 1570 MATHEMATICS TOTALS Page 56 Little Rock School District Program Budget  OOM Actual 1991/92 S261,943.72 S313.34 S18.84 S40.30 S29.50 S7,576.39 S15,949.06 S0.00 S262.40 S2,526.87 S288 660.42 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Sl0,000.20 S0.00 S11,519.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S21 519.20 ---- Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S313.66 S0.00 S129.84 S0.00 S0.00 S3,648.98 Sl,691.51 S125.00 S0.00 S5 908.99 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SS,000.00 S0.00 S7,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S12,000.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fl.rlction Object Code - Description Code - Description 1580 ACADEMIC PROGRESS GRANTS 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0124 CLERICAL OVERTIME 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0311 INSTRUCTION SERVICES 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0313 PUPIL SERVICES 0316 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0380 FOOD SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0413 SOFTIIARE 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0440 PERIODICALS 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0545 EQUIPMENT LEASE PURCHASE 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 1580 ACADEMIC PROGRESS GRANTS TOTALS Page 57 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S118,uYY.U6 $84.27 S0.00 S9, 138.70 S32.90 S1,625.00 $675.00 S1 ,213.35 S235.00 S7,529.35 S700.00 $35,550.94 S2.90 S1 ,062.17 S8,790.48 $168,725.30 S30,414.31 S0.00 (S88.60) S740.25 (S15.38) S272,444.23 S0.00 S1,616.00 $658,575.23 Budget 1992/93 SO.OD S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $320,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $320 000.00 Actual 1992/93 $49,417.48 S0.00 SJ, 199.49 $4,417.62 S7.28 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S126.00 S0.00 S0.00 S12,252.60 S174.00 S0.00 S1,878.7J $45,296.64 S2,004.43 S1,868.81 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S35,332.38 S26,009.22 S0.00 S181 984.68 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $320,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO SO.DO S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 S0.00 $320 000.DO PROG: Bl.ll004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Ft.n:tion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1595 COMPENSATORY EDUCATION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1595 COMPENSATORY EDUCATION TOTALS Page 58 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $73:i,oo.:.44 $32,581.74 S0.00 $58,784.61 $28,657.95 $628.00 $104,697.68 $0.00 $5,791.41 $967 023.83 Budget 1992/93 SDY,DY( .80 $0.00 $0.00 $99,039.72 $0.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $862 437.52 - Actual 1992/93 $572,307.32 $27,014.25 $0.00 $45,821.60 $30,114.69 $0.00 $38,978.66 $304.13 $0.00 $714 540.65 $1 -- Budget 1993/94 $896,504.40 $0.00 $85,369.74 $70,502.15 $46,927.72 $0.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 102 804.02 -- PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 29.00 8.00 37.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0370 TUITION 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0440 PERIODICALS 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0490 OTHER SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED TOTALS Page 59 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 Sl,143,rYY.80 SO.DO S15, 133.92 $88,658.96 S41, 124.25 SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD SO.DO S120.56 S448.60 $657.39 $618.02 Sl,359.00 S30,421.27 SO.OD SO.OD Sl ,650.91 SO.DO $68.90 S101.90 S2,848.11 S1 ,327, 011. 59 Budget 1992/93 S525,587.00 S10,000.00 SO.DO $67,346.75 SO.DO $4,000.00 $400.00 $810.00 S360.00 SO.DO S1 ,500.00 Sl,000.00 Sl,500.00 SO.DO S27,243.00 SO.OD $450.00 Sl,835.00 $450.00 SO.DO SO.DO S4,000.00 $646,481.75 Actual 1992/93 S581,377.52 SO.OD S14,353.22 $45,573.25 S26,569.31 SO.OD SO.OD S734.20 SO.OD SO.DO S134.84 $698.44 S445.26 S687.25 S15,796.23 $782.10 SO.DO S189.66 SO.DO SO.OD S261.25 Sl,348.42 $688,950.95 Budget 1993/94 S946,743.94 S5,000.00 S15,288.71 $69,503.26 S50,665.84 S2,000.00 S200.00 $810.00 S360.00 SO.DO S1,000.00 Sl,000.00 S1,000.00 SO.DO S27,243.00 SO.OD $450.00 $800.00 $450.00 SO.DO SO.DO S3,000.00 S1,125,514.75 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 41.00 1.00 42.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fu,ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 2111 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 0310 PROFESSIONAL , TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINOINGINTERN 0361 PRINTING ANO BINOING-EXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 0430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0540 EQUIPHENTPERSONAL PROPER 2111 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION TOTALS Page 60 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 St!.\u0026gt;( .37 SO.OD S0.00 (S49.00) S417.36 S146.37 S236.52 S10,332.90 S11.321.52 Budget 1992/93 Sl,200.00 S1,200.00 S500.00 S200.00 S300.00 S1 ,250.00 S500.00 S0.00 S5,150.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD (S16.00) SO.DO S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 (S16.00) Budget 1993/94 s1,200.oo S1,200.00 S500.00 S200.00 S300.00 S1,250.00 S500.00 S0.00 S5, 150.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2113 SOCIAL IIORIC SERVICES 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 2113 SOCIAL IIORIC SERVICES TOTALS Page 61 little Rock School District Program Budget  OOH Actual 1991/92 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD Budget 1992/93 sa.oo S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD Budget 1993/94 $108,422.16 S8,346.63 S5,593.01 S122,361.80 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 10.00 10.00 Date: D6/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2114 PUPIL ACCOONTING SERVICES 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 0415 TEST MATERIALS 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2114 PUPIL ACCOONTING SERVICES TOTALS Page 62 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $57,828.92 $28,961.58 $6,832.98 $2,716.67 $32,289.20 $200.45 $838.36 $86.19 $189.48 $818.81 $11,689.90 S0.00 $2,517.24 $509.45 $145,479.23 Budget 1992/93 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $2,700.00 $12,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $14 700.00 Actual 1992/93 $54,060.29 $19,311.24 $5,612.87 $2,805.79 $7,695.00 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $87.67 $8,620.50 $307.49 S0.00 SO.OD $98,500.85 Budget 1993/94 $60,987.00 $38,663.25 $7,129.63 $4,745.62 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 so.oo $500.00 Sll,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO $123,025.50 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94  1.00 2.00 3.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 fU'lCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description 2120 GUIDANCE SERVICES 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0333 TRAVEL 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 2120 GUIDANCE SERVICES TOTALS Page 63 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOM Actual 1991/92 Sl,408,559.51 S107, 755 .13 S44,349.26 S0.00 $1,168.42 S0.00 Sl.561.832.32 Budget 1992/93 sz,~uu,4/4.90 $269,562.52 S0.00 S0.00 $5,000.00 S0.00 S2 475 037.42 Actual 1992/93 S1 ,997,465.05 $152,805.99 $87,369.22 $565.36 $241.11 S82.67 S2,Z38 529.40 Budget 1993/94 S2,557,98/ .81 $182,580.24 $117,691.65 S0.00 $5,150.00 S0.00 S2 863 409.70 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 79.00 79.00 Date: D6/30/93 Little Rock School District PROG: BUD004 Time: 09:13 Program Budget - OOM Function Object Actual Budget Actual Budget FTE Code Descri tion Code - Descri tion 1991/92 1992/93 1992/93 1993/94 1993/94 12 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 0 0 PROFESSIONAL TECHNICAL $496.00 350.00 $400.00 $350.00 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV Sl,715.97 S2,000.00 S0.00 Sl,000.00 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL $20.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 0333 TRAVEL $717.29 S0.00 $603.87 S0.00 0342 POSTAGE $584.30 $2,200.00 $569.65 Sl,200.00 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN S0.00 S1,000.00 S0.00 S500.00 0361 PRINTING ANO BINOING-EXTE $672.01 Sl,000.00 S0.00 S500.00 0410 SUPPLIES $4,433.83 $6,300.00 $79.00 $7,300.00 2121 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION TOTALS $8,639.40 $12,850.00 Sl,652.52 $10,850.00 Page 64  - Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fi.nction Object Code - Description Code - Description 2122 COUNSELING SERVICES 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 2122 COUNSELING SERVICES TOTALS Page 65 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 $1, 1Jl,Y1.61 S86,591.n $42,848.52 $1,261 361.90 Budget 1992/93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 Actual 1992/93 $45,522.52 $3,482.50 $2,164.69 $51,169.71 Budget 1993/94 $34,748.00 S2,4n.90 $1,640.51 $38,866.41 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 1.00 1.00 Datt!: 06/30/93 Timi!: 09:13 Function Objl!ct Codi! Dl!scri tion Codi! Dl!scri tion OTHER GUIDANCE SERVICES 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 2129 OTHER GUIDANCE SERVICES TOTALS Page 66  - - Littll! Rock School District Program Budgl!t  OOH Actual 1991/92 Budgl!t 1992/93 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Budgl!t 1993/94 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FL11Ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 2134 NURSING SERVICES 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 0642 LIABILITY INSURANCE 0649 OTHER INSURANCE 2134 NURSING SERVICES TOTALS Page 67 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 SO.DO S0.00 $682,852.45 S52,238.92 S29,310.94 S8, 177.54 S942.54 Sl,393.82 S974.37 S81.31 S727 .85 S12,299.57 S208.47 S240.00 S1 ,817 .08 SO.DO S791 264.86 Budget 1992/93 S9,1'7.50 S757.00 S682, 737 .50 S99,083.86 SO.DO S9,200.00 S200.00 $350.00 SO.DO S90.00 S821.00 S7,982.40 SO.DO SJ00.00 SO.OD S2, 175.00 $812,854.26 Actual 1992/93 SD.00 SO.DO S586,321.70 S44,853.42 $33,849.43 SO.DO S977.45 S4, 125.15 S518.04 S83.16 S587.75 S10,329.43 SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD Sl,748.00 $683,393.53 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 SO.OD $687,569.42 S52,930.65 S44,538. 74 S9,200.00 S200.00 $350.00 SO.DO S90.00 S821.00 S10,000.00 SO.OD SJ00.00 SO.DO S2, 175.00 S808, 174.81 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 42.20 42.20 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2142 PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING SER 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 2142 PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING SER TOTALS Pege 68 Little Rock School District Program Budget - DOM Actual 1991/92 $157,717.08 $12,065.45 $6,732.97 $176 515.50 Budget 1992/93 SO.DO $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Actual 1992/93 $135,710.30 $10,381.84 $7,012.04 $153 104.18 Budget 1993/94 $176,258.94 $12,569.14 $8,789.73 $197 617.81 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 5.00 5.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code Description 2211 SERVICE AREA OIRECTION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROO IMPROV 0318 BOARD OF ED SERVICES 0319 OTHER PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0365 COPIER LEASE 0370 TUITION 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0435 0440 PERIOOICALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CENTER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 0635 DUES \u0026amp; FEES NCA 2211 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION TOTALS Page 69 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 $299, ,o,. 75 S0.00 $127,704.37 $31,744.44 $12,337.02 $118,243.62 S0.00 $2,455.37 S305.96 S79.20 $2,721.00 $592.16 $1,849.29 $491.05 $2,575.82 $98,632.75 S567.56 S0.00 $2,681.11 S0.00 S0.00 $160.83 $3,343.94 S0.00 $126.92 S12,950.00 $719 148.16 Budget 1992/93 $268,653.00 $107,404.00 $33,574.00 S35,430.69 S0.00 $22,600.00 $46,362.00 S0.00 S2,800.00 S0.00 S4,000.00 $1,000.00 $5,998.00 S3,000.00 S0.00 S135,000.00 $200.00 S0.00 $15,761.72 $17,447.00 U,000.00 S0.00 S2,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S26,000.00 S730 230.41 Actual 1992/93 $248,238.41 S47,425.29 $138,694.16 $32,276.71 $13,577.27 S0.00 S89,500.00 S0.00 S411.46 S0.00 U,644.04 $597.86 $2,473.36 $1, 155.60 S0.00 $136,019.00 $1,151.52 S1, 139.67 $6,677.16 $1,492.66 S0.00 S367.56 S1, 704.68 $129.49 S373.66 S15,023.01 S742,072.57 Budget 1993/94 S322, 120.00 S0.00 $97,848.21 $28,677.37 $14,585.42 S25,000.00 $150,000.00 S0.00 SJ, 125.00 S0.00 U,000.00 $750.00 $4,500.00 $2,500.00 S0.00 $145,000.00 S1,000.00 S0.00 $12,412.00 S5,000.00 S2,000.00 S0.00 S1,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 $17,000.00 $835.518.00 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 5.00 5.00 10.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Flnctlon Object Code - Description Code - Description 2212 INSTRUCTION AND CURR DEV 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0314 STAFF SERVICES 0319 OTHER PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES - SP TRACKING 0412 LOCAL SUPPLIES SP TRACKIN 0413 SOFTIIARE 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL S\u0026lt;JJRCES 0431 LIBRARY REFERENCE MATERIA 0440 PERIOOICALI 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0451 AUDIO-VISUAL MATERIALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2212 INSTRUCTION AND CURR DEV TOTALS Page 70 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 $1,243,098.68 $74,532.36 $406,737.78 S134,050.61 $59,576.17 Sl,275.40 S0.00 S40.00 S0.00 S6,568.39 S19.80 $13,573.70 $1,731.70 $3,711.58 S2, 722.18 $9,356.20 $2,681.39 $116.28 $115,716.47 S4,691.25 S6,926.08 Sl,250.00 S0.00 Sl,620.41 $15,527.70 $5,253.82 $833.59 $5,317.36 $25,221.15 $0.00 S539.50 S2 142,689.55 Budget 1992/93 S1 ,047,711.00 $66,903.55 $774,976.00 $297,012.44 S0.00 S22,000.00 S0.00 S2,000.00 S0.00 S6,766.00 S0.00 $2,436.00 $3,600.00 $3,200.00 S3,525.00 S41,700.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 S53,m.oo S4,500.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 S0.00 Sll,000.00 S0.00 $41,330.00 S2,000.00 $50,000.00 $55,500.00 SO.OD $3,000.00 $2 505,932.99 Actual 1992/93 S1 ,078,510.86 $41,213.44 $329,597.38 $110,868.12 $62,206.66 S4, 997 .25 S25,900.00 S61.60 $5,400.00 S4,021.52 $0.00 $13,776.25 S692.20 S6, 730.44 $2,907.03 $10,316.57 $3, 152.63 $328.49 $59,828.87 $0.00 S0.00 $7,045.19 SS,628.12 Sl ,227.72 S0.00 $19,843.11 S417.00 $22,019.01 $5,765.01 S423.55 $736.55 Sl,826,614.57 Budget 1993/94 S1 ,387, 995.10 so.oo $289,901.10 $121,148.28 $71,539.31 S14, 150.00 S0.00 Sl,000.00 S0.00 SS,866.00 S0.00 $17,436.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 S4,327.00 $25,335.00 Sl,000.00 S0.00 S60,036.00 $1,000.00 S0.00 Sl0,000.00 S0.00 S6,000.00 S0.00 $22,881.35 S500.00 $30,000.00 $13,500.00 S0.00 $1,200.00 $2,093,315.15 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 29.00 16.60 45.60 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2213 INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF TRAIN 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 2213 INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF TRAIN TOTALS Page 71 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 S2,079.66 S159.16 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S2,238.82 Budget 1992/93 S14,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S14,000.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Budget 1993/94 SI0,000.00 S713.11 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S10 713.11 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 F111Ction Object Code Description Code - Description u15 INST STAFF TRAINING - TES 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 2215 INST STAFF TRAINING - TES TOTALS Page 72 I I I Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 so.001 SO.DOI S0.00 I Budget 1992/93 $25,000.001 SO.DOI S25,ooo.oo I Actual 1992/93 SO.OD SO.DO $0.00 Budget 1993/94 S15,000.00 Sl,070.13 S16,070.13 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 FlllCtlon Object Code - Description Code - Description 2216 INST STAFF TRAINING - PET 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 2216 INST STAFF TRAINING - PET TOTALS Page 73 I I I Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 S4,747 .05 I $363.14) $5 110.19 I Budget 1992/93 S40,000.001 $0.001 S40 000.00 I Actual 1992/93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Budget 1993/94 $30,000.00 $2, 139.33 $32,139.33 PROG: BU\u0026gt;004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2217 CLASSROOI MANAGEMENT 011, STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG 2217 CLASSROOI MANAGEMENT TOTALS Page 74 IMPROV Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 s12,,oo.J8 S961.88 S500.00 S14.030.26 Budget 1992/93 Sl.5,000.00 SO.OD SO.OD S13 000.00 Actual 1992/93 SO.DO S0.00 S756.00 S756.00 Budget 1993/94 S10,000.00 S713.11 SO.OD S10 713.11 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Fl.net ion Object Code Description Code Description 2218 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 2218 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION TOTALS Page 75 Little Rock School District Program Budget  ODM Actual 1991/92 S17,041.69 Sl,303.78 Sl ,028.30 s19 373.n Budget 1992/93 SO.Ou S0.00 so.co so.co Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: D6/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2219 OTHER IMPROVEMENT OF INST 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0124 CLERICAL OVERTIME 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES - SP TRACKING 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0440 PER I OD I CALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2219 OTHER IMPROVEMENT OF INST TOTALS Page 76 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 S10,64.S.62 S0.00 $117,059.37 S0.00 $9,769.44 S6,338. 16 S84.55 S4,828.25 $2,411.41 S29.56 S709.82 $1,540.02 $1,383.92 $2,459.88 S0.00 S91.50 S2,658.09 S305.00 $160.312.59 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S835.00 $144,523.00 S0.00 $21,664.60 S0.00 S0.00 S2,500.00 S1,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S11,500.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S182 022.60 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 $120,666.02 $16,038.99 $10,457.73 $9,213.68 S0.00 $2,429.29 $3,632.83 S0.00 S1,688.09 S0.00 S644.80 $2,490.84 S985.53 S119.76 S36.87 S325.00 S168 729.43 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 $93,428.97 S0.00 S7,192.38 S6,291.63 S0.00 S3,000.00 S5,000.00 S0.00 S1,500.00 S0.00 $2,700.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S119 112.97 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 6.00 6.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 FlXlCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description 2222 SCHOOL LIBRARY SERVICES 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDIMG-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0430 LI BR ARY BOOKS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 2222 SCHOOL LIBRARY SERVICES TOTALS Page 77 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $1,554,555.82 $630,210.45 S167, 134.80 S97,028.66 S0.00 S151,623.52 SO.DO S13.61 S3,020.04 $2 603 586.90 Budget 1992/93 $1,553,735.00 S567,938.00 S297,696.06 SO.DO SO.DO S21,750.00 S18,250.00 SO.DO S0.00 S2 459 369.06 Actual 1992/93 Sl ,409, 194.91 S520,410.11 S147,615.59 S112,285.96 S36.00 S146,163.24 S6, 146.58 SO.DO S0.00 S2 341 852.39 Budget 1993/94 Sl ,676,485 .19 $440,867.59 S119,653.84 S150,295.84 SO.DO S22,402.50 S18,797.50 SO.DO S0.00 $2,428,502.46 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 46.00 44.00 90.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - DescrlptiOl'I 2a.\u0026gt; AUDIOVISUAL SERVICES 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 2223 AUDIOVISUAL SERVICES TOTALS Page 78 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S32,269.66 S2,468. 73 S2,067.36 S36.805. 75 Budget 1992/93 SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD S0.00 Actual 1992/93 S24, 140.00 Sl,846.80 S2,382.68 S28 369.48 Budget 1993/94 S27,370.93 S2,107.07 S3,031.56 S32 509.56 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 2.00 2.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code Descri tion Code Descri tion 229 OTHER EDUCATIONAL MEDIAS 031 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL OTHER EDUCATIONAL MEDIAS TOTALS Page 79 little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 S 6,000. 0 S76 000.00 Budget 1992/93 $86,000.00 S86 000.00 Actual 1992/93 S76,000.00 S76,000.00 Budget 1993/94 $86,000.00 S86 000.00 PROG: Blll004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 F111etion Object Code - Description Code - Description 2310 BOARD OF EDUCATION SERVIC 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 2310 BOARD OF EDUCATION SERVIC TOTALS Page 80 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODIi Actual 1991/92 $6,694.53 S512.17 S129.10 S7 335.80 Budget 1992/93 SO.DO SO.OD SO.OD S0.00 Actual 1992/93 SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD S0.00 Budget 1993/94 SO.DO SO.OD S0.00 S0.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Little Rock School District PROG: BUD004 Time: 09:13 Program Budget  OOH FU'lCt ion Object Actual Budget Actual Budget FTE Code - Descri tion Code Descri tion 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1993/94 2314 ELECTION SERVICES 03 BOARD OF ED SERVICES $0. $16, 0 .00 S 0,000.00 2314 ELECTION SERVICES TOTALS S0.00 $16 500.00 $20 000.00 Page 81 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fl.net ion Object Code - Descrl tlon Code - Descrl tlon LEGAL SERVICES BOARD OF ED SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES TOTALS Page 82 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 Budget 1992/93 Actual 1992/93 Budget 1993/94 $350,000.00 S350,000.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code Descri tion Code Descri tion 31 AUDIT SERVICES 0 BOARD OF ED SERVICES AUDIT SERVICES TOTALS Page 83 little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 Budget 1992/93 Actual 1992/93 $36,692.50 $36 692.50 Budget 1993/94 $35,000.00 $35 ODO.DO PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 F1n:tion Object Code - Description Code - Description 2$19 OTHER BOARD OF EDUCATION 0240 INSURANCE 0250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0290 OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0318 BOARD OF ED SERVICES 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0365 COPIER LEASE 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0440 PERIOOICALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2319 OTHER BOARD OF EDUCATION TOTALS Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 ($26,989.28) $153,797.29 $60,014.78 $50,465.41 $0.00 $4,735.02 $126.90 $367.80 $3,180.50 $368.75 $1,312.66 $2,585.01 $7,089.61 $3,364.38 $0.00 $492.39 $24,079.73 $3,030.00 $288 020.95 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S160,000.00 $73,462.00 S5,000.00 $1,500.00 $10,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 $3,000.00 S6,000.00 $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11,000.00 $281 462.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 $192,426.52 $57,835.84 $193.07 $0.00 $7,697.99 $104.16 $512.20 $2,732.32 $149.70 $0.00 $2,572.55 $9,411.87 $296.27 $156.06 $30.65 $287.38 $4,710.00 $279 116.58 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 $195,000.00 S60,000.00 S5,000.00 $1,500.00 $10,000.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $3,500.00 $12,000.00 $600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $305 100.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: D9: 13 Fu,ctlon Object Code - Description Code - Description 2321 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTEND 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NOH-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0333 TRAVEL 0334 OFF I CE EXPENSES 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0365 COPIER LEASE 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES - SP TRACKING 0412 LOCAL SUPPLIES SP TRACKIN 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0440 PERIOOICALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 0649 OTHER INSURANCE 2321 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTEND TOTALS Page 85 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S198,4\\ll .86 S59,355.68 S17,D27.73 $4,475.91 S240.54 S123.11 S1 ,784.00 ($80.DD) S578.39 S36D.61 S349.5D S283.78 S518.51 S11,484.84 S1, 183.10 SO.OD S107.25 S304.89 $454.00 S2,364.85 S299,408.55 Budget 1992/93 S11D,ODD.OD S59,819.DD S18,295.23 SO.DO S5DD.DD S175.DD S3,55D.OD SO.DD Sl,000.0D S700.0D SO.DO $400.00 Sl,184.00 $6,693.00 Sl,800.00 SO.DO S126.00 SO.DO S500.00 S2,600.00 S207.342.23 Actual 1992/93 Sll0,833.33 S56, 136.85 S12,0D8.43 $4,287.02 $629.90 SD.DO S5D7 .52 SD.DD Sl,279.31 $675.80 SO.DD S196.7D S137 .27 Sl0,048.54 S391. 16 $332.56 S39.00 SO.OD Sl ,488.00 S2,291.68 S201 283.07 Budget 1993/94 SllD,000.DO S58,244.28 S5, 196.89 $4,711.14 S7DD.OD S175.0D S3,55D.DD SD.OD S2,DDD.OD S1,0DO.OO SD.OD $400.00 $800.00 S10,500.00 $800.00 SO.OD S200.00 SO.OD S500.00 S2,600.00 S201 3TT.31 PROG: BUDDD4 FTE 1993/94 1.00 2:00 3.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code  Description Code - Description 2326 DESEGREGATION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0319 OTHER PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH 0326 REPAIRSEQUIPHENT 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERT! SI NG 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDINGEXTE 0365 COPIER LEASE 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2326 DESEGREGATION TOTALS Page 86 little Rock School District Program Budget  OOM Actual 1991/92 s11r,u:.1. H S0.00 $236,071.22 $23,536.94 $10,356.16 S0.00 S0.00 $195.88 $500.00 $6,350.00 $15,939.12 $5,537.18 $1,392.07 S5,876.39 $8.60 $1,265.41 S5, 771.43 S0.00 SJ,730.98 $326.00 S433 908.55 Budget 1992/93 $115,018.80 $6,000.00 $221,932.00 $43,642.08 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $200.00 S0.00 S0.00 $20,040.00 S0.00 $6,000.00 S5,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 $7,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S424 832.88 Actual 1992/93 $106,731.57 SO.DO $203,664.21 $23,745.23 $14,663.86 $4,800.00 SJ, 111.70 $132.93 S0.00 SJ,709.55 $25,275.94 S0.00 S2, 143.42 $442.69 S0.00 $1,004.58 $1,837.77 SJ,569.53 $1,356.74  S75.00 $396 264. 72 Budget 1993/94 $131,400.00 S0.00 $221,054.46 $17,231.69 $16,028.94 S0.00 S0.00 $206.00 S0.00 $4,000.00 S25,000.00 S0.00 $4,000.00 S2,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S7,000.00 S0.00 SO.OD so.oo $427 921.09 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 2.00 8.00 10.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2410 OFF ICE OF THE PRINCIPAL 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0124 CLERICAL OVERTIME 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDINGINTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2410 OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL TOTALS Page 87 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 $3,981,j~i.68 $1,356,553.33 $25,234.23 $407,126.16 $0.00 $0.00 $185,459.11 $151.00 $8,871.54 $0.00 $578.29 SO.DO $60 . 00 $5 965,386.34 Budget 1992/93 $j, IY, ,l611.UO $1,252,085.25 $0.00 $661,0TT.98 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13,700.00 $14,800.00 $13,500.00 $300.00 $0.00 $5,746,732.23 Actual 1992/93 $3,614,894.08 $1,293,900.00 $38,432.92 $377,677.62 $1,152.34 SS.43 $234,608.52 $0.00 $2,426.60 $6,899.73 $3,660.65 s5n.47 $0.00 $5,574,230.36 Budget 1993/94 $4,j08,Hl6.l2 $1,337,675.08 $0.00 $407,179.03 SO.DO S0.00 S2TT,688.11 $0.00 $14,111.00 $15,244.00 $13,905.00 $309.00 $0.00 $6,374,937.44 PROG: BLA'.l004 FTE 1993/94 H6.00 88.00 174.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FlrlCtion Object Code  Description Code  Description 2490 OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES 0361 PRINTING AND 0410 SUPPLIES 2490 OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES TOTALS Page 88 BINOINGEXTEI I I Little Rock School District Program Budget  OOM Actual 1991/92 $3,901.001 $17,053.461 S20.954.46 I Budget 1992/93 s10,ooo.001 S18,000.00I S28 000.00 I Actual 1992/93 SO.DO S925.63 S925.63 Budget 1993/94 SS,000.00 S6,000.00 S11 000.00 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FlllC:tion Object Code Description Code Description 2~10 DIRECTION OF BUSINESS SUP 0411 SUPPLIES  SP TRACKING 0416 SUPPLIES  SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CENTER 2510 DIRECTION OF BUSINESS SUP TOTALS Page 89 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOM Actual 1991/92 S19,.\u0026gt;Yl.60 .$0.00 S48,881.62 $0.00 $68 273.22 Budget 1992/93 $30,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,830.00 $39,800.00 $81,630.00 Actual 1992/93 $8,462.48 $796.70 $28, TT4. 18 $23,403.07 $61,436.43 Budget 1993/94 $15,000.00 $2,000.00 S40,000.00 S30,000.00 $87 000.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fl.nCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description 2521 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 2521 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION TOTALS Page 90 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $56,Jl0.08 $4,116.90 $1,153.56 $61.590.54 Budget 1992/93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Actual 1992/93 $51,626.67 $3,949.44 $1,503.64 $57.079.75 Budget 1993/94 $~2,170.39 $4,016.21 $1,647.36 $57.833.96 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 1.00 1.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fi.net ion Object Code - Description Code - Description 2525 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING SERV 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING ANO BINDINGEXTE 0365 COPIER LEASE 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2525 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING SERV TOTALS Page 91 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 SO.DO S250, 765.41 S19,183.80 Sl0,571.12 S50.12 S26,399.35 S197.01 $6,203.50 S24.66 S9,070.13 $0.00 S278.04 SO.DO SO.DO S322, 743.14 Budget 1992/93 S2,854.00 S335,510.00 $45,967.31 SO.DO S150.00 Sll,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,690.00 SO.OD S200.00 SO.OD SO.OD S400, 971. 31 Actual 1992/93 SO.OD S253,117.43 S19,363.88 S14,148.06 S109.34 Sl0,722.52 $127.72 $0.00 $0.00 $3,687.66 $1,480.50 SO.OD S261.64 S149.28 S303, 168.03 Budget 1993/94 SO.DO S262,036.33 S19,985.22 S17,283.12 S150.00 S12,500.00 $0.00 SO.OD $0.00 $6,000.00 SO.DO S250.00 SO.DO SO.OD S318,204.67 PROO: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 11.00 11.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FLnCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description l)l.Y OTHER FISCAL ACCCXJNTING S OllO REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 2529 OTHER FISCAL ACCCXJNTING S TOTALS Page 92 Little Rock School District Program Budget - DOM Actual 1991/92 S35,l.)0.00 $2,696.64 Sl, 131.62 S39 078.26 Budget 1992/93 su.oo S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Actual 1992/93 SJ,02r.OO S231.58 S101.92 $3,360.50 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2539 OTHER FACILITIES ACQ \u0026amp; CO 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREHE 0240 INSURANCE 0321 UTILITY SERVICES-NATURAL 0322 UTILITY SERVICES-ELECTRIC 0323 UTILITY SER-~ATER/SE~AGE/ 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0329 OTHER PROPERTY SERVICES 0341 TELEPHONE 0390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES . SP TRACKING 0416 SUPPLIES . SUPPLY CENTER 0481 PLUMBING 0482 CARPENTRY 0483 ELECTRIC 0485 AIR COHO/HEAT 0486 BOILERS/SH ENGINES 0488 PAINTING 0489 ROOFING 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0543 EQUIPMENT (REAL PROPERTY) 2539 OTHER FACILITIES ACQ \u0026amp; CO TOTALS Page 93 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 $85,656.40 S6,552.46 SJ,037.40 SS,639.01 S25,354.92 S105,683.29 SJ,558.65 S891.10 S9,357.56 S5,276.19 SS,900.46 S8,817 .33 S2,467.59 SO.OD S2,676.92 S231.99 Sl,644.12 S4,572.63 S406.11 $631.82 Sl,350.78 Sl ,851. 74 S549.13 S282, 107.60 Budget 1992/93 so.oo S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S28,000.00 S110,000.00 S5,500.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD SO.OD S28,400.00 SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO S0.00 SO.DO SO.DO S171,900.00 Actual 1992/93 $80,699.44 S6, 173.53 S2,688.18 S5,909.00 S27,674.88 S87,412.16 SJ, 165.12 Sl,032.05 Sl,598.64 (S52,561.78) S9,253.18 $6,223.86 SO.OD S3,833.42 SO.DO S376.63 S436.13 S2.31 S53.17 S282.25 SO.DO S624.48 SO.DO S184 876.65 Budget 1993/94 $63,009.81 $4,850.63 S2,339.54 S7,546.89 SJ0,000.00 s110,ooo.oo SJ,600.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD S29,252.00 SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD SO.DO S0.00 SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD S250,598.87 PROG: 800004 FTE 1993/94 5.00 5.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2541 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREHE 0240 INSURANCE 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 2541 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION TOTALS Page 94 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S117,.H!l.00 $8,979.36 S971.76 $4,383.10 $43.90 Sl,434.00 S7,810.33 S0.00 S141,000.45 Budget 1992/93 SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD S0.00 SO.DO SO.OD S0.00 SO.DO SO.OD Actual 1992/93 S21!1, /04. 74 S16, 730. 71 S930.17 S10,706.59 S19.24 $446.27 S2,487.27 Sl,519.42 S251,544.41 Budget 1993/94 S192,079.14 S14,744.23 SO.OD S11,072.38 S100.00 $800.00 S3,000.00 S4,000.00 S225, 795. 75 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 9.00 9.00 - - - Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2542 UPKEEP OF BUILDINGS 011/ STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0121 MAINTENANCE 0124 CLERICAL OVERTIME 0140 SUBST NON-CERTIFIED-SHORT 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0290 OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0321 UTILITY SERVICES-NATURAL 0322 UTILITY SERVICES-ELECTRIC 0323 UTILITY SER-WATER/SEWAGE/ 0324 CLEANING SERVICES 0325 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0327 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0329 OTHER PROPERTY SERVICES 0333 TRAVEL 0341 TELEPHONE 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES - SP TRACKING 0412 LOCAL SUPPLIES SP TRACKIN 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0481 PLUMBING 0482 CARPENTRY 0483 ELECTRIC 0485 AIR COND/HEAT 0488 PAINTING 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0541 EQUIPMENT PER PROP SP TRA 0543 EQUIPMENT (REAL PROPERTY) 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2542 UPKEEP Of BUILDINGS TOTALS Page 95 little Rock School District Program Budget - COM Actual 1991/92 SU.00 S2,586, 199.27 Sl,129,828.37 $66,578.68 S454,885.96 S324, 175.08 S98,616.63 S206,202.70 S2.40 S0.00 S537,985.10 S2,546,006.78 S169,508.33 SO.OD S519,413.12 S14,349.22 S24,375.00 S7,996.01 S101,006.53 $806.13 SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD S30,330.98 S18,609.36 S220,821.34 S9,482.69 S0.00 $649.14 Sl ,417.25 S2,246.93 S2,399.47 S3,006.01 S20,019.47 S33,731.51 S90,978.65 S5,080.87 S9 226,708.98 Budget 1992/93 516,252.00 $4,306,210.87 S0.00 S0.00 S250,000.00 S721,865.56 SO.DO SO.OD S0.00 S2,000.00 SO.DO S3,421,500.00 SO.DO S15,000.00 S501,558.00 S122,800.00 S25,000.00 S10,000.00 S265,500.00 S2,500.00 Sl0,000.00 Sl,200.00 S300.00 S26,000.00 S37,400.00 Sl0,000.00 S5,000.00 S80,000.00 SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO S3,500.00 SO.DO S92,000.00 S0.00 S9,927 586.43 Actual 1992/93 SO.oO S2, 198,634.15 S1 ,029, 129. 73 S3,846.87 S216,737.56 S264, 170.69 $82,950.55 S240,049.81 SO.OD SO.OD S535,898.83 Sl,881,618.58 S122,916.32 S126,721.30 S239,830.12 S0.00 S48,468.00 S6,361.46 S2,662.14 $89.04 SO.OD SO.OD S0.00 S108,935.31 S5,217.15 S23,267.88 S7, 137.50 S40,523.33 SO.DO S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 S0.00 S9,533.42 S4, 154.TT $33,506.47 $4,184.00 S7,236 544.98 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S2,423,333.70 Sl,136,945.28 S0.00 S231,580.25 S291,905.52 SB9,m.o6 $334,391.33 SO.OD S53,500.00 S796,700.00 S2,769,165.00 S206,350.00 S400,000.00 s200,ooo.oo S27,545.00 S112,300.00 Sl0,000.00 Sl 13,650.00 $800.00 S30,000.00 Sl,236.00 $309.00 $40,680.00 $8,000.00 S20,000.00 S9,000.00 $6,800.00 S0.00 SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO S0.00 S23,090.00 Sl0,000.00 $60,000.00 S7,500.00 S9,414 554.14 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 189.26 50.00 239.26 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fu,ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 2:\u0026gt;43 UPKEEP OF GROONOS 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES - SP TRACKING 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 2543 UPKEEP OF GROONOS TOTALS Page 96 'y little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $126.61 $31,387.91 $303.52 $1,265.88 $33 083.92 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 $9,856.79 $39.03 S0.00 $9,895.82 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 $16,500.00 S1 ,500.00 S0.00 S18,000.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2544 UPKEEP OF EQUIPMENT 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0486 BOILERS/SH ENGINES 2544 UPKEEP OF EQUIPMENT TOTALS Page 97 I I I little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $3,920.071 $17,176.901 $21,096.97 I Budget 1992/93 so.001 so.001 SO.DO I Actual 1992/93 $643.12 $7,622.78 S8 265.90 Budget 1993/94 $2,500.00 $15,000.00 $17 SOD.OD PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2545 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.S26 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 2545 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE TOTALS Page 98 I I I Little Rock School District Progrem Budget  OOM Actuel 1991/92 S1r,266.6.SI S54,m.991 S72,039.62 I Budget 1992/93 so.001 so.001 S0.00 I Actual 1992/93 S10, 103.08 $36,613.87 $46,716.95 Budget 1993/94 $16,000.00 S60,000.00 $76,000.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2546 SECURITY SERVICES 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0319 OTHER PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 2546 SECURITY SERVICES TOTALS Page 99 Little Roc:k School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $3,457.00 $2,532.50 $2,620.75 $658.71 S0.00 $107.69 $31,463.53 $316.03 $470.95 $41 627.16 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 $2,525.00 S0.00 $193.23 $4.50 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $2 722. 73 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2548 ASBESTOS PROGRAM 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0319 OTHER PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH 2548 ASBESTOS PROGRAM TOTALS Page 100 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 $69,304.08 SS,301.60 S2, 142.93 S320.00 S77 068.61 Budget 1992/93 SO.OD SO.OD SO.OD SO.OD SO.OD Actual 1992/93 S65,037.50 $4,975.32 S2, 753.48 SO.DO S72 766.30 Budget 1993/94 S61,500.00 $4,655.00 S3,402.00 SO.DO S69 557.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 2.00 2.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 fu,ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 25411 OTHER OPER \u0026amp; HAINT 0640 INSURANCE 0641 PROPERTY INSURANCE 2549 OTHER OPER \u0026amp; MAINT TOTALS Page 101 I I I Little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 ($52.00) I $50,000.00( S49 948.00 I Budget 1992/93 S0.001 so.ool S0.00 I Actual 1992/93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Budget 1993/94 so.uo $0.00 $0.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 F1..netion Object Code - Description Code - Description 2551 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; YEH 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING ANO BINDING-EXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0440 PERIODICALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 2551 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION TOTALS Page 102 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 s:,r,2a.64 $4,363.62 S1,049.46 S0.00 S0.00 Sl, 196.48 S2,082.40 S3,382.14 S2,369.26 S0.00 S244.00 S13,869.08 S85 779.28 Budget 1992/93 so.oo S0.00 S0.00 S500.00 S2,400.00 $600.00 sa,000.00 S1,000.00 S5,400.00 S0.00 S260.00 S0.00 S18.160.00 Actual 1992/93 so.oo S0.00 so.oo S190.72 SO.OD $445.01 S2,532.00 S22.40 S1,040.35 S1,772.40 S137.00 S411.29 S6 551.17 Budget 1993/94 $6,086.15 $468.52 S1 ,470.89 S500.00 S2,400.00 S700.00 S4,000.00 S500.00 $4,000.00 S0.00 S200.00 S1,000.00 S21.325.55 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 1 .00 1.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2552 VEHICLE OPERATION 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREHE 0240 INSURANCE 0290 OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2552 VEHICLE OPERATION TOTALS Page 103 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $2,663,328.58 $203,236.18 $51,886.18 $242,810.23 $2.40 $3,161,263.57 Budget 1992/93 $2,111),000.00 $625,688.20 S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO S3 500 688.20 Actual 1992/93 $2,399,315.89 $183,545.86 $42,757.05 $295,713.95 S0.00 $2,921,332.75 Budget 1993/94 $2,815,761.73 $216,762.13 $37,042.07 $465,187.74 S0.00 $3,534,753.67 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 324.10 324.10 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code  Description Code  Description l))j MONITORING OllO REGULAR NON -CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREHE 0240 INSURANCE 0550 VEHICLES 2553 MONITORING TOTALS Page 104 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOM Actual 1991/92 5264,1147.0\\1 $20,268.45 S5, 160.17 S11, 742.43 $19,600.00 $321,718.14 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Actual 1992/93 S260,61Z.54 $19,936.97 $6,070.57 $15,633.09 S0.00 $302,253.17 Budget 1993/94 $275,571.52 $21,214.59 $7,079.40 $18,923.89 S0.00 S322 795.40 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 12.00 12.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code Description Code Description 2554 VEHICLE SERVICING 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAK 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0329 OTHER PROPERTY SERVICES 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0333 TRAVEL 0339 OTHER TRANSPORTATION SERV 0409 SUPPLIES 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES SP TRACKING 0490 OTHER SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0550 VEHICLES 0551 VEHICLES LEASE PURCHASE 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2554 VEHICLE SERVICING TOTALS Page 105 little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 $0.00 $273,452.95 $20,918.95 $9,359.28 $10,747.15 $278,469.60 $16,000.00 $549,220.97 $1,908.51 $1,430.88 $0.00 $181,396.99 $794,427.65 $9,399.57 $9,903.94 $132,506.60 $906,669.49 $3,435.30 $3 199 247.83 Budget 1992/93 $10,370.00 $585,214.00 $79,871.09 $0.00 $0.00 $259,000.00 $10,000.00 $400,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $235,000.00 $737,146.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $910,000.00 $0.00 $3 227.601.09 Actual 1992/93 $0.00 $279,933.31 $21,414.73 $8,049.15 $13,330.04 $335,329.96 $12,703.25 $431,152.60 $1,419.43 $835.70 ($22,450.39) $104,226.16 $698,885.70 $15,271.99 $2,155.95 $0.00 $618,895.35 $9,681.80 $2 530.834.73 $1 Budget 1993/94 $0.00 $280, 791 . 98 $21,616.09 $8,997.36 $14,482.97 $259,000.00 $15,000.00 $478,000.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $150,000.00 $722,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 962 888.40 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 10.00 10.00 Dete: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 F1.11Ction Object Code - Description Code - Description /.)//. PURCHASING SERVICES Ull/ STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0327 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINOING-EXTE 0365 COPIER LEASE 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0440 PERIOOICALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0545 EQUIPMENT LEASE PURCHASE 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2572 PURCHASING SERVICES TOTALS Page 106 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 so.oo S374,m.6o $28,563.92 $1,645.68 S14, 963. 13 S0.00 S194.92 $12,857.25 S117.90 $321.45 $2,776.63 S22.50 S0.00 S0.00 $387,415.95 S4, 100. 10 S0.00 S257.95 S0.00 $5,611.69 $93,964.39 S0.00 S0.00 $927,587.06 Budget 1992/93 S5,oro.50 $427,972.00 $58,033.30 S0.00 SO.OU S0.00 $700.00 S10,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S4,000.00 S750.00 U,000.00 S11,000.00 S470,000.00 $3,600.00 S0.00 $360.00 S0.00 S15,000.00 S0.00 $51,902.00 S0.00 $1,062,193.80 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 $366,392.79 $28,028.98 $1,560.50 $19,649.40 S0.00 S0.00 $13,258.12 S0.00 $140.77 S2, 185.38 S38.95 S52.00 $25.00 $278,783.36 $2,020.87 $1,234.70 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $72,802.76 S0.00 $320.00 $786,493.58 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 $371,681.67 $28,491.19 $1,785.50 $22,279.63 S30,000.00 $600.00 S14,000.00 S0.00 S15,000.00 S5,000.00 $800.00 $2,400.00 S7,500.00 $503,000.00 U,000.00 S0.00 $370.80 $360.00 S12,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 Sl,200.00 S1 ,019,468. 79 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 15.00 15.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Ft.net ion Object Code - Description Code - Description 2573 1/AREHOJSING \u0026amp; OISTRIBUTIN 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0325 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 2573 1/AREHOJSING \u0026amp; DISTRIBUTIN TOTALS Page 107 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 s21,rn.r!! Sl,667.38 S714.72 S0.00 S102.40 S4, 173.64 SO.DO S208.23 S28,662.15 Budget 1992/93 50.oO SO.OD SO.DO S0.00 S500.00 S11,000.00 SO.DO S0.00 $11,500.00 Actual 1992/93 S34,992.10 S2,676.78 Sl,385.13 SO.DO S200.00 $3,359.81 S28.28 SO.OD $42,642.10 Budget 1993/94 S36,893.51 S2,840.16 S1 ,631.93 S300.00 S500.00 S14,705.00 $0.00 S2,985.00 $59,855.60 PROG: BU\u0026gt;004 FTE 1993/94 1.00 1.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 FlllCtion Object Code Oescrl tlon Code - Oescri tlon 4 PRINTING PUB OUPLICAT 6 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING ANO BINOING-EXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 2574 PRINTING PUB \u0026amp; OUPLICAT TOTALS Page 108 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 Budget 1992/93 S65,000.00 $5,000.00 $115,000.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 $25,095.29 $74,994.07 S0.00 $100 089.36 Budget 1993/94 ,000.00 $50,000.00 S65,000.00 $3,500.00 $126,500.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Flfietion Object Code Description Code Description 2585 SAFETY-DRUG TESTING 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES SP TRACKING 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 2585 SAFETY-DRUG TESTING TOTALS Page 109 little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 Sl,589.00 S121.56 $380.00 S0.00 S103.S4 S12,394.14 S0.00 $14.588.24 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S500.00 S500.00 S10,000.00 S0.00 S5,000.00 S16,000.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 SO.DO S565.00 S71.00 S131.35 S9,242.08 S0.00 S10.009.43 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 SO.OD $600.00 S200.00 S200.00 S12,000.00 S2,000.00 S15 000.00 PROG: BIA\u0026gt;004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code Description 2587 SAFETY \u0026amp; SE CUR I TY 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0319 OTHER PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES SP TRACKING 0412 LOCAL SUPPLIES SP TRACKIN 0414 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0545 EQUIPMENT LEASE PURCHASE 0548 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CENTER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2587 SAFETY \u0026amp; SECURITY TOTALS Page 110 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 S103,364.50 $0.00 $435,792.63 $41,209.77 $616.91 S33,998.66 $4,319.00 $46,923.44 S136.62 $842.56 S392.98 $129.76 S155.04 S13,500.00 S5,546.95 Sl,099.38 S1 ,497 .30 sa, 101.60 $0.00 SO.DO S30,880.64 S31,650.41 SO.DO S214.00 S760 378. 15 Budget 1992/93 SO.DO $5,464.00 S483,649.00 S91, 115.30 SO.DO SO.DO S2,000.00 S70,000.00 S2,000.00 S5,000.00 SO.DO SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD $40,000.00 SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD S5,000.00 SO.DO S50,000.00 $0.00 SO.DO S754 228.30 Actual 1992/93 $11,967.73 $0.00 $498,078.83 $39,018.72 S701.52 $42,326.98 $5,765.00 S42,515.06 Sl,202.63 Sl,523.84 $454.32 $41.97 S169.59 $4, 180.00 S19,356.74 SO.DO S2,396.88 Sl,098.52 S246.53 S3,407.33 S758.15 $31,650.41 S258.98 S208.00 S707 327.73 Budget 1993/94 $0.00 $0.00 $640,216.08 S49,088.66 $642.92 $59,024.40 $5,000.00 S72,100.00 S2,000.00 S2,000.00 S700.00 $75.00 $250.00 S5,200.00 S21,800.00 SO.OD S3,000.00 S2,000.00 SO.DO S5,000.00 S2,000.00 SO.OD SO.DO S500.00 $870 597.06 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 40.00 40.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2589 RISK MANAGEMENT 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 0440 PERIOOICALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 0640 INSURANCE 0649 OTHER INSURANCE 2589 RISK MANAGEMENT TOTALS Page 111 Little Rock School Olstrict Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $76,632.13 $198.00 S0.00 $35.35 $37.35 $10.39 $924.29 $181.13 $1,029.68 $335.00 $1,196,288.20 $49,440.00 $1 325 111.52 Budget 1992/93 $688.00 $60,307.00 $7,820.98 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $1,018,440.00 $50,000.00 $1,137,255.98 Actual 1992/93 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $93,724.69 $0.00 S447.63 $3.82 $0.00 $0.00 $164.99 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $620,983.15 $47,960.00 $763 284. 28 Budget 1993/94 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S400,000.00 $50,000.00 S450,000.00 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fla'let ion Object tlon Code - Descri tion PPORT SERVICES-BU 6 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES-BU TOTALS Page 112 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 0. 0 S0.00 Budget 1992/93 Actual 1992/93 Budget 1993/94 S 71,500.00 $171 500.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fi.nction Object Code Description Code - Description 2610 DIR OF CENTRAL SUPPORT SE 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0327 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0333 TRAVEL 0342 . POST~GE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0365 COPIER LEASE 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0413 SOFTWARE 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0440 PER I 00 I CALS 0540 EQUIPMENTPERSONAL PROPER 0620 INTEREST 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 0660 IMPROVEMENT TAX 0690 OTHER EXPENSES 2610 DIR OF CENTRAL SUPPORT SE TOTALS Page 113 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 SlU'.\u0026gt;,899.JO S8, 101.24 S2,986.92 SO.DO S573.92 S7,000.00 Sl,692.05 S46.91 S38.95 S209.24 SO.DO S545.24 S0.00 SO.OD S0.00 S132.09 S355,103.68 S6,691.00 S8, 971.34 SO.DO S497, 991.88 Budget 1992/93 so.oo S0.00 SO.DO S1,200.00 SO.OD S7,000.00 S10,000.00 SO.OD SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD S10,000.00 S1,000.00 SO.OD S450.00 S0.00 SO.OD S0.00 S0.00 S190,713.00 S220 363.00 Actual 1992/93 S98,917.50 S7,567.30 S3,489.63 S483.00 SO.DO SS,000.00 SO.DO S66.14 S821.45 SO.OD S95.92 S722.64 S0.00 S469.02\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1182","title":"Little Rock School District Court Submission","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1993-06-28"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational statistics","School improvement programs","School employees"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District Court Submission"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1182"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 COURT SUBMISSION JUNE 28, 1993 Little Rock School District June 28, 1993 Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge and Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Chris: JUN 2 8 1993 Ollice of Des gregation Monitoring As a prerequisite to the July 7 and 8 court hearings to review budget matters, I submit the following exhibits as required by Judge Wright's order dated June 15, 1993: 1-A Budget Changes Supported by \"Business Cases\" 1-B Major Deficit Reduction Actions 1-C 1993-94 Certified Teacher Salary Increases Matrix 1-D Budget Revision (Draft 4) 1-E Action Plan Based upon my interpretation of the order, the attached exhibits should complete our required filings for the June 28, 1993 court submission date.\n~ly, Mark D. Milhollen Controller MDM/cfh Attachments 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)374-3361 Exhibit 1-A BUDGET CHANGES SUPPORTED BY \"BUSINESS CASES\" A list of the business cases which relate to the 1993-94 Board approved budget changes are as follows: Four full time social workers at Incentive Schools One Spanish teacher for Incentive Schools A police resource officer at each secondary school Extended contracts for King staff, ABACUS expansion One secretary for desegregation facilitator One half-time communications assistant Director of Human Resources One additional assistant principal at Central High Discontinue KLRE/KUAR funding after 2 year notice One secretary in Human Resources Communications Assistant Curriculum and Learning Improvement Department One secretary in School Operations Plant Services Department Transportation Department One position in VIPS Department Total Additions Total Reductions * Savings will not accrue for two years, so they are not included in the total. $132,000 33,000 203,000 339,137 21,500 10,000 55,000 40,000 $ 833,637 $ 86,000* 21,800 40,040 897,098 23,000 178,031 62,962 20,937 $ 1,243,868 J / / \\/ t/ \\/' t/  V / v  v Exhibit 1-A Page Two Gifted and Talented Counseling Music Teachers IRC Aides Community Schools Parent Recruiting Seventh Period at Henderson $ 242,000 260,000 551,000 38,500 100,000 75,000 303,000 Total Reinstatements $ 1,569,500 A~TIO/J S ti/Toi,) ldfftd-ff T~ 15 /Jo SvS,-l.le.55 ~\"\"\" -- ~~--.. A~f-~V2 ~' ~ - ~J~. I,\u0026lt;'e- ~ - ~~P, ~o/ ~~ - b~~~. ~./ ~ -~/:, .. ~ ~ - ~~-- ~ - t:Jy~_,, \u0026amp;P~ - ~~ t.e~,.. JJ\u0026amp;~~ k~~d:i - ~ ~-- kd~~ ~ t::-~ - :l\n,a---~-- Q',4 ~ - ~ ~,., \u0026amp;~~~ ~7 /.A:~ _ ~ ad-- ~ 4 ~/~-~ 4,..t!- /:\u0026amp;?Y ~-~ ~7~--~ PROGRAM ANALYSIS for STAFFING THE INCENTIVE SCHOOLS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Desegregation Plan identifies twenty different positions to be considered for staffing at each Incentive School. Over the past several years the District has made a good faith effort to hire most of the recommended positions. The remaining unfilled positions are being considered at this time to further meet the needs of students and the school community. These positions are: assistant principals, social workers, a Spanish teacher(s), and alternative classroom specialists. A. Background These positions identified in the Desegregation Plan have already been placed at the Incentive Schools. The positions include: o Assistant principals for Rockefeller \u0026amp; Franklin o Classroom Teachers o Counselor o Media Specialist o Music Teacher o Art Teacher o P.E. Teacher o Auxiliary Teacher {permanent substitute) o Reading Teacher (remediation) o Math Teacher (remediation) o Computer Lab Attendant o Resource Teacher o Speech Teacher o Media Clerk o Instructional Aide (classroom) o Theme Specialist o Principal o Supervision Aides (cafeteria and playground) The plan clearly states that a needs assessment should be conducted to determine the basis for adding any unfilled positions. A needs assessment was conducted by the Staffing Committee at each Incentive School in February of 1993, to consider the positions of assistant principals, social workers, Spanish teachers, and alternative classroom specialists added to each Incentive School staff. B. C. D. Problem Definition The data received from the needs assessment conducted at each school indicated a need for the following positions: 1) Four assistant principals 2) Four full-time social workers 3) A Spanish teacher 4) Two alternative classroom specialists The staffing committees held lengthy discussions on these positions to determine whether or not these were absolute needs. Adding a full-time social worker at Franklin and Rockefeller will eliminate the need for an alternative classroom specialist. The Board did not approve additional assistant principals for incentive schools in the 1993-94 budget. Rather than add a Spanish teacher at every incentive school for the 1993-94 school year, the Board supported phasing in a pilot program at two (2) incentive schools as recommended by the Staffing Committee. The budget impact of adding four (4) social workers and one (l) Spanish teacher will cost the District approximately $165,000 for the 1993-94 school year. Analysis of Alternatives After compiling and analyzing the data of the needs assessments, each Incentive Schools' Staffing Committee was responsible for writing a statement of rationale to support their findings and recommendations. The staffing recommendations were then prioritized according to the most dire needs at each school. Any other alternative to form a basis for adding unfilled positions would be contrary to the process identified in the Desegregation Plan. Recommendation The specific placement of the recommended positions are as follows: Rockefeller: Full-time Social Worker Half-time Spanish Teacher Garland: Franklin: Full-time Social Worker Full-time Social Worker E. F. Rightsell: Mitchell: Half-time Social Worker Half-time Spanish Teacher Half-time Social Worker* * We already have one (1) full time social worker for incentive schools. We propose to use this person one-half (1/2) time at Ish and Stephens, which will give all incentive schools at least a one-half (1/2) time social worker. Objectives The objective of the recommendation is to meet the needs of each Incentive School community and to further implement our Desegregation Plan. Because school community needs are constantly changing, a needs assessment should be conducted yearly to determine the basis for continuing staffed positions. The specific duties, responsibilities and activities of each position should be analyzed to evaluate program need and position effectiveness. Impact Analysis The expected positive impact of adding additional positions to the Incentive Schools hopefully is an increase in student achievement and success. The possible negative impact of adding additional positions to the Incentive Schools might be that the comparatively low student enrollments at the Incentive Schools may cause duties and responsibilities of various positions to overlap and be perceived as a non-essential staff position. However, a recent court order does state that the addition of staff positions should not be based on enrollment, rather the need for such positions. Resources Analysis The desegregation budget will be impacted by an additional salary expenditure of $162,000 for the 1993-94 school year. Instructional materials, training, and other program costs are estimated to be an additional $3,000. BUSINESS CASE SAFETY AND SECURITY DEPARTMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 1989, after the unfortunate shooting of a student at a Little Rock Junior High School, the Board of Directors authorized the Administration to conduct a safety and security study. This study was to address the security issue on campuses, on buses, and in the neighborhoods surrounding the schools. The Board of Directors made the decision to have a committee from each school study the various safety and security issues in the LRSD. A Task Force was formed that 1. Held public hearings 2. Met with Parent-Teacher groups and/or their designated leaders 3. Interviewed city and community leaders 4. Reviewed secondary school safety and security issues in other urban school districts The Task Force enlisted the expertise of the National School Safety Center who sent its Deputy Director to Little Rock for one week and on later follow-up visits. The Task Force report was dealt with by issuing twenty (20) major recommendations to use as an outline to build a strong, effective safety and security program for the Little Rock School District. Recommendation No. 18 in this report was to establish a school district office of Safety and Security. A. Background 1. At present, the Safety and Security Department is composed of a Director of Safety and Security, two supervisors, and one person who answers all alarm calls to the various sights, meets the police that have been dispatched, and secures the buildings upon completion of his report. There are thirty-six (36) School Based Security Officers assigned to the secondary schools in the LRSD. A recommended addition is the addition of fourteen (14) School Resource Officers. School Resource Officers (SRO) will be assigned to the current secondary schools. A School Resource Officer is a commissioned law enforcement officer that is assigned to the local school district. Safety and Security Page Two B. C. 2. School security is a problem that is currently concerning both school district employees and members of the community throughout the nation. The idea of School Resource Officers and security forces is certainly not a new idea. It is, however, fairly new to the State of Arkansas. The problem of dealing effectively with unruly students and community members has been an ongoing problem through the country for many years. Districts across the country are having to develop plans, policies, and strategies for coping with these issues and the resulting increase of fights, assaults, homicides, drive-by shootings, weapons, and general disruption to previously \"quiet\" schools. Problem Definition 1. Various approaches to better safety and security in the schools have been attempted. It must be recognized that there is no one single approach that will solve the multitude of problems. The School Resource Officer approach is, however, one that has been successful throughout the country in dealing with the various acting out behaviors and in helping create a bridge between local law enforcement and troubled youth in the community. Analysis of Alternatives 1. Many alternatives have been approached in solving the problems. The LRSD has not discarded any of our approaches only attempted to bring new answers to the problem. The National School Safety Center, an advocate of School Resource Officers, supplied this office with information on these programs throughout the country. Visits were made to programs in California and Florida. Numerous telephone conferences were held with Resource Officers on duty in different schools. The Little Rock School District looked at these different options: a. b. Do nothing: A number of school districts do not need a formal security program that involves Resource Officers. With the problems facing the City of Little Rock and the schools in the Little Rock District this option was not chosen. ~ with a guard service. Two private guard services were contacted. Neither of these services had any experience in providing a security force that had expertise in dealing with the diverse student population in our community. Few training programs were available through these groups. Additionally, these groups seemed to have a lack of commitment to and understanding of our educational philosophy. Safety and Security Page Three c. Employ School Resource Officers. Historically, police have played a significant role in public education. They have been involved in handling truancy, juvenile crime, and major collective disturbances. Personnel are trained. The size of the force can be down-sized when needed. A pre-employment background check is always completed and support personnel is available. A formal agreement is prepared that identifies duties and responsibilities of both the police department and the school district. D. Recommendations E. 1. The Little Rock School District recommends that alternative number 3 be employed. It is our belief that School Resource Officers will help provide a balance between crime prevention, education, enforcement, and informed positive contacts. A School Resource Officer will help develop relationships with students. The School Resource Officer will lay a foundation for student confidence and trust by demonstrating both a knowledge and an interest in matters of child advocacy. Objectives 1. Objectives to the recommendation. Program objectives are: a. To prevent students from becoming involved in behaviors that violate state statutes, city codes, and District policy b. To establish an improved rapport between law enforcement officers and youth c. To assist the building staff and administration in providing security for students d. To act as a resource to staff and students in legal matters and violence prevention intervention e. To help to provide an educational environment that offers prevention programs in determining youth involvement in gang activities, crime, alcohol, and drug abuse f. To assist in the coordination of community resources in promoting interagency approaches to the solution of community youth problems Safety and Security Page Four F. 2. Good Support. One of the prerequisites for students to have a chance to learn is to have a safe, secure environment in which to learn. District level goals that would increase educational achievement with emphasis on closing disparities certainly fall within this area. A safe, secure environment is also necessary for students and staff if the following goals are to be reached: a. Providing equitable educational opportunities for all students in a desegregated learning environment b. Enabling all students to develop a lifelong capacity and love for learning c. Teaching all students to be productive contributors in the school, the community, and the work place d. Providing a disciplined, structured learning environment for all students 3. Evaluation Criteria. Evaluation criteria for the School Resource Officer Program include: a. Written evaluation by principals, including suggested improvements b. Written evaluation by school resource officer, including suggested improvements c. Survey of all staff members of schools d. Survey 10% of students, including high school and junior high school students e. Survey 10% of parents of high school and junior high school students f. Compare pre and post data for suspension, attendance, and dropout incidents involving unauthorized non-students on campus and juveniles processed into the juvenile justice system Impact Analysis 1. Program. It is expected that this program will have a positive effect on both the schools and the community. Additional role models, both male and female, will be visible to all children. These officers will be able to provide Safety and Security Page Five G. assistance to students and staff in legal matters. Various crime prevention, drug and alcohol programs will be presented to students. It is expected that the relationship between students and their respect for the law will be a positive move for our community. Some of the built-in mistrust of \"police types\" will be affected. The added protection of a qualified law enforcement officer that is available at all times will also present a positive impact. 2. Desegregation Plan. There will be no negative impact upon the Desegregation Plan. All employees are expected to work together to promote adherence to the Plan. 3. Court Orders. No impact is known. 4. Political Factors. No political factors will have impact upon this program. 5. Risks. Any new program has risks that accompany the program. Schools face the risk of becoming overly dependant on police personnel to solve problems. Police officers generally have not been schooled in educational philosophy. Police lack the flexibility that school administrators have in dealing with student off enders. A special inservice program will be given to all involved before the program will be implemented. After three years of program planning, the administration believes that the community is ready for this program. 6. Timing. The major issues are the extensive training required to replace officers that join this program. The City of Little Rock must take that into account before accepting the program. The Little Rock School District must plan inservice activities before placing the program in action. These programs will be completed prior to program implementation. Resource Analysis 1. Personnel Analysis. Fourteen School Resource Officers will be added to the district staff. One support person, a LRPD supervisor, will perform support duties to the program. Personnel will be recruited from the ranks of the Little Rock Police Department. 2. Financial Analysis. Operating costs have been prepared and submitted by the City of Little Rock. Under the proposed plan, costs will be shared between the city and the Little Rock School District on a 50/50 basis. The Little Rock School District's expense for the first year of operation will be $203,000. This cost will fund fourteen (14) police resource officer positions. Safety and Security Page Six H. These costs are valid for the 1993 school year. A 5% cost of living type of increase in overall personnel costs should be planned for 1994. Additionally, the second year personnel costs should include an additional $34,079 for employee step increases plus $20,000 to pay for benefit increases such as educational pay and longevity. Force Field Analysis 1. Forces For. The primary support of this recommendation will likely be the principals in the affected schools. In addition, teachers in the schools affected will likely form a group that will support this move. It is my opinion that all Board members will support this recommendation. Support will come from these groups because each of the groups has studied this option for approximately three years. They have been presented with both pros and cons of the program. Parents will be a support of this recommendation. All calls to my office have been supportive. 2. Forces Against. The only persons to have voiced concerns in the past have seemed to have the feeling that the policeman may use his authority in an abusive manner. The success of the program for a one semester trial at McClellan High School was discussed at a recent meeting. Board members who had voted in a negative manner in the past seemed to have changed their minds and talked in a positive manner. I. Implementation begins with approval by the governing bodies of both the City of Little Rock and the Little Rock School District. Following approval, meetings will be held with Little Rock Police Department officials to determine starting dates for training newly hired officers to supplement the officers that are selected to become School Resource Officers. Additionally, both the LRSD and LRPD will offer training sessions for officers selected to begin the Resource Officer program. Bill Barnhouse, Director of Safety and Security, will assume the task of scheduling all events that will ensure a successful program implementation. All status reports for program implementation will be submitted to the Manager of Resources and School Support, Little Rock School District. ADDITIONAL BUDGET EXPENDITURES ABACUS - INSTRUCTIONAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Little Rock School District is committed to a comprehensive desegregation plan which focuses on the total learning environment for all students. The method of assigning these students is the first step in creating school and classroom environments that foster academic achievement and improve race relations between students and staff members. The next step involves a commitment to quality desegregated education by the District, the parents, and the community. The commitment requires a plan of action predicated upon the District's commitment to remaining solvent, while providing quality desegregated education for its students. The Educational Audit pointed out the curriculum must be reviewed, revised as necessary, developed in an appropriate scope and sequence, and capable of supporting carefully-written objectives. Not until this was done could we move forward to address in a meaningful way the evaluation of effective teaching and the assessment of student learning. Instructional management systems are very effective and helpful in tracking the progress of individual students and providing corrective prescriptions to improve learning. A. BACKGROUND The Little Rock School District remains committed to providing teachers and principals with the training and technical support necessary to ensure that the Abacus system is used by teachers as a viable instructional management tool. In order to fulfill this commitment using District resources currently available, all principals were trained during the first semester, but the original plan for training all K-12 core-area teachers during the 1992-93 school year was modified and, thus, the initial schedule for training was revised. During the 1992-93 school year, the Abacus system is being implemented in a limited number of schools. All K-9 core-area teachers, specialists, and administrators in these schools were trained to use the system for management instruction in core content areas of the revised curriculum. Because of the large number of schools applying for the limited spaced available in the pilot project, the District decided to conduct two (2) cycles of the pilot training in order to include more schools in the project. The schools chosen to participate in each cycle were as follows: Cycle I Mabelvale Jr. High Southwest Jr. High Baseline Carver Dodd Geyer Springs Gibbs Mitchell Rightsell Romine Terry Cycle II Badgett Booker Chicot Forest Park Ish Jefferson Meadowcliff Otter Creek Pulaski Heights El. Watson Woodruff Each cycle was divided into two phases of training: the first phase consisted of K-9 corearea teachers in each pilot school attending two half-day training sessions\nthe second phase consisted of individual technical assistance conducted by the Staff Development Specialists at the local pilot schools. Additional training for the teachers trained this past summer was also provided. After teachers had completed two training sessions, the Staff Development Specialists spent four to six ( 4-6) days in each school providing Phase II training, which consisted of individual technical assistance to the teachers as they used the Abacus system. This assistance was provided according to a schedule developed cooperatively by each teacher and the Staff Development Specialists. Following completion of the in-school technical assistance, additional class sessions and/or further in-school training will be scheduled and conducted according to the needs of the participants. Several optional Abacus review /refresher workshops were scheduled for those teachers who were originally trained this past summer at the IBM center. These workshops were conducted at Metropolitan during the AEA Convention. Session 1 - November 5, 1992 -- 8:30 - 11:30 a.m. Session 2 - November 5, 1992 -- 12:30 - 3:30 p.m. Session 3 - November 6, 1992 -- 8:30 - 11:30 a.m. Each session was limited to 20 participants per session. The remaining schools are targeted for initial training this summer and during the 1993- 94 school year. B. PROBLEM DEFINITION The District must determine the most appropriate way to complete the training for the remaining schools and how to provide additional technical assistance and support to all schools. The new curriculum offers core content area teachers flexibility in making the best uses of an almost infinite number of assessment possibilities. Teachers realize that assessing student progress is an ongoing part of the instructional process, and most teachers incorporate a variety of assessment strategies into the daily teaching/learning routine. With the new core curriculum, teachers can ensure that students are mastering the grade level objectives by correlating their assessment methods, along with their instructional strategies, to the identified objectives. Since teachers have the freedom to arrange the objectives so that they fit the learner's needs and the teacher's style, they must also choose how to assess. Teachers will continue to use standardized chapter tests and other similar mass-produced assessment with caution. The new curriculum has been designed by LR teachers for LR teachers. The objectives in all core areas are linked to specific learner outcomes, and any assessment must reflect individual student progress consistent with the aims of those outcomes. To assist teachers in the assessment process, a test item bank that is aligned with the District's curriculum is available through the Instructional Management System. The test item bank will be expanded to include more test items by the beginning of the 1993-94 school year. Remaining teachers need to be trained in order to access the test items. C. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES The District needs to determine the most efficient and user-friendly method of completing this needed training. We have given a great deal of thought and discussion as to the most cost-effective means of providing this training. Feedback from staff in pilot schools was secured in determining what worked and what did not work in Cycle I and II training sessions this school year. A District-wide instructional management system is needed to help us track the progress of individual students and to provide corrective prescriptions to improve teaching and learning. We can no longer wait until spring each year to know whether or not our students have mastered the objectives in our curriculum. D. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the District fully implement the Abacus Instructional Management System during the 1993-94 school year. During the 1992-93 school year, 22 schools participated in the piloting of the Instructional Management System. The pilot schools assisted us in learning to effectively train staff and to work out expected \"glitches\" in the System. The rationale for this recommendation is that the management system, fully operational, can provide: Parents Continuous monitoring of individual student progress. Detailed reports for conferences, Board of Directors, and the Office of Desegregation and Monitoring. Immediate feedback on test results with diagnostic information. Comprehensive library of learning resources. Capability to create, store, and print tests. The Abacus Instructional Management System provides ways to help make the parent an integral part of their student's learning process. It will: Provide reports showing the learning objectives and instructional goals to be mastered. Provide regular and timely update reports showing current progress toward those instructional goals. Clearly show parents which learning objectives have not been mastered or not attempted. Provide suggested instructional resource listings which the parent can use to supplement classroom instruction in areas where the student needs help. Enhance parent/teacher cooperation. E. OBJECTIVE The objective of this recommendation is to fully utilize technology to uniformly manage and monitor instruction as indicated in the desegregation plan. The District needs this technology to help it evaluate programs that are working and to secure the necessary data to assist us in eliminating programs that are not working. Technology, used appropriately, can save staff many hours of manual labor and can provide uniform and consistent reporting of student learning and student mastery of the curriculum. Evaluation Criteria  Continuous monitoring of student progress. Timely, detailed reports for conferences, administration, Board of Directors, and the Office of Desegregation and Monitoring. Increased teacher use of test item bank. Increased use of mastery reports by teachers and principals to intervene in student learning. Increased use of the System by reluctant users. Increased use of mastery reports to parents regarding student learning. F. IMPACT A AL YSIS The Instructional Management System has the potential for assisting the District in gathering data for reports, monitoring and evaluating teaching and learning, and tracking student progress. Reliable data are needed to make professional judgements regarding the effectiveness of District programs. It is important to provide student, class, school, and District Objective Mastery Analysis and Summary. The System can provide a rich and stimulating instructional resource bank that will assist teachers, librarians, media clerks, and parents. Desegregation Plan District-wide implementation of the Instructional Management System will allow us to achieve another objective in our desegregation plan: the use of an instructional management system that will track student progress. Court Orders The District has committed to the utilization of an instructional management system, and this commitment has been noted by the Court. Political Factors The District can receive favorable responses from the community and schools if it commits the necessary resources to correctly implement the System. Risks The quality of support and services provided by the schools and patrons can be positive if implemented correctly. The additional funds requested will be viewed as a wise investment. Should the District decide not to support this system, the results can be very negative and regarded as \"just another gimmick.\" Timing Decisions regarding full implementation should be made prior to teachers and principals going off contract. It will be necessary to begin training the remaining elementary teachers prior to the beginning of school. G. RESOURCES ANALYSIS Provided is a listing of personnel that must be trained to use the Instructional Management System. Included is the projected budget for staff development of teachers. We have developed several implementation plans for your consideration. They are included in this Business Case. The Administration recommends the Board of Directors consider Plan 2 for implementation for the 1993-94 school year. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 PROJECTED BUDGET FOR 1993-94 ABACUS TRAINING I. Secondary 45 teachers ( 4 per each of 11 secondary schools and 1 from Alternative Leaming Center) A. One day of training @ $100 per teacher B. Yearly stipends @ $1,000 per teacher II. Elementary A. One day of training for 440 teachers including G/T, Special Education, Math, and Reading Specialists @ $100 per teachers OR One day of training for 344 teachers including ONLY regular classroom teachers @ $100 per teacher B. One-half day training for 37 designated teachers providing technical support @ $50 per teacher C. Yearly stipends for 37 teachers providing technical support @ $500 per teacher $4,500.00 $45,000.00 $44,000.00 OR $34,000.00 $1,850.00 $18,500.00 TOT AL WITH 440 ELEMENTARY TEACHERS $113,850.00 TOTAL WITH 344 ELEMENTARY TEACHERS $104,250.00 NOTE: If a 10 station lab is used, a total of 51 days will be needed for the above training if 440 elementary teachers are trained, or a total of 42 days will be needed if 344 elementary teachers are trained. If a 15 station lab is used, a total of 35 days will be needed for the above training if 440 elementary teachers are trained, or a total of 28 days will be needed if 344 elementary teachers are trained. The following budget assumes full implementation of all schools except Metropolitan during the 1993-94 school year. It uses current enrollment numbers with the addition of King School's projected enrollment. It does not include any additional personnel costs. Additional equipment numbers are based on having four stations at school with enrollment \u0026gt; 1000 students, three stations at schools with \u0026gt; 800 students, and two stations at schools with enrollments \u0026gt; 600 students. Those schools with less than 600 students would have only one (1) work station. We would have two printers and two scanners only at those locations with four PC's. All other locations would share one printer and one scanner. 52 PC's 7 Laser Printers 13 Sentry 3000 Scanners Total Forms Printer Cartridges In-district Printing Total $1,676.00 3,995.00 3,520.00 Grand Total Equipment/Supplies TOTAL ABACUS BUDGET 1993-94: Equipment/Supplies Inservice for 440 Elementary Teachers Inservice for Secondary Teachers Total OR Equipment/Supplies Inservice for 344 Elementary Teachers Inservice for Secondary Teachers Total $ 87,152.00 27,965.00 45,760.00 $160,877.00 $ 40,000.00 ~ ~ ~ 10,540.00 3,520.00 $ 54,060.00 $214,937.00 $214,937.00 113,850.00 49,500.00 $214,937.00 104,250.00 49,500.00 $378,287.00 $368,687.00 ABACUS TRAINING FOR 1993-94 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2 1. Train only the remaining elementary and secondary schools and provide maintenance for the original pilot schools. .,(A,,/, 1)f11\u0026gt;1.,.Ta?e 2. Add five (5) technicians~ Data Processin~ provide district-wide technical assistance. 3. Designate one (1) teacher in each elementary school to provide technical assistance within the school\neach person will receive a $500 stipend. Training Costs for Plan 2 a. Training July 26 - August 13 Participants: Four (4) remaining incentive schools and King Review Session 3 pilot incentive schools Training for in-school technical person If the above staff members are not on contract, stipends of approximately $50 per day per teacher for approximately 240 teachers $12,000.00 b. Training August 30 - October 4 Participants: Twelve (12) remaining elementary schools Training for in-school technical person One (1) day substitute for approximately 340 teachers @ approximately $30 per day per substitute 10,200.00 c. Remaining eleven (11) secondary schools of approximately 400 teachers added to this plan - $30 per one day substitute for each of the 400 teachers 12,000.00 d. Stipends (approx. $500 per school) 25,000.00 e. Five (5) technicians @ $13,000 each 65,000.00 TOTAL $124,200.00 Training Schedule for Plan 2 Note: the following schedule is based on a 15 station Abacus lab. July 26 - August 13: Remaining incentive schools, King, and Review Sessions for 3 pilot incentive schools (240 teachers\none (1) full day per teacher and one additional full day for technical persons\nif not on contract, a stipend of approximately $50 per day) July 26 - Franklin July 27 - Franklin July 28 - Garland July 29 - Garland and Rockefeller July 30 - Rockefeller August 2 - Stephens August 3 - King August 4 - King August 5 - Review for Ish August 6 - Review for Mitchell August 9 - Review for Mitchell and Rightsell August 10 - Review for Rightsell August 11 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) August 12 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) August 13 - In-school Technical Person (13 schools) August 30 - October 4: Tuelve (12) remaining elementary schools and 37 technical persons (340 teachers\ntwo (2) half-day sessions per teacher\none full day for technical person\nuse substitutes) August 30 and September 15 August 31 and September 16 Bale (8) Brady (8) Cloverdale El. (6) Fair Park (4) Fulbright (4) Bale (8) Brady (8) Cloverdale El. ( 6) Fair Park (4) Fulbright (4) September 1 and September 17 September 2 and September 20 September 3 and September 21 September 6 and September 23 September 9 and September 24 September 10 and September 27 September 13 and September 28 September 14 and September 29 Bale (4) Brady (6) Fair Park (4) Fulbright (8) Mabelvale El. (6) Fair Park (8) Fulbright (8) Mabelvale El. (8) McDermott (6) Fulbright (2) Mabelvale El. (6) McDermott (8) Wakefield (8) Washington (6) Mabelvale El. ( 6) McDermott (8) Wakefield (8) Washington (10) McDermott (6) Wakefield (8) Washington (10) Western Hills (6) Wakefield (2) Washington (10) Western Hills (8) Williams (10) Washington (4) Western Hills (6) Williams (10) Wilson (10) Washington (8) Williams (8) Wilson ( 10) September 30 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) October 1 October 4 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) - In-school Technical Person (13 schools) October 14 - January 7: Eleven (11) remaining secondary schools ( 408 teachers @ 20 per day\ntwo half-day sessions per teacher) October 14 and November 19 October 15 and November 22 October 18 and November 23 October 19 and November 29 October 20 and November 30 October 21 and December 1 October 26 and December 2 October 27 and December 3 October 28 and December 6 October 29 and December 7 November 1 and December 8 November 2 and December 9 November 8 and December 10 Cloverdale Jr. ( 10) Dunbar (10) Cloverdale Jr. (10) Dunbar (10) Cloverdale Jr. (10) Dunbar (10) Forest Heights ( 10) Henderson (10) Forest Heights (10) Henderson (10) Forest Heights ( 10) Henderson (10) Henderson (8) Mann (6) Pulaski Heights Jr. (6) Mann (10) Pulaski Heights Jr. ( 10) Mann (10) Pulaski Heights Jr. (10) Mann (14) Pulaski Heights Jr. (4) Central (12) Fair (4) Hall (4) Central (12) Fair (4) Hall (4) Central (12) Fair (4) Hall (4) November 9 and December 13 Central ( 12) Fair (4) Hall (4) November 10 and December 14 Central (8) Fair (8) Hall (4) November 11 and December 15 Central (4) Fair (6) Hall (10) November 12 and December 16 Fair (4) Hall (10) McClellan (6) November 15 and January 4 Fair (2) McClellan (9) Parkview (9) November 16 and January 5 McClellan (10) Parkview (10) November 17 and January 6 McClellan (10) Parkview (10) November 18 and January 7 McClellan (2) Parkview (8) BUDGET- ABACUS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2 The following budget assumes full implementation of all schools except Metropolitan during the 1993- 94 school year. It uses current enrollment numbers with the addition of King School's projected enrollment. Additional equipment numbers are based on having four stations at school with enrollment \u0026gt; 1000 students, three stations at schools with \u0026gt; 800 students, and two stations at schools with enrollments \u0026gt;600 students. Those schools with less than 600 students would have only one (1) work station. We would have two printers and two scanners only at those locations with four PC's. All other locations would share one printer and one scanner. 52 PC's 7 Laser Printers 13 Sentry 3000 Scanners Total Forms Printer Cartridges In-district Printing Total $1,676.00 3,995.00 3,520.00 Grand Total Equipment/Supplies .GRAND TQTALA.BACUS BUDGET 1993-94 Equipment/Supplies Stipends for 580 Elementary Teachers Stipends for 400 Secondary Teachers Stipends for one (1) teacher tech. asst. per school (50) Stipends for five (5) computer technicians Total $ 87,152.00 27,965.00 45,760.00 $160,877.00 $ 40,000.00 10,540.00 3,520.00 $ 54,060.00 $214,937.00 $214,937.00 22,200.00 12,000.00 ,1 .. ,o 1-i-\"'11., 25,000.00 65.000.00 $339,137.00 ABACUS TRAINING FOR 1993-94 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 3 1. Train only the remainder of the elementary schools and provide maintenance for the original pilot schools. 2. Add five (5) technicians in Data Processing to providfe district-wide technical assistance. 3. Designate one (1) teacher in each elementary school to provide technical assistance within the school\neach person will receive a $500 stipend. Training Costs for Plan 3 a. Training July 26 - August 13 Participants: Four (4) remaining incentive schools and King Review Session 3 pilot incentive schools Training for in-school technical person If the above staff members are not on contract, stipends of approximately $50 per day per teacher for approximately 240 teachers $12,000.00 b. Training August 30 - October 4 Participants: C. Twelve (12) remaining elementary schools Training for in-school technical person One (1) day substitute for approximately 340 teachers @ approximately $30 per day per substitute $10,200.00 Stipends (approx. $500 per school) $19,000.00 $41,200.00 Training Schedule for Plan 3 Note: the following schedule is based on a 15 station Abacus lab. July 26 - August 13: Remaining incentive schools, King, and Review Sessions for all pilot incentive schools (240 teachers\none (1) full day per teacher and one additional full day for technical persons\nif not on contract, a stipend of approximately $50 per day) July 26 - Franklin July 27 - Franklin July 28 - Garland July 29 - Garland and Rockefeller July 30 - Rockefeller August 2 - Stephens August 3 - Kfog August 4 - King August 5 - Review for Ish August 6 - Review for Mitchell August 9 - Review for Mitchell and Rightsell August 10 - Review for Rightsell August 11 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) August 12 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) August 13 - In-school Technical Person (13 schools) August 30 - October 4: Tuelve (12) remaining elementary schools and 37 technical persons (340 teachers\ntwo (2) half-day sessions per teacher\none full day for technical person\nuse substitutes) August 30 and September 15 August 31 and September 16 Bale (8) Brady (8) Cloverdale El. (6) Fair Park (4) Fulbright (4) Bale (8) Brady (8) Cloverdale El. (6) Fair Park ( 4) Fulbright (4) September 1 and September 17 September 2 and September 20 September 3 and September 21 September 8 and September 23 September 9 and September 24 September 10 and September 27 September 13 and September 28 September 14 and September 29 Bale (4) Brady (6) Fair Park (4) Fulbright (8) Mabelvale El. (6) Fair Park (8) Fulbright (8) Mabelvale El. (8) McDermott (6) Fulbright (2) Mabelvale El. (6) McDermott (8) Wakefield (8) Washington (6) Mabelvale El. (6) McDermott (8) Wakefield (8) Washington (10) McDermott (6) Wakefield (8) Washington (10) Western Hills (6) Wakefield (2) Washington (10) Western Hills (8) Williams (10) Washington (4) Western Hills (6) Williams (10) Wilson (10) Washington (8) Williams (8) Wilson (10) September 30 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) October 1 October 4 - In-school Technical Person ( 12 schools) - In-school Technical Person (13 schools) BUDGET - ABACUS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 3 The following budget assumes full implementation of all elementary schools during the 1993-94 school year. It uses current enrollment numbers with the addition of King School's projected enrollment. Additional equipment numbers are based on having four stations at school with enrollment \u0026gt; 1000 students, three stations at schools with \u0026gt; 800 students, and two stations at schools with enrollments \u0026gt;600 students. Those schools with less than 600 students would have only one (1) work station. We would have two printers and two scanners only at those locations with four PC's. All other locations would share one printer and one scanner. 27 PC's 9 Laser Printers 13 Sentry 3000 Scanners Total Forms $1,676.00 3,995.00 3,520.00 Printer Cartridges (56) 170.00 In-district Printing Total Grand Total Equipment/Supplies Equipment/Supplies Stipends for 580 Elementary Teachers Stipends for one (1) teacher technical asst. per school (38) Stipends for five (5) computer technicians Total $ 45,252.00 35,955.00 45.760.00 $126,967.00 $ 21,000.00 9,520.00 3.520.00 $ 34,040.00 $161.007.00 $161,007.00 22,200.00 19,000.00 65.000.00 $267,207.00 A. Background Decision Analysis of Secretarial Position for Desegregation Office Submitted by Arma J. Hart Executive Summary The position of Desegregation Facilitator is a requirement of the desegregation plan and was, therefore, newly instituted at the beginning of the 1991-92 school year. A new office had to be set up and a secretary was moved from the Business Office to assist in carrying out the technical and clerical responsibilities required by the position. Several weeks later, a Federal Programs Director was hired and the same secretary was assigned to assist both administrators on a half-time basis. The responsibility of the positions for the Desegregation Facilitator and the Federal ~ ~ Programs Director is monumental. The Desegregation Facilitator generated monthly ~ ~--  ./ desegregation reports for the Desegregation Associate Superintendent and the School ~ ~ Board\nplanned, gathered materials, organized and conducted monthly meetings in order to inform, clarify, interpret and assist Incentive School principals with a new desegregation plan. The superintendent and other administrators were to be kept informed when the district was not in compliance. Materials and equipment were ordered and resources were recommended in order to supplement the comprehensive programs during the regular school day, extended day, and on Saturdays. Meetings were held with all teachers and parents to explain the Incentive School program, expectations, and specific roles as they related to ensuring student academic, social, and emotional needs. Recruitment efforts were planned and a Speakers Bureau consisting of teachers and parents was formed in Incentive Schools and at Romine Interdistrict School for desegregation purposes. Training was held for this committee as well as other newly formed parent groups. Night recruitment meetings were held in the Little Rock and Pulaski County Special School Districts to assist with desegregation in both districts. Recruitment meetings were planned by the desegregation facilitator and held every Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. to make sure a recruitment plan was being carried out in the district. Decision Analysis - Executive Summary Desegregation Office Page 2 This office was also responsible for canvassing neighborhoods\nsetting up luncheon meetings with community people\nassisting with the development of a recruitment plan for Martin Luther King School\nmeeting with the City Board of Directors\nplanning programs and scheduling quality extended year summer school programs based -on the needs of children. Checklists were developed for monitoring purposes, test data and student and parent surveys were reviewed. The results were then interpreted, and the impact on integration and desegregation was reported to principals. I attended monthly biracial committee and parent council meetings and presented information as needed on Incentive Schools\nheld parent meetings, responded to parent complaints, and set up criteria for a Parent Night meeting in all Incentive Schools. The job description encompasses that of both an Assistant Superintendent and a Desegregation Facilitator. Therefore, because of the enormous responsibility of providing technical assistance to the schools, monitoring and evaluating programs and staff, addressing facility needs, and other problems that impede desegregation, a substitute secretarial position was approved by the Superintendent during the 1991-92 school year. The substitute was hired to assist the Desegregation Facilitator with typing, filing, answering the phone, scheduling meetings, answering questions about the plan, distributing information to principals and the school communities, responding to principal, parent, and teacher complaints and requests, ordering equipment and supplies, etc. To read the job description of the Desegregation Facilitator and to know what is required in the Incentive Schools is to know that a secretary is needed (see attached job description). The new Federal Programs Director's responsibilities increased as federal and state requirements increased and has continued to do so during the 1992-93 school year. Among the many responsibilities of this administrator is to prepare and submit applications for ongoing federal funding, to supervise all activities paid by these funds, to write and approve all federal project proposals, to compile and maintain written records and reports on results of all federal projects and disseminate this information throughout the district (see job description). With the monumental responsibilities of this position, the State Department personnel noted that in districts with student enrollments that are less than those of the LRSD, at least three clerical persons are needed to do an effective job. Additionally, there are ten private schools that are under the supervision of this office and many state and federal deadlines to meet. Decision Analysis - Executive Summary Desegregation Office Page 3 B. Problem Definition A permanent secretarial position is needed for the Office of the Desegregation Facilitator to provide stability and effective and efficient service. Three very good substitute secretaries left the office after they were trained and understood the functions of the Desegregation Office and its importance. Each of these persons left to obtain permanent positions so they could accrue medical benefits, seniority, etc. This problem is acute and is not cost effective to the district because of the many hours lost in interviewing and training new substitutes rather than hiring a permanent, but efficient, secretary who can meet the needs of the office. C. Analysis of Alternatives '}I, ~......#4 __,/) A need is a gap between current results and required results, as a gap m results between \"what is\" and \"what should be.\" The process that I used in analyzing alternatives for a permanent secretarial position, was to compare the effectiveness of the Desegregation 11.b~ Office with a half-time secretary that is also shared by a Federal Programs Director f..J ~ compared with a full-time substitute that works only for the Desegregation Office. When 'J0 ,J:r~~.:, using a shared secretary, additional secretarial help is often requested from at least two or rr,---.-... three other secretaries on the second floor of the building. Often they are busy with their own assignments. When they are, reports or mail outs are not produced in a timely manner. When some of the reports are confidential, there is a degree of concern regarding public disclosure. A negative impact is hiring a full-time substitute who leaves her employment in my office in the middle of an assignment after finding a permanent position. D. Recommendations Based on the defined problem of not having a secretary, and after carefully analyzing the facts, I am recommending that a full-time secretary be hired immediately. This information was shared with the superintendent and approved over two months ago. Decision Analysis - Executive Summary Desegregation Office Page 4 E. Objectives 1. Objective of the Recommendation To hire an office secretary for the Desegregation Facilitator who will provide effective and efficient service and support so that the maximum positive impact of that office can be realized. 2. Goal Support Having an effective Desegregation Office secretary will indirectly support the desegregation plan and the district's goals of (a) establishing climates of educational excellence and equity in all schools and (b) enhancing human relation skills for principals, teachers, and central office administration. These goals can be achieved through support by the Desegregation Facilitator by having efficient and effective office personnel. 3. Evaluation Criteria The effectiveness of this position can be measured by product outcomes, efficiency of service, comments from principals, parents, district personnel, visitors, etc. 4. Expected Benefits Typing, filing, reports, etc. are expected to be completed in a timely manner. A well- run office will allow information related to the desegregation plan to flow to the parents, students, and district administrators from the Desegregation Facilitator in timely manner. This positive impact will enhance the entire district as an organization and the community it serves. F. Impact Analysis 1. Program If information is not disseminated to the schools and or community in an efficient and effective manner, it will have an adverse effect on the programs in the schools. 2. Desegregation Plan If there is ineffective written and/or oral communication due to the lack of adequate office personnel, the desegregation plan will definitely be negatively impacted. 3. Court Orders Information not submitted to principals by the secretary in a timely manner and interpreted by the Desegregation Facilitator will have an adverse effect on the district. Decision Analysis - Executive Summary Desegregation Office Page 5 4. Political Factors Due to the district's present position on hiring, other persons in the district, unless informed, will perceive this addition of staff as inconsistent with the budget reductions. 5. Risks The risks are to hear complaints from other secretaries in the district who want to fill the vacant position, or from other secretaries who were cut. The risks of not hiring a full-time, competent secretary to run the Desegregation Office is to not assume the responsibility of supporting the desegregation plan as effectively as it should be. Because of the workload and number of reports to be generated, the position requires a secretary who has good organizational skills, maturity, types accurately, is skilled on the computer, has good written and oral communication skills, and has a knowledge and understanding of the desegregation plan. 6. Timing This position needs to be filled as soon as the interview process is completed. The secretary should be hired no later than June 1, 1993. G. Resource Analysis 1. Personnel Analysis The position of Desegregation Facilitator is equivalent to that of the Assistant Superintendent. The workload as evidenced by the job description and the many elements in the desegregation plan requires a high level secretary that can run the office effectively at all times. A recruiting pool by which a secretary is merely placed based on seniority in the district will not suffice. 2. Financial Analysis The salary cost of this position is $21,500. The cost to the district can only be measured by the time lost running around the building to solicit other secretarial help and the loss of commitment to the desegregation plan. Time is money. Decision Analysis - Executive Summary Desegregation Office Page 6 H. Force Field Analysis 1. Forces For Principals Parent and teacher committees Parents in school communities Federal Programs secretary and director Desegregation Facilitator Some district secretaries who are favorable toward the the recommendation of hiring a full-time secretary. a. Principals, parents, and teachers can always call my office and get information from my secretary if I am attending a meeting or doing a school visit. b. My office secretary can type information for parent groups\nsend mail-outs to members of the Staffing Committee, etc.\nsummer school surveys\nand, other information to parents in the school community. c. The Federal Programs Director will be able to use his secretary on full-time basis. In addition to schools in the LRSD, the Federal Programs Office will be able to meet the needs of more than ten private schools and adhere to specific state and federal deadlines. d. The Desegregation Facilitator will not have to interrupt other district secretaries except in emergencies. At least one of the secretaries in another office have missed scheduled breaks and lunch to complete a task for me. This report today is no exception. 2. Focus Against Other secretaries who experienced budget cuts and want the position. Their confidence can be gained by allowing them to interview for the position and hire them if they meet the qualifications. BUSINESS CASE LRSD OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS MAY1993 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Little Rocle School District is faced with budget cuts for the 1993/94 year totaling more than 5 million. When given the choice, reducing positions rather than laying off has less adverse effect on employees. The maJor impact of cutting the position of Communications Assistant to part-time will be the necessity to transfer or delete some services that were in place with two full-time professionals in the office. Savings to the District will be $25,000 in salary, $600 travel stipend and $4,440 in benefits (Total $30,040.00) Current Situation Currently the LRSD Office of Communications is operating with one professional staff member and one secretary. The professional staff member, formerly the Communications Assistant for 1 1/2 years, is now functioning as Acting Director of Communications. The budget cut recommendation is to hire a part-time Communications Assistant at a salary of $10,000 with no travel stipend or benefits package. Background Information Prior to the Director's departure in February 1993, the office operated with the Director of Communications, a Communications Assistant, and a secretary. The Director was responsible for seeing that the office executed communications/marketing/public information strategies and supported the District's overall mission through improved community awareness, understanding and confidence. As part of those duties, the Director functioned as one of the two district spokespersons, was a member of the superintendent's cabinet, represented the District on two major boards, maintained a budget and directed the two other staff members in assigned tasks. As part of these tasks and supportive activities, the Communications Office has obligations it must meet pursuant to the \"Settlement Plan\" generally and specifically in the areas of public relations, incentive schools, focused activities, parent and community involvement and staff. Task areas include media relations, communications planning, crisis communication planning/ training, community /business relations, marketing and recruiting support for various schools detailed by the desegregation plan, development of support materials, such as brochures, videos, etc.\nmanaging the District's cable public access channel (Cable Channel 4), providing information to student households, school-community communications and staff communications. Business Case Office of Communications Page2 The Communications Assistant developed and executed programs for internal and external constituencies. The assistant kept records and developed various reports for the communications office, as well as the superintendent's office. Many of these reports supported items addressed in the desegregation plan. The assistant also planned and executed special events, developed written and video materials, directed school-community communications arid prepared various scripts for the superintendent. The secretary assisted in addressing external/internal requests that average more than 90 per month, media requests averaging more than 30 per month, internal requests for computer support, event planning, bulk mailings, preparation of superintendent citations, and general secretarial duties. College level interns have been used in the past when available. This practice will be continued. Problem Definition and Considerations The current financial status in which the LRSD finds itself, has forced the District to carefully consider budget cuts of all kinds. Everyone understands that the District cannot, by law, operate with a deficit. More than 7.5 million dollars must be cut from the budget. However, the community, as well as the administration, believes that those cuts should be made as far away from the students as possible, affecting the desegregation plan as little as possible. The reduction of professional staff has been considered whenever possible, hence, the recommendation to fill the position of Communications Assistant on a part-time basis. Alternatives As in all budget decisions, management has been sensitive to employees and the loss of their jobs, but cuts must be made. Alternatives for making the decision to make the Communications Assistant's position part-time include: 1. Restructure the department duties and hire an assistant with less experience at almost half the current salary. The assistant could be trained to assume many of the duties that have been returned to the school level, been assumed by the acting director or fallen by the wayside. 2. Leave the position at its current salary and hire a more experienced professional. 3. Do nothing-- do not rehire or restructure. Business Case Office of Communications Page3 4. Do not rehire and begin restructuring the office duties. 5. Hire a part-time Communications Assistant. Analysis of Alternatives 1. Restructuring the department and hiring an assistant at less salary would allow programs and activities that have been put in place to continue. Many of the programs and activities are directly and indirectly mentioned in the desegregation plan. Others duties that have been done by the assistant in the past but have been put on \"hold\" due to the lack of manpower, address the issue of record keeping and reporting which are important in providing materials for monitoring. The impact of the staff reduction has greatly reduced the productivity of the two staff members that remain. Basically the work load of the one vacated staff member has been divided as following: 85% to the remaining professional and 15% to the secretary. There has been minimal restructuring at this time. By hiring another assistant with less experience the restructured work load could be more evenly distributed among the three staff members. The hiring would also more closely align the Communications Office with the recommendations of the Interdistrict Desegregation Plan where it states that all three districts should \"augment\" the communications staffs. The financial savings would be approximately one-half the salary or $18,000. This alternative was rejected because it did not save the District sufficient money. 2. Leaving the position as it is would provide two staff members of a professional level to continue programs and supportive activities as obligated in the desegregation plan. With this alternative there would be no financial savings to the District (loss of $40,040). This alternative was rejected because it was a continuing level budget and would not meet the reduction requirements. 3. The decision to not rehire or restructre would make the office almost impossible to run. Minimal restructuring has begun in order to make the office duties somewhat manageable for the two remaining staff members. The financial savings would be that of $40,040). This alternative was rejected because although the District would save money, the chances of the desegregation plan being implemented would be slim. 4. The decision to not rehire, but instead restructure the office duties to reduce the work load would allow the staff to continue some of the programs and activities. Many of the programs developed and executed by the Communications Office in the past will be managed at the school level as a way Business Case Office of Communications Page4 of addressing the requirements of the desegregation plan. Others will be evaluated and restructured or dropped. The restructuring of the office will allow the staff to realign their duties to compensate for the reduction by placing the duties at the school level. The restructuring will be accomplished in such a way as to avoid an adverse effect on the implementation of the desegregation plan. This alternative is recommended. 5. Hire a part-time Communications Assistant to releive some of the work load and still save the District money. In addition, the Office of Communications will need to enter into a support services contract for services that may no longer be produced internally. These services may include copy writing, typesetting and printing production of written materials, graphic computer support, marketing and recruiting support and event planning. Suggested salary would be $10,000 without benefits. Recommendation The decision to hire a part-time Communications Assistant would allow many of the projects in place to be continued. It would help take the pressure off of the schools to be responsible fo thier own promotion. It would also allow the Communications Office to be more in line with the Interdistrict Desegregation Plan recommendations. This decision would save the District more than $30,000. The alternative is recommended. Objective The objective/ goal is to make budget cuts with as little direct effect on the children/ students of the District without affecting programs and the desegregation plan. This recommendation supports the goal listed above and would be a budget cut that is rather far from students. It cuts the salary and benefits of one position saving the District $30,040. It does not directly affect the education of children. Evaluation of the budget cut will be made by the superintendent, ODM and the Court. The superintendent will assess the office on its capability to support communications/marketing/public relations aspects of education and the ability to support the District in its overall mission through improved community awareness, understanding and confidence. ODM and the Court will monitor the effectiveness of the office in fulfilling the implementation of the desegregation plan. Business Case Office of Communications Pages Expected Benefits Expected benefits are a budget reduction of $30,040. The community will benefit if the District can balance the budget and not be forced to depend on additional taxation. The District will gain public support and confidence in their word by becoming fiscally responsible.  Impact Analysis Desegregation Plan Impact The effects of reduction in personnel will be most noticeable in reduced services to schools, internal staff and the community. Services may no longer be feasible at the level they have been offered, may need to be restructured and moved to another area of responsibility, or may be deleted. Services that are currently being offered that are ex ected to continue are listed below with references to the public relations and incentive school promotion section of the desegregation plan. 1. Innovative ways to disseminate public information (Pg. 62, 63) 2. Brochures (externally produced,) fliers, annual school calendar, PSAs, weekly news releases, and news conferences when appropriate. (Pg 62) 3. School/ administration network to assure accurate and ongoing flow of information. (Pg. 63) 4. Outreach to community - Realtors, key community leaders, Chamber of Commerce, opinion makers, business leaders and others. (Pg. 63, 64) 5. Recognition and reward of achievement for employees, students and parents. (Pg. 64, 7) 6. Continuation of community and internal forums with the Superintendent and administration to gain input for future planning. (Pg. 65, 66, 67) 7. Strengthening the link with business community by promoting the activities of VIPS, the Chamber of Commerce and others who assist us in helping the community to understand the desegregation plan. (Pg. 67) Business Case Office of Communications Page6 8. Assist the SAO in recruiting for all schools as well as aggressive marketing efforts for specific schools such as King and Stephens schools. 9. Continue to assist in recruitment for incentive schools. (Pg. 215, 216) In addition to the services listed above, day to day office operation requires addressing external/internal inquires averaging 90 per month, media requests averaging 30 per month, superintendent's office support in gathering information for script/ citation preparation, internal requests for computer support, event planning such as the District retirement party, National Merit Scholar reception and teacher/ staff appreciation and many more unexpected requests. In addition there are several unknowns that must be factored into the workload for recruiting support for King and Stephens Interdistrict Schools in 1993/94. The following areas are expected to feel the cuts more intensely, be moved to another area of responsibility, or be deleted: School level 1. Management, execution and evaluation of external media requests and programs to present LRSD schools and students in a positive tone (Pg. 62, 2) 2. Training of secretarial and other staff to be ambassadors on behalf of the schools and the desegregation plan (Pg. 64, 8) 3. Preparation of a public relations resource handbook (Pg. 65, d) 4. Internal production of recruitment brochures and other promotional literature (Pg. 62, 3) 5. Internal production of a LRSD newsletter for all staff (Pg. 63, Sd) Community level 1. External production of a LRSD newsletter for the community (Pg. 62, 3, pg. 67, 12) 2. Further development of forms of communication with public who are hard to reach through routine methods (Pg. 63, 4) Business Case Office of Communications Page7 3. Further development of ways to insure that business leaders understand the desegregation plan terminology and programs. (Pg. 67, 11 c) 4. Development of a business-community based speakers bureau (Pg. 67, 11 c) 5. Development of programming for LRSD's Cable Channel 4. (Pg. 62, 63) Court Orders The effect this reduction would have on court orders is unknown at this time. However, concerns about the District's recruiting and support for that effort have been expressed in recent court hearings. Concerns about internal and external communications in providing staff and the public with educational information about the desegregation plan have also been expressed. Political Factors Politically the District would benefit from a balanced budget, public support and confidence gained by becoming fiscally responsible and meeting one of the goals in making cuts as far away from children as possible. Risks Risks in making this cut include the problems that may arise if one or both staff members become ill or are on leave for an extended period, or find other employment. Risks might also occur in not being able to implement all items in the desegregation plan even with the restructuring of the department. Dispersing the duties to others who may or may not be trained properly may be risky. Education is most important at the school level, as it should be. When given the choice, schools may set priorities that do not include requests for good public relations in their schools at the top of their list. These actions, when monitored by the court, could place the District at risk. Timing Budget cuts IDYS.t be made for the coming year. The position is unfilled at this point and presents an opportunity to make a cut without the loss of an employee's job. Business Case Office of Communications Page8 General Implementation Plan Task Responsibility When Identification of Communications Ongoing responsibilities to be restructured Recommendations for Communications Ongoing/ restructuring of as needed responsibilities Identification of Communications/ June 1993/ print projects to be done externally Student Assignment Ongoing Recommendation for Communications July 1993 who will do staff training and resource book Recommendation for who Communications August 1993 will produce newsletters Development of forms of Communications August 1993 communication/ restructure Development of community Communications August 1993 understanding/restructure Development of community- Communications Sept. 1993 based speakers bureau/ restructure Development of programming Communications Oct. 1993 for Cable 4 HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR Executive Summary The Human Resources Department was combined with the Labor Relations Department during the 1992-93 school year, and the position of Human Resources Director was eliminated. The consolidation of these two departments has been unsuccessful, causing departmental operations to further deteriorate and impact school operations. Therefore, it is essential that the position of Human Resources Director be filled immediately. A. B. C. D. E. Background The merger of Human Resources and Labor Relations resulted in the elimination of one cabinet level administrative position. The consolidation of these two departments has been unsuccessful. Problem Definition fe,2\n1411-uA ~r f'~_? The Human Resources Department continues to have difficulty accomplishing the department's organizational objectives. The result of this department's inability to operate in an efficient manner is impacting school operations. Analysis of Alternatives ~~~~1 There appears to be only two viable alternatives, namely\n(1) hire a Human Resources Director, or (2) subcontract this department's operations to a private company. The alternative to recruit a professional Human Resources Director appears to be the best short-run alternative. Recommendation Recruit and hire a Human Resources Director. The total cost including salary and benefits is $55,000. Objective -7~, The objective of this recommendation is to improve the Human Resources Department operations as well as improve school support. PROGRAM ANALYSIS for the ADDITION OF THE ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The five high schools within the Little Rock School District are faced with a multitude of challenges each day to keep teaching and learning a top- priority. The administrative teams have tremendous responsibilities in trying to meet the needs of all students, staff, and parents. A B. Background The current number of teachers, administrative teams, and each school are as follows: studentenrollo/ SCHOOL TEACHERS ADMINISTRATORS ,/It SIUDENT ENROILMENT T Parkview 73 4 18,'Z.S 10-1-92 871 ,,., 4-13-93 823 11.3 McClellan 78 4 l'I,~ 10-1-92 985 ,z., 4-13-93 916 ,,.1 Hall 83 4 z~.7~ 10-1-92 994 //, 1 4-13-93 978 ,,.g Fair 67 4 ,~.7~ 10-1-92 905 ,r .c 4-13-93 855 Central 115 4 7.g,11 10-1-92 1,991 \" 4-13-93 1,867 \" Problem DefinitiQn Central High, with a student population of close to 2,000, needs an additional assistant principal to meet the demands of the daily school operation. The school has been able to function with the number of administrators currently assigned there, but it has been most stressful and difficult. ~ RRnt\u0026gt;S -.4 z,7.8 zoG z#.,3 zz, Z,l'J.5 t.'l'I-'\u0026gt; iZL.3 C. Alternatives ,fJ . I. VU~~ tH\"d ~ ~- ~!'~~ F~: The alternatives are limited in this situation. The decision fo add one additional administrator should be based on an appropriate justification for the need at Central High School. Business Case Addition of the Assistant Principal Page 2 D. E. F. G. H. Recommendation It is recommended that one additional assistant principal be added to the Central High administrative team for the 1993-94 school year. Objective The addition of this position will greatly reduce the individual workload on all the administrators. With over 115 teachers to supervise and evaluate, an additional administrator will significantly make a difference. Students will benefit from this recommendation because one additional administrator will be available to assist with campus supervision, discipline issues, and the coordination of student activities. In addition, parents wuld have one more administrator available to them to address issues and concerns. Impact This recommendation will undoubtedly help the Central High staff to implement the Desegregation Plan more effectively and efficiently. Resources Analysis The addition of one assistant principal to Central High School will cost approximately $40,000. Force Field Analysis The Central High School staff and community will most likely support this recommendation. Forces against the recommendation would include individuals who are opposed to administrative positions being added, while other non-administrative positions have been eliminated or reduced. BUSINESS CASE: KUAR/KLRE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Little Rock School District currently supports a local public radio station. The amount expended for this support is approximately $86,000 per year. The District has come to question this support because of the financial crisis it currently finds itself in. In order to discontinue the support the District must give the radio station two years notice. The following information discusses the radio station situation in greater detail. It is recommended that the School District give the radio station the required two years notice so that resources may be more directly focused on District goals in the future. BACKGROUND: 1. Current Situation: The Little Rock School District has had an agreement with KUAR/KLRE, the local public radio station. This agreement has resulted in the station running public service announcements and giving other forms of support to the District. The station was helpful during the last millage and has provided some opportunities for students to experience radio production over the years. The District is currently paying $86,000 per year to support the station and must give two years notice if the agreement between it and the station is to be severed. This means that the station will have two years to find a source of funds to replace those furnished by the District. 2. Background Information: The District has supported the radio station over the years but has now reached a financial situation that has made continued support subject to question because of the necessity of the District to focus funds on teaching and learning activities and implementation of the Desegregation Plan. PROBLEM DEFINITION: 1. Problem Statement: The District is currently spending $86,000 per year to support the station. It can no longer afford to do this because the money could be spent on activities which are more closely aligned with District goals. 2. Considerations: The radio station has a large number of listeners who feel that the District should continue to support the station for a variety of reasons including enhanced public relations, assistance with recruiting and help with future millages. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES: 1. Process: Discussions have been held with personnel from the radio station but the station has not yet reported alternatives to replace the funds if the District withdraws its support. 2. Identification: Alternatives to the severing of the contract could include the furnishing of support at a reduced level or the station finding funds from another source. 3. Analysis: Reduced levels of support from the District could lend some assistance to the station, but the question of whether the District really has any business supporting a public radio station would remain. The option of reduced levels of support is rejected at this time because the action contemplated is simply that of giving two years notice on the agreement with the station. This time span will give personnel from the station two years to find alternatives. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Action Recommended: It is recommended that the District give notice to KUAR/KLRE so that the contract with the station will be severed after two years. 2. Rationale: Support for a public radio station is inconsistent with the primary purposes of the District. Resources must be focused on activities that directly impact the classroom. This need is increasingly acute as resources continue to decline. OBJECTIVE: 1. Objective of the Recommendation: The District will begin to save over $86,000 per year at the end of the two year notice period. 2. Goal Support: The most important two goals of the District are to increase student learning and to implement the Desegregation Plan. The funds realized from withdrawing of support from the station will be used to support these two goals. IMPACT ANALYSIS: 1 . Program: Little impact on other programs is expected. 2. Desegregation Plan: Little impact on the Desegregation Plan is expected. 3. Court Orders: No Court Orders will be affected by this recommendation. 4. Political Factors: The radio station has a great deal of support from various segments of the community. These persons will exert pressure to maintain funding for the station. Other members of the community, and parents question why the District is spending money on a radio station. 5. Risks: The School District could lose support for future millages or other programs because supporters of the station are criticial of the withdrawal of funding. The District could also be accused by parents and non listeners of wasting money on activities which take money away from the classroom if the two years notice required by the contract is not given. 6. Timing: Timing for this decision is very good because the District is currently in a financial crisis which may worsen. This makes the giving of two years notice very important if future budget flexibility is to be maintained. BUSINESS CASE FOR PERSONNEL REDUCTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Reductions in personnel are necessary for the District to balance the budget for the 1993-94 school year. Each cabinet level administrator has been asked to make recommendations to reduce personnel in areas they supervise. The Human Resources Department (HR) has been asked to explore the possibility of reducing one secretarial position to assist in the effort to balance the budget. The secretarial duties of the position can be absorbed by the remaining secretarial staff with minimal impact to the District. The recommended reduction would save the District approximately $21,800 for the 1993-94 school year. However, the action by the Board of Directors must occur in time to notify the employee before June 1, 1993. Although restructuring of duties must take place with the remaining staff, it is possible to implement the recommendations. A BACKGROUND: Currently, the Human Resources Department (HR) has a staff consisting of a Director, a Recruiting Specialist, an Administrative Assistant and ten (10) secretaries. This staffing level is the result of the consolidation of the Labor Relations Department and Human Resources beginning in the 1992-93 school Year. The merger of the two departments was a budget reduction decision and allowed the elimination of one cabinet level administrative position (Director of Labor Relations). Additional needs for budget reductions to balance the 1993-94 budget have caused the District to further examine possible staff reductions for budgetary reasons. To meet that end, HR has been asked to reduce one secretarial position. B. PROBLEM DEFINITION: Given that additional budget reductions must be made in HR, the Problem is to decide which personnel cuts can be made and minimize the impact on the department's ability to accomplish its essential functions. C. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives were limited by the actual staff size, administrative and secretarial, and by the seniority of the respective members of the staff assigned to HR. In determining if it could be possible to make cuts .other than personnel from the HR budget as an alternative recommendation to staff cuts, it must be understood that the entire operating budget for HR is currently $37,120 excluding salaries. For the 1993-94 school year, the budgeted amount has been reduced by 2 7 % to $27,120. The total non-salary budget for 1993-94 is almost the same as the salary of one secretarial position\ntherefore, a significant reduction in the HR non-salary budget would not be feasible. Since there are only two administrative positions in HR (Director and Recruiting Specialist) the only logical alternative has to be the Recruiting Specialist position. A school district with approximately 4000 employees cannot be expected to function with no director of HR for an extended period. After careful consideration, it has been determined that the recruiting function must remain a high priority with the District, and it is highly desirable for those functions to be coordinated by the Recruiting Specialist. On the secretarial reduction for HR, the selection of the person to be reduced will be decided by seniority with the duties assigned to that position to be distributed between the remaining secretarial staff. D. RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the analysis of the available alternatives, the following recommendations are made: 1. One secretarial position assigned to HR should be eliminated. The rationale for the recommendation which has been presented is based solely on the analysis of the very limited alternatives. Reductions of personnel in HR represent the only significant monetary savings. The one position being recommended represents the least impact on HR's ability to complete its essential functions. E. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this recommendation is to reduce administrative expenses of the District to aid in the development of a balanced budget for the 1993-94 school year. The reduction of the secretarial position will assist in that effort by approximately $21,800. F. IMPACT ANALYSIS: secretary Program: The responsibilities of one of the s.ecretaries in HR will be absorbed by the remaining secretarial staff. Restructuring of responsibilities of the staff will be implemented to ensure minimal negative impact. Desegregation Plan: This reduction will not impact the plan. Court Orders: This reduction will not impact any court orders. Political Factors: There do not appear to be any political factors associated with this recommendation. Risks: The risk is that the remaining clerical staff will be stretched too thin and the delivery of services could be slowed. Timing: There are no timing problems associated with this recommendation. G. RESOURCES ANALYSIS: PERSONNEL ANALYSIS: This recommendation eliminates one position. The secretarial reduction would result in the transfer of one secretary unless a vacancy occurs as the result of a resignation or retirement. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: The recommendation will have a first year savings of approximately $21,800. Assuming only an increment increase (approximately 3%) for the next five years, the savings to the District would be as follows: 1993-94 - $21,800 1994-95 - $22,454 1995-96 - $23,128 1996-97 - $23,821 1997-98 - $24,536 H. GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN: If the recommended personnel reduction is approved by the Board of Directors, the secretary will be transferred effective July 1, 1993. This notification will be made by the Director of Human Resources. BUSINESS CASE LRSD OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS MAY1993 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Little Rock School District is faced with budget cuts for the 1993/94 year totaling more than 5 million. Reducing positions has less adverse effect on employees. The major impact of cutting the position of Communications Assistant will be the necessity to transfer or delete services. Savings to the District will be $35,000 in salary, $600 travel stipend and $4,440 in benefits (Total $40,040.00) Current Situation Currently the LRSD Office of Communications is operating with one professional staff member and one secretary. The professional staff member, formerly the Communications Assistant for 11/2 years, is now functioning as Acting Director of Communications. The budget cut recommendation is to continue running the department with the reduced staff of two. Background Information Prior to the Director's departure in February 1993, the office operated with the Director of Communications, a Communications Assistant, and a secretary. The Director was responsible for seeing that the office executed communications/marketing/public information strategies and supported the District's overall mission through improved community awareness, understanding and confidence. As part of those duties, the Director functioned as one of the two district spokespersons, was a member of the superintendent's cabinet, represented the District on two major boards, maintained a budget and directed the two other staff members in assigned tasks. As part of these tasks and supportive activities, the Communications Office has obligations it must meet pursuant to the \"Settlement Plan\" generally and specifically in the areas of public relations, incentive schools, focused activities, parent and community involvement and staff. Task areas include media relations, communications planning, crisis communication planning/ training, community /business relations, marketing and recruiting support for various schools detailed by the desegregation plan, development of support materials, such as brochures, videos, etc.\nmanaging the District's cable public access channel (Cable Channel 4), providing information to student households, school-community communications and staff communications. The Communications Assistant developed and executed programs for internal and external constituencies. The assistant kept records and developed various reports for the communications office, as well as the superintendent's Business Case Office of Communications office. Many of these reports supported items addressed in the desegregation plan. The assistant also planned and executed special events, developed written and video materials, directed school-community communications and prepared various scripts for the superintendent. The secretary assisted in addressing external/internal requests that average more than 90 per month, media requests averaging more than 30 per month, internal requests for computer support, event planning, bulk mailings, preparation of superintendent citations, and general secretarial duties. College level interns have been used in the past when available. This practice will be continued. Problem Definition and Considerations The current financial status in which the LRSD finds itself, has forced the District to carefully consider budget cuts of all kinds. Everyone understands that the District cannot, by law, operate with a deficit. More than 7.5 million dollars must be cut from the budget. However, the community, as well as the administration, believes that those cuts should be made as far away from the students as possible, affecting the desegregation plan as little as possible. The reduction of professional staff has been considered whenever possible, hence, the recommendation not to fill the position of Communications Assistant. ..Alternatives As in all budget decisions, management has been sensitive to employees and the loss of their jobs but cuts must be made. Alternatives for making the decision to cut the Communications Assistant's position include: 1. Restructure the department duties and hire an assistant with less experience at almost half the current salary. The assistant could be trained to assume many of the duties that have been returned to the school level, been assumed by the acting director or fallen by the wayside. 2. Leave the position at its current salary and hire a more experienced professional. 3. Do nothing -- do not rehire or restructure. 4. Do not rehire and begin restructuring the office duties. Business Case Office of Communications Analysis of Alternatives 1. Restructuring the department and hiring an assistant at less salary would allow programs and activities that have been put in place to continue. Many of the programs and activities are directly and indirectly mentioned in the desegregation plan. Others duties that have been done by the assistant in the past but have been put on \"hold\" due to the lack of manpower, address the issue of record keeping and reporting which are important in providing materials for monitoring. The impact of the staff reduction has greatly reduced the productivity of the two staff members that remain. Basically the work load of the one vacated staff member has been divided as following: 85% to the remaining professional and 15% to the secretary. There has been minimal restructuring at this time. By hiring another assistant with less experience the restructured work load could be more evenly distributed among the three staff members. The financial savings would be approximately one-half the salary or $18,000. This alternative was rejected because it did not save the District sufficient money. 2. Leaving the position as it is would provide two staff members of a professional level to continue programs and supportive activities as obligated in the desegregation plan. With this alternative there would be no financial savings to the District (loss of $40,040). This alternative was rejected because it was a continuing level budget and would not meet the reduction requirements. 3. The decision to not rehire or restructure would make the office almost impossible to run. Minimal restructuring has begun in order to make the office duties somewhat manageable for the two remaining staff members. The financial savings would be that of $40,040). This alternative was rejected because although the District would save money, the chances of the desegregation plan being implemented would be slim. Recommendation 4. The decision to not rehire, but instead restructure the office duties to reduce the work load would allow the staff to continue some of the programs and activities. Many of the programs developed and executed by the Communications Office in the past will be managed at the school level as a way of addressing the requirements of the desegregation plan. Others will be evaluated and restructured or dropped. The restructuring of the office will allow the staff to realign their duties to compensate for the reduction by placing the duties at the school level. The restructuring will be accomplished in such a way Business Case Office of Communications as to avoid an adverse effect on the implementation of the desegregation plan. This alternative is recommended. Objective The objective/ goal is to make budget cuts with as little direct effect on the children/ students of the District without affecting programs and the desegregation plan. This recommendation supports the goal listed above and would be a budget cut that is rather far from students. It cuts the salary and benefits of one position saving the District $40,040. It does not directly affect the education of children. Evaluation of the budget cut will be made by the superintendent, ODM and the Court. The superintendent will assess the office on its capability to support communications/marketing/public relations aspects of education and the ability to support the District in its overall mission through improved community awareness, understanding and confidence. ODM and the Court will monitor the effectiveness of the office in fulfilling the implementation of the desegregation plan. Expected Benefits Expected benefits are a budget reduction of $40,040. The community will benefit if the District can balance the budget and not be forced to depend on additional taxation. The District will gain public support and confidence in their word by becoming fiscally responsible. Impact Analysis Desegregation Plan Impact The effects of reduction in personnel will be most noticeable in reduced services to schools, internal staff and the community. Services may no longer be feasible at the level they have been offered, may need to be restructured and moved to another area of responsibility, or may be deleted. Services that are currently being offered that are expected to continue are listed below with references to the public relations and incentive school promotion section of the desegregation plan. Business Case Office of Communications 1. Innovative ways to disseminate public information (Pg. 62, 63) 2. Brochures (externally produced,) fliers, annual school calendar, PSAs, weekly news releases, and news conferences when appropriate. (Pg 62) 3. School/ administration network to assure accurate and ongoing flow of information. (Pg. 63) 4. Outreach to community - Realtors, key community leaders, Chamber of Commerce, opinion makers, business leaders and others. (Pg. 63, 64) 5. Recognition and reward of achievement for employees, students and parents. (Pg. 64, 7) 6. Continuation of community and internal forums with the Superintendent and administration to gain input for future planning. (Pg. 65, 66, 67) 7. Strengthening the link with business community by promoting the activities of VIPS, the Chamber of Commerce and others who assist us in helping the community to understand the desegregation plan. (Pg. 67) 8. Assist the SAO in recruiting for all schools as well as aggressive marketing efforts for specific schools such as King and Stephens schools. 9. Continue to assist in recruitment for incentive schools. (Pg. 215, 216) In addition to the services listed above, day to day office operation requires addressing external/internal inquires averaging 90 per month, media requests averaging 30 per month, superintendent's office support in gathering information for script/ citation preparation, internal requests for computer support, event planning such as the District retirement party, National Merit Scholar reception and teacher/ staff appreciation and many more unexpected requests. In addition there are several unknowns that must be factored into the workload for recruiting support for King and Stephens Interdistrict Schools in 1993/94. The following areas are expected to feel the cuts more intensely, be moved to another area of responsibility, or be deleted: Business Case Office of Communications School level 1. Management, execution and evaluation of external media requests and programs to present LRSD schools and students in a positive tone (Pg. 62, 2) 2. Training of secretarial and other staff to be ambassadors on behalf of the schools and the desegregation plan (Pg. 64, 8) 3. Preparation of a public relations resource handbook (Pg. 65, d) 4. Internal production of recruitment brochures and other promotional literature (Pg. 62, 3) 5. Internal production of a LRSD newsletter for all staff (Pg. 63, 5d) Community level 1. External production of a LRSD newsletter for the community (Pg. 62, 3, pg. 67, 12) 2. Further development of forms of communication with public who are hard to reach through routine methods (Pg. 63, 4) 3. Further development of ways to insure that business leaders understand the desegregation plan terminology and programs. (Pg. 67, 11 c) 4. Development of a business-community based speakers bureau (Pg. 67, 11 c) 5. Development of programming for LRSD's Cable Channel 4. (Pg. 62, 63) Court Orders The effect this reduction would have on court orders is unknown at this time. However, concerns about the District's recruiting and support for that effort have been expressed in recent court hearings. Concerns about internal and external communications in providing staff and the public with educational information about the desegregation plan have also been expressed. Business Case Office of Communications Political Factors Politically the District would benefit from a balanced budget, public support and confidence gained by becoming fiscally responsible and meeting one of the goals in making cuts as far away from children as possible. Risks in making this cut include the problems that may arise if one or both staff members become ill or are on leave for an extended period, or find other employment. Risks might also occur in not being able to implement all items in the desegregation plan even with the restructuring of the department. Dispersing the duties to others who may or may not be trained properly may be risky. Education is most important at the school level, as it should be. When given the choice, schools may set priorities that do not include requests for good public relations in their schools at the top of their list. These actions, when monitored by the court, could place the District at risk. Timing Budget cuts nms1 be made for the coming year. The position is unfilled at this point and presents an opportunity to make a cut without the loss of an employee's job . .General Implementation Plan Task Identification of responsibilities to be restructured Recommendations for restructuring of responsibilities Identification of print projects to be done externally Responsibility Communications Communications Communications/ Student Assignment When Ongoing Ongoing/ as needed June 1993 Business Case Office of Communications Recommendation for Communications June 1993 who will do staff training and resource book Recommendation for who Communications July 1993 will produce newsletters Development of forms of Communications July 1993 communication/ restructure Development of community Communications August 1993 understanding/ restructure Development of community- Communications August 1993 based speakers bureau/ restructure Development of programming Communications Sept. 1993 for Cable 4 BUSINESS CASE CURRICULUM AND LEARNING IMPROVEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Little Rock School District is committed to a comprehensive desegregation plan which focuses on the total learning environment for all students. The method of assigning these students is the first step in creating school and classroom environments that foster academic achievement and improve race relations between students and staff members. The next step involves a commitment to quality desegregated education by the District, the parents, and the community. The commitment requires a plan of action predicated upon the District's commitment to remaining solvent, while providing quality desegregated education for its students. To remain solvent requires the District to reduce its budget by nine million dollars and to begin operating effective schools with the funds that are generated on an annual basis. In an effort to contribute to the necessary budget reductions, Curriculum and Learning Improvement proposes reductions in the areas of computer lab attendants, media clerks, secretaries, and academic support math teachers. As a result of these reductions, the District will need to equitably distribute staff through restructuring of computer labs, media and secretarial services, and the Academic Support Program. A BACKGROUND Little Rock School District continues to cope with many of the problems that are unique ~o urban school districts, including safety and security, urban flight, racial issues, financial ~ssues, aging buildings, and political interest groups. It has also been involved in implementing an extremely comprehensive and detailed desegregation plan and initiating major construction projects. The severity of the financial problems has caused the District to focus primarily on \"keeping the doors open rather than teaching and learning.\" The District desperately needs to reduce expenditures significantly in order to have a balanced budget for the 1993-94 school year and to discontinue deficit spending. The Di trict must operate an efficient school district within the boundaries of the revenues it receives on an annual basis. Prior to the 1989-90 school year, the previous administration and Board of Directors had developed desegregation plans and negotiated a financial settlement with the State of Arkansas. Two essential issues regarding the settlement must be understood. First, all ?long, the parties knew that the financial settlement would not be sufficient to implement the desegregation plan and that local dollars would be required to fully fund the plan. No one knew how many local dollars would be required to support the settlement money to pay for this plan. The second issue is the commitment to \"double fund\" the original six racially identifiable incentive schools. At the time the settlement was reached, \"double funding\" was not clearly defined nor had the cost for implementing the plan been determined. Over the years the District has negotiated salaries and benefits with several employee groups and obligated funds without knowing the exact amount it could expect to receive from its tax supported resources The student enrollment has declined for a period of years, yet the number of District employees has increased on a regular basis. The District has continued to add programs, such as computer-assisted instruction and media clerks, but has not deleted any programs. The District usually fully implements programs rather than \"piloting or phasing-in\" programs in an orderly and financially responsible manner. Until recently it has been unsuccessful in passing a millage. The District has attempted to resolve or reduce the financial problems through a process called budget recovery, passage of an eight-mill tax increase, budget reduction of 5.5 million dollars in July, 1990, busing settlement proceeds, and an approximately ten million dollar budget reduction in July, 1992. These short-term resolutions only delayed the financial crisis that we now face. B. PROBLEM DEFINITION The Department of Curriculum and Learning Improvement must assist the District in resolving its financial problems. Over the years major cuts--personnel and materials/supplies--have been made in this department. The budget reduction process escalated our timeline as we evaluated how we use time and other resources, such as technology and staff, differently and more meaningfully. Given these circumstances, it appears that we can reduce the number of computer lab attendants and media clerks in :he District as technology, used appropriately, has the potential for facilitating a decrease in staff. All schools and the community will be impacted by various degrees. The computer labs are used as a recruitment tool by the area schools, and computer attendants provide computer assisted instruction to all students. The computer attendants have been trained to provide these services, while some classroom teachers are not trained and may not be comfortable providing this instruction. The community, however, values these computer !abs. Issues, such as these, can cause the community to view the District as unstable and insensitive to its needs. !ime spent seeking additional revenues through budget reductions is negatively 1~pacting teaching and learning. Media clerks assist the librarians by keeping the libraries open and supervising students doing independent research and checking out books while the librarian is teaching. They also provide clerical assistance in ordering and processing materials. Library clerks will continue to perform these duties, but time can be more effectively used with the development and use of curriculum resource guides. C. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES The Department of Curriculum and Learning Improvement has been impacted by every budget cut down through the years. Very few options remain if we are to continue to support the schools. Now the Department must determine the most effective means of implementing the newly-proposed budget cuts. Consideration was first given to eliminating all of the computer attendants and to reducing the number of hours that our media clerks work. Consideration was also given to using more of the Desegregation Loan. Concerns were raised regarding the impact this action would have on the community and the schools. Discussions were held with curriculum supervisors, cabinet members, some principals, and representatives from the Arkansas Department of Education. Support was evident. There is a strong commitment to recruit white students to desegregate our schools. Other alternatives were also reviewed, such as cutting teacher positions, closing several small schools, shortening the school year, asking for another millage increase, imposing a five percent (5%) cut across the board, or eliminating library clerks. Student registration for the 1993-94 school year has not been completed, and it would be premature to consider reducing the number of teachers. Presently, there is not enough community support to pass another millage. The process for closing schools is very detailed and it is too late to begin the process for the 1993-94 school year. The reduction of school days would cause the District an accreditation violation or loss of accreditation. A five percent (5%) reduction across the board for all departments may not provide enough revenue to cover our projected deficits. D. RECOMMENDATIONS Following several meetings with curriculum supervisors and central office staff, recommendations are listed below for your consideration. 1. Computer Lab Attendants and Media Clerks: It is recommended that the District eliminate twenty (20) computer lab attendants and twenty-one (21) media clerks in order to reduce the budget deficit. 2. Curriculum Secretaries: It is recommended that through secretarial pooling, the District eliminate four ( 4) positions. 3. Instructional Resource Center: It is recommended that the District reinstate one position in Instructional Technology. One secretary has been eliminated from this department. The technologist will assume some of these duties and assist other supervisors who are located at the IRC. 4. Academic Support Math Teachers: It is recommended that the District eliminate the pull-out program for math in grades 1-3. This action would allow the District to reassign eight (8) teachers. Staff training would be provided to regular teachers to enhance their skills and to provide alternative instructional strategies. It is recommended that the District eliminate twenty (20) computer lab attendants and twenty-one (21) media clerks for the 1993-94 school year. Remaining computer attendants and media clerks will be scheduled into schools on an equitable basis as are music, art, and physical education teachers. (See attachment) The revised curriculum centers on student learning outcomes and is implemented District-wide. We are now able to make decisions that require us to use time and resources, such as technology and staff, differently and more meaningfully. The restructuring of computer-assisted instruction and media clerks will allow us to make the needed budget cuts and, at the same time, allow trained computer lab attendants to provide computer-assisted instruction. The number of library clerks will be reduced, but the remaining clerks will be able to provide services to librarians and the schools. A review of staffing for the computer labs and library clerks was beneficial. All schools except Washington were originally staffed with one (1) lab attendant. Little or no consideration was given to the student enrollment and staff assignments. This recommendation allows the District to continue to provide two 30-minute periods of computer instruction each week for students in grades 1-6. The computer labs will be staffed by trained computer lab attendants. Lab attendants may be assigned to provide services to more than one school. Computer labs will also be available to regular teachers, gifted specialists, etc., to further enhance learning for students, as well as to help them become more comfortable using the computers. Library clerks will be assigned to schools based on student enrollment and identifiable school needs. E. OBJECTIVE The objective of this recommendation is to allow the District to reduce the budget deficit a:s well as to minimally impact the integrity of the District's mission and desegregation plan. We can provide for more equitable distribution of staff. Consideration was given to providing quality computer services to our schools. Maintenance of this service by trained lab attendants will allow the schools to continue to use the computer labs as a recruitment tool. Additionally, this restructuring will allow wider and more comprehensive use of computers, with a greater focus and connection within and across school sites. The more computer-assisted instruction is aligned with the curriculum and used by all staff, the greater is our likelihood of increasing academic achievement for all students. We can, over a period of time, eliminate the need for teachers to stop teaching the curriculum in order to prepare students to pass a particular test. The revised curriculum contains resource guides which identify materials needed to support the teaching of the curriculum. This resource will assist in a more efficient use of media clerks' time. Evaluation Criteria Students in grades 1-6 will be scheduled for the same amount of time in the computer labs as in the 1992-93 school year. Staffing of computer labs will be based on need rather than across the board allocations. Teaching and learning will show greater focus and connection rather than teaching for the test. Increased student achievement should be noted. Increased use of computer labs and libraries by regular teachers should be noted. Media clerks will become more efficient in providing support. Student recruitment will not be negatively impacted by the modified scheduling of computer lab attendants. Students will continue to use the library but in a more meaningful way. Expected Benefits The District will be able to meet its commitment of increasing achievement for all students which will result in a reduction of the disparity between white and black students. As students matriculate through school, there will be positive gains over a three- to five-year period of time. There will be a closer connection between teaching in the classroom and the support provided by the media center. Staff will become less hesitant to use technology to assist in the delivery of daily instruction. The District will expend its funds in a more cost-saving manner which can result in the elimination of deficit spending. F. IMPACT ANALYSIS Basic computer-assisted instruction can be maintained for each school. Fewer lab attendants will be displaced. Staffing will be more equitable in all schools. The school year will not be reduced. Regular teachers will have options and time to become comfortable using computers. Schools will be able to use computer labs as a recruitment tool. Teaching and learning will be more meaningful and connected. All lab attendants will not have jobs. Some lab attendants will have to travel. Additional activities, such as assisting students attending the labs at times other than their prescribed times, will not be performed by lab attendants. Media services will be impacted, but with limited staff, most duties can be performed in a more meaningful manner. The desegregation plan will not be negatively impacted. This recommendation should have a positive impact on the plan. Court orders will be preserved as we have been ordered to make good use of all equipment and supplies that were purchased with desegregation funds. The restoration of most computer lab attendants and their services will provide for the community's needs. Failure to approve this recommendation will result in a need for the District to find $700,000 from some other source. It also prevents the District from dealing with the issue of \"overstaffing\" our schools. The risk of implementing the recommendation is minimal as the labs and media centers will be available for greater usage. It is possible that regular teachers may not take advantage of using the computer labs. Computer lab attendants and media clerks should be notified of their lack of employment thirty (30) days prior to the beginning of their 1993-94 reporting-to-work date. G. RESOURCES ANALYSIS The staffing for computer labs for the 1993-94 school year as compared to the 1992-93 school year is indicated (see attached chart). Training will be needed for regular teachers. This training will be ongoing and can be provided during the school day by using time allocated for faculty meetings. Additional training can be provided during the evenings at the new Instructional Resource Center (IRC) on a volunteer basis.  The District needs to develop a technology plan to determine its equipment needs. Such a plan will include library media equipment costs and proposals for assuming such costs. The existing hardware will be outmoded within the next two to three years. Most new and high-quality software cannot be used by the District due to the type of hardware we are currently using. Such hardware can be purchased from our bond account using a lease-purchase arrangement. Federal funds may also be used to purchase the needed software and limited hardware. Technology is currently available that will eliminate a number of services provided by media clerks. H. FORCE FIELD ANALYSIS The primary supporters of this recommendation will be central office staff, principals, some teachers, and community persons. This recommendation provides for the needs of students, teachers, some computer attendants/media clerks, and the community. Providing information to these forces will assist the District in reassuring patrons and others of our commitment. The primary detractors will be computer lab attendants and media clerks who will be displaced. We will need to assist the displaced persons in securing other employment. They should be dealt with in a very caring and professional manner. I. GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Date Activity Person(s) Responsible 5/93 Plan presented to Board Superintendent and of Directors for Assoc. Supt. for discussion Curriculum 5/27/93 Plan presented to Board Superintendent of Directors for approval 6/93 Staffing needs are Director of Human finalized Resources, Assoc. Supt. and Curr. Supervisors 6/93 Staff notified of Director of Human employment status Resources 6/93 Principals notified of Director of Human 1993-94 staffing Resources 8/93 Develop plans for use of Principals computers by other staff 8/93 Pre-school inservice\nCurriculum Supervisors media clerks/computer lab attendants report to work 8/93 Services provided to Computer lab schools attendants/media clerks 9/93 - 6/94 On-going monitoring of Principals and Curr. computer labs Supervisors 9/93 - 6/94 Quarterly status reports Principals and Curr. Supervisors 5/94 Annual evaluation of Principals, Teachers, computer-assisted and Curr. Supvs. instruction 6/94 Feedback used to Principals, Teachers, improve services and Curr. Supvs. It is recommended that the Department of Curriculum and Learning Improvement eliminate four ( 4) secretarial positions and that a secretarial pool be established at the IRC and Metropolitan Vocational-Technical Education Center to perform the needed services. It is recommended that the Department of Curriculum and Learning Improvement reinstate one position in Instructional Technology. The technologist will assume some of the responsibilities that were performed by the secretaries as well as assist other supervisors at the IRC. The rationale for these recommendations is that given our new location, we can now use remaining staff in a more responsive manner. The existing structure lends itself to make these changes with minimum impact on the schools and our departments. Reduction of the budget is the reason for making such cuts. E. OBJECTIVE The objective of these recommendations is to save money in the area of Curriculum and Learning Improvement. The reduction of the positions will help the District in stopping deficit spending, as well as beginning to staff departments in accordance with their delegated responsibilities. Responsibilities assigned to these staff members will allow the District to provide the needed support to the schools and curriculum departments. It will be necessary for staff to examine how time and responsibilities can become more efficient and effective. Technology such as computers and automated requisitioning should facilitate the smooth operation of these offices. Evaluation Criteria Ongoing monitoring of services to the schools and supervisors will indicate that quality services are being provided to staff.  Customer Satisfaction Surveys will be used near the end of the 1993-94 school year to determine our customer reactions to the reduction of staff. Information gathered through surveys and monitoring of programs will be used to improve services and/ or to recommend that the District consider restoring these positions. F. IMPACT ANALYSIS Each position has been reviewed in terms of assigned responsibilities, the impact on services to the schools, the desegregation plan, and political factors and risks for the District and the Department. The relocation of the IRC may allow the District to utilize a secretarial po_ol to provide the needed services for curriculum supervisors and our 52 schools (including King). All supervisors relocated are housed on one floor and the use of a secretarial pool could be effective and efficient. Prior to this spring, the technology department personnel were not housed with other curriculum supervisors. It is recommended that some of their duties be reassigned to other IRC staff. The remaining two secretaries at Metropolitan will assume the responsibilities and duties that are now performed by three secretaries. The physical location of the site as well as the reduction of grants will help this proposal to work. Desegregation Plan These positions are not identified in the desegregation plan. Some basic secretarial and technology responsibilities are in the plan. The plan does not indicate who will perform such services. The remaining staff will assume responsibilities. Court Orders No existing court orders should have a bearing on these recommendations. Political Factors The administration will be viewed as insensitive by some staff and community members when we discontinue the services of employees. The District should take measures to ensure a supportive and smooth transition for such employees. Risks The quality and level of services to schools and staff could be negatively impacted. Presently, staff is able to respond in a timely manner. The District must look for other alternatives in securing needed funding. Timing It is extremely important that affected staff know as soon as possible their employment status for the 1993-94 school year. G. RESOURCES ANALYSIS Provided is a chart that shows the existing staff and the proposed staffing assignments for the 1993-94 school year. Existing Curriculum Staff 1992-93 Content Area No. of Secretaries English/For. Lang./ESL Instruc. Tech/ Library Services Mathematics Reading Science Social Studies Staff Development Parent Advisory Comm. Early Childhood Educ. Vocational Education TOTAL Content Area Instructional Technology: Supervisor Technologists Total 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 .1--- 1* 0 3 13 1 3 4 Projected Curriculum Staff 1993-94 Content Area No. of Secretaries English/For. Lang./ESL Instruc. Tech/ Library Services Mathematics Reading Science Social Studies Staff Development Parent Advisory Comm. Early Childhood Educ. Vocational Education Content Area Instructional Technology: Supervisor Technologists POOL II II II II II 1* POOL 2 9 1 3 4 * The District assumes financial responsibility for all positions except the secretary for our Parent Advisory Committee which is funded by Chapters 1 and 2. Cost savings should be maintained each year after this budget reduction . H. FORCE FIELD ANALYSIS The primary supporters of this recommendation will be the administration, some schools, staff, and various facets of our community. These persons recognize that the District must make these budget reductions. The cuts will be made without significantly impacting the schools. Providing information and keeping the lines of communication open will help us to gain additional support. The primary detractors will be the displaced staff and some facets of our schools and community. We will be viewed as insensitive and non-caring for our employees who have worked for us over a period of years. We can provide information to our detractors and try to reassure them that efforts will be made to assist displaced staff in securing employment and/or retirement. I. GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Curriculum supervisors will review all responsibilities associated with the operation of their departments and make the necessary adjustments with their remaining staff. These assignment changes will be monitored by the supervisors to ensure that services to the schools are satisfactory. The District proposes to reassign eight (8) academic support math teachers by eliminating the pull-out program for math in grades 1-3. Math support will be provided by the regular teachers. E. OBJECTIVE The objective of this recommendation is to provide appropriate math instruction for primary students in the regular classroom and to reduce the number of elementary academic support math teachers. This proposal will assist the District in the budget reduction process while supporting its overall goal to increase achievement for all students. Math specialists will assist regular teachers by equipping them with useful teaching methods, providing alternatives such as flexible use of time, creating betweenclass grouping plans, developing menus of effective alternative instruction approaches, etc. Extended Day services will also be an option for schools. Evaluation Criteria The revised instructional delivery of math services for students in grades 1-3 will be successfully operating in all schools as evidenced by: Increased student achievement. Improvement on standardized test scores. Increased number of students moving from bottom quartile to the next quartile. Increased number of students moving above the 50th percentile. Improved attendance for targeted students. Improved quality of math instruction provided by regular teachers. Over a period of several years of enhancing the teaching skills of regular teachers, the need for remediation should be reduced and these funds can be used to provide other types of support for students. F. IMP ACT ANALYSIS The implementation of this proposal will allow the District to focus on teaching and learning and, at the same time, reduce its budget. These displaced teachers will be reassigned to other positions in the District. We anticipate the availability of a number of teaching vacancies. Teachers will feel more comfortable in providing math instruction for their students. There will be more time for instruction by classroom teachers . .Desegregation Plan This proposal, implemented c\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":105,"next_page":106,"prev_page":104,"total_pages":155,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":1248,"total_count":1850,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":1843},{"value":"Sound","hits":4},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":3}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":289},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":220},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":179},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","hits":69},{"value":"United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit","hits":30},{"value":"North Little Rock School District","hits":12},{"value":"Bushman Court Reporting","hits":11},{"value":"Walker, John W.","hits":6},{"value":"Joshua Intervenors","hits":5},{"value":"Arkanasas State University. Office of Educational Research and Services","hits":4},{"value":"Arkansas Association of Educational Administrators","hits":4}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":1745},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":1244},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":1207},{"value":"Education--Evaluation","hits":886},{"value":"Educational law and legislation","hits":721},{"value":"Educational planning","hits":690},{"value":"School integration","hits":604},{"value":"School management and organization","hits":601},{"value":"Educational statistics","hits":560},{"value":"Education--Finance","hits":474},{"value":"School improvement programs","hits":417}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Springer, Joy C.","hits":6},{"value":"Walker, John W.","hits":3},{"value":"Heller, Christopher","hits":2},{"value":"Wright, Susan Webber, 1948-","hits":2},{"value":"Armor, David","hits":1},{"value":"Eddington, Ramsey","hits":1},{"value":"Intervenors, Joshua","hits":1},{"value":"Intervenors, Knight","hits":1},{"value":"Jones, Sam","hits":1},{"value":"Jones, Stephen W.","hits":1},{"value":"Joshua, Lorene","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":6},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":1849},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":1836},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":1799},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":1539},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, North Little Rock, 34.76954, -92.26709","hits":10},{"value":"United States, Missouri, 38.25031, -92.50046","hits":5},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Maumelle, 34.86676, -92.40432","hits":4},{"value":"United States, Missouri, Saint Louis City County, Saint Louis, 38.65588, -90.30928","hits":3},{"value":"United States, Kansas, 38.50029, -98.50063","hits":2},{"value":"United States, New York, 43.00035, -75.4999","hits":2},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Chicot County, 33.26725, -91.29397","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":1836},{"value":"Missouri","hits":5},{"value":"Kansas","hits":2},{"value":"Massachusetts","hits":2},{"value":"New York","hits":2},{"value":"Connecticut","hits":1},{"value":"Illinois","hits":1},{"value":"Maryland","hits":1},{"value":"Michigan","hits":1},{"value":"Ohio","hits":1},{"value":"Oklahoma","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1994","hits":385},{"value":"1995","hits":376},{"value":"1996","hits":334},{"value":"1993","hits":312},{"value":"1992","hits":292},{"value":"1999","hits":273},{"value":"1997","hits":268},{"value":"1991","hits":255},{"value":"2001","hits":252},{"value":"2000","hits":251},{"value":"1998","hits":245},{"value":"2002","hits":182},{"value":"1990","hits":173},{"value":"2003","hits":164},{"value":"2004","hits":148},{"value":"1989","hits":134},{"value":"2005","hits":119},{"value":"2006","hits":86},{"value":"2011","hits":62},{"value":"2010","hits":60},{"value":"2007","hits":57},{"value":"1988","hits":51},{"value":"2008","hits":47},{"value":"2009","hits":47},{"value":"1987","hits":35},{"value":"1986","hits":30},{"value":"2012","hits":30},{"value":"1984","hits":27},{"value":"1985","hits":23},{"value":"2013","hits":19},{"value":"1983","hits":16},{"value":"1982","hits":15},{"value":"1980","hits":13},{"value":"1981","hits":13},{"value":"1974","hits":12},{"value":"1975","hits":12},{"value":"1976","hits":12},{"value":"1977","hits":12},{"value":"1978","hits":12},{"value":"1979","hits":12},{"value":"1973","hits":11},{"value":"2014","hits":11},{"value":"1967","hits":9},{"value":"1968","hits":9},{"value":"1969","hits":9},{"value":"1970","hits":9},{"value":"1971","hits":9},{"value":"1972","hits":9},{"value":"1954","hits":8},{"value":"1966","hits":8},{"value":"1950","hits":7},{"value":"1951","hits":7},{"value":"1952","hits":7},{"value":"1953","hits":7},{"value":"1955","hits":7},{"value":"1956","hits":7},{"value":"1957","hits":7},{"value":"1958","hits":7},{"value":"1959","hits":7},{"value":"1960","hits":7},{"value":"1961","hits":7},{"value":"1962","hits":7},{"value":"1963","hits":7},{"value":"1964","hits":7},{"value":"1965","hits":7},{"value":"2017","hits":6},{"value":"2015","hits":5},{"value":"2016","hits":5},{"value":"2018","hits":5},{"value":"2019","hits":5},{"value":"2020","hits":5},{"value":"2021","hits":5},{"value":"2022","hits":5},{"value":"2023","hits":5},{"value":"2024","hits":5}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1950","max":"2024","count":5114,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":904},{"value":"reports","hits":255},{"value":"judicial records","hits":232},{"value":"legal documents","hits":207},{"value":"exhibition (associated concept)","hits":67},{"value":"project management","hits":62},{"value":"budgets","hits":38},{"value":"correspondence","hits":23},{"value":"handbooks","hits":20},{"value":"agendas (administrative records)","hits":17},{"value":"handbills","hits":16}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}